Aerospace-Facts-And-Figures-1991

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aerospace-Facts-And-Figures-1991 Pride and Purpose AEROSPACE . - - ' Facts & Figures 91.-92 · Compiled by: Economic Data Service Aerospace Research Cente r Aerospace Industri es Association of America, Inc. Executive Director, Research Center Vi rginia C. Lopez Manager, Economic Data Service David H. Napier Editorial Consultant James J. Haggerty Design Xanthus Design Published by Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. 1250 Eye Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 37 1-8400 FAX (202) 37 1-8470 For information and orders. call (202) 371-856 1 Copyright © 1991 by Aerospace l n du s tr~ es Assoc•a t1on ol Amer~ca . Inc Library of Congress Catalog No 46-25007 International Standard Book No 0898-44 25 Acknowledgments Air Transport Association of America Battelle Memorial Institute Council of Economic Advisers Export-Import Bank of the United States Exxon International Company General Aviation Manufacturers Association Helicopter Association International International Civil Aviation Organization McGraw-Hill Publications Company National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Science Foundation Office of Management and Budget TRW Space & Technology Group U.S. Departments of Commerce (Bureau of the Census, Bureau of Economic Analysis, International Trade Administration) Defense (Comptroller; Directorate for Informa­ tion , Operations and Reports; Army; Navy; Air Force; Strategic Defense Initiative Organization) Labor (Bureau of Labor Stati stics) Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Airline Stati sti cs ) Foreword 6 Aerospace Summary 8 Aircraft Production 26 Missile Programs 48 Space Programs 58 Air Transportation 76 Research and Development 102 Foreign Trade 11 8 Employment 138 Fin ance 154 Glossary 164 Index 171 The U. S. Aerospace Team. \ \ Pride and Purpose The U.S. aerospace workforce is a world class team. Smart, skilled, and resourceful , they are the people behind the products-those that move us.ahead in commercial aviation and space, and those that help America defend freedom at home and around the world. They are the people who helped make victory in Desert Storm possible. The U.S. aerospace team is committed to innovation, to new products and processes, to doing things better than yesterday. The team is 1.2 million strong, and dedicated to making tomorrow possible. or the U.S. aerospace industry, 1990 was a year remarkably similar to its predecessor in that the F industry set new records for sales, backlog, export volume and trade balance. But there was one significant difference: In 1989, the flow of new orders surged to an all-time high; in 1990, new orders declined for the first time since 1986. The reduction in total new industry orders was significant -15 percent. It was occasioned almost entirely by a sharp downward plunge- nearly 30 percent- in orders from the U.S. Government, meaning, for the most part, orders for defense systems. That fact exemplifies what the industry can expect from the dBcade of the 1990s: a continuing real -term decline in the defense sales level , offset to a degree by high levels of sales in non-defense areas. On the positive side, 1990 overall sales not only set a record but eclipsed the prior record by an impressive 14 percent. The principal factor in that record performance was a big increase in non-military sales, in particular, sales of commercial transport aircraft. Despite the decline in U.S. Sovernment orders, the industry's overall backlog grew appreciably, to $264 billion at year-end 1990, a gain close to $12 billion . Orders from non­ government sources constituted nearly two-thirds (65 per­ cent) of the backlog. Space sector sales continued their steady ri se and reached a new record level. In dollar terms, space business amounted to a solid 22 percent of total sales. The indicated future growth 6 of the industry's space workload offers a ber of calls for defense cuts below the good measure of compensation for de­ levels envisioned by the Administration clining defense activity. plan. Atthe moment of writing, however, The importance to the U.S. economy there has been' no concerted action to­ of high value, high technology aero­ ward drastic cuts below the appropria­ space exports was underscored once tion levels planned by the Administra­ again by the industry's record perfor­ tion. mance in foreign sales and trade bal­ AlA expects further downward pres­ ance. In a year in which the U.S. as a sure on the defense budget but not whole experienced a trade deficit of reductions of disastrous dimension. $101 billion, U.S. aerospace exports Therefore, the association stands by its amounted to more than $39 billion, just earlier projection that overall sales, in under 10 percent of all U.S. merchan­ real , inflation-adjusted