JCR Bibliometrics Report 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

JCR Bibliometrics Report 2016 JCR Bibliometrics Report 2016 American College of Prosthodontists Journal of Prosthodontics The information and details provided in this report are proprietary and contain information provided in confidence by Wiley to the American College of Prosthodontists. It is understood that both parties shall treat the contents of this report in strict confidence in perpetuity. © 2017 Wiley. Contents Impact Factor Metrics and Calculations ....................................................................... 2 Journals Citation Ranking (JCR) metrics .................................................................. 2 2016 Impact Factor calculations ............................................................................... 2 Journal of Prosthodontics Impact Factor Breakdown ............................................... 3 Comparison with Peer Journals ................................................................................ 3 Journal and peer journal Impact Factor history ........................................................ 4 Citation Trends ............................................................................................................. 5 Citation Distributions ................................................................................................. 5 Document Types ....................................................................................................... 7 Geographical Analysis ............................................................................................ 10 Top 20 Institutions by Research Output ................................................................. 13 Cited and Citing Journals ........................................................................................... 15 Journals Citing Journal of Prosthodontics in 2016 ................................................. 15 Journals Cited by Journal of Prosthodontics in 2016 ............................................. 15 Ranked Journals List .............................................................................................. 16 Glossary ..................................................................................................................... 17 1 Impact Factor Metrics and Calculations Journals Citation Ranking (JCR) metrics Data relating to the Journal of Prosthodontics JCR metrics, including Impact Factor, are presented below. Metric 2014 2015 2016 2Yr Impact Factor 1.071 1.133 1.452 5Yr Impact Factor 1.315 1.356 1.398 2Yr IF Ranking for Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine 56 of 87 55 of 89 45 of 90 Citable Items Published 93 104 100 Immediacy Index 0.129 0.202 0.420 Cited Half Life 6 6.3 6.7 Total Citations to All Journal Content 1383 1484 1685 EigenFactor 0.00293 0.00228 0.0026 Article Influence 0.359 0.303 0.369 2yr IF Cites 211 222 286 5yr IF Cites 676 674 699 2016 Impact Factor calculations 2-Year Impact Factor 2015 = 131 2015 = 104 Cites in 2016 to papers Number of citable 2014 = 155 2014 = 93 published in: items published in: Sum: 286 Sum: 197 Cites to recent papers 286 Calculation: = 1.452 Number of citable items 196 5-Year Impact Factor 2015 = 131 2015 = 104 2014 = 155 2014 = 93 Cites in 2016 to papers 2013 = 93 Number of citable 2013 = 103 published in: 2012 = 154 items published in: 2012 = 94 2011 = 166 2011 = 106 Sum: 699 Sum: 500 Cites to recent papers 699 Calculation: = 1.398 Number of citable items 500 2 Journal self-cites in 2014-2015 Self Cites 124(7.359% of 1685) Self Cites to Years Used 15(5.245% of 286) in 2016 2-Year Impact Factor Calculation 2-Year 2016 Impact Factor without Self Cites 1.375 Journal of Prosthodontics Impact Factor Breakdown 350 1.6 300 1.4 1.2 Items 250 1 200 Factor Citable 0.8 150 and 0.6 100 Impact 0.4 Cites IF 50 0.2 0 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 IF Citations Citable Items Impact Factor Comparison with Peer Journals Journal and peer journal rankings 2016 2Yr IF 2Yr IF Journal Subject Impact Rank %Rank Factor Dentistry, Oral 4 of 90 96.60% 4.07 DENTAL MATERIALS Surgery & Medicine Materials Science, 10 of 33 71.80% 4.07 DENTAL MATERIALS Biomaterials JOURNAL OF ORAL Dentistry, Oral 24 of 90 74.10% 2.098 REHABILITATION Surgery & Medicine INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF Dentistry, Oral 49 of 90 46.00% 1.386 PROSTHODONTICS Surgery & Medicine INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL Dentistry, Oral 22 of 90 76.40% 2.263 IMPLANTS Surgery & Medicine JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT 45 of 90 50.50% 1.452 