DOCSLIB.ORG

The Golden Rule and Resistance to Nuclear Testing in Asia and the Pacific 長い航海−−ゴールデン・ルール号 とアジア太平洋地域における核実験反対運動

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Golden Rule and Resistance to Nuclear Testing in Asia and the Pacific 長い航海−−ゴールデン・ルール号 とアジア太平洋地域における核実験反対運動 Volume 8 | Issue 8 | Number 3 | Article ID 3308 | Feb 22, 2010 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus The Long Voyage: The Golden Rule and Resistance to Nuclear Testing in Asia and the Pacific 長い航海−−ゴールデン・ルール号 とアジア太平洋地域における核実験反対運動 Lawrence S. Wittner The Long Voyage: The Golden Rule and Resistance to Nuclear Testing in Asia and the Pacific Lawrence S. Wittner Recently, when a battered, 30-foot sailboat, the Golden Rule, came to rest in a small shipyard in northern California, the event did not inspire fanfare. But, in fact, the Golden Rule was far Hiroshima Maidens more important than it appeared, for the small ketch had helped inspire a widespread struggle Other people, too, were growing restless with against nuclear testing, particularly throughout the escalating preparations of the great powers the Asia-Pacific region. for nuclear war, and especially with nuclear tests, which sent vast clouds of radioactive The long voyage of theGolden Rule began fallout scudding around the globe. In 1954, the thanks to the efforts of Albert Bigelow, a irradiation of a Japanese fishing boat, the retired World War II U.S. naval commander. Lucky Dragon #5, by a U.S. hydrogen bomb Learning of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, test in the Pacific led to a furor in Japan and Bigelow had been not only awestruck, but the formation of a mass ban-the-bomb horrified. "It was then," he recalled, "that I movement, Gensuikyo (the Japan Council realized for the first time that morally war is Against Atomic and Hydrogen Bombs). In impossible." In the postwar years, Bigelow and 1957, Britons founded the National Council for his wife joined the Society of Friends and, in the Abolition of Nuclear Weapon Tests, which 1955, housed two of the 25 Hiroshima Maidens, the following year was folded into an even who had been brought to the United States for larger organization, the Campaign for Nuclear reconstructive surgery. Working with the Disarmament. In the fall of 1957, activists in American Friends Service Committee, Bigelow the United States launched the National sought to deliver a petition against nuclear Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy (SANE) testing to the White House, but was rebuffed by that, like its overseas counterparts, quickly U.S. government officials. grew into the largest peace and disarmament organization in the country. As part of this uprising, Bigelow and other pacifists, in late 1957, organized a small group, 1 8 | 8 | 3 APJ | JF Non-Violent Action Against Nuclear Weapons, government to block entry by its citizens. to employ direct action in the struggle against the Bomb. After the announcement of U.S. government plans to set off nuclear bomb blasts near Eniwetok in the Marshall Islands -- an island chain governed by the United States as a "trust territory" for the native people -- the moment of truth had arrived. Bigelow and other pacifists decided to sail a vessel of protest, the Golden Rule, into the testing zone. Explaining their decision, Bigelow declared: "All nuclear explosions are monstrous, evil, unworthy of human beings." In January 1958, Bigelow and three other crew members wrote to President Dwight Eisenhower of their plans. "For years we have spoken and written of the suicidal military preparations of the Great Powers," they observed, "but our voices have been lost in the massive effort of those responsible for preparing this country for war. We mean now to speak with the weight of our whole lives." Although the Boston Herald thought the crew The Golden Rule members "Thoreauesque," the U.S. government's response was considerably more In this context, Bigelow and his crew faced hostile. As theGolden Rule, captained by formidable obstacles. After the arrival of the Bigelow, made its way across the Pacific, Golden Rule in Honolulu, a U.S. federal court anxious officials from the State Department, issued an injunction barring continuation of its the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), and the journey to Eniwetok. Despite the legal U.S. Navy conferred on how to counter the ramifications of disobeying the injunction, the pacifist danger. The U.S. commander-in-chief pacifists decided: "We would sail -- come what in the Pacific warned that this group of may." And they did. Overtaken en route, they "Communists or misguided