September 29, 1983 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 26539 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS DEFICITS BLOCK ECONOMIC lion are allowed to occur. If, in 5 years' to bring both sides to this state of pa RECOVERY time, we amass an additional $1 tril ralysis. lion to the national debt, on top of the It is imperative that something· be HON. LES AuCOIN current accumulated $1 trillion debt, done to break through. There are OF OREGON neither of those things will occur. Nei dogmas on both sides of the aisle IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ther of those things will occur if Gov which must be broken. Something has ernment borrowing absorbs 78 percent to give. Wednesday, September 28, 1983 of the total savings pool of this coun But if we can form a Presidential e Mr. AuCOIN. Mr. Speaker, as I try, which is where we will be if our commission to deal with the impossi travel through the First Congressional deficits grow unabated. ble task of social security, and we did, District in Oregon, the question most You cannot help your fellow man and if we can form a Presidential com often asked by millworkers in Toledo, and you cannot form capital to get the mission to deal with the intractable by fishermen in Astoria, and by small business machinery of this country and vexing problems of Central Amer businessmen in Beaverton is this, Is going if debt service alone becomes ica, and we have, and if we can form a the recovery going to be a strong one, one of the major items in the Federal Presidential commission to deal with is it going to be sustainable, and is it budget. And neither of those things strategic forces-the Scowcroft Com one that can bring us out of one of the will happen if interest rates destroy mission-which we have done, then it deepest economic holes we have been the principal source of wealth needed seems to me there is an argument for in for decades? to make this country the kind of socie using this secret weapon on the most When we look at the statistics of ty I think we all want it to be. This is critical problem facing not only the what we have been through in terms why I feel it is so important for re domestic structure of this Nation's of bank failures, financial institutions sponsible Members of both parties to economy and strength, but also, ulti which have been merged, jobs which join in an effort to bring our fiscal mately, its foreign strength as well. have been lost, some of which, frankly, policy under control. If we fail in this We should be able to bring the lead will never come back, I think we have effort, or even worse if we continue on ership together from both parties, in paid a very dear price to reach this our present course as if there were no the executive branch and on Capitol point at which we might just be able problem, we will be courting a finan Hill, and have a national commission to see economic recovery. cial and economic crisis which will composed in a way that represents bal Those who have survived the reces shred the social fabric of this country, ance to come forward with a deficit re sion have every right to expect a re making the riots of the 1960's and duction package which will be bal covery that rewards them for one of 1970's look like small potatoes. anced and, most importantly, will com the sharpest sacrifices the economy And what stands in the way of deci mand the support necessary to pass has been put through in decades. And sive action which can reduce the size both the House and the Senate. I believe the recovery can be sus of the deficits which loom on the hori Some would say that this approach tained. I believe the policymakers in zon? There has certainly been no lack circumvents the committee system and Congress and in the executive branch of ideas as to how the deficit can best the budget process established to deal owe those who have survived by being be reduced. with this matter. as skillful as they have during this re cession a recovery which rewards their My conservative friends suggest that I would answer, first of all, that this enterprise and nurtures those who are we only need to cut nondefense discre simply would not be the case. Any set picking up the pieces now and are tionary spending further in order to of legislative recommendations pro trying to put it all back together bring the budget into balance, al posed by such a commission would again. though with the magnitude of the come before the Congress and be re deficits which we face you could shut ferred to the appropriate committees. But to be quite frank, Mr. Speaker, down every function of the Federal While significant alterations could there is one thing standing in the way Government with the exception of the upset the balance struck by such a of a prolonged and sustained economic Department of Defense and the Social