DOCSLIB.ORG

Works of the District Subject to Chapter 40E-6, F.A.C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Works of the District Subject to Chapter 40E-6, F.A.C SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT RIGHT OF WAY SECTION WORKS OF THE DISTRICT SUBJECT TO CHAPTER 40E-6, F.A.C. (RIGHT OF WAY OCCUPANCY PERMITS) CANALS – OUTSIDE OF BIG CYPRESS BASIN Project Resolution Project (P) or Designation No. Local or Common Name/Other Information Non-Project (NP) C-1 538 Black Creek Canal P C-1N 873 Black Creek Canal, North Leg P C-1W 91-01 Black Creek Canal, West Leg P C-2 538 Snapper Creek Canal P C-4 538 Tamiami Canal NP C-6 538 Miami Canal NP C-7 538 Little River Canal P C-7 Extension 538 P C-8 873 Biscayne Canal P C-8 Extension 873 P C-9 538 Snake Creek Canal P C-9 Extension 91-01 P C-10 538 Hollywood Canal P C-10 Spur 91-01 P C-11 538 South New River Canal P C-11S 91-01 P C-12 538 Plantation Canal P C-13 538 Middle River Canal P C-14 538 Cypress Creek Canal P Designated Works of the District/Page 2 Updated 3/28/2018 Project Resolution Project (P) or Designation No. Local or Common Name/Other Information Non-Project (NP) C-15 873 Hidden Valley Canal P C-16 873 Boynton Beach Canal P C-17 538 Earman River Canal P C-18 538 Hungryland Slough, a/k/a Limestone Canal, SW Fork of P the Loxahatchee River C-19 538 West Boundary Newhall Drainage District Canal P C-19 Extension 91-01 P C-20 91-01 Nine Mile Canal P C-21 91-01 Nine Mile Stub Canal P C-23 873 Bessey Creek Canal, a/k/a Martin-St. Lucie County Line P Canal C-23A 538 North Fork St. Lucie Canal P C-24 538 North St. Lucie Drainage District Canal, a/k/a Rim Ditch P Diversion Canal C-25 538 Belcher Canal P C-25 Extension 538 a/k/a C-25 North Leg P C-29 920 Hart-Mary Jane Canal P C-29A 91-01 Ajay-Hart Canal P C-29B 91-01 Ajay-East Tohopekaliga Canal P C-30 920 Myrtle-Mary Jane Canal P C-31 538 St. Cloud Canal, formerly known as Tohopekaliga Cypress P Canal C-32B 91-01 Joel-Myrtle Canal P C-32C 91-01 Trout-Joel Canal P C-32D 91-01 Lost-Trout Canal P C-32F 91-01 Lizzie-Lost Canal P C-32G 91-01 Alligator-Lizzie Canal P C-33 873 Alligator-Gentry Canal P C-34 873 Canoe Creek P C-35 538 South Port Canal, a/k/a Tohopekalinga Cypress Canal P C-36 873 Cypress-Hatchineha Canal P C-37 873 Hatchineha-Kissimmee Canal P Designated Works of the District/Page 3 Updated 3/28/2018 Project Resolution Project (P) or Designation No. Local or Common Name/Other Information Non-Project (NP) C-38 91-01 Kissimmee River Canal P C-38, 873 Kissimmee River Canal P Secs. 1, 2 and 3 C-39A 538 State Road 70 Borrow Ditch P C-40 538 Indian Prairie Canal P C-41 538 Harney Pond Canal P C-41A 538 Slough Ditch or Stub Canal, a/k/a Brighton Canal P C-42 538 West Hollywood Canal P C-51 538 West Palm Beach Canal NP C-59 91-01 Nubbin Slough P C-60 91-01 S-140 Outlet Canal P C-100 91-01 Cutler Drain Canal P C-100A 873 Cutler Drain Canal P C-100B 873 Cutler Drain Canal P C-100C 873 Cutler Drain Canal P C-102 873 Princeton Canal P C-102N 873 C-102, North Leg P C-103 873 Mowry Canal P C-103N 873 C-103, North Leg P C-103S 873 C-103, South Leg P C-107 91-01 Model Land Canal P C-108 91-01 Card Sound Canal P C-111 873 Aerojet Canal P C-111E 873 P C-113 873 P C-113, 920 P Remainder C-120 91-01 Shingle Creek P C-121 91-01 Boggy Creek P C-123 91-01 Conveyance Canal, WCA 3A P C-304 91-01 Miami Canal, WCA 3B P Designated Works of the District/Page 4 Updated 3/28/2018 Project Resolution Project (P) or Designation No. Local or Common Name/Other Information Non-Project (NP) Arch Creek 538 NP Bel-Aire Canal 91-01 Part of C-1 Canal System NP