DOCSLIB.ORG

Antimatter Really Matters?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Antimatter Really Matters? CERN Antimatter really matters? Thanks to A. Höcker for material from his Summer Studen Lectures 2005 Richard Jacobsson 1 Paul Dirac (1933) CERN e+ μ ixtmxtγψ∂−μ (),,0 ψ () = Carl Anderson in 1932 “If we accept the view of complete symmetry between positive and negative electric charge so far as concerns the fundamental laws of Nature, we must regard it rather as an accident that the Earth (and presumably the whole solar system), contains a preponderance of negative electrons and positive protons. It is quite possible that for some of the stars it is the other way about, these stars being built up mainly of positrons and negative protons. In fact, there may be half the stars of each kind. The two kind of stars would both show exactly the same spectra, and there would be no way of distinguishing them by present astronomical methods.” Also in the 30s: ¾ Universe is exppganding with finite size and a ge…. Î Mind boggling “existential” questions arise Richard Jacobsson 2 Particle/antiparticle dynamicsCERN What happens if particles and antiparticles are brought together? z A particle can annihilate with its antiparticle to form gamma rays z An example whereby matter is converted into ppgyyure energy by Einstein’s formula E = mc2 z Conversely, gamma rays with sufficiently higggyh energy can turn into a p article- antiparticle pair Particle-antiparticle tracks in a bubble chamber Richard Jacobsson 3 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, Big Bang! CERN z Initial state of the Universe p + p ÅÆ γ + γ ¾ Soup of energy, and particle and antiparticles ¾ “Quasithermal” equilibrium z Two starting possibilities for the baryon number (Bp =1= 1, Bp = -1) 1. <B(t=0)> /= 0 • Very unnatural…. • Even if it had been the case it would have been driven to zero duringgg the initial stages 2. <B(t=0)> = 0 - Two possibilities 1. All annihilates leaving behind a Universe void of matter but filled with photons at 2.7K today ¾ Anthropic principle rules this out…. 2. Annihilation rate falls below expansion rate before all is annihilated • RiRegions o f an tittithUitimatter in the Universe • Î Antimatter search! 3. …unless….. Richard Jacobsson 4 Naturally existing antimatter?CERN No evidence of large antimatter regions at less that 20 Mpc (600 Mly) z Indirect search ¾ No peaks in gamma-ray diffuse background from nucleon-antinucleon annihilation ¾ No distorsions compatible with matter and antimatter annihilations in Cosmic Microwave Background z Direct search for antimatter ¾ Single anti-helium, anti-carbon nucleon Æ anti-stars! ¾ BESS experiment, Balloon-borne Experiment with Superconducting Spectrometer • Antihelium / helium < 10-6 ¾ AMS – Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer Richard Jacobsson 5 …unless… Baryogenesis! CERN ? B(t=0)=0 Æ B(t > 10-11s) /= 0 z StSpontaneous symme tbkiftt/titttry breaking of matter/antimatter symmet ry Δ − nbaryonnnbaryon baryon −10 ¾ Baryon asymmetry parameter η = = ~ O()10 nnγγ as required by nucleosynthesis to generate abundance of light elements in the Universe (if B(t=0) = 0 would have been preserved, after freeze-out η = Ο (10−18)) 1 baryon out of 1010 pairs did not annihilate and survived z Where did the photons go? Naïve estimate of η by comparing the estimated atom density in the universe (~ 1. 