The Early Life History of Fish

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Early Life History of Fish Rapp. P.-v. Réun. Cons. int. Explor. Mer, 191: 160-168. 1989 Herring larval studies in the west-central North Sea J. H. Nichols and K. M. Brander Nichols, J. H., and Brander, K. M. 1989. Herring larval studies in the west-central North Sea. - Rapp. P.-v. Réun. Cons. int. Explor. Mer, 191: 160-168. Herring larval abundance in the west-central North Sea, as shown by the annual indices from the international larval surveys, declined during the early 1970s to reach a low in 1975 and 1976. Following a ban on fishing for herring in the North Sea (1977- 1983), the spawning stock recovered. This was indicated both by a rapid rise in larval production and by a re-occurrence of larvae in areas where no larval production had been observed since the mid-1960s. Larval production reached a new peak in 1985 but has subsequently declined to about half that level. Spawning is confined to suitable substrata for egg adhesion. As a result, larval production occurs in thermally stratified water in the north, in well-mixed water further south, and in the boundary areas between these two regimes. Interannual variation in the position of these water masses during the hatching period produces variability in the environment that could affect larval survival. Some indication of the potential for variability is seen in the movement of satellite-tracked buoys. J. H. Nichols and K. M. Brander: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Directorate of Fisheries Research, Fisheries Laboratory, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 OHT, England. Introduction Sea stocks. This resulted in a recommendation from the Assessment Working Group for a complete closure of The spawning areas of the herring in the west-central the North Sea herring fisheries. The closure came into North Sea are well defined from larval surveys both effect in 1977 and was lifted in 1983. By 1984, larval historically (Bückman, 1942) and in recent years from abundance in the west-central North Sea had increased, international larval surveys (Rankine, 1986). Spawning reaching a peak in 1985. Larval production has sub­ occurs along the northeast coast of England from the sequently fallen, both in 1986 and 1987, but is still well Longstone area south to the Dowsing (see Fig. 2 for above pre-1984 levels in this area. Detailed field studies, place names). Offshore, spawning occurs in the vicinity aimed at improving our understanding of the factors of the North-East Bank and along the western edge of governing recruitment, have run concurrently with the the Dogger Bank. The spawning season extends from international larval surveys since 1984. These studies August in the north progressing southwards to the were planned before production rose, and in some ways Dowsing in October. Zijlstra (1970) shows the position the high larval densities made such patch studies more and timing of spawning on the Yorkshire coast and the difficult to conduct. Dogger Bank from catches of spawning herring and This paper describes the changes in herring larval from larval surveys during the period 1957-1968. His distribution and abundance in the west-central North surveys demonstrate particularly the decline and dis­ Sea since 1976. The position and timing of spawning in appearance of larvae on the western edge of the Dogger relation to substratum and stratification is also exam­ Bank. ined. Since 1972, the ICES Herring Assessment Working Groups have established a relationship between larval Materials and methods abundance and spawning stock biomass for North Sea stocks. This has been used as a basis for stock assessment The ICES coordinated herring larval surveys have been over that period (Anon., 1987a). For the central North carried out in the west-central North Sea since 1970 by Sea, larval data have been collected on regular surveys England and The Netherlands with some participation during September and October. These surveys show a by Poland and Norway. Herring larvae are sampled steep decline in larval abundance in 1975 and 1976, using a Gulf III type high-speed townet (Gehringer, which coincided with a big reduction in all other North 1952) deployed at 5 knots, on a double oblique profile 160 from the surface to within 5 m of the sea bed. This are fixed in 4% formalin and the herring larvae sorted is fitted with a conductivity, temperature, and depth and measured at least two weeks after fixation. recorder monitoring continuously during the tow. Vol­ For the examination of distribution and abundance umes filtered are calculated from the readings of the of larvae, the international data set is grouped into four calibrated flowmeter in the mouth opening. Numbers