terms, will de­ dise exports in 1990. The aerospace cline on a moderate curve throughout trade balance topped the prior record by the decade. The decline will be serious 23 percent. but not catastrophic. As regards the industry's future out­ To adjust to the changing environ­ look, AlA estimates - on the basis of ment, the aerospace industry is ener­ the Administration's force reduction pro­ getically pursuing new efficiencies in gram outlined by the Secretary of De­ every aspect of its operation. So there is fense - that DoD aerospace sales will a bright side to the outlook: the industry drop by 1995 to roughly 25 percent may emerge from this decade of transi­ below the 1990 level in real terms. tion in better financial , technological and That is a very large reduction and competitive strength than it enjoys to­ one that will pose a serious problem fo~ day. those companies most heavily commit­ ted to defense work. The picture is less grim for the industry as a whole, be­ cause it is expected that much of the business lost to defense downsizing will Don Fuqua be offset by gains in other areas. President In the weeks preceding publication Aerospace Industries Associati on of this volume, there have been a num- 7 he U.S. aerospace industry recorded an all-time sales peak in 1990 in both current and constant T dollars, according to data compiled by the Aero­ space Industries Association (AlA). In current dollar terms, the record volume was compounded of increases in all sales categories. Separately-reported data from the Bureau of the Census similarly showed peaks in current/constant dollar overall sales, and current dollar gains in most sales categories. The principal factor in the industry's record performance was another big increase in non-military sales- in particular, sales of commercial transport aircraft. An additional factor was an upward fluctuation in sales to the Department of De!ense, which had been on a declining curve since 1987. Here is the breakdown of the industry's performance in 1990: Sales In current dollars, overall sales amounted to $134.2 billion ; a 14 percent increase over 1989's $117.6 billion . Aerospace sales to the Department of Defense, after two years of decline, rebounded to $60.6 billion, well over half of total aerospace products and services sales and up 3.6 percent over the prior year's $58.5 bii P"'l n. In a breakdown by product group, dircraft sales predomi­ nated, as is customarily the case. Aircraft sales totaled $70.8 billion, 16 percent above the record $61 billion reported in the previous year. Military aircraft sales amounted to $39.9 billion, up slightly from 1989 in current dollars but actually a decline when 8 adjusted for inflation. Civil aircraft sales received by aerospace companies (including engines and parts) totaled dropped sharply to $147.4 billion ac­ $30.9 billion, up almost 40 percent over cording to the Census Bureau. Most of the previous record (1 989) of $22.1 bil­ the decline was due to a plunge in orders lion. from the Department of Defense, which The big gain moved civil aircraft fell to the lowest level since 1981 . into second place among product cat­ Orders from the U.S. Government egories, after having trailed space sales totaled $56.8 billion, down from $80.6 for seven prior years. Space sales none­ billion in 1989. Census reported declin­ theless showed a strong gain, up 12 ing orders in all product categories. percent from $25.8 billion in 1989 to Despite those declines, the $28.9 billion in 1990. industry's backlog rose appreciably, from Sales of missile systems, at $12.1 $252.4 billion at the end of 1989 to billion, increased from 1989's $11 .2 bil­ $264.2 billion as of December 31 , 1990. lion. In the "Related products and ser­ This was due to the fact that non-gov­ vices" category, sales amounted to $22.4 ernment backlog experienced a large billion, which compares with $19.6 bil­ increase (more than $27 biiiLon) that lion in 1989. more than offset a sharp decline in the For 1990, aerospace industry sales backlog of government business (down represented 2.5 percent of the Gross more than $15 billion). The major com­ National Product and 4.6 percent of total ponent of the non-government backlog, sales by all U.S. manufacturing indus­ and also the major area of gain, was ci ~ l tries. The comparable figures for 1989 aircraft, engines and parts; the backlog were 2.3 percent and 4.1 percent. increase was more than $25 billion. Earnings These data once again underline the The industry recorded a net profit indicated shift in the industry product after taxes of $4.5 billion, compared mix during the 1990s, in which commer­ with $3.9 billion in 1989. Expressed as cial product manufacture is expected to a percentage of sales, the 1990 profit account for an ever-increasing percent­ (3.4 percent) approximated that of 1989 age of total sales.
