DOCSLIB.ORG

The French Revolution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The French Revolution Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive in 2007 witii funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation littp://www.arGliive.org/details/frenclirevolutionOlGarluoft THE FRENCH REVOLUTION A HISTORY BY THOMAS CARLYLE WITH INTRODUCTION, NOTES AND APPENDICES BY JOHN HOLLAND ROSE, M.A. AUTHOR OK "the LIFE OF NAPOLEON I," "THE REVOLUTIONARY AND NAPOLEONIC ERA," ETC. IN THREE VOLUMES WITH ILLUSTRATIONS AND PLANS 5^ 0^ VOL. I ^,---^1 6 THE BASTILLE LONDON GEORGE BELL AND SONS 1902 ! Diesem Ambos vergleich' ich das Land, den Hammer dem Herrscher ; Und dem Volke das Blech, das in der Mitte sich krlimmt. Wehe dem armen Blech, wenn nur willkiirliche Schlage Ungewiss treffen, und nie fertig der Kessel erscheint Goethe. CniSWICK PRKSS : CilARLES VVHITTINGHAM AND CO. TOOKS COURT, CHANCERY LANE, LONDON. CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE Introduction by the Editor ix Book I. Death of Louis XV. I. Louis the Well-beloved I II. Realised Ideals 7 III. Viaticum i8 IV. Louis the Unforgotten 22 Book II. The Paper Age. I. Astraea Redux 30 II. Petition in Hieroglyphs 38 III. Questionable .... 41 IV. Maurepas 46 V. Astraea Redux without Cash 51 VI. Windbags 56 VII. Contrat Social 62 VIII. Printed Paper .... 66 Book III. The Parlement of Paris. I. Dishonoured Bills 11 II. Controller Calonne 79 III. The Notables . 83 IV. Lomenie's Edicts 94 V. Lomenie's Thunderbolts 100 VI. Lomenie's Plots 106 VII. Internecine 112 VIII. Lomenie's Death-throes 119 IX. Burial with Bonfire . 131 Book IV. States-General. I. The Notables again .... 136 II. The Election 143 III. Grown electric 151 IV. The Procession 156 CONTENTS Book V. The Third Estate. CHAFTEB PACK I. Inertia i79 II. Mercury de Breze . 190 III. Brogue the War-God 199 206 IV. To Arms ! . V. Give us Arms . 212 VI. Storm and Victory 220 VII. Not a Revolt . 231 VIII. Conquering your King . 236 . IX. The Lanterne . 241 Book VI. Consolidation. I. Make the Constitution . - . .248 II. The Constituent Assembly . • 255 III. The General Overturn . 263 IV. In Queue .... 273 V. The Fourth Estate 277 Book VII. The Insurrection of Women. I. Patrollotism 281 II. O Richard, O my King 287 III. Black Cockades 293 IV. The Menads 296 V. Usher Maillard 301 VI. To Versailles 307 VII. At Versailles 312 VIII. The Equal Diet 317 IX. Lafayette 323 X. The Grand Entries 328 XI. From Versailles 334 I : Appendix "Le Contrat Social" . 343 Appendix II : Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen 346 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Louis XVI., from a painting by Duplessis . Frontispiece Marie-Antoinette, from a painting by Mme. Vig^e- Lebrun 36 Philippe, Due d'Orl]£ans 58 Assembly of the Notables 84 A "Lit de Justice" 98 Scene as the Comte d'Artois left the Palais . 103 The Crowd stopping Coaches on the Pont-Neuf 134 Riot in Faubourg St.-Antoine 154 Camille Desmoulins . 162 J. S. Bailly 170 Opening of the States-General 176 The Tennis-Court Oath . 192 The Procession WITH Busts of Neckeranid d'Orleans 208 Lambesc and the Regiment Royal-Allemand 210 Pillage of the Maison de Saint-Lazare 214 Capture of the Bastille . 224 The Death of Foulon 244 Abolition of all Privileges . 258 The Garden of the Palais Royal 284 Marquis de la Fayette . 305 The Royal Family arriving at Paris, October Cth, 17S9 340 Plan of the Bastille page " INTRODUCTION I " T FIND on a general view that the book is one of X the savagcst written for several centuries. It is a book written by a wild man, a man disunited from the fellowship of the world he lives in, looking King and beggar in the face with an indifference of brotherhood and an indifference of contempt." Such was the verdict passed by Thomas Carlyle on his own handiwork when he made its acquaintance once again in type. The words come quite naturally in his letter of February i/th, 1837, written to his brother John, whose advice he had taken as to several omissions and a more minute division of chapters ; and they tally with those which he wrote to " his mother a little earlier : It is not altogether a bad book. For one thing I consider it to be the sincerest book this nation has got offered to it for a good few years, or is likely to get for a good few. And so I ' say to them : Good Christian people ; there it is. Shriek over it, since ye will not shout over it. Trample it, and kick it, and use