two-weekly periods for September and October. of larvae per sample are converted to numbers below Specifications for the “Argos” satellite-tracked, drift­ one square metre of sea surface. All plankton samples ing buoys deployed in the centres of herring larvae 8-16 Sept 1981 3-12 Sept 1985 31 Aug - 4 Sept 1987 1976 32-30 Sept 1981 21-28 Sept 1985 S.W^Patch 29 Sept - 12 Oct 1981 6-12 Oct 1987 j Herring larvae nm " 2 1-27 27 -2 4 3 243-2187 > 21B7 Figure 1. Distribution of herring larvae <10 mm as numbers m 2 for the years 1976, 1981, 1985, and 1987. The area of the survey is also outlined. patches in 1985 and 1987 are described by Booth and Table 1. Abundance indices of <10 mm larvae (xlO 9) for the Ritchie (1983). Briefly, the window drogue used meas­ west-central North Sea, 1976-1987. ures 7.5 m deep by 5 m wide with its surface float sep­ Year Larval index Year Larval index arated from the transmitting buoy by a 5 m tether line. The top of the drogue is set between 12.5 and 16 m from 1976 76 1982 338 the surface. 1977 174 1983 661 1978 462 1984 1055 1979 188 1985 3802 1980 214 1986 2027 Results 1981 364 1987 1970 Larvae distribution and abundance The abundance of herring larvae <10 mm in length is In 1976, the highest abundance of larvae <10 mm in shown for the first three sampling periods in 1976,1981, length during the season rose to only 91 m-2 in a small 1985, and 1987 in Figure 1. These distributions show area close to the coast between the Fame Islands and the low level of larval production in 1976, and the the river Tyne in early September (see Fig. 2 for place gradual recovery following the closure of the adult names). By mid-September, some hatching had fishery between 1977 and 1983. occurred off Bridlington Bay. By 1981, the picture in 56° \Farne Is. [Farne Deeps! 55” ;S.W. Patch River Tees W hitby* Flamborough 54° More than 80% gravel 30%-80% gravel Dowsing] 0 o\ 5% -30% gravel M ud 1 [Less than 5% gravel S and Stones and rough ground 53“ Figure 2. A summary of available data on the substratum off the northeast coast of England. 162 early September had changed considerably with dense and recently-hatched larvae were present in all four patches of small larvae in the Longstone area and off sampling periods. The most notable feature was their Whitby. Abundance of larvae reached a peak of reappearance well offshore at the northern edge of the 1120 m-2 off Whitby in the first half of September survey area (North-East Bank) and on the western edge 1981. After the end of September, no further hatching of the Dogger Bank in the vicinity of the South-West occurred. Patch. Larval abundance, although low in early Sep­ By 1985, larval production had increased considerably tember, reached a peak of over 12 000 m^2 off the 21-28 Sept 1985 Herring larvae nm Stratification parameter 10,30,50,70.90.Jm -s 2 7 -243 2 *3-2 187 > 2187 Figure 3. The distribution of herring larvae <10 mm on the English surveys from 1984-1987 and the contours showing stratification parameters 0 (J m~3) (see Simpson, 1981). 163 Yorkshire coast by the end of September. Larval pro­ Drift of larvae duction declined in 1986, although hatching continued on the North-East Bank and along the western edge of Differences in the position of the boundary areas and the Dogger Bank. In 1987, there was a further reduction in the timing of the breakdown of stratification may also in overall larval production, although abundance in the affect the drift of larvae and the retention times within Whitby area reached 18 000 tr r 2on 1 October. Hatching the sampled area. Such potential interannual differences continued on the North-East Bank and there was still can be seen from the tracks of “Argos” satellite-tracked evidence of spawning activity on the western edge of buoys deployed in the area in 1984, 1985, and 1987. In the Dogger Bank. The larval index for the area for the 1984, a single system was deployed in a larval patch in years 1976-1987 ( from Rankine, 1988) is shown in Table well-mixed water off Flamborough Head on 13 October 1. This index is based on the mean number of <10 mm (Fig. 4a). This buoy moved generally southeastwards at larvae and provides a useful summary of the trend in 7 k m d ^ ‘ until it was recovered on 29 October. Two larval production over this period. systems were launched in late September 1985 in the De Groot (1980) reviewed the relation between centre of larval patches and on the edge of mixed and spawning herring and substratum in the southern North stratified water (Fig. 4b). Their movement over the next Sea and established their requirement for a coarse, six weeks indicates a very slow south to southeasterly stable substratum generally consisting of some gravel movement averaging 2.5 km d~1 following the boundary or stones.
