DOCSLIB.ORG

Terms of Reference: Evaluation of Blue Ventures Project “Improving the Profitability and Ecological Sustainability of Octopus Fisheries in Southwest Madagascar”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Terms of Reference: Evaluation of Blue Ventures Project “Improving the Profitability and Ecological Sustainability of Octopus Fisheries in Southwest Madagascar” Blue Ventures Conservation Level 2 Annex, Omnibus Business Centre, 39-41 North Road, London N7 9DP Tel: +44 (0) 20 7697 8598 Fax: +44 (0) 800 066 4032 [email protected] www.blueventures.org Registered charity #1098893 Terms of Reference: Evaluation of Blue Ventures project “Improving the profitability and ecological sustainability of octopus fisheries in southwest Madagascar” 1.1. Background information Blue Ventures develops transformative approaches for nurturing and sustaining locally ​ led marine conservation. We work in places where the ocean is vital to local cultures and economies, and we are committed to protecting marine biodiversity in ways that benefit coastal people. More information about Blue Ventures’ mission and our approach to marine conservation can be found on our website. ​ ​ Blue Ventures has been working with Vezo communities in the Atsimo Andrefana region, SW Madagascar, since 2003, providing support to village­level management associations (including Velondriake, Beandriake, Soariake and Fimihara). Temporary fishery closures are a powerful management tool that can demonstrate the economic benefits of fisheries management rapidly, to fishers and seafood buyers alike. By producing tangible benefits to coastal communities, this approach can build robust support for broader marine management initiatives. In SW Madagascar, where fishing ​ ​ accounts for more than 80% of income for around 90% of households, temporary fisheries closures have focussed on the octopus fishery, one of the most economically significant fisheries in the region (Barnes­Mauthe et al 2013). ​ ​ Importantly, these closures have provided the catalyst for encouraging community engagement in ambitious marine conservation efforts, including the creation of permanent marine reserves, now established at a number of sites by communities in parallel with temporary fishery closures within locally managed marine areas (LMMAs). ​ ​ 1.2. Project description The current DFID funded project focuses on the traditional fishing communities of ​ ​ southwest Madagascar. In particular the focus is on women within these communities. Octopus fishing is the principal ­ and for many women ­ the sole source of income, with 98% of women surveyed naming octopus as their main source of revenue (Epps 2006) for many households in these communities. It is a particularly important commodity for girls, women and the elderly, because they are able to fish octopus on reef flats by foot and using simple spears. In southern Madagascar, where community characteristics typify those of deep poverty, women have traditionally played a secondary role in decision­making. Their status is subordinate to men, and their inferior status has many negative consequences for their education, health, nutrition and life prospects. Poverty has forced men to migrate away to work for long periods, leaving many households headed by women (Metcalf 2007, Cripps 2009). The current initiative builds on BV’s work community­led management of the octopus fishery that began in the region in 2003, as well as work by the Madagascar government’s Projet d'Appui aux Communauté des Pêcheurs de Toliara (PACP) project, ​ ​ ​ which aimed to decrease poverty amongst coastal communities of southwest Madagascar. The project has aimed to increase the sustainability and profitability of this crucially important fishery, increasing income for women and food security within Vezo communities. By empowering communities, and in particular women, to undertake resource management, additional lasting impacts on the lives of the beneficiaries are expected to include increased gender equity and community participation in resource management and decision making, as well as increased environmental awareness and support for fisheries management and conservation actions. 1.3. Purpose of evaluation The project evaluation is also requested by the DFID fund manager (GPAF). The ​ ​ independent final evaluation reports submitted to Blue Ventures will be further submitted to the fund manager and used to inform their understanding of the grantee’s performance at the project level. The report will in turn be used to inform the evaluation manager’s assessment of performance at the GPAF fund level. The outcomes of the project evaluation are also expected to be useful to both Blue Ventures and other partners in explaining the impacts of the project and developing further support for community led management of octopus fisheries in Madagascar. The independent final evaluation report needs to be a substantial document that (a) answers all the elements of the Terms of Reference (ToR); (b) provides findings and conclusions that are based on robust and transparent evidence; and (c) where necessary supplements the grantee’s own data with independent research. 