DOCSLIB.ORG

Bighorn Sheep Ecology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bighorn Sheep Ecology a Bighorn Sheep Ecology An Integrated Science Project to Support Restoration and Management 2021Final Report rt 1 FEDERAL AID IN WILDLIFE RESTORATION GRANT MONTANA BIGHORN SHEEP STUDY #W-159-R 01 DECEMBER 2013 – 31 JANUARY 2020 CONTRIBUTORS Robert A. Garrott Professor, Montana State University [email protected] Kelly Proffitt Research Biologist, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks [email protected] Jay Rotella Professor, Montana State University [email protected] Elizabeth Flesch Post-doctoral Researcher & Ph.D. Candidate, Montana State University [email protected] Ethan Lula M.Sc. Graduate, Montana State University [email protected] Carson Butler M.Sc. Graduate, Montana State University [email protected] Blake Lowrey Post-doctoral Researcher & Ph.D. Graduate, Montana State University [email protected] Terrill Paterson Post-doctoral Researcher & Ph.D. Graduate, Montana State University [email protected] Jesse DeVoe Research Associate, Montana State University [email protected] Emma Grusing B.Sc. Graduate Student, Montana State University [email protected] AGENCIES Montana State University, Ecology Department 310 Lewis Hall, Bozeman, MT 59717 Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks 1400 S. 19th Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715 Suggested citation Garrott, R., K. Proffitt, J. Rotella, E. Flesch, E. Lula, C. Butler, B. Lowrey, J. T. Paterson, J. DeVoe, and E. Grusing. 2021. Bighorn Sheep Ecology: An Integrated Science Project to Support Restoration and Conservation. Final Report for Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Grant #W-159-R. Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Helena, Montana Cover photo Rocky Mountain Front Range (Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks) 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS scholarship funds to help support graduate HE COLLABORATIVE nature of this T student research on this project, as has the MSU research project has provided the privilege to Foundation and friends and family of Don work with a diversity of people without whom Quimby through the Don C. Quimby award. Brian this project would not be possible. More people Solan and Shane Clouse and the Montana assisted in this effort than names are known, Chapter of the Wild Sheep Foundation have but we are grateful to all. contributed encouragement and financial Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (MFWP) support that lead to the incorporation of the personnel who have assisted in this study genomics studies. The Stillwater Mining include, but are not limited to: Bruce Sterling, Company provided safety training and access to Jim Williams, Ben Jimenez, Liz Bradley, Tyler their property and we appreciate the assistance Smucker, Ray Vinkey, Craig Fager, Mike of Josh Harris, Dave Johnson, Tom Kircher, and Thompson, Brent Lonner, Mark Schlepp, Tim Dave Anderson. Tom Stevenson, biologist with McWilliams, Stan Buresh, George Larson, Sonja California Fish and Game Department and Anderson, Graham Taylor, Julie Cunningham, leader of the Sierra Nevada Bighorn Sheep Jenny Jones, Scott Hemmer, Scott Thompson, Recovery Program, traveled to Montana to train Tyler Park, Howard Burt, Mark Sullivan, Shawn MSU and MFWP personnel in the use of Stewart, Justin Paugh, Julie Golla, Brett Dorak, ultrasonography to quantify rump fat thickness Drew Henry, Ray Mule, Brent Cascadden, Kevin in bighorn sheep. Important Wyoming Game and Hughes, Vanna Boccadori, John Thornburg, Fish collaborators on the Greater Yellowstone Jennifer Ramsey, Emily Almberg, Claire Gower, Area Mountain Ungulate Project that Karen Loveless, Neil Anderson, Keri Carson, contributed to the regional scope of these Trever Throop, Neil Cadwell, Nick DeCesare, studies include Doug McWhirter, Doug Quentin Kujala, Justin Gude, and Cory Loecker. Brimeyer, Allyson Courtemanch, Gary Fralick, In addition, Vickie Edwards, a former MFWP Hank Edwards, Mary Wood, Hally Killion, and biologist, was instrumental in laying the Jessica Jennings Gaines. The Wyoming Game & groundwork for including the Petty Creek Fish Wildlife Disease Lab has been instrumental population in the studies. The MFWP Wildlife in shaping our respiratory pathogen research Health Lab has been essential to this project in and contributing to sample collection outside of the support, service, and cooperation they have Montana. Tom Besser of Washington State provided throughout the study. Montana State University has provided insights and advice on University (MSU) personnel who have assisted pathogen sampling and has conducted initial in the studies include Aaron McGuire, Dave strain-typing of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae Willey, Jesse White, Tawnya Gilstrap, Cheyenne isolates from Montana and Wyoming bighorn Stirling, John Landsiedel, Eric Boyd, Heather sheep. This project has benefited from Brown, Jasmine Cutter, Aubrey Power, Samuel interactions with scientists involved in the Hells Allen, and numerous other student volunteers. Canyon