Recommended publications
  • Business & Commercial Aviation
    BUSINESS & COMMERCIAL AVIATION LEONARDO AW609 PERFORMANCE PLATEAUS OCEANIC APRIL 2020 $10.00 AviationWeek.com/BCA Business & Commercial Aviation AIRCRAFT UPDATE Leonardo AW609 Bringing tiltrotor technology to civil aviation FUEL PLANNING ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Part 91 Department Inspections Is It Airworthy? Oceanic Fuel Planning Who Says It’s Ready? APRIL 2020 VOL. 116 NO. 4 Performance Plateaus Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 207/Monday, October 26, 2020
    67692 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 207 / Monday, October 26, 2020 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such on the availability of this material at the marked submissions as confidential Federal Aviation Administration FAA, call 817–222–5110. under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public docket of this Examining the AD Docket 14 CFR Part 39 NPRM. Submissions containing CBI You may examine the AD docket on should be sent to Neil Doh, Aerospace [Docket No. FAA–2020–0920; Project the internet at https:// Identifier AD–2020–00662–R] Engineer, Boston ACO Branch, FAA, www.regulations.gov by searching for 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA RIN 2120–AA64 and locating Docket No. FAA–2020– 01803. Any commentary that the FAA 0920; or in person at Docket Operations receives which is not specifically Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday Aircraft and Sikorsky Aircraft designated as CBI will be placed in the through Friday, except Federal holidays. public docket for this rulemaking. Corporation Helicopters The AD docket contains this NPRM, any Background AGENCY: Federal Aviation comments received, and other Administration (FAA), DOT. information. The street address for The FAA proposes to adopt a new AD Docket Operations is listed above. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking for Sikorsky Aircraft Model S–61L, S– FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (NPRM). Neil 61N, S–61NM, and S–61R helicopters Doh, Aerospace Engineer, Boston ACO and Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Model S–61A, S–61D, S–61E, and S– new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781– 61V restricted category helicopters, with Sikorsky Aircraft Model S–61L, S–61N, 238–7757; fax: 781–238–7199; email: an arm assembly, part number S6140– S–61NM, and S–61R helicopters and [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Feasibility Study for a 19 PAX Hybrid-Electric Commuter Aircraft
    Air s.Pace ELectric Innovative Commuter Aircraft D2.1 Economic Feasibility Study for a 19 PAX Hybrid-Electric Commuter Aircraft Name Function Date Author: Maximilian Spangenberg (ASP) WP2 Co-Lead 31.03.2020 Approved by: Markus Wellensiek (ASP) WP2 Lead 31.03.2020 Approved by: Dr. Qinyin Zhang (RRD) Project Lead 31.03.2020 D2.1 Economic Feasibility Study page 1 of 81 Clean Sky 2 Grant Agreement No. 864551 © ELICA Consortium No export-controlled data Non-Confidential Air s.Pace Table of contents 1 Executive summary .........................................................................................................................3 2 References ........................................................................................................................................4 2.1 Abbreviations ...............................................................................................................................4 2.2 List of figures ................................................................................................................................5 2.3 List of tables .................................................................................................................................6 3 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................8 4 ELICA market study ...................................................................................................................... 12 4.1 Turboprop and piston engine
