DOCSLIB.ORG

Czech Journal of Contemporary History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Czech Journal of Contemporary History Vol. VII (2019) Vol. Vol. VII (2019) CZECH JOURNAL of CONTEMPORARY HISTORY Vít Smetana Ten Propositions about Munich 1938 On the Fateful Event of Czech and European History – without Legends and National Stereotypes Dalibor Vácha When We Walk Down Wenceslas Square… ISTORY H A Picture of the Return of Czech Legionnaires to Their Homeland in Their Recollections and Autobiographic Novels Jan Rychlík Jozef Tiso: My Enemy – Your Hero? Jakub Šlouf Cleansing of Industrial Plants from Collaborationists and “Anti-Social” Elements in 1945 A Political Machination, Retribution Excess or an Incubator of Revolutionary Morals? ONTEMPORARY C Marie Černá “You Have to Fight the Struggle Yourselves” The Political Role of the Soviet Army and Its Local Allies of in “Normalization” of Czechoslovakia (1968–1969) Tomáš Zahradníček Debates on Czechoslovakism and Czechoslovaks at the End of the Federation, 1989–1992 OURNAL Prague Chronicle J Oldřich Tůma Doyen of Czech Contemporary History, Karel Kaplan ZECH C Jana Wohlmuth Markupová Reflections on the Conference “A Hundred Student (R)Evolutions” Book Reviews (Helena Sadílková, Martin Čížek, Petr Chalupecký, Adéla Gjuričová, Lucie Rajlová) Czech Journal of Contemporary History Guidelines for Contributors 1. The articles published in the journal vary somewhat in length. Typically, they have approximately 30 pages1 they should not be shorter than 10 pages and longer than 50 pages. The reviews should be 4–10 pages long, although in exceptional cases longer reviews would be accepted as well. Annotations are normally 1–2 pages long. No specific restrictions are placed on contributions intended for Prague Chronicle. 2. The fee paid to authors is in general between 200 and 300 CZK (depending on the quality of the contribution) per printed page2 for the articles; 300 CZK per printed page for the reviews. For the fees to be processed and paid, we need the following information: permanent address of the author, date of birth (personal identification number for the Czech and Slovak authors) and bank account number. 3. Please send the manuscripts in electronic form to the email address [email protected]. 4. If at all possible, please use footnotes rather than endnotes. 5. When quoting from an archival collection, please use the following form of reference: the name and location of the archive [if quoting from the same source repeatedly, the abbreviation commonly used for the archive is sufficient], name and signature of the fund [collection], document number, name and/or description. 6. When quoting from publications, please use the following form of reference: Monograph: Name of the author [in this order: SURNAME /in capital letters/, given name /initial(s) only if quoted more than once/] – co-authors [following the same pattern]: Title: Subtitle [in Czech Journal of Contemporary History italics]. Place of publication, publisher year of publication, page(s) quoted [if applicable]. ISSN 2336-3134 (On-line) Paper published in a volume of proceedings: Author/authors of the paper [written as ISSN 2336-3142 (Print) above]: Title: Subtitle. In: Editor of the volume [similar as for the author of monograph] ISBN 978-80-7285-217-8 (ed.): Title: Subtitle of the volume. Place of publication, publisher year of publication, pagination, page quoted. Article in a journal: Author of the article [written as above]: Published by Title: Subtitle. In: Name of the journal, volume, number (year), pagination, page quoted. Institute for Contemporary History Article in a newspaper/magazine: Author of the article [written as above]: Title: Subtitle. of the Czech Academy of Sciences In: Name of the newspaper/magazine, date of issue, pagination, page quoted. Vlašská 9 7. Please enclose a summary of 15–30 lines in length together with your article. 118 00 Prague 1 8. For reviews, please include information about the author(s) [translator(s), editor(s), Czech Republic author(s) of preface and afterword, illustrator(s)] of the publication under review and other publication data [publisher, edition/series, indexes, bibliographies etc.]