DOCSLIB.ORG

Incorrect Use of the Names ]Alosidae^ and ]Alosid^ When

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

American Fisheries Society Symposium 35:000–000, 2003 © 2003 by the American Fisheries Society Incorrect Use of the Names Alosidae and Alosid when Referring to the Shads in the Subfamily Alosinae (Teleostei, Clupeidae) JOHN E. OLNEY1 Department of Fisheries Science, School of Marine Science, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062, USA “‘Must a name mean something?’ Alice asked doubtfully. ‘Of course it must,’ Humpty Dumpty said with a short laugh...” (Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass, 1872) Abstract.—Fishes in the subfamily Alosinae (the shads, Family: Clupeidae) are properly termed alosine species, alosine clupeids, or alosines. The name “Alosidae” has never been formally presented as a family-level name that included the alosine genus Alosa and has no standing in fish classification. The term “alosid” is similarly meaningless since no fish family name “Alosidae” exists. Scientists, fishery managers, administrators, and the public should avoid these invalid names when referring to the shads. Introduction name ending of a subfamily name is “-inae” (e.g., Alosinae) and its adjectival and lower case nomi- Current classification of the teleostean family nal forms end in “-ine” (in this example, alosine). Clupeidae (Clupeiformes, Clupeoidei) is based on In some cases, names of subfamilies and their tribes the systematic works of Svetovidov (1952), White- have similar spellings such as the subfamily head (1963), and Grande (1985) and has been re- Epinephelinae and its tribe Epinephelini (the grou- viewed recently by Lecointre and Nelson (1996). pers, Pisces, Serranidae). In this case, the accepted The family contains five subfamilies: adjectival and lower case nominal forms of the taxa Dussumieriinae, Pellonulinae, Clupeinae, Alosinae, are epinepheline and epinephelin, respectively and Dorosomatinae. Grande (1985) recognized a (Baldwin and Johnson 1993). Following common monophyletic Clupeidae but concluded that the usage, the adjectival and lower case nominal forms interrelationships of the Clupeinae, Alosinae, and of the clupeid subfamilies are dussumieriine, Dorosomatinae were uncertain. Although these pellonuline, clupeine, alosine, and dorosomatine. phylogenetic problems lack resolution, the classi- fication and nomenclature of these fishes remains stable (Nelson 1994). In recent years, fishery sci- Incorrect Use of the Words Alosidae entists, fishery managers, administrators, and the and Alosid public have introduced incorrect names when re- ferring to fishes of the subfamily Alosinae, com- The family name “Alosidae” has never been for- monly known as shads. This subfamily includes mally presented as a family-level name that in- 31 species in seven genera (Alosa, Brevoortia, cluded the alosine genus Alosa and has no stand- Ethmalosa, Ethmidium, Gudusia, Hilsa, and ing in fish classification. Its adjectival and nominal Tenualosa). form, “alosid,” has no meaning. In the system of naming animal taxa specified Unfortunately, these fictitious names are en- in the International Code of Zoological Nomencla- countered frequently in post-1980 published and ture (ICZN 1999), the name ending of a family name unpublished fishery science literature as well as is “-idae,” as in Clupeidae. By common usage (al- manuscripts in review. In a brief survey for the though not specified in the Code), its adjectival or purposes of demonstrating the error, these names lower case nominal forms end in “-id,” such as in appeared in publications in peer-reviewed journals the phrases “a clupeid fish” or “a clupeid.” The (Crecco and Blake 1983; Dadswell et al. 1986; Aprahamian 1989; Garman 1992; Raabe and Wieland 1993; Chapman et al. 1994; Mathur et al. 1 E-mail: [email protected] 1994, 1996; Dunning et al. 1997; Navodaru 2001), 1 2OLNEY documents relating to management of American rivers Severn and Wye (Britain). Hydrobiologia shad Alosa sapidissima and river herring (Alosa spp.) 179:173–182. (Richkus and DiNardo 1984; ASMFC 1985; ASMFC (Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commis- Winslow 1989; CBEC 1989; CBP 1991; Smith 1996; sion). 1985. Fishery management plan for anadro- Lary 1998), newsletter articles (Varnell 1996; mous alosid stocks of the eastern United States: American shad, hickory shad, alewife, and Dadswell 1997), and contract reports (Cooke and blueback herring. Phase II in interstate manage- Chappelear 1994; Miller et al. 1996, 2002). In addi- ment planning for migratory alosids of the Atlan- tion, these names are frequently encountered in tic coast. ASMFC, Washington, D.C. public documents and discussions posted on the Baldwin, C. C., and G. D. Johnson. 