Recommended publications
  • Fronts in the World Ocean's Large Marine Ecosystems. ICES CM 2007
    - 1 - This paper can be freely cited without prior reference to the authors International Council ICES CM 2007/D:21 for the Exploration Theme Session D: Comparative Marine Ecosystem of the Sea (ICES) Structure and Function: Descriptors and Characteristics Fronts in the World Ocean’s Large Marine Ecosystems Igor M. Belkin and Peter C. Cornillon Abstract. Oceanic fronts shape marine ecosystems; therefore front mapping and characterization is one of the most important aspects of physical oceanography. Here we report on the first effort to map and describe all major fronts in the World Ocean’s Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs). Apart from a geographical review, these fronts are classified according to their origin and physical mechanisms that maintain them. This first-ever zero-order pattern of the LME fronts is based on a unique global frontal data base assembled at the University of Rhode Island. Thermal fronts were automatically derived from 12 years (1985-1996) of twice-daily satellite 9-km resolution global AVHRR SST fields with the Cayula-Cornillon front detection algorithm. These frontal maps serve as guidance in using hydrographic data to explore subsurface thermohaline fronts, whose surface thermal signatures have been mapped from space. Our most recent study of chlorophyll fronts in the Northwest Atlantic from high-resolution 1-km data (Belkin and O’Reilly, 2007) revealed a close spatial association between chlorophyll fronts and SST fronts, suggesting causative links between these two types of fronts. Keywords: Fronts; Large Marine Ecosystems; World Ocean; sea surface temperature. Igor M. Belkin: Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, 215 South Ferry Road, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882, USA [tel.: +1 401 874 6533, fax: +1 874 6728, email: [email protected]].
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Announcement Template V2.1 (29Th April 2019) (Based on MSC Fishery Announcement Template V2.01)
    Control Union Pesca Ltd. CFTO Indian Ocean Purse Seine Skipjack fishery MSC Fishery Announcement Control Union Pesca Ltd 56 High Street, Lymington, Hampshire, SO41 9AH, United Kingdom Tel: 01590 613007 Fax: 01590 671573 Email: [email protected] Website: www.cupesca.com Marine Stewardship Council fishery announcement Table 1 – Fishery announcement 1 Fishery name CFTO Indian Ocean Purse Seine Skipjack fishery 2 Assessment number Initial assessment 3 Reduced reassessment (Yes/No) N/A 4 Statement that the fishery is within scope The CAB confirms that the fishery entering full assessment meets the scope requirements (FCR 7.4) for MSC fishery assessments [FCR 7.8.3.1]. The CAB further confirms the following: • The fishery is within scope of the MSC standard, i.e. it does not operate under a controversial unilateral exemption to an international agreement, use destructive fishing practices, target amphibians, birds, reptiles or mammals and is not overwhelmed by dispute; • The CAB has reviewed available assessment reports and other information. A pre-assessment was conducted for this fishery (February 2019); • The fishery has not failed an assessment within the last two years; • IPI stocks are not caught; • The fishery is enhanced; • The fishery is not based on an introduced species; and • The fishery does not include an entity that has been successfully prosecuted for violations against forced labour laws. The fishery overlaps with the “Maldives pole & line skipjack tuna” and “Echebastar Indian Ocean purse seine skipjack tuna” 5 Unit(s)