    [Show full text]
  • Top Turboprop Series: We Compare Popular Pre-Owned Models
    FOR THE PILOTS OF OWNER-FLOWN, CABIN-CLASS AIRCRAFT SEPTEMBER 2019 $3.95 US VOLUME 23 NUMBER 9 Top Turboprop Series: We Compare Popular Pre-Owned Models Five Questions The Latest on One Pilot’s with Corporate the Cessna Denali Introduction Angel Network & SkyCourier to Aerobatics Jet It US One year $15.00, two years $29.00 Canadian One year $24.00, two years $46.00 Overseas One Year $52.00, Two Years $99.00 Single copies $6.50 PRIVATE. FAST. SMART. EDITOR Rebecca Groom Jacobs SEPTEMBER2019 • VOL. 23, NO. 9 (316) 641-9463 Contents [email protected] EDITORIAL OFFICE 2779 Aero Park Drive 4 Traverse City, MI 49686 Editor’s Briefing Phone: (316) 641-9463 E-mail: [email protected] 2 A Career Shaped by Turboprops PUBLISHER by Rebecca Groom Jacobs Dave Moore PRESIDENT Position Report Dave Moore 4 What Makes a Turboprop CFO Safer? Answer: You Rebecca Mead PRODUCTION MANAGER by Dianne White Mike Revard PUBLICATIONS DIRECTOR Jake Smith GRAPHIC DESIGNER Marci Moon 6 TWIN & TURBINE WEBSITE 6 Top Turboprop Series: www.twinandturbine.com Pre-Owned Piper Meridian ADVERTISING DIRECTOR and Daher TBM 700C2 John Shoemaker Twin & Turbine by Joe Casey 2779 Aero Park Drive Traverse City, MI 49686 12 Five on the Fly with Phone: 1-800-773-7798 Corporate Angel Network Fax: (231) 946-9588 [email protected] by Rebecca Groom Jacobs ADVERTISING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATOR & REPRINT SALES 14 The Latest on the Betsy Beaudoin Cessna Denali and Phone: 1-800-773-7798 [email protected] SkyCourier ADVERTISING ADMINISTRATIVE by Rich Pickett ASSISTANT Jet It Erika Shenk 22 Intro to Aerobatics Phone: 1-800-773-7798 by Jared Jacobs [email protected] SUBSCRIBER SERVICES Rhonda Kelly Diane Smith Jamie Wilson Molly Costilow 22 Kelly Adamson P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Sikorsky Multi-Mission Helicopter
    SIKORSKY ® MULTI-MISSION S-92 HELICOPTER This Page Does Not Contain Export Controlled Technical Data COMFort AND CONVenience This Page Does Not Contain Export Controlled Technical Data REVolutionAry The Sikorsky S-92® helicopter is truly revolutionary. From enhanced safety features that meet the latest and most stringent FAA and JAA regulations to its various multi-mission capabilities, the S-92 helicopter’s versatility and dependability are unmatched. The S-92 is an aircraft capable of flying virtually any mission, anywhere, including offshore oil transport, search and rescue and airliner point-to-point service. In addition to the range of mission configurations the S-92 helicopter offers, it is also designed to be cost-effective to operate and easy to maintain. Whatever your mission requires you need an aircraft that’s up to the challenge. Safe, comfortable, reliable – the S-92 is all that and more. Ideal for passengers, pilots and operators alike, the S-92 helicopter is truly a revolutionary way to fly. S-92® is a registered trademark of Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation. All rights reserved. This Page Does Not Contain Export Controlled Technical Data A GenerAtion AheAD Improving Safety and Reliability Building on Sikorsky’s fifty year legacy of exceptional civil helicopters, the S-92 helicopter was the first in it’s class to meet the newest, most stringent FAA/JAA Part 29 requirements, and remains the only medium weight helicopter to meet those requirements without exception or waiver. The S-92 incorporates state-of-the-art technology such as active vibration control, composite blades, and a long list of advanced safety features that are a generation ahead of competitive helicopters.