. Envelope Aleš Lederer, David Weber 9. In the short information about yourself as an author, please include the following: year Translations Jiří Mareš, Blanka Medková, Tereza Jonášová, Kathleen Geaney of birth and a brief summary of your scholarly activities [current position, areas of Resumé Derek Paton specialization, your key published works with the place and year of publication]. Typesetting David Weber 10. The authors of texts published in the Czech Journal of Contemporary History are entitled Printed by Tiskárna Protisk, s.r.o., České Budějovice to receive a complimentary copy (two copies in case they have published an article) of the relevant issue of the journal. The complimentary copy will either be sent by mail or Contact Vít Smetana can be picked up in the editorial office of the journal. [email protected] © Institute for Contemporay History of the Czech Academy of Sciences 1 In this context, the standardized page numbers 1 800 characters including spaces. 2 Two printed pages are usually equal to three pages as defined in footnote 1. CZECH JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HISTORY Vol. VII (2019) THE INSTITUTE FOR CONTEMPORARY HISTORY EDITORIAL CIRCLE: Kateřina Čapková, Milan Drápala, Kathleen Geaney, Adéla Gjuričová, Daniela Kolenovská, Michal Kopeček, Vít Smetana, Oldřich Tůma EDITORIAL BOARD: Muriel Blaive, Prague/Vienna Christianne Brenner, Munich Chad Bryant, Chapel Hill (NC) Petr Bugge, Aarhus Mark Cornwall, Southampton Benjamin Frommer, Evanston (IL) Maciej Górny, Warsaw Magdalena Hadjiiski, Strasbourg Milan Hauner, Madison (WI) Vít Hloušek, Brno Adam Hudek, Bratislava Georgyi Kasianov, Kiev Tamás Kende, Budapest Pavel Kolář, Florence Jan Kuklík, Prague Mark Kramer, Cambridge (MA) James Krapfl , Montreal Jan Láníček, Sydney Libora Oates-Indruchová, Olomouc Andrea Orzoff, Las Cruces (NM) Adrian Portman – von Arburg, Brno Vilém Prečan, Prague/Scheinfeld Peter Ruggenthaler, Graz Dušan Segeš, Bratislava Kacper Szulecki, Berlin/Oslo Victoria Vasilenko, Belgorod Kieran Williams, Des Moines (IA) Ella Zadorozhnyuk, Moscow EDITORS: Vít Smetana, Kathleen Geaney Contents Essays and Articles Vít Smetana: Ten Propositions about Munich 1938 On the Fateful Event of Czech and European History – without Legends and National Stereotypes ............. 5 Dalibor Vácha: When We Walk Down Wenceslas Square… A Picture of the Return of Czech Legionnaires to Their Homeland in Their Recollections and Autobiographic Novels ................................... 15 Jan Rychlík: Jozef Tiso: My Enemy – Your Hero? .................... 44 Jakub Šlouf: Cleansing of Industrial Plants from Collaborationists and “Anti-Social” Elements in 1945 A Political Machination, Retribution Excess or an Incubator of Revolutionary Morals? ............. 65 Marie Černá: “You Have to Fight the Struggle Yourselves” The Political Role of the Soviet Army and Its Local Allies in “Normalization” of Czechoslovakia (1968–1969) ........................... 111 Tomáš Zahradníček: Debates on Czechoslovakism and Czechoslovaks at the End of the Federation, 1989–1992 ......... 143 Prague Chronicle Oldřich Tůma: Doyen of Czech Contemporary History, Karel Kaplan ................................................... 162 Jana Wohlmuth Markupová: Refl ections on the Conference “A Hundred Student (R)Evolutions” ......................................................... 166 Book Reviews Helena Sadílková: A Thrown Gauntlet Josef Serinek and Jan Tesař as a Challenge for Current Research into the History of the Roma in the 20th Century ............................................ 173 Martin Čížek: Ethnic Composition of Czechoslovak Units during the Second World War ............................ 188 Petr Chalupecký: The Persistent Bond of Socialism ....................... 194 Adéla Gjuričová: The Unbearable Lightness of Women’s Rights? ... 203 Lucie Rajlová: The “Velvet Revolution” in a Kaleidoscope of Fates of “Ordinary People” .......................................... 210 Summaries ..................................................................................................... 215 Authors ........................................................................................................... 