DOCSLIB.ORG

Metoclopramide: an Antiemetic in Chemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Metoclopramide: an Antiemetic in Chemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting Central Journal of Drug Design and Research Bringing Excellence in Open Access Mini Review *Corresponding author Jørn Herrstedt, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000, Odense C, Denmark, Tel: Metoclopramide: An Antiemetic 45-6541-3634; Email: Submitted: 13 January 2017 Accepted: 16 March 2017 in Chemotherapy Induced Published: 17 March 2017 ISSN: 2379-089X Nausea and Vomiting Copyright © 2017 Herrstedt et al. 1 2 Signe Ladegaard Harder and Jørn Herrstedt * OPEN ACCESS 1Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark 2Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital and the University of Southern Keywords Denmark, Denmark • Metoclopramide • Chemotherapy Abstract • Nausea • Vomiting Chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are two of the most • Emesis feared adverse events experienced by cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Metoclopramide was derived from procainamide in the 1950s and one of the first drugs investigated in the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy. The breakthrough came in 1981 with the recognition that high-dose metoclopramide was effective and tolerable in the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. A combination of high- dose metoclopramide and a corticosteroid was the standard antiemetic recommendation until the serotonin (5-HT)3-receptor antagonists, ondansetron, granisetron, tropisetron and dolasetron became available in the beginning of the 1990s. The development of these highly selective (5-HT)3-receptor antagonists with a superior effect and a preferable tolerability profile has limited the use of metoclopramide to be prescribed as a rescue antiemetic, when guideline recommended antiemetic therapy fails. ABBREVIATIONS The emetic risk of chemotherapy is divided in high emetic risk (risk of vomiting 0-24 hours after chemotherapy > 90%), CINV: Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting; moderate emetic risk (30-90%), low emetic risk (10-30%) and MCP: Metoclopramide; NK -Receptor Antagonist: Neurokinin 1 minimal emetic risk (< 10%). This paper will review studies (NK) -Receptor Antagonist; 5-HT -Receptor Antagonist: 1 3 with MCP in the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting in patients 5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) -Receptor Antagonist 3 receiving high and moderate emetic risk chemotherapy, INTRODUCTION primarily cisplatin (high risk), anthracyclines (moderate risk), cyclophosphamide (moderate risk) and the combination of Metoclopramide (MCP) is a dopamine receptor antagonist, an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (high risk). The most and is the most intensively investigated drug of this class as important randomized studies are summarized in Table 1. regards prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). The early trials (1960-1989) MCP (2-methoxy-5-chloro-procainamide) was originated in Conventional, low doses of MCP: In randomized, double- the 1950s as a substituted benzamide derived from procainamide blind trials, oral doses of MCP 20 mg x 2-3 were equal to placebo a drug with local anesthetic and antiarrhythmic properties [1]. or to prochlorperazine, (but both were ineffective) and inferior In therapeutic doses, MCP is almost devoid of these effects, to dexamethasone or domperidone against nausea and vomiting but instead enhances gastrointestinal motility and possesses induced by both non-cisplatin-based and cisplatin-based antiemetic effect. chemotherapy [4-7]. It should be noticed, that in these early