DOCSLIB.ORG

Stanford Habitat Conservation Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement Revised and Sent August 30, 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stanford Habitat Conservation Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement Revised and Sent August 30, 2010 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR AUTHORIZATION FOR INCIDENTAL TAKE AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STANFORD UNIVERSITY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN VOLUME II: COMMENTS AND RESPONSES NOVEMBER 2012 U.S. Fish and Wildlife National Marine Fisheries Service Service FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR AUTHORIZATION FOR INCIDENTAL TAKE AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STANFORD UNIVERSITY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN VOLUME II: COMMENTS AND RESPONSES NOVEMBER 2012 United States Fish and Wildlife Service and National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration/ National Marine Fisheries Service as Co-Lead Agencies Contents i Final Environmental Impact Statement for Authorization for Incidental Take and Implementation of the Stanford University Habitat Conservation Plan Volume II: Comments and Responses TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................... i 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose of Comment and Response Document ........................................................... 1-1 1.2 Organization of Volume II ........................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 List of Public Agencies, Organizations and Individuals Who Submitted Comments . 1-1 1.3.1 Public Agencies ...................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3.2 Organizations .......................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3.3 Individuals............................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 How to Find the Response to Your Comments ........................................................... 1-2 2.0 Comments Received on the DEIS ............................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Letter 1: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Kathleen Goforth ...... 2-2 2.2 Letter 2: Beyond Searsville Dam, Matt Stoecker; with comments from Center for Biological Diversity, Jeff Miller (attached). ................................................................ 2-4 2.3 Letter 3: Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Gordon Becker (on behalf of Beyond Searsville Dam) ............................................................................. 2-64 2.4 Letter 4: City of Menlo Park, Kathleen Gallagher ..................................................... 2-73 2.5 Letter 5: City of Menlo Park, Kent Steffens .............................................................. 2-74 2.6 Letter 6: City of Palo Alto, Glenn Roberts and Curtis Williams ............................... 2-77 2.7 Letter 7: Committee for Green Foothills, Brian Schmidt .......................................... 2-79 2.8 Letter 8: Committee for Green Foothills, Brian Schmidt and Lennie Roberts .......... 2-82 2.9 Letter 9: County of Santa Clara, Rob Eastwood ........................................................ 2-86 2.10 Letter 10: ESA Biological Resources, Brian Pittman (on behalf of Santa Clara County) ................................................................................................................................... 2-97 2.11 Letter 11: Guadalupe-Coyote Resource Conservation District, Lawrence Johmann ....... ................................................................................................................................. 2-104 2.12 Letter 12: San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority, Len Materman ........... 2-110 2.13 Letter 13: League of Women Voters, Jamie Shepherd ............................................ 2-112 2.14 Letter 14: Shute Mihaly & Weinberger, LLP, Ellison Folk (on behalf of Beyond Searsville Dam) ........................................................................................................ 2-113 2.15 Letter 15: Town of Portola Valley, Stephen Toben ................................................. 2-124 2.16 Letter 16: Trout Unlimited, Kent MacIntosh ........................................................... 2-127 2.17 Letter 17: Representative Form Letter (Services received over 3,000 form letters by email from various individuals) ............................................................................... 2-128 2.18 Letter 18: Susan Culliney ........................................................................................ 2-129 2.19 Letter 19: Pat Haines ................................................................................................ 2-130 2.20 Letter 20: Amos Hausman-Rogers .......................................................................... 2-131 2.21 Letter 21: Steve Kennedy ........................................................................................ 2-132 Authorization for Incidental Take and Implementation FEIS Volume II: Comments and Responses of Stanford University Habitat Conservation Plan November 2012 ii Contents 2.22 Letter 22: Libby Lucas ............................................................................................. 2-133 2.23 Letter 23: Donna Mackowski .................................................................................. 2-139 2.24 Letter 24: Susan McDonough .................................................................................. 2-140 2.25 Letter 25: Jean Public .............................................................................................. 