DOCSLIB.ORG

Soda Mountain Solar Project Public Scoping Report EIS/EIR

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soda Mountain Solar Project Public Scoping Report EIS/EIR PUBLIC SCOPING REPORT Environmental Impact Statement / Environmental Impact Report Soda Mountain Solar Project Lead Agencies: Bureau of Land Management Contact: Jeffery Childers, 951-697-5308 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos Moreno Valley, California 92553-9046 San Bernardino County Contact: Nelson Miller, (760) 995-8153 15900 Smoke Tree Street Hesperia, CA 92345 JANUARY 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Soda Mountain Solar Project Public Scoping Report EIS/EIR Page Acronyms Used in this Report iii 1.0 Overview of NEPA/CEQA Scoping Process 1-1 1.1 Introduction 1-1 1.2 Summary of NEPA/CEQA Scoping Process 1-2 1.3 Agencies, Organizations, and Persons Providing Scoping Comments 1-3 1.4 Scoping Report Organization 1-3 2.0 Summary of the Proposed Project 2-1 2.1 The BLM’s Purpose and Need 2-1 2.2 Applicant’s Project Objectives 2-1 2.3 Project Description 2-2 3.0 Summary of Scoping Comments 3-1 3.1 Project Description 3-1 3.2 Human Environment Issues 3-2 3.3 Natural Environment Issues 3-7 3.4 Cumulative Impacts 3-21 3.5 Project Alternatives 3-22 3.6 EIS/EIR Administrative and Permitting Issues 3-24 3.7 Issues Outside the Scope of the EIS/EIR 3-24 4.0 Summary of Future Steps in the Planning Process 4-1 Appendices A. Notices A-1 A-1 Notice of Intent (published in the Federal Register on October 23, 2012) A-2 Notice of Preparation (posted October 26, 2012) B. Public Notices B-1 B-1 Scoping Meeting Announcement C. Scoping Meeting Materials C-1 C-1 Written Comment Forms C-2 Speaker Registration Cards C-3 Scoping Meeting Presentations Soda Mountain Solar Project i January 2013 Public Scoping Report Table of Contents Page Appendices (continued) D. Scoping Meeting Sign-in Sheets D-1 D-1 November 14, 2012 BLM Scoping Meeting Sign-in Sheets E. Speaker Registration Cards and Summary of Verbal Public Comments from Scoping Meetings E-1 E-1 Speaker Registration Cards E-2 Summary of Verbal Comments F. Comments Received During Scoping Period F-1 Figure 1. NEPA/CEQA Process Flowchart 4-1 Table 1. Comments Received During Public Scoping Period 1-4 Soda Mountain Solar Project ii January 2013 Public Scoping Report Acronyms Acronyms Used in this Report ACM asbestos containing material BLM Bureau of Land Management CCR California Code of Regulations CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CESA California Endangered Species Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations CNDDB California Natural Diversity Data Base CORVA California Off-Highway Vehicle Association CWA Clean Water Act EIR Environmental Impact Report EIS Environmental Impact Statement EPA Environmental Protection Agency FESA Federal Endangered Species Act LADWP Los Angeles Department of Water and Power LST Localized Significant Thresholds NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NOI Notice of Intent NOP Notice of Preparation NPS National Park Service OHV Off-Highway Vehicle kV kilovolt MW megawatt PV photovoltaic ROW Right-of-Way RTP Regional Transportation Plan SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SCS Sustainable Communities Strategies SSC Species of Special Concern USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Soda Mountain Solar Project iii January 2013 Public Scoping Report SECTION 1.0 Overview of NEPA/CEQA Scoping Process 1.1 Introduction Soda Mountain, LLC has applied to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for a right-of-way (ROW) grant on public lands to construct, operate, maintain, and decommission a 350 megawatt (MW) photovoltaic (PV) solar energy generating facility and related infrastructure approximately 6 miles southwest of the town of Baker, California, in unincorporated San Bernardino County, to be known as the Soda Mountain Solar Project (Project). The Project would be constructed on approximately 4,397 acres of BLM administered public lands. If the ROW grant application is approved, an amendment of the California Desert Conservation Area Plan of 1980, as amended (CDCA Plan) would be required to identify the site as appropriate for the proposed use. The ROW grant application and CDCA Plan amendment are subject to review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The applicant also has submitted a groundwater well construction permit application to San Bernardino County. The County’s decision regarding the issuance of a well permit is a discretionary action subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This scoping report documents the joint NEPA/CEQA scoping process and summarizes the scoping comments received for the Project. Specifically, this report describes the scoping events and activities conducted for the Project. It also summarizes the written and verbal comments received on the BLM’s Notice of