humanitarians" were arrested, brought back to Honolulu, tried, wanted to "stop tests by preventing us from convicted, and placed on probation. But these firing . or if we did fire and killed a few were men with a mission, and not easily people . create additional anti-atomic test deterred by the awesome power of the U.S. support." Secretary of State John Foster Dulles government. Defying the terms of their worried that cordoning off a large area on the probation, they set sail once again on the high seas would "have serious international Golden Rule. And once again they were repercussions," while too lenient a policy arrested on the high seas, returned to Hawaii, toward protesters might open the way to tried, and -- this time -- imprisoned with sixty- participation by Japanese antinuclear groups. day sentences. Ultimately, the administration decided to have the AEC issue a ban on entry to the test zone Even so, the U.S. government was beginning to by Americans and to pressure the Japanese lose control of the situation. Among those who 2 8 | 8 | 3 APJ | JF met the crew members of the Golden Rule in the voyage of the Golden Rule and lauded its Honolulu and attended their trial for contempt activities and those of thePhoenix in his of court were Earle and Barbara Reynolds, a magazine, the Saturday Review. married couple, and their two children. Traveling around the globe on their hand-built No longer able to hold the line against public sailboat, the Phoenix, they were heading back opposition to nuclear testing, the nuclear to Hiroshima, where Earle Reynolds, an powers began a reluctant retreat. In late anthropologist, had coordinated research for August 1958, Eisenhower announced that, as of the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission,October 31, the United States would suspend established by the U.S. government to gather its nuclear tests and would join other nuclear data on the effects of the atomic bombs. powers in negotiations for a nuclear test ban Greatly impressed by the crew members, as treaty. Although these negotiations dragged on well as convinced that the U.S. government had for years, the U.S., Soviet, and British misreported the deadly effects of radioactive governments did halt their nuclear tests. Their fallout and had no right to restrict travel on the testing moratorium collapsed in the fall of high seas, the Reynolds family decided to 1961, when the Soviet government led the way complete the voyage of the Golden Rule. On by resuming nuclear tests. But popular protest July 1, 1958, Earle Reynolds went on the radio resumed and, in the summer of 1963, resulted to announce that the Phoenix was entering the in the signing of the Partial Test Ban Treaty, U.S. test zone "as a protest against nuclear banning nuclear tests in the atmosphere. testing. Please inform appropriate authorities." The U.S. Coast Guard boarded the Phoenix the Even as the nuclear powers began to back next day, arrested Reynolds, and returned him away from nuclear testing, the influence of the to Hawaii for trial. Here he was convicted and Golden Rule persisted. In November 1958, the sentenced to two years in prison. crews of the Golden Rule and of the Phoenix traveled to Geneva to urge U.S., British, and These dramatic events heightened popular Soviet negotiators to sign a comprehensive test protest against nuclear testing. Picket lines ban treaty. Although Bigelow wrote a book sprang up around federal buildings and AEC about his protest in the Pacific (The Voyage of offices all across the United States, including the Golden Rule, 1959) and participated in those in Boston, Chicago, New York, Los further antinuclear protests, his most famous Angeles, Philadelphia, San Francisco, and subsequent venture occurred as one of the first Washington. Signs declared: "Stop the tests, Freedom Riders, when -- once again defying the not the Golden Rule." Reynolds, out on bail authorities by traveling into forbidden territory before a higher federal court ruled in his favor - -- he boarded a bus to the Deep South with - and, implicitly, in favor of his predecessors -- other challengers to racial segregation. Along embarked on a speaking tour that included 58 the way, he managed to block a white racist major talks, 20 other meetings, 21 radio assault on young John Lewis (today a member programs, and eight television appearances. of the U.S. House of Representatives) by SANE dispatched telegrams to political leaders absorbing the blows himself. Later on the trip, declaring that it joined the Golden Rule's crew Bigelow narrowly survived a firebombing of the members "in protesting against [the] unrightful bus