Journal of Architectural Education

Editorial Board Meeting

106th ACSA Annual Meeting Sheraton Denver Downtown Hotel, IM Pei Tower Denver, CO March 15-18, 2018

Table of Contents

General Information ...... 1

Meeting Schedule ...... 2

Meeting Agenda ...... 3

Additional Material

Fall 2017 Meeting Minutes

Theme proposals

Planning Matrix

Recent Themes

Executive Editor Report

Associate Editor, Design Report

Associate Editor, Reviews Report

Managing Editor Report General Information

Welcome to the Journal of Architectural Education 2018 Spring Editorial Board Meeting.

As usual, we will convene during the Annual ACSA meeting. All of our meetings will occur at the Sheraton Denver Downtown Hotel (1550 Court Place, Denver, CO 80202).

If you are unable to attend the meeting, a skype connection can be provided. Please email Marc Neveu ([email protected]) if you wish to participate via skype.

1 Meeting Schedule

Saturday, 17 March

2:00 – 6:30 Reviews Committee Silver Room Rupnik, Brennan, Deamer, Hyde, Marjanovic, Nawre,

Design Committee Spruce Room Dayer, Deyong, Golden, Hutton, Lyster, Mans, Sprecher, Stevens, Stuth, Theodore, Turan.

8:30 Dinner linger 2030 W 30th St., Denver, CO 303-993-3120 Editorial Board, Vonier, Gann

Sunday, 18 March

8:00am – 12:30pm Editorial Board Meeting Tower Court A (Breakfast provided) Editorial Board, Vonier, Gann

Sessions Schedule

Thursday, 15 March

4:00pm – 5:30pm Preserve – JAE Focus Session Windows Room Tricia Stuth, Ted Shelton

Friday, March 16

5:30pm JAE Awards @ ACSA Business Meeting Grand Ballroom Neveu

Saturday, March 17

11:00 – 12:30 Project – JAE Focus Session Windows Room Dayer

2 General Board Meeting Agenda

Sunday, 18 March Action Breakfast 8:00 am

Call to Order Neveu 9:00 am

Approval of Agenda Neveu 9:05 am Approve Agenda

Approval of Fall 2017 Minutes Neveu 9:10 am Approve Minutes

Issues 71:2/72:1 post-mortem Neveu 9:15 am

Future Themes all 9:30 am Select 2 Themes

Break 11:00 am

Policy Review - update Neveu 11:20 pm

Executive Editor Report Neveu 11:30 pm

Associate Editor, Design Report Kulper 11:45 pm

Associate Editor, Reviews Report Rupnik 12:00 pm

Managing Editor Report Gann 12:15 pm

Other business all 12:25 pm

Thank outgoing members all

Adjournment 12:30 pm

3 Fall 2017 JAE Full Editorial Board Meeting, Burbank, CA September 30, 2017, Saturday, 1:15pm

Attendees: Carolina Dayer (CD), Sarah Deyong (SD), Elizabeth Golden (EG), Jane Hutton (JH), Timothy Hyde (TH), Clare Lyster (CL), Jacob Mans (JM), Igor Marjanovic (IM), Michael Monti (MM), Alpa Nawre (AN), Marc J. Neveu (MN), Ivan Rupnik (IR), Sara Stevens (SS), Tricia Stuth (TS), Georgeen Theodore (GT), Neyran Turan (NT), Pascale Vonier (PV) (via Skype) AnnMarie Brennan Not Present: Peggy Deamer, Aaron Sprecher, Mitchell Squire

MN: Announcement – The President of ACSA is in Puerto Rico and the situation is dire there. Mike has made a call to all ACSA member schools to host students & faculty from PR. There are four member schools in Puerto Rico. MM: University of Puerto Rico sustained flooding and will not open until November. Catholic University didn’t sustain much damage. All information to host is on the website. GT: What needs to be provided, just access to education and housing? MM: Yes – housing & work opportunities but it varies. Different universities are offering different things – please tell us what you can offer. Students just need to continue their work/studies. MN: Contact and information is available on ACSA website.

Action: Approval of Agenda Motion: TS, Second IR All in favor: Unanimous

Action: Approval of last Meeting Minutes Motion JH, Second TS All in favor: Unanimous

Best of selection for Design as Scholarship

MN: One essay under consideration is by JM and so he would need to recuse himself, that is leave the room until deliberations are over. There is an imbalance in number of essays for each category because of the way the issues were structured. Typically, there is one award is in each category. We will have an open conversation, and then a vote. IR: I will propose ‘Scaling for non-Expert Production’ – it is situated well and covers several lenses. CL: Is that a thesis project? IR: Yes, part of a thesis project. JH: It take a pragmatic experiment and looks beyond. Looks at a different disciplinary aspect. CL: I have a problem with the first sentence. Trying to reclaim the architect as a non-expert makes me nervous. I thought of this essay and the Soft Futures essay. Soft Futures also takes on an experimental approach. The outcome might not be as finished but it is attempting to find something out there. The author had trouble finding theory and examples to situate and it shows how innovative this is. NT: The ‘Scaling for non-Expert production’ brings into discussion other kinds of expertise. Maybe it’s a polemical start but I think it is a provocative expertise. GT: I think there are more people who are talking about architect as generalist. The system approach this essay takes is interesting. IR: This piece has tried the hardest to reconcile the different voices. It re-contextualizes architecture – and underlines that we need to speak different languages. MN: I would like to bring up ‘Crafting Production’ - this essay shows to a design build project that looks very different from the rest. I am not arguing it for it as the best of essay but by choosing it we can show that we appreciate what the author was trying to do. TH: But the essay ends with statements about all sorts of stuff that couldn’t be done properly. It seems to be a super- problematic project. There is discussion about what was proposed and what actually resulted. MN: Should we look at these in combination with Scholarship of Design essays? TH: In their category, they can win. They are not problematic in the same way the Scholarship of Design essays were last year. GT: These show that JAE is looking at design technology synthetically. AB: In Australia, we look at research funding and research impact – and research impact has impacts on other aspects such as economy, health, public policy etc. I am looking at these articles, and of these Emergency Preparedness Hub and Soft Futures seem to have a lot of other impacts. Emergency Preparedness Hub has direct value. Soft Futures propositions the discipline to act on new values that mitigate 21st century problems. TS: I like that Soft Futures is a design build project that situates material research in an artistic way – it seems meaningful and works at multiple levels. MN: Does anyone want to talk about Energy and Form? IR: How does it fit in the Design as Scholarship piece? MN: AB your ballot is already with me. AB: Can I change it? (Sent revision typed in the chat window) CL: Is there any value in thinking about a school project under an advisor or as an independent effort? IR: We evaluate the article. CL: Can we not evaluate the premise of a project? MN: The discussion is about the essay. The essay is the creation of the author. The issues raised are a part of a conversation. CL: When you are writing scholarship about your project then the product and the scholarship is directly related, isn’t it? There is no distance between the product and the scholarship. MN: During the committee meetings there are discussions if an essay can bring up the level of the product. As this stage, we are discussing the essay itself.

(Distributed ballots are marked and returned to MN)

MN: Jacob Mans’ “Scaling for Non-Expert Production” has won the vote.

Best of selection for Scholarship of Design

MN: Background - We decided to do two separate issues; one for Design of Scholarship and one for Scholarship of Design. First the Design of Scholarship issue was published. Second was the Scholarship issue and so there are many articles in this round to consider for this category. IR: I propose the ‘Architecture in Support of Citizenry’, and ‘Architecture in the Art Market’, these two take things that have a lined scholarship in architectural theory – and are interesting formal readings and perspective. Future scholarship can think about such readings of public space. TH: Yes, it takes something we know about – has an unsympathetic cast of characters and looks at a moment in architecture discourse that we have not really talked about. Can also set up new ways of talking about this. SS: I agree but it did not lead us to anything. GT: I support the ‘Architecture in Support of Citizenry’; we will have more problems to look at by the time we meet in Denver. MN: I would like to bring up Mathew Jull’s article as I really enjoyed reading it. TS: I liked the ‘Australia’s Lost Capital’ as well. The historical perspective and how it affected citizenry was interesting. AB: Yes, unlike the US, Australia is not patriotic. Through architecture, sovereign differences are pointed – and it is well researched. I liked the ‘Architecture in Support of Citizenry’ and ‘Encountering the urban crisis’. Also an example of how a studio can address a very volatile event in a fair way. The ‘Abel Cahen’s Open City’ article is also good - history is well researched. JH: I like the ‘Architecture in Support of Citizenry’ piece because it’s so timely. I wish there was more commentary on it. The Mathew Jull piece is a serious typological study. About the ‘Critical Engagement’ piece – it is an interesting idea to look at the role of the critic. IR: In Mathew’s piece – some things are specifically architectural issues. TH: I appreciate the insights – but the typological study is almost a refuge. GT: We moved it to this category. MN: I also want to bring up Costanzo’s piece – demonstrates value of academy but it does not get unpacked. It is well-researched and well-looked at. SD: In some of these articles the scholarship is really tied to their creative work. The Aitchison piece deconstructs a modern fantasy and the relation of car and house. It makes a claim; how can we think the mobile house? The essay ‘Encountering the Urban Crisis’ also attempts to do that. The beginning is great but the studio part is not as well- developed – in comparing the Aitchison piece to encountering piece. AB: The Aitchinson piece reads like a preface to a grant application for research in pre-fab housing. MN: ‘Supple skins’ and ‘Performing problems on pavement’ has not been mentioned. ‘Birds must not be eliminated’ is not edited well. AB: Yes, it’s very tangential in its relationship to architecture and urbanism. IM: I second comments made for Clare Robinson piece. Places emphasis on the social condition.

(ballots are passed out, marked and returned)

MN: Clare Robinson’s “Architecture in Support of Citizenry” is the winner.

We will put forward these two essays for awards – “Scaling for Non-Expert Production” for Design of Scholarship and “Architecture in Support of Citizenry” for Scholarship of Design.

JAE at 75 Publication

MN: We will have the 75th anniversary of the journal in a few years. We had a board member last year who mentioned that it would be interesting to publish volumes on different topics. I would like to make a proposal to make an edited collection and have it published in 2022. It would be a series of edited reprints. Through this publication we can demonstrate a transformation and show how architectural ideas have changed over time and put them in the context of contemporary times. We are planning to make a proposal to MIT press for funding. If there is interest, how should we do it? Should we solicit people to cull through the content and write introductory pieces. The 1500-word piece can be followed by a few selected articles. The introduction would be a history of journal. IR: Is there an opportunity to have a workshop on it? Like a design charrette – to generate some higher-level concepts. MN: The plan is to put the idea in front of the board and see what the next steps would be. This should happen relatively soon. I have downloaded all 75 years’ archives. University of Michigan and ACSA have complete copies of the journal. There is some interesting stuff in the early journal on what research should be or what pedagogy should be? We have an excel sheet of all editors and all tables of content. JH: Would it be separate from the issues? MN: Yes, this would be a book – a separate thing. The Board decides the theme for the 75th year. SD: It’s a good idea take a retrospective view. It’s a great opportunity to trace a topic such as pedagogy – to demonstrate that it is not a static thing but changing. GT: I like the idea of a workshop. I am interested in visualizing different types of pedagogy – we will need to do an in-depth analysis of what the content is to figure out what the categories can be. Think about who we think the readers are. Books are precious – we should look at the production of the book in terms of who would have it? Who should be the audience? How could it be projective? How is it important to the future? TH: There can be two versions – one is the history, one is pre-history of now. It would be interesting to position it as a prehistory of now. We have different groups in architecture – these didn’t just happen – and that could be a basis of a projective thread. TS: The book would include articles that are re-published – but we should also look at future modes. MN: This is where the topics become important. TH: I can imagine other categories. Workshop would be helpful to look at the content. IR: Schools of thought and categories keep changing. If categories are changing, a question is how to organize them? TS: Authorship will also be different. GT: If we do the workshop, I would like to bring in other people to discuss organization. We have the essays, we have the issues – we could organize it in many ways. Taking a step back and re-thinking about how it can be organized will be helpful. JH: We can think about internal dialogues but also think if it is possible to have an impact outside of the journal. IR: It is the impact factor in a way. We don’t understand architectural scholarship or how we evaluate its impact. TS: We can also look at the content and figure out a way to talk about gaps. GT: we have to be careful how we present things. MN: JAE has reviewers with most diversity. How are we going to go about understanding the content? Even understanding the idea of themes is a new thing. Things have changed – we need to think of a way to organize how to understand content. TH: Is hiring doctoral students a possibility MN: A doctoral student in UK is thinking about organizing publications there. He might be someone to think about. TH: The second thing to think about is how much it should be about the journal and how much in general? Can we think about extracting data and have a theme issue dedicated to it – have an issue in the journal about the journal? IR: Some of the topics that ACSA maps could be mapped through the journal content – we could understand the blind spots in both architectural education and the journal. SS: How should we distinguish between this and the architecture school book? TS: Isn’t that thematic? IR: We can’t do everything at once. This is not meant to be a reader. JAE has a history – how did people talk about these things before? Maybe it’s also about what is the center of the discourse? How does the gravitational shift happen? CL: With the benefit of hindsight are there any seminal pieces by some young faculty member which have now become very critical pieces? SD: Makes me think of Oppositions Reader, the anthology by Michael Hays. CL: We really need to dig in the material. CD: Have the ‘best of essays’ been always done? MM: I don’t know how long though. CD: Looking at the ‘best of essays’ may be one way of paring down. Instead of looking at now and finding things in the back we can really go back and bring the discussion forward. MN: The issue with that is that first issues are not very thick and not based on research; the issues become more substantial after a decade. There have been a number of editors around. IR: Past editors could come to the workshop! Great if we can have a narrative about the intellectual history. We can demonstrate it through tectonic shifts and not themes. MN: I am less optimistic about this – it is actually not so coherent, JAE is a scatter-shop. An intellectual history would be great but not sure what we will find. JH: Could we find people who follow their interest and use this as their source material and write a substantive essay? EG: Who is going to be reading this and so thinking about who is writing would make it more exciting to read through. JH: Might also bring in new perspectives so it’s not a JAE tunnel-hole. GT: I am wondering about relationship between journal and book. What can we do with the journal – do we do a series of issues? At ACSA meetings, can we bring together some people to talk about it? How could there be more cross conversation and collaboration? TS: Who is going to read this book? Who reads it now and who we wish read it as well? We would definitely want students to read this. MN: Everyone gets the journal. TS: We could use this to direct students to the best of essays. PV: 1984 was the first year for the award. AN: The journal and the book both need to be thought about so that there is an online home for JAE’s 75th as well. MN: We have been looking at potential sources of funding – budget is tricky. If we could give it to everyone, it would be nice. TS: We could have an ACSA session as well on this. MN: It is hard to have this conversation on phone/skype – workshop idea is good and prior to that I can pull together more data and look at more models. If anyone is interested in working with me, please let me know. Should we plan to workshop this in Denver?

