Sir ·William
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Edward III, Vol. 16, P
136 CALENDAR OF PATENT ROLLS. 1375. Membrane 33d — cont. May6. Richard,earl of Arundel and Surrey, Thomas de Ponynges, Westminster. Robert Bealknap,Edward de Sancto Johanne,John de Waleys, William de Cobeham,HenryAsty,Roger Dalyngrugge,Robert de Halsham and Nicholas Wilcombe ; Sussex. May16. Nicholas de Audeleye,Gilbert Talbot, Walter Perle, David Westminster. Hanemere,John Gour and John de Oldecastel ; Hereford. May20. Henryde Percy, William de Aton, Roger de Kirketon,Roger Westminster. de Fulthorp, John Conestable of Halsham, Thomas de Wythornwyk,Peter de Grymmesby, Robert de Lorymer, Thomas Saltmersh and John Dayvill ; the East Riding,co. York. July5. William de Monte Acuto,earl of Salisbury,William Tauk,Robert Westminster. le Fitz Payn,John de la Hale,Edmund Fitz Herberd,Walter Perle,Roger Manyngford,William Payn and Edmund Strode ; Dorset. July5. Hugh, earl of Stafford,Guyde Bryan, Peter le Veel,Walter Westminster. Perle, David Hanemere,Robert Palet, John Clifford and Thomas Styward ; Gloucester. ' chivaler,' July15. Hugh de Courtenay,earl of Devon,Guyde Bryene, Westminster. William Botreaux,' chivaler,'William Tauk,HenryPercehay, William Caryand John Cary; Devon. Dec. 6. William de Wychyngham,Thomas de Ingelby,John de Basynges, Westminster. Simon Warde, John de Wittelesbury,Nicholas Grene and Walter Scarle ; Rutland. ByC. Sept. 25. John de Vernoun,John Golafre,Richard de Adderbury,Reynold Westminster. Malyns,Walter Perle,David Hanemere,John de Baldyngton, Robert de Wyghthull and John Laundeles ; Oxford. Nov. 10. Thomas de Ingelby,Roger de Kirketon,Roger de Fulthorp, Westminster. Walter Frost, John de Lokton and Thomas de Beverle ; the libertyof St. John of Beverley. Dec. 6. William Latymer,John de Cobham,Robert Bealknap,Reynold Westminster. -
TVA Thames Valley Anarchists
. - I ~ Ir"-3 1 ' _ _ L»;< / .-‘.5*1 1 \\3: \.l5‘?-w~';,;»" ,//Ihi...’ ‘r - ‘A1:.-"3\., *3? \\ '.'"‘"I. 1'.-I.-". in‘ \\\‘ ‘_. ~\ \;R 1 ‘ I - . _ l in ~r‘\ ‘»\ I 4 j :'u-‘- '-::-‘ ‘II b\‘_ '1'}/Ki 1 n In 1 ‘J'.-- :"-- 5-*-_ - . f""j*,._.“'.'; '1 ".22 '.\ ‘, , r ,..--- \. ’_'' _ . P ”' 3:- T-1-9-LI ‘1.' 1- fr‘:7: "\‘ \ :- ( 2 ""' 4.’ are-"'3 '-(‘.1 ' \ ' ‘I Q fig ml! y. aria.-_ .5," 1' W F*""*)>§»\"“___ , - ,‘i~ -5*/» "'-'5'! ’ F‘ - 9 \ féqirr .¢-' ‘ 1’ -\ /. ' lilo 0 I .n " I“ I l I fi ,5; \ 11.. , ‘K : ' I I ‘I /' . 3C.)-C)6; ‘I ,, 31¢ —-I" -ill -‘F: L. :6)‘ / /,”' ‘. | r I \ _ E’\ ) gjvi’: F’ \ "5 4 L 4%}! ' \ \ _/;“~..' ‘ _______ \\\.“ L\\\X £9’:.... I /' \;\~%\}\I I ‘E “Em V PIE "5 “$515, /'“°‘~Z:\* " \%‘'"“"/ ~?-"j'¢Qi /""'\ ‘ Q T J \\\\\\\ jm | *0' ' -3.‘-‘Q: 1* % ('%”%I I %~""i’ --..-1 TM ‘In $1‘ ‘ ! j i ‘Q |~\I'lrr L 1 'I\1'I'\IIJ Q. ID”) $1 "'an-' ; H‘ % 1 | 1.-f‘"“ 1|-I_ I5, Iii =5=.=.--=Hf fin \_3)‘~“Q‘? E.-~ * . \‘ _ I, QII 9:* _ _II “‘ ii5, -ll II- I ./<’<*/I ""' unl- v- |-II-' ll-' -7\& u—\—' -In-II I \- JI""'-in / \~ _é_.. r\!'(<. J-Q)):;).)/; , -in’. -1|? _ r .../' Q v‘ ‘A. n 7? _, 41) <<<<<<_g§$é5%,w 1 I I"-1 T”<:"f.~?:*~ 1-'1;~‘Q-r.‘-,L.‘..‘§.f§_T::Y§1-."‘?~.‘L?_. 'f//7%' ((((( ) ))))% r- '- ii.‘ | .1 r --~ u r\\ ‘.1-LL \§),\))§<_(:f(<c<<c\\ (‘rfi'l§(((a\§‘Ji\0-‘ i Q I "\ I \~) D) I . -
Chaucer's Official Life