6/m3) with the photon gas density at 2.73 K cosmic background radiation temperature (~4.2×108/m3) Richard Jacobsson 6 Universe in the making CERN The Universe begun as an extremely hot and dense soup of energy and particles The rapidly expanding Universe is already endowed with an excess of matter over antimatter by one in a billion and small density variations The souppq of quarks condenses into p rotons, neutrons,.. The first light nuclei are formed Atoms are formed This marks the limit between the use of telescopes and accelerators! Recent research shows that we only know what 4% of the Universe is and that its expansion is accelerating Richard Jacobsson 7 What’s behind baryogenesis?CERN z Andrei Sakharov’s criteria for baryogenesis (1967): 1) Baryon number violation η(t=0) = 0 Æ η(today) /= 0 2) C and CP violation otherwise the process generating excess of baryons will be exactly equal to process generating excess of antibaryons 3) Departure from thermal equilibrium Richard Jacobsson 8 Discrete symmetries CERN z Invariance under the discrete parity, charge conjugation, time reversal transformations requires: P : fxt(r′′ , ) Hixt (rrr ,)=− f ( xt ′′ , ) Hi ( − xt ,) C :()()()(): fxt( r′′, )( Hixtrrr, )(= f xt ′′, )( Hixt, ) T :(,)(,)(,)(, fxtrrr′′ Hix tfxtHixt=− ′ ′ r −) z Fundamental consequences of CPT theorem ¾ Relation between spin and statistics: fields with integer spin (“bosons ” ) commute and fields with half-numbered spin (“fermions”) anticommute Æ Pauli exclusion principle ¾ Particles and antiparticles have equal mass and lifetime, equal magnetic moments with opposite sign, and opposite quantum numbers ()mmm−</ 10−18 • Best test KKK000 • Electromagnetic and strong interactions are C, P and T invariant Richard Jacobsson 9 C and P in weak interaction CERN z Weak interaction violates both C and P symmetries μνν−−→++ z Consider the decay of a polarized muon: polarized e μ e P The preferred emission handedness of the electron: P transformation (i.e. direction of an electron reversing all three is opposite to the muon directions in space) polarization. suppressed yields constellation that is suppressed in nature. CC Similar situation for C Applying CP, the resulting transformation (i.e. reaction—in which an replace all particles with antimuon preferentially their antiparticles). suppressed emits a positron in the same direction as the polarization—is observed. handedness of the positron: B. Cahn, LBL Richard Jacobsson 10 CP violation in neutral K CERN Γ→()if ≠Γ→ () i f ∗+−====00 z Stranggpe particles: (KK , ,K )I=1/ 2 : K usK, usK, dsK, ds 0 0 ¾ Experimentally one does not observe the neutral “flavor eigenstates” K and K but rather long- and short-lived neutral states: KL and KS z The observed pionic decays were thought to be cleanly ππ)0 ¾ KS(CP=+1)Æ ( (CP=+1) πππ)0 ¾ KL(CP=-1) Æ ( (CP = -1) z Cronin, Fitch et al. discovered in 1964 CP-violating decay π0π0 ¾ KL(CP=-1) Æ (CP = +1) →π+π– KL Today’s most precise measurement for amplitude ratio: AK( → ππ+−) ε = L → ππ+− AK()S =±×(2. 282 0. 017) 10−3 Richard Jacobsson 11 Three types of CP violation CERN z CP Violation in mixing (indirect CP violation) s d + =+00 0 W 0 Oscillations! Kt() gt () K ht () K K tc, tc, K d W − s Prob()()()KK00→≠Prob() KK 00 → 0 = 0 = 0 = 0 = ¾ Oscillating systems Ksd Dcu Bbdd Bbss z CP Violation in interference between decays with and without mixing (indirect CP violation) Pb(()Prob(Kt00 ( )→≠ππ+++ − )Pb(()) Prob( Kt ( ) → ππ+ − ) z CP Violation in the decay (direct CP violation) ¾ Due to the sma llness o f the e ffect , it t ook several experi ment s and over 30 years o f e ffor t to observe this phenomenon Prob(Kf→≠ ) Prob( Kf → ) Richard Jacobsson 12 CP violation in B CERN z A much richer repertoire of CP phenomena available in b-hadrons ¾ Start of “B-factories” at the end of 90s (BaBar (SLAC), BELLE (KEK)) BaBar 2005 B0 Æ J/ψ K0 ((Gold‘Gold-plated channel ’ ) ¾ ¾ Three ingredients b c W+ c s s d b d db cd ∝ ∗g VVcb cs c d b u c t s = d s d d B0 mixing B0 decay K0 mixing Richard Jacobsson 13 VP violation in SM CERN z