Characterization of Next Generation Lithium-Ion Battery Materials Through Electrochemical, Spectroscopic, and Neutron-Based Methods

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Characterization of Next Generation Lithium-Ion Battery Materials Through Electrochemical, Spectroscopic, and Neutron-Based Methods Characterization of Next Generation Lithium-ion Battery Materials Through Electrochemical, Spectroscopic, and Neutron-Based Methods DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Danny Xin Liu Graduate Program in Chemistry The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Anne C. Co, Advisor Prabir K. Dutta Sherwin J. Singer Harris P. Kagan Copyright by Danny Xin Liu 2015 Abstract The development of a real-time quantification of Li transport using a non-destructive neutron method to measure the Li distribution upon charge and discharge in a Li-ion cell is reported here. Using in situ neutron depth profiling (NDP), we probed the onset of lithiation in high capacity Sn and Al anodes and visualized the enrichment of Li atoms on the surface which is followed by their propagation into the bulk. The de-lithiation process shows the removal of near surface Li, leading to a loss in coulombic efficiency assigned to trapped Li within the intermetallic material. In situ NDP developed in this work provides temporal and spatial measurement of Li transport within the battery material with exceptional sensitivity. Direct application of Fick’s Laws allowed for the effective lithium diffusion coefficient to be calculated from the lithium concentration profiles. This diagnostic tool opens up possibilities of understanding rates of Li transport and their distribution to guide materials development for efficient storage mechanisms. In addition, in situ NDP was employed to explore the feasibility of utilizing Al as the anode current collector. The results indicate that an Al anode current collector can be employed as a strategy to improve energy density while reducing cost, provided that the surface of the Al is not in direct contact with Li+ or the voltage is limited to a value above the Al lithiation redox voltage. Our observations provide important mechanistic insights to the design of advanced battery materials. ii Dedication This document is dedicated to my family. iii Acknowledgments I am very grateful to The Ohio State University (OSU) and the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry for the resources and opportunity to pursue a doctoral degree. I am especially indebted to my advisor, Professor Anne C. Co, and my colleagues within the Co Research Group for their patience, support, and guidance throughout my time at OSU. Prof. Co has been an influential mentor establishing an environment which fosters independent thought, innovative approaches, and collaborative strategies to address relevant technical challenges. I am very fortunate to have worked with Dr. Jennifer M. Black and Dr. Eric J. Coleman – two outstanding scientists that I consider dear friends. Of the numerous Faculty members that have contributed towards my development as a scientist. I would like to thank Prof. Prabir K. Dutta for teaching the Advanced Analytical Chemistry course – that provided the foundation upon which I have refined myself as an experimental scientist. I am forever indebted to Prof. Sherwin J. Singer for affording me the opportunity and support to develop as a physical chemistry student. I want to thank Prof. Walter R. Lempert, Prof. Heather C. Allen, and Prof. Sherwin J. Singer for serving as my First Year Oral Exam committee members. Additionally, I am grateful for the insights and critiques provided by my Candidacy Exam committee members, Prof. Prabir K. Dutta, Prof. Heather C. Allen, Prof. Yiying Wu. Finally, I iv would like to express my sincere gratitude to my Dissertation committee members listed on the title page. I have had the privilege of working with outstanding staff members within the Department Chemistry and Biochemistry. My teaching responsibilities have been primarily supervised by Dr. Steve Kroner. I thank Dr. Kroner for his guidance, support, and advice on countless academic, professional, and personal topics. I would like to acknowledge Jerry Hoff, Larry Antal, and Ryan Shea from the machine shop for their time, knowledge, and expertise in numerous projects and designs that have contributed towards my research efforts. I would like to thank Eric Jackson, Eric Kesselring, and John Sullivan from the electronics shop for sharing their knowledge in electronics and device fabrication. I want to thank Lisa Hommel for sharing her knowledge and experience in surface chemistry and training me on the operations of the x-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS). I would like to acknowledge Spencer Porter, Tricia Meyer, and Andrew Sharits for their maintenance and troubleshooting efforts regarding the x-ray diffractometer. Special thanks is reserved for the administrative staff especially Judy Brown, Jennifer Hambach, Kelly Burke and Thomas Hyle for organizing departmental events, disseminating crucial deadlines, and all of the necessary behind-the- scenes daily tasks and documentation that keep the department functional. Additionally, I would like to acknowledge Barbara Bennett (B2) from the computer support staff for her