DOCSLIB.ORG

Flora Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flora Technical Report Report Red Hill Mining Lease Flora Survey Report 30 SEPTEMBER 2013 Prepared for BM Alliance Coal Operations Pty Ltd 42627136 Red Hill Mining Lease EIS – Terrestrial Flora Project Manager: URS Australia Pty Ltd Level 17, 240 Queen Street Chris Taylor Brisbane, QLD 4000 Senior Associate GPO Box 302, QLD 4001 Australia Principal-In-Charge: T: 61 7 3243 2111 F: 61 7 3243 2199 Chris Pigott Senior Principal Author: pp. Kirsty Macpherson Senior Environmental Scientist Reviewer: Date: 30 September 2013 Reference: 42627136/01/3 Status: FINAL Dan Simmons Senior Associate Environmental Scientist Document copyright of URS Australia Pty Limited. This report is submitted on the basis that it remains commercial-in-confidence. The contents of this report are and remain the intellectual property of URS and are not to be provided or disclosed to third parties without the prior written consent of URS. No use of the contents, concepts, designs, drawings, specifications, plans etc. included in this report is permitted unless and until they are the subject of a written contract between URS Australia and the addressee of this report. URS Australia accepts no liability of any kind for any unauthorised use of the contents of this report and URS reserves the right to seek compensation for any such unauthorised use. Document delivery URS Australia provides this document in either printed format, electronic format or both. URS considers the printed version to be binding. The electronic format is provided for the client’s convenience and URS requests that the client ensures the integrity of this electronic information is maintained. Storage of this electronic information should at a minimum comply with the requirements of the Commonwealth Electronic Transactions Act (ETA) 2000. Where an electronic only version is provided to the client, a signed hard copy of this document is held on file by URS and a copy will be provided if requested. 42627136 i Red Hill Mining Lease EIS – Terrestrial Flora Table of Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Aims and Objectives .......................................................................................... 1 1.3 Legislative Context ............................................................................................ 1 1.3.1 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 ............................. 1 1.3.2 Nature Conservation Act 1992 ........................................................................................2 1.3.3 Land Protection (Pest and Stock Route Management) Act 2002 ................................ 2 1.3.4 Vegetation Management Act 1999 ..................................................................................2 1.3.5 Biodiversity Offset Policy ...............................................................................................2 2 Assessment Methodology ................................................................................ 3 2.1 Literature review ................................................................................................ 3 2.1.1 Search Area ...................................................................................................................... 3 2.1.2 Data Sources .................................................................................................................... 3 2.1.3 Biodiversity Values ..........................................................................................................3 2.1.4 Regional Ecosystem Mapping ........................................................................................4 2.1.5 High Value Regrowth Mapping .......................................................................................5 2.1.6 Essential Habitat Mapping ..............................................................................................5 2.1.7 HERBRECS ....................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.8 EHP Wildlife Online ..........................................................................................................5 2.1.9 EPBC MNES ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.10 Previous Ecological Reports .......................................................................................... 6 2.2 Field Survey ........................................................................................................ 