How can we incorporate this phenomena in the SM? z Weak decay through transitions between families of quarks mediated by W Æ Flavor quarks (‘weak eigenstates’) are not the same as the physical quarks (‘mass eigenstates’) Æ Only if quarks are massive! (SM CP violation after appearance of Higgs field) + ′ W ⎛⎞⎛dVVVdud us ub ⎞⎛⎞ ⎜⎟⎜′ = ⎟⎜⎟ U sVVVscd cs cb o Li, V ⎜⎟⎜ ⎟⎜⎟ ij D ⎜⎟⎜′ ⎟⎜⎟ Lj, ⎝⎠⎝bVVVbtd ts tb ⎠⎝⎠ d’ d d -1/2 γμ + s’ = V s Lcc = 2 g (u, c, t)L V s W μ + h.c. b’ b b Quark mixing matrix - Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix, 1973 (KM) Æ KM introduced third family which gave a complexe phase to generate CP violation Richard Jacobsson 14 Quark mixing CERN 2 z The |Vij | are transition probabilities and hence the matrix has to be unitary z For example, a t quark can decay into a d, s, or b quark and nothing else; thus, the sum of the decay probabilities into these quarks must be one: ¾ Unitarity constraints! 222++= VVVtd ts tb 1 uct t b c s u d s b Richard Jacobsson 15 Unitarity triangles CERN z Wolfstein parametrization of CKM matrix −−λλρ23λ ()η ⎛⎞VVudVus ub ⎛⎞1/2 Ai ⎜⎟ VVVV= ⎜⎟ ⇒ −−λλλ122 / 2 A + O( λ 4) ⎜⎟cd cs cb ⎜⎟ ⎜⎟VVV⎜⎟ Aλρηλ32()11−− i − A ⎝⎠td ts tb ⎝⎠ Im ∗∗∗++= 0 VVud us VV cd cs VV td ts 0 K system ∗ + ∗ +=∗ VVud ub VV cd cb VVtd tb 0 ∗∗+=∗ + OO()λ + (λ )()+=O λ 5 0 VVus ub VV cs cb VV ts tb 0 OOO()λλ33++= (λ )0( 3 ) 0 ∗∗∗ B system + + = 4 22 d VVud cd VVus cs V ubVcb 0 O ()λλλ++=O ()O ()0 ∗ + ∗∗+ = VVud td VV us ts VV ub tb 0 0 Bs system ∗∗+ ∗ + = VcdVVVVV td cs tscbtb 0 relative size of CP-violating effect Richard Jacobsson 16 ‘Flavour’ of what we do…. CERN z Measuring all parameters in as many processes as possible and confront them with SM and with different measurements of the same parameters Im 00↔ΔΔ ()ρ,η BBmmsssd:/ +− 0 →μμ 010× − B()s (BR for Bd ~ 2 10 ) R% (()BR for B09~ 4× 10− ) R% t s 0 → u BDKss bccs→ 0 +− γ′ BKK→ δγ ~1° s 0 → ψφφ 00→ ψ BJs / ,..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BESS-Polar Experiment
    PSB1-0046-02 1 BESS-Polar experiment T. Yoshida1, A. Yamamoto1, J. Mitchell2, K. Abe3, H. Fuke1,3, S. Haino1,3, T. Hams2, N. Ikeda4, A. Itazaki4, K. Izumi1,3, M. H. Lee5, T. Maeno4, Y. Makida1, S. Matsuda3, H. Matsumoto3, A. Moiseev2, J. Nishimura3, M. Nozaki4, H. Omiya1, J. F. Ormes2, M. Sasaki2, E. S. Seo5, Y. Shikaze4, A. Stephens2, R. Streitmatter2, J. Suzuki1, Y. Takasugi4, K. Tanaka1, K. Tanizaki4, T. Yamagami6, Y. Yamamoto3, K. Yamato4, and K. Yoshimura1 1 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan 2 Goddard Space Flight Center / NASA, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 3 The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan 4 Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan 5 University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA 6 Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan ABSTRACT For investigating elementary particle phenomena in the early Universe, the BESS-Polar experiment was proposed for highly sensitive studies of the low-energy antiprotons and extensive searches for antinuclei in the cosmic radiations. A new superconducting spectrometer is being developed for long-duration balloon flights. In order to extend detectable energy range of the antiprotons down to 100 MeV, materials along the trajectory of the incident particle is minimized. The spectrometer will be completed in 2003, and the first long-duration flight is planned in 2004. INTRODUCTION Observations of anomalous excess of antiproton ) flux (Bogolomov et al. 1979, Golden et al. 1979, 1 - -1 Buffington et al. 1981), compared to the predictions by V 10 e G the secondary production models, had suggested 1 - c existence of novel processes of the antiproton e s 1 production.
