DOCSLIB.ORG

Open Cluster Groups and Complexes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Open Cluster Groups and Complexes Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades "doctor rerum naturalium" (Dr. rer. nat.) in der Wissenschaftsdisziplin "Astrophysik" eingereicht an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultat¨ der Universitat¨ Potsdam angefertigt am Leibnitz-Institut fur¨ Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP) von Dipl.Phys.Claudia Conrad unter Betreuung von:Prof.Dr.Matthias Steinmetz, Dr.Roelof S. de Jong, Dr.Ralf-Dieter Scholz, Dr.Olivier V. Schnurr Potsdam,June 15, 2015 Published online at the Institutional Repository of the University of Potsdam: URN urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-77605 http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-77605 ”Remember to look up at the stars and not down at your feet. Try to make sense of what you see and wonder about what makes the universe exist. Be curious. And however difficult life may seem, there is always something you can do and succeed at. It matters that you don’t just give up.“ Stephen Hawking (In an Interview with Diane Sawyer, for ABC News, June 2010) Contents List of Figures ............................. vii List of Tables ............................. xi Abstract ................................1 Zusammenfassung ...........................3 1 Introduction .............................5 1.1 General aspects ...........................5 1.1.1 Open clusters..........................5 1.1.2 Stellar associations........................9 1.2 The hierarchy of star formation .....................9 1.3 Galactic structure and dynamics .................... 12 1.4 Past investigations on open clusters and stellar associations .......... 13 1.5 Studies on structures in the open cluster population ............. 14 1.6 Outline of this thesis ......................... 15 2 The Catalogues ........................... 17 2.1 Catalogues on Galactic open clusters................... 17 2.1.1 DAML............................ 17 2.1.2 The COCD and CSOCA...................... 18 2.1.3 The CRVAD and CRVOCA..................... 20 2.2 The RAdial Velocity Experiment (RAVE)................. 21 2.2.1 Binary studies in RAVE...................... 23 2.2.2 Dedicated open cluster observations in RAVE.............. 24 3 Sample characteristics ........................ 25 3.1 Open cluster members ........................ 25 3.1.1 Sample selection and data quality................... 26 3.1.2 Radial velocities......................... 30 3.1.3 Metallicities.......................... 33 3.2 Open cluster mean values ....................... 36 3.2.1 Radial velocities......................... 36 3.2.2 Binarity fraction......................... 39 3.2.3 Metallicities.......................... 39 3.2.4 Summary on the RAVE data..................... 42 3.3 Final set of parameters for my open cluster working sample ......... 43 3.3.1 Combined radial velocities..................... 43 3.3.2 Distances........................... 45 3.3.3 Proper motions......................... 46 3.3.4 Ages............................. 49 3.3.5 Metallicities.......................... 50 4 Open cluster groups and complexes .................. 53 4.1 6D phase-space information ...................... 53 4.2 Identification of open cluster groupings.................. 55 4.3 Verification of open cluster groupings .................. 58 4.3.1 The reference catalogue...................... 58 4.3.2 Monte-Carlo simulations...................... 68 4.4 Characterisation of the found open cluster groupings ............ 76 4.4.1 Comparison to the literature..................... 82 5 Discussion and Outlook ....................... 87 Acknowledgment ........................... 93 Bibliography.............................. 95 Appendix .............................. 101 A Tables for the results from RAVE ................... 101 A.1 Radial Velocities .......................... 101 A.2 Metallicities ............................ 102 B Tables for the final working sample from the COCD .......... 111 C Additional information on the found OC groupings .......... 139 C.1 For linking lengths 100 pc and 10 km/s .................. 139 C.2 For linking lengths 100 pc and 20 km/s .................. 159 Bibliography for the Appendix ..................... 165 List of Figures 1.1 Colour-magnitude diagrams generated for four Galactic open clusters from the COCD . .6 1.2 Images of known Galactic open clusters . .7 1.3 Histograms for the radii and number of members in Galactic open clusters . .8 1.4 Spatial distribution of Galactic open clusters . .8 1.5 Images of known Galactic stellar associations . .9 1.6 Illustration of mass segregation . 10 1.7 Visualisation of simulated mass loss in open clusters . 11 1.8 Distribution in Z with respect to cluster age for Galactic open clusters . 12 1.9 Schematic for hierarchical star formation . 14 2.1 Schematic for the membership selection procedure in the COCD . 18 2.2 Comparison between the computed and literature RV data in the CRVOCA . 20 2.3 Footprint of RAVE DR4 . 