New Zealand Census of Population and Dwellings Guide Notes
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
![In the High Court of New Zealand Auckland Registry I Te Kōti Matua O Aotearoa Tāmaki Makaurau Rohe Civ-2019-404-2672 [2020] Nz](https://docslib.b-cdn.net/cover/6165/in-the-high-court-of-new-zealand-auckland-registry-i-te-k%C5%8Dti-matua-o-aotearoa-t%C4%81maki-makaurau-rohe-civ-2019-404-2672-2020-nz-46165.webp)
In the High Court of New Zealand Auckland Registry I Te Kōti Matua O Aotearoa Tāmaki Makaurau Rohe Civ-2019-404-2672 [2020] Nz
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE CIV-2019-404-2672 [2020] NZHC 2768 UNDER Resource Management Act 1991. IN THE MATTER of an appeal under section 299 of the Resource Management Act 1991 against a decision of the Environment Court. BETWEEN NGĀTI MARU TRUST Appellant AND NGĀTI WHĀTUA ŌRĀKEI WHAIA MAIA LIMITED Respondent (Continued next page) Hearing: 18 June 2020 Auckland Council submissions received 26 June 2020 Respondent submissions received 1 July 2020 Appellants’ submissions received 26 June and 6 July 2020 Counsel: A Warren and K Ketu for Appellants L Fraser and N M de Wit for Respondent R S Abraham for Panuku Development Auckland S F Quinn for Auckland Council Judgment: 21 October 2020 JUDGMENT OF WHATA J This judgment was delivered by me on 21 October 2020 at 4.00 pm, pursuant to Rule 11.5 of the High Court Rules. Registrar/Deputy Registrar Date: …………………………. Solicitors: McCaw Lewis, Hamilton Simpson Grierson, Auckland DLA Piper, Auckland Chapman Tripp, Auckland NGĀTI MARU TRUST v NGĀTI WHĀTUA ŌRĀKEI WHAIA MAIA LIMITED [2020] NZHC 2768 [21 October 2020] CIV-2019-404-2673 BETWEEN TE ĀKITA O WAIOHUA WAKA TAUA INCORPORATED SOCIETY Appellant AND NGĀTI WHĀTUA NGĀTI WHĀTUA ŌRĀKEI WHAIA MAIA LIMITED Respondent CIV-2019-404-2676 BETWEEN TE PATUKIRIKIRI TRUST Appellant AND NGĀTI WHĀTUA NGĀTI WHĀTUA ŌRĀKEI WHAIA MAIA LIMITED Respondent [1] The Environment Court was asked to answer the following question (the Agreed Question): Does the Environment Court have jurisdiction to determine whether any tribe holds primary mana whenua over an area the subject of a resource consent application: (a) generally; or (b) where relevant to claimed cultural effects of the application and the wording of resource consent conditions. -
Program Draft.21
9th Annual “Living Breath of wǝɫǝbʔaltxʷ” Indigenous Foods Virtual Symposium “Food is Resistance” Saturday, June 5th 2021 Hosted by University of Washington’s American Indian Studies Department and the Na’ah Illahee Fund Find us at: https://livingbreathfoodsymposium.org/ www.facebook.com/UWLivingBreath Twitter - @LivingBreathUW Welcome from our Symposium Committee! First, we want to acknowledge and pay respect to the Coast Salish peoples whose traditional territory our event is normally held on at the University of Washington’s wǝɫǝbʔaltxʷ Intellectual House. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we were unable to come together last year but we are so grateful to be able to reunite this year in a safe virtual format. We appreciate the patience of this community and our presenters’ collective understanding and we are thrilled to be back. We hope to be able to gather in person in 2022. We are also very pleased you can join us today for our 9th annual “Living Breath of wǝɫǝbʔaltxʷ” Indigenous Foods Symposium. This event brings together individuals to share their knowledge and expertise on topics such as Indigenous foodways and ecological knowledge, Tribal food sovereignty and security initiatives, traditional foods/medicines and health/wellness, environmental justice, treaty rights, and climate change. Our planning committee is composed of Indigenous women who represent interdisciplinary academic fields of study and philanthropy and we volunteer our time to host this annual symposium. We are committed to Indigenous food, environmental, and social justice and recognize the need to maintain a community-based event as we all carry on this important work. We host this event and will continue to utilize future symposia to better serve our Indigenous communities as we continue to foster dialogue and build collaborative networks to sustain our cultural food practices and preserve our healthy relationships with the land, water, and all living things. -
Te Runanga 0 Ngai Tahu Traditional Role of the Rona!Sa