by a racist mob outside Anniston, Alabama. use of [the] Pacific Ocean for nuclear weapons Jim Peck, another pacifist crew member of the testing, and against [the] Atomic Energy Golden Rule, also became a Freedom Rider and Commission's exercise of authority which it was severely injured by white racists. Like does not rightfully possess." Norman Cousins, Bigelow, Peck continued his antinuclear SANE's founder and co-chair, helped finance activities, in his case as a staff member of the 3 8 | 8 | 3 APJ | JF War Resisters League. to the dismay of the Soviet authorities, some crew members began to sink the vessel in the For their part, the Reynolds family returned to harbor while others grabbed leaflets and Japan. As a result of the notoriety Earle leaped into the near-freezing water in an Reynolds had attained thanks to his protest attempt to swim ashore.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tordess Oeeupiedi
    THE SCOTTISH CAMPAIGN TO RESIST THE ATOMIC MENACE,2 AINSLIE PLACE,E~INBURGH.031-2?5 7752 ISSN 0140- 7340 No 8 October/November 1978 lOp TORDESS OEEUPIEDI ---protesters rebuild cottage---- On 30th September the date on which the tenant farmers on the Torness site gave up their land to the SSEB, the 15 members of the Torness Alliance moved on. Supported by a group of similar size outwith the site; they immediately began to rebuild the derilict 'Half Moon' cottage, which is seen as a base for the occupation. This m·ove, to non-violent direct action and civil disobedience, was not taken without careful thought and planning.Clearly Mr. Millan, the Secretary of State, has decided to turn a deaf ear to any objections to Torness - whether they come from anyi- nuclear groups or the Labour · controlled Lothian Regional Council~ Thus, in the spirit of the Torness declaration, non-violent direct action is the only option availabl e if the power sta!on is to be stopped. DE COMMISSIONING FRIENDLY THE HIDDEN PROBLEMS Those participating (from all over Britain) British nuclear This statement, however, carefully planned this companies have deliberately flies i n the face of action; and of necessit y played down the difficulties evidence , both from t he trained in non-violent involved in scrapping atomic United States and the A. E.A's techniques. This planning pl ant. own sc-ientists. Their has paid off the l ocal report s claim t hat outworn community has rallied round According to a r.ecent plants are highly radioact ive in support and materials for 'Guardian' repor.t the Atomic and should be l eft for the reconstruction of the Ener gy Authority "is certain 100- 150 years for the cottage have been readily · that i t could demolish a r adi at ion t o " cool down" ma.de available; and the· nuclear react or local police have been comprehensivel y enough to b efoo=~=~]J univer sally friendly.
    [Show full text]
  • Flooding the Border: Development, Politics, and Environmental Controversy in the Canadian-U.S
    FLOODING THE BORDER: DEVELOPMENT, POLITICS, AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROVERSY IN THE CANADIAN-U.S. SKAGIT VALLEY by Philip Van Huizen A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in The Faculty of Graduate Studies (History) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) June 2013 © Philip Van Huizen, 2013 Abstract This dissertation is a case study of the 1926 to 1984 High Ross Dam Controversy, one of the longest cross-border disputes between Canada and the United States. The controversy can be divided into two parts. The first, which lasted until the early 1960s, revolved around Seattle’s attempts to build the High Ross Dam and flood nearly twenty kilometres into British Columbia’s Skagit River Valley. British Columbia favoured Seattle’s plan but competing priorities repeatedly delayed the province’s agreement. The city was forced to build a lower, 540-foot version of the Ross Dam instead, to the immense frustration of Seattle officials. British Columbia eventually agreed to let Seattle raise the Ross Dam by 122.5 feet in 1967. Following the agreement, however, activists from Vancouver and Seattle, joined later by the Upper Skagit, Sauk-Suiattle, and Swinomish Tribal Communities in Washington, organized a massive environmental protest against the plan, causing a second phase of controversy that lasted into the 1980s. Canadian and U.S. diplomats and politicians finally resolved the dispute with the 1984 Skagit River Treaty. British Columbia agreed to sell Seattle power produced in other areas of the province, which, ironically, required raising a different dam on the Pend d’Oreille River in exchange for not raising the Ross Dam.