    [Show full text]
  • The General Antiparticle Spectrometer (GAPS) - Dark Matter Search Using Cosmic-Ray Antideuterons
    The General Antiparticle Spectrometer (GAPS) - Dark matter search using cosmic-ray antideuterons KAVLI, Stanford University October 2011 Philip von Doetinchem on behalf of the GAPS collaboration Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley [email protected] T. Aramaki1, N. Bando4, St. Boggs2, W. Craig3, B. Donakowski2, H. Fuke4, F. Gahbauer1,5 , Ch. Hailey1(PI), J. Hoberman2, P. Kaplan1, J. Koglin1, N. Madden1, St. McBride2, I. Mognet6, B. Mochizuki2, K. Mori1, R. Ong6, K. Perez1, D. Stefanik1, M. Lopez-Thibodeaux2, T. Yoshida4, R. Zambelli1, J. Zweerink6 1 Columbia University, 2 UC Berkeley, 3 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 4 Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency 5 University of Latvia, 6 UC Los Angeles Outline Why are antideuterons interesting? How to measure them? cosmic rays antideuteron physics GAPS concept GAPS prototype instrument Ph. von Doetinchem The General Antiparticle Spectrometer (GAPS) Oct. 2011 – p. 2 Cosmic rays in the GeV to TeV range • in general good agreement of models and data • what we already learned: – particle physics – interstellar medium – astronomical objects – … • small fluxes with no primary astronomical source are especially sensitive to new effects Ph. von Doetinchem The General Antiparticle Spectrometer (GAPS) Oct. 2011 – p. 3 Positron fraction & electron flux E. Mocchiutti et al. arxiv:0905.2551 D. Grasso et al. arxiv:0905.0636 pulsar DM: KK SNR DM: SUSY nearby pulsars • unexplained features in positron and electron spectra • proposed theories: – γ-ray pulsars can produce electron and positrons via pair production in the magnetosphere – positrons and electrons can also be accelerated in PWN or SNR shocks – dark matter self-annihilation Ph. von Doetinchem The General Antiparticle Spectrometer (GAPS) Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • V^ " > Proceedings of the 3Rd Workshop on BALLOON-BORNE EXPERIMENTS with SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNET SPECTROMETERS
    KEK-PR0C--92- JP9304099 ^ ,-*.«?* ?*! S-;V^ " > Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on BALLOON-BORNE EXPERIMENTS WITH SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNET SPECTROMETERS held at National Laboratory for High Energy Physics (KEK) February 24-25, 1992 Edited by Akira Yamamoto [ r National Laboratory for High Energy Physics, 1992 KEK Reports are available from: Technical Information & Library National Laboratory for High Energy Physics 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba-shi Ibaraki-ken, 305 JAPAN Phone: 0298-64-1171 Telex: 3652-534 (Domestic) (0)3652-534 (International) Fax: 0298-64-4604 Cable: KEKOHO II '•J % Foreword The Third Work Shop on Balloon Borne Experiment with a Superconducting Magnet Spectrometer was held at National Laboratory for High Energy Physics (KEK), Tsukuba, Japan on February 24 - 25, 1992. The workshop was supported by a Grant for Joint Research under The Monbusho International Scientific Research Program (No. 02044151). Two invited review talks were presented on " Progress of Measurement of Cosmic Ray Antiprotons and Search for Primordial Antimatter" and on " High Rate Data Acquisition System in Balloon Borne Experiments." The main effort for this workshop was focused on the progress of the BESS (Balloon Borne Experiment with a Superconducting Spectrometer) experiment and on the scope for scientific investigation with the BESS detector. The progress was reviewed and further investigation was discussed for the BESS further scientific collaboration among Univ. of Tokyo, Kobe University, KEK, ISAS and NMSU. The 30 scientists and engineers participated to the workshop and there were extensive discussions to verify and to complete the BESS detector to be launched in Canada, this summer. New technologies for future balloon and space experiments were also discussed on triggering by using Neural Network and on Scientific investigation with Japanese Experimental Module (JEM) on the Space Station.
