<<

Communication and Theater Association of Minnesota Journal

Volume 34 Article 6

January 2007 Rhetorical Strategies of Visual Pleasure in Situation Comedies: 'Friends' and Female Body Image Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky, [email protected]

Jonna Reule Ziniel Southern Illinois University, [email protected]

Follow this and additional works at: https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/ctamj Part of the Broadcast and Video Studies Commons, Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons

Recommended Citation Sellow, D., & Ziniel, J. R. (2007). Rhetorical Strategies of Visual Pleasure in Situation Comedies: 'Friends' and Female Body Image. Communication and Theater Association of Minnesota Journal, 34, 62-77.

This General Interest is brought to you for free and open access by Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication and Theater Association of Minnesota Journal by an authorized editor of Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. Sellnow and Ziniel: Rhetorical Strategies of Visual Pleasure in Situation Comedies: ' 62CTAMJSummer2007

Rhetorical Strategies of Visual Pleasure in Situation Comedies: ‘Friends’ and Female Body Image

Deanna D. Sellnow Jonna Reule Ziniel Professor of Communication Doctoral Candidate [email protected] [email protected] College of Communications and Department of Speech Communication Information Studies Southern Illinois University University of Kentucky Carbondale, IL Lexington, KY

ABSTRACT The visual messages conveyed by and about the female characters on Friends reinforce hegemonic ideals of femininity and an ideal female body image that is excessively thin. Messages of narcissism, , and fetishism draw adolescent female viewers to identify with the images, characteristics, and behaviors of Rachel and Monica as models and to distance themselves from the images, characteristics, and behaviors of Phoebe and “Fat Monica” as anti-models. The messages sometimes overtly and often covertly perpetuate hegemonic stereotypes about women. Messages advocate that the ideal female body image is a sex object, and the most desirable sex objects are excessively thin. Implications from this analysis include: (1) Happiness and success for women are defined and restricted by hegemony. (2) “Beauty” is crucial to a young woman’s happiness and success. (3) “Beautiful women” are excessively thin at all costs, even costs related to physical health and professional achievement. has been part of American culture for decades, particularly for women. This ideology manifests itself, for example, in a plethora of weekly magazines targeted toward womenandadolescentgirls.Infact,studiessuggestthatasmanyas65percentofadultwomen are concerned about being or becoming (Anderson, Eyler, Galuska, Brown, & Brownson,2002).Morealarmingisthefactthatbyage13,80percentofyounggirlsreportboth dissatisfactionwiththeirbodiesandhavingbeenonadiet(Natenshon,1999).Thesestatisticsare particularly disconcerting in light of the surgeon general warning that “35 pecent of normal dieters willbecome obsessive, unhealthy dieters”(“Overweight and,” 2002,pp.89). Unhealthy dieting, also known as disordered eating, includes participating in unsafe diet programs,takingunprovendietproducts,andpursuingunreasonableweightstandards,aswellas the more commonly understood disorders of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa (Dorotik, 2006). Disorderedeatingisespeciallypervasiveamongyoungwomen.Studiesreportthat40– 50percentofcollegewomenaredisorderedeatersandthatthenumberonepreoccupationof highschoolgirlsisweight(Natenshon,1999).Moreover,althoughmalesalsodiet,thepractice

Published by Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato, 2007 1 Communication and Theater Association of Minnesota Journal, Vol. 34, Iss. 1 [2007], Art. 6 CTAMJSummer200763

ofdisorderedeatingissignificantlymoreprevalentamongfemales(Harrison,Taylor,&Marske, 2006).Mostoftheseyoungwomenarenotoverweight,butactuallybelievetheyare“being more health conscious” (NeumarkSztainer & Story, 1998, p. 446). Interestingly, “women’s fitness”aspracticedtodayisbeingtoutedasthe“newestpatriarchalreligion,”withanorexics fillingfitness classes “likeworshippersin achurch” (Valdes,2001,p. 31).At atime when youngwomencouldbeseizingtheopportunityto“createaworldinourimage,”toomanyare concentratinginsteadon“recreatingtheshapeofourthighs”(Chernik,2001,p.110). Anessentialpredispositiontodisorderedeatingisadistortedperceptionofbodyimageas itrelatesto“personalbeliefsaboutthesocialbenefitsandconsequencesof‘thinness’”(Thombs, Mahoney,&McLaughlin,1998,p.107).Manywomenhavecometobelievethatsuccessand empowermentarereservedfortheverythin(Hendricks,2002).Consequently,oneoutofevery twowomenclaimstobedissatisfiedwithherbody(p.109). Thistrendofdisorderedeatingcanhaveseriousconsequencesonyoungwomen.Lackof sufficientnutrients(suchascarbohydrates,fats,andlipids)canleadtoseriouscomplications, including delay in , osteoporosis, infertility, hair loss, anemia, and organic brain syndromes(Becker,Grinspoon,Klibanski,&Herzog,1999),aswellasnumerouspsychological difficulties(e.g.,Cash&Ancis,1997;Derenne&Beresin,2006;Wiseman,Sunday,&Becker, 2005). Although many cultural influences contribute to body image perceptions (including peers,families,schools,andreligiousbeliefs),mediaplayanimportantrole(e.g.,Becker,2004; Camarena,Sarigiani,&Petersen,1997;Groesz,Levine,&Murnen,2001;Harrison&Hefner, 2006;Wiseman,Sunday,&Becker,2005).Mediatedmessagesperpetuatea“cultural‘pressure tobethin’[andset]thestageforthedietingandbodydisparagementthatoftenprecedeaneating disorder”(Becker&Hamburg,1996,p.163).Theinfluentialroleofthemediaisparticularly alarmingforyounggirls.Schlenker,Caron,andHalterman(1998)pointoutthat“is markedbyagirl’slossinconfidenceofherself”and,consequently,sheisparticularlyvulnerable tothemediatedmessagesto“beattractiveatallcosts”(p.147).Thefemaleimagesportrayedas attractiveessentiallybecomerolemodelsfortheseyoungwomen(Groesz,Levine,&Murnen, 2001). Femalesportrayedinthemediaas“attractiverolemodels”areusuallyverythin.Infact, sincethebirthoftelevision,“morethanhalf[ofthefemaletelevisionpersonalities]meetsthe criteria for anorexia nervosa” (Harrison, 2000, p. 143). Moreover, women’s body types as portrayedontelevisionarelessdiversifiedthanmen’sbodytypesandare“notreflectiveofthe generalpopulation”(White,Ginsburg,&Brown,1999,p.391).Televisionpresentsasstandard afemalebodyimagethat’s“nearlyimpossibletoachieve”(Olson,1996,p.11).Thisthinideal isalsocommunicatedcompellingly“byportrayalsoffatnessasanundesirabletrait”(Harrison, 2000,p.121).Sincetheseimagesofidealfemalebeautyaresoclearlyandnarrowlydefined,it follows that ramifications for young female viewers might include loss of selfesteem and loweredperceptionsofselfworth,aswellasdisorderedeatinghabits(Harrison&Hefner,2006).

