DOCSLIB.ORG

Silver Peak Lithium Mine Developer: Albemarle Corporation Location: Esmeralda County, Nevada Prepared February 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Silver Peak Lithium Mine Developer: Albemarle Corporation Location: Esmeralda County, Nevada Prepared February 2018 Silver Peak Lithium Mine Developer: Albemarle Corporation Location: Esmeralda County, Nevada Prepared February 2018 Background brine from an old lake bed that is then evaporated in Opening in 1864, the Silver Peak Mine was large, shallow ponds to expose the lithium. These initially a silver mine. However, a century later, evaporation ponds take up thousands of acres and 12 miners discovered lithium in the water and it was in to 18 months of evaporation are required before the this way that the Silver Peak Mine became the lithium is concentrated enough for offsite factory lithium mine that we know currently. Today, the processing (Walker, 2017). Silver Peak Mine produces 3,500 metric tons of The mine receives its name from the town lithium carbonate per year with the capacity to nearest to it, Silver Peak. Silver Peak is just four produce 6,000. The mine, after many changes in miles away from the mine and is 215 miles northwest ownership, is now owned by Albemarle Corporation, of Las Vegas. As of 2010, only 107 people resided in a mining company based in Charlottesville, NC that the town. Founded in 1863 as an outpost for silver is one of four global mining conglomerates that and gold miners, Silver Peak is one of Nevada’s control the majority of the world’s lithium supply. oldest mining communities. The Environmental The mine employs 80 full time workers and about 20 Assessment for the mine’s proposed expansion more contractors. describes the area around Silver Peak as “sparsely In 2010, the then owner of the Silver Peak Mine, populated with between 0 to 40 people per square Rockwood Lithium, announced a doubling of their mile, within at least an 80-mile radius...” (DOE, 2010) capacity. This expansion was made possible in part by a $28.4 million grant from the US Department of Policy Context Energy with the expressed purpose to “expand and The Silver Peak Mine is a part of a growing upgrade the production of lithium materials for lithium industry that produced 175,000 metric tons advanced transportation batteries.” Albemarle of lithium carbonate in 2015 globally. According to believes that the Silver Creek expansion is an Cormark Securities, global lithium consumption is ‘investment’ into Esmeralda County. (Albemarle, projected to increase 100% by 2020. This increase in 2016) demand and consumption is mainly due to use of lithium-ion batteries for electric and hybrid vehicles. Citi Research reports that the global market for lithium-ion batteries in 2015 was $24 billion, and is predicted to be $40 billion by 2020 (Fehrenbacher, 2016). The expansion of the Silver Peak Mine is connected to the construction of the “Gigafactory,” a $5 billion lithium-ion battery factory co-owned by the electric vehicle-manufacturer, Tesla, and Clayton Valley, location of the Silver Peak Mine1 Japanese technology giant, Panasonic. The gigafactory is currently being built only three and a The word “mine” is a bit misleading when half hours away from the Silver Peak Mine near the referring to Silver Peak. This operation is not town Sparks. The goal of the Gigafactory is to extracting rock or ore from the ground to be vertically integrate the battery-making process in processed. Rather the “mine” withdraws subsurface order to cut down on costs. This means that the Gigafactory will take raw materials, such as lithium, already in operation, the approval process for the nickel and cobalt, and turn them into batteries, all expansion was relatively easy and simple. The under one roof. Once completed and operating at full largest consideration seemed to be potential harm to capacity the gigafactory will be able to turn 15,000- migratory waterfowl, which can be harmed or killed 25,000 tons of lithium carbonate into lithium ion- by the high-concentration brine in the evaporation batteries every year. That is 17% of current global ponds. The expansion would require more lithium output. Batteries produced in the factory will evaporation ponds meaning that there is an increased be installed in Tesla’s electric vehicles as well as in risk of birds landing in the ponds (DOE, 2010). a product that Tesla calls the “PowerPack” which is There appears to have been little to no public used to charge Tesla vehicles. Silver Peak Mine’s opposition to the proposed expansion of the Silver proximity to the Gigafactory