    Proceedings of the 3Rd Workshop on BALLOON-BORNE EXPERIMENTS with SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNET SPECTROMETERS" class="panel-rg color-a">[Show full text]
  • CP Violation and Baryogenesis
    PITHA 02/08 CP VIOLATION and BARYOGENESIS 1 Werner Bernreuther Institut f. Theoretische Physik, RWTH Aachen, 52056 Aachen, Germany Abstract: In these lecture notes an introduction is given to some ideas and attempts to un- derstand the origin of the matter-antimatter asymmetry of the universe. After the discussion of some basic issues of cosmology and particle theory the scenarios of electroweak baryogenesis, GUT baryogenesis, and leptogenesis are outlined. 1 Introduction arXiv:hep-ph/0205279v1 24 May 2002 CP violation has been observed so far in the neutral K meson system, both in ∆S = | | 2 and ∆S = 1 processes, and recently also in neutral B meson decays. These phenomena| | are very probably caused by the Kobayashi-Maskawa (KM) mechanism, that is to say by a non-zero phase δKM in the coupling matrix of the charged weak quark currents to W bosons. CP violation found so far in these meson systems does not catch the eye: either the value of the CP observable or/and the branching ratio of the associated mesonic decay mode is small. However, the interactions that give rise to these subtle effects may have also been jointly responsible for an enormous phenomenon, namely for the apparent matter-antimatter asymmetry of the universe. In this context it has been a long-standing question whether or not CP violation in 1Lectures given at the International School on CP Violation and Related Processes, Prerow, Germany, October 1 - 8, 2000, and at the workshop of the Graduiertenkolleg Elementarteilchen- physik of Humboldt Universit¨at, Berlin, April 2 - 5, 2001. 1 0 0 K K¯ mixing, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • A Thin Superconducting Solenoid Magnet for Ballon Experiments in Space Science
    A THIN SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOID MAGNET FOR BALLON EXPERIMENTS IN SPACE SCIENCE Akira Yamamoto KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Tsukuba, 305-0801, Japan Abstract A very thin and transparent superconducting solenoid magnet is being developed to investigate cosmic-ray antiparticles in the Universe. The uniform magnetic field is provided in a cosmic-ray particle detector system, BESS-Polar, for high-altitude long duration ballooning at Antarctica. The coil is wound with high-strength aluminum stabilized superconductor which has been recently much advanced in mechanical strength while keeping electrical resistivity low enough for the coil stability. The progress of the high-strength aluminum stabilized superconductor and the development of the thin solenoid magnet are described. 1. INTRODUCTION The Balloon-borne Experiment with a Superconducting Solenoid Magnet Spectrometer, BESS, has been carried out, as a US-Japan space science cooperation program, since 1993 [1-2]. Figure 1 shows a picture just before launching of the BESS spectrometer, in northern Canada, 2002. It aims at highly sensitive search for cosmic-ray antiparticle and for the novel primary origins such as evaporation of Primordial Black Holes (PBH) initiated in the early history of the Universe [3.4]. The search for antihelium to investigate the asymmetry of particle/antiparticle composition in the Universe is also a major fundamental question in the history of the Universe [5]. Fig. 1 Balloon launching of the BESS superconducting magnet spectrometer. It provides a central magnetic field of 1T maintained constant in persistent mode. TOF Counters Solenoid Jet chamber Middle TOF Inner DC Silica Aerogel 00.51m Cherenkov TOF Counters Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Search for Primordial Antiparticle in Cosmic Rays with the BESS