ESTHETIC AND Dentistry, Oral RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY Surgery & Medicine 3 Journal and Peer Journal Impact Factor History 4.500 4.000 3.500 3.000 2.500 2.000 1.500 1.000 0.500 0.000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS‐IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY 4 Citation Trends An Impact Factor is essentially a measure of average citations over a defined period of time (usually two or five years). This can be problematic as averages tend to disguise differences in the behavior of contributing articles. Journals with high Impact Factors may still have a high proportion of uncited content, with the Impact Factor score being reliant on the inclusion of a few highly-cited articles. This can result in Impact Factor fluctuations as the highly-cited articles fall out of the Impact Factor window. The citation distribution graphs below show the pattern of citation activity within competitor journals for the 2016 Impact Factor period, and within Journal of Prosthodontics since 2011. Citation Distributions Competitor Journals – 2016 Impact Factor Period Citation Distibution in Current IF Period (Citable Items Only) 100.00% 90.00% 80.00% 70.00% 60.00% Items 50.00% 40.00% Citable % 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% DENTAL MATERIALS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF JOURNAL OF ORAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL PROSTHODONTICS REHABILITATION PROSTHODONTICS‐IMPLANT IMPLANTS ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY Uncited 1‐3 Cites 4‐7 Cites 8‐12 Cites 13‐20 Cites 21‐40 Cites 41+ Cites 5 Competitors Top-Cited Papers in 2016 IF Period Document Publicatio Times Title Journal Author(s) Type n Year Cited 2016 ESTHETIC OUTCOMES FOLLOWING IMMEDIATE INTERNATIONAL AND EARLY IMPLANT JOURNAL OF ORAL Chen, ST Article 2014 28 PLACEMENT IN THE & MAXILLOFACIAL ANTERIOR MAXILLA-A IMPLANTS SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REASONS FOR FAILURES JOURNAL OF ORAL Chrcanovic, Review 2014 27 OF ORAL IMPLANTS REHABILITATION BR CHARACTERIZATION OF A POLYMER-INFILTRATED DENTAL Della Bona, Article 2014 24 CERAMIC-NETWORK MATERIALS A MATERIAL CLINICAL PERFORMANCE OF SCREW-VERSUS INTERNATIONAL CEMENT-RETAINED FIXED JOURNAL OF ORAL Wittneben, Article 2014 24 IMPLANT-SUPPORTED & MAXILLOFACIAL JG RECONSTRUCTIONS-A IMPLANTS SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ENAMEL WEAR CAUSED BY MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA JOURNAL OF ORAL CROWNS AFTER Stober, T Article 2014 22 REHABILITATION 6MONTHS OF CLINICALUSE BONDING TO OXIDE CERAMICS-LABORATORY DENTAL Kern, M Article 2015 21 TESTING VERSUS MATERIALS CLINICAL OUTCOME THE CLINICAL SUCCESS INTERNATIONAL OF ZIRCONIA-BASED JOURNAL OF Larsson, C Review 2014 21 CROWNS: A SYSTEMATIC PROSTHODONTIC REVIEW S MAKING YTTRIA- DENTAL STABILIZED TETRAGONAL Zhang, Y Article 2014 20 MATERIALS ZIRCONIA TRANSLUCENT IMPROVEMENTS IN IMPLANT DENTISTRY OVER THE LAST DECADE: INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF JOURNAL OF ORAL Pjetursson, Article 2014 20 SURVIVAL AND & MAXILLOFACIAL BE COMPLICATION RATES IN IMPLANTS OLDER AND NEWER PUBLICATIONS CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN IMPLANT DENTISTRY: A INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMATIC REVIEW JOURNAL OF ORAL Bornstein, Article 2014 20 FOCUSING ON & MAXILLOFACIAL MM GUIDELINES, IMPLANTS INDICATIONS, AND RADIATION DOSE RISKS 6 Citation Distribution – Journal of Prosthodontics Over Time This graph allows us to compare the citation performance of different publication years. In-Window citations refers to those citations that fall within the 2 year Impact Factor window (i.e. for 2014 papers, in-window citations would be those citations received in 2015 and 2016). Distribution of In‐Window Cites by Publication Year (Citable Items Only) 100.00% 90.00% 80.00% 70.00% 60.00% Items 50.00% 40.00% Citable % 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% 2011 2012 2013 2014 Uncited 1‐3 Cites 4‐7 Cites 8‐12 Cites 13‐20 Cites 21‐40 Cites 41+ Cites Journal of Prosthodontics Top-Cited Papers in 2016 IF Period Document Publicati Times Title Journal Author(s) Type on Year Cited 2016 A RETROSPECTIVE JOURNAL OF ANALYSIS OF 800 PROSTHODONTI BRANEMARK SYSTEM CS-IMPLANT Balshi, TJ Article 2014 9 IMPLANTS FOLLOWING THE ESTHETIC AND ALL-ON-FOUR (TM) RECONSTRUCTI PROTOCOL VE DENTISTRY 3D AND 2D MARGINAL FIT OF PRESSED AND CAD/CAM JOURNAL OF LITHIUM DISILICATE PROSTHODONTI CROWNS MADE FROM CS-IMPLANT Anadioti, E Article 2014 8 DIGITAL AND ESTHETIC AND CONVENTIONAL RECONSTRUCTI IMPRESSIONS VE DENTISTRY JOURNAL OF IN VITRO WEAR BEHAVIOR PROSTHODONTI OF ZIRCONIA OPPOSING CS-IMPLANT Passos, SP Article 2014 8 ENAMEL: A SYSTEMATIC ESTHETIC AND REVIEW RECONSTRUCTI VE DENTISTRY SURVIVAL AND COMPLICATION RATES OF JOURNAL OF FIXED RESTORATIONS PROSTHODONTI SUPPORTED BY LOCKING- CS-IMPLANT Mangano, F Article 2014 7 TAPER IMPLANTS: A ESTHETIC AND PROSPECTIVE STUDY WITH RECONSTRUCTI 1 TO 10 YEARS OF FOLLOW- VE DENTISTRY 7 UP SELECTIVE LASER MELTING TECHNIQUE OF CO-CR DENTAL ALLOYS: A REVIEW JOURNAL OF OF STRUCTURE AND PROSTHODONTI Al Jabbari, Article 2015 6 PROPERTIES AND CS-IMPLANT YS COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ESTHETIC AND WITH OTHER AVAILABLE RECONSTRUCTI TECHNIQUES VE