1.4. Key objectives of evaluation 1.4.1. To independently verify (and supplement where necessary) Blue Ventures’ record of achievement as reported through their Annual Reports and as defined in the project logframe; 1.4.2. To assess the extent to which the project was good value for money, which includes considering: ● How well the project met its objectives; ● How well the project applied value for money principles of effectiveness, economy, efficiency in relation to delivery of its outcome; ● What has happened because of DFID funding that wouldn’t have otherwise happened; and ● How well the project aligns with DFID’s goals of supporting the delivery of the MDGs. 1.5. Verification of reporting The first task of the final evaluation is to verify grantee achievement. The record of achievement will be presented in past Annual Reports and progress against the project logframe. This exercise could include verifying information that was collected by the grantee for reporting purposes and possibly supplementing this data with additional information collected through primary and secondary research. Verifying the results from the project logframe will begin to capture what the project has achieved. However, there will be other activities and results that occur outside of the logframe that may require examination in order to respond to the different evaluation questions. Verifying reporting will also necessarily include a review of the data and systems that were used to populate results. 1.6. Assessment of Value for Money The final evaluation should assess the extent to which the delivery and results of the project are good value for money. Value for money can be defined in different ways, but at minimum the evaluation report should include an assessment against: ● How well the project applied value for money principles of effectiveness, economy, efficiency in relation to delivery of its outcome; ● What has happened because of DFID funding that wouldn’t have otherwise happened. 1.7. Evaluation questions 1.7.1. Relevance ● To what extent did the grantee contribute to the MDGs, specifically off­track MDGs? specifically to this project: ○ MDG1 ­ incidence of extreme poverty, reducing the number people living below the poverty line ○ MDG3 Gender equality ­ integrating women in fisheries management decision making ○ MDG7 Ensuring environmental sustainability, contributing to community led conservation action ● To what extent did the project target and reach the poor and marginalised? ● To what extent did the project mainstream gender equality in the design and delivery of activities (and or other relevant excluded groups)? ● How well did the project respond to the needs of target beneficiaries, including how these needs evolved over time? 1.7.2. Effectiveness ● To what extent are the results that are reported a fair and accurate record of achievement? ○ Do the original indicators chosen effectively assess the impact of the project? ○ How have the context/conditions changed during the project changed and are outputs/outcomes still accurate/fair? ○ Have the inputs of the projects had the desired impact? e.g. has the development of women’s (ATM) groups actually changed women’s outlook on management? ● To what extent has the project delivered results that are value for money? To include but not limited to: ○ How well the project applied value for money principles of effectiveness, economy, and efficiency ○ What has happened because of DFID funding that wouldn’t have otherwise happened; and ● What challenges has the project faced and how has the project been adapted or found solutions to these challenges? ● What are the key drivers and barriers affecting the delivery of results for the project? 1.7.3. Efficiency ● To what extent did the grantee deliver results on time and on budget against agreed plans? ● To what extent did the project understand cost drivers and manage these in relation to performance requirements? 1.7.4. Sustainability ● To what extent has the project leveraged additional resources (financial and in­kind) from other sources? ● What effect has this had on the scale, delivery or sustainability of activities? ● To what extent is there evidence that the benefits delivered by the project will be sustained after the project ends? 1.7.5. Impact ● To what extent and how has the project built the capacity of civil society? Specifically to this project: ○ The community association’s management abilities ○ The management capabilities of the regional platform (CGP) ○ Women’s capacity to engage in management/decision making ○ Improved skill sets (literacy and numeracy) ● How many people are engaged in octopus fisheries management that weren’t before? ● How many people benefit from octopus fisheries