1993. Phylogeny of Internet. The source of this unfortunate epidemic the Epinephelinae (Teleostei:Serranidae). Bulletin may be the first use of the erroneous names in a of Marine Science 52(1): 240–283. series of contract reports to federal agencies dur- CBEC (Chesapeake Bay Executive Council). 1989. ing the 1960s and 1970s (beginning with Davis and Chesapeake Bay alosid management plan. CBEC, Miller [1967]). The erroneous terms appeared in the Annapolis, Maryland. titles of entries in a bibliography of Chesapeake Bay CBP (Chesapeake Bay Program). 1991. Chesapeake Bay alosid, blue crab, bluefish, and weakfish/ library resources (Loesch 1981). In 1981, “a fishery spotted seatrout fishery management plans. CBP, management plan for the anadromous alosid” was Environmental Protection Agency, Annual recommended by an advisory committee of the progress report, Annapolis, Maryland. Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Cooke, D. W., and S. J. Chappelear. 1994. Santee–Coo- (Richkus and DiNardo 1984). Subsequently, the per blueback herring studies. South Carolina De- errors appeared in federal fisheries management partment of Natural Resources, Division of Wild- plans that were distributed widely and then pro- life and Freshwater Fisheries, Rediversion Project, liferated into the fishery science literature. Annual report, January 16, 1994 to September 30, 1994, Charleston. Crecco, V. A., and M. M Blake. 1983. Feeding ecology A Plea for Proper Nomenclature of coexisting larvae of American shad and blueback herring in the Connecticut River. Trans- Fishery scientists, fishery managers, administra- actions of the American Fisheries Society tors, and the public should avoid meaningless and 112:498–507. incorrect names when referring to the shads and Dadswell, M. 1997. Dadswell on invasions and com- should follow international rules and accepted con- petition. The Shad Journal 2(3):2. ventions when using any names of fishes Dadswell, M. J., R. A. Rulifson, and G. R. Daborn. 1986. (Eschmeyer 1990, 1998; ICZN 1999). Reviewers and Potential impact of large-scale tidal power devel- opments in the upper Bay of Fundy on fisheries editors should be watchful for these errors in manu- resources of the Northwest Atlantic. Fisheries scripts. Formal training in systematic ichthyology 11(4):26–35. and nomenclature is encouraged for students of Davis, J., and J. P. Miller. 1967. Biology and utilization fishery science, fishery management, and policy. of anadromous alosids.Virginia Institute of Ma- rine Science, Anadromous fish project annual Acknowledgements progress report, Gloucester Point. Dunning, D. J., J. R. Waldman, Q.E. Ross, and M. Mattson. 1997. Use of Atlantic tomcod and other Thanks to William Eschmeyer (California Academy prey by striped bass in the lower Hudson River of Sciences) who searched his developing family- estuary during winter. Transactions of the Ameri- name database and was unable to find the fictitious can Fisheries Society 126:857–861. family “Alosidae.” The manuscript was improved Eschmeyer, W. N. 1990. Catalog of genera of recent fishes. considerably by the reviews of Victor Springer and California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco. G. David Johnson (U.S. National Museum, Eschmeyer, W. N. 1998. Catalog of fishes, volumes 1– Smithsonian Institution). Joel Hoffman and John 3. California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco. Walter assisted in the epidemiological research. Garman, G. C. 1992. Fate and potential significance of This is VIMS contribution XXXX. postspawning anadromous fish carcasses in an Atlantic coastal river. Transactions of the Ameri- can Fisheries Society 121:390–394. References Grande, L. 1985. Recent and fossil clupeomorph fishes with materials for revision of the subgroups of Aprahamian, M. W. 1989. The diet of juvenile and adult clupeoids. Bulletin of the Museum of Natural twaite shad Alosa fallax fallax (Lacepede) from the History 181:231–372. ALOSINE NOMENCLATURE 3 ICZN (International Commission on Zoological No- Miller, T. J., E. D. Houde, and E. J. Watkins. 1996. Pros- menclature). 1999. International code of zoologi- pects for multi-species management and cal nomenclature, fourth edition. The International sustainability. Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London. Chesapeake Bay Program, Scientific and Techni- Lary, S. J. 1998. Anadromous alosid restoration in the cal Advisory Committee, Perspectives on Chesa- Androscoggin River watershed. Completion re- peake Bay, Annapolis, Maryland. port to the Maine Department of Marine Re- Navodaru, I. 2001. Seaward drift of the Pontic shad sources, Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, larvae (Alosa pontica) and the influence of Danube West Boothbay Harbor. River hydrology on their travel path through the Lecointre, G., and G. Nelson. 1996. Clupeomorpha, Danube Delta system. Bulletin Français de la sister-group of Ostariophysi. Pages 193–207 in
Recommended publications
  • Pacific Herring