2-141 2.26 Letter 26: Carolyn Rogers ........................................................................................ 2-144 2.27 Letter 27: Marilyn Walter ........................................................................................ 2-145 2.28 Letter 28: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, Chris Shutes ..................... 2-147 2.29 Letter 29: Beyond Searsville Dam, Matt Stoecker .................................................. 2-148 2.30 Letter 30: Center for Biological Diversity, Jeff Miller ............................................ 2-149 3.0 Response to Comments .............................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Topic Areas .................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Comment Responses .................................................................................................... 3-2 3.2.1 45-day Comment Period Extension ........................................................................ 3-2 3.2.2 Conservation Easements/Mitigation Accounts ....................................................... 3-3 3.2.3 Conservation Program Manager ............................................................................. 3-8 3.2.4 Coordination with Other Laws and Regulations ..................................................... 3-9 3.2.5 Cover Other Species ............................................................................................. 3-11 3.2.6 Covered Species – California Tiger Salamander .................................................. 3-12 3.2.7 Covered Species –Estimating Take/Alternatives to Avoid Take .......................... 3-18 3.2.8 Covered Species – Habitat Information ................................................................ 3-19 3.2.9 Covered Species – San Francisco Garter Snake ................................................... 3-21 3.2.10 Covered Species – Steelhead ................................................................................ 3-22 3.2.11 Covered Species – Western Pond Turtle .............................................................. 3-32 3.2.12 Cumulative Effects Analysis................................................................................. 3-35 3.2.13 Development – General Use Permit (GUP) .......................................................... 3-38 3.2.14 Development – Stanford’s Future Development .................................................. 3-39 3.2.15 Development – Sustainable Development Study .................................................. 3-40 3.2.16 Felt Reservoir ........................................................................................................ 3-42 3.2.17 Foothills Fire Management Plan ........................................................................... 3-43 3.2.18 Form letters and Related Comments Regarding Searsville Dam and Reservoir .. 3-44 3.2.19 General .................................................................................................................. 3-51 3.2.20 Geologic Hazards, Seismicity, Soils ..................................................................... 3-55 3.2.21 Grazing .................................................................................................................. 3-55 3.2.22 Hydrology, Water Quality and Groundwater........................................................ 3-56 3.2.23 Land Trust ............................................................................................................. 3-70 3.2.24 Land Use ............................................................................................................... 3-73 3.2.25 Management Zones ............................................................................................... 3-74 3.2.26 Non-native Species (and Native Revegetation) .................................................... 3-75 3.2.27 Permit Term
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dam Removal Planning in the California Coast Ranges by Clare
    The Big Five: Dam Removal Planning in the California Coast Ranges by Clare Kathryn O’Reilly A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Landscape Architecture in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor G. Mathias Kondolf, Chair Professor Randolph T. Hester Professor Emeritus Robert Twiss Spring 2010 The thesis of Clare Kathryn O’Reilly, titled The Big Five: Dam Removal Planning in the California Coast Ranges, is approved: Chair Date: Professor G. Mathias Kondolf Date: Professor Randolph T. Hester Date: Professor Emeritus Robert Twiss University of California, Berkeley Spring 2010 The Big Five: Dam Removal Planning in the California Coast Ranges Copyright 2010 by Clare O’Reilly Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Methods 18 CHAPTER 3: Conceptual Framework 22 CHAPTER 4: Case Studies 46 Upper York Creek Dam 47 Searsville Dam 58 San Clemente Dam 72 Matilija Dam 84 Rindge Dam 99 CHAPTER 5: Synthesis & Recommendations 108 REFERENCES 124 APPENDICES 136 table OF COnTEnTS i List of Figures CHAPTER 1 Figure 1-1. Sediment deposition from upstream watershed (left) and resulting deposition in reservoir. 2 Figure 1-2. Transport impact of dams. (Wildman, 2006) 3 Figure 1-3. Dams in the US by height. (USACE, 2009) 3 Figure 1-4. Dams in the US by hazard potential. (USACE, 2009) 3 Figure 1-5. Delta deposition in reservoir. (Mahmood, 1987) 5 Figure 1-6. Example of reservoir sediment deposit. 5 Figure 1-7. Infilled reservoir. (Morris & Fan, 1998) 5 Figure 1-8. Bar-lin Dam on the Dahan River in Taiwan, full of sediment in 2006 four years after completion (left), and post-failure in 2007 (right).