it all ways ye judge best. If ye can kill it and extinguish it, then in God's name do. If ye cannot, why then ye will not. My share in it is done.' And the book was not killed. There was a good deal " " of lamentation and admonition about the style ; but on the whole there was more shouting than shrieking, :; X INTRODUCTION so Carlyle noted with grim surprise, even in the circles where Macaulay and Jeffrey intoned their Hterary deca- logues. In truth, it soon became clear to all but the devotees of conventionality that here was a book that vibrated with irrepressible emotion. Carlyle himself said " as much in his letter to John Sterling : It has come hot out of my own soul, born in blackness, whirlwind, and sorrow." There, surely, we have the explanation of many of its characteristics. We can see, for one thing, why its style set all the recognised canons at defiance. It is not the outcome of mere historical study—though there is a great deal of honest research in the book ; it is not the style of a literary man who has strayed somewhat scornfully into the domain of History, deeming it, as did Dr. Johnson, the least honoured department of Literature a mere workshop for the turning out of sonorous prose. No : Carlyle's work is the outpouring of a vehement nature, the protest of a mind flaming up in revolt against the evils of his time. It is that of one crying in the wilderness ; and the sons of wisdom will not expect from this John the Baptist of modern thought the elegances of those who wear soft raiment and aspire to dwell in kings' houses. He himself stated that the style of " The French Revolution " was the natural outcome of his thoughts. Nearly two years before he struggled through to the longed-for end of the work, he wrote to his brother " The book is certainly better some ways than any I have hitherto written ; contains no falsehood, singularity, or triviality that I can help." ^ This testimony from a ^ See, too, the entry in his Journal of July 15th, 1835, regretting the difficulty that he found in composing : " What to do ? To INTRODUCTION xi man of utter truthfulness, who at that time did not know whether the book would see the light, ought to convince every unbiassed mind that his writing was devoid of affectation. I quote his words here, not in defence of his strange desire to reform our Comparatives and Superla- tives, and of the resulting abortions, " audibler," " insup- portablest," etc. ; for, from the literary standpoint, they are inexcusable. I do claim, however, that, though they are not English, they are honest Carlylese. We must wonderingly accept these and many other singu- larities as, so to speak, the sackcloth of the prophet. II Granting, then, that the work was the truthful expres- sion of an overmastering conviction, what was the im- pulse that drove him to it ? Though there is little direct evidence in his letters on this topic, yet we can see from his other writings that the mysterious magic of that great upheaval early laid its spell on him. He hailed it as a sign of the heights and depths of human nature, which transcend all experience and set at naught the wisdom of the wiseacres. Its very horrors he regarded as a Nemesis for the lingering wrongs of the past. Above all, it was a mighty /"^z^/, or as he says (*' French Revolu- tion," vol. iii., p. 260), " This Republic and National write on the best 07ie can, get the freest sincerest possible utterance. " . Truly I feel like one that was bursting with meaning (" Car- lyle's Life in London," vol. i., p. 56). I think that a comparison of the rather monotonous and laboured diction of his early essays with the fresh vivid utterance of " Sartor" and "The French Revo- lution" will show that the latter was his natural style, while the other was adopted in order to please the editors of reviews. " xi INTRODUCTION Tigress is a New-Birth ; a Fact of Nature among Formulas, in an Age of Formulas." He viewed it, there- fore, as a volcanic outburst, revealing the utmost powers and passions of human nature ; and he gazed into the crater with eager longing, so that he might learn some- thing of that daemonic force that lies hidden under the surface of a seemingly outworn society. To describe the meanest of the mean, " in its actual truth as it swims there, were a poem," he says in his " Diamond Neck- lace." " How much more if the object fixed on were not mean, but already wonderful. Romance exists, strictly speaking, in Reality alone. The thing that is, what can be so wonderful } Furthermore, he felt strongly that this wonderful event had never yet been described. He says rightly that Thiers' " History of the French Revolution " wears a superficial air of order and clearness, while inwardly it is waste, inorganic, and singularly false. As for Mignet's work, it has the symmetry, not of a tree, but " of a firm, well-manufactured gridiron." For two works only has " he a good word ; these are the account by Deux Amis de la Liberte," the value of which he certainly overrated, and the " Histoire Parlementaire " by Buchez and Roux, which deserves all the good that he said of it.