Application to the HR~8799 Planets

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Application to the HR~8799 Planets Draft version May 13, 2011 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 2/16/10 MODEL ATMOSPHERES FOR MASSIVE GAS GIANTS WITH THICK CLOUDS: APPLICATION TO THE HR 8799 PLANETS AND PREDICTIONS FOR FUTURE DETECTIONS Nikku Madhusudhan1, Adam Burrows1, & Thayne Currie2 Draft version May 13, 2011 ABSTRACT We have generated an extensive new suite of massive giant planet atmosphere models and used it to obtain fits to photometric data for the planets HR 8799b, c, and d. We consider a wide range of cloudy and cloud-free models. The cloudy models incorporate different geometrical and optical thicknesses, modal particle sizes, and metallicities. For each planet and set of cloud parameters, we explore grids in gravity and effective temperature, with which we determine constraints on the planet's mass and age. Our new models yield statistically significant fits to the data, and conclusively confirm that the HR 8799 planets have much thicker clouds than those required to explain data for typical L and T dwarfs. Both models with 1) physically thick forsterite clouds and a 60-µm modal particle size and 2) clouds made of 1 µm-sized pure iron droplets and 1% supersaturation fit the data. Current data are insufficient to accurately constrain the microscopic cloud properties, such as composition and particle size. The range of best-estimated masses for HR 8799b, HR 8799c, and HR 8799d conservatively span 2{12 MJ , 7{13 MJ , and 3{11 MJ , respectively and imply coeval ages between ∼20 and ∼150 Myr, consistent with previously reported stellar age. The best-fit temperatures and gravities are slightly lower than values obtained by Currie et al. (2011) using even thicker cloud models. Finally, we use these models to predict the near-to-mid IR colors of soon-to-be imaged planets. Our models predict that planet-mass objects follow a locus in some near-to-mid IR color-magnitude diagrams that is clearly separable from the standard L/T dwarf locus for field brown dwarfs. Subject headings: planetary systems | planets and satellites: general | planets and satellites: indi- vidual (HR 8799b, HR 8799c, HR 8799d) 1. INTRODUCTION ever, transit surveys for planet detection are sensitive to Advances in high-contrast imaging have made it pos- small orbital separations much less than an astronomical sible to image young giant planets at wide orbital sep- unit (AU). Consequently, spectra of giant planets at sep- arations around host stars. Major efforts are currently arations analogous to those in the solar system (a ≥ 5 underway targeting progressively higher contrast levels, AU) can be observed only with high-contrast imaging. e.g., GPI (Macintosh et al. 2006), SPHERE (Beuzit et al. Since currently achievable sensitivities can resolve only 2008), Project 1640 (Hinkley et al. 2008,2011), SEEDS systems that are hot, hence likely young, the planets are (Tamura 2009), and NICI (Liu et al. 2010). Current also likely formed in situ at the observed separations, and instruments are capable of detecting contrast ratios in provide valuable probes for models of planet formation. the near infrared down to ∼ 10−5 (Marois et al. 2010), Recent photometric observations of directly imaged leading to a number of planet detections in recent years. planets are increasingly highlighting the need for a new The initial discovery of a giant planet around the low- class of atmospheric models to explain the data. Inter- mass cool dwarf 2M1207 (Chauvin et al. 2004 ) was fol- pretations of current observations are based on tradi- lowed by more recent discoveries of giant planets around tional models that were used to interpret atmospheric massive stellar hosts HR 8799 (Marois et al. 2008,2010), spectra of brown dwarfs (Burrows et al. 2001, 2006; Formalhaut (Kalas et al. 2008), and β Pic (Lagrange Baraffe et al. 2003; Saumon & Marley, 2008). While et al. 2009). Such detections provide the exciting op- giant planets at large orbital distances, and, hence, with portunity of obtaining planetary spectra (Marois et al. low stellar irradiation, could have been expected to have 2008; Lafreniere et al. 2009; Hinz et al. 2010; Janson had similar spectral characteristics to low temperature et al. 2010; Bowler et al. 2010) and characterizing their brown dwarfs, recent observations are proving otherwise atmospheres, in particular their temperature structures, (Marois et al. 2008 & 2010, Bowler et al. 2010, Currie compositions, and gravities. Furthermore, the planetary et al. 2011). radii, masses, and ages can be derived from the atmo- The HR 8799 system (Marois et al. 2008,2010) with spheric parameters (Burrows et al. 2001; Burrows, 2005). four planetary companions at wide orbital separations is Extrasolar planets detected with high-contrast imaging a case in point, epitomizing the difficulty in modeling di- occupy a unique region