23 3.1 Spatial distribution of stars in open cluster areas in the RAVE footprint . 25 3.2 eRV∗ vs. SNR distribution of my high-quality RV sample in RAVE DR4 . 26 3.3 eRV∗ vs. R distribution of my high-quality RV sample in RAVE DR4 . 26 3.4 eRV∗ vs. corr_RV distribution of my high-quality RV sample in RAVE DR4 . 27 3.5 Histograms for eRV∗ for the different RV samples . 28 3.6 Magnitude dependent eRV∗ histograms for my high-quality RV sample . 29 3.7 Distribution of eRV∗ with respect to log g for the selective RV samples . 30 3.8 Distribution of eRV∗ and log g with respect to b for the selective RV samples . 30 3.9 VJohnson histograms in RAVE and CRVAD-2 . 31 3.10 RV comparison between RAVE and CRVAD-2 . 32 3.11 RV difference distributions between RAVE and the CRVAD-2 source catalogues . 33 3.12 Distribution of e[M=H]∗ with respect to SNR for my high-quality RV sample . 34 3.13 [M=H] distribution with respect to SNR for my high-quality RV sample . 34 3.14 [M=H] distribution with respect to R for my high-quality RV sample . 34 3.15 [M=H] distribution with respect to VJohnson for my high-quality [M=H] sample . 35 3.16 Histogram for the number of individual measurements/stars used to derive RV ......... 37 3.17 RV comparison between RAVE and reference values . 37 3.18 Comparison between σRV and eRV∗ in CRVAD-2 and RAVE . 38 3.19 Histogram for the number of individual measurements/stars used to obtain [M=H]....... 40 3.20 [M=H] comparison between RAVE DR4 and DAML . 41 3.21 [M=H] comparison between the RAVE chemical pipeline and DAML . 41 vii 3.22 Summarised histograms for the number of individual measurements used to compute RV and for the resulting eRV for my final working sample . 43 3.23 Radial velocity dependence on Galactic longitude . 44 3.24 Histogram for open cluster distances from the COCD . 45 3.25 Histogram for the proper motion uncertainties in my working sample . 46 3.26 Tangential velocity dependence on Galactic longitude . 47 3.27 Histogram for the uncertainties in the tangential velocities . 48 3.28 Histogram for the open cluster ages in the COCD . 49 3.29 Relation between brightest member and age of clusters in the COCD . 49 3.30 Age-metallicity relation for my working sample . 50 3.31 Radial and vertical metallicity gradients . 51 4.1 Velocity field and UVW dependency on Galactic longitude in the working sample . 54 4.2 Histograms for the UVW uncertainties in my working sample . 55 4.3 Nearest neighbour histograms in 6D phase-space for the working sample . 56 4.4 Distribution of identified open cluster groupings in coordinate and velocity space . 57 4.5 Histograms for the size of the identified open cluster groupings for both sets of linking lengths 58 4.6 Density profile in the XY-plane of open clusters in the MWSC within 1.8 kpc . 58 4.7 Effect of extinction and Galactic spiral arms on the spatial distribution of MWSC clusters . 59 4.8 Comparison of the spatial distribution between COCD and MWSC . 60 4.9 Comparison in the Galactic coordinates between COCD and MWSC . 60 4.10 Comparison for the location of the identified open cluster groupings between the COCD and MWSC.............................................. 61 4.11 Comparison of the separation histograms for the nearest neighbours in the COCD and MWSC 61 4.12 Comparison of the distributions for the Cartesian XYZ-coordinates and UVW-velocities be- tween the COCD and MWSC . 62 4.13 Difference distributions for the Cartesian coordinates and velocities in the COCD and MWSC 63 4.14 Difference distributions for the cluster distances, proper motions, tangential and radial veloci- ties in the COCD and MWSC . 64 4.15 Distributions of the XYZ-coordinates and UVW-velocities for the randomised sample of the MCMWS C and my working sample . 66 4.16 Distributions for the spatial separation and velocity difference of the nearest neighbours in XYZ for the randomised sample of the MCMWS C and my working sample . 67 4.17 Histograms for the number and size of identified open cluster groupings for the MCMWS C using 100 pc and 10 km/s and in comparison with the results from my working sample . 67 4.18 Histograms for the number and size of identified open cluster groupings for the MCMWS C using 100 pc and 20 km/s and in comparison with the results from my working sample . 68 4.19 Distributions for the spatial separation and velocity difference of the nearest neighbours in XYZ for the randomised sample of the MCUni and my working sample . 69 4.20 Histograms for the number and size of identified open cluster groupings for the MCUni using linking lengths of 100 pc and 10 km/s in comparison with my working sample . 69 4.21 Histograms for the number and size of identified open cluster groupings for the MCUni using linking lengths of 100 pc and 20 km/s in comparison with my working sample . 70 4.22 Distributions for the Cartesian coordinates and velocities for the MCUni in comparison with the distributions for my working sample . 71 4.23 Distribution in X and Y for the MCXYcheck compared to the distributions in the MWSC . 72 4.24 2D-Histogram for the number density of COCD clusters in the XY-plane .
Recommended publications
  • The Desert Sky Observer

