The Child As the Guardian of Being Fr. Antonio Lopez If, As Some Have

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Child As the Guardian of Being Fr. Antonio Lopez If, As Some Have The Child as the Guardian of Being Fr. Antonio Lopez If, as some have shown, coming to terms with the meaning of divorce and its effects on children requires dealing with the nature of marriage,1 marriage itself is impossible to understand without questioning the meanings of person and love, as well as their relation to their ultimate origin. Once we see what the human person is and what is characteristic about human love and its distinctive fruitfulness, it will be possible to grasp more clearly that what is at stake in the family—and hence what divorce renders problematic for both parents and children—is the person’s participation in the truth of love. I will proceed in five steps. First, I will show that, ontologically speaking, the form of the human person is filial. Nietzsche’s anthropology will clarify by contrast our understanding of the child and show that we cannot adequately consider childhood apart from the mystery of our own birth. Second, I will speak of the unity of love proper to married love, its dynamic relation of giving and receiving and its fruitfulness. Exploring the nature of love will help us to grasp better the homelessness that results for parents and, above all, children when this unity is broken (sections 3–4). I will conclude by reflecting on the sacrifice required for the unity of human love to be true. 1. Memory and Childhood In her best seller, The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce: The 25 Year Landmark 1 Elizabeth Marquardt, Between Two Worlds: The Inner Lives of Children of Divorce (New York: Three Rivers Press, 2005), 22. Study, Judith Wallerstein cogently argues against the claim that “divorce is a temporary crisis that exerts its most harmful effects on parents and children at the time of the breakup.”2 Indeed, children of divorced parents have to learn to live the rest of their lives with the wounds their parents’ breakup inflicts on them. The literature on children of divorced parents is also an eloquent witness to another frequently neglected fact: the past cannot be canceled. Even if parents can partially justify dismissing their past life together, the presence of their children is a permanent reminder that the past remains present. Although the past—that is, the exchange of vows, and the children as fruit of their union—can be denied, it cannot be deleted. This brief remark on time and divorce opens for us an ontological dimension of the human person that normally goes unnoticed. The past abides, and the effects of divorce are enduring because the form of the person is filial.3 In other terms, the filial relation and the effects of divorce are ontological: they regard what the person and love are. As we shall see later, the child is the fruitful unity of the parents’ love. At the beginning of this chapter we can indicate positively that the child’s identity arises qua the loving unity between the parents. We thus cannot extirpate his relationship with his parents and with the trinitarian mystery their nuptial love represents. Children dwell in their parents and parents dwell in their children. This filial relation is constitutive, that is, ever defining and ever new. Negatively speaking we can say that, when parents divorce, the ontological identity of the child is called into question in a profound sense. Quite literally, the divorce poses anew for the child the question: “Who am I?” What does it mean to say that the filial relation is ontological? The human being is and remains childlike. To clarify this claim, I would like to turn to Nietzsche’s contrasting, albeit 2 Judith S. Wallerstein, Julia M. Lewis, and Sandra Blakeslee, The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce: The 25 Year Landmark Study (New York: Hyperion, 2000), xxx. 3 Andrew Root addresses the ontological dimension of the effects of divorce on children. Andrew Root, The Children of Divorce: The Loss of Family as the Loss of Being (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2010), 43–65. deceivingly similar, thesis, which apprehends the human person without any reference to his origin. Nietzsche’s account, in fact, describes very accurately the way we still think and operate. At the beginning of his epoch-opening book, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, the German philosopher writes: “Of three metamorphoses of the spirit I tell you: how the spirit becomes a camel; and the camel, a lion; and the lion, finally, a child.”4 Since the remarkably deep and powerful description of Zarathustra’s path through life is well known, it suffices now to make explicit the points