in orbital phase space. Planetary rectly imaged planets. In the discovery paper, Marois et spectra can also be observed for transiting planets. How- al. (2008) reported six-channel near-infrared photome- try of HR 8799 b, c, and d, and derived effective tem- 1 Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton Uni- peratures (Teff ), masses (M), and radii (Rp) from the versity, Princeton, NJ 08544; [email protected], observed luminosities and an assumed common age of [email protected] the objects, using already published theoretical cooling 2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,Greenbelt, Maryland tracks (Baraffe et al. 2003). On the other hand, deriving 20771; [email protected] 2 the atmospheric parameters from spectral fits to their tween the various model parameters. As anticipated in photometry, instead of cooling tracks, yielded unrealisti- recent literature (Marois et al. 2008, Bowler et al. 2010, cally small radii (see Supplementary Online Material of Currie et al. 2011), the observations of the HR 8799 plan- Marois et al. 2008). This discrepancy was attributed to ets indicate a potentially new class of objects with cloud missing atmospheric physics, including inadequate cloud properties unlike those of any field brown dwarfs known. modeling, suggesting the need for new spectral models. We do not consider the recently discovered fourth com- Several follow-up observations of the HR 8799 system panion HR 8799e (Marois et al. 2010), for which data are have also highlighted the need for new models. Bowler presently inadequate for a detailed atmospheric analysis. et al. (2010) reported spectroscopy of HR 8799b in the We report constraints on the atmospheric properties, 2.12 - 2.23 µm range. While existing models were un- masses, and ages of HR 8799b, c, and d. We use existing able to explain all their observations, the better fits were observations of near-infrared photometry for these ob- obtained with models with thick clouds. Furthermore, jects compiled in Currie et al. (2011). Our best-fit mod- the Teff and Rp they derived from the best fitting spec- els allow us to constrain Teff , log10(g), mass (M), and age tral model were inconsistent with those derived based on (t) for each object. The range of estimated masses for evolutionary models. Hinz et al. (2010) reported pho- HR 8799b, HR 8799c, and HR 8799d conservatively span tometry at 3.3, 3.8, and 4.8 µm, and suggested that mod- 2{12 MJ , 7{13 MJ , and 3{11 MJ , respectively. The best els with non-equilibrium chemistry provided better fits fits for HR 8799b, c, and d yield Teff of ∼850 K, ∼1000 to their data, while noting the differences in fits based K, and ∼900 K, respectively, with log10(g) of 4.3, 4.2, on different model assumptions. Based on VLT spec- and 3.8, respectively. The corresponding estimates of troscopy in the 3.88-4.1 µm range (Janson et al. 2010), the masses are ∼12, ∼11, and ∼6 MJ, respectively, and similar conclusions were drawn for HR 8799c. of the ages are ∼150, ∼65, and ∼20 Myr, indicating that Currie et al. (2011) further explored the HR 8799 plan- they are indeed roughly coeval, if the adopted age of the ets' atmospheres with data from Marois et al.(2008), new star is ∼30-160 Myr. Subaru and VLT data, and re-reduced MMT data first The observations of all the objects can be explained presented in Hinz et al. (2010). Using the model formal- with models involving forsterite clouds, with physically ism of Burrows et al. (2006), they found that standard thick cloud cover, and 60-µm modal grain size. Models L/T dwarf atmosphere models over-predicted the flux without clouds cannot explain the observations for any between 1 and 1.25 µm. They found that \thick cloud" of the objects. The observations are not explained by models, where the cloud density tracks that of the gas canonical model spectra of L and T brown dwarfs (Bur- high in the atmosphere, reproduced the suppressed 1{ rows et al. 2006; Saumon & Marley 2008) at the same 1.25 micron flux and, thus, provided far improved fits Teff , indicating that the present objects might form a to the data. However, they suggested that these mod- new class with thicker (geometrically) clouds than those els may \overcorrect" for the weak cloud coverage in inferred for L and T dwarfs, as also suggested in Cur- the standard models, as their preliminary `partly cloudy' rie et al. (2011). The recent inference of clouds in the models fit the data better. They also acknowledged that late T Dwarf Ross 458C (Burgasser et al. 2010) suggests their grid sampling was too coarse to precisely deter- that this object may be related. While the requirement mine best-fit surface gravities and effective temperatures of clouds at altitude is stringent, the cloud composition from the data. Thus, further refinements of the \thick and particle sizes are less constrained by the data, as is cloud" formalism with a new, expansive, set of atmo- the gas-phase metallicity.