makes it an attractive Peak mine. This could be due to two different reasons. potential supplier to Tesla and Panasonic (Nanalyze, First, the opportunities for public response to the 2015). expansion might not have been easily accessible to The Silver Peak Mine expansion has the the public, resulting in low participation. Second, support of state-level policymakers. Brian and perhaps more likely, is that the residents of the Sandoval, the current Governor of Nevada has said Silver Peak area are in support of the mine and felt that “[t]he key to growing our mining industry is the no reason to participate in any opportunities for continued opposition to restrictive federal rules public response. Silver Peak’s entire existence has related to public lands.” The Governor would like been centered around mining in the region. It is no President Trump to ease regulations for mining coincidence that the mine and town share the same companies so that they might more easily develop name. In 2017, the mine’s Plant Manager, John more mines. Additionally, early in 2017, State Mayes, stated that the operation is “pretty important” Senator Pat Spearman and State Assemblyman Jim to Silver Peak because of all the jobs that it provides Wheeler began drafting legislation that would promote the development of lithium mining in to the small town (Nelson, 2017). It is likely that the Nevada by removing sales taxes on equipment expansion of the Silver Peak was a welcome needed for lithium exploration and development development for the small town. within the state (Walker, 2017). Conclusion The rise of electric vehicles and the construction of Tesla and Panasonic’s Gigafactory has given the Silver Peak Mine new life. The mine has the general favorability of global markets as well as local and state politics. Lithium mining at the Silver Peak Mine is contributing to a transition to a world with more sustainable energy, however the mine is still inherently degrading the surrounding environment. Evaporation Ponds at the Silver Peak Mine2 Rather than being an open-pit mine or one that is associated with radioactive thorium production like Evaporation Ponds at the Silver Peak Mine2 other REE mines, the Silver Peak Mine requires Public Response and EA Process tremendous amounts of land for evaporation ponds, The Environmental Assessment process which also are toxic to plants and wildlife in the area. concluded in 2010 with a Finding of No Significant Although the environmental impacts may differ, the Impact statement released by the Department of Silver Peak Mine should adhere to the same Energy (DOE, Sept 2010). Since the mine was environmental rigor applied to every other REE mine. Works Cited Fehrenbacher, Katie. “A Lithium Gamble That Could Win Big for Tesla.” Fortune, 29 Mar. 2016, fortune.com/2016/03/29/lithium-tesla-mine-nevada/. Frankel, Todd, and Peter Whoriskey. “Companies are making billions in lithium mining. But these indigenous people are being left out.” The Washington Post, WP Company, 19 Dec. 2016, www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/business/batteries/tossed-aside-in-the-lithium-rush/. Geuss, Megan. “Tesla signs another deal with a company developing a lithium mine.” Ars Technica, 17 Sept. 2015, arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/09/tesla-signs-another-deal-with-a-company- developing-a-lithium-mine/. Nelson, Paul. “Nevada's Silver Peak Lithium Mine Prepares To Ramp Up Production.” KTVN Channel 2, CBS News, 1 Feb. 2017, www.ktvn.com/story/34405088/nevadas-silver-peak-lithium-mine-prepares-to-ramp-up- production. Pullen, John Patrick. “New Drone Footage From Over Tesla's Massive Gigafactory.” Fortune, 7 Aug. 2017, fortune.com/2017/08/07/tesla-gigafactory-drone-footage-video-construction/. “The Likely Provider of Lithium for Tesla's Gigafactory.” Nanalyze, 19 Aug. 2015, www.nanalyze.com/2015/08/the-likely-provider-of-lithium-for-teslas-gigafactory/. “Silver Peak, Nevada Lithium Operations.” Albemarle Corporation, 20 May 2016. https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/InterimCommittee/REL/Document/6827 Walker, Patrick. “North America's only working lithium mine is in Nevada.” Las Vegas Now, CBS News, 23 Feb. 2017, www.lasvegasnow.com/news/north-americas-only-working-lithium-mine-is-in- nevada/662089846. Westervelt, Amy. “Tesla's new batteries may be harder on the environment than you think.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 10 June 2015, www.theguardian.com/vital-signs/2015/jun/10/tesla-batteries- environment-lithium-elon-musk-powerwall. United States, Congress, Department of Energy, “Final Environmental Assessment For Chemetall Foote Corporation: Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Kings Mountain, NC and Silver Peak, NV.” Chemetall Foote Corporation, 2010. United States, Congress, Department of Energy, “Finding of No Significant Impact for Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Project.” Chemetall Foote Corporation, 2010. https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/nepapub/nepa_documents/RedDont/EA-1715-FONSI-2010.pdf Photo Sources 1http://www.lithium-x.com/clayton_valley/ 2https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_Peak,_Nevada .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Atomic Spectra of Alkali Elements