225 Ten Propositions about Munich 1938 On the Fateful Event of Czech and European History – without Legends and National Stereotypes Vít Smetana The Munich conference of 29–30 September 1938, followed by forced cession of border regions of Czechoslovakia to Nazi Germany and subsequently also to Poland and Hungary, is unquestionably one of the crucial milestones of Czech and Czecho- slovak history of the 20th century, but also an important moment in the history of global diplomacy, with long-term overlaps and echoes into international politics. In the Czech environment, round anniversaries of the dramatic events of 1938 repeatedly prompt emotional debates as to whether the nation should have put up armed resistance in the autumn of 1938. Such debates tend to be connected with strength comparisons of the Czechoslovak and German armies of the time, but also with considerations whether the “bent backbone of the nation” with all its impacts on the mental map of Europe and the Czech role in it was an acceptable price for saving an indeterminate number of human lives and preserving material assets and cultural and historical monuments and buildings all around the country. Last year’s 80th anniversary of the Munich Agreement was no exception. A change for the better was the attention that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TRANSLATION. the Investigation of Karl Hermann Frank Continues On
    TRANSLATION. The investigation of Karl Hermann Frank continues on 10 June 1945» The investigating officer: The Judge Advocate Colonel Dr. B. Ecer. Present : Captain Hart, Hq 12th Array Group, JA , Section, War Crimes Branch. Dr. Ernest Hochwald. Question: Do you have any information concerning the fate of the two children of Professor Jaromir Samal, Jiri Samal, born 23 March 1933» and Alenka Samal, horn 5 March 1937» who or 17 July 1942 were arrested in the German Childrens;' Hospital and abducted therefrom, Answer: This is the first time I hear about this matter. • ,. Unfortunately, I cannot give any information which might \ lead to the discovery of the location CKC the children, i for until today I had no knowledge of the incident. Question: When and under what circumstances did you and your family leave Prague? Answer: Although many German women and children left the Protectorate during the last weeks preceding the surrender in order to seek an abode in the Reich territory, I had agreed with my wife that she and the children would stay with me to the end, lest a panic of flight be created. That is what we did. On 9 May 1945 at 2.30 AM we left together my official residence at 11 York Street in two armored passenger cars in order to drive toward the West direction PLZEN /PILSEN/ to meet the American troops. -2- I wanted to surrender to the Americans as a prisoner of war, but prior to that I wanted to accommodate my wife and children with a farmer somewhere in Bavarian territory, I do not have any acquaintances or friends in that region, .
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust/Shoah the Organization of the Jewish Refugees in Italy Holocaust Commemoration in Present-Day Poland
    NOW AVAILABLE remembrance a n d s o l i d a r i t y Holocaust/Shoah The Organization of the Jewish Refugees in Italy Holocaust Commemoration in Present-day Poland in 20 th century european history Ways of Survival as Revealed in the Files EUROPEAN REMEMBRANCE of the Ghetto Courts and Police in Lithuania – LECTURES, DISCUSSIONS, remembrance COMMENTARIES, 2012–16 and solidarity in 20 th This publication features the century most significant texts from the european annual European Remembrance history Symposium (2012–16) – one of the main events organized by the European Network Remembrance and Solidarity in Gdańsk, Berlin, Prague, Vienna and Budapest. The 2017 issue symposium entitled ‘Violence in number the 20th-century European history: educating, commemorating, 5 – december documenting’ will take place in Brussels. Lectures presented there will be included in the next Studies issue. 2016 Read Remembrance and Solidarity Studies online: enrs.eu/studies number 5 www.enrs.eu ISSUE NUMBER 5 DECEMBER 2016 REMEMBRANCE AND SOLIDARITY STUDIES IN 20TH CENTURY EUROPEAN HISTORY EDITED BY Dan Michman and Matthias Weber EDITORIAL BOARD ISSUE EDITORS: Prof. Dan Michman Prof. Matthias Weber EDITORS: Dr Florin Abraham, Romania Dr Árpád Hornják, Hungary Dr Pavol Jakubčin, Slovakia Prof. Padraic Kenney, USA Dr Réka Földváryné Kiss, Hungary Dr Ondrej Krajňák, Slovakia Prof. Róbert Letz, Slovakia Prof. Jan Rydel, Poland Prof. Martin Schulze Wessel, Germany EDITORIAL COORDINATOR: Ewelina Pękała REMEMBRANCE AND SOLIDARITY STUDIES IN 20TH CENTURY EUROPEAN HISTORY PUBLISHER: European Network Remembrance and Solidarity ul. Wiejska 17/3, 00–480 Warszawa, Poland www.enrs.eu, [email protected] COPY-EDITING AND PROOFREADING: Caroline Brooke Johnson PROOFREADING: Ramon Shindler TYPESETTING: Marcin Kiedio GRAPHIC DESIGN: Katarzyna Erbel COVER DESIGN: © European Network Remembrance and Solidarity 2016 All rights reserved ISSN: 2084–3518 Circulation: 500 copies Funded by the Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media upon a Decision of the German Bundestag.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Years After the Iron Curtain: the Czech Republic in Transition Zdeněk Janík March 25, 2010
