Draft New York Sunfish and Crappie Management Plan 2021-2028

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Draft New York Sunfish and Crappie Management Plan 2021-2028 Draft New York Sunfish and Crappie Management Plan 2021 - 2028 Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor | Basil Seggos, Commissioner Draft New York Sunfish and Crappie Management Plan 2021 - 2028 NYSDEC BOF Report #: Prepared by: Bureau of Fisheries Division of Fish and Wildlife New York State Department of Environmental Conservation December 31, 2020 Jefferey Loukmas, Warmwater Fisheries Unit Leader Gregory Kozlowski, Inland Fisheries Section Head Stephen S. Hurst, Chief, Bureau of Fisheries Heidi O’Riordan, Region 1 Fisheries Manager Melissa Cohen, Region 2 Fisheries Manager Michael DiSarno, Region 3 Fisheries Biologist Christopher VanMaaren, Region 4 Fisheries Manager Robert Fiorentino, Region 5 Fisheries Manager Jana Lantry, Region 6 Fisheries Manager David Lemon, Region 7 Fisheries Manager Scott Prindle, Region 7 Fisheries Biologist Webster Pearsall, Region 8 Fisheries Manager Michael Clancy, Region 9 Fisheries Manager Approved by ___________________ Stephen S. Hurst, Chief Bureau of Fisheries Vision Sunfish and crappie fisheries will be managed to achieve an optimal balance between conservation and the current views and values of New York anglers for these species. This will include creating a suite of special opportunities for anglers to sustainably catch large fish in suitable waters. Management Philosophies Sunfish are widely dispersed in New York and serve both as a gateway species for introducing new people to fishing and as a desirable target for anglers seeking quality table fare. Sunfish will be managed in a sustainable manner to improve population size structure and provide anglers with the opportunity for recreational enjoyment and equitable harvest. Crappie fill a unique panfish niche in New York and will be managed for sustainable populations of preferred size fish for recreational enjoyment and equitable harvest. Where environmental and social conditions are acceptable, both species will be managed to optimize the size structure of populations to produce unique fisheries that offer anglers the chance to catch large size fish. Scope Sunfish (bluegill, pumpkinseed, and redbreast sunfish) and crappie (black crappie and white crappie) fisheries statewide, including the Great Lakes. Need Sunfish and crappie are widespread and abundant throughout New York and are popular with anglers, collectively accounting for approximately 900,000 days fished in 2017 (Duda et al. 2019). These species generally provide harvest-based fisheries, and anglers can have significant impacts on population structure where bag limits are liberal and harvest is intense (Coble 1988, Olson and Cunningham 1989, Parsons and Reed 1998, Beard and Kampa 1999). Despite their widespread prevalence and popularity, sunfish and crappie have received less management attention than other species such as black bass, walleye, and trout. They are rarely the primary focus of fisheries surveys, and there are very few special fishing regulations for these species groups in New York, none of which are specifically designed to improve the size structure of populations. It is incumbent on the NYSDEC Bureau of Fisheries to periodically review harvest regulations and other management strategies for these species groups to ensure that management appropriately addresses and reflects current science and angler views and values. The statewide sunfish possession limit is 50 per day and has been in place since 1996. This limit was founded largely on the rationale that 50 fish per day should generally provide sustainable and equitable opportunities for harvest. There is, however, concern that the existing daily limit could result in overharvest and lead to less than ideal size structures and lower quality fishing. The use of social media to quickly draw attention to high quality fishing opportunities and the widespread use of electronic fish finders and other devices to improve fishing efficiency have added to that concern. In addition, the daily limit may no longer appropriately represent the current views of New York anglers about sunfish as a recreationally important species (Loukmas 2020a). The statewide fishing regulations for crappie include a possession limit of 25 per day and a minimum size limit of 9 inches. This minimum size limit allows most crappie to reach at least age-3, the age at which they typically begin to spawn, before being subjected to harvest. There are relatively few high- 1 use crappie fisheries in New York (Duda et al. 2019), most likely due to the limited number of high- quality fishing opportunities in the state. NYSDEC Fisheries managers have a responsibility to manage crappie fisheries to provide anglers with