DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Environmental Assessment for Pronghorn and White-Tailed Deer Hunting on the National Elk Refuge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Environmental Assessment for Pronghorn and White-Tailed Deer Hunting on the National Elk Refuge Draft Environmental Assessment for Pronghorn and White-Tailed Deer Hunting on the National Elk Refuge April 2021 Prepared By Frank Durbian, Project Leader National Elk Refuge 675 East Broadway, Jackson, WY 83001 307-201-5409 Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 3 Proposed Action .......................................................................................................... 3 Background ................................................................................................................. 3 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action ................................................................ 4 Alternatives ......................................................................................................................... 5 Alternatives Considered .............................................................................................. 5 Alternative A – Open Hunting Opportunities for Pronghorn and White-Tailed Deer – Proposed Action Alternative ................................................................................................... 5 Alternative B – Current Conditions – No Action Alternative ................................................ 7 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ............................................ 7 Monitoring ................................................................................................................ 29 Summary of Analysis ................................................................................................. 29 Alternative A – Pronghorn and White-Tailed Deer Hunting (Proposed Action Alternative) ............................................................................................................................................... 29 Alternative B – Current Management Strategy (No Action Alternative) ............................. 29 List of Sources, Agencies and Persons Consulted ...................................................... 30 List of Preparers ........................................................................................................ 30 State Coordination .................................................................................................... 30 Tribal Consultation .................................................................................................... 30 Public Outreach ......................................................................................................... 30 Determination ........................................................................................................... 31 Signatures ................................................................................................................. 31 References ......................................................................................................................... 32 1 List of Figures Figure 1. National Elk Refuge Boundary and Roads. ................................................................... 34 Figure 2. Map of the National Elk Refuge Proposed Pronghorn Hunting Units, Including Refuge Hunt Unit 6 and Refuge Hunt Unit 8. ........................................................................................... 35 Figure 3. Map of the National Elk Refuge Proposed White-tailed Deer Hunting Units, Including Hunting Unit 6. ............................................................................................................................. 36 List of Tables Table 1. Potential for Adverse Impacts from Proposed Action and Alternatives ........................... 8 Table 2. Affected Natural Resources and Anticipated Direct and Indirect Impacts of the Proposed Action and Any Alternatives. ......................................................................................................... 9 Table 3. Affected Visitor Use and Experience and Anticipated Direct and Indirect Impacts of the Proposed Action and Any Alternatives......................................................................................... 24 Table 4. Affected Refuge Management and Operations and Anticipated Direct and Indirect Impacts of the Proposed Action and Any Alternatives. ................................................................ 26 Table 5. Affected Socioeconomics and Anticipated Direct and Indirect Impacts of the Proposed Action and Any Alternatives. ....................................................................................................... 