commission, the Congress would still recovery-deficits. Structural deficits, Security Administration and still face have the opportunity to work its will. deficits which are estimated, conserv a $20 to $30 billion deficit. Some would atively, at $200 billion. Not only this Second, I would say that the prob even advocate amending the Constitu lem we face is extraordinary in nature. year, but next year, the year after tion to require balanced budgets as if that, and, in David Stockman's words, Its solution requires extraordinary by magic that would provide the votes steps be taken. as far forward into the future as the to pass legislation which will cut these eye can see. These Federal budget deficits. I feel a solution to this is critical and deficits have driven up interest rates, I am alarmed by the prospect that the which have in turn devasted the auto My liberal friends, on the other inertia which has set in will continue. mobile industry, the housing industry, hand, similarly refuse to consider This is why, today, I am introducing a the wood products industry, and other changes in entitlement programs joint resolution setting up such a com credit sensitive businesses. which will be necessary to provide the mission. Patterned after the National This is a problem which knows no substantial savings needed to reduce Commission on Social Security political bounds. It does not matter the deficit. There are still too many Reform, the National Commission for whether you are a Republican or a sacred cows, despite substantial budget a Responsible Budget calls upon the Democrat. It does not matter whether cuts, in the area of domestic spending. President, the Senate majority leader, your world revolves around capital for What we have on our hands is a and the Speaker of the House to nomi mation or whether it revolves around state of paralysis, legislative gridlock, nate a 15-member commission charged providing social services to help the in which the political muscle of vari with reviewing all elements of fiscal needy. Neither of those things will ous factions within both political par and monetary policy with particular happen if budget deficits of $200 bil- ties has been applied skillfully enough emphasis on the causes of the cyclical
e This "bullet" symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by the Member on the floor. 26540 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS September 29, 1983 and structural budget deficits and with advancing commercial development of lands and its grazing pastures, its scenic come forward with a set of options for the public lands, which Secretary Watt has vistas, its grand canyons and its majestic the President and the Congress. adopted as a mandate. mountains. But he chose, instead, to worry Most Western resource experts and Interi about whether he was becoming a political This is the most difficult task facing or officials agree that he has been a good liability to his president, and he measured Congress, and the most important. I administrator-he "runs a tight ship" and his performance by that yardstick. urge my colleagues who may be inter he deserves credit for launching an ambi Watt not only has burdened his president, ested in breaking this gridlock and set tious program to develop offshore oil and but he has burdened the nation and the ting up such a commission to contact gas resources. With a third of this nation's West as well. me and cosponsor this resolution. It is oil supply coming from abroad, it is clear He should now do his president a favor crucial that we act now.e that domestic energy development is in the and, coincidentally, as he sees it, he should public interest. do us all a favor-and resign immediately. But Watt has not been effective in his Let's get on with the serious business of pro THE DENVER POST: "JAMES overall administration of the public lands. tecting our public resources.e WATT SHOULD RESIGN" While he launched an ambitious restora tion of facilities in the national parks, he did so at the cost of a sharp reduction in the A BILL TO EXEMPT EUROBOND HON. PATRICIA SCHROEDER purchase of additional tracts. And in one INTEREST FROM TAXATION OF COLORADO case, his aides are advocating that those fa IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES cilities be made available-for the first time-to wild-game hunters licensed to kill HON. DOUG BARNARD, JR. Wednesday, September 28, 1983 in the national parks of Alaska. OF GEORGIA e Mrs. SCHROEDER. Mr. Speaker, Watt boasts that he has "not leased any the Denver Post has been one of wilderness" for mineral development, but IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES James Watt's most consistent support the fact is that House Democrats blocked Thursday, September 29, 1983 him from doing so. ers during his tour of duty as Interior Meanwhile, he has