Recommended publications
  • GEMINI PLANET IMAGER SPECTROSCOPY of the HR 8799 PLANETS C and D
    The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 794:L15 (5pp), 2014 October 10 doi:10.1088/2041-8205/794/1/L15 C 2014. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. GEMINI PLANET IMAGER SPECTROSCOPY OF THE HR 8799 PLANETS c AND d Patrick Ingraham1, Mark S. Marley2, Didier Saumon3, Christian Marois4, Bruce Macintosh1, Travis Barman5, Brian Bauman6, Adam Burrows7, Jeffrey K. Chilcote8, Robert J. De Rosa9,10, Daren Dillon11,Rene´ Doyon12, Jennifer Dunn4, Darren Erikson4, Michael P. Fitzgerald8, Donald Gavel11, Stephen J. Goodsell13, James R. Graham14, Markus Hartung13, Pascale Hibon13, Paul G. Kalas14, Quinn Konopacky15, James A. Larkin8, Jer´ omeˆ Maire15, Franck Marchis16, James McBride14, Max Millar-Blanchaer15, Katie M. Morzinski17,24, Andrew Norton11, Rebecca Oppenheimer18, Dave W. Palmer6, Jenny Patience9, Marshall D. Perrin19, Lisa A. Poyneer6, Laurent Pueyo19, Fredrik Rantakyro¨ 13, Naru Sadakuni13, Leslie Saddlemyer4, Dmitry Savransky20,Remi´ Soummer19, Anand Sivaramakrishnan19, Inseok Song21, Sandrine Thomas2,22, J. Kent Wallace23, Sloane J. Wiktorowicz11, and Schuyler G. Wolff19 1 Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 2 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 3 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA 4 NRC Herzberg Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, Canada 5 Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0092, USA 6 Lawrence Livermore National Lab,
    [Show full text]
  • Coronagraphic Imaging of Debris Disks from a High Altitude Balloon Platform
    Coronagraphic Imaging of Debris Disks From a High Altitude Balloon Platform Stephen Unwin >", Wesley 'Traub", Geoffrey Bryden", Paul Brugarolasa , Pin Chen", Olivier Guyonb, Lynne Hillenbrandc, John Krist", Bruce ~facintoshd , Dimitri 1Ifawete, Bertrand Mennesson", Dwight Moody", Lewis C. Roberts Jr.", Karl Stapelfeldt!, David Stuchlik9, John 'Traugera , and Gautam Vasisht" "Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109 bNational Observatory of Japan, 650 N. A'ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720 cCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 dLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550 eEuropean Southern Observatory, Alonso de Cordova 3107, Vitacura, Casilla 19001, Santiago de Chile 19, Chile fNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 9NASA Wallops Flight Facility, Wallops Island, VA 23337 ABSTRACT Debris disks around nearby stars are tracers of the planet formation process, and they are a key element of our understanding of the, formation and evolution of extrasolar planeta.ry systems. With multi-color images of a. significant number of disks, we can probe important questions: ca.'1. we learn about planetary system evolution; whflt materials are the disks made of; and can they reveal the presence of planets? :Most disks are known to exist only through their infrared flux excesses as measured by the Spitzer Space Telescope, and through images mesaured by Herschel. The brightest, most exte::tded disks have been imaged with HST, and a few, such as Fomalhaut, can be observed using ground-based telescopes. But the number of good images is still very small, and there are none of disks with densitips as low as the disk associated with the asteroid belt and Edgeworth­ Kuiper belt in our own Solar System.
