David Ricardo: Theory of Free International Trade

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

David Ricardo: Theory of Free International Trade Economic Insights FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF DALLAS VOLUME 9, NUMBER 2 David Ricardo Theory of Free International Trade Few ideas have been as widely accepted David Ricardo was born in London in 1772, one of 17 children. His parents by economists and as roundly rejected by were Sephardic Jews who had emi- many other people as the doctrine of free grated to England. His father, Abraham, international trade. Economists base their was a successful stockbroker. Ricardo’s business career started when he began acceptance of the mutual benefits from such working for his father at age 14, but at trade on a concept called comparative 21 he married a Quaker, which created advantage. The theory is most closely associ- a family rift that sent Ricardo into the world completely on his own. He none- ated with the writings of the great English clas- theless prospered as a stockbroker and sical school economist David Ricardo. left a vast estate at his death. Although his career in the field of political Having no money problems, Ricardo could afford to spend a great economy was brief, Ricardo became one deal of time in intellectual pursuits, and of the most influential—and financially he became interested in many subjects. successful—practitioners the discipline has Besides political economy, which he took up after reading Adam Smith’s ever known. Wealth of Nations in 1799, he also stud- David Ricardo Today, world trade agreements are ied mathematics, mineralogy, chemistry under increasing attack. Many people are and geology. His career as an active political economist lasted but 14 years.1 This helped to cement in the pub- deeply concerned about such issues as out- Ricardo’s first major work in the lic’s mind the idea that Ricardo was an sourcing and the physical location—and field of economics, The High Price of economist of some standing. That sta- relocation—of firms doing business across Bullion, a Proof of the Depreciation of tus brought him into contact with other Bank Notes, was published in 1810. famous political economists of his time, national borders. In light of these develop- This pamphlet became very influential, notably James Mill and Thomas Robert ments, we offer this latest Economic Insights making Ricardo’s name familiar to those Malthus. Mill became Ricardo’s mentor, on the life and ideas of one of free trade’s most in government who sought economic coaching him and inspiring him to write advice. A parliamentary inquiry into the more in their shared field. ardent theoretical defenders. Anyone inter- high bullion price may have been the In 1814, Ricardo retired from busi- ested in this issue should become familiar with direct result of the pamphlet’s publica- ness life and bought an estate in Glou- Ricardo’s work. We hope this short piece pro- tion, but that’s speculative. In any case, cestershire. A year later, he published the government report’s conclusion— his next major work in economics, vides a useful starting point. that the inflation then occurring in Essay on the Influence of a Low Price of — Bob McTeer England was the result of too many Corn on the Profits of Stock. In that President paper banknotes being created—was work, Ricardo laid out what was to Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Ricardo’s own claim in his pamphlet. become a key idea in neoclassical eco- nomics: the so-called law of diminish- The Beneficent Effects of ing returns as it applied to labor and Taxation Impedes Growth, Free Trade and National capital. Generally, as it applies to culti- and Its Incidence Falls vation of crops, this law states that Profit Equalization increasing the quantities of inputs will Not Necessarily Where increase total production up to a point, the Law Says Under a system of perfectly free com- but then output must decline, given merce, each country naturally devotes its that the land used is fixed in size. There are no taxes which have not a capital and labour to such employments Although increasing production is pos- tendency to lessen the power to accumu- as are most beneficial to each. This pursuit sible, and perhaps common at first, at late. All taxes must either fall on capital or some point the marginal returns to of individual advantage is admirably con- revenue. If they encroach on capital, they additional inputs must decline, fol- nected with the universal good of the must proportionably diminish that fund by lowed by their average returns and, whole. By stimulating industry, by reward- whose extent the extent of the productive thus, total output must decline as well. ing ingenuity, and by using most effica- industry of the country must always be Ricardo’s purpose in exploring the ciously the peculiar powers bestowed issue of land rents was British legisla- regulated; and if they fall on revenue, they by nature, it distributes labour most effec- tion called the Corn Laws. Passed in must either lessen accumulation, or force tively and most economically: while, by in- 1815, these laws forbade the importa- the contributors to save the amount of the creasing the general mass of productions, tion into England of food grown else- tax, by making a corresponding diminution it diffuses general benefit, and binds to- where and sought to maintain the of their former unproductive consumption gether by one common tie of interest and rising prices for British agricultural of the necessaries and luxuries of life. intercourse, the universal society of products that had occurred during the Some taxes will produce these effects in a nations throughout the civilized world. It is Napoleonic wars, when the French navy much greater degree than others; but the this principle which determines that wine had embargoed British ports. Facing