increasingly used his e Mr. BARNARD. Mr. Speaker, I am Secretary. Interior post as a pulpit to attack his critics, today introducing legislation that Today, the Denver Post had enough to orchestrate fundamentalist statements would amend the Internal Revenue and called for Mr. Watt to step down. on such highly-charged issues as abortion Code by permitting U.S. corporations The editorial, "The Record Is Clear: and to overstate his policies on Indian to sell so-called Eurobonds, on a tax James Watt Should Resign," Septem tribes. free basis, to foreign persons directly ber 28, 1983, follows: The secretary also found time to precipi from the United States. Present tax tate a selfish feud with Rep. Morris Udall, [From the Denver Post, Sept. 28, 1983] D-Ariz., one of the most powerful men in law requires that Eurobonds be sold THE RECORD Is CLEAR: JAMES WATT SHOULD Congress. only through Netherlands Antilles fi RESIGN Although his responsibility was to admin nance subsidiaries if the interest is to James Watt's big moment has arrived. ister the public resources, he approached be exempt from the 30-percent with He can now step to front and center, with the job as the regulator of a mythical corpo holding tax normally imposed on U.S. the klieg lights focused on his familiar pro ration, intent on dismantling a "monopoly" source income sent abroad. The ability file, and, after a long and laborious explana that unfairly held title to vast resources. to sell Eurobonds on a tax-free basis is tion that Qlaces primary blame with the Such rash conduct equates to a misuse of vitally important to hundreds of U.S. media, announce that he has resigned. the high trust delivered into his hands by Somehow, in the season of the Emmy's, President Reagan and the U.S. Senate in corporations as a relatively low-cost it's all appropriate. early 1981. method of raising capital in foreign It became clear several months ago that If Watt possessed some irreplaceable markets. Total Eurobond debt current Watt must be jettisoned from the Reagan genius in the governance of public deeds, ly stands at approximately $40 billion. cockpit if the 1984 mission were to be com our judgment might be different. But he The problem, Mr. Speaker, is that pleted. has posted no such record. His record as ad use of the Netherlands Antilles for is However, Watt refused to bow out without ministrator of our resources is, at best, me suing Eurobonds creates enormous tax applause. He needed the recognition of diocre. Additionally, there are his repeated, compliance problems for the Internal center stage. That, essentially, was Watt's tasteless forays into misguided humor. problem. The stage meant more to him than If all this were incidental, it might be dif Revenue Service and results in a huge the job. ferent. But it is intentional. In his many loss each year to the U.S. Treasury. For months, he has declared that he public appearances, Watt plainly has en This is because the Netherlands Antil would resign as interior secretary "when I joyed his self-perceived role as Reagan's les is the world's principal tax haven/ become a burden to President Reagan." court jester. While he clearly delighted in tax secrecy jurisdiction and is being It is interesting to note that the secre creating statements to taunt the press over utilized by U.S. residents and third tary's loyalties were with the political the past few months, he will now blame the country "treaty shoppers" to evade office, not with the public interest and not press for his demise. payment of billions of dollars of U.S. with his employees in the Deparment of In Watt knew where he was going on his terior. carefully mapped journey to resignation. taxes on income earned in the United Accordingly, what Watt had to say as a Unfortunately, he had little regard for the States. The Antilles tax haven status public official-whether he prefers John Interior Department in the process. While derives from its tax treaty with the Phillip Sousa to the Beach Boys or whether he was conducting his sideshow comedy act, United States-a treaty that our he feels freed or persecuted as a born-again there were legions of dedicated bureaucrats, Treasury Department has been trying, Christian-all were more important to him forest managers and park rangers who were unsuccessfully, to renegotiate for the than the task assigned him by President out in the field dutifully doing their jobs. past 3 years. The Antilles has been Reagan. His primary job was to serve as the They were managing the public resources able to resist efforts to tighten the chief trustee of our lands, and he crassly according to the laws of the land. manipulated that job into a personal politi James Watt lost sight of that duty. treaty against tax abusers precisely be cal soapbox for unrelated causes. He was busy on the lecture circuit, creat cause it is the