    [Show full text]
  • The LEECH Exoplanet Imaging Survey. Further Constraints on the Planet Architecture of the HR 8799 System?
    A&A 576, A133 (2015) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425185 & c ESO 2015 Astrophysics The LEECH Exoplanet Imaging Survey. Further constraints on the planet architecture of the HR 8799 system? A.-L. Maire1, A. J. Skemer2;??, P. M. Hinz2, S. Desidera1, S. Esposito3, R. Gratton1, F. Marzari4, M. F. Skrutskie5, B. A. Biller6;7, D. Defrère2, V. P. Bailey2, J. M. Leisenring2, D. Apai2, M. Bonnefoy8;9;7, W. Brandner7, E. Buenzli7, R. U. Claudi1, L. M. Close2, J. R. Crepp10, R. J. De Rosa11;12, J. A. Eisner2, J. J. Fortney13, T. Henning7, K.-H. Hofmann14, T. G. Kopytova7;15, J. R. Males2;???, D. Mesa1, K. M. Morzinski2;???, A. Oza5, J. Patience11, E. Pinna3, A. Rajan11, D. Schertl14, J. E. Schlieder7;16;????, K. Y. L. Su2, A. Vaz2, K. Ward-Duong11, G. Weigelt14, and C. E. Woodward17 1 INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, Italy e-mail: [email protected] 2 Steward Observatory, Department of Astronomy, University of Arizona, 993 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA 3 INAF–Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo E. Fermi 5, 50125 Firenze, Italy 4 Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Universitá di Padova, via F. Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, Italy 5 Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA 6 Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK 7 Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany 8 Université Grenoble Alpes, IPAG, 38000 Grenoble, France 9 CNRS, IPAG, 38000 Grenoble, France
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Imaging of Exoplanets
    Direct Imaging of Exoplanets Wesley A. Traub Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Ben R. Oppenheimer American Museum of Natural History A direct image of an exoplanet system is a snapshot of the planets and disk around a central star. We can estimate the orbit of a planet from a time series of images, and we can estimate the size, temperature, clouds, atmospheric gases, surface properties, rotation rate, and likelihood of life on a planet from its photometry, colors, and spectra in the visible and infrared. The exoplanets around stars in the solar neighborhood are expected to be bright enough for us to characterize them with direct imaging; however, they are much fainter than their parent star, and separated by very small angles, so conventional imaging techniques are totally inadequate, and new methods are needed. A direct-imaging instrument for exoplanets must (1) suppress the bright star’s image and diffraction pattern, and (2) suppress the star’s scattered light from imperfections in the telescope. This chapter shows how exoplanets can be imaged by controlling diffraction with a coronagraph or interferometer, and controlling scattered light with deformable mirrors. 1. INTRODUCTION fainter than its star, and separated by 12.7 arcsec (98 AU at 7.7 pc distance). It was detected at two epochs, clearly showing The first direct images of exoplanets were published in common motion as well as orbital motion (see inset). 2008, fully 12 years after exoplanets were discovered, and Figure 2 shows a near-infrared composite image of exo- after more than 300 of them had been measured indirectly planets HR 8799 b,c,d by Marois et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Enrichment of the HR 8799 Planets by Minor Bodies and Dust Frantseva, K.; Mueller, M.; Pokorný, P.; Van Der Tak, F