Initiative Consortium including Frances Cassirer with Idaho Fish and Game and Kezia We appreciate the cooperation of the Manlove with Utah State University. Kezia Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribe and the conducted field work monitoring demographics assistance of Dale Becker, Shannon Clairmont, of the Fergus population in summer 2015 and and Stacy Courville. The US Forest service provided valuable information on lamb permitted captures and provided lodging for production and survival that would not capture crews. Kevin Hurley, Carl Phillips, Anna otherwise have been available. Lukasik, and the Wild Sheep Foundation have been key supporters and have contributed 3 3 Danielle Walker conducted lab work at MSU to Rocky Creek Farm in Bozeman provided apple extract and assess quality of bighorn sheep pulp for bait. genetic samples. Doug McWhirter collected and Dozens of unnamed state biologists, wardens, provided genetic samples from harvested and technicians, federal biologists, and citizens bighorn sheep rams. provided invaluable and enthusiastic assistance Katherine Ralls, Mike Buchalski, Renee in handling and restraining animals. Len Kopec Bellinger, Sierra Love Stowell, Sim Zijian, from Augusta Montana conducted numerous Joshua Miller, and Paul Stothard shared classification and survival surveys at Castle expertise regarding genomics analyses. Holly Reef. We appreciate the skilled helicopter Ernest provided genomics expertise and some piloting of Rick Swisher and Mark Stott and the funding for SNP genotyping of Beartooth- net-gunning, animal handling, and helo support Absaroka samples. Tabitha Graves provided services of Travis Heater, Trent Brown, Mark expertise and access to Glacier National Park Keech, and Jace Clark of Quicksilver Air Inc. bighorn sheep samples. Funding for this project was provided from Several private landowners that contributed to MFWP bighorn sheep auction sales matched this study in various ways included Harry and with USFWS Grants-in-Aid funds. Kathy Liss, Monte Ishler, Cody Ishler, Kyle Photo: Cindy Goeddel Ishler, and Pat and Anna Byrne. Pete Fay at 4 Executi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2013, MFWP and MSU initiated a collaborative document represents the final report for this 6-year research program designed to assess research project. factors driving bighorn sheep population dynamics across Montana. The integrated study RESPIRATORY PATHOGEN design entailed using standardized methods to COMMUNITIES & POPULATION investigate demographic rates, body condition and nutrition, respiratory pathogens, PERFORMANCE movements, habitat use, and population Respiratory disease has been a persistent attributes across a diverse set of populations problem for recovery of bighorn sheep in North occupying a diverse set of landscapes. Similar America. The severity of respiratory disease designs have proven efficient at producing epizootics has been variable, ranging from 30% reliable and generalizable findings useful for to 90% mortality in affected populations. The management agencies. Accordingly, epizootics often involve an extended phase populations included in this research program where a high percentage of juveniles die from were carefully selected by MFWP regional respiratory disease within four months of birth, wildlife managers to capture varying however, the duration of this phase is also respiratory disease histories, habitat types, extremely variable, lasting from a single year to management histories, as well as demographic decades of poor recruitment. Our understanding performances. The 8 primary bighorn sheep of respiratory disease in bighorn sheep is populations incorporated into this study occupy limited, but a number of bacterial pathogens portions of Deer Lodge, Fergus, Lewis & Clark, have been implicated as causing respiratory Madison, Missoula, Phillips, Sanders, Stillwater disease in bighorn sheep including Mycoplasma and Teton Counties, as well as the Flathead ovipneumoniae and several species within the Indian Reservation. In recognition of the Pasteurellaceae family. All bighorn sheep improved inference associated with captured during management and research incorporation of additional study populations, operations are tested for the presence of these this research program also incorporated data pathogens, but interpretation of test results has from a companion MSU bighorn sheep study been problematic as there has been no rigorous (Greater Yellowstone Area Mountain Ungulate assessment of the reliability of the various Project), worked with the MFWP Wildlife Health diagnostic tests routinely employed. Laboratory to incorporate data from additional populations captured for health monitoring We performed 2,093 standard
