DOCSLIB.ORG

LOV;:~ , ..__, RIVERS A!S • MUNCIPAUTJ£$

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LOV;:~ , ..__, RIVERS A!S • MUNCIPAUTJ£$ lrtW -$- . liiW auw -$- · anw + anw ~ • "., -$- WYOMING TIZN . ... ··: /: .. ... /~. ·• •. ••••• :. :-. ~ ROOSEVEl-T~ I : ~:. : ~ NATIONAL FOREST' ~ r• :WORSTEll JIUEIIVOI~ : TIIIJ WILSON SU"'*L"f_L DITCH-~ ~ r I C:OWMIIH ) UVERMORE DITCHY j I 101 c:IIEEX ~. I DITCH '-) I. I r WallJ HORSETOO'TM C:.MEAON PI-SS DJTCH L!G£HO HIGHW.t.YS 0 lnlers:.ale 8 u.s. e SS.Ie I I I I • JU.t~AOADS LOV;:~ ,_..__, RIVERS a!S • MUNCIPAUTJ£$ IOUNDIJUES -'- e.~ .. ,...,.,. ...... • • • • • • • H•a.eft81 For ..t - •• - Counrr c.Jne ~ Towt~ .,.. Rante ltoinll --- Honl'lem Coloraoo Water ConsetYaftC)' Oia~nc:t _..,.. '""•••.. DwetS..,. ~- • ,. w .,.. Ill,, w ~- • ,, w • :: w au w .c. / I AGENDA WATER SUPPLY AND STORAGE COMPANY TOUR I Saturday, July 8, 1989 7:00 A.M. Meet at the civic Center Parking Lot Donuts, Milk, and Juice will ·be served. (SORRY NO COFFEE) 7:15 A.M. Depart for Fort Collins 8:30 A.M. Meet at the wssc Office at 2319 E. Mulberry, Fort Collins - The wssc Board of Directors will join the tour. 9:00 A.M. Depart for the High Country Order of Tour: 1. Grand River Ditch 2. Long Draw Reservoir 3 • Chambers Lake Lunch will be served at approximately 1:00 P.M. 4. Laramie-Poudre Tunnel 6:00 P.M. Return to Fort Collins 7:30 P.M. Back at the Civic Center Agenda/WSSC/Tour I FACT SHEET * The Water Supply and Storage Company (WSSC) is one of the largest and oldest irrigation systems in northern Colorado. * WSSC and its parent company constructed the first transmountain diversion in northern Colorado. Approximately 50% of the total water supply is provided through transmountain diversions. * The WSSC System consists of 2 mountsin reservoirs, 9 plain reservoirs (total storage about 45,000 ac.ft.), a 2.5 mile tunnel, about 100 miles of canals, which serve approximately 50,000 acres of land between LaPorte and Pierce, Colorado. * There are 600 outstanding shares of stock in WSSC. * Currently 9 members serve on the Board of Directors of WSSC. THE WSSC BOARD OF DIRECTORS Harvey Johnson, President Thomas Moore, Vice President David Hergert Robert Noffsinger Robert Alkire LeRoy Waag Virgil Stewart A. Jay Bailey Bahman Hatami Secretary: Vivienne Woodward Superintendent: Jim McFall, Sr. Ditch Riders: Jim McFall, Jr. (Div. #1) Al Meyer (Div. #2) Ken Brown (Div. #3) Bob Scantland (Div. #4) Brief History of the Water supply and Storage company (WSSC) The Original Ditch Company • on February 25, 1881, the Larimer County Ditch Company (LCD) was incorporated. • By 1882 a ditch was constructed extending from the Cache La Poudre River to the Boxelder Creek. • Starting in 1883, work of extending the ditch eastward beyond the Boxelder Creek began. 2. Supplemental Water • On March 15, 1882, the Larimer County Reservoir Company (LCRC) was incorporated for the purpose of supplying addi­ tional water for the LCD. • In July, 1882, Chambers Lake Reservoir was built (original dam) by the LCRC. • During the same year, connecting channels between the Lost Lakes and Chambers Lake were built. • Also in 1882, the Cameron Pass Ditch was constructed. 3. The Water Supply and Storage Company • In 1891-1892, the system of Larimer County Ditch Company passed to the Water Supply and Storage Company (WSSC) in­ cluding Cameron Pass Ditch, Lost Lakes and Chambers Lake. 4. Imported Water 1882 (The Lost Lakes) • Lost, Laramie, and Twin (Lilly) Lakes (better known as the Lost Lakes). • All located immediately north of Chambers Lake. • First intent to divert water from a foreign watershed (March, 1882). • Connecting channels were constructed to deliver water from these Lakes into the Chambers Lake. • Currently no diversion takes place from the Lost Lakes (due