MCP was tested in the early 1960s by Justin-Besancon, Laville, and it can therefore be concluded, that MCP in oral doses up to and Thominet [2] and soon proved to be effective against nausea 20trials, mg only is no the better first 24than hours placebo after in chemotherapy the period 0-24 was hours evaluated, after and vomiting induced by a number of non-malignant conditions chemotherapy. The interest in investigating MCP in conventional such as dyspepsia, delayed gastric emptying and postoperative doses was therefore modest during the 1960s and 1970s. nausea and vomiting [1,3]. Cite this article: Harder SL, Herrstedt J (2017) Metoclopramide: An Antiemetic in Chemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting. J Drug Des Res 4(2): 1037. Herrstedt et al. (2017) Email: Central Bringing Excellence in Open Access Table 1: Important randomized studies 1960-2017 in the development of metoclopramide as an antiemetic in the prophylaxis of CINV. Number Chemo- Reference of pa- Investigational Arm Comparator Primary parameter Results* therapy tients Moertel PLA Incidence of nausea et al. 1969 144 Non-CIS MCP 20 mg x 3 po MCP = MPZ = PLA MPZ 5 mg x 3 po and vomiting days 1-4 [4], Frytak et al. MCP > PCP, both inef- 100 CIS MCP 20 mg x 3 po PCP Vomiting 1981 [6], fective Gralla et al. PLA Number of EE 0-24 MCP > PLA 41 CIS MCP 2 mg/kg x 5 iv 1981[8], PCP 10 mg x 5 im hours MCP > PCP Grunberg Number of EE 0-24 et al. 1984 28 CIS MCP 2 mg/kg x 5 iv HAL 3 mg/kg x 5 iv MCP > HAL hours [19], 60(24 Kris et al. received Number of EE 0-24 3 mg/kg x 2 iv = 2 mg/ CIS MCP 2 mg/kg x 5 iv MCP 3 mg/kg x 2 iv 1985 [9], 3 mg/kg hours kg x 5 iv x 2 Nausea, vomiting and Warrington MCP 7 mg/kg divided in MCP 3 mg/kg followed by 4 Nausea and vomiting patient preference in et al. 1986 33 CIS 5 bolus infusions + DEX mg/kg (8 hour continuous 0-24 hours favor of the continuous [11], 20 mg iv infusion) + DEX 20 mg iv regimen Number of EE 0-24 Kris et al. MCP 3mg/kg x 2 iv + DEX MCP 3mg/kg x 2 iv + DEX 20 No difference in EE, but 120 CIS hours 1987 [22], 20 mg iv + DPH 50 mg iv mg iv + L 1.5 mg/m2 iv less restlessness with L Safety Complete protection MCP 3 mg/kg superior as Roila et al. MCP 1 mg/kg x 4 iv + MP MCP 3 mg/kg x 2 iv + DEX 20 367 CIS from vomiting/nausea concerns EE, nausea and 1989 [10], 250mg x 2 iv mg iv + DPH 50 iv 0-24 hours, Safety safety (<extrapyramidal AE) Marty et al. OND 8 mg iv + OND 1 MCP 3 mg/kg iv + Number of patients 97 CIS OND > MCP 1990 [33], mg/h iv for 24 hours MCP 0.5 mg/kg/h for 8 hours with 0-2 EE 0-24h MCP 3 mg/kg iv + Number of patients 0-24 h: OND > MCP De Mulder OND 8 mg iv + OND 1 MCP 0.5 mg/kg/h for 8 with 0-2 EE 0-24 h Day 2-6: et al. 1990 125 CIS mg/h iv for 24 hours + hours+ MCP 20 mg x 3 po Number of patients Vomiting: OND = MCP [34], OND 8 mg x 3 po days 2-6 days 2-6 with 0-2 EE days 2-6 Nausea:Ond Number with 0-2 EE EE: OND > MCP (days Bonneterre OND 4 mg iv + OND 4 mg MCP 60 mg iv + MCP 20 mg FAC or (day 1) 1-3) Nausea: OND > MCP et al. 1990 75 po day 1 + OND 8 mg x 3 po day 1 + MCP 20 mg x 3 po FEC Number with 0-2 EE (day 1) Nausea: OND = [39], po for 3-5 days for 3-5 days (days 2-3) MCP (days 2-3) EE (day 1) but not 0 EE: OND > MCP (day 1) 0 EE: OND = MCP (days Kaasa et al. OND 8 mg iv day 1 + OND MCP 60 mg iv + MCP 20 mg parameter was number 2-3) Nausea: OND > MCP 93 AC or EC 1990 [40], 8 mg x 3 po for 3-5 days po x 3 for 3-5 days withspecified 0 EE if or the with primary 0-2 (day 1) EE. EE (days 2-3) same Nausea: OND = MCP comment (days 2-3) Marschner OND 8 mg po + OND 8 mg MCP 60 mg iv + MCP 20 mg Number of patients et al. 122 EC or FEC OND = MCP x 3 po for 3-5 days po x 3 for 3-5 days with 0-2 EE 0-24 h. 1991[41], Mean nausea score Warr et al. MCP 2 mg/kg x 5 iv+ DEX 10 151 CIS (day 1) Number of pa- GRA = DEX + MCP + DPH 1993 [35], mg iv + DPH10 mg iv tients with 0 EE (day 1) GRA 80 μg/kg iv Number of patients Chevallier MCP 3 mg/kg iv + MCP 0.5 to 2 more doses of GRA with no vomiting and et al.1993 281 CIS mg/kg/h for 8 hours + DEX GRA = DEX + MCP ifGRA breakthrough 40 μg/kg iv emesis+up no or only mild nausea [36], 12 mg iv 0-24 h PAL 0.25 mg iv + DEX 12 PAL 0.25 mg iv + DEX 12 mg 303 of mgwithin iv + the APR first 125 24h mg x Complete response (no Roila et al. iv + APR 125 mg x 1 po day 480 CIS 1 po day 1+ DEX 8 mg x EE and no rescue an- MCP + DEX = APR + DEX 2015 [52], 1+DEX 8 mg x 1 po days 2-4+ planned 1podays 2-4 + MCP 20 tiemetics) days 2-5 APR80 mg x 1 podays 2-3 mg x 4 po days 2-4 0-24 hours means from start of cisplatin infusion until 24 hours after. EE, emetic episodes; AE, adverse events; PCP, prochlorperazine; MCP, meto- clopramide;*> means a statistical DOM, domperidone; significant difference; MPZ, metopimazine; = means no DEX, statistical dexamethasone; significant MP, difference, methylprednisolone; but numerical DPH, differences diphenhydramine; may appear. L, lorazepam; HAL, E, epirubicin; C, cyclophosphamide. haloperidol; OND, ondansetron; GRA, granisetron; PAL, palonosetron; PLA, placebo; APR, aprepitant; CIS, cisplatin; F, 5-fluorouracil; A, doxorubicin; J Drug Des Res 4(2): 1037 (2017) 2/6 Herrstedt et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table S1: Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, and F1 Score of NLP Vs. ICD for Identification of Symptoms for (A) Biome Developm
    Table S1: Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and F1 score of NLP vs. ICD for identification of symptoms for (A) BioMe development cohort; (B) BioMe validation cohort; (C) MIMIC-III; (D) 1 year of notes from patients in BioMe calculated using manual chart review. A) Fatigue Nausea and/or vomiting Anxiety Depression NLP (95% ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P CI) 0.99 (0.93- 0.59 (0.43- <0.00 0.25 (0.12- <0.00 <0.00 0.54 (0.33- Sensitivity 0.99 (0.9 – 1) 0.98 (0.88 -1) 0.3 (0.15-0.5) 0.85 (0.65-96) 0.02 1) 0.73) 1 0.42) 1 1 0.73) 0.57 (0.29- 0.9 (0.68- Specificity 0.89 (0.4-1) 0.75 (0.19-1) 0.68 0.97 (0.77-1) 0.03 0.98 (0.83-1) 0.22 0.81 (0.53-0.9) 0.96 (0.79-1) 0.06 0.82) 0.99) 0.99 (0.92- 0.86 (0.71- 0.94 (0.79- 0.79 (0.59- PPV 0.96 (0.82-1) 0.3 0.95 (0.66-1) 0.02 0.95 (0.66-1) 0.16 0.93 (0.68-1) 0.12 1) 0.95) 0.99) 0.92) 0.13 (0.03- <0.00 0.49 (0.33- <0.00 0.66 (0.48- NPV 0.89 (0.4-1) 0.007 0.94 (0.63-1) 0.34 (0.2-0.51) 0.97 (0.81-1) 0.86 (0.6-0.95) 0.04 0.35) 1 0.65) 1 0.81) <0.00 <0.00 <0.00 F1 Score 0.99 0.83 0.88 0.57 0.95 0.63 0.82 0.79 0.002 1 1 1 Itching Cramp Pain NLP (95% ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P CI) 0.98 (0.86- 0.24 (0.09- <0.00 0.09 (0.01- <0.00 0.52 (0.37- <0.00 Sensitivity 0.98 (0.85-1) 0.99 (0.93-1) 1) 0.45) 1 0.29) 1 0.66) 1 0.89 (0.72- 0.5 (0.37- Specificity 0.96 (0.8-1) 0.98 (0.86-1) 0.68 0.98 (0.88-1) 0.18 0.5 (0-1) 1 0.98) 0.66) 0.88 (0.69- PPV 0.96 (0.8-1) 0.8 (0.54-1) 0.32 0.8 (0.16-1) 0.22 0.99 (0.93-1) 0.98 (0.87-1) NA* 0.97) 0.98 (0.85- 0.57 (0.41- <0.00 0.58 (0.43- <0.00 NPV 0.98 (0.86-1) 0.5 (0-1) 0.02 (0-0.08) NA* 1) 0.72) 1 0.72) 1 <0.00 <0.00 <0.00 F1 Score 0.97 0.56 0.91 0.28 0.99 0.68 1 1 1 *Denotes 95% confidence intervals and P values that could not be calculated due to insufficient cells in 2x2 tables.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Union Reference Dates A
    Active substance name (INN) EU DLP BfArM / BAH DLP yearly PSUR 6-month-PSUR yearly PSUR bis DLP (List of Union PSUR Submission Reference Dates and Frequency (List of Union Frequency of Reference Dates and submission of Periodic Frequency of submission of Safety Update Reports, Periodic Safety Update 30 Nov. 2012) Reports, 30 Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacy and Poisons (Third and Fourth Schedule Amendment) Order 2017