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Locatable Mineral Reports for Colorado, South Dakota, and Wyoming provided to the U.S. Forest Service in Fiscal Years 1996 and 1997 by Anna B. Wilson Open File Report OF 97-535 1997 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. CONTENTS page INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 COLORADO ...................................................................... 2 Arapaho National Forest (administered by White River National Forest) Slate Creek .................................................................. 3 Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests Winter Park Properties (Raintree) ............................................... 15 Gunnison and White River National Forests Mountain Coal Company ...................................................... 17 Pike National Forest Land Use Resource Center .................................................... 28 Pike and San Isabel National Forests Shepard and Associates ....................................................... 36 Roosevelt National Forest Larry and Vi Carpenter ....................................................... 52 Routt National Forest Smith Rancho ............................................................... 55 San Juan National
    [Show full text]
  • Whiskey Mountain-Dubois Badlands Wilderness Environmental Impact Statement
    BLM LIBRARY United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Rawlins District Office January 1990 Whiskey Mountain-Dubois Badlands Final Wilderness Environmental Impact Statement * sw rwn I s' If/ m ^ . <\W. NV. x v% >-'v\V . 'Xf TD ' 181 fJMt " .W8 J..V# j'f I'f w\\W . A\ W45 v\'^V^ . o"\\N,' 1990 Whiskey Mountain and Dubois Badlands Wilderness Environmental Impact Statement (X) Final Environmental Impact Statement ( ) Draft (X) Legislative Type of Action: ( ) Administrative Responsible Agencies: Lead Agency: Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management Cooperating Agencies: None Abstract The Whiskey Mountain and Dubois Badlands Final Wilderness Environmental Impact Statement analyzes two wilderness study areas (WSAs) in the Rawlins District to determine the resource impacts that could result from designation or nondesignation of those WSAs as wilderness. The following WSAs are recommended as nonsuitable for wilderness designation: Whiskey Moutain (487 acres) and Dubois Badlands (4,520 acres). Comments have been requested and received from the following: See the “Consultation" section. Date draft statement made available to the Environmental Protection Agency and the public. Draft EIS: Filed 11/14/88 Final EIS: United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT WYOMING STATE OFFICE P.O. BOX 1828 CHEYENNE, WYOMING 82003 Dear Reader: Enclosed is the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared for the Whiskey Mountain and Dubois Badlands Wilderness Study Areas (WSAs) in the Lander Resource Area of our Rawlins District. You were sent this copy because of your past interest and participation in the review of the draft version of the EIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Study Areas
    I ___- .-ll..l .“..l..““l.--..- I. _.^.___” _^.__.._._ - ._____.-.-.. ------ FEDERAL LAND M.ANAGEMENT Status and Uses of Wilderness Study Areas I 150156 RESTRICTED--Not to be released outside the General Accounting Wice unless specifically approved by the Office of Congressional Relations. ssBO4’8 RELEASED ---- ---. - (;Ao/li:( ‘I:I)-!L~-l~~lL - United States General Accounting OfTice GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-262989 September 23,1993 The Honorable Bruce F. Vento Chairman, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Committee on Natural Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: Concerned about alleged degradation of areas being considered for possible inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System (wilderness study areas), you requested that we provide you with information on the types and effects of activities in these study areas. As agreed with your office, we gathered information on areas managed by two agencies: the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLN) and the Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service. Specifically, this report provides information on (1) legislative guidance and the agency policies governing wilderness study area management, (2) the various activities and uses occurring in the agencies’ study areas, (3) the ways these activities and uses affect the areas, and (4) agency actions to monitor and restrict these uses and to repair damage resulting from them. Appendixes I and II provide data on the number, acreage, and locations of wilderness study areas managed by BLM and the Forest Service, as well as data on the types of uses occurring in the areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitive and Rare Plant Species Inventory in the Salt River and Wyoming Ranges, Bridger-Teton National Forest