assistance during technical difficulties related to the computer network. I am grateful for the opportunities that resulted in collaborative relationships leading to many of the findings within this dissertation. Prof. Lei R. Cao and Dr. Jinghui v Wang have been instrumental collaborators who introduced me to the field of neutron depth profiling (NDP). Special recognition is reserved for Dr. R. Gregory Downing, a staff scientist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Center for Neutron Research (NCNR). I thank Dr. Downing for his experience, insights, and patience throughout the collaborative experiments. Additionally, I have very grateful to have been granted access to the Cold NDP system at NCNR, which have led to pioneering findings and the advancement of in situ NDP within the energy storage community. The vast majority of my experience and knowledge of neutron depth profiling is a direct result of working with Dr. Downing. I would like to express my sincere appreciation to Rachelle L. Speth for her friendship, devotion, love and support throughout my graduate career. Returning her “misplaced” mitten was one of the best decisions I could have ever made. Finally, no words could express my gratitude for my parents. They have always encouraged me in my academic pursuits, challenged my rationalizations, provided guidance and supported me through turbulent times. They have had undeniably the greatest influence on my personal development and it is their experiences and insurmountable sacrifices that have shaped my outlook and afforded me the opportunities to pursue my dreams. I am and will forever be indebted to them. vi Vita 2004................................................................Woodbury High School 2008................................................................B.S. Chemistry, University of Minnesota – Twin Cities 2010 to present ..............................................Graduate Teaching/Research Associate, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University Publications Liu, D.; Wang, J.; Ke, P.; Qiu, J.; Canova, M.; Cao, L.; Co, A. “In Situ Quantification and Visualization of Lithium Transport with Neutrons.” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 53 (2014) 9498-9502. Wang, J.; Liu, D.; Canova, M.; Downing, R. G.; Cao, L.; Co, A. “Profiling lithium distribution in Sn anode for lithium-ion batteries with neutrons.” J Radioanal Nucl Chem, 301, 1, (2014) 277-284. Tan, C.; Leung, K. Y.; Liu, D.; Canova, M.; Downing, R. G.; Co, A.; Cao, L. “Gamma radiation effects on Li-ion battery electrolyte in neutron depth profiling for lithium quantification.” J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 305, 2, (2015) 675-680. Fields of Study Major Field: Chemistry vii Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii Dedication .......................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................. iv Vita .................................................................................................................................... vii Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. viii List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... xi List of Figures ................................................................................................................... xii Chapter 1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. In Situ Quantification and Visualization of Lithium Transport with Neutrons ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Neutron Depth Profiling ....................................................................................... 9 2.3. Methods .............................................................................................................. 11 2.4. Results and Discussion ......................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Atomic Spectra of Alkali Elements
    Atomic Spectra of Alkali Elements S. R. Kulkarni April 10, 2020 Rydberg primarily focused on studying the lines of alkali metals (Lithium, Potassium and Sodium).1 Rydberg organized the various features by their appearance on the pho- tographs:The alkali spectra were more complicated than that of hydrogen. Rydberg recog- nized that were three different types of lines: lines which looked \sharp" (on photographic plates), \principal" (strong lines that showed up in emission and absorption) and those which appeared ‘diffuse”. These series were abbreviated to S, P, D. Later \Fundamental" (F) was added. As noted earlier, Rydberg preferred to work with wavenumbers. Using data from Liveing and Deware he recast Angstrom's formula as follows: N k = k − (1) n 1 (n + µ)2 where kn is the wavenumber of the nth line in a given series. Rydberg kept N fixed to the value measured by Balmer with k1 µ being free parameters. Rydberg found the following formulae for Lithium R ks = ks − ; 2; 3; 4; ::: (2) n 1 (n + S)2 R kp = kp − 1; 2; 3; ::: (3) n 1 (n + P )2 R kd = kd − 2; 3; 4; ::: (4) n 1 (n + D)2 s −1 p −1 where S = 0:5951, P = 0:9596, D = 0:9974, k1 = 28601:6 cm k1 = 43487:7 cm , d −1 k1 = 28598:5 cm and we have switched to the modern notation in which N is replaced by R (the value he found was R = 109721:6 cm−1). Rydberg had confidence in the data that he was able to find a deeper connection between the constants between the series.
