Primary School and Platts Heath (Community) Primary School, Maidstone: Proposed Amalgamation – Outcome of Public Consultation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Primary School and Platts Heath (Community) Primary School, Maidstone: Proposed Amalgamation – Outcome of Public Consultation Item No B2 By: Director - Operations To: School Organisation Advisory Board – 18 September 2006 Subject KINGSWOOD (COMMUNITY) PRIMARY SCHOOL AND PLATTS HEATH (COMMUNITY) PRIMARY SCHOOL, MAIDSTONE: PROPOSED AMALGAMATION – OUTCOME OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION. Classification: Unrestricted File Ref: ________________________________________________________________________________ Summary: This report sets out the results of the public consultation. It seeks the views of the School Organisation Advisory Board on the proposed amalgamation of Kingswood Primary School and Platts Heath Primary School by the issuing of a public notice for the closure of both schools and the establishment of a new combined school on the Kingswood Site, using existing Kingswood facilities. ________________________________________________________________________________ Introduction 1. (1) The School Organisation Advisory Board at its meeting on 8 June 2006 supported the undertaking of a public consultation on the proposal to amalgamate Kingswood Primary School and Platts Heath Primary School into a new Community Primary School on the Kingswood site. (2) Platts Heath and Kingswood Primary schools are located approximately two miles apart. Platts Heath Primary School is situated in Platts Heath village and about half of the school's pupils are drawn from within a one mile radius of the school. Kingswood Primary School is located within the village of Kingswood and approximately 60% of its pupils live within one mile of the school. (3) Platts Heath School is hampered by poor quality accommodation and a site which has little scope for development. Kingswood School has recently benefited from the replacement of mobile classrooms and now enjoys good quality accommodation, together with good on-site facilities, including playing fields (4) In January 2006 Platts Heath Primary School had 74 pupils on roll, with the capacity to accommodate 91 pupils (surplus of 18.68%). Kingswood Primary School had 69 pupils on roll and a capacity to accommodate 140 pupils (50.71% surplus). Thus, the combined rolls of the two schools was 143, but their total surplus capacity was 88 places (38.09%). (5) County average funding cost per pupil is £2,819 (£2,453 without SEN funding). The funding cost per pupil at Platts Heath School is £3,067 (£2,941 without SEN) and the funding cost per pupil at Kingswood is £3,421 (£3,147 without SEN funding). ed&libreports/2006/180906d B2:1 (6) For September 2006 admissions, 5 parents placed Platts Heath as their first preference while 4 placed Kingswood as first preference. (7) A map is attached in Appendix 1 which shows the location of the two schools and the current pupil distribution. Background Information 2. (1) In Maidstone Borough there are 53 primary schools with a combined net capacity of 13,337. There are currently 11,662 pupils attending these schools giving a surplus capacity of 12.6%. (2) As part of the Strategy, Recommendation 27 states that "wherever surplus primary capacity is projected to rise above 7% in any cluster area, proposals should be brought forward to reduce it to 5%”. The retention of a 5% surplus in any area (rather than zero) is considered to be 'good practice' to assist parental preferences being met, and to build in a contingency to deal with any unforeseen short-tem increase in pupil numbers. The DfES require all authorities to report annually on all schools with an excess of 25% surplus capacity, giving justifications why such schools are not being closed or having their net capacity reduced. The Proposal 3. (1) It is proposed that Platts Heath and Kingswood Primary Schools should amalgamate to form a new community primary school based in the Kingswood school buildings. (2) The school would have capacity to admit 150 pupils, aged 5 to 11 years, which is considered sufficient to meet the needs of both Platts Heath and Kingswood communities. (3) The amalgamation would be achieved by both schools closing and the new primary school opening at the earliest by 1 September 2007. (4) All children in Platts Heath Primary and Kingswood Primary Schools would be guaranteed places in the new school. The surplus capacity at Kingswood School (71 places) is sufficient to absorb almost the entire pupil population of Platts Heath School (74). For parents who do not wish to take up places at a combined Platts Heath/Kingswood school, places are available at Ulcombe CEP School. (5) Amalgamation would create a school of sufficient size to guarantee a more secure future for primary education within this rural area. The strengths of staff from both schools would be combined to provide a more comprehensive range of skills and expertise with which to raise standards, to the benefit of children from both