Bolles Canal 538 NP Cross Canal 538 NP Dania Cut-Off 538 Formerly EDD Canal (S.R. 7 to ICW) NP Canal Deer Fence 2010-804, as G-3W NP Canal modified by 2012-607 Flamingo Canal 91-01 Flamingo Road Canal, Old Snake Creek Canal, C-11S NP Extension Istokpoga Canal 538 NP Hillsboro Canal 583 Formerly EDD Canal (L-36 to U.S. 1); G-8 Canal NP Miami River 538 NP Middle River 538 NP New River 538 NP North Fork 538 NP Middle River North Fork New 538 NP River North New River 538 G-15, Formerly EDD Canal (L-35 to U.S. 1) NP Canal Pompano Canal 538 From U.S. 1 to C-14; G-16 Canal NP South Fork 538 NP Middle River South Fork New 538 NP River Taylor Creek 538 NP CANALS – BIG CYPRESS BASIN Airport Road 90-05 C.R. 31 Canal NA Canal Cocohatchee 90-05 Immokalee Road Canal NA Canal Designated Works of the District/Page 5 Updated 3/28/2018 Project Resolution Project (P) or Designation No. Local or Common Name/Other Information Non-Project (NP) Cocohatchee 93-33 Lying within Sections 23 and 24, Township 48 South, NA Canal Range 26 East and Sections 19, 20, 21 and 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East Cocohatchee 2015-904 Includes the realigned portion of the Cocohatchee Canal NA Canal, north of immediately adjacent to and north of the intersection of Immokalee C.R. 951 and Immokalee Road Road Corkscrew 93-33 Section 9, 10, 15, 16, 22, 27 and 34, Township 48 South, NA Canal, including Range 27 East its side branches C.R. 951 Canal 93-33 Lying within Sections 26 and 35, Township 48 South, NA Range 26 East and Sections 2, 11, 14, 23 and 26, Township 49 South, Range 26 East C.R. 951 Canal, 2015-904 Includes the extended portion of the C.R. 951 Canal NA north of immediately adjacent to and north of the intersection of Immokalee C.R. 951 and Immokalee Road Road Curry Canal 93-33 Lying within Sections 28 and 33, Township 48 South, NA Range 27 East Cypress Canal 91-03 Lying within Sections 1, 2, 11, 12, 13 and 14, Township 49 NA South, Range 26 East; Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Township 49 South, Range 27 East; Section 36, Township 48 South, Range 26 East; and Sections 31, 32, 33 and 34, Township 48 South, Range 27 East (See specific plats identified in Resolution 91-03) Faka Union 91-03 Resolution 91-03: Lying within Sections 28, 29, 32 and NA Canal 92-01 33, Township 48 South, Range 28 East; Sections 4, 5, 8, 9, 16, 17, 20, 21, 28, 29, 32 and 33, Township 49 South, Range 28 East; Sections 2, 5, 8, 9, 16, 17, 20, 21, 28, 29, 32 and 33, Township 50 South, Range 28 East; Sections 4, 5, 8, 9, 16, 17, 20, 21, 28, 29, 33 and 34, Township 51 South, Range 28 East; and Sections 3, 4, 9 and 10, Township 52 South, Range 28 East (See specific plats identified in Resolution 91-03) Added by Resolution 92-01: Canal north of Weir FU-5 lying within Sections 28, 29,32 and 33, Township 47 South, Range 28 East and Sections 4, 5, 8, 9, 16, 17, 20, 21, 28 and 29, Township 48 South, Range 28 East. (See specific plats identified in Resolution 92-01) Golden Gate 90-05 Added by Resolution 92-01: Canal north of Weir No. 5 NA Main Canal 92-01 lying within Sections 25 and 36, Township 47 South, Range 27 East; Sections 30 and 31, Township 47 South, Range 28 East; and Sections 1, 12, 13 and 24, Township 48 South, Range 27 East; and Sections 6, 7, 18 and 19, Designated Works of the District/Page 6 Updated 3/28/2018 Project Resolution Project (P) or Designation No. Local or Common Name/Other Information Non-Project (NP) Township 48 South, Range 28 East. (See specific plats identified in Resolution 92-01, less that portion of right of way “unadopted” as a Work of