Comparison of Anodic Community in Microbial Fuel Cells with Iron Oxide-Reducing Community Hiroshi Yokoyama, Mitsuyoshi Ishida, and Takahiro Yamashita*
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. (2016), 26(4), 757–762 http://dx.doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1510.10037 Research Article Review jmb Comparison of Anodic Community in Microbial Fuel Cells with Iron Oxide-Reducing Community Hiroshi Yokoyama, Mitsuyoshi Ishida, and Takahiro Yamashita* Animal Waste Management and Environment Division, NARO Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, Tsukuba 305-0901, Japan Received: October 13, 2015 Revised: December 1, 2015 The group of Fe(III) oxide-reducing bacteria includes exoelectrogenic bacteria, and they Accepted: December 6, 2015 possess similar properties of transferring electrons to extracellular insoluble-electron acceptors. The exoelectrogenic bacteria can use the anode in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) as the terminal electron acceptor in anaerobic acetate oxidation. In the present study, the anodic First published online community was compared with the community using Fe(III) oxide (ferrihydrite) as the January 15, 2016 electron acceptor coupled with acetate oxidation. To precisely analyze the structures, the *Corresponding author community was established by enrichment cultures using the same inoculum used for the Phone: +81-29-838-8676; MFCs. High-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene revealed considerable differences Fax: +81-29-838-8606; between the structure of the anodic communities and that of the Fe(III) oxide-reducing E-mail: [email protected] community. Geobacter species were predominantly detected (>46%) in the anodic communities. In contrast, Pseudomonas (70%) and Desulfosporosinus (16%) were predominant in the Fe(III) oxide-reducing community. These results demonstrated that Geobacter species are the most specialized among Fe(III)-reducing bacteria for electron transfer to the anode in MFCs. In addition, the present study indicates the presence of a novel lineage of bacteria in the genus Pseudomonas that highly prefers ferrihydrite as the terminal electron acceptor in acetate oxidation. pISSN 1017-7825, eISSN 1738-8872 Copyright© 2016 by Keywords: Acetate oxidation, community structure, dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction, microbial The Korean Society for Microbiology fuel cell, sulfate reduction and Biotechnology Introduction understood. Elucidating this mechanism would provide vital clues to improving the power output of MFCs. Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) are environmentally friendly In anoxic natural environments, bacteria decompose bioreactors that simultaneously perform sustainable acetate to CO2 using soluble and insoluble electron bioenergy production and wastewater treatment [11]. acceptors, such as sulfate, nitrate, and Fe(III) oxides. The Bacteria decompose the organic matter in wastewater to mechanism of electron transfer to the anode is suggested to CO2 through redox reactions under anaerobic conditions in be similar to the transfer to insoluble Fe(III) oxides. In fact, the reactors. The electrons generated in these redox exoelectrogenic bacteria comprise many Fe(III) reducers, reactions are transferred to the anode by bacteria, where such as Geobacter species [2]. Given that the anode acts as a they react with electron acceptors such as O2 and substitute for Fe(III) oxide, it is predicted that the anodic K3[Fe(CN)6] via a circuit in the cathodes. The anode serves community (AC) and Fe(III)-reducing community (FRC) as an insoluble extracellular electron acceptor in these would have similar structures. In the present study, to test redox reactions, called electrode respiration. Many bacteria, this hypothesis, ACs in three MFCs and a FRC were including Geobacter, Shewanella, Desulfuromonas, and established by enrichment cultures, and the structure of the Rhodopseudomonas, can mediate electron transfer to the bacterial communities was analyzed using high-throughput anode [13]. However, the mechanism of formation of an sequencing. For comparison, a sulfate-reducing community electrochemically active biofilm on the anode is not well (SRC) was also analyzed. A 2016 ⎪ Vol. 26⎪ No. 0 758 Yokoyama et al. Materials and Methods 16S rRNA gene fragment was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the 27F and 1492R primers using the KAPA Bacterial Culture HiFi HotStart ReadyMix PCR Kit (Kapa Biosystems, MA, USA). MFC32 was a two-chambered reactor comprising two glass Subsequently, the second round of PCR was conducted using bottles (500 ml) and a Nafion 117 membrane (Dupont Japan, 563F and 802R primers, including the Illumina overhang adapter Tokyo, Japan). The anode and cathode used were a carbon cloth sequences, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The (5 cm × 5 cm) and a carbon rod (diameter, 0.5 cm; length, 15 cm), libraries were sequenced on a 300PE MiSeq run, and image respectively. The anolyte was a basal medium containing (per liter analysis, base calling, and data quality assessment were performed with the MiSeq Reporter software (Illumina). Paired-end read of distilled