Domestic Airport Codes
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Indiana's Native Magnolias
FNR-238 Purdue University Forestry and Natural Resources Know your Trees Series Indiana’s Native Magnolias Sally S. Weeks, Dendrologist Department of Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 This publication is available in color at http://www.ces.purdue.edu/extmedia/fnr.htm Introduction When most Midwesterners think of a magnolia, images of the grand, evergreen southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora) (Figure 1) usually come to mind. Even those familiar with magnolias tend to think of them as occurring only in the South, where a more moderate climate prevails. Seven species do indeed thrive, especially in the southern Appalachian Mountains. But how many Hoosiers know that there are two native species Figure 2. Cucumber magnolia when planted will grow well throughout Indiana. In Charles Deam’s Trees of Indiana, the author reports “it doubtless occurred in all or nearly all of the counties in southern Indiana south of a line drawn from Franklin to Knox counties.” It was mainly found as a scattered, woodland tree and considered very local. Today, it is known to occur in only three small native populations and is listed as State Endangered Figure 1. Southern magnolia by the Division of Nature Preserves within Indiana’s Department of Natural Resources. found in Indiana? Very few, I suspect. No native As the common name suggests, the immature magnolias occur further west than eastern Texas, fruits are green and resemble a cucumber so we “easterners” are uniquely blessed with the (Figure 3). Pioneers added the seeds to whisky presence of these beautiful flowering trees. to make bitters, a supposed remedy for many Indiana’s most “abundant” species, cucumber ailments. -
Exploring Collaborative Learning Methods in Leadership Development Programs Mary F
Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2018 Exploring Collaborative Learning Methods in Leadership Development Programs Mary F. Woods Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods Commons, and the Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Management and Technology This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by Mary F. Woods has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Richard Schuttler, Committee Chairperson, Management Faculty Dr. Keri Heitner, Committee Member, Management Faculty Dr. Patricia Fusch, University Reviewer, Management Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2018 Abstract Exploring Collaborative Learning Methods in Leadership Development Programs by Mary F. Woods MA, Oakland City University, 2006 BS, Oakland City University, 2004 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Management Walden University May 2018 Abstract Collaborative learning as it pertained to leadership development was an obscured method of learning. There was little research addressing the attributes contributing to collaborative learning for leadership development in leadership development programs. -
(Asos) Implementation Plan
AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities ......................... -
KCEW Procedures
CRESTVIEW, FLORIDA AL-5261 (FAA) 20086 Rwy Idg LOC I-CEW APP CRS 8006 TDZE 213 ILS or LOC RWY 17 111.9 175° Apt Elev 214 BOB SIKES(CEW) ADF required. MISSED APPROACH: Climb T Circling NA for Cat D West of Rwy 17-35. Autopilot coupled approach NA. When local to 1000 then climbing right altimeter setting not received, use Eglin AFB altimeter setting and increase S-ILS 17 DA to turn to 2000 direct KOBRA A NA 1 472 and all MDA 60 feet, increase S-LOC 17 Cat C/D and Circling Cat D visibility 4 SM. LOM and hold. ASOS EGLIN APP CON UNICOM 119.275 124.05 284.65 122.95(CTAF)L ROMEK CE 25 N CEW 21.5 SA M M 355 2300 ° 1249 ° 220 ° 090° 270° 2000 040 165° (21.1) 1800 175 LOM / IAF ° KOBRA 201 CE SE-3, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV C E 355 ° CRESTVIEW 2000 115.9 CEW C ° E 082 367 W 111.9 Chan 106 (7.5) I I-CEW C 395 WE 673 514 R-2914A SE-3, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV R-2918 ELEV 214 TDZE 213 R-2915A 175° 3.8 NM 17 from FAF Duke Field 1 . 