https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/ctamj/vol34/iss1/6 2 Sellnow and Ziniel: Rhetorical Strategies of Visual Pleasure in Situation Comedies: ' 64CTAMJSummer2007

Interestingly, Becker et al. (1999) examined the effects of satellite television on adolescentgirlsinFiji.Priortotheintroductionofsatellitetelevision,about3percentofthese girlsreportedtohavedieted.Lessthanthreeyearslater,twothirdsreportedtohavedietedand 15percentofthemadmittedvomitingtocontroltheirweight.Althoughtelevisionprogramsdo notactinisolation,theydoplayarolein“bodyimageprocessing”byencouragingadolescent girlsto“endorseathinideal”(Botta,1999,p.35)andare“positivelyrelatedtoeatingdisorder symptomology”(Harrison,2000,p.143). Ifthisisso,thenweconcurwithHendricks(2002)whoarguesthatitiscrucialtoboth deepenandbroadenourunderstandingoftherelationshipbetweentelevisedmessagesandbody image.Shecontendsfurtherthatsuchresearchmustextendbeyondexistingstudiesthatrely “almostsolelyonempiricalevidencetoexplaintheinfluencesoftelevisiononbodyimageand satisfaction” to offer theoretically grounded interpretations as to why and how television programs do so (p. 111). This study seeks to answer her call via a rhetorical analysis of messagesaboutfemalebodyimageportrayedinthepopulartelevisionprogramFriends.Inother words, we seek to deepen intellectual understanding regarding how rhetorical strategies employedintelevisionsitcomslikeFriendscommunicatemessagesaboutfemalebodyimage. Duringthedurationoftheseries, Friends anditsactorswonmorethan20Emmys,a People’sChoiceAwardforBestComedySeriesin2001,andaScreenActor’sGuildAwardfor OutstandingComedySeriesin1996.Moreover,itsprimarytargetaudienceisadolescentgirls andyoungwomen(Olson,1996).Althoughsomesourcesarguethatitstargetaudienceis18to 35yearoldwomen,Neilsonratingsdatareportthatnearly2millionviewersarebetweenthe agesof2and17(ParentsTelevisionCouncil,2004).Finally,twoofthefemaleleads,Courtney CoxandJenniferAnniston,lostnoticeableamountsofweightbythetimetheseriesended. Bandura (1994) contends that social learning occurs vicariously by observing the behaviorsandconsequencesofothers.Adolescentgirlsusemediaasanimportantsourcefor suchsociallearning(Garner,Sterk,&Adams,1998).Theydosobycomparingthemselvesto and identifying with characters. Model and antimodel characters are established by observingeachcharacter’simageandbehaviors,aswellastheapparentconsequencesofthem (Hendricks,2002). As viewersbegintoidentify withthecharacters,they aremorelikelyto accept the messages conveyed as social reality (Rubin, 1993). Since the average American watchesatleastthreehoursoftelevisionperdayandmillionsofadolescentgirlswatchFriends (now rerunning in syndication on many stations at all hours of the day), the potential implicationsoftheprogram’smessagesaboutthinnessbecomemorecompelling.Hence,we soughttoanswerthequestion: RQ: What rhetorical strategies are employed to convey messages about female body image in the show Friends and how? More specifically, we examine the messages expressed by and about the primary female characters using visual pleasure theory groundedinafeministperspective.

Published by Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato, 2007 3 Communication and Theater Association of Minnesota Journal, Vol. 34, Iss. 1 [2007], Art. 6 CTAMJSummer200765

Rhetorical Perspective and Method Wegroundouranalysisinafeministperspectivebecauseitallowsustodeconstructthe takenforgranted ways in which society perceives the world. These takenforgranted beliefs andbehaviorsarerootedinhegemony,whichisperpetuatedthroughanyprocessesthat“support the dominant ideology” by “reproduc[ing] that ideology in cultural institutions and products” (Dow,1990,p.261).Typically,theseprocessesoperateon“‘commonsense’andconventional morality...secur[ing]thedominanceofsomemen(andthesubordinationofwomen)withinthe sex/gendersystem”(Hanke,1990,p.232).Essentially,afeministperspectivehelpsrevealthe ways“genderhasbeenconstructedtodegeneratewomen”(Foss,Foss,&Trapp,1991,p.276). Doingsoprovidesafoundationtoincitechange. One of the ways in which women continue to be oppressed by our social system is throughtelevision.Morespecifically,televisioncontinuestoperpetuatehegemonybylimiting ourperceptionsofbothwomenandmenbypresentingtheminstereotypicalways(e.g.,Davis, 2003; Dow, 1996; Fouts & Burggraf, 2000; Nathanson, Wilson, McGee, & Sebastian, 2002; Stern&Mastro,2004). Weexaminethemessagesaboutfemalebodyimageconveyedin Friendsthroughthe portrayalof“model”and“antimodel”femalecharacters(Bandura,1994).Modelcharactersare rewarded based on their image, characteristics, or behaviors and antimodel characters are chastised,laughedat,orpunishedbasedontheirimage, characteristics,orbehaviors(Barrett, 1986).Assuch,viewersareencouragedtolearnhowthey“oughtto”lookandact(Bandura, 1994). Werelyonvisualpleasuretheorytoexaminethemessagesaboutfemalebodyimage employedinFriendsbecausethenotionofbodyimageisrelateddirectlytovisualperception. Visualpleasuretheorysuggeststhatvisualsymbolsfunctionrhetoricallyastheycommunicate messages of narcissism, voyeurism, and fetishism (Mulvey, 1989). Visual pleasure theory is usefulforthisanalysisbecauseitisolatesspecificmessagesexpressedthroughvisualsymbols withregardtofemalebodyimage.Eachofthefourmainfemalecharacters(Rachel,Monica, Phoebe,and“FatMonica”)isexaminedinitiallyassheperpetuatesorchallengeshegemonyvia narcissism,voyeurism,andfetishismandthentheramificationsofdoingso.1Bydeterminingthe images, characteristics, and behaviors portrayed as “model” and “antimodel,” the analysis revealshowvisualpleasuretheorymayfunctioninsituationcomedieslikeFriendstoreproduce hegemonyand“ideal”femalebodyimage. Narcissism is when an image (or character) draws the viewer to “mirror” him or her. Essentially,narcissists“portrayanimageofwhattheaveragepersonwouldliketobe”(Fromm, 1980, p. 47). Voyeurism is when a character’s behavior is illicit or improper (according to cultural norms) for public display. Voyeurism occurs when models in advertisements “caress eachotherinpassionateembracestosellperfume,provocativelyzipandunziptheirdesigner jeans,andjogacrossbeachesinbathingsuitstosellbeer”(Seeger,1997,p.155).Fetishismis whenanimage(e.g.,acharacterorherbodypart)isportrayedasa“spectacle”tobegazedatas

