Private Pension Plans in Six Countries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Private Pension Plans in Six Countries Private Pension Plans in Six Countrz’es* NFORMATION on private pension survivor benefits. The law sets up a tirement rather than the period of plans in other countries has not restrictive income test for receipt of employment. I hitherto been readily available in benefits that is a form of means test. Retirement age. - Following the the United States. These plans, estab- pattern of the public system, the usual lished to supplement the public pro- Private Plans retirement age provision in private visions in effect to protect workers and Types of plans and coverage.- plans is 65 for men and 60 for women. their dependents or survivors, take Private pension plans have been in Some plans provide later retirement many forms, varying with the coun- existence in Denmark for at least 50 ages, adding as much as 5 years for try’s economy and the adequacy of the years. A majority of the larger em- both sexes. There is a trend toward basic social insurance system. The ployers have contributory plans cover- increasing the retirement age in pri- following summary of private pension ing salaried employees and providing vate plans to 67 for men and 63 for plans in efIect in Denmark, Norway, retirement, disability, and survivor women as a result of the increasing Sweden, and Switzerland as of Sep- benefits. Although some plans for average age of the population. tember and October 1952, and in Aus- wage earners exist, workers have not, Pension amount.-Few plans relate tralia and New Zealand as of October as a rule, been interested in contribu- benefits to average earnings-the 1951, is based on a series of surveys tory private plans, since payment of a usual practice in the United States made by H. Walter Forster as a service private pension may operate, through under insured plans. About half the to those of his firm’s clients who have the income (means) test, to reduce the plans are of the money-purchase type, branches in the countries he visited. amount of the public pension. Such in which an agreed percentage of cur- These reports have been made avail- reduction in benefits is of more signifi- rent pay is invested by the employer able to the Social Security Adminis- cance to wage earners than to salaried and employee in a level-premium tration. employees. contract, with the sum of the pur- This summary touches only briefly An Insurance Board closely super- chases determining the benefit level. on the social insurance provisions in vises noninsured funded plans; Under this type of funding, the older effect in the six countries.1 although it does not supervise insured the employee upon entering the plan plans, it has approved an agreement the smaller the pension. An approach Denmark between the private insurance com- to adequacy is sometimes achieved for panies and the Government’s State older employees by a supplement for Public System Insurance Company establishing ac- past-service credit and establishment The social insurance system in Den- tuarial standards and other provi- of a reasonable minimum pension. Al- mark pays male workers 65 years of sions. At the end of 1950, there were though this type of plan has much age and over and female workers aged approximately 2,500 insured Plans appeal for employers because of fixed 60 and over a flat basic pension on re- covering 50,000 employees and 300 costs, the trend is away from such tirement, plus a series of allowances noninsured plans covering 43,000 em- plans. paid under specified conditions. The ployees. Additional employees are Pensions under the remaining half basic pension varies with the size of covered by informal plans, the mere of the private plans are based on the community of residence and is ad- announcement of which gives employ- “Anal” pay-that is, pay at time of re- justed semiannually to the cost of liv- ees certain legal rights. tirement. The benefits amount to 50- ing; it is not related to wage rates. A Eligibility for participation.-Be- 70 percent (usually 66% percent) of pension is also payable in case of total fore an employee becomes eligible to average earnings in the last 3-5 years disability, but there is no provision for participate in an established private after 25-35 years of service, and they pension plan, he is usually required to are proportionally less for shorter * Based on reports made by II. Walter have worked l-3 years in the estab- service. These plans reflect the influ- Forster, a director and former president of lishment and to have attained age ence of the public plans for the mili- Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Inc., 20-30 (the average is under age 25). tary and the civil service, which date pension consultants. The summary was prepared by Herman B. Brotman, Division Many