    [Show full text]
  • SA227-AC Aircraft Registration: N175SW
    Aircraft Data and Inspection Report Operator: Berry Aviation Date: 5.20.20 Location: Springfield Missouri Aircraft Type: Fairchild Merlin III C Serial #: AC621 Aircraft Model: SA227-AC Aircraft Registration: N175SW Date of Manufacture: Aug/1985 Current Total A/C Time: 34089.1 Current Total Airframe Cycle: 54373 Hours since Major Inspection/Overhaul: 61 Maintenance Program: FAR Part 91; Manufacturer's Recommended Inspection Type and Interval:Phase Last Inspection: Date: 10/11/2018 Operator's Representative: Title: Inspection Completed By: Laurie Stilwell Date of Completion: Inspection Type: Off-lease Work Order Reference: Notes: LH Engine Data Aircraft Registration No.: N175SW Serial #: AC621 TAT: 34089.1 Effective Date: TAC: 54373 Limits Left Hand Engine: TPE331-11U-611G Serial #: P-44414C Oprtrs Mfrs Engine H@I TSN: 24816.7 TCSN: 33347 24816 TSCAM: 5539.8 TCSCAM: 7939 7000 7000 FH ENG C@I 33346 TSO CSO Remaining ENG Time Since CAM Inspection: 5539.8 7939 1460.2 7000 7000 FH ENG Time Since Hot Section Inspection: 659.0 2841.0 3500 3500 FH ENG Time Since Gearbox Inspection: 5539.8 NA 1460.2 NA 7000 FH CYC/Time at PN SN install CSN/TSN Remaining Limit 1st Stage Turbine Wheel 3101520-4 1818244926610 0 212 19788 20000 CYC 2nd Stage Turbine Wheel 3102106-10 50134508846 761 2266 12734 15000 CYC 3rd Stage Turbine Wheel 3102655-2 10-156101-13373 0 1505 4495 6000 CYC Seal Plate 3102483-1 5-18040-2320 16713 18212 1788 20000 CYC Compressor Bearing 3103708-1 95-06049-265 5926.5 7545.2 1454.8 9000 FH 1st Stg Compressor Impeller 3108182-2 350100114
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace Facts and Figures 1983/84
    Aerospace Facts and Figures 1983/84 AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. 1725 DeSales Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 Published by Aviation Week & Space Technology A MCGRAW-HILL PUBLICATION 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, N.Y. 10020 (212) 997-3289 $9.95 Per Copy Copyright, July 1983 by Aerospace Industries Association o' \merica, Inc. · Library of Congress Catalog No. 46-25007 2 Compiled by Economic Data Service Aerospace Research Center Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. 1725 DeSales Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 429-4600 Director Research Center Virginia C. Lopez Manager Economic Data Service Janet Martinusen Editorial Consultant James J. Haggerty 3 ,- Acknowledgments Air Transport Association of America Battelle Memorial Institute Civil Aeronautics Board Council of Economic Advisers Export-Import Bank of the United States Exxon International Company Federal Trade Commission General Aviation Manufacturers Association International Civil Aviation Organization McGraw-Hill Publications Company National Aer~mautics and Space Administration National Science Foundation Office of Management and Budget U.S. Departments of Commerce (Bureau of the Census, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Industrial Economics) Defense (Comptroller; Directorate for Information, Operations and Reports; Army, Navy, Air Force) Labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics) Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration The cover and chapter art throughout this edition of Aerospace Facts and Figures feature computer-inspired graphics-hot an original theme in the contemporary business environment, but one particularly relevant to the aerospace industry, which spawned the large-scale development and application of computers, and conti.nues to incorpora~e computer advances in all aspects of its design and manufacture of aircraft, mis­ siles, and space products.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Walsh Thesis.