that are pertinent to our reflection. Zarathustra, like everyone who dares to embrace the dangerous but indispensable adventure of becoming an overman, has first to appropriate all the values, moral imperatives, beliefs, ideas, words, and traditions that history and family bequeath.5 One begins by receiving all these values and beliefs like a camel does: kneeling and letting oneself be well loaded. The spirit-camel soon discovers that all these “grave words and values” are alien to him. Because they do not come from him, “life seems a desert to him.”6 The spirit thus needs to roar at all this inheritance with the strength of a lion and destroy it through laughter. Only the one who breaks the inherited tables of values and worldviews, that is, uncompromisingly questions everything, realizes that every value comes from oneself.7 The spirit-lion, however, is still unable to create a new table of values and be content with the fact that this table is its own. Only the spirit that becomes a child has the courage of the new, the unstoppable energy to discover what is authentic, and the joy that desires and knows how to reach the highest peaks. 4 Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None, in The Portable Nietzsche, ed. and trans. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Penguin Books, 1976), 137. Hereafter cited as TSZ. 5 For the meaning of the overman see, among others, Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science: With a Prelude in Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs, trans. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Vintage Books, 1974), nos. 143, 283, 289, 292, 309, 310, 324, 342, hereafter cited as GS; TSZ, Prologue, no. 3; bk. 1, no. 20; bk. 2, no. 4; Nietzsche, The Will to Power, trans. Walter Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale (New York: Random House, 1967), nos. 804, 866, 983, 1001, 1027, 1060, hereafter cited as WtP. 6 TSZ, 305. 7 “We should be able also to stand above morality—and not only to stand with the anxious stiffness of a man who is afraid of slipping and falling any moment, but also to float above it and play. How then could we possibly dispense with art—and with the fool? And as long as you are in any way ashamed before yourselves, you do not yet belong with us” (GS, no. 107). It is clear here that Nietzsche’s radical questioning never wonders about the truth of one’s own table of values. The overman and his will to power are the measure of all things. The child, Nietzsche tells us, is “innocence and forgetting, a new beginning, a game, a self- propelled wheel, a first movement, a sacred ‘Yes.’ For the game of creation, my brothers, a sacred ‘Yes’ is needed: the spirit now wills his own will and he who had been lost to the world now conquers his own world.”8 For Nietzsche, the child does not encounter values. Rather, he bestows value on the world in which he lives.9 Only the child is able to “create for himself a sun of his own.”10 The creator-child is the one who is able to play the game of forging one’s own values and of determining what is good and evil.11 Nietzsche contends that the courage of the new and the energy to build a worldview express the child’s power to create. Nietzsche’s spirit-child is the epitome of the will to power, that is, of the eternal striving to overcome oneself. The child is the real human being (the overman) inasmuch as he wills his own will. Contrary to what we may think, this will to power is not concerned with controlling others—hurting others is a sign that one still lacks power.12 Nor does the will to power aim at an eschatological realization of oneself. Rather, it is a constant fight, a permanent striving to perfect oneself, to master oneself. This human height consists in the unity in which the different drives of life (passions, reason, etc.) have been sublated, that is, 13 preserved, canceled, and lifted up. The mastery of oneself, therefore, is not the canceling out of 8 TSZ, 139. 9 GS, no. 301. 10 Ibid., no. 320. He further wrote: “Let us therefore limit ourselves to the purification of our opinions and valuations and to the creation of our own new tables of what is good, and let us stop brooding about the ‘moral value of our actions’!” (ibid., no. 335). 11 Heidegger, who spent much time reading Nietzsche, wrote that “there are also great children. By the gentleness of its play, the greatest royal child is that mystery of the play in which humans are engaged throughout their life, that play in which their essence is at stake. The question remains whether and how we, hearing the movements of this play, play along and accommodate ourselves to the play.” Martin Heidegger, The Principle of Reason, trans. Reginald Lilly, (Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1996), 113.