https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/ctamj/vol34/iss1/6 4 Sellnow and Ziniel: Rhetorical Strategies of Visual Pleasure in Situation Comedies: ' 66CTAMJSummer2007

anobject(Brummett,1994,p.181).Finally,itisimportanttonotethatinstancesofnarcissism, voyeurism,andfetishismdonotoccurinavacuum.Thatis,animageorbehaviordiscussed undertherealmofonecategorymayalsobecodedwithinoneorbothoftheothercategories. Whatisimportantrhetoricallyistheholisticanalysisasnarcissism,voyeurism,andfetishism work together to convey perceptions of each character (and her image, characteristics, and behaviors)as“model”or“antimodel”(basedonconsequences)toviewers. Analysis

TheBest of Friendsvideocollectionservesasarepresentativesampleforthisanalysis. Thetitlesoftheepisodesare:“ThePilot,”“TheOnewithAllthePoker,”“TheOneWhereRoss FindsOut,”“TheOnewiththePromVideo,”“TheOneWhereNoOne’sReady,”“TheOne withtheEmbryos,”and“TheOnewithAlltheThanksgivings.” “The Pilot”

Sincesituationcomediesrelyalmostinvariablyonareiterationofstockcharactertypes andstorylines(Dow,1996,p.37),“ThePilot”servestoestablishthecharacters.Mostofthe actiontakesplaceinthe“CentralPerk”coffeeshop.Rachelisportrayedas“perpetuatingthe valuesofthestatusquo,”whichistypicalofmainstreammedia(Jaggar,1983,p.197).Monica isportrayedasstrivingtodoso,althoughnotalwayssuccessfully.Phoebe,ontheotherhand,is characterized as embracing an oppositional ideology. Viewers are encouraged to laugh at her oppositionalbehavior.Becausetheconsequencesofherchoicesarealmostalwaysnegative,she serves as an “antimodel” for young female viewers (Bandura, 1994). Ultimately, her characterizationreinforceshegemonybyplacingit“withinthesafeconfinesofthejoke”thatis inherentinsituationcomedy(Taylor,1989,p.27). Rachel’sbehaviorinitiallychallengeshegemonywhenviewerslearnshejustlefther fiancé at the altar. This behavior is not what “ideal women” (i.e., who embrace hegemony) woulddo.Likewise,herattireintheopeningcoffeeshopscene(aweddinggown)isgawkedat asinappropriate.Bytheendoftheprogram,however,sheisclearlyportrayedasamodelthat reinforceshegemonicidealsoffemininity.Eventheoppositionalbehaviorofleavingherfiancé atthealtariseventuallyexcused.WhilewatchingtheweddingepisodeofJoni Loves Chachi, sheexclaims“Oh...see...butJonilovedChachi!That’sthedifference!”Viewerslearnthat Racheldoeswanttomarry,butshewantstodosoforlove. Leaving herfiancéisexcused because“idealwomen”wouldonlymarryforlove. ThemessagesRachel’scharactersendswithregardtoattirearealsonoteworthy.After theopeningweddinggownscene,shechangesclothesfivetimesduringthe30minuteprogram. Eachoutfitconsistsoftightjeansorashortskirtwithalowcut,tightfittingblouse,perpetuating thehegemonicidealofmodelwomenasobjectsinvitingviewerstogazeatthemasbeautiful

Published by Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato, 2007 5 Communication and Theater Association of Minnesota Journal, Vol. 34, Iss. 1 [2007], Art. 6 CTAMJSummer200767

spectacles. Rachel is ultimately rewarded for doing so as both Joey and Ross find her so desirablethateachoneaskshertogoonadate. SimilartoRachel,Monicaisshownwearingthreedifferenttrendyoutfits,whichseemto inviteviewerstogazeatherasabeautifulsexobject.Moreover,sheisportrayedasempathetic andcaringassheattemptstocomfortbothRachel(hergoodfriend)andRoss(herbrother).This behavior also seems to establish her as a model. What is perhaps most interesting about Monica,however,isherillicitbehaviors.Duringtheshortdurationoftheprogram,Monicaspits onherdate,participatesinaonenightstand,andtalksaboutsexatwork.Thesebehaviors clearlydonotreinforcehegemony.Shesuffersnegativeconsequencesforherbehavior.Sheis portrayed as unhappy because she is not involved in a romantic relationship. Hence, her behaviorandconsequencesreinforcethestatusquobydemonstratingwhatnottodo.Viewers learnthatevenyoungwomenwhostrivetoembracefeminineidealswithregardtoappearance andempathy,butwhoactlikeMonicaregardingmen,willbemiserablebecausetheywillnotbe abletomaintainalongtermromanticrelationship. Phoebe’s appearance and behavior throughout “The Pilot” challenge hegemony. For example,shetalksopenlyabouthermother’ssuicideandthesuicideofheralbinoroommate. Becausebothdiscussionsmaketheother charactersvisiblyuncomfortable,viewerslearnthat doingsoisinappropriate.Moreover,sheconsistentlybehavesinwaysthatareperceivedas “odd” by the others, cultivating a stronger impression of her as antimodel (Gerbner, Gross, Morgan, & Signorielli, 1994, pp. 1741). For example, she pulls out her own eyelashes, “cleanses”Ross’s“aura,”colorswithcrayonsinthecoffeeshop,andsingslewdsongsabout “love”asa“giantpigeoncrappingonmyheart”atthetopofherlungsinthesubwaystation. UnlikeRachelandMonica,Phoebe’sattirealsochallengeshegemony.Shewearsonlyonedress throughouttheepisode.Shealsowearsherhairintwobraidsorponytails,andwearsabulky necklaceandbulkyearrings.Herattirelooksnothinglikethemodelsinthemagazines adolescentgirlsperuseor,forthatmatter,nothinglikeRachelorMonica. The threefold punishment for Phoebe’s appearance and behavior confirms her as a “feministbuffoon”andantimodelforyoungfemaleviewers(Dow,1996,p.149).First,Rachel andMonicaarenotasintimatewithherastheyarewitheachother.Second,Phoebeisnot portrayed as desirable by the male characters in the show. Third, both her male and female friendsdismissherandherbehaviorasodd.Hence,Phoebefunctionsasthecomicreliefand sacrificed scapegoat who helps preserve the social order through laughter, humiliation, and embarrassment(Duncan,1962,pp.378–89).2 “The One with All the Poker”