sustainable quality fishing opportunities. There is a concern that the current harvest regulations don’t adequately provide this, and crappie fisheries could improve with more conservative harvest regulations. In addition, there are certain waters throughout the state with the potential to provide truly exceptional fishing for large sunfish and crappie if harvest regulations were designed to provide that opportunity. These waters are typically very productive and have fast growing fish that are subject to high harvest rates. More conservative harvest regulations would add the protection necessary to provide sustainable opportunities to catch memorable size fish (≥10-inch sunfish and ≥12-inch crappie; Gablehouse 1984). Creating these special fisheries may enhance the diversity of New York’s sunfish and crappie fisheries, balancing the desires of anglers with the potential of certain waters to provide a special fishing opportunity. Literature Review The traditional belief among anglers that sunfish populations can be improved by “thinning them out” (i.e. harvesting large numbers) has been largely disproven, as more conservative harvest regulations have been effective in improving or maintaining sunfish population size structure (Paukert et al. 2002, Jacobson 2005, Rypel 2015). Paukert et al. (2002) evaluated the effects of an 8-inch minimum size limit on bluegill size structure in18 Nebraska lakes and found an overall increase in the proportion of preferred size (≥8 inch) fish, with the highest increases in lakes with the fastest growth and lowest natural mortality. Jacobson (2005) found that reducing the daily limit for sunfish from 30 to 10 in eight small Minnesota lakes resulted in increased male size at maturity and significantly improved population size structure. Rypel (2015) found that a reduction in the sunfish daily limit from 25 to 10 in seven Wisconsin lakes resulted in higher mean lengths averaging 0.8 inches and ranging up to 2 inches. For crappie, increases in the minimum length limit are likely to be more effective than reductions in the daily limit for improving size structure, particularly where growth is fast and angler harvest is high. Iserman et al. (2002) simulated the effects of 9 inch and 10 inch minimum size limits on Tennessee reservoir crappie populations and found that, while harvest would predictably decline, numbers of 12 inch crappie would increase, with the largest size increases resulting from a 10 inch minimum size in lakes with low natural mortality. Webb and Ott (1991) found that implementation of a 10 inch minimum size limit (from no limit) resulted in a significant increase in preferred size (≥10 inches) crappies in lakes with high harvest rates. They concluded that minimum length limits may moderate or eliminate age class variability that is common in crappie fisheries and help maintain a more stable population of larger crappies. Mosel et al. (2015) simulated the effects of 9 inch, 10 inch and 11 inch minimum size limits and found that these were always predicted to reduce harvest (22–93% reductions) and increase mean length of harvested crappies (0.5 – 2.4 inches) compared with no minimum length limit. The 10 inch and 11 inch minimum length limits were predicted to improve mean lengths of harvested fish by >1 inch. Angler Opinion The positive impacts of more conservative harvest regulations can only be realized with angler understanding and support. The potential support for more conservative harvest regulations on sunfish was gauged via an online survey of New York sunfish anglers (Loukmas 2020a). Of the more than 1,400 respondents, 77% thought that an appropriate daily limit for sunfish should be 30 or less, and 2 57% favored 20 or less, indicating that New York sunfish anglers would generally support a substantial decrease in the statewide daily limit. Also, the large majority (85%) are not motivated to maximize harvest up to the daily limit and many (48%) preferred to harvest larger sunfish (≥ 8 inches). These results suggest that anglers are likely to be open to other management options, such as size limits or reduced daily limits, to maintain or improve sunfish populations in certain waters. Although no formal angler opinion survey of crappie anglers was conducted, NYSDEC Bureau of Fisheries believes that New York crappie anglers hold opinions similar to sunfish angers and would be supportive of more conservative harvest regulations if those changes were likely to provide more sustainable opportunities to catch crappies of desirable size. Approach The current science on the impacts of conservative harvest regulations on sunfish populations and the high level of public support for a decrease in the sunfish daily possession limit indicates that consideration of an adjustment to the current management strategy is warranted. Similarly, an increase in the minimum size limit for New York’s crappie fisheries