    Twenty Years after the Iron Curtain: The Czech Republic in Transition Zdeněk Janík March 25, 2010 Assistant Professor at Masaryk University in the Czech Republic n November of last year, the Czech Republic commemorated the fall of the communist regime in I Czechoslovakia, which occurred twenty years prior.1 The twentieth anniversary invites thoughts, many times troubling, on how far the Czechs have advanced on their path from a totalitarian regime to a pluralistic democracy. This lecture summarizes and evaluates the process of democratization of the Czech Republic’s political institutions, its transition from a centrally planned economy to a free market economy, and the transformation of its civil society. Although the political and economic transitions have been largely accomplished, democratization of Czech civil society is a road yet to be successfully traveled. This lecture primarily focuses on why this transformation from a closed to a truly open and autonomous civil society unburdened with the communist past has failed, been incomplete, or faced numerous roadblocks. HISTORY The Czech Republic was formerly the Czechoslovak Republic. It was established in 1918 thanks to U.S. President Woodrow Wilson and his strong advocacy for the self-determination of new nations coming out of the Austro-Hungarian Empire after the World War I. Although Czechoslovakia was based on the concept of Czech nationhood, the new nation-state of fifteen-million people was actually multi- ethnic, consisting of people from the Czech lands (Bohemia, Moravia, and Silesia), Slovakia, Subcarpathian Ruthenia (today’s Ukraine), and approximately three million ethnic Germans. Since especially the Sudeten Germans did not join Czechoslovakia by means of self-determination, the nation- state endorsed the policy of cultural pluralism, granting recognition to the various ethnicities present on its soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Aftermath: Accounting for the Holocaust in the Czech Republic
    Aftermath: Accounting for the Holocaust in the Czech Republic Krista Hegburg Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERISTY 2013 © 2013 Krista Hegburg All rights reserved Abstract Aftermath: Accounting for the Holocaust in the Czech Republic Krista Hegburg Reparations are often theorized in the vein of juridical accountability: victims of historical injustices call states to account for their suffering; states, in a gesture that marks a restoration of the rule of law, acknowledge and repair these wrongs via financial compensation. But as reparations projects intersect with a consolidation of liberalism that, in the postsocialist Czech Republic, increasingly hinges on a politics of recognition, reparations concomitantly interpellate minority subjects as such, instantiating their precarious inclusion into the body po litic in a way that vexes the both the historical justice and contemporary recognition reparatory projects seek. This dissertation analyzes claims made by Czech Romani Holocaust survivors in reparations programs, the social work apparatus through which they pursued their claims, and the often contradictory demands of the complex legal structures that have governed eligibility for reparations since the immediate aftermath of the war, and argues for an ethnographic examination of the forms of discrepant reciprocity and commensuration that underpin, and often foreclose, attempts to account for the Holocaust in contemporary Europe. Table of Contents Acknowledgments ii Introduction 1 Chapter 1 18 Recognitions Chapter 2 74 The Veracious Voice: Gypsiology, Historiography, and the Unknown Holocaust Chapter 3 121 Reparations Politics, Czech Style: Law, the Camp, Sovereignty Chapter 4 176 “The Law is Such as It Is” Conclusion 198 The Obligation to Receive Bibliography 202 Appendix I 221 i Acknowledgments I have acquired many debts over the course of researching and writing this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Young Czechs' Perceptions of the Velvet Divorce and The