to a u.s. Supreme Court decision which limits Colorado diver­ sions from the Laramie River to 19,875 acre-feet per year). -1- History of the Water supply and storage Company (WSSC) continued 1882 (The cameron Pass Ditch) • The Cameron Pass Ditch was constructed at the same time as Chambers Lake and Lost Lakes channels were built. • Running north and east about 1/2 mile to Cameron Pass. • Discharges into Joe Wright creek, then through Chambers into the Cache La Poudre River. • Collects water from the slopes of the valley of the Michigan River (a tributary to the North Platte River). • Average annual diversions are about 120 acre-feet. 1891 - 1894 (The Skyline Ditch) • Originally called the Laramie River Ditch. • August, 1891, survey of the ditch was completed. • By the Fall of 1893, the construction of the Skyline Ditch was completed. • By July, 1894, the ditch was in full operation. • Major foreign water source into the Poudre River. • Collects water from the headwater of the Laramie River empty­ ing into the Chambers Lake. • Approximately 5 miles long. • Average annual diversions are approximately 2,000 acre-feet. 1882 (The Chambers Lake) • Located in the basin of Joe Wright Creek (then thought as the headwater of the Cache La Poudre River). • Storage for imported water from the Cameron Pass, Lost Lakes and the Skyline Ditches as well as the tributaries to Joe Wright Creek. one June 9, 1891, during a very rainy season, Chambers Lake • Dam went out and financially broke the Larimer County Ditch Company (at which time it was sold to WSSC). • Chambers Dam was reconstructed by the WSSC sometime during or after the Skyline Ditch was built (dam height is 23 feet; capacity is 3,000 acre-feet). -2- History of the water Supply and Storage Company (WSSC) continued I 1910-1913 The dam height was raised by 21 feet to increase • the capacity to 6,600 acre-feet. 1923-1926 The dam was raised by another 11 feet which in­ • creased the capacity to its current capacity of 8,850 acre­ I feet (total dam height is 55 feet). • 1974 The State Engineer's Office (SEO) imposed a storage limitation on Chambers Lake, reducing the gage height to 45 feet. • 1983 The SEO classified the Chambers Lake Dam as "a high hazard dam". 1890 - 1975 (The Grand River Ditch) • September, 1890, surveys of the ditch were carried out. • Originally called the Bennett Ditch. • The Ditch consisted of two branches. The south side and the north side. • In 1891, the wssc took over the project. • Very little work done up to 1895. • 1895 survey and cross-section for an enlarged ditch was com­ pleted. • 1896 - Timber clearing along the right-of-way. • Work on the south side ditch (also known as Little Grand Ditch) was completed by September of 1990. • Little Grand Ditch is 1.5 miles long, 6 foot wide at the top, 3 foot wide on the bottom, 3 foot deep, and a carrying capac­ ity of 172 cfs. • Work on the North Side Ditch (or the Grand River Ditch) began in September of 1990. • By mid-summer of 1904, 5 miles of the ditch was completed (to Big Dutch Creek). • By 1906 the ditch was extended to Tank Creek. • Between 1914 and 1917, 9,000 feet of the ditch was covered. • No work except repairs was done until 1928. • 1928-1930, the Long Draw Reservoir was constructed; 5,700 acre-feet in capacity with a 58 foot dam. -3- History of the Water supply and storage Company (WSSC) continued I • At the same time work on extending the Grand River Ditch began. • 1933-1934, the ditch was extended to Lost Creek. • By the end of September 1936, the last 6 miles of the ditch (to the Baker Gulch, about 16 miles) was completed approxi­ mately 46 years after the first work crew left Fort Collins to commence the diggings of the Grand River Ditch. • 1975 Construction on the last enlargement of the Long Draw Reservoir