DOCSLIB.ORG

AEIC Active Member Companies (January 2020)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AEIC Active Member Companies (January 2020) AEIC Active Member Companies (January 2020) Holding Companies Entergy Corporation Xcel Energy Entergy Arkansas, LLC Northern States Power Company – Minnesota ALLETE Entergy Louisiana, LLC Northern States Power Company – Wisconsin ALLETE Clean Energy Entergy Mississippi, LLC Public Service Company of Colorado Minnesota Power Entergy New Orleans, LLC Southwestern Public Service Company Superior Water, Light & Power Entergy Nuclear ALLETE Renewable Resources Entergy Texas, LLC Individual Companies Ameren Evergy Inc. Ameren Illinois Kansas City Power & Light Company Calpine Corporation Ameren Missouri KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company Ameren Services Westar Energy Luminant Ameren Transmission Eversource MidAmerican Energy Company American Electric Power Company AEP Energy Exelon Corporation NRG Energy AEP Generation Resources Baltimore Gas & Electric Company AEP Ohio Commonwealth Edison Company Oncor AEP Texas Exelon Generation AEP Transmission Constellation New Energy Pacific Gas & Electric Company Appalachian Power PECO Energy Company Kingsport Power Company Pepco Holdings, Inc. Prairie State Generating Company LLC Wheeling Power Company Atlantic City Electric Company Indiana Michigan Power Delmarva Power & Light Company San Diego Gas & Electric Company Kentucky Power Potomac Electric Power Company Public Service Company of Oklahoma Southern California Edison Company Southwestern Electric Power Company FirstEnergy Corporation The Illuminating Company Tampa Electric Company AVANGRID Jersey Central Power & Light Company Central Maine Power Met-Ed New York State Electric & Gas Mon Power International Companies Ohio Edison Company Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation Penelec UIL Holdings Corporation Caribbean Utilities Company, Ltd. Penn Power The United Illuminating Company Potomac Edison Avangrid Renewables LLC Hydro One Toledo Edison Company Volterra Energy Berkshire Hathaway Energy Hydro-Québec West Penn Power Pacificorp Rocky Mountain Power Hawaiian Electric Industries Inc. Pacific Power Federal, State Coop. & Municipalities NV Energy Hawaiian Electric Company Hawaii Electric Light Company Nevada Power Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, Inc. Sierra Pacific Power Company Maui Electric Company Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. CenterPoint Energy, Inc. National Grid USA Massachusetts Electric Company CenterPoint Energy Buckeye Power, Inc. Houston Electric Nantucket Electric Company Narragansett Electric Company Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Company CPS Energy Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC Dairyland Power Cooperative Cleco Power NextEra Energy, Inc. Florida Power & Light Company East Kentucky Power Cooperative CMS Energy Corporation Gexa Energy LP Gulf Power Company Consumers Energy Company Georgia Transmission Corporation NextEra Energy Resources Con Edison, Inc. Great River Energy Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. NiSource Northern Indiana Public Service Company Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. JEA Rockland Electric Company OGE Energy Corporation Con Edison Transmission, Inc. New York Power Authority Con Edison Clean Energy Businesses, Inc. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation Dominion Energy Pinnacle West Capital Corporation Arizona Public Service Company Dominion Electric Transmission Oglethorpe Power Corporation Dominion Generation Bright Canyon Energy Corporation Dominion Energy North Carolina Orlando Utilities Commission Dominion Energy Virginia PPL Corporation LG&E and KU Energy LLC SCANA PowerSouth Energy Cooperative SCE&G PPL Electric Utilities Western Power Distribution PSNC Energy Salt River Project Southeast Energy Group Southern Company Tacoma Power DQE Alabama Power Company Georgia Power Company Duquesne Light Company Tennessee Valley Authority Mississippi Power Company Southern Company Services DTE Energy Tri-State Generation and DTE Electric Company Southern Power Southern Nuclear Operating Company Transmission Association Duke Energy WEC Energy Group Duke Energy Carolinas Associate Members Duke Energy Florida We Energies Duke Energy Indiana Wisconsin Electric Power Company American Transmission Company LLC Duke Energy Kentucky Wisconsin Public Service Duke Energy Ohio Upper Michigan Energy Resources Electric Power Research Institute Duke Energy Progress .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2021 ESG Report
    2021 REPORT Environmental, Social and Governance Our strategy: NextEra About Our 2020-2021 Coronavirus Confronting Building the Environment Social Governance Risks and Conclusion Appendix A letter from Energy’s this report operating awards & (COVID-19) climate world’s leading opportunities our CEO ESG journey portfolio recognitions response change clean energy provider Contents Our strategy: A letter from our CEO .............................................3 NextEra Energy’s ESG journey ......................................................6 About this report .............................................................................7 Our operating portfolio ..................................................................8 2020-2021 awards & recognitions ..............................................10 Coronavirus (COVID-19) response..............................................11 Confronting climate change ........................................................13 Building the world’s leading clean energy provider .................19 Florida Power & Light Company ................................................20 NextEra Energy Resources ........................................................26 Environment ...................................................................................30 Social ..............................................................................................38 Governance ....................................................................................48 Risks and opportunities ...............................................................52