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Harnessing Mobile Technology to Improve Small-Scale Fisheries Management
    REGISTERED CHARITY 1098893 Harnessing mobile technology to improve small-scale fisheries management Thanks to the region’s mobile networks, we’re using smartphones to collect fisheries data, enabling communities to monitor their own resources and to create new opportunities for communication THIERRY NOHASIARIVELO MOBILE DATA COLLECTION COORDINATOR Blue Ventures, Level 2 Annex, Omnibus Business Centre, 39-41 North Road, London N7 9DP, UK. Tel: +44 (0)20 7697 8598 Fax: +44 (0)800 066 4032 Email: [email protected] www.blueventures.org The data deficiency challenge The world is experiencing a marine fisheries crisis. Fisheries Reversing this trend in collapsed fisheries requires improved and aquaculture support the livelihoods of at least 10 management, which in turn depends on accurate data on the percent of the world’s population, yet over 90 percent of fish status of stocks. Sound data are fundamental to effective stocks are either fully fished or overfished. marine conservation and efforts to rebuild fisheries, yet the vast majority of small-scale fisheries are unmonitored – out At least 500 million people depend on fishing for food and of sight and out of mind. Throughout much of the developing livelihoods, and this dependency is particularly high in the world, governments, communities and fisheries organisations developing world, which is home to 97% of the world’s lack the means to assess stocks, particularly in the so-called fishers, working mostly in the ‘small-scale’ traditional and small-scale fisheries sector. artisanal sectors. The initiative Blue Ventures is using mobile technology to address Blue Ventures works closely with community members to the challenge of data-deficiency in small-scale fisheries, design forms that are suitable for use by those with low capitalising on the rapid expansion of mobile technology and levels of literacy, and limited previous experience with connectivity in low-income nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Belize's Lionfishery
    REGISTERED CHARITY 1098893 Building Belize’s lionfishery A new market to drive the targeted removal of invasive lionfish Lionfish needs to be the business of the entire country; from Sarteneja all the way to Punta Gorda! JUSTINO MENDEZ, PLACENCIA PRODUCERS’ COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD Image © Gordon Kirkwood Blue Ventures, Omnibus Business Centre, 39-41 North Road, London, N7 9DP, United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)207 697 8598 Web: www.blueventures.org The lionfish invasion Since its accidental introduction to the Atlantic in the 1980s, invasion is driving further dramatic reductions in fish the Indo-Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans has become one recruitment rates. of the greatest threats to the resilience of Caribbean reef Lionfish are a particular menace for Belize, a small country systems. With extremely rapid reproduction and few natural where fishing and marine tourism support the livelihoods predators outside its native range, lionfish populations have of over 15,000 people and contribute 25% to GDP. Whilst exploded across the Caribbean and beyond, devastating fish eradicating lionfish is not possible, recent research has shown and invertebrate communities on coral reef ecosystems that suppressing populations on coral reefs allows native throughout the Caribbean region. marine species to recover. To do so requires significant and A voracious predator of juvenile fish and invertebrates, consistent removal of lionfish at scale, with the engagement lionfish suppress populations of many ecologically important of all reef stakeholders. species. With Caribbean ecosystems already weakened by the effects of overfishing and climate change, the lionfish Lionfish have been recorded as far north as New York State and as far south as Brazil 2 million eggs are produced by one female lionfish in a year 27 average density of lionfish per hectare in BCMR* Average prey consumption rate in >10kg BCMR* per lionfish per year2 of prey items identified % as reef fish by Blue 59 Ventures3 * Bacalar Chico Marine Reserve 1 Average estimate from data collected by Blue Ventures in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Responding to Change: to Change: Responding
