1 Bruna Contro1,*, Rob Wittenmyer1,2,3, Jonti Horner2,3
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
High Precision Photometry of Transiting Exoplanets
McNair Scholars Research Journal Volume 3 Article 3 2016 High Precision Photometry of Transiting Exoplanets Maurice Wilson Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University and Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Jason Eastman Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics John Johnson Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/mcnair Recommended Citation Wilson, Maurice; Eastman, Jason; and Johnson, John (2016) "High Precision Photometry of Transiting Exoplanets," McNair Scholars Research Journal: Vol. 3 , Article 3. Available at: https://commons.erau.edu/mcnair/vol3/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in McNair Scholars Research Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wilson et al.: High Precision Photometry of Transiting Exoplanets High Precision Photometry of Transiting Exoplanets Maurice Wilson1,2, Jason Eastman2, and John Johnson2 1Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University 2Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics In order to increase the rate of finding, confirming, and characterizing Earth-like exoplanets, the MINiature Exoplanet Radial Velocity Array (MINERVA) was recently built with the purpose of obtaining the spectroscopic and photometric precision necessary for these tasks. Achieving the satisfactory photometric precision is the primary focus of this work. This is done with the four telescopes of MINERVA and the defocusing technique. The satisfactory photometric precision derives from the defocusing technique. The use of MINERVA’s four telescopes benefits the relative photometry that must be conducted. Typically, it is difficult to find satisfactory comparison stars within a telescope’s field of view when the primary target is very bright. -
Where Are the Distant Worlds? Star Maps
W here Are the Distant Worlds? Star Maps Abo ut the Activity Whe re are the distant worlds in the night sky? Use a star map to find constellations and to identify stars with extrasolar planets. (Northern Hemisphere only, naked eye) Topics Covered • How to find Constellations • Where we have found planets around other stars Participants Adults, teens, families with children 8 years and up If a school/youth group, 10 years and older 1 to 4 participants per map Materials Needed Location and Timing • Current month's Star Map for the Use this activity at a star party on a public (included) dark, clear night. Timing depends only • At least one set Planetary on how long you want to observe. Postcards with Key (included) • A small (red) flashlight • (Optional) Print list of Visible Stars with Planets (included) Included in This Packet Page Detailed Activity Description 2 Helpful Hints 4 Background Information 5 Planetary Postcards 7 Key Planetary Postcards 9 Star Maps 20 Visible Stars With Planets 33 © 2008 Astronomical Society of the Pacific www.astrosociety.org Copies for educational purposes are permitted. Additional astronomy activities can be found here: http://nightsky.jpl.nasa.gov Detailed Activity Description Leader’s Role Participants’ Roles (Anticipated) Introduction: To Ask: Who has heard that scientists have found planets around stars other than our own Sun? How many of these stars might you think have been found? Anyone ever see a star that has planets around it? (our own Sun, some may know of other stars) We can’t see the planets around other stars, but we can see the star. -
Naming the Extrasolar Planets
Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named. -
Winter Observing Notes
Wynyard Planetarium & Observatory Winter Observing Notes Wynyard Planetarium & Observatory PUBLIC OBSERVING – Winter Tour of the Sky with the Naked Eye NGC 457 CASSIOPEIA eta Cas Look for Notice how the constellations 5 the ‘W’ swing around Polaris during shape the night Is Dubhe yellowish compared 2 Polaris to Merak? Dubhe 3 Merak URSA MINOR Kochab 1 Is Kochab orange Pherkad compared to Polaris? THE PLOUGH 4 Mizar Alcor Figure 1: Sketch of the northern sky in winter. North 1. On leaving the planetarium, turn around and look northwards over the roof of the building. To your right is a group of stars like the outline of a saucepan standing up on it’s handle. This is the Plough (also called the Big Dipper) and is part of the constellation Ursa Major, the Great Bear. The top two stars are called the Pointers. Check with binoculars. Not all stars are white. The colour shows that Dubhe is cooler than Merak in the same way that red-hot is cooler than white-hot. 2. Use the Pointers to guide you to the left, to the next bright star. This is Polaris, the Pole (or North) Star. Note that it is not the brightest star in the sky, a common misconception. Below and to the right are two prominent but fainter stars. These are Kochab and Pherkad, the Guardians of the Pole. Look carefully and you will notice that Kochab is slightly orange when compared to Polaris. Check with binoculars. © Rob Peeling, CaDAS, 2007 version 2.0 Wynyard Planetarium & Observatory PUBLIC OBSERVING – Winter Polaris, Kochab and Pherkad mark the constellation Ursa Minor, the Little Bear. -