28 Appendices Other Applicable Statutes, Executive Orders, and Regulations ...........................33 Maps of the National Elk Refuge and Proposed Action ......................................34 2 Draft Environmental Assessment for Pronghorn and White-Tailed Deer Hunting on the National Elk Refuge Date: April 2021 This environmental assessment (EA) is being prepared to evaluate the effects associated with this proposed action and to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in accordance with Council on Environmental Quality regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 1500-1508), Department of the Interior (43 CFR 46; 516 DM 8), and United States (U.S.) Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) (550 FW 3) regulations and policies. NEPA requires examination of the effects of proposed actions on the natural and human environment. Introduction Proposed Action The Service is proposing to open the National Elk Refuge (NER or refuge) to pronghorn and white-tailed deer hunting in accordance with the refuge’s Draft Pronghorn and White-Tailed Deer Hunting Plan (USFWS 2021), and Wyoming Game and Fish Department’s (WGFD) hunting regulations. The details regarding the refuge’s proposed hunt locations, policies, and procedures are all available for review in the hunting plan. The proposed action may evolve during the NEPA process, as the agency refines its proposal and gathers feedback from the public, tribes, and other agencies. Therefore, the final proposed action may be different from the original. The proposed action will be finalized at the conclusion of the public comment period for the draft EA. Background National wildlife refuges are guided by the mission and goals of the National Wildlife Refuge System (Refuge System), the purposes of an individual refuge, Service policy, and laws and international treaties. Relevant guidance includes the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (NWRSAA), as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (Improvement Act) (16 U.S. Code 668dd et seq.), Refuge Recreation Act of 1962, and selected portions of the Code of Federal Regulations and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Manual. The refuge was established in 1912 as a “winter game (elk) reserve” pursuant to 37 Stat 293, 16 U.S. Code 673. In the following year, Congress designated the area as “a winter elk refuge” (37 Stat 847). In 1921, all lands included in the refuge or that might be added in the future were reserved and set apart as “refuges and breeding grounds for birds” (Executive Order 3596), which was affirmed in 1922 (Executive Order 3741). In 1927, the refuge was expanded to provide “for the grazing of, and as a refuge for, American Elk and other big game animals” (44 Stat 1246, U.S. Code 673a). 3 The mission of the Refuge System, as outlined by the NWRSAA, as amended by the Improvement Act (16 U.S. Code 668dd et seq.), is: “. to administer a national network of lands and waters for the conservation, management and, where appropriate, restoration of the fish, wildlife, and plant resources and their habitats within the United States for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans.” The NWRSAA mandates the Secretary of the Interior in administering the Refuge System (16 U.S. Code 668dd[a][4]) to: • provide for the conservation of fish, wildlife, and plants, and their habitats within the Refuge System; • ensure that the biological integrity, diversity, and environmental health of the Refuge System are maintained for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans; • ensure that the mission of the Refuge System described at 16 U.S. Code 668dd(a)(2) and the purposes of each refuge are carried out; • ensure effective coordination, interaction, and cooperation with owners of land adjoining refuges and the fish and wildlife agency of the states in which the units of the Refuge System are located; • assist in the maintenance of adequate water quantity and water quality to fulfill the mission of the Refuge System and the purposes of each refuge; • recognize compatible wildlife-dependent recreational uses as the priority general public uses of the Refuge System through which the American public can develop an appreciation for fish and wildlife; • ensure that opportunities are provided within the Refuge System for compatible wildlife- dependent recreational uses; and • monitor the status and trends of fish, wildlife, and plants in each refuge. In accordance with the comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) for the refuge (USFWS 2015), the National Elk Refuge currently allows elk and bison hunting as wildlife-dependent recreational uses and population control measures for the Jackson elk and bison herds. Approximately 98% of the refuge is open to hunting for these species. The remaining 2% is closed to hunting due to employee and public safety reasons. Big game hunting in the Jackson, Wyoming, area is a longstanding tradition and has strong
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020-2021 Arizona Hunting Regulations