(Nods across the room)

I am looking for some people to set that meeting up so that it is productive. We might need to scan the archives and start thinking about it – how do we want to approach it?

IR, TH, GT & JM volunteered.

CL: How many issues are we looking at? MM: Earlier there used to be four issues of the journal. MN: Let’s look at what we are getting into before we strategize. The archives are not bad – we can handle it but we have to be intelligent about how to address it. TS: Can we look at editorial introduction page for each issue? MN: That has changed through the years too.

Break 3:30pm – 3:45pm

Design Committee Report

CD: I am new and so learning about the journal’s work-flow. I sat in on JAE meetings in Detroit; it’s been good to know and understand the processes. We have four new members on the committee who I would like to welcome – EG, CL, JM & SS. We received 47 Design as Scholarship submissions for the a/to issue – we are looking at projective qualities of the essays and what makes a project. It seems to have been successful – we received a lot of submissions. But we need to work on what the journal is really interested in terms of design of scholarship. We also received 12 micronarratives. Each member selected and submitted a discursive image – this became curated content with a longer text. There is some solicited content from CJ Lim for discursive image. Nader Tehrani, is writing a piece in the issue in honor of Diane Lewis, who passed away in May 2017. We need to create a better system for submission of discursive images. MN: Are there any updates on the system for peer-reviewing? MM: We are working on it and have to re-evaluate software. MN: We work with ScholarOne for peer review – and have to think what peer review system ACSA uses. CD: Should there be a publication of discursive images? Maybe there is something in the idea of collecting material for future publication?

Reviews Committee Report

IR: We have published five book reviews, five exhibit reviews and one symposium review all on-line. We have 14 reviews between last issue and this. We are developing text to make clear the process of how books are chosen for reviews. We may be able to curate when reviews come out. MN: Historically one person would sift through content for a year and give up. It was not going to last. So we made a decision to make a Reviews committee and also to open the dialogue to include different types of reviews.

Managing Editor Report

PV: Since the last meeting, there has been a 50% increase in web traffic and 500% increase in use of social media. Monthly flows are pretty regular. Huge hikes for calls or when new issues are announced. Would you like to send out monthly e-mails since now reviews are going online? IR: Yes. PV: There is much new content on JAE online. We have started to put up the archives online. We hired a new copy- editor who is ready to start work. We have flyers for next call – please get them from me to distribute.

Executive Editor Report

MN: We removed the reviews from the journal and moved them online. It frees up more space in the journal and gets the material out very quickly. ‘Environments’ issue is almost finished but we do not have it ready for this meeting. We gave the cover an artificial treatment and so it is taking longer than usual. Issues will be shipped within the month. TS will be editing the next issue. TS: We are working on inviting contributors. Please think about potential reviewers and let me know. MN: It is a pretty open, flexible call – and so if you have some people in mind, please encourage them to submit. ‘Preserve’ will be due Feb 1, ‘Atmosphere’ is due August 1. Aaron and Martin are theme editors for that. Ivan is Associate Editor, Reviews and Carolina Dayer is Associate Editor, Design for 2017 - 2018 and I have been appointed for another term. If you are a new member, please don’t hesitate to talk during meetings. We want to make all new members feel welcome and so we instituted a Board dinner, which will be tonight at Church & State.

No new or other business Meeting Adjourned October 1, 2017, Sunday 9:05 am

Edits on JAE Editorial Board Guide MN: At the end of the discussions, corrections will be approved or not. Please let me know if you have any questions/ comments.

Background: In 2011 or 2012 there was a committee of ACSA board members and JAE board members that wrote policies & procedures for the JAE board. Over the past five years ACSA board members have changed resulting in other changes. A major change is that there is no longer a publications committee. The JAE Executive Editor reports directly to the ACSA Board which is more efficient because it eliminates the added publications committee filter.

The first change is deletion of text that states the JAE Editorial Board is a peer-review body -- peer review is sent to general public – and so the first paragraph could be more aspirational. We could mention that Board serves as intellectual leader for the board. IR: Coming back to conversation about transparency about procedures that we had in committee meeting – should the paragraph include details about design of scholarship, scholarship of design and the committees etc.? MN: This does not feel appropriate here and I don’t want to tie it down for future changes. MM: The JAE editorial board provides intellectual leadership for the journal. TD: I wonder if the word ‘leadership’ is appropriate. Can it be something like constructing an intellectual framework which supports the work we do? TS: This could go right after intellectual framing of journal. Point/paragraph A2. SS: I like it front and center. MN: How about stating something like ‘The editorial board frames the intellectual leadership of the journal’. I can wordsmith it some more. (nods across the room)

Second edit is replacing ‘executive’ with ‘publications’. The next edits in Section A2 and A3a deal with the fact that our board is a subset of ACSA – and so this is a verification change. Just as clarification - we nominate members and then the nominations go to ACSA and all new members get letters from ACSA. (nods across the room)

Section A4 edits address Terms – the only language change is text inserted about Associate Editor-Designate. When a new Associate Editor comes in they begin in spring they come in as Designate so that there is some overlap with the Associate Editor. Same with Executive Editors. (nods across the room)

Next section describes duties of different editors. There is added content about Design Editors. Section A5a is about At-Large members – text is inserted about JAE Board member who join but do not show up for meetings. If there are extenuating circumstances, we understand. But we do want everyone to understand that participation in meetings in expected. This language allows ACSA to dismiss board members if they don’t join the meetings. (nods across the room)

In the next section which is about Executive Editor, as in other places ‘Publications’ is replaced by ‘Executive’. GT: In Section A5b, isn’t ‘in a row’ redundant with ‘consecutive’? MN: Yes, thank you.

Moving along, some typos are fixed and ‘Publications’ is changed to ‘Executive’ Next section describes duties and text is inserted that expands the responsibilities of the EE that extends to the journal also to the website. We didn’t have a website when this guide was put together and so there was no language about it. In Sections C, D & E nothing changes except clarifying ACSA bylaws. Any questions about these changes?

Next part is just descriptions. Regarding online content, we need language from ACSA. MM: Yes, we keep waiting on updates with ScholarOne. MN: The Issue Topics section describes the Open and Themed issues; the idea is that we have issue proposals in spring meeting. They will be sent prior to the Board meeting and so we will discuss and vote for two proposals. Proposals are 500 words and include potential solicited authors. The planning documents shows all past proposals. JM: If you propose a theme and it gets selected, are you the editor? MN: Yes, we decided to have theme editors come from the board. If you look at previous Board-books, you can see the past proposals. Any comments? IR: This is helpful language.

NT: It will be helpful if the Board-book is accessible to new members – so they have information about what the responsibilities and expectations of new board members are. MN: Yes – so on the JAE website, all past Board-books are available. If new members go through them they can get a gist of how business is conducted and what the expectations are. EG: What is the timeline of this? That is how much time between selection of issues to when they come out? MN: Let’s take TS’s theme issue ‘Preserve’. She made a proposal last spring – we voted on it during the Jae meetings, the 1 Feb of the following year is the deadline and it will be printed in October. The second selected theme issue ‘Environments’ is due August of next year and printed in the following March. Anybody can propose. I will follow up on this after this meeting asking you all to think about theme topics and submitting them to me. JH: Sometimes theme editors are already done with their term or may be in their last year – can they still submit? MN: Yes – that is fine. The intention is to have theme editors that know what the conversation is. MM: I think it’s great we have such lead times for the issues. MN: It also gives you all time to think about the proposals.

Action: Approval of edits to JAE Policy Guide: Motion: IR, Second: SD All in favor: Unanimous

Board Member Selection

MN: We need to begin thinking about new board members.

Background: When I first joined, we had a conversation about it and it got catty. So, we have replaced a face-to-face conversation on this with e-mailed conversation and what I ask you all to do is suggest 2 – 3 members who could be good members. We will need to work to maintain diversity on the Board – thinking about the geographic, gender, and expertise of the board as we consider selections. We should think of the expertise of the people who will be replaced. We have four people cycling off – AN, TS, AB and SD. Even though we have four people leaving, we can nominate about 6 people. Board members can serve two terms and so you can self-nominate. We do try to have international members – but it can be hard to get here because of funding/schedule. We have asked a few people who have refused multiple times and so we don’t ask them anymore.

IR: They can’t be from a school that’s already represented on the JAE Board. MN: Grace, La had a rule about it – no stinkers! Think about who you would like to work with. Any questions? Please Assemble a list over the break – and I will compile it and send it to you for voting. ACSA votes in spring and the terms of the new members begin next winter. It’s good to get this started earlier. And, it would be good to get some seasoned people on the Board. IM: Are we missing any particular geographies? MN: We have the east coast covered. And, west coast – people from all over and we would like to maintain that. IR: We have had people from Puerto Rico too in the past. MN: Any other questions? I will follow up with an e-mail on this request.