    [Show full text]
  • Helium Adsorption on Lithium Substrates
    JLowTempPhys DOI 10.1007/s10909-007-9516-5 Helium Adsorption on Lithium Substrates E. Van Cleve · P. Taborek · J.E. Rutledge Received: 25 July 2007 / Accepted: 13 September 2007 © Springer Science+Business Media 2007 Abstract We have developed a cryogenic pulsed laser deposition (PLD) system to deposit lithium films onto a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) at 4 K. Adsorption isotherms of 4He on lithium were measured in the temperature range between 1.42 K and 2.5 K. The isotherms are qualitatively different from isotherms on strong sub- strates such as gold and weak substrates such as cesium. There is no evidence of the formation of solid-like layers of helium, and the helium coverage is approximately linear in the pressure over a wide range. By measuring the low coverage slope of the isotherms, the binding energy of helium to lithium was found to be approxi- mately −13.6 K. For lithium substrates less than approximately 100 layers thick, the chemical potential at which the superfluid transition was observed was surprisingly sensitive to the details of lithium deposition. Keywords Helium films · Pulsed laser deposition · Superfluidity · Alkali metal 1 Introduction When helium is adsorbed onto a strong heterogenous substrate such as gold, the first 2 or 3 statistical layers are solid-like. The nature of these layers is not yet clear, but the layers are amorphous and do not participate significantly in superflow at high coverages. Superfluidity on strong substrates requires a minimum critical coverage to saturate the solid-like layers, and the superfluid phase which forms at higher cover- ages flows over these layers and does not interact directly with the strong, short range This work was supported by NSF grant DMR 0509685.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithium Data Sheet
    98 LITHIUM (Data in metric tons of lithium content unless otherwise noted) Domestic Production and Use: The only lithium production in the United States was from a brine operation in Nevada. Two companies produced a wide range of downstream lithium compounds in the United States from domestic or imported lithium carbonate, lithium chloride, and lithium hydroxide. Domestic production data were withheld to avoid disclosing company proprietary data. Although lithium markets vary by location, global end-use markets are estimated as follows: batteries, 65%; ceramics and glass, 18%; lubricating greases, 5%; polymer production, 3%; continuous casting mold flux powders, 3%; air treatment, 1%; and other uses, 5%. Lithium consumption for batteries has increased significantly in recent years because rechargeable lithium batteries are used extensively in the growing market for portable electronic devices and increasingly are used in electric tools, electric vehicles, and grid storage applications. Lithium minerals were used directly as ore concentrates in ceramics and glass applications. Salient Statistics—United States: 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019e Production W W W W W Imports for consumption 2,750 3,140 3,330 3,420 2,500 Exports 1,790 1,520 1,960 1,660 1,700 Consumption, estimated1 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,000 Price, annual average, battery-grade lithium carbonate, dollars per metric ton2 6,500 8,650 15,000 17,000 13,000 Employment, mine and mill, number 70 70 70 70 70 Net import reliance3 as a percentage of estimated consumption >25 >50 >50 >50 >25 Recycling: One domestic company has recycled lithium metal and lithium-ion batteries since 1992 at its facility in British Columbia, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Expansion of Domestic Production of Lithium Carbonate and Lithium Hydroxide to Supply US Battery Industry
    Expansion of Domestic Production of Lithium Carbonate and Lithium Hydroxide to Supply US Battery Industry John Groves Jeff Davis Chemetall Foote Corp May 11, 2011 Project ID# ARRAVT010 This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information Overview Expand Lithium Raw Material Base in US Timeline Barriers Start Date: April 14, 2010 Geothermal Resource Strength and Viability of End Date: February, 2013 Geothermal resource Partners Budget Engineering: BE&K® (a KBR DOE Share - $28.4 million company) Rockwood Share - $39.5 Environmental Assessment: million Nevada Bureau of Land Mgmt Relevance: Domestic Source of Strategic Materials • Objectives – Expand domestic lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide production to supply