and extension of the Grand River Ditch was complet­ ed. • Currently Long Draw Reservoir has a capacity of 11,000 acre­ feet (active capacity is 10,719 acre-feet), and the Grand River Ditch is approximately 17 miles long with a carrying capacity of 525 cfs. • Average annual diversions are approximately 20,000 acre­ feet. 1897 (Laramie-Poudre Tunnel System) • The concept of constructing the tunnel system was originated by a man named Wallis A. Link who was hunting in the area in 1897. • The plan consisted of the upper Rawah Ditch and the West Side Ditch along the western side, and the East Side Ditch along the eastern side of the Laramie River Valley. The water from these collection ditches would be carried into the cache La Poudre through the Laramie-Poudre Tunnel. In August, 1902 the initial survey of the Plan was • completed. On June 12, 1904 the first water was turned into the ditch • after the construction of 600 feet of the ditch was completed. Before the completion of the tunnel, wssc agreed to carry • water through the Skyline Ditch for a fee. Meanwhile, the Poudre Valley Canal which was one of the • largest canals in the north of the Poudre River (built in 1902 and 1903) was selected to distribute the water in the plains. On September 19, 1906, the Laramie Reservoir and Irrigation • Company was incorporated. Later in 1907, the company was re-organized under the Laramie-Poudre Reservoirs and Irrigation Company (LPRIC). -4- / 1 t/ Brief History of the water supply and storage company (WSSC) ~ c~ntinued • In 1908, the LPRIC got a controlling stock interest in the Poudre Valley Reservoir Company, securing complete use of the Poudre Valley Canal. • By September, 1909, the Poudre Valley Canal was extended to Nunn, Colorado. • In 1909 the Greeley-Poudre Irrigation District was formed which included the boundaries of the Tunnel system service area. • on Christmas Day, 1909, the first blast in the Tunnel was fired.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trait Ridge Road Guide
    Sign No. 9 Medicine Bow Curve (11,640 feet) succeeded more than 80 years ago in bringing water from Never The sign here points northwest to the Medi­ Summer streams through the Grand Ditch and La Poudre Pass Rocky Mountain National Park cine Bow Mountains which extend into Wyo­ to irrigate the semiarid lands east of the Rockies. He failed to 9 ming, 44 miles away. The Cache la Poudre find sufficient precious metals in Lulu City diggings to establish River twists through the glacial gorge before profitable mines. Broken stone chimneys and rotting founda­ you, separating this point from rounded, tion logs are all that remain of this once bustling mining camp. v 7 This country is also a favorite home of the beaver. Trait Ridge brownish Specimen Mountain to the west. Its color provides a clue to the mountain's orgin, Sign No. 12 Shadow Mountain National as a volcano, and the cliffs at Iceberg Lake Recreation Area are of lava from this source. Shadow Mountain Lake and Lake Granby Road Guide Sign No. 10 Continental Divide, Milner Pass are two reservoirs of the Colorado — Big (10,758 feet) 12 Thompson Project, built and operated by the Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of Surprise! You thought the Continental Divide \ 7 the Interior. From here water flows through would be the highest point on your trip. But Grand Lake and the 13.1-mile Adams Tunnel this delightful spot where an undecided rain­ to Estes Park. There, east of the Continental drop might flow either to the Atlantic or to \10/ Divide, it stairsteps down through penstocks the Pacific is more than a thousand feet below and turbines producing electric power and finally emptying into the Alpine Visitor Center, and 1,425 feet be- reservoirs and irrigation canals east of the Front Range.