    Atomic Spectra of Alkali Elements S. R. Kulkarni April 10, 2020 Rydberg primarily focused on studying the lines of alkali metals (Lithium, Potassium and Sodium).1 Rydberg organized the various features by their appearance on the pho- tographs:The alkali spectra were more complicated than that of hydrogen. Rydberg recog- nized that were three different types of lines: lines which looked \sharp" (on photographic plates), \principal" (strong lines that showed up in emission and absorption) and those which appeared ‘diffuse”. These series were abbreviated to S, P, D. Later \Fundamental" (F) was added. As noted earlier, Rydberg preferred to work with wavenumbers. Using data from Liveing and Deware he recast Angstrom's formula as follows: N k = k − (1) n 1 (n + µ)2 where kn is the wavenumber of the nth line in a given series. Rydberg kept N fixed to the value measured by Balmer with k1 µ being free parameters. Rydberg found the following formulae for Lithium R ks = ks − ; 2; 3; 4; ::: (2) n 1 (n + S)2 R kp = kp − 1; 2; 3; ::: (3) n 1 (n + P )2 R kd = kd − 2; 3; 4; ::: (4) n 1 (n + D)2 s −1 p −1 where S = 0:5951, P = 0:9596, D = 0:9974, k1 = 28601:6 cm k1 = 43487:7 cm , d −1 k1 = 28598:5 cm and we have switched to the modern notation in which N is replaced by R (the value he found was R = 109721:6 cm−1). Rydberg had confidence in the data that he was able to find a deeper connection between the constants between the series.
    [Show full text]
  • Helium Adsorption on Lithium Substrates
    JLowTempPhys DOI 10.1007/s10909-007-9516-5 Helium Adsorption on Lithium Substrates E. Van Cleve · P. Taborek · J.E. Rutledge Received: 25 July 2007 / Accepted: 13 September 2007 © Springer Science+Business Media 2007 Abstract We have developed a cryogenic pulsed laser deposition (PLD) system to deposit lithium films onto a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) at 4 K. Adsorption isotherms of 4He on lithium were measured in the temperature range between 1.42 K and 2.5 K. The isotherms are qualitatively different from isotherms on strong sub- strates such as gold and weak substrates such as cesium. There is no evidence of the formation of solid-like layers of helium, and the helium coverage is approximately linear in the pressure over a wide range. By measuring the low coverage slope of the isotherms, the binding energy of helium to lithium was found to be approxi- mately −13.6 K. For lithium substrates less than approximately 100 layers thick, the chemical potential at which the superfluid transition was observed was surprisingly sensitive to the details of lithium deposition. Keywords Helium films · Pulsed laser deposition · Superfluidity · Alkali metal 1 Introduction When helium is adsorbed onto a strong heterogenous substrate such as gold, the first 2 or 3 statistical layers are solid-like. The nature of these layers is not yet clear, but the layers are amorphous and do not participate significantly in superflow at high coverages. Superfluidity on strong substrates requires a minimum critical coverage to saturate the solid-like layers, and the superfluid phase which forms at higher cover- ages flows over these layers and does not interact directly with the strong, short range This work was supported by NSF grant DMR 0509685.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithium Data Sheet