    [Show full text]
  • New Strategies for Utility Growth
    New Strategies for Utility Growth As electricity use levels off, utility executives will need to explore new ways to meet investor growth expectations. By Grant Dougans and Joe Scalise Grant Dougans is a partner in Bain’s Utilities practice, and Joe Scalise leads the practice globally. Joe also leads the fi rm’s Energy & Natural Resources practice in the Americas. Copyright © 2019 Bain & Company, Inc. All rights reserved. New Strategies for Utility Growth At a Glance Investors remain confident in the regulated utility model, and most expect earnings growth of at least 6% annually—a daunting challenge given that electricity load growth is nearly flat for many utilities. In the core regulated utility business, every function has a role to play in supporting growth at a time of increasing competitive pressure and heightened scrutiny from regulators and stakeholders. Winners will use M&A to access new capital investment opportunities, build scale and realize cost savings. Some executive teams will develop second engines of growth outside of the regulated utility, in adjacencies that make use of their engineering and infrastructure expertise. Several utilities are exploring investments in new energy technologies, though success is far from guaranteed. Investors expect utilities to grow the size of their businesses by 70% over the next decade in the face of flat electric load growth. That is the stark message from new research by Bain & Company and Rivel Research Group, surveying utilities investors in North America. Our survey confirms investors’ extraordinary faith in the traditional regulated utility model(see Figure 1). Nearly three quarters of investors have a positive outlook on the sector, and more than 80% believe that the vertically integrated utility model remains sustainable.
    [Show full text]
  • Entergy Services, LLC
    Entergy Services, LLC REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RFP Purpose: Identification of Environmental Projects For Potential Funding Issued and Coordinated by: Entergy’s Sustainability & Environmental Policy Organization Statement of Confidentiality: The information contained in this document is proprietary to Entergy Services, LLC. It may not be disclosed, duplicated, or used for any purpose, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of Entergy Services, LLC. Request for Proposal Environmental Projects General Information and Purpose of this RFP The intent of this RFP is to assist Entergy’s Sustainability & Environmental Policy (SEP) organization in the selection of environmentally beneficial projects and/or partners for those projects. The selected projects will be funded in whole or in part by the Entergy Environmental Initiatives Fund (EIF). Acceptable projects may include those that lower water usage, prevent or reduce waste, encourage recycling, promote energy efficiency, lower emissions, promote or address environmental justice education, decrease fuel consumption, increase efficiency, reduce water effluents, improve water quality, provide for registered greenhouse gas (GHG) offsets and/or develop innovative solutions to climate change impacts, or any other concepts that have an added environmental benefit for Entergy and its stakeholders. The RFP also solicits existing or developing projects targeted in the same areas whose scope of work could be modified to accomplish the goals stated above. Funding for the project must be completed in 2021. An initial screening of the high-level proposals will identify a set of proposals for which SEP will seek additional information for further consideration. SEP may engage with third-party subject matter experts (SMEs) to review, rank, and recommend projects for consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation
    NextEra Energy Reaches Agreement to Acquire Gulf Power, Florida City Gas and Two Natural Gas Facilities from Southern Company May 21, 2018 Forward Looking Statements This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words or phrases such as “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “predict,” and “target” and other words and terms of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements involve estimates, expectations, projections, goals, forecasts, assumptions, risks and uncertainties. NEE cautions readers that any forward-looking statement is not a guarantee of future performance and that actual results could differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Such forward- looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about the anticipated benefits of the proposed acquisitions from Southern Company of Gulf Power Company, Florida City Gas and two gas-fired plants (Southern Company assets), including future financial or operating results of NEE or the Southern Company assets, NEE’s or the Southern Company assets’ plans, objectives, expectations or intentions, the expected timing of completion of the transactions, the value of the transactions, as of the completion of the transactions or as of any other date in the future, and other statements that are not historical facts. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ
    [Show full text]
  • A Chronological History of Electrical Development from 600 B.C
    From the collection of the n z m o PreTinger JJibrary San Francisco, California 2006 / A CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY OF ELECTRICAL DEVELOPMENT FROM 600 B.C. PRICE $2.00 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION 155 EAST 44th STREET NEW YORK 17, N. Y. Copyright 1946 National Electrical Manufacturers Association Printed in U. S. A. Excerpts from this book may be used without permission PREFACE presenting this Electrical Chronology, the National Elec- JNtrical Manufacturers Association, which has undertaken its compilation, has exercised all possible care in obtaining the data included. Basic sources of information have been search- ed; where possible, those in a position to know have been con- sulted; the works of others, who had a part in developments referred to in this Chronology, and who are now deceased, have been examined. There may be some discrepancies as to dates and data because it has been impossible to obtain unchallenged record of the per- son to whom should go the credit. In cases where there are several claimants every effort has been made to list all of them. The National Electrical Manufacturers Association accepts no responsibility as being a party to supporting the claims of any person, persons or organizations who may disagree with any of the dates, data or any other information forming a part of the Chronology, and leaves it to the reader to decide for him- self on those matters which may be controversial. No compilation of this kind is ever entirely complete or final and is always subject to revisions and additions. It should be understood that the Chronology consists only of basic data from which have stemmed many other electrical developments and uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Visions of Electric Media Electric of Visions
    TELEVISUAL CULTURE Roberts Visions of Electric Media Ivy Roberts Visions of Electric Media Television in the Victorian and Machine Ages Visions of Electric Media Televisual Culture Televisual culture encompasses and crosses all aspects of television – past, current and future – from its experiential dimensions to its aesthetic strategies, from its technological developments to its crossmedial extensions. The ‘televisual’ names a condition of transformation that is altering the coordinates through which we understand, theorize, intervene, and challenge contemporary media culture. Shifts in production practices, consumption circuits, technologies of distribution and access, and the aesthetic qualities of televisual texts foreground the dynamic place of television in the contemporary media landscape. They demand that we revisit concepts such as liveness, media event, audiences and broadcasting, but also that we theorize new concepts to meet the rapidly changing conditions of the televisual. The series aims at seriously analyzing both the contemporary specificity of the televisual and the challenges uncovered by new developments in technology and theory in an age in which digitization and convergence are redrawing the boundaries of media. Series editors Sudeep Dasgupta, Joke Hermes, Misha Kavka, Jaap Kooijman, Markus Stauff Visions of Electric Media Television in the Victorian and Machine Ages Ivy Roberts Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: ‘Professor Goaheadison’s Latest,’ Fun, 3 July 1889, 6. Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden
    [Show full text]
  • 1 “Update on the Restoration of Puerto Rico's Electric Infrastructure” Carlos D. Torres Consultant, Edison Electric Instit
    “Update on the Restoration of Puerto Rico’s Electric Infrastructure” Carlos D. Torres Consultant, Edison Electric Institute Power Restoration Coordinator, Puerto Rico Summary Since November 2017, I have served as the Power Restoration Coordinator in Puerto Rico and as a member of the Unified Command Group. Prior to my current position, I worked for more than 30 years for Consolidated Edison in New York. During my career, I managed emergency and storm restoration efforts and oversaw Con Edison’s response to major storms including Superstorm Sandy and Hurricane Irene, and emergencies such as the 9/11 attacks and the 2003 Northeast blackout. However, the damage caused by Hurricane Maria is unlike anything any of us in the industry has ever seen on the mainland United States. Without question, this power restoration mission has been the most challenging of my career. Having lived on the island now for more than five months, I can tell you that the people of Puerto Rico are the most resilient people I have ever met in my life. While their resiliency is admirable, nobody deserves to be without electricity for this long, and I and everyone involved in the restoration effort remain committed to working as one team, with one mission—providing power to our fellow citizens in Puerto Rico. As of April 8, PREPA reports that 96.4 percent of its customers—or approximately 1.42 million out of more than 1.47 million customers—who can receive electricity have had their power restored. While significant progress has been made across the island, restoring power to the remaining customers, most of whom are in the hardest-hit and most remote areas, remains challenging and labor- and time-intensive.