Recommended publications
  • Crawford Reservoir
    Crawford Reservoir FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Eric Gardunio, Fish Biologist Montrose Service Center General Information: Crawford Reservoir is a popular fishery that provides angling opportunity for yellow perch, channel catfish, northern pike, rainbow trout, black crappie, and largemouth bass. This reser- voir, located in Crawford State Park, covers 414 surface acres at full capacity and is open year round to an- gling. Visit the State Parks website for information on regulations, camping, and recreation: http://parks.state.co.us/Parks/Crawford Location: 2 miles south of the town of Crawford on Hwy 92. Primary Management: Warmwater Mixed Species Lake Category 602 Amenities Previous Stocking Sportfishing Notes 2019 Black Crappie Boat Ramps (2) Rainbow Trout (10”): 9,100 Good spots include the East Campgrounds (2) Largemouth Bass (2”): 30,088 shore primarily around the Showers Clear Fork boat ramp cove or Largemouth Bass (6”): 150 anywhere with brush Visitors Center Largemouth Bass (20”): 70 Good baits include small tube Restrooms Channel Catfish (7”): 1,500 jigs and worms Parking Areas 2018 Channel Catfish Picnic Shelters Rainbow Trout (10”): 12,184 Good spots include the north Largemouth Bass (2”): 30,000 side of peninsula cove and near the dam Channel Catfish (7”): 4,250 Good baits include night 2017 crawlers and cut-bait WARNING !!! Rainbow Trout (10”): 12,184 Largemouth Bass Prevent the Spread of Largemouth Bass (2”): 20,000 Good spots include the rocky Zebra Mussels and other Largemouth Bass (16”): 70 areas near the dam and flood- Aquatic Nuisance Species ed brush and vegetation in the Channel Catfish (9”): 2,000 spring and summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Fishing Regulations Summary
    2 Kansas Fishing 0 Regulations 0 5 Summary The new Community Fisheries Assistance Program (CFAP) promises to increase opportunities for anglers to fish close to home. For detailed information, see Page 16. PURCHASE FISHING LICENSES AND VIEW WEEKLY FISHING REPORTS ONLINE AT THE DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND PARKS' WEBSITE, WWW.KDWP.STATE.KS.US TABLE OF CONTENTS Wildlife and Parks Offices, e-mail . Zebra Mussel, White Perch Alerts . State Record Fish . Lawful Fishing . Reservoirs, Lakes, and River Access . Are Fish Safe To Eat? . Definitions . Fish Identification . Urban Fishing, Trout, Fishing Clinics . License Information and Fees . Special Event Permits, Boats . FISH Access . Length and Creel Limits . Community Fisheries Assistance . Becoming An Outdoors-Woman (BOW) . Common Concerns, Missouri River Rules . Master Angler Award . State Park Fees . WILDLIFE & PARKS OFFICES KANSAS WILDLIFE & Maps and area brochures are available through offices listed on this page and from the PARKS COMMISSION department website, www.kdwp.state.ks.us. As a cabinet-level agency, the Kansas Office of the Secretary AREA & STATE PARK OFFICES Department of Wildlife and Parks is adminis- 1020 S Kansas Ave., Rm 200 tered by a secretary of Wildlife and Parks Topeka, KS 66612-1327.....(785) 296-2281 Cedar Bluff SP....................(785) 726-3212 and is advised by a seven-member Wildlife Cheney SP .........................(316) 542-3664 and Parks Commission. All positions are Pratt Operations Office Cheyenne Bottoms WA ......(620) 793-7730 appointed by the governor with the commis- 512 SE 25th Ave. Clinton SP ..........................(785) 842-8562 sioners serving staggered four-year terms. Pratt, KS 67124-8174 ........(620) 672-5911 Council Grove WA..............(620) 767-5900 Serving as a regulatory body for the depart- Crawford SP .......................(620) 362-3671 ment, the commission is a non-partisan Region 1 Office Cross Timbers SP ..............(620) 637-2213 board, made up of no more than four mem- 1426 Hwy 183 Alt., P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Crappie and Crappie Fishing
    Crappie & Crappie Fishing Crappie are among the most popular sport fishes in Texas. They are known by various names including white perch, sac-a-lait, calico bass, and paper-mouth. Two species are found in Texas, the white crappie (Pomoxis annularis) and black crappie (P. nigromaculatus). Black crap­ pie have irregular dark speck­ les and blotches on their sides. On white crappie, the dark markings consist of regularly arranged vertical bars. When in doubt, count the number of sharp dorsal spines at the front of a crappie’s dorsal fin. Black crappie have seven or eight spines while white crappie Young crappie feed on microscopic crustaceans called have five or six. During the spawning season, males of zooplankton. Juveniles and adults feed primarily on both species develop dark markings over most of the small threadfin and gizzard