    Sensitive and Rare Plant Species Inventory in the Salt River and Wyoming Ranges, Bridger-Teton National Forest Prepared for Bridger-Teton National Forest P.O. Box 1888 Jackson, WY 83001 by Bonnie Heidel Wyoming Natural Diversity Database University of Wyoming Dept 3381, 1000 E. University Avenue University of Wyoming Laramie, WY 21 February 2012 Cooperative Agreement No. 07-CS-11040300-019 ABSTRACT Three sensitive and two other Wyoming species of concern were inventoried in the Wyoming and Salt River Ranges at over 20 locations. The results provided a significant set of trend data for Payson’s milkvetch (Astragalus paysonii), expanded the known distribution of Robbin’s milkvetch (Astragalus robbinsii var. minor), and relocated and expanded the local distributions of three calciphilic species at select sites as a springboard for expanded surveys. Results to date are presented with the rest of species’ information for sensitive species program reference. This report is submitted as an interim report representing the format of a final report. Tentative priorities for 2012 work include new Payson’s milkvetch surveys in major recent wildfires, and expanded Rockcress draba (Draba globosa) surveys, both intended to fill key gaps in status information that contribute to maintenance of sensitive plant resources and information on the Forest. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All 2011 field surveys of Payson’s milkvetch (Astragalus paysonii) were conducted by Klara Varga. These and the rest of 2011 surveys built on the 2010 work of Hollis Marriott and the earlier work of she and Walter Fertig as lead botanists of Wyoming Natural Diversity Database. This project was initially coordinated by Faith Ryan (Bridger-Teton National Forest), with the current coordination and consultation of Gary Hanvey and Tyler Johnson.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviewing Officer for Thomas Tidwell, Chief of the U. S. Forest Service
    Reviewing Officer for Thomas Tidwell, Chief of the U. S. Forest Service Attn: EMC Administrative Reviews 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Mailstop 1104 Washington, DC 20250-1104 Dear U. S. Forest Service Chief Thomas Tidwell FOREST SERVICE COMMENTS Thank you for this opportunity to comment on the proposed Shoshone National Forest Plan and addendum Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). As a native of Wyoming and long-time rancher and back country outfitter the Shoshone has been of great personal importance to me and my family. My mother and father, an early physician in the Cody country since 1940, acquired the 7D Ranch in Sunlight Basin in the 1950s. And I personally own a working cattle ranch located on the Greybull River upstream of its junction with the Wood River. My comments center on 5 areas: 1. Motorized use in Francs Peak and Wood River. 2. Illegal mountain bike trail in the Dunoir Special Management Unit 3. The need for recommendations in the plan for additional wilderness designations 4. Wild & Scenic Rivers 5. Enforcement 1. Proposed motorized use in the Wood River and Francs Peak area. This critical high country habitat gives protection for the Grizzly, Mountain Sheep, bird life including blue grouse, ptarmigan, lynx and even the possibility of expanded range for elusive wolverine. Francs Peak itself is the highest of all mountains in the Absaroka Range. The trails proposed the the local ORV organization for year-round motorized vehicles would impact 37,000 acres in the Wood River and 5,900 acres in Francs Peak for winterized use. The new motorized management areas that the Forest Service proposes would significantly impact the vast majority of the Wood River roadless area and roughly a third of the Francs Peak roadless area.
    [Show full text]
  • Undergraduate Research Day: 2008 Program
    April 26, 2008 Student Abstracts Abstracts are in order by last name of presenter. Oral Presentations: Classroom Building, University of Wyoming Campus 1:00 – 6:30 PM Poster Presentations: Family Room, Wyoming Student Union 4:30 – 6:30 PM Some of the program acronyms you will see in the Abstract Book: ¾ EPSCoR: Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research ¾ WySTEP: Wyoming Science Teacher Education Program ¾ INBRE: IDeA Networks for Biomedical Research Excellence ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The University of Wyoming Undergraduate Research Day would not be possible without the contributions of many people and programs. We are especially grateful to the following: Working Group Steve Boss, Coe Library Randy Lewis, Wyoming NSF EPSCoR Angela Faxon, Office of Research and Economic Richard Matlock, Wyoming EPSCoR Development Sherrie Merrow, College of Engineering Carol Frost, Office of Research and Economic Tami Morse McGill, Coe Library Development Susan Stoddard, McNair Scholars Program Sharla Gordon, Wyoming EPSCoR Zackie Salmon, McNair Scholars Program Duncan Harris, UW Honors Program R. Scott Seville, UW/Casper College/INBRE Kristy Isaak, Wyoming NASA Space Grant Michele Stark, Wyoming NASA Space Grant Barbara Kissack, Wyoming EPSCoR Lillian Wise, UW Honors Program Moderators for the Oral Presentations Craig Arnold Stanislaw Legowski Paul Bergstraesser Carlos Mellizo Dennis Coon Scott Morton Anthony Denzer Heather Rothfuss Carol Frost Scott Seville Rubin Gamboa Anne Sylvester Gary Hampe Glaucia Texieria H. Gordon Harris Robert Torry Janice Harris Jeff Van Baalen Electrical and Computer Engineering Senior Design Judges Irena W. Stange, Institute for Telecommunication Sciences, US Department of Commerce (NTIA) Barry A. Mather, University of Colorado at Boulder, Ph.D. student Andrew A.