7 2.2.1 Transect Surveys .............................................................................................................7 2.2.2 Meander Searches ...........................................................................................................8 2.2.3 Targeted Grassland Survey ............................................................................................9 2.2.4 Specimen Identification .................................................................................................10 2.2.5 Nomenclature .................................................................................................................10 2.2.6 Survey Limitations .........................................................................................................10 3 Results ............................................................................................................. 11 3.1 Literature Review Results ............................................................................... 11 3.1.1 Regional Context ...........................................................................................................11 42627136 ii Red Hill Mining Lease EIS – Terrestrial Flora 3.1.2 Conservation Significant Communities .......................................................................11 3.1.3 Conservation Significant Species ................................................................................12 3.1.4 Essential Habitat Mapping ............................................................................................13 3.1.5 Significant Biodiversity Values ....................................................................................14 3.2 Field Survey results ......................................................................................... 14 3.2.1 Survey Conditions .........................................................................................................15 3.2.2 Regional Connectivity ...................................................................................................16 3.2.3 Species Diversity ...........................................................................................................17 3.2.4 Conservation Significant Vegetation Communities ...................................................17 3.2.5 Conservation Significant Flora Species ......................................................................18 3.2.6 Regional Ecosystems ....................................................................................................18 3.2.7 Targeted Grassland Survey ..........................................................................................22 3.2.8 Riparian communities ...................................................................................................22 3.2.9 Weeds of concern ..........................................................................................................22 4 Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 24 5 Figures ............................................................................................................. 25 6 References ....................................................................................................... 37 7 Appendix A - Survey Site Descriptions ......................................................... 41 A.1 Alluvial Plains (Landzone 3) field survey results .......................................... 41 A.1.1 Vegetation Unit 1a: Acacia harpophylla (brigalow) open forest on alluvial plains (RE 11.3.1) ..............................................................................................41 A.1.2 Vegetation Unit 1b: Eucalyptus populnea woodland on alluvial plains (RE 11.3.2) ....................................................................................................................... 43 A.1.3 Vegetation Unit 1c: Eucalyptus coolabah woodland on alluvial plains (RE 11.3.3) ....................................................................................................................... 45 A.1.4 Vegetation Unit 1d: Eucalyptus tereticornis and/or Eucalyptus spp woodland on alluvial plains (RE 11.3.4) .......................................................................47 A.1.5 Vegetation Unit 1di: Corymbia tessellaris woodland on alluvial sand ridges to elevated levees and level terraces (RE 11.3.4a) ........................................49 A.1.6 Vegetation Unit 1e: Acacia cambagei woodland on alluvial plains (RE 11.3.5) .............................................................................................................................. 50 A.1.7 Vegetation Unit 1f: Corymbia spp. Woodland on alluvial plains (RE 11.3.7) .............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FT Fitzroy Region Plant Index
