Author Guidelines for 3DTV-CON 2010
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Review About Augmented Reality Tools and Developing a Virtual Reality Application
Academic Journal of Science, CD-ROM. ISSN: 2165-6282 :: 03(02):139–146 (2014) $5(9,(:$%287$8*0(17('5($/,7<722/6$1' '(9(/23,1*$9,578$/5($/,7<$33/,&$7,21%$6('21 ('8&$7,21 0XVWDID8ODVDQG6DID0HUYH7DVFL )LUDW8QLYHULVLW\7XUNH\ Augmented Reality (AR) is a technology that gained popularity in recent years. It is defined as placement of virtual images over real view in real time. There are a lot of desktop applications which are using Augmented Reality. The rapid development of technology and easily portable mobile devices cause the increasing of the development of the applications on the mobile device. The elevation of the device technology leads to the applications and cause the generating of the new tools. There are a lot of AR Tool Kits. They differ in many ways such as used methods, Programming language, Used Operating Systems, etc. Firstly, a developer must find the most effective tool kits between them. This study is more of a guide to developers to find the best AR tool kit choice. The tool kit was examined under three main headings. The Parameters such as advantages, disadvantages, platform, and programming language were compared. In addition to the information is given about usage of them and a Virtual Reality application has developed which is based on Education. .H\ZRUGV Augmented reality, ARToolKit, Computer vision, Image processing. ,QWURGXFWLRQ Augmented reality is basically a snapshot of the real environment with virtual environment applications that are brought together. Basically it can be operated on every device which has a camera display and operation system. -
Augmented Reality & Virtual Reality Is Now a Reality for Enterprises
WHITE PAPER AUGMENTED REALITY & VIRTUAL REALITY IS NOW A REALITY FOR ENTERPRISES- THE FUTURE IS HERE! Abstract Innovation and next-generation technologies have completely changed the way we work, live and possibly even the way we think. AI, Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality (VR), and Blockchain are just some of the technologies that have affected how we consume art, music, movies, and how we communicate, shop, and travel. We are in the midst of a complete digital revolution. This perspective paper illustrates a point of view on the use of mixed reality (MR) in today’s enterprise environment, and covers-- virtual reality and augmented reality, market trends, industry examples, and challenges within organizations that are adopting mixed reality. In short, it sheds light on what the future is expected to look like in the context of enterprise disruption with MR. Introduction Johnny Mnemonic, the Lawnmower Man, Minority Report, the Matrix, Minority Report, the Terminator 2, Ironman… Besides captivating audiences with their Everyone seems to know what VR headsets using special electronic equipment, such as stunning visual effects, these films all have are, and the popularity of Pokémon a helmet with an internal screen or gloves one thing in common - they showcase how Go almost allows omission of a basic fitted with sensors.” VR can digitally recreate MR technologies could be potentially used introduction to AR. Though they are often the environment around you, or give you in the future. used interchangeably, it is essential to clarify the impression you are somewhere entirely that AR and VR are not the same. -
P15083: Virtual Visualization for Anatomy Teaching, Training and Surgery Simulation Applications
P15083: Virtual Visualization for Anatomy Teaching, Training and Surgery Simulation Applications Problem Definition Preamble ● Thank you for attending our review! We are looking for: ● constructive criticisms ● outside perspective Team Member Introduction Member Role Alex Dawson-Elli Team Lead - Biomedical Engineer Nate Burrell Biomedical Engineer Jascha Wilcox Biomedical Engineer Kenny LaMarca Computer Engineer Kevin Alexandre Computer Engineer context context volume rendering stereo visualization technology Background ● Anatomy is inherently a 3D problem ● conventional teaching techniques: ○ book -> 2D ○ dissection -> may discourage some students ● Modern technology is underutilized in the classroom Problem Statement Current State:Students learning anatomy from a textbook, at a low level of excitement, and a low level of exposure to modern imaging modalities Desired State: Students learning in a stereoscopic anatomy visualization environment, with a high level of excitement, and a high level of exposure to modern imaging modalities Project Goals: create a fully virtual stereo anatomy viewer Constraints: budget, pre-designed hardware, must use existing data set Stakeholders ● Project advisor ○ Dr. Christian Linte ● Teachers ○ Instructor of students (grade 6-12) ● Students ○ Our target age group is middle and high school students (grade 6-12) Use Scenario Customer Needs Customer Rqmt. # Importance Description CR1 9 Easy for a teacher to learn CR2 9 Easy for the Student to use CR3 9 Graphical Interface CR4 9 Stereo Viewing System, in 3D -
Exploring How Bi-Directional Augmented Reality Gaze Visualisation Influences Co-Located Symmetric Collaboration
ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 14 June 2021 doi: 10.3389/frvir.2021.697367 Eye See What You See: Exploring How Bi-Directional Augmented Reality Gaze Visualisation Influences Co-Located Symmetric Collaboration Allison Jing*, Kieran May, Gun Lee and Mark Billinghurst Empathic Computing Lab, Australian Research Centre for Interactive and Virtual Environment, STEM, The University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA, Australia Gaze is one of the predominant communication cues and can provide valuable implicit information such as intention or focus when performing collaborative tasks. However, little research has been done on how virtual gaze cues combining spatial and temporal characteristics impact real-life physical tasks during face to face collaboration. In this study, we explore the effect of showing joint gaze interaction in an Augmented Reality (AR) interface by evaluating three bi-directional collaborative (BDC) gaze visualisations with three levels of gaze behaviours. Using three independent tasks, we found that all bi- directional collaborative BDC visualisations are rated significantly better at representing Edited by: joint attention and user intention compared to a non-collaborative (NC) condition, and Parinya Punpongsanon, hence are considered more engaging. The Laser Eye condition, spatially embodied with Osaka University, Japan gaze direction, is perceived significantly more effective as it encourages mutual gaze Reviewed by: awareness with a relatively low mental effort in a less constrained workspace. In addition, Naoya Isoyama, Nara Institute of Science and by offering additional virtual representation that compensates for verbal descriptions and Technology (NAIST), Japan hand pointing, BDC gaze visualisations can encourage more conscious use of gaze cues Thuong Hoang, Deakin University, Australia coupled with deictic references during co-located symmetric collaboration. -
Effects of Control Device and Task Complexity on Performance and Task Shedding During a Robotic Arm Task
Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Psychology Theses & Dissertations Psychology Spring 2019 Effects of Control Device and Task Complexity on Performance and Task Shedding During a Robotic Arm Task Shelby K. Long Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds Part of the Applied Behavior Analysis Commons, Human Factors Psychology Commons, and the Robotics Commons Recommended Citation Long, Shelby K.. "Effects of Control Device and Task Complexity on Performance and Task Shedding During a Robotic Arm Task" (2019). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Psychology, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/yh1y-0016 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/231 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Psychology at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Psychology Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EFFECTS OF CONTROL DEVICE AND TASK COMPLEXITY ON PERFORMANCE AND TASK SHEDDING DURING A ROBOTIC ARM TASK by Shelby K. Long B.S. December 2013, Georgia Institute of Technology A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE PSYCHOLOGY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY May 2019 Approved by: James P. Bliss (Director) Yusuke Yamani (Member) Xiaoxiao Hu (Member) ABSTRACT EFFECTS OF CONTROL DEVICE AND TASK COMPLEXITY ON PERFORMANCE AND TASK SHEDDING DURING A ROBOTIC ARM TASK Shelby K. Long Old Dominion University, 2019 Director: Dr. James P. Bliss The use of robotic arms across domains is increasing, but the relationship between control features and performance is not fully understood. -
Evaluating Performance Benefits of Head Tracking in Modern Video
Evaluating Performance Benefits of Head Tracking in Modern Video Games Arun Kulshreshth Joseph J. LaViola Jr. Department of EECS Department of EECS University of Central Florida University of Central Florida 4000 Central Florida Blvd 4000 Central Florida Blvd Orlando, FL 32816, USA Orlando, FL 32816, USA [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT PlayStation Move, TrackIR 5) that support 3D spatial in- teraction have been implemented and made available to con- We present a study that investigates user performance ben- sumers. Head tracking is one example of an interaction tech- efits of using head tracking in modern video games. We nique, commonly used in the virtual and augmented reality explored four di↵erent carefully chosen commercial games communities [2, 7, 9], that has potential to be a useful ap- with tasks which can potentially benefit from head tracking. proach for controlling certain gaming tasks. Recent work on For each game, quantitative and qualitative measures were head tracking and video games has shown some potential taken to determine if users performed better and learned for this type of gaming interface. For example, Sko et al. faster in the experimental group (with head tracking) than [10] proposed a taxonomy of head gestures for first person in the control group (without head tracking). A game ex- shooter (FPS) games and showed that some of their tech- pertise pre-questionnaire was used to classify participants niques (peering, zooming, iron-sighting and spinning) are into casual and expert categories to analyze a possible im- useful in games. In addition, previous studies [13, 14] have pact on performance di↵erences. -
The Application of Virtual Reality in Engineering Education