    Pacific Herring

    THE MULTITUDINOUS PACIFIC HERRING by D. N. OUTRAM FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA BIOLOGICAL STATION, NANAIMO, B. C. CIRCULAR NO. 6 3^*u DECEMBER, 1961 COVER PHOTOGRAPH: A mountain of herring covers the storage bin area of the reduction plant at Imperial Cannery, Steveston, B„ C„, awaiting processing into fish meal and oil. Photographs by Mr. C. Morley. THE MULTITUDINOUS PACIFIC HERRING . Vast Shoals of Protein-Rich Herring Rove the Temperate Coastal Waters Along Canada's Western Seabord N V By Donald N, Outram y ^v- _•• HISTORICAL BACKGROUND annually. While this fishery is. Fabulous numbers of herring first in landed weight and second (Fig. l) are found along the sea- to salmon in landed value, it is washed shores of Canada's most wes only worth about one-quarter as much terly province, Their migrations, as the salmon catch. their sudden abundance and their Fluctuations in the world price straggle to survive is an exciting of fish meal and oil cause the market study. Undoubtedly, herring were one value at about ten million dollars to of the first coastal fishes to be vary from year to year, utilized by man. In northern Europe, FISHING FOR HERRING particularly, they have been a source The British Columbia herring of food since before written history. fishery is a highly organized opera Herring and herring roe have been an tion utilizing modern shore plants and article of food or barter of the efficient fishing vessels . The seventy- coastal Indian tribes of British Col to eighty-foot long seine boats are umbia for ma.ny centuries, They were equipped with the very latest electronic not fished, however, on a commercial fish-detecting equipment, enabling the basis until 1877 when 75 tons were fishermen to "see" the shoals before caught.
  • Saltwater Fishing Tournament 20

    Saltwater Fishing Tournament 20

    UG Annual Virginia Saltwater Fishing Tournament 20 Virginia Saltwater Fishing Tournament Marine Resources Commission 380 FenwicN Road Fort Monroe, VA 23651 Tel. No. (757) 491- 5160 Fax. No. (757) 247-8014 E-mail: [email protected] 1/20 ELIGIBLE SPECIES AND MINIMUM WEIGHTS FOR CITATIONS Swordfish...................................................................................100 lbs. Tuna, Bluefin............................................................................. 100 lbs. Black Drum ..................................................................................80 lbs. Tuna, Yellowfin or Bigeye........................................................... 70 lbs Cobia ............................................................................................55 lbs. Tuna, True Albacore (Longfin Tuna)...........................................40 lbs. Striped Bass .................................................................................40 lbs. Wahoo ..........................................................................................35 lbs. Golden Tilefish ............................................................................30 lbs Dolphin ........................................................................................25 lbs. King Mackerel .............................................................................20 lbs. Bluefish........................................................................................16 lbs. Sheepshead ...................................................................................10
  • The Freshwater Herring of Lake Tanganyika Are the Product of a Marine Invasion Into West Africa