    The Desert Sky Observer

    Desert Sky Observer Volume 32 Antelope Valley Astronomy Club Newsletter February 2012 Up-Coming Events February 10: Club Meeting* February 11: Moon Walk @ Prime Desert Woodlands February 13: Executive Board Meeting @ Don’s house February 18: Telescope Night and Star Party @ Devil's Punchbowl * Monthly meetings are held at the S.A.G.E. Planetarium on the Cactus School campus in Palmdale, the second Friday of each month. The meeting location is at the northeast corner of Avenue R and 20th Street East. Meetings start at 7 p.m. and are open to the public. Please note that food and drink are not allowed in the planetarium President Don Bryden Well I gave a star party and no one showed up! Not that I can blame them – it was raining and windy and cold – it even hailed! Still I dragged out the scope and got it ready to go. Briefly, between the clouds I looked at Jupiter and it was quite a treat. The Galilean moons were all tight to the planet either coming from just in front or behind. It gave a bejeweled look like a large ruby surrounded by four small diamonds. Even with the winds and clouds the sky was surprisingly steady and I went as high as 260x with ease, exposing the shadow of Europa transiting the planet. But soon more clouds came and inside we had a nice fire so I put the Artist's rendering DVD “400 Years of the Telescope” on and settled in for the night. My daughter had a few friends over after a skating party that afternoon and later when I went out for one more look they came out to see what was up.
  • Arxiv:2012.09981V1 [Astro-Ph.SR] 17 Dec 2020 2 O