    [Show full text]
  • Central Coast
    Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Consultation History......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Action Area ..................................................................................................................... 32 2. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: BIOLOGICAL OPINION AND INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT ......................................................................................................... 34 2.1 Analytical Approach ....................................................................................................... 34 2.2 Life History and Range-wide Status of the Species and Critical Habitat ...................... 35 2.3 Environmental Baseline .................................................................................................. 48 2.4 Effects of the Action ........................................................................................................ 62 2.5 Cumulative Effects .......................................................................................................... 76 2.6 Integration and Synthesis ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • | Palo Alto Online |
    neighborhoods |publicofficialsneighborhoods | getting around |www.paloaltoonline.com arts &entertainment |outdoors &recreation |seniors |education A local resource guide published by the Palo AltoA localresource the guidepublishedWeekly Palo by 2018-192018-19 PALO ALTO PAPER is WONDERFUL PAPER is GOOD for your GREEN for your GREEN CART! CART! COMPOST soiled paper: paper towels & napkins paper plates paper containers, cups & cartons pizza boxes For more information, visit www.cityofpaloalto.org/soiledpaper [email protected] (650) 496-5910 Info PA 2018-19.indd 2 9/4/18 1:01 PM Roots in the community? You betcha. There are locals, and then there is the local’s local – which is Brian. He was raised in Palo Alto, and in turn, is raising his family here as well. It’s a deep relationship with the area, as evidenced by Brian’s 25 years in real estate on the Peninsula and his role as an active, lifelong community volunteer. So it’s no wonder people far and wide look to him for his deep local knowledge, expertise, integrity, and network. You and Brian Chancellor; it’s an opportunity to grow together. THE ART AND SCIENCE OF REAL ESTATE BrianChancellor.com 650.303.5511 Info PA 2018-19.indd 3 9/4/18 1:01 PM The thrill of the hunt. C p track down that perfect treasure. 5VQRD[*QOG%QPUKIPOGPV%GPVGTƂTUV čÃÌ i«ÀiiÀVÃ}iÌLÕÃiÃÃÌ i1°-°ÜiV>ÌiÕÀÃÌÀiÃ>vyÕiÌÛLÀ>ÌVÕÌið 7ivviÀvÕÀÌÕÀi]>ÀÌ]>`>VViÃÃÀiÃvÀÌ i>Ài>½ÃwiÃÌ iÃ] >Õv>VÌÕÀiÀ½Ã Ã Ü samples, prototypes, and closeouts, as well as builder’s model homes, ALL AT CONSIGNMENT *, °"ÕÀ Õ}ià ÜÀÃ>Àiwi`ÜÌ VÀi`Li«À`ÕVÌÃÌ >ÌV >}iiÛiÀÞ`>Þt DANVILLE 1901-F Camino Ramon 925-866-6164 CORTE MADERA 801 Tamalpais Drive 415-924-6691 CAMPBELL 930 West Hamilton Ave., Suite 190 408-871-8890 SAN CARLOS 1123 Industrial (near Best Buy/Ross) 650-508-8317 17 Locations in California, Nevada & Texas www.thehomeconsignmentcenter.com 4 • Info Palo Alto www.PaloAltoOnline.com Info PA 2018-19.indd 4 9/4/18 1:01 PM Caption goes here.