^ Then, too, he had had the advantage of visiting Paris in the year 1825, when he introduced himself to that sinister friend of Danton, the butcher Legendre.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 the Regency, 1643–1661
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-57177-8 — A/AS Level History for AQA The Sun King: Louis XIV, France and Europe, 1643–1715 Student Book David Hickman , Edited by Michael Fordham , David Smith Excerpt More Information PART 1: THE SUN KING 1643–1685 1 The Regency, 1643–1661 In this section, we shall look at the beginning of Louis XIV’s reign and the situation in France when he came to the throne aged four. We shall look at how the government was established that ruled in France until Louis took personal control of afairs in 1661. The Regency years were marked by armed conflict, so we shall also examine the wars and civil wars of this period in French history. We will look into: • the French monarchy in 1643: the legacy of Richelieu and Louis XIII; the establishment of the Regency • the minority of Louis XIV: the roles of Anne of Austria and Mazarin; the Parlement of Paris, unrest and opposition; the Frondes • France and Europe: the rise of French power at the expense of the Habsburgs; the treaties of Westphalia and the Pyrenees • the condition of France at the accession of Louis XIV in 1661: politics, economy and society. The French monarchy in 1643 The legacy of Richelieu and Louis XIII Louis XIII was king of France 1610–1643 and married Anne of Austria. Ater 23 years of hoping for an heir and four still births, the couple produced Louis in 1638, prompting calls of a miracle birth. 1 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-57177-8 — A/AS Level History for AQA The Sun King: Louis XIV, France and Europe, 1643–1715 Student Book David Hickman , Edited by Michael Fordham , David Smith Excerpt More Information A/AS Level History for AQA: The Sun King: Louis XIV, France and Europe, 1643–1715 Voices from the past Richelieu Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu was French Chief Minister 1624–1642.
    [Show full text]
  • Ritual and Politics in France Before the Revolution
    2021 VIII Death and the Crown: Ritual and Politics in France before the Revolution Anne Byrne Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2020 Review by: Lynette White Review: Death and the Crown: Ritual and Politics in France before the Revolution Death and the Crown: Ritual and Politics in France before the Revolution. By Anne Byrne. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2020. ISBN 978-1-5261-4330-3. xxii + 202 pp. £80.00 here is a persistent idea that the Bourbon monarchy by the end of the eighteenth century was crumbling under the weight of rules, expectations, and ceremony imposed by Louis XIV and followed blindly by his successors. T Scholarship of Louis XVI’s reign is often concerned with tracing the causes of the Revolution, focusing on what went wrong with the monarchy. Rather than looking ahead to 1789, Anne Byrne provides a snapshot of royal ceremonial, and considers the successes and failures largely without reference to future events. This work analyses the ceremonial occasions following the death of Louis XV in 1774 and the coronation of Louis XVI in 1775 as a sample of events unified by time and actors. It also explores how ritual was used to express political points and also highlighting the wider participation of the public in royal ritual. Some lesser-known sources are used to overturn preconceived ideas of the death and burial of Louis XV, the first lit de justice of the reign and recall of parlement, and the engagement of both key figures and the wider public in the coronation. The first two chapters examine the deathbed and subsequent funeral rites of Louis XV.