only jurisdiction from After four years of pro-environmentalism ing the controversy that newspaper cartoon which Eurobonds can currently be by his predecessor, Cecil D. Andrus, Watt ists survive on. He was in the headlines. He sold on a tax-free basis to foreign pur assumed a mandate from President Rea was playing to the radical right. He was the chasers. If the United States termi gan's smashing election victories in the last remanant of the Reagan campaign. He nates the treaty, interest paid on Eur public-land states. He unwisely translated was loving every minute of it. obonds will be taxable and U.S. corpo Reagan's general-election promises into a Unfortunately, he also was the director of rations will be forced to pay unaccept policy sympathetic to commercial develop Interior, our ambassador-our represen ers of the public domain, and into a forum tive-in Washington. ably high and inflationary interest of personal political views. And he didn't represent us very effective rates to foreign purchasers of their But there were many reasons Westerners ly. debt. favored Ronald Reagan over Jimmy Carter, James Watt was entrusted with the custo The legislation I am introducing and few of those reasons had anything to do dy of America's coal reserves, its timber- today-which draws on extensive hear- September 29, 1983 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 26541 ings held into the tax haven issue by First. The U.S. Treasury could begin course. all income earned in the $300 the House Commerce. Consumer and to collect $1 billion or more a year in billion underground economy; and Monetary Affairs Subcommittee. revenue now lost because Antillean se Third, the Antilles has systematical which I chair-eliminates the need for crecy laws shield from the ms the ly failed to cooperate in a meaningful Antillean finance subsidiaries by per beneficial owners of taxable U.S. way with IRS and State law enforce mitting the direct sale of Eurobonds source income. Moreover, the U.S. ment authorities on tax fraud and tax on a tax-free basis. It would therefore Treasury should gain an additional evasion cases. permit the U.S. Government to cancel $120 million annually in tax reve U. COMPARISON WITH THE GIBBONS-CONABLE our tax treaty with the Antilles if se nues-the dollar value of tax credits BILL,ILR. 3025 crecy abuses-which shield the identi American corporations currently re ties of U.S. investors-are not ended ceive for taxes paid the Antillean Gov The essential difference is that my and it would result in the recapture of ernment by their Antillean finance bill would exempt only interest on an estimated billion dollars a year in subsidiaries. according to a leading Eurobonds. Gibbons-Conable would tax revenues. U.S. investment banking firm; exempt from taxation almost all types My legislation is distinguishable Second. Because the United States of interest payments. I believe my bill from a similar bill introduced by our Netherlands Antilles treaty already is preferable for the following reasons: colleagues SAM GIBBONS and BARBER exempts from taxation Eurobond in First. The Gibbons-Conable bill CoNABLE in that mine exempts from terest paid to foreigners. the amend would create a new tax loss to the U.S. taxation only interest on Eurobonds. ment would not cause any new tax loss Treasury of $91.5 million per year, Their legislation would create new cat to the U.S. Treasury; and based on 1980 data. The 1983 annual egories of tax-exempt U.S. source in Third. Direct issuance of Eurobond tax loss would likely be in excess of terest income. at an annual loss of ap by American corporations would elimi $100 million. Future tax losses could proximately $100 million. By contrast, nate the need for and significant costs be substantially greater. By contrast, my legislation creates no new tax ex of Antillean finance subsidiaries and my bill would result in no additional emptions. Their bill would produce a result in substantial savings to U.S. tax loss because Eurobond interest net tax gain of approximately $35 mil firms issuing such bonds. paid through Antillean finance sub lion. My bill would produce a net tax The Subcommittee on Commerce, sidiaries is already tax-exempt. gain of $120 million. Consumer. and Monetary Affairs, The overall effect of Gibbons-Con So that Members can fully under which I chair, has extensively investi able would be a net tax gain to the stand the need for this amendment to gated and on April 12 and 13, 1983, Treasury of approximately $35 mil the Internal Revenue Code, I am at held hearings into the use of the lion. By contrast, my bill would taching a brief memo describing the Netherlands Antilles for tax evasion produce a new tax gain of approxi problems the bill seeks to resolve and purposes by U.S. taxpayers and for mately $120 million. explaining the differences between eign