great evil of taxation is to be found, not so shall be made in France and Portugal, that the loss of food imports, Britain had to much in any selection of its objects, as in corn shall be grown in America and Poland, use more of its own land to feed its the general amount of its effects taken col- and that hardware and other goods shall be population. This caused crop prices, lectively. manufactured in England. and hence, land rents to rise at rapid Taxes are not necessarily taxes on In one and the same country, profits rates during the war period. The pro- capital because they are laid on capital; nor are, generally speaking, always on the tectionist Corn Laws were an attempt to on income because they are laid on in- same level; or differ only as the employ- maintain the agricultural status quo after come…. The desire which every man has ment of capital may be more or less secure Napoleon’s defeat and a return to peace- to keep his station in life, and to maintain and agreeable. It is not so between differ- ful conditions. his wealth at the height which it has once ent countries. If the profits of capital em- Ricardo, himself a landowner who attained, occasions most taxes, whether ployed in Yorkshire should exceed those of was profiting from the rising rents, nev- laid on capital or on income, to be paid ertheless argued that the Corn Laws capital employed in London, capital would from income; and therefore as taxation pro- should not be enacted and, after they speedily move from London to Yorkshire, ceeds, or as government increases its were, continued to argue strenuously and an equality of profits would be ef- expenditure, the annual enjoyments of for their repeal. Beyond that, the ob- fected; but if in consequence of the dimin- the people must be diminished, unless they served rent increases suggested to Ri- ished rate of production in the lands of cardo a general theory of land rent. are enabled proportionally to increase England, from the increase of capital and The reason rent exists, he argued, was their capitals and income. It should be the population, wages should rise, and profits that as more and more land of dimin- policy of governments to encourage a dis- fall, it would not follow that capital and ishing fertility was applied to growing position to do this in the people, and never population would necessarily move from food, the better lands commanded a to lay such taxes as will inevitably fall on England to Holland, or Spain, or Russia, premium. This was an argument for capital; since by so doing, they impair the where profits might be higher. I rent on the extensive margin, that is, as funds for the maintenance of labour, and more land was cultivated. But Ricardo thereby diminish the future production of —On the Principles of Political Economy also argued for rent on the intensive the country. I and Taxation (Cambridge, UK: margin, that is, where similar lands Cambridge University Press, 1983), experienced different diminishing returns —On the Principles of Political Economy 133–34 to capital and labor. In Ricardo’s view, and Taxation, 152–53 the Corn Laws generated rents both ex- tensively and intensively. His analysis of the effects of the Corn Laws produced The Potential Pitfalls the famous Ricardian theory of rent.2 In 1817, he expanded his pamphlet for Paper Monies on rent and retitled it On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. By There is no point more important in issuing paper money, than to be fully impressed with the 1819, he had been elected to the House effects which follow from the principle of limitation of quantity. It will scarcely be believed fifty of Commons, where he continued to years hence, that Bank directors and ministers gravely contended in our times, both in parliament, be an active participant in the policy and before committees of parliament, that the issue of notes by the Bank of England, unchecked discussions of his time.
Recommended publications
  • Redalyc.Theory of Money of David Ricardo
    Lecturas de Economía ISSN: 0120-2596 [email protected] Universidad de Antioquia Colombia Takenaga, Susumu Theory of Money of David Ricardo: Quantity Theory and Theory of Value Lecturas de Economía, núm. 59, julio-diciembre, 2003, pp. 73-126 Universidad de Antioquia .png, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=155218004003 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative . El carro del heno, 1500 Hieronymus Bosch –El Bosco– Jerónimo, ¿vos cómo lo ves?, 2002 Theory of Money of David Ricardo: Quantity Theory and Theory of Value Susumu Takenaga Lecturas de Economía –Lect. Econ.– No. 59. Medellín, julio - diciembre 2003, pp. 73-126 Theory of Money of David Ricardo : Quantity Theory and Theory of Value Susumu Takenaga Lecturas de Economía, 59 (julio-diciembre, 2003), pp.73-126 Resumen: En lo que es necesario enfatizar, al caracterizar la teoría cuantitativa de David Ricardo, es en que ésta es una teoría de determinación del valor del dinero en una situación particular en la cual se impide que el dinero, sin importar cual sea su forma, entre y salga libremente de la circulación. Para Ricardo, la regulación del valor del dinero por su cantidad es un caso particular en el cual el ajuste del precio de mercado al precio natural requiere un largo periodo de tiempo. La determinación cuantitativa es completamente inadmisible, pero solo cuando el período de observación es más corto que el de ajuste.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of John Stuart Mill Chris Daly