plans establish a maximum age from 1851 and which pay pensions of of Program Analysis, Bureau of Old-Age for entering the plan; for some the 70 percent of final pay after 35 years and Survivors Insurance. maximum is as low as age 40. This of service, with an employee contribu- 1 For details on the public programs see provision is designed to lower em- tion of 5 percent of earnings. In addi- Carl H. Farman and Veronica Marren Hale, Social Security Legislation Throughout ployer costs under funded plans, but tion to presenting the employer with the World (Division of Research and Sta- since the older worker thus excluded the problem of varying costs, the final- tistics, Bureau Report No. 16), 1949; Carl is usually covered by a special plan pay plans are expensive since each pay H. Farman, “World Developments in Social requiring additional employer flnanc- increase raises all prior-service costs. Security Legislation,” Social Security Bul- letin, March 1950; and Konrad Persson. ing when and if the employee attains Maximum benefits.-Many plans at- ‘Social Welfare in Sweden,” Social Secur- retirement age, the employer costs are tempt to reduce costs by devices that ity Bulletin, April 1949. largely shifted to the period after re- limit the amount of the pension. In 10 Social Security Denmark, it is customary to provide a pension. Under insured plans, the not sufficient to cover the entire con- maximum salary base on which pen- widow’s pension is payable for life tribution. Employers may deduct their sions may be computed, but the pres- regardless of whether there are any total contributions for income-tax sure is to increase such maximums as young children, and it continues even purposes, provided the contribution is wage levels increase and as high-level in the event of remarriage. Noninsured not larger than the premium for an employees are affected. Other plans plans are usually less liberal; if the annuity with benefits equal to those introduce limitations by excluding marriage took place after the em- in the pension plan. Past-service costs, from the base salary increases after ployee was 55-60 years old, the widow if paid in lump sums, cannot in gen- age 55-60 or cost-of-living allowances. is frequently ineligible for a pension. eral be charged off in less than 6 years. Employee rights on separation. - The orphan’s pension is a flat Pensions are considered taxable in- Partly as a result of legal requirements amount in some cases. In most cases, come in Denmark, where tax rates are but chiefly from accepted practice, however, it is 10 percent of the father’s relatively high even at low income Danish workers usually have rights prospective pension for half orphans levels. based not only on their own contribu- and 20 percent for full orphans. The Norway tions but also on those of their em- pension is usually payable until the ployer at the time of separation. orphan attains age 18, but in some Public Sys tern Under the plans insured with an in- cases it is payable until age 2 1. The Norwegian public system pays surance company, the premiums may Death benefits and life insurance.- all persons aged 70 or over a uniform be continued by the employee himself In view of the provision of survivor flat pension on retirement, subject to or jointly with his new employer un- benefits, most private plans do not in- a means test, with supplements pro- der the old contract; the contract can clude payment of death benefits. When vided by many of the municipalities be amended to fit the plan with the a death benefit is provided, the benefit (political subdivisions, including rural new employer; the employee may be is limited to an amount equal to ap- areas). Seamen and forestry workers given a paid-up benefit; a woman proximately 1 year’s pension. Very are covered by special plans that omit leaving to marry may receive a cash little group life insurance exists in the means test and that permit retire- payment, as may a worker who emi- Denmark. ment at age 60 and 65, respectively. grates to another country; or an em- Disability. - Almost all the private There is no national provision for pay- ployee may receive in cash the surren- plans provide for pension payment in ment of permanent disability pensions der value of the policy arising from his cases of permanent disability. Full before retirement age, but municipali- own contributions or at least half the pensions, computed on the assumption ties in some cases pay such pensions. total premiums plus 4-percent inter- that the current rate of pay for the Restricted widow’s pensions are pay- est. employee would have continued until able if the pensioner dies after age 70 Under the noninsured funded plans, normal retirement age, are payable if (following retirement), provided the minimum rights are established by a working ability has been decreased by widow is over age 60.