    The Freshwater Herring of Lake Tanganyika Are the Product of a Marine Invasion Into West Africa

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Open Marine Archive Marine Incursion: The Freshwater Herring of Lake Tanganyika Are the Product of a Marine Invasion into West Africa Anthony B. Wilson1,2¤*, Guy G. Teugels3, Axel Meyer1 1 Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany, 2 Zoological Museum, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 3 Ichthyology Laboratory, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium Abstract The spectacular marine-like diversity of the endemic fauna of Lake Tanganyika, the oldest of the African Great Lakes, led early researchers to suggest that the lake must have once been connected to the ocean. Recent geophysical reconstructions clearly indicate that Lake Tanganyika formed by rifting in the African subcontinent and was never directly linked to the sea. Although the Lake has a high proportion of specialized endemics, the absence of close relatives outside Tanganyika has complicated phylogeographic reconstructions of the timing of lake colonization and intralacustrine diversification. The freshwater herring of Lake Tanganyika are members of a large group of pellonuline herring found in western and southern Africa, offering one of the best opportunities to trace the evolutionary history of members of Tanganyika’s biota. Molecular phylogenetic reconstructions indicate that herring colonized West Africa 25–50MYA, at the end of a major marine incursion in the region. Pellonuline herring subsequently experienced an evolutionary radiation in West Africa, spreading across the continent and reaching East Africa’s Lake Tanganyika during its early formation. While Lake Tanganyika has never been directly connected with the sea, the endemic freshwater herring of the lake are the descendents of an ancient marine incursion, a scenario which may also explain the origin of other Tanganyikan endemics.
  • ORIGINAL ARTICLES Length-Weight Relationship and Condition Factor

    ORIGINAL ARTICLES Length-Weight Relationship and Condition Factor

    49 Research Journal of Fisheries and Hydrobiology, 6(2): 49-53, 2011 ISSN 1816-9112 ORIGINAL ARTICLES Length-Weight Relationship and Condition Factor of Pontic Shad, Alosa immaculata (Pisces: Clupeidae) From the Southern Black Sea Savaş Yılmaz, Nazmi Polat Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Ondokuz Mayıs University, 55139, Kurupelit, Samsun, Turkey ABSTRACT Seasonal variations in the length-weight relationship and condition factor of pontic shad, Alosa immaculata Bennett, 1835 collected from the Turkish Black Sea coast were investigated. A total of 730 individuals, 438 female and 292 male, were caught between December 2004 and October 2005. The length-weight relationships of females and males did not differ statistically in the same season. However, the length-weight relationships of sexes were seen to vary depending on the seasons. The parameter b of length-weight relationship was determined as 3.303 in females and 3.249 in males. The condition factor ranged from 0.550 to 1.064 for females, with a mean value of 0.794 and from 0.557 to 1.047 for males, with a mean value of 0.761. The highest condition factor in both sexes was obtained in spring. The average condition factor of female and male individuals >21 cm total length displayed an upward trend. Key words: Length-weight relationship, condition factor, pontic shad, Alosa immaculata, Black Sea Introductıon The length-weight relationship (LWR) in fish is significantly important in terms of fishery ecology and stock management. The LWRs allow determining the average weight of the fish in a certain class of length (Beyer, J.E., 1987), estimating the productivity and biomass of a fish population (Hossain, M.Y, 2006) determining the condition factor of fish (Bolger, T 1989) making a morphological comparison between species and populations (King, R.P., 1996; Goncalves, J.M.S, 1997).
  • Morphological Identifications and Morphometric Measurements of Genus Tenualosa Spp Fowler, 1934 (Family Clupeidae) in Mon Coastal Areas, Myanmar

    Morphological Identifications and Morphometric Measurements of Genus Tenualosa Spp Fowler, 1934 (Family Clupeidae) in Mon Coastal Areas, Myanmar