    Arizona Game and Fish Department 2020-2021 Arizona Hunting Regulations This publication includes the annual regulations for statewide hunting of deer, fall turkey, fall javelina, bighorn sheep, fall bison, fall bear, mountain lion, small game and other huntable wildlife. The hunt permit application deadline is Tuesday, June 9, 2020, at 11:59 p.m. Arizona time. Purchase Arizona hunting licenses and apply for the draw online at azgfd.gov. Report wildlife violations, call: 800-352-0700 Two other annual hunt draw booklets are published for the spring big game hunts and elk and pronghorn hunts. i Unforgettable Adventures. Feel-Good Savings. Heed the call of adventure with great insurance coverage. 15 minutes could save you 15% or more on motorcycle insurance. geico.com | 1-800-442-9253 | Local Office Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states, in all GEICO companies, or in all situations. Motorcycle and ATV coverages are underwritten by GEICO Indemnity Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, DC 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. © 2019 GEICO ii ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT — AZGFD.GOV AdPages2019.indd 4 4/20/2020 11:49:25 AM AdPages2019.indd 5 2020-2021 ARIZONA HUNTING4/20/2020 REGULATIONS 11:50:24 AM 1 Arizona Game and Fish Department Key Contacts MAIN NUMBER: 602-942-3000 Choose 1 for known extension or name Choose 2 for draw, bonus points, and hunting and fishing license information Choose 3 for watercraft Choose 4 for regional
    [Show full text]
  • Drawn by the Bison Late Prehistoric Native Migration Into the Central Plains
    DRAWN BY THE BISON LATE PREHISTORIC NATIVE MIGRATION INTO THE CENTRAL PLAINS LAUREN W. RITTERBUSH Popular images of the Great Plains frequently for instance, are described as relying heavily portray horse-mounted Indians engaged in on bison meat for food and living a nomadic dramatic bison hunts. The importance of these lifestyle in tune with the movements of the hunts is emphasized by the oft-mentioned de­ bison. More sedentary farming societies, such pendence of the Plains Indians on bison. This as the Mandan, Hidatsa, Pawnee, Oto, and animal served as a source of not only food but Kansa, incorporated seasonal long-distance also materials for shelter, clothing, contain­ bison hunts into their annual subsistence, ers, and many other necessities of life. Pursuit which also included gardening. In each case, of the vast bison herds (combined with the multifamily groups formed bands or tribal en­ needs of the Indians' horses for pasturage) af­ tities of some size that cooperated with one fected human patterns of subsistence, mobil­ another during formal bison hunts and other ity, and settlement. The Lakota and Cheyenne, community activities.! Given the importance of bison to these people living on the Great Plains, it is often assumed that a similar pattern of utilization existed in prehistory. Indeed, archeological KEY WORDS: migration, bison, Central Plains, studies have shown that bison hunting was Oneota, Central Plains tradition key to the survival of Paleoindian peoples of the Plains as early as 11,000 years ago. 2 If we Lauren W. Ritterbush is Assistant Professor of Anthropology at Kansas State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National
    Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge Prepared for the US Fish and Wildlife Service National Elk Refuge By Walter Fertig Wyoming Natural Diversity Database The Nature Conservancy 1604 Grand Avenue Laramie, WY 82070 February 28, 1998 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following individuals for their assistance with this project: Jim Ozenberger, ecologist with the Jackson Ranger District of Bridger-Teton National Forest, for guiding me in his canoe on Flat Creek and for providing aerial photographs and lodging; Jennifer Whipple, Yellowstone National Park botanist, for field assistance and help with field identification of rare Carex species; Dr. David Cooper of Colorado State University, for sharing field information from his 1994 studies; Dr. Ron Hartman and Ernie Nelson of the Rocky Mountain Herbarium, for providing access to unmounted collections by Michele Potkin and others from the National Elk Refuge; Dr. Anton Reznicek of the University of Michigan, for confirming the identification of several problematic Carex specimens; Dr. Robert Dorn for confirming the identification of several vegetative Salix specimens; and lastly Bruce Smith and the staff of the National Elk Refuge for providing funding and logistical support and for allowing me free rein to roam the refuge for plants. 2 Table of Contents Page Introduction . 6 Study Area . 6 Methods . 8 Results . 10 Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge . 10 Plant Species of Special Concern . 10 Species Summaries . 23 Aster borealis . 24 Astragalus terminalis . 26 Carex buxbaumii . 28 Carex parryana var. parryana . 30 Carex sartwellii . 32 Carex scirpoidea var. scirpiformis .