    University of Groningen Enrichment of the HR 8799 planets by minor bodies and dust Frantseva, K.; Mueller, M.; Pokorný, P.; van der Tak, F. F. S.; ten Kate, I. L. Published in: Astronomy and astrophysics DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936783 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2020 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Frantseva, K., Mueller, M., Pokorný, P., van der Tak, F. F. S., & ten Kate, I. L. (2020). Enrichment of the HR 8799 planets by minor bodies and dust. Astronomy and astrophysics, 638, [A50]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936783 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Imaging of Exoplanets
    Direct Imaging of Exoplanets Techniques & Results Challenge 1: Large ratio between star and planet flux (Star/Planet) Reflected light from Jupiter ≈ 10–9 Stars are a billion times brighter… …than the planet …hidden in the glare. Challenge 2: Close proximity of planet to host star Direct Detections need contrast ratios of 10–9 to 10–10 At separations of 0.01 to 1 arcseconds Earth : ~10–10 separation = 0.1 arcseconds for a star at 10 parsecs Jupiter: ~10–9 separation = 0.5 arcseconds for a star at 10 parsecs 1 AU = 1 arcsec separation at 1 parsec Younger planets are hotter and they emit more radiated light. These are easier to detect. Adaptive Optics : An important component for any imaging instrument Atmospheric turbulence distorts stellar images making them much larger than point sources. This seeing image makes it impossible to detect nearby faint companions. Adaptive Optics (AO) The scientific and engineering discipline whereby the performance of an optical signal is improved by using information about the environment through which it passes AO Deals with the control of light in a real time closed loop and is a subset of active optics. Adaptive Optics: Systems operating below 1/10 Hz Active Optics: Systems operating above 1/10 Hz Example of an Adaptive Optics System: The Eye-Brain The brain interprets an image, determines its correction, and applies the correction either voluntarily of involuntarily Lens compression: Focus corrected mode Tracking an Object: Tilt mode optics system Iris opening and closing to intensity levels: Intensity control mode Eyes squinting: An aperture stop, spatial filter, and phase controlling mechanism The Ideal Telescope image of a star produced by ideal telescope where: • P(α) is the light intensity in the focal plane, as a function of angular coordinates α ; • λ is the wavelength of light; • D is the diameter of the telescope aperture; • J1 is the so-called Bessel function.
    [Show full text]
  • GEMINI PLANET IMAGER SPECTROSCOPY of the HR 8799 PLANETS C and D
    The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 794:L15 (5pp), 2014 October 10 doi:10.1088/2041-8205/794/1/L15 C 2014. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. GEMINI PLANET IMAGER SPECTROSCOPY OF THE HR 8799 PLANETS c AND d Patrick Ingraham1, Mark S. Marley2, Didier Saumon3, Christian Marois4, Bruce Macintosh1, Travis Barman5, Brian Bauman6, Adam Burrows7, Jeffrey K. Chilcote8, Robert J. De Rosa9,10, Daren Dillon11,Rene´ Doyon12, Jennifer Dunn4, Darren Erikson4, Michael P. Fitzgerald8, Donald Gavel11, Stephen J. Goodsell13, James R. Graham14, Markus Hartung13, Pascale Hibon13, Paul G. Kalas14, Quinn Konopacky15, James A. Larkin8, Jer´ omeˆ Maire15, Franck Marchis16, James McBride14, Max Millar-Blanchaer15, Katie M. Morzinski17,24, Andrew Norton11, Rebecca Oppenheimer18, Dave W. Palmer6, Jenny Patience9, Marshall D. Perrin19, Lisa A. Poyneer6, Laurent Pueyo19, Fredrik Rantakyro¨ 13, Naru Sadakuni13, Leslie Saddlemyer4, Dmitry Savransky20,Remi´ Soummer19, Anand Sivaramakrishnan19, Inseok Song21, Sandrine Thomas2,22, J. Kent Wallace23, Sloane J. Wiktorowicz11, and Schuyler G. Wolff19 1 Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 2 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 3 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA 4 NRC Herzberg Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, Canada 5 Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0092, USA 6 Lawrence Livermore National Lab,
