DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary Report Electionwide Kings County 2020 Presidential Primary March 3, 2020 Summary Report Registered Turnout PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES DEM Voters ( 64 of 64 precincts reported ) Total Registration and Turnout 55,389 21,248 JULIÁN CASTRO 36 0.51% Election Day 2,650 MICHAEL A. ELLINGER 5 0.07% Provisional 1,030 ELIZABETH WARREN 451 6.40% Vote by Mail 17,568 MARIANNE WILLIAMSON 12 0.17% DEMOCRATIC Registration & Turnout 18,551 7,455 ANDREW YANG 62 0.88% Election Day 1,074 ROQUE "ROCKY" DE LA FUENTE III 14 0.20% Provisional 520 JOHN K. DELANEY 9 0.13% Vote by Mail 5,861 AMY KLOBUCHAR 130 1.85% REPUBLICAN Registration & Turnout 22,237 11,006 BERNIE SANDERS 2,481 35.23% Election Day 1,365 JOE SESTAK 6 0.09% Provisional 372 TOM STEYER 331 4.70% Vote by Mail 9,269 DEVAL PATRICK 13 0.18% AMERICAN INDEPENDENT Registration 1,761 564 & Turnout MICHAEL BENNET 24 0.34% Election Day 48 MICHAEL R. BLOOMBERG 991 14.07% Provisional 35 MOSIE BOYD 4 0.06% Vote by Mail 481 CORY BOOKER 10 0.14% GREEN Registration & Turnout 120 18 PETE BUTTIGIEG 263 3.73% Election Day 4 JOSEPH R. BIDEN 2,131 30.26% Provisional 5 TULSI GABBARD 66 0.94% Vote by Mail 9 MARK STEWART GREENSTEIN 3 0.04% LIBERTARIAN Registration & Turnout 524 145 Total 7,042 Election Day 13 PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AI Provisional 17 ( 64 of 64 precincts reported ) Vote by Mail 115 PHIL COLLINS 43 21.61% PEACE AND FREEDOM Registration & 236 21 ROQUE "ROCKY" DE LA FUENTE 71 35.68% Turnout CHARLES KRAUT 18 9.05% Election Day 1 J.R. MYERS 32 16.08% Provisional 1 DON BLANKENSHIP 35 17.59% Vote by Mail 19 Total 199 Nonpartisan Registration & Turnout 11,960 2,039 PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES PF Election Day 145 ( 64 of 64 precincts reported ) Provisional 80 HOWIE HAWKINS 3 30.00% Vote by Mail 1,814 GLORIA LA RIVA 7 70.00% Total 10 PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES REP ( 64 of 64 precincts reported ) ROBERT ARDINI 18 0.17% JOE WALSH 143 1.35% BILL WELD 125 1.18% ROQUE "ROCKY" DE LA FUENTE 82 0.78% ZOLTAN G. ISTVAN 12 0.11% MATTHEW JOHN MATERN 48 0.45% DONALD J. TRUMP 10,144 95.95% Total 10,572 Data Refreshed: Monday, March 30, 2020 12:32 PM Printed: Monday, March 30, 2020 12:32 PM Page 1 of 3 Electionwide Kings County 2020 Presidential Primary March 3, 2020 Summary Report PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES LIB NONPARTISAN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, #3 ( 64 of 64 precincts reported ) ( 64 of 64 precincts reported ) KEN ARMSTRONG 5 8.33% VALERIE R. CHRISSAKIS 16,220 100.00% MAX ABRAMSON 0 0.00% Total 16,220 SAM ROBB 4 6.67% KIM RUFF 8 13.33% NONPARTISAN COUNTY SUPERVISOR, 2ND STEVEN A RICHEY 3 5.00% DISTRICT ERIK CHASE GERHARDT 2 3.33% ( 12 of 12 precincts reported ) JACOB HORNBERGER 10 16.67% RICHARD VALLE 1,719 100.00% KEENAN WALLACE DUNHAM 2 3.33% Total 1,719 SOURAYA FAAS 2 3.33% ADAM KOKESH 7 11.67% NONPARTISAN COUNTY SUPERVISOR, 5TH VERMIN SUPREME 9 15.00% DISTRICT JO JORGENSEN 7 11.67% ( 15 of 15 precincts reported ) DAN BEHRMAN 1 1.67% RICHARD L FAGUNDES 3,538 66.97% Total 60 MICHAEL P. MENDOZA 1,745 33.03% PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES GRN Total 5,283 ( 64 of 64 precincts reported ) DAVID ROLDE 2 22.22% PROPOSITION 13 HOWIE HAWKINS 4 44.44% ( 64 of 64 precincts reported ) DARIO HUNTER 0 0.00% YES 6,142 29.79% DENNIS LAMBERT 2 22.22% NO 14,473 70.21% SEDINAM MOYOWASIFZA-CURRY 1 11.11% Total 20,615 Total 9 UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE 21st District HANFORD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT MEASURE H ( 64 of 64 precincts reported ) ( 14 of 14 precincts reported ) TJ COX 6,499 31.05% BOND - YES 3,428 46.58% ROQUE "ROCKY" DE LA FUENTE 380 1.82% BOND - NO 3,931 53.42% RICARDO DE LA FUENTE 699 3.34% Total 7,359 DAVID G. VALADAO 13,354 63.80% Total 20,932 LEMOORE UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT MEMBER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY 32nd District MEASURE L ( 64 of 64 precincts reported ) ( 17 of 17 precincts reported ) RUDY SALAS 8,525 41.30% BONDS - YES 2,346 44.30% TODD COTTA 12,117 58.70% BONDS - NO 2,950 55.70% Total 20,642 Total 5,296 