Recommended publications
  • Core Principles of Private Pension Regulation
    OECD CORE PRINCIPLES OF PRIVATE PENSION REGULATION G20/OECD INFE CORE COMPETENCIES FRAMEWORK ON FINANCIAL LITERACY FOR ADULTS OECD Core Principles of Private Pension Regulation Photo credits: Thinkstock/Maryna Maschewsky © OECD 2016 FOREWORD Foreword The OECD Core Principles of Private Pension Regulation serve to encourage more efficient regulation and management of private pension systems. Private pensions play a major and growing role in complementing retirement income from public sources in OECD countries and worldwide. Their importance in ensuring adequate pension provision is increasing as government revenues are less able to finance retirement promises. The economic crisis led to a loss of public confidence in private pensions in many countries which needs to be reversed in order to encourage individuals to save for retirement. At the same time, the financial sustainability, solvency and adequacy of private pensions are challenged by population ageing and by an economic environment characterised by low growth, low returns and low interest rates. Efficient regulation and management of private pension systems are essential to withstand these pressures and to rebuild trust in private pensions. The OECD, in coordination with pension regulators across OECD countries, has updated and expanded the OECD Core Principles of Occupational Pension Regulation, first adopted in 2009. The 2016 OECD Core Principles of Private Pension Regulation provide governments, regulators and supervisors worldwide with a relevant common benchmark and high-level guidance on the design and operation of private pension systems. These revised Principles now include all funded pension arrangements, reflecting changes in the nature of private pension provision, especially the rise in defined contribution and personal pension plans; they aim to strengthen the regulatory framework of funded pension systems in order to promote the sound and reliable operation of private pension plans and thereby protect members' savings.
    [Show full text]
  • Coverage of Private Pension Systems: Evidence and Policy Options”, OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions, No.20, OECD Publishing
    OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions No. 20 Coverage of Private Pablo Antolin, Pension Systems: Evidence Stéphanie Payet, and Policy Options Juan Yermo https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k94d6gh2w6c-en Please cite this paper as: Antolin, P., S. Payet and J. Yermo (2012), “Coverage of Private Pension Systems: Evidence and Policy Options”, OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions, No.20, OECD Publishing. OECD WORKING PAPERS ON FINANCE, INSURANCE AND PRIVATE PENSIONS, NO. 20 COVERAGE OF PRIVATE PENSION SYSTEMS: EVIDENCE AND POLICY OPTIONS Pablo Antolin, Stéphanie Payet, Juan Yermo June 2012 OECD WORKING PAPERS ON FINANCE, INSURANCE AND PRIVATE PENSIONS OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions provide timely analysis and background on industry developments, structural issues, and public policy in the financial sector, including insurance and private pensions. Topics include risk management, governance, investments, benefit protection, and financial education. These studies are prepared for dissemination in order to stimulate wider discussion and further analysis and obtain feedback from interested audiences. The papers are generally available only in their original language English or French with a summary in the other if available. OECD WORKING PAPERS ON FINANCE, INSURANCE AND PRIVATE PENSIONS are published on www.oecd.org/daf/fin/wp This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Ce document et toute carte qu'il peut comprendre ne préjugent en rien du statut de tout territoire, de la souveraineté s’exerçant sur ce dernier, du tracé des frontières et limites internationales, et du nom de tout territoire, ville ou région.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Review of the Private Pensions System
    ISRAEL REVIEW OF THE PRIVATE PENSIONS SYSTEM October 2011 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where governments work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The European Union takes part in the work of the OECD. OECD Publishing disseminates widely the results of the Organisation’s statistics gathering and research on economic, social and environmental issues, as well as the conventions, guidelines and standards agreed by its members. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Ce document et toute carte qu'il peut comprendre ne préjugent en rien du statut de tout territoire, de la souveraineté s’exerçant sur ce dernier, du tracé des frontières et limites internationales, et du nom de tout territoire, ville ou région.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of Private Pension Systems
    8. PRIVATE PENSIONS AND PUBLIC PENSION RESERVE FUNDS STRUCTURE OF PRIVATE PENSION SYSTEMS Key results The pension landscape includes various types of plan worldwide. Occupational and personal plans coexist in most OECD countries. In 2016, the size of occupational plans in terms of assets varied greatly across countries. In most cases, pension funds would administer these plans although there are some notable exceptions (e.g. Denmark, France). Personal plans and occupational defined contribution plans are gaining importance at the expense of occupational defined benefit plans. The pension landscape includes various types of plan hybrid DB plan) provide benefits based on a fixed worldwide. For example, pension plans may be accessed contribution rate and a guaranteed rate of return (the through employment or by individuals directly without any guarantee is provided by the sponsoring employer, hence involvement of their employers. When plans are accessed these plans are classified as DB). Such plans are part of the through employment and were established by employers or pension landscape in Belgium (where by law, employers social partners on behalf of their employees, these plans are must provide a minimum return guarantee), Japan and the considered as occupational. The OECD taxonomy classifies United States. Mixed plans are those where the plan has plans as personal when access to these plans does not have two separate DB and DC components which are treated as to be linked to an employment relationship and these plans part of the same plan. For instance, the plan may calculate are established directly by a pension fund or a financial benefits under a DC formula up to a certain age before institution acting as pension provider without any retirement and apply a DB formula thereafter.