    [Show full text]
  • The Red Guide
    The Red Guide THE (UN)OFFICIAL GUIDE TO STANFORD LAW SCHOOL The First and Only Guide to SLS Created by and for SLS Students Brought to you by: Stanford Law Association (SLA) Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 2 ACADEMIC TERMS & TIPS ............................................................................................................................ 4 IMPORTANT: How to Get a SLATA Outline ................................................................................................... 5 TIPS FOR PET OWNERS ................................................................................................................................. 7 TIPS FOR OUTDOOR LOVERS ........................................................................................................................ 7 FOOD AND COFFEE MAP .............................................................................................................................. 8 STUDY SPOT MAP ........................................................................................................................................ 9 MAP OF CAMPUS ....................................................................................................................................... 11 TIPS FOR STUDENT-PARENTS ..................................................................................................................... 12 TIPS FOR SIGNIFICANT OTHERS
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resource Study
    HAWTHORNS HISTORIC STRUCTURES ASSESSMENT Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Windy Hill Open Space Preserve Portola Valley, California Deliverable 1: Historic Resource Study October 2013 FINAL October 2013 Hawthorns Historic Structures Assessment FINAL Historic Resource Study TABLE OF CONTENTS HAWTHORNS HISTORIC STRUCTURES ASSESSMENT HISTORIC RESOURCE STUDY I. Introduction............................................................................................................ 1 II. Historic Overview & Contexts................................................................................ 5 III. Physical Description & Character-Defining Features .......................................... 58 IV. Historic Resource Evaluation ............................................................................ 105 V. Bibliography....................................................................................................... 109 VI. Endnotes VII. Appendix A. Methodology B. Drawings: Hawthorn House, Garage and Cottage October 2013 Hawthorns Historic Structures Assessment FINAL Historic Resource Study I. INTRODUCTION Hawthorns Historic Structures Assessment The Hawthorns Historic Structures Assessment is a project undertaken by Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) to assess the history and condition of the Hawthorn property. The District is a special district whose purpose is to purchase, permanently protect, and restore lands forming a regional open space greenbelt, preserve unspoiled wilderness, wildlife habitat, watershed,
    [Show full text]
  • (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California
    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward p. 3 Introduction p. 5 Methods p. 7 Determining Historical Distribution and Current Status; Information Presented in the Report; Table Headings and Terms Defined; Mapping Methods Contra Costa County p. 13 Marsh Creek Watershed; Mt. Diablo Creek Watershed; Walnut Creek Watershed; Rodeo Creek Watershed; Refugio Creek Watershed; Pinole Creek Watershed; Garrity Creek Watershed; San Pablo Creek Watershed; Wildcat Creek Watershed; Cerrito Creek Watershed Contra Costa County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 39 Alameda County p. 45 Codornices Creek Watershed; Strawberry Creek Watershed; Temescal Creek Watershed; Glen Echo Creek Watershed; Sausal Creek Watershed; Peralta Creek Watershed; Lion Creek Watershed; Arroyo Viejo Watershed; San Leandro Creek Watershed; San Lorenzo Creek Watershed; Alameda Creek Watershed; Laguna Creek (Arroyo de la Laguna) Watershed Alameda County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 91 Santa Clara County p. 97 Coyote Creek Watershed; Guadalupe River Watershed; San Tomas Aquino Creek/Saratoga Creek Watershed; Calabazas Creek Watershed; Stevens Creek Watershed; Permanente Creek Watershed; Adobe Creek Watershed; Matadero Creek/Barron Creek Watershed Santa Clara County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p.