shad and insect larvae, es­ body, causing many anglers to misidentify male white pecially mayflies. Their diet also includes minnows, crappie as black crappie. silversides, other crappie and any other fish small enough to swallow. Black crappie are more numerous in the clear, acidic to slightly alkaline waters of East Texas. White crappie are found state­ In lakes with low bass populations, crappie often wide. Fish of both species may live up to eight years and overpopulate and become stunted. For crappie to reach become sexually mature at one to two years. Crappie belong larger sizes, populations must experience high total mor­ to the same family as the sunfishes and black basses; like tality to keep their numbers within the carrying capacity their cousins, crappie are nest builders.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Fishing Regulations 3 Fishing License Fees Getting Started
    2019 & 2020 Fishing Regulations for your boat for your boat See how much you could savegeico.com on boat | 1-800-865-4846insurance. | Local Offi ce geico.com | 1-800-865-4846 | Local Offi ce See how much you could save on boat insurance. Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states or all GEICO companies. Boat and PWC coverages are underwritten by GEICO Marine Insurance Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, D.C. 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. TowBoatU.S. is the preferred towing service provider for GEICO Marine Insurance. The GEICO Gecko Image © 1999-2017. © 2017 GEICO AdPages2019.indd 2 12/4/2018 1:14:48 PM AdPages2019.indd 3 12/4/2018 1:17:19 PM Table of Contents Getting Started License Information and Fees ..........................................3 Douglas A. Ducey Governor Regulation Changes ...........................................................4 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH COMMISSION How to Use This Booklet ...................................................5 JAMES S. ZIELER, CHAIR — St. Johns ERIC S. SPARKS — Tucson General Statewide Fishing Regulations KURT R. DAVIS — Phoenix LELAND S. “BILL” BRAKE — Elgin Bag and Possession Limits ................................................6 JAMES R. AMMONS — Yuma Statewide Fishing Regulations ..........................................7 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT Common Violations ...........................................................8 5000 W. Carefree Highway Live Baitfish
    [Show full text]
  • Status Review and Management Outline for Quality Bluegill and Black Crappie Populations in the Grand Rapids Area
    Status Review and Management Outline for Quality Bluegill and Black Crappie Populations in the Grand Rapids Area. Revised in 2013 By David L. Weitzel Assistant Area Fisheries Supervisor MN DNR, Grand Rapids Area Fisheries Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Bass Lake ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Blackwater, Jay Gould, and Little Jay Gould lakes ...................................................................................... 10 Cut Foot and Little Cut Foot Sioux lakes ..................................................................................................... 18 Deer, Pickerel, and Battle lakes .................................................................................................................. 23 Dixon Lake ................................................................................................................................................... 31 Grave Lake ................................................................................................................................................... 37 Split Hand and Little Split Hand Lakes ........................................................................................................ 41 Sand Lake ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Programme and Abstracts THANKS to OUR SPONSORS!
    5th Pan-European Duck Symposium 16th-20th April 2018 Isle of Great Cumbrae, Scotland Programme and Abstracts THANKS TO OUR SPONSORS! 2 ORGANISING COMMITTEE Chris Waltho (Independent Researcher) Colin A Galbraith (Colin Galbraith Environment Consultancy) Richard Hearn (Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust / Duck Specialist Group) Matthieu Guillemain (Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage / Duck Specialist Group) SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Tony Fox (University of Aarhus) Colin A Galbraith (Colin Galbraith Environment Consultancy) Andy J Green (Estación Biológica de Doñana) Matthieu Guillemain (Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage / DSG) Richard Hearn (Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust / Duck Specialist Group) Sari Holopainen (University of Helsinki) Mika Kilpi (Novia University of Applied Sciences) Carl Mitchell (Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust) David Rodrigues (Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra) Diana Solovyeva (Russian Academy of Sciences) Chris Waltho (Independent Researcher) 3 PROGRAMME Monday 16th April: Pre- meeting Workshop on marine issues 11.00 – 16.00. DAY1 (Tuesday 17th April) Chair: Chris Waltho 9:00 – 9:05 Chris Waltho – Welcome. 