JAE Session at ACSA Annual Conference

MN: This year’s ACSA conference in Denver. We have had sessions in the past – of many different kinds. There was a discussion about a workshop yesterday – this is not the same as a workshop. Typically, we have a panel session – we invite people who are participating in the conference and then, we curate a conversation. Last year in Detroit, we had a very robust conversation. JH: Were those all contributors to the issue? MN: Some, yes. You always invite more. Most importantly, we need someone to own these sessions. The workshop will be part of the board meeting. This will be a public session. TS: The last session was well attended. I would be happy to do one with the theme ‘Preserve’. But if it makes more sense to focus on ‘Atmosphere’, since the deadline for ‘Preserve’ will be over, and the next deadline will be for ‘Atmosphere’, that is also fine. IR: Will the deadline be done? TS: Yes, the deadline will be over but not the issue will not have come out. NT: The last time as well, the deadline for ‘Environments’ was past. JH: This is also an opportunity to have an informative session about JAE. IR: We have one, don’t we? TS: It could be an informative session but not necessarily instructions on submitting. GT: We did a session like that in Toronto but I felt it wasn’t as impactful. CD: What was the theme? GT: It was just a walkthrough. TS: The structure that Doug used was good – an organized platform. We could talk about projects in a way so as to generate conversation on how we hope to see submissions. Something that helps others see. MN: One problem is that the same types of essays are rejected for the same types of reasons. We could talk about how to write about studios and projects. IR: The session on ‘Environments’ was a collection of interesting people. Talking about mechanics is different. Maybe with ‘Preserve’ we could do both. People think they know what they are doing! NT: I prefer mechanics to be part of content discussion. These things are automatically part of the conversation. Our content should lead the conversation. We can ask people to curate a conversation about the theme. SS: Having it line up with deadline for themes would be more useful. It would be more useful to talk about ‘atmosphere’ than ‘preserve’ which will already be done. SD: Yes, that was my initial reaction as well but if we do it with an issue for which the deadline is upcoming, there might be a (false) perception that the journal is already locked up with people who are presenting. I like the idea that content leads the discussion. The discussion about ‘Environments’ was great - it made people wait for the issue to come out. TS: It will be helpful to foreground that the conversation is about the issue that is coming out. JH: I like that it’s like contributors are raising questions that they would want to address. It is like a workshop that is collectively producing the issue, as opposed to becoming more consumable and set. MN: With the schedule, there will be time with the production – there is still production happening after the session. GT: If Aaron invites people, they are already defining the content. It is better to see the responses that a call generates instead of curating it before-hand. So, we don’t want to demonstrate that its locked up. IR: With Doug, it was like a slice into JAE. It showed a little bit of what goes on. CD: Content of Design of Scholarship needs a lot of work – many of the submissions read like reports right now - we can flush and work on it more. MN: Yes, this is something which has been a constant struggle. There might be some language that you (design) as a committee produce. Which could deal with: this is how reviewers think and deliberate on pieces. There could also be some work on crafting language that goes online. JH: Is there some other format such a workshop? Something that is more hands-on? What is available for people who want more feedback? PS: Amy Kulper visited University of Tennessee and made a presentation on JAE. We can all of us easily do that at our own institutions - might be easier to do than have a session. JH: Yes, there could be more informal advice. IR: If we have a session, I would recommend some of my colleagues so that the work is situated better. EG: The issue goes deeper than just writing about studios. Not all studios are based on premises you one can/should write about. CD: We shouldn’t have an instruction but a demonstration session. That was what was successful about ‘Environments’ issue. MN: Is there a possibility of having two sessions? MM: Hard, but could work. MN: We need someone to own it. We did not have much success in the past with the workshop hand-on session. PS: Maybe people are self-conscious about seeking help. MN: We need to be clear about what it is. IR: Maybe we can invite people to the workshop? SD: There is ambiguity in our own understanding of what is scholarship of design – are we talking about scholarship of design in the present, or past? At what point scholarship of design in the present become design of scholarship. What is the difference? CD: For example, for ‘Preserve’ - maybe we have one person who can focus on design of scholarship and one on scholarship of design. MN: Who are they? It gets tricky. IR: We wouldn’t know until March. MN: No, but we could have two sessions. One about the project, crafting an argument and one on the theme issue. GT: If we do two sessions, we could do something about discursive images. Especially, in the one about crafting the argument. MN: I would include micro-narrative so it’s not just design of scholarship but also micronarratives and discursive images. There is language that succinctly divides these things. It would be good to look back on it.

Two sessions at ACSA Annual Conference in 2018 – one dealing with design of scholarship and one with the theme issue. Motion: IR, Second: GT All in favor: Unanimous

MN: Who will take ownership of these sessions? Does it seem reasonable to suggest that TS can run the theme and CD: I can take on the Design of Scholarship session. SD: Would it just be Design of Scholarship? MN: No, it would include all. IR: But, not Scholarship of Design. MM: We need a title blurb and list of speakers by end of December. Scheduling will also need to be looked at. GT: The session should not be named something that sounds boring such as Design of Scholarship – something more in the topic to attract people. There should be some kind of draw - nice to have something more specific. MN: I agree. GT: People will look at many things and we want them to see this and want to come. TS: Do we leave the speaker/panel list general – since we don’t know who is coming. MN: Last year we solicited people until the end. TS: Can we invite someone who has already submitted peer-reviewed work. MN: Let’s talk more in detail about this. SD: Leaving off one category, scholarship of design worries me. MN: CD can work on this.

MN: Potentially moving JAE board meetings on Sunday will free up time for people to go to conference. It will also mean leaving late on Sunday night or early Monday. That’s an option. We will have two meetings – the committee meeting and full editorial board meeting. So in all, one full day of meetings – the other option is to have half day Sunday meetings – is anyone opposed to that? We have always ended on Saturday. GT: I would like to be back by Sunday night – it is difficult with flight schedules. MN: We can end by noon on Sunday. Committee meetings could happen on Friday and Saturday. OK, so I will look into scheduling until noon on Sunday.

Fall Meeting Location

MN: Is anybody interested in hosting next fall? JH: Does this require having institutional support. Is there any budget to rent spaces for meeting? MN: No, we do not have any budget. MN: Having a place in the middle of the country will be good. JM: We can do Minneapolis. There is public transportation. MN: It is decided then that the Fall 2018 JAE Board meeting will be in Minneapolis. I will look at dates and any scheduling conflicts.

GT: I am still thinking about the sessions – will there be anything specific about presenting studios? There are some examples from the journal about studios which might be interesting to future contributors. MN: Yes, we could identify some problems that you saw. GT: We saw a lot of these submissions and some were really bad. MN: Everyone should feel free to send comments to TS and CD. PS: Can everyone please think about potential reviewers for ‘preserve’ and let me know.

Break 10:30am – 10:45am

Architectural Labor

Peggy Deamer, Yale School of Architecture Tsz Yan Ng, Taubman College, University of Michigan

Architecture has always been concerned with its products: What do our buildings/environments look like? How are they experienced? How do they perform? Concerns for how they are produced, however, have been largely sidestepped until more recently when digital fabrication and various types of information delivery system recast the nature of how we work and the types of skills necessary to perform those tasks.

Our social and ethical responsibility as designers in relation to labor has its legacy. The 19th century theorists’ attention to the workers (think John Ruskin) addressed the builders. But today, when thinking about productive labor, whose labor are we referring to? There are those that we design for and there are those who do the actual building. There are also those who manage the building process and even those that manufacture building components. As architects, we engage with/in different forms of labor each day. However, as we look inward to ask why is our own labor increasingly undervalued and unrewarding, it is perhaps timely to reevaluate the nature of what we do, how we perform those tasks, and the values we assign to those endeavors. Within broader shifts in what constitute labor for design professional, how can architects lead, nudge, and recalibrate the labor of those in related fields and for ourselves?

In this issue, we invite the revision of legacies, praxis, and ethos in building. We turn the focus not just on whose labor we design for but on ourselves, to highlight emergent models of practice. Without making an Arendtian distinction between work and labor, we make the assumption that work and labor are two sides of the same coin. Work is what an architect does in their daily life; labor is their role in the larger economic equation. But even here, historical and theoretical positions of this sort – as they pertain to architecture – need to be debated. Upon this digital and neoliberal era, if we still believe that architectural production operates in the midst of historical conditions of labor, management, and resources, don’t we need to survey where architectural work is or is not singular, in the past and in the present, in order to theorize a more meaningful future?

The Journal of Architectural Education Issue 73:2 seeks Scholarship of Design, Design as Scholarship, and Micro-Narratives that address architectural labor. From the multitude of questions that emerge in the shaping of architectural labor from professional practice to academia, where should our labor be focused – in service, in making, or information production? Given the myriad types of work architects produce, from imaging representations that engender new worlds, to integrating advance technology for building, what training should be reinforced to respond and redirect hegemonic values to account for inclusivity and diversity? Is our labor legally defined? In context to interdisciplinary practice, what lessons from other métiers can we learn from that bring ethical labor practices to the fore? How should we envision the labor of architects in the next 10, 20, 50 years?

Urbanization

Ivan Rupnik, Northeastern University Kiel Moe, Harvard University

Having long fetishized the architectural object—often inscribing it with attributes that are more the product of social and political relations than physical attributes—architects have likewise tended to fetish the city as well through a rather narrow discourse on urbanism. Recent work on urban conditions in adjacent disciplines reflects an evolutionary shift from a rather singular discourse on urbanism to myriad, heterogeneous processes of urbanization, viewed through consequential disciplinary lenses: planetary urbanization (geographic and political ecology views), landscape urbanism (landscape view), metabolic urbanism (materialist/techno-managerial view), and participatory urbanism (engaged sociological view), to identify but a few.

Building is a key agent in these expanded and extended processes of urbanization and, in turn, urbanization poses new questions about the political economy and efficacy of architecture today. Given these shifts in discourse, method, and agency regarding urbanization, how can architects understand the relations and processes inherent in architectural objects in new ways? That is, how is architecture a product of urbanization regimes? And how is it an instrument or tool of urbanization regimes? This issue of the Journal of Architectural Education seeks submissions that re-articulate the inextricable relations between architectural objects and urbanization processes. In addition to an open call that encourages new scholarship of design and design as scholarship that examine the role of architecture in urbanization, the editors also propose contributors whose work examines urbanization from a variety of perspectives in adjacent disciplines. Through this topic, the editors also hope to explore new modes of dialogue and discourse across disciplines and scales of the built environment.

Water

Alpa Nawre, University of Florida Carey Clouse, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

As an expression of aesthetic luxury, water has found its way into architecture through reflective pools, sweeping roof-lines and exquisite detailing. While deeply experiential, such treatment simultaneously discounts the many pluralities and values water holds. From a celebratory role in one culture, water, in another geography becomes a critical metric for human development indices. What is its price - is water an indivisible shared heritage or a commodity to be sold, bought and fought for across personal, state and national borders? Is water a resource for human use, an eco-system element to be conserved, or a sacralized object? Who owns it and who manages it - the individual, community, state, federal and/or international governments? And, how does design negotiate these many pluralities? Often, these values become sub-consciously embedded and perpetuated in design proposals, reflecting dominant world views. How, then, can deeply ingrained values about water be brought to the surface and challenged through the practice of architecture, landscape architecture, urban design and planning? How can design help to reveal (scholarship of design submissions), question and then craft (design as scholarship submissions) changes in socio-cultural, religious, environmental, political and/or economic values about water?

Submissions for JAE X:X may include interrogations or provocations, reflections or predictions, drawn from across a range of design disciplines. We are particularly interested in historical precedents, manifestos, and anticipatory projections which expose or exhibit the kind of radical reframing towards water that may, in turn, inform future development in the Anthropocene.

Drawing Acts

Carolina Dayer, Aarhus School of Architecture Note: All Design as Scholarship

DRAWING ACTS, which of course makes reference to David Rosand's work and perhaps I could include something unpublished by him - not sure yet, but I think this title could expand into the political and activist role of drawing, as well as how drawings are enacted, made, contested, invented by various practices / pedagogies...

To be replaced with a more complete description. Year Issue Theme Editor Board Membership Meeting

2014 - Spring 68_1 design + Sheila Crane EE/AE 2011-2014 2012-2015 2013-2016 ACSA - Miami Amy Kulper Marc Neveu Marshall Brown Tom Avermaete Georgeen Theodore deadline: August 2013 Marc Neveu Amy Kulper Sheila Crane Murray Fraser Grace La Michelangelo Sabatino Nicholas deMonchaux Aaron Sprecher Franca Trubiano Mason White John Stuart Christina Contandriopolous Ivan Rupnik

2014 - Fall 68_2 Building Modern Africa David Rifkind EE/AE 2012-2015 2013-2016 2014-2017 Washington - ACSA Itohan Osayimwese Marc Neveu Tom Avermaete Georgeen Theodore Nora Wendl deadline: March 2014 Amy Kulper Murray Fraser Grace La Mari Fujita Michelangelo Sabatino Aaron Sprecher Franca Trubiano Doug Jackson John Stuart Christina Contandriopolous Saundra Weddle Michelangelo Sabatino Eric Mumford

2015 - Spring 69_1 crisis Timothy Hyde EE/AE 2012-2015 2013-2016 2014-2017 ACSA - Toronto Marc Neveu Tom Avermaete Georgeen Theodore Nora Wendl deadline: August 2014 Amy Kulper Murray Fraser Grace La Mari Fujita Ivan Rupnik Aaron Sprecher Franca Trubiano Doug Jackson John Stuart Christina Contandriopolous Saundra Weddle Michelangelo Sabatino Eric Mumford

2015 - Fall 69_2 S,M,L,XL Alicia Imperiale EE/AE 2013-2016 2014-2017 2015-2018 Portland - PSU Enrique Ramirez Marc Neveu Georgeen Theodore Nora Wendl Aaron Sprecher deadline: March 2015 Amy Kulper Grace La Mari Fujita Alpa Nawre Ivan Rupnik Franca Trubiano Doug Jackson AnnMarie Brennan Christina Contandriopolous Saundra Weddle Mitchell Squire Eric Mumford Tricia Stuth