    YOUNG CZECHS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE VELVET DIVORCE AND THE MODERN CZECH IDENTITY By BRETT RICHARD CHLOUPEK Bachelor of Science in Geography Bachelor of Science in C.I.S. University of Nebraska Kearney Kearney, NE 2005 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE July, 2007 YOUNG CZECHS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE VELVET DIVORCE AND THE MODERN CZECH IDENTITY Thesis Approved: Reuel Hanks Dr. Reuel Hanks (Chair) Dale Lightfoot Dr. Dale Lightfoot Joel Jenswold Dr. Joel Jenswold Dr. A. Gordon Emslie Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Reuel Hanks for encouraging me to pursue this project. His continued support and challenging insights into my work made this thesis a reality. Thanks go to my other committee members, Dr. Dale Lightfoot and Dr. Joel Jenswold for their invaluable advice, unique expertise, and much needed support throughout the writing of my thesis. A great deal of gratitude is due to the faculties of Charles University in Prague, CZ and Masaryk University in Brno, CZ for helping administer student surveys and donating their valuable time. Thank you to Hana and Ludmila Svobodova for taking care of me over the years and being my family away from home in the Moravské Budejovice. Thanks go to Sylvia Mihalik for being my resident expert on all things Slovak and giving me encouragement. Thank you to my grandmother Edith Weber for maintaining ties with our Czech relatives and taking me back to the ‘old country.’ Thanks to all of my extended family for remembering our heritage and keeping some of its traditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Czechoslovak-Polish Relations 1918-1968: the Prospects for Mutual Support in the Case of Revolt
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1977 Czechoslovak-Polish relations 1918-1968: The prospects for mutual support in the case of revolt Stephen Edward Medvec The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Medvec, Stephen Edward, "Czechoslovak-Polish relations 1918-1968: The prospects for mutual support in the case of revolt" (1977). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5197. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5197 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CZECHOSLOVAK-POLISH RELATIONS, 191(3-1968: THE PROSPECTS FOR MUTUAL SUPPORT IN THE CASE OF REVOLT By Stephen E. Medvec B. A. , University of Montana,. 1972. Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1977 Approved by: ^ .'■\4 i Chairman, Board of Examiners raduat'e School Date UMI Number: EP40661 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • „Tretia Ríša“ a Vznik Slovenského Štátu Dokumenty I Das „Dritte Reich“
    „Tretia ríša“ a vznik Slovenského štátu Dokumenty I Das „Dritte Reich“ und die Entstehung des Slowakischen Staates Dokumente I Michal Schvarc, Martin Holák, David Schriffl (eds.) „Tretia ríša“ a vznik Slovenského štátu Dokumenty I Das „Dritte Reich“ und die Entstehung des Slowakischen Staates Dokumente I ÚSTAV PAMÄTI NÁRODA SNM – MÚZEUM KULTÚRY KARPATSKÝCH NEMCOV BRATISLAVA 2008 Publikácia vznikla vďaka finančnej podpore spoločnosti NESS Slovensko, a.s. Herausgabe der Publikation wurde von NESS Slovensko, a.s. unterstützt. Michal Schvarc, Martin Holák, David Schriffl (ed.) „Tretia ríša“ a vznik Slovenského štátu Dokumenty I Das „Dritte Reich“ und die Entstehung des Slowakischen Staates Dokumente I Edícia Dokumenty Vydal/Herausgegeben Ústav pamäti národa Nám. SNP 28 810 00 Bratislava Slowakei www.upn.gov.sk 1. vydanie/1. Auflage Recenzenti/Rezensenten PhDr. Valerián Bystrický, DrSc. Prof. PhDr. Karol Fremal, CSc. PaedDr. Martin Pekár, PhD. Jazyková redaktorka/Korrektur Zora Vanovičová, David Schriffl Cover design Peter Rendek Sadzba, grafická úprava a tlač/Satz, Graphik und Druck Vydavateľstvo Michala Vaška © Michal Schvarc, Martin Holák, David Schriffl 2008 © Ústav pamäti národa 2008 Fotografia na obálke/Titelbild: Ferdinand Ďurčanský (prvý zľava), Vojtech Tuka a Joachim von Ribbentrop pri podpise tajného dodatku Ochrannej zmluvy o hospodárskej spolupráci medzi Nemeckom a Slovenskom 23. marca 1939, v Berlíne. Ferdinand Ďurčanský (links), Vojtech Tuka und Joachim von Ribbentrop. Unterzeichnung des vertraulichen Protokolls von Schutzvertrag über wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit zwischen NS-Deutschland und Slowakei am 23. März 1939 in Berlin. ISBN 978-80-89335-02-2 Predslov Vážení čitatelia, do Vašich rúk sa dostáva prvý diel edície dokumentov „Tretia ríša“ a vznik Slovenského štátu, ktorý sa zameriava na obdobie od druhej polovice septembra 1938 do polovice januára 1939.