This episode focuses on Rachel’s unsuccessful attempts to secure professional employment and, ultimately, on helping her cope with rejection. Ross lusts after Rachel throughouttheepisode.Hence,sheisportrayedasdesirabletomen(model).Itisnotclear whetherherdesirabilityisinspiteof,becauseof,orregardlessofherapparentinabilitytogeta

https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/ctamj/vol34/iss1/6 6 Sellnow and Ziniel: Rhetorical Strategies of Visual Pleasure in Situation Comedies: ' 68CTAMJSummer2007

“real” job. As in “The Pilot,” Rachel wears five different tightfitting outfits with lowcut blousesduringthisepisode.Moreover,shebendsoverseveraltimestopourcoffeeortotake orders, enticing the viewer to gaze at some body part as a sexy spectacle. Ross ogles her throughout,furtheremphasizingherasanobjecttobegazedat.AfterRachelinterviewsfora position at Saks Fifth Avenue—a position she fails to get—she exclaims the interview was “great”becausetheinterviewersaidshehad“greattasteinclothes.”Themessageisclear—how womenlookanddressisimportant,eveniftheycan’tgetajob(Projansky&VandeBerg,2000). Monica is again portrayed as the caretaker, reinforcing hegemony. She wears three differentoutfits,eachofthemtightfittingandsexy.Asin“ThePilot,”sheispunishedwhen she engages in behavior that opposes hegemony. This time, the others taunt her when she becomescompetitivewhileplayingPictionary.ViewerslearnfromMonicathatmodelwomen donotactinaggressiveorcompetitiveways(Dow,1996,pp.146148). Phoebeisagaindepicteddoingthingstheothercharactersperceiveasodd.Forexample, shethrowsawayjacksbecause“theyweren’thappy”and“curses”themoneyshelosesinthe pokergame.Becauseherfriendsperceiveherasodd,(e.g.,sociallyrejected),herappearance andbehaviorsareportrayedasonestobeavoided. “The One Where Ross Finds Out”

In“TheOneWhereRossFindsOut,”RosschoosesRacheltobehisgirlfriendanddrops hiscurrentgirlfriendintheprocess.Rachelisdepictedascaring,loving,andwanting“herman” morethananythingelse.SheisrewardedbywinningRoss’sheartandevenakissfromhimat theend.Shedoesgetdrunkatonepointduringtheepisode,whichmightappeartooppose hegemony.However,sheispunishedfordoingso.First,sheembarrassesherselfwhiledrunk by taking a stranger’s cell phone to call Ross; then by leaving an embarrassing message on Ross’sansweringmachine;and,finally,byregrettingheractionsandsportingahangoverthe nextmorning.Thesesanctionsservetoreinforcehegemonybypurportingthatidealwomendo notgetintoxicated.Interestingly,viewersalsolearnthatRachelessentiallygotdrunkbecause shelovesRossanddidnothavethecouragetotellhimsowhenshewassober.Eventhoughthe behavior itself is antimodel, Rachel’s motive (love) perpetuates hegemony and essentially excusesthebehaviorunderthecircumstances. Monicaisnotromanticallyinvolvedwithamanandisdepressedaboutit.Asaresult, shebecomesobsessedwithherappearanceandengagesinanexcessivedietandexerciseplan. Her desire to be in a relationship with a man and to look good by dieting and exercising perpetuatesthehegemonicmodelforwomentobeattractiveanddesirabletomeninordertobe happy.Moreover,thismarksthefirstblatantmessagethatdesirablewomenarethin.Although herbehaviordoesnotimmediately resultinachievingherromanticdesires,eventuallysheis rewardedwithChandlerasherintimatepartner. Phoebecontinuestoengageinbehaviorsperceivedasoddbytheothers.WhenJoeytells hershehasa“nicerack”anda“greatbutt,”forexample,shereplies,“Really?That’ssosweet.”

Published by Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato, 2007 7 Communication and Theater Association of Minnesota Journal, Vol. 34, Iss. 1 [2007], Art. 6 CTAMJSummer200769

Her reaction visibly stuns Joey and sets off the laugh track. Phoebe’s indifference to Joey’s reaction opposes hegemony and the laugh track encourages viewers who don’t want to be laughedattointerpretherbehaviorasantimodel.Shealsomakesreferencesaboutattemptingto getherdateto“putout”throughouttheshow.Shecomments,“Look,y’know,Idon’tmind takingitslow.Ilikehimalot.Y’knowhe’sreallyinterestingandhe’sreallysweetandwhy won’thegiveitup?”Thesecommentsthatopposehegemonyshockherfriendsandsetoffthe laughtrack,whichsendsamessagethattheyarenotappropriateforyoungwomenwhowantto be popular. Although patriarchy dictates that women should be viewed as sex objects, they shouldnotopenlythanksomeoneforcommentingontheirnicebuttorbreastsnorshouldthey talkabouttheirdatesasunwillingtoengageinsexualactivity. Theattiretrendsofthefirsttwoepisodescontinue.Asinpreviousepisodes,Racheland Monicaeachwearfivedifferenttightfitting,sexyoutfitsportrayingthemassexobjects.Phoebe wearsanoversizedshirtwithatropicalpatternonit,asweaterwithoversizedbuttons,andasilk shirtwithanembroidereddragononit,noneofthemportrayedasfeminineorsexy. Mostimportant,however,isthefactthatweightbecomesacentralissueinthisepisode. AlthoughMonicaisnotoverweight,sheengagesinanobsessivedietandexerciseprograminan attempttogetaboyfriend.Atonepoint,Phoebeactuallycomments,“EverytimeIputonalittle weight,Istarttoquestioneverything.”Towardtheendoftheprogram,Monicaboastsabout how“inshape”sheis.Monicaisnoticeablythinnerthanshewasin“TheOnewithAllthe Poker.”MakingweightatopicofthenarrativeservestoexpandontheworkofMulvey(1989) and Pribram (1988), among others, who claim that female images as spectacles tend to slow downthenarrativeratherthanadvanceit.Thenotionofexcessivelythinwomenasbeautifulis madepoignantnotonlyintheimages,butalsointhenarrativeofthescriptitself. “The One with the Prom Video”

