DOCSLIB.ORG

Lecture 9 CPT Theorem and CP Violation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Lecture 9 CPT theorem and CP violation Emmy Noether's theorem (proved 1915, published 1918) •Any differentiable symmetry of the action of a physical system has a corresponding conservation law. The action of a physical system is the integral over time of a Lagrangian function (which may or may not be an integral over space of a Lagrangian density function), from which the system’s behavior can be determined by the principle of least action. •Energy, momentum and angular momentum conservation laws are consequences of symmetries of space. eg, if a physical system behaves the same regardless of how it is oriented in space -> Lagrangian is rotationally symmetric -> angular momentum of the system must be conserved •We have seen that although both charge conjugation and parity are violated in weak interactions, the combination of the two CP turns left-handed antimuon onto right-handed muon, that is exactly observed in nature. •There is another symmetry in nature – time reversal T (winding the film backward). •Charge conjugation, C, together with parity inversion, P, and time reversal, T, are connected into the famous CPT theorem. •CPT theorem is one of the basic principles of quantum field theory. It states that all interactions are invariant under sequential application of C, P and T operations in any order. Any Lorentz invariant local quantum field theory with a Hermitian Hamiltonian must have CPT symmetry. •It is closely related to the interpretation that antiparticles can be treated mathematically as particles moving backward in time. Ernst Stueckelberg (1905-1984) Should have received several Noble prizes • 1934 - First developer of fully Lorentz-covariant theory for quantum field • 1935 - Developed vector boson exchange as theoretical explanation for nuclear forces. Rediscovered by Yukawa. • 1938 - Proposed a conservation of baryon number. • 1941- Recognized that electrodynamics with massive particles contain a hidden scalar. Rediscovered in 1964 by Higgs. • 1941- Proposed an interpretation of positron as a positive energy electron travelling backwards in time. • 1943 – Proposed renormalization method to deal with infinities in quantum electrodynamics (paper rejected by Physical Review) Spent substantial fraction of his time in later years dealing with mental problems. Most of his papers were written in very difficult German and published in small local journals in Switzerland. He did not like public talks and avoided crowd. Recognized only after his death à if you want to be famous – learn to talk and present your ideas. I have to give credit to Stueckelberg for the concept of antiparticle considered as particle travelling backward in time. In most of the Literature it is usually connected with Richard Feynman, who used it to introduce Feynman diagrams that vastly simplify QED calculations and are used as graphical illustration of particle level processes. Consider a Lorentz boost in a fixed direction z. This can be interpreted as a rotation of time axis into the z axis with an imaginary rotation parameter. If this rotation parameter were real, it would be possible for a 1800 rotation to reverse the direction of time and of z. Reversing the direction of one axis is a reflection of space in any number of dimensions. For a 3 dimensional space, it is equivalent to reflection of all the coordinates, because an additional rotation of 1800 in the x-y plane would be included. •Symmetry of time reversal is very difficult to test experimentally. One of its prediction is that some properties of particles and antiparticles should have the same magnitudes, e.g., mass, lifetime, magnetic moment. For most of the cases that has been verified to be true within measurement precision, but not always. •CPT theorem implies that the violation of CP invariance implies violation of time reversal symmetry T. •One of the most important unresolved questions today is the evolution of the universe. If it started with a Big Bang where all interactions had strength of strong forces – then there should be equal amount of matter and antimatter in the universe. CP violation allows for some preference of survival of matter over survival of antimatter, but so far we have not seen sufficient amount of CP violation to account for observations of the Cosmos. Insert Matt Stein –cosmic rays Cosmic Rays Matt Stein - SMU A long, long time ago… • 1785: France • Charles Coulomb shows that charged metallic bodies gradually lose charge when placed in air • There will be conflicting opinions on this claim, and its causes, for the next ~100 years • In 1895, J.J. Thompson would speak on “ions” in the atmosphere Charles-Augustin de Coulomb 9 Why is the atmosphere • Radium in the Earth ionized? • Tests conducted over seas by Arthur S. Eve, 1907 • 1901: Charles Thomson Rees Wilson conducted experiments in deep tunnels • Found no decrease in ionization no matter how much rock was overhead • “It is unlikely, therefore, that the ionization is due to radiation which has traversed our