    [Show full text]
  • Exoplanet Characterization and the Search for Life
    Exoplanet Characterization and the Search for Life James Kasting, Penn State (lead author) Wesley A. Traub, JPL (co‐author) Aki Roberge, GSFC Alain Leger, France Alan Schwartz, Netherlands Alyn Wooten, NRAO Amir Vosteen, Netherlands Amy Lo, NGST Andre Brack, France Angelle Tanner, NExScI/JPL Athena Coustenis, France Benjamin Lane, Draper Ben R. Oppenheimer, AMNH Bertrand Mennesson, Franc e Bruno Lopez, France Carl Grillmair, IPAC Charles Beichman, NExScI/J P L Charles Cockell, UK Charles Hanot, Belgium Chris McCarthy, SFSU Chris Stark, U. Maryland Christian Marois, Canada Claude Aime, France D. Angerhausen, Germany David Montes, Spain David Wilner, CfA Denis Defrere, Belgium Denis Mourard, France Dimitri Mawet, JPL Douglas Lin, UCSC Edwin Kite, UC Berkeley Eric Chassefiere, France Fabien Malbet, Caltech/CNRS Feng Tian, U. Colorad Frances Westall, o France Garth Illingworth, UCSC Gautam Vasisht, JPL Gene Serabyn, JPL Geoff Marcy, UC Berkeley Geoffrey Bryden, JPL Glenn White, UK Gregory Laughlin, UC Guillermo Torres, CfA Heidi B. HO Lick ammel, SSI Henry C. Ferguson, STScI Hiroshi Shibai, Japan H. Röttgering, Netherlands Jean Surdej, Belgium Jennifer Wiseman, GSFC Jian Ge, U. Florida John Bally, U. Colorad John Krist, JPL John Monnier, U. Mo ichigan John T. Trauger, JPL Jonti Horner, UK Joseph Catanzarite, JPL Joe Harrington, UCF Jun Nishikawa, Japan Karl Stapelfeldt, JPL Kaspar von Braun, IPAC Katia Biazzo Italy Kenneth Carpenter, GSFC K. Balasubramanian, JPL Lisa Kaltenegger, CfA Marc Postman, STScI Marco Spaans, Netherlands Margaret Turnbull, GSI Marie Levine, JPL Mark Burchell, UK Mark Ealey, NGST Mark J. Kuchner, GSFC Mark S. Marley, ARC Martin Dominik, UK Matt Mountain, STScI Matthew Kenworthy, U.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of a Probable 4 − 5 Jupiter-Mass Exoplanet to HD 95086 by Direct-Imaging
    Discovery of a probable 4 − 5 Jupiter-mass exoplanet to HD 95086 by direct-imaging J. Rameau1, G. Chauvin1, A.-M. Lagrange1, A. Boccaletti2, S. P. Quanz3, M. Bonnefoy4, J. H. Girard 5, P. Delorme1, S. Desidera6, H. Klahr4, C. Mordasini 4, C. Dumas5, M. Bonavita6, T. Meshkat7, V. Bailey8, and M. Kenworthy7 ABSTRACT Direct imaging has just started the inventory of the population of gas giant planets on wide- orbits around young stars in the solar neighborhood. Following this approach, we carried out a deep imaging survey in the near-infrared using VLT/NaCo to search for substellar companions. We report here the discovery in L ' (3:8 µm) images of a probable companion orbiting at 56 AU the young (10 − 17 Myr), dusty, and early-type (A8) star HD 95086. This discovery is based on observations with more than a year-time-lapse. Our first epoch clearly revealed the source at ' 10 σ while our second epoch lacked good observing conditions hence yielding a ' 3 σ detection. Various tests were thus made to rule out possible artifacts. This recovery is consistent with the signal at the first epoch but requires cleaner confirmation. Nevertheless, our astrometric precision suggests the companion to be comoving with the star, with a 3 σ confidence level. The planetary nature of the source is reinforced by a non-detection in Ks-band (2:18 µm) images according to its possible extremely red Ks - L ' color. Conversely, background contamination is rejected with good confidence level. The luminosity yields a predicted mass of about 4 − 5 MJup (at 10 − 17 Myr) using "hot-start" evolutionary models, making HD 95086 b the exoplanet with the lowest mass ever imaged around a star.