    [Show full text]
  • The Catholic Church in the Czech Lands During the Nazi
    STUDIA HUMANITATIS JOURNAL, 2021, 1 (1), pp. 192-208 ISSN: 2792-3967 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53701/shj.v1i1.22 Artículo / Article THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN THE CZECH LANDS DURING THE NAZI OCCUPATION IN 1939–1945 AND AFTER1 LA IGLESIA CATÓLICA EN LOS TERRITORIOS CHECOS DURANTE LA OCUPACIÓN NAZI ENTRE LOS AÑOS 1939–1945 Y DESPUÉS Marek Smid Charles University, Czech Republic ORCID: 0000-0001-8613-8673 [email protected] | Abstract | This study addresses the religious persecution in the Czech lands (Bohemia, Moravia and Czech Silesia) during World War II, when these territories were part of the Bohemian and Moravian Protectorate being occupied by Nazi Germany. Its aim is to demonstrate how the Catholic Church, its hierarchy and its priests acted as relevant patriots who did not hesitate to stand up to the occupying forces and express their rejection of their procedures. Both the domestic Catholic camp and the ties abroad towards the Holy See and its representation will be analysed. There will also be presented the personalities of priests, who became the victims of the Nazi rampage in the Czech lands at the end of the study. The basic method consists of a descriptive analysis that takes into account the comparative approach of the spiritual life before and after the occupation. Furthermore, the analytical-synthetic method will be used, combined with the subsequent interpretation of the findings. An additional method, not always easy to apply, is hermeneutics, i.e., the interpretation of socio-historical phenomena in an effort to reveal the uniqueness of the analysed texts and sources and emphasize their singularity in the cultural and spiritual development of Czech Church history in the first half of the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Propositions About Munich 1938 on the Fateful Event of Czech and European History – Without Legends and National Stereotypes
    Ten Propositions about Munich 1938 On the Fateful Event of Czech and European History – without Legends and National Stereotypes Vít Smetana The Munich conference of 29–30 September 1938, followed by forced cession of border regions of Czechoslovakia to Nazi Germany and subsequently also to Poland and Hungary, is unquestionably one of the crucial milestones of Czech and Czecho- slovak history of the 20th century, but also an important moment in the history of global diplomacy, with long-term overlaps and echoes into international politics. In the Czech environment, round anniversaries of the dramatic events of 1938 repeatedly prompt emotional debates as to whether the nation should have put up armed resistance in the autumn of 1938. Such debates tend to be connected with strength comparisons of the Czechoslovak and German armies of the time, but also with considerations whether the “bent backbone of the nation” with all its impacts on the mental map of Europe and the Czech role in it was an acceptable price for saving an indeterminate number of human lives and preserving material assets and cultural and historical monuments and buildings all around the country. Last year’s 80th anniversary of the Munich Agreement was no exception. A change for the better was the attention that the media paid to the situation of post-Munich refugees from the border regions as well as to the fact that the Czechs rejected, immediately after Munich, humanist democracy and started building an authori- tarian state instead.1 The aim of this text is to deconstruct the most widespread 1 See, for example: ZÍDEK, Petr: Po Mnichovu začali Češi budovat diktaturu [The Czechs started building a dictatorship after Munich].