the District by Resolution 2012-207) Golden Gate 93-33 Lying within Sections 11 and 12, Township 48 South, NA Main, Side Range 27 East. Branch Green Canal 90-05 Added by Resolution 93-33: Lying within Sections 20, 21 NA 93-33 and 22, Township 49 South, Range 26 East. Henderson 91-03 Lying within Sections 2, 11, 14, 23, 26 and 35, Township NA Creek 50 South, Range 26 East. (See specific plats identified in Resolution 91-03) I-75 Canal 90-05 D-2 Canal NA Merritt Canal 92-01 Lying within Sections 2, 3, 10, 11, 14, 15, 22, 23, 26, 27, NA 34 and 35, Township 50 South, Range 28 East and Sections 2, 3, 10, 11, 14, 15, 22, 23, 26, 27, 34 and 35, Township 51 South, Range 28 East. (See specific plats identified in Resolution 92-01) Miller Canal 91-03 Lying within Sections 1, 12 and 13, Township 49 South, NA Range 27 East; Sections 6,7,18, 19, 30 and 31, Township 49 South, Range 27 East; and Sections 6, 7, 18, 19, 30 and 31, Township 49 South, Range 27 East; Sections 6, 7, 18 and 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East; Sections 6, 7, 18, 19, 30 and 31, Township 50 South, Range 28 East; and Sections 6, 7, 18, 19, 29 and 30 of Township 51 South, Range 28 East.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Initial Draft – for Discussion Purposes Only
    Initial Draft – For Discussion Purposes Only Draft South Florida Canal Aquatic Life Study October 29, 2012 1 Initial Draft – For Discussion Purposes Only Draft South Florida Canal Aquatic Life Study Background and Introduction The Central & Southern Florida (C&SF) Project, which was authorized by Congress in 1948, has dramatically altered the waters of south Florida. The current C&SF Project includes 2600 miles of canals, over 1300 water control structures, and 64 pump stations1. The C&SF Project, which is operated by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), provides water supply, flood control, navigation, water management, and recreational benefits to south Florida. As a part of the C&SF, there are four major canals running from Lake Okeechobee to the lower east coast – the West Palm Beach Canal (42 miles long), Hillsboro Canal (51 miles), North New River Canal (58 miles) and Miami canal (85 miles). In addition, there are many more miles of primary, secondary and tertiary canals operated as a part of or in conjunction with the C&SF or as a part of other water management facilities within the SFWMD. Other entities operating associated canals include counties and special drainage districts. There is a great deal of diversity in the design, construction and operation of these canals. The hydrology of the canals is highly manipulated by a series of water control structures and levees that have altered the natural hydroperiods and flows of the South Florida watershed on regional to local scales. Freshwater and estuarine reaches of water bodies are delineated by coastal salinity structures operated by the SFWMD.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1955
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 382 INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1955 PART 2. SOUTH ATLANTIC SLOPE AND EASTERN GULF OF MEXICO BASINS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fred A. Seaton, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 382 INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS TO SEPTEMBER 30,1955 PART 2. SOUTH ATLANTIC SLOPE AND EASTERN GULF OF MEXICO BASINS By P. R. Speer and A. B. Goodwin Washington, D. C., 1956 Free on application to the Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS TO SEPTEMBER 30,1955 PAET 2. SOUTH