persons subject to U.S. taxation. Second. By creating additional tax this bill and the Gibbons/Conable bill. The hearing record, including internal loopholes-for no valid public policy purposes-during a period of looming I. THE TAX COMPLIANCE PROBLEM IRS and Florida Department of Law The Treasury Department has been Enforcement documents, demon budget deficits, Gibbons-Conable will trying for the past 3 years to revise strates the following: attract substantial political and public the United States-Netherlands Antil First, $1 billion or more per year in opposition. By contrast, my bill does les income tax treaty so as to prevent taxes go uncollected because thou not carry such political liabilities. tax evasion on U.S. source income by sands of U.S. and foreign persons not Third. The administration's support Americans and by third country treaty resident in the Antilles use that off for a tax exemption for Eurobond in shoppers who invest here through shore country to escape taxes on U.S. terest seems to be predicated primarily "bearer share" Antillean corporations source income; on its desire to remove from the Neth and financial accounts. The negotia Second, as a result of three factors erlands Antilles, leverage over the tions have been stalemated for one the United States-Antilles tax treaty treaty negotiations. Gibbons-Conable overriding reason: Under the treaty, provisions eliminating or reducing does this but with the serious liability the Antilles is the only country in the withholding on U.S. source income; of creating new tax exemptions and world through which the finance sub the strict Antilles secrecy laws which losses. sidiaries of hundreds of major U.S. shield the indentities and financial These points are enumerated below corporations can sell Eurobonds to for transactions of beneficial owners of in more detail. eign persons on a tax-free basis. If U.S. source income; and, the low or TAX REVENUE LOSS UNDER GIBBONS·CONABLE Treasury were to cancel the treaty, zero rate of Antillean taxes on finan BILL the Internal Revenue Code would re cial transactions emanating from or IRS data for 1980 show that $96.1 quire the immediate imposition of a passing through the country-the million of tax revenue was collected by 30-percent withholding tax on the in Netherlands Antilles has become the IRS from U.S. paying agents on inter terest income from future sales of Eur world's largest tax haven jurisdiction est income paid to foreign persons. Of obonds and from the $40 billion cur for U.S. residents and treaty shoppers this amount, $78.5 million would have rently outstanding. This would shrink seeking to evade payment of U.S. been lost-not collected-if Gibbons the Eurobond market-a major source taxes. In 1981, $1.4 billion in U.S. Conable, as presently written, were en of capital for U.S. corporations-in source income reported to IRS was acted. This is because the Gibbons crease interest costs to American Eur sent to the Antilles. The effective tax Conable bill exempts from taxation obond issuers and otherwise cause a rate on this U.S. source income was the following categories of interest dislocation in U.S. capital markets. only 1.85 percent-$26 million out of income paid to foreign persons: However, my bill amending the In $1.4 billion. Had the regular 30-per [Tax loss in millions. 1980] ternal Revenue Code-exempting from cent withholding been applied to this 1. Interest on U.S. real property taxation interest paid on Eurobonds income, it would have produced more mortgages...... $11.5 issued directly by U.s·. corporations to than $400 million in tax revenues to 2. Interest on corporate bonds, U.S. foreign bonds holders-would remove the United States. Even these figures Treasury securities and other gen- the leverage now enjoyed by the Alltil greatly understate U.S. source income eral interest payments ...... 65.0 les over the treaty negotiations and sent to the Antilles and the potential 3. Miscellaneous interest such as allow Treasury to cancel the treaty if tax loss to the Treasury, because that paid by a U.S.-based branch nonabuse provisions are not signifi income reports sent to IRS exclude all of a foreign corporation...... 2.0 cantly strengthened. Approval is desir interest paid by financial institutions, able for several related reasons: real estate capital gains, and, of Total tax loss ...... 78.5
11-059 0-87-28 (Pt. 19)