communities. The larger team of staff would be able to share responsibilities, and would have access to a more flexible range of teaching resources. Opportunities for staff’s professional development would also be greater. (6) In amalgamating Platts Heath and Kingswood schools, both would close and a ‘new’ school would open on the Kingswood site. By adopting this strategy, rather than simply closing Platts Heath School, it is intended to establish that the new school at ed&libreports/2006/180906d B2:2 Kingswood would be recognised as the appropriate provision for both villages, with a sense of `joint ownership’ and support for it. Public Consultation Process 4. (1) A consultation document, a copy of which is attached as Appendix 2, was circulated according to the County Procedures for Review. This included Local Members, District Council, Parish Councils, local libraries, schools within the two Maidstone Clusters, Member of Parliament and other interested parties. (2) Approximately 1,000 copies of the document were circulated. (3) The document included a separate form on which respondents could express their views. (4) A public meeting was held at Kingswood Primary School on 13 July 2006. The meeting was chaired by Mrs P Stockell, KCC Member for Maidstone Rural West. Mr L Ridings, KCC Member for Sandwich (and Vice Chairman of the Council), Lord Bruce- Lockhart (KCC Member for Maidstone Rural East), Mr Hugh Robertson (MP for Faversham and Mid Kent), Dr. Ian Craig (Director of Operations), Mr Chris Jones (Area Education Officer), Mrs Hilary Macdonald (Local Education Officer) and Mr Tony Smith (School Organisation Officer) were in attendance. (5) There were 160 members of the public in attendance. Responses to the Public Consultation Written Responses 5. (1) In total, 358 written responses (letters, emails and consultation forms) had been received, of which 18 were in favour of the proposal and 340 were against. A Petition was also received in three parts, which was signed in total by 573 people – parents, staff, governors and members of the community - stating ‘signatories oppose the proposal for the amalgamation of Platts Heath and Kingswood Primary Schools’. (2) A summary of written responses is attached as Appendix 3. Responses to the main points are included in the Area Education Officer’s Comments in Section 14. Public Meeting Responses (3) A summary of comments, views and responses is attached as Annex 3. Views of the Local Member 6. (1) Lord Bruce-Lockhart, Local Member for Maidstone Rural East made the following comments on the proposal (from letter dated 26 July 2006): (2) I am totally opposed to the closure of Platts Heath School on the grounds that the County Council has recently confirmed it has a higher than average standard of education; it is financially viable; it has 74 pupils out of a capacity of 91, 45% of whom live within one mile of the school; and it is an essential part of the village community. ed&libreports/2006/180906d B2:3 (3) This consultation is stated to be about the reduction of surplus capacity in primary schools in Maidstone. This is right. It is, however, clear that there is absolutely no need to close Platts Heath School as the County Council has already achieved the reduction in surplus capacity in the Maidstone area that is required by the DfES and by the KCC’s own policy. (4) The Audit Commission’s submission to DfES states “Authorities should aim to have no more than 10% surplus overall and should address the situation as a matter of urgency at individual schools with more than 25%.” I understand the KCC Cabinet of 6 February this year agreed to adopt a new policy to reduce this to 5% or 7% surplus capacity in any area. (5) In the Maidstone area the current and forecast surplus capacity is 10.9%, close to the Audit Commission guidance. There are excellent proposals in the SOAB paper to put children’s centres into some town centre schools with large surplus capacities, and for a “desk top” exercise to reduce the “theoretical total capacity number” in seven schools totalling a reduction of 706 school places. This would very sensibly reduce the surplus capacity for Maidstone to 6% and achieve this with no closures. This therefore achieves both the DfES and the County Council’s objectives in reducing surplus capacity. (6) Platts Heath School is an outstanding small rural primary school serving its own distinct village. It has 74 children on roll out of a total theoretical capacity of 91. It has a high standard of education with six out of ten children this year achieving entry to grammar school. It has good PANDA and value added schools. The SATs results this summer again showed further improvement. The County Council’s Assistant Director of Education has confirmed that Platts Heath's standard of education is well above average. Most importantly of all, in a small school, its dedicated staff are able to deliver a high standard of personalised and individual learning. (7) Platts Heath School has a strongly supportive Governing Board. It has effective resource management and no financial deficit.