Recommended publications
  • Hart Templeton Colloquium Sch
    This Templeton Colloquium at the NDIAS is offered due to the generosity of the John Templeton Foundation and through a grant to the Notre Dame Institute for Advanced Study. Cover Image: A Lifetime of Looking Artist: David Plunkert Program for Mind, Soul, World: Consciousness in Nature A Templeton Colloquium led by David Bentley Hart Templeton Fellow at the NDIAS March 14-15, 2016 Notre Dame Conference Center 100-104 McKenna Hall In this two-day Templeton Colloquium, Professor David Bentley Hart will explore the mystery of consciousness (the entirety of mental life), posing critical questions such as the place of nature within mind, and probing more traditional assumptions about the physicalist emergentist accounts of the origins of consciousness. In dialogue with other scholars he will take up the idea that careful reflection on the nature of consciousness yields an understanding of consciousness to which certain classical understandings of the soul (Western and Eastern) may prove far better suited than more materialist reductionist approaches. This colloquium, made possible through the generosity of the John Templeton Foundation and a grant to the Notre Dame Institute for Advanced Study (NDIAS), brings together scholars from history and philosophy of science, philosophy, and theology to examine critical topics about consciousness including whether consciousness can evolve or emerge from matter, intentionality and the transcendental ends of consciousness, classical metaphysics of the soul, Eastern contributions to the understanding of consciousness, and the soul and the whole of being. Monday, March 14, 2016 8:00 a.m. Continental breakfast available 9:00 a.m. Introduction Presenter: David Bentley Hart, Templeton Fellow at the NDIAS Moderator: Brad S.
    [Show full text]
  • Plato and Non Philosophy
    Radical Orthodoxy: Theology, Philosophy, Politics, Vol. 1, Numbers 1 & 2 (August 2012): 322-32. ISSN 2050-392X Reasoning within the Good: An Interview with David C. Schindler Paul Tyson Paul Tyson [PT]: It seems to me that the Plato you give us is fully committed to the reality of transcendence as encountered within the context of immanent lived reality. Thus, your Plato could be cast as a somewhat Hamannean/Kierkegaardian counter-enlightenment figure affirming the two way truth of transcendence and immanence in lived reality, all of which denies the Kantian phenomenological ceiling, denies Humean pure immanentism, and denies high abstract Hegelian idealism. If this is a fair reading, can you unpack the Kantian allusion of your title for us? That is, if Kant critiques pure reason and Plato critiques impure reason, what type of relationship between the task of Kant and the task of Plato, in our post-Kantian context, is your title alluding to? David C Schindler [DCS]: This is indeed a fair reading of one of the book’s central concerns. A reviewer, I believe, wrote that he was disappointed not to find an engagement with Kant, which the title seems to promise. In fact, the entire book could arguably be read as an engagement with Kant, though it was intended to be in the first place an interpretation of Plato rather than a comparative study. The title was meant to reverberate in several different directions: first, it is intended to suggest that the Republic is “Plato’s version,” if you will, of the attempt to work out the foundation and scope of reason, just like Kant’s first Critique, though of course in a radically different manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Spirit and Truth
    Gunnar Innerdal Spirit and Truth A Systematic Reconstruction of Hans Urs von Balthasar’s Doctrine of the Spirit of Truth and Its Connections to the Philosophy and Theology of Truth by the Theoretical Framework of Lorenz B. Puntel Dissertation submitted for the degree PhD (Philosophiae Doctor) MF Norwegian School of Theology 2014 © Gunnar Innerdal ii Outline of contents INTRODUCTION Part I: TRUTH IN PHILOSOPHY Part II: TRUTH IN SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY Part III: THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH CONCLUSION EPILOGUE iii iv Detailed table of contents Outline of contents .................................................................................................................... iii Detailed table of contents ........................................................................................................... v Preface ....................................................................................................................................... xi Thanks ..................................................................................................................................... xiii Abbreviations etc. ..................................................................................................................... xv INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 § 1. Prelude: Truth, Spirit, Philosophy and Dogmatics .................................................. 1 § 2. Research Question: A Systematic Theology of the Spirit of Truth ........................