    [Show full text]
  • TOWN of PORTOLA VALLEY 7:00 PM – Special Town Council Meeting Wednesday, October 24, 2012 the Sequoias Hanson Hall 501 Portola Road, Portola Valley, CA 94028
    Page 1 TOWN OF PORTOLA VALLEY 7:00 PM – Special Town Council Meeting Wednesday, October 24, 2012 The Sequoias Hanson Hall 501 Portola Road, Portola Valley, CA 94028 _____________________________________________________________________________ SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 7:00 PM – CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Councilmember Aalfs, Mayor Derwin, Councilmember Driscoll, Vice Mayor Richards, Councilmember Wengert ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Persons wishing to address the Town Council on any subject may do so now. Please note however, that the Council is not able to undertake extended discussion or action tonight on items not on the agenda. (1) PRESENTATION – Community Events Committee; Report on Blues and BBQ (3) (2) PRESENTATION – Jayme Ackemann, SamTrans Government Affairs Officer Executive Director; Report on (4) SamTrans Service Plan (3) PRESENTATION – Nicole Pasini, Branch Manager for Portola Valley and Woodside Library’s; San Mateo County Library’s 2011-12 Annual Report (18) CONSENT AGENDA The following items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered routine and approved by one roll call motion. The Mayor or any member of the Town Council or of the public may request that any item listed under the Consent Agenda be removed and action taken separately. (4) Approval of Minutes – Regular Town Council Meeting of October 10, 2012 (35) (5) Approval of Warrant List – October 24, 2012 (47) REGULAR AGENDA (6) Discussion by Town Manager – Options to Improve Committee Volunteer Experience (56) COUNCIL, STAFF, COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (7) Report from Town Manager – Update on Staffing Plan (66) There are no written materials for this item. (8) Reports from Commission and Committee Liaisons (67) There are no written materials for this item.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Element
    Town of Portola Valley General Plan Historic Element Last amended April 22, 1998 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 Background of Community ......................................................................................................... 1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Scope ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Definitions ................................................................................................................................... 2 Objectives ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Principles ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Standards ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Historic Resource to be Preserved .............................................................................................. 4 Historic Resource to be Noted with a Plaque ............................................................................. 5 Historic Resource Listed for Further
    [Show full text]
  • Hatfield Aerial Surveys Photographs
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt609nf5sn Online items available Guide to the Hatfield Aerial Surveys photographs Daniel Hartwig Stanford University. Libraries.Department of Special Collections and University Archives Stanford, California October 2010 Copyright © 2015 The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved. Guide to the Hatfield Aerial PC0086 1 Surveys photographs Overview Call Number: PC0086 Creator: Hatfield Aerial Photographers Title: Hatfield Aerial Surveys photographs Dates: 1947-1979 Physical Description: 3 Linear feet (43 items) Summary: This collection consists of aerial photographs of the Stanford University campus and lands taken by Hatfield Aerial Surveys, a firmed owned by Adrian R. Hatfield. The images date from 1947 to 1979 and are of two sizes: 18 by 22 inches and 20 by 24 inches. Language(s): The materials are in English. Repository: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford, CA 94305-6064 Email: [email protected] Phone: (650) 725-1022 URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Information about Access Open for research. Scope and Contents note This collection consists of aerial photographs of the Stanford University campus and lands taken by Hatfield Aerial Surveys, a firmed owned by Adrian R. Hatfield. The images date from 1947 to 1979 and are of two sizes: 18 by 22 inches and 20 by 24 inches. Access Terms Hatfield Aerial Photographers Aerial Photographs Box 1 AP4 Stanford campus, from Faculty housing area before Shopping Center and Medical Center built; Old Roble still standing, Stern under construction; ca. 1947 Box 1 AP5 Main academic campus, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Small Dam Removal Planning in the San Francisco Bay Area