    Journal of Aquaculture & Marine Biology Research Article Open Access Morphological identifications and morphometric measurements of genus Tenualosa spp fowler, 1934 (Family Clupeidae) in Mon coastal areas, Myanmar Abstract Volume 8 Issue 1 - 2019 Morphometric measurements and identifying morphological characteristics of genus Khin Myo Myo Tint,1 Zarni Ko Ko,2 Naung Tenualosa spp (Family Clupeidae) along Mon Coastal Areas were accomplished during the 2 studied period June–Nov 2018. During the study period, it was designated as ten sampling Naung Oo 1Demonstrator, Department of Marine Science, Mawlamyine sites along Mon Coastal Areas for sample collection. The dissimilarities of morphological University, Myanmar characters between Tenualosa spp (Family Clupeidae) found along Mon Coastal Areas were 2Assistant Lecturer, Department of Marine Science, Mawlamyine consecutively revealed to particular column in a tabular form. Furthermore, morphometric University, Myanmar measurements between the two species of Tenualosa spp; Tenualosa ilisha (Hamilton, 1822) and Tenualosa toli (Valencinnes, 1847) were determined on the specimens to ascertain the Correspondence: Khin Myo Myo Tint, Demonstrator, possibility of morphological diversification. Department of Marine Science, Mawlamyine University, Myanmar, Email Keywords: morphological characteristics, morphometric measurements, Mon coastal areas, Tenualosa spp Received: February 11, 2019 | Published: February 22, 2019 Introduction containing small boast fishing and offshore fisheries of the whole country Myanmar. (DoF data 2012-2013) Furthermore, the capture Tenualosa (tenus=thin, alausa=a fish) is a genus of fish in the for herring fish that rely on man power using motorized vessels Clupeidae family and its subfamily Alosinae (the shads). There are (Myaw Pike Hlay) which was introduced in Ayeyawady deltaic areas three Hilsa species found in the Bay of Bengal, Tenualosa ilisha and for herring fish capture had been operated by 6 vessels in the study T.
  • Important Northeast Fish Provides Bait & Forage Needs

    Important Northeast Fish Provides Bait & Forage Needs

    Species Profile: Atlantic Herring Atlantic Herring Clupea harengus Important Northeast Fish Provides Bait & Forage Needs Introduction Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) is a member of the clupeid family, which are typically small, schooling marine fishes, such as menhaden, shad, and sardines. This species is also known as sea herring because it spends its entire life cycle in the ASMFC Management Area: ME - NJ ocean (unlike the anadromous river herring). Atlantic herring inhabits the coastal Common Names: Sea herring, sar- waters of the United States from Cape Hatteras, North Carolina through Labra- dine, herring dor, Canada, and also off the coasts of Europe. Herring form the base of the food web as a forage fish for marine mammals, seabirds, and many fish throughout the Interesting Facts: * Atlantic sea herring are often Mid-Atlantic and Northeast. They are an effective and affordable bait source for confused with river herring. Sea lobster, blue crab, and tuna fishermen, and were historically sold by fish canneries herring spend their entire life at as sardines. Whale watching/ecotourism and salt retailers are indirectly dependent sea, while river herring migrate on a steady supply of herring because whales migrate inshore in pursuit of schooling annually to freshwater to spawn. * Atlantic and Pacific herring have herring and fishermen buy salt to preserve their fish. Overseas, frozen and salted been found to produce a burst herring are a valued commodity. of sound, called a Fast Repetitive Tick, at night. Its believed that The Commission’s Atlantic Herring Section manages herring in state waters (0 - 3 this high-pitched click-like sound miles from shore), while the New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is used by herring to signal their location, thereby making it easier regulates the stock in federal waters (3 - 200 miles from shore).
  • Alewives and Blueback Herring Juila Beaty University of Maine