    Q UO N T FA R U T A F E BERMUDA PHARMACY AND POISONS (THIRD AND FOURTH SCHEDULE AMENDMENT) ORDER 2017 BR 111 / 2017 The Minister responsible for health, in exercise of the power conferred by section 48A(1) of the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979, makes the following Order: Citation 1 This Order may be cited as the Pharmacy and Poisons (Third and Fourth Schedule Amendment) Order 2017. Repeals and replaces the Third and Fourth Schedule of the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979 2 The Third and Fourth Schedules to the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979 are repealed and replaced with— “THIRD SCHEDULE (Sections 25(6); 27(1))) DRUGS OBTAINABLE ONLY ON PRESCRIPTION EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFIED IN THE FOURTH SCHEDULE (PART I AND PART II) Note: The following annotations used in this Schedule have the following meanings: md (maximum dose) i.e. the maximum quantity of the substance contained in the amount of a medicinal product which is recommended to be taken or administered at any one time. 1 PHARMACY AND POISONS (THIRD AND FOURTH SCHEDULE AMENDMENT) ORDER 2017 mdd (maximum daily dose) i.e. the maximum quantity of the substance that is contained in the amount of a medicinal product which is recommended to be taken or administered in any period of 24 hours. mg milligram ms (maximum strength) i.e. either or, if so specified, both of the following: (a) the maximum quantity of the substance by weight or volume that is contained in the dosage unit of a medicinal product; or (b) the maximum percentage of the substance contained in a medicinal product calculated in terms of w/w, w/v, v/w, or v/v, as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979
    Q UO N T FA R U T A F E BERMUDA PHARMACY AND POISONS ACT 1979 1979 : 26 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I PRELIMINARY 1 Short title 2 Interpretation PART II THE PHARMACY COUNCIL 3 The Pharmacy Council 4 Membership of the Council 4A Functions of the Council 4B Protection from personal liability 4C Annual Report 5 Proceedings of the Council, etc PART III REGISTRATION OF PHARMACISTS 6 Offence to practise pharmacy if not registered 7 Registration as a pharmacist 7A Re-registration as non-practising member 7AA Period of validity of registration 8 Code of Conduct 9 Pharmacy Profession Complaints Committee 10 Investigation of complaint by Committee 10A Inquiry into complaint by Council 10B Inquiry by Council of its own initiative 11 Surrender of registration 12 Restoration of name to register 1 PHARMACY AND POISONS ACT 1979 13 Proof of registration 14 Appeals 14A Fees 14B Amendment of Seventh Schedule 15 Regulations for this part PART IV REGISTRATION OF PHARMACIES 16 Register of pharmacies 17 Registration of premises as registered pharmacies 18 Unfit premises: new applications 19 Unfit premises: registered pharmacies 20 Appeals 21 When certificates of unfitness take effect 22 Regulations for this Part PART V CONTROL OF PRESCRIPTIONS AND IMPORTATION 23 Prescriptions to be in a certain form 23A Validity of a prescription 24 Supply by registered pharmacist of equivalent medicines 25 Restrictions on the importation of medicines 26 Declaration relating to imported medicines [repealed] PART VI CONTROL OF DRUGS 27 Certain substances to be sold on prescription
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Issues in Caring for Older People