    [Show full text]
  • After Heidegger and Marion: the Task of Christian Metaphysics Today
    Modern Theology 34:4 October 2018 DOI: 10.1111/moth.12445 ISSN 0266-7177 (Print) ISSN 1468-0025 (Online) AFTER HEIDEGGER AND MARION: THE TASK OF CHRISTIAN METAPHYSICS TODAY JOHN R. BETZ Abstract Without denying legitimate criticisms of metaphysics that have been made since the time of the Reformation, the purpose of this essay is to challenge prevailing assumptions in continental philoso- phy and theology since Heidegger that the age of metaphysics is now over and should be replaced as “first philosophy” either by some version of phenomenology, such as that offered by Jean-Luc Marion, or by a pragmatic linguistic approach in the spirit of Wittgenstein, such as that offered by Kevin Hector. Notwithstanding the genuine merits of their proposals and concerns, it is argued here that metaphysics is not so easily dismissed, and that there is, in fact, a way to do metaphysics otherwise – a way that was taken by Erich Przywara, whose analogical metaphysics is characterized not only by an analogy between God and creation, the analogia entis, but also by an analogy between philo- sophical and theological metaphysics. In this, form, it is argued, not only is metaphysics impervious to the standard criticisms of “onto-theology,” it also turns out to be, at its core, nothing other than a Christological metaphysics. We need not fear that the work of metaphysics has to be begun again, but it is equally true that it has to be reviewed and renewed in every age in relation of the difficulties and problems of the age. Dennis Hawkins1 This is the ultimate truth: that Christians, as guardians of a metaphysics of the whole person in an age which has forgotten both Being and God, are entrusted with the weighty responsibility of leading this metaphysics of wholeness through that same fire.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtue and the Happiness of Persons
    „Studia Ełckie” 22(2020), nr 3 e-ISSN 2353-1274 p-ISSN 1896-6896 DOI: 10.32090/SE.220316 ANTHONY DAUM OSB* Virtue and the Happiness of Persons What is happiness and how do we get it? This is arguably the most peren- nial and universal question that human beings have asked (and will continue to ask). The reasons for this are both profound and self-evident. First and fore- most, everyone, regardless of ethnicity, religion, geo-political or socio- economic context wants to be happy. The profundity of this is on clear display since no one could sincerely object to the statement ‘I want to be happy’; it is truly self-evident, expressing a first principle (and last end) of human action. The self-evidence quickly subsides, however, when the question turns to defining precisely the end and to determining the means by which we attain that end. The argument of this essay is essentially twofold: (1) that the ultimate hap- piness of human persons is found in the contemplation of and union with pure act, insofar as each person has the capacity to receive it, and (2) that the principle means of attaining and increasing that capacity is virtue. Unfortunately, this tra- ditional understanding, taken from both the Greco-Roman and Judeo-Christian traditions, has largely been lost, even within the Catholic Church, which histori- cally has been the preeminent aegis of both of these traditions in the West1. 1. Defining and Expounding Our Terms The principal terms requiring definition and exposition in this essay are: essence, existence, person, virtue, virtual quantity, and happiness2.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeing the Self As Beautiful: Hans Urs Von Balthasar on Beauty and the Divine Exegesis of the Self
    KOREA PRESBYTERIAN JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY Vol. 49 No. 3 Seeing the Self as Beautiful: Hans Urs von Balthasar on Beauty and the Divine Exegesis of the Self PARK Shin-Young, Ph.D. Student, Systematic & Philosophical Theology Graduate Theological Union, USA I. Introduction II. Seeing the Form (Gestalt) and the Divine Exegesis of the Self III. Seeing [the] Gestalt Christi, the Exegesis of God, and Redeeming Beauty IV. Seeing the Self through the Mother’s Loving Gaze V. Conclusion Korea Presbyterian Journal of Theology Vol. 49 No. 3 (2017. 9), 215-235 DOI: 10.15757/kpjt.2017.49.3.009 216 KOREA PRESBYTERIAN JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY Vol. 49 No. 3 Abstract This article is an aesthetic and theological inquiry into the self. The author draws on Hans Urs von Balthasar’s theological aesthetics to explore how one perceives oneself in seeing the form—or, more specifically, how the aesthetic experience of the formal archetype, the Christ form (Gestalt Christi) shapes the self-identity of the seer. The article argues that seeing the form is an act of knowing God and the self, for one awakens to consciousness by seeing God’s loving gaze viewing the self as beautiful, which is true self-knowledge. Balthasar’s notion of Gestalt played a key role in the theological aesthetics that he developed in the first volume of his trilogy The Glory of the Lord, and his work reveals in what sense seeing the form is receiving the divine exegesis of the self. The Gestalt Christi, the concrete analogia entis, offers a vision for perceiving the beauty of the self through Christ’s mission, and self-identity as known and revealed in Christ’s “I-Thou relation” to the Father.