Arxiv:1904.05358V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 10 Apr 2019
Draft version April 12, 2019 Typeset using LATEX default style in AASTeX62 The Gemini Planet Imager Exoplanet Survey: Giant Planet and Brown Dwarf Demographics From 10{100 AU Eric L. Nielsen,1 Robert J. De Rosa,1 Bruce Macintosh,1 Jason J. Wang,2, 3, ∗ Jean-Baptiste Ruffio,1 Eugene Chiang,3 Mark S. Marley,4 Didier Saumon,5 Dmitry Savransky,6 S. Mark Ammons,7 Vanessa P. Bailey,8 Travis Barman,9 Celia´ Blain,10 Joanna Bulger,11 Jeffrey Chilcote,1, 12 Tara Cotten,13 Ian Czekala,3, 1, y Rene Doyon,14 Gaspard Duchene^ ,3, 15 Thomas M. Esposito,3 Daniel Fabrycky,16 Michael P. Fitzgerald,17 Katherine B. Follette,18 Jonathan J. Fortney,19 Benjamin L. Gerard,20, 10 Stephen J. Goodsell,21 James R. Graham,3 Alexandra Z. Greenbaum,22 Pascale Hibon,23 Sasha Hinkley,24 Lea A. Hirsch,1 Justin Hom,25 Li-Wei Hung,26 Rebekah Ilene Dawson,27 Patrick Ingraham,28 Paul Kalas,3, 29 Quinn Konopacky,30 James E. Larkin,17 Eve J. Lee,31 Jonathan W. Lin,3 Jer´ ome^ Maire,30 Franck Marchis,29 Christian Marois,10, 20 Stanimir Metchev,32, 33 Maxwell A. Millar-Blanchaer,8, 34 Katie M. Morzinski,35 Rebecca Oppenheimer,36 David Palmer,7 Jennifer Patience,25 Marshall Perrin,37 Lisa Poyneer,7 Laurent Pueyo,37 Roman R. Rafikov,38 Abhijith Rajan,37 Julien Rameau,14 Fredrik T. Rantakyro¨,39 Bin Ren,40 Adam C. Schneider,25 Anand Sivaramakrishnan,37 Inseok Song,13 Remi Soummer,37 Melisa Tallis,1 Sandrine Thomas,28 Kimberly Ward-Duong,25 and Schuyler Wolff41 1Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 2Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 3Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 4NASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, CA 94035, USA 5Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. -
Correlations Between the Stellar, Planetary, and Debris Components of Exoplanet Systems Observed by Herschel⋆
A&A 565, A15 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323058 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics Correlations between the stellar, planetary, and debris components of exoplanet systems observed by Herschel J. P. Marshall1,2, A. Moro-Martín3,4, C. Eiroa1, G. Kennedy5,A.Mora6, B. Sibthorpe7, J.-F. Lestrade8, J. Maldonado1,9, J. Sanz-Forcada10,M.C.Wyatt5,B.Matthews11,12,J.Horner2,13,14, B. Montesinos10,G.Bryden15, C. del Burgo16,J.S.Greaves17,R.J.Ivison18,19, G. Meeus1, G. Olofsson20, G. L. Pilbratt21, and G. J. White22,23 (Affiliations can be found after the references) Received 15 November 2013 / Accepted 6 March 2014 ABSTRACT Context. Stars form surrounded by gas- and dust-rich protoplanetary discs. Generally, these discs dissipate over a few (3–10) Myr, leaving a faint tenuous debris disc composed of second-generation dust produced by the attrition of larger bodies formed in the protoplanetary disc. Giant planets detected in radial velocity and transit surveys of main-sequence stars also form within the protoplanetary disc, whilst super-Earths now detectable may form once the gas has dissipated. Our own solar system, with its eight planets and two debris belts, is a prime example of an end state of this process. Aims. The Herschel DEBRIS, DUNES, and GT programmes observed 37 exoplanet host stars within 25 pc at 70, 100, and 160 μm with the sensitiv- ity to detect far-infrared excess emission at flux density levels only an order of magnitude greater than that of the solar system’s Edgeworth-Kuiper belt. Here we present an analysis of that sample, using it to more accurately determine the (possible) level of dust emission from these exoplanet host stars and thereafter determine the links between the various components of these exoplanetary systems through statistical analysis. -
One-Armed Oscillations in Be Star Discs