    Doctoral Thesis - Tesis Doctoral Quality issues in caring for older people: • Appropriateness of transition from long-term care facilities to acute hospital care • Potentially inappropriate medication: development of a European list Anna Renom Guiteras Prof. Gabriele Meyer Prof. Ramón Miralles Basseda Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Halle (Saale) & Barcelona, Catalonia University of Witten/Herdecke Spain Witten Germany Programa de doctorat en Medicina Departament de Medicina, Facultat de Medicina Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona, 2015 13 Contents 15 1. Introduction • Research context • Background of the research topics • Pesetaio of the ailes 23 2. Summary and discussion of the results 31 3. Conclusions 37 4. References 47 5. Articles • Article 1: Renom-Guiteras A, Uhrenfeldt L, Meyer G, Mann E. Assessment tools for determining appropriateness of admission to acute care of persons transferred from long-term care facilities: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14:80 • Article 2: Renom-Guiteras A, Meyer G, Thürmann PA. The EU(7)-PIM list: a list of potentially inappropriate medications for older people consented by experts from seven European countries. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;71(7):861-75 77 6. Annexes • Annex 1.1 (article 1) - Additional file 1: Studies dealing with assessment tools for determining appropriateness of hospital admissions among residents of LTC facilities. • Annex 1.2 (article 1) - Additional file 2: Characteristics of the assessment tools for determining appropriateness of hospital admissions among residents of LTC facilities. • Annex 2.1 (article 2) - Appendix 1: Complete EU(7)-PIM list • Annex 2.2 (article 2) - Appendix 2: Questionable Potentially Inappropriate Medications (Questionable PIM): results of the Delphi survey.
    [Show full text]
  • The Handbook of Cannabis Therapeutics: from Bench to Bedside
    Handbook of Cannabis Therapeutics From Bench to Bedside 9780789030979 Handbook of Cannabis Therapeutics From Bench to Bedside Size: 212 x 152mm Spine size: 26 mm Color pages: Binding: Paperback THE HAWORTH PRESS® Haworth Series in Integrative Healing Ethan Russo Editor The Last Sorcerer: Echoes of the Rainforest by Ethan Russo Professionalism and Ethics in Complementary and Alternative Medicine by John Crellin and Fernando Ania Cannabis and Cannabinoids: Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Therapeutic Potential by Franjo Grotenhermen and Ethan Russo Modern Psychology and Ancient Wisdom: Psychological Healing Practices from the World’s Religious Traditions edited by Sharon G. Mijares Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Clinic Design by Robert A. Roush Herbal Voices: American Herbalism Through the Words of American Herbalists by Anne K. Dougherty The Healing Power of Chinese Herbs and Medicinal Recipes by Joseph P. Hou and Youyu Jin Alternative Therapies in the Treatment of Brain Injury and Neurobehavioral Disorders: A Practical Guide edited by Gregory J. Murrey Handbook of Cannabis Therapeutics: From Bench to Bedside edited by Ethan B. Russo and Franjo Grotenhermen Handbook of Cannabis Therapeutics From Bench to Bedside Ethan B. Russo, MD Franjo Grotenhermen, MD Editors Routledge Taylor &. Francis Croup NEW YORK AND LONDON First Published by The Haworth Press, Inc., 10 Alice Street, Binghamton, NY 13904-1580. Transferred to Digital Printing 2010 by Routledge 270 Madison Ave, New York NY 10016 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN For more information on this book or to order, visit http://www.haworthpress.com/store/product.asp?sku=5741 or call 1-800-HAWORTH (800-429-6784) in the United States and Canada or (607) 722-5857 outside the United States and Canada or contact [email protected] © 2006 by The Haworth Press, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Ehealth DSI [Ehdsi V2.2.2-OR] Ehealth DSI – Master Value Set