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Corporate Structure
    Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. SECTION II SECTION II. OVERVIEW OF THE COMPANY Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Corporate Structure Board of Directors Kevin Burke Chairman of The Board Chief Executive Officer Louis M. Bevilacqua Randolph S. Price Vice President & Committee Chair General Auditor Environmental & Auditing Safety Committee Craig S. Ivey John D. McMahon President Executive Vice President CECONY Marilyn Caselli Elizabeth Moore Senior Vice President General Counsel Customer Operations Law John F. Miksad Senior Vice President Electric Operations John J. McAvoy Senior Vice President Central Operations Claude Trahan Senior Vice President Gas Operations Joann Ryan Luther Tai Senior Vice President Senior Vice President Business Shared Services Enterprise Shared Services Robert Hoglund Frances A. Resheske Senior Vice President & Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer Public Affairs Gas Sales and Transportation Operating Procedures Manual 1 Effective Date: December 5, 2011 Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. SECTION II Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Gas Operation Structure Claude Trahan Senior Vice President Gas Operations Edward C. Foppiano Katherine L. Boden Vice President Vice President Gas Engineering Gas Operations Enterprise Shared Services Structure Luther Tai Senior Vice President Enterprise Shared Services Joseph P. Oates Vice President Energy Management Peter T. Carnavos Director Gas Supply Gas Sales and Transportation Operating Procedures Manual 2 Effective Date:
    [Show full text]
  • 19-Cv-1007 Exhibit D
    Case: 3:19-cv-01007 Document #: 1-9 Filed: 12/11/19 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT D Case: 3:19-cv-01007 Document #: 1-9 Filed: 12/11/19 Page189 2 Members of 10 MEMBERSHIP LISTING BY STAKEHOLDER GROUP1 (September 2019) I. TRANSMISSION OWNERS2 1. AEP Indiana Michigan Transmission Company, Inc. 2. ALLETE, Inc. (for its operating division Minnesota Power, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Superior Water, Light and Power Company) 3. Ameren Illinois Company (d/b/a Ameren Illinois) 4. Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois3 5. American Transmission Company, LLC 6. Ames Municipal Electric System 7. Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation 8. Big Rivers Electric Corporation 9. Board of Water, Electric, and Communications Trustees of the City of Muscatine, Iowa 10. Central Minnesota Municipal Power Agency 11. City of Alexandria, Louisiana 12. City of Springfield, Illinois (Office of Public Utilities) 13. Cleco Power LLC 14. Columbia, Missouri, City of (Water & Light Dept.) 15. Cooperative Energy (formerly SMEPA) 16. Dairyland Power Cooperative 17. Duke Energy Indiana, LLC 18. East Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc. 19. Entergy Arkansas, LLC 20. Entergy Louisiana, LLC 21. Entergy Mississippi, LLC 22. Entergy New Orleans, LLC 23. Entergy Texas, Inc. 1 This membership listing reflects Members’ stakeholder group selections from respective membership applications approved by MISO’s Board of Directors. Membership participation in the stakeholder process is governed by the Stakeholder Governance Guide and any relevant guidelines of the various stakeholder sectors. 2 As Transmission Owning Members of MISO and signatories to the Transmission Owners Agreement, City of Henderson; City of Rochester; Consumers Energy Company; Willmar Municipal Utilities; and WPPI Energy participate in the Municipals/Cooperatives/Transmission Dependent Utilities stakeholder group.