    98 LITHIUM (Data in metric tons of lithium content unless otherwise noted) Domestic Production and Use: The only lithium production in the United States was from a brine operation in Nevada. Two companies produced a wide range of downstream lithium compounds in the United States from domestic or imported lithium carbonate, lithium chloride, and lithium hydroxide. Domestic production data were withheld to avoid disclosing company proprietary data. Although lithium markets vary by location, global end-use markets are estimated as follows: batteries, 65%; ceramics and glass, 18%; lubricating greases, 5%; polymer production, 3%; continuous casting mold flux powders, 3%; air treatment, 1%; and other uses, 5%. Lithium consumption for batteries has increased significantly in recent years because rechargeable lithium batteries are used extensively in the growing market for portable electronic devices and increasingly are used in electric tools, electric vehicles, and grid storage applications. Lithium minerals were used directly as ore concentrates in ceramics and glass applications. Salient Statistics—United States: 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019e Production W W W W W Imports for consumption 2,750 3,140 3,330 3,420 2,500 Exports 1,790 1,520 1,960 1,660 1,700 Consumption, estimated1 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,000 Price, annual average, battery-grade lithium carbonate, dollars per metric ton2 6,500 8,650 15,000 17,000 13,000 Employment, mine and mill, number 70 70 70 70 70 Net import reliance3 as a percentage of estimated consumption >25 >50 >50 >50 >25 Recycling: One domestic company has recycled lithium metal and lithium-ion batteries since 1992 at its facility in British Columbia, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Expansion of Domestic Production of Lithium Carbonate and Lithium Hydroxide to Supply US Battery Industry
    Expansion of Domestic Production of Lithium Carbonate and Lithium Hydroxide to Supply US Battery Industry John Groves Jeff Davis Chemetall Foote Corp May 11, 2011 Project ID# ARRAVT010 This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information Overview Expand Lithium Raw Material Base in US Timeline Barriers Start Date: April 14, 2010 Geothermal Resource Strength and Viability of End Date: February, 2013 Geothermal resource Partners Budget Engineering: BE&K® (a KBR DOE Share - $28.4 million company) Rockwood Share - $39.5 Environmental Assessment: million Nevada Bureau of Land Mgmt Relevance: Domestic Source of Strategic Materials • Objectives – Expand domestic lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide production to supply the US electric drive automotive market. – Deliver high quality lithium products to battery component manufacturers to produce high quality lithium ion batteries. – Create construction jobs over the first two years in the US and permanent jobs for production of lithium raw materials. – Stimulate the US economy with worthwhile long term benefits that will support the conversion to electric drive mobility. Relevance: Domestic Source of Strategic Materials • Milestones – Deliver battery grade lithium products to the DOE and component manufacturers in 2012 from this project. – Maintain the long term viability of domestic production of lithium raw materials by lowering operating cost and at the same time reducing fossil fuel based energy consumption. – Job Creation throughout 2010-2012
    [Show full text]
  • Global Lithium Sources—Industrial Use and Future in the Electric Vehicle Industry: a Review
    resources Review Global Lithium Sources—Industrial Use and Future in the Electric Vehicle Industry: A Review Laurence Kavanagh * , Jerome Keohane, Guiomar Garcia Cabellos, Andrew Lloyd and John Cleary EnviroCORE, Department of Science and Health, Institute of Technology Carlow, Kilkenny, Road, Co., R93-V960 Carlow, Ireland; [email protected] (J.K.); [email protected] (G.G.C.); [email protected] (A.L.); [email protected] (J.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 28 July 2018; Accepted: 11 September 2018; Published: 17 September 2018 Abstract: Lithium is a key component in green energy storage technologies and is rapidly becoming a metal of crucial importance to the European Union. The different industrial uses of lithium are discussed in this review along with a compilation of the locations of the main geological sources of lithium. An emphasis is placed on lithium’s use in lithium ion batteries and their use in the electric vehicle industry. The electric vehicle market is driving new demand for lithium resources. The expected scale-up in this sector will put pressure on current lithium supplies. The European Union has a burgeoning demand for lithium and is the second largest consumer of lithium resources. Currently, only 1–2% of worldwide lithium is produced in the European Union (Portugal). There are several lithium mineralisations scattered across Europe, the majority of which are currently undergoing mining feasibility studies. The increasing cost of lithium is driving a new global mining boom and should see many of Europe’s mineralisation’s becoming economic. The information given in this paper is a source of contextual information that can be used to support the European Union’s drive towards a low carbon economy and to develop the field of research.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Table Key Concepts