    [Show full text]
  • The Analogy of the Sexes in the Trinitarian
    “A GREAT MYSTERY”: THE ANALOGY OF THE SEXES IN THE TRINITARIAN COMMUNIO OF HANS URS VON BALTHASAR IN LIGHT OF A FEMINIST PERSPECTIVE Thesis Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Master of Arts in Theological Studies By John Joseph Allen UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio August 2012 “A GREAT MYSTERY”: THE ANALOGY OF THE SEXES IN THE TRINITARIAN COMMUNIO OF HANS URS VON BALTHASAR IN LIGHT OF A FEMINIST PERSPECTIVE Name: Allen, John Joseph APPROVED BY: ______________________________________________ Matthew J. Levering, Ph.D. Faculty Advisor ______________________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Faculty Reader ______________________________________________ Jana M. Bennett, Ph.D. Faculty Reader ii ABSTRACT “A GREAT MYSTERY”: THE ANALOGY OF THE SEXES IN THE TRINITARIAN COMMUNIO OF HANS URS VON BALTHASAR IN LIGHT OF A FEMINIST PERSPECTIVE Name: Allen, John Joseph University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Matthew Levering This project attempts to expound the theological anthropology of Hans Urs von Balthasar as a decidedly Trinitarian anthropology. The method of this project explores the writings of Balthasar on the analogy of the sexes grounded in the Godhead, and incorporates the critical engagement of feminist theologian Tina Beattie. Central to the conclusion of this thesis is an understanding of the Trinity as a reciprocal Gift-Exchange of Love between the Persons; a model after which the human sexes, male and female, were created and called to imitate. This thesis questions the degree to which Beattie’s critique of Balthasar fails to take into account the Trinitarian grounding of Balthasar’s vision of the human sexes.