atmosphere; it seems to be a property of the air itself.” – Elster Geitel 10 1909 – Theodor Wulf • Ionization at different heights • Theorized that if Earth were the source of radiation, it should quickly diminish with increasing height • Took measurements from the base and top of the Eifel Tower (~300m) • Recorded 6 ions generated per cc per second at ground level, and 3.5 ions per cc per second on top • Expected to find ionization at the top to be ~1% that of the bottom 11 The Gold-leaf Electroscope • Charge is applied to metallic wires • The static charge causes repulsion between the wires and they spread to form a “v” shape • Separation between the wires is measured and 12 total charge on wires can be August 7, 1912 – Victor F. Hess • Most decisive results starting coming in by the 7th flight • Took off near Aussig, Austria and flight lasted 6 hours • Balloon elevation ~ 16,400ft (5 km) • Conclusively correlated increasing radiation with increasing altitude 13 14 Confirmation by Werner Kolhorster 15 The Millikan Doubts • Extraterrestrial origin of cosmic rays was difficult for some to believe • Robert Millikan would work for years in an attempt to disprove Hess’ claims • Sent balloons to over 50,000ft (15km) • “The results then… constitute definite proof that there exists no radiation of cosmic origin having such characteristics as we had assumed.” • Later conducted experiments at Lake Muir, Arrowhead Lake, Mt. Whitney, and Pikes Peak 16 17 1925 – Lake Muir and Arrowhead Lake • Submerged electroscopes to depths as deep as 20m • Readings decreased steadily to 15m • Compare where discharge rates are similar • Millikan confirms that this radiation definitely originates from outside the Earth’s atmosphere 18 “Cosmic Rays” • Millikan coins the term “Cosmic Rays” • After his 1923 Nobel Prize, he is already the most respected physicist in America • The New York Times names this 19 radiation “Millikan What are cosmic rays? • A large variety of particles including: • Electrons • Positrons • Protons • Muons • Other nuclei like carbon, oxygen, neon, magnesium, silicon, iron, nickel, and more. • Gamma rays (~0.1%) • Can be split into “Primary” and “Secondary” rays 20 Primary and Secondary Cosmic Rays • Primary rays are the first to interact with Earth’s atmosphere • They collide with air molecules and create an “air shower” of secondary particles • Can even convert 21 Nitrogen into Carbon-14 LHC 99.99999999999999999999951% c OMG! 22 23 How do we detect cosmic rays? • High energy cosmic rays can be detected from their air showers • Air Shower Arrays are created to detect particles and their direction • In general, there are more particles in the center of the air shower • Scintillator detectors and water Cherenkov detectors are used on Earth 24 Water Cherenkov Scintillator Detector Detector 25 Tibet Air Shower Experiment 26 Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer • Capable of detecting primary cosmic rays • 5 detectors onboard 27 Recent AMS Results • Positron fraction is higher than previously assumed • Two popular theories: • 1. Positrons generated by pulsars • 2. Positrons are generated by dark matter collisions 28 • Further data collection up to There’s an app for that! • http://wipac.wisc.edu/le arn 29 Sources of Cosmic Rays 30 Pierre Auger Observatory 31 32 Supernovae as sources 33 Cosmic Rays • First significant finding came in 1912 from Hess’ balloon flight • Cosmic rays are a variety of very high energy particles; the highest known to exist • Air showers form when primary cosmic rays interact with the upper atmosphere • Detecting these primary particles can be done in space, as in the case of the AMS • Charged particles are difficult to determine the source unless at the very highest energy levels • Most cosmic rays probably originate within ~160,000 light years • Sources are supernovae for low energy cosmic rays, and AGN for high energy cosmic rays 34 Resources • Abraham, J., et al. "Correlation of the Highest-Energy Cosmic Rays with Nearby Extragalactic Objects." Science 318.5852 (2007): 938-43. • Ackermann, M. et al. "Detection of the Characteristic Pion-Decay Signature in Supernova Remnants." Science 339.6121 (2013): 807-11. • Amenomori, M., et al. "Tibet Air Shower Array: Results and Future Plan." Journal of Physics: Conference Series 120.6 (2008): 062024. • Bauleo, Pablo M., and Julio Rodríguez Martino. "The Dawn of the Particle Astronomy Era in Ultra-high-energy Cosmic Rays." Nature 458.7240 (2009): 847-51. • Carroll, Bradley W., and Dale A. Ostlie. An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Pearson Addison-Wesley, 2007. Print. • Cronin, James W., Thomas K. Gaisser, and Simon P. Swordy. "Cosmic Rays at the Energy Frontier." Scientific American 276.1 (1997): 44-49. • Griffiths, David J. Introduction to Elementary Particles. 2nd ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2008. Print. • Matthiae, Giorgio. "The Cosmic Ray Energy Spectrum as Measured Using the Pierre Auger Observatory." New Journal of Physics 12.7 (2010): 075009. • Xu, Qiaozhen.
Recommended publications
  • Thesis Reference