Recommended publications
  • REVIEW Bibliographic Analysis of Oral Precancer and Cancer Research Papers from Saudi Arabia
    DOI:10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.1.13 Bibliometric Analysis of Saudi Precancer/Cancer Papers REVIEW Editorial Process: Submission:10/01/2019 Acceptance:12/16/2019 Bibliographic Analysis of Oral Precancer and Cancer Research Papers from Saudi Arabia Shankargouda Patil1, Sachin C Sarode2*, Hosam Ali Baeshen3, Shilpa Bhandi4, A Thirumal Raj5, Gargi S Sarode2, Sadiq M Sait6, Amol R Gadbail7, Shailesh Gondivkar8 Abstract Objective: Oral cancer and precancers are a major public health challenge in developing countries. Researchers in Saudi Arabia have constantly been directing their efforts on oral cancer research and have their results published. Systematic analysis of such papers is the need of the hour as it will not only acknowledge the current status but will also help in framing future policies on oral cancer research in Saudi Arabia. Method: The search string “oral cancer” OR “Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma” OR “oral premalignant lesion” OR “oral precancer” OR “Oral Potentially malignant disorder” AND AFFIL (Saudi AND Arabia ) was used for retrieval of articles from Scopus database. Various tools available in Scopus database were used for analyzing the bibliometric related parameters. Results: The search revealed a total of 663 publications based on the above query. Maximum affiliations were from King Saud University (163) followed by Jazan University (109) and then King Abdulaziz University (106). A large number of international collaborations were observed, the maximum with India (176) and the USA (127). The maximum number of articles were published in the Asia Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (34) followed by the Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (33) and Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine (19).
    [Show full text]
  • Machine Learning for Prognosis of Oral Cancer: What Are the Ethical Challenges?
    Proceedings of the Conference on Technology Ethics 2020 - Tethics 2020 Machine learning for prognosis of oral cancer: What are the ethical challenges? Long paper Rasheed Omobolaji Alabi1 [0000-0001-7655-5924], Tero Vartiainen2 [0000-0003-3843-8561], Mohammed Elmusrati1 [0000-0001-9304-6590] 1 Department of Industrial Digitalization, School of Technology and Innovations, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland 2 Department of Computer Science, School of Technology and Innovations, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland [email protected] Abstract. Background: Machine learning models have shown high performance, particularly in the diagnosis and prognosis of oral cancer. However, in actual everyday clinical practice, the diagnosis and prognosis using these models remain limited. This is due to the fact that these models have raised several ethical and morally laden dilemmas. Purpose: This study aims to provide a systematic state- of-the-art review of the ethical and social implications of machine learning models in oral cancer management. Methods: We searched the OvidMedline, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers databases for articles examining the ethical issues of machine learning or artificial intelligence in medicine, healthcare or care providers. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis was used in the searching and screening processes. Findings: A total of 33 studies examined the ethical challenges of machine learning models or artificial intelligence in medicine, healthcare or diagnostic analytics. Some ethical concerns were data privacy and confidentiality, peer disagreement (contradictory diagnostic or prognostic opinion between the model and the clinician), patient’s liberty to decide the type of treatment to follow may be violated, patients–clinicians’ relationship may change and the need for ethical and legal frameworks.
