Remarks from the President
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Briefing Paper, No
Briefing Paper, No. 8, March 2012 THE DEBILITATING DYNAMICS OF NEPAL’S CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY (2008-2012) Briefing MartinPaper Chautari No. 8 March 2013 Martin Chautari THE DEBILITATING www.martinchautari.org.np DYNAMICS OF NEPAL’S CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY (2008-2012) Introduction Nepal now appears to be moving closer to ending the political impasse that has existed since the end of the term of the Constituent Assembly (CA)/Legislature- Parliament on 27 May, 2012. Without a new constitution and in the absence of a legislature, this was, and continues to be, unchartered terrain. However, the agreement among leaders on a way forward via new CA elections and a government headed by the Chief Justice for that purpose, has revived hope. It is clear that the hopes and aspirations of Nepali citizens cannot be formalized under a new constitution until the latter is made and adopted by a CA.1 However, as citizens in Nepal look towards movement out of a prolonged political impasse to a democratic future with a new CA, it is important that key lessons from the last CA be taken into account. At the most obvious and general level, the writing of the constitution for a new Nepal was neglected in the past as political parties prioritized power distribution and consolidating power. The consensus principle legitimated power- plays and resulted in stalemates. There were numerous concomitant obstructions in the work of the CA2 and key contentious issues of federalism and forms of 1 Bhusan, Bharat.2012. Nepal: A passage to democracy. Asian Age, 27 February. http://www.asianage.com/ columnists/nepal-passage-democracy-473 (Accessed on 1 March 2012). -
Policy Paper New Forweb.Pmd
Policy Paper, No. 5, June 2011 DEADLINES, DEMOCRACY AND A POPULAR, DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTION Policy MartinPaper Chautari No. 5 June 2011 DEADLINES, DEMOCRACY AND Martin Chautari www.martinchautari.org.np A POPULAR, DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTION Recommendations 1. Political authorities should make public concrete plans and time-lines for the completion of both the draft and final Constitution as soon as possible. 2. All political party leaders and all Constituent Assembly (CA) members should make public commitments to wide-spread and meaningful public consultations and debates. 3. Mandatory attendance at all CA meetings should be enforced with CA members excused only upon good cause. The specific reasons given should be recorded and maintained as public record. Strict penalties should be stipulated and enforced including fines and expulsion. 4. Political party leaders should honor the votes of citizens and commit to include in government only those that have been elected through the CA election process. 5. Political party leaders should commit to ensuring proportional representation in the formation of governments. 1 Policy Paper, No. 5, June 2011 DEADLINES, DEMOCRACY AND A POPULAR, DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTION Martin Chautari Introduction of his full cabinet three months after his election, with the Home Ministry along with other ministries given to In a replay of a year earlier, a last-minute agreement the UCPN-M, resulted in furthering divisive politics within between the three largest parties permitted the extension both the UCPN-M and Khanal’s own party the CPN- of the tenure of the Constituent Assembly (CA) on 28 UML as well as between other political parties. May, 2011. -
Report National Workshop on EVALSDG and Evalagenda
National Workshop on EVALSDG and EvalAgenda: Towards Evaluating SDGs with an Equity-Focused and Gender Equality Approach Report Community of Evaluators-Nepal August 21-23, 2016 National Workshop on EVALSDG and EvalAgenda 1 Action Plan Enabling Environment Policy Equity Focused and Gender Responsive Evaluation Institutional Capacity Building Individual Capacity Building Coordination and Sharing Data August 21-23, 2016 National Workshop on EVALSDG and EvalAgenda 2 Acknowledgement This report is an output of inputs from several individuals and organisations not only those participated in the EVALSDG and EvalAgenda Workshop organised jointly by National Parliamentarian Forum on Development Evaluation Policy in Nepal (NPFDEPN) and the Community of Evaluators-Nepal (COE-Nepal) from August 21 to 23, 2016 but also beyond this. We like to acknowledge them collectively as the list to name them individually is too lengthy. Please accept our apology for not being able to individually acknowledge for specific contribution. There are, however, some individuals and organisations who have put specific extra efforts and supports in relation to this workshop. Without their specific supports, we would not be able to organise the workshop and bring this report in this form. In the top of the list is the National Planning Commission Secretariat (NPCS) of the Government of Nepal. The effort of NPCS is not less than the efforts made by organisers in several ways right from the planning and to the end of the workshop and even beyond. Similarly, the contribution of UN Agencies, specifically the UNICEF, UN Women, UNDP and UNFPA has also been equally important as these organisation also participated in several meetings towards preparation and provided suggestions online. -