ManymenpursueRachelthroughoutthisepisode,againpromotingherasamodelwith whichadolescentfemaleviewersareleadtoidentify.Likewise,Monicacontinuestobedepicted asresponsibleandcaring.Moreover,whenMonicatriestobefinanciallyindependent,sheends uprelyingonRoss(aman)topayherrentforher,reinforcingthatevenindependentwomen needmentotakecareofthemfinancially(Dow,1996,p.213).Phoeberarelyappears.When she does, her image and behaviors continue to oppose hegemony and result in negative consequencesintermsofhowothersperceiveher.Shedescribeshow“lobstersfallinloveand mateforlife,” again establishingherself asdisconnected from“reality,”basedontheothers’ reactions.Inanotherscene,sheimitatesamaleasshesingstoJoey“Dude,11o’clock,totally hotbabecheckin’youout.Thatwasreallygood,IthinkI’mreadyformypenisnow.”Joeyis visiblystunnedanduncomfortable.Viewerslearnthatdesirablewomenaresexobjectsformen toenjoy,butdesirablewomendonotreducementothesamestatus. Perhapsthemostinterestingdevelopmentwith regardtomessagesaboutfemalebody imageistheintroductionof“FatMonica.”“FatMonica”isactuallyaflashbackofMonicawhen

https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/ctamj/vol34/iss1/6 8 Sellnow and Ziniel: Rhetorical Strategies of Visual Pleasure in Situation Comedies: ' 70CTAMJSummer2007

shewasateenager.Viewersareintroducedtoherviaahighschoolpromvideo.“FatMonica,” whoismuchlargerthanMonica,isportrayedasinsecure,clumsy,andconstantlyhungry.Sheis alsoportrayedasasloppyeaterwhenshegetsmayonnaiseonRachel’spromdress.Sheis clearlyportrayedasunattractiveandundesirablebyherfriendsastheywatchthevideo.Several ofthemmakejokesabout“FatMonica”astheyviewthevideotape.Joeyremarks,forexample, “WhoateMonica?”WeevenhearMonica’sfathersay“HowdoIzoomout?”asheattemptsto getallof“FatMonica”intotheviewfinder.Moreover,“FatMonica’s”promdateisportrayedas an“undesirable”nerd.Viewerslearnthatfatgirlsonlyattractundesirableboysiftheyattract anyatall.HerantimodelstatusisfurtherstrengthenedwhencontrastedwithMonicawhois nowvisiblythinnerthaninpreviousepisodesandisnowalsohappy(Dow,1996,p.147). Attirealsosendssomeinterestingmessagesinthisepisode.Rachelwearsthreesexyand revealing outfits. Thus, she continues to be portrayed as a sex object. Monica also wears mostlytightfittingtopsandjeans,accentuatingherthinnerlook.Moreover,“FatMonica”wears ahugepromdressthatlookslikeitwasmadefromlivingroomdraperies.Thiscontrastinganti modelimagefurtherreinforcesMonica’snew,thinnerlookasideal.Phoebecontinuestowear clothes that oppose hegemony as they are neither sexy nor feminine. Viewers are led to disassociatefrom “Fat Monica”andtoidentifywiththe“new”Monicaasthe“real”Monica (Rubin,1993,pp.98105). “The One Where No One’s Ready”

Thisepisodefocusesonthecharactersastheydressforabanquet.Sincetheprogramis aboutgettingdressed,themostcompellingmessagesrevolvearoundattire. Rachel is depicted as blissfully in love with Ross and wants to “look good for her boyfriend.”Sheactuallymodelssevendifferentoutfitsassheattemptstofindthe“rightlook,” thusestablishingherasthe“fashionqueen”andperpetuatinghegemony. Monica also tries on four different outfits. First, she wears a short skirt and blouse. Then,sheisshownwearingonlyaslip.Next,sheisshownwearingadifferentslip.Finally,she isshowninaveryrevealingandsexyreddress.Assuch,thisthinnerMonicaisportrayedmuch likeRachel—asasexobjecttobegazedat(Mulvey,1989).Monicaisalsoobsessedwithapast love. Throughout the episode, she obsesses about leaving a message on her exboyfriend’s answeringmachineafteragreeingnottocallhim.Theseactionsreinforcethehegemonicideal thatawomanneedsamantobefulfilled. Phoebeistheonlyfemalecharacterdressedandreadyforthebanquetfromthestartof theshow.ShewaitsinthelivingroomwiththemenwhileRachelandMonicarusharound tryingto“getbeautiful.”Phoebeactuallywearsaformfittingdress,whichtheotherstakenote ofasattractive.Justwhenitseemsherattirecouldbecodedasmodel,however,hummusis spilledonher.Ratherthanchangeclothes,PhoebecoversthespotwithaChristmasribbon.The factthatshedoesn’tchangeclothesseveraltimescoupledwiththefactthatshedoesn’tchange clothes when spilled on clearly opposes hegemony. The fact that the others perceive this as

Published by Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato, 2007 9 Communication and Theater Association of Minnesota Journal, Vol. 34, Iss. 1 [2007], Art. 6 CTAMJSummer200771

unusualandthatthelaughtrackencouragesviewerstolaughatherportraysPhoebe’simageand behaviorasanantimodel. Althoughweightissuesarenotcentraltothisepisode,littlecommentsaboutweightare mentionedthroughoutit.Forexample,Rachelcomplainsthatcertainoutfitsmakeherankles “lookfat.”Hence,thenotionofweightanddesirablewomenworryingaboutlookingfatis perpetuatedvialittleasidesthroughouttheepisode,commentsthatmaygounnoticedbyviewers whoarenot“attunedtothesubtleties”ofthem(Dow,1996,p.272). “The One with the Embryos”

