DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Record of Decision

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Record of Decision United States USDA Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Region DRAFT RECORD OF DECISION Long Term Special Use Authorization for the Wyoming Game and Fish Commission to Use National Forest System Land for their Winter Elk Management Activities at Alkali Creek Feedground January 23, 2015 Responsible Official Kathryn J. Conant Acting Forest Supervisor ; USDA Forest Service ;-‘ Bridger-Teton National Forest Jackson Ranger District nq air Teton County, Wyoming r1 1/; A:’ :ri Section 23, T42N, RII3W, 6th PM. ITO rvi1:ç £L!: - ,!jt’_i1 ,.! — __/ --- -, 7I-’ — _ Kathryn J. Conant Date Acting Forest Supervisor Record ofDecision Winter Elk Management Activities Supplement to the EJS Background On July 15, 2008, the Forest Supervisor of the Bridger-Teton National Forest issued a Final Environmental Impact Statement (hereafter 2008 EIS) and signed a Record of Decision (ROD) concerning a Long Term Special Use Authorization for the Wyoming Game and Fish Commission (hereinafter “the Commission”) to use National Forest System land for their winter elk management activities. The 2008 EIS included analysis related to six existing feedgrounds and two new areas adjacent to a feedground on land owned by the Commission. In the 2008 ROD, the Forest Supervisor decided to authorize use of five of the existing feedgrounds but postponed the decision concerning authorization for Alkali Creek Feedground to allow for additional analysis. The Forest Supervisor directed the Jackson District Ranger to survey the Gros Ventre Wilderness boundary adjacent to this feedground and to cooperate with the Commission to perform a more detailed survey of vegetative effects inside the wilderness. This draft Record of Decision displays the draft decision for the Alkali Creek Feedground. A Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (hereafter 2015 Final SETS), documenting the additional analysis performed for the Alkali Creek Feedground is being issued together with this draft ROD. The FSEIS can be found at http://www,fs.usda.gov/goto/btni7projects. Supplemental feeding of elk (Cervus elaphus) has been conducted in northwestern Wyoming since the early 1900s. The initiation of providing supplemental feed to elk was in response to large-scale winter die-offs, which were due in part to the loss of migration routes to suitable winter range and the direct loss of winter range due to rural development and fencing (Taylor 2001). Emergency feeding was documented as early as 1907 when a Pinedale game warden provided feed for 200 snowbound elk on Willow Creek; the Supervisor of the Teton National Forest secured funds to purchase the hay (Sheldon 1927; Brown 1947). A 1939 Wyoming statute designates the Commission’ liable for damages caused by big game animals. Many feedgrounds were established in the 1 940s and 1 950s to prevent elk from entering private lands and damaging stored crops. They have become an effective tool in reducing damage to haystack yards and winter pastures on private lands, and in reducing potential for transmission of brucellosis to livestock (Wyoming Game and Fish (WGFD) 2004). Elk feeding sites have been strategically placed on and near National Forest System lands with the intent of preventing elk migration through private lands that are located in historic big game winter ranges. Alkali Creek Feedground is situated such that it is critical for holding elk in the Gros Ventre River drainage that otherwise would end up overwintering on adjoining private agricultural lands or the National Elk Refuge. The U.S. Department of the Interior’s 2007 Bison and Elk Management Plan for Grand Teton National Park and the National Elk Refuge sets an objective for having about 5,000 elk on feed on the National Elk Refuge, which at current herd populations cannot be met if substantial numbers of elk leave the Gros Ventre drainage. The Commission’s supplemental elk feeding activities occur during the winter months at 21 feedgrounds and one staging area. Attachment 1 displays a map of the 21 Commission managed feedgrounds, the staging area (North Piney) and the National Elk Refuge. Eight of the 21 feedgrounds are on National Forest System lands: Alkali Creek, Dell Creek, Dog Creek, Fall A note on terminology: The Wyoming Game and Fish Commission is the policy making board of the Wyoming Game and Fish Department (WGFD) and is responsible for the direction and supervison of the Director of WGFD. The Commission, through efforts of WGFD provides a system of control, propagation, management, protection, and regulation of all wildlfe in Wyoming. Thus, the Commission is the entity that is currently authorized to use and occupy National Forest System land for feedground use on the Bridger-Teton National Forest, while WGFD is the State agency that implements the Commission’s management direction, including the acts of feeding, vaccinating and testing elk at feedgrounds. 