    [Show full text]
  • Pension Funds and the Financing Productive Investment. An
    102 S E R I E financiamiento del desarrollo Pensionolíticas funds para canalizarand the financingmayores of productive investment An analysis based on Brazil’s recent experience Rogerio Studart Development Finance Unit International Trade and Development Finance Division Santiago de Chile, August 2000 This document was prepared by Rogerio Studart, consultant of the Joint ECLAC/GTZ “Pension Fund and Old Age Provision” of ECLAC. The author wishes to thank Andras Uthoff, Daniel Titelman, Felipe Jiménez and Günther Held for their enlightening comments. The views expressed in this document, which has been reproduced without formal editing, are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Organization. United Nations Publication LC/L.1409-P ISBN: 92-1-121271-5 Copyright © United Nations, August 2000. All rights reserved Sales No.: E.00.II.G.83 Printed in United Nations, Santiago, Chile Applications for the right to reproduce this work are welcomed and should be sent to the Secretary of the Publications Board, United Nations Headquarters, New York, N.Y. 10017, U.S.A. Member States and their governmental institutions may reproduce this work without prior authorization, but are requested to mention the source and inform the United Nations of such reproduction. CEPAL – SERIE Financiamiento del desarrollo No 102 Contents Abstract ............................................................................................... 5 I. Introduction ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Private Pension Plan Bulletin Historical Tables and Graphs 1975-2018
    Private Pension Plan Bulletin Historical Tables and Graphs 1975-2018 January 2021 Version 1.0 Contract DOLOPS14D0017 E10g. Pension Plan Assets (Graph) TABLE OF CONTENTS by type of plan, 1975-2018............................14 E11. Pension Plan Assets of Plans with Fewer than SECTION E: HISTORICAL TABLES AND 100 Participants GRAPHS by type of plan, 1975-2018............................15 E1. Number of Pension Plans E12. Pension Plan Assets of Plans with 100 or by type of plan, 1975-2018..............................1 More Participants by type of plan, 1975-2018............................16 E1g. Number of Pension Plans (Graph) by type of plan, 1975-2018..............................2 E13. Pension Plan Contributions by type of plan, 1975-2018............................17 E2. Number of Pension Plans with Fewer than 100 Participants E13g. Pension Plan Contributions (Graph) by type of plan, 1975-2018..............................3 by type of plan, 1975-2018............................18 E3. Number of Pension Plans with 100 or More E14. Pension Plan Contributions to Plans with Participants Fewer than 100 Participants by type of plan, 1975-2018..............................4 by type of plan, 1975-2018............................19 E4. Number of Participants in Pension Plans E15. Pension Plan Contributions to Plans with 100 by type of plan, 1975-2018..............................5 or More Participants by type of plan, 1975-2018............................20 E4g. Number of Participants in Pension Plans (Graph) E16. Pension Plan Benefits Disbursed by type of plan, 1975-2018..............................6 by type of plan, 1975-2018............................21 E5. Number of Participants in Pension Plans with E16g. Pension Plan Benefits Disbursed (Graph) Fewer than 100 Participants by type of plan, 1975-2018............................22 by type of plan, 1975-2018..............................7 E17.