2016 - Spring 70_1 Open - Design as Scholarship Amy Kulper EE/AE 2013-2016 2014-2017 2015-2018 ACSA - Seattle Marc Neveu Georgeen Theodore Nora Wendl Aaron Sprecher deadline: August 2015 Amy Kulper Grace La Mari Fujita Alpa Nawre Ivan Rupnik Franca Trubiano Doug Jackson AnnMarie Brennan Christina Contandriopolous Saundra Weddle Mitchell Squire Eric Mumford Tricia Stuth

2016 - Fall 70_2 Open - Scholarship of Design AnnMarie Brennan EE/AE 2014-2017 2015-2018 2016-2019 St Louis - WashU Saundra Weddle Marc Neveu Nora Wendl Aaron Sprecher Peggy Deamer deadline: August 2015 Amy Kulper Mari Fujita Alpa Nawre Timothy Hyde Ivan Rupnik Doug Jackson AnnMarie Brennan Jane Hutton Saundra Weddle Mitchell Squire Neyran Turan Eric Mumford Tricia Stuth Georgeen Theodore Sarah Deyong

2017 - Spring 71_1 Production Ryan Smith EE/AE 2014-2017 2015-2018 2016-2019 ACSA - Detroit Marc Neveu Nora Wendl Aaron Sprecher Peggy Deamer deadline: August 2016 Amy Kulper Mari Fujita Alpa Nawre Timothy Hyde Ivan Rupnik Doug Jackson AnnMarie Brennan Jane Hutton Saundra Weddle Mitchell Squire Neyran Turan Eric Mumford Tricia Stuth Georgeen Theodore Sarah Deyong

2017 - Fall 71_2 Environments Doug Jackson EE/AE 2015-2018 2016-2019 2017-2020 Los Angeles - Woodbury Marc Neveu Aaron Sprecher Peggy Deamer Elizabeth Golden deadline: March 2017 Carolina Dayer Alpa Nawre Timothy Hyde Clare Lyster Ivan Rupnik AnnMarie Brennan Jane Hutton Sara Stevens Mitchell Squire Neyran Turan Jacob Mans Tricia Stuth Georgeen Theodore Igor Marjanovic Sarah Deyong

2018 - Spring 72_1 to/a project Carolina Dayer EE/AE 2015-2018 2016-2019 2017-2020 ACSA - Denver Marc Neveu Aaron Sprecher Peggy Deamer Elizabeth Golden deadline: August 2017 Carolina Dayer Alpa Nawre Timothy Hyde Clare Lyster call: October 2016 Ivan Rupnik AnnMarie Brennan Jane Hutton Sara Stevens Mitchell Squire Neyran Turan Jacob Mans Tricia Stuth Georgeen Theodore Igor Marjanovic Sarah Deyong

2018 - Fall 72_2 preserve Tricia Stuth / Ted Shelton Marc Neveu 2016-2019 2017-2020 2018-2021 Minneapolis - Uminn Peggy Deamer Elizabeth Golden Alpa Nawre deadline: February 2018 Timothy Hyde Clare Lyster Jana Cephas Jane Hutton Sara Stevens Ijlal Muzaffar Neyran Turan Jacob Mans David Theodore Georgeen Theodore Igor Marjanovic Neeraj Bhatia Sarah Deyong Joyce Hwang

2019 - Spring 73_1 atmospheres Aaron Sprecher / EE/AE 2016-2019 2017-2020 2018-2021 ACSA - Pittsburgh Martin Bressani Marc Neveu Peggy Deamer Elizabeth Golden Alpa Nawre deadline: August 2018 Timothy Hyde Clare Lyster Jana Cephas Jane Hutton Sara Stevens Ijlal Muzaffar Neyran Turan Jacob Mans David Theodore Georgeen Theodore Igor Marjanovic Neeraj Bhatia Sarah Deyong Joyce Hwang

2019 - Fall 73_2 2017-2020 2018-2021 2019-2022 Elizabeth Golden Alpa Nawre deadline: February 2019 Clare Lyster Jana Cephas Sara Stevens Ijlal Muzaffar Jacob Mans David Theodore Igor Marjanovic Neeraj Bhatia Joyce Hwang

2020 - Spring 74_1 EE/AE 2017-2020 2018-2021 2019-2022 ACSA - San Diego Marc Neveu Elizabeth Golden Alpa Nawre deadline: August 2019 Clare Lyster Jana Cephas Sara Stevens Ijlal Muzaffar Jacob Mans David Theodore Igor Marjanovic Neeraj Bhatia Joyce Hwang

2020 - Fall 74_2 2018-2021 2019-2022 2020-2023 Alpa Nawre deadline: February 2020 Jana Cephas Ijlal Muzaffar David Theodore Neeraj Bhatia Joyce Hwang

2021 - Spring 75_1 EE/AE 2018-2021 2019-2022 2020-2023 Marc Neveu Alpa Nawre deadline: August 2020 Jana Cephas Ijlal Muzaffar Volume year 75 David Theodore Neeraj Bhatia Joyce Hwang

2021 - Fall 75_1 tbd 2019-2022 2020-2023 2021-2024

deadline: February 2021

Volume year 75

Theme Prompts: Building noun: a building verb: act of building

Drawing noun: a drawing verb: act of drawing

Use noun: a use verb: to use

Site noun: a site verb: to site

Code System Regulate Service Scale Condition Form Function Construct Represent Mediate Adapt Thesis Engage Recent Themes Spring 2018

Marc J Neveu 2019__73.2 2019__73.1 atmospheres

2018__72.2 preserve 2018__72.1 to/a project

2017__71.2 environments 2017__71.1 production

2016__70.2 Scholarship of Design 2016__70.1 Design as Scholarship

2015__69.2 S,M,L,XL 2015__69.1 Crisis

2014__68.2 Building Modern Africa 2014__68.1 design+

Graham Livesey 2013__67:2 General

Livesey / Grimes 2013__67:1 Utopia, c. 2016

Ellen Grimes 2012__66:1 General 2012__65:2 Beginning Design

2011__65:1 Ending Design

George Dodds 2011__64:2 Beyond Precedent

2010__64:1 Diacritical | Dialogical 2010__63:2 Changing Asia

2009__63:1 Vernaculars in the Age of Digital Reproduction 2009__62:4 Alternative Architectures | Alternative Practices 2009__62:3 Criticism in Architecture

2008__62:2 Immateriality in Architecture 2008__62:1 General 2008__61:4 Performance/Architecture 2008__61:3 Collateral Damage: War & Architecture

2007__61:2 Engaging the Recent Past 2007__61:1 Architectural Design as Research, Scholarship and Inquiry

Barbara Allen 2007__60:4 Sustainability 2007__60:3 General

2006__60:2 Design Build 2006__60:1 New Orleans and Katrina: One Year Later 2006__59:4 Installations by Architects 2006__59:3 1966: Forty Years After

2005__59:2 Recycling 2005__59:1 General 2005__58:4 Design Building 2005__58:3 Globalization Now

2004__59:2 Medium 2004__58:1 Architecture, Technology and Education 2004__57:4 General 2004__57:3 Architecture and Landscape

2003__59:2 Surface 2003__57:1 Public Realm 2003__56:4 Transparency 2003__56:3 Marking Domain

2002__56:2 General 2002__56:1 Digital Design 2002__55:4 Latin America 2002__55:3 General

2001__55:2 Gender and Architecture 2001__55:1 General issue

To: ACSA Executive Committee

From: Marc J Neveu

Re: JAE Executive Editor Report

Date: 01 March 2018

Issues

71:2 – environments Printed and shipped in the fall.

72:1 – a/to project Currently being printed. We should have copies for the board meeting in Denver.

72:2 – preserve Tricia Stuth and Ted Shelton, editors Contents are in review.

16 Design as Scholarship 17 Micronarratives 22 Scholarship of Design

Solicited Content (not all confirmed)

Opinion Deborah Berke Transformations of existing buildings, with particular interest in theory of programming of 21st c. projects and strategies as they relate to reverent/irreverent preservation practices.

Interview Jorge Otero-Pailos

Guest Curator | Discursive Images Bryony Roberts Sample Projects: David Gissen - Environmental Reproduction Farzin Lotfi-Jam + Caitlin Blanchfield - Modern Management Methods Jaffer Kolb - Home Economics

Micronarratives Tim Slade heritage conservation, destruction of memory David Leatherbarrow Salk Institute, weathering, maintenance, material flows Randall Mason counterpoint to experimental preservation

73:1 – atmospheres Martin Bressani and Aaron Sprecher, editors Call is posted on JAEOnline.org.

ACSA Annual Meeting, Denver Project – Special Focus Session Carolina Dayer

Preserve – Special Focus Session Tricia Stuth

Two new calls will be voted on.

Board Membership The Editorial Board has developed a list of candidates for nomination to the Editorial Board for a term beginning in July 2018. Nominations have been forwarded to the ACSA Executive Committee.

The term of the following Board Members will end this summer: Aaron Sprecher, McGill University AnnMarie Brennan, University of Melbourne Alpa Nawre, University of Florida Tricia Stuth, University of Tennessee

The following candidates were proposed for nomination for a three-year term beginning in the summer of 2018: Alpa Nawre, University of Florida Jana Cephas, [University of Michigan] Ijlal Muzaffar, Rhode Island School of Design David Theodore, McGill University Neeraj Bhatia, California College of the Arts Joyce Hwang, University of Buffalo

Each of the candidates has been contacted and we have confirmation of guaranteed financial support from their respective departments.

Associate Editor, Design: Report Spring 2018

Since the last board meeting in Los Angeles hosted at Woodbury University much work has gone into the production of the all-design issue 72:1 A/To Project due to the large body of content that the issue received and was accepted by the design board. Amanda Gann has been incredibly helpful and committed to some new ideas that we have been exploring with cover design and the possibility of other pages’ formats (eg. fold-outs). Due to limited budget, these efforts have focused in the realization of a new distinct cover for A/To Project.

At the LA meeting, we agreed that the category ‘Design as Scholarship’ still presents structural challenges for prospective authors. In order to strengthen its potential, we decided to lead two sessions at the 106th Annual ACSA Meeting, The Ethical Imperative, where discussions and presentations related to the category can exemplify and inspire a wide range of authors to submit to the journal. One session will be led by Tricia Stuth and will feature short presentations by a selection of notable scholars in response to the JAE 72:2 Preserve issue. Ivan Rupnik and myself will lead the other session entitled: JAE: The Project of Projection. We have invited Peggy Deamer from Yale University, Heather Flood from Woodbury University, Kevin Hirth from University of Colorado, Marc Neveu from Woodbury University and Pari Riahi, from University of Massachusetts Amherst. All five authors will discuss how architects write and theorize with and about their design work. This session intends to be a clear demonstration of the multiple horizons from which ‘Design as Scholarship’ can be framed.

The design board has additionally been working on reviewing 32 design submissions for the Preserve issue. We have not yet been able to develop an automated system for the discursive images submissions since the Preserve issue did not make a call for it, but we should continue to discuss and implement a new system for the next all-design issue.

Associate Editor, Reviws: Report Spring 2018

Thirteen reviews have been published on-line between October 1, 2017 and March 15, 2018, achieving and slightly exceeding the goal of publishing a review every two weeks. Since October 1, a “New Reviews” feature has been sent regularly to the ACSA readership. A new description of the JAE Reviews Committee was also generated to help the ACSA community understand the selection, production and dissemination process.

2018 Journal of Architectural Education Managing Editor Report March 15th - 17th, 2018 - ACSA 106th Annual Meeting | Denver, CO Managing Editor Summary

Since the October 2017 Board meeting, we have assembled the A/To Project issue of JAE. With nearly 100 submissions, the peer-review process called for efficient processing by both the ACSA Staff as well as our new Associate Design Editor Carolina Dayer and Marc Neveu. This issue, as it is a “Design Issue,” we have removed the “Scholarship of Design section and replaced it with 26 Discursive Images, expanded Design as Scholarship section, and a lengthy Curation section to focus more on the design work of the architectural faculty.

During this process, we were assigned a new contact at Taylor & Francis, Anita Michel, left for a new position and we are now working with Dave Miniaci. The transition required more one-on-one collaboration to help him acclimate to the system by which the JAE is reviewed, processed, designed, and then printed.

The call was very successful and received 131 discursive image submissions, 71 were faculty and 60 student submissions. Through ScholarOne, we received 47 Design as Scholarship Submissions and 12 Micro-Narratives.