    Arxiv:2012.09981V1 [Astro-Ph.SR] 17 Dec 2020 2 O

    Contrib. Astron. Obs. Skalnat´ePleso XX, 1 { 20, (2020) DOI: to be assigned later Flare stars in nearby Galactic open clusters based on TESS data Olga Maryeva1;2, Kamil Bicz3, Caiyun Xia4, Martina Baratella5, Patrik Cechvalaˇ 6 and Krisztian Vida7 1 Astronomical Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences 251 65 Ondˇrejov,The Czech Republic(E-mail: [email protected]) 2 Lomonosov Moscow State University, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Universitetsky pr. 13, 119234, Moscow, Russia 3 Astronomical Institute, University of Wroc law, Kopernika 11, 51-622 Wroc law, Poland 4 Department of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotl´aˇrsk´a2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic 5 Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia Galileo Galilei, Vicolo Osservatorio 3, 35122, Padova, Italy, (E-mail: [email protected]) 6 Department of Astronomy, Physics of the Earth and Meteorology, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynsk´adolina F-2, 842 48 Bratislava, Slovakia 7 Konkoly Observatory, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, H-1121 Budapest, Konkoly Thege Mikl´os´ut15-17, Hungary Received: September ??, 2020; Accepted: ????????? ??, 2020 Abstract. The study is devoted to search for flare stars among confirmed members of Galactic open clusters using high-cadence photometry from TESS mission. We analyzed 957 high-cadence light curves of members from 136 open clusters. As a result, 56 flare stars were found, among them 8 hot B-A type ob- jects. Of all flares, 63 % were detected in sample of cool stars (Teff < 5000 K), and 29 % { in stars of spectral type G, while 23 % in K-type stars and ap- proximately 34% of all detected flares are in M-type stars.
  • Arxiv:0804.4630V1 [Astro-Ph] 29 Apr 2008 I Ehnv20;Ficao 06) Ti Nti Oeas Role This in Is It 2006A)

    Arxiv:0804.4630V1 [Astro-Ph] 29 Apr 2008 I Ehnv20;Ficao 06) Ti Nti Oeas Role This in Is It 2006A)

    DRAFT VERSION NOVEMBER 9, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 05/04/06 OPEN CLUSTERS AS GALACTIC DISK TRACERS: I. PROJECT MOTIVATION, CLUSTER MEMBERSHIP AND BULK THREE-DIMENSIONAL KINEMATICS PETER M. FRINCHABOY1,2,3 AND STEVEN R. MAJEWSKI2 Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400325, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4325, USA Draft version November 9, 2018 ABSTRACT We have begun a survey of the chemical and dynamical properties of the Milky Way disk as traced by open star clusters. In this first contribution, the general goals of our survey are outlined and the strengths and limita- tions of using star clusters as a Galactic disk tracer sample are discussed. We also present medium resolution (R 15,0000) spectroscopy of open cluster stars obtained with the Hydra multi-object spectrographs on the Cerro∼ Tololo Inter-American Observatory 4-m and WIYN 3.5-m telescopes. Here we use these data to deter- mine the radial velocities of 3436 stars in the fields of open clusters within about 3 kpc, with specific attention to stars having proper motions in the Tycho-2 catalog. Additional radial velocity members (without Tycho-2 proper motions) that can be used for future studies of these clusters were also identified. The radial velocities, proper motions, and the angular distance of the stars from cluster center are used to derive cluster member- ship probabilities for stars in each cluster field using a non-parametric approach, and the cluster members so-identified are used, in turn, to derive the reliable bulk three-dimensional motion for 66 of 71 targeted open clusters.
  • Winter Constellations

    Winter Constellations

    Winter Constellations *Orion *Canis Major *Monoceros *Canis Minor *Gemini *Auriga *Taurus *Eradinus *Lepus *Monoceros *Cancer *Lynx *Ursa Major *Ursa Minor *Draco *Camelopardalis *Cassiopeia *Cepheus *Andromeda *Perseus *Lacerta *Pegasus *Triangulum *Aries *Pisces *Cetus *Leo (rising) *Hydra (rising) *Canes Venatici (rising) Orion--Myth: Orion, the great ​ ​ hunter. In one myth, Orion boasted he would kill all the wild animals on the earth. But, the earth goddess Gaia, who was the protector of all animals, produced a gigantic scorpion, whose body was so heavily encased that Orion was unable to pierce through the armour, and was himself stung to death. His companion Artemis was greatly saddened and arranged for Orion to be immortalised among the stars. Scorpius, the scorpion, was placed on the opposite side of the sky so that Orion would never be hurt by it again. To this day, Orion is never seen in the sky at the same time as Scorpius. DSO’s ● ***M42 “Orion Nebula” (Neb) with Trapezium A stellar ​ ​ ​ nursery where new stars are being born, perhaps a thousand stars. These are immense clouds of interstellar gas and dust collapse inward to form stars, mainly of ionized hydrogen which gives off the red glow so dominant, and also ionized greenish oxygen gas. The youngest stars may be less than 300,000 years old, even as young as 10,000 years old (compared to the Sun, 4.6 billion years old). 1300 ly. ​ ​ 1 ● *M43--(Neb) “De Marin’s Nebula” The star-forming ​ “comma-shaped” region connected to the Orion Nebula. ● *M78--(Neb) Hard to see. A star-forming region connected to the ​ Orion Nebula.
  • A Spitzer Study of Debris Disks in the Young Nearby Cluster NGC 2232