    Alewives and Blueback Herring Juila Beaty University of Maine

    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Maine Sea Grant Publications Maine Sea Grant 2014 Fisheries Then: Alewives and Blueback Herring Juila Beaty University of Maine Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/seagrant_pub Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Repository Citation Beaty, Juila, "Fisheries Then: Alewives and Blueback Herring" (2014). Maine Sea Grant Publications. 71. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/seagrant_pub/71 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine Sea Grant Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. (http://www.downeastfisheriestrail.org) Alewives and Blueback Herring Fisheries Then: Alewives and Blueback Herring (i.e. River Herring) By Julia Beaty and Natalie Springuel Reviewed by Chris Bartlett, Dan Kircheis The term “river herring” collectively refers to two species: Alosa pseudoharengus, commonly known as alewife, and the closely related Alosa aestivalis, commonly known as blueback herring, or simply bluebacks. Records dating back to the early nineteenth century indicate that fishermen could tell the difference between alewives and bluebacks, which look very similar; however, historically they have been harvested together with little regard to the differences between the two (Collette and Klein­MacPhee 2002). Alewives are the more common of the two species in most rivers in Maine (Collette and Klien­ MacPhee 2002). Fishermen in Maine often use the word “alewife” to refer to both alewives and bluebacks. Both alewives and bluebacks are anadromous fish, meaning that they are born in fresh water, but spend the majority of their adult lives at sea.
  • Atlantic Herring

    Atlantic Herring

    Species Profile: Atlantic Herring New Stock Assessment Could Lead to Species Snapshot Management Changes Introduction Atlantic Herring Until recently, the Atlantic herring stock had been considered healthy and fully rebuilt from a Clupea harengus collapsed stock in the 1980s. However, the results of the 2018 benchmark stock assessment have raised new concerns about the Atlantic herring resource. While the stock remains not Management Unit: Maine through New Jersey overfished and was not experiencing overfishing in the terminal year (2017) of the assess- ment, the assessment did show very low levels of recruitment over the past five years. These Common Names: Sea herring, sardine, sild, results will likely have management implications for the species as regulators work to prevent common herring, Labrador herring, sperling overfishing from occurring in the coming years. Diminished stock size and, in turn, lowered catch limits will also impact fisheries that rely on Atlantic herring as an important source of Interesting Facts: bait, such as American lobster, blue crab, tuna, and striped bass fisheries. • Atlantic herring and other clupeid fish have exceptional hearing. They can detect sound Life History frequencies up to 40 kilohertz, beyond the Atlantic sea herring is one of 200 species in the clupeid family, which includes menhaden, range of most fish. This allows schooling fish shad, and river herring. It inhabits coastal waters of the U.S. from Cape Hatteras, North Caro- to communicate while avoiding detection by lina through Labrador, Canada, and off the coast of Europe. Herring form the base of the food predatory fish. web as a forage species for many animals, from starfish and whelk to economically import- • While most members of the clupeid family are ant fish such as haddock, cod, and flounder.
  • High Levels of Genetic Variability and Differentiation In

    High Levels of Genetic Variability and Differentiation In

    Genetics and Molecular Biology Online Ahead of Print Copyright © 2009, Sociedade Brasileira de Genética. Printed in Brazil www.sbg.org.br High levels of genetic variability and differentiation in hilsa shad, Tenualosa ilisha (Clupeidae, Clupeiformes) populations revealed by PCR-RFLP analysis of the mitochondrial DNA D-loop region Sabuj Kanti Mazumder and Md. Samsul Alam Department of Fisheries Biology and Genetics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh. Abstract The hilsa shad, Tenualosa ilisha (Clupeidae, Clupeiformes) is an important anadromous clupeid species from the Western division of the Indo-Pacific region. It constitutes the largest single fishable species in Bangladesh. Informa- tion on genetic variability and population structure is very important for both management and conservation pur- poses. Past reports on the population structure of T. ilisha involving morphometric, allozyme and RAPD analyses are contradictory. We examined genetic variability and divergence in two riverine (the Jamuna and the Meghna), two estuarine (Kuakata and Sundarbans) and one marine (Cox’s Bazar) populations of T. ilisha by applying PCR-RFLP analysis of the mtDNA D-loop region. The amplified PCR products were restricted with four restriction enzymes namely, XbaI, EcoRI, EcoRV, and HaeIII. High levels of haplotype and gene diversity within and significant differenti- ations among, populations of T. ilisha were observed in this study. Significant FST values indicated differentiation among the river, estuary and marine populations. The UPGMA dendrogram based on genetic distance resulted in two major clusters, although, these were subsequently divided into three, corresponding to the riverine, estuarine and marine populations. The study underlines the usefulness of RFLP of mtDNA D-loop region as molecular mark- ers, and detected at least two differentiated populations of T.
  • Diversified Fish Farming for Sustainable Livelihood a Case-Based Study On