1 Record ofDecision Winter Elk Management Activities Supplement to the EIS Creek, Fish Creek, Forest Park, Muddy Creek, and Upper Green River. Forest Service regulations require authorization for use and occupancy of National Forest System lands. The feedground that is the subject of this decision is located near Alkali Creek on the Jackson Ranger District, see Attachment 2. Alkali Creek Feedground is located within the Gros Ventre drainage northeast of the Town of Jackson within the Jackson Elk Herd Unit along with two other feedgrounds at Patrol Cabin and Fish Creek. The first special use permit for feeding in this area was issued to the Commission in 1947 for use of one acre of land east of the current Alkali Creek Feedground to construct and maintain a hay shed. Daily feeding at Alkali Creek, Patrol Cabin, and Fish Creek Feedgrounds started in the mid 1960’s (WGFD 2007). Alkali Creek Feedground was moved to its current location in 1976. Facilities and feeding areas at Alkali Creek and Fish Creek feedgrounds are located on National Forest System lands. Patrol Cabin Feedground is operated on land owned by the Wyoming Fish and Game Commission. Historically these feedgrounds were operated relatively independently of each other with little interchange of elk among the three feedgrounds. Feeding at Alkali Creek, Fish Creek, and Patrol Cabin prior to 1998 saw an average of 497, 764, and 490 elk at each feedground respectively. The average length of feeding was 98 days at Alkali and Fish Creek and 89 days at Patrol Cabin. Since that time, wolf activity has influenced elk distribution in the Gros Ventre, resulting in elk aggregating into one large group of up to 2,845 animals. These elk now have a propensity to congregate on one feedground, and move to another feedground in the drainage in response to wolf pressure. It should be noted though, that some groups of elk persist on native winter range in the Gros Ventre independent of the feeding operations. Decision and Reasons for the Decision Decision I am selecting Alternative 2 as described on pages 14 to 16 of the 2015 Final SETS with the addition of required design feature 8. I am deciding to authorize the use of 91 acres of National Forest System land for the Commission elk management activities at Alkali Creek Feedground. Specifically, the WGFD, at the behest of the Commission, will maintain and operate one elk tagging corral, one horse corral, one tack shed, one haystack yard containing two hay sheds, spring and trough developments including protective fencing and piping, and a feeding ground associated with their ongoing winter elk management program. My decision means that the existing special use authorization issued to the Commission for use Of National Forest System land for elk management activities at Dog Creek, Fall Creek, Fish Creek, Muddy Creek and Upper Green River Feedgrounds will be amended to add authorization for use at Alkali Creek Feedground. Attachment 2 displays the location and boundary of Alkali Creek Feedground. Required design features and monitoring that are part of my decision include: 1) Any hay or straw used in association with this permit will be certified and tagged as noxious weed or noxious weed seed free (Orders #04-00-056, and #02-96-02). The WGFD will use certified weed free hay to minimize the potential introduction of noxious weeds. The operation will comply with county ordinance where applicable. 2 Record ofDecision Winter Elk Management Activities Supplement to the EIS 2) The WGFD will be responsible for monitoring and treating of noxious and invasive weeds within the permit area. Monitoring will occur annually. 3) In areas adjacent to the permitted area, WGFD will treat cheat grass invasions with integrated pest management techniques and reseed areas with native grass adjacent to the feedground where cheat grass is prevalent. Monitoring will occur annually. 4) Forest Service monitoring of soil disturbance class and percent detrimental soil disturbance will occur about every five years. 5) Feeding is not authorized to take place on the mapped wetland areas or within 100 feet of the outer edge of the wetlands and the channel that connects them. The WGFD will monitor the condition of the aquatic resources and vegetative conditions within the 100- foot buffer area approximately every five years, using monitoring protocols approved by the U.S. Forest Service. If the desired conditions are not achieved, additional measures will be considered and conducted consistent with requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act. 6) Feeding operations will be conducted over 18 inches of snow or frozen ground as
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National
    Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge Prepared for the US Fish and Wildlife Service National Elk Refuge By Walter Fertig Wyoming Natural Diversity Database The Nature Conservancy 1604 Grand Avenue Laramie, WY 82070 February 28, 1998 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following individuals for their assistance with this project: Jim Ozenberger, ecologist with the Jackson Ranger District of Bridger-Teton National Forest, for guiding me in his canoe on Flat Creek and for providing aerial photographs and lodging; Jennifer Whipple, Yellowstone National Park botanist, for field assistance and help with field identification of rare Carex species; Dr. David Cooper of Colorado State University, for sharing field information from his 1994 studies; Dr. Ron Hartman and Ernie Nelson of the Rocky Mountain Herbarium, for providing access to unmounted collections by Michele Potkin and others from the National Elk Refuge; Dr. Anton Reznicek of the University of Michigan, for confirming the identification of several problematic Carex specimens; Dr. Robert Dorn for confirming the identification of several vegetative Salix specimens; and lastly Bruce Smith and the staff of the National Elk Refuge for providing funding and logistical support and for allowing me free rein to roam the refuge for plants. 2 Table of Contents Page Introduction . 6 Study Area . 6 Methods . 8 Results . 10 Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge . 10 Plant Species of Special Concern . 10 Species Summaries . 23 Aster borealis . 24 Astragalus terminalis . 26 Carex buxbaumii . 28 Carex parryana var. parryana . 30 Carex sartwellii . 32 Carex scirpoidea var. scirpiformis .