Note: I have include the Table of Contents and Introductions by Marc Neveu and Carolina Dayer for the JAE 72:1 A/To Project Issue in the following five pages.

Cover of JAE 72:1 a/to project - Coming soon to a mailbox near you.

2 2018 Managing Editor: Report Journal of Architectural Education 72: 1 March 2018

1 28 50 The Evolving Project The Two-Dimensional Orthographic Bubble Box Eat & Watch Marc J. Neveu Projection of a Semicircle onto an Jonathon Brearley Epicycle of Cones 2 Mark Ericson 52 The Project of Projecting Urban Renewal Through Granularized Carolina Dayer 30 Utility Generation From Scratch… to Scratched-Out: An Ying Qi Chen In Memoriam Alternative History of Kampgrounds of America 56 5 Martin Hogue A Post-Truth Manifesto Diane Lewis: Reader of Urbanity Aren Edwards Nader Tehrani 32 Field of Plans/Sections—UCLA 58 Discursive Images Chiller Plant with Cogeneration Island of Living Tales Wes Jones Will Fu 10 A Romance of Many Dimensions 34 60 CJ Lim Millions of Hours The Great Divide: Citizen Science in Rachel Hurst the Anthropocene at the Columbia 14 Icefield On Process-Based Drawings 36 Andrej Iwanski Viola Ago Google-y Eyes: The Northumberland Remix 62 16 Brian M. Kelly Inter-Species Scaffold (Field) Office Cameron Parkin Robert K. Alexander 38 Aesthetics of Ruins 64 18 Hamed Khosravi The Centre for Arctic Preservation The Post Office and the Running Melt Kelly Bair and Kristy Balliet 40 Evan Taylor DWG X KOSMOS XENIOS 20 Giorgos Kyriazis and Sofia Stylianou Design as Scholarship [Housing] Destruction Germane Barnes 42 67 Creative Commons Oteiza's Chalk Laboratory as 22 Lluis J. Liñán Architecture Discovery Salvagion Antonio Juárez and Lucía C. Nikole Bouchard 44 Pérez-Moreno The Analogue as a Critical Project 24 Cameron McEwan 78 Manufacturing Sceneries: Disrupt/Displace: Translating The Boating Lake 46 Territory Peter Alexander Bullough Behind the Seams: Sequence + Shelby Doyle and Leslie Forehand Infrastructure 26 Maggie McManus 91 City of Architectural Fiction Organic Urbanism via Collective Site Alexander Eisenschmidt 48 Appropriation Balloon Framing Arturo Frediani and Rafael Anthony Viscardi Gómez-Moriana

JAE 72:1 1

3 2018 Managing Editor: Report 99 178 Experimental Architecture for Composing Homeless Self-Housing Tricia Stuth Yael Allweil 180 105 Judging a Book by its Cover The Garden of Earthly Delights: A Georgeen Theodore Social Condenser of Contemporary Pleasures in Pedagogical Design 182 Strategies Subtlety as Engagement María Fullaondo and Joseph Neyran Turan Gauci-Seddon

120 Autonomy and Automation in the Architectural Project: The Algorithm of Hypermobile Commuter's City Rodrigo Delso Gutiérrez and Javier Argota Sánchez-Vaquerizo

135 Bending Bamboo Rules: Beyond Century-Old Typologies Kristof Crolla

146 PRACTICEOPOLIS: From an Imaginary City to a Graphic Novel Yasser Megahed and Adam Sharr

Curation

168 Projectio Carolina Dayer

170 Complexity in Disguise Clare Lyster

172 Continuous Intervention Jacob Mans

174 Multidimensional Space: -X, X -Y, Y -Z, Z Aaron Sprecher

176 Figuring a Project Sara Stevens

2

4 2018 Managing Editor: Report The Evolving Project

Marc J. Neveu Woodbury University

This issue marks the end of my first were included in addition to the in its themes. Barbara Allen followed term as Executive Editor of the scholarly essays. At the beginning of and, in 2002, introduced a new layout Journal of Architectural Education. Over the decade, the Teacher’s Conference that would more easily accommo- the past four volume years we have provided the majority of content. date design work. Lily Chi, then published eight issues, completed a In 1974, Arthur E. Hacker became Design Editor, proposed a series of redesign of the physical journal, and the editor of the journal and quickly frameworks for design content such launched a new website. Given the proceeded to make a complete as “design as research” and “design three-year tenure for board members, graphic redesign. He increased page as critical inquiry.” As a result, the membership on the Editorial Board count and introduced letters to the design content increased in page has completely turned over. In editor. Theme issues such as Canada, count and improved in quality. this issue devoted to a “project,” it Landscape, Preservation, Energy, Although limited, project images seems like a good moment to reflect Aging, the Profession, Drawing, were printed in color and the journal on the project that is the Journal of Symbolism, and Gaming were made its first foray into the world Architectural Education. mixed with open issues made up of wide web. 2007 marked the 60th The JAE was first published in content submitted to no particular anniversary of the JAE and the 150th 1947. It developed out of a pre-War theme. At the end of the 1970s Roger anniversary of the American Institute bulletin printed by Walter Rolfe called Schluntz helped to establish the of Architects. George Dodds was The Evolving Architect. In 1946 Turpin JAE endowment fund and in 1982 named as the Executive Editor and Bannister, who was also influential the Editorial Board was formed by began his term with an image-less in the formation of the Journal of the Peter Papadimetriou, then Executive cover, intended to mark the change Society of Architectural Historians, was Editor. Papadimetriou’s term began in editorship. Under Dodds’ tapped to revive the effort and named with another complete redesign leadership the current scholarship the ACSA publication, the Journal of of the journal. Interviews were categories—Design as Scholarship Architectural Education. The first issue introduced—most notable, perhaps, and Scholarship of Design—were included news items, the results of a was an interview with Albert Speer. established and the journal shifted survey on research, and scholarship In 1986 David Bell introduced from four issues per volume year to on research in architecture. Through the OpArch—opinion pieces that two. More recently, Amy Kulper and the first decade of the journal, and were not peer-reviewed—and the Design Committee developed through a rotating cast of editors, the proposed to include design content. new frameworks for curated design contents mostly consisted of proceed- The first of such essays (a car content as well as micronarratives. ings from ACSA Annual meetings. wash) was published in 1989 under Ivan Rupnik has led the expansion of Similar to the participants of the the editorship of Diane Ghirardo reviews, which are now completely ACSA Annual meetings, the authors who presented a call for design online at JAEOnline.org. of the journal were not particularly submissions in her first issue (42:1) The design of the journal, diverse. It took almost a full decade as Executive Editor. Ghirardo also content categories, the organizational for a female author, Catherine Bauer, introduced essays of architectural structure of the journal’s leadership, to be published. Into the 1960s the criticism and conference reviews. funding models, digital presence, content evolved but still included By the late 1980s the journal had scale of publication, editors, authors, ACSA reports and records from doubled in size and in 1990 the readers, staff, and the publishing AIA-ACSA Teacher’s Seminars. journal was, again, completely context have all radically changed Issues were typically not more than redesigned. Under Ghirardo’s eleven- since 1947. It is truly an evolving sixteen pages and images were limited year tenure, the JAE celebrated its project. That said, the mission of the to black and white photographs of 50th anniversary (with two covers in JAE has not changed. The Journal people speaking at conferences. color!), Peggy Deamer was appointed of Architectural Education has been By the 1970s, the journal grew as inaugural Design Editor, and the published since 1947 for the purpose in page count with issues averaging journal evolved to be much more of enhancing architectural design around thirty pages. Book reviews inclusive in its authorship and diverse education, theory, and practice.

JAE 72:1 1

5 2018 Managing Editor: Report The Project of Projecting

Carolina Dayer Aarhus School of Architecture

“In order to legitimate its repetitive positions surrounding the idea of be manifested. In their appearing, procedures,” Stan Allen claims in a project certainly results from the projects have the capacity to sustain his 1999 essay “Practice vs. Project,” lexical abundance of the term itself. the continuous experimental nature “practice appeals to a project: an As an action, to project is to plan a of their existence. These demonstra- overarching theoretical construct, scheme as well as to have an idea or to tions prompt the architect’s reflection defined from someplace else.”1 speculate; in other words, it simulta- on his or her own judgment and Critical of the need to justify neously evokes acts of methodic perception, yet another kind of material practices through the precision and conjectural wondering. projection. Within the nature of static abstractions of theory, Allen In Freudian terms, to project describes projects and projecting, the original sees the drive to produce projects, the externalization of an internal meaning of theory as an inherently rather than performance-based process, a making visible of an reflective practice thrives and persists. practices, as indicative of an overly invisible condition, and thus it relates The work, in turn, projects outward, discursive approach to architec- to the political and ethical dimension allowing the architect to keep ture. Alternatively, seeking to create of making things public. As a noun, wondering, changing, and testing. bridges between theory and practice, a project can be a final building, but it The Journal of Architectural Pier Vittorio Aureli together with may also be the process surrounding Education’s Design as Scholarship Manuel Orazi argue for the architec- it. It can refer to a body of research essays embody the fertility of tural project as precisely that which or to the pedagogical framework of a architectural projects through a series can lead to such a materialized design studio. In several languages, of critical reflections, performative reality. “A project must be seen as such as Spanish and Italian, a project practices, and emerging theories. a conceptual format,” they state, (proyecto, progetto) may refer to the The intention of this issue call, a/to “in which the relationship between plan drawing of a building as well as project, was to deliberately address the thought and form, intention and the design of it, with the verb form nature of the Design as Scholarship device, theme and context, is always projecting (proyectar, progettare) being category, as well as to examine the made clear and pertinent to specific the activity proper to architects, as works of architects and educators problems and issues that we designate opposed to designing (diseñar, disegnare). through the totality of a project, from as urgent.”2 Aureli and Orazi’s notion The family of derivatives surround- process to outcome, from inquiries to of the project is forwarded as a kind ing the term—such as projection, reflections. Among the large volume of pragmatic theory that responds to projective, projectable, projecting— of proposals, the design committee specific, current situations through demonstrates its malleability within diligently selected eight submissions the work of the architect’s own architectural discourse. In one notable for publication. Five of these investi- subjectivity. Yet, within the multiple example, Robin Evans problematizes gate the nature of pedagogical array of intellectual positions on the complexities of architectural projects. Antonio Juárez and Lucía the idea of the project, one thing projections in his aptly titled book The C. Pérez-Moreno’s “Oteiza’s Chalk appears certain: practicing architects, Projective Cast, concluding with the Laboratory as Architecture Discovery” educators, and architectural research- provocation that “projection breaches experiments with pedagogy as a ers, all working with different media, the boundary between world and poetic-material project founded in methods, and principles, refer self, object and the objective and the the exploratory projects of Spanish almost unanimously to their work subjective.”3 artist Jorge Oteiza. A connection as projects. Has the word become too Within such a vast field of with history and a reintroduction of generic to define anything directly definitions and understandings, the methods for beginning education or tangentially relating to architec- nature of projects seem to generally show the learning potential of working ture? Or is there still specificity in the address the ambiguity of volatile and genetically between existing and term that makes room for ingenious concrete actions that precipitate in future projects. Having a distinctly approaches to architecture? demonstrations. Fundamental to different agenda, Shelby Doyle and The numerous and diverse any form of project is that it must Leslie Forehand’s “Disrupt/Displace:

2

6 2018 Managing Editor: Report Translating Territory” explores Javier Argota Sánchez-Vaquerizo’s Lastly, in recognition of the untimely pedagogy as a political project, “Autonomy and Automation in the passing of architect and educator engaging public discourse through an Architectural Project: The Algorithm Diane Lewis, we celebrate her exhibition at the 2016 Venice Biennale. of Hypermobile Commuter’s passionate commitment to architec- By making visible the underlying City” questions design as a digital, ture with a thoughtful piece by issues of the Dakota Access Pipeline autonomous project within the Nader Tehrani, dean of the Irwin through an open, public session and potentials offered by big data. Their S. Chanin School of Architecture performance, Doyle and Forehand work opens relevant questions at The Cooper Union and principal illuminate the notion of the project regarding the role of the architect and of NADAAA. In an essay entitled as a critique, one that engages an the city among the vast and rapidly “Diane Lewis: Reader of Urbanity” audience through both contempla- expanding fields of available digital Tehrani commemorates her work tion and participation. Following information. Positioned in between and stark intellectual legacy while these notions of political negotia- past and future, Kristof Crolla’s reflectively mourning the loss of a tion, two more examples examine “Bending Bamboo Rules: Beyond loved and respected figure in the pedagogy as a social project. Arturo Century-Old Typologies” explores architectural community. Frediani and Rafael Gómez-Moriana’s a threatened, traditional form of “Organic Urbanism via Collective bamboo craftsmanship in Hong Author Biography Site Appropriation” unfolds the Kong and exposes how a project can Carolina Dayer teaches at the Aarhus generative potential of projecting, combine modern tools and techniques School of Architecture in Denmark. when a student group is tasked to with historical practices, keeping an She now serves as the Journal of negotiate among themselves the old building technology both alive Architectural Education's Associate appropriate land use for hypothetical and current. Lastly, Yasser Megahed Editor of Design. building sites. By emphasizing a sense and Adam Sharr’s “Practiceopolis: of common belonging, questions From an Imaginary City to a Graphic Notes of social urbanism emerge that Novel” explores practice-based design 1 Stan Allen, Practice: Architecture, Technique + constitute a larger project beyond the research as a project of critical fiction. Representation (London: Routledge, 2009), xiv. 2 Pier Vittorio Aureli and Manuel Orazi, “The studio exercise. In the case of Yael Through the format of a graphic Solitude of the Project,” Log, no. 7 (Winter/ Allweil’s “Experimental Architecture novel, the authors dramatically unfold Spring 2006): 25. for Homeless Self-Housing,” a the conflicts, values, and ideologies 3 Robin Evans, The Projective Cast: Architecture and socio-pedagogical project engages that shape the relationships between Its Three Geometries (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, with full-size constructions for the architect and other actors in the 2000), 369. homeless people in Tel Aviv. The construction profession. essay reveals the urgency of projects In addition, twenty eight to be active within contested areas Discursive Images contributions and marginalized populations, show the wide range of projects that offering a possible pedagogy for architects explore throughout their engaging these realities. Lastly, creative work, practice, and research. pedagogy as a socio-hedonistic Created and commented on by project is demonstrated through the its author, each image constitutes creative work of María Fullaondo and a microcosmos of thinking and Joseph Gauci-Seddon’s students in making. Beyond their immediate, “The Garden of Earthly Delights: A visual seduction, I ask the reader Social Condenser of Contemporary to slowly indulge a more savory Pleasures in Pedagogical Design reading of these images, as they offer Strategies.” This project engages with valuable content in reflecting on the works of fiction and history to attract project of architecture. A further set and provoke students’ imaginations of Discursive Images, specifically through pleasurable encounters with selected and examined by members of real places. the JAE design committee, explores Three Design as Scholarship the multidimensionality of projects. submissions address the issue These images originate in a variety of theme by utilizing design practice sources and time periods, reflecting as projections into wider inquiries. the critical positions of committee Rodrigo Delso Gutiérrez and members in regard to the issue theme.

Dayer JAE 72:1 3

7 2018 Managing Editor: Report JAE Print Issues

72:2—Preserve (October 2018) For this call, we currently have 56 submissions under consideration on ScholarOne.

From ScholarOne Report (Aug 10, 2017 - February 10, 2018) 20 Design as Scholarship 21 Micro-Narratives 38 Scholarship of Design 2 Interviews (which we do not accept via ScholarOne)

79 Total Submissions though... 56 were appropriate for the current call.

72:1—a/to project (March 2018) For the a/to project call, we received 68 submissions on ScholarOne.

From ScholarOne (March 10, 2017 - August 10, 2017) 47 Design as Scholarship 12 Micro-Narratives 0 Scholarship of Design (this call did not accept this type)

59 Total Submissions

72:1—a/to project Call for Discursive Images In addition to the call for papers, ACSA also put out a call for Discursive Images to both Faculty and Students. The images were sent to [email protected] and collected and archived by Amanda Gann, the Managing Editor.

131 Total Submissions

Note: For the next discursive image call, the ACSA staff suggests the use of Google Forms for the submission to make sure that it is streamlined and efficient.

8 2018 Managing Editor: Report JAE Online

JAEOnline.org is an online platform that we are using to post all the reviews, references to the online downloads through Taylor & Francis. Pascale Vonier has been working with Ivan Rupnik to post one review per week. (WOW!)

New Web Content Since October 2017

March 7, 2018 Book Review Charles Waldheim: Landscape as Urbanism: A General Theory by Kristina Hill http://www.jaeonline.org/articles/reviews-books/landscape-urbanism-general-theory

February 23, 2018 Book Review Lola Sheppard and Mason White, editors and authors: Many Norths: Spatial Practice in a Polar Territory by Matthew Jull http://www.jaeonline.org/articles/reviews-books/many-norths-spatial-practice-polar-territory

February 16, 2018 Book Review Sonja Dümpelmann and John Beardsley Women, Modernity, and Landscape Architecture by Terry Clement http://www.jaeonline.org/articles/reviews-books/women-modernity-and-landscape-architecture

February 9, 2018 Book Review Rhodri Windsor Liscombe and Michelangelo Sabatino: Canada: Modern Architectures in History by David Theodore http://www.jaeonline.org/articles/reviews-books/canada-modern-architectures-history

January 31, 2018 Book Review Hilary Sample: Maintenance Architecture by Jonathan Hill http://www.jaeonline.org/articles/reviews-books/maintenance-architecture

January 16, 2018 Book Review Brian Goldstein: The Roots of Urban Renaissance: Gentrification and the Struggle over Harlem by Amber N. Wiley http://www.jaeonline.org/articles/reviews-books/roots-urban-renaissance

9 2018 Managing Editor: Report JAE Online (continued...)

New Web Content Since October 2017

December 17, 2017 Exhibit Review Multiple Ways of Knowing Pierre Chareau by Madlen Simon http://www.jaeonline.org/articles/reviews-exhibits/multiple-ways-knowing-pierre-chareau

December 7, 2017 Book Review Nadia Amoroso: Representing Landscapes: Hybrid by Danika Cooper http://www.jaeonline.org/articles/reviews-books/representing-landscapes

November 18, 2017 Book Review Socrates Yiannoudes: Architecture and Adaptation: From Cybernetics to Tangible Computing by Suleiman Alhadidi http://www.jaeonline.org/articles/reviews-books/architecture-and-adaptation-cybernetics-tangible-computing

November 16, 2017 Book Review Katie Lloyd Thomas, Tilo Amhoff, Nick Beech: Industries of Architecture by Christina E. Crawford http://www.jaeonline.org/articles/reviews-books/industries-architecture

November 8, 2017 Book Review Frederick R. Steiner, Georg F. Thompson, Armando Carbonell: Nature and Cities: The Ecological Imperative in Urban Design and Planning by John Alder http://www.jaeonline.org/articles/reviews-books/nature-and-cities-ecological-imperative-urban-design-and-planning

10 2018 Managing Editor: Report 73:1atmospheresatmospheresatmospheres ar rea JAE Online Open Calls McGill University ar reer Technion Israel Institute of Technology

From Yves Klein’s Fire Fountain, to Andrea reenacting atmospheric conditions? With Branzi’s interior spaces of No-stop City, to the emergence of new forms of vision, oŠ en Nicholas Schoe er’s Cybernetic Sculptures, to addressed as immersive, augmented, or Francois Roche’s I’ve heard about, and Olafur engineered, how might the architectural fi eld Eliasson’s Weather Project, a wide range of engage with scientifi c studies that question architects have searched for ways to produce the potential psychological and physiological experiential environments in which the object impact of architecture on human experience? of architecture acts on the psychological While such transdisciplinary approach Upcoming Issues condition at multiple levels. With increasing questions the capability of the architectural technological intensity architects are capable object to bridge the physical, artifi cial, and of generating augmented realities, virtual virtual dimensions of space, what would be worlds, and responsive environments. the nature of an experimental architecture Projects are conceived of and produced at capable of infl uencing our sense of space, its the convergence architecture and other fi elds materiality, and morphology? Further, what of inquiry such as psychology, physiology, would be the conditions of its representation? and neuroscience. All this combined with the extensity of information networks and The Journal of Architectural Education, Issue the widespread use of mediated tools that 73:1 seeks Scholarship of Design, Design regulate every aspect of our life, including as Scholarship, and Micro-Narratives our bodies, the atmospheric dimension that approach the notion of atmosphere of the architectural project calls for a in architecture from its multiple aspects, redefi nition of past theories from the to include the political, social, and/or phenomenological to functionalist approaches. cultural. What is the modus operandi of an atmospheric architecture? How would it be While the architectural model conventionally experimentally formed? What would be a approaches the atmospheric dimension in pedagogical program capable of generating terms of its infl uence on the senses, this atmospheres as an objective? Submissions 106th Annual Meeting Registration Desk Flyer >>>>>>>>>>>> issue of the Journal of Architectural Education may include work that reveal the history and proposes to revisit the idea of the atmospheric theory of atmospheres in architecture; report through the lens of the experiential economy, on new pedagogical and experimental models hypermediated culture, and the politics of that question the impact of visualization, global communities. What is the nature of an simulation, and fabrication technologies on atmospheric architecture in the post-digital the human perception of atmospheres; and/ Go get one! age? In a world saturated with screens of or examine design methods that transform all kinds, how is architecture generating or our understanding of atmospheres.

Deadline: August 1st, 2018 Journal of Architectural Education 73:1 Atmospheres Submit your papers at www.jaeonline.org.

posted on January 1st, 2018 Call for Papers JAE 73:1 Atmospheres Theme Editors: Martin Bressani, McGill University and Aaron Sprecher, Technion Israel of Technology http://www.jaeonline.org/pages/atmospheres

11 2018 Managing Editor: Report JAE Online

Since October 2017, JAEOnline.org has received over 18,000 visitors. People are spending over 2 minutes during their visits. As you can see below, the majority of the traffic was for submissions to a/to project and the call for discursive images.

September 7, 2017 - March 9, 2018 19,016 46,549 2.45 02:08 12,584 sessions page views pages/session average duration users

Top Pages March 2017 - September 2017 (Old) September 2017 - March 2018 (New!) Source Page Views Source Page Views /homepage 10,490 /homepage 10,778^ /pages/call-submissions-discursive-images-0 4,269 /pages/preserve 3,486 /pages/project 4,026 /pages/submit 1,812 /pages/submit 2,233 /pages/atmospheres 1,168 /tag/submission 1,531 /pages/journal-architectural-education 1,121 /pages/guidelines 1,243 /editorial-board 990 /issues/production 1,194 /tag/submission 969 /pages/journal-architectural-education 1,158 /pages/guidelines 952 /pages/preserve 971 /tag/reviews 866 /editorial-board 878 /issues/environments 717 /articles/reviews-books/architecture-neoliber- /pages/environments 746 603 alism /tag/discursive-images 724 /read/ 587 /articles/reviews-software/birkhauser-“build- /tag/reviews 525 569 ing-types-online”-database /read/ 487 /pages/call-submissions-discursive-images-0 548

/pages/call-discursive-images 473 /articles/reviews-books/toward-urban-ecology 532

/articles/reviews-books/treacherous-transparen- /articles/reviews-books/landscape-urban- 414 479 cies-thoughts-and-observations-triggered-visit ism-general-theory /articles/reviews-books/architecture-and-adap- /articles/reviews-books/spatial-structure 402 469 tation-cybernetics-tangible-computing /other-journals 343 /pages/project 467

Note: Information retrieved on March 8th, 2018.

12 2018 Managing Editor: Report JAE Online

Broken down by month since September 2017, these numbers show sessions on the website. Note: the verical axis measurement changes. Thanks, Google Analytics.

September 29 -171 sessions September 20 - 142 sessions

September 7, 2017 - October 7, 2017 | 2,669 sessions

October 18 - 683 sessions October 8 - 728 sessions

October 8, 2017 - November 8, 2017 | 4,448 sessions

13 2018 Managing Editor: Report JAE Online

Broken down by month since September 2017, these numbers show sessions on the website. Note: the verical axis measurement changes. Thanks, Google Analytics.

November 9, 2017 - December 9, 2017 | 2,700 sessions

December 12

December 22

December 10, 2017 - January 10, 2018 | 2,518 sessions

14 2018 Managing Editor: Report JAE Online

Broken down by month since September 2017, these numbers show sessions on the website. Note: the verical axis measurement changes. Thanks, Google Analytics.

January 18

January 11, 2018 - February 11, 2018 | 4,025 sessions

March 2nd

February 12, 2018 - March 9, 2018 | 2,655 sessions

Note: “other” and “referral” are from the ACSA Website or other affiliate sites like T&F and SAH.