    RESPONDING TO CHANGE: FACT SHEET EXPEDITING AND SCALING UP INTEGRATED APPROACHES FOR SUSTAINABLE COASTAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT THAT IMPROVE LIVELIHOODS AND FOOD SECURITY FOR COASTAL 2017 AND SMALL SCALE FISHING COMMUNITIES © Jürgen Freund / WWF-Malaysia INTEGRATING HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION WITH CONSERVATION KEY MESSAGES n Many poor households in coastal communities rely on healthy ecosystems for survival and to defend against climate change, but poverty, food insecurity and vulnerability to social, environmental and economic shocks mean they’re often driven to exploit these ecosystems unsustainably n Protected or locally-managed areas can be used to create new income streams for local communities, compensating for restricted access to marine resources n Understanding how social, cultural and economic factors interact with conservation goals is key to using development approaches to advance conservation goals n Broad-based development plans encompassing a ‘population-health-environment’ approach are more likely to succeed than narrow initiatives n Listening to the community to understand their needs and engaging them through participatory development approaches from conception to delivery and ongoing management is essential n Approaches must be inclusive, with particular attention paid to addressing obstacles to the participation of women and other marginalised groups in any program. LESSONS FROM THE CORAL TRIANGLE In the Coral Triangle, coastal ecosystems are critically important, providing food and resources THE ISSUE to more than 350 million people – 130 million of those are vulnerable coastal communities directly dependent on coastal and marine resources for their food and livelihoods. These ecosystems provide many services including fisheries productivity, building materials, maintenance of coastal water quality, coastal protection against storm surges, cultural and spiritual benefits, and tourism opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebuilding Tropical Fisheries with Coastal Communities
    REGISTERED CHARITY 1098893 Rebuilding tropical fisheries with coastal communities Blue Ventures, Level 2 Annex, Omnibus Business Centre, 39-41 North Road, London, N7 9DP, United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)207 697 8598 Web: www.blueventures.org >1billion 500 million people worldwide people worldwide rely on fish as a are supported by source of protein small-scale fisheries The conservation commitment A critical coastal resource conundrum Traditional small-scale fisheries are critical to the livelihoods and food security of hundreds of millions of Marine conservation efforts often fail when short-term people worldwide. However, marine ecosystems and the costs are perceived to outweigh future benefits, which may fisheries they support are facing unprecedented pressures be uncertain. All too often, forgoing fishing in protected from overfishing and climate change. 90% of global fish areas represents a severe economic sacrifice for coastal stocks are either overfished or fully fished. communities, and the promised ‘spill -over’ benefits of marine protection can be slow to accrue. As a result, Experience from around the world shows that managing conservation goals are often at loggerheads with local needs, fisheries and marine resources works best when disenfranchising traditional resource users. responsibility is placed in the hands of local communities. This is particularly true in low-income countries, where Reconciling the interests of the conservation and fishing there is often limited central capacity and infrastructure sectors requires new approaches that overcome the for fisheries management and conservation. opportunity costs of surrendering fishing in a protected area, in timeframes that work for communities. Our models We empower coastal communities to manage their own work by demonstrating that fisheries management can resources, developing rights-based fisheries management yield meaningful economic benefits for communities and plans aiming to sustain local fisheries and safeguard seafood buyers, in realistic timescales.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside: from BC’S Gulf Islands to Madagascar’S Mangroves
    branchlines Volume 25#1 Spring 2014 Inside: From BC’s Gulf Islands to Madagascar’s mangroves ............ 8 Is that tree looking at me? (cover story) ....................................10 Citizen science helps an alpine bird specialist ...................12 Carbon in wood-framed houses ..............................................18 Forest industry transformation ..............................20 Mangrove forest clear-cut for charcoal production in Ambanja Bay From BC’s Gulf Islands to Madagascar’s mangroves Dr Trevor Jones received his PhD in Forest Resources ing, soon after receiving his PhD Trevor moved to Toliara, Management under the supervision of Dr Nicholas Coops Madagascar to help establish a “blue” (ie, marine) forests sci- in UBC’s Integrated Remote Sensing Studio (IRSS). Trevor’s ence program for the marine conservation NGO