A&A 456, 1097–1104 (2006) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065407 & c ESO 2006 Astrophysics One-armed oscillations in Be star discs J. C. B. Papaloizou1 andG.J.Savonije2 1 Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK 2 Astronomical Institute “Anton Pannekoek”, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 403, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] Received 11 April 2006 / Accepted 20 June 2006 ABSTRACT Aims. In this paper we study the effect of the quadrupole-term in the gravitational potential of a rotationally deformed central Be star on one armed density waves in the circumstellar disc. The aim is to explain the observed long-term violet over red (V/R) intensity variations of the double peaked Balmer emission-lines, not only in cool Be star systems, but also in the hot systems like γ Cas. Methods. We have carried out semi-analytic and numerical studies of low-frequency one armed global oscillations in near Keplerian discs around Be stars. In these we have investigated surface density profiles for the circumstellar disc which have inner narrow low surface density or gap regions, just interior to global maxima close to the rapidly rotating star, as well as the mode inner boundary conditions. Results. Our results indicate that it is not necessary to invoke extra forces such as caused by line absorption from the stellar flux in order to explain the long-term V/R variations in the discs around massive Be stars. When there exists a narrow gap between the star and its circumstellar disc, with the result that the radial velocity perturbation is non-zero at the inner disc boundary, we find oscillation (and V/R) periods in the observed range for plausible magnitudes for the rotational quadrupole term. -
Detection of Nitrogen Gas in the Β Pictoris Circumstellar Disc P
Manuscript version: Published Version The version presented in WRAP is the published version (Version of Record). Persistent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/110773 How to cite: The repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing citation guidance from the publisher. Copyright and reuse: The Warwick Research Archive Portal (WRAP) makes this work by researchers of the University of Warwick available open access under the following conditions. Copyright © and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in WRAP has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. Publisher’s statement: Please refer to the repository item page, publisher’s statement section, for further information. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications A&A 621, A121 (2019) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201834346 & © ESO 2019 Astrophysics Detection of nitrogen gas in the β Pictoris circumstellar disc P. A. Wilson1,2,3,4,5, R. Kerr6, A. Lecavelier des Etangs4,5, V. Bourrier4,5,7, A. Vidal-Madjar4,5, F. Kiefer4,5, and I. -
Gas Accretion by Giant Planets : a Study with 3D Inviscid Hydrodynamical Simulations
EPSC Abstracts Vol. 8, EPSC2013-363, 2013 European Planetary Science Congress 2013 EEuropeaPn PlanetarSy Science CCongress c Author(s) 2013 Gas Accretion by Giant Planets : a study with 3D inviscid hydrodynamical simulations J. Szulágyi (1), A. Morbidelli (1), A. Crida (1) and F. Masset (2) (1) University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis, CNRS, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, Laboratoire Lagrange, France ([email protected]) (2) Institute of Physical Sciences, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Abstract If this were true, there should be a dichotomy in the mass distribution of planets : planets should be either We investigate the properties of the circumplanetary smaller than 30 Earth masses (those that did not ∼ disc (CPD) of a Jupiter-mass planet with a three- reach the phase of runaway gas accretion) or of mul- dimensional hydrodynamical nested grid code. We tiple Jupiter-masses (those that entered and completed perform isothermal simulations of a large radial por- the fast runaway gas accretion). Planets in between tion of the circumstellar disc and, with the help of a these two mass categories should be extremely rare, system of 8 nested grids, we zoom into the planet’s conversely to what is observed [4]. vicinity. Since giant planets are thought to form in a A very likely possibility, however, is that the cir- dead zone, we do not use any prescribed viscosity in cumplanetary disc acts as a regulator of the rate of gas the fluid-dynamics equations. accretion onto the planet. In particular, if the circum- We discuss in details the geometry of the circum- planetary disc (CPD) has a very low viscosity [8], then planetary disc, and especially focus on the role of the the transport of angular momentum through this disc polar inflow. -
On the Structure and Mass Delivery Towards Circumplanetary Discs Matthäus Schulik,1 Anders Johansen,1 Bertram Bitsch,2 Elena Lega3 Michiel Lambrechts1
Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. cpds c ESO 2020 March 31, 2020 On the structure and mass delivery towards circumplanetary discs Matthäus Schulik,1 Anders Johansen,1 Bertram Bitsch,2 Elena Lega3 Michiel Lambrechts1 1 Lund Observatory, Box 43, Sölvegatan 27, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden e-mail: [email protected] 2 Max-Planck Institut für Astronomie, Königsstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany 3 Laboratoire Lagrange, UMR7293, Université de la Côte d’Azur, Boulevard de la Observatoire, 06304 Nice Cedex 4, France Received ... ABSTRACT Circumplanetary discs (CPDs) form around young gas giants and are thought to be the sites of moon formation as well as an interme- diate reservoir of gas that feeds the growth of the gas giant. How the physical properties of such CPDs are affected by the planetary mass and the overall opacity is relatively poorly understood. In order to clarify this, we use the global radiation hydrodynamics code FARGOCA, with a grid structure that allows resolving the planetary gravitational potential sufficiently well for a CPD to form. We then study the gas flows and density/temperature structures that emerge as a function of planet mass, opacity and potential depth. Our results indicate interesting structure formation for Jupiter-mass planets at low opacities, which we subsequently analyse in de- tail. Using an opacity level that is 100 times lower than that of ISM dust, our Jupiter-mass protoplanet features an envelope that is sufficiently cold for a CPD to form, and a free-fall region separating the CPD and the circumstellar disc emerges. Interestingly, this free-fall region appears to be a result of supersonic erosion of outer envelope material, as opposed to the static structure formation that one would expect at low opacities. -
Worlds Apart - Finding Exoplanets
Worlds Apart - Finding Exoplanets Illustrated Video Credit: NASA, JPL-Caltech, T. Pyle; Acknowledgement: djxatlanta Dr. Billy Teets Vanderbilt University Dyer Observatory Osher Lifelong Learning Institute Thursday, November 5, 2020 Outline • A bit of info and history about planet formation theory. • A discussion of the main exoplanet detection techniques including some of the missions and telescopes that are searching the skies. • A few examples of “notable” results. Evolution of our Thinking of the Solar System • First “accepted models” were geocentric – Ptolemy • Copernicus – heliocentric solar system • By 1800s, heliocentric model widely accepted in scientific community • 1755 – Immanuel Kant hypothesizes clouds of gas and dust • 1796 – Kant and P.-S. LaPlace both put forward the Solar Nebula Disk Theory • Today – if Solar System formed from an interstellar cloud, maybe other clouds formed planets elsewhere in the universe. Retrograde Motion - Mars Image Credits: Tunc Tezel Retrograde Motion as Explained by Ptolemy To explain retrograde, the concept of the epicycle was introduced. A planet would move on the epicycle (the smaller circle) as the epicycle went around the Earth on the deferent (the larger circle). The planet would appear to shift back and forth among the background stars. Evolution of our Thinking of the Solar System • First “accepted models” were geocentric – Ptolemy • Copernicus – heliocentric solar system • By 1800s, heliocentric model widely accepted in scientific community • 1755 – Immanuel Kant hypothesizes clouds of gas and dust • 1796 – Kant and P.-S. LaPlace both put forward the Solar Nebula Disk Theory • Today – if Solar System formed from an interstellar cloud, maybe other clouds formed planets elsewhere in the universe. -
GEMINI PLANET IMAGER SPECTROSCOPY of the HR 8799 PLANETS C and D
The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 794:L15 (5pp), 2014 October 10 doi:10.1088/2041-8205/794/1/L15 C 2014. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. GEMINI PLANET IMAGER SPECTROSCOPY OF THE HR 8799 PLANETS c AND d Patrick Ingraham1, Mark S. Marley2, Didier Saumon3, Christian Marois4, Bruce Macintosh1, Travis Barman5, Brian Bauman6, Adam Burrows7, Jeffrey K. Chilcote8, Robert J. De Rosa9,10, Daren Dillon11,Rene´ Doyon12, Jennifer Dunn4, Darren Erikson4, Michael P. Fitzgerald8, Donald Gavel11, Stephen J. Goodsell13, James R. Graham14, Markus Hartung13, Pascale Hibon13, Paul G. Kalas14, Quinn Konopacky15, James A. Larkin8, Jer´ omeˆ Maire15, Franck Marchis16, James McBride14, Max Millar-Blanchaer15, Katie M. Morzinski17,24, Andrew Norton11, Rebecca Oppenheimer18, Dave W. Palmer6, Jenny Patience9, Marshall D. Perrin19, Lisa A. Poyneer6, Laurent Pueyo19, Fredrik Rantakyro¨ 13, Naru Sadakuni13, Leslie Saddlemyer4, Dmitry Savransky20,Remi´ Soummer19, Anand Sivaramakrishnan19, Inseok Song21, Sandrine Thomas2,22, J. Kent Wallace23, Sloane J. Wiktorowicz11, and Schuyler G. Wolff19 1 Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 2 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 3 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA 4 NRC Herzberg Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, Canada 5 Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0092, USA 6 Lawrence Livermore National Lab,