    [Show full text]
  • 10.10.2020 Cameron Peak Fire EOC Situation Report
    LARIMER COUNTY | OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT P.O. Box 1190, Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190, 970.498.7010, Larimer.org LARIMER COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER SITUATION REPORT This report is intended to provide information and status in quickly evolving situations and is subject to change. This report can be shared publicly. INCIDENT INFORMATION: REPORT SUBMITTED BY: Lori R. Hodges, EOC Manager REPORT DATE/TIME: 10/10/2020 1400 MST EOC ACTIVATIONS: Larimer County - Level I (All Hands) (All personnel virtual due to COVID-19) DECLARATIONS/DELEGATIONS: Larimer County signed a local Disaster Declaration on August 18, 2020 which was extended on 9/15/2020 by the Board of Commissioners until October 31, 2020. The Governor verbally declared a Disaster Emergency on August 18, 2020 for multiple fires in Colorado, including the Cameron Peak Fire and signed an Executive Order on September 16, 2020. The Governor signed a second Executive Order on the same day extending the disaster declaration until October 16, 2020. Larimer County received approval from FEMA for an FMAG declaration on 9/7/2020. The Fire was delegated to DFPC as of midnight on 9/6/2020 for the county and state lands. USFS is in charge of federal lands. SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment has issued an Air Quality Alert for Larimer County until 1600 hours today (10/10). Periods of moderate to heavy smoke will continue for parts of the Front Range region Friday and Saturday. The heaviest smoke is most likely for Larimer and Weld counties, including Ft. Collins and Greeley, due to smoke transported from the Cameron Peak wildfire in western Larimer County and the Mullen wildfire in south-central Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiking in the Kawuneeche Valley Rocky Mountain
    National Park Rocky Mountain National Park Service Hiking in the Kawuneeche Valley Adams Falls (East Inlet Trailhead) This easy 1/3 mile hike leads to a small, pleasant waterfall. If you wish to go further, past the falls, you will come to a large, grassy, glaciated valley with a river running through it. Moose are sometimes sighted in this valley. Many types of wildflowers are found in this area. (79’gain) Cascade Falls (North Inlet Trailhead) Photogenic Cascade Falls is 3.4 miles into the North Inlet trail. This easy hike passes through an open meadow where marmots are often found, and by a river that winds through a lodgepole pine forest. Fishing is good for small brook trout and an occasional brown trout. Allow about 3-4 hours for hiking this trail. (300’gain) Lulu City (Colorado River Trailhead) A flowered field is all that remains of this once booming mining town. Pass by the remains of log cabins and look for tailings from Shipler Mine about 2 miles into the trail. The trail parallels the Colorado River and passes meadows on this easy to moderately difficult 7.4-mile round trip hike. (350’gain) Lulu City/Yellowstone Loop (Colorado River Trailhead) After passing Shipler’s cabins, you will come to a sign that will designate Lulu City to the left and Little Yellowstone to the right. Stay right at the Y. Follow the trail all the way to the Grand Ditch. Little Yellowstone is a miniature version of the Grand Canyon of Yellowstone, formed of stark gray volcanic rock.