2 (Eglin AF Aux NR3) V % DO W CE 1000 2000 CE N Remain LOM within 10 NM 8006 ° 355 1498 X 2000 150 175° 0 . 3 1600 % GS 3.00° U TCH 50 P 3.8 NM V CATEGORY A B C D 3 3 35 S-ILS 17 413- 4 200 (200- 4 ) HIRL Rwy 17-35 L 1 1 S-LOC 17 407 (500-1) 620-1 407 (500-1 8 ) 620-1 8 FAF to MAP 3.8 NM 3 820-1 4 840-2 Knots 60 90 120 150 180 C CIRCLING 700-1 486 (500-1) 3 606 (700-1 4 ) 626 (700-2) Min:Sec 3:48 2:32 1:54 1:31 1:16 CRESTVIEW, FLORIDA 30°47'N-86°31'W BOB SIKES(CEW) Amdt 1 28FEB19 ILS or LOC RWY 17 CRESTVIEW, FLORIDA AL-5261 (FAA) 20086 WAAS Rwy Idg APP CRS 8006 CH 56206 TDZE 213 RNAV (GPS) RWY 17 175° W17A Apt Elev 214 BOB SIKES(CEW) RNP APCH. -
Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020. -
F5 Data Solutions Compatibility Matrix
F5 Data Solutions Compatibility Matrix Last Revised: January 25, 2016 This document provides interoperability information intended for use as a reference guide in qualifying customer’s environments for use with the F5 ARX Data Management Operating System 6.4.0, 6.x.x, 5.3.x, v5.2.x, v5.1.x, v5.0.x, v4.1.x, v3.2.x and F5 Data Manager v3.1.x, v3.0.x and v2.6.1. Use this document for planning purposes only because hardware and software versions vary and numerous combinations are possible. The content of this document may change at any time. Please contact F5 Networks to review specific site requirements and questions. For ARX and Data Manager Versions not listed in this document and for storage systems and versions not covered in this solution matrix, please contact your F5 Networks representative or submit a Customer Special Request (CSR) to F5 Networks Data Solutions Product Management. F5 ARX and NAS / File-Server Compatibility This section lists common storage systems and file servers, as well as their respective software versions, which have been tested and qualified for interoperability with the F5 ARX. These servers were tested with the F5 ARX series intelligent file virtualization devices running the Data Management Operating System. Please contact F5 Networks to review any NAS or file server option not listed in this section. Supported Network File Virtual Present- Operating System Level6 Comments Platforms Protocols1,2 Snapshots5 ation Vols. Amazon S3 Amazon Simple Storage CIFS No Yes Requires ARX Cloud Extender v1.10.1.3 and ARX v5.1.9 or greater for CIFS Services (S3) NFS Requires ARX Cloud Extender v1.10.1 and ARX v6.0.0, v6.1.0 for NFS see Deployment Guide F5 ARX DG for Amazon S3 for details. -
CARES ACT GRANT AMOUNTS to AIRPORTS (Pursuant to Paragraphs 2-4) Detailed Listing by State, City and Airport
CARES ACT GRANT AMOUNTS TO AIRPORTS (pursuant to Paragraphs 2-4) Detailed Listing By State, City And Airport State City Airport Name LOC_ID Grand Totals AK Alaskan Consolidated Airports Multiple [individual airports listed separately] AKAP $16,855,355 AK Adak (Naval) Station/Mitchell Field Adak ADK $30,000 AK Akhiok Akhiok AKK $20,000 AK Akiachak Akiachak Z13 $30,000 AK Akiak Akiak AKI $30,000 AK Akutan Akutan 7AK $20,000 AK Akutan Akutan KQA $20,000 AK Alakanuk Alakanuk AUK $30,000 AK Allakaket Allakaket 6A8 $20,000 AK Ambler Ambler AFM $30,000 AK Anaktuvuk Pass Anaktuvuk Pass AKP $30,000 AK Anchorage Lake Hood LHD $1,053,070 AK Anchorage Merrill Field MRI $17,898,468 AK Anchorage Ted Stevens Anchorage International ANC $26,376,060 AK Anchorage (Borough) Goose Bay Z40 $1,000 AK Angoon Angoon AGN $20,000 AK Aniak Aniak ANI $1,052,884 AK Aniak (Census Subarea) Togiak TOG $20,000 AK Aniak (Census Subarea) Twin Hills A63 $20,000 AK Anvik Anvik ANV $20,000 AK Arctic Village Arctic Village ARC $20,000 AK Atka Atka AKA $20,000 AK Atmautluak Atmautluak 4A2 $30,000 AK Atqasuk Atqasuk Edward Burnell Sr Memorial ATK $20,000 AK Barrow Wiley Post-Will Rogers Memorial BRW $1,191,121 AK Barrow (County) Wainwright AWI $30,000 AK Beaver Beaver WBQ $20,000 AK Bethel Bethel BET $2,271,355 AK Bettles Bettles BTT $20,000 AK Big Lake Big Lake BGQ $30,000 AK Birch Creek Birch Creek Z91 $20,000 AK Birchwood Birchwood BCV $30,000 AK Boundary Boundary BYA $20,000 AK Brevig Mission Brevig Mission KTS $30,000 AK Bristol Bay (Borough) Aleknagik /New 5A8 $20,000 AK -
CY 2001 Compared to CY 2000