Briefing Paper, No
Briefing Paper, No. 8, March 2013 THE DEBILITATING DYNAMICS OF NEPAL’S CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY (2008-2012) Briefing MartinPaper Chautari No. 8 March 2013 Martin Chautari THE DEBILITATING www.martinchautari.org.np DYNAMICS OF NEPAL’S CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY (2008-2012) Introduction Nepal now appears to be moving closer to ending the political impasse that has existed since the end of the term of the Constituent Assembly (CA)/Legislature- Parliament on 27 May, 2012. Without a new constitution and in the absence of a legislature, this was, and continues to be, unchartered terrain. However, the agreement among political leaders on a way forward via new CA elections and a government headed by the Chief Justice for that purpose, has revived hope. It is clear that the hopes and aspirations of Nepali citizens cannot be formalized under a new constitution until the latter is made and adopted by a CA.1 However, as citizens in Nepal look towards movement out of a prolonged political impasse to a democratic future with a new CA, it is important that key lessons from the last CA be taken into account. At the most obvious and general level, the writing of the constitution for a new Nepal was neglected in the past as political parties prioritized power distribution and consolidating power. The “consensus” principle legitimated power-plays and resulted in stalemates. There were numerous concomitant obstructions in the work of the CA2 and key contentious issues of federalism and 1 Bhusan, Bharat.2012. Nepal: A Passage to Democracy. Asian Age, 27 February. http://www.asianage.com/ columnists/nepal-passage-democracy-473 (Accessed 1 March 2012). -
Election Results 43 3.4 Electoral Dispute Resolution 44 3.5 Formation of the Government 45
Observation of Nepal’s Constituent Assembly Election-2013 National Secretariat Satoaki Memorial Building, Kupondole–10, Lalitpur, Nepal GPO Box: 26550, Tel: +977-01-5541502, Fax: +977-01-5541503 Email: [email protected], [email protected] [email protected], web: www.neocelection.org CA Election Observation Comprehensive Report Advisor : Surya Prasad Shrestha Chief Editor : Dr. Gopal Krishna Siwakoti Sub-Editors : Deepika Naidu Bikal Shrestha Expert Contribution : Prof. Kapil Shrestha Micheal Vurens Vanes Bhadra Sharma Coordination Team : Bhawani Prasad Kharel Lhakpa Lama Thematic Team : Krishna Prasad Subedi Nabaraj Basnet Special Assistance : Binda Kumari Nepali Parbati Paudel Pasang Sherpa Layout/Design : Bhim Prasad Neupane “Dipesh” Financial Assistance : Delegation of the European Union to Nepal Publisher : National Election Observation Committee (NEOC) Copyright© : NEOC ISBN : 978-9937-2-8044-0 Printing : Ganga Jamuna Pvt. Ltd. Tel:01-4386934 Year of Publication : April, 2014 No. of Copies : 800 Table of Contents Page No. Message from the Chairperson Executive Summary Chapter 1- Introduction 1 1. Background 1 i. An Overview of Political Situation 1 ii. The Context of CA Election 3 iii. Formation of Election Government 4 iv. Formation of the Election Commission 5 v. Constitutional Arrangement for Election 6 2. NEOC and Election Observation 7 2.1 Coordination of Election Observation 8 2.2 Election Observation Directives 10 3. Election Administration and Management 11 4. Voter Education 13 5. Poll Rejection 14 Chapter 2 – Electoral Cycle and NEOC Observation 16 1. Pre-Election Setting 16 1.1 Voter Registration 16 1.2 Legal Framework and electoral systems 18 1.3 Constituency Delimitation 20 1.4 Political Party Registration 20 1.5 Participation and Inclusion 21 i. -
Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal Project (SPCBN)
Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal project (SPCBN) Stakeholder Consultation Report December 2011 Bipin Adhikari Mukta S. Lama Submitted to Enabling State Programme United Nations Development Programme Kathmandu 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary I. Background and objective ................................................................................................. 6 II. Project performance in relation to goals and targets ......................................................... 8 III. Overall result and general impact ................................................................................... 13 IV. Donor expectations ......................................................................................................... 15 V. Possible areas of improvement ....................................................................................... 17 VI. Suggested priorities for the next six months................................................................... 19 VII. Management Imperatives ............................................................................................... 21 VIII. Risk scenario and mitigation strategies .......................................................................... 22 IX. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 22 Appendix I Terms of Reference II List of people consulted III Questionnaire used for survey with CA members 2 Executive Summary The project on Support to Participatory