    [Show full text]
  • Frank Zelko Research Fellow, GHI
    “MAKE IT A GREEN PEACE”: THE HISTORY OF AN INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATION Frank Zelko Research Fellow, GHI In the early 1970s, the United States Congress’s House Subcommittee on Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation held a series of hearings on the sub- ject of marine mammal protection. Among those who testified were rep- resentatives of America’s oldest and most established wilderness protec- tion groups, such as the Sierra Club, the Audubon Society, and the National Wildlife Federation. Although it was important to ensure that the world’s populations of whales and seals remained as healthy as pos- sible, these organizations argued, they did not support a policy of abso- lute protection. As long as the survival of the species was ensured, they believed, it was legitimate to use its “surplus” members for the benefit of people. In his testimony before the subcommittee, Thomas Kimball of the National Wildlife Federation employed phrases such as “renewable re- sources,” “stewardship,” and “professional wildlife management.” The “harvesting of surplus wildlife populations,” his organization felt, wasan “important management tool if the continuing long-range well-being of an animal population is the ultimate objective.”1 A few years later, a group of environmental protesters off the coast of California came across a fleet of Soviet whaling boats. Using motorized inflatable dinghies, the activists positioned themselves between a whal- er’s harpoon and a fleeing pod of sperm whales, acting as human shields to protect the defenseless giants. Whaling, these activists insisted, was not merely an issue of wildlife preservation or resource stewardship. Rather, it was an unconscionable act of violence perpetrated against a species whose intelligence and sensitivity put them in the same biological cat- egory as human beings.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic CD Actions.Pmd
    A SELECTIVE LIST OF Historic Civil Disobedience Actions here have been 1917 U.S. countless acts of civil WOMEN’S SUFFRAGE Tdisobedience through- Inspired by similar actions in Britain, out history in virtually every Alice Paul and 217 others (including country by people opposed to Dorothy Day) are arrested for picketing oppressive laws, governments, the White House, considered by some to be the first nonviolent civil disobedience corporations, institutions, and campaign in U.S. history; many go on cultures. Below is a listing of hunger strikes while in prison and are just a few notable — because brutally force-fed sheer size or subsequent impact Gandhi during the “Salt March,” at the start of the massive civil disobedience campaign in — and disparate examples India, 1930. Photo via Wikipedia. (mostly in the United States) since Thoreau’s “Civil Disobe- 1936-1937 U.S. dience” essay. In bold are LABOR names of just a few of the Autoworkers (CIO) organized 900 sit- down strikes — including 44-day sit- organizers or participants, down in Flint, MI — to establish the right each of whom could merit a to unionize (UAW), seeking better pay separate study by students. and working conditions Suggragist pickets arrested at the White House, 1917. Photo: Harris & Ewing 1940-1944 India 1846 U.S. INDEPENDENCE / WORLD WAR II WAR / SLAVERY The Quit India campaign led by Gandhi 1918-1919 U.S. Henry David Thoreau refuses to pay defied the British ban on antiwar WORLD WAR I taxes that support the Mexican-American propaganda and sought to fill the jails War and slavery Draft resisters and conscientious objectors (over 60,000 jailed) imprisoned for agitating against the war 1850s-1860s U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Hawaii Football MG.Pdf
    Photos credited to: Chicago Bears, Denver Broncos, USA Today, Detroit Lions, Andy Lyons Getty images, Hamilton Tiger-Cats, BC Lions WHAT’S INSIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS 2018 SCHEDULE Date Opponent Time Table of Contents __________________________ 1 Aug. 25 at Colorado State* (CBSSN) 5:30 pm MT Quick Facts ______________________________2-3 97 HISTORY Media Information ________________________4-5 History of UH Football _________________ 97-101 Sept. 1 NAVY (CBSSN) 5:00 pm Bowl Games Media Outlets _____________________________ 6 Sept. 8 RICE (Spectrum) 6:00 pm Aloha Stadium ____________________________ 7 Bowl Game History __________________ 102 Sept. 15 at Army (CBSSN) 12:00 pm ET Bowl Appearances ______________ 103-108 Sept. 22 DUQUESNE (HC) (Spectrum) 6:00 pm RAINBOW