    SearchSearch forfor AntiparticleAntiparticle inin CosmicCosmic RaysRays withwith BESSBESS Akira Yamamoto (KEK) for the BESS Collaboration RESCEU symposium, held at U. Tokyo, Nov. 11-14, 2008 1 BESS Collaboration High Energy Accelerator National Aeronautical and Research Organization(KEK) Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center BESS The University University of Maryland of Tokyo Collaboration Kobe University University of Denver (Since June 2005) Institute of Space and Astronautical Science/JAXA Balloon-borne Experiment with a Superconducting Spectrometer 2 BESSBESS CollaborationCollaboration (as of Nov., 2008) •KEK M. Hasegawa, A. Horikoshi, Y.Makida, M. Nozaki, R. Orito, J.Suzuki, K.Tanaka, A. Yamamoto*, K.Yoshimura, S. Haino •NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center T. Hams, J.W .Mitchell*, M. Sasaki, R.E. Streitmatter •The University of Tokyo J.Nishimura, K. Sakai •Kobe University A. Kusumoto •Univ. of Maryland K. Kim, M.H. Lee, E.S. Seo •ISAS/JAXA H. Fuke, T. Yoshida, T. Yamagami •University of Denver J. Ormes, N. Thakur 3 Cosmic-Ray Antiproton Chronology 1979: First Antiproton Report (Golden et al.) 2004: BESS-Polar I 1979: Russian PM (Bogomolov et al.) 2006: PAMELA 1981: Low-energy excess (Buffington et al.) 2007: Solar minimum 1985: ASTROMAG Study Started BESS-Polar II 1986: HEAO Antinucleus upper limits 2010+: AMS-02 1987: LEAP, PBAR (upper limits) BESS proposed (by Orito) 1991: MASS 1992: IMAX (16 mass-resolved antiprotons) 1993: BESS (6 mass-resolved antiprotons) 1994: CAPRICE94 1998: CAPRICE98, AMS-01 2000: HEAT-pbar 4 SearchSearch
    [Show full text]
  • BESS- Polar Acceptance 0.0021 0.5 0.3 3 Years (M2•Sr) MDR (GV) 740 ~1000 150
    Searching for Cosmological Antimatter Bob Streitmatter For the BESS Collaboration (KEK / NASA-GSFC / Tokyo / Kobe / Maryland / ISAS) Outline • Briefly: (TEE), Theory Explained by Experimentalist • Review History of Experimental Search for CAM • Instruments, Techniques and measurements • BESS Program • Current Status of Data •The Future In the Beginning … •Dirac, in 1928, was the first to realize that the physics of relativity and quantum mechanics taken together required the existence of matter whose additive quantum numbers (e.g. charge, baryon number, lepton number, spin) were the negative of “normal” matter. (Proc. R. Soc. London, A, 117, (1928), 610) •Positron discovered, August 2, 1932. Positron produced by cosmic radiation seen in a cloud chamber. (Anderson, Phys. Rev. (1933) 491) Baryon Symmetric Universe “We must regard it rather as an accident that the Earth and presumably the whole Solar System contains a preponderance of negative electrons and positive protons. It is quite possible that for some of the stars it is the other way about” -- Dirac, 1933 Noble acceptance speech Antimatter Miscellanea • 1955: Antiprotons are “manufactured” at Bevatron - Chamberlain et al. Phys. Rev. 100 (1955) 947 • Experimental evidence that antimatter is normal in the gravitational sense - High and Holzschieter Phy. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 854 • Contrary to popular myth among Trekkies, the 1908 Tunguska meteor was not antimatter - Cowan, Atluri and Libby, Nature, May 29, 1965 But: Simple Big Bang BSU Fatal Problems •The “Annihilation Catastrophe” - not enough baryons •SBB predicts baryon/photon ratio ≈ 10-18 at freezeout •Observed baryon/photon raio ≈ 10-9 •How did the matter and antimatter get separated? •Fluctuations won’t do it •e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Search for Cosmic-Ray Antiproton Origins and for Cosmological Antimatter with BESS