Intent (NOI) and County’s Notice of Preparation (NOP). The BLM is the NEPA Lead Agency for the Project; San Bernardino County is the CEQA Lead Agency. This report serves as an information source to the Lead Agencies in their determination of the range of issues and alternatives to be addressed in the joint Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The Lead Agencies will use the comments received during the scoping period to: 1) Identify key issues to focus the analysis 2) Identify reasonable alternatives to the Project 3) Analyze environmental impacts of the Project and alternatives 4) Identify ways to avoid or reduce environmental impacts 5) Inform the Lead Agencies’ decision-making processes. Soda Mountain Solar Project 1-1 January 2013 Public Scoping Report 1.0 Overview of NEPA/CEQA Scoping Process 1.2 Summary of NEPA/CEQA Scoping Process The NEPA/CEQA scoping process provides government agencies, organizations, and members of the general public the opportunity to identify environmental issues and alternatives for consideration in the EIS/EIR. The scoping process and results are an initial step in the NEPA/CEQA process. To comply with NEPA (40 CFR 1501.7), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a NOI in the Federal Register on October 23, 2012, that provided notice of the BLM’s intent to prepare an EIS for the Project (77 FR 64824). The NOI serves as the official legal notice that a federal agency is commencing preparation of an EIS. The Federal Register serves as the U.S. Government’s official noticing and reporting publication. The NOI initiates the public scoping period for the EIS, provides information about the Project, and serves as an invitation for other federal agencies to provide comments on the scope and content of the EIS. The NOI for the Project is included as Appendix A-1. The BLM issued a press release regarding the NOI on October 24, 2012. The NOI and press release, included as Appendix B-1, were made available to agencies and the public on BLM’s website for the Project: http://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/fo/barstow/renewableenergy/soda_mountain.html As required by Section 15082 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR 15000 et seq.), San Bernardino County issued an NOP on October 26, 2012, that summarized the Project, stated the County’s intention to prepare a joint EIS/EIR, and requested comments from interested parties. The NOP is included as Appendix A-2. Three public notices sent to property owners; 15 copies of the NOP were sent to the California State Clearinghouse; 79 public notices were sent to federal, state, and local agencies and organizations; and 6 public notices were sent to local libraries. Public notices also were sent to Native American groups. During the NOI comment period, the BLM and San Bernardino County held two joint public scoping meetings on November 14, 2012, one from 2-5 PM and the other from 6-9 PM, at the Hampton Inn & Suites in Barstow, California (2710 Lenwood Road, Barstow, CA 92311). Comment cards and speaker cards were available to participants. The BLM and the County put on a PowerPoint presentation explaining the EIS/EIR processes, the BLM’s and the County’s roles throughout these processes, and public participation opportunities (the PowerPoint presentation is provided in Appendix C). The scoping meetings provided the public and government agencies opportunities to receive information on the NEPA/CEQA process and about the Project, as well as to provide oral and written comments. The scoping meetings from 2-5 PM and 6-9 PM were attended by four and 26 persons, respectively, including representatives from local and state agencies, organizations, and private citizens. All materials provided to the public at the scoping meetings are contained within Appendix C and include the following: Soda Mountain Solar Project 1-2 January 2013 Public Scoping Report 1.0 Overview of NEPA/CEQA Scoping Process 1) Comment Cards 2) Speaker Registration Cards 3) Scoping Meeting Presentations Appendix D includes the sign-in sheets from both scoping meetings. Appendix E includes the completed speaker registration cards and a summary of the verbal comments from both of the meetings. Speaker comments made during the BLM scoping meeting were recorded by-hand and summarized. The comment period ended on December 14, 2012 for the BLM’s NOI and November 26, 2012 for the County’s NOP. In total, 22 letters were received: 11 from federal, state, and local agencies; and 11 from individuals and organizations (see Table 1). These comments have been included in the administrative record for the Project, are documented and summarized in this scoping report, and will be considered in the drafting of the EIS/EIR. 1.3 Agencies, Organizations, and Persons Providing Scoping Comments Federal, state, and local agencies; private and public organizations; and members of the general public provided written comments during the scoping period.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mineral Resources and Mineral Resource Potential of the Saline Valley and Lower Saline Wilderness Study Areas Inyo County, California