    [Show full text]
  • ORAL ONCOLOGY a Journal Related to Head & Neck Oncology
    ORAL ONCOLOGY A Journal Related to Head & Neck Oncology AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK TABLE OF CONTENTS XXX . • Description p.1 • Impact Factor p.2 • Abstracting and Indexing p.2 • Editorial Board p.2 • Guide for Authors p.5 ISSN: 1368-8375 DESCRIPTION . Oral Oncology is an international interdisciplinary journal which publishes high quality original research, clinical trials and review articles, editorials, and commentaries relating to the etiopathogenesis, epidemiology, prevention, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neoplasms in the head and neck. Oral Oncology is of interest to head and neck surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, maxillo- facial surgeons, oto-rhino-laryngologists, plastic surgeons, pathologists, scientists, oral medical specialists, special care dentists, dental care professionals, general dental practitioners, public health physicians, palliative care physicians, nurses, radiologists, radiographers, dieticians, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, nutritionists, clinical and health psychologists and counselors, professionals in end of life care, as well as others interested in these fields. Basic, translational, or clinical Research or Review papers of high quality and that make a contribution to new knowledge are invited on the following aspects of neoplasms arising in the head and neck (including lip, tongue, oral cavity, oropharynx, salivary glands, sinuses, nose, nasopharynx, larynx, skull base, thyroid, and craniofacial region, and the related hard and
    [Show full text]
  • Scimago Journal Rank Indicator: a Viable Alternative to Journal Impact Factor for Dental Journals
    volume 26, issue 2, pages 144-151 (2016) SCImago Journal Rank Indicator: A Viable Alternative to Journal Impact Factor for Dental Journals Khalid Mahmood (corresponding author) Department of Information Management, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan [email protected] Khalid Almas College of Dentistry, University of Dammam, Saudi Arabia [email protected] ABSTRACT Objective. This paper investigated the possibility of SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) indicator as an alternative to the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) in the field of dentistry. Method. The SJR and JIF scores and ranking order of 88 dental journals were downloaded from the relevant websites. Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to test hypotheses for association between the two journal quality metrics. Result. A very strong positive correlation was found between the scores and ranking order based on the SJR and JIF of selected journals. Hence, academics and researchers in dentistry can use the SJR indicator as an alternative to JIF. INTRODUCTION Assessment of research quality is an important activity in all academic and professional fields. Citation-based evaluation metrics have been the most common method in the last few decades. As the only provider of citation data, the Institute for Scientific Information (now Thomson Reuters) has a long-established monopoly of the market. The Journal Impact Factor (JIF), first conceived in 1955 by Eugene Garfield, was the main quantitative measure of quality for scientific journals. The JIFs, published annually in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR), are widely used for quality ranking of journals and extensively used by leading journals in their advertising (Elsaie & Kammer, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • The Quality of Statistical Reporting and Data Presentation in Predatory Dental Journals Was Lower Than in Non-Predatory Journals
    entropy Article The Quality of Statistical Reporting and Data Presentation in Predatory Dental Journals Was Lower Than in Non-Predatory Journals Pentti Nieminen 1,* and Sergio E. Uribe 2,3,4 1 Medical Informatics and Data Analysis Research Group, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland 2 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Oral Health, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia; [email protected] 3 School of Dentistry, Universidad Austral de Chile, Rudloff, Valdivia 1640, Chile 4 Baltic Biomaterials Centre of Excellence, Headquarters at Riga Technical University, LV-1658 Riga, Latvia * Correspondence: pentti.nieminen@oulu.fi Abstract: Proper peer review and quality of published articles are often regarded as signs of reliable scientific journals. The aim of this study was to compare whether the quality of statistical reporting and data presentation differs among articles published in ‘predatory dental journals’ and in other dental journals. We evaluated 50 articles published in ‘predatory open access (OA) journals’ and 100 clinical trials published in legitimate dental journals between 2019 and 2020. The quality of statistical reporting and data presentation of each paper was assessed on a scale from 0 (poor) to 10 (high). The mean (SD) quality score of the statistical reporting and data presentation was 2.5 (1.4) for the predatory OA journals, 4.8 (1.8) for the legitimate OA journals, and 5.6 (1.8) for the more visible dental journals. The mean values differed significantly (p < 0.001). The quality of statistical reporting of clinical studies published in predatory journals was found to be lower than in open access and Citation: Nieminen, P.; Uribe, S.E.