    EVALUATING SMALL DAM REMOVAL PLANNING IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA A thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Master of Arts In Geography: Resource Management and Environmental Planning by Andrea Sarisky Sproul San Francisco, California August 2017 Copyright by Andrea Sarisky Sproul 2017 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read Evaluating Small Dam Removal Planning in the San Francisco Bay Area by Andrea Sarisky Sproul, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Master of Arts in Geography: Resource Management and Environmental Planning at San Francisco State University. Nancy Lee Wilkinson, Ph.D. Professor of Geography Jerry D. Davis, Ph.D. Professor of Geography EVALUATING SMALL DAM REMOVAL PLANNING IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA Andrea Sarisky Sproul San Francisco, California 2017 Dam removal is now commonly being considered as a river restoration tactic as millions of small dams in the United States outlive their intended purposes and become liabilities or cause environmental degradation. This study evaluates two cases of small dam removal in the San Francisco Bay Area, gauging what aspects of the decision-making and planning process facilitated successful removal. Through the study of the setting, actors, steps of progression, and treatment of risks for each dam removal project, the cases are evaluated against one another via pattern matching and comparing factors of analysis. Planning at the watershed scale, the presence of protected salmonids, available funding, and strong leadership that incorporates multiple stakeholder viewpoints and embraces adaptive management were all found to be important factors leading to successful outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2 Physical/Biological Setting, Including Covered Species
    SECTION 2 PHYSICAL/BIOLOGICAL SETTING, INCLUDING COVERED SPECIES 2.0 PHYSICAL / BIOLOGICAL SETTING, INCLUDING COVERED SPECIES 2.1 SIGNIFICANT HYDROLOGIC FEATURES 2.1.1 San Francisquito Creek Watershed The San Francisquito Creek watershed encompasses an area of approximately 45 square miles and is located on the east- ern flank of the Santa Cruz Mountains, at the base of the San Francisco Peninsula (Fig. 2-1). This watershed is located in two counties, San Mateo and Santa Clara, and two of its constituent creeks (Los Trancos and San Francisquito) form part of the boundary between the two counties. The San Francisquito Creek watershed has four major sub-watersheds located at least partially on Stanford lands: Bear Creek (Bear When this HCP was prepared, Stanford had the following Gulch Creek), Los Trancos Creek, San Francisquito Creek, and functioning water diversion facilities in the San Francisquito streams that flow into Searsville Reservoir (including Corte Creek system: Searsville Dam and Reservoir, located down- Madera, Dennis Martin, Sausal, and Alambique creeks). stream from the confluence of Corte Madera Creek and Sausal Creek; Los Trancos diversion on Los Trancos Creek, near A USGS gauging station (11164500) is located on San the intersection of Arastradero and Alpine roads; and an in- Francisquito Creek near the Stanford golf course, approxi- channel pumping station, located in San Francisquito Creek mately 500 meters south (upstream) of the Junipero Serra near the Stanford golf course, south of the Junipero Serra Boulevard/Alpine Road intersection. This station has been in Boulevard/Alpine Road intersection. Another diversion facil- operation since the early 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanford University, Press, Photographs
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt7z09s4v3 No online items Guide to the Stanford University, Press, Photographs Daniel Hartwig Stanford University. Libraries.Department of Special Collections and University Archives Stanford, California October 2010 Copyright © 2015 The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved. Note This encoded finding aid is compliant with Stanford EAD Best Practice Guidelines, Version 1.0. Guide to the Stanford University, PC0093 1 Press, Photographs Overview Call Number: PC0093 Creator: Stanford University. Press. Title: Stanford University, Press, photographs Dates: 1924-1976 Bulk Dates: 1924-1945 Physical Description: 2.25 Linear feet Summary: Collection includes photographs, 1936-1945, and one scrapbook, 1924-1976. Subjects of the photographs are the Stanford University Press and staff; Stanford University buildings, students, and faculty/staff; and San Francisco's skyline and bay bridge. Of note among the Stanford photographs are scenes of army training during World War II, the 1942 commencement, the Flying Indians (student flying club), class and laboratory scenes, and a radio workshop ca. 1940. Individuals include John Borsdamm, Will Friend, Herbert Hoover, Marchmont Schwartz, Clark Shaughnessy, Graham Stuart, and Ray Lyman Wilbur. The album pertains largely to staff in the press bindery and includes photographs, clippings, letters, notes, humorous pencil sketches, and poems, mostly by Carlton L. Whitten. Language(s): The materials are in English. Repository: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford, CA 94305-6064 Email: [email protected] Phone: (650) 725-1022 URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Administrative transfer from the Stanford University Press, 2000.
    [Show full text]