New Anti-Obesity Drugs on the Horizon
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
WELLBUTRIN SR Safely and Effectively
HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION psychosis, hallucinations, paranoia, delusions, homicidal ideation, These highlights do not include all the information needed to use aggression, hostility, agitation, anxiety, and panic, as well as suicidal WELLBUTRIN SR safely and effectively. See full prescribing ideation, suicide attempt, and completed suicide. Observe patients information for WELLBUTRIN SR. attempting to quit smoking with bupropion for the occurrence of such symptoms and instruct them to discontinue bupropion and contact a WELLBUTRIN SR (bupropion hydrochloride) sustained-release tablets, healthcare provider if they experience such adverse events. (5.2) for oral use • Initial U.S. Approval: 1985 Seizure risk: The risk is dose-related. Can minimize risk by gradually increasing the dose and limiting daily dose to 400 mg. Discontinue if WARNING: SUICIDAL THOUGHTS AND BEHAVIORS seizure occurs. (4, 5.3, 7.3) See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. • Hypertension: WELLBUTRIN SR can increase blood pressure. Monitor blood pressure before initiating treatment and periodically during • Increased risk of suicidal thinking and behavior in children, treatment. (5.4) adolescents and young adults taking antidepressants. (5.1) • Activation of mania/hypomania: Screen patients for bipolar disorder and • Monitor for worsening and emergence of suicidal thoughts and monitor for these symptoms. (5.5) behaviors. (5.1) • Psychosis and other neuropsychiatric reactions: Instruct patients to contact a healthcare professional if such reactions occur. (5.6) --------------------------- INDICATIONS AND USAGE ---------------------------- • Angle-closure glaucoma: Angle-closure glaucoma has occurred in WELLBUTRIN SR is an aminoketone antidepressant, indicated for the patients with untreated anatomically narrow angles treated with treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). (1) antidepressants. -
Chapter 7: Monogenic Forms of Diabetes
CHAPTER 7 MONOGENIC FORMS OF DIABETES Mark A. Sperling, MD, and Abhimanyu Garg, MD Dr. Mark A. Sperling is Emeritus Professor and Chair, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA. Dr. Abhimanyu Garg is Professor of Internal Medicine and Chief of the Division of Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. SUMMARY Types 1 and 2 diabetes have multiple and complex genetic influences that interact with environmental triggers, such as viral infections or nutritional excesses, to result in their respective phenotypes: young, lean, and insulin-dependence for type 1 diabetes patients or older, overweight, and often manageable by lifestyle interventions and oral medications for type 2 diabetes patients. A small subset of patients, comprising ~2%–3% of all those diagnosed with diabetes, may have characteristics of either type 1 or type 2 diabetes but have single gene defects that interfere with insulin production, secretion, or action, resulting in clinical diabetes. These types of diabetes are known as MODY, originally defined as maturity-onset diabetes of youth, and severe early-onset forms, such as neonatal diabetes mellitus (NDM). Defects in genes involved in adipocyte development, differentiation, and death pathways cause lipodystrophy syndromes, which are also associated with insulin resistance and diabetes. Although these syndromes are considered rare, more awareness of these disorders and increased availability of genetic testing in clinical and research laboratories, as well as growing use of next generation, whole genome, or exome sequencing for clinically challenging phenotypes, are resulting in increased recognition. A correct diagnosis of MODY, NDM, or lipodystrophy syndromes has profound implications for treatment, genetic counseling, and prognosis. -
Clarifying the Ghrelin System's Ability to Regulate Feeding Behaviours
International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Clarifying the Ghrelin System’s Ability to Regulate Feeding Behaviours Despite Enigmatic Spatial Separation of the GHSR and Its Endogenous Ligand Alexander Edwards and Alfonso Abizaid * Department of Neuroscience, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-613-520-2600 (ext. 1544) Academic Editor: Suzanne L. Dickson Received: 27 February 2017; Accepted: 11 April 2017; Published: 19 April 2017 Abstract: Ghrelin is a hormone predominantly produced in and secreted from the stomach. Ghrelin is involved in many physiological processes including feeding, the stress response, and in modulating learning, memory and motivational processes. Ghrelin does this by binding to its receptor, the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR), a receptor found in relatively high concentrations in hypothalamic and mesolimbic brain regions. While the feeding and metabolic effects of ghrelin can be explained by the effects of this hormone on regions of the brain that have a more permeable blood brain barrier (BBB), ghrelin produced within the periphery demonstrates a limited ability to reach extrahypothalamic regions where GHSRs are expressed. Therefore, one of the most pressing unanswered questions plaguing ghrelin research is how GHSRs, distributed in brain regions protected by the BBB, are activated despite ghrelin’s predominant peripheral production and poor ability to transverse the BBB. This manuscript will describe how peripheral ghrelin activates central GHSRs to encourage feeding, and how central ghrelin synthesis and ghrelin independent activation of GHSRs may also contribute to the modulation of feeding behaviours. Keywords: feeding; ghrelin; GHSR; blood brain barrier; vagal afferents; circumventricular organs; central ghrelin synthesis; GHSR heterodimerization; GHSR constitutive activity 1. -