    [Show full text]
  • The Bear in the Footprint: Using Ethnography to Interpret Archaeological Evidence of Bear Hunting and Bear Veneration in the Northern Rockies
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2014 THE BEAR IN THE FOOTPRINT: USING ETHNOGRAPHY TO INTERPRET ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF BEAR HUNTING AND BEAR VENERATION IN THE NORTHERN ROCKIES Michael D. Ciani The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Ciani, Michael D., "THE BEAR IN THE FOOTPRINT: USING ETHNOGRAPHY TO INTERPRET ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF BEAR HUNTING AND BEAR VENERATION IN THE NORTHERN ROCKIES" (2014). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 4218. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/4218 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BEAR IN THE FOOTPRINT: USING ETHNOGRAPHY TO INTERPRET ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF BEAR HUNTING AND BEAR VENERATION IN THE NORTHERN ROCKIES By Michael David Ciani B.A. Anthropology, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 2012 A.S. Historic Preservation, College of the Redwoods, Eureka, CA, 2006 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology, Cultural Heritage The University of Montana Missoula, MT May 2014 Approved by: Sandy Ross, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Dr. Douglas H. MacDonald, Chair Anthropology Dr. Anna M. Prentiss Anthropology Dr. Christopher Servheen Forestry and Conservation Ciani, Michael, M.A., May 2014 Major Anthropology The Bear in the Footprint: Using Ethnography to Interpret Archaeological Evidence of Bear Hunting and Bear Veneration in the Northern Rockies Chairperson: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Techniques for Estimating Coyote Abundance
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Symposium Proceedings—Coyotes in the Southwest: A Compendium of Our Knowledge Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center (1995) for April 1995 TECHNIQUES FOR ESTIMATING COYOTE ABUNDANCE Scott E. Henke Texas A&M University- Kingsville, Kingsville, TX Fred F. Knowlton USDA-APHIS Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/coyotesw Part of the Environmental Health and Protection Commons Henke, Scott E. and Knowlton, Fred F., "TECHNIQUES FOR ESTIMATING COYOTE ABUNDANCE" (1995). Symposium Proceedings—Coyotes in the Southwest: A Compendium of Our Knowledge (1995). 28. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/coyotesw/28 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Symposium Proceedings—Coyotes in the Southwest: A Compendium of Our Knowledge (1995) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. TECHNIQUES FOR ESTIMATING COYOTE ABUNDANCE SCOTT E. HENKE, Caesar Kleberg Wlldlife Research Institute, Campus Box 2 18, Texas A&M University- Kingsvllle, Kingsville, TX 78363 FRED F. KNOWLTON, USDA-APHIS Denver Wildlife Research Center, Utah State Univers~ty,Logan, Utah 84322-5295 Absirad Knowledge of coyote abundance is needed to make intelligent management decisions Several methods have been devised to ennumerate coyote (Canis latrans) population size. We review several techniques and attempt to identify biases associated with each method. Once biases are understood, recommendations can be made to minimize theu impact on data collection processes and yield better estimates of coyote population trends. Enumerat~onof population status (i e ,denslty, Methods used to estimate coyote population trends) is impostant in research and management of slze, dens~ty,and relative abundance have included wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 - JCR Evaluation Form
    2017 - JCR Evaluation Form SPECIES: Elk PERIOD: 6/1/2017 - 5/31/2018 HERD: EL101 - TARGHEE HUNT AREAS: 73 PREPARED BY: ALYSON COURTEMANCH 2012 - 2016 Average 2017 2018 Proposed Hunter Satisfaction Percent 62% 84% 85% Landowner Satisfaction NA NA NA Percent Harvest: 26 53 60 Hunters: 101 124 150 Hunter Success: 26% 43% 40% Active Licenses: 101 131 150 Active License Success: 26% 40% 40% Recreation Days: 561 964 500 Days Per Animal: 21.6 18.2 8.3 Males per 100 Females: 0 0 Juveniles per 100 Females 0 0 Satisfaction Based Objective 60% Management Strategy: Recreational Percent population is above (+) or (-) objective: N/A% Number of years population has been + or - objective in recent trend: NA 2018 HUNTING SEASONS TARGHEE ELK HERD (EL101) Hunt Season Dates Type Quota License Limitations Area Opens Closes 73 Sep. 20 Oct. 25 General Antlered elk, spikes excluded 6 Aug. 15 Jan. 31 25 Limited Cow or calf valid on private quota land Archery Sep. 1 Sep.19 Refer to Section 3 of this Chapter Management Evaluation