Recommended publications
  • Statement of Common Ground Between Kent County Council and Maidstone Borough Council Concerning (The Parties) Minerals and Waste
    Statement of Common Ground Between Kent County Council and Maidstone Borough Council Concerning (the Parties) Minerals and Waste Safeguarding and Allocation of Mineral Sites Updated May 2019 1.0 Introduction and Parties Involved 1.1 National policy1 states that: “Local planning authorities and county councils (in two-tier areas) are under a duty to cooperate with each other, and with other prescribed bodies, on strategic matters that cross administrative boundaries.” and “Strategic policy-making authorities should collaborate to identify the relevant strategic matters which they need to address in their plans.” 1.2 It also states2: “In order to demonstrate effective and on-going joint working, strategic policy-making authorities should prepare and maintain one or more statements of common ground, documenting the cross-boundary matters being addressed and progress in cooperating to address these. These should be produced using the approach set out in national planning guidance, and be made publicly available throughout the plan-making process to provide transparency.” 1.3 This document represents a Statement of Common Ground (SoCG) between Kent County Council (KCC) and Maidstone Borough Council (MBC) (the Parties) that demonstrates how cross-boundary matters with respect to minerals and waste are being addressed and progressed. 1.4 Specifically this SoCG covers the following strategic matters: • Safeguarding of mineral resources • Safeguarding Minerals Management, Transportation & Waste Management Facilities • Allocation of land for extraction of minerals 1.5 KCC is the waste and minerals planning authority for the two tier area of Kent with responsibility for planning for the future management of waste and supply of minerals in the county by preparing relevant strategic policies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Dairy, Biddenden Road, Headcorn, Ashford, Kent
    Warehousing, Commercial Repair Centre and Yard – can be taken together or separately The Old Dairy, Biddenden Road, Headcorn, Ashford, Kent www.sibleypares.co.uk 01622 673086 [email protected] The Old Dairy, Biddenden Road, Headcorn, Ashford, Kent Description This premises currently has warehousing ideal for use as a commercial repair centre with ample yard space that can be let as a whole or separately. The warehouse offers dual access and benefits from storage mezzanine plus first floor offices as well as a functioning spray oven and separate preparation bay. Location The property is located on the A274 Biddenden Road just outside Headcorn Village. Headcorn is 10 miles south of Maidstone and 13 miles west of Ashford with excellent access to the Weald and East Sussex. Headcorn Village has excellent local amenities anchored by Sainsburys and Costa along with a variety of other shops and businesses. Warehouse units with front & rear shutters, spray oven and preparation bay 24 hour access 5.4m roof eaves Approx 1.16 acre yard CCTV - full 360° yard surveillance Rent from £25,000 per annum The Old Dairy, Biddenden Road, Headcorn, Ashford, Kent Accommodation Terms The property comprises of a main warehouse benefitting from front and rear shutter doors allowing excellent To take a new lease by negotiation, subject to upward only access to the yard. There are first floor offices plus a storage mezzanine. The adjoining (and linked) unit has one rent reviews fully serviced and operational commercial spray oven and one preparation bay making the unit ideal for commercial vehicle maintenance. The accommodation can be split into separate units or yard space which can Rateable Value be let in smaller lot sizes.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring and Predicting Railway Subsidence Using Insar and Time Series Prediction Techniques
    Monitoring and Predicting Railway Subsidence Using InSAR and Time Series Prediction Techniques ZIYI YANG A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Civil Engineering College of Engineering and Physical Sciences The University of Birmingham, UK March 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract Abstract Improvements in railway capabilities have resulted in heavier axle loads and higher speed operations. Both of these factors increase the dynamic loads on the track. As a result, railway subsidence has become a threat to good railway performance and safe railway operation. Poor infrastructure performance requires more maintenance work, and therefore the life cycle costs of the railway will increase. In order to ensure good performance and reduce life cycle costs, railway subsidence should be monitored and predicted. The author of this thesis provides an approach for railway performance assessment through the monitoring of railway subsidence and prediction of railway subsidence based on a time series of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images. The railway is a long and relatively narrow infrastructure, which subsides continuously over a long time period.