Blue Ventures research involved using data collected by advanced airborne (www.blueventures.org). hyperspectral and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors While blue forests collectively refer to all marine vegetation, to map the structure and distribution of tree species in and including sea-grasses, marshes, sea-weeds and mangroves, around the Canadian Gulf Islands National Park Reserve. This Trevor’s work in Madagascar focussed on mangroves. Mangroves work directly built on his undergraduate and master’s-level are inter-tidal ecosystems found in over 120 countries between experience at Clark University, which had involved using 30° N and S latitude. These ecosystems provide a staggering field observations and Landsat satellite imagery to map past range of goods (eg, construction and fuel materials; food and and present forest distribution in the commonwealth of medicine) and services (eg, protection from storms and ero- Massachusetts and the New York State Adirondack Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Responding to Change: to Change: Responding
    RESPONDING TO CHANGE: FACT SHEET EXPEDITING AND SCALING UP INTEGRATED APPROACHES FOR SUSTAINABLE COASTAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT THAT IMPROVE LIVELIHOODS AND FOOD SECURITY FOR COASTAL 2017 AND SMALL SCALE FISHING COMMUNITIES © Tanya Petersen / WWF-Philippines Tanya © SUSTAINING COMMUNITY-BASED CONSERVATION AND LIVELIHOOD PROJECTS KEY MESSAGES n Planning for long-term sustainability beyond the exit of the initial funders should be an essential part of all community-based conservation and livelihood projects n Failure to sustain projects can lead to a loss of their positive impacts, stalled community development, and a breakdown of trust n Long-term income can be generated through community development initiatives including eco-tourism, payment for ecosystem services, trust funds and endowments, and improved fisheries management n Multiple sources and levels of funding increase actor commitment and project resilience, as do wide-ranging coalitions and partnerships n Long-term sustainability strategies require broad-based community consultation and endorsement, and strong leadership from within the community n Clear roles and responsibilities must be established, and communities empowered to manage projects directly. LESSONS FROM THE CORAL TRIANGLE The challenge of continuing community-based conservation projects once the initial external THE ISSUE funding (which is usually brokered by the lead NGO) has been exhausted, is one which is often underestimated – but it can have profound impact on the sustainability of the project and its outcomes. To help overcome this difficulty and to support strategies for fully transitioning management responsibility to communities, it is common practice for NGOs to integrate the development of sustainable funding mechanisms and local enterprises aimed at providing alternative livelihood opportunities or long-term financial support for the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Mangrove Carbon Stocks and Ecosystem Cover Dynamics in Southwest Madagascar and the Implications for Local Management
    Article Mangrove Carbon Stocks and Ecosystem Cover Dynamics in Southwest Madagascar and the Implications for Local Management Lisa Benson 1,2,*, Leah Glass 1, Trevor Gareth Jones 1,3, Lalao Ravaoarinorotsihoarana 1 and Cicelin Rakotomahazo 1 1 Blue Ventures Conservation, 39-41 North Road, London N7 9DP, UK; [email protected] (L.G.); [email protected] (T.G.J.); [email protected] (L.R.); [email protected] (C.R.) 2 Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory, Lowestoft NR33 OHT, UK 3 Department of Forest Resources Management, 2424 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-20-7697-8598 Academic Editors: Bradley B. Walters and Timothy A. Martin Received: 28 March 2017; Accepted: 20 May 2017; Published: 31 May 2017 Abstract: Of the numerous ecosystem services mangroves provide, carbon storage is gaining particular attention for its potential role in climate change mitigation strategies. Madagascar contains 2% of the world’s mangroves, over 20% of which is estimated to have been deforested through charcoal production, timber extraction and agricultural development. This study presents a carbon stock assessment of the mangroves in Helodrano Fagnemotse in southwest Madagascar alongside an analysis of mangrove land-cover change from 2002 to 2014. Similar to other mangrove ecosystems in East Africa, higher stature, closed-canopy mangroves in southwest Madagascar were estimated to contain 454.92 (±26.58) Mg·C·ha−1. Although the mangrove extent in this area is relatively small (1500 ha), these mangroves are of critical importance to local communities and anthropogenic pressures on coastal resources in the area are increasing.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Invasive Lionfish in Belize's Marine Protected Areas