CHAUCER'S OFFICIAL LIFE JAMES ROOT HULBERT CHAUCER'S OFFICIAL LIFE Table of Contents CHAUCER'S OFFICIAL LIFE..............................................................................................................................1 JAMES ROOT HULBERT............................................................................................................................2 NOTE.............................................................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................4 THE ESQUIRES OF THE KING'S HOUSEHOLD...................................................................................................7 THEIR FAMILIES........................................................................................................................................8 APPOINTMENT.........................................................................................................................................12 CLASSIFICATION.....................................................................................................................................13 SERVICES...................................................................................................................................................16 REWARDS..................................................................................................................................................18 -
Prisons and Punishments in Late Medieval London
Prisons and Punishments in Late Medieval London Christine Winter Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of London Royal Holloway, University of London, 2012 2 Declaration I, Christine Winter, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: Date: 3 Abstract In the history of crime and punishment the prisons of medieval London have generally been overlooked. This may have been because none of the prison records have survived for this period, yet there is enough information in civic and royal documents, and through archaeological evidence, to allow a reassessment of London’s prisons in the later middle ages. This thesis begins with an analysis of the purpose of imprisonment, which was not merely custodial and was undoubtedly punitive in the medieval period. Having established that incarceration was employed for a variety of purposes the physicality of prison buildings and the conditions in which prisoners were kept are considered. This research suggests that the periodic complaints that London’s medieval prisons, particularly Newgate, were ‘foul’ with ‘noxious air’ were the result of external, rather than internal, factors. Using both civic and royal sources the management of prisons and the abuses inflicted by some keepers have been analysed. This has revealed that there were very few differences in the way civic and royal prisons were administered; however, there were distinct advantages to being either the keeper or a prisoner of the Fleet prison. Because incarceration was not the only penalty available in the enforcement of law and order, this thesis also considers the offences that constituted a misdemeanour and the various punishments employed by the authorities. -
Black's Guide to Devonshire
$PI|c>y » ^ EXETt R : STOI Lundrvl.^ I y. fCamelford x Ho Town 24j Tfe<n i/ lisbeard-- 9 5 =553 v 'Suuiland,ntjuUffl " < t,,, w;, #j A~ 15 g -- - •$3*^:y&« . Pui l,i<fkl-W>«? uoi- "'"/;< errtland I . V. ',,, {BabburomheBay 109 f ^Torquaylll • 4 TorBa,, x L > \ * Vj I N DEX MAP TO ACCOMPANY BLACKS GriDE T'i c Q V\ kk&et, ii £FC Sote . 77f/? numbers after the names refer to the page in GuidcBook where die- description is to be found.. Hack Edinburgh. BEQUEST OF REV. CANON SCADDING. D. D. TORONTO. 1901. BLACK'S GUIDE TO DEVONSHIRE. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from University of Toronto http://www.archive.org/details/blacksguidetodevOOedin *&,* BLACK'S GUIDE TO DEVONSHIRE TENTH EDITION miti) fffaps an* Hlustrations ^ . P, EDINBURGH ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK 1879 CLUE INDEX TO THE CHIEF PLACES IN DEVONSHIRE. For General Index see Page 285. Axniinster, 160. Hfracombe, 152. Babbicombe, 109. Kent Hole, 113. Barnstaple, 209. Kingswear, 119. Berry Pomeroy, 269. Lydford, 226. Bideford, 147. Lynmouth, 155. Bridge-water, 277. Lynton, 156. Brixham, 115. Moreton Hampstead, 250. Buckfastleigh, 263. Xewton Abbot, 270. Bude Haven, 223. Okehampton, 203. Budleigh-Salterton, 170. Paignton, 114. Chudleigh, 268. Plymouth, 121. Cock's Tor, 248. Plympton, 143. Dartmoor, 242. Saltash, 142. Dartmouth, 117. Sidmouth, 99. Dart River, 116. Tamar, River, 273. ' Dawlish, 106. Taunton, 277. Devonport, 133. Tavistock, 230. Eddystone Lighthouse, 138. Tavy, 238. Exe, The, 190. Teignmouth, 107. Exeter, 173. Tiverton, 195. Exmoor Forest, 159. Torquay, 111. Exmouth, 101. Totnes, 260. Harewood House, 233. Ugbrooke, 10P. -
Descent of St. Maur and Seymour Families
-390- ST MAUR AND SEYMOUR DESCENT OF ST.MAUR FAMILY OF CO.MONMOUTH AND SEYMOUR FAMILY OF HATCH, CO.SOMERSET by Paul C. Reed1 ABSTRACT This Seymour family became renowned in the person of Jane Seymour, who died twelve days after the birth of Edward, the only legitimate son of Henry VIII to survive infancy. It is not surprising that the origins of this family came under the focus of the earliest English historians and genealogists, including Camden, Dugdale and Vincent. Brydges and others later attempted fuller accounts in their works on the peerage, but the paucity of surviving records has allowed errant conclusions and fictions to persist in the most widely available modern accounts. The purpose of this article is to present a fresh analysis of what survives and bring the subject up to current standards of scholarship. Foundations (2008) 2 (6): 390-442 © Copyright FMG and the author As is the case with so many medieval English families, our knowledge of the earliest generations of the Seymours in the century and a half after Domesday is vague and uncertain. The earliest definitely traceable ancestor appears in record because of his acquisition of land—he burst onto the scene through conquest. In a period when preserving the king’s peace would normally have forbad dispossessing anyone of a manor (whether they had been in legitimate possession or not), at this specific time it furthered the interests of the crown to have Englishmen displace the native Welsh. Even after the family acquired heritable land, the descent of the male line through the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries is not entirely certain because of the scant survival of documents concerning manors and lands in the Marches of Wales. -
ROBERT MOGRIDGE :Prepared by WILLIAM G SCROGGINS 26 Oct
ROBERT MOGRIDGE 2260. ROBERT MOGRIDGE Born Died May 1640 Bradninch, Devonshire, England Married (1) Helen Dunsford 06 May 1622 Bradninch, Devonshire, England Born Died Mar 1622/3 Bradninch, Devonshire, England Children (1): Johan Mogridge b. 1622/3 Bradninch, Devonshire, England d. Mar 1622/3 Bradninch, Devonshire, England m. Married (2) 2261. Dorothy Lovering 15 Oct 1623 Bradninch, Devonshire, England Born Died (Feb 1690/1 Bradninch, Devonshire, England?) Children (2): Grace Mogridge b. 1624 Bradninch, Devonshire, England d. (Jun 1665 Bradninch, Devonshire, England?) m. Richard Mogridge b. 1625 Bradninch, Devonshire, England d. Aug 1625 Bradninch, Devonshire, England m. William Mogridge b. 1627 Bradninch, Devonshire, England d. Dec 1690 Bradninch, Devonshire, England m. (1) Alice ------ (2) Marie ------ 23 Dec 1680 Bradninch, Devonshire, England 1130. John Mogridge b. 1630 Bradninch, Devonshire, England d. Nov 1700 Bradninch, Devonshire, England m. 1131. Mary Milton Johan (Joane) Mogridge b. 1633 