    Periodic Table Key Concepts Periodic Table Basics The periodic table is a table of all the elements which make up matter Elements initially grouped in a table by Dmitri Mendeleev Symbols – each element has a symbol which is either a Capital Letter or a Capital Letter followed by a lower case letter Atomic Number – the number above an element’s symbol which shows the number of protons Atomic Mass – the number found below an elements symbol which shows the mass of the element. Mass = the number of protons + the number of neutrons Metals – the elements which have the properties of malleability, luster, and conductivity o These elements are good conductors of electricity & heat. o Found to the left of the zig-zag line on the periodic table Nonmetals – do not have the properties of metals. Found to the right of the zig-zag line Metalloids – elements found along the zig-zag line of the periodic table and have some properties of metals and nonmetals (B, Si, Ge, As, Sb, Te, and Po) Groups The columns going up and down (There are 18 groups) Group 1: Hydrogen, Lithium, Sodium, Potassium, Rubidium, Cesium, and Francium Elements arranged so that elements with similar properties would be in the same group. o Group 1 Alkali Metals - highly reactive metals o Group 2 Alkali Earth Metals – reactive metals o Group 3-12 Transition Metals o Group 17 Halogens – highly reactive non-metals o Group 18 Noble Gases - do not react or combine with any other elements. Elements are grouped according to their properties or reactivity Reactivity is determined by the number of electrons in an element’s outer energy level These electrons are called valence electrons Periods The rows that run from left to right on the periodic table (There are 7 periods) Period 1 contains 2 elements, Hydrogen and Helium.
    [Show full text]
  • Expansion of Domestic Production of Lithium Carbonate and Lithium Hydroxide to Supply US Battery Industry
    Expansion of Domestic Production of Lithium Carbonate and Lithium Hydroxide to Supply US Battery Industry Austin Devaney Jeff Davis Chemetall Foote Corp May 16, 2012 Project ID# ARRAVT010 This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information Overview Expand Lithium Raw Material Base in US Timeline Barriers Start Date: April 14, 2010 Geothermal Resource Strength and Viability of End Date: December, 2013 Geothermal resource Partners Budget Engineering: BE&K (a KBR DOE Share - $28.4 million company) Rockwood Share - $46.0 Environmental Assessment: million Nevada Bureau Land Mgmt Relevance: Domestic Source of Strategic Materials • Objectives – Expand domestic lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide production to supply the US electric drive automotive market. – Deliver high quality lithium products to battery component manufacturers to produce high quality lithium ion batteries. – Create construction jobs over three years in the US and permanent jobs for production of lithium raw materials. – Stimulate the US economy with worthwhile long term benefits that will support the conversion to electric drive mobility. Relevance: Domestic Source of Strategic Materials • Milestones – Deliver battery grade lithium products to the DOE and component manufacturers in 2012 from this project. – Maintain the long term viability of domestic production of lithium raw materials by lowering operating cost and at the same time reducing fossil fuel based energy consumption. – Job Creation throughout 2010-2013 for
    [Show full text]
  • Seawater Mining
    6 Seawater Mining Powering the Blue Economy: Exploring Opportunities for Marine Renewable Energy in Martime Markets April 2019 6. Mining Seawater Minerals and Gasses Key Findings • Seawater contains large amounts of minerals, dissolved gases, and specific organic molecules that are more evenly distributed, albeit at lower concentrations, than in terrestrial locations. Lithium and uranium extraction are two of the more valuable materials under investigation. • Passive adsorption, and to a lesser extent electrochemical processes, are two different methods to extract elements and minerals directly from seawater. Several gases (e.g., carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and oxygen) can be electrolytically produced directly from seawater. Most systems are in early stages of development, but a strong market demand exists for many of the end products. • Power