    Fitzroy Region Plant Index Common name Species name Page Angleton grass* Dichanthium aristatum cv. Floren FT01, FT02, FT05, FT11, FT13, FT16, FT19, FT23, FT29 armgrass Urochloa spp. (syn. Brachiaria FT17, FT22, FT30 spp.) balloon cottonbush Gomphocarpus physocarpus FT13 Bambasti panic* Panicum coloratum FT01, FT02, FT05, FT11, FT13, FT19, FT23 barbwire grass Cymbopogon refractus FT04, FT12, FT13, FT14, FT15, FT16, FT19, FT20, FT21, FT22, FT24, FT27, FT28, FT30 bauhinia Lysiphyllum sp. FT01, FT03, FT06, FT11, FT19, FT24, FT29 belah Casuarina cristata FT06 bellyache bush* Jatropha gossypiifolia FT09 bendee Acacia catenulata FT17 Bisset creeping bluegrass Bothriochloa insculpta see creeping bluegrass* black speargrass Heteropogon contortus FT02, FT03, FT04, FT07, FT08, FT10, FT12, FT13, FT14, FT15, FT16, FT19, FT20, FT21, FT22, FT24, FT25, FT26, FT27, FT28, FT30, FT31 black tea tree Melaleuca bracteata FT19, FT23 black wattle Acacia salicina FT19 blackbutt Eucalyptus cambageana FT04, FT16 blackdown yellow-jacket Corymbia bunites FT15 blady grass Imperata cylindrica FT08, FT10 bloodwood Corymbia clarksoniana, FT03, FT14, FT20, FT21, FT23, FT28, C. erythrophloia FT24 blue gum Eucalyptus tereticornis FT08, FT02 bonewood Macropteranthes leichhardtii FT06, FT29 boonaree Alectryon oleifolium FT19 bottletree Brachychiton rupestris FT06, FT29 Land types of Queensland - 1 - Fitzroy Region Version 3.1 Common name Species name Page bottlewasher grasses Enneapogon spp. FT02, FT04, FT12, FT14, FT15, FT17, FT19, FT20, FT21, FT22, FT23, FT24, FT25, FT28,
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Gulf, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION on the TIWI ISLANDS, NORTHERN TERRITORY: Part 1. Environments and Plants
    BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ON THE TIWI ISLANDS, NORTHERN TERRITORY: Part 1. Environments and plants Report prepared by John Woinarski, Kym Brennan, Ian Cowie, Raelee Kerrigan and Craig Hempel. Darwin, August 2003 Cover photo: Tall forests dominated by Darwin stringybark Eucalyptus tetrodonta, Darwin woollybutt E. miniata and Melville Island Bloodwood Corymbia nesophila are the principal landscape element across the Tiwi islands (photo: Craig Hempel). i SUMMARY The Tiwi Islands comprise two of Australia’s largest offshore islands - Bathurst (with an area of 1693 km 2) and Melville (5788 km 2) Islands. These are Aboriginal lands lying about 20 km to the north of Darwin, Northern Territory. The islands are of generally low relief with relatively simple geological patterning. They have the highest rainfall in the Northern Territory (to about 2000 mm annual average rainfall in the far north-west of Melville and north of Bathurst). The human population of about 2000 people lives mainly in the three towns of Nguiu, Milakapati and Pirlangimpi. Tall forests dominated by Eucalyptus miniata, E. tetrodonta, and Corymbia nesophila cover about 75% of the island area. These include the best developed eucalypt forests in the Northern Territory. The Tiwi Islands also include nearly 1300 rainforest patches, with floristic composition in many of these patches distinct from that of the Northern Territory mainland. Although the total extent of rainforest on the Tiwi Islands is small (around 160 km 2 ), at an NT level this makes up an unusually high proportion of the landscape and comprises between 6 and 15% of the total NT rainforest extent. The Tiwi Islands also include nearly 200 km 2 of “treeless plains”, a vegetation type largely restricted to these islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Land Clearing
    Impacts of Land Clearing on Australian Wildlife in Queensland January 2003 WWF Australia Report Authors: Dr Hal Cogger, Professor Hugh Ford, Dr Christopher Johnson, James Holman & Don Butler. Impacts of Land Clearing on Australian Wildlife in Queensland ABOUT THE AUTHORS Dr Hal Cogger Australasian region” by the Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union. He is a WWF Australia Trustee Dr Hal Cogger is a leading Australian herpetologist and former member of WWF’s Scientific Advisory and author of the definitive Reptiles and Amphibians Panel. of Australia. He is a former Deputy Director of the Australian Museum. He has participated on a range of policy and scientific committees, including the Dr Christopher Johnson Commonwealth Biological