Bradninch, Devonshire, England d. m. John Saunder 25 Mar 1654 Bradninch, Devonshire, England :Prepared by WILLIAM G SCROGGINS 26 Oct 1990 : 718 Mill Valley Drive, Taylor Mill KY 41015-2278 1 ROBERT MOGRIDGE Mary Mogridge b. 1636 Bradninch, Devonshire, England d. m. The parents of Robert Mogridge have not been determined and the parents of his two wives are not known. His marriages are recorded in the register of Bradninch Parish, which was begun in 1559:i 1622 May 6 Robert Mogridge & Hellen Dunsford 1623 Oct 15 Robert Mogridge & Dorothie Loveringe Robert Mogridge and Helen Dunsford apparently had a daughter Johan, who was stillborn or died shortly after birth, since church records do not indicate that she was baptized before her death on 06 March 1622/3. -
Archaeological Journal Ancient Church Within the Castle Of
This article was downloaded by: [Northwestern University] On: 30 January 2015, At: 13:28 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Archaeological Journal Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/raij20 Ancient Church within the Castle of Exeter the Rev George Oliver D.D. Published online: 10 Jul 2014. To cite this article: the Rev George Oliver D.D. (1854) Ancient Church within the Castle of Exeter, Archaeological Journal, 11:1, 157-164, DOI: 10.1080/00665983.1854.10850937 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00665983.1854.10850937 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. -
The Scropfs of Bolton and of Masham
THE SCROPFS OF BOLTON AND OF MASHAM, C. 1300 - C. 1450: A STUDY OF A kORTHERN NOBLE FAMILY WITH A CALENDAR OF THE SCROPE OF BOLTON CARTULARY 'IWO VOLUMES VOLUME II BRIGh h VALE D. PHIL. THE UNIVERSITY OF YORK DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY MAY 1987 VOLUME 'IWO GUIDE '10 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION CALENDAR OF THE SCROPE OF BOLTON CARTULARY 1 GUIDE '10 Call'ENTS page 1. West Bolton 1 2. Little Bolton or Low Bolton 7, 263 3. East Bolton or Castle Bolton 11, 264 4. Preston Under Scar 16, 266 5. Redmire 20, 265, 271 6. Wensley 24, 272 7. Leyburn 38, 273 8. Harmby 43, 274, 276 9. Bellerby 48, 275, 277 10. Stainton 57, 157 11. Downholme 58, 160 12. Marske 68, 159 13. Richmond 70, 120, 161 14. Newton Morrell 79, 173 15. rolby 80, 175 16. Croft on Tees 81, 174 17. Walmire 85 18. Uckerby 86, 176 19. Bolton on Swale 89, 177 20. Ellerton on Swale 92, 178, 228, 230 21. Thrintoft 102, 229 22. Yafforth 103, 231 23. Ainderby Steeple 106, 232 24. Caldwell 108, 140, 169 25. Stanwick St. John 111, 167 26. Cliff on Tees 112 27. Eppleby 113, 170 28. Aldbrough 114, 165 29. Manfield 115, 166 30. Brettanby and Barton 116, 172 31. Advowson of St. Agatha's, Easby 122, 162 32. Skeeby 127, 155, 164 33. Brampton on Swale 129, 154 34. Brignall 131, 187 35. Mbrtham 137, 186 36. Wycliffe 139, 168 37. Sutton Howgrave 146, 245 38. Thornton Steward 150, 207 39. Newbiggin 179, 227 40. -
Occasional Papers, No
Occasional Papers, no. 46 SCUDAMORE DESCENDANTS OF CERTAIN YOUNGER SONS THAT CAME OUT OF UPTON SCUDAMORE, WILTSHIRE by Warren Skidmore Preface The Skidmores of both Somerset and Derbyshire were settled in the area surrounding the village of Wellow in Somerset from the late 15th century. A large number of descendants from around the world come from these ancestors. This family is well documented in Warren Skidmore’s “Thirty Generations”. However, where this family came from, as with the large Westerleigh, Gloucestershire branch, is unknown. Though Skidmore/Scudamore had been a local name in Upon Scudamore up to the 14th century, that branch of the family appeared to end and a cadet branch blossomed in Herefordshire. The