15 2018 Managing Editor: Report JAE Online GO TO REPORT All Web Site Data  Location

Sep 8, 2017 - Mar 8, 2018 All Users 100.00% Users

Map Overlay

Summary JAE Online

Note: There were 12,584 users. 1 6,450 This is the color scale.

Site Visits byAcquisition Country Behavior Conversions Country March 2017 - September 2017 September 2017 - March 2018 (New!) New Bounce Pages / Avg. Session Goal Conversion Goal Goal Users Sessions Source UsersSessions Rate SourceSession DurationSessions Rate Completions Value

United States 12,428 12,0578,654 18,821 56.51%United States2.45 00:02:086,450 0.00% 0 $0.00 % of % of Total: % of Avg for Avg for View: Avg for View: Avg for View: % of Total: % of Total: Canada Total: 100.10%1,016 Total: View:Canada 2.45 72500:02:08 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% (12,045) 100.00% 56.51% (0.00%) (0.00%) (0.00%) (0) ($0.00) United Kingdom(12,428) 642 (18,821) (0.00%)United Kingdom 566 Italy 567 India 305 1. United States 6,450 6,173 9,917 58.42% 2.32 00:01:48 0.00% 0 $0.00 Spain (51.15%) (51.20%)539 (52.69%) Turkey 285 (0.00%) (0.00%)

2. Canada Australia 725 440694 1,068 54.49%Italy 2.46 00:02:10276 0.00% 0 $0.00 (5.75%) (5.76%) (5.67%) (0.00%) (0.00%) Turkey 426 Australia 258 3. United Kingdom 566 542 765 56.34% 2.27 00:02:06 0.00% 0 $0.00 India (4.49%) (4.50%)375 (4.06%) China 252 (0.00%) (0.00%) Hong Kong 309 Spain 216 4. India 305 299 396 54.04% 2.18 00:02:11 0.00% 0 $0.00 (2.42%) (2.48%) (2.10%) (0.00%) (0.00%) Germany 261 Germany 194 5. Turkey 285 268 480 41.88% 3.32 00:03:36 0.00% 0 $0.00 Note: Information retrieved(2.26%) on March 8th,(2.22%) 2018. (2.55%) (0.00%) (0.00%)

6. Italy 276 267 491 52.34% 3.16 00:03:23 0.00% 0 $0.00 (2.19%) (2.21%) (2.61%) (0.00%) (0.00%) 16 2018 Managing Editor: Report 7. Australia 258 246 398 46.73% 2.72 00:03:06 0.00% 0 $0.00 (2.05%) (2.04%) (2.11%) (0.00%) (0.00%)

8. China 252 250 279 83.87% 1.66 00:01:18 0.00% 0 $0.00 (2.00%) (2.07%) (1.48%) (0.00%) (0.00%)

9. Spain 216 199 348 54.02% 2.65 00:02:15 0.00% 0 $0.00 (1.71%) (1.65%) (1.85%) (0.00%) (0.00%)

10. Germany 194 185 252 54.37% 2.73 00:02:38 0.00% 0 $0.00 (1.54%) (1.53%) (1.34%) (0.00%) (0.00%)

Rows 1 - 10 of 132 JAE Online

Conversions/Referrals The ACSA Communications team posts on Facebook for each online review, shares the information on the @ACSAUpdate Twitter feed, weekly emails, and on the ACSA Facebook page which has over 4,000 followers.

Follow the JAE on Facebook by going to facebook.com/journalofarchitecturaleducation. Follow ACSA on Twitter @ACSAUpdate to engage in conversations about JAE.

Source/Medium (How people are finding us?) March 2017 - September 2017 (Old!) September 2017 - March 2018 (New!) Source Sessions Source Sessions Organic Search 7,098 Direct 5,524 Direct 6,222 Organic Search 5,306 Referral 2,305 Referral 1,413 Social 1,193 Social 914 Email 577 Email 29

Top Referrals March 2017 - September 2017 (Old!) September 2017 - March 2018 (New!) Source Page Views Source Page Views acsa-arch.org 1,657 acsa-arch.org 996 facebook.com 1,006 facebook.com 630 sah.org 162 twitter 204 tandfonline.com 159 bing/organic 116 bing.com 99 tandfonline.com 95 yahoo.com 86 yahoo/organic 50 t.co (twitter) 72 instagram 44 archinect.com 21 apps.acsa-arch.org 39 wikipedia.org 21 newsletter/email 29 linkedin.com 10 sah.org 19

17 2018 Managing Editor: Report JAE Social Media

Top Posts Facebook - ACSA National Date Description Reach Engagement 02/23/2018 Reviews: Books Many Norths by Matthew Jull 210 5 01/09/2018 JAE 72:2 Preserve Reminder 379 30 10/10/2017 Reviews: Books | A House in the Sun by Lydia Kallipoliti 310 4

Top Posts Facebook - JAE Date Description Reach Engagement 03/03/2018 Submit to JAE 73:1 Atmospheres 601 78 03/02/2018 Reviews: Books | Landscape as Urbanism 341 33 02/23/2018 Reviews: Books | Many Norths by Matthew Jull 660 33 02/16/2018 Submit to JAE 73:1 Atmostpheres 400 64 02/16/2018 Reviews: Books | Women, Modernity, and Landscape Architecture 219 19 02/16/2018 Reviews: Books | Canada: Modern Architectures in History 136 8 01/19/2018 Deadline: JAE 72:2 Preserve 572 64 12/4/2017 NEW ISSUE: JAE 71:2 Environments 788 92 12/4/2017 Reviews: Books | Architecture and Adaptation: From Cybernetics... 577 52 11/13/2017 Reviews: Books | Nature and Cities: The Ecological Imperative... 926 11 11/06/2017 Learn how reviews are selected... 1,518 17 09/30/2017 Reviews: Books | A House in the Sun: Modern Architecture... 1,774 178 09/30/2017 JAE 72:2 Call for Submissions Preserve 485 36 09/19/2017 Reviews: Books | The Architecture of Neoliberalism... 1,424 173 09/14/2017 Submit your Discursive Image by Sept 1 1,353 114

Top Posts Twitter ACSA National @ACSAUpdate Date Description Impressions Engagement 02/28/2018 [Reviews: Books] Many Norths by Lola Sheppard and Mason White 660 8 01/05/2018 Call for Submissions - JAE 72:2 Preserve 929 16 12/12/2017 JAE 71:2 Environments - The Legibility of Environment 459 4

18 2018 Managing Editor: Report Contact Info

Amanda Gann - Managing Editor/Social Media Manager for JAE [email protected] (202) 785-2324

Pascale Vonier - Senior Art Editor for JAE [email protected]

TH AN KS! 19 2018 Managing Editor: Report

Journal of Architectural Education

Confidential Publishing Report March 2018 1 Confidential

Highlights for Journal of Architectural Education

• Journal of Architectural Education received 36,714 downloads in 2017, which is 15% higher than downloads received in 2016. • The most downloaded article is ‘Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park and the Making of Japanese Postwar Architecture’ by Hyunjung Cho, with 1,102 downloads. • The most downloaded issue in 2017 (among issues published at any point in the journal’s history) is 66(1).

1. Global Accessibility

Journal of Architectural Education is accessible to readers via direct subscriptions, online-only sales packages with institutions and as part of our Social Sciences & Humanities Library.

1.1. Circulation

3,000

2,500 2,431 2,345 2,317 2,000 2,184

1,500 1,786

1,000

500 Number of Institutions with Access with Institutions of Number 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

1.2. EBSCO Usage

Number of Libraries Using via EBSCO

1200 1106 1000 800 600 400 234 172 200 90 50 39 33 11 6 0

2 Confidential

1.3. Article Downloads

12,000 10,983 9,7729,423 10,000 8,809 9,014 8,336 8,136 8,478 7,665 8,102 8,000 6,702 6,407 6,536 5,936 6,000 5,233 4,623 3,907 4,000 3,447 2,014 2,000 1,157

- Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Article downloads have increased by 15% from 2016 to 2017. There were 36,714 downloads in 2017.

1.4. Article Downloads by Region 2017

7412 North America Northern & Central 13379 Europe Southern Europe 3958 Australasia

Rest of World 4883 7022

1.5. Top Issues Downloaded 2017

Vol (iss) Downloads

66(1) 7,026

71(1) 3,339 70(1) 2,709

67(1) 2,592

67(2) 1,699

3 Confidential

1.6. Top Articles Downloaded 2017 (among all published)

Vol Author Title Downloads (iss) Hyunjung Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park and the Making of Japanese Postwar 66(1) 1,102 Cho Architecture* Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture ROBERT VENTURI Museum of Deborah 66(1) Modern Art, 1966 141 pages, 350 illustrations; 2nd. ed. 1977, 146 pages, 903 Fausch $19.95 (paperback)* Ana María 66(1) Prisoners of Ritoque: The Open City and the Ritoque Concentration Camp* 867 León Andrew The Possibility of an Absolute Architecture PIER VITTORIO AURELI MIT Press, 66(1) 581 Leach 2011 xiv + 251 pages, 58 illustrations, $24.95 (paperback)* Landform Building: Architecture's New Terrain STAN ALLEN AND MARC Michael 66(1) MCQUADE, editors Lars Müller Publishers, 2011 480 pages, 430 illustrations, 565 Kubo $65.00 (hardcover)* Antoine Learning From Utopia Contemporary Architecture and the Quest for Political 67(1) 540 Picon and Social Relevance Interdisciplinary Reflections and Deflections of Histories of the Scientific Stylianos 69(1) Revolution in Alberto Pérez-Gómez's Architecture and the Crisis of Modern 444 Giamarelos Science** Kathryn E. 66(1) Mies and Bacardi Mixing Modernism, c. 1960* 429 O'Rourke Simon Guy, 54(3) Graham Reinterpreting Sustainable Architecture: The Place of Technology 366 Farmer Marc J. 71(1) Production/Value* 357 Neveu * Article is free to view. ** Article is Open Access

1.7. Top Articles Downloaded 2017 (among articles published in 2016 and 2017)

Vol Author Title Downloads (iss) Marc J. 71(2) The Design of Environmental Design 161 Neveu Doug 71(2) Environmental Entanglement 79 Jackson Whitney 71(2) Cedric Price: Radical Pragmatist, in Pursuit of Lightness 67 Moon Todd 71(2) Strange Loops: Toward an Aesthetics for the Anthropocene 53 Gannon Anuradha Mathur, 70(1) Aqueous Terrain 49 Dilip da Cunha 71(2) Kiel Moe Magnificence: On the Appearance of the Baths of Caracalla 46 Marc J. 71(1) Production/Value 42 Neveu Joseph 71(1) Soft Futures: Mushrooms and Regenerative Design 41 Dahmen Mathew 71(1) A House Is Not a Car (Yet) 39 Aitchison 71(1) Kiel Moe Energy and Form in the Aftermath of Sustainability 39 * Article is free to view. ** Article is Open Access 4 Confidential

1.8. Top Institutions by Downloads 2017

Institutions Country No.

Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture (ACSA) USA 4,270

Woodbury University USA 1,433

Toros University Turkey 1,064

University of Sydney Australia 720

Zhejiang University China 460

University College London UK 379

University of Toronto Canada 375

Curtin University of Technology Australia 313

University of Michigan USA 300

University of New South Wales Australia 289 *Downloads from Consortia are not included.

5 Confidential

2. Citation Analysis

2.1. Mock Impact Factor

Number of citations in 2017 to 2015-2016 content = 5

Number of citable items counting towards the IF = 72

2017 Mock Impact Factor

0.069 Mock Ranking 95/96 in JCR Category Interdisciplinary Social Sciences

2.2. Top Cited Articles for Mock Impact Factor

Issue Author Title No. Batuman, Bulent; Encountering the Urban Crisis The Gezi Event and the Politics of 70(2) Baykan, Deniz 1 Urban Design Altay; Deniz, Evin Toward a Northern Architecture The Microrayon as Arctic 70(2) Jull, Matthew 1 Urban Prototype 70(1) Emily Baker Keswa: An Uncovering 1

70(1) Kees Lokman Dam[ned] Landscapes: Envisioning Fluid Geographies 1 Edward Architecture and Urban Form in Kuala Lumpur: Race and 70(1) 1 Denison Chinese Spaces in a Postcolonial City

2.3. Countries Citing Journal of Architectural Education

The top countries citing Journal of Architectural Education journal are as follows:

• USA (3 citations) • Canada (1 citation) • China (1 citation)

2.4. Journals Citing Journal of Architectural Education

• Design Journal (1 citation) • Journal of Architecture (1 citation) • Journal of Landscape Architecture (1 citation) • Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians (1 citation) • Polar Geography (1 citation)

6 Confidential

3. Altmetric

3.1. Top Altmetric Scores

An Altmetric score is a high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that an individual article has received. The score is based on relevant mentions from social media sites, newspapers, policy documents, blogs, Wikipedia, and many other sources.