Diversity Advisory Committee, Chair of the Australian Biological Dr Chris Johnson is an authority on the ecology and Resources Study, and Chair of the Australasian conservation of Australian marsupials. He has done Reptile & Amphibian Specialist Group (IUCN’s extensive research on herbivorous marsupials of Species Survival Commission). He also held a forests and woodlands, including landmark studies of Conjoint Professorship in the Faculty of Science & the behavioural ecology of kangaroos and wombats, Mathematics at the University of Newcastle (1997- the ecology of rat-kangaroos, and the sociobiology of 2001). He is a member of the International possums. He has also worked on large-scale patterns Commission on Zoological Nomenclature and is a in the distribution and abundance of marsupial past Secretary of the Division of Zoology of the species and the biology of extinction. He is a member International Union of Biological Sciences. He is of the Marsupial and Monotreme Specialist Group of currently the John Evans Memorial Fellow at the the IUCN Species Survival Commission, and has Australian Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • 005056Ba00a7/A71d58ad-4Cba-48B6
    Referral of proposed action Project title: Carmichael Coal Mine and Rail Project 1 Summary of proposed action 1.1 Short description Adani Group (Adani) is proposing to develop the Carmichael Coal Mine and Rail Project (the Project). This involves the development of a new open-cut and underground coal mine over EPC 1690, and the construction of a rail link. Coal will be exported via rail to the Port of Abbot Point and the Port of Hay Point. The proposed mine will produce up to 60 million tonnes per annum (Mtpa) of product coal and have a mine life of 150 years, inclusive of construction, operation and closure. 1.2 Latitude and longitude Mine Site Point Y_WGS_84_DMS X_WGS84_DMS Northwest corner E146°12'3.6" S21°54'54.36" Northeast corner E146°17'2.4" S21°54'54.36" Southwest corner E146°27'3.6" S22°8'54.24" Southeast corner E146°24'3.6" S22°13'54.48" Rail Option 1 – a corridor of 2 km based on a centre line as follows: Point Y_WGS_84_DMS X_WGS84_DMS Mine 0 E146°24'28.8" S22°2'19.68" 1 E146°29'6" S22°2'18.24" 2 E146°34'26.44" S22°0'8.28" 3 E146°38'13.16" S22°0'57.96" 4 E146°46'33.6" S22°1'0.84" 5 E146°51'54.04" S22°0'4.68" 6 E146°55'40.76" S21°57'58.32" 7 E147°0'54" S21°58'39" 8 E147°4'30" S22°0'4.68" 9 E147°7'48" S21°59'11.4" 10 E147°14'24.04" S21°59'58.56" 11 E147°19'37.2" S21°59'6" 12 E147°23'49.2" S21°56'13.2" 13 E147°25'12" S21°53'27.6" 14 E147°26'2.44" S21°48'27" 15 E147°29'45.6" S21°45'34.2" 16 E147°33'14.4" S21°45'43.56" 17 E147°35'52.84" S21°43'33.6" 18 E147°41'9.6" S21°30'29.88" 19 E147°50'20.4" S21°18'47.88" 20 E147°49'8.4" S21°15'26.64"
    [Show full text]
  • South West Queensland QLD Page 1 of 89 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region South West Queensland, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Conservation Advice for Atalaya Collina
    This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister / Delegate of the Minister on: 16/12/2008 Approved Conservation Advice (s266B of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999) Approved Conservation Advice for Atalaya collina This Conservation Advice has been developed based on the best available information at the time this Conservation Advice was approved; this includes existing plans, records or management prescriptions for this species. Description Atalaya collina, Family Sapindaceae, also known as Yarwun Whitewood, is a small spreading tree to 5 m with light grey rough bark. Leaves are compound with one or two pairs of glossy green, discolorous, narrowly elliptic leaflets to 7 cm long. Flowers are small, cream, to 8 mm diameter and clustered in dense terminal panicles. Fruit is a single seeded samara (dry winged fruit). It is distinguished from the closely related A. salicifolia and A. multiflora by the leaves with 1 or 2 pairs of usually narrow elliptic leaflets, the larger inflorescences, hairy petals and hairless fruits (Reynolds, 1991; Barry & Thomas, 1994; Harden et al., 2006). Conservation Status Atalaya collina is listed as endangered. This species is eligible for listing as endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act) as, prior to the commencement of the EPBC Act, it was listed as endangered under Schedule 1 of the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth). Atalaya collina is also listed as endangered under the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Queensland). Distribution and Habitat Atalaya collina is known from only two populations: west of Gladstone at Yarwun, where only 10 trees of an even age survive, and near Ubobo, west of Miriam Vale, Queensland.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Species of the Northern Territory