    [Show full text]
  • Walks in West Kent Ages to Take on the Walk Can Be
    This circular walk is one of a number of walks produced by Photo Guide Kent County Council. If you liked this walk you can find more Walk Overview on the Explore Kent website at www.kent.gov.uk/explorekent Distance: 5.2 miles (8.3km) allow 3 hours We welcome any feedback about this walk or the content Start/Finish: Sutton Valence of the guide. If you know of a good walk and would like to Stiles: 7 share it, please let us know and we may feature it on our website. Gates: 5 1 2 3 4 5 If the route description or pictures are out-of-date please Terrain: Field paths. Some moderate slopes e-mail [email protected] Views: Some good views � Please tell us about any problems concerning the paths Toilets: None on route using the Kent Report Line 0845 345 0210. � This guide is available in other formats on request. Refreshments: Shops� and pubs at Sutton Valence FAMILY FUN! Walking is not only a healthy How to get there... activity but it can be fun and � 6 7 8 9 10 informative too. Free activity Road Map: worksheets for children of all Multimap website Walks in West Kent ages to take on the walk can be www.multimap.com. ordered by emailing Search for “Sutton Valence”. When you’re out walking [email protected] in the countryside, or calling By Car: Sutton Valence is please respect the just off the A274 between 08458 247600. Countryside Code. Maidstone and Headcorn. 5.2 miles (8.3km) approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Kent Association of Local Councils
    KENT ASSOCIATION OF LOCAL COUNCILS Minutes of the Meeting of the Maidstone Area Committee of the Kent Association of Local Councils held via Zoom Conference at 7pm on Monday 29 June 2020. Present: Councillors: Geraldine Brown (Chairman) Yalding, Cheryl Taylor Maggio (Vice-Chairman) Langley Helen Anderson (Secretary), Fay Gooch Barming, Richard Ash and Erin Sudgen (Parish Clerk) Bearsted, Anthony Humphryes Boughton Monchelsea, Ivor Davies Boxley, Tina Clark Broomfield and Kingswood, Steve Standish Collier Street, John Wilson Coxheath, Lyn Selby and Nigel Pyman Headcorn, Bob China Leeds, Zuri Loose, Lesley Mannington Marden, Sue Forward Staplehurst, Eve Poulter Sutton Valence, Peter Coulling and Chris Douglass Teston, Peter Titchener Ulcombe, John Perry and Martin Cox MBC. Apologies. Councillors: Robert Turner and Ron Galton Boughton Malherbe, Malcolm Ireland, East Sutton, Fred Stanley Harrietsham. 1. Welcome. Cllr Brown welcomed everyone to this inaugural virtual meeting. 2. Virtual Meetings. It was agreed that future meetings would be held via Zoom conference facilities if circumstances necessitate. 3. Minutes. The minutes of the 2 March 2020 meeting were taken as read, confirmed as a correct record. These will be signed at the next available meeting held in person. 4. Matters Arising. Cllr Wilson noted that due to the Coronavirus crisis the HGV Pilot Scheme has not progressed any further. A short questionnaire is still to be compiled to Parishes regarding attendance at KALC Area Committee meetings, agenda content, speakers etc. 5. Deferral of the 2020/21 AGM – This was agreed. All positions/representatives remain the same. 6. COVID-19. 6.1 The leader of Maidstone Borough Council was welcomed to the meeting and gave a very comprehensive review, answering the following points:- 6.1.1 Where we are as a Borough Maidstone Borough Council were relatively prepared for when lock down happened on the technology front.