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn Sheep 2015 Bighorn Sheep 2006
    TABLE I BIGHORN SHEEP HARVEST STATEWIDE BY TOTAL HUNTERS 2015 NUMBER TOTAL VALID ACTIVE HARVEST REC. HUNTER DAYS/ LICENSES* HUNTERS RAM EWE LAMB TOTAL DAYS SUCCESS HARVEST STATE TOTAL 196 193 154 0 0 154 1,831 79.8% 11.9 RESIDENT 143 140 106 0 0 106 1,553 75.7% 14.7 NONRESIDENT 53 53 48 0 0 48 278 90.6% 5.8 *Equals licenses sold per regulations through the draw and medical carryover (MCO) adjustments, governor licenses, supertag, trifecta licenses and refunds. TABLE II BIGHORN SHEEP TEN-YEAR COMPARISON OF STATEWIDE HARVEST 2006 - 2015 YEAR 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 VALID LICENSES* 219 238 242 251 263 258 271 220 220 196 RESIDENT 160 177 178 186 194 191 202 166 163 143 NONRESIDENT 59 61 64 65 69 67 69 54 57 53 NUMBER ACTIVE HUNTERS 219 237 242 251 263 249 249 213 217 193 RESIDENT 160 176 178 186 194 180 180 157 160 140 NONRESIDENT 59 61 64 65 69 69 69 56 57 53 TOTAL HARVEST 186 201 194 196 211 181 212 187 169 154 RESIDENT 135 151 141 141 150 125 147 134 119 106 NONRESIDENT 51 50 53 55 61 56 65 53 50 48 TOTAL RECREATION DAYS 1,654 2,225 2,230 2,032 1,867 2,029 2,152 1,609 1,889 1,831 RESIDENT 1,323 1,739 1,799 1,728 1,595 1,548 1,800 1,223 1,513 1,553 NONRESIDENT 331 486 431 304 272 481 352 386 376 278 DAYS/HARVEST 8.9 11.1 11.5 10.4 8.8 11.2 10.2 8.6 11.2 11.9 RESIDENT 9.8 11.5 12.8 12.3 10.6 12.4 12.2 9.1 12.7 14.7 NONRESIDENT 6.5 9.7 8.1 5.5 4.5 8.6 5.4 7.3 7.5 5.8 ACTIVE LICENSE SUCCESS 84.9% 84.8% 80.2% 78.1% 80.2% 72.7% 85.1% 87.8% 77.9% 79.8% HARVEST METHOD FIREARM 99.9% 99.0% 100.0% 99.0% 98.1% 99.4% 98.6%
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn Sheep Disease Risk Assessment
    Risk Analysis of Disease Transmission between Domestic Sheep and Goats and Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep Prepared by: ______________________________ Cory Mlodik, Wildlife Biologist for: Shoshone National Forest Rocky Mountain Region C. Mlodik, Shoshone National Forest April 2012 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Bighorn Sheep Disease Risk Assessment Contents Background ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Bighorn Sheep Distribution and Abundance......................................................................................... 1 Literature
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum
    TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: WWDC DATE: May 12, 2010 FROM: MWH REFERENCE: Wind-Bighorn Basin Plan SUBJECT: Task 6A–Issues Affecting Future Water Use Opportunities This memorandum discusses known environmental processes, permits and other related issues associated with future water use opportunities within the Wind-Bighorn Basin. This memorandum fulfills the reporting requirements for Task 6A of the consultant scope of work for the Wind-Bighorn Basin Plan Update (Basin Plan Update). Contents Section 1 – Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Section 2 –Water Management Issues .................................................................................................. 2 Issues Related to Tribal Compacts and Settlements .......................................................................... 2 Issues Related to Federal Projects ..................................................................................................... 3 Issues Related to Water Quality ......................................................................................................... 3 Section 3– Compact Requirements........................................................................................................ 3 Section 4– Funding Agency Requirements-WWDC ............................................................................... 4 Section 5 – Federal Legislation and Regional Laws ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens Wilderness Proposal Blm Lands