ThisepisodecontinuestoportrayRachelandMonicaasmodelsintermsofattireand behavior.Moreover,bothRachelandMonicatalkabouttheirapartmentasa“girl’sapartment” becauseitis“cleanandpurple.”Viewerslearnthatmodelwomenarenotonlydesirabletomen, butalsoaregoodhousekeepers.“FatMonica”ismentionedonceasa“bigfatgoalie,”again reinforcingthatfatwomenareundesirable. The most interesting aspect of this episode, however, is Phoebe as an antimodel. Phoebehasagreedtoimplantherbrotherandsisterinlaw’sembryosinheruterus.Although theotherssayPhoebeisverykind,theyalsosaytheywouldneverdosothemselves.Thisact, combinedwithwhattheothercharactersviewasanoddbehaviorofsittingupsidedownto“let gravitydoitsjob,”addstowhatisportrayedasundesirablebehaviorforyoungwomen.Atone point,PhoebeactuallyengagesinaconversationwiththeembryosinthePetridish.Shetells themto“reallygrabon”oncetheygetinside.AlthoughPhoebe’sdecisionislaudedasaltruistic, itisalsodismissedbytheothersasabnormal.Hence,thisinstanceofvaluingPhoebeforher independent, antihegemonic decision is ultimately placed within the “system’s overall hegemonicdesign”(Cloud,1992,p.313).Asforattire,Phoebewearsajuvenilelookingdressat theoutset,thenahospitalgownandcartoonprintsocksand,finally,thejuvenilelookingdress again.Again,Phoebe’s attire,whichopposeshegemony,isportrayed asbothoddandfunny, reinforcesherasanantimodel. Although weight is not central to the narrative of this episode, Rachel has lost a noticeableamountofweightcomparedto“TheOneWhereNoOne’sReady.”Now,bothshe andMonicaportraymessagesthatidealwomen(e.g.,desirableandpopular)arealsoexcessively thin.Becausebothmodelfemalecharactersarenoticeablythinner,thecultivationeffectpotential becomes more compelling as well (Gerbner et al., 1994). Further, the groceries Rachel buys duringthisepisodeconsistofdietsoda,yogurt,andapples.Modelwomen,itseems,arealso verycarefulaboutwhattheyeatintermsofthenumberofcaloriestheyingest. “The One with All the Thanksgivings”

“TheOnewithAlltheThanksgivings”addsunintelligenttoRachel’scharacteristics.In flashbackscenes,sheisportrayedasbothlackingcommonsenseandbeingverypopular.She

https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/ctamj/vol34/iss1/6 10 Sellnow and Ziniel: Rhetorical Strategies of Visual Pleasure in Situation Comedies: ' 72CTAMJSummer2007

mentions,forinstance,thatshechangedhermajorbecausetherewas“neveranygoodparking bythosebuildings.” Inthevideotapeflashback,“FatMonica”isportrayedasclumsyandlackingselfesteem. Chandler(whoeventuallybecomesthinMonica’sboyfriend)isheardonthevideotapereferring toherasRoss’s“fatsister”andexclaimingthathewouldneverdateher.Wealsohear“Fat Monica’s”parentsmakedemeaningremarksaboutherappearanceandeatinghabits.Inthenext flashbacksceneoneyearlater,shehaslostweightandwearsatightandelegant,lowcutdress. Chandler finds her attractive and desirable, and tells her he loves her. She is now a “good girlfriend” to the same man who said he would never date Ross’s “fat sister” just one year earlier.Thisshiftfrom“FatMonica”to“sexyMonica”underscorestheimportanceofweight forattractive,desirable,andhappywomen. Phoebe continues to say and do things that are perceived as bizarre by the others, reinforcingherasanantimodel.Shewearsapurplelacydressthathasnotbeeninstylesince theearly1980s.Shealsositsonthefloor,whichisnotconsideredladylike,particularlywhen wearingadress.Atonepoint,Rossevenchastisesherforbeing“different”whenhesays“In thislifePhoebe.”Towhichsheresponds“Oh,thislife!Oh,ok.” Weight is again a central issue in this episode. Although Rachel’s weight loss is noticeable,Monica’sweightlossisevenmorepronounced.Whilewearingalowcut,sleeveless blouse,viewers’eyesaredrawntoherpronouncedsternumandverythinarms.Thecontrast between“FatMonica”andthisnew,excessivelythinMonicaisblatant.ThinMonicaasidealis reinforcedwhenChandlerfindsherdesirable.Themessageconveyedisthatoverweightgirls can somehow achieve this very thin look if they try hard enough, a look that is not only unhealthy,but“nearlyimpossible”toattain(Olson,1996,p.11). Conclusions

The messages conveyed by and about the female characters in Friends perpetuate hegemonicstereotypesaboutwomen,includingthenotionthattheidealfemalebodyimageis excessivelythin.Themessagesofnarcissism,voyeurismandfetishismestablishmodelandanti model female characters that reinforce or challenge hegemony based on the consequences of doingso.Essentially,viewerslearnhowthey“oughtto”lookandactbasedontheperceived rewards and punishments of the characters. Ultimately, ideal women perpetuate hegemonic stereotypesintermsofbothimageandbehavior.Idealwomenaresexobjects,andsexobjects areexcessivelythin. RachelandMonica,whotypicallyembodycharacteristicsandbehaviorsthatperpetuate hegemonyandarerewardedaccordingly,areessentiallythemodelswithwhomyoungwoman areledtoidentify.TheyaremorelikelythaneitherPhoebeor“FatMonica”tobeportrayedas attractiveanddesirabletomen;asengagedinlongtermromanticrelationships;and,ultimately, as“normal,”popular,andhappy.Moreover,whenevereitherRachelorMonicadoesengageina behaviorthatchallengeshegemony,sheispunishedfordoingso.Hence,evenidealwomenwill

Published by Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato, 2007 11 Communication and Theater Association of Minnesota Journal, Vol. 34, Iss. 1 [2007], Art. 6 CTAMJSummer200773