    Thesis Reference

    Thesis On Testing Modified Gravity : with Solar System Experiments and Gravitational Radiation SANCTUARY, Hillary Adrienne Abstract Three theories of gravitation – general relativity, the chameleon and Horava gravity - are confronted with experiment, using standard and adapted post-Newtonian (PN) tools. The laboratory is provided by the Solar System, binary pulsars and future detections at gravitational wave observatories. We test Horava gravity by studying emission of gravitational radiation in the weak-field limit for PN sources using techniques that take full advantage of the parametrized post-Newtonian (PPN) formalism. In particular, we provide a generalization of Einstein’s quadrupole formula and show that a monopole persists even in the limit in which the PPN parameters are identical to those of General Relativity. Based on a technique called non-relativistic General Relativity, we propose a phenomenological way to measure deviations from General Relativity coming from an unknown UV completion. Finally, we systematically show that the self-interacting chameleon at orders three and higher do not jeopardize the chameleon theory for Solar System type objects. Reference SANCTUARY, Hillary Adrienne. On Testing Modified Gravity : with Solar System Experiments and Gravitational Radiation. Thèse de doctorat : Univ. Genève, 2012, no. Sc. 4524 Available at: http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:28935 Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version. [ Downloaded 07/04/2015 at 08:06:08 ] 1 / 1 UNIVERSITÉ DE GENÈVE FACULTÉ DES SCIENCES Département de physique théorique Professeur Michele Maggiore On Testing Modified Gravity with Solar System Experiments and Gravitational Radiation THÈSE présentée à la Faculté des Sciences de l’Université de Genève pour obtenir le grade de Docteur ès Sciences, mention Physique par Hillary Sanctuary de Montréal, Canada Thèse No 4524 Genève, juillet 2012 Reprographie EPFL Publications D.
  • Advanced Information on the Nobel Prize in Physics, 5 October 2004

    Advanced Information on the Nobel Prize in Physics, 5 October 2004

    Advanced information on the Nobel Prize in Physics, 5 October 2004 Information Department, P.O. Box 50005, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden Phone: +46 8 673 95 00, Fax: +46 8 15 56 70, E-mail: [email protected], Website: www.kva.se Asymptotic Freedom and Quantum ChromoDynamics: the Key to the Understanding of the Strong Nuclear Forces The Basic Forces in Nature We know of two fundamental forces on the macroscopic scale that we experience in daily life: the gravitational force that binds our solar system together and keeps us on earth, and the electromagnetic force between electrically charged objects. Both are mediated over a distance and the force is proportional to the inverse square of the distance between the objects. Isaac Newton described the gravitational force in his Principia in 1687, and in 1915 Albert Einstein (Nobel Prize, 1921 for the photoelectric effect) presented his General Theory of Relativity for the gravitational force, which generalized Newton’s theory. Einstein’s theory is perhaps the greatest achievement in the history of science and the most celebrated one. The laws for the electromagnetic force were formulated by James Clark Maxwell in 1873, also a great leap forward in human endeavour. With the advent of quantum mechanics in the first decades of the 20th century it was realized that the electromagnetic field, including light, is quantized and can be seen as a stream of particles, photons. In this picture, the electromagnetic force can be thought of as a bombardment of photons, as when one object is thrown to another to transmit a force.
  • BESS-Polar Experiment