:I: Mouru Pasco Maaka, who told him he was the last Maaka. In reply ::I: William told Aritaku that he had an unmerried sister Ani, m (nee Haberfield, also Metzger) in Murihiku. Ani and Aritaku met and went on to marry. m They established themselves in the area of Waimarama -0 and went on to have many children. -a o Mouru attended Greenhills Primary School and o ::D then moved on to Southland Girls' High School. She ::D showed academic ability and wanted to be a journalist, o but eventually ended up developing photographs. The o -a advantage of that was that today we have heaps of -a beautiful photos of our tlpuna which we regard as o priceless taolsa. o ::D Mouru went on to marry Nicholas James Metzger ::D in 1932. Nick's grandfather was German but was o educated in England before coming to New Zealand. o » Their first son, Nicholas Graham "Tiny" was born the year » they were married. Another child did not follow until 1943. -I , around home and relished the responsibility. She Mouru had had her hopes pinned on a dainty little girl 2S attended Raetihi School and later was a boarder at but instead she gave birth to a 13lb 40z boy called Gary " James. Turakina Maori Girls' College in Marton. She learnt the teachings of both the Ratana and Methodist churches. Mouru went to her family's tlU island Pikomamaku In 1944 Ruruhira took up a position at Te Rahui nui almost every season of her life. She excelled at Wahine Methodist Hostel for Maori girls in Hamilton cooking - the priest at her funeral remarked that "she founded by Princess Te Puea Herangi. -
Selwyn Katene Powerpoint
Treaty Negotiations in Te Whanganui a Tara: The KhKahawai and the Shark Selwyn Katene Ngati Toa, Ngati Tama, Ngaruahine BACKGROUND Te Upoko o te Ika a Maui or ‘head of Maui's fish’ Kupe 1000 years ago Tara son of Whatonga - Te Whanganui a Tara From 1820s Taranaki & Kawhia tribes through rights of conquest, continuous occupation, ohaki (gifting) tangata whenua KEY ISSUES Effectiveness of small iwi ggpgroup, Ngati Tama (NT) struggling to assert its identity, mana, and tino rangatiratanga Role of the Crown, and others, in attempts to re-establish autonomous iwi-specific voice & focus for advancement of NT interests CLAIMS Tw o N gati Tama claims: Wai 735 claim Ngati Tama ki teUpokooteIka Wai 377 claim Ngati TamaTe Kaeaea Main claim number Wai 145 Wellington Tenths Trust & Palmerston North Maori Reserves ◦ The 8 gene ra l cla ims merge into large r natura l grouping of iwi, hapu, whanau, and marae interests – Port Nicholson Block Claim (PNBC) – to negotiate and settle on behalf of all TkiTaranaki clilaimants CLAIM AREA Some 209, 000 acres covering the greater Wellington area: 17,,py900 acres NZ Company claimed to have purchased from Taranaki tribes ◦ 137,242 acres of ‘wasteland’ Crown gave itself title to on assumption tha t no-one hdhad title because not occupied or cultivated by Maori CROWN BREACHES Accepting as valid purchases by the NZ Company, which could not possibly have constituted a legal sale or provided valid title to the land CROWN BREACHES (cont) Disposing of wrongfully acquired land by sale to the private sector, grants -
Ngāti Hāmua Environmental Education Sheets
NGTI HMUA ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION SHEETS Produced by Rangitne o Wairarapa Inc in conjunction with Greater Wellington 2006 2 NGTI HMUA ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION SHEETS This education resource provides the reader with information about the environment from the perspective of the Ngti Hmua hap of Rangitne o Wairarapa iwi. There are 9 separate sheets with each one focussing on a different aspect of Mori customary belief. The first two sheets look at history relating to Ngti Hmua starting with the creation myth and the Maori gods (Nga Atua). The second sheet (Tupuna) looks at the Ngti Hmua ancestors that have some link to the Wairarapa including Maui – who fished up Aotearoa, Kupe – the first explorer to these shores, Whtonga aboard the Kurahaup waka and his descendants. The remaining sheets describe the values, practices or uses that Ngti Hmua applied to their environment in the Wairarapa valleys, plains, mountains, waterways and coastal areas. The recording of this information was undertaken so that people from all backgrounds can gain an appreciation of the awareness that the kaumtua of Ngti Hmua have of the natural world. Rangitne o Wairarapa and Greater Wellington Regional Council