NONPARTISAN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, WAUKENA JOINT UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT #1 MEASURE N ( 64 of 64 precincts reported ) ( 1 of 1 precincts reported ) MICHAEL J. REINHART 16,573 100.00% BONDS - YES 2 100.00% Total 16,573 BONDS - NO 0 0.00% Total 2 NONPARTISAN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, #2 ( 64 of 64 precincts reported ) RANDY EDWARDS 16,367 100.00% Total 16,367 Data Refreshed: Monday, March 30, 2020 12:32 PM Printed: Monday, March 30, 2020 12:32 PM Page 2 of 3 Electionwide Kings County 2020 Presidential Primary March 3, 2020 Summary Report KINGSBURG JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT MEASURE E ( 2 of 2 precincts reported ) BONDS - YES 94 41.41% BONDS - NO 133 58.59% Total 227 Data Refreshed: Monday, March 30, 2020 12:32 PM Printed: Monday, March 30, 2020 12:32 PM Page 3 of 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TRIP Snap Poll XII January 2020 Introduction
    TRIP Snap Poll XII January 2020 Teaching, Research & International Policy (TRIP) Project Global Research Institute (GRI) https://trip.wm.edu/home Principal Investigators: Susan Peterson, William & Mary Ryan Powers, University of Georgia Michael J. Tierney, William & Mary Data Contacts: Eric Parajon or Emily Jackson Phone: (757) 221-1466 Email: i [email protected] Methodology: We attempted to contact all international relations (IR) scholars in the U.S. We define IR scholars as individuals who are employed at a college or university in a political science department or professional school and who teach or conduct research on issues that cross international borders. Of the 4,752 scholars across the U.S. that we contacted, 971 responded. The resulting response rate is approximately 20.43 percent. The poll was open 10/30/2019-12/14/2019. Our sample is roughly similar to the broader International Relations scholar population in terms of gender, academic rank and university type. Our sample includes a higher percentage of men and a higher percentage of tenured and tenure track faculty than the overall scholar population. Introduction By Emily Jackson, Eric Parajon, Susan Peterson, Ryan Powers, and Michael J. Tierney We are pleased to share the results of the 12th Teaching, Research and International Policy (TRIP) Snap Poll, fielded with the support of the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Our polls provide real-time data in the wake of significant policy proposals, during international crises, and on emerging foreign policy debates. In this poll, we asked questions on the 2020 Presidential Election, President Trump’s foreign policy actions, and impeachment.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Primary Election Results
    Official Election Results Primary Election - May 12, 2020 Thomas County, Nebraska Description District# Name Party Total Thomas Thomas Nonpartisan/Partisan Description District# Name Party Early Voting Early Voting Thomas Precinct Thomas By Request Total Early Voting Thomas Republican Ticket President Donald J. Trump Republican 262 Early Voting 221 Thomas 41 N/A President Bill Weld Republican 5 Early Voting 4 Thomas 1 N/A US Senator Ben Sasse Republican 141 Early Voting 124 Thomas 14 3 3 0 US Senator Matt Innis Republican 132 Early Voting 100 Thomas 28 4 4 0 President Tulsi Gabbard Democratic 0 Early Voting Thomas 0 Congress, District 3 Larry Lee Scott Bolinger Republican 10 Early Voting 8 Thomas 1 1 1 0 Congress, District 3 Adrian Smith Republican 219 Early Voting 186 Thomas 29 4 4 0 Congress, District 3 William Elfgren Republican 13 Early Voting 13 Thomas 0 0 0 0 Congress, District 3 Justin Moran Republican 11 Early Voting 5 Thomas 6 0 0 0 Congress, District 3 Arron Kowalski Republican 7 Early Voting 4 Thomas 1 2 2 0 0 Democratic Ticket President Joe Biden Democratic 24 Early Voting 21 Thomas 2 1 1 0 President Tulsi Gabbard Democratic 0 Early Voting 0 Thomas 0 0 0 0 President Bernie Sanders Democratic 3 Early Voting 0 Thomas 2 1 1 0 President Elizabeth Warren Democratic 0 Early Voting 0 Thomas 0 0 0 0 0 US Senator Dennis Frank Maček Democratic 2 Early Voting 1 Thomas 1 0 0 0 US Senator Chris Janicek Democratic 7 Early Voting 6 Thomas 0 1 1 0 US Senator Larry Marvin Democratic 5 Early Voting 5 Thomas 0 0 0 0 US Senator Angie Philips Democratic 5 Early Voting 2 Thomas 2 1 1 0 US Senator Alisha Shelton Democratic 3 Early Voting 2 Thomas 1 0 0 0 US Senator Daniel M.