    [Show full text]
  • Malherbe Monthly
    Malherbe Monthly Number 37 August 2007 Incorporating Liverton Street & Platts Heath Useful contact names and telephone Nos. BOUGHTON MALHERBE/GRAFTY GREEN County Councillor Lord Sandy Bruce-Lockhart 890651 Borough Councillors Jenny Gibson 890200 Richard Thick 891224 Church Wardens Kenneth Alexander 858348 Joan Davidson 850210 Parish Council Clerk Pat Anderson 858350 Village Hall Doreen Walters 850387 bookings KM Correspondent Sylvia Close 858919 Gardening Club Sue Burch 850381 Church Choir Doreen Hulm 850287 Sunday School Mair Chantler 859672 Yoga Liz Watts 737321 Neighbourhood Keith Anderson 858350 Watch Sue Burch 850381 Incumbent To be announced Benefice Office Michelle Saunders (email: 850604 [email protected]) Mobile Library Wednesday afternoons St. Edmunds Centre Tricia Dibley 858891 Fresh Fish delivery Thursday afternoons at approx. 3.30 by Post Office Council Rubbish See article in magazine Freighter Malherbe Monthly Production Team Chris King Advertising: [email protected] 850711 Mike Hitchins Editor: [email protected] 858937 John Collins Treasurer 850213 The views expressed in “Malherbe Monthly” are not necessarily those of the Production Team; publication of articles/adverts does not constitute endorsement and we reserve the right to edit! Anything for the September edition should be left in Grafty Green Shop, or contact Mike on 01622 858937 ([email protected]) by 15th August Front cover: The Post bus leaves Grafty Post Office – but not for long!! Photograph courtesy of John Collins – 17th July 2007 News from St. Nicholas Church Cream Teas Cream teas are now being served at St. Nicholas. We have been lucky with the weather for the first two Sundays in July and hope our luck will hold for the rest of the Summer.
    [Show full text]
  • First Urgent Update Report Item 24 Church Farm, Ulcombe Hill, Ulcombe, Kent 17/503284 Pages 167-187 Additional Representation/In
    First Urgent Update Report Item 24 Church Farm, Ulcombe Hill, Ulcombe, Kent 17/503284 Pages 167-187 Additional representation/information submitted Ulcombe Parish Council Ulcombe Parish Council have submitted a Landscape and Visual Impact rebuttal produced by Harper Landscape Architecture (referred to as HLA). This consists of the following documents : Rebuttal dated October 2017 Executive Summary of Rebuttal dated October 2017 Appendix 1 – HAD and additional HLA Viewpoints Appendix 2 – Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Methodology Appendix 3 – Table of LVIA Judgements Appendix 4 – Landscape Assessment of Kent October 2004 Appendix 5 – Maidstone Landscape Character Assessment 2012 Appendix 6 – Maidstone Borough Wide Local Plan 2017 Appendix 7 – Listed building designations Appendix 8 – Critique of DHA and Graham J Field drawings Appendix 9 – LI Photography Advice Note It is understood that these documents have been submitted to Members as lobbying material. Officer Response The submitted information has been considered by Officer’s and the Landscape Officer. In summary the information seeks to question the methodology used by DHA (the applicant’s agent) and draws differing conclusions regarding the impact of the proposed development. Firstly regarding the methodology, it should be acknowledged that the Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (GLVIA), 3rd Edition, 2013 is as the title suggests, guidelines and does not need to be strictly followed in producing a landscape and visual appraisal. It is considered by Officer’s that the document generally conforms with the guidelines and although lacking in information relating to the impact on the adjoining landscape area and not taking into consideration the Maidstone Landscape Capacity Study : Sensitivity Assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Malherbe Monthly