WARRIOR FOOTBALL Bowl Game Record Book _____________ 109 8 National Appearances Sept. 29 at San José State* (Spectrum) TBA Head Coach Nick Rolovich _________________8-9 National Television __________________ 110 Oct. 6 WYOMING* (Spectrum) 6:00 pm Assistant Coaches _____________________ 10-14 National Rankings ___________________ 111 Support Staff & Graduate Assistants _________ 15 Coaches & Players Oct. 13 at Brigham Young (ESPN Family) TBA Rosters ______________________________ 16-17 All-Time Head Coaches _______________ 112 Oct. 20 NEVADA* (Spectrum) 6:00 pm Geographical Roster/Pronunciation Chart _____ 18 All-Time Assistant Coaches ___________ 113 Oct. 27 at Fresno State* (ESPN Family) TBA Returning Player Profiles ________________ 20-39 All-Time Letterwinners ___________ 114-121 2018 Recruiting Class Profiles ___________ 40-45 All-Time Homecoming Results _____________ 121 Nov. 3 UTAH STATE* (Spectrum) 6:00 pm 2018 Opponents ______________________ 46-50 Stats & Results Nov. 17 UNLV* (Spectrum) 6:00 pm Rivalry Games ___________________________ 50 Year-by-Year Statistics ___________ 122-123 Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainbow Warrior Case
    1 Rainbow Warrior Case Rainbow Warrior (NEW ZEALAND v. FRANCE) France-New Zealand Arbitration Tribunal. 30 April 1990 (Jiménez de Aréchaga, Chairman; Sir Kenneth Keith and Professor Bredin, Members) SUMMARY: The facts: - In July 1985 a team of French agents sabotaged and sank the Rainbow Warrior, a vessel belonging to Greenpeace International, while it lay in harbour in New Zealand. One member of the crew was killed. Two of the agents, Major Mafart and Captain Prieur, were subsequently arrested in New Zealand and, having pleaded guilty to charges of manslaughter and criminal damage, were sentenced by a New Zealand court to ten years' imprisonment.1 A dispute arose between France, which demanded the release of the two agents, and New Zealand, which claimed compensation for the incident. New Zealand also complained that France was threatening to disrupt New Zealand trade with the European Communities unless the two agents were released. The two countries requested the Secretary-General of the United Nations to mediate and to propose a solution in the form of a ruling, which both Parties agreed in advance to accept. The Secretary-General's ruling, which was given in 1986, required France to pay US $7 million to New Zealand and to undertake not to take certain defined measures injurious to New Zealand trade with the European Communities.2 The ruling also provided that Major Mafart and Captain Prieur were to be released into French custody but were to spend the next three years on an isolated French military base in the Pacific. The two States concluded an agreement in the form of an exchange of letters on 9 July 1986 ("the First Agreement"),3 which provided for the implementation of the ruling.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: the Rise of the Antinuclear Power Movement: 1957 to 1989
    Chapter 3 THE RISE OF THE ANTINUCLEAR POWER MOVEMENT 1957 TO 1989 In this chapter I trace the development and circulation of antinuclear struggles of the last 40 years. What we will see is a pattern of new sectors of the class (e.g., women, native Americans, and Labor) joining the movement over the course of that long cycle of struggles. Those new sectors would remain autonomous, which would clearly place the movement within the autonomist Marxist model. Furthermore, it is precisely the widening of the class composition that has made the antinuclear movement the most successful social movement of the 1970s and 1980s. Although that widening has been impressive, as we will see in chapter 5, it did not go far enough, leaving out certain sectors of the class. Since its beginnings in the 1950s, opposition to the civilian nuclear power program has gone through three distinct phases of one cycle of struggles.(1) Phase 1 —1957 to 1967— was a period marked by sporadic opposition to specific nuclear plants. Phase 2 —1968 to 1975— was a period marked by a concern for the environmental impact of nuclear power plants, which led to a critique of all aspects of nuclear power. Moreover, the legal and the political systems were widely used to achieve demands. And Phase 3 —1977 to the present— has been a period marked by the use of direct action and civil disobedience by protesters whose goals have been to shut down all nuclear power plants. 3.1 The First Phase of the Struggles: 1957 to 1967 Opposition to nuclear energy first emerged shortly after the atomic bomb was built.