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Submarine Cabling Overview Fisheries Technical Working Group
    OFFSHOREoverview WIND SUBMARINE CABLING Fisheries Technical Working Group Final Report | Report Number 21-14 | April 2021 NYSERDA’s Promise to New Yorkers: NYSERDA provides resources, expertise, and objective information so New Yorkers can make confident, informed energy decisions. Our Vision: New York is a global climate leader building a healthier future with thriving communities; homes and businesses powered by clean energy; and economic opportunities accessible to all New Yorkers. Our Mission: Advance clean energy innovation and investments to combat climate change, improving the health, resiliency, and prosperity of New Yorkers and delivering benefits equitably to all. Courtesy, Equinor, Dudgeon Offshore Wind Farm Offshore Wind Submarine Cabling Overview Fisheries Technical Working Group Final Report Prepared for: New York State Energy Research and Development Authority Albany, NY Morgan Brunbauer Offshore Wind Marine Fisheries Manager Prepared by: Tetra Tech, Inc. Boston, MA Brian Dresser Director of Fisheries Programs NYSERDA Report 21-14 NYSERDA Contract 111608A April 2021 Notice This report was prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. in the course of performing work contracted for and sponsored by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (hereafter “NYSERDA”). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of NYSERDA or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, NYSERDA, the State of New York, and the contractor make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Natura 2000 Sites for Reefs and Submerged Sandbanks Volume II: Northeast Atlantic and North Sea
    Implementation of the EU Habitats Directive Offshore: Natura 2000 sites for reefs and submerged sandbanks Volume II: Northeast Atlantic and North Sea A report by WWF June 2001 Implementation of the EU Habitats Directive Offshore: Natura 2000 sites for reefs and submerged sandbanks A report by WWF based on: "Habitats Directive Implementation in Europe Offshore SACs for reefs" by A. D. Rogers Southampton Oceanographic Centre, UK; and "Submerged Sandbanks in European Shelf Waters" by Veligrakis, A., Collins, M.B., Owrid, G. and A. Houghton Southampton Oceanographic Centre, UK; commissioned by WWF For information please contact: Dr. Sarah Jones WWF UK Panda House Weyside Park Godalming Surrey GU7 1XR United Kingdom Tel +441483 412522 Fax +441483 426409 Email: [email protected] Cover page photo: Trawling smashes cold water coral reefs P.Buhl-Mortensen, University of Bergen, Norway Prepared by Sabine Christiansen and Sarah Jones IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EU HD OFFSHORE REEFS AND SUBMERGED SANDBANKS NE ATLANTIC AND NORTH SEA TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I LIST OF MAPS II LIST OF TABLES III 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 REEFS IN THE NORTHEAST ATLANTIC AND THE NORTH SEA (A.D. ROGERS, SOC) 3 2.1 Data inventory 3 2.2 Example cases for the type of information provided (full list see Vol. IV ) 9 2.2.1 "Darwin Mounds" East (UK) 9 2.2.2 Galicia Bank (Spain) 13 2.2.3 Gorringe Ridge (Portugal) 17 2.2.4 La Chapelle Bank (France) 22 2.3 Bibliography reefs 24 2.4 Analysis of Offshore Reefs Inventory (WWF)(overview maps and tables) 31 2.4.1 North Sea 31 2.4.2 UK and Ireland 32 2.4.3 France and Spain 39 2.4.4 Portugal 41 2.4.5 Conclusions 43 3 SUBMERGED SANDBANKS IN EUROPEAN SHELF WATERS (A.