    A Spitzer Study of Debris Disks in the Young Nearby Cluster NGC 2232

    A Spitzer Study of Debris Disks In The Young Nearby Cluster NGC 2232: Icy Planets Are Common Around ∼ 1.5–3 M⊙ Stars Thayne Currie1, Peter Plavchan2, and Scott J. Kenyon1 [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT We describe Spitzer IRAC and MIPS observations of the nearby 25 Myr- old open cluster NGC 2232. Combining these data with ROSAT All-Sky Survey observations, proper motions, and optical photometry/spectroscopy, we construct a list of highly probable cluster members. We identify 1 A-type star, HD 45435, with definite excess emission at 4.5–24 µm indicative of debris from terrestrial planet formation. We also identify 2–4 late-type stars with possible 8 µm excesses, and 8 early-type stars with definite 24 µm excesses. Constraints on the dust luminosity and temperature suggest that the detected excesses are produced by debris disks. From our sample of B and A stars, stellar rotation appears correlated with 24 µm excess, a result expected if massive primordial disks evolve into massive debris disks. To explore the evolution of the frequency and magnitude of debris around A-type stars, we combine our results with data for other young clusters. The frequency of debris disks around A-type stars appears to increase from ∼ 25% at 5 Myr to ∼ 50–60% at 20–25 Myr. Older A-type stars have smaller debris disk frequencies: ∼ 20% at 50–100 Myr. For these ages, the typical level of debris emission rises from 5–20 Myr and then declines. Because 24 µm dust emission probes icy planet formation around A-type stars, our results suggest that the frequency of icy planet formation is ηi & 0.5–0.6.
  • February 14, 2015 7:00Pm at the Herrett Center for Arts & Science Colleagues, College of Southern Idaho

    February 14, 2015 7:00Pm at the Herrett Center for Arts & Science Colleagues, College of Southern Idaho

    Snake River Skies The Newsletter of the Magic Valley Astronomical Society www.mvastro.org Membership Meeting President’s Message Saturday, February 14, 2015 7:00pm at the Herrett Center for Arts & Science Colleagues, College of Southern Idaho. Public Star Party Follows at the It’s that time of year when obstacles appear in the sky. In particular, this year is Centennial Obs. loaded with fog. It got in the way of letting us see the dance of the Jovian moons late last month, and it’s hindered our views of other unique shows. Still, members Club Officers reported finding enough of a clear sky to let us see Comet Lovejoy, and some great photos by members are popping up on the Facebook page. Robert Mayer, President This month, however, is a great opportunity to see the benefit of something [email protected] getting in the way. Our own Chris Anderson of the Herrett Center has been using 208-312-1203 the Centennial Observatory’s scope to do work on occultation’s, particularly with asteroids. This month’s MVAS meeting on Feb. 14th will give him the stage to Terry Wofford, Vice President show us just how this all works. [email protected] The following weekend may also be the time the weather allows us to resume 208-308-1821 MVAS-only star parties. Feb. 21 is a great window for a possible star party; we’ll announce the location if the weather permits. However, if we don’t get that Gary Leavitt, Secretary window, we’ll fall back on what has become a MVAS tradition: Planetarium night [email protected] at the Herrett Center.
  • Open Clusters in Gaia