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Engineering A PRELIMINARY ACOUSTIC INVESTIGATION OF A COAXIAL HELICOPTER IN HIGH-SPEED FLIGHT A Thesis in Aerospace Engineering by Gregory Walsh c 2016 Gregory Walsh Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science August 2016 The thesis of Gregory Walsh was reviewed and approved∗ by the following: Kenneth S. Brentner Professor of Aerospace Engineering Thesis Advisor Jacob W. Langelaan Associate Professor of Aerospace Engineering George A. Lesieutre Professor of Aerospace Engineering Head of the Department of Aerospace Engineering ∗Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. Abstract The desire for a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) aircraft capable of high forward flight speeds is very strong. Compound lift-offset coaxial helicopter designs have been proposed and have demonstrated the ability to fulfill this desire. However, with high forward speeds, noise is an important concern that has yet to be thoroughly addressed with this rotorcraft configuration. This work utilizes a coupling between the Rotorcraft Comprehensive Analysis System (RCAS) and PSU-WOPWOP, to computationally explore the acoustics of a lift-offset coaxial rotor sys- tem. Specifically, unique characteristics of lift-offset coaxial rotor system noise are identified, and design features and trim settings specific to a compound lift-offset coaxial helicopter are considered for noise reduction. At some observer locations, there is constructive interference of the coaxial acoustic pressure pulses, such that the two signals add completely. The locations of these constructive interferences can be altered by modifying the upper-lower rotor blade phasing, providing an overall acoustic benefit.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiche Pédagogique ANPI Date : 10/07/2019 – Page : 1/20 Référence : FICHE ANPI 2019/1 Rédacteur : Pierre Belair
    Fiche pédagogique ANPI Date : 10/07/2019 – page : 1/20 Référence : FICHE ANPI 2019/1 Rédacteur : Pierre Belair L’approche, l’atterrissage… et la remise des gaz Normalement, tout vol se termine par un atterrissage… Eventuellement une remise des gaz si celui-ci s’avère mal engagé ! A travers ce mémo (ok, un peu plus long que de coutume, mais le sujet le mérite), nous allons tenter de comprendre ce qui se passe, ou peut se passer, lors de cette phase critique du vol. Avant tout une histoire d’énergie Comme chacun sait, voler nécessite de l’énergie ! Si un planeur ne dispose que de sa perpétuelle chute comme source d’énergie, un avion profite d’un moteur aux ordres du pilote. Il pourra, dans certaines limites évidemment, ajuster la quantité d’énergie disponible à la quantité requise pour tenir une pente (vitesse verticale) et une vitesse (vitesse horizontale). Pour commencer, un petit rappel sur l’incidence : Exclusivement en palier (avion – 1 –), l’assiette « i » peut être 1 Incidence assimilée à l’incidence de l’avion « A » « A » ; L’incidence de l’aile est généralement légèrement plus horizon Pente élevée (calage de l’aile) mais pas représentée sur ces schémas. Vitesse « A » Incidence Pour une masse donnée, « A » l’incidence et la vitesse sont liées : Les schémas – 1 – et – 2 – représentent des avions volant à 2 la même incidence, donc la horizon même vitesse, pour une assiette « i » inférieure à « ii ». L’avion – 1 – est en palier. L’avion – 2 – est en montée. Incidence L’assiette « ii » est identique sur « B » 3 les schémas – 2 – et – 3 –, horizon toutefois l’incidence « B » est supérieure à l’incidence « A » correspondant à une vitesse plus faible.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Factors Industry News ! Volume XV
    Aviation Human Factors Industry News ! Volume XV. Issue 21, October 13, 2019 Hello all, To subscribe send an email to: [email protected] In this weeks edition of Aviation Human Factors Industry News you will read the following stories: ★FAA Aviation MX Human Factors ★FAA complains to ICAO of Quarterly weakening skills of "manual" aircraft piloting ★Two Former NTSB Experts Create atthe Bedford “Flight Safety a few Detectives”years ago was a perfect★Criminal example Charges of professionals Brought whoPodcast had drifted over years into a very unsafeAgainst operation. Aeroflot SJ100 This crewCrash Pilot was★Exposed literally Engine an “accident Forces Unitedwaiting to happen”★Japanese and never sailor throughkilled by a consciousAirlines Flight decision. To Return This Tovery Denver same processpropeller fooled while a very working smart on bunch aircraft ofInternational