    [Show full text]
  • Techniques for Estimating Coyote Abundance
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Symposium Proceedings—Coyotes in the Southwest: A Compendium of Our Knowledge Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center (1995) for April 1995 TECHNIQUES FOR ESTIMATING COYOTE ABUNDANCE Scott E. Henke Texas A&M University- Kingsville, Kingsville, TX Fred F. Knowlton USDA-APHIS Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/coyotesw Part of the Environmental Health and Protection Commons Henke, Scott E. and Knowlton, Fred F., "TECHNIQUES FOR ESTIMATING COYOTE ABUNDANCE" (1995). Symposium Proceedings—Coyotes in the Southwest: A Compendium of Our Knowledge (1995). 28. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/coyotesw/28 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Symposium Proceedings—Coyotes in the Southwest: A Compendium of Our Knowledge (1995) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. TECHNIQUES FOR ESTIMATING COYOTE ABUNDANCE SCOTT E. HENKE, Caesar Kleberg Wlldlife Research Institute, Campus Box 2 18, Texas A&M University- Kingsvllle, Kingsville, TX 78363 FRED F. KNOWLTON, USDA-APHIS Denver Wildlife Research Center, Utah State Univers~ty,Logan, Utah 84322-5295 Absirad Knowledge of coyote abundance is needed to make intelligent management decisions Several methods have been devised to ennumerate coyote (Canis latrans) population size. We review several techniques and attempt to identify biases associated with each method. Once biases are understood, recommendations can be made to minimize theu impact on data collection processes and yield better estimates of coyote population trends. Enumerat~onof population status (i e ,denslty, Methods used to estimate coyote population trends) is impostant in research and management of slze, dens~ty,and relative abundance have included wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 - JCR Evaluation Form
    2017 - JCR Evaluation Form SPECIES: Elk PERIOD: 6/1/2017 - 5/31/2018 HERD: EL101 - TARGHEE HUNT AREAS: 73 PREPARED BY: ALYSON COURTEMANCH 2012 - 2016 Average 2017 2018 Proposed Hunter Satisfaction Percent 62% 84% 85% Landowner Satisfaction NA NA NA Percent Harvest: 26 53 60 Hunters: 101 124 150 Hunter Success: 26% 43% 40% Active Licenses: 101 131 150 Active License Success: 26% 40% 40% Recreation Days: 561 964 500 Days Per Animal: 21.6 18.2 8.3 Males per 100 Females: 0 0 Juveniles per 100 Females 0 0 Satisfaction Based Objective 60% Management Strategy: Recreational Percent population is above (+) or (-) objective: N/A% Number of years population has been + or - objective in recent trend: NA 2018 HUNTING SEASONS TARGHEE ELK HERD (EL101) Hunt Season Dates Type Quota License Limitations Area Opens Closes 73 Sep. 20 Oct. 25 General Antlered elk, spikes excluded 6 Aug. 15 Jan. 31 25 Limited Cow or calf valid on private quota land Archery Sep. 1 Sep.19 Refer to Section 3 of this Chapter Management Evaluation Current Hunter/Landowner Satisfaction Management Objective: Primary Objective: Achieve a 3-year average of ≥ 60% of hunters indicating they are “satisfied” or “very satisfied” on the harvest survey. Secondary Objective: Achieve a 3-year average of ≥ 25% harvest success. Management Strategy: Recreational 2017 Hunter Satisfaction Estimate: 84% 2017 Hunter Success: 43% Most Recent 3-Year Running Average Hunter Satisfaction Estimate: 69% Most Recent 3-Year Running Average Hunter Success: 31% The Wyoming Game and Fish Department (WGFD) proposed changing the objective for the Targhee Elk Herd from a postseason population objective to a hunter satisfaction objective in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Close Cache Creek for Cougars Records Show Game Tain Lions Using the Area,” Fuchs Con- Tinued
    Black JACKSON HOLE NEWS&GUIDE, Wednesday, February 22, 2012 - 9A Residents: Close Cache Creek for cougars Records show Game tain lions using the area,” Fuchs con- tinued. “On Thursday night, however, and Fish inundated the family group returned and killed with comments after another deer. At that point the prop- erty owner asked if there was more cat family was captured. that we could do to haze her and the siblings from their property.” By Cory Hatch In the email, Fuchs expressed a de- sire to keep the family group intact. Some Jackson Hole residents said “It is our hope that we will be able they would rather close Cache Creek to capture at least the female quick- temporarily than see a cougar fam- ly,” he said. “If so, we will attempt to ily