suffer the unavoidable “negative consequences of female independence,” thereby reinforcing hegemony(Dow,1996,p.144). Conversely,Phoebeand“FatMonica”usuallyembodycharacteristicsandbehaviorsthat challengehegemonyandarepunishedforthem.Theyarelikelytobeportrayedasunattractive andundesirabletomen,aswellaslaughedatorhumiliated,therebyservingasantimodelsto viewers.AlthoughPhoebeisoftennoticeablyunconcernedandevenunawareoftheperceptions othershaveofher,viewersareencouragedtolaughatherimageandbehaviors.Thus,although hercharacterisusuallyportrayedashappy,sheservesasanantimodeltoviewerswhowantto bepopular.Vulnerable,adolescentfemaleviewersmaybedrawntoidentifywithRacheland Monica who are rewarded for perpetuating hegemony and, at the same time, to distinguish themselvesfromPhoebeand“FatMonica”astheyattempttogain“selfconfidence”bystriving “to be attractive at all costs” (Schlenker et al., 1998, p. 147). This argument becomes particularlycompellinginlightoftheresearchsuggestingthatthemediadramaticallyinfluence the behavior of adolescent girls (e.g., Becker, 2004; Derenne & Beresin, 2006; Groesz et al, 2001;Harrison&Hefner,2006;Wisemanetal.,2005). These conclusions also raise some important implications. For young women, the messagessentonFriendsstressthatbeautyiscrucialtobehappyandsuccessful.Moreover,the notionsofwhatconstitutesbeauty,happiness,andsuccessaredeeplyembeddedinhegemony. More specifically, beautiful women are not only physically attractive to men, but are also excessively thin, sex objects. Finally, happiness and success for women are achieved by engaginginactivitiesthatleadtosecuringalongtermromanticrelationshipwithaman.These messagesaretroublinginthattheymayperpetuatebeliefsthatyoungwomenmustembodythese traitsatallcosts,“evenifitmeansforegoingthedevelopmentof[their]personalandacademic interests”(Schlenkeretal.,1998,p.147). AnotherdisturbingimplicationforyoungwomenstemsfromthefactthatFriendsoffers only one female body image, the excessively thin image, as ideal. Moreover, this narrow definitiondoesnotreflectthegeneralpopulationwho“tendtobespreadmoreevenlyacrossthe spectrumofbodytypes”(Whiteetal.,1999,p.391).Whileectomorphicwomenmightbeable toachievethisimage,endomorphicandmesomorphicwomenareveryunlikelytobeabletodo so.Yet,viewerswatch“FatMonica”achievethisveryoutcomethroughobsessivedietingand exercise. She is essentially transformed into excessively thin, happy, and desirable Monica. Unlessabroaderspectrumofidealfemalebodyimageappearsontelevisionsitcomstargeted towardadolescents,itisfairlysafetoassumethatyoungwomenwillcontinuetobeinfluenced inwaysthatperpetuatedisorderedeatinghabits. Thisanalysisalsogivesrisetoimportantimplicationsforyoungmen.Certainly,men whowatchtheprogrammaybeinfluencedtobelievethatonlyexcessivelythinwomenoughtto beconsideredattractive.Moreimportant,however,isthepossibilitythattheywillbelievethat womenwanttobeandoughttobetreatedassexobjects,aswellassubmissivetoanddependent on men, in order to be happy and successful. If these stereotypical gender roles pervade

https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/ctamj/vol34/iss1/6 12 Sellnow and Ziniel: Rhetorical Strategies of Visual Pleasure in Situation Comedies: ' 74CTAMJSummer2007

televisionsituationcomediesasthenormforhappinessandsuccess,youngmenmightfindit difficulttoacceptorrespectsuccessful,independentwomeninsociety. Certainly,therhetoricalpowerofsuchmessagesaremeanttobehumorousandviewers oughttobe givencreditfor realizingthathumoroften reliesondeprecationandstereotypes. However,repeatingthesamenarrowcovertmessagesaboutwhatconstitutesidealfemalebody image and behaviors across episodes of a particular program or even a genre warrants examination. Somemightdismissthepotentialpowerofthemessagesinprogramslike Friends by contendingthatotherpopularprogramscounteractthem.Whetherornotsuchacontentionis true,webelievethereisvalueinrevealingthenatureofthemessagesperpetuatedonpopular sitcomssuchasFriends astheymightinfluenceyoungwomentobelieveandbehave.Moreover, failingtodosoessentiallygrantssuchprogramsmorepowertopersuadeviewersinsubtleways. Wehopethatthisstudyandotherslikeitencourageindustrygatekeeperstobroadenthe kindsofmessagesportrayedontelevisionasnormalandabnormal,desirableandundesirable, and attractive and unattractive, particularly with regard to hegemony and ideal female body image. Likewise, we hope that educators will find ways to encourage critical analyses and discussionswithstudentsabouttheroleofmediaininfluencingbeliefsandbehaviors.Finally, academicscholarsmustcontinuetoresearch,publish,andpresenttheseresultstofostermore criticalconsumersofentertainmentmedia’spersuasiveroleinsociety.

References

Anderson,L.A.,Eyler,A.A.,Galuska,D.A.,Brown,D.R.,&Brownson,R.C.(2002). Relationshipofsatisfactionwithbodysizeandtryingtoloseweightinanationalsurvey ofoverweightandobesewomenaged40andolder,UnitedStates.Preventative , 35,390396. Bandura,A.(1994).Socialcognitivetheoryofmasscommunication.InJ.Brant&D.Zillman (Eds.),Media effects: Advances in theory and research(pp.6190).Hillsdale:Lawrence Erlbaum. Barrett,H.(1986).Narcissismandrhetoricalmaturity.The Western Journal of Communication, 5,7480. Becker,A.E.(2004).Television,disorderedeatingandyoungwomeninFiji:Negotiatingimage andidentityduringrapidsocialchange.Culture, Medicine and ,28,533559. Becker,A.E.,&Hamburg,P.(1996).Culture,themedia,andeatingdisorders.Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 3, 163167. Becker,A.E.,Grinspoon,S.K.,Klibanski,A.,&Herzog,D.B.(1999).Currentconcepts: Eatingdisorders.The New England Journal of Medicine,340,10921098. Botta,R.A.(1999).Televisionimagesandadolescentgirls’bodyimagedisturbance.Journal of Communication, 49, 2241. Brummett,B.(1994).Rhetoric in popular culture.NewYork:St.Martin’sPress.

Published by Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato, 2007 13 Communication and Theater Association of Minnesota Journal, Vol. 34, Iss. 1 [2007], Art. 6 CTAMJSummer200775