ATLANTIC SLOPE AND EASTERN GULF OF MEXICO BASINS By P. R Speer and A. B. Goodwin EXPLANATION This index lists the streamflow and reservoir stations in the South Atlantic slope and Eastern Gulf of Mexico basins for which records have been or are to be published in reports of the Geological Survey for periods prior to September 30, 1955. Periods of record for the same station published by other agencies are listed only when they contain more detailed information or are for periods not reported in publications of the Geological Survey. The stations are listed in the downstream order first adopted for use in the 1951 series of water-supply papers on surface-water supply of the United States. Starting at the headwater of each stream all stations are listed in a downstream direction. Tributary streams are indicated by indention and are inserted between main-stem stations in the order in which they enter the main stream. To indicate the rank of any tributary on which a record is available and the stream to which it is immediately tributary, each indention in the listing of stations represents one rank.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness on the Edge: a History of Everglades National Park
    Wilderness on the Edge: A History of Everglades National Park Robert W Blythe Chicago, Illinois 2017 Prepared under the National Park Service/Organization of American Historians cooperative agreement Table of Contents List of Figures iii Preface xi Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations and Acronyms Used in Footnotes xv Chapter 1: The Everglades to the 1920s 1 Chapter 2: Early Conservation Efforts in the Everglades 40 Chapter 3: The Movement for a National Park in the Everglades 62 Chapter 4: The Long and Winding Road to Park Establishment 92 Chapter 5: First a Wildlife Refuge, Then a National Park 131 Chapter 6: Land Acquisition 150 Chapter 7: Developing the Park 176 Chapter 8: The Water Needs of a Wetland Park: From Establishment (1947) to Congress’s Water Guarantee (1970) 213 Chapter 9: Water Issues, 1970 to 1992: The Rise of Environmentalism and the Path to the Restudy of the C&SF Project 237 Chapter 10: Wilderness Values and Wilderness Designations 270 Chapter 11: Park Science 288 Chapter 12: Wildlife, Native Plants, and Endangered Species 309 Chapter 13: Marine Fisheries, Fisheries Management, and Florida Bay 353 Chapter 14: Control of Invasive Species and Native Pests 373 Chapter 15: Wildland Fire 398 Chapter 16: Hurricanes and Storms 416 Chapter 17: Archeological and Historic Resources 430 Chapter 18: Museum Collection and Library 449 Chapter 19: Relationships with Cultural Communities 466 Chapter 20: Interpretive and Educational Programs 492 Chapter 21: Resource and Visitor Protection 526 Chapter 22: Relationships with the Military
    [Show full text]
  • Ttt-2-Map.Pdf
    BRIDGE RESTRICTIONS - MARCH 2019 <Double-click here to enter title> «¬89 4 2 ESCAMBIA «¬ «¬189 85 «¬ «¬ HOLMES 97 SANTA ROSA ¬« 29 331187 83 610001 ¤£ ¤£«¬ «¬ 81 87 570006 «¬ «¬ 520076 TTT-2 10 ¦¨§ ¤£90 «¬79 Pensacola Inset OKALOOSA Pensacola/ «¬285 WALTON «¬77 West Panhandle 293 WASHINGTON «¬87 570055 ¦¨§ ONLY STATE OWNED 20 ¤£98 «¬ BRIDGES SHOWN BAY 570082 460051 600108 LEGEND 460020 Route with «¬30 Restricted Bridge(s) 368 Route without 460113 «¬ Restricted Bridge(s) 460112 Non-State Maintained Road 460019 ######Restricted Bridge Number 0 12.5 25 50 Miles ¥ Page 1 of 16 BRIDGE RESTRICTIONS - MARCH 2019 <Double-click here to enter title> «¬2 HOLMES JACKSON 610001 71 530005 520076 «¬ «¬69 TTT-2 ¬79 « ¤£90 Panama City/ «¬77 ¦¨§10 GADSDEN ¤£27 