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Advances in Space Research 51 (2013) 227–233 www.elsevier.com/locate/asr Search for cosmic-ray antiproton origins and for cosmological antimatter with BESS A. Yamamoto a,⇑, J.W. Mitchell b, K. Yoshimura a, K. Abe c,1, H. Fuke d, S. Haino a,2, T. Hams b,3, M. Hasegawa a, A. Horikoshi a, A. Itazaki c, K.C. Kim e, T. Kumazawa a, A. Kusumoto c, M.H. Lee e, Y. Makida a, S. Matsuda a, Y. Matsukawa c, K. Matsumoto a, A.A. Moiseev b, Z. Myers b,4, J. Nishimura f, M. Nozaki a, R. Orito c,5, J.F. Ormes g, K. Sakai f, M. Sasaki b,6, E.S. Seo e, Y. Shikaze c,7, R. Shinoda f, R.E. Streitmatter b, J. Suzuki a, Y. Takasugi c, K. Takeuchi c, K. Tanaka a, T. Taniguchi a,8, N. Thakur g, T. Yamagami d, T. Yoshida d, BESS Collaboration a High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan b National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center (NASA/GSFC), Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA c Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan d Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (ISAS/JAXA), Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan e IPST, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA f The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan g University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA Available online 29 July 2011 Abstract The balloon-borne experiment with a superconducting spectrometer (BESS) has performed cosmic-ray observations as a US–Japan cooperative space science program, and has provided fundamental data on cosmic rays to study elementary particle phenomena in the early Universe.
    [Show full text]
  • High Precision Particle Astrophysics As a New Window on the Universe with an Antimatter Large Acceptance Detector in Orbit (Aladino)
    High Precision Particle Astrophysics as a New Window on the Universe with an Antimatter Large Acceptance Detector In Orbit (ALADInO) A White Paper submitted in response to ESA’s Call for the VOYAGE 2050 long-term plan Contact Person: Roberto Battiston Address: Dipartimento di Fisica, Via Sommarive 14, 38123 Trento E-mail: [email protected] Telephone: +39 366 687 2527 Core Team members O.Adriani1,2, G.Ambrosi3, , B. Baoudoy4, R.Battiston5,6, B.Bertucci7,3, P.Blasi8, M.Boezio9, D.Campana10, L. Derome11, I. De Mitri8, V. Di Felice12, F. Donato13, M.Duranti3, V.Formato12, D. Grasso14, I. Gebauer15, R. Iuppa5,6, N. Masi17, D. Maurin11, N.Mazziotta17, R. Musenich18, F. Nozzoli6, P.Papini2, P. Picozza19,12, M.Pierce20, S.Pospíšil21, L. Rossi22, N.Tomassetti6,3, V. Vagelli23, X.Wu24 1) University of Florence, Italy (IT) 2) INFN-Florence, Italy (IT) 3) INFN-Perugia, Italy (IT) 4) CEA Saclay Irfu/SACM, France (FR) 5) University of Trento, Italy (IT) 6) INFN-TIFPA, Trento, Italy (IT) 7) University of Perugia, Italy (IT) 8) Gran Sasso Science Institute, Italy & INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Italy (IT) 9) INFN-Trieste, Italy (IT) 10) INFN-Napoli, Italy (IT) 11) Universitè Grenoble Alpes and IN2P3 LSPC, France (FR) 12) INFN-Roma Tor Vergata, Italy (IT) 13) University & INFN Torino, Italy (IT) 14) INFN Pisa, Italy (IT) 15) KIT, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, Germany (DE) 16) University and INFN Bologna, Italy (IT) 17) INFN-Bari, Italy (IT) 18) INFN-Genova, Italy (IT) 19) University of Roma Tor Vergata, Italy (IT) 20) KTH Royal
    [Show full text]
  • BESS-Polar Experiment
    Advances in Space Research 33 (2004) 1755–1762 www.elsevier.com/locate/asr BESS-polar experiment T. Yoshida a,*, A. Yamamoto a, J. Mitchell b, K. Abe c, H. Fuke a,c, S. Haino a,c, T. Hams b, N. Ikeda d, A. Itazaki d, K. Izumi a,c, M.H. Lee e, T. Maeno d, Y. Makida a, S. Matsuda c, H. Matsumoto c, A. Moiseev b, J. Nishimura c, M. Nozaki d, H Omiya a, J.F Ormes b, M. Sasaki b, E.S. Seo e, Y. Shikaze d, A. Stephens b, R. Streitmatter b, J. Suzuki a, Y. Takasugi d, K. Tanaka a, K. Tanizaki d, T. Yamagami f, Y. Yamamoto c, K. Yamato d, K. Yoshimura a a High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan b Goddard Space Flight Center/NASA, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA c The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan d Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan e University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA f Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan Received 19 October 2002; received in revised form 28 April 2003; accepted 2 May 2003 Abstract In order to investigate elementary particle phenomena in the early Universe, the BESS-polar experiment is proposed. It will study low-energy antiprotons and search for antinuclei in the galactic cosmic rays at the constant altitude maintained by a scientific balloon. A new superconducting spectrometer is being developed for long-duration balloon flights. In order to extend the detectable energy range of antiprotons down to 100 MeV, the thickness of materials along the trajectory of the incident particle is minimized.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 9 CPT Theorem and CP Violation