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral resources and mineral resource potential of the Saline Valley and Lower Saline Wilderness Study Areas Inyo County, California Chester T. Wrucke, Sherman P. Marsh, Gary L. Raines, R. Scott Werschky, Richard J. Blakely, and Donald B. Hoover U.S. Geological Survey and Edward L. McHugh, Clay ton M. Rumsey, Richard S. Gaps, and J. Douglas Causey U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 84-560 Prepared by U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Bureau of Mines for U.S. Bureau of Land Management This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. 1984 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral resources and mineral resource potential of the Saline Valley and Lower Saline Wilderness Study Areas Inyo County, California by Chester T. Wrucke, Sherman P. Marsh, Gary L. Raines, R. Scott Werschky, Richard J. Blakely, and Donald B. Hoover U.S. Geological Survey and Edward L. McHugh, Clayton M. Rumsey, Richard S. Gaps, and J. Douglas Causey U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 84-560 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. 1984 ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1. Mineral resource potential map of the Saline Valley and Lower Saline Wilderness Study Areas, Inyo County, California................................ In pocket Figure 1. Map showing location of Saline Valley and Lower Saline Wilderness Study Areas, California.............. 39 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Interest and the Panamint Shoshone (E.G., Voegelin 1938; Zigmond 1938; and Kelly 1934)
    109 VyI. NOTES ON BOUNDARIES AND CULTURE OF THE PANAMINT SHOSHONE AND OWENS VALLEY PAIUTE * Gordon L. Grosscup Boundary of the Panamint The Panamint Shoshone, also referred to as the Panamint, Koso (Coso) and Shoshone of eastern California, lived in that portion of the Basin and Range Province which extends from the Sierra Nevadas on the west to the Amargosa Desert of eastern Nevada on the east, and from Owens Valley and Fish Lake Valley in the north to an ill- defined boundary in the south shared with Southern Paiute groups. These boundaries will be discussed below. Previous attempts to define the Panamint Shoshone boundary have been made by Kroeber (1925), Steward (1933, 1937, 1938, 1939 and 1941) and Driver (1937). Others, who have worked with some of the groups which border the Panamint Shoshone, have something to say about the common boundary between the group of their special interest and the Panamint Shoshone (e.g., Voegelin 1938; Zigmond 1938; and Kelly 1934). Kroeber (1925: 589-560) wrote: "The territory of the westernmost member of this group [the Shoshone], our Koso, who form as it were the head of a serpent that curves across the map for 1, 500 miles, is one of the largest of any Californian people. It was also perhaps the most thinly populated, and one of the least defined. If there were boundaries, they are not known. To the west the crest of the Sierra has been assumed as the limit of the Koso toward the Tubatulabal. On the north were the eastern Mono of Owens River.
    [Show full text]
  • The Imperial Valley Is Located About 150 Miles Southeast of Los Angeles
    The Imperial Valley is located about 150 miles southeast of Los Angeles. It is a section of a much larger geologic structure -- the Salton Trough -- which is about 1,000 miles in length. The structure extends from San Gorgonio Pass southeast to the Mexican border, including the Gulf of California and beyond the tip of the Baja California Peninsula. The surrounding mountains are largely faulted blocks of the Southern California batholith of Mesozoic age, overlain by fragments of an earlier metamorphic complex. The valley basin consists of a sedimentary fill of sands and gravels ranging up to 15,000 feet in thickness. The layers slope gently down-valley, and contain several important aquifers. The valley is laced with major members of the San Andreas Fault system. Minor to moderate earthquake events are common, but severe shocks have not been experienced in recorded history. The entire trough, including the Gulf is an extension of the East Pacific Rise, a zone of separation in Earth's crust. Deep sea submergence instruments have observed many phenomena of crustal formation. The axis of the Rise, hence of the Salton Valley as well, is a great transform fault that is having the effect of separating an enormous slab of North America, consisting of the Baja Peninsula and coastal California away from the mainland, with movement to the northwest and out to sea as a terranne. Table of Contents Chapter 1 The San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains Chapter 2 The Eastern Mountains Chapter 3 San Gorgonio Pass Chapter 4 The Hills Chapter 5 Desert Sand