water) 0.98 g potassium acetate, 0.6 g NaH2PO4·2H2O, data exported in the FASTQ format were processed with the 2g NaHCO3, 2.9 g NaCl, 0.1 g KCl, 0.2 g NH4Cl, 1 mg resazurin, 41 mg 2-bromoethanesulfonate sodium salt (a methanogenesis Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME software ver. 1.8) pipeline [4]. The read sequences were joined, quality- inhibitor), 50 mg Na2S·9H2O, and 10 ml of trace mineral and vitamin checked, and clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) solutions. The catholyte was composed of 16.5 g K3[Fe(CN)6], 0.6 g using the Uclust method [5]. Representative sequences were aligned NaH2PO4·2H2O, 2 g NaHCO3, 2.9 g NaCl, 0.1 g KCl, and 0.2 g using PyNAST [3], and a phylogenetic tree was constructed. After NH4Cl. MFC35 and MFC36 were cubic air-cathode single- chambered reactors (125 ml) fed with the basal medium. The a chimera check, the taxonomic classification and alpha and beta carbon-cloth anode (5 cm × 5 cm) was placed at the opposite side diversities were computed using the QIIME tool. The taxonomic to the carbon-cloth cathode containing 0.5 mg/cm2 of a Pt catalyst assignment of the major OTUs was checked using Classifier [18]. fused with the membrane. Activated sludge collected at the The beta diversity was calculated using an unweighted UniFrac NARO Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, Tsukuba, distance matrix [15], and the result was visualized using a principal Japan, was inoculated into MFC32 and MFC35 as seed sludge, coordinate (PCo) plot. whereas cattle feces was inoculated into MFC36. The MFCs were The sequencing data were deposited in DDBJ under the accession connected to an external resistor and were operated at 30°C in the numbers LC071702-LC071715 and DRR040632-DRR040636 fed-batch mode. The external resistor was adjusted such that the (Sequence Read Archive). MFCs generated a voltage of 0.5–0.6 V. The FRC and SRC were established by enrichment culture in 15 ml test tubes containing a Results and Discussion gas phase of 100% N2. The test tubes were filled with 10 ml of the basal medium supplemented with poorly crystalline Fe(III) MFC Operation and Enrichment Cultures of FRC and SRC oxyhydroxide (ferrihydrite; 15 mM) or Na2SO4 (20 mM) for the To precisely compare the community structures, all FRC and SRC, respectively. Ferrihydrite was prepared by titrating communities, except MFC36, were cultured using the same a FeCl solution against 10% NaOH [19], and it was stored in a 3 inoculum (activated sludge) and the same medium containing glass bottle with a gas phase of nitrogen until use. Activated acetate as the sole carbon and energy source; cattle feces sludge (1 ml), identical to that used for the MFC, was inoculated were inoculated into MFC36. The MFCs were operated for into the test tubes, and the test tubes were statically incubated at 8 months. The profiles of electricity generation by the MFCs 30°C. The culture medium (1 ml) was transferred into fresh medium at an interval of 1–4 weeks, and the transfer was repeated are shown in Fig. 1. Usually, higher electricity generation is 10 times. Coulombic efficiency was estimated from the amount obtained with the use of K3[Fe(CN)6] than with O2 as an of electron flow and decrease in acetate concentration [14]. The electron acceptor in the cathode. Air-cathode single- Fe(II) concentration was determined photometrically using the chambered MFCs generally exhibit lower Coulombic phenanthroline method [6]. efficiency than double-chambered MFCs because of O2 intrusion from the membrane. Consistent with these High-Throughput Sequencing previous observations, MFC32 (two-chambered MFC with Next-generation sequencing was performed with the MiSeq K3[Fe(CN)6]) generated a higher current (1.0–1.5 mA) than Illumina sequencing platform (Illumina Inc., CA, USA) using the the air-cathode single-chambered MFC35 and MFC36 V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene [10]. The biofilms developed on (0.2–0.3 mA). The Coulombic efficiency of MFC32 was the anodes were extensively washed with distilled water for approximately 71–85%, which was higher than that of removing the bacteria loosely attached to the anodes. The genomes MFC35 (32–33%). The FRC decomposed acetate coupled were extracted from the washed biofilms with an UltraClean Soil DNA Isolation kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA). To with reduction of Fe(III) oxide. The stoichiometry was prepare the genomes of the FRC and SRC, the cultured medium acetate:Fe(III) = 1:6.8, which was close to the expected ratio was centrifuged at 12,000 ×g for 15 min. The precipitates were of 1:8. The SRC consumed acetate and sulfate with the washed with distilled water, and the genomes were extracted stoichiometry of acetate:sulfate = 1:1.1. This value was also from the precipitates using the kit. Nearly the full length of the close to the expected ratio of 1:1. These values of stoichiometry J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Anodic Community in Microbial Fuel Cells 759 Fig. 2. Rarefaction curves (A) and PCo plot (B) showing the relationship between the anodic communities (MFC32, MFC35, and MFC36) and Fe(III)- and sulfate-reducing communities (FRC and SRC, respectively).