    BESS-Polar Experiment

    PSB1-0046-02 1 BESS-Polar experiment T. Yoshida1, A. Yamamoto1, J. Mitchell2, K. Abe3, H. Fuke1,3, S. Haino1,3, T. Hams2, N. Ikeda4, A. Itazaki4, K. Izumi1,3, M. H. Lee5, T. Maeno4, Y. Makida1, S. Matsuda3, H. Matsumoto3, A. Moiseev2, J. Nishimura3, M. Nozaki4, H. Omiya1, J. F. Ormes2, M. Sasaki2, E. S. Seo5, Y. Shikaze4, A. Stephens2, R. Streitmatter2, J. Suzuki1, Y. Takasugi4, K. Tanaka1, K. Tanizaki4, T. Yamagami6, Y. Yamamoto3, K. Yamato4, and K. Yoshimura1 1 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan 2 Goddard Space Flight Center / NASA, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 3 The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan 4 Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan 5 University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA 6 Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan ABSTRACT For investigating elementary particle phenomena in the early Universe, the BESS-Polar experiment was proposed for highly sensitive studies of the low-energy antiprotons and extensive searches for antinuclei in the cosmic radiations. A new superconducting spectrometer is being developed for long-duration balloon flights. In order to extend detectable energy range of the antiprotons down to 100 MeV, materials along the trajectory of the incident particle is minimized. The spectrometer will be completed in 2003, and the first long-duration flight is planned in 2004. INTRODUCTION Observations of anomalous excess of antiproton ) flux (Bogolomov et al. 1979, Golden et al. 1979, 1 - -1 Buffington et al. 1981), compared to the predictions by V 10 e G the secondary production models, had suggested 1 - c existence of novel processes of the antiproton e s 1 production.
  • The General Antiparticle Spectrometer (GAPS) - Dark Matter Search Using Cosmic-Ray Antideuterons

    The General Antiparticle Spectrometer (GAPS) - Dark Matter Search Using Cosmic-Ray Antideuterons

    The General Antiparticle Spectrometer (GAPS) - Dark matter search using cosmic-ray antideuterons KAVLI, Stanford University October 2011 Philip von Doetinchem on behalf of the GAPS collaboration Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley [email protected] T. Aramaki1, N. Bando4, St. Boggs2, W. Craig3, B. Donakowski2, H. Fuke4, F. Gahbauer1,5 , Ch. Hailey1(PI), J. Hoberman2, P. Kaplan1, J. Koglin1, N. Madden1, St. McBride2, I. Mognet6, B. Mochizuki2, K. Mori1, R. Ong6, K. Perez1, D. Stefanik1, M. Lopez-Thibodeaux2, T. Yoshida4, R. Zambelli1, J. Zweerink6 1 Columbia University, 2 UC Berkeley, 3 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 4 Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency 5 University of Latvia, 6 UC Los Angeles Outline Why are antideuterons interesting? How to measure them? cosmic rays antideuteron physics GAPS concept GAPS prototype instrument Ph. von Doetinchem The General Antiparticle Spectrometer (GAPS) Oct. 2011 – p. 2 Cosmic rays in the GeV to TeV range • in general good agreement of models and data • what we already learned: – particle physics – interstellar medium – astronomical objects – … • small fluxes with no primary astronomical source are especially sensitive to new effects Ph. von Doetinchem The General Antiparticle Spectrometer (GAPS) Oct. 2011 – p. 3 Positron fraction & electron flux E. Mocchiutti et al. arxiv:0905.2551 D. Grasso et al. arxiv:0905.0636 pulsar DM: KK SNR DM: SUSY nearby pulsars • unexplained features in positron and electron spectra • proposed theories: – γ-ray pulsars can produce electron and positrons via pair production in the magnetosphere – positrons and electrons can also be accelerated in PWN or SNR shocks – dark matter self-annihilation Ph. von Doetinchem The General Antiparticle Spectrometer (GAPS) Oct.
  • V^ " > Proceedings of the 3Rd Workshop on BALLOON-BORNE EXPERIMENTS with SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNET SPECTROMETERS