    [Show full text]
  • JOURNAL of ORAL BIOSCIENCES the Official Journal of the Japanese Association for Oral Biology
    JOURNAL OF ORAL BIOSCIENCES The official journal of the Japanese Association for Oral Biology AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK TABLE OF CONTENTS XXX . • Description p.1 • Abstracting and Indexing p.1 • Editorial Board p.1 • Guide for Authors p.4 ISSN: 1349-0079 DESCRIPTION . The Journal of Oral Biosciences (JOB) is the official journal of the Japanese Association for Oral Biology, and is published quarterly in addition to a supplementary issue for the Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Japanese Association for Oral Biology. The Journal is an interdisciplinary journal, devoted to the advancement and dissemination of fundamental knowledge concerning every aspect of oral biosciences including cariology research, craniofacial biology, dental materials, implant biology, geriatric oral biology, microbiology/immunology and infection control, mineralized tissue, neuroscience, oral oncology, periodontal research, pharmacology, pulp biology, salivary research, and other fields. A global journal, JOB welcomes submission from both society members and non-members from around the world. Article types accepted include original and review articles, short communications, technical notes and letters. Authors submitting to the journal may choose to publish their article open access. ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING . PubMed/Medline Scopus Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) EDITORIAL BOARD . Editor-in-Chief Norio Amizuka, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan Developmental Biology of Hard Tissue Vice Editors-in-Chief Kenji Mishima, Showa University Graduate School
    [Show full text]
  • Publications
    PUBLICATIONS 1. BKM Reddy, V Lokesh, MS Vidyasagar, K Shenoy, KG Babu, and et al. Nimotuzumab provides survival benefit to patients with inoperable advancedsquamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A randomized, open-label, phase IIB,5-year study in Indian patients. Oral Oncology 2014; 50:498-505. INDEXED IN EMBASE, ELSEVIER BIOBASE, SCIENCE CITATION INDEX, SCISEARCH, RESEARCH ALERT, CURRENT CONTENTS/CLINICAL MEDICINE, MEDLINE, CURRENT CLINICAL CANCER, CINAHL, GLOBAL HEALTH, SCOPUS. (ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE) 2. Shenoy VK, Shenoy KK, Rodrigues S, Shetty P. Management of oral health in patients irradiated for head and neck cancer-a review.Kathmandu University Medical Journal. 2007;5(1-17):117-120.INDEXED IN MEDLINE/PUBMED.(ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE) 3. Shobha Rodrigues, VidyaKamalakshShenoy, KamalakshShenoy.ProstheticRehabilitation of a patient after partial rhinectomy: a clinical reportJ Prosthet Dent 2005; 93:125-128.INDEXED INSCOPUS.(ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE) 4. Fluka Monte Carlofor basic dosimetric studies of dual energy medical linear accelerator. Siddharth, Shakir KK. Guided/Graded Motor Imagery for Cancer Pain: Exploring the Mind-Brain Inter-relationship.SenthilParamashivam Kumar, Anup Kumar, KamalakshShenoy,Mariella D’Souza, Vijaya K Kumar.Indian J Palliat Care 2013;19(2):125-126.INDEXED INDOAJ, EMERGING SOURCES CITATION INDEX, INDEX COPERNICUS, INDIAN SCIENCE ABSTRACTS, PUBMED CENTRAL, SCIMAGO JOURNAL RANKING, SCOPUS.(ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE) 5. K Reshma, S Kamalaksh, YS Bindu, K Pramod, A Asfa, D Amritha, S Aswathi, R Chandrashekhar.Tulasi (Ocimum Sanctum) as radioprotector in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy. Biomedicine 2012;32(1):39–44..INDEXED INMEDLINE, SCISEARCH, BIOSIS/BIOLOGICAL ABSTRACTS, PASCAL/INIST- CNRSCURRENT CONTENTS/LIFE SCIENCES, EMBASE/EXCERPTA MEDICA, SCIENCE CITATION INDEX, SCIENCEDIRECT, ELSEVIER BIOBASE, SCOPUS, RESEARCH4LIFE (HINARI).(ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE).(ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE) 6.
    [Show full text]