    [Show full text]
  • Revue Celebrates 25 Years!
    The Truth About Nutrition | 2009 Heros and Zeros | From Cornwall to Newfoundland | Revue Celebrates 25 Years! January 22nd - February 5th Volume 12, Issue 1 Issue 12, Volume 5th February - 22nd January this issue Local Artists headed No Oven Mitts Required! to the 2010 Olympics The Book of Eli From Cornwall to Newfoundland in Van City NON STOP STAGE ENTERTAINMENT • SHOWER SHOWS PRIVATE VIP DANCE AREA • STAG & GROUP FUNCTIONS XXX-TREME ADULT ENTERTAINMENT 16 Queen Street – www.thecottonclub.ca January 22nd - February 5th, 2010 SNaps Goddess and High FasHion Homeless www.RayoFlightphoTogRaPhy.Ca PhotograPher: Apryl Pitts Jill nolan stacey Barnes dia lynn ayles Kim Harding CURRENT | Page 2 January 22nd - February 5th, 2010 current team Editor Contributors Joshua Jamieson Stephanie Abbott [email protected] Peter Barbour Richard Burnett [email protected] Tim Conway Jonny Hodder advertising Sales Tara Lehman [email protected] Gary Moore Jennifer Murray Production & Design Charissa Reeves Debby Winters Joshua Jamieson Kevin Woolridge Distribution Publisher Barry Ross Marketing Services Ltd. P.O. Box 693 Pouch Cove, NL A0A 3L0 www.currentmag.ca EDiToRial THe opposiTion By Kevin Woolridge CURRENT | Page 3 January 22nd - February 5th, 2010 sport WinTer YaHs! Find your winter ActiviTy By gary Moore A few years back the majority of winter was spent more of a journey, considered snowshoes? French snowboarding. It was truly amazing. Walking up and Immersion Teacher and Hot Hoops co-owner, Cindy down Victoria Park with snowboard tucked under arm Butt suggests bring a group of people and make it and the numerous bails trying to do some ridiculous social, “we should all do a snowshoe adventure this jump/grab combo.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenging the U.S. Nuclear Tests:The Golden Rule Sails Again
    Challenging the U.S. Nuclear Tests:The Golden Rule Sails Again Ann Wright Veterans for Peace Honolulu, Hawaii 96821 USA Email: [email protected] Abstract In January 1958, Andrew Bigelow and three other anti-nuclear activists attempted to sail the 30 foot ketch, The Golden Rule, from California into the U.S. nuclear testing zone in the Marshall Islands to try to stop nuclear testing. While on a stopover in Honolulu, a U.S. federal court issued an injunction barring the voyage of the Golden Rule into the nuclear test sites. Despite the injunction, the four crew members attempted to sail twice and were arrested by U.S. federal law enforcement officials, tried, convicted and given sixty-day sentences and imprisoned. 55 years later, The Golden Rule, was found in a small shipyard in Eureka, California and her historical significance recognized. The boat had suffered the ravages of time and was in terrible shape. She is being carefully renovated by members of Veterans for Peace who intend to sail the boat on the West Coast as an educational vessel that personifies opposition to militarism and the use of nuclear weapons. Using documents from the Quaker House in Honolulu, the saga of The Golden Rule is a part of the rich history of maritime Hawaii. Keywords: Pacific Nuclear Testing, Protest Ships, Marshall Islands, AEC, Greenpeace Introduction In 2010, Larry Zerlangs, the owner of a boatyard in Eureka, Northern California, hauled out of a nearby bay a 30 foot double-masted Alpha 30 sailboat that had broken loose of her moorings and sunk during a big storm.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenpeace, Earth First! and the Earth Liberation Front: the Rp Ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008)