    [Show full text]
  • Czech Literature Guide
    CZECH CZECH LITERATURE LITERATURE GUIDE GUIDE GUIDE LITERATURE CZECH CZECH LITERATURE GUIDE Supported by the Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic © Institut umění – Divadelní ústav (Arts and Theatre Institute) First edition ISBN 978-80-7008-272-0 All rights of the publication reserved CONTENT ABOUT THE CZECH REPUBLIC 12 A CONCISE HISTORY OF CZECH LITERATURE 13 LITERATURE 1900–45 13 LITERATURE AFTER 1945 13 CONTEMPORARY CZECH LITERATURE 1995–2010 20 PROSE 20 POETRY 26 ESSAY 31 LITERATURE FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE 37 THE BOOK MARKET 41 THE TEACHING OF WRITING IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC 48 CONTEMPORARY LITERARY LIFE 51 ORGANIZATIONS AND INSTITUTIONS 51 LITERARY AND BOOK AWARDS 56 FESTIVALS AND FAIRS 58 EDUCATION 59 LEGISLATION AND LITERARY AGENCIES 62 LIBRARIES AND ARCHIVES 63 GRANTS AND SCHOLARSHIPS 65 LITERARY CAFÉS AND TEA-ROOMS 68 ANTIQUARIAN BOOKSHOPS 71 MEDIA 77 LITERARY PERIODICALS 77 CZECH LITERATURE ON THE WEB 82 LITERARY PROGRAMMES ON TV 83 LITERARY PROGRAMMES ON RADIO 83 CZECH LITERATURE ABROAD 87 VARIOUS LINKS 87 OVERVIEW OF FOREIGN CZECH STUDIES SCHOLARS, TRANSLATORS AND FRIENDS OF CZECH CULTURE 87 DEAR READERS WITH AN INTEREST IN CZECH LITERATURE Allow us to draw your attention to our Czech Literature Guide. It presents a panorama of the contemporary life of Czech literature with a short historical overview. It has been produced for everyone who has an interest in understanding Czech literary culture and its milieu, from the specialist and scholarly to the active and practical. 11 ABOUT THE CZECH REPUBLIC CZECH LITERATURE GUIDE 12 ABOUT THE CZECH REPUBLIC The Czech Republic (CR) is a landlocked country The GDP per capita in CZK in 2010 was 361,986 with a territory of 78,865 m2 lying in the centre (exchange rate EUR 1 = CZK 24.5) and the infl ation of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • When States Appease: British Appeasement in the 1930S
    Trubowitz, Peter and Harris, Peter When states appease: British appeasement in the 1930s. Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Trubowitz, Peter and Harris, Peter (2015) When states appease: British appeasement in the 1930s. Review of International Studies, 41 (02). pp. 289-311. ISSN 0260-2105 DOI: 10.1017/S0260210514000278 © 2014 Cambridge This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/61659/ Available in LSE Research Online: April 2015 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. When states appease: British appeasement in the 1930s Peter Trubowitz London School of Economics and Political Science Peter Harris University of Texas at Austin Few grand strategies puzzle international relations scholars more than appeasement. Scholars have debated why states put their hopes in seemingly risky attempts to “buy off” foreign challengers ever since Neville Chamberlain unsuccessfully sought to mollify Adolf Hitler in the 1930s.1 Today, few analysts subscribe to the once-popular “guilty men” theory, which attributes appeasement to leaders’ personal failings.2 Instead, two general approaches delineate the contemporary study of appeasement.
    [Show full text]
  • Communism on Trial: the Slansky Affair and Anti-Semitism in Post-WWII Europe
    Communism on Trial: The Slansky Affair and Anti-Semitism in Post-WWII Europe Helaine Blumenthal Summer 2009 Helaine Blumenthal is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of History at the University of California, Berkeley Acknowledgments I would like to thank Professors John Connelly and John Efron for their comments and advice regarding this paper. Their critiques and suggestions have enabled me to explore avenues of investigation that have truly enriched the scope of this project. Abstract: In 1952, hardly a decade after the Holocaust, Communist Czechoslovakia staged one of the post-WWII era’s most blatant acts of state-sponsored anti-Semitism. The Prague Political Purges put on trial fourteen defendants. Eleven of the fourteen were of Jewish origin. All were found guilty, and eleven of the fourteen were condemned to death. The remaining three were sentenced to life imprisonment. All of the defendants were devoted Communists, having shed any religious, ethnic, or national identity in their pursuit of a socialist utopia. Yet, the trial’s main ideological thrust was anti-Semitism. The Slansky Trial of 1952 came as a sharp blow to Jews across a spectrum of political, religious, and national affiliations. The Purge Trials forced many Jews to reexamine their positions vis-à-vis Zionism, Communism, and the Left as a traditionally popular choice for Jews. The trial held unique significance as Jews sought to redefine what it meant to be Jewish in a post-Holocaust world. Despite the trial’s overt use of anti-Semitic tropes, historians have yet to properly explore how Jews, both within and beyond the Iron Curtain, experienced the trial.
    [Show full text]