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the California Desert
    BIRDS OF THE CALIFORNIA DESERT A. Sidney England and William F. Laudenslayer, Jr. i INTRODUCTION i \ 1 The term, "California desert", as used herein, refers to a politically defined region, most of i which is included in the California Desert Conservation Area (CDCA) designated by the Federal Land ; and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA). Of the 25 million acres in the CDCA, about one-half are i public lands, most of which are managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) according to the "980 P California Desert Conservation Area Plan mandated by FLPMA. The California desert encompasses those portions of the Great Basin Desert (east of the White and lnyo Mountains and A south of the California-Nevada border), the Mojave Desert, and the Colorado Desert which occur " within California; it does not include areas of riparian, aquatic, urban, and agricultural habitats . adjacent to the Colorado River. (Also see chapters on Geology by Norris and Bioclimatology by E3irdsI4 are the most conspicuous vertebrates found in the California deserts. Records exist for at least 425 species (Garrett and Dunn 1981) from 18 orders and 55 families. These counts far exceed those for mammals, reptiles, amphibians and fish, and they are similar to totals for the entire state -- 542 species from 20 orders and 65 families (Laudenslayer and Grenfell 1983). These figures may seem surprisingly similar considering the harsh, arid climates often believed characteristic of I desert environments. However, habiiats found in the California desert range from open water and h marshes at the Salton Sea to pinyon-juniper woodland and limber pinelbristlecone pine forests on a few mountain ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Inferences Regarding Aboriginal Hunting Behavior in the Saline Valley, Inyo County, California
    Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Vol. 2, No. I, pp. 60-79(1980). Inferences Regarding Aboriginal Hunting Behavior in the Saline Valley, Inyo County, California RICHARD A. BROOK HE documented use of stone "hunting a member of the 1861 Boundary Survey Party Tblinds" behind which marksmen hid them­ reconnoitering the Death Valley region. The selves "ve'/7//-6'o?m-e"i (Baillie-Grohman 1884: chronicler observed: 168) waiting for sheep to be driven along trails, can be found in the writings of a number of . curious structures ... on the tops of early historians (Baillie-Grohman 1884; round bald hills, a short distance to the Spears 1892; Muir 1901; Bailey 1940). Recent northwest of the springs, being low walls of archaeological discoveries of rock features loose stones curved in the shape of a demi­ lune, about ten feet in length and about believed to be hunting blinds at the Upper three feet high . , . , There were twenty or Warm Springs (Fig. I) in Saline Valley, Inyo thirty of them [Woodward 1961:49], County, California, provide a basis to substan­ tiate, build upon, and evaluate these observa­ This paper discusses a series of 60 such piled- tions and the ethnographic descriptions of up boulder features recorded within a I km.^ hunting in the Great Basin (Steward 1933, area at Upper Warm Springs (Fig. 2). 1938, 1941; Driver 1937; Voegelin 1938; The same chronicler offered some tentative Stewart 1941). An examination of these explanations as to their function: features, their location, orientation, and asso­ ciations in
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    1 INTRODUCTION This monograph is an introductory descriptive grammar of Tlimpisa Shoshone, meant to provide both layman and specialist with a basic understanding of how the language works as a linguistic system. In this sense, it is intended to be a "nuts and bolts" grammar with lots of examples illustrating the most important grammatical elements and processes in the language. 1 Tlimpisa Shoshone is a dialect of the language most often called Panamint in the technical literature (e.g., Freeze and Iannucci 1979, Henshaw 1883, Kroeber 1939, Lamb 1958a and 1964, McLaughlin 1987, Miller 1984) . The language is also known as Panamint Shoshone (Fowler and Fowler 1971, Merriam 1904, Miller et al. 1971), Koso (= Coso) or Koso Shoshone (Kroeber 1925, Lamb 1958a), and simply Shoshone (Steward 1938). Panamint and two other closely related languages, Shoshone proper and Comanche, comprise the Central Numic branch of the Numic subfamily of the northern division of the uto-Aztecan family of American Indian languages (see Lamb 1964, Miller 1984, Kaufman and Campbell 1981). Speakers of uto-Aztecan languages occupied more territory in aboriginal America than any other group. More than 30 Uto-Aztecan languages were spoken over a vast area stretching from the Salmon River in central Idaho south through the Great Basin and peripheral areas into the Southwest and through northern and central Mexico. Colonies of Aztecan speakers were also scattered further south into Central America. At the time of 1 UTO-AZTECAN FAMILY Northern Division NUMlC Central Numic