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Senior Honors Projects Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island 2008 Greenpeace, Earth First! and The aE rth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher J. Covill University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Covill, Christopher J., "Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008). Senior Honors Projects. Paper 93. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The Progression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher John Covill Faculty Sponsor: Professor Timothy Hennessey, Political Science Causes of worldwide environmental destruction created a form of activism, Ecotage with an incredible success rate. Ecotage uses direct action, or monkey wrenching, to prevent environmental destruction. Mainstream conservation efforts were viewed by many environmentalists as having failed from compromise inspiring the birth of radicalized groups. This eventually transformed conservationists into radicals. Green Peace inspired radical environmentalism by civil disobedience, media campaigns and direct action tactics, but remained mainstream. Earth First’s! philosophy is based on a no compromise approach.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strategy of Radical Environmentalism
    Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, Summer 2008, Vol. 10, Issue 4. THROWING A WRENCH INTO THINGS: THE STRATEGY OF RADICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM Teale Phelps Bondaroff, University of Calgary Introduction: The current focus on Islamic terrorism has resulted in a lack of awareness of other forms of terrorism. Similarly, the focus on external non-conventional threats to security has meant that domestic threats are being overlooked. One such instance is that of the threat posed by radical environmentalist organizations, such as Earth First! (EF!)1, the Earth Liberation Front (ELF), and the Sea Shepherds Society. These organizations, which premise themselves upon the assertion of “No compromise in the Defense of Mother Earth!” have declared themselves Mother Nature’s armies and navies and represent the militarization of the environmental movement.2 The operations in which they engage, of which there have been more than 600 in the United States and Canada since 1996, have been responsible for an estimated $100 million in damages.3 Though the impact of these operations pale in comparison to those of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon in 2001, they represent a growing trend in environmental organizations, and a growing non-conventional societal threat. The threat is especially real in Canada where many groups find their origins in Canadian-born organizations such as Greenpeace. 1 The name of the ‘Earth First!’ includes the exclamation mark, which places emphasis on their commitment to action. 2 Jonathan I. Lange, “Refusal to Compromise: The Case of Earth First!” Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54 (Fall 1990), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic CD Actions.Indd
    A SELECTIVE LIST OF Historic Civil Disobedience Actions here have been 1917 U.S. countless acts of civil WOMEN’S SUFFRAGE T disobedience through- Inspired by similar actions in Britain, out history in virtually every Alice Paul and 217 others (including Dorothy Day) are arrested for picketing country by people opposed to the White House, considered by some oppressive laws, governments, to be the first nonviolent civil disobedi- corporations, institutions, and ence campaign in U.S. history; many go cultures. Below is a listing of just on hunger strikes while in prison and are brutally force-fed a few notable — because sheer size or subsequent impact — and Gandhi during the “Salt March,” at the start disparate examples (mostly in of the massive civil disobedience campaign in the United States) since Tho- India, 1930. Photo via Wikipedia. reau’s “Civil Disobedience” essay. 1936-1937 U.S. In bold are names of just a few LABOR Autoworkers (CIO) organized 900 sit- of the organizers or participants, down strikes — including 44-day sit- each of whom could merit a down in Flint, MI — to establish the right separate study by students. to unionize (UAW), seeking better pay and working conditions Suggragist pickets arrested at the White House, 1917. Photo: Harris & Ewing 1940-1944 India 1846 U.S. INDEPENDENCE / WORLD WAR II WAR / SLAVERY The Quit India campaign led by Gandhi Henry David Thoreau refuses to pay 1918-1919 U.S. defied the British ban on antiwar taxes that support the Mexican-American WORLD WAR I propaganda and sought to fill the jails War and slavery Draft resisters and conscientious objectors (over 60,000 jailed) imprisoned for agitating against the war 1850s-1860s U.S.
    [Show full text]