    Proceedings of the 3Rd Workshop on BALLOON-BORNE EXPERIMENTS with SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNET SPECTROMETERS" class="text-overflow-clamp2"> V^ " > Proceedings of the 3Rd Workshop on BALLOON-BORNE EXPERIMENTS with SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNET SPECTROMETERS

    KEK-PR0C--92- JP9304099 ^ ,-*.«?* ?*! S-;V^ " > Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on BALLOON-BORNE EXPERIMENTS WITH SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNET SPECTROMETERS held at National Laboratory for High Energy Physics (KEK) February 24-25, 1992 Edited by Akira Yamamoto [ r National Laboratory for High Energy Physics, 1992 KEK Reports are available from: Technical Information & Library National Laboratory for High Energy Physics 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba-shi Ibaraki-ken, 305 JAPAN Phone: 0298-64-1171 Telex: 3652-534 (Domestic) (0)3652-534 (International) Fax: 0298-64-4604 Cable: KEKOHO II '•J % Foreword The Third Work Shop on Balloon Borne Experiment with a Superconducting Magnet Spectrometer was held at National Laboratory for High Energy Physics (KEK), Tsukuba, Japan on February 24 - 25, 1992. The workshop was supported by a Grant for Joint Research under The Monbusho International Scientific Research Program (No. 02044151). Two invited review talks were presented on " Progress of Measurement of Cosmic Ray Antiprotons and Search for Primordial Antimatter" and on " High Rate Data Acquisition System in Balloon Borne Experiments." The main effort for this workshop was focused on the progress of the BESS (Balloon Borne Experiment with a Superconducting Spectrometer) experiment and on the scope for scientific investigation with the BESS detector. The progress was reviewed and further investigation was discussed for the BESS further scientific collaboration among Univ. of Tokyo, Kobe University, KEK, ISAS and NMSU. The 30 scientists and engineers participated to the workshop and there were extensive discussions to verify and to complete the BESS detector to be launched in Canada, this summer. New technologies for future balloon and space experiments were also discussed on triggering by using Neural Network and on Scientific investigation with Japanese Experimental Module (JEM) on the Space Station.
  • CP Violation and Baryogenesis

    CP Violation and Baryogenesis

    PITHA 02/08 CP VIOLATION and BARYOGENESIS 1 Werner Bernreuther Institut f. Theoretische Physik, RWTH Aachen, 52056 Aachen, Germany Abstract: In these lecture notes an introduction is given to some ideas and attempts to un- derstand the origin of the matter-antimatter asymmetry of the universe. After the discussion of some basic issues of cosmology and particle theory the scenarios of electroweak baryogenesis, GUT baryogenesis, and leptogenesis are outlined. 1 Introduction arXiv:hep-ph/0205279v1 24 May 2002 CP violation has been observed so far in the neutral K meson system, both in ∆S = | | 2 and ∆S = 1 processes, and recently also in neutral B meson decays. These phenomena| | are very probably caused by the Kobayashi-Maskawa (KM) mechanism, that is to say by a non-zero phase δKM in the coupling matrix of the charged weak quark currents to W bosons. CP violation found so far in these meson systems does not catch the eye: either the value of the CP observable or/and the branching ratio of the associated mesonic decay mode is small. However, the interactions that give rise to these subtle effects may have also been jointly responsible for an enormous phenomenon, namely for the apparent matter-antimatter asymmetry of the universe. In this context it has been a long-standing question whether or not CP violation in 1Lectures given at the International School on CP Violation and Related Processes, Prerow, Germany, October 1 - 8, 2000, and at the workshop of the Graduiertenkolleg Elementarteilchen- physik of Humboldt Universit¨at, Berlin, April 2 - 5, 2001. 1 0 0 K K¯ mixing, i.e.
  • A Thin Superconducting Solenoid Magnet for Ballon Experiments in Space Science