engineers andAirport managers at NASA andengine brought down two US space shuttles! This process is built into our human software. ★The Four Pillars of Safety ★‘Accident waiting to happen’: Management After death, airport workers want safety improvements Human Factors Industry News 1 FAA Aviation MX Human Factors Quarterly Human Factors Industry News 2 https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/maintenance_hf/fatigue/publications/ media/Aviation-Mx-HF-Newsletter-September-2019.pdf Two Former NTSB Experts Create the “Flight Safety Detectives” Podcast The new show will dig into all aspects of aviation. John Goglia and Gregory Feith, two well-known and outspoken aviation safety insiders, this week released episode three of their new podcast the "Flight Safety Detectives." The show looks in depth at aircraft accidents, aircraft technology and the big business of aviation around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Lider Firmy Rodzinnej
    ISSN 2353–6470 MAGAZYN FIRM RODZINNYCH Nr 7 (15), grudzień 2015 LIDER FIRMY RODZINNEJ DARIUSZ JASIŃSKI ALICJA HADRYŚ ‑NOWAK MAGDALENA DAROWSKA Prezes firmy i sędzia siatkówki. Liderki Ocena Projektu Lider? Firmy Rodzinne 2 FIRMAFIRMA RODZINNA RODZINNA TO TO MARKA MARKA2 SPIS TREŚCI FIRMAFIRMAFIRMA RODZINNA RODZINNARODZINNA TO TOTO MARKA MARKAMARKAFIRMA RODZINNA TO MARKA TEMAT NUMERU 4 Arkadiusz Zawada Folwark, delfiny i konie strzygące uszami 6 Wiesława Machalica Zostać przywódcą czy być zarządcą? iłość MMiłośćiłość RELACJE. Magazyn Firm Rodzinnych 8 Aleksandra Jasińska ‑Kloska MMMiłośćiłośćiłość M dwumiesięcznik, nr 7 (15), grudzień 2015 Stając się liderem. Nie tylko dla sukcesorów ISSN 2353–6470 10 Dariusz Jasiński wangarda biznesuWydawca: Prezes firmy i sędzia siatkówki. Lider? wangardawangarda biznesubiznesu Awangarda biznesu AAwangarda biznesu Stowarzyszenie AAAwangarda biznesu 11 Agnieszka Szwejkowska Inicjatywa Firm Rodzinnych ul. Smolna 14 m. 7 Lider i współczesne czasy – co jest możliwe? 00–375 Warszawa 12 Wojciech Popczyk ecepta na zmienną rzeczywistość ReceptaRecepta na zmiennąna zmiennąwww.firmyrodzinne.pl rzeczywistość rzeczywistość Kompetencje przywódcze przedsiębiorcyR rodzinnegoRReceptaeceptaecepta na nana zmienną zmiennązmienną rzeczywistość rzeczywistośćrzeczywistość R Redaktor naczelna: 14 Marietta Lewandowska Maria Adamska Czy liderowanie musi być trudne? Spojrzenie młodego pokolenia 16 Alicja Hadryś ‑Nowak reatywność Kreatywnośćreatywność Kontakt: KKreatywnośćreatywnośćreatywność K K Liderki K [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Library 
    Interagency Aviation Training Aircraft Library Disclaimer: The information provided in the Aircraft Library is intended to provide basic information for mission planning purposes and should NOT be used for flight planning. Due to variances in Make and Model, along with aircraft configuration and performance variability, it is necessary acquire the specific technical information for an aircraft from the operator when planning a flight. Revised: June 2021 Interagency Aviation Training—Aircraft Library This document includes information on Fixed-Wing aircraft (small, large, air tankers) and Rotor-Wing aircraft/Helicopters (Type 1, 2, 3) to assist in aviation mission planning. Click on any Make/Model listed in the different categories to view information about that aircraft. Fixed-Wing Aircraft - SMALL Make /Model High Low Single Multi Fleet Vendor Passenger Wing Wing engine engine seats Aero Commander XX XX XX 5 500 / 680 FL Aero Commander XX XX XX 7 680V / 690 American Champion X XX XX 1 8GCBC Scout American Rockwell XX XX 0 OV-10 Bronco Aviat A1 Husky XX XX X XX 1 Beechcraft A36/A36TC XX XX XX 6 B36TC Bonanza Beechcraft C99 XX XX XX 19 Beechcraft XX XX XX 7 90/100 King Air Beechcraft 200 XX XX XX XX 7 Super King Air Britten-Norman X X X 9 BN-2 Islander Cessna 172 XX XX XX 3 Skyhawk Cessna 180 XX XX XX 3 Skywagon Cessna 182 XX XX XX XX 3 Skylane Cessna 185 XX XX XX XX 4 Skywagon Cessna 205/206 XX XX XX XX 5 Stationair Cessna 207 Skywagon/ XX XX XX 6 Stationair Cessna/Texron XX XX XX 7 - 10 208 Caravan Cessna 210 X X x 5 Centurion Fixed-Wing Aircraft - SMALL—cont’d.
    [Show full text]