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 112 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 112 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION SENATE—Wednesday, December 7, 2011 The Senate met at 11:30 a.m. and was appoint the Honorable KIRSTEN E. GILLI- day and the hundreds of thousands called to order by the Honorable BRAND, a Senator from the State of New more who made the ultimate sacrifice KIRSTEN E. GILLIBRAND, a Senator from York, to perform the duties of the Chair. during World War II. These service- the State of New York. DANIEL K. INOUYE, members are heroes. They set a fine ex- President pro tempore. ample for the men and women who pro- PRAYER Mrs. GILLIBRAND thereupon as- tect our freedoms today, and none of us sumed the chair as Acting President The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- will ever forget their courage. pro tempore. fered the following prayer: Let us pray. f f O mighty God, our hope for years to RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY PAYROLL TAX CUT come, thank You for giving us this day LEADER to use for Your glory. From the morn- Mr. REID. Madam President, the Re- ing Sun until the going down of the The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- publicans like to claim they are the same, Your blessings provide us with pore. The majority leader is recog- party of the tax cuts, but as Democrats confidence that our future is brighter nized. propose more tax relief—we propose it than our past. f every day for working families—Repub- Today, as we remember Pearl Harbor licans every day are showing their true SCHEDULE and a day of infamy, we praise You for colors.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Letters List 2017-2019
    R Sen. Maria Cantwell Office Depot Sales of Possibly Unnecessary 11/17/16 1/30/ 17 Computer Repair Products T Sen. Bill Nelson SES Bonuses 11/17/16 1/24/17 V Sen. Bill Nelson Out of Network Hospital Costs 12/1/16 1/31/17 X Sens. Mike Lee, Amy Seed Mergers 12/14/16 1/30/ 17 Klobuchar y Rep. Peter Welch Visa / EMV 12/14/16 1/31/17 z Sens. Cory Booker, Robert FieldTurf 12/16/16 1/24/17 Menendez vu Sens. Mike Lee, Ron Johnson FTC Actions 12/21/16 1/23/17 CONGRESSIONAL LETTERS 2017: VOLUME 1 l(b)( ?)(A) I Member: Subject ~sponded 1 Sen. Mike Lee Non Public Briefing onl 7 1/4/2017 1/5/17 Qualcomm, & Questcor 2 Reps. Eliot Engel, Tony Fur Labeling 1/9/2017 2/16/17 Cardenas, Paul Tonka, Earl Blumenauer, Steve Cohen, Donald Beyer Jr., Mike Quigley, Leonard Lance, Nita Lowey, Anna Eshoo, & Jerry McNerney 3 Sen. Ted Cruz Seed Mergers 1/11/17 1/31/17 4 Sen. Mike Lee Non Public Briefing on Quincy 1/17/17 1/25/17 Biosciences 5 Sens. Susan Collins and Robert Invitation to testify re Senior Scams 1/23/17 Casey Jr. (Senate Aging Committee) 6 Sen. Cory Booker Walgreens / RiteAid Merger 2/2/17 2/21 /17 7 Sen. Bill Nelson Fiat Chrysler 1/31/17 3/15/17 8 Rep. Steve Chabot Invitation to testify re Small Business 2/16/17 Cybersecurity (House Small Business Committee) 9 Sen. Jon Tester Vizio 3/3/17 3/21/17 10 Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarian Party National Convention | First Sitting May 22-24, 2020 Online Via Zoom
    LIBERTARIAN PARTY NATIONAL CONVENTION | FIRST SITTING MAY 22-24, 2020 ONLINE VIA ZOOM CURRENT STATUS: FINAL APPROVAL DATE: 9/12/20 PREPARED BY ~~aryn ,~nn ~ar~aQ, LNC SECRETARY TABLE OF CONTENTS CONVENTION FIRST SITTING DAY 1-OPENING 3 CALL TO ORDER 3 CONVENTION OFFICIALS AND COMMITTEE CHAIRS 3 CREDENTIALS COMMITTEE REPORT 4 ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA FOR THE FIRST SITTING 7 CONVENTION FIRST SITTING DAY 1-ADJOURNMENT 16 CONVENTION FIRST SITTING DAY 2 -OPENING 16 CREDENTIALS COMMITTEE UPDATE 16 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION 18 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION QUALIFICATION TOKENS 18 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION SPEECHES 23 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 1 24 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 2 26 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 3 28 