    Lecture 9 CPT theorem and CP violation Emmy Noether's theorem (proved 1915, published 1918) •Any differentiable symmetry of the action of a physical system has a corresponding conservation law. The action of a physical system is the integral over time of a Lagrangian function (which may or may not be an integral over space of a Lagrangian density function), from which the system’s behavior can be determined by the principle of least action. •Energy, momentum and angular momentum conservation laws are consequences of symmetries of space. eg, if a physical system behaves the same regardless of how it is oriented in space -> Lagrangian is rotationally symmetric -> angular momentum of the system must be conserved •We have seen that although both charge conjugation and parity are violated in weak interactions, the combination of the two CP turns left-handed antimuon onto right-handed muon, that is exactly observed in nature. •There is another symmetry in nature – time reversal T (winding the film backward). •Charge conjugation, C, together with parity inversion, P, and time reversal, T, are connected into the famous CPT theorem. •CPT theorem is one of the basic principles of quantum field theory. It states that all interactions are invariant under sequential application of C, P and T operations in any order. Any Lorentz invariant local quantum field theory with a Hermitian Hamiltonian must have CPT symmetry. •It is closely related to the interpretation that antiparticles can be treated mathematically as particles moving backward in time. Ernst Stueckelberg (1905-1984) Should have received several Noble prizes • 1934 - First developer of fully Lorentz-covariant theory for quantum field • 1935 - Developed vector boson exchange as theoretical explanation for nuclear forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Symmetries and CP Violation Thanks to a Hocker and M
    FYST17 Lecture 2 Symmetries and CP violation Thanks to A Hocker and M. Bona 1 Today’s topics • Symmetries – Broken symmetries • Neutral kaon mixing • CP violation – Matter / anti-matter asymmetry • The CKM matrix 2 3 Continuous Symmetries and Conservation Laws In classical mechanics we have learned that to each continuous symmetry transformation, which leaves the scalar Lagrange density invariant, can be attributed a conservation law and a constant of movement (E. Noether, 1915) Continuous symmetry transformations lead to additive conservation laws No evidence for violation of these symmetries seen so far 4 Continuous Symmetries and Conservation Laws In general, if U is a symmetry of the Hamiltonian H, one has: H, U 0 H U† HU fHi UfHUi fUHUi† fHi Accordingly, the Standard Model Lagrangian satisfies local gauge symmetries (the physics must not depend on local (and global) phases that cannot be observed): Conserved additive quantum numbers: Electric charge (processes can move charge between quantum fields, but the sum of all charges is constant) Similar: color charge of quarks and gluons, and the weak charge Quark (baryon) and lepton numbers (however, no theory for these, therefore believed to be only approximate asymmetries) → evidence for lepton flavor violation in “neutrino oscillation” 5 Discrete Symmetries Discrete symmetry transformations lead to multiplicative conservation laws The following discrete transformations are fundamental in particle physics: Parity P (“handedness”): In particle physics: Reflection of space around
    [Show full text]