    blu@ ventut�� beyond conservation Managing invasive lionfish in Belize's Marine Protected Areas Fabian C. Kyne, Jennifer K. Chapman, Stephanie J. Green, Anna L. Simmons, Charlotte L.A. Gough July 2020 Recommended citation Kyne FK, Chapman JK, Green SJ, Simmons AL & Gough CLA (2020) Managing Invasive Lionfish In Belize’s Marine Protected Areas. Blue Ventures Conservation Report, 50 pages. All photos © Blue Ventures unless indicated otherwise. Acknowledgements Funders: MAR Fund, Summit Foundation Field support: Chuck and Robby’s, Blue Sea, Tranquility Bay Resort, Brujula, Belize Fisheries Department, Blue Ventures Expeditions, FAMRACC, TIDE Field surveys led by: Anna Simmons Data collected by: Tanya Barona, Genevieve Ramirez and Fernando Robateau (TIDE), Eli Romero (Belize Audubon Society), Anna Simmons, Julia Rubin, Anouk Neuhaus, Marc Fruitema, Daniela Escontrela, Jennifer Chapman (Blue Ventures), Elias Cantun, Henry Brown and Ali Cansino (Belize Fisheries Department), Ellen McRae (FAMRACC) Data analysis and report preparation: Fabian Kyne, Jennifer Chapman, Lucy Anderson, Rosie Williams (Blue Ventures), Fanny Tricone (independent) Abbreviations BCMR – Bacalar Chico Marine Reserve CCMR – Caye Caulker Marine Reserve GUZ – General Use Zone HCMR – Hol Chan Marine Reserve IAS – Invasive Alien Species LFS – Lionfish Focused Search MPA – Marine Protected Area NTZ – No Take Zone PHMR – Port Honduras Marine Reserve SWCMR – South Water Caye Marine Reserve 2 Table of contents Recommended citation 2 Acknowledgements 2 Abbreviations 2 Table of contents
    [Show full text]
  • Five Years in Bacalar Chico Marine Reserve: an Evaluation of Reef Health and Reserve Effectiveness Between 2011-2015
    REGISTERED CHARITY 1098893 Blue Ventures Conservation Report Five Years in Bacalar Chico Marine Reserve: an evaluation of reef health and reserve effectiveness between 2011-2015. Tyrell Reyes, Hannah Gilchrist, Olivia Lacasse, Friederike Peiffer, Henry Duffy & Alison Druskat December 2019 Blue Ventures, Level 2 Annex, Omnibus Business Centre, 39-41 North Road, London, N7 9DP, United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)207 697 8598 Web: www.blueventures.org Email: [email protected] Blue Ventures Conservation Report © Blue Ventures 2019. Copyright in this publication and in all text, data and images contained herein, except as otherwise indicated, rests with Blue Ventures. Keywords: Belize, Bacalar Chico Marine Reserve, coral reef Authors: Tyrell Reyes, Hannah Gilchrist, Olivia Lacasse, Friederike Peiffer, Henry Duffy & Alison Druskat Contributors: Daniela Escontrela, Anna Simmons, Lucy Anderson, Andreina Acosta & Clara Sabal. Fieldwork supervised by: Jennifer Chapman (2011-2012), Nikkita Lawton (2011), Sarah Beach (2011-2013), Klavdija Jenko (2012-2013), Philippa Swannell (2013), Winnie Courtene-Jones (2013-2014), Me’ira Mizrahi (2014), Tom Nuttall-Smith (2014), Anouk Neuhaus (2015) & Daniela Escontrela (2015). Fieldwork conducted by: Volunteers and staff of Blue Ventures Expeditions, 2011-2015. Editors: Hannah Gilchrist, Jennifer Chapman, Charlotte Gough, Alison Druskat & Fabian Kyne Recommended citation: Reyes, T., Gilchrist, H., Lacasse, O., Peiffer, F., Duffy, H., and Druskat, A. 2019. Five years at Bacalar Chico Marine Reserve, an evaluation of reef health and reserve effectiveness. Blue Ventures Conservation Report, Blue Ventures, London. Acknowledgements: Blue Ventures would like to thank the Belize Fisheries Department for their on-going collaboration, in particular Henry Brown, the Fisheries Biologist for Bacalar Chico Marine Reserve throughout the period covered by this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Locally-Managed Marine Areas: Towards a Global Learning Network
    Blue Ventures Report Steve Rocliffe and Shawn Peabody Locally-managed marine areas: towards a global learning network Workshop report - World Conservation Congress, Jeju, South Korea, September 2012. Omnibus Business Centre, 39-41 North Road, London N7 9DP [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)20 7697 8598 Fax: +44 (0)800 066 4032 Blue Ventures Conservation Report © Blue Ventures 2013. Copyright in this publication and in all text, data and images contained herein, except as otherwise indicated, rests with Blue Ventures. Keywords: LMMA, Community-based management, marine conservation, local governance, learning-network. Acknowledgements: This workshop would not have been possible without the generous support of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Special thanks go to Foundation staff Kate Barnes and Elizabeth Chadri, as well as to the 17 community leaders who attended from 12 countries including Fiji, Kenya, Madagascar, Vietnam, Papua New Guinea, Costa Rica and India. We are also deeply indebted to