    [Show full text]
  • A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Rocky Mountain National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Rocky Mountain National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRR—2010/228 ON THE COVER Rocky Mountain National Park Photograph by: Billy Schweiger A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Rocky Mountain National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRR—2010/228 David M. Theobald1,2 Jill S. Baron2,3 Peter Newman1 Barry Noon4 John B. Norman III1,2 Ian Leinwand1 Sophia E. Linn1 Richard Sherer4 Katherine E. Williams2,5 Melannie Hartman2 1Department of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1480 2Natural Resource Ecology Lab, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1499 3U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins, CO 80523 4Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1474 5Current address: Department of Biology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071 This report was prepared under Task Order J2380060103 (Cooperative Agreement #H1200040001) July 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park Lawn Lake Flood Interpretive Area (Elevation 8,640 Ft)
    1 NCSS Conference 2001 Field Tour -- Colorado Rocky Mountains Wednesday, June 27, 2001 7:00 AM Depart Ft. Collins Marriott 8:30 Arrive Rocky Mountain National Park Lawn Lake Flood Interpretive Area (elevation 8,640 ft) 8:45 "Soil Survey of Rocky Mountain National Park" - Lee Neve, Soil Survey Project Leader, Natural Resources Conservation Service 9:00 "Correlation and Classification of the Soils" - Thomas Hahn, Soil Data Quality Specialist, MLRA Office 6, Natural Resources Conservation Service 9:15-9:30 "Interpretive Story of the Lawn Lake Flood" - Rocky Mountain National Park Interpretive Staff, National Park Service 10:00 Depart 10:45 Arrive Alpine Visitors Center (elevation 11,796 ft) 11:00 "Research Needs in the National Parks" - Pete Biggam, Soil Scientist, National Park Service 11:05 "Pedology and Biogeochemistry Research in Rocky Mountain National Park" - Dr. Eugene Kelly, Colorado State University 11:25 - 11:40 "Soil Features and Geologic Processes in the Alpine Tundra"- Mike Petersen and Tim Wheeler, Soil Scientists, Natural Resources Conservation Service Box Lunch 12:30 PM Depart 1:00 Arrive Many Parks Curve Interpretive Area (elevation 9,620 ft.) View of Valleys and Glacial Moraines, Photo Opportunity 1:30 Depart 3:00 Arrive Bobcat Gulch Fire Area, Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest 3:10 "Fire History and Burned Area Emergency Rehabilitation Efforts" - Carl Chambers, U. S. Forest Service 3:40 "Involvement and Interaction With the Private Sector"- Todd Boldt; District Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service 4:10 "Current Research on the Fire" - Colorado State University 4:45 Depart 6:00 Arrive Ft. Collins Marriott 2 3 Navigator’s Narrative Tim Wheeler Between the Fall River Visitors Center and the Lawn Lake Alluvial Debris Fan: This Park, or open grassy area, is called Horseshoe Park and is the tail end of the Park’s largest valley glacier.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Park Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior State of the Park Report Rocky Mountain National Park Colorado December 2017 National Park Service. 2017. State of the Park Report for Rocky Mountain National Park. State of the Park Series No. 50. National Park Service, Washington, DC. On the cover: Hallett Peak reflected in Dream Lake. NPS Photo. Disclaimer. This State of the Park report summarizes the current condition of park resources, visitor experience, and park infrastructure as assessed by a combination of available factual information and the expert opinion and professional judgment of park staff and subject matter experts. The internet version of this report provides additional details and sources of information about the findings summarized in the report, including references, accounts on the origin and quality of the data, and the methods and analytic approaches used in data collection and assessments of condition. This report provides evaluations of status and trends based on interpretation by NPS scientists and managers of both quantitative and non-quantitative assessments and observations. Future condition ratings may differ from findings in this report as new data and knowledge become available. The park superintendent approved the publication of this report. Executive Summary The mission of the National Park Service is to preserve unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of national parks for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations. NPS Management Policies (2006) state that “The Service will also strive to ensure that park resources and values are passed on to future generations in a condition that is as good as, or better than, the conditions that exist today.” As part of the stewardship of national parks for the American people, the NPS has begun to develop State of the Park reports to assess the overall status and trends of each park’s resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park