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 4 32 CONVENTION FIRST SITTING DAY 2 -ADJOURNMENT 33 CONVENTION FIRST SITTING DAY 3 -OPENING 33 CREDENTIALS COMMITTEE UPDATE 33 VICE-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION 35 VICE-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION QUALIFICATION TOKENS 35 VICE-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION SPEECHES 37 ADDRESS BY PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE DR. JO JORGENSEN 37 VICE-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 1 38 VICE-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 2 39 VICE-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION – BALLOT 3 40 STATUS OF TAXATION 41 ADJOURNMENT TO CONVENTION SECOND SITTING 41 SPECIAL THANKS 45 Appendix A – State-by-State Detail for Election Results 46 Appendix B – Election Anomalies and Other Convention Observations 53 2020 NATIONAL CONVENTION | FIRST SITTING VIA ZOOM – FINAL Page 2 LEGEND: text to be inserted, text to be deleted, unchanged existing text. All vote results, points of order, substantive objections, and rulings will be set off by BOLD ITALICS. The LPedia article for this convention can be found at: https://lpedia.org/wiki/NationalConvention2020 Recordings for this meeting can be found at the LPedia link.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Care: Estimating Leading Democratic Candidates' Health Plans
    CHAIRMEN Primary Care: MITCH DANIELS Estimating Leading Democratic Candidates’ Health Plans LEON PANETTA US Budget Watch 2020 TIM PENNY January 24, 2020 PRESIDENT Health care is the single largest part of the federal budget and a key driver of our MAYA MACGUINEAS unsustainably rising national debt.1 Rising health care costs also place growing burdens on households and businesses and – along with a significant uninsured rate DIRECTORS BARRY ANDERSON – have prompted those seeking higher office to propose bold solutions with ERSKINE BOWLES significant fiscal implications. CHARLES BOWSHER KENT CONRAD As part of our US Budget Watch 2020 project, the Committee for a Responsible Federal DAN CRIPPEN Budget has analyzed the plans of the four candidates polling the highest in the VIC FAZIO WILLIS GRADISON majority of national polls and polls in the first four primary states: Vice President Joe JANE HARMAN Biden, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, Senator Bernie Sanders, and Senator Elizabeth Warren. WILLIAM HOAGLAND JIM JONES For each plan, we score the fiscal impact of coverage and other spending provisions, LOU KERR JIM KOLBE reductions in current and proposed health care costs, direct offsets proposed as part MARJORIE MARGOLIES of their plans to expand coverage, and further offsets meant to finance remaining DAVE MCCURDY costs. We focus on federal fiscal impact rather than the effect on total national health JAMES MCINTYRE, JR. expenditures. DAVID MINGE MARNE OBERNAUER, JR. JUNE O’NEILL Our estimates are rough and rounded, based on our best understanding of how PAUL O’NEILL campaign-level detail translates into specific policies, and subject to change as more RUDOLPH PENNER details are made available.2 This report is for educational purposes and does not ROBERT REISCHAUER represent an endorsement of any candidate or any policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrate and Reactivate the 1968 Fair Housing Mandate Courtney L
    Georgia State University College of Law Reading Room Faculty Publications By Year Faculty Publications 1-1-2016 Integrate and Reactivate the 1968 Fair Housing Mandate Courtney L. Anderson Georgia State University College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/faculty_pub Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Housing Law Commons Recommended Citation Courtney L. Anderson, Integrate and Reactivate the 1968 Fair Housing Mandate, 13 Hastings Race & Poverty L.J. 1 (2016) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Reading Room. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications By Year by an authorized administrator of Reading Room. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HASTINGS RACE AND POVERTY LAW JOURNAL VOLUME XIII NO. 1 WINTER 2016 ARTICLES INTEGRATE AND REACTIVATE THE 1968 FAIR HOUSING MANDATE Courtney L. Anderson LA GRAN LUCHA: LATINA AND LATINO LAWYERS, BREAKING THE LAW ON PRINCIPLE, AND CONFRONTING THE RISKS OF REPRESENTATION Marc‐Tizoc González THE OBERGEFELL MARRIAGE EQUALITY DECISION, WITH ITS EMPHASIS ON HUMAN DIGNITY, AND A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FOOD SECURITY Maxine D. Goodman NOTE POLICE TERROR AND OFFICER INDEMNIFICATION Allyssa Villanueva University of California Hastings College of the Law 200 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102 HASTINGS RACE AND POVERTY LAW JOURNAL Winter 2016 Volume 13, Issue 1 Mission Statement The Hastings Race and Poverty Law Journal is committed to promoting and inspiring discourse in the legal community regarding issues of race, poverty, social justice, and the law. This Journal is committed to addressing disparities in the legal system.
    [Show full text]
  • Giving Adequate Attention to Failings of Judicial Impartiality
    Impeach Brent Benjamin Now!? Giving Adequate Attention to Failings of Judicial Impartiality JEFFREY W. STEMPEL* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION:M EN WITH NO REGRETS AND INADEQUATE CONCERN................... 2 II. CAPERTON V. MASSEY: JUDICIAL ERROR; WASTED RESOURCES; NEW CONSTITUTIONAL LAW—AND LIGHT TREATMENT OF THE PERPETRATOR ............................................................................................... 10 A. The Underlying Action............................................................................... 10 B. The 2004 West Virginia Supreme Court Elections..................................... 12 C. Review and Recusal ................................................................................... 13 D. The Supreme Court Intervenes .................................................................. 16 E. Caperton’s Test for Determining When Recusal Is Required by the Due Process Clause ........................................................................ 17 F. Comparing the “Reasonable Question as to Impartiality” Standard for Nonconstitutional Recusal Under Federal and State Law to the “Serious Risk of Bias” Standard for Constitutional Due Process Under Caperton....................................... 19 G. The Dissenters’ Defense of Justice Benjamin—And Defective Judging ...................................................................................... 25 H. Enablers: Reluctance To Criticize Justice Benjamin................................. 28 * © 2010 Jeffrey W. Stempel. Doris S. & Theodore B. Lee Professor
    [Show full text]
  • The Economist/Yougov Poll
    The Economist/YouGov Poll Sample 1500 US Adult citizens Conducted August 3 - 6, 2019 Margin of Error ±2.6% 1. Would you say things in this country today are... Generally headed in the right direction . 35% Off on the wrong track . 54% Notsure ................................................................................10% 2. Have you heard mostly positive or mostly negative news stories about the economy, or have you not heard much news at all about the economy? Mostly positive . .32% Equally positive and negative . 33% Mostly negative . .18% Not heard much news about the economy at all . 16% 3. How serious a problem is unemployment in the U.S.? Very serious . 16% Somewhat serious . 33% A minor problem . 30% Not a problem . 14% Notsure .................................................................................8% 4. How serious a problem is unemployment in your LOCAL community? Very serious . 14% Somewhat serious . 26% A minor problem . 28% Not a problem . 20% Notsure ................................................................................11% 5. For you personally, which of the following do you consider the best measure of how the national economy is doing? The stock market index . 8% The unemployment rate and job reports . .28% The prices of goods and services you buy . 32% Your personal finances . .16% continued on the next page . 1 The Economist/YouGov Poll continued from previous page Don’t know . 16% 6. What is the current unemployment rate in the U.S.? Please tell us the percentage of adults who want to work that are currently unemployed and looking for a job. If you don’t know, please make your best guess. Less than 5% . .40% Between 5% and 6% . 14% Between 6% and 7% .