    A Thin Superconducting Solenoid Magnet for Ballon Experiments in Space Science

    A THIN SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOID MAGNET FOR BALLON EXPERIMENTS IN SPACE SCIENCE Akira Yamamoto KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Tsukuba, 305-0801, Japan Abstract A very thin and transparent superconducting solenoid magnet is being developed to investigate cosmic-ray antiparticles in the Universe. The uniform magnetic field is provided in a cosmic-ray particle detector system, BESS-Polar, for high-altitude long duration ballooning at Antarctica. The coil is wound with high-strength aluminum stabilized superconductor which has been recently much advanced in mechanical strength while keeping electrical resistivity low enough for the coil stability. The progress of the high-strength aluminum stabilized superconductor and the development of the thin solenoid magnet are described. 1. INTRODUCTION The Balloon-borne Experiment with a Superconducting Solenoid Magnet Spectrometer, BESS, has been carried out, as a US-Japan space science cooperation program, since 1993 [1-2]. Figure 1 shows a picture just before launching of the BESS spectrometer, in northern Canada, 2002. It aims at highly sensitive search for cosmic-ray antiparticle and for the novel primary origins such as evaporation of Primordial Black Holes (PBH) initiated in the early history of the Universe [3.4]. The search for antihelium to investigate the asymmetry of particle/antiparticle composition in the Universe is also a major fundamental question in the history of the Universe [5]. Fig. 1 Balloon launching of the BESS superconducting magnet spectrometer. It provides a central magnetic field of 1T maintained constant in persistent mode. TOF Counters Solenoid Jet chamber Middle TOF Inner DC Silica Aerogel 00.51m Cherenkov TOF Counters Fig.
  • Search for Primordial Antiparticle in Cosmic Rays with the BESS

    Search for Primordial Antiparticle in Cosmic Rays with the BESS

    SearchSearch forfor AntiparticleAntiparticle inin CosmicCosmic RaysRays withwith BESSBESS Akira Yamamoto (KEK) for the BESS Collaboration RESCEU symposium, held at U. Tokyo, Nov. 11-14, 2008 1 BESS Collaboration High Energy Accelerator National Aeronautical and Research Organization(KEK) Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center BESS The University University of Maryland of Tokyo Collaboration Kobe University University of Denver (Since June 2005) Institute of Space and Astronautical Science/JAXA Balloon-borne Experiment with a Superconducting Spectrometer 2 BESSBESS CollaborationCollaboration (as of Nov., 2008) •KEK M. Hasegawa, A. Horikoshi, Y.Makida, M. Nozaki, R. Orito, J.Suzuki, K.Tanaka, A. Yamamoto*, K.Yoshimura, S. Haino •NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center T. Hams, J.W .Mitchell*, M. Sasaki, R.E. Streitmatter •The University of Tokyo J.Nishimura, K. Sakai •Kobe University A. Kusumoto •Univ. of Maryland K. Kim, M.H. Lee, E.S. Seo •ISAS/JAXA H. Fuke, T. Yoshida, T. Yamagami •University of Denver J. Ormes, N. Thakur 3 Cosmic-Ray Antiproton Chronology 1979: First Antiproton Report (Golden et al.) 2004: BESS-Polar I 1979: Russian PM (Bogomolov et al.) 2006: PAMELA 1981: Low-energy excess (Buffington et al.) 2007: Solar minimum 1985: ASTROMAG Study Started BESS-Polar II 1986: HEAO Antinucleus upper limits 2010+: AMS-02 1987: LEAP, PBAR (upper limits) BESS proposed (by Orito) 1991: MASS 1992: IMAX (16 mass-resolved antiprotons) 1993: BESS (6 mass-resolved antiprotons) 1994: CAPRICE94 1998: CAPRICE98, AMS-01 2000: HEAT-pbar 4 SearchSearch
  • BESS- Polar Acceptance 0.0021 0.5 0.3 3 Years (M2•Sr) MDR (GV) 740 ~1000 150

    BESS- Polar Acceptance 0.0021 0.5 0.3 3 Years (M2•Sr) MDR (GV) 740 ~1000 150

    Searching for Cosmological Antimatter Bob Streitmatter For the BESS Collaboration (KEK / NASA-GSFC / Tokyo / Kobe / Maryland / ISAS) Outline • Briefly: (TEE), Theory Explained by Experimentalist • Review History of Experimental Search for CAM • Instruments, Techniques and measurements • BESS Program • Current Status of Data •The Future In the Beginning … •Dirac, in 1928, was the first to realize that the physics of relativity and quantum mechanics taken together required the existence of matter whose additive quantum numbers (e.g. charge, baryon number, lepton number, spin) were the negative of “normal” matter. (Proc. R. Soc. London, A, 117, (1928), 610) •Positron discovered, August 2, 1932. Positron produced by cosmic radiation seen in a cloud chamber. (Anderson, Phys. Rev. (1933) 491) Baryon Symmetric Universe “We must regard it rather as an accident that the Earth and presumably the whole Solar System contains a preponderance of negative electrons and positive protons. It is quite possible that for some of the stars it is the other way about” -- Dirac, 1933 Noble acceptance speech Antimatter Miscellanea • 1955: Antiprotons are “manufactured” at Bevatron - Chamberlain et al. Phys. Rev. 100 (1955) 947 • Experimental evidence that antimatter is normal in the gravitational sense - High and Holzschieter Phy. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 854 • Contrary to popular myth among Trekkies, the 1908 Tunguska meteor was not antimatter - Cowan, Atluri and Libby, Nature, May 29, 1965 But: Simple Big Bang BSU Fatal Problems •The “Annihilation Catastrophe” - not enough baryons •SBB predicts baryon/photon ratio ≈ 10-18 at freezeout •Observed baryon/photon raio ≈ 10-9 •How did the matter and antimatter get separated? •Fluctuations won’t do it •e.g.
  • Renormalization Group - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia 3/17/12 5:27 PM Renormalization Group from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

    Renormalization Group - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia 3/17/12 5:27 PM Renormalization Group from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

    Renormalization group - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 3/17/12 5:27 PM Renormalization group From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In theoretical physics, the renormalization group (RG) refers to a mathematical apparatus that allows systematic investigation of the changes of a physical system as viewed at different distance scales. In particle physics, it reflects the changes in the underlying force laws (codified in a quantum field theory) as the energy scale at which physical processes occur varies, energy/momentum and resolution distance scales being effectively conjugate under the uncertainty principle (cf. Compton wavelength). A change in scale is called a "scale transformation". The renormalization group is intimately related to "scale invariance" and "conformal invariance", symmetries in which a system appears the same at all scales (so-called self-similarity). (However, note that scale transformations are included in conformal transformations, in general: the latter including additional symmetry generators associated with special conformal transformations.) As the scale varies, it is as if one is changing the magnifying power of a notional microscope viewing the system. In so- called renormalizable theories, the system at one scale will generally be seen to consist of self-similar copies of itself when viewed at a smaller scale, with different parameters describing the components of the system. The components, or fundamental variables, may relate to atoms, elementary particles, atomic spins, etc. The parameters of the theory typically describe the interactions of the components. These may be variable "couplings" which measure the strength of various forces, or mass parameters themselves. The components themselves may appear to be composed of more of the self-same components as one goes to shorter distances.
  • Search for Cosmic-Ray Antiproton Origins and for Cosmological Antimatter with BESS