WASHINGTON JEFFERSON Tallahassee 500092 ¤£19 ONLY STATE OWNED ¬20 BRIDGES SHOWN BAY « CALHOUN 460051 «¬71 «¬65 Tallahassee Inset «¬267 231 73 LEGEND ¤£ «¬ LEON 59 «¬ Route with Restricted Bridge(s) 460020 LIBERTY 368 «¬ Route without WAKULLA 61 «¬22 «¬ Restricted Bridge(s) 98 460112 ¤£ Non-State 460113 Maintained Road 460019 GULF TA ###### Restricted Bridge Number 98 FRANKLIN ¤£ 490018 ¤£319 «¬300 490031 0 12.5 25 50 Miles ¥ Page 2 of 16 BRIDGE RESTRICTIONS - MARCH 2019 350030 <Double-click320017 here to enter title> JEFFERSON «¬53 «¬145 ¤£90 «¬2 «¬6 HAMILTON COLUMBIA ¦¨§10 290030 «¬59 ¤£441 19 MADISON BAKER ¤£ 370013 TTT-2 221 ¤£ SUWANNEE ¤£98 ¤£27 «¬247 Lake City TAYLOR UNION 129 121 47 «¬ ¤£ ¬ 238 ONLY STATE OWNED « «¬ 231 LAFAYETTE «¬ ¤£27A BRIDGES SHOWN «¬100 BRADFORD LEGEND 235 «¬ Route with
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) and Are NAPPER CREEK EXT Delineated in the Adopted Text
    E E E A I E E E E E V 1 E V X D 5 V V V V I I V A Y V A 9 A S A A A D E R A 7 I A W 7 2 U 7 7 2 K 7 O 3 7 H W 7 4 5 6 P E W L 7 E 9 W T W N F V W E V 7 W N W N W A W N V 2 A N N 5 N N 7 A 7 S 7 0 1 7 I U 1 1 8 W S DAIRY RD GOLDEN BEACH W SNAKE CREEK CANAL IVE W N N N NW 202 ST AVENTURA BROWARD COUNTY MAN C LEH SWY OMPIAA-MLOI- C K A MIAMI-DADE COUNTY DAWDEES T CAOIRUPNOTYR T NW 186 ST MIAMI GARDENS SUNNY ISLES BEACH E K P T ST W A NE 167 NORTH MIAMI BEACH D NW 170 ST O I NE 163 ST K R SR 826 EXT E E E O OLETA RIVER E V C L V STATE PARK A A H F 0 O 2 1 B 1 ADOPTED 2015 AND 2025 E E E T E N R X N D E LAND USE PLAN * NW 154 ST 9 R Y FIU/BUENA MIAMI LAKES S W VISTA H 1 FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA OPA-LOCKA E AIRPORT I S HAULOVER X U I PARK D RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES NW 138 ST OPA-LOCKA W ESTATE DENSITY (EDR) 1-2.5 DU/AC G ESTATE DENSITY W/ ONE DENSITY INCREASE (DI-1) R NORTH MIAMI BAL HARBOUR A T BR LOW DENSITY (LDR) 2.5-6 DU/AC IG OAD N BAY HARBOR ISLANDS HIALEAH GARDENS Y CSW LOW DENSITY W/ ONE DENSITY INCREASE (DI-1) Y AMELIA EARHART PKY E PARK E V E E BISCAYNE PARK E V LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY (LMDR) 6-13 DU/AC V A V V V A D I A A A SURFSIDE MDOC A V 7 M LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY W/ ONE DENSITY INCREASE (DI-1) 2 L 2 7 NORTH 2 1 A B INDIAN CREEK VILLAGE I 2 E E W W E E M W V MEDIUM DENSITY (MDR) 13-25 DU/AC N N N W N V N A N Y NW 106 ST N A 6 MEDIUM DENSITY W/ ONE DENSITY INCREASE (DI-1) A HIALEAH C S E IS N MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY (MHDR) 25-60 DU/AC N B I MEDLEY L L HIGH DENSITY (HDR) 60-125 DU/AC OR MORE/GROSS AC E MIAMI SHORES O V E C A TWO DENSITY
    [Show full text]
  • Collier Miami-Dade Palm Beach Hendry Broward Glades St
    Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission F L O R ID A 'S T U R N P IK E er iv R ee m Lakewood Park m !( si is O K L D INDRIO ROAD INDRIO RD D H I N COUNTY BCHS Y X I L A I E O W L H H O W G Y R I D H UCIE BLVD ST L / S FT PRCE ILT SRA N [h G Fort Pierce Inlet E 4 F N [h I 8 F AVE "Q" [h [h A K A V R PELICAN YACHT CLUB D E . FORT PIERCE CITY MARINA [h NGE AVE . OKEECHOBEE RA D O KISSIMMEE RIVER PUA NE 224 ST / CR 68 D R !( A D Fort Pierce E RD. OS O H PIC R V R T I L A N N A M T E W S H N T A E 3 O 9 K C A R-6 A 8 O / 1 N K 0 N C 6 W C W R 6 - HICKORY HAMMOCK WMA - K O R S 1 R L S 6 R N A E 0 E Lake T B P U Y H D A K D R is R /NW 160TH E si 68 ST. O m R H C A me MIDWAY RD. e D Ri Jernigans Pond Palm Lake FMA ver HUTCHINSON ISL . O VE S A t C . T I IA EASY S N E N L I u D A N.E. 120 ST G c I N R i A I e D South N U R V R S R iv I 9 I V 8 FLOR e V ESTA DR r E ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: the Everglades to the 1920S Introduction