    MTC eHealth DSI [eHDSI v2.2.2-OR] eHealth DSI – Master Value Set Catalogue Responsible : eHDSI Solution Provider PublishDate : Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 1 of 490 MTC Table of Contents epSOSActiveIngredient 4 epSOSAdministrativeGender 148 epSOSAdverseEventType 149 epSOSAllergenNoDrugs 150 epSOSBloodGroup 155 epSOSBloodPressure 156 epSOSCodeNoMedication 157 epSOSCodeProb 158 epSOSConfidentiality 159 epSOSCountry 160 epSOSDisplayLabel 167 epSOSDocumentCode 170 epSOSDoseForm 171 epSOSHealthcareProfessionalRoles 184 epSOSIllnessesandDisorders 186 epSOSLanguage 448 epSOSMedicalDevices 458 epSOSNullFavor 461 epSOSPackage 462 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 2 of 490 MTC epSOSPersonalRelationship 464 epSOSPregnancyInformation 466 epSOSProcedures 467 epSOSReactionAllergy 470 epSOSResolutionOutcome 472 epSOSRoleClass 473 epSOSRouteofAdministration 474 epSOSSections 477 epSOSSeverity 478 epSOSSocialHistory 479 epSOSStatusCode 480 epSOSSubstitutionCode 481 epSOSTelecomAddress 482 epSOSTimingEvent 483 epSOSUnits 484 epSOSUnknownInformation 487 epSOSVaccine 488 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 3 of 490 MTC epSOSActiveIngredient epSOSActiveIngredient Value Set ID 1.3.6.1.4.1.12559.11.10.1.3.1.42.24 TRANSLATIONS Code System ID Code System Version Concept Code Description (FSN) 2.16.840.1.113883.6.73 2017-01 A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 2.16.840.1.113883.6.73 2017-01
    [Show full text]
  • Changes Highlighted Final Version Date of Issue: 23Rd December 2015
    EPHMRA ANATOMICAL CLASSIFICATION GUIDELINES 2016 Section A Changed Classes/Guidelines: Changes Highlighted Final Version Date of issue: 23rd December 2015 1 A2B ANTIULCERANTS R1997r2 016 Combinations of specific antiulcerants with anti-infectives against Helicobacter pylori are classified according to the anti-ulcerant substance. For example, proton pump inhibitors in combination with these anti-infectives are classified in A2B2. A2B1 H2 antagonists R2002 Includes, for example, cimetidine, famotidine, nizatidine, ranitidine, roxatidine. Combinations of low dose H2 antagonists with antacids are classified with antacids in A2A6. A2B2 Acid Proton pump inhibitors R2003r2 016 Includes esomeprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole. A2B3 Prostaglandin antiulcerants Includes misoprostol, enprostil. A2B4 Bismuth antiulcerants Includes combinations with antacids. A2B9 All other antiulcerants R2002r2 016 Includes all other products specifically stated to be antiulcerants even when containing antispasmodics (see A3). Combinations of low dose H2 antagonists with antacids are classified with antacids in A2A6. Included are, eg carbenoxolone, gefarnate, pirenzepine, proglumide, sucralfate and sofalcone. Herbal combinations are classified in A2C. In Japan, Korea and Taiwan only, sulpiride and other psycholeptics indicated for ulcer use are also included in this group, whilst in all other countries, these compounds are classified in N5A9. Products containing rebamipide for gastric mucosal protection are classified here. Products containing rebamipide and indicated for dry eye are classified in S1K9. A2C OTHER STOMACH DISORDER PREPARATIONS R1994 Includes herbal preparations and also plain alginic acid. Combinations of antacids with alginic acid are in A2A1. 2 A4 ANTIEMETICS AND ANTINAUSEANTS A4A ANTIEMETICS AND ANTINAUSEANTS R1996 Products indicated for vertigo and Meniere's disease are classified in N7C. Gastroprokinetics are classified in A3F.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/0143734 A1 DE COLLE Et Al