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Honors Theses University Honors Program 5-2002 The Boundaries of Liberalism in a Global Era: A Critique of John Stuart Mill Chris Daly Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/uhp_theses Recommended Citation Daly, Chris, "The Boundaries of Liberalism in a Global Era: A Critique of John Stuart Mill" (2002). Honors Theses. Paper 131. This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the University Honors Program at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. r The Boundaries of Liberalism in a Global Era: A Critique of John Stuart Mill Chris Daly May 8, 2002 r ABSTRACT The following study exanunes three works of John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, Utilitarianism, and Three Essays on Religion, and their subsequent effects on liberalism. Comparing the notion on individual freedom espoused in On Liberty to the notion of the social welfare in Utilitarianism, this analysis posits that it is impossible for a political philosophy to have two ultimate ends. Thus, Mill's liberalism is inherently flawed. As this philosophy was the foundation of Mill's progressive vision for humanity that he discusses in his Three Essays on Religion, this vision becomes paradoxical as well. Contending that the neo-liberalist global economic order is the contemporary parallel for Mill's religion of humanity, this work further demonstrates how these philosophical flaws have spread to infect the core of globalization in the 21 st century as well as their implications for future international relations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economists' Quartet - a Game, Not a Theory
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Gruescu, Sandra; Thomas, Niels Peter Working Paper The Economists' Quartet - A Game, not a Theory Darmstadt Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 109 Provided in Cooperation with: Darmstadt University of Technology, Department of Law and Economics Suggested Citation: Gruescu, Sandra; Thomas, Niels Peter (2002) : The Economists' Quartet - A Game, not a Theory, Darmstadt Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 109, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Department of Law and Economics, Darmstadt This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/84840 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Darmstadt Discussion Papers in Economics The Economists' Quartet A Game, not a Theory Sandra Gruescu and Niels Peter Thomas No.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Dimensions of Classical Utilitarian Economic Thought ––Bentham, J.S
    July 2012 Three Dimensions of Classical Utilitarian Economic Thought ––Bentham, J.S. Mill, and Sidgwick–– Daisuke Nakai∗ 1. Utilitarianism in the History of Economic Ideas Utilitarianism is a many-sided conception, in which we can discern various aspects: hedonistic, consequentialistic, aggregation or maximization-oriented, and so forth.1 While we see its impact in several academic fields, such as ethics, economics, and political philosophy, it is often dragged out as a problematic or negative idea. Aside from its essential and imperative nature, one reason might be in the fact that utilitarianism has been only vaguely understood, and has been given different roles, “on the one hand as a theory of personal morality, and on the other as a theory of public choice, or of the criteria applicable to public policy” (Sen and Williams 1982, 1-2). In this context, if we turn our eyes on economics, we can find intimate but subtle connections with utilitarian ideas. In 1938, Samuelson described the formulation of utility analysis in economic theory since Jevons, Menger, and Walras, and the controversies following upon it, as follows: First, there has been a steady tendency toward the removal of moral, utilitarian, welfare connotations from the concept. Secondly, there has been a progressive movement toward the rejection of hedonistic, introspective, psychological elements. These tendencies are evidenced by the names suggested to replace utility and satisfaction––ophélimité, desirability, wantability, etc. (Samuelson 1938) Thus, Samuelson felt the need of “squeezing out of the utility analysis its empirical implications”. In any case, it is somewhat unusual for economists to regard themselves as utilitarians, even if their theories are relying on utility analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Physiocrats Six Lectures on the French Économistes of the 18Th Century
    The Physiocrats Six Lectures on the French Économistes of the 18th Century Henry Higgs Batoche Books Kitchener 2001 First Edition: The Macmillan Company, 1897 This Edition: Batoche Books Limited 52 Eby Street South Kitchener, Ontario N2G 3L1 Canada email: [email protected] ISBN: 1-55273-064-6 Contents Preface ............................................................................................... 5 I: Rise of the School. .......................................................................... 6 II: The School and Its Doctrines. ..................................................... 17 III: The School and Its Doctrines (contd.) ....................................... 29 IV: Activities of the School. ............................................................. 43 V: Opponents of the School. ............................................................ 55 VI: Influence of the School. ............................................................. 66 Appendix .......................................................................................... 77 Authorities ....................................................................................... 80 Notes ................................................................................................ 82 Preface This little volume consists of lectures delivered before the London School of Economics in May and June of the present year. Impossible though it was found to give a truly adequate account of the Physiocrats in these six lectures, it has been thought that they may perhaps furnish
    [Show full text]
  • Legitimacy, Globally: the Incoherence of Free Trade Practice, Global Economics and Their Governing Principles of Political Economy
    Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Law Faculty Articles and Essays Faculty Scholarship 2001 Legitimacy, Globally: The Incoherence of Free Trade Practice, Global Economics and their Governing Principles of Political Economy Michael Henry Davis Cleveland State University, [email protected] Dana Neacsu Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/fac_articles Part of the International Law Commons, and the International Trade Law Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Original Citation Michael Henry Davis, Legitimacy, Globally: The Incoherence of Free Trade Practice, Global Economics and their Governing Principles of Political Economy 69 University of Missouri at Kansas City Law Review 733 (2001) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Articles and Essays by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: 69 UMKC L. Rev. 733 2000-2001 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Thu Sep 27 14:40:03 2012 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0047-7575 LEGITIMACY, GLOBALLY: THE INCOHERENCE OF FREE TRADE PRACTICE, GLOBAL ECONOMICS AND THEIR GOVERNING PRINCIPLES OF POLITICAL ECONOMY Michael H.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper No. 40, the Rise and Fall of Georgist Economic Thinking
    Portland State University PDXScholar Working Papers in Economics Economics 12-15-2019 Working Paper No. 40, The Rise and Fall of Georgist Economic Thinking Justin Pilarski Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/econ_workingpapers Part of the Economic History Commons, and the Economic Theory Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Pilarski, Justin "The Rise and Fall of Georgist Economic Thinking, Working Paper No. 40", Portland State University Economics Working Papers. 40. (15 December 2019) i + 16 pages. This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Working Papers in Economics by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. The Rise and Fall of Georgist Economic Thinking Working Paper No. 40 Authored by: Justin Pilarski A Contribution to the Working Papers of the Department of Economics, Portland State University Submitted for: EC456 “American Economic History” 15 December 2019; i + 16 pages Prepared for Professor John Hall Abstract: This inquiry seeks to establish that Henry George’s writings advanced a distinct theory of political economy that benefited from a meteoric rise in popularity followed by a fall to irrelevance with the turn of the 20th century. During the depression decade of the 1870s, the efficacy of the laissez-faire economic system came into question, during this same timeframe neoclassical economics supplanted classical political economy. This inquiry considers both of George’s key works: Progress and Poverty [1879] and The Science of Political Economy [1898], establishing the distinct components of Georgist economic thought.
    [Show full text]
  • David Ricardo's Comparative Advantage and Developing Countries
    David Ricardo’s Comparative Advantage and Developing Countries: Myth and Reality Kalim Siddiqui1 In International Critical Thought, Vol 8, issue 3. Abstract This article examines David Ricardo’s trade theory, which emphasises that if protection is removed, resources would be expected to move away from high cost to low cost products and as a result productivity would rise. His comparative advantage trade theory advocates in favour of a free trade, the argument implied generally to defend laissez faire. This study aims to critically analyse the theoretical and empirical basis for trade liberalisation. It also discusses the mainstream arguments relating to static and dynamic gains from trade liberalisation which seem to be based on weak theoretical and empirical grounds. The study analyses the phenomenon from a historical materialist perspective. It will also briefly discuss free trade and its impact on the industrial and agricultural sectors and how the performance of both sectors could have a long-term impact on local industrialisation, food security, employment and well-being of the people in developing countries. This article builds on this political economy and looks in particular at free trade policies and their impact on the economies of developing countries. Free trade theory, which has wide support among international financial institutions, namely the IMF, World Bank, WTO (World Trade Organisation) draws on David Ricardo’s theory. The study has argued that free trade policy will deepen further the process of uneven development and unequal exchange. The study concludes that free trade policy will deepen further the process of uneven development and unequal exchange. Keywords: Comparative Advantage, developing countries, capitalist expansion, WTO and free trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Part II Core Theory: Classic International Trade Theories
    Part II Core Theory: Classic International Trade Theories Table of Contents Part II Core Theory: Classic International Trade Theories.........................2 1. Mercantilism ...........................................................................................2 The Classical World of David Ricardo and Comparative (Chapter 3).......3 Advantage ...................................................................................................3 Absolute Advantage and Comparative Advantage .....................................5 Problems of Using Absolute Advantage to Guide Allocation of Tasks......8 Ricardian Comparative Advantage.............................................................9 Resource Constraints: ...............................................................................18 Complete Specialization: ..........................................................................20 Technological take over by less developed countries...............................21 Production Possibilities: ...........................................................................21 Complete versus Partial Specialization ....................................................23 The case of a small country ......................................................................24 Some concluding observations .................................................................25 2. Extensions and Tests of the Classical Model of Trade (chapter 4).......26 2.1 The classical model in money terms...................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • PROFESSIONALIZING ECONOMICS: the 'Marginalist Revolution' in Historical Context Michael A. Bernstein Department of History 0