    Search for Cosmic-Ray Antiproton Origins and for Cosmological Antimatter with BESS

    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Advances in Space Research 51 (2013) 227–233 www.elsevier.com/locate/asr Search for cosmic-ray antiproton origins and for cosmological antimatter with BESS A. Yamamoto a,⇑, J.W. Mitchell b, K. Yoshimura a, K. Abe c,1, H. Fuke d, S. Haino a,2, T. Hams b,3, M. Hasegawa a, A. Horikoshi a, A. Itazaki c, K.C. Kim e, T. Kumazawa a, A. Kusumoto c, M.H. Lee e, Y. Makida a, S. Matsuda a, Y. Matsukawa c, K. Matsumoto a, A.A. Moiseev b, Z. Myers b,4, J. Nishimura f, M. Nozaki a, R. Orito c,5, J.F. Ormes g, K. Sakai f, M. Sasaki b,6, E.S. Seo e, Y. Shikaze c,7, R. Shinoda f, R.E. Streitmatter b, J. Suzuki a, Y. Takasugi c, K. Takeuchi c, K. Tanaka a, T. Taniguchi a,8, N. Thakur g, T. Yamagami d, T. Yoshida d, BESS Collaboration a High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan b National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center (NASA/GSFC), Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA c Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan d Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (ISAS/JAXA), Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan e IPST, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA f The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan g University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA Available online 29 July 2011 Abstract The balloon-borne experiment with a superconducting spectrometer (BESS) has performed cosmic-ray observations as a US–Japan cooperative space science program, and has provided fundamental data on cosmic rays to study elementary particle phenomena in the early Universe.
  • High Precision Particle Astrophysics As a New Window on the Universe with an Antimatter Large Acceptance Detector in Orbit (Aladino)

    High Precision Particle Astrophysics As a New Window on the Universe with an Antimatter Large Acceptance Detector in Orbit (Aladino)

    High Precision Particle Astrophysics as a New Window on the Universe with an Antimatter Large Acceptance Detector In Orbit (ALADInO) A White Paper submitted in response to ESA’s Call for the VOYAGE 2050 long-term plan Contact Person: Roberto Battiston Address: Dipartimento di Fisica, Via Sommarive 14, 38123 Trento E-mail: [email protected] Telephone: +39 366 687 2527 Core Team members O.Adriani1,2, G.Ambrosi3, , B. Baoudoy4, R.Battiston5,6, B.Bertucci7,3, P.Blasi8, M.Boezio9, D.Campana10, L. Derome11, I. De Mitri8, V. Di Felice12, F. Donato13, M.Duranti3, V.Formato12, D. Grasso14, I. Gebauer15, R. Iuppa5,6, N. Masi17, D. Maurin11, N.Mazziotta17, R. Musenich18, F. Nozzoli6, P.Papini2, P. Picozza19,12, M.Pierce20, S.Pospíšil21, L. Rossi22, N.Tomassetti6,3, V. Vagelli23, X.Wu24 1) University of Florence, Italy (IT) 2) INFN-Florence, Italy (IT) 3) INFN-Perugia, Italy (IT) 4) CEA Saclay Irfu/SACM, France (FR) 5) University of Trento, Italy (IT) 6) INFN-TIFPA, Trento, Italy (IT) 7) University of Perugia, Italy (IT) 8) Gran Sasso Science Institute, Italy & INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Italy (IT) 9) INFN-Trieste, Italy (IT) 10) INFN-Napoli, Italy (IT) 11) Universitè Grenoble Alpes and IN2P3 LSPC, France (FR) 12) INFN-Roma Tor Vergata, Italy (IT) 13) University & INFN Torino, Italy (IT) 14) INFN Pisa, Italy (IT) 15) KIT, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, Germany (DE) 16) University and INFN Bologna, Italy (IT) 17) INFN-Bari, Italy (IT) 18) INFN-Genova, Italy (IT) 19) University of Roma Tor Vergata, Italy (IT) 20) KTH Royal