    [Show full text]
  • Evénement Narcissique
    UCLA Paroles gelées Title L'entrée royale de Saint-Simon : Evénement narcissique Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/86n6d2v2 Journal Paroles gelées, 13(1) ISSN 1094-7264 Author Duffrin, Diane Publication Date 1995 DOI 10.5070/PG7131003021 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California L'entree royale de Saint-Simon: Evenement narcissique Diane Duffrin Louis de Rouvroy, due de Saint-Simon decrit dans ses Memoires un royaume en declin (Brody "Peintre"). D'apres les Memoires, le regne de Louis XTV n'etait pas glorieux, mais ruineux. Ce roi accueillait dans la famille royale ainsi que dans la societe noble le sang de ceux d'une naissance inferieure. Dans ses Memoires Saint-Simon cree une opposition binaire entre la vraie noblesse, dont il faisait partie, et ceux qui pretendait a un rang noble. Cette bipolarite menera a un examen de la glorification narcissique de I'ecrivain par lui-meme dans les deux scenes dont il s'agira ici, la seance du Parlement apres la mort de Louis XIV en 1715 et le lit de justice de 1718. Tres fier de son statut social de due et pair, Saint-Simon croyait tout statut social immuable. II ne comprenait pas que Ton puisse violer les lois sacrees de la purete de la noblesse. Apres avoir melange son sang royal et pur au sang infecte du peuple. Taction la plus infame qu'a commise Louis XFV a ete de dormer a ses batards un rang au-dessus de celui de due et pair. Saint-Simon ecrit au sujet des batards: "Leur rang egale a celui des princes du sang avoit coute au Roi le renversement de toutes les regies et les droits, et celui des lois du royaume les plus anciennes, les plus saintes, les plus fondamentales, les plus intactes" (12:41).^ Ce "favoritisme sacrilege et negateur de I'Etat" (de Waelhens 285) etait "une violence faite par Louis d'abord a son etat de Roi, et, en consequence, a I'Etat de la France" (Brody, "Structures" 68).
    [Show full text]
  • Compulsory Registration and Its Limits, 1665–1671
    1 Compulsory registration and its limits, 1665–1671 Every student of French history knows that Louis XIV deprived the parlements of their most important power and function – that of opposing new legislation, especially fiscal legislation, when it first appeared before them. Given the ten- dency of the parlements to obstruct new legislation, frequently under Henry IV and Louis XII and periodically under Louis XV and Louis XVI, the reign of Louis XIV stands in sharp contrast in this regard. Curiously, however, even the most recent studies offer little in the way of narrative, analysis or background to explain how, why and under what circumstances the parlements lost their powers to obstruct new laws for the first time in their history. In treating this subject, most historians point to the ordinance of civil procedure of 1667, which curtailed the use of remonstrances by the parlements, and the declara- tion of February 1673, which regulated the procedure by which the tribunals registered the laws. But other kings had restricted remonstrances in ways that resembled the provisions of the ordinance; and few historians have appreciated the original features of the declaration, let alone explained why the government needed to enact it, once it had issued the ordinance. In any event, the mere cita- tion of the laws of 1667 and 1673 cannot tell us how and why, or much about when, the government of Louis XIV, in contrast with both its predecessors and its successors, imposed its will upon the parlements in the registration of laws.1 The issue merits a fresh examination.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Revolution 1789
    Grade 10 - History Topic 3 THE FRENCH REVOLUTION 1789 1 Until 1789 rule by Kings States Generals Called 1789 Fall of the Bastille, July 1789 King Louis XVI of France [http://www.biography.com/people/louis-xvi-9386943] New Constitution 1789 - 1791 Republic 1792 Extremists in Power 1793 Reign of Terror 1793 - 1794 Napoleon First The Directory Consul 1795 1799 2 [http://www.biography.com/people/napoleon- 9420291] CONDITIONS IN FRANCE BEFORE 1789 The French Revolution was the result of conditions in France in the century preceding 1789. The causes are usually considered under the following headings: POLITICAL CAUSES A. THE WORKING OF THE GOVERNMENT The government was despotic, i.e. the King had absolute power. However, there were two other powerful organisations in France: i The power of the Church a. The Catholic Church owned a large amount of land. b. It was very wealthy. c. It was not subjected to ordinary laws; it had its own legal system. d. It did not pay official taxes but gave ‘presents’ to the state on a voluntary basis. e. It was socially and educationally very important. ii The Parlements of France a. These were special courts of law that had the right to register all and therefore could refuse to register a law made by the King. b. The King could use his power of ‘Lit de justice’ whereby he could in theory force the Parlements to register the law, but in fact he was afraid to use this power in case he upset the Parlements. b. The King nominated the members of the Royal Council and they were responsible to him.