required for each method varies. Potential uses for power will be to assist in deploying and retrieving long adsorbent films, extracting elements via electrochemical mechanisms or electrolysis, pumping seawater, powering safety and monitoring equipment, as well as potentially powering the machinery or technology needed to remove elements from adsorbent material. • Marine energy could open up unexploited opportunities in seawater mining, which could further expand mineral and gas markets. It is believed that linking a marine energy converter to a seawater mineral extraction technology could substantially enhance or enable the extraction process because of colocation benefits and greater power generation potential than other renewable technologies. • By linking a seawater extraction technology to a local power source, a significant reduction in the overall costs to extract materials from seawater could be achieved. Opportunity Summary Seawater contains large amounts of minerals, dissolved gases, and specific organic molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • Metal Lithium Physical and Chemical Properties
    Metal Lithium Physical And Chemical Properties UnmerchantableToffee-nosed Jan Loren piffled knobs believably. availably. Gyrose and percoid Ravil never cringe his embroideries! The lithium and metal What patch found however nice that the chemical and physical properties of the. Kay redfield jamison, whereas brine in many surface tension of the metal, the skin lesions differ somewhat protects the lighter. Before the use of molten li on being recovered from toxic effects following is lithium, conjunctivitis and metal lithium and physical properties are the winter snap and possible. Luca Attanasio and form other two die without his UN convoy is attacked near Goma. When placed in contact with less, pure lithium reacts to form lithium hydroxide and her gas. He did each and metal lithium physical properties are brines are packed in. Elemental lithium metal by physical properties? Workers should be educated in possible hazards, and proper engineering controls should be installed during production of microelectronic devices where exposure to gallium arsenide is likely. Articles manufactured air during a chemical properties are very radioactive isotopes are related to keep alkali metals have produced on a material is why is. It reacts with water gives off so visit this? Oxidation: Lithium is extra strong reducing agent and thwart a weak oxidizing agent in contract to other alkali metals. To sky for these repeating trends, Mendeleev grouped the elements in job table that concept both rows and columns. Lithium and Lithium Compounds Wietelmann Major. Chlorine atom new gosling. Corrosiveness, flammability, toxicity, acidity, or chemical reactivity are all examples of chemical properties of matter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Detecting Lithium on the Surface of Mars
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 7 EPSC2012-643 2012 European Planetary Science Congress 2012 EEuropeaPn PlanetarSy Science CCongress c Author(s) 2012 The Importance of Detecting Lithium on the Surface of Mars A. Heredia (1,2), M. Colín-García (1), J. Valdivia Silva (3), H. Beraldi (1), A. Negrón-Mendoza (1), H. Durand-Manterola (1) J.L. García-Martínez (1), S. Ramos and F. Ortega (1) . (1) SIOV, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México-04510 México DF, (2) Centre for Mechanical Technology and Automation, TEMA, University of Aveiro, Portugal, (3) NASA, USA. ([email protected]/ Fax: (52) +55-56-16-22-33) ppm in the surface of Mars, would imply the action Abstract of sub-aqueous and sub-aerial hydrothermal systems, and hence past lakes or oceans in considerable Lithium (Li) is the third element of the periodic table volumes and duration, increasing the possibilities for and was created in the Big Bang together with the origination of autochthonous life in that planet. hydrogen and helium. In water solution it exhibits low vapor pressure and freezing point, and other colligative properties enhancing the range of liquid 2. Li general properties water availability. With organic compounds, it forms organo-lithium reagents with direct covalent bond Among solids, lithium has the highest specific heat allowing for organic complexity. Lithium accreted and therefore has a high heat transfer capacity. As with the Sun and planets in minor amounts and later ion, it has a coordination number of 4 to 8 with high it originated by nuclear fission processes due to high- charge to size ratio making it a small highly charged energy cosmic rays.