    [Show full text]
  • April 6, 2014 the LIVING CHURCH CATHOLIC EVANGELICAL ECUMENICAL
    Student Essays in Christian Wisdom Competition (see page 40) April 6, 2014 THE LIVING CHURCH CATHOLIC EVANGELICAL ECUMENICAL Spring Education Issue $5.50 livingchurch.org Opening Doors to Academic Achievement “Can We Have Christian Liberal Education in 21st-Century America?” The Saint James Conference Speakers & Topics myaLehtfoeloRehT“ rhCehtnirehcaeTnam ”yadoTloohcSnaitsir Mr. Theodore Camp, M.A. (Connecticut) biLehT“ biLehT otetoditnAstrAlareb otetoditnA:strAlareb ”msiehtA The Reverend Joel Heck, Th.D. (Concordia, St. Louis) dE“ laroMehtdnanoitacud iWlacitcarPehT:efiLl snhoJleumaSfomodsi ”no Professor David Hein, Ph.D. (Virginia), FRHistS iserPdnatseirP“ oybligOnesmeR:tnedi ”egelloCytinirTfo The Revd F. Washington Jarvis, D.Litt., L.H.D. hCdtPhT“ ruhCnredomtsoPehT“ itlfRlhSh snoitcelfeR:loohcShcr ”itilibiRd ”seitilibisnopseRdnas Frederick Jordan, Ph.D. (Notre Dame) ifeDadrawoTsetoN“ nacilgnAehtfonoitini ”noitidarTcitsalohcS The Reverend D. Stuart Dunnan, D.Phil. (Oxon) The Reverend W.L. Chip Prehn, Ph.D. (Virginia) ‘“ orGruoYdooGgnikaM‘ amweNlanidraC:’dnuo noitacudElarebiLnona ”n Professor Bernadette Waterman Ward, Ph.D. (Stanford) June 6-8, A.D. 2014 Saint James School St. James, Maryland hT“ otacudefognirehtagsih lohcsdna,sdneirf,sro rednowdnaerarsisra .lufr nitI nasllifdnaemseripsn oisseforprehtoondeen fnactnempolevedlano fi .ll ”.ll — citraP3102 iipp tnap For more details and to register www.stjames.edu/Conf2014 E-mail: [email protected] THE LIVING CHURCH ON THE COVER THIS ISSUE April 6, 2014 | William Augustus Muhlenberg NEWS “had a social commitment that the school should be the Church’s out- 4 A Rainbow of Nonviolence reach into the world” —The Rev. FEATURES Stuart Dunnan (see “Muhlenberg’s Vision Thrives,” p. 8). 8 Muhlenberg’s Vision Thrives By G. Jeffrey MacDonald | 12 Listen for Jesus on Campus By D. Stuart Dunnan Photo courtesy of St. James School, Philadelphia | COMMON 16 Miracle on 6th Avenue By Mary Ellen Barnes LIFE | 20 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses WONDERFULLY AND FEARFULLY MADE: Hans Urs von Balthasar on the Metaphysical Signicance of the Wonder of a Child and the Fruitfulness of Human Sexual Dierence REID, ANGUS,DAVID,INGVAR How to cite: REID, ANGUS,DAVID,INGVAR (2019) WONDERFULLY AND FEARFULLY MADE: Hans Urs von Balthasar on the Metaphysical Signicance of the Wonder of a Child and the Fruitfulness of Human Sexual Dierence, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/13228/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 WONDERFULLY AND FEARFULLY MADE Hans Urs von Balthasar on the Metaphysical Significance of the Wonder of a Child and the Fruitfulness of Human Sexual Difference by Angus David Ingvar Reid Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Durham University Department of Theology and Religion 2019 ABSTRACT WONDERFULLY AND FEARFULLY MADE Hans Urs von Balthasar on the Metaphysical Significance of the Wonder of a Child and the Fruitfulness of Human Sexual Difference Angus David Ingvar Reid Hans Urs von Balthasar promotes a concrete metaphysics whereby humans disclose the reality of being as a whole within their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • A Little Child Shall Lead Us the Theology of the Child
    The Linacre Quarterly Volume 73 | Number 2 Article 6 May 2006 A Little hiC ld Shall Lead Us The Theology of the Child Kathleen Curran Sweeney Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq Recommended Citation Sweeney, Kathleen Curran (2006) "A Little hiC ld Shall Lead Us The Theology of the Child," The Linacre Quarterly: Vol. 73 : No. 2 , Article 6. Available at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq/vol73/iss2/6 A Little Child Shall Lead Us The Theology of the Child by Kathleen Curran Sweeney, B.A., M.A. The author holds two Master's Degrees, one in Theological Studies from the John Paul II Institute and another in History from the University of Washington. Mother-child attachment in the early years of life lays the foundation not only for personal security and relationships, but also for spiritual life. The implications for society are enormous. Moreover, theologians and philosophers have developed reflections about the state of childhood that reveal realities about our relationship with God and our spiritual state. Our