Current Hunter/Landowner Satisfaction Management Objective: Primary Objective: Achieve a 3-year average of ≥ 60% of hunters indicating they are “satisfied” or “very satisfied” on the harvest survey. Secondary Objective: Achieve a 3-year average of ≥ 25% harvest success. Management Strategy: Recreational 2017 Hunter Satisfaction Estimate: 84% 2017 Hunter Success: 43% Most Recent 3-Year Running Average Hunter Satisfaction Estimate: 69% Most Recent 3-Year Running Average Hunter Success: 31% The Wyoming Game and Fish Department (WGFD) proposed changing the objective for the Targhee Elk Herd from a postseason population objective to a hunter satisfaction objective in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Engl USA Vermejo Park Ranch 2016
    USA 2016 - Vermejo Park Ranch - Office Germany : Office Austria : Ziegelstadel 1 · D-88316 Isny Europastr. 1/1 · A-7540 Güssing Phone: +49 (0) 75 62 / 9 14 54 - 14 Phone: +43 (0) 33 22 / 4 29 63 - 0 www.blaser-safaris.com Fax.: +43 (0) 33 22 / 4 29 63 - 59 [email protected] Hunting in Vermejo Take the opportunity to experience a top class hunt in the bea utiful and unspoiled New Mexico/ USA landscape of New Mexico. Our partner Vermejo Park Ranch offers you 240,000 hectares of unparalleled hunting and fishing possibilities in the original western territories. Large herds of Wapiti, Pronghorn and Bison are not uncommon in these regions and are sighted with certainty. Businessmen, like Ted Turner (CNN), and other well-known personalities spend their holidays here. Accommodation Vermejo Park is a private mountain resort and a bison ranch open to t he public at the same time. In summer, only a limited number of guests visit the ranch to enjoy the beauty of nature and outdoor activities, such as hunting and fishing, and to get away from everyday life. The ranch is hidden in a valley, which offers fascinating panoramic views of the western mountain scenery of Vermejo. You will stay in first class rooms at the ranch. Meals are served in the common dining room. A comfortable lounge invites you to enjoy convivial evenings, during which the hunting day is reviewed, while the spacious veranda offers the possibility to spot Wapitis and Mule Deer as the sun sets behind the mountains. Furthermore, the lodge provides a meeting room for business meetings in a stress-free environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Close Cache Creek for Cougars Records Show Game Tain Lions Using the Area,” Fuchs Con- Tinued
    Black JACKSON HOLE NEWS&GUIDE, Wednesday, February 22, 2012 - 9A Residents: Close Cache Creek for cougars Records show Game tain lions using the area,” Fuchs con- tinued. “On Thursday night, however, and Fish inundated the family group returned and killed with comments after another deer. At that point the prop- erty owner asked if there was more cat family was captured. that we could do to haze her and the siblings from their property.” By Cory Hatch In the email, Fuchs expressed a de- sire to keep the family group intact. Some Jackson Hole residents said “It is our hope that we will be able they would rather close Cache Creek to capture at least the female quick- temporarily than see a cougar fam- ly,” he said. “If so, we will attempt to ily relocated from its home in the tree and immobilize the kittens if we drainage. cannot capture them in the box traps. Over several weeks, wildlife man- COURTESY PHOTO Anything that is captured will be held agers captured a female cougar and The Wyoming Game and Fish Department officials received hundreds of pages in a bear trap in our shop so as not to her three kittens after they repeatedly of comments from people asking them to return a female cougar and her break up the group. However, we can- killed deer near private homes near kittens to the Cache Creek drainage. Wildlife managers captured the cats and not hold them for long, so we will have relocated them south of Lander after they killed deer on private property.
    [Show full text]
  • National Park Service U.S
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science DOI Bison Report Looking Forward Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/BRMD/NRR—2014/821 ON THE COVER Bison bull at southeastern Utah's Henry Mountains Photograph by Utah Division of Wildlife Resources DOI Bison Report Looking Forward Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/BRMD/NRR—2014/821 Prepared by the Department of the Interior Bison Leadership Team and Working Group National Park Service Biological Resource Management Division 1201 Oakridge Drive, Suite 200 Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 June 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data.