Myalept® (Metreleptin)
UnitedHealthcare Pharmacy Clinical Pharmacy Programs Program Number 2021 P 2032-11 Program Prior Authorization/Medical Necessity Medication Myalept® (metreleptin) P&T Approval Date 5/2014, 7/2014, 8/2014, 7/2015, 6/2016, 5/2017, 5/2018, 5/2019, 5/2020, 5/2021 Effective Date 8/1/2021; Oxford only: 8/1/2021 1. Background: Myalept (metreleptin) is a leptin analog indicated as an adjunct to diet as replacement therapy to treat the complications of leptin deficiency in patients with congenital or acquired generalized lipodystrophy.1 Myalept is available only through a restricted distribution program under a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), called the Myalept REMS program, because of the risks associated with the development of anti-metreleptin antibodies that neutralize endogenous leptin and the risk of lymphoma. 2. Coverage Criteria: A. Initial Authorization 1. Myalept will be approved based on all of the following criteria: a. Diagnosis of congenital or acquired generalized lipodystrophy associated with leptin deficiency -AND- b. Myalept is being used as an adjunct to diet modification -AND- c. Prescribed by an endocrinologist -AND- d. Documentation demonstrates that patient has at least one of the following: (1) Diabetes mellitus or insulin resistance with persistent hyperglycemia (HgbA1C > 7.0) despite both of the following: (a) Dietary intervention (b) Optimized insulin therapy at maximum tolerated doses © 2021 UnitedHealthcare Services, Inc. 1 -OR- (2) Persistent hypertriglyceridemia (TG > 250) despite both of the following: (a) Dietary intervention (b) Optimized therapy with at least two triglyceride-lowering agents from different classes (e.g., fibrates, statins) at maximum tolerated doses Authorization will be issued for 12 months B. -
Weight Management Guideline: Children and Adolescents
Weight Management in Children and Adolescents Screening and Intervention Guideline Prevention ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nutrition ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Healthy eating behaviors .............................................................................................................. 2 Physical activity ............................................................................................................................ 3 Screening ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Diagnosis.......................................................................................................................................... 3 Interventions ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Goals ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Strategies to help with weight loss ............................................................................................... 5 Behavior change counseling using the 5A approach ................................................................... 5 Lifestyle modifications ................................................................................................................. -
The Activation of the Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor by Peptide and Non-Peptide Ligands
The Activation of the Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor by Peptide and Non-Peptide Ligands Clare Louise Wishart Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Science University of Leeds School of Biomedical Sciences Faculty of Biological Sciences September 2013 I Intellectual Property and Publication Statements The candidate confirms that the work submitted is her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of Clare Louise Wishart to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. © 2013 The University of Leeds and Clare Louise Wishart. II Acknowledgments Firstly I would like to offer my sincerest thanks and gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. Dan Donnelly, who has been nothing but encouraging and engaging from day one. I have thoroughly enjoyed every moment of working alongside him and learning from his guidance and wisdom. My thanks go to my academic assessor Professor Paul Milner whom I have known for several years, and during my time at the University of Leeds he has offered me invaluable advice and inspiration. Additionally I would like to thank my academic project advisor Dr. Michael Harrison for his friendship, help and advice. I would like to thank Dr. Rosalind Mann and Dr. Elsayed Nasr for welcoming me into the lab as a new PhD student and sharing their experimental techniques with me, these techniques have helped me no end in my time as a research student. -
Experimental Dopamine Reuptake Inhibitors in Parkinson’S Disease: a Review of the Evidence