    US 20170143734A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/0143734 A1 DE COLLE et al. (43) Pub. Date: May 25, 2017 (54) PRODRUGS OF METOPMAZINE Publication Classification (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: Neurogastrx, Inc., Campbell, CA (US) A6II 3/545 (2006.01) A6IR 9/00 (2006.01) (72) Inventors: Cyril DE COLLE, Campbell, CA A 6LX 9/70 (2006.01) (US); Pankaj PASRICHA, Ellicott C07D 417/06 (2006.01) City, MD (US); David WUSTROW, A63L/98 (2006.01) Los Gatos, CA (US) (52) U.S. Cl. (21) Appl. No.: 15/320,724 CPC ........ A6IK3I/5415 (2013.01); C07D 417/06 (2013.01); A61K 31/198 (2013.01); A61 K (22) PCT Fed: Jun. 23, 2015 9/7023 (2013.01); A61K 9/006 (2013.01) (86) PCT No.: PCT/US 15/37258 (57) ABSTRACT S 371 (c)(1), Provided herein are methods, compounds, compositions, and kits for the treatment of an enteric nervous system (2) Date: Dec. 20, 2016 disorder. Such methods may comprise administering to a Subject an effective amount of a phenothiazine compound, a peripherally restricted dopamine decarboxylase inhibitor, Related U.S. Application Data and/or a peripherally restricted dopamine D2 receptor (60) Provisional application No. 62/016.235, filed on Jun. antagonist that does not substantially inhibit hERG chan 24, 2014. nels. Patent Application Publication May 25, 2017. Sheet 1 of 2 US 2017/O143734 A1 Repeated measures one-way ANOVA data 2 5 2 O 1 5 1 O FIGURE 1 Patent Application Publication May 25, 2017. Sheet 2 of 2 US 2017/O143734 A1 Solid Gastric Emptying (%) QCcodoG |- ODCON,COLO<!--(NI<- G2Cco ||||||| IIIIII FIGURE 2 US 2017/O 143734 A1 May 25, 2017 PRODRUGS OF METOPMAZINE The safety concerns relate to (1) unwanted cardiac side effects caused by, e.g., interaction of the agents with ion CROSS-REFERENCE channels involved in cardiac action potentials, and (2) unwanted motor dysfunction caused by the actions of the 0001.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomical Classification Guidelines V2021 EPHMRA ANATOMICAL CLASSIFICATION GUIDELINES 2021
    EPHMRA ANATOMICAL CLASSIFICATION GUIDELINES 2021 Anatomical Classification Guidelines V2021 "The Anatomical Classification of Pharmaceutical Products has been developed and maintained by the European Pharmaceutical Marketing Research Association (EphMRA) and is therefore the intellectual property of this Association. EphMRA's Classification Committee prepares the guidelines for this classification system and takes care for new entries, changes and improvements in consultation with the product's manufacturer. The contents of the Anatomical Classification of Pharmaceutical Products remain the copyright to EphMRA. Permission for use need not be sought and no fee is required. We would appreciate, however, the acknowledgement of EphMRA Copyright in publications etc. Users of this classification system should keep in mind that Pharmaceutical markets can be segmented according to numerous criteria." © EphMRA 2021 Anatomical Classification Guidelines V2021 CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 1 B BLOOD AND BLOOD FORMING ORGANS 28 C CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM 36 D DERMATOLOGICALS 51 G GENITO-URINARY SYSTEM AND SEX HORMONES 58 H SYSTEMIC HORMONAL PREPARATIONS (EXCLUDING SEX HORMONES) 68 J GENERAL ANTI-INFECTIVES SYSTEMIC 72 K HOSPITAL SOLUTIONS 88 L ANTINEOPLASTIC AND IMMUNOMODULATING AGENTS 96 M MUSCULO-SKELETAL SYSTEM 106 N NERVOUS SYSTEM 111 P PARASITOLOGY 122 R RESPIRATORY SYSTEM 124 S SENSORY ORGANS 136 T DIAGNOSTIC AGENTS 143 V VARIOUS 145 Anatomical Classification Guidelines V2021 INTRODUCTION The Anatomical Classification was initiated in 1971 by EphMRA. It has been developed jointly by Intellus/PBIRG and EphMRA. It is a subjective method of grouping certain pharmaceutical products and does not represent any particular market, as would be the case with any other classification system.