relocated from its home in the tree and immobilize the kittens if we drainage. cannot capture them in the box traps. Over several weeks, wildlife man- COURTESY PHOTO Anything that is captured will be held agers captured a female cougar and The Wyoming Game and Fish Department officials received hundreds of pages in a bear trap in our shop so as not to her three kittens after they repeatedly of comments from people asking them to return a female cougar and her break up the group. However, we can- killed deer near private homes near kittens to the Cache Creek drainage. Wildlife managers captured the cats and not hold them for long, so we will have relocated them south of Lander after they killed deer on private property.
    [Show full text]
  • National Park Service U.S
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science DOI Bison Report Looking Forward Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/BRMD/NRR—2014/821 ON THE COVER Bison bull at southeastern Utah's Henry Mountains Photograph by Utah Division of Wildlife Resources DOI Bison Report Looking Forward Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/BRMD/NRR—2014/821 Prepared by the Department of the Interior Bison Leadership Team and Working Group National Park Service Biological Resource Management Division 1201 Oakridge Drive, Suite 200 Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 June 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Sustainable Management Policy for the National Elk Refuge, Wyoming Tim W
    Yale University EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Bulletin Series 2000 Developing Sustainable Management Policy for the National Elk Refuge, Wyoming Tim W. Clark Denise Casey Anders Halverson Follow this and additional works at: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/yale_fes_bulletin Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons, and the Forest Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Clark, Tim W.; Casey, Denise; and Halverson, Anders, "Developing Sustainable Management Policy for the National Elk Refuge, Wyoming" (2000). Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Bulletin Series. 97. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/yale_fes_bulletin/97 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Forestry and Environmental Studies at EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. It has been accepted for inclusion in Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Bulletin Series by an authorized administrator of EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bulletin Series Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Developing Sustainable Management Policy for the National Elk Refuge, Wyoming TIM W. CLARK, DENISE CASEY, AND ANDERS HALVERSON, VOLUME EDITORS JANE COPPOCK, BULLETIN SERIES EDITOR Yale University New Haven, C o n n e c t i c u t • 2000 This volume was published as a cooperative effort of the Northern Rockies Conservation Cooperative of Jackson, Wyoming, the Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, and many other organiza­ tions and people. The Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Bulletin Series, begun in 1912, publishes student and faculty monographs, symposia, workshop proceedings, and other reports of envi­ ronmental interest.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 National Elk Refuge
    U.S.U.S. Fish Fish & Wildlife& Wildlife Service Service National Elk Refuge National Elk Refuge Elk Hunting Information and Regulations 1. Who manages hunting on the National 4. What Refuge-specific laws regulate Transportation activities prohibited on Elk Refuge? hunting on the Refuge? the Refuge: Hunting on the National Elk Refuge In addition to all Federal and WGFD ■ Driving off designated roads. (NER, Refuge) is managed through requirements, the following Refuge ■ Stopping or unloading hunters along a cooperative effort between the specific regulations are enforced. Refuge roads. NER, Grand Teton National Park, and Hunters must be knowledgeable of ■ Parking outside of designated hunt Wyoming Game & Fish Department all regulations prior to hunting as parking lots. (WGFD), with the goal of achieving violations may result in forfeiture optimum herd size. The NER posts of the animal, criminal penalties, ■ Overnight camping or parking. information and updates related to the and permit revocation. ■ Using bicycles off designated roads Refuge and Refuge hunting programs Hunting activities prohibited on the NER: ■ ATVs are