    [Show full text]
  • Dogger Bank Special Area of Conservation (SAC) MMO Fisheries Assessment 2021
    Document Control Title Dogger Bank Special Area of Conservation (SAC) MMO Fisheries Assessment 2021 Authors T Barnfield; E Johnston; T Dixon; K Saunders; E Siegal Approver(s) V Morgan; J Duffill Telsnig; N Greenwood Owner T Barnfield Revision History Date Author(s) Version Status Reason Approver(s) 19/06/2020 T Barnfield; V.A0.1 Draft Introduction and Part V Morgan E Johnston A 06/07/2020 T Barnfield; V.A0.2 Draft Internal QA of V Morgan E Johnston Introduction and Part A 07/07/2020 T Barnfield; V.A0.3 Draft JNCC QA of A Doyle E Johnston Introduction and Part A 14/07/2020 T Barnfield; V.A0.4 Draft Introduction and Part V Morgan E Johnston A JNCC comments 26/07/2020 T Barnfield; V.BC0.1 Draft Part B & C N Greenwood E Johnston 29/07/2020 T Barnfield; V.BC0.2 Draft Internal QA of Part B N Greenwood E Johnston & C 30/07/2020 T Barnfield; V.BC0.3 Draft JNCC QA of A Doyle E Johnston Introduction and Part A 05/08/2020 T Barnfield; V.BC0.4 Draft Part B & C JNCC N Greenwood E Johnston comments 06/08/2020 T Barnfield; V.1.0 Draft Whole document N Greenwood E Johnston compilation 07/08/2020 T Barnfield; V.1.1 Draft Whole document N Greenwood E Johnston Internal QA 18/08/2020 T Barnfield; V.1.2 Draft Whole document A Doyle E Johnston JNCC QA 25/08/2020 T Barnfield; V1.3 Draft Whole Document G7 Leanne E Johnston QA Stockdale 25/08/2020 T Barnfield; V1.4 Draft Update following G7 Leanne E Johnston QA Stockdale 25/01/2021 T Barnfield; V2.0 – 2.4 Draft Updates following NGreenwood; K Saunders; new data availability J Duffill Telsnig T Dixon; E and QA Siegal 01/02/2021 T Barnfield; V2.5 Final Finalise comments Nick Greenwood K Saunders; E and updates Siegal 1 Dogger Bank Special Area of Conservation (SAC) MMO Fisheries Assessment 2020 Contents Document Control ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Words from the Chair Page 2 On-Going Dossiers Page 3 Studies
    COMMITTEE ON FISHERIES Wednesday 4 September 2019 (9.00 – 12.30 and 14.30 – 18.30) in Brussels, Room ASP 3E-2 ►Exchange of views with Jari Leppä, Minister for Agriculture and Forestry of Finland, on the programme of the Finnish Presidency-in-office ►“The state of the seas“: debate with the Commission on the state of fish stocks in the North Sea, Baltic and Western Waters ►Adoption of the PECH opinion on the General Budget 2020 ►Exchange of views on recent developments in the mackerel quota, in particular regarding the mackerel seizures by Iceland and Greenland Words from the Chair page 2 Next meetings of the Committee on Fisheries: On-going dossiers page 3 Studies & briefing notes page 5 Monday 23 September 2019, 15.00 – 18.30 Fisheries news page 6 Tuesday 24 September 2019, 9.00 – 12.30 AC meetings page 13 International meetings page 15 Tuesday 24 September 2019, 14.30 – 18.30 Partnership agreements page 17 Committee on Fisheries page 19 Calendar of PECH meetings page 20 1 Chris DAVIES Chair of Committee on Fisheries Dear Friends, A summer visit to the port of Kilkeel in Northern Ireland provided me with illustration for many of our committee discussions. It’s a prosperous place, reflecting the profitability of a good part of Europe’s fishing industry, and is looking to expand its harbour to take the largest vessels. The enthusiasm of its people to diversify and explore new opportunities is infectious. The boat building yard has orders for years ahead. Top quality langoustines are packed for shipping across Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Reef Effects of Offshore Wind Farm Strucurse and Potential for Enhancement and Mitigation
    REVIEW OF REEF EFFECTS OF OFFSHORE WIND FARM STRUCTURES AND POTENTIAL FOR ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION JANUARY 2008 IN ASSOCIATION WITH Review of the reef effects of offshore wind farm structures and potential for enhancement and mitigation Report to the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform PML Applications Ltd in association with Scottish Association of Marine Sciences (SAMS) Contract No : RFCA/005/00029P This report may be cited as follows: Linley E.A.S., Wilding T.A., Black K., Hawkins A.J.S. and Mangi S. (2007). Review of the reef effects of offshore wind farm structures and their potential for enhancement and mitigation. Report from PML Applications Ltd and the Scottish Association for Marine Science to the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR), Contract No: RFCA/005/0029P Acknowledgements Acknowledgements The Review of Reef Effects of Offshore Wind Farm Structures and Potential for Enhancement and Mitigation was prepared by PML Applications Ltd and the Scottish Association for Marine Science. This