are pleased to present this information to the people of the Wairarapa and beyond. This resource was created as part of the regional council’s iwi project funding which helps iwi to engage in environmental matters. For further information please contact Rangitne o Wairarapa Runanga 06 370 0600 or Greater Wellington 06 378 2484 Na reira Nga mihi nui ki a koutou katoa 3 CONTENTS Page SHEET 1 Nga Atua –The Gods 4 2 Nga Tupuna – The Ancestors 8 3 Te Whenua – The Land 14 4 Nga Maunga – The Mountains 17 5 Te Moana – The Ocean 19 6 Nga Mokopuna o Tnemahuta – Flora 22 7 Nga Mokopuna o Tnemahuta – Fauna 29 8 Wai Tapu – Waterways 33 9 Kawa – Protocols 35 4 Ngti Hmua Environmental Education series - SHEET 1 of 9 NGA ATUA - THE GODS Introduction The Cosmic Genealogy The part that the gods play in the life of all M ori is hugely s ignificant. -
(Māori) Battalion
Fact sheet 5: The formation of the 28th (Māori) Battalion When the decision was made in October 1939 to form a Māori military unit one suggestion was to call it the ‘Treaty of Waitangi’ battalion. It was felt that this would draw the attention of both Māori and Pākehā to their respective obligations under the Treaty. Article Three of the Treaty spoke of the rights and obligations of British subjects, something Āpirana Ngata saw as ‘the price of citizenship’. He believed that if Māori were to have a say in shaping the future of the nation after the war, they needed to participate fully during it. It was also a matter of pride. As Ngata asked, ‘how can we ever hold up our heads, when the struggle is over, to the question, “Where were you when New Zealand was at war?”’ Officially called the New Zealand 28th (Māori) Battalion, the unit was part of the 2nd New Zealand Division, the fighting arm of the 2nd New Zealand Expeditionary Force (2NZEF). The NZ Division was made up of 15,000- 20,000 men, divided into three infantry brigades (the 4th, 5th and 6th Brigades) plus artillery, engineers, signals, medical and service units. Each brigade initially had three infantry battalions (numbered from 18th to 26th). The 28th (Māori) Battalion was at times attached to each of the Division's three brigades. Each battalion was commanded by a lieutenant-colonel. The Māori Battalion usually contained 700-750 men, divided into five companies. The Māori Battalion’s four rifle companies were organised on a tribal basis: • A Company was based on recruits from -
Ngati Tama Claims Settlement Bill
Ngati Tama Claims Settlement Bill Government Bill Explanatory note General policy statement This Bill . records the acknowledgements and apology given by the Crown to Ngati Tama in the deed of settlement dated 20 December 2001 between the Crown and Ngati Tama: gives effect to the deed of settlement in which the Crown and Ngati Tama agree to a final settlement of all the Ngati Tama historical claims in Taranaki. Scope of settlement Ngati Tama is one of the 8 iwi of Taranaki. They are located in northern Taranaki and have approximately 900 registered members. In the deed of settlement, and in this Bill, Ngati Tama have been defined as the descendants of- • Whata, Rakaeiora, or Tamaariki; and • people who exercised customary interests in the Ngati Tama area of interest from 1 January 1800. The settlement settles all of the historical claims of Ngati Tama in Taranaki. Those claims include all claims that are founded on a right arising from the Treaty of Waitangi or the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, under legislation or at common law (including aboriginal title or customary law), from fiduciary duty or otherwise, and that arise from, or relate to, acts or omissions before 21 September 1992 by, or on behalf of, the Crown or by or under legislation. The Crown is released and discharged from all obligations and liabilities in respect of those claims. *1 1 Ngati Tama Claims Settlement Explanatory note Any claims that Ngati Tama may have as a result of any loss of interest in land, or natural or physical resources, outside of Taranaki are not settled under the deed of settlement or this Bill. -
Waikato CMS Volume I