the US electric drive automotive market. – Deliver high quality lithium products to battery component manufacturers to produce high quality lithium ion batteries. – Create construction jobs over the first two years in the US and permanent jobs for production of lithium raw materials. – Stimulate the US economy with worthwhile long term benefits that will support the conversion to electric drive mobility. Relevance: Domestic Source of Strategic Materials • Milestones – Deliver battery grade lithium products to the DOE and component manufacturers in 2012 from this project. – Maintain the long term viability of domestic production of lithium raw materials by lowering operating cost and at the same time reducing fossil fuel based energy consumption. – Job Creation throughout 2010-2012
    [Show full text]
  • Global Lithium Sources—Industrial Use and Future in the Electric Vehicle Industry: a Review
    resources Review Global Lithium Sources—Industrial Use and Future in the Electric Vehicle Industry: A Review Laurence Kavanagh * , Jerome Keohane, Guiomar Garcia Cabellos, Andrew Lloyd and John Cleary EnviroCORE, Department of Science and Health, Institute of Technology Carlow, Kilkenny, Road, Co., R93-V960 Carlow, Ireland; [email protected] (J.K.); [email protected] (G.G.C.); [email protected] (A.L.); [email protected] (J.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 28 July 2018; Accepted: 11 September 2018; Published: 17 September 2018 Abstract: Lithium is a key component in green energy storage technologies and is rapidly becoming a metal of crucial importance to the European Union. The different industrial uses of lithium are discussed in this review along with a compilation of the locations of the main geological sources of lithium. An emphasis is placed on lithium’s use in lithium ion batteries and their use in the electric vehicle industry. The electric vehicle market is driving new demand for lithium resources. The expected scale-up in this sector will put pressure on current lithium supplies. The European Union has a burgeoning demand for lithium and is the second largest consumer of lithium resources. Currently, only 1–2% of worldwide lithium is produced in the European Union (Portugal). There are several lithium mineralisations scattered across Europe, the majority of which are currently undergoing mining feasibility studies. The increasing cost of lithium is driving a new global mining boom and should see many of Europe’s mineralisation’s becoming economic. The information given in this paper is a source of contextual information that can be used to support the European Union’s drive towards a low carbon economy and to develop the field of research.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Table Key Concepts
    Periodic Table Key Concepts Periodic Table Basics The periodic table is a table of all the elements which make up matter Elements initially grouped in a table by Dmitri Mendeleev Symbols – each element has a symbol which is either a Capital Letter or a Capital Letter followed by a lower case letter Atomic Number – the number above an element’s symbol which shows the number of protons Atomic Mass – the number found below an elements symbol which shows the mass of the element. Mass = the number of protons + the number of neutrons Metals – the elements which have the properties of malleability, luster, and conductivity o These elements are good conductors of electricity & heat. o Found to the left of the zig-zag line on the periodic table Nonmetals – do not have the properties of metals. Found to the right of the zig-zag line Metalloids – elements found along the zig-zag line of the periodic table and have some properties of metals and nonmetals (B, Si, Ge, As, Sb, Te, and Po) Groups The columns going up and down (There are 18 groups) Group 1: Hydrogen, Lithium, Sodium, Potassium, Rubidium, Cesium, and Francium Elements arranged so that elements with similar properties would be in the same group. o Group 1 Alkali Metals - highly reactive metals o Group 2 Alkali Earth Metals – reactive metals o Group 3-12 Transition Metals o Group 17 Halogens – highly reactive non-metals o Group 18 Noble Gases - do not react or combine with any other elements. Elements are grouped according to their properties or reactivity Reactivity is determined by the number of electrons in an element’s outer energy level These electrons are called valence electrons Periods The rows that run from left to right on the periodic table (There are 7 periods) Period 1 contains 2 elements, Hydrogen and Helium.