' 26542 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS September 29, 1983 In addition to the tax revenue IRS the Treasury of $35 to $50 million Fifth, requires that the election out collects from U.S. paying agents on in $120-million foreign tax credit savings of joint and survivor converage must terest income paid to foreign persons, minus the $78.5-million tax loss on in have the consent of the spouse; certain tax treaty countries such as terest income exempted under the bill. Sixth, requires that in the case of a Switzerland collect and remit to IRS This revenue __gain estimate does not divorce after a joint and survivor an additional tax revenue on income re include the loss under Gibbons-Con nuity starts, the ex-spouse be eligible ceived by persons in the treaty coun able of $13 million in taxes collected to receive survivor benefits; try at treaty reduced tax rates who are by and remitted to the United States Seventh, repeals the ERISA require ineligible to receive the reduced rates. by our tax treaty partners. However, ment allowing a plan to void an elec The amount of tax remitted to IRS by my bill would result in a tax revenue tion of joint and survivor benefits if U.S. tax treaty countries applicable to gain of the entire $120 million because the participant dies within 2 years of interest income during 1980 that no interest income presently taxed the election; would be exempt from taxation under would be made exempt.e Eighth, requires that a joint and sur the Gibbons-Conable bill was about vivor annuity be the normal form of $13 million. benefit payout for any plan which As a result, the total tax revenue THE PENSION EQUITY ACT OF offers an annuity as an optional form loss for 1980 that would have occurred 1983 of benefit payment; under the Gibbons-Conable bill is Ninth, provides that a spouse can di $91.5 million. rectly attach the employee's pension NO TAX LOSS UNDER THE BARNARD BILL HON. JOHN N. ERLENBORN OF ILLINOIS in child support, alimony, and marital My bill to amend the Internal Reve property cases and requires that the nue Code would not result in any tax IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES plan, to the extent the court orders, revenue loss because Eurobond inter Thursday, September 29, 1983 split the participant spouse's pension est income paid to foreign persons is account between the divorced husband now exempt under the United States e Mr. ERLENBORN. Mr. Speaker, today I am introducing legislation on and wife, and provide the nonpartici Netherlands Antilles tax treaty. Fur pant ex-spouse with the· option for an thermore, . there are very good tax behalf of the administration entitled compliance reasons for including the the "Pension Equity Act of 1983." I annuity based on her own life expect Eurobond interest exemption in the am pleased that ·Representatives Rou ancy-at the plan's early retirement Internal Revenue Code, while no simi KEMA, CONABLE, FIEDLER, HOLT, JOHN date for the participant; lar justification exists for exempting SON, MARTIN of Illinois, SCHNEIDER, Tenth, requires that individual bene fit statements include a notice to par from taxation the other types of inter~ SMITH of Nebraska, SNOWE, and est under the Gibbons-Conable bill as VucANOVICH are joining as original ticipants that vested benefits may be noted below: sponsors of this bill. Mr. Speaker, I forfeited upon death; and First. The cost-benefit justification think it is important to state at the Eleventhi increases the · level at for including in the Internal Revenue outset of my remarks that the legisla which plans may cash out benefits Code a tax exemption for . Eurobond tion I am introducing today contains from $1,759 to $3,500. interest paid to foreign persons in provisions comparable in scope to Mr. Speaker, while I fully support stead of through the Antilles Tax those in S. 19, the Retirement Equity the thrust of the administration's pro Treaty as is now done-is that U.S. Act, which was introduced by Senator posal, I am, however, concerned about companies could issue Eurobonds DoLE. It is also similar in many re two specific provisions. First, I am without having to incur the cost of es spects to H.R. 2100, the Private Pen greatly concerned that lowering the tablishing and maintaining finance sion Reform Act of 1983. participation -age from 25 to 21 will subsidiaries in The Netherlands Antil As you and my colleagues already substantially and unnecessarily· in les. No similar costs are incurred by know, women, as a group, have tradi crease the administrative costs forcer corporations for the other types of in tionally received a lower level of re tain plans, particularly those in indus terest that would be tax-exempt under tirement income than men for a tries such as retail sales. As you know, Gibbons-Conable. number of reasons. Further, married industries such as these experience a Second. From a tax compliance women are often dependent on their high turnover of employees at young point of view, allowing direct issuance husband's pensions for retirement ages, and most of these employees will of Eurobonds would remove the major income. In many cases, however, the not stay long enough to become vested hurdle that now prevents the Treas wife never receives any of the hus and receive benefits. ury Department from terminating