CMS CONSERVATioN MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Waikato 2014–2024, Volume I Operative 29 September 2014 CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGY WAIKATO 2014–2024, Volume I Operative 29 September 2014 Cover image: Rider on the Timber Trail, Pureora Forest Park. Photo: DOC September 2014, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISBN 978-0-478-15021-6 (print) ISBN 978-0-478-15023-0 (online) This document is protected by copyright owned by the Department of Conservation on behalf of the Crown. Unless indicated otherwise for specific items or collections of content, this copyright material is licensed for re- use under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand licence. In essence, you are free to copy, distribute and adapt the material, as long as you attribute it to the Department of Conservation and abide by the other licence terms. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/nz/ This publication is produced using paper sourced from well-managed, renewable and legally logged forests. Contents Foreword 7 Introduction 8 Purpose of conservation management strategies 8 CMS structure 10 CMS term 10 Relationship with other Department of Conservation strategic documents and tools 10 Relationship with other planning processes 11 Legislative tools 12 Exemption from land use consents 12 Closure of areas 12 Bylaws and regulations 12 Conservation management plans 12 International obligations 13 Part One 14 1 The Department of Conservation in Waikato 14 2 Vision for Waikato—2064 14 2.1 Long-term vision for Waikato—2064 15 3 Distinctive -
Part 2 | North Kaipara 2.0 | North Kaipara - Overview
Part 2 | North Kaipara 2.0 | North Kaipara - Overview | Mana Whenua by the accumulation of rainwater in depressions of sand. Underlying There are eight marae within the ironstone prevents the water from North Kaipara community area (refer leaking away. These are sensitive to the Cultural Landscapes map on environments where any pollution page 33 for location) that flows into them stays there. Pananawe Marae A significant ancient waka landing Te Roroa site is known to be located at Koutu. Matatina Marae Te Roroa To the east of the district, where Waikara Marae the Wairoa River runs nearby to Te Roroa Tangiteroria, is the ancient portage Waikaraka Marae route of Mangapai that connected Te Roroa the Kaipara with the lower reaches Tama Te Ua Ua Marae of the Whangārei Harbour. This Te Runanga o Ngāti Whātua portage extended from the Northern Ahikiwi Marae Wairoa River to Whangārei Harbour. Te Runanga o Ngāti Whātua From Tangiteroria, the track reached Taita Marae Maungakaramea and then to the Te Runanga o Ngāti Whātua canoe landing at the head of the Tirarau Marae Mangapai River. Samuel Marsden Ngāuhi; Te Runanga o Ngāti Whātua (1765-1838), who travelled over this route in 1820, mentions in his journal There are a number of maunga that Hongi Hika conveyed war and distinctive cultural landscapes canoes over the portage (see Elder, significant to Mana Whenua and the 1932). wider community within the North Kaipara areas. These include Maunga Mahi tahi (collaboration) of Te Ruapua, Hikurangi, and Tuamoe. opportunities for mana whenua, Waipoua, and the adjoining forests wider community and the council of Mataraua and Waima, make up to work together for the good of the largest remaining tract of native the northern Kaipara area are vast forests in Northland. -
Te Kāuru Taiao Strategy
TE KĀURU EASTERN MANAWATŪ RIVER HAPŪ COLLECTIVE Te Kāuru Taiao Strategy TE KĀURU For The Eastern Manawatū River Catchment NOVEMBER 2016 First Edition: November 2016 Published by: Te Kāuru Eastern Manawatū River Hapū Collective 6 Ward Street PO Box 62 Dannevirke New Zealand Copyright © 2016 Te Kāuru Eastern Manawatū River Hapū Collective Acknowledgments The development of the ‘Te Kāuru Taiao Strategy’ is a tribute to all those who have been and those who are still collectively involved. This document provides strategies and actions for caring for the land, rivers, streams, all resident life within our environment, and our people in the Eastern Manawatū River Catchment. TE KĀURU EASTERN MANAWATŪ RIVER HAPŪ COLLECTIVE Te Kāuru Taiao Strategy Endorsements This strategy has been endorsed by the following 11 hapū of Te Kāuru who are shown with their respective tribal affiliation. A two tier rationale has been used (where required) to identify the Te Kāuru hapū members in terms of their customary connections with regards to their locality, occupation and connection with the Manawatū River and its tributaries: 1. Take ahikāroa 2. Tātai hono Ngāti Mārau (Rangitāne, Kahungunu) Ngāi Te Rangitotohu (Rangitāne, Kahungunu) Ngāi Tahu (Rangitāne, Kahungunu) Ngāti Ruatōtara (Rangitāne) Ngāti Te Opekai (Rangitāne) Ngāti Parakiore (Rangitāne) Ngāti Pakapaka (Rangitāne) Ngāti Mutuahi (Rangitāne) Ngāti Te Koro (Rangitāne) Te Kapuārangi (Rangitāne) Ngāti Hāmua (Rangitāne) Te Kāuru has hapū mana whenua membership of the Manawatū River Leaders’ Forum and will continue to support the ongoing efforts to restore and revitalise the mauri of the Manawatū River. Te Kāuru further support the integration of the Taiao Strategy into the wider Iwi/Hapū Management Plans. -