allowed on public roads on its website: ■ Intentional herding or harassment but must be registered, insured, and www.fws.gov/refuge/national_elk_refuge of wildlife. operated by a licensed driver. ATVs and snowmobiles are not allowed on Refuge 2. What must I have while hunting elk ■ Discharging firearms other than for retrieval roads. on the Refuge? lawful hunting (i.e. target shooting and ■ ■ NER permit for elk hunting and WGFD sighting in). Horses used for hunting are restricted to the Any Weapon Area and new elk hunting license ■ Indiscriminant shooting, shooting Archery Area north of Flat Creek ■ Note: The applicant must possess a full multiple times into a running herd, (including West Hunt Lot) as depicted price license to apply for the Any Elk or injuring multiple animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Outreach Announcement
    Outreach - GS-0462-10 Supervisory Forestry Technician (Airbase/Short-haul Base Manager) Bridger-Teton National Forest (BTNF)/Grand Teton National Park (GTNP) In Jackson, Wyoming The Announcement Numbers for this position will be forthcoming in a subsequent announcement. Duty Location for this position will be Jackson, Wyoming Government housing may be available. The North Zone of the Bridger-Teton National Forest is planning to fill an Airbase/Short- haul Base Manager position in the near future. Outreach responses are expected by October 23, 2015 and the application deadline will be November 01, 2015. The referral lists will be requested on November 01, 2015. This is a permanent position, GS-0462-10, the position will be based at the Jackson Airport where the Teton Helibase is located; tour of duty will be PFT and employment will be through the Bridger-Teton Forest. Anyone interested in further information should e-mail Steve Markason, North Zone FMO, at [email protected], 307-739-5431. To apply and for more information go to: https://www.usajobs.gov THE POSITION The program is interagency in its composition and mission. In addition to suppression, the program provides search and rescue, fire use, aerial ignition, and project services directly to the BTNF and GTNP. Search and rescue missions also occur in support of area county Sheriffs Offices. Personnel and aircraft are regularly dispatched off-area when not required by local staffing requirements. The Teton Helitack program successfully implemented the Forest Service Short Haul program in 2015. The position serves as the Airbase/Shorthaul Manager supervising with a GS-09 Helitack Supervisor for a 20 person, two helicopter program located at the Teton Interagency Helibase.
    [Show full text]
  • Septicemic Pasteurellosis in Elk (Cervus Elaphus) on the United States National Elk Refuge, Wyoming
    Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 24(4), 1988, pp. 715-717 Septicemic Pasteurellosis in Elk (Cervus elaphus) on the United States National Elk Refuge, Wyoming J. Christian Franson and Bruce L. Smith,2 1 National Wildlife Health Research Center, 6006 Schroeder Road, Madison, Wisconsin 53711, USA; 2 National Elk Refuge, P.O. Box C, Jackson, Wyoming 83001, USA ABSTRACT: Septicemic pasteurellosis caused by bison that died in 1922. A 2-yr-old female Pasteurella multocida is believed responsible elk died of septicemic pasteurellosis in for the deaths of 48 elk (Cervus elaphus) on the National Elk Refuge near Jackson, Wyoming Carbon County, Wyoming in 1960 and (USA) during 1986 and 1987. Clinical signs in- several cases have been reported from cluded depression and salivation; necropsy find- pronghorn antelope (Antilocapra anleri- ings included congestion and petechial and cana) elsewhere in Wyoming (Thorne, ecchymotic hemorrhages in lymph nodes, dia- 1982). Murie (1951) indicated that P. mul- phragm, lungs and endocardium. Pasteurella tocida was isolated from one elk in the multocida was isolated from femur marrow of eight carcasses and a variety of tissues from eight Jackson Hole herd, but it is unclear wheth- others. er the animal died of septicemic pasteu- Key words: Septicemic pasteurellosis, Pas- rellosis. We report here septicemic pasteu- ten rella multocida, elk, Cervus elaphus nelsoni, rellosis in elk on the National Elk Refuge National Elk Refuge, epizootic, case history near Jackson, Wyoming in 1986 and 1987. study. During the winter of 1985-1986, 120 Septicemic pasteurellosis is an acute dis- elk mortalities (36 adult bulls, four spike ease of wild and domestic ruminants caused bulls, 45 cows and 35 calves) were recorded by Pasteurella multocida.