    Diversified Fish Farming for Sustainable Livelihood a Case-Based Study On

    Aquaculture 529 (2020) 735569 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Aquaculture journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aquaculture Diversified fish farming for sustainable livelihood: A case-based study on small and marginal fish farmers in Cachar district of Assam, India T ⁎ Jyoti Prabhat Duarah, Manmohan Mall Centre for Management Studies, North Eastern Regional Institute of Science and Technology, Arunachal Pradesh 791109, India ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Freshwater aquaculture is one of the fastest-growing sectors in India and has the potential for large scale em- Gudusia chapra ployment. However, this sector is dominated by small and marginal fish farmers adopting traditional technol- Carps ogies resulting in low productivity and nominal impact on their livelihood. The success of fish farming as a Sustainable livelihood business depends mostly on its scientific culture practice and efficient farming strategy, which will assist not only Species diversification in individual socio-economic development but also the economic growth of the country as a whole. Through a Farming practice case-based research method an economic analysis has been made on species diversification strategy of fish Economic analysis farming. It is found that, by adopting an effective and most economical diversification strategy consisting of the culture of Gudusia chapra along with Carps in small-scale composite culture ponds will resulted in more than 100% return on investment. Therefore, the outcome of this research has propounded for a novel farming practice of small indigenous high valued species having negligible investment will enhance the income of fish farmers. 1. Introduction were directly involved in the fishing, processing, and marketing, out of which 51 million were associated with inland fisheriesFAO Food and The inland water bodies of a country play a significant role in Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2009.
  • Spanish Mackerel (8

    Spanish Mackerel (8

    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 41(3): 822-834, ]987 LARVAL KING MACKEREL (SCOMBEROMORUS CAVALLA), SPANISH MACKEREL (8. MACULATUS), AND BLUEFISH (POMATOMUS SALTATRIX) OFF THE SOUTHEAST COAST OF THE UNITED STATES, 1973-1980 Mark R. Collins and Bruce W Stender ABSTRACT Surface and subsurface ichthyoplankton collections were made from 9 m to beyond the continental shelf(deepest station 3,940 m) in all seasons from Cape Hatteras, North Carolina to Cape Canaveral, Florida. King mackerel spawn from April to at least September, primarily at depths >40 m. Spring spawning activity takes place further offshore than does summer spawning. An apparent concentration of larvae between 32° and 33°N suggests that the area of upwelling associated with the Charleston bump is an important spawning and/or nursery area. Spanish mackerel spawn from May to September in depths <40 m. Larvae were less abundant than those of king mackerel, and no areas of concentration were found. Vertical migration to the surface at night is indicated for both king and Spanish mackerels. Bluefish spawn bimodally from March through at least November in depths >40 m, with the primary spawning peak in spring and the secondary peak in late summer. In spring, larvae were caught most often between 32° and 33°N, but in summer-fall were taken more often at locations further south. Neither vertical migration or visually-cued net avoidance is indicated, but bluefish >4 mm are strongly associated with the surface. Spanish (Scomberomorus maculatus) and king (S. cavalla) mackerels and blue- fish (Pomatomus saltatrix) support large recreational and commercial fisheries along the east coast of the United States.
  • Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria 2019

    Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria 2019

    FISH PASSAGE ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA 2019 37.2’ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northeast Region June 2019 Fish and Aquatic Conservation, Fish Passage Engineering Ecological Services, Conservation Planning Assistance United States Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 FISH PASSAGE ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA June 2019 This manual replaces all previous editions of the Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 Suggested citation: USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2019. Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria. USFWS, Northeast Region R5, Hadley, Massachusetts. USFWS R5 Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria June 2019 USFWS R5 Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria June 2019 Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ ix List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. x List of Equations ............................................................................................................................ xi List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................ xii 1 Scope of this Document ....................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Role of the USFWS Region 5 Fish Passage Engineering ............................................