    [Show full text]
  • ROYAL AUTHORITY in SEVENTEENTH CENTURY FRANCE by KENT WARREN JONES, B.A
    A DELICATE BALANCE: ROYAL AUTHORITY IN SEVENTEENTH CENTURY FRANCE by KENT WARREN JONES, B.A. A THESIS IN HISTORY Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved Accepted May, 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION . 1 II. INSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY. 7 III. PATRONAGE AND POWER. 69 IV. J.-B. BOSSUET AND THE "ABSOLUTE" MONARCHY. 100 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 112 ii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION French royal absolutism is an insidious historical myth. Insidious because it is so seductive, a myth because it is a generalization propagated by historians too ready to believe Louis XIV's propagandists. Part of the reason for the creation and survival of this myth is its role in providing a convenient starting point for studying the French Revolution. The tale of absolutism in France prospered during the nineteenth century because it fit well with the pro-republican and anti-monarchical political values of many of that era's historians.1 By the twentieth century, the Sun King's absolutism was a firmly entrenched part of the historical orthodoxy. This alone ensured that historians in the first half of the century continued to discuss the seventeenth-century French state within the context of absolutism. More importantly, the absolutist model survived because it was a product of traditional history. History was written, as it had always been, primarily as the story of great men and their institutions. When a Georges Pages or Gaston Zeller wrote about seventeenth-century France, they almost inevitably described an absolutist state, using abundant archival evidence of lparticularly in the works of the Romantic historians, for example, Jules Michelet in History of the French Revolution (1847-53).
    [Show full text]
  • Louis XIV and the Parlements of France, the of ROYAL AUTHORITY Parlement of Paris and All the Provincial Tribunals
    hurt.cov 29/9/03 3:22 pm Page 1 THIS is a thoroughly researched book, which deals with a major subject in a more accessible way than previous accounts, and which commands respect because of its impressive archival foundations. OUIS XIV L L Professor Joseph Bergin, University of Manchester OUIS XIV and the AN impressive range of source material has been examined with meticulous care, which in itself will make this a very useful book. FRONT COVER David Parker, University of Leeds PARLE M E NTS — The palaisdejustice oftheparlementRennes THE ASSERTION HIS is the first scholarly study of the political and economic Trelationship between Louis XIV and the parlements of France, the OF ROYAL AUTHORITY Parlement of Paris and all the provincial tribunals. The author and the explains how the king managed to overcome the century-old opposition of the parlements to new legislation, and to impose upon them the strict political discipline for which this reign, and only this reign, is known. Hurt shows that the king built upon that discipline to extract large sums of money from the judges in the parlements, notably in the form of forced loans and office sales, thus damaging . Reproduced bykindpermissionof the MuséedeBretagne, France PARLE M E NTS their economic interests. When the king died in 1715, the regent, Philippe d’Orléans, after a brief attempt to befriend the parlements through compromise, resorted to the authoritarian methods of Louis XIV and perpetuated the Sun King’s political and economic legacy. This study calls into question the current revisionist understanding of the reign of Louis XIV and insists that, after all, absolute government had a harsh reality at its core.