Source: 2001 ACAIS Summary of Enplanement Activity CY 2001 Compared to CY 2000 Svc Hub CY 2001 CY 2000 % Locid Airport Name City ST RO Lvl Type Enplanement Enplanement Change ATL The William B Hartsfield Atlanta International Atlanta GA SO P L 37,181,068 39,277,901 -5.34% ORD Chicago O'Hare International Chicago IL GL P L 31,529,561 33,845,895 -6.84% LAX Los Angeles International Los Angeles CA WP P L 29,365,436 32,167,896 -8.71% DFW Dallas/Fort Worth International Fort Worth TX SW P L 25,610,562 28,274,512 -9.42% PHX Phoenix Sky Harbor International Phoenix AZ WP P L 17,478,622 18,094,251 -3.40% DEN Denver International Denver CO NM P L 17,178,872 18,382,940 -6.55% LAS Mc Carran International Las Vegas NV WP P L 16,633,435 17,425,214 -4.54% SFO San Francisco International San Francisco CA WP P L 16,475,611 19,556,795 -15.76% IAH George Bush Intercontinental Houston TX SW P L 16,173,551 16,358,035 -1.13% Minneapolis-St Paul International/Wold- MSP Chamberlain/ Minneapolis MN GL P L 15,852,433 16,959,014 -6.53% DTW Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Detroit MI GL P L 15,819,584 17,326,775 -8.70% EWR Newark International Newark NJ EA P L 15,497,560 17,212,226 -9.96% MIA Miami International Miami FL SO P L 14,941,663 16,489,341 -9.39% JFK John F Kennedy International New York NY EA P L 14,553,815 16,155,437 -9.91% MCO Orlando International Orlando FL SO P L 13,622,397 14,831,648 -8.15% STL Lambert-St Louis International St. -
Departure Procedures 08073
C1 TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS AND (OBSTACLE) DEPARTURE PROCEDURES 08073 INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURE CHARTS IFR TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS AND (OBSTACLE) DEPARTURE PROCEDURES Civil Airports and Selected Military Airports ALL USERS: Airports that have Departure Procedures (DPs) designed specifically to assist pilots in avoiding obstacles during the climb to the minimum enroute altitude , and/or airports that have civil IFR take-off minimums other than standard, are listed below. Take-off Minimums and Departure Procedures apply to all runways unless otherwise specified. Altitudes, unless otherwise indicated, are minimum altitudes in MSL. DPs specifically designed for obstacle avoidance are referred to as Obstacle Departure Procedures (ODPs) and are described below in text, or published separately as a graphic procedure. If the (Obstacle) DP is published as a graphic procedure, its name will be listed below, and it can be found in either this volume (civil), or a separate Departure Procedure volume (military), as appropriate. Users will recognize graphic obstacle DPs by the term "(OBSTACLE)" included in the procedure title; e.g., TETON TWO (OBSTACLE). If not assigned a SID or radar vector by ATC, an ODP may be flown without ATC clearance to ensure obstacle clearance. Graphic DPs designed by ATC to standardize traffic flows, ensure aircraft separation and enhance capacity are referred to as "Standard Instrument Departures (SIDs)". SIDs also provide obstacle clearance and are published under the appropriate airport section. ATC clearance must be received prior to flying a SID. CIVIL USERS NOTE: Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 prescribes standard take-off rules and establishes take-off minimums for certain operators as follows: (1) Aircraft having two engines or less - one statute mile. -
Airport Grants Announced on June 30, 2020 1 State City Airport
Airport Grants Announced on June 30, 2020 State City Airport Airport Code Description of Work Total Funding Amount (June 2020) AK Anchorage Ted Stevens ANC Rehabilitate Taxiway,Seal Taxilane Pavement $9,351,300 Anchorage Surface/Pavement Joints,Seal Taxiway Pavement International Surface/Pavement Joints, Improve/Modify/Rehabilitate Terminal Building, Construct/Extend/Improve Safety Area,Improve Airport Drainage,Obstruction Marking/Lighting/Removal [Non- Hazard],Reconstruct Perimeter Fencing required by 49 CFR 1542 AK Atmautluak Atmautluak 4A2 Construct Snow Removal Equipment Building,Install $10,428,002 Miscellaneous NAVAIDS,Reconstruct Runway Lighting,Reconstruct Taxiway Lighting,Rehabilitate Access Road,Rehabilitate