Camarena,P.M.,Sarigiani,P.A.,&Petersen,A.C.(1997).Adolescence,gender,andthe developmentofmentalhealth.InA.Lieblich&R.Josselson(Eds.),The narrative study of lives(pp.182206).ThousandOaks:Sage. Cash,T.F.,&Ancis,J.R.(1997).Genderattitudes,feministidentity,andbodyimagesamong collegewomen.Sex Roles, 36,433–448. Chernik,A.F.(2001).Thebodypolitic.InB.Findlen(Ed.),Listen up: Voices from the next feminist generation (pp.103111).NewYork:SealPress. Cloud,D.L.(1992).Thelimitsofinterpretation:AmbivalenceandthestereotypeinSpencer for Hire. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 9,311324. Davis,S.M.(2003).Sexstereotypesincommercialstargetedtowardchildren:Acontent analysis.Sociological Spectrum, 23, 407424. Derenne,J.L.,&Beresin,E.V.(2006).Bodyimage,mediaandeatingdisorders.Academic Psychiatry, 30,257261. Dorotik,D.(September2006).Disorderedeatingoreatingdisorder?Trail Runner. Retrieved July19,2007,fromhttp://www.trailrunnermag.com/article.php?id=107&cat=1 Dow,B.(1990).Hegemony,feministcriticismandThe Mary Tyler Moore Show.Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7, 261–274. Dow,B.(1996).Prime-time feminism: Television, media culture, and the women’s movement since 1970.Philadelphia:UniversityofPennsylvaniaPress. Duncan,H.D.(1962).Communication and social order.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress. Foss,S.K.,Foss,K.A.,&Trapp,R.(1991).Contemporary perspectives on rhetoric.Prospect Heights:WavelandPress. Fouts,G.,&Burggraf,K.(2000).Televisionsituationcomedies:Femaleweight,malenegative comments,andaudiencereaction.Sex Roles, 42, 925932. Fromm,E.(1980).The greatness and limitations of Freud’s thought.NewYork:Mentor. Garner,A.,Sterk,H.M.,&Adams,S.(1998).Narrativeanalysisofsexualetiquetteinteenage magazines.Journal of Communication, 48,5978. Gerbner,G.,Gross,L.,Morgan,M.,&Signorielli,N.(1994).Growingupwithtelevision:The cultivationperspective.InJ.Bryant&D.Zillman(Eds.),Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp.1741).Hillsdale:LawrenceErlbaumAssociates. Groesz,L.M.,Levine,M.P.,&Murnen,S.K.(2001).Theeffectofexperimentalpresentation ofthinmediaimagesonbodysatisfaction:Ametaanalyticreview.International Journal of Eating Disorders,31,116. Hanke,R.(1990).HegemonicmasculinityinThirtysomething.Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7,231248. Harrison,K.(2000).Thebodyelectric:Thinidealmediaandeatingdisordersinadolescents. Journal of Communication 50,11943. Harrison,K.,&Hefner,V.(2006).Mediaexposure,currentandfuturebodyideals,and disorderedeatingamongpreadolescentgirls:Alongitudinalpanel.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,35,146156.

https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/ctamj/vol34/iss1/6 14 Sellnow and Ziniel: Rhetorical Strategies of Visual Pleasure in Situation Comedies: ' 76CTAMJSummer2007

Harrison,K.,Taylor,L.D.,&Marske,A.L.(2006).Women’sandmen’seatingbehavior followingexposuretoidealbodyimagesandtext.Communication Research, 33,507 529. Hendricks,A.(2002).Examiningtheeffectsofhegemonicdepictionsoffemalebodieson television:Acallfortheoryandprogrammaticresearch.Critical Studies in Media Communication 19,106123. Jaggar,A.M.(1983).Feminist politics and human nature.Totowa:RowmanandAllanheld. Mulvey,L.(1989).Visual and other pleasures.Bloomington:IndianaUniversityPress. Natenshon,A.H.(1999).When your child has an : A step by step workbook for parents and other caregivers. SanFrancisco,CA:JosseyBass. Nathanson,A.I.,Wilson,B.J.,McGee,J.,&Sebastian,M.(2002).Counteractingtheeffectsof femalestereotypesontelevisionviaactivemediation.Journal of Communication, 52, 922937. NeumarkSztainer,D.,&Story,M.(1998).Dietingandbingeeatingamongadolescents:What dotheyreallymean?Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 98,446451. Olson,T.(1996).Imagesofwomen:ShouldweallbelikeKate?Scholastic Update, 128,11. Overweightandobesity:Ataglance.(2003).The Surgeon General’s call to action to prevent and decrease overweight and obesity.RetrievedSeptember3,2003,from http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/topics/obesity/calltoaction/factsheet02.pdf ParentsTelevisionCouncil.(2004).Trend tracking: Happy mother’s day, Rachel Green. RetrievedSeptember29,2004,from http://www.parentstv.org/PTS/publication/trends/2003/050803.asp Pribram,E.D.(Ed.).(1988).Female spectators: Looking at film and television.London:Verso. Projansky,S.,&VandeBerg,L.R.(2000).Sabrinatheteenage...?:Girls,witches,mortals, andthelimitationsofprimetimetelevision.InE.R.Helford(Ed.),Fantasy girls: Gender in the new universe of science fiction and fantasy television (pp.1340). Boulder: Rowman&Littlefield. Rubin,A.M.(1993).Audienceactivityandmediause.Communication Monographs, 60,98 105. Schlenker,J.A.,Caron,S.L.,&Halterman,W.A.(1998).AfeministanalysisofSeventeen magazine:Contentanalysisfrom1945to1995.Sex Roles, 38,135150. Seeger,M.W.(1997).Ethics and organizational communication.Cresskill:HamptonPress. Stern,S.R.,&Mastro,D.E.(2004).Genderportrayalsacrossthelifespan:Acontentanalytic lookatbroadcastcommercials.Mass Communication and Society, 7, 215236. Taylor,E.(1989).Prime-time families: Television culture in postwar America.Berkeley: UniversityofCaliforniaPress. Thombs,D.L.,Mahoney,C.A.,&McLaughlin,M.M.(1998).Expectancies,selfesteem, knowledge,andadolescentweightreductionbehavior.Journal of Nutrition Education 30, 107113. Valdes,A.L.(2001).Ruminationsofafeministfitnessinstructor.InB.Findlen(Ed.),Listen

Published by Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato, 2007 15 Communication and Theater Association of Minnesota Journal, Vol. 34, Iss. 1 [2007], Art. 6 CTAMJSummer200777

up: Voices from the next feminist generation(pp.2532).NewYork:SealPress. White,S.E.,Ginsburg,S.L.,&Brown,N.J.(1999).Diversityofbodytypesinnetwork televisionprogramming:Acontentanalysis.Communication Research Reports, 16,386 392. Wiseman,C.V.,Sunday,S.R.,&Becker,A.E.(2005).Impactofthemediaonadolescentbody image.Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Clinics of North America,14,453471. Endnotes 1Wearedefining“model”asitperpetuateshegemony.Wearenotarguing,however, that“model”is“ideal.”Itisonly“ideal”inthesensethatitreproduceshegemonyandnotinthe sensethatitishowtheworldoughttobe. 2Werealizethatsomeviewersmay,infact,identifywithandwanttobelikePhoebe. Weargue,however,thatthemessagebeingsentviacomicreliefisonethatessentiallyreinforces hegemony.Mostadolescentfemaleviewerswhoaretryingto“fitin”aremorelikelytointerpret Phoebe’scharacterassomeonetheyshouldnotlookoractlikeiftheywanttobepopularand happy.

https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/ctamj/vol34/iss1/6 16