    A Resource Assessment ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION JULY 2002 State of the Parks Program More than a century ago, Congress established Yellowstone as C ONTENTS the world’s first national park. That single act was the begin- ning of a remarkable and ongoing effort to protect this nation’s natural, historical, and cultural heritage. Summary page 1 But over the years, Americans have learned that designat- I. ALPINE WONDER 4 ing national parks does not automatically ensure the well being of the resources parks are meant to protect and the his- II. ROCKY MOUNTAIN ASSESSMENT 6 tory those resources represent. Many parks are threatened by incompatible development of adjacent lands, air and water Natural Resources 7 pollution, skyrocketing visitation, and rapid increases in Native Biodiversity 7 motorized recreation. Historic structures suffer from deterio- Terrestrial Communities and Systems 9 ration. Most cultural landscapes have yet to be adequately Freshwater Communities and Systems 12 inventoried. Only a small part—usually less than 10 percent—of the Cultural Resources 14 National Park Service budget each year is earmarked for man- History and Historic Structures 14 agement of natural, historical, and cultural resources. And in Collections and Archives 16 most years, only about 7 percent of permanent park employ- Archaeological Sites 17 ees work in jobs directly related to preserving park resources. The National Parks Conservation Association initiated Ethnography 18 the State of the Parks program in 2000 to assess the condition Cultural Landscapes 19 of natural and cultural resources in the parks, forecast the like- Stewardship Capacity 20 ly future condition of those resources, and determine how well equipped the National Park Service is to protect the Funding and Staffing 20 park—its stewardship capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Colorado River: Lifeline Of
    4 The Colorado River: lifeline of the American Southwest Clarence A. Carlson Department of Fishery and Wildlife Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA 80523 Robert T. Muth Larval Fish Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA 80523 1 Carlson, C. A., and R. T. Muth. 1986. The Colorado River: lifeline of the American Southwest. Can. J. Fish. Aguat. Sci. In less than a century, the wild Colorado River has been drastically and irreversibly transformed into a tamed, man-made system of regulated segments dominated by non-native organisms. The pristine Colorado was characterized by widely fluctuating flows and physico-chemical extremes and harbored unique assemblages of indigenous flora and fauna. Closure of Hoover Dam in 1935 marked the end of the free-flowing river. The Colorado River System has since become one of the most altered and intensively controlled in the United States. Many main-stem and tributary dams, water diversions, and channelized river sections now exist in the basin. Despite having one of - the most arid drainages in the world, the present-day Colorado River supplies more water for consumptive use than any river in the United States. Physical modification of streams and introduction of non-native species have adversely impacted the Colorado's native biota. This paper treats the Colorado River holistically as an ecosystem and summarizes current knowledge on its ecology and management. "In a little over two generations, the wild Colorado has been harnessed by a series of dams strung like beads on a thread from the Gulf of California to the mountains of Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • The Colorado River Compact
    The Colorado River Compact CRWUA ‐‐ As the 20th century dawned, the vast domain of the Colorado River lay almost entirely untouched. Though there had been a few early filings for diversion and a "grand ditch" conveying water some 16 miles across the Continental Divide into eastern Colorado in the late 1800s, California's Imperial Valley was among the first areas to tap the river's true potential. In early 1901, the 60 mile long Alamo Canal, developed by private concerns, was completed to deliver Colorado River water for irrigation, and a wasteland was transformed. But the Imperial Valley did not move ahead without problems. About 50 miles of the canal coursed through Mexico, leaving the valley farmers at the mercy of a foreign government. And in 1905, the river, raging with floods, eroded the opening to the canal, roared through and created the Salton Sea before the river was pushed back into its normal channel. With the constant threat of flood looming along the lower Colorado, demands grew for some sort of permanent flood control work ‐a storage reservoir and dam on the river. And Imperial Valley farmers called for a canal totally within the United States, free of Mexican interference. By 1919, Imperial Irrigation District had won the support of the federal Bureau of Reclamation. A bureau engineering board recommended favorably on the canal and added the government "should undertake the early construction of a storage reservoir on the drainage basin of the Colorado." While this report was greeted with enthusiasm by people along the river's lower stretches, it was viewed with alarm by those in upper reaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park Backcountry/Wilderness Plan