9:05 – 9:10 Provost Ian Clarkson - North Ayrshire Council. 9:10 – 9:20 Lady Isobel Glasgow - Chair of the Clyde Marine Planning Partnership. 9:20 – 9:30 Colin Galbraith – The aims and objectives of the Conference. 9:30 – 10:20 Plenary 1 Dr. Jacques Trouvilliez, (Executive Secretary of the Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds (AEWA)) 10:20 - 10:45 Coffee break SESSION 1 POPULATION DYNAMICS AND TRENDS Chair: Colin Galbraith 10:45 – 11:00 New pan-European data on the breeding distribution of ducks. Verena Keller, Martí Franch, Sergi Herrando, Mikhail Kalyakin, Olga Voltzit and Petr Voříšek 11:00 – 11:15 Trends in breeding waterbird guild richness in the southwestern Mediterranean: an analysis over 12 years (2005-2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Fish & Fishing Session Outline
    Fish & Fishing Session Outline For the Outdoor Skills Program th th 7 & 8 Grade Lessons I. Welcome students and ask group what they remember or learned in the last session. II. Fish & Fishing Lessons A. Activity: Attract a Fish B. Activity: Lures and Knot Tying C. Activity: Tackle Box and Fishing Plan III. Review: Ask the students what they enjoyed most about today’s session and what they enjoyed the least. (Another way to ask is “what was your high today, and what was your low? As the weeks progress this can be called “Time for Highs & Lows”.) The Outdoor Skills program is a partnership with Nebraska Games & Parks and the UNL Extension/4-H Youth Development Program to provide hands-on lessons for youth during their afterschool time and school days off. It provides the opportunity to master skills in the areas of hunting, fishing, and exploring the outdoors. This educational program is part of the 20 year plan to recruit, develop and retain hunters, anglers, and outdoor enthusiasts in Nebraska. Inventory Activity: Fishing Lures Curriculum Level: 7-8 Kit Materials & Equipment Feathers Waterproof glue Fish anatomy poster Pliers Fish models (catfish, bluegill, crappie, Tackle box with “filling your tackle & bass) box” components ID/habitat cards Laminated copy of “Awesome Lures” Lures displays Cabela’s Fishing Catalog Supplies Instructor Provides (15) Nebraska Fishing Guide Paperclips (15) NGPC Fish ID Book Pop cans Trilene line Scissors Knot tying cards Masking tape Knot tying kit (6 shark hooks & 6 lengths of rope) Copies of “Plan Your Trip” worksheet (15) Knot-testing weights Treble hooks Duct tape Materials to be Restocked-After Each Use (15) Nebraska Fishing Guide (15) NGPC Fish ID Book For information on restocking items contact Julia Plugge at 402-471-6009 or [email protected] All orders must be placed at least 2 weeks in advance.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands of Saratoga County New York
    Acknowledgments THIS BOOKLET I S THE PRODUCT Of THE work of many individuals. Although it is based on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), tlus booklet would not have been produced without the support and cooperation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Patrick Pergola served as project coordinator for the wetlands inventory and Dan Montella was project coordinator for the preparation of this booklet. Ralph Tiner coordi­ nated the effort for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). Data compiled from the NWI serve as the foun­ dation for much of this report. Information on the wetland status for this area is the result of hard work by photointerpreters, mainly Irene Huber (University of Massachusetts) with assistance from D avid Foulis and Todd Nuerminger. Glenn Smith (FWS) provided quality control of the interpreted aerial photographs and draft maps and collected field data on wetland communities. Tim Post (N.Y. State D epartment of Environmental Conservation), John Swords (FWS), James Schaberl and Chris Martin (National Park Ser­ vice) assisted in the field and the review of draft maps. Among other FWS staff contributing to this effort were Kurt Snider, Greg Pipkin, Kevin Bon, Becky Stanley, and Matt Starr. The booklet was reviewed by several people including Kathleen Drake (EPA), G eorge H odgson (Saratoga County Environmental Management Council), John Hamilton (Soil and W ater Conserva­ tion District), Dan Spada (Adirondack Park Agency), Pat Riexinger (N.Y. State Department of Environ­ mental Conservation), Susan Essig (FWS), and Jen­ nifer Brady-Connor (Association of State Wetland Nlanagers).