    PROFESSIONALIZING ECONOMICS: The ‘Marginalist Revolution’ in Historical Context Michael A. Bernstein Department of History 0104 University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla, California 92093-0104 [USA] [Phone: 858-534-1070] [Fax: 858-534-7283] [[email protected]] 2 Economic analysis, serving for two centuries to win an understanding of the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, has been fobbed off with another bride -- a Theory of Value. There were no doubt deep-seated political reasons for the substitution but there was also a purely technical, intellectual reason. -- Joan Robinson [1956]i If the last years of the nineteenth century witnessed the first, genuine articulation of a professional self-consciousness among American economists, then they also demarcated the establishment of an altogether novel protocol for those experts. This new agenda, developed with increasing rigor and authority as the twentieth century beckoned, began a significant reorientation of the field's object of study while at the same time it reconfigured long-standing perceptions of the history of economic thought as a whole. Scientific sophistication necessarily involved a revision of practice, yet it also encouraged the articulation of new perceptions of its pedigree.ii Linking the object of study with particular and venerable authorities from the ages was of singular importance to the successful construction of a distinctly professional knowledge. Framing that understanding in a particular way was the result of both a social and an intellectual process. With their most apparent and seemingly immediate intellectual roots in the moral philosophy of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, modern economists were (and are) eager to invoke validation by impressive forebears and traditions.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. David Ricardo and Classical Economics Robert L
    Section XIV: The ndusI trial Revolution, Classical Contemporary Civilization (Ideas and Institutions Economics, and Economic Liberalism of Western Man) 1958 8. David Ricardo and Classical Economics Robert L. Bloom Gettysburg College Basil L. Crapster Gettysburg College Harold L. Dunkelberger Gettysburg College See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/contemporary_sec14 Part of the Economic History Commons, Economic Theory Commons, and the Growth and Development Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Bloom, Robert L. et al. "8. David Ricardo and Classical Economics. Pt XIV: The ndusI trial Revolution, Classical Economics, and Economic Liberalism." Ideas and Institutions of Western Man (Gettysburg College, 1958), 37-49. This is the publisher's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ contemporary_sec14/8 This open access book chapter is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 8. David Ricardo and Classical Economics Abstract It is David Ricardo, (1772-1823) rather than Malthus who has long been regarded as the more outstanding of the classical economists after Adam Smith. His father was a Jewish immigrant to England who became a prosperous merchant and broker. Ricardo entered his father's business, but after marrying a Quakeress and embracing her faith was forced onto his own resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoliberalism, Capital Accumulation, and Austerity in Academia, the Term
    Neoliberalism, Capital Accumulation, and Austerity Mehdi S. Shariati, Ph.D. Professor, Economics, Sociology and Geography Kansas City Kansas City Community College Abstract Recent crisis in global capitalism has once again brought to the fore major structural contradictions and the consequences of these contradictions are reflected in the massive dislocation of the economy, growing number of (the) poor, concentration of wealth in the hands of a few around the globe, indebtedness, rampant speculation and an unprecedented concentration of financial capital at the expense of productive sector of the economy. The austerity program by which the global working class must endure has generated much social protests including "occupy Wall Street," but with very little discussion of an alternative to the current global system. In academia, the term descriptive of finance capital’s policy prescription is “neoliberalism.” Yet the term not only has created confusion since in the North American context, liberals and neoliberals have always been viewed as left leaning people and not the free marketers and market fundamentalists. Neoliberalism often refers to a set of economic policies designed for intense and accelerated capital accumulation. Rarely the discussion of the process of intense capital accumulation includes a restructuring of society and social institutions as a precondition for the successful implementation of the policies. This paper is an attempt to add to the discussion by pointing out the indispensability of the practice of social imperialism in the process of reproducing the hegemonic structure and effective implementation of the policy. Reaction to the evolving socio-economic and political events has been one of the greatest preoccupation in the social and political sciences as a habit and of necessity.
    [Show full text]