Apron,Rehabilitate Runway,Rehabilitate Taxiway,Update Airport Master Plan or Study AK Cold Bay Cold Bay CDB Acquire Aircraft Rescue & Fire Fighting Vehicle $1,174,763 AK Deadhorse Deadhorse SCC Acquire Aircraft Rescue & Fire Fighting Vehicle $1,145,628 AK Gustavus Gustavus GST Construct Taxiway,Rehabilitate Apron,Rehabilitate $23,842,105 Runway,Rehabilitate Taxiway AK Juneau Various *AKV Acquire Aircraft Rescue & Fire Fighting Safety Equipment $176,579 Locations in Alaska AK Kenai Kenai Municipal ENA Acquire Snow Removal Equipment $250,000 AK Kotzebue Ralph Wien OTZ Install Apron Edge Lights and/or Flood Lighting,Reconstruct $16,000,000 Memorial Taxiway Lighting,Rehabilitate Apron,Rehabilitate Taxilane,Rehabilitate Taxiway AK Nunapitchuk Nunapitchuk 16A Install Miscellaneous NAVAIDS,Reconstruct Runway $7,696,000 Lighting,Reconstruct -
DO-272 Airports Available for Download February 6, 2017 1
DO-272 Airports Available for Download February 6, 2017 ICAO FAA ID NAME 1. KABQ ABQ ALBUQUERQUE INTL SUNPORT 2. KATL ATL HARTSFIELD JACKSON ATLANTA INTL 3. KADW ADW JOINT BASE ANDREWS 4. KAUS AUS AUSTIN BERGSTROM INTL 5. KBAB BAB BEALE AFB 6. KBAD BAD BARKSDALE AFB 7. KBDL BDL BRADLEY INTL 8. KBIX BIX KEESLER AFB 9. KBKF BKF BUCKLEY AFB 10. KBLV BLV SCOTT AFB MIDAMERICA 11. KBNA BNA NASHVILLE INTL 12. KBOS BOS GENERAL EDWARD LAWRENCE LOGAN INTL 13. KBWI BWI BALTIMORE WASHINGTON INTL THURGOOD MARSHALL 14. KCID CID THE EASTERN IOWA 15. KCLT CLT CHARLOTTE DOUGLAS INTL 16. KCMH CMH PORT COLUMBUS INTL 17. KCPS CPS ST LOUIS DOWNTOWN 18. KDCA DCA RONALD REAGAN WASHINGTON NATIONAL 19. KDEN DEN DENVER INTL 20. KDFW DFW DALLAS FORT WORTH INTL 21. KDMA DMA DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 22. KDOV DOV DOVER AFB 23. KDTW DTW DETROIT METROPOLITAN WAYNE COUNTY 24. KEDW EDW EDWARDS AFB 25. KEWR EWR NEWARK LIBERTY INTL 26. KFFO FFO WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB 27. KFLL FLL FORT LAUDERDALE HOLLYWOOD INTL 28. KGEG GEG SPOKANE INTL 29. KHIF HIF HILL AFB 30. KHRT HRT HURLBURT FIELD 31. KIAD IAD WASHINGTON DULLES INTL 1 AeroNavData, Inc. ~ 1839 Ghent Road ~ Columbia, IL 62236 ~ 618-281-8986 www.aeronavdata.com/capabilities/airport-mapping-data/ DO-272 Airports Available for Download February 6, 2017 32. KIAH IAH GEORGE BUSH INTERCONTINENTAL HOUSTON 33. KIND IND INDIANAPOLIS INTL 34. KINS INS CREECH AFB 35. KJFK JFK JOHN F KENNEDY INTL 36. KLAS LAS MC CARRAN INTL 37. KLAX LAX LOS ANGELES INTL 38. -
Magnolia X Soulangiana Saucer Magnolia1 Edward F
Fact Sheet ST-386 October 1994 Magnolia x soulangiana Saucer Magnolia1 Edward F. Gilman and Dennis G. Watson2 INTRODUCTION Saucer Magnolia is a multi-stemmed, spreading tree, 25 feet tall with a 20 to 30-foot spread and bright, attractive gray bark (Fig. 1). Growth rate is moderately fast but slows down considerably as the tree reaches about 20-years of age. Young trees are distinctly upright, becoming more oval, then round by 10 years of age. Large, fuzzy, green flower buds are carried through the winter at the tips of brittle branches. The blooms open in late winter to early spring before the leaves, producing large, white flowers shaded in pink, creating a spectacular flower display. However, a late frost can often ruin the flowers in all areas where it is grown. This can be incredibly disappointing since you wait 51 weeks for the flowers to appear. In warmer climates, the late- flowering selections avoid frost damage but some are less showy than the early-flowered forms which blossom when little else is in flower. GENERAL INFORMATION Scientific name: Magnolia x soulangiana Figure 1. Middle-aged Saucer Magnolia. Pronunciation: mag-NO-lee-uh x soo-lan-jee-AY-nuh Common name(s): Saucer Magnolia DESCRIPTION Family: Magnoliaceae USDA hardiness zones: 5 through 9A (Fig. 2) Height: 20 to 25 feet Origin: not native to North America Spread: 20 to 30 feet Uses: container or above-ground planter; espalier; Crown uniformity: irregular outline or silhouette near a deck or patio; shade tree; specimen; no proven Crown shape: round; upright urban tolerance Crown density: open Availability: generally available in many areas within Growth rate: medium its hardiness range 1.