Journal of Experimental Pharmacology Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article REVIEW Experimental Dopamine Reuptake Inhibitors in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of the Evidence This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Journal of Experimental Pharmacology Thomas Müller Abstract: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most chronic neurodegenerative disorder worldwide. Deficit of monoamines, particularly dopamine, causes an individually varying Department of Neurology, St. Joseph Hospital Berlin-Weissensee, Berlin, compilation of motor and non-motor features. Constraint of presynaptic uptake extends 13088, Germany monoamine stay in the synaptic cleft. This review discusses possible benefits of dopamine reuptake inhibition for the treatment of PD. Translation of this pharmacologic principle into positive clinical study results failed to date. Past clinical trial designs did not consider a mandatory, concomitant stable inhibition of glial monoamine turnover, i.e. with mono amine oxidase B inhibitors. These studies focused on improvement of motor behavior and levodopa associated motor complications, which are fluctuations of motor and non-motor behavior. Future clinical investigations in early, levodopa- and dopamine agonist naïve patients shall also aim on alleviation of non-motor symptoms, like fatigue, apathy or cognitive slowing. Oral levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor application is inevitably necessary with advance of PD. Monoamine reuptake (MRT) inhibition improves the efficacy of levodopa, the blood brain barrier crossing metabolic precursor of dopamine. The pulsatile brain delivery pattern of orally administered levodopa containing formulations results in synaptic dopamine variability. Ups and downs of dopamine counteract the physiologic principle of continuous neurotransmission, particularly in nigrostriatal, respectively meso corticolimbic pathways, both of which regulate motor respectively non-motor behavior. -
Behavioral Approach to Weight Loss
Pennington Nutrition Series Healthier lives through education in nutrition and preventive medicine Body Mass Index (BMI) is a way to define over- The distribution of body fat is important from a weight and obesity. The index is a mathematical formula in chronic disease perspective. Those who have more which a person’s body weight in kilograms is divided by body fat in the abdominal area have an increased risk the square of his or her height in meters [kg/m2]. The BMI for elevated triglycerides, high blood pressure and is more highly correlated with body fat than any other glucose intolerance. Waist circumference correlates mathematical ratio of height and weight; however, athletes well with chronic disease risk. A waist circumference and individuals with a high percentage of muscle may of 40 inches (102 cm) or more in men or a waist have a BMI in the overweight range because of the higher circumference of 35 inches (88cm) or more in women density of muscle compared to fat. puts one at greater risk of insulin resistance and the chronic diseases associated with it. A BMI of 18 to 25 is considered normal weight. Individuals with a BMI of 25 to 29.9 are When someone is a few pounds overweight and considered overweight, and those with a BMI of is motivated to lose weight, there are safe and effec- 30 or more are considered obese. tive methods to lose a few pounds and to maintain a Overweight is defined as increased weight in weight loss. relation to height. Obesity is defined as an excessively high amount of body fat or adipose tissue in relation to lean body mass. -
Efficacy and Safety of the MC4R Agonist Setmelanotide in POMC
Efficacy and Safety of the MC4R Agonist Setmelanotide in POMC Deficiency Obesity: A Phase 3 Trial TT-P-LB-3712 Presenting Author: Karine Clément,1,2 Jesús Argente,3 Allison Bahm,4 Hillori Connors,5 Kathleen De Waele,6 Sadaf Farooqi,7 Gregory Gordon,5 James Swain,8 Guojun Yuan,5 Peter Kühnen9 Peter Kühnen 1Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Nutrition and Obesities Research Unit, Paris, France; 2Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Nutrition Department, Paris, France; 3Department of Pediatrics & Pediatric Endocrinology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid University, Madrid, Spain; 4Peel Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 5Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boston, MA; [email protected] 6Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; 7Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 8HonorHealth Bariatric Center, Scottsdale, AZ; 9Institute for Experimental Pediatric Endocrinology Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany Summary ¡ In this phase 3 trial, setmelanotide was associated with clinically meaningful weight loss and reduction in hunger scores in individuals with proopiomelanocortin (POMC) or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 1 (PCSK1) deficiency obesity ¡ No new safety concerns emerged, and setmelanotide was generally well tolerated in individuals with POMC or PCSK1 deficiency obesity ¡ Further evaluation of setmelanotide is warranted in other disorders resulting from variants in the central melanocortin pathway that cause impaired melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R) activation ¡ Participants were instructed to not change their regular diet or exercise regimen Table 1. Baseline Participant Characteristics ¡ During the placebo withdrawal period, participants gained an average of 5.52 kg (n=8), and Introduction participants’ mean “most hunger” score (n=6) increased from 4.87 during the first open-label active Figure 2. -