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Based Characterization of Resident Fish Entrainment-Turbine
    Draft Technical Memorandum Literature Based Characterization of Resident Fish Entrainment and Turbine-Induced Mortality Klamath Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2082) Prepared for PacifiCorp Prepared by CH2M HILL September 2003 Contents Introduction...................................................................................................................................1 Objectives ......................................................................................................................................1 Study Approach ............................................................................................................................2 Fish Entrainment ..............................................................................................................2 Turbine-induced Mortality .............................................................................................2 Characterization of Fish Entrainment ......................................................................................2 Magnitude of Annual Entrainment ...............................................................................9 Size Composition............................................................................................................10 Species Composition ......................................................................................................10 Seasonal and Diurnal Distribution...............................................................................15 Turbine Mortality.......................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Best Indiana Panfishing Lakes
    15 best Indiana panfishing lakes This information has been shared numerous places but somehow we’ve missed putting it on our own website. If you’ve been looking for a place to catch some dinner, our fisheries biologists have compiled a list of the 15 best panfishing lakes throughout Indiana. Enjoy! Northern Indiana Sylvan Lake Sylvan Lake is a 669-acre man made reservoir near Rome City. It is best known for its bluegill fishing with some reaching 9 inches. About one third of the adult bluegill population are 7 inches or larger. The best places to catch bluegill are the Cain Basin at the east end of the lake and along the 8 to 10 foot drop-offs in the western basin. Red-worms, flies, and crickets are the most effective baits. Skinner Lake Skinner Lake is a 125-acre natural lake near Albion. The lake is known for crappie fishing for both black and white crappies. Most crappies are in the 8 to 9 inch range, with some reaching 16 inches long. Don’t expect to catch lots of big crappies, but you can expect to catch plenty that are keeper-size. The best crappie fishing is in May over developing lily pads in the four corners of the lake. Live minnows and small white jigs are the most effective baits. J. C. Murphey Lake J. C. Murphey Lake is located on Willow Slough Fish and Wildlife Area in Newton County. Following this winter, there was minimal ice fishing (due to lack of ice) and the spring fishing should be phenomenal especially for bluegills.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of a Roving Creel Survey to Monitor Exploited Coastal Fish Species in the Goukamma Marine Protected Area, South Africa
    The use of a Roving Creel Survey to monitor exploited coastal fish species in the Goukamma Marine Protected Area, South Africa by Carika Sylvia van Zyl A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Technoligae, Nature Conservation Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University 2011 i I, Carika Sylvia van Zyl (s208027504) hereby declare that the work in this document is my own. ii Abstract A fishery-dependant monitoring method of the recreational shore-based fishery was undertaken in the Goukamma Marine Protected Area (MPA) on the south coast of South Africa for a period of 17 months. The method used was a roving creel survey (RCS), with dates, times and starting locations chosen by stratified random sampling. The MPA was divided into two sections, Buffalo Bay and Groenvlei, and all anglers encountered were interviewed. Catch and effort data were collected and catch per unit effort (CPUE) was calculated from this. The spatial distribution of anglers was also mapped. A generalized linear model (GLM) was fitted to the effort data to determine the effects of month and day type on the variability of effort in each section. Fitted values showed that effort was significantly higher on weekends than on week days, in both sections. A total average of 3662 anglers fishing 21 428 hours annually is estimated within the reserve with a mean trip length of 5.85 hours. Angler numbers were higher per unit coastline length in Buffalo Bay than Groenvlei, but fishing effort (angler hours) was higher in Groenvlei. Density distributions showed that anglers were clumped in easily accessible areas and that they favored rocky areas and mixed shores over sandy shores.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Species
    Wildlife Species This chapter contains information on species featured in each of the ecoregions. Species are grouped by Birds, Mammals, Reptiles, Amphibians, and Fish. Species are listed alphabetically within each group. A general description, habitat requirements, and possible wildlife management practices are provided for each species. Wildlife management practices for a particular species may vary among ecoregions, so not all of the wildlife management practices listed for a species may be applicable for that species in all ecoregions. Refer to the WMP charts within a particular ecoregion to determine which practices are appropriate for species included in that ecoregion. The species descriptions contain all the information needed about a particular species for the WHEP contest. However, additional reading should be encouraged for participants that want more detailed information. Field guides to North American wildlife and fish are good sources for information and pictures of the species listed. There also are many Web sites available for wildlife species identification by sight and sound. Information from this section will be used in the Wildlife Challenge at the National Invitational. Participants should be familiar with the information presented within the species accounts for those species included within the ecoregions used at the Invitational. It is important to understand that when assessing habitat for a particular wildlife species and considering various WMPs for recommendation, current conditions should be evaluated. That is, WMPs should be recommended based on the current habitat conditions within the year. Also, it is important to realize the benefit of a WMP may not be realized soon. For example, trees or shrubs planted for mast may not provide cover or bear fruit for several years.
    [Show full text]