    [Show full text]
  • Nextera Energy Inc. Revenue Decomposition
    Krause Fund Research 2 Spring 2021 NextEra Energy, Inc. (NYSE: NEE) Stock Rating: Utilities th April 16 , 2021 HOLD Analysts z Caleb Fitch Jerome Mays Guy Renquist Grant Wambold [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Investment Thesis Target Price: $85.47-$89.85 Drivers of Thesis: Model Prices • Two of NextEra’s largest subsidiaries, Florida Power and Light (FPL) DCF $87.66 and Gulf Power, are set to see large increases in demand for their services DDM $87.85 in 2021 and 2022. FPL and Gulf Power provide public electricity services to Relative PE $29.95 a large majority of the popular vacation destinations in Florida. As the vaccine Price Data rollout continues in the U.S. and the COVID-19 pandemic draws to a close, Current Price $80.94 safety concerns will diminish. As this happens, we expect Americans to 52-week Low $55.66 increase travel and head to NextEra’s rate-regulated service areas. This 52-week High $87.69 expectation is built into our model with combined revenue growth of 13% in $1 2021 and 6.7% in 2022 for both segments. Key Statistics • NextEra Energy Resources (NEER) will grow at an accelerated rate as Market Capitalization $158.76 B more businesses and consumers look for cleaner energy sources and the Shares Outstanding 1.96 B market for electric vehicle infrastructure expands. NEER is the largest EPS (2021E) $2.15 provider of energy sourced from the wind and sun in the World. NEER’s P/E Ratio (TTM) 54.0 attractive generating portfolio will draw in more customers who are looking Forward P/E Ratio 37.1 for electricity sourced from renewables.
    [Show full text]
  • Entergy Grand Gulf Unit 3 COLA
    Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Unit 3 Combined License Application Part 1: General and Administrative Information Revision 0 February 2008 Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 3 COL Application Part 1, General and Administrative Information Table of Contents Section Page 1.0. GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1. Applicants - Corporate Information ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1. Entergy Mississippi, Inc. .............................................................................................. 1-2 1.1.2. Entergy Louisiana, LLC ............................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.3. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, LLC ............................................................................. 1-3 1.1.4. Entergy Operations, Inc. .............................................................................................. 1-3 1.1.5. System Energy Resources, Inc. .................................................................................. 1-4 1.2. Entergy Corporation - Corporate Information .................................................................... 1-13 1.3. Foreign Ownership Declaration ......................................................................................... 1-16 1.4. Requested Licenses And Authorized Uses ....................................................................... 1-16 1.5. Identification Of
    [Show full text]
  • The American Legion Magazine [Volume 79, No. 3 (September 1965)]
    THE AM E R I CAN LEGIONMAGAZINE 19 6 5 LYNDON JOHNSON'S "GET-TOUGh POLICY" by George Fieying Eliot tlllllAS A. EDISON $100 BILLION FOR FRESH WATER? LOOK AT A BOYS' SI 1he man by Dawson Jones Invented ^^^^^^ almost , 0 everything by Robert Silverberg ^ You'll go better refreshed with ice-c<. .a-Cola. Gives a lift to your spirits, a boost to your energy, a big, bold, unmistakable taste. In short- Coca-Cola is more than an ordinary soft drink. things go betteri Coke ; The American SEPTEMBER 1965 Volume 79. .yiumhrr 3 LEGION POSTMASTER: Send Form 3579 to P.O. Box 1954 Indianapolis, Ind. 46206 Magazine The American Legion Magazine Editorial & Advertising Offices 720 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10019 Contents for September 1965 Publisher, James F. O'Neil Editor Robert B. Pitkin Assistant Editor $100 BILLION FOR FRESH WATER? 6 John Andretila Art Editor BY TOM MAHONEY Al Marshall A fantastic proposal for North America dramatizes the Associate Editors Roy Miller world's fresh-water situation. James S. Swartz Production Manager Art lirrt/field Copy Editor 10 Grail S. Hanford LYNDON JOHNSON'S GET-TOUGH POLICY Circulation Manager BY GEORGE FIELDING ELIOT Dean B. Nelson Indianapolis, Ind. Will our stand in Vietnam and the Dominican Republic Advertising Director deter future "small wars" as nuclear Robert P. Redden weapons deter "big wars?" Chicago-Detroit Sales Office Bart J. Burns 35 East Wacker Drive Chicago. 111. 60601 CEntral 6-2101 THOMAS A. EDISON—THE MAN WHO INVENTED ALMOST EVERYTHING 14 CHANGE OF ADDRESS: BY ROBERT SILVERBERG Notify Circulation Dept.
    [Show full text]