    Threatened Species of the Northern Territory Atalaya brevialata Formerly known as Atalaya sp. Elizabeth River Conservation status Australia: Critically Endangered Northern Territory: Not listed Photo: I Cowie Description reduced wing on the samara, the simple, linear leaves and the suffruticose growth habit Suffuticose subshrub, aerial parts annual, to (Cowie & Stuckey 2012; Reynolds 1981, 45 cm tall, stems slender, to 21 cm, rootstock 1985). All other NT species are trees, usually perennial, woody, 8–15 mm diam. Branchlets with compound leaves and have a prominent with short, mid-dense, straw coloured hairs wing on the fruit. A. variifolia sometimes 0.1–0.3 mm long. Leaves simple, sessile, produces simple leaves below the alternate, linear, 65–410 mm long, 1.4–7.5 inflorescence or on the juvenile regeneration mm wide, concolorous. Inflorescence but both the leaves and stems are more paniculate or sometimes corymbose, axillary, robust than in A. brevialata and the juvenile supra axillary or terminal, to 70 mm long. Fruit regeneration appears to rarely produce divaricately 3-lobed, separating into flowers and fruit. indehiscent, 1-seeded, dorsally-winged samaras. Samaras 3, brown when mature, It can also be distinguished from A. variifolia, oblong to ovate or broady elliptic, 11–22 mm and A. hemiglauca by the smaller, sericeous long, 7–12 mm wide, with short, curved, mid- petals with an attenuate base and the lack of dense hairs, base turgid, wing erect, 0–6 mm lobing of the scales (Reynolds 1981, 1985). In long, apex rounded, entire, irregular or erose. A. hemiglauca and A. salicifolia the leaflets Seed 1, pale brown, obovoid, c.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Unit Master
    Land Unit Information Sheet Land system name: Northern Plateau Land unit: NP3 General description This land unit represents the lower slopes in a landscape of the gentle rises. Thick, sandy loam topsoils are common, resulting from the deposition of sheet wash off adjacent slopes, and the natural process of soil profile development. The subsoils are usually a compact yellowish, faintly mottled clay, that is, yellow Chromosols. The dominant vegetation is a mid-tall woodland of Eucalyptus melanophloia (silver-leaved ironbark), together with some E. brownii (Reid River box) and an occasional Corymbia dallachiana (ghost gum) The proportions of each change with variations in soil type, but the ironbark becomes dominant on soils with better drainage. Acacia coriacea (desert oak) and Carissa ovata (currant bush) dominate the shrub layer, and Triodia pungens (gummy spinifex), and Themeda triandra (kangaroo grass) the dominant grasses. Regional ecosystem 10.5.5 is predominant. Site characteristics Landform element Average slope Hillslopes 1% Site drainage Soil permeability Imperfectly drained Slowly permeable Flooding risk Inundation risk Low Low Potential recharge to groundwater Soil depth Low Very deep; 1.5 - 5.0m Present land use Grazing Susceptibility to land degradation processes Sheet erosion Gully erosion Wind erosion Salting Moderate Moderate Moderate Low This information has been generated from the Desert Uplands Land Resource Database. The Environmental Protection Agency accepts no liability for any decisions or actions taken on the basis of this information. State of Queensland. Environmental Protection Agency 2004. 7/12/2005 Land Unit NP3 - page 1 Representative site number: 129 Soil classification Australian Soil Classification Principle Profile Form CH AC EA EO - C E L O X Dy2.53 - 2/0/055 General soil description A texture-contrast profile with a thick sandy loam topsoil over a brownish yellow, sodic clay, with an ironstone hardpan at approximately 2m depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonaparte Gas Pipeline Flora & Fauna Studies & Ecological Field