The table below lists the top Altmetric-scoring articles in the last year:

Altmetric Score Article Title Author Issue

Building for “l'Authenticité”: Eugène Johan Lagae, Kim 68(2) Palumbo and the Architecture of De Raedt Mobutu's Congo

Slumming in Utopia: Protest Construction Lance Hosey 53(3) and the Iconography of Urban America

Highest and Best Use: Subjectivity and Fred Scharmen 71(2) Climates Off and After Earth

Who's Afraid of Ludwig Hilberseimer? Daniela Fabricius 67(1)

Emergency Preparedness Hub: Designing Miho Mazereeuw, Decentralized Systems for Disaster 71(1) Elizabeth Yarina Resilience

7 Confidential

4. Marketing 2018 Marketing Overview

Taylor & Francis has a proactive, customer-focused marketing strategy planned for Journal of Architectural Education. Our marketing teams are dedicated to helping you meet your objectives for the readership and public profile of your journals, while working with your society, to fulfill its mission.

Taylor & Francis promotes JAE across a variety of platforms including electronic marketing, social media, advertising, and conference display. We provide fully customer-focused journals marketing, with the teams dedicated to specific customer groups and key capabilities to support marketing programs:

• Societies & Editors • Authors & Researchers • Commercial & Corporate • Content & Communications • E-Marketing • Libraries & Institutions • Network Marketing

These dedicated global teams work collectively to understand your needs and provide tailored services to help JAE maximize its impact. We will work to ensure that we meet the following key objectives for JAE:

8 Confidential

These teams employ the following tactics to increase discoverability and usage:

Email Campaigns

Email campaigns reaching global audiences can be sent through multiple channels including key outside list vendors such as Clarivate Analytics. Clarivate Analytics generates email lists of Web of Science cited authors from related titles. The lists can be customized to include recipients from a specific country or region especially where the discipline might be seeing growth. We also market to our in-house list of authors, reviewers, book buyers and subscribers of related Taylor & Francis content. Messages are tested and analyzed to ensure favorable open and click-through rates.

We will continue to collaborate with JAE to design emails, as well as select featured content and review the target audience of each list selection (specific country requests, etc.)

Driving Readership

Once new articles appear in one of the journals, they are included in our usage email service – a weekly email that is sent to researchers within our network, and contains content based on their subject interest and access rights. These campaigns are designed to deliver reach, readership and potential citations as relevant articles are presented weekly to interested readers and the recipient doesn’t need to be signed up to the journal to learn about new articles, just registered with Taylor & Francis with an interest in the subject area. This way, we aim to send the right message to the right person at the right time, for every article. We launched this service in September and plan to report by journal, regularly to you during the year.

The right message to the right person at the right time.

eTOC Alerts

New Issue Alerts is a free email contents alerting service designed to deliver tables of contents for all JAE and available to everyone, and by doing so ensures that our contacts are sent relevant news, updates and services within our Mathematics & Statistics portfolio. To sign up, visit the journal homepages on www.tandfonline.com and click on the “New Content Alerts” button.

9 Confidential

Author Marketing Post Publication Author Marketing Once an author has published in an JAE journal, they will be sent an email on publication and at 6 and 12 months after the publication of their paper.

This is launched with the objective of providing published authors with a report on article readership and to encourage authors to share their article via social media to drive readership and citations.

There will be a call to action button to encourage authors to publish again in the journal and they will be redirected back to the journal’s ‘instructions for authors’ page to actively encourage re-submissions.

You’ve Been Cited!

We have recently launched a pilot campaign for 150 journals informing authors who have published in a T&F journal when they have been cited in another T&F journal. The email includes details of their article, where it has been cited and encourages them to share the research further.

The initial pilot used Web of Science data. Results are currently being drawn up and further datasets, such as Wizdom.ai, may be considered.

Article Collection Inclusion Message

When an article collection goes live on Taylor & Francis Online, all authors connected to that collection are sent an email linking them to this collection. It’s dynamically populated with their name, article and collection name. The proposition of the email is a congratulatory message about the article inclusion, plus a soft push towards sharing this news via social media.

We have four article collections planned as outlined in the Email Campaigns section above, so all authors whose articles feature in these collections will receive these congratulatory messages and will be encouraged to share the collection to their network.

10 Confidential

Submissions Marketing

Marketing will work closely with the editors to create submissions-based promotions targeted to each journal’s individual need.

Tactics can include, but are not limited to:

• Call for papers landing pages • Social media posts • Email campaigns • Cross-promotion with other relevant journals/subject areas

Marketing efforts will be monitored and assessed based on submissions. We would be happy to discuss with you any needs you have for submissions marketing during the year.

Social Media

JAE is promoted through regular posts, news updates, and features on Twitter and Facebook primarily through the accounts noted below. We will use social media to promote conferences and conference themes/sessions, key speakers, call for papers, call for editors, association news, engaging articles, award winning articles, and article collections. We will also collaborate and share posts with JAE to help generate usage, promote the journal, engage with the community, and share research.

Routledge, Taylor & Francis Media, Cultural, and Communication Studies Sites:

• Twitter (https://twitter.com/RoutLandscape): 1,931 followers • Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/RoutledgeConstruction/): 2,595 likes • We have recently launched a social media guide for editors which you can find here: http://editorresources.taylorandfrancisgroup.com/social-media-101/

Press Releases

Promoting journal articles with a press release can be a very effective way of increasing the impact of research, reaching a wider audience and securing significant exposure for the article and journal.

The Taylor & Francis Press & Media team drives media exposure for major discoveries in the field, topical research, and recommendations for changes in practices, as well

11 Confidential

as human-interest and novelty stories. If you think an article that is being published in your journal might be of interest to either the specialist or generalist press, please let us know by completing a Media Promotion Nomination Form for Journal Editors here: http://forms.tandfonline.com/feedback/press-nomination. IMPORTANT NOTE: Please only nominate an article after the peer review process has been completed and you have given or are about to give final acceptance to the article. The form will be submitted directly to the Taylor & Francis Media team who will assess suitability for arranging media promotion for the nominated article. You can view all our press releases here: http://newsroom.taylorandfrancisgroup.com.

We can also work with you to jointly issue press releases using both of our press contacts with a joint branding for Routledge, Taylor and Francis and the JAE.

Press Pass/Article Pass

Taylor & Francis Press Pass allows credentialed journalists full access to our full portfolio of 3,500,000+ articles. The pass allows access to a set number of articles (allowances) through Taylor & Francis Online. Each allowance can be applied to an article of your choice from across the site and will provide one month of free access to each article.

Cartoon Abstracts

In 2016, Taylor & Francis was awarded winner of the ALPSP Awards for Innovation in Publishing for our Cartoon Abstracts initiative. Each individual cartoon abstract summarizes the original authors’ work through illustration, harnessing the overwhelming power of images over text. Illustrations can aid the understanding of difficult concepts, broaden the appeal of niche topics, and transcend language barriers. Elements of humor, intrigue, and parody can be found throughout many of the cartoons, which further increases audience engagement.

View our current Cartoon Abstracts at http://explore.tandfonline.com/page/est/cartoon-abstracts. If you’d like to nominate your research for this, we can discuss what might be suitable.

12 Confidential

Conferences

JAE will be represented at various appropriate Architecture, Design and Built Environment conferences globally in 2018 and going forward. We will be working closely with you to launch the partnership between Routledge, Taylor & Francis and JAE, to attract new authors and members, and to engage with delegates in order to build our network further. If you have suggestions or would like JAE present at relevant events throughout the year, please do reach out to us.

Working with our Editors and Editorial Boards We appreciate and value the input of our Societies, Editors and Editorial Boards in the process of marketing our journals. You can always help in the following ways: • Taylor & Francis Author Services Site: http://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/. On this website, you’ll find information that will guide you through the entire journal publishing process. • Taylor & Francis Editor Resources Site: http://editorresources.taylorandfrancisgroup.com/. News and ideas from the journal publishing front line. • Reading lists: Add your article or the journal to your students’ reading lists as essential reading. • Department website or personal webpage: Use your staff profile entry on your department website, or your personal webpage, to add information about your article and link directly to the online version. • Twitter and Facebook: Place an announcement on your Twitter or Facebook page highlighting the publication of your article with a link to direct people to the online version. Authors are increasingly promoting their content via Twitter and Facebook so it can be picked up by other researchers and practitioners. • LinkedIn: Create a LinkedIn profile that summarizes your professional expertise and accomplishments and mention your articles. LinkedIn is an interconnected network of experienced professionals from around the world with over 55 million members. • Discussion lists: Post a short message to any discussion lists you are a member of, letting people know that the journal’s latest issue, which includes your article, is now available. The easiest way to do this is to register for the table of contents alert for the journal so you can forward the email once you have received it. • Blogs: If you blog, don’t forget to inform other users about your article. • Library recommendation: Check if your institution has a subscription to the journal. If not, recommend it for the next subscription year.

Publishing Partnership Program This new initiative aims to keep you in the loop with the metrics that matter the most to you. By signing up, you’ll receive regular, personalized updates that may include usage, citations, social media, Altmetrics and press coverage data for your journal. As well as this personalization, we’ll keep you updated on T&F initiatives, opportunities to get involved with our schemes such as Summits, webinars, editor and author resources and community and industry news. This service is currently in pilot, and we welcome you to take part in this program.

13 Confidential

Sign up at: http://pages.email.taylorandfrancis.com/publishing-partner-program

Raising your profile

The Hive of Knowledge

To demonstrate the benefits of learned society membership to our readers, we launched the Hive of Knowledge campaign in October of 2017. The aim of this campaign is to showcase the work done by our partner societies and institutes in supporting researchers throughout their careers.

It is primarily targeted at researchers at all stages, to encourage them to become members of relevant learned societies. A number of our society partners are featured in the campaign, contributing posts on how their society supports members at various stages of their careers.

To view The Hive of Knowledge Campaign visit: http://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/celebrating-our-partnerships

14 Confidential

5. Production Schedules Production schedules for JAE for 2018 and 2017, respectively, are as follows:

Volume-Issue Online Publication Date Print Publication Date 72-02 19 September, 2018 9 October, 2018 72-01 12 March, 2018 9 March, 2018

Volume-Issue Online Publication Date Print Publication Date 71-02 28 November, 2017 20 November, 2017 71-01 12 April, 2017 16 March, 2017

15 Confidential

6. Submissions & Peer Review

6.1. Submission Trends

Original submissions received by year: 200 187 188 150

125 100 116 90

50 NumberofSubmissions 0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

6.2. Geography of Submissions

Top submitting countries ordered by 2017 submissions: 100 2014 2015 2016 2017

80

60

40

20 Numbersubmissions of

0 United Canada Spain Australia UK Iran, Islamic Italy China Hong Kong India States Republic of

6.3. Time from Submission to Decision in 2017

120 All Papers Accepted Only 100 80 60 40 20

Number of Final NumberofFinal Decisions 0

Submission to First Decision (Days)

16 Confidential

7. Resources

Guidance and support on a range of topics. Keep up to date with the latest developments through visiting the website. http://editorresources.taylorandfrancisgroup.com/

Twitter: @TandFEditors

Support, updates, tips and talking points from Taylor & Francis’ Author Services and Editor Resources websites straight to your inbox. Sign up at: http://tandf.msgfocus.com/k/Tandf/insights

News, support and guidance for researchers publishing in Taylor & Francis and Routledge journals. http://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com

Support and news for Librarians can be found at www.tandf.co.uk/libsite.

8. Open Access

Open Access (OA) means making content permanently freely available online to read. Further information can be found at the following links: http://editorresources.taylorandfrancisgroup.com/open-access-for-editors/ http://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/publishing-open-access-with-taylor-francis/

To sign up to our Open Access Bulletin, visit: http://eupdates.msgfocus.com/k/Tandf-Eupdates/openaccess

9. Development Initiatives

Taylor & Francis Group is committed to the widest distribution of its journals to non-profit institutions in developing countries.

Further information can be found at: http://taylorandfrancis.com/about/corporate-responsibility/development-initiatives

17 Confidential

Our Team

Editorial

Publisher Jonathan Manley [email protected]

Managing Editor Emma Sanders [email protected] Production Production Editor Anita Michel [email protected] Editorial System Coordinator Joanna Czerepowicz [email protected]

18 Confidential