the band's retirement pension. This may Rather than forcing plans to unnec Antilles Tax Treaty. Treaty termina be due to divorce or because the hus essarily increase their paperwork tion would enable IRS to track down band elected not to provide survivor burden and PBGC premiums, I would tax cheats who now use the Antilles to coverage for his wife. The legislation like my colleagues to consider a provi evade U.S. income taxes. No compara that is being introduced today is de sion which would provide plans of the ble advantage is obtained by exempt signed to correct some of these inequi defined benefit type with an option to ing other types of interest from tax ties. age 21 participation but which would ation, as proposed in Gibbons-Conable. Specifically, the Pension Equity Act also provide the same benefit and vest Third. One final point-since both of 1983 does the following: ing as age 21 participation. This alter the Gibbons-Conable bill and my bill First, lowers the minimum age of native which a defined benefit plan would eliminate the need for U.S. com participation under ERISA from 25 to would have to elect, would require panies to maintain Antilles finance 21; pension benefit accruals to be credited subsidiaries, Morgan-Stanley of New Second, lowers the minimum age for for service from age 21, but such ac York estimates there would be a tax vesting under ERISA from 22 to 21; cruals would not have to be granted saving of $120-million annually since Third, insures 'that individuals on until age 25-the current law mini U.S. companies would no longer be maternity or paternity leave would not mum age of participation. This would able to offset against their U.S. tax li incur a 1 year break in service for par allow plans to avoid burdensome pa ability the foreign tax credits attrib ticipation and vestihg; perwork for employees who may only uted to their Antilles finance subsidi Four-th, requires that joint and sur work a short period of time and leave aries. As a result, Morgan-Stanley, and vivor benefits be the normal form of before vesting, but would still provide the Treasury Department estimate benefits even if an individual contin employees who stay with benefit that passage of the Gibbons-Conable ues working past the plan's early re credit for those years. This proposal bill will result in a net revenue gain to tirement age; · would accomplish the same goal as the September 29, 1983 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 26543 administration's bill but at what I be lative proposal will be a crucial factor efit option, which is normally only lieve to be a lower adminstrative cost. in expediting needed reforms. available when the employee reaches This is important if we are to continue The problem this bill addresses is the age of 55. to encourage the improvement and ex one that principally affects one par In other words, an employee could pansion of defined benefit plans. ticular segment of our population: begin working for an employer at the The other provision that I am con women of retirement age. It is disturb age of 25, vest at the age of 35, and die cerned about is one which changes the ing to note that 81 percent of all at the age of 55 and the surviving court ruling in BBS Associates; that is, women over the age of 65 who live spouse would receive absolutely no requiring that the joint and survivor alone are living in poverty. While portion of those vested benefits. annuity requirement be the normal there is no single reason for this, the Meanwhile, she may have been doing form of benefit payment. Here, Mr. fact that less than 10 percent of all her own work in the home, which Speaker, I am very concerned that re surviving spouses receive pension ben leaves her without a husband, pension, versing this decision might result in efits is certainly a major contributing or any other form of income support. plans abandoning any annuity options factor. The importance of a pension is True, she may receive an insurance in order to avoid the joint and survivor underscored by the fact that, while 32 payment which may tide her over for annuity requirement. This could percent of those who receive only a couple of years but, by the time she create far greater harm to participants social security benfits are at or below reaches the age where the annuity and their beneficiaries than the help the poverty level, only 98 percent of would have begun, that insurance this provision is intended to provide. I those receiving social security and money is gone. fear that defined contribution plans pension benefits are above that level. I believe that reform in this aspect may become just glorified savings ac This is one measurement of the so of pension inequity must be addressed counts paying lump sums, rather than called feminization of poverty. and resolved by this committee prior