    [Show full text]
  • The Destruction of the Bison an Environmental History, –
    front.qxd 1/28/00 10:59 AM Page v The Destruction of the Bison An Environmental History, 1750–1920 ANDREW C. ISENBERG Princeton University front.qxd 1/28/00 10:59 AM Page vi published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 2ru, uk http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, usa http://www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia Ruiz de Alarcón 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain © Andrew C. Isenberg 2000 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2000 Printed in the United States of America Typeface Ehrhardt 10/12 pt. System QuarkXPress [tw] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication data Isenberg, Andrew C. (Andrew Christian) The destruction of the bison : an environmental history, 1750–1920 / Andrew C. Isenberg. p. cm. – (Studies in environment and history) Includes index. isbn 0-521-77172-2 1. American bison. 2. American bison hunting – History. 3. Nature – Effect of human beings on – North America. I. Title. ql737.u53i834 2000 333.95´9643´0978 – dc21 99-37543 cip isbn 0 521 77172 2 hardback front.qxd 1/28/00 10:59 AM Page ix Contents Acknowledgments page xi Introduction 1 1 The Grassland Environment 13 2 The Genesis of the Nomads 31 3 The Nomadic Experiment 63 4 The Ascendancy of the Market 93 5 The Wild and the Tamed 123 6 The Returns of the Bison 164 Conclusion 193 Index 199 ix intro.qxd 1/28/00 11:00 AM Page 1 Introduction Before Europeans brought the horse to the New World, Native Americans in the Great Plains hunted bison from foot.
    [Show full text]
  • Bison Hunting Education Booklet 2010
    Bison Hunter Education Booklet i Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................ 1 Goals of the Wood Bison Hunt ..................................................... 3 2010 Wood Bison Season .............................................................. 5 Bison Hunting Zone Map ................................................. 5 For Aboriginal Hunters .................................................... 6 For Recreational Hunters .................................................. 6 The Hunt .................................................................................... 8 Rifle Calibre .................................................................... 8 Shot Placement ............................................................... 9 Selecting an Animal to Harvest ....................................... 10 Head Shape of Male and Female Bison ............................ 13 Bison Hunting Considerations ........................................ 20 Weather ........................................................................ 21 Ice Travel ...................................................................... 21 Bison Behaviour ............................................................ 21 Human Health Concerns ............................................................ 22 Bovine Tuberculosis ....................................................... 22 Brucellosis .................................................................... 22 Disease Detail ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Sustainable Management Policy for the National Elk Refuge, Wyoming Tim W
    Yale University EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Bulletin Series 2000 Developing Sustainable Management Policy for the National Elk Refuge, Wyoming Tim W. Clark Denise Casey Anders Halverson Follow this and additional works at: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/yale_fes_bulletin Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons, and the Forest Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Clark, Tim W.; Casey, Denise; and Halverson, Anders, "Developing Sustainable Management Policy for the National Elk Refuge, Wyoming" (2000). Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Bulletin Series. 97. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/yale_fes_bulletin/97 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Forestry and Environmental Studies at EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. It has been accepted for inclusion in Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Bulletin Series by an authorized administrator of EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bulletin Series Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Developing Sustainable Management Policy for the National Elk Refuge, Wyoming TIM W. CLARK, DENISE CASEY, AND ANDERS HALVERSON, VOLUME EDITORS JANE COPPOCK, BULLETIN SERIES EDITOR Yale University New Haven, C o n n e c t i c u t • 2000 This volume was published as a cooperative effort of the Northern Rockies Conservation Cooperative of Jackson, Wyoming, the Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, and many other organiza­ tions and people. The Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Bulletin Series, begun in 1912, publishes student and faculty monographs, symposia, workshop proceedings, and other reports of envi­ ronmental interest.
    [Show full text]