    [Show full text]
  • Expansion of Domestic Production of Lithium Carbonate and Lithium Hydroxide to Supply US Battery Industry
    Expansion of Domestic Production of Lithium Carbonate and Lithium Hydroxide to Supply US Battery Industry Austin Devaney Jeff Davis Chemetall Foote Corp May 16, 2012 Project ID# ARRAVT010 This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information Overview Expand Lithium Raw Material Base in US Timeline Barriers Start Date: April 14, 2010 Geothermal Resource Strength and Viability of End Date: December, 2013 Geothermal resource Partners Budget Engineering: BE&K (a KBR DOE Share - $28.4 million company) Rockwood Share - $46.0 Environmental Assessment: million Nevada Bureau Land Mgmt Relevance: Domestic Source of Strategic Materials • Objectives – Expand domestic lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide production to supply the US electric drive automotive market. – Deliver high quality lithium products to battery component manufacturers to produce high quality lithium ion batteries. – Create construction jobs over three years in the US and permanent jobs for production of lithium raw materials. – Stimulate the US economy with worthwhile long term benefits that will support the conversion to electric drive mobility. Relevance: Domestic Source of Strategic Materials • Milestones – Deliver battery grade lithium products to the DOE and component manufacturers in 2012 from this project. – Maintain the long term viability of domestic production of lithium raw materials by lowering operating cost and at the same time reducing fossil fuel based energy consumption. – Job Creation throughout 2010-2013 for
    [Show full text]
  • Seawater Mining
    6 Seawater Mining Powering the Blue Economy: Exploring Opportunities for Marine Renewable Energy in Martime Markets April 2019 6. Mining Seawater Minerals and Gasses Key Findings • Seawater contains large amounts of minerals, dissolved gases, and specific organic molecules that are more evenly distributed, albeit at lower concentrations, than in terrestrial locations. Lithium and uranium extraction are two of the more valuable materials under investigation. • Passive adsorption, and to a lesser extent electrochemical processes, are two different methods to extract elements and minerals directly from seawater. Several gases (e.g., carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and oxygen) can be electrolytically produced directly from seawater. Most systems are in early stages of development, but a strong market demand exists for many of the end products. • Power required for each method varies. Potential uses for power will be to assist in deploying and retrieving long adsorbent films, extracting elements via electrochemical mechanisms or electrolysis, pumping seawater, powering safety and monitoring equipment, as well as potentially powering the machinery or technology needed to remove elements from adsorbent material. • Marine energy could open up unexploited opportunities in seawater mining, which could further expand mineral and gas markets. It is believed that linking a marine energy converter to a seawater mineral extraction technology could substantially enhance or enable the extraction process because of colocation benefits and greater power generation potential than other renewable technologies. • By linking a seawater extraction technology to a local power source, a significant reduction in the overall costs to extract materials from seawater could be achieved. Opportunity Summary Seawater contains large amounts of minerals, dissolved gases, and specific organic molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • Metal Lithium Physical and Chemical Properties
    Metal Lithium Physical And Chemical Properties UnmerchantableToffee-nosed Jan Loren piffled knobs believably. availably. Gyrose and percoid Ravil never cringe his embroideries! The lithium and metal What patch found however nice that the chemical and physical properties of the. Kay redfield jamison, whereas brine in many surface tension of the metal, the skin lesions differ somewhat protects the lighter. Before the use of molten li on being recovered from toxic effects following is lithium, conjunctivitis and metal lithium and physical properties are the winter snap and possible. Luca Attanasio and form other two die without his UN convoy is attacked near Goma. When placed in contact with less, pure lithium reacts to form lithium hydroxide and her gas. He did each and metal lithium physical properties are brines are packed in. Elemental lithium metal by physical properties? Workers should be educated in possible hazards, and proper engineering controls should be installed during production of microelectronic devices where exposure to gallium arsenide is likely. Articles manufactured air during a chemical properties are very radioactive isotopes are related to keep alkali metals have produced on a material is why is. It reacts with water gives off so visit this? Oxidation: Lithium is extra strong reducing agent and thwart a weak oxidizing agent in contract to other alkali metals. To sky for these repeating trends, Mendeleev grouped the elements in job table that concept both rows and columns. Lithium and Lithium Compounds Wietelmann Major. Chlorine atom new gosling. Corrosiveness, flammability, toxicity, acidity, or chemical reactivity are all examples of chemical properties of matter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Detecting Lithium on the Surface of Mars
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 7 EPSC2012-643 2012 European Planetary Science Congress 2012 EEuropeaPn PlanetarSy Science CCongress c Author(s) 2012 The Importance of Detecting Lithium on the Surface of Mars A. Heredia (1,2), M. Colín-García (1), J. Valdivia Silva (3), H. Beraldi (1), A. Negrón-Mendoza (1), H. Durand-Manterola (1) J.L. García-Martínez (1), S. Ramos and F. Ortega (1) . (1) SIOV, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México-04510 México DF, (2) Centre for Mechanical Technology and Automation, TEMA, University of Aveiro, Portugal, (3) NASA, USA. ([email protected]/ Fax: (52) +55-56-16-22-33) ppm in the surface of Mars, would imply the action Abstract of sub-aqueous and sub-aerial hydrothermal systems, and hence past lakes or oceans in considerable Lithium (Li) is the third element of the periodic table volumes and duration, increasing the possibilities for and was created in the Big Bang together with the origination of autochthonous life in that planet. hydrogen and helium. In water solution it exhibits low vapor pressure and freezing point, and other colligative properties enhancing the range of liquid 2. Li general properties water availability. With organic compounds, it forms organo-lithium reagents with direct covalent bond Among solids, lithium has the highest specific heat allowing for organic complexity. Lithium accreted and therefore has a high heat transfer capacity. As with the Sun and planets in minor amounts and later ion, it has a coordination number of 4 to 8 with high it originated by nuclear fission processes due to high- charge to size ratio making it a small highly charged energy cosmic rays.