    [Show full text]
  • The Treatment of Early Modern French Jews in Politics and Literary Culture
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2014 Reality vs. Perceptions: The Treatment of Early Modern French Jews in Politics and Literary Culture Michael Woods Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/3391 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Michael Woods 2014 All Rights Reserved Reality vs. Perceptions: The Treatment of Early Modern French Jews in Politics and Literary Culture A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts at Virginia Commonwealth University. by Michael James Woods Bachelor of Arts, The Pennsylvania State University, 2012. Director: Dr. George Munro Professor, Department of History Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia May, 2014 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my thesis adviser, the brilliant Dr. George Munro. Without his time and dedication to my project, this study would not have evolved into what it has become now. The success of this work is a product of his assistance. Many thanks also go to Dr. John Powers and Dr. Angelina Overvold for agreeing to serve on my defense committee and for offering up their expertise and suggestions. A special thanks to every faculty member in Virginia Commonwealth University’s Department of History that I have had the pleasure to work with: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • In Majesty an Exhibition from 1 March to 19 June 2011 2
    1 The Palace of Versailles presents THRONES in Majesty an exhibition from 1 March to 19 June 2011 2 Table of contents Press release 3 Interview with Jean-Jacques Aillagon 4 Interview with Jacques Charles-Gaffiot 6 Presentation of the exhibition 8 Exhibition scenography 33 Interview with Marc Jeanclos 34 Marc Jeanclos, from objects to scenography 35 Around the exhibition 36 Publications 37 Mini-site of the exhibition 39 Booklet-game by Paris Mômes 40 Practical information 41 Visuals available for the press 42 Partners 48 press release Thrones in Majesty From 1 March to 19 June 2011 - Grand Apartments of the Palace of Versailles Press contacts Thrones from different periods and varied civilisations are presented in the Grand Apartments of the Palace of Versailles. Forty emblematic thrones enable the visitor to Hélène Dalifard better understand the universality of the seated representation of religious or 01 30 83 77 01 Aurélie Gevrey political authority. Whether sober or majestic, reasonable or extravagant, thrones 01 30 83 77 03 always convey the same symbol of legitimately established authority. This exhibition sets Violaine Solari up an original dialogue between these exceptional objects, often masterpieces, in the 01 30 83 77 14 sumptuous setting of the Palace of Versailles, a place par excellence of the exercise and [email protected] representation of sovereignty. The exercise of sovereignty associates two universal and timeless notions: authority and power. Authority establishes its possessor on bases regarded as more stable than those offered by power. CURATORS Jacques Charles-Gaffiot The latter is ephemeral and acquired with difficulty by its holder, and comes from the victory of a Assisted by Hélène Delalex hero over his enemies.
    [Show full text]
  • Conciergerie De Répression Que L’On Va Nommer : La « Terreur »*
    Histoire Visiter Le palais de la Cité Informations Histoire Visiter Le palais de la Cité Informations Histoire Visiter Le palais de la Cité Informations ▲ ▲ ▲ français Mais, à l’été 1794, de plus en plus de Français Glossaire souhaitent voir mettre un terme à cette période Conciergerie de répression que l’on va nommer : la « Terreur »*. Chapiteau : pierre taillée ou sculptée placée au sommet Après Robespierre, qui incarne la Dictature de d’une colonne pour supporter la retombée d’un arc. 2016. novembre Stipa, Demeure royale et prison Salut Public, Fouquier-Tinville, l’accusateur public, Géminée : partagée en deux par une colonne. est à son tour exécuté. Quelques mois plus tard, e impression Héloïse et Abélard : héros du début du XII siècle Demeure royale et prison la justice ordinaire reprend son cours. Elle est alors d’une tragique histoire d’amour devenue légendaire. mise au service d’un nouveau projet politique : Justice d’exception : justice dérogatoire au droit commun, Au VIe siècle, Clovis, roi des Francs, installe sur l’île terminer la Révolution. mise en place lors de grandes crises politiques ou Marie-Hélène Forestier. Marie-Hélène Forestier. de la Cité sa demeure royale. Cinq siècles plus tard, 10 La chapelle. Située sur l’emplacement de l’oratoire* de guerres civiles. Hugues Capet, premier roi capétien, établit son conseil médiéval du roi, la chapelle des prisonniers sert aussi Lit de justice : réunion du Parlement présidée par le roi et son administration dans le palais de la Cité de cellule collective pendant la Révolution. Proche qui faisait prévaloir son autorité. qui devient ainsi le siège du pouvoir royal.