    [Show full text]
  • Amy Coney Barrett
    Post-Hearing Analysis: Amy Coney Barrett Introduction After President Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett, Alliance for Justice issued our report. Reviewing her record, it was clear that if Barrett is confirmed, the American people will suffer grave harm. Millions will lose their health insurance. The clock will be turned back on critical rights and legal protections. Her record overwhelmingly demonstrates that she would be an extreme member of the Court and would implement the dangerous agenda of President Trump and the Republican Party. This week, Amy Coney Barrett’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee only confirmed and reinforced our prior conclusions. When pressed regarding Trump’s litmus tests — and her own record — she was evasive, misleading, and even contemptuous. She was visibly annoyed that senators had the gall to probe her record and views. She chastised senators for asking questions she decided she would not answer. She failed to turn over key documents to the Senate.. She famously held up a blank notepad, proudly displaying she had taken no notes; an apt metaphor for how she went out of her way not to address the very real concerns and fears millions of people have with her nomination. Republican senators spent the hearings trying to downplay the stakes and pretend that they were only interested in judges who will neutrally and without bias apply the law. Ted Cruz once asked a previous Trump nominee — who he later forced to withdraw — what that judge had ever done to advance the conservative cause. Yet, over days of hearing, Republicans tried to pretend they weren’t pushing an agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Omnibus June 2019 Dem Primary
    Democratic Dividing Lines Verified Voter Omnibus Survey N=484 Democrats or Democratic leaners June 22 - June 25, 2019 !X!1 Key Findings • Biden’s lead among 24 announced Democratic candidates has narrowed by 6-points since May to 32% of the Democratic vote. • Biden’s 6-point drop came with a concurrent 6-point gain by Elizabeth Warren to 11% of the Democratic vote, or 4- points behind Bernie Sanders who takes 15% of the Democratic vote. • Biden continues to lead both Sanders and Warren in head to head match-ups, but his lead has narrowed to 30-points from both Sanders and Warren, down from 36-points ahead of Sanders and 47-points ahead of Warren in May. • 73% of Democrats plan to watch the debates, or coverage of the debates. Ahead of the kickoff of tonight’s debates, we tested Democratic concern about two recent pieces of news about Biden — his flip flopping on the Hyde Amendment’s impact on access to abortion, and past associations with segregationists. • We found the Hyde Amendment resonates more strongly with Democratic voters, with 39% of Democrats concerned about Biden’s stance on the Hyde Amendment, and 22% concerned about his associations with segregationists. • Particularly concerned are women, African Americans, younger voters, and more educated voters. !2 Methodology • Using a voter file-matched online panel, we surveyed n=1,006 registered voters across the country from June 22 to June 25, 2019, with a sample of 484 Democrats or Democratic-leaning Independents. • With our third monthly tracking survey of 2019, we were able to confirm the voting history of participants and track changes in the attitudes and behaviors of key 2020 voters since our last survey of verified Democratic or Democratic-leaning Independent voters from May 20 to May 21, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Biden Holds Steady, Warren Slips As the Iowa Caucuses Approach
    ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: 2020 Democrats EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 12:01 a.m. Sunday, Jan. 26, 2020 Biden Holds Steady, Warren Slips As the Iowa Caucuses Approach Joe Biden’s holding his ground in preference nationally for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, with Bernie Sanders close by and a drop in support for Elizabeth Warren. Two new arrivals to the leaderboard come next in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll: Mike Bloomberg and Andrew Yang. With the Feb. 3 Iowa caucuses drawing near, 77 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents nationally say they’re satisfied with their choice of candidates. Far fewer, 24 percent, are very satisfied, although that’s near the average in ABC/Post polls since 2000. This poll, produced for ABC by Langer Research Associates, finds plenty of room for movement: Just about half of leaned Democrats are very enthusiastic about their choice, and 53 percent say they’d consider supporting a different candidate. Warren, while weaker as a first choice, leads in second-choice preference. Further, while Biden continues to prevail by a wide margin as the candidate with the best chance to defeat Donald Trump in the general election, his score on the measure has slipped slightly, from 45 percent in July to 38 percent now. Eighteen percent pick Sanders as best against Trump; 10 percent, Warren. Biden does best in vote preference among likely voters, defined here as those who say they’re registered and certain to vote in their state’s primary or caucuses. He has 34 percent support in this group, leading Sanders, at 22 percent, and Warren, 14 percent.
    [Show full text]