applied sciences Review The Application of Virtual Reality in Engineering Education Maged Soliman 1 , Apostolos Pesyridis 2,3, Damon Dalaymani-Zad 1,*, Mohammed Gronfula 2 and Miltiadis Kourmpetis 2 1 College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences, Brunel University London, London UB3 3PH, UK; [email protected] 2 College of Engineering, Alasala University, King Fahad Bin Abdulaziz Rd., Dammam 31483, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (M.G.); [email protected] (M.K.) 3 Metapower Limited, Northwood, London HA6 2NP, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The advancement of VR technology through the increase in its processing power and decrease in its cost and form factor induced the research and market interest away from the gaming industry and towards education and training. In this paper, we argue and present evidence from vast research that VR is an excellent tool in engineering education. Through our review, we deduced that VR has positive cognitive and pedagogical benefits in engineering education, which ultimately improves the students’ understanding of the subjects, performance and grades, and education experience. In addition, the benefits extend to the university/institution in terms of reduced liability, infrastructure, and cost through the use of VR as a replacement to physical laboratories. There are added benefits of equal educational experience for the students with special needs as well as distance learning students who have no access to physical labs. Furthermore, recent reviews identified that VR applications for education currently lack learning theories and objectives integration in their design. -
Leap Motion Controllertm
Leap Motion ControllerTM The world’s leading hand tracking technology The Leap Motion Controller from Ultraleap is an optical hand tracking module that captures the movement of users’ hands and fingers so they can interact naturally with digital content. Small, fast, and accurate, the Leap Motion Controller can be used for productivity applications with Windows computers, integrated into enterprise- grade hardware solutions or displays, or attached to virtual/augmented reality headsets for AR/VR/XR prototyping, research, and development. The controller is capable of tracking hands within a 3D interactive zone that extends up to 60cm (24”) or more, extending from the device in a 120×150° field of view. Leap Motion‘s software is able to discern 27 distinct hand elements, including bones and joints, and track them even when they are obscured by other parts of the hand. With a 120Hz refresh rate and low-latency software, the time between motion and photon falls beneath the human perception threshold1. An accessory component, the VR Developer Mount, allows for easy, reliable, and consistent attachment of the device to virtual reality headsets such as the Oculus Rift and HTC Vive. The Leap Motion App Gallery features 75+ legacy desktop applications and a demo suite for virtual reality. Example applications • Entertainment (location-based VR/AR experiences, arcades, amusement parks) • Healthcare (stroke rehabilitation, training, mirror, medical imaging, lazy eye treatment) • Therapy and Education (anatomic visualizations, hands-on learning) • Personnel training (flight simulators, complex computer systems) • Industrial design and engineering (automotive, assembly lines, facilities management) • Robotics (telepresence, robotic controls, AI-assisted teaching) The Leap Motion Controller features a 120×150° • Global team collaboration field of view and an interactive tracking range of more than 2 feet (60cm). -
Téléprésence, Immersion Et Interactions Pour Le Reconstruction
THÈSE Pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE GRENOBLE Spécialité : Mathématiques et Informatique Arrêté ministériel : 7 août 2006 Présentée par Benjamin PETIT Thèse dirigée par Edmond BOYER et codirigée par Bruno RAFFIN préparée au sein des laboratoires LJK et LIG dans l’école doctorale MSTII Téléprésence, immersion et tel-00584001, version 1 - 7 Apr 2011 tel-00584001, version 1 - 7 interaction pour la reconstruction 3D temps-réel Thèse soutenue publiquement le 21 Février 2011 devant le jury composé de : Mme. Indira, THOUVENIN Enseignant chercheur à l’Université de Technologie de Compiègne, Président Mr. Bruno, ARNALDI Professeur à l’INSA Rennes, Rapporteur Mme. Saida, BOUAKAZ Professeur à l’Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Rapporteur Mr. Edmond, BOYER Directeur de recherche à l’INRIA Grenoble, Membre Mr. Bruno, RAFFIN Chargé de recherche à l’INRIA Grenoble, Membre tel-00584001, version 1 - 7 Apr 2011 Remerciements Je voudrais commencer par remercier Edmond et Bruno pour avoir encadrer ma thèse. Ce fut un plaisir de travailler avec vous. Merci également aux membres de mon jury d’avoir accepté de rapporter cette thèse. Merci pour vos commentaires très constructifs. Pendant ma thèse j’ai eu l’occasion de travailler avec différentes personnes. Ces collaborations ont été très enrichissantes. Je voudrais remercier plus spécifiquement Jean-Denis qui m’a aidé à remettre sur pied la plateforme Grimage, Thomas avec qui j’ai passé de longues heures à développer les applications et démonstrations de ma thèse et enfin Hervé pour son excellent support sur la plateforme Grimage. J’aimerais remercier également Clément et Florian pour m’avoir transmis leur savoir sur la plateforme Grimage, Nicolas et Jean-François pour leur aide technique. -
Design Architecture in Virtual Reality