family then reappeared in Somerset with a single mention of John Skydemor in 1441 in Dunkerton (next to Wellow) amerced in a view of frankpledge. The line that has been documented as continuous began with Robert Skydmor who is first noticed as a juror in a view of frankpledge in Wellow Hundred in 1486. Of course, this was a time before parish records were required. Unless a person is mentioned in a legal document that has survived they will not have been recorded, and it is likely that there are many people, and indeed generations, of which we do not know. Nevertheless, it does seem that the Wellow Skidmores migrated from elsewhere. The most likely place, given the size of the family there, would be Herefordshire. However, a possibility existed that they may have come from Devon. Skidmores were certainly prominent there, being farmers, clergy and lords of a manor. -
Family Tree Maker
Ancestors of Elizabeth Windsor Generation No. 1 1. Elizabeth Windsor, born 1465 in Bradenlove (Bucks.) ENG. She was the daughter of 2. Thomas Windsor and 3. Elizabeth Andrews. She married (1) Richard Fowler Abt. 1509. He was born 1460 in Rycot, Great Haseley (Oxfordshire) ENG, and died 1528. He was the son of Sir Richard Fowler and Joan Danvers. Generation No. 2 2. Thomas Windsor, born 1440 in Stanwell (Middlesex) ENG; died September 29, 1485 in Stanwell (Middlesex) ENG. He was the son of 4. Miles Windsor and 5. Joan Green. He married 3. Elizabeth Andrews. 3. Elizabeth Andrews, born 1444 in Baylham (Suffolk) ENG; died Abt. 1485. She was the daughter of 6. John Andrews and 7. Elizabeth Stratton. Children of Thomas Windsor and Elizabeth Andrews are: 1 i. Elizabeth Windsor, born 1465 in Bradenlove (Bucks.) ENG; married Richard Fowler Abt. 1509. ii. Andrew Windsor, born February 1466/67 in Stanwell (Middlesex) ENG; died March 20, 1542/43 in Hounslow (Middlesex) ENG; married Elizabeth Blount; born Abt. 1469 in Rock (Worcestershire) ENG. Generation No. 3 4. Miles Windsor, born 1410 in Stanwell (Middlesex) ENG; died September 30, 1451 in Colbrook (Bucks.) ENG. He was the son of 8. Richard de Windsor, III and 9. Christian Faulkner. He married 5. Joan Green Abt. 1443. 5. Joan Green, born 1414 in Bridgenorth, ENG. She was the daughter of 10. Walter Green. Child of Miles Windsor and Joan Green is: 2 i. Thomas Windsor, born 1440 in Stanwell (Middlesex) ENG; died September 29, 1485 in Stanwell (Middlesex) ENG; married Elizabeth Andrews. 6. -
Canterbury Christ Church University's Repository of Research Outputs Http
Canterbury Christ Church University’s repository of research outputs http://create.canterbury.ac.uk Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. Kersey, H. (2014) Isabella de Forz: a woman in the age of baronial reform and rebellion, 1237-1293. M.A. thesis, Canterbury Christ Church University. Contact: [email protected] Isabella de Forz: A Woman in the Age of Baronial Reform and Rebellion, 1237-1293 By Harriet Lily Kersey Canterbury Christ Church University Thesis submitted For the degree of Masters by Research 2014 Abstract Isabella de Forz (1237-1293), countess of Devon and Aumale and lady of the Isle of Wight, was the wealthiest noblewoman in thirteenth-century England. Isabella, who was of impressive lineage, became the heiress to the earldom of Devon following the death of her brother in 1262. Existing records provide a wealth of evidence regarding Isabella's life especially the years of her widowhood (1260-1293) and the extent of her power and influence within English politics. Isabella’s allegiance was of great importance and she was very much involved in the events surrounding the Barons’ War of 1263-1267.