project was undertaken as part of the UK Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) offshore wind energy research programme, and managed on behalf of BERR by Hartley Anderson Ltd. We are particularly indebted to John Hartley and other members of the Research Advisory Group for their advice and guidance throughout the production of this report, and to Keith Hiscock and Antony Jensen who also provided detailed comment on early drafts. Numerous individuals have also contributed their advice, particularly in identifying data resources to assist with the analysis. We are particularly indebted to Angela Wratten, Chris Jenner, Tim Smyth, Mark Trimmer, Francis Bunker, Gero Vella, Robert Thornhill, Julie Drew, Adrian Maddocks, Robert Lillie, Tony Nott, Ben Barton, David Fletcher, John Leballeur, Laurie Ayling and Stephen Lockwood – who in the course of passing on information also contributed their ideas and thoughts.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 North Sea 6.1 Ecosystem Overview 6.1.1 Ecosystem Components
    6 North Sea 6.1 Ecosystem overview 6.1.1 Ecosystem components Seabed topography and substrates The topography of the North Sea can be broadly described as having a shallow (<50 m) southeastern part, which is sharply separated by the Dogger Bank from a much deeper (50–100 m) central part that runs north along the British coast. The central northern part of the shelf gradually slopes down to 200 m before reaching the shelf edge. Another main feature is the Norwegian Trench running east along the Norwegian coast into the Skagerrak with depths up to 500 m. Further to the east, the Norwegian Trench ends abruptly, and the Kattegat is of depths similar to the main part of the North Sea (Figure 6.1.1). The substrates are dominated by sands in the southern and coastal regions and fine muds in deeper and more central parts (Figure 6.1.2). Sands become generally coarser to the east and west, with patches of gravel and stones existing as well. In the shallow southern part, concentrations of boulders may be found locally, originating from transport by glaciers during the ice ages. This specific hard-bottom habitat has become scarcer, because boulders caught in beam trawls are often brought ashore. The area around, and to the west of the Orkney/Shetland archipelago is dominated by coarse sand and gravel. The deep areas of the Norwegian Trench are covered with extensive layers of fine muds, while some of the slopes have rocky bottoms. Several underwater canyons extend further towards the coasts of Norway and Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Dogger Bank Complaint
    Complaint to the Commission concerning alleged breach of Union legislation Failure to comply with Article 6(1), 6(2) and 6 (3) of Council Directive 92/43/ΕEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna - the Habitats Directive, in relation to the fisheries management measures for the Dutch and UK Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) in the Dogger Bank in the North Sea 24 June 2019 1. Identity and contact details 2. Infringement of EU Law 3. Request for action from the Commission 4. Previous action taken to solve the problem 5. Previous correspondence with EU institutions 6. List any supporting documents/evidence which you could – if requested – send to the Commission 7. Personal data 8. Signatures Annex 1A Dogger Bank H1110 listed typical species reported as bycatch in demersal seining Annex 1B Dogger Bank H1110 listed typical species considered sensitive to bottom disturbance Annex 1C Vulnerable, near threatened, threatened, endangered and critically endangered species known to occur or to have occurred on Dogger Bank (not listed as H1110 typical species by the governments) and observed as bycatch in demersal seining Annex 1D Dogger Bank species known to be typically occurring on the Dogger Bank (however not listed as H1110 typical species by the governments) and reported bycatch Annex 1E Dogger Bank species known to occur or to have typically occurred (however not listed as H1110 typical species by the governments) and considered sensitive to demersal seining Annex 2 Inability to control and enforce with recommended VMS frequency and minimum transit speed Annex 3 The process leading to the proposed management measures of fisheries activities in the Dogger Bank Natura 2000 sites Annex 4 The fisheries industry and nature conservation organisations’ proposals of 2012 Annex 5 Pictures and URLs of demersal seining rope, gear, fisheries, bycatch 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Fisheries Management Measures in Natura 2000 Sites