Study Protocol
Clinical Study Protocol A 24-WEEK PHASE 2, DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO- CONTROLLED, SINGLE-CENTER SAFETY AND EFFICACY STUDY TO EVALUATE OVERALL SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF CO- ADMINISTRATION OF TESOFENSINE AND METOPROLOL IN SUBJECTS WITH HYPOTHALAMIC INJURY-INDUCED OBESITY (HIO), AND WITH A 24-WEEK OPEN-LABEL EXTENSION, IN TOTAL 48 WEEKS Sponsor: Saniona, A/S Baltorpvej 154 DK2750 Ballerup Denmark Protocol number: TM005 Protocol version: 5.0 Date: 10 December 2019 EudraCT number: 2018-003672-12 The information contained in this document is provided in confidence. It is understood that this information will not be disclosed to others without prior agreement with Saniona A/S, according to the statement in the Clinical Study Protocol, and in accordance with the confidentiality agreement. Saniona A/S Clinical Study Protocol TM005 CONFIDENTIAL CLINICAL STUDY PROTOCOL SYNOPSIS A 24-week phase 2, double-blind (DB), randomized, placebo- controlled, single-center safety and efficacy study to evaluate overall safety and tolerability of co-administration of Study title tesofensine and metoprolol in subjects with hypothalamic injury-induced obesity (HIO), and with a 24-week open-label extension, in total 48 weeks. Saniona, A/S Baltorpvej 154 Study sponsor DK2750 Ballerup Denmark Phase 2a Number of sites 1 site; Rigshospitalet (RH), Copenhagen, Denmark Sample size Minimum of 12 and maximum of 25 adult subjects with HIO. DB, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-center study followed by an open-label extension period. The study will have two -
(Pram) and Insulin A21G Improves Post-Prandial Glucose Vs Novolog
ADO09, A Co-Formulation Of Pramlintide (Pram) and Insulin A21G improves Post-Prandial Glucose Vs Novolog® in Type 1 Diabetes (T1DM) G.Meiffren¹, G.Andersen², R.Eloy¹, C.Seroussi¹, C.Mégret¹, S.Famulla², Y.-P Chan¹, M.Gaudier¹, O.Soula¹, J.H. DeVries²,T.Heise² (1 Adocia, Lyon, France ; 2 Profil, Neuss, Germany) Introduction & Background Overall safety Outpatient period results - CGM metrics o ADO09 (M1Pram) is a co-formulation of pramlintide and insulin A21G o Both treatments were well tolerated without any treatment-related serious adverse events o Most of the CGM metrics (TiR [70-180], TiR [80-140], mean blood glucose per day), were significantly improved developed to leverage the beneficial effects of pramlintide on post-prandial (Table 2). As expected M1Pram had numerically more, mostly gastrointestinal adverse events with M1Pram (Table 4). Postprandial and mean 24-hour glucose profiles were improved with M1Pram (Fig. 3) glucose without additional injections than insulin aspart Table 4: CGM metrics, all days. Significant differences are marked in bold Objective and design o No severe hypoglycemia were seen, slightly more hypoglycemic events occurred with M1Pram Ratio of LSMean* o To compare the effect of M1Pram and insulin aspart (Novolog®, Novo than with aspart (Table 3) Difference Parameter Treatment LS Mean M1Pram / Aspart P-value Nordisk) on post-prandial glucose control, glycemic control assessed by Table 2: Incidence of adverse events throughout the trial (M1Pram-Aspart) (95% CI) CGM and safety/tolerability M1Pram Aspart M1Pram -
Efficacy and Safety of the MC4R Agonist Setmelanotide in POMC Deficiency Obesity: a Phase 3 Trial
Efficacy and Safety of the MC4R Agonist Setmelanotide in POMC Deficiency Obesity: A Phase 3 Trial Karine Clément,1,2 Jesús Argente,3 Allison Bahm,4 Hillori Connors,5 Kathleen De Waele,6 Sadaf Farooqi,7 Greg Gordon,5 James Swain,8 Guojun Yuan,5 Peter Kühnen9 1Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Nutrition and Obesities Research Unit, Paris, France; 2Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié- Salpêtrière Hospital, Nutrition Department, Paris, France; 3Department of Pediatrics & Pediatric Endocrinology Universidad Autónoma de Madrid University, Madrid, Spain; 4Peel Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada; 5Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boston, MA; 6Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; 7Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 8HonorHealth Bariatric Center, Scottsdale, AZ; 9Institute for Experimental Pediatric Endocrinology Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany Melanocortin Signaling Is Crucial for Regulation of Body Weight1,2 • Body weight is regulated by the hypothalamic central melanocortin pathway • In response to leptin signaling, POMC is produced in POMC neurons and is cleaved by protein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 1 into α-MSH and β-MSH • α-MSH and β-MSH bind to the MC4R, which decreases food intake and increases energy expenditure, thereby promoting a reduction in body weight Hypothalamus AgRP/NPY Neuron LEPR Hunger AgRP Food Intake ADIPOSE Weight TISSUE MC4R- Energy Expressing Expenditure MC4R Neuron LEPTIN PCSK1 BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER POMC α-MSH LEPR POMC Neuron AgRP, agouti-related protein; LEPR, leptin receptor; MC4R, melanocortin 4 receptor; MSH, melanocyte-stimulating hormone; NPY, neuropeptide Y; PCSK1, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 1; POMC, proopiomelanocortin. 2 1. Yazdi et al.