    Open Clusters in Gaia

    Sede Amministrativa: Università degli Studi di Padova Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “G. Galilei” Corso di Dottorato di Ricerca in Astronomia Ciclo XXX OPEN CLUSTERS IN GAIA ERA Coordinatore: Ch.mo Prof. Giampaolo Piotto Supervisore: Dr.ssa Antonella Vallenari Dottorando: Francesco Pensabene i Abstract Context. Open clusters (OCs) are optimal tracers of the Milky Way disc. They are observed at every distance from the Galactic center and their ages cover the entire lifespan of the disc. The actual OC census contain more than 3000 objects, but suffers of incom- pleteness out of the solar neighborhood and of large inhomogeneity in the parameter deter- minations present in literature. Both these aspects will be improved by the on-going space mission Gaia . In the next years Gaia will produce the most precise three-dimensional map of the Milky Way by surveying other than 1 billion of stars. For those stars Gaia will provide extremely precise measure- ment of proper motions, parallaxes and brightness. Aims. In this framework we plan to take advantage of the first Gaia data release, while preparing for the coming ones, to: i) move the first steps towards building a homogeneous data base of OCs with the high quality Gaia astrometry and photometry; ii) build, improve and test tools for the analysis of large sample of OCs; iii) use the OCs to explore the prop- erties of the disc in the solar neighborhood. Methods and Data. Using ESO archive data, we analyze the photometry and derive physical parameters, comparing data with synthetic populations and luminosity functions, of three clusters namely NGC 2225, NGC 6134 and NGC 2243.
  • A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In

    A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In

    Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun­ damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short).
  • All Charts 2010.Pdf

    All Charts 2010.Pdf

    The Evening Sky in October 2020 Four planets light up the evening sky most of the month. Jupiter and Mars are the brightest 'stars' in the sky, so the first seen after sunset. Golden Jupiter is northwest of overhead. Orange Mars is low in the eastern sky. As the sky darkens Saturn appears to the right of Jupiter. Mercury is low in the southwest, looking like a lone bright star. It fades into the twilight after the 20th. Of the four, Jupiter and Saturn are the most interesting in telescopes. Even a small telescope shows Jupiter's disk. Larger 'scopes will show the parallel bands in Jupiter's clouds. Jupiter's four big moons are lined up on either side of the planet, swapping positions from night to night. Jupiter is 760 million km from us mid-month. Saturn appears as an oval in a low-powered telescope as the rings and planet merge. Larger telescopes show the rings and Saturn's biggest moon Titan four ring-diameters from the planet. Smaller moons are closer in. Saturn is 1480 million km away. The moon will be near Jupiter and Saturn on the 22nd and 23rd. Mars is at its closest to Earth mid-month, 63 million km away. In a telescope it is a small disk with some dusky markings. Mercury is catching up on us most of the month. It then passes between us and the sun on the 25th and moves into the dawn sky. The Moon will be near Mars on the 3rd, and near Mercury on the 18th.
  • Download This Article in PDF Format

    Download This Article in PDF Format

    A&A 453, 101–119 (2006) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053894 & c ESO 2006 Astrophysics On the difference between nuclear and contraction ages, W. Lyra1,2,3,A.Moitinho4,N.S.vanderBliek1,andJ.Alves5 1 Cerro Tololo Interamerican Observatory, Casilla 603 La Serena, Chile 2 Observatório do Valongo/UFRJ, Ladeira do Pedro Antônio 43, 20080-090 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 3 Department of Astronomy and Space Physics, Uppsala Astronomical Observatory, Box 515, 751 20 Uppsala, Sweden e-mail: [email protected] 4 Observatório Astronómico de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-018 Lisbon, Portugal 5 European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild 2, 85748 Garching, Germany Received 23 July 2005 / Accepted 20 February 2006 ABSTRACT Context. Ages derived from low mass stars still contracting onto the main sequence often differ from ages derived from the high mass ones that have already evolved away from it. Aims. We investigate the general claim of disagreement between these two independent age determinations by presenting UBVRI pho- tometry for the young galactic open clusters NGC 2232, NGC 2516, NGC 2547 and NGC 4755, spanning the age range ∼10–150 Myr Methods. We derived reddenings, distances, and nuclear ages by fitting ZAMS and isochrones to color–magnitudes and color–color di- agrams. To derive contraction ages, we used four different pre-main sequence models, with an empirically calibrated color-temperature relation to match the Pleiades cluster sequence. Results. When exclusively using the V vs. V − I color–magnitude diagram and empirically calibrated isochrones, there is consistency between nuclear and contraction ages for the studied clusters.
  • The Ara Ob1a Association: Stellar Population and Star Formation History