    Bonaparte Gas Pipeline Flora & Fauna Studies & Ecological Field Survey Results Prepared for: Australian Pipeline Trust Prepared by: EcOz Environmental Services Suite 1, Third Floor Winlow house 75 Woods Street, Darwin (cnr Lindsay & Woods St) GPO Box 381, Darwin Northern Territory 0801 T: 08 8981 1100 F: 08 8981 1102 Freecall: 1800 801 208 E: [email protected] I: www.ecoz.com.au VDM (WA) Pty Ltd t/a EcOz Environmental Services ABN 59 009 351 400 BGP Flora & Fauna Report & Field Studies DOCUMENT CONTROL Project number: APT 0601 File ref: Z:\EcOz_Documents\ecoz_projects\APT0601\13 Field Surveys - EcOz\Field_Report_v9_RH.doc Report by: Ray Hall, Kate Bauer Date: Revision Status: Reviewed by: Document distribution: 25th Feb 2007 Revision 1 NDP EcOz 6th March Revision 4 RH EcOz 8th March Revision 9 RH EcOz 8th March 2007 Final NDP APT RELIANCE STATEMENT AND USES This report is copyright and to be used only for its intended purpose by the intended recipient, and is not to be copied or used in any other way. The report may be relied upon for its intended purpose within the limits of the following disclaimer. LIMITATIONS This study, report and analyses have been based on the information available to EcOz at the time of the study. EcOz accepts responsibility for the report and its conclusions to the extent that the information was sufficient and accurate. EcOz does not take responsibility for errors and omissions due to incorrect information or information not available to EcOz at the time of the study. © EcOz Environmental Services 2007 Page I BGP Flora & Fauna Report & Field Studies 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Ecosystem Technical Descriptions for Einasleigh Uplands
    Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts Regional Ecosystem Technical Descriptions Technical descriptions provide a detailed description of the full range in structure and floristic composition of regional ecosystems (e.g. 9.10.3) and their component vegetation communities (e.g. 9.10.3a, 9.10.3b). The descriptions are compiled using site survey data from the Queensland Herbarium’s CORVEG database. Distribution maps, representative images (if available) and the pre-clearing and remnant area (hectares) of each vegetation community derived from the regional ecosystem mapping (spatial) data are included. The technical descriptions should be used in conjunction with the fields from the regional ecosystem description database (REDD) for a full description of the regional ecosystem. Quantitative site data from relatively undisturbed sites are extracted from CORVEG and summarized to provide information specific to each vegetation community. Technical descriptions include the attributes: tree canopy height and cover and native plant species composition of the predominant layer, which are used to assess the remnant status of vegetation under the Vegetation Management Act 1999. However, as technical descriptions reflect the full range in structure and floristic composition across the climatic, natural disturbance and geographic range of the regional ecosystem, local reference sites should be used where possible (Neldner et al. 2012 section 3.3.1). The technical descriptions are subject to review and are updated as additional
    [Show full text]
  • Trees, Shrubs, and Perennials That Intrigue Me (Gymnosperms First
    Big-picture, evolutionary view of trees and shrubs (and a few of my favorite herbaceous perennials), ver. 2007-11-04 Descriptions of the trees and shrubs taken (stolen!!!) from online sources, from my own observations in and around Greenwood Lake, NY, and from these books: • Dirr’s Hardy Trees and Shrubs, Michael A. Dirr, Timber Press, © 1997 • Trees of North America (Golden field guide), C. Frank Brockman, St. Martin’s Press, © 2001 • Smithsonian Handbooks, Trees, Allen J. Coombes, Dorling Kindersley, © 2002 • Native Trees for North American Landscapes, Guy Sternberg with Jim Wilson, Timber Press, © 2004 • Complete Trees, Shrubs, and Hedges, Jacqueline Hériteau, © 2006 They are generally listed from most ancient to most recently evolved. (I’m not sure if this is true for the rosids and asterids, starting on page 30. I just listed them in the same order as Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II.) This document started out as my personal landscaping plan and morphed into something almost unwieldy and phantasmagorical. Key to symbols and colored text: Checkboxes indicate species and/or cultivars that I want. Checkmarks indicate those that I have (or that one of my neighbors has). Text in blue indicates shrub or hedge. (Unfinished task – there is no text in blue other than this text right here.) Text in red indicates that the species or cultivar is undesirable: • Out of range climatically (either wrong zone, or won’t do well because of differences in moisture or seasons, even though it is in the “right” zone). • Will grow too tall or wide and simply won’t fit well on my property.
    [Show full text]