the following coordinating partners for their tireless contributions to the planning of the workshop between March and September 2012: The LMMA Network, the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) World Conservation Monitoring Centre and Coastal Oceans Research and Development in the Indian Ocean (CORDIO). Finally, thanks are due to all the workshop participants who travelled internationally, regionally, nationally and locally to the workshop to make it such a success. Recommended citation: Rocliffe, S., and Peabody, S., 2013. Locally-managed marine areas: towards a global learning network workshop, World Conservation Congress, Jeju, South Korea, 10 September 2012. Blue Ventures. London. Front page: [Malagasy fisher in traditional sailing pirogue, Johnson, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Advisor - Mangrove Markets
    Blue Ventures Conservation 39-41 North Road, London N7 9DP +44 (0) 20 7697 8598 [email protected] www.blueventures.org Technical Advisor - Mangrove Markets Location: ​Flexible Closing date for applications: ​20 September 2020 Contract status​:​ International post Start date: ​As soon as possible Contract duration: ​Fixed term 1 year contract with the possibility of extension Remuneration: ​Competitive salary based on experience We rebuild tropical fisheries with coastal communities Blue Ventures develops locally led approaches to marine conservation that benefit people and nature alike. By listening and responding to basic needs, we design our models to catalyse and sustain marine protection, unlocking the potential of coastal communities to manage their resources. We work in places where the ocean is vital to local cultures and economies, and are committed to advancing the rights of small-scale fishers throughout the coastal tropics. Summary job description For almost two decades, Blue Ventures has innovated ways for tropical coastal communities to both safeguard mangroves and earn a better living from them. Our Blue Forests model secures mangrove rights, builds strong governance, democratises mangrove supply chains, and brings climate finance to pay local mangrove protectors. We are currently recruiting a Technical Advisor to support the refinement and scaling up of our Blue Forests model. The position will support the exploration and development of approaches to remove the barriers that both mangrove communities and climate finance investors face in developing viable community-based investment opportunities with measurable returns in blue carbon and other mangrove ecosystem services, including sustainable forestry. In doing so the position will play a pivotal role in helping unlock capital to protect mangroves across the tropics through community-led conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Ventures Skoll Awardee Profile
    Blue Ventures Skoll Awardee Profile Organization Overview Key Info Social Entrepreneur Alasdair Harris Year Awarded 2015 Issue Area Addressed Economic Opportunity, Environmental Sustainability, Health Sub Issue Area Addressed Arresting Deforestation, Health Delivery, Livelihoods, Ocean Ecosystems, Responsible Supply Chains Countries Served Belize, Comoros, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Madagascar, Mozambique, Tanzania, United Kingdom Website http://www.blueventures.org Twitter handle BlueVentures Facebook https://www.facebook.com/blueventures Youtube https://www.youtube.com/user/blueventures About the Organization Blue Ventures rebuilds tropical fisheries with coastal communities. They work alongside fishing communities throughout the tropics to design and implement practical measures to protect oceans for future generations. Throughout the tropics, the food security, livelihoods and cultural identity of hundreds of millions of people depend on what the ocean provides. Our tropical oceans are under unprecedented pressure from overfishing and habitat destruction, often to supply distant markets. Climate breakdown is exacerbating these threats, jeopardising the futures of coastal communities. Marine conservation initiatives designed from the top down often alienate local people and are costly to implement. Low cost, locally-led approaches that respond to the needs of coastal people show the greatest promise to expand marine conservation to the scale urgently required. Over the last decade Blue Ventures models have guided national fisheries policy and been replicated by communities, NGOs, businesses, donors, and government agencies along thousands of miles of coastline.Blue Ventures has created the largest locally-managed marine protected areas in the Indian Ocean, catalyzed a sea change in community-led fisheries management, established sustainable livelihood, aquaculture and ecotourism businesses, and developed new approaches to financing and incentivizing marine conservation.
    [Show full text]