    Dsci0003.jpg Malherbe Monthly Free Number 19 February 2006 Incorporating Liverton Street & Platts Heath 1 Useful contact names and telephone Nos. BOUGHTON MALHERBE/GRAFTY GREEN County Councillor Sandy Bruce Lockhart 890651 Borough Councillors Jenny Gibson 890200 Richard Thick 891224 Church Wardens Kenneth Alexander 858348 Joan Davidson 850210 Parish Council Clerk Pat Anderson 858350 Village Hall Doreen Walters 850387 bookings KM Correspondent Sylvia Close 858919 Gardening Club Sue Burch 850381 Church Choir Doreen Hulm 850287 Sunday School Mair Chantler 859672 Yoga Liz Watts 737321 Neighbourhood Keith Anderson 858350 Watch Sue Burch 850381 Incumbent Revd Don Irvine 859466 (email: [email protected]) Benefice Office Michelle Saunders 850604 (email: [email protected]) Mobile Library Wednesday afternoons St. Edmunds Centre Tricia Dibley 858891 Fresh Fish delivery Thursday afternoons at approx. 3.30 by Post Office Council Rubbish See article in magazine Freighter Malherbe Monthly Production Team Chris King Advertising: [email protected] 850711 Mike Hitchins Editor: [email protected] 858937 John Collins Treasurer 850213 The views expressed in “Malherbe Monthly” are not necessarily those of the Production Team, publication of articles/adverts does not constitute endorsement and we reserve the right to edit! Anything for the March edition should be left in Grafty Green Shop, or contact Mike on 01622 858937 ([email protected]) by 15th February Front cover: Picture taken in Singapore Botanical Gardens – If anyone knows what it is please e-mail the editor. 2 News from St. Nicholas Church Lent Lunches Lent Lunches will begin on Ash Wednesday 1st March. The first one will be at Bowley Farm, Sandway 12.00-2.00p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document For
    ADJOURNED PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING Date: Thursday 16 November 2017 Time: 6.00 p.m. Venue: Town Hall, High Street, Maidstone Membership: Councillors Boughton, Clark, Cox, English (Chairman), Harwood, Munford, Powell, Prendergast, Round (Vice-Chairman), Spooner, Mrs Stockell and Vizzard AGENDA Page No. 1. Apologies for Absence 2. Notification of Substitute Members 3. Notification of Visiting Members 4. Items withdrawn from the Agenda 5. Any business the Chairman regards as urgent including the urgent update report as it relates to matters to be considered at the meeting 6. Disclosures by Members and Officers 7. Disclosures of lobbying 8. To consider whether any items should be taken in private because of the possible disclosure of exempt information. 9. Reference from the Policy and Resources Committee - Budget 1 Monitoring 2017/18 - Development Control Appeals 10. 16/505932 - Land Rear Of Chart View, Off Chart Hill Road, 2 - 18 Chart Sutton, Kent 11. 16/508660 - Land South Of Vicarage Road, Yalding, Kent 19 - 38 12. 17/500819 - Bungalow at Hill View, Yelsted Road, Yelsted, Kent 39 - 44 13. 17/501308 - 1 Brooklands, Headcorn, Kent 45 - 54 Issued on Friday 10 November 2017 Continued Over/: Alison Broom, Chief Executive 14. 17/503043 - Land South Of Avery Lane And Land South of 55 - 69 Sutton Road, Otham, Kent 15. 17/503284 - Church Farm, Ulcombe Hill, Ulcombe, Kent 70 - 90 16. 17/503647 - Orchard Farm Nursery, Chartway Street, Sutton 91 - 96 Valence, Maidstone, Kent 17. Appeal Decisions 97 - 98 18. Chairman's Announcements PLEASE NOTE The order in which items are taken at the meeting may be subject to change.