psychological experience and our spiritual experience mutually enlighten each other. These theological developments are an inner window which shed light on the deeper meaning of maternal-child bonding. Swiss theologian Hans urs von Balthasar brought attention to the theological importance of childhood, particularly in his small book, Unless You Become Like This Child (UYBY . He says: It occurred to no one [in earlier cultures] to consider the distinctive consciousness of children as a value in itself. And because childhood was ranked as merely a "not-yet" stage, no one was concerned with the form of the human spirit, indeed the form of man's total spiritual-corporeal existence, that preceded free, moral decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Things, Subsidiary Focal Integration, and A
    1 “Things, Subsidiary Focal Integration, and a Metaphysics of Liberty: Comparing Michael Polanyi and Michael Hanby on Science and Metaphysics” Paper for the Annual Meeting of the Polanyi Society, November 2020. Esther Lightcap Meek, Geneva College Introduction The purpose of this essay is to attest to and explore the resonance I am finding between Michael Polanyi’s innovative science-inspired philosophical claims and Classical Christian metaphysics (CCM) as developed especially by philosopher Michael Hanby in his book, No God, No Science? Theology, Cosmology, Biology.1 I want to show how Polany’s core philosophical insights seem intuitively well attuned to CCM’s central claims.2 I begin with a few definitions and prefatory comments. Consistently with this metaphysical tradition, I have come to regard metaphysics as concerning the most fundamental claims about reality. They are so fundamental as to be indemonstrable, except insofar as they cannot coherently be denied in any demonstrations, nor in our actual knowing and being.3 I think of these as the metaphysics of childhood—how we all quite naturally move toward the world from our first moments of infancy in the loving gaze of the mother’s smile.4 As we grow up, especially in this milieu, however, incoherent denying of them happens and damages human efforts. Modernity seems to have installed this denial as its defining agenda. Yet on this fundamental level, metaphysics concerns and envelops us all, Michael Polanyi and the modern enterprise of science included. So there is an obvious sense in which Polanyi’s work is intuitively imbued with metaphysics. But I believe that his philosophical proposals set him apart in this anti-metaphysical, reductivist, materialist, positivist, modernist era as being especially attuned to metaphysics and its mutual, concrete but indeterminate bearing on scientific discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • The Light of the Gift in Homo Abyssus
    THE LIGHT OF THE GIFT IN HOMO ABYSSUS M ARINE DE LA TOUR “Being is the unity of creation and its mobility, its fecundity, and its life.” The gift in the philosophy of Ferdinand Ulrich, especially in Homo Abyssus, is an ever-present and fundamental light. But par- adoxically, it is not a phenomenon that Ulrich considers in its concrete human reality, whether personal or social. The gift will be the great explicit theme of Gabe und Vergebung, his last work.1 In Homo Abyssus, the work that presents the metaphysical heart of Ulrich’s thought, there is no phenomenology of the gift; the logic of the gift is rather the implicit logic in which the great questions of metaphysics are clarified and certain difficulties or contradictions resolved. But it is neither a model for thinking nor a total logic or idea that would grasp the totality of the real in its concept. I will therefore not speak directly of the gift, but make a roundabout tour of what seem to me some of the most fruitful 1. Ferdinand Ulrich, Gabe und Vergebung. Ein Beitrag zur biblischen Ontolo- gie, Schriften V, ed. Stefan Oster (Freiburg: Johannes Verlag Einsiedeln, 2006) (hereafter cited as GV ). Communio 46 (Spring 2019). © 2019 by Communio: International Catholic Review 28 MARINE DE LA TOUR traits in Homo Abyssus, and to develop some of the ideas, distinc- tions, or interpretations that help us to think and to live. We shall then see that the gift is, in a way, the central light of Homo Abys- sus, and that its important questions are answered on the basis of the consent to the gift or of the refusal of the gift.
    [Show full text]