    Backcountry/Wilderness Management Plan and Environmental Assessment FONSI FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT BACKCOUNTRY/WILDERNESS MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK The Backcountry/Wilderness Management Plan for Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP) was developed to address issues and provide guidelines for managing the non-developed areas of the park that are defined as backcountry or as designated, recommended, or potential wilderness. Park management proposed this new plan because the 1984 Backcountry Management Plan mainly addresses overnight use in the backcountry/wilderness and is inadequate for addressing management direction, consistency, and needs. The new plan details a wide array of issues and identifies specific standards for managing administrative actions and visitor use. The plan formalizes many current backcountry/wilderness management practices that have been in effect for the past twenty years. It does not affect developed areas, roads, or frontcountry park uses. The new plan supercedes any direction or guidance set forth in the 1984 Backcountry Management Plan. The adoption of this plan is not part of the recommendation before Congress to officially designate a large portion of the park as wilderness. An Environmental Assessment (EA) was conducted to examine plan alternatives. The EA involves detailed analysis of two alternatives and describes the potential impacts associated with implementing the proposed plan (Alternative A), or maintaining the current status of backcountry and wilderness management with no written standards (Alternative B). The EA was available for public review and comment beginning on January 19, 2001, and the review period was extended to April 6, 2001, which provided an opportunity for public input on the alternatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Larimer County Emergency Operations Center Situation Report
    LARIMER COUNTY | OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT P.O. Box 1190, Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190, 970.498.7010, Larimer.org LARIMER COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER SITUATION REPORT This report is intended to provide information and status in quickly evolving situations and is subject to change. This report can be shared publicly. INCIDENT INFORMATION: REPORT SUBMITTED BY: Lori R. Hodges, EOC Manager REPORT DATE/TIME: 08/21/2020 1000 MST INCIDENT NAME: Cameron Peak Wildfire CO-ARF-636 INCIDENT TYPE: Wildfire INCIDENT START DATE/TIME: 08/13/2020 1430 MST INCIDENT LOCATION: Cameron Peak, near Chambers Lake, Larimer County LARIMER OEM OR EOC POC NAME/CONTACT INFO: Lori Hodges, EOC Manager (303) 656-3214 [mobile] [email protected] CURRENT SITUATION: Larimer County is currently under a fire ban that went into effect at 1200 hours 8/18/2020 and will be in effect for a period of 30 days, until 9/18/2020. https://www.larimer.org/spotlights/2020/08/18/larimer- county-open-fire-ban-effect Governor Polis has issued a 30-day open fire ban for the State of Colorado, starting 8/20/2020. Fire restrictions for each county can be found at: https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/dfpc/fire-restriction- information The USFS expanded closures for the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest yesterday. Updated closures can be found at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/arp/news-events/?cid=FSEPRD787358 DESCRIPTION: At approximately 1445 on 8/13/2020, Larimer OEM received notification that an active wildfire was growing on USFS property near Chambers Lake and Blue Lake on W.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Deliveries of Colorado River Basin Water
    Municipal Deliveries of Colorado River Basin Water Author Michael J. Cohen Research Assistant Jenifer C. Martin Editors Nancy Ross Paula Luu Pacific Institute 654 13th Street, Preservation Park Oakland, California 94612 www.pacinst.org Phone: 510.251.1600 Facsimile: 510.251.2203 © Copyright 2011. All Rights Reserved ISBN: 1-893790-34-7 ISBN 13: 978-1-893790-34-6 Cover Photo: Aerial view of the Whitsett Pumping Plant, Courtesy © The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Note – this 8/21/2011 revision corrects: population data for the City of Westminster, water delivery data for Denver Water, GPCD calculations for Grand Valley, CO (Grand Junction), and 2005 Colorado River deliveries for San Luís Río Colorado, Mexico. Municipal Deliveries of Colorado River Basin Water About the Pacific Institute The Pacific Institute is one of the world’s leading independent nonprofits conducting research and education to create a healthier planet and sustainable communities. Based in Oakland, California, with an office in Boulder, Colorado, we conduct interdisciplinary research and partner with stakeholders to produce solutions that advance environmental protection, economic development, and social equity—in California, nationally, and internationally. We work to change policy and find real-world solutions to problems like water shortages, habitat destruction, global warming, and environmental injustice. Since our founding in 1987, the Pacific Institute has become a locus for independent, innovative thinking that cuts across traditional areas of study, helping us make connections and bring opposing groups together. The result is effective, actionable solutions addressing issues in the fields of freshwater resources, climate change, environmental justice, and globalization. More information about the Institute and our staff, directors, funders, and programs can be found at www.pacinst.org.
    [Show full text]