Auckland Council, Far North District Council, Kaipara District Council and Whangarei District Council
Auckland Council, Far North District Council, Kaipara District Council and Whangarei District Council Draft Proposed Plan Change to the District / Unitary Plan Managing Risks Associated with Outdoor Use of Genetically Modified Organisms Draft Section 32 Report January 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Scope and Purpose of the Report 1 1.2 Development of the Plan Change 1 1.3 Structure of the Report 3 2. GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS 4 2.1 Introduction 4 2.2 Benefits and Risks 5 2.2.1 Benefits 5 2.2.2 Risks 7 2.3 Risk Management and Precaution 10 2.4 Consultation 12 2.4.1 Community Concerns Regarding GMO Use 12 2.4.2 Māori Perspectives 14 2.4.3 Summary 15 2.5 Synopsis 16 3. THE PLAN CHANGE 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Significant Resource Management Issue 17 3.3 Objectives and Policies 18 3.4 Related Provisions 19 3.4.1 Activity Rules 19 3.4.2 General Development and Performance Standards 20 3.4.3 Definitions 20 4. SECTION 32 EVALUATION 21 4.1 Introduction 21 4.2 Alternative Means to Address the Issue 22 4.2.1 Do Nothing 22 4.2.2 Central Government Amendment to the HSNO Act 23 4.2.3 Local Authority Regulation through the RMA 24 4.2.4 Assessment of Alternatives Considered 24 4.3 Risk of Acting or Not Acting 26 4.3.1 Ability to Deliver a Precautionary Approach 27 4.3.2 Proportionate Action and Difficulties Arising From Inaction 29 i 4.4 Appropriateness of the Objectives in Achieving the Purpose of the Act 31 4.5 Appropriateness, Costs and Benefits of Policies, Rules and Other Methods 33 4.5.1 Appropriateness 33 4.5.2 Costs 34 4.5.3 Benefits 36 5. -
Section 4 Te Wāhanga Tuawha Appendices
SECTION 4 TE WĀHANGA TUAWHA APPENDICES APPENDIX A - STATUTORY RECOGNITION OF THE REMP 175 APPENDIX A Statutory recognition of the REMP RMA 1991 For the purposes of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA), particularly of section 35A, Raukawa Charitable Trust confirms that it is the Iwi Authority for Raukawa and that the Te Rautaki Taiao a Raukawa, the Raukawa Environmental Management Plan (the Plan) represents the Raukawa Charitable Trust is to be considered the Iwi Authority for all relevant sections of the RMA. It should be noted that Raukawa Charitable Trust may, from time to time, delegate certain functions and implementation of this Plan to a subsidiary, delegated person(s), and/or other Waikato- Tainui entity (for example, the Waikato Raupatu River Trust). Such delegations are authorised and removed at the sole discretion of Raukawa Charitable Trust Raukawa Charitable Trust expects that the marae and hapū that constitute Raukawa are afforded the same status as Raukawa Charitable Trust when exercising their kaitiakitanga consistent with this Plan as if this Plan were written for their marae and hapū. Raukawa Charitable Trust also recognises that marae, hapū, and clusters of marae and/or hapū may develop their own environmental planning documents and Raukawa Charitable Trust is supportive of documents where they are consistent with this Plan. 176 TE RAUTAKI TAIAO A RAUKAWA With respect to the RMA it is noted that: (a) This Plan provides clarity to those Part 2 Matters in the RMA that are of relevance to Māori, in particular (but not limited to): (i) Section 6 – recognising and providing for: (e) the relationship of Māori and their culture and traditions with their ancestral lands, water, sites, wāhi tapu, and other taonga; (g) the protection of historic heritage from inappropriate subdivision, use, and development; (f) the protection of protected customary rights; (ii) Section 7 Other Matters – (a) having particular regard to kaitiakitanga; and (iii) Section 8 Treaty of Waitangi – taking into account the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi.