DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 247/Friday, December 23, 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 247/Friday, December 23, 2016 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 247 / Friday, December 23, 2016 / Notices 94351 http://www.georgecountylakesEIS.com is the lead agency for this project under many places throughout the watershed. at least 15 days prior to the meeting. NEPA. The SFCJPA is the lead agency Flooding on San Francisquito Creek Comments are encouraged from the for this project under the California affects the cities of Menlo Park and East public as well as Federal, state, and Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Palo Alto in San Mateo County, and the local agencies and officials, Indian will be preparing a separate city of Palo Alto in Santa Clara County. tribes, and other interested parties so Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Flooding from San Francisquito Creek that the scope of the EIS may be DATES: Written comments from all has been a common occurrence. The properly identified. interested parties are encouraged and most recent flood event occurred in 7. Coordination: The proposed action must be received on or before 5:00 p.m. December 2012, and the flood of record is being coordinated with a number of on February 17, 2017. occurred in February 1998, when the Federal and State agencies, including ADDRESSES: Written comments and Creek overtopped its banks in several the U.S. Environmental Protection requests for information should be sent areas, affecting approximately 1,700 Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, to Eric Jolliffe, U.S. Army Corps of residential and commercial structures Mississippi Department of Engineers, San Francisco District, 1455 and causing more than $26.6 million in Environmental Quality, and Mississippi Market St., 17th floor, San Francisco, property damages. After these floods, Department of Marine Resources. These CA 94103, [email protected]. the SFCJPA was formed to pursue flood control and restoration opportunities in agencies were requested by the USACE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. the area. to be cooperating agencies for the EIS Eric Jolliffe, (415) 503–6869. per Council on Environmental Quality The current USACE Feasibility Study SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The San regulations at 40 CFR 1501.6. is a continuation of the authority passed Francisquito Creek watershed Collaboration with other agencies, on May 22, 2002 by the Committee on encompasses an area of approximately including state resource protection Transportation and Infrastructure of the 45 square miles, extending from the agencies, is anticipated during the EIS United States House of Representatives, ridge of the Santa Cruz Mountains to process. which is in accordance with Section 4 8. Availability of the Draft EIS: The San Francisco Bay in California. The of the Flood Control Act of 1941. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will majority of the watershed lies in the resolution reads as follows: advertise the availability of a Draft Santa Cruz Mountains and Bay Foothills ‘‘Resolved by the Committee on Environmental Impact Statement when northwest of Palo Alto; the remaining Transportation and Infrastructure of the it becomes available for the public 7.5 square miles lie on the San United States House of Representatives, review. Francisquito alluvial fan near San That, the Secretary of the Army, in Francisco Bay. accordance with Section 4 of the Flood Brenda S. Bowen, The San Francisquito Creek Control Act of 1941, is hereby requested Army Federal Register Liaison Officer. watershed contains mainstem San to conduct a study of the Guadalupe [FR Doc. 2016–30988 Filed 12–22–16; 8:45 am] Francisquito Creek and the main River and Tributaries, California, to BILLING CODE 3720–58–P tributary streams of West Union Creek, determine whether flood damage Corte Madera Creek, Bear Creek and Los reduction, environmental restoration Trancos Creek. Los Trancos Creek and and protection, storm water retention, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE lower San Francisquito Creek form the water conservation and supply, boundary between San Mateo and Santa recreation and other allied purposes are Department of the Army, Corps of Clara counties. The reaches are divided advisable in the interest of the San Engineers up as follows: Reach 1 extends from San Francisquito Creek Watershed, Francisco Bay to the upstream face of Intent To Prepare an Integrated including San Francisquito Creek, Santa Highway 101; Reach 2 extends from Feasibility Study/Environmental Impact Clara and San Mateo Counties, Highway 101 to El Camino Real; Reach Statement for the San Francisquito California.’’ 3 continues from El Camino Real to 2. Proposed Action. The integrated Creek Flood Risk Management Study, Sand Hill Road; and Reach 4 continues FS/EIS will consider the environmental San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties, from Sand Hill Road to the ridge of the impact of potential flood risk CA Santa Cruz Mountains. This FS/EIS will management projects with the end goal AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. investigate flood risk management of reducing flood damage in the San Army Corps of Engineers, DOD. solutions related to breakout flow in Francisquito Creek Watershed. ACTION: Notice of intent. Reach 2 only. The entire watershed will 3. Project Alternatives. The integrated be considered when developing FS/EIS will include four alternatives. SUMMARY: The Department of the Army solutions to address flooding in Reach 2. a. No Action: Alternative 1 is the No and the San Francisquito Creek Joint The non-Federal sponsor for the Action Plan. With the No Action Plan Powers Authority (SFCJPA) hereby give Feasibility phase of the study is the (which is the ‘‘Future Without-Project notice of intent to prepare an integrated SFCJPA. The SFCJPA is comprised of Condition’’), it is assumed that no long- Feasibility Study/Environmental Impact the following member agencies: the City term actions would be taken to reduce Statement (FS/EIS) for the San of Palo Alto; the City of Menlo Park; the flood damage along San Francisquito Francisquito Creek Flood Risk City of East Palo Alto; the Santa Clara Creek; flood control improvements Management Project in San Mateo and Valley Water District; and the San would consist of emergency fixes to Santa Clara Counties, CA to consider Mateo County Flood Control District. damage areas, consistent with available opportunities to reduce fluvial flooding, 1. Background. The carrying capacity funding. to reduce the risk to public safety due of San Francisquito Creek is affected by b. Alternative 2 includes replacing to flooding consistent with protecting the presence of development, bridges and widening channel the Nation’s environment, in accordance vegetation, sedimentation, land constriction points to provide additional with national environmental statutes, subsidence, levee settlement, erosion, channel capacity in Reach 2 between applicable executive orders, and other and culverts and bridges in the project Highway 101 and El Camino Real. Federal planning requirements. The area. Erosion has caused the Under this alternative, bridges and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) undermining of roads and structures in channel constrictions or ‘‘bottlenecks’’ VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:33 Dec 22, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM 23DEN1 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES 94352 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 247 / Friday, December 23, 2016 / Notices that cause creek flows to back up and Council on Environmental Quality 1. Authority. The study is authorized rise would be widened to increase regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–1508). under Section 216 of the 1970 Rivers channel conveyance and thus reduce and Harbor Act, Public Law 91–611, water surface elevation. Included in this John C. Morrow, 91st Congress, H.R. 19877, dated 31 widening is a proposed project element Lieutenant Colonel, Corps of Engineers December 1970. to align the channel with a CalTrans District Engineer. 2. Proposed Action. The study will project to increase flow capacity at [FR Doc. 2016–30985 Filed 12–22–16; 8:45 am] evaluate a range of alternatives for Highway 101 and adjacent frontage BILLING CODE 3720–58–P deepening and widening the MSC from roads. Impacts from these activities will offshore in the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) be evaluated in the FS/EIS. through the Point Comfort turning c. Alternative 3 includes constructing DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE basin. Modifications to the existing 26- floodwalls along the channel. This mile long navigation channel are needed Department of the Army; Corps of Alternative would consider the addition to reduce transportation costs and Engineers of floodwalls in Reach 2 as a stand- increase operational efficiencies of alone measure and in combination with Intent To Prepare a Draft maritime commerce movement through the bridge replacement and channel Environmental Impact Statement for the channel. The existing MSC is widening in Alternative 2. the Matagorda Ship Channel, TX, comprised of an entrance channel about d. Alternative 4 would consider the Feasibility Study 4 miles long from the Gulf through a addition of a bypass culvert as a stand- man-made cut across Matagorda alone measure and in combination with AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Peninsula. The bayside channel is about the bridge replacement and channel Army Corps of Engineers, DoD. 22 miles long across Matagorda and widening in Alternative 2. This ACTION: Notice of Intent. Lavaca Bays to Point Comfort with a alternative may include floodwalls, turning basin at Point Comfort. Offshore though at a reduced scale compared to SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of and through the Matagorda Peninsula, Alternative 3. This alternative includes Engineers (USACE) intends to prepare a the channel has a 300-foot bottom width a new bypass inlet located a few Draft Integrated Feasibility Report and and is maintained at a depth of 40 feet hundred feet upstream from University Environmental Impact Statement (DIFR– mean lower low water (MLLW). Avenue that would divert high flows to EIS) to assess the social, economic and Generally, in Matagorda and Lavaca a culvert beneath Woodland Avenue or environmental effects of widening and Bays, the channel has a 200-foot wide a street in Palo Alto.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dam Removal Planning in the California Coast Ranges by Clare
    The Big Five: Dam Removal Planning in the California Coast Ranges by Clare Kathryn O’Reilly A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Landscape Architecture in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor G. Mathias Kondolf, Chair Professor Randolph T. Hester Professor Emeritus Robert Twiss Spring 2010 The thesis of Clare Kathryn O’Reilly, titled The Big Five: Dam Removal Planning in the California Coast Ranges, is approved: Chair Date: Professor G. Mathias Kondolf Date: Professor Randolph T. Hester Date: Professor Emeritus Robert Twiss University of California, Berkeley Spring 2010 The Big Five: Dam Removal Planning in the California Coast Ranges Copyright 2010 by Clare O’Reilly Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Methods 18 CHAPTER 3: Conceptual Framework 22 CHAPTER 4: Case Studies 46 Upper York Creek Dam 47 Searsville Dam 58 San Clemente Dam 72 Matilija Dam 84 Rindge Dam 99 CHAPTER 5: Synthesis & Recommendations 108 REFERENCES 124 APPENDICES 136 table OF COnTEnTS i List of Figures CHAPTER 1 Figure 1-1. Sediment deposition from upstream watershed (left) and resulting deposition in reservoir. 2 Figure 1-2. Transport impact of dams. (Wildman, 2006) 3 Figure 1-3. Dams in the US by height. (USACE, 2009) 3 Figure 1-4. Dams in the US by hazard potential. (USACE, 2009) 3 Figure 1-5. Delta deposition in reservoir. (Mahmood, 1987) 5 Figure 1-6. Example of reservoir sediment deposit. 5 Figure 1-7. Infilled reservoir. (Morris & Fan, 1998) 5 Figure 1-8. Bar-lin Dam on the Dahan River in Taiwan, full of sediment in 2006 four years after completion (left), and post-failure in 2007 (right).
    [Show full text]
  • (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California
    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward p. 3 Introduction p. 5 Methods p. 7 Determining Historical Distribution and Current Status; Information Presented in the Report; Table Headings and Terms Defined; Mapping Methods Contra Costa County p. 13 Marsh Creek Watershed; Mt. Diablo Creek Watershed; Walnut Creek Watershed; Rodeo Creek Watershed; Refugio Creek Watershed; Pinole Creek Watershed; Garrity Creek Watershed; San Pablo Creek Watershed; Wildcat Creek Watershed; Cerrito Creek Watershed Contra Costa County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 39 Alameda County p. 45 Codornices Creek Watershed; Strawberry Creek Watershed; Temescal Creek Watershed; Glen Echo Creek Watershed; Sausal Creek Watershed; Peralta Creek Watershed; Lion Creek Watershed; Arroyo Viejo Watershed; San Leandro Creek Watershed; San Lorenzo Creek Watershed; Alameda Creek Watershed; Laguna Creek (Arroyo de la Laguna) Watershed Alameda County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 91 Santa Clara County p. 97 Coyote Creek Watershed; Guadalupe River Watershed; San Tomas Aquino Creek/Saratoga Creek Watershed; Calabazas Creek Watershed; Stevens Creek Watershed; Permanente Creek Watershed; Adobe Creek Watershed; Matadero Creek/Barron Creek Watershed Santa Clara County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Element
    Town of Portola Valley General Plan Historic Element Last amended April 22, 1998 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 Background of Community ......................................................................................................... 1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Scope ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Definitions ................................................................................................................................... 2 Objectives ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Principles ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Standards ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Historic Resource to be Preserved .............................................................................................. 4 Historic Resource to be Noted with a Plaque ............................................................................. 5 Historic Resource Listed for Further
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2 Physical/Biological Setting, Including Covered Species
    SECTION 2 PHYSICAL/BIOLOGICAL SETTING, INCLUDING COVERED SPECIES 2.0 PHYSICAL / BIOLOGICAL SETTING, INCLUDING COVERED SPECIES 2.1 SIGNIFICANT HYDROLOGIC FEATURES 2.1.1 San Francisquito Creek Watershed The San Francisquito Creek watershed encompasses an area of approximately 45 square miles and is located on the east- ern flank of the Santa Cruz Mountains, at the base of the San Francisco Peninsula (Fig. 2-1). This watershed is located in two counties, San Mateo and Santa Clara, and two of its constituent creeks (Los Trancos and San Francisquito) form part of the boundary between the two counties. The San Francisquito Creek watershed has four major sub-watersheds located at least partially on Stanford lands: Bear Creek (Bear When this HCP was prepared, Stanford had the following Gulch Creek), Los Trancos Creek, San Francisquito Creek, and functioning water diversion facilities in the San Francisquito streams that flow into Searsville Reservoir (including Corte Creek system: Searsville Dam and Reservoir, located down- Madera, Dennis Martin, Sausal, and Alambique creeks). stream from the confluence of Corte Madera Creek and Sausal Creek; Los Trancos diversion on Los Trancos Creek, near A USGS gauging station (11164500) is located on San the intersection of Arastradero and Alpine roads; and an in- Francisquito Creek near the Stanford golf course, approxi- channel pumping station, located in San Francisquito Creek mately 500 meters south (upstream) of the Junipero Serra near the Stanford golf course, south of the Junipero Serra Boulevard/Alpine Road intersection. This station has been in Boulevard/Alpine Road intersection. Another diversion facil- operation since the early 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • To Sit in the Shade on a Fine Day and Look Upon Verdure Is the Most Perfect Refreshment.” —Jane Austen
    8/19/2011 Draft HISTORIC OVERVIEW OPEN SPACE ELEMENT IN TRODUCTION GENERAL PLAN ELEMENTS OPEN SPACE APPENDIXES AREA PLANS “To sit in the shade on a fine day and look upon verdure is the most perfect refreshment.” —Jane Austen Introduction....................................................................................................................................140 Changes.Since.1988....................................................................................................................141 Definitions........................................................................................................................................142 Open.Space.Purposes.................................................................................................................142 SPECIFIC PLANS Open.Space.Types........................................................................................................................143 Easements.(Open.Space,.Conservation,.and.Scenic)...................................................146 Open.Space.Inventory................................................................................................................148 Goal.OS1,.Policies,.and.Strategies..........................................................................................160 TOWN OF WOODSIDE GENERAL PLAN 2012 139 8/19/2011 Draft Introduction The Woodside Planning Area contains significant open space areas important not only to local residents but to Woodside is blessed to have an abundance of open space. the larger
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Passage San Francisquito
    COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation May 29, 2014 SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK: LOS TRANCOS AND BEAR CREEKS FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Project No. 13-020-02 Project Manager: Amy Hutzel RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorization to disburse up to $67,000 to American Rivers to design and prepare for implementation three fish passage improvement projects on two San Francisquito Creek tributaries: Los Trancos Creek and Bear Creek in Portola Valley and Woodside, respectively. LOCATION: Los Trancos Creek and Bear Creek, tributaries to San Francisquito Creek, in Portola Valley and Woodside, respectively, San Mateo County. PROGRAM CATEGORY: San Francisco Bay Area Conservancy EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Project Location and Site Maps Exhibit 2: Summary Description of Fish Passage Barriers Exhibit 3: Project Letters RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommends that the State Coastal Conservancy adopt the following resolution pursuant to Sections 31160-31165 of the Public Resources Code: “The State Coastal Conservancy hereby authorizes the disbursement of up to sixty-seven thousand dollars ($67,000) to American Rivers to design and prepare for implementation three fish passage improvement projects in the San Francisquito Creek watershed at Los Trancos Creek and Bear Creek, in Portola Valley and Woodside, respectively, San Mateo County. Prior to the disbursement of funds, American Rivers shall submit for review and approval by the Executive Officer of the Conservancy: 1. A work program, including a schedule and budget for the project; 2. The names and qualifications of all contractors to be employed for the project.” Staff further recommends that the Conservancy adopt the following findings: Page 1 of 8 SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK: LOS TRANCOS AND BEAR CREEK FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS “Based on the accompanying staff report and attached exhibits, the State Coastal Conservancy hereby finds that: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • National Marine Fisheries Service/NOAA, Commerce § 226.211
    National Marine Fisheries Service/NOAA, Commerce § 226.211 and the following DOI, USGS, 1:500,000 (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Critical habitat scale hydrologic unit maps: State of is designated to include all river Oregon, 1974 and State of California, reaches accessible to listed coho salm- 1978 which are incorporated by ref- on between Cape Blanco, Oregon, and erence. This incorporation by reference Punta Gorda, California. Critical habi- was approved by the Director of the tat consists of the water, substrate, Federal Register in accordance with 5 and adjacent riparian zone of estuarine U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies and riverine reaches (including off- of the USGS publication and maps may channel habitats) in hydrologic units be obtained from the USGS, Map Sales, and counties identified in Table 6 of Box 25286, Denver, CO 80225. Copies may this part. Accessible reaches are those be inspected at NMFS, Protected Re- within the historical range of the ESU sources Division, 525 NE Oregon that can still be occupied by any life Street—Suite 500, Portland, OR 97232– stage of coho salmon. Inaccessible 2737, or NMFS, Office of Protected Re- sources, 1315 East-West Highway, Sil- reaches are those above specific dams ver Spring, MD 20910, or at the Na- identified in Table 6 of this part or tional Archives and Records Adminis- above longstanding, naturally impass- tration (NARA). For information on able barriers (i.e., natural waterfalls in the availability of this material at existence for at least several hundred NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: http:// years).
    [Show full text]
  • Beneficial Uses of the SFAN Water Bodies
    Appendix A. Beneficial Uses of the SFAN Water Bodies 67 Beneficial Uses of individual the SFAN water bodies as determined by the San Francisco Bay RWQCB (with modifications/additions by the SFAN staff in an April 2003 Memo to the RWQCB) are listed in the table below. Sets of water bodies grouped together with similar shading are located within the same greater watershed. Chalone Creek is located within the jurisdiction of the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board; however, it is not included in there list of streams. Potential beneficial uses are indicated by “P”, existing beneficial uses are indicated by “E”. Park AGR COLD COMM EST FRSH GWR IND MAR MIGR MUN NAV PROC RARE REC1 REC2 SHEL SPWN WARM WI Tomales Bay PORE E E E E E E E E E E E E E E GOGA Lagunitas Creek GOGA E E E E E E E E E E E Bear Valley Creek PORE E E E P E E E Haggerty Gulch PORE E E E E E E Olema Creek PORE E E E E E E E E E Pacific Ocean PORE E E E E E E E E E E E GOGA Santa Maria Creek PORE E E E P E E E E Coast Creek PORE E P P E E E E Alamere Creek PORE P E E E Crystal Lake PORE P E E E E Arroyo Hondo PORE E P E P E E E Limantour Estero PORE E E E E E E P E E E E Glenbrook Creek PORE E E E E E E P E E E Muddy Hollow PORE E E E E E E P E E E Kehoe Lagoon PORE E E E E Abbott’s Lagoon PORE E E E E E Drakes Estero PORE P E E E E E E E E E East Schooner Ck.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Conservation Plan November 2012 5-2 Environmental Consequences
    Environmental Consequences 5-1 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES This section analyzes the effects of issuing the ITPs and implementation of the HCP on the physical, biological, and socioeconomic environment. It describes the direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of three alternatives: the Proposed Action, No Action, and HCP for CTS Only. The list of activities covered by the Proposed Action (i.e., Covered Activities) is provided in Section 3 and in the HCP (Appendix B). The direct and indirect effects of the Proposed Action and two alternatives on the physical environment are addressed in Section 5.1; on the biological environment in Section 5.2; on the socioeconomic environment in Section 5.3; and on environmental justice in Section 5.4. A summary comparison of effects of the alternatives is provided in Table 5-8, near the end of the section. Direct effects are caused by the action and occur at the same time and place. Indirect effects are caused by the action and are later in time or farther removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable. They may include the physical effects of population growth or changes in land use. The possible cumulative effects on each resource are evaluated in Section 5.5. Cumulative effects are the incremental effects of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency or person undertakes such other actions. Cumulative effects can result from individually minor but collectively significant actions taking place over a period of time. Global climate change, for example, is addressed in this section.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanford Habitat Conservation Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement Revised and Sent August 30, 2010
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR AUTHORIZATION FOR INCIDENTAL TAKE AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STANFORD UNIVERSITY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN VOLUME II: COMMENTS AND RESPONSES NOVEMBER 2012 U.S. Fish and Wildlife National Marine Fisheries Service Service FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR AUTHORIZATION FOR INCIDENTAL TAKE AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STANFORD UNIVERSITY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN VOLUME II: COMMENTS AND RESPONSES NOVEMBER 2012 United States Fish and Wildlife Service and National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration/ National Marine Fisheries Service as Co-Lead Agencies Contents i Final Environmental Impact Statement for Authorization for Incidental Take and Implementation of the Stanford University Habitat Conservation Plan Volume II: Comments and Responses TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................... i 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose of Comment and Response Document ........................................................... 1-1 1.2 Organization of Volume II ........................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 List of Public Agencies, Organizations and Individuals Who Submitted Comments . 1-1 1.3.1 Public Agencies ...................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3.2 Organizations .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ALPINE ROAD TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
    ALPINE ROAD TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared for August 2013 County of San Mateo Department of Public Works ALPINE ROAD TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared for August 2013 County of San Mateo Department of Public Works 550 Kearny Street Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94108 415.896.5900 www.esassoc.com Los Angeles Oakland Orlando Palm Springs Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego Santa Cruz Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D120603.02 OUR COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY | ESA helps a variety of public and private sector clients plan and prepare for climate change and emerging regulations that limit GHG emissions. ESA is a registered assessor with the California Climate Action Registry, a Climate Leader, and founding reporter for the Climate Registry. ESA is also a corporate member of the U.S. Green Building Council and the Business Council on Climate Change (BC3). Internally, ESA has adopted a Sustainability Vision and Policy Statement and a plan to reduce waste and energy within our operations. This document was produced using recycled paper. Notice of Public Review and Intent to Adopt a Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Alpine Road Trail Improvements Project Pursuant to the State of California Public Resources Code and the "Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended to date, this is to advise you that the County of San Mateo (County) has prepared a Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) on the County’s Alpine Road Trail Improvements Project (proposed project). The County proposes to implement the Alpine Road Trail Improvements Project.
    [Show full text]
  • 88000-POUND RESTRICTED BRIDGES (Page 1 of 8)
    88,000-POUND RESTRICTED BRIDGES (Page 1 of 8) BRIDGE NUMBER BRIDGE NAME DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE POSTMILE 10 0113 GARCIA RIVER 1 MEN 1 18.5 10 0120 ELK CREEK 1 MEN 1 31.35 10 0149 SOUTH FORK EEL RIVER 1 MEN 1 104.96 27 0019 REDWOOD CREEK 4 MRN 1 6.02 27 0022 LAGUNITAS CREEK OVERFLOW 4 MRN 1 28.39 27 0024 LAGUNITAS CREEK OVERFLOW 4 MRN 1 28.56 27 0025 ELLIS CREEK 4 MRN 1 34.97 27 0056 TOMASINI CANYON 4 MRN 1 29.85 34 0015 WEST PACIFIC AVENUE UC 4 SF 1 6.18 34 0021 ALEMANY BLVD OC 4 SF 1 R.11 36 0024 CAPITOLA AVENUE OC 5 SCR 1 12.93 36 0066 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD OC 5 SCR 1 15.82 36 0069R ROUTE 1 NB / 17 SEPARATION 5 SCR 1 17.02 36 0071L SAN LORENZO RIVER 5 SCR 1 17.41 44 0012 GRANITE CANYON 5 MON 1 64.33 49 0042 SANTA MARIA RIVER 5 SLO 1 .01 49 0053 ARROYO LAGUNA 5 SLO 1 R59.89 49 0108 SOUTH MORRO BAY OC 5 SLO 1 28.82 49 0123 STENNER CREEK 5 SLO 1 17.05 52 0012 LITTLE SYCAMORE CREEK 7 VEN 1 1.23 52 0040 VENTURA OH 7 VEN 1 21.54 53 0316 MAIN STREET OC 7 LA 1 35.07 53 2725 WESTCHESTER PARKWAY OC 7 LA 1 28.5 55 0119 MORO CREEK 12 ORA 1 11.9 55 1106 LAGUNA CANYON CHANNEL 12 ORA 1 9.39 53 0063 SLIDE CANYON 7 LA 2 28.58 53 0086 WOODWARDIA CANYON 7 LA 2 29.55 53 0088 SIDEHILL VIADUCT 7 LA 2 29.08 02 0038 PATTERSON CREEK 2 SIS 3 24.26 05 0055 STUART FORK 2 TRI 3 43.93 28 0105 UTILITIES UNDERCROSSING 4 CC 4 24.97 29 0045 OLD RIVER SR 4 10 SJ 4 .01 30 0036 WEST BRANCH CHEROKEE CREEK 10 CAL 4 16.15 38 0039 DUCK CREEK 10 STA 4 .88 38 0041 HOODS CREEK 10 STA 4 7.28 37 0074 SARATOGA CREEK 4 SCL 9 4.85 37 0078 SARATOGA CREEK 4 SCL 9 6.7 36 0046 SAN LORENZO
    [Show full text]