    [Show full text]
  • 230Th AAS Session Table of Contents
    230th AAS Austin, TX – June, 2017 Meeting Abstracts Session Table of Contents 100 – Welcome Address by AAS President Christine Jones (Harvard-Smithsonian, CfA) 101 – Kavli Foundation Lecture: Dark Matter in the Universe, Katherine Freese (University of Michigan) 102 – Extrasolar Planets: Detection and Future Prospects 103 – Instrumentation, and Things to do with Instrumentation: From the Ground 104 – Topics in Astrostatistics 105 – Inner Solar Systems: Planet Compositions as Tracers of Formation Location 106 – Annie Jump Cannon Award: Origins of Inner Solar Systems, Rebekah Dawson (Penn State University) 108 – Astronomy Education: Research, Practice, and Outreach Across the Human Continuum 109 – Bridging Laboratory & Astrophysics: Atomic Physics 110 – Preparing for JWST Observations: Insights from First Light and Assembly of Galaxies GTO Programs I 111 – Inner Solar Systems: Super-Earth Orbital Properties: Nature vs. Nurture 112 – Plenary Talk: The Universe's Most Extreme Star-forming Galaxies, Caitlin Casey (University of Texas, Austin) 113 – Plenary Talk: Science Highlights from SOFIA, Erick Young (USRA) 114 – Preparing for JWST Observations Poster Session 115 – Astronomy Education: Research, Practice, and Outreach Across the Human Continuum Poster Session 116 – Societal Matters Poster Session 117 – Instrumentation Poster Session 118 – Extrasolar Planets Poster Session 119 – The Solar System Poster Session 200 – LAD Plenary Talk: The Rosetta Mission to Comet 67P/ Churyumov-Gerasimenko, Bonnie Buratti (JPL) 201 –
    [Show full text]
  • VLT/NACO Astrometry of the HR 8799 Planetary System⋆
    A&A 528, A134 (2011) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116493 & c ESO 2011 Astrophysics VLT/NACO astrometry of the HR 8799 planetary system L-band observations of the three outer planets C. Bergfors1,, W. Brandner1, M. Janson2,R.Köhler1,3, and T. Henning1 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 University of Toronto, Dept. of Astronomy, 50 St George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3H8, Canada 3 Landessternwarte, Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg, Königstuhl, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Recieved 10 January 2011 / Accepted 16 February 2011 ABSTRACT Context. HR 8799 is so far the only directly imaged multiple exoplanet system. The orbital configuration would, if better known, provide valuable insight into the formation and dynamical evolution of wide-orbit planetary systems. Aims. We present data which add to the astrometric monitoring of the planets HR 8799 b, c and d. We investigate how well the two simple cases of (i) a circular orbit and (ii) a face-on orbit fit the astrometric data for HR 8799 d over a total time baseline of ∼2 years. Methods. The HR 8799 planetary system was observed in L-band with NACO at VLT. Results. The results indicate that the orbit of HR 8799 d is inclined with respect to our line of sight, and suggest that the orbit is slightly eccentric or non-coplanar with the outer planets and debris disk. Key words. planetary systems – stars: individual: HR 8799 1. Introduction masses 7–10 MJ at projected separations 14.5, 24, 38 and 68 AU from the central star.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectrum of Young Extrasolar Planet Yields Surprising Results 1 September 2010
    Spectrum of young extrasolar planet yields surprising results 1 September 2010 image planets around other stars, but we can begin to study the properties of their atmospheres in detail. Direct spectroscopy of exoplanets is the future of this field,” said Mr. Brendan Bowler, a graduate student at the University of Hawaii and the lead author of the study. The planet, known as HR 8799 b, is one of three gas-giant planets orbiting the star HR 8799, located 130 light-years away from Earth in the constellation Pegasus. (For reference, the distance to the nearest nighttime star from Earth is about four light- years.) HR 8799 b is the lowest-mass planet around the star, about seven times the mass of Jupiter. This multiplanet system was discovered by direct imaging in 2008, and now, only a year and a Keck II image of the young extrasolar planet HR 8799 b, half later, astronomers have obtained a spectrum of seen as the point source in center of image. The bright light from the parent star HR 8799 is seen in background one of its planets. The spectrum of a planet in yellow/red and has been removed in an annular region contains much more information than a single centered on the planet. Credit: Brendan Bowler and image: it can reveal the temperature, chemical Michael Liu, IfA/Hawaii composition, and cloud properties of the planet. The technique the team used to determine the planet’s temperature relies on the chemistry of the (PhysOrg.com) -- Astronomers at the University of planet’s atmosphere.
    [Show full text]