    Chapter 1: The Everglades to the 1920s Introduction The Everglades is a vast wetland, 40 to 50 miles wide and 100 miles long. Prior to the twentieth century, the Everglades occupied most of the Florida peninsula south of Lake Okeechobee.1 Originally about 4,000 square miles in extent, the Everglades included extensive sawgrass marshes dotted with tree islands, wet prairies, sloughs, ponds, rivers, and creeks. Since the 1880s, the Everglades has been drained by canals, compartmentalized behind levees, and partially transformed by agricultural and urban development. Although water depths and flows have been dramatically altered and its spatial extent reduced, the Everglades today remains the only subtropical ecosystem in the United States and one of the most extensive wetland systems in the world. Everglades National Park embraces about one-fourth of the original Everglades plus some ecologically distinct adjacent areas. These adjacent areas include slightly elevated uplands, coastal mangrove forests, and bays, notably Florida Bay. Everglades National Park has been recognized as a World Heritage Site, an International Biosphere Re- serve, and a Wetland of International Importance. In this work, the term Everglades or Everglades Basin will be reserved for the wetland ecosystem (past and present) run- ning between the slightly higher ground to the east and west. The term South Florida will be used for the broader area running from the Kississimee River Valley to the toe of the peninsula.2 Early in the twentieth century, a magazine article noted of the Everglades that “the region is not exactly land, and it is not exactly water.”3 The presence of water covering the land to varying depths through all or a major portion of the year is the defining feature of the Everglades.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COLA
    Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COL Application Part 2 — FSAR SUBSECTION 2.4.1: HYDROLOGIC DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.4 HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING ..................................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1 HYDROLOGIC DESCRIPTION ............................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1.1 Site and Facilities .....................................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1.2 Hydrosphere .............................................................................2.4.1-3 2.4.1.3 References .............................................................................2.4.1-12 2.4.1-i Revision 6 Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COL Application Part 2 — FSAR SUBSECTION 2.4.1 LIST OF TABLES Number Title 2.4.1-201 East Miami-Dade County Drainage Subbasin Areas and Outfall Structures 2.4.1-202 Summary of Data Records for Gage Stations at S-197, S-20, S-21A, and S-21 Flow Control Structures 2.4.1-203 Monthly Mean Flows at the Canal C-111 Structure S-197 2.4.1-204 Monthly Mean Water Level at the Canal C-111 Structure S-197 (Headwater) 2.4.1-205 Monthly Mean Flows in the Canal L-31E at Structure S-20 2.4.1-206 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Canal L-31E at Structure S-20 (Headwaters) 2.4.1-207 Monthly Mean Flows in the Princeton Canal at Structure S-21A 2.4.1-208 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Princeton Canal at Structure S-21A (Headwaters) 2.4.1-209 Monthly Mean Flows in the Black Creek Canal at Structure S-21 2.4.1-210 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Black Creek Canal at Structure S-21 2.4.1-211 NOAA