provide the monthly retirement Nevertheless, we cannot ignore the to congressional action.e income such plans now pay or should progress that has been made overall in be paying. pension coverage for both men and While the bill is improved technical women. Since 1958, the percent of pri ly over similar legislation introduced vate sector employees covered by pen to date, I invite comments from all sion plans has grown from 32.4 per THE PENSION EQUITY ACT OF parties concerned in order to make the cent to 50 percent. In addition, with 1983 legislation as beneficial to participants enactment of ERISA in 197 4, some and as workable to plans as possible. progress was made for women with the HON. BARBER B. CONABLE, JR. Mr. Speaker, while I have concerns inclusion of provisions such as that OF NEW YORK about the two aforementioned provi which requires credit to be given for IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES service before a "maternity leave" sions, I believe that the time has come Thursday, September 29, 1983 to eliminate those provisions in pen Flight launch position Flight duration Termination Date number Missile Notes August 3, 1979...... I FTM I ...... LP-2 ...... 44m 1 ••••••••••••••• •••••••••• • •• Impact...... Max lift data. September 6, 1979 ...... 2 FTM 2 ...... LP-2 ...... 4h, 9m ...... Mid air recovery (MAR) ...... Total success. September 25, 1979 ...... 3 FTM 3 LP-5 ...... 4h , 24m.. Soft landing ...... Cross country landing. 1 October 9. 1979 ...... 4 FTM 6 ...... LP-3..... lh. 47m ..••••• •••••••••• .•. FTS .. Fail-safe tone. November 21 , 1979 ...... 5 FTM 7 ...... R/L...... 2h, 33m 1 ...... Impact...... Engine. November 29. 1979 ...... 6 FTM 10 ...... R/L ...... :.. 4h, 25m...... Soft landing ...... Pacific launch. December 4. 1979 ...... 7 FTM 9...... LP-L ...... 4h, 20m ...... MAR ...... Survivability. December 18, 1979 ...... 8 FTM 4.... LP- 5...... 4h, 27m...... Impact fuzing ...... Maintainability. January 5, 1980 ...... 9 FTM 12 ...... LP-5 ...... 4h, 29m...... Soft landing ...... Production missile. January 22, 1980 ...... 10 FTM 5...... R/L...... 19m 1 ••••• •••• ••••••• •••••••••••• •• •••• •••••••• •• Impact ...... RCC software. June 12, 1980 ...... 11 FTM 15 ...... R/L ...... 4h, 7m ...... Impact...... Full rotary launcher. July 22. 1980 ...... 12 FTM 13 .. LP-4 ...... 3h. 25m 1 ...... •...... FTS ...... Engine oil pressure. August 21. 1980 ...... 13 FTM 8 ...... LP-4 ...... I h 4m 2 . ...•...... FTS...... Carbon buildup. October 23, 1980 ...... 14 AV 1...... RP-L ...... 3h, 33m...... Impact fuzing ...... First fiscal year 1978 missile. November 12, 1980 ...... 15 FTM 14...... LP-1...... 3h, 30m ...... MAR ...... Totally over water. November 20, 1980 ...... 16 FTM 9RL ...... LP- 6 ...... 8s 2 . • ..•.••.•..•• Pacific ...... Jettison. February 19, 1981...... 17 AV 2...... LP-3...... 34m 2 .••...•. • •..••••• Impact...... Fuel controller. March 25, 1981...... 18 FTM 14RL .... RP-6...... 3h, 52m ...... MAR ...... RCC, 1st production engine. April 16, 1981 ...... 19 AV 10 ...... RP-6...... 4h, lm...... Impact fuzing ...... 1st MRA. April 24, 1981 .. . 20 FTM lORI...... RP- 4.. 4h, 9m ...... MAR-almost ...... 1st Canadian INE. JP-1. April 30, 1981 ...... 21 FTM 12RL ...... RP-3...... 4h. Sm ...... MAR ...... Survivability. July 25. 1981 ...... 22 AV 9...... LP-2 .. 4h, 19m ...... Impact fuzing .. ············· ···········-····· 1st OAS, MRA. September 13, 1981 ...... 23 FTM 12RL. .... LP- 3...... 4h, 12m MAR...... Survivability. December 2, 1981 ...... 24 FTM 14RL. .... LP-4 .. 4h, 3m ...... Soft landing ...... Survivability. December II, 1981 ...... 25 FTM 12RS3.. LP-4 ...... 4h, lm MAR ...... Survivability. January 7, 1982 26 AV 8 ...... LP-6 ...... 4h, Sm ...... MAR ...... Pacific launch. January 27, 1982...... 27 AV 24 .. ... LP-2 ...... 3h, 57m...... MAR ...... Icing test August 10, 1982...... 28 AV 13 ...... LP- 6 ...... 3h, Sm 1 .....••..••••••••• ..•...••.••••••• Impact...... False fix. September 21 , 1982 ...... 29 AV 71...... LP-4.. 3h, 53m. Soft landing ...... Pacific launch. October I. 1982 ...... 30 FTM 12RL ...... LP-3 ...... 3h. 17m 1 ••••••••••••••• Hard landing ...... Pacific launch. 26562 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS September 29, 1983 Flight number Missile Launch position Flight duration Termination Notes October 10. 1982 ...... 31 AV 14 ...... LP-6 ...... 3h, 50m ...... MAR ...... Production Knollsman MRA. December 19, 1982 ··········································································· May 24, 1983 ...... June 14, 1983 ...... June 16, 1983 ...... = [f' : = June 23, 1983 ...... ~ 'J' : ~~~· - ~1i -it•'FO • Partial success. 2 Failure. 3 Full successful operational test launch. Note: h=hours ; m=minutes ; s= seconds.e EDUCATION SAVINGS ACCOUNTS the beneficiary over a 10-year period <4>. and subsection