    [Show full text]
  • National Wildlife Refuge System
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Refuge Centennial Collection U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service National Conservation Our National Wildlife Refuge System celebrates its Training Center centennial year in 2003 - a century of conservation in Route 1, Box 166 National Wildlife behalf of fish and wildlife ... and the American people. Shepherdstown, WV 25443 Enjoy America's National Wildlife Refuge System, as www.fws.gov we enter our second century! Image Library: 304/876 7675 Refuge System Centennial Panorama Cover photograph of National Elk Refuge by Karen Hollingsworth 0402 ~~>~- System Requirements Refuge Centennial Collection Windows Window 3.1 or later, including Windows 95, Introduction This "Refuge Centennial Collection" presents Windows 98 and Windows NT. 150 of our most outstanding images 8 MB RAM and 20 MB free hard disc space. representing the beauty and diversity of the 256 color display+ National Wildlife Refuge System in this dual 8X CD ROM drive recommended. CD ROM set. From the cypress swamps of Okefenokee to the windswept bird islands of Macintosh System 7.6 or later Alaska Maritime, your national wildlife 10 MB RAM refuges are portrayed in all of their colorful and dynamic profusion ... 100 years after Instructions President Theodore Roosevelt created For Windows Users Insert CD disc in CD ROM drive. Click MY America's first refuge - Florida's tiny COMPUTER on desktop. Choose CD ROM Pelican Island. drive letter. Click CENTENNIAL icon for files. Each public domain image is available in jpg, For Macintosh Users Insert CD disc in CD ROM drive. The icon in multi-resolution file formats (low- CENTENNIAL will appear on your desktop.
    [Show full text]
  • Fens and Their Rare Plants in the Beartooth Mountains, Shoshone National Forest, Wyoming
    United States Department of Agriculture Fens and Their Rare Plants in the Beartooth Mountains, Shoshone National Forest, Wyoming Bonnie Heidel, Walter Fertig, Sabine Mellmann-Brown, Kent E. Houston, and Kathleen A. Dwire Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Report Service Research Station RMRS-GTR-369 November 2017 Heidel, Bonnie; Fertig, Walter; Mellmann-Brown, Sabine; Houston, Kent E.; Dwire, Kathleen A. 2017. Fens and their rare plants in the Beartooth Mountains, Shoshone National Forest, Wyoming. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-369. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 110 p. Abstract Fens are common wetlands in the Beartooth Mountains on the Shoshone National Forest, Clarks Fork Ranger District, in Park County, Wyoming. Fens harbor plant species found in no other habitats, and some rare plants occurring in Beartooth fens are found nowhere else in Wyoming. This report summarizes the studies on Beartooth fens from 1962 to 2009, which have contributed to current knowledge of rare plant distributions and biodiversity conservation. The study area is the Wyoming portion of the Beartooth Mountains in the Middle Rocky Mountains. Here, we profile 18 fens that occur over the range of elevations, settings, geomorphic landforms, and vegetation. The wetland flora from these 18 fens is composed of 58 families, 156 genera, and 336 vascular plant species—more than 10 percent of the known Wyoming flora. We discuss 32 rare vascular plant species and 1 bryophyte species associated with Beartooth fens and their State and regional significance. Protection and management of Beartooth fens are addressed in guidance documents prepared by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Planner Shoshone National Forest 808 Meadow Lane Avenue Cody, WY 82414
    Responsible official Daniel J. Jirón Regional Forester Rocky Mountain Region 740 Simms Street Golden, CO 80401 For more information Joseph G. Alexander Forest supervisor Shoshone National Forest 808 Meadow Lane Avenue Cody, WY 82414 Olga G. Troxel Acting Forest Planner Shoshone National Forest 808 Meadow Lane Avenue Cody, WY 82414 Telephone: 307.527.6241 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Table of Contents Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Terms used in this document ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]