    [Show full text]
  • Retiring Right: Understanding the Taxation of Retirement Income
    Retiring right: Understanding the taxation of retirement income January 2021 Jamie Golombek Managing Director, Tax and Estate Planning, CIBC Private Wealth Management “The question isn't at what age I want to retire, it's at what income.” – George Foreman, two-time world heavyweight boxing champion and an Olympic gold medalist What types of income might you receive in retirement? How will your retirement income be taxed? In a CIBC Retirement Poll1, 74% of respondents said they worry about having enough income in retirement. Yet the majority of respondents didn’t know how retirement income is taxed, which may result in lost opportunities to implement strategies that might reduce the tax you pay by hundreds or even thousands of dollars annually. This report provides an overview of the main ways to fund your retirement and describes how each source of funds is taxed. It also outlines some tax credits that are commonly available in retirement and provides some strategies that may help to reduce taxes, as well as to preserve certain government benefits, in your retirement years so as to increase your available funds. Funding your retirement According to the CIBC Retirement Poll, Canadians are most likely to rely on government benefits, private pensions and personal savings for retirement funding. Figure 1 below shows that the majority of respondents expected to receive Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Old Age Security (OAS) benefits, as well as funds from pension plans or private savings, including a Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP), a Registered Retirement Income Fund (RRIF) or a Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Disability Benefits for Employees in Private Pension Plans
    Disability benefits for employees in private pension plans Although benefits vary, for many 20 year employees aged SS, a private pension and social security would replace about one-half of the worker's pre-disability earnings DONALD BELL AND WILLIAM WIATROWSKI Although private pension plans are thought of primarily surance benefits were typically available to employees as a source of cash income for the elderly, they typically under deferred disability retirement plans. (Long-term serve other functions as well . For example, they usually disability benefits were less common when immediate contain early retirement features and often provide pen- disability pensions were paid .) Such private benefits are sions to workers who lose their jobs because of disability . provided in addition to payments under the social secu- The high proportion of pension plans with disability rity system when a worker is incapacitated. retirement features is dramatized in data from the Bu- Under retirement plans providing immediate disabili- reau of Labor Statistics' annual survey of the incidence ty pensions, benefits were available to workers meeting and characteristics of employee benefit plans in medium plan definitions of disability ; commonly, service or age and large establishments .' Of the 1,002 private pension requirements, or both, were specified as well. Employees plans found in the 1980 survey, 86 percent had disabili- covered by deferred-benefit plans also had to reach the ty retirement features .2 This article analyzes the various stipulated early or normal retirement age to receive eligibility requirements for disability retirement and typ- benefits. ical benefit levels, as found in these plans. Illustrative benefit levels from all potential sources- Disabled workers may have other protection as well .
    [Show full text]
  • 1 PRIVATE ANNUITY MARKETS* in the Past Several Years, Extensive
    PRIVATE ANNUITY MARKETS* In the past several years, extensive work has been done examining the annuity markets in several countries.1 While the work stands on earlier analyses, this body of work is noteworthy in its attempt to relate the development of annuity markets to the value that annuitants are receiving for their premiums. Much of the literature postulates that the demand for private sector annuities will be increasing over the next decades, and that the state may have to intervene to otherwise assure predictable retirement income at a socially acceptable level. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the annuity markets in OECD countries focusing on the counterbalancing forces, which have underpinned the developments. The paper is organised as follows: the first section reviews the changes in the pension landscape. Section two provides an overview of the recent annuity market trends in OECD countries. Section three gives an introduction to basic elements in measuring annuity value. In section four the recent findings of annuity markets value added for consumers are referenced while section five discussed the apparent paradox in the findings: despite good value for consumers demand for annuities remains weak. Given the possible market failure section six reviews the scope for policy intervention in the form of making participation mandatory. Section seven ends the paper with some final remarks. I. Background: The changing pension landscape To a large extent the focus on annuities markets has been catalyst by structural changes in pension systems where companies are reducing the supply of defined benefit contracts and governments are cutting back on – or at least limiting the growth in -- public pension schemes.