    [Show full text]
  • The Croft, Pilgrims Way, Detling, Kent
    The Croft, Pilgrims Way, Detling, Kent The Croft Outside Pilgrims Way, The property is approached through a charming Detling Hill tarmac driveway which forms a circle and sweeps around the house. There is an area of Maidstone cobbles adjacent to the detached Coach House, the Coach House which is of brick and stone Kent ME14 3HY construction with weatherboarding and a slate A charming house of character dating tiled roof incorporates the stables, tack room and includes two carports with hayloft above. from 1840. Well situated on the This property has much potential subject to the edge of the North Downs in a highly usual planning consents being obtained. accessible location The gardens are delightful and have been beautifully planted on free draining chalk soil. Detling 0.3 miles , Bearsted 2 miles, Maidstone The property has been opened under the town and mainline station 4 miles, J7 of M20 national garden scheme and has won the gold 1 mile, J5 of M2 5 miles award twice for the Kent Wild Life Trust. Pillared entrance porch | Elegant entrance Location hall Double drawing room | Kitchen/breakfast The property lies in the North Downs area of room Sitting room | Utility/garden room | Full Outstanding Natural Beauty and has fabulous lower ground floor comprising 3 rooms | 7/8 local amenities all within easy reach. The Bedrooms (2/3 on second floor) | Integral pretty village of Detling has a recently opened garage | Detached Coach House including community shop, a public house and a well- stabling, tack room, work store and carports known church, together with the neighbouring Woodland walk | Sweeping circular driveway villages of Thurnham and Bearsted offering local Pretty garden, meadows in all about 4 acres amenities serving all the day to day needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Loose Threads’ Your Local History Magazine Number 13
    ‘Loose Threads’ Your local history magazine Number 13 The first of two issues commemorating the centenary of the declaration of the ‘Great War’ and the 70th anniversary of D-Day, featuring local men and women who served in the armed forces and on the ‘home front’ during two world wars Also in this issue * 35 years of ‘Loose Women’ * The Dairy House, Kirkdale * Bockingford’s war workers * ‘My Workhouse ancestors’ * The remarkable Barker family * Our valley’s Roman rulers * School looks back 100 years * Mystery of church’s patron saint * Memories of winters past * Coxheath’s corn mills ... And much more! The Journal of the Loose Area History Society £4.00 Nucleus', said Phil. 'I paid a visit and was enthused by the concept of the gallery and the warmth of the staff and volunteers and the fact that the student had actually sold some of his work. 'When I was teaching full time it was often exhausting. Producing my own work felt a bit like a busman's holiday. On my semi-retirement my partner Sue could see the potential advantage of me painting rather than getting under her feet and was full of enthusiasm and encouragement for the idea, so I signed up. 'Working to deadlines has been very good for me. I doubt I would have rediscovered my enthusiasm for painting without Nucleus. The concept of the gallery is inspirational to many local artists and something that has been missing from Maidstone for a long time. 'I hope to continue to develop my expertise and extend my work by producing Phil Brown: water colour portraits and develop a web site'.
    [Show full text]
  • Lenham' Lenham
    LLENHAMENHAM' NEIGHBOURHOOD+PLANNEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN+ + + + + PUBLIC'CONSULTATION' STATEMENT' + REGULATION 14 CONSULTATION DRAFT February+2016+ SEPTEMBER 2018 LENHAM PARISH COUNCIL Contents Page 1. Introduction 2 2. Lenham Today 5 3. Lenham Tomorrow: Vision Statement, Goals and Objectives 8 4. Design quality 9 5. Promoting active, smarter and sustainable travel 14 6. Enhancing green space and biodiversity value 16 7. Employment 22 8. Community facilities 24 9. Tourism 29 10. Air quality and renewables 30 11. Strategic Housing Delivery Sites 32 12. Suggested Development Sites 43 13. Community Infrastructure Levy 45 14. Next Steps 47 Appendix A: Glossary 48 Appendix B: Acknowledgements 49 Drawings: Lenham Parish Boundary 50 Local Green Space Sites 51 Proposed Housing Sites 52 Lenham Local Policies Map 53 Masterplans: North-West of Lenham Village Extension 54 North-East of Lenham Village Extension 55 South of Lenham Village Extension 56 1. Introduction 1.1 A Plan for Lenham 1.1.1 This is the Regulation 14 version Lenham Neighbourhood Plan. It covers the parish of Lenham, as illustrated in Figure 1. It sets out the local community’s aspirations for Lenham over the period to 2031 and establishes policies in relation to land use and development. These are policies that will influence future planning applications and decisions in the area. 1.1.2 The purpose of neighbourhood planning is to give local people and businesses a much greater say in how the places in which they live and work should change and develop over time. Neighbourhood planning is designed to give local people a very real voice in deciding the look and feel of an area, from determining the location of shops, offices and schools for example, to identifying sites and development standards for new housing.
    [Show full text]