    [Show full text]
  • DOSSIER ENSEIGNANT Ile De La Cité Conciergerie, Sainte-Chapelle, Cathédrale Notre-Dame
    DOSSIER ENSEIGNANT Ile de la Cité Conciergerie, Sainte-Chapelle, cathédrale Notre-Dame Berceau de la capitale, l’Ile de la Cité conserve du Moyen Age quelques-uns de ses plus beaux monuments : la Conciergerie, la Sainte-Chapelle et la cathédrale Notre-Dame. Ceux-ci constituent aujourd’hui le plus vaste ensemble architectural gothique civil et religieux en France. Ils sont classés avec l’Ile de la Cité au patrimoine mondial de l’Unesco et sont un témoignage extraordinaire de notre histoire et de la genèse de Paris. Une île au cœur de Paris THÉMATIQUES • les grandes périodes de l’Histoire de France • la naissance d’une ville : Paris • la Seine et Paris au cours des siècles NOS ATELIERS • l’évolution urbaine de Paris : quartier Palais • l’évolution urbaine de Paris : quartier cathédral Plan de 1754 de l’Ile de la Cité. • la Seine, les ponts La plaine parisienne fut progressivement transformée du paléolithique au néolithique par la Seine qui AUTRES RESSOURCES découpa une série de petites îles dont la plus grande était l’Ile de la Cité. Au confluent de la Marne et de l’Oise, à l’intersection de deux routes, l’une fluviale, l’autre terrestre, le site parisien est fréquenté par l’homme dès le • crypte archéologique : paléolithique. La future Ile de la Cité est occupée à partir du IIIe siècle avant J.-C. par une tribu celte, les Parisii. vestiges de rues et de En 45 avant J.-C., Jules César dans ses « Commentaires » fait mention de cette ville de Lutèce. Dès maisons des périodes cette époque, l’Ile de la Cité est partagée en deux pôles, le spirituel à l’est avec l’édification à l’emplacement gallo-romaine et médiévale actuel de la cathédrale Notre-Dame d’un temple probablement dédié à Jupiter et le temporel à l’ouest avec • musée national du Moyen un oppidum, siège du pouvoir administratif, construit à l’emplacement actuel du palais de Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Confronting the Parlement of Paris, 1718
    6 Confronting the Parlement of Paris, 1718 The menacing appearance of d’Argenson, the new keeper of the seals and pres- ident of the Council of Finances, so frightened contemporaries that they called him Rhadamanthus, a judge of the underworld in Greek mythology known for his stern sense of justice. But d’Argenson’s efficiency as chief of police for Paris, his talent for making rapid decisions and his ability, even at the age of sixty-five, to work through the day and into the night, or vice versa, also won their respect. Experienced in government and an early supporter of John Law, he seemed fully capable of overcoming the Parlement of Paris, as though born for the moment. He had clashed with the tribunal over jurisdiction and assembled embarrassing personal files on some of its magistrates, as they had reason to know. In 1716 the Parlement, seeking its revenge, attempted to try him for embezzlement and fraud, a fate from which the regent providentially rescued him; but the experi- ence naturally made him more hostile than ever towards the judges. In the summer of 1718, d’Argenson assumed the key role in the regency’s decisive confrontation with the Parlement and worked hard to achieve the final victory. Perhaps most important, he defined the central issue of the dispute as the question of legislative sovereignty, adding to it an important ideological dimension. His son René-Louis, who watched d’Argenson at work, likened him to Richelieu, although he might have adopted Pussort and Colbert as the better comparison.1 The magistrates took d’Argenson’s new appointment as an affront and did not even consider registering the letters patent appointing him keeper of the seals, an unfavourable augury for their relationship.
    [Show full text]