    [Show full text]
  • Employer-Sponsored Pensions: a Primer
    THE RETIREMENT POLICY PROJECT Employer-Sponsored Pensions: A Primer January 2008 What Are Pensions? Employees can also contribute to their retirement accounts and defer taxes on their contributions until Pension plans are benefits offered by many they withdraw funds from their accounts. Employer employers that provide workers with cash payments contributions sometimes depend on how much the in retirement. In 2006, about 24 percent of Americans participant contributes. Some employers, for age 65 and older received pension benefits from past example, match worker contributions up to a specific private-sector employers, and about 11 percent amount, providing few benefits to employees who received benefits from past public-sector employers contribute little to their retirement plans. Account (Purcell 2007a). Median annual benefits in 2006 were balances grow over time with contributions and about $7,200 among older adults receiving private investment returns. pensions and $14,400 for those receiving pensions from government employers. Hybrid pension plans combine features of DB and DC plans. In cash balance plans, the most There are two basic types of employer-sponsored common type of hybrid plan, employers set aside a pension plans. Defined benefit (DB) plans, once the given percentage of salary for each employee and most common type, promise specific monthly credit interest on these contributions. Interest credit retirement benefits that usually last until death. rates are generally tied to some benchmark, such as Defined contribution (DC) plans, which now the U.S. Treasury bill rate. Benefits are expressed as dominate, function essentially as individual tax- an account balance, as in DC plans, but these deferred retirement savings accounts into which both balances are only bookkeeping devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Questions and Answers About Pension Subtraction Adjustments
    Common questions and answers about pension subtraction adjustments $20,000 Pension and Annuity Exclusion Q: What determines if an individual’s pension or annuity qualifies for the $20,000 pension and annuity exclusion on the NYS personal income tax return? A: The individual receiving the pension must be 59½ years of age or over. In addition, the pension and annuity income must be: • included in federal adjusted gross income (FAGI); • received in periodic payments (except IRA or Keogh); • attributable to personal services performed by the individual before their retirement; and • from an employer-employee relationship or from an employee’s tax deductible contributions to a retirement plan. Q: Does a pension received from another country qualify for the pension and annuity income exclusion? A: Yes, to the extent included in FAGI not to exceed $20,000. This would qualify for the $20,000 pension and annuity income exclusion provided all the other requirements are met (over 59½, periodic payments, attributable to personal services performed before retirement and an employer- employee relationship exists). The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) requires that recipients of a pension distribution of $10 or more receive a Form 1099-R. However, foreign pension distributions are not typically reported on Form 1099-R. The taxpayer must retain their contribution/distribution documentation to provide to the department if necessary. New York State, Local Governments and Federal Government Full Pension Exclusion Q: The instructions state that a pension received from NYS and local governments or the federal government, the United States, its territories, possessions (or “political subdivisions” thereof) is excluded in arriving at a NYS adjusted gross income figure.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Have Defined Benefit Plans Survived in the Public Sector?
    State and Local Pension Plans Number 2, December 2007 WHY HAVE DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS SURVIVED IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR? By Alicia H. Munnell, Kelly Haverstick, and Mauricio Soto* Introduction While 401(k) plans now dominate the private sec- different. Unlike private sector firms, state and local tor, defined benefit plans remain the norm among governments are perpetual entities. They do not dis- state and local governments. Why have public sector appear — like many of the large manufacturing firms employers not shifted from defined benefit plans to — taking their plans with them, and they are much 401(k)s like their private sector counterparts? less concerned about the financial volatility associated This brief examines the unique factors affecting with defined benefit plans. States and localities can the two sectors that may explain their very different also increase required employee contributions to keep patterns of pension coverage. State and local govern- the plan’s finances under control. Finally, the public ments have an older, less mobile and more risk-averse sector has not had comprehensive pension regulation workforce, with a higher degree of unionization to like the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of press for benefits that satisfy the needs of these work- 1974; the absence of such regulation lowers adminis- ers. The nature of the employer is also fundamentally trative costs and enables later vesting. *Alicia H. Munnell is the Peter F. Drucker Professor of Man- agement Sciences in Boston College’s Carroll School of Manage- LEARN MORE ment and Director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College (CRR).
    [Show full text]