    Wyoming Citizens' Wilderness Proposal for BLM Lands The Wyoming Citizens' Wilderness Proposal for BLM lands was originally developed and submitted to the BLM in 1994, was updated and resubmitted in 2004, and resubmitted again in 2011. The 1994 Wyoming Citizens' Wilderness Proposal was the result of an intensive, on-the-ground inventory effort carried out by hundreds of Wyoming residents from 1990 to 1993. To accomplish the inventories, citizens hiked through undeveloped BLM landscapes across the state, documenting the presence or absence of wilderness characteristics explicitly following the criteria defined by the United States Congress in Section 2(c) of the Wilderness Act of 1964. As a result of this comprehensive inventory, the Wyoming Citizens' Wilderness Proposal identified approximately 1.5 million acres in the state that fully met the criteria for wilderness designation and recommended that they be so designated. Most, although not all, of the areas recommended by the Citizens' Proposal encompass existing wilderness study areas but also include areas immediately adjacent to wilderness study areas that meet all criteria for wilderness qualities and consideration. The wilderness recommendations contained in the original Wyoming Citizens' Wilderness Proposal of 1994, as well as updates and resubmissions to the BLM in 2004 and 2011, was supported by a broad coalition of environmental and conservation organizations, including the Wyoming Wilderness Association, FOAL, Sierra Club Wyoming Chapter, On Sacred Ground of Wyoming, Wyoming Outdoor Council, Northern Arapaho Preservation Society, Wilderness Society - Wyoming Office, Greater Yellowstone Coalition, Biodiversity Conservation Alliance, and Western Watersheds Project. WILDERNESS AT RISK: CITIZENS’ WILDERNESS PROPOSAL FOR BLM LANDS The noted organizations and entities submit this proposal to the BLM and DOI to represent the “crown jewels” of Wyoming’s BLM Lands.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2015 Lease Parcels
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT February 2015 Lease Parcels Wind River / Bighorn Basin District Wind River/Bighorn Basin District, Wyoming DOI-BLM-WY-R050-EA-14-49 Office Na me and State goes here February 2015 Lease Parcels Wind River / Bighorn Basin District DOI-BLM-WY-R050-EA-14-49 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................ 1-2 1.4 Conformance with BLM Land Use Plans ........................................................................ 1-3 1.5 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, or Other Plans ..................................................... 1-4 1.6 Identification of Issues and Scoping ................................................................................ 1-5 1.7 Issues Considered and Eliminated From Further Analysis .............................................. 1-2 2 Description of Alternatives, Including Proposed Action ................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 2-1
    [Show full text]
  • 1 of 8 Casey Mcquiston, Resources Staff Officer Shoshone National Forest 808 Meadowland Ave. Cody, Wyoming 82424 August 2, 2017
    Casey McQuiston, Resources Staff Officer Shoshone National Forest 808 Meadowland Ave. Cody, Wyoming 82424 August 2, 2017 Purpose: BRG’s Official Comments For the Record to the Supplemental Draft EIS (Use of Domestic Sheep, Goats, and Pack Goats) Dear Mr. McQuiston, The Bighorn Restoration Group’s (BRG) mission is to advance the conservation and restoration of bighorn sheep throughout the southern Wind River Mountains. BRG therefore would like to offer the following official comments for the record to the Supplemental Draft EIS (Use of Domestic Sheep, Goats, and Pack Goats). If, as stated in the July 28th public meeting, the SNF chooses to extend the deadline for comments past the current August 10th deadline to define other possible alternatives to the Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS), BRG may also submit additional comments at that time. July 28th, 2017 Public Meeting Outcomes BRG especially appreciates the Washakie Ranger District (WRD) of the Shoshone National Forest (SNF) hosting the public meeting on July 28th, 2017—complete with hired mediator—to aid the U.S. Forest Service and other interested parties in better understanding the complex concerns involved in this issue from the point of view of all interested parties in attendance. BRG was very pleased with the win/win dynamics and cooperative, collaborative, and accommodating tone of the meeting. We also appreciated and concur with the willingness of all parties involved to pursue and promote a final decision that seeks to formulate an agreeable ruling, which integrates and maximizes all stakeholder concerns and interests. This meeting was very informative, useful, and enlightening with the following notable findings: The disease transfer science between domestic animals and wild bighorn sheep is complicated and imperfect.
    [Show full text]