Design Architecture in Virtual Reality by Anisha Sankar A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Architecture Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2019 © Anisha Sankar 2019 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. - iii - Abstract Architectural representation has newly been introduced to Virtual Real- ity (VR) technology, which provides architects with a medium to show- case unbuilt designs as immersive experiences. Designers can use specialized VR headsets and equipment to provide a client or member of their design team with the illusion of being within the digital space they are presented on screen. This mode of representation is unprec- edented to the architectural field, as VR is able to create the sensation of being encompassed in an environment at full scale, potentially elic- iting a visceral response from users, similar to the response physical architecture produces. While this premise makes the technology highly applicable towards the architectural practice, it might not be the most practical medium to communicate design intent. Since VR’s conception, the primary software to facilitate VR content creation has been geared towards programmers rather than architects. The practicality of inte- grating virtual reality within a traditional architectural design workflow is often overlooked in the discussion surrounding the use of VR to rep- resent design projects. This thesis aims to investigate the practicality of VR as part of a de- sign methodology, through the assessment of efficacy and efficiency, while studying the integration of VR into the architectural workflow. -
Learn More: Windows Mixed Reality Platform + Steamvr
NOT FOR USE IN INDIA FAQ HP REVERB VR HEADSET PROFESSIONAL EDITION, STEAMVR & WINDOWS MIXED REALITY 2 1.0 STEAMVR 3 2.0 HP REVERB VR HEADSET PRO EDITION 6 3.0 WINDOWS MIXED REALITY 7 LEARN MORE: WINDOWS MIXED 4.0 GENERAL VR REALITY PLATFORM + STEAMVR Frequently asked questions about HP’s professional head-mounted display (HMD) - built on the Windows Mixed Reality (WMR) platform - and integration with SteamVR. The HP Reverb Virtual Reality Headset - Professional Edition offers stunning immersive computing with significant ease of setup and use in a cost effective solution. This solution is well suited for Engineering Product Dev and design reviews, AEC (Architecture, Engineering & Construction) reviews, location-based entertainment, and MRO (Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul) training use environments. HIGHLIGHT: Take advantage of the complete Windows 10 Mixed Reality and SteamVR ecosystems. The HP Reverb VR Headset Pro HP Reverb Virtual Reality Headset - Professional Edition is not recommended for children under the age of Edition is built on the Windows IMPORTANT NOTE: 13. All users should read the HP Reverb Virtual Reality Headset - Professional Edition User Guide to reduce the risk of personal Mixed Reality platform. injury, discomfort, property damage, and other potential hazards and for important information related to your health and Integration with SteamVR safety when using the headset. Windows Mixed Reality requires Windows 10 October 2018 Update installed on the workstation requires the Windows Mixed or PC. Features may require software or other 3rd-party applications to provide the described functionality. To minimize the Reality bridge app. possibility of experiencing discomfort using a VR application, ensure that the PC system is equipped with the appropriate graphics and CPU for the VR application. -
Natural Menu Interactions in VR with Leap Motion Masterarbeit
Natural Menu Interactions in VR with Leap Motion Masterarbeit Zur Erlangung des Grades Master of Science (M.Sc.) im Studiengang Informatik vorgelegt von Björn Zeutzheim Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Stefan Müller (Institut für Computervisualistik, AG Computergraphik) Zweitgutachter: Nils Höhner, M.Sc. (Institut für Wissensmedien, IWM) Koblenz, der 6. September 2019 Erklärung Ich versichere, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbständig verfasst und keine anderen als die angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel benutzt habe. Ja Nein Mit der Einstellung dieser Arbeit in die Bibliothek bin ich einverstanden. □ □ . (Ort, Datum) (Unterschrift) Abstract With the appearance of modern virtual reality (VR) headsets on the consumer market, there has been the biggest boom in the history of VR technology. Naturally, this was accompanied by an increasing focus on the problems of current VR hardware. Especially the control in VR has always been a complex topic. One possible solution is the Leap Motion, a hand tracking device that was initially developed for desktop use, but with the last major software update it can be attached to standard VR headsets. This device allows very precise tracking of the user’s hands and fingers and their replication in the virtual world. The aim of this work is to design virtual user interfaces that can be operated with the Leap Motion to provide a natural method of interaction between the user and the VR environment. After that, subject tests are performed to evaluate their performance and compare them to traditional VR controllers. Zusammenfassung Mit dem Erscheinen moderner Virtual Reality (VR) Headsets auf dem Verbrauchermarkt, gab es den bisher größten Aufschwung in der Geschichte der VR Technologie.