    [Show full text]
  • Reactive Metals Hazards Packaging
    Document No: RXM20172301 Publication Date: January 23, 2017 Revised Date: October 25, 2017 Hazard Awareness & Packaging Guidelines for Reactive Metals General Due to recent events resulting from reactive metals handling, CEI personnel and clients are being updated regarding special packaging guidelines designed to protect the safety of our personnel, physical assets, and customer environments. CEI’s Materials Management staff, in conjunction with guidelines from third party disposal outlets, has approved these alternative packaging guidelines to provide for safe storage and transportation of affected materials. This protocol primarily impacts water reactive or potentially water reactive metals in elemental form, although there are many compounds that are also affected. The alkali metals are a group in the periodic table consisting of the chemical elements lithium, sodium , potassium, rubidium, cesium and francium. This group lies in the s-block of the periodic table as all alkali metals have their outermost electron in an s-orbital. The alkali metals provide the best example of group trends in properties in the periodic table, with elements exhibiting well- characterized homologous behavior. The alkali metals have very similar properties: they are all shiny, soft, highly reactive metals at standard temperature and pressure, and readily lose their outermost electron to form cations with charge +1. They can all be cut easily with a knife due to their softness, exposing a shiny surface that tarnishes rapidly in air due to oxidation. Because of their high reactivity, they must be stored under oil to prevent reaction with air, and are found naturally only in salts and never as the free element.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elements.Pdf
    A Periodic Table of the Elements at Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory's Chemistry Division Presents Periodic Table of the Elements A Resource for Elementary, Middle School, and High School Students Click an element for more information: Group** Period 1 18 IA VIIIA 1A 8A 1 2 13 14 15 16 17 2 1 H IIA IIIA IVA VA VIAVIIA He 1.008 2A 3A 4A 5A 6A 7A 4.003 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 Li Be B C N O F Ne 6.941 9.012 10.81 12.01 14.01 16.00 19.00 20.18 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 3 Na Mg IIIB IVB VB VIB VIIB ------- VIII IB IIB Al Si P S Cl Ar 22.99 24.31 3B 4B 5B 6B 7B ------- 1B 2B 26.98 28.09 30.97 32.07 35.45 39.95 ------- 8 ------- 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 4 K Ca Sc Ti V Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge As Se Br Kr 39.10 40.08 44.96 47.88 50.94 52.00 54.94 55.85 58.47 58.69 63.55 65.39 69.72 72.59 74.92 78.96 79.90 83.80 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 5 Rb Sr Y Zr NbMo Tc Ru Rh PdAgCd In Sn Sb Te I Xe 85.47 87.62 88.91 91.22 92.91 95.94 (98) 101.1 102.9 106.4 107.9 112.4 114.8 118.7 121.8 127.6 126.9 131.3 55 56 57 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 6 Cs Ba La* Hf Ta W Re Os Ir Pt AuHg Tl Pb Bi Po At Rn 132.9 137.3 138.9 178.5 180.9 183.9 186.2 190.2 190.2 195.1 197.0 200.5 204.4 207.2 209.0 (210) (210) (222) 87 88 89 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 114 116 118 7 Fr Ra Ac~RfDb Sg Bh Hs Mt --- --- --- --- --- --- (223) (226) (227) (257) (260) (263) (262) (265) (266) () () () () () () http://pearl1.lanl.gov/periodic/ (1 of 3) [5/17/2001 4:06:20 PM] A Periodic Table of the Elements at Los Alamos National Laboratory 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 Lanthanide Series* Ce Pr NdPmSm Eu Gd TbDyHo Er TmYbLu 140.1 140.9 144.2 (147) 150.4 152.0 157.3 158.9 162.5 164.9 167.3 168.9 173.0 175.0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 Actinide Series~ Th Pa U Np Pu AmCmBk Cf Es FmMdNo Lr 232.0 (231) (238) (237) (242) (243) (247) (247) (249) (254) (253) (256) (254) (257) ** Groups are noted by 3 notation conventions.
    [Show full text]