    The Ara Ob1a Association: Stellar Population and Star Formation History

    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. 15497 c ESO 2018 November 7, 2018 The Ara OB1a association Stellar population and star formation history G. Baume1,⋆, G. Carraro2,⋆⋆, F. Comeron3, and G. C. de El´ıa1 1 Facultad de Ciencias Astron´omicas y Geof´ısicas (UNLP), Instituto de Astrof´ısica de La Plata (CONICET, UNLP), Paseo del Bosque s/n, La Plata, Argentina e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] 2 ESO, Alonso de Cordova 3107, Vitacura, Santiago de Chile, Chile e-mail: [email protected] 3 ESO, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2 85748 Garching bei Munchen Germany e-mail: [email protected] Received: June 10, 2010; Accepted: April 26, 2011 ABSTRACT Context. The Ara OB1a association is a nearby complex in the fourth Galactic quadrant where a number of young/embedded star clusters are projected close to more evolved, intermediate age clusters. It is also rich in interstellar matter, and contains evidence of the interplay between massive stars and their surrounding medium, such as the rim HII region NGC 6188. Aims. We provide robust estimates of the fundamental parameters (age and distance) of the two most prominent stellar clusters, NGC 6167 and NGC 6193, that may be used as a basis for studing the star formation history of the region. Methods. The study is based on a photometric optical survey (UBVIHα) of NGC 6167 and NGC 6193 and their nearby field, complemented with public data from 2MASS-VVV, UCAC3, and IRAC-Spitzer in this region. Results. We produce a uniform photometric catalogue and estimate more robustly the fundamental parameters of NGC 6167 and NGC 6193, in addition to the IRAS 16375-4854 source.
  • 198 7Apjs. . .63. .645U the Astrophysical Journal Supplement

    198 7Apjs. . .63. .645U the Astrophysical Journal Supplement

    .645U The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 63:645-660,1987 March © 1987. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. .63. 7ApJS. A CO SURVEY OF THE DARK NEBULAE IN PERSEUS, TAURUS, AND AURIGA 198 H. Ungerechts and P. Thaddeus Goddard Institute for Space Studies and Columbia University Received 1986 February 20; accepted 1986 September 4 ABSTRACT A region of 750 square degrees including the well-known dark nebulae in Perseus, Taurus, and Auriga was surveyed in the 115 GHz, J = l-0 line of CO at an angular resolution of 0?5. The spectral resolution of the survey is 250 kHz, or 0.65 km s-1, and the rms noise per spectrometer channel is 0.14 K. Emission was detected from nearly 50% of the observed positions; most positions with emission are in the Taurus-Auriga dark nebulae, a cloud associated with IC 348 and NGC 1333, and a cloud associated with the California nebula (NGC 1499) and NGC 1579, which overlaps the northern Taurus-Auriga nebulae but is separated from them in velocity. Other objects seen in this survey are several small clouds at Galactic latitude —25° to —35° southwest of the Taurus clouds, and the L1558 and L1551 clouds in the south. The mass of each of the IC 348 and NGC 1499 4 4 clouds is about 5X10 M0, and that of the Taurus-Auriga clouds about 3.5 X10 M0; the total mass of all 5 clouds surveyed is about 2x10 Af0. On a large scale, the rather quiescent Taurus clouds are close to virial equilibrium, but the IC 348 and NGC 1499 clouds are more dynamically active.