    [Show full text]
  • Niperotidine Hydrochloride
    Metopimazine/Nizatidine 1751 ataxia, confusion, disorientation, dizziness, euphoria, dysphoria, little effect on the metabolism of other drugs. However, hallucinations, psychosis, depression, headache, decreased con- like other H2-antagonists its effects on gastric pH may centration, blurred vision, sleep disturbances, decreased coordi- O affect the absorption of some other drugs. nation, and tremors. Adverse cardiovascular reactions including -O N+ hypotension, orthostatic hypotension, and tachycardia have oc- curred. Gastrointestinal disturbances, decreased appetite, and ab- HN Pharmacokinetics dominal pain have also been reported. Nizatidine is readily and almost completely absorbed O HN Precautions S from the gastrointestinal tract. The bioavailability of Nabilone is extensively metabolised and largely excreted in bile, O CH3 nizatidine after oral doses exceeds 70% and may be and therefore is not recommended in patients with severe hepatic O N slightly increased by the presence of food. It is widely impairment. It should be used with caution in patients with a his- CH3 distributed and is about 35% bound to plasma proteins. tory of psychiatric disorders or depression, or those with hyper- tension or heart disease. (niperotidine) The elimination half-life of nizatidine is 1 to 2 hours Because of the possibility of CNS depression, patients should be and is prolonged in renal impairment. Nizatidine is warned not to drive or operate machinery. Profile partly metabolised in the liver: nizatidine N-2-oxide, Niperotidine hydrochloride is a histamine H2-receptor antagonist nizatidine S-oxide, and N-2-monodesmethylnizatidine The possibility of dependence similar to that of cannabis should with general properties similar to those of cimetidine (p.1716). be borne in mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Download of These Slides, Please Direct Your Browser to the Following Web Address
    Clinical Roundtable Monograph Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology October 2015 Advances in the Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: New Data From Recent and Ongoing Trials Discussants Eric Roeland, MD Director of Clinical Research in Symptom Intervention Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center La Jolla, California Matti S. Aapro, MD Dean of the Multidisciplinary Oncology Institute A CME Activity Clinique de Genolier Approved for Genolier, Switzerland 1.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) TM Lee S. Schwartzberg, MD Professor of Medicine Chief, Division of Hematology & Oncology Release Date: October 2015 The University of Tennessee Health Science Center Expiration Date: October 31, 2016 Memphis, Tennessee Estimated time to complete activity: 1.25 hours Project ID: 11026 Abstract: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is among the most feared and debilitating adverse events experienced by cancer patients. Left unaddressed, CINV symptoms not only decrease quality of life, but may also affect patients’ willingness to continue chemotherapy treatment. Detailed guidelines are available that outline best practices for prophylaxis of acute and delayed CINV. However, adherence to guideline recommendations continues to be suboptimal, and many patients still suffer unnecessarily from CINV. In addition, breakthrough/refractory CINV continues to present particular challenges. The development of effective CINV treatments with diverse mechanisms of action has expanded the options available for preventing symptoms. The US Food and Drug Administration has recently approved several new therapies for the management of CINV. NEPA is a fixed-dose combination of netupitant (300 mg) plus palonosetron (0.5 mg). In combination with dexamethasone, NEPA has demonstrated superior efficacy to palonosetron alone in patients receiving highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.
    [Show full text]