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information for Canal Evaluations
    Restoration Strategies Regional Water Quality Plan – Science Plan for the Everglades Stormwater Treatment Areas: Evaluation of the Influence of Canal Conveyance Features on STA and FEB Inflow and Outflow TP Concentrations Supporting Information for Canal Evaluations WR-2015-003 Prepared by: Hongying Zhao, Ph.D., P.E., Tracey Piccone, P.E., and Orlando Diaz, Ph.D. South Florida Water Management District and Tetra Tech, Inc. 759 South Federal Highway, Suite 314 Stuart, FL 34994 July 2015 Revised September 16, 2015 Restoration Strategies Science Plan - Evaluation of the Influence of Canal Conveyance Features on STA and FEB Inflow and Outflow TP Concentrations – Supporting Information for Canal Evaluations Acknowledgments The authors thank Delia Ivanoff, Kim O’Dell, and Larry Schwartz for support throughout this study; Jeremy McBryan, Larry Gerry, Seán Sculley, and Ceyda Polatel for support in developing and reviewing the Detailed Study Plan; Michael Chimney, Wossenu Abtew, Larry Schwartz, and Seán Sculley for reviewing the early draft; and Stacey Ollis for detailed editing of this technical report. 2 Restoration Strategies Science Plan - Evaluation of the Influence of Canal Conveyance Features on STA and FEB Inflow and Outflow TP Concentrations – Supporting Information for Canal Evaluations TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I: Literature Review .............................................................................................................................. 5 Transport ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Quality Assessment of Southern Florida: an Overview of Available Information on Surface and Ground-Water Quality and Ecology
    Water-Quality Assessment of Southern Florida: An Overview of Available Information on Surface and Ground-Water Quality and Ecology By Kirn H. Haag, Ronald L. Miller, Laura A. Bradner, and David S. McCulloch U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4177 Prepared as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program Tallahassee, Florida 1996 FOREWORD The mission of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is to assess the quantity and quality of the earth resources of the Nation and to provide information that will assist resource managers and policymakers at Federal, State, and local levels in making sound decisions. Assessment of water-quality conditions and trends is an important part of this overall mission. One of the greatest challenges faced by water-resources scientists is acquiring reliable information that will guide the use and protection of the Nation's water resources. That challenge is being addressed by Federal, State, interstate, and local water-resource agencies and by many academic institutions. These organizations are collecting water-quality data for a host of purposes that includes: compliance with permits and water-supply standards; development of remediation plans for a specific contamination problem; operational decisions on industrial, wastewater, or water-supply facilities; and research on factors that affect water quality. An additional need for water-quality information is to provide a basis on which regional and national-level policy decisions can be based. Wise decisions must be based on sound information. As a society we need to know whether certain types of water-quality problems are isolated or ubiquitous, whether there are significant differences in conditions among regions, whether the conditions are changing over time, and why these conditions change from place to place and over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan 6 Project Kissimmee River