    Review of fisheries management measures in Natura 2000 sites Prepared by THE N2K GROUP April 2018 Contents 1. BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2. RISK ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................................. 3 2.1. Risk assessment - Generic ............................................................................................................. 4 2.2. Risk assessment – Site specific ...................................................................................................... 4 2.3. Risk assessment – Activity/gear type ............................................................................................ 5 2.4. Risk assessment – Feature ............................................................................................................ 6 3. TECHNICAL MEASURES ......................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Measures relating to fishing gear types .............................................................................................. 8 3.2. Measures relating to fishing gear selectivity ..................................................................................... 9 3.3. Spatial/temporal restrictions ........................................................................................................... 10 4. FISHING EFFORT
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Activities on the Dogger Bank 2006-2011 (LEI)
    Fishing activities on the Dogger Bank 2006-2011 H. Bartelings K. Hamon J.A.E. van Oostenbrugge LEI Memorandum 13-051 May 2013 Project code 22720003402 LEI Wageningen UR, The Hague 2 Fishing activities on the Dogger Bank Bartelings, H., K. Hamon and J.A.E. van Oostenbrugge LEI Memorandum 13-051 45p., fig., tab., app. 3 Project BO-20-010-022, 'Effecten visserijzonering N2000 gebieden' This research project has been carried out within the Policy Supporting Research for the Ministry of Economic Affairs, BO 20.40: BO Agro, Theme: N2000. This publication is available at www.wageningenUR.nl/en/lei © LEI, part of Stichting Landbouwkundig Onderzoek (DLO foundation), 2013 Reproduction of contents, either whole or in part, is permitted with due reference to the source. 4 LEI is ISO 9001:2008 certified. Contents 1 Introduction 6 1.1 Motivation 6 1.2 Objectives 6 1.3 Results 6 1.4 Contents 7 2 Methods 8 2.1 Data sources 8 2.2 Processing of data for Dutch vessels 8 2.3 Processing of data for foreign vessels 9 2.4 Historical fishing trends in areas of interest 10 3 Historic trends in fishing activities 11 3.1 Dutch Fleet 11 3.2 Foreign Fleets 15 4 Discussion and conclusions 19 4.1 Discussion 19 4.2 Conclusions 20 Literature 21 Appendices 22 1 Data sources 22 2 Quality of the data 23 3 Fishing trends in the areas 39 4 Gear codes 45 5 1 Introduction 1.1 Motivation In 2008, the Minister of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality notified four proposed Sites of Community In- terest (pSCIs) to the European Commission (for protection as Special Conservation Areas (SCAs) under the Habitats Directive).
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Cross-Border Maritime Spatial Planning in Two Case Studies (D1.2)
    Report on cross-border Maritime Spatial Planning in two case studies (D1.2) Report on cross-border Maritime Spatial Planning in two case studies Deliverable D1.2 Due date of deliverable: April 2012 (month 17) Submission date: June 2012 This project is co-financed under the European Integrated Maritime Policy 1 Report on cross-border Maritime Spatial Planning in two case studies (D1.2) Coordinated by: Saskia Hommes, Deltares, Delft, The Netherlands Contributors: Saskia Hommes, Deltares, Delft, The Netherlands Frank Maes, Maritime Institute, Ghent University, Belgium An Vanhulle, Maritime Institute, Ghent University, Belgium David Goldsborough, Centre for Marine Policy, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands Martin Pastoors, Centre for Marine Policy, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands Thomas Kirk Sørensen, DTU Aqua, Charlottenlund, Denmark Vanessa Stelzenmüller, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Institute of Sea Fisheries(vTI-SF), Hamburg, Germany Acknowledgements The MASPNOSE advisory board consisted of Roland Cormier (DFO, Canada),Charles Ehler (Ocean Visions Consulting, France) and Eugene Nixon (Marine Institute, Ireland). We have had two inspiring sessions with the advisory board and they have made an important impact in steering the project towards the final results on the two case studies that are contained in this report. A special thanks to Lodewijk Abspoel (Ministry of Infrastructure & Environment, The Netherlands), Steven Vandenborre (Federal Public Service Health, Food chain safety and Environment, Belgium) and Euan Dunn (NSRAC) for their
    [Show full text]