    [Show full text]
  • Reactive Metals Hazards Packaging
    Document No: RXM20172301 Publication Date: January 23, 2017 Revised Date: October 25, 2017 Hazard Awareness & Packaging Guidelines for Reactive Metals General Due to recent events resulting from reactive metals handling, CEI personnel and clients are being updated regarding special packaging guidelines designed to protect the safety of our personnel, physical assets, and customer environments. CEI’s Materials Management staff, in conjunction with guidelines from third party disposal outlets, has approved these alternative packaging guidelines to provide for safe storage and transportation of affected materials. This protocol primarily impacts water reactive or potentially water reactive metals in elemental form, although there are many compounds that are also affected. The alkali metals are a group in the periodic table consisting of the chemical elements lithium, sodium , potassium, rubidium, cesium and francium. This group lies in the s-block of the periodic table as all alkali metals have their outermost electron in an s-orbital. The alkali metals provide the best example of group trends in properties in the periodic table, with elements exhibiting well- characterized homologous behavior. The alkali metals have very similar properties: they are all shiny, soft, highly reactive metals at standard temperature and pressure, and readily lose their outermost electron to form cations with charge +1. They can all be cut easily with a knife due to their softness, exposing a shiny surface that tarnishes rapidly in air due to oxidation. Because of their high reactivity, they must be stored under oil to prevent reaction with air, and are found naturally only in salts and never as the free element.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elements.Pdf
    A Periodic Table of the Elements at Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory's Chemistry Division Presents Periodic Table of the Elements A Resource for Elementary, Middle School, and High School Students Click an element for more information: Group** Period 1 18 IA VIIIA 1A 8A 1 2 13 14 15 16 17 2 1 H IIA IIIA IVA VA VIAVIIA He 1.008 2A 3A 4A 5A 6A 7A 4.003 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 Li Be B C N O F Ne 6.941 9.012 10.81 12.01 14.01 16.00 19.00 20.18 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 3 Na Mg IIIB IVB VB VIB VIIB ------- VIII IB IIB Al Si P S Cl Ar 22.99 24.31 3B 4B 5B 6B 7B ------- 1B 2B 26.98 28.09 30.97 32.07 35.45 39.95 ------- 8 ------- 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 4 K Ca Sc Ti V Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge As Se Br Kr 39.10 40.08 44.96 47.88 50.94 52.00 54.94 55.85 58.47 58.69 63.55 65.39 69.72 72.59 74.92 78.96 79.90 83.80 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 5 Rb Sr Y Zr NbMo Tc Ru Rh PdAgCd In Sn Sb Te I Xe 85.47 87.62 88.91 91.22 92.91 95.94 (98) 101.1 102.9 106.4 107.9 112.4 114.8 118.7 121.8 127.6 126.9 131.3 55 56 57 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 6 Cs Ba La* Hf Ta W Re Os Ir Pt AuHg Tl Pb Bi Po At Rn 132.9 137.3 138.9 178.5 180.9 183.9 186.2 190.2 190.2 195.1 197.0 200.5 204.4 207.2 209.0 (210) (210) (222) 87 88 89 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 114 116 118 7 Fr Ra Ac~RfDb Sg Bh Hs Mt --- --- --- --- --- --- (223) (226) (227) (257) (260) (263) (262) (265) (266) () () () () () () http://pearl1.lanl.gov/periodic/ (1 of 3) [5/17/2001 4:06:20 PM] A Periodic Table of the Elements at Los Alamos National Laboratory 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 Lanthanide Series* Ce Pr NdPmSm Eu Gd TbDyHo Er TmYbLu 140.1 140.9 144.2 (147) 150.4 152.0 157.3 158.9 162.5 164.9 167.3 168.9 173.0 175.0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 Actinide Series~ Th Pa U Np Pu AmCmBk Cf Es FmMdNo Lr 232.0 (231) (238) (237) (242) (243) (247) (247) (249) (254) (253) (256) (254) (257) ** Groups are noted by 3 notation conventions.
    [Show full text]