    Upper Chain of Lakes Lake Kissimmee Indian River Lagoon Plan 6 Project Kissimmee River St. Lucie Estuary Lake Stop the destructive Okeechobee discharges to the Caloosahatchee Estuary Northern Estuaries and Everglades Restore the River of Grass Biscayne Ba Florida Bay Coral Reefs Plan 6 Project Flow Historic, Current & Plan 6 Project Flows Plan 6 Project – Stop destructive discharges to the Northern Estuaries and Restore the River of Grass www.FloridaOcean.org Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) Sugarcane Farmlands (Needed for Project) Pubic Lands (Existing) Plan 6 Project – Stop destructive discharges to the Northern Estuaries and Restore the River of Grass www.FloridaOcean.org C-10 A 1. Becomes THE primary outflow for water from Lake Okeechobee S-352 2. Stops destructive discharge releases from S-351 S-354 Lake Okeechobee to the Northern Estuaries 3. Replaces the Lake Okeechobee ASR Project of CERP with a project of greater flow & capacity 4. Restores water flows south from the Lake to the Everglades 5. Provides for healthy water levels in Lake Okeechobee 6. Maintains Water Quantity, Quality, Timing and Distribution for Everglades Restoration WCA 3A Plan 6 Project – Stop destructive discharges to the Northern Estuaries and Restore the River of Grass www.FloridaOcean.org Lake Okeechobee ASR Project- 200 wells – Proposed CERP Current Average Annual 1548 cfs DischargeWhere Volumes the Water Current MaximumGoes Flood Based on 1996-2005 Data Discharge Rates S-308 7300 cfs St Lucie Estuary 20 % C-10 A 442 K AF per Year 900 cfs S-77 2.21 M AF
    [Show full text]
  • The Everglades & Northern Estuaries; St. Lucie River Estuary, Indian River
    The Everglades & Northern Estuaries; Upper Chain of Lakes St. Lucie River Estuary, Lake Kissimmee Indian River Lagoon & Indian River Lagoon Caloosahatchee Estuary Kissimmee River St. Lucie Estuary Lake Okeechobee Water Flows & Current Caloosahatchee Estuary Issues Florida Governor Everglades Rick Scott Biscayne Bay August 20, 2013 Florida Bay Coral Reefs Upper Chain of Lakes (8) flow south into Lake Kissimmee Lake Kissimmee flows south into the Kissimmee River – 105-mile Oxbow River with 2-mile-wide floodplain Water takes 6-8 Months to reach Lake Okeechobee Lake Okeechobee flows south through “River “River of Grass”, 60-mile-wide shallow of (1 ft deep) river flowing at 1 mile in 4 Grass” days. Water takes 16 Months to reach Florida Bay Everglades Changes - Then “Drain The Swamp” Hurricanes in 1926 & 1928 “Dam The Lake” Dam Lake Okeechobee- Stop the flow to the River of Grass (Killed the River of Grass) Killed the Kissimmee River- 1962-1970 Dug C- 38 Canal up 105 mile oxbows-drained floodplain Upper Chain of Lakes Lake Kissimmee Indian River Lagoon St. Lucie Estuary Lake Okeechobee Caloosahatchee Estuary Biscayne Bay Florida Bay Coral Reefs 1.7 Billion Gallons per Day of freshwater is wasted to the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico! ($5.9 million/day) South Florida’s Northern Coastal Estuaries St. Lucie River Estuary Caloosahatchee River Estuary Major Impacts Atlantic Ocean C-24 Canal Indian River Lagoon Florida Oceanographic Coastal Center C-23 Canal St. Lucie River Estuary St. Lucie Inlet Nearshore Reefs Lake Okeechobee C-44 St. Lucie Canal Discharges from Lake Okeechobee to the St.
    [Show full text]