    [Show full text]
  • High Desert Report
    Spring 2016 l Volume 55 The RADCO CompaniesHigh Desert Report An economic overview of the High Desert region affiliated with The Bradco Companies, a commercial real estate group We have some very cancer, he was unable to prepare an article Jr.; Mr. Michael Yannone; Mr. Robert R. exciting information for this edition. Considering how long he Gaines, Sr.; Mr. Brad Orchard; Mr. Mark to share in this Edi- has been in this battle, Dr. Gobar is do- Eagleton; Ms. Judith Joan Curren; Mr. tion of the Report. ing quite well. We talk often and he con- Mike Perry & Mr. Tom Perry (the son and But first, I wish to tinues to be one of my personal mentors. husband of our close friend and renowned welcome our cur- When the doctors told him they thought escrow professional Mrs. Debbie Perry); rent, future, and long he would lose a substantial amount of Mr. Stephen J. Flannery; Mr. Bill Nelson; standing subscrib- weight, they forgot that Dr. Gobar is a Ms. Susan Mari So; Ms. Rita Rae Dale; ers and sponsors of unique individual, undoubtedly one of Mr. Chuck Love; Mr. Jack Julian Hall; the 55th Edition of the most unique people anyone will ever Ms. Rita Louise Jaramillo; Mrs. Cherie The Bradco High Desert Report, the first meet. He has actually gained over 16 Vackar; Mr. Lowell Draper; and my wife’s and only economic overview of The High pounds. He looks great and still has the 99-1/5-year old Aunt, Ms. Myrtle Mason- Desert, covering the northern portion of greatest sense of humor.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B NEPA Process
    APPENDIX B SUMMARY OF NEPA PROCESS FOR WMRNP WEST MOJAVE (WEMO) ROUTE NETWORK PROJECT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Appendix B Summary of NEPA Process for WMRNP B.1 Notice of Intent The impact analyses are based on the Applicant’s description of their proposed Project, and that description includes, for some The planning process was initiated by a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement and Proposed Plan Amendment to the 2006 WEMO Plan that was published in the Federal Register on September 13, 2011, and clarified on May 2, 2013. The clarified NOI served as notification of the intent to prepare an EIS as required in 40 CFR 1501.7, as well as of potential amendment to the CDCA Plan. The NOI served to indicate the planning- level vs non-planning level decisions, and to clarify that the plan amendment would be an EIS- level amendment, and requested comments on relevant issues, National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) (16 U.S.C. 470(f) concerns, and initial planning criteria for the plan amendment. The NOI indicated that the Proposed Plan Amendment and SEIS would consider the following: Amend the Motorized-Vehicle Access (MVA) Element of the CDCA Plan to modify the language regarding the process for designating routes in the West Mojave Planning Area; Reconsider other MVA Element land-use-planning level guidance for the West Mojave Planning Area; Revisit the route designation process for the West Mojave Planning Area; Clarify the West Mojave Planning Area inventory for route designation and analysis; Establish a route network in the Planning Area consistent with current guidance and new information; Adopt travel management areas (TMAs) to facilitate implementation of the West Mojave route network; Provide or modify network-wide and TMA-specific activity-plan level minimization, mitigation, and other implementation strategies for the West Mojave Planning Area; and Respond to specific issues related to the US District Court WEMO Summary Judgment and Remedy Orders.
    [Show full text]
  • EICHBAUM TOLL ROAD HISTORIC CONTEXT REPORT Towne Pass Curve Correction Project Inyo County, California 09-INY 190, PM 69.2/69.8 EA 09-35320 Contract No
    EICHBAUM TOLL ROAD HISTORIC CONTEXT REPORT Towne Pass Curve Correction Project Inyo County, California 09-INY 190, PM 69.2/69.8 EA 09-35320 Contract No. 06A2138 Project ID: 09-1200-0007 Prepared for: Prepared by: Trevor Pratt Steven J. “Mel” Melvin, Architectural Historian Caltrans District 9 Bryan Larson, Partner / Architectural Historian 500 South Main Street JRP Historical Consulting, LLC Bishop, CA 93514 2850 Spafford Street Davis, CA 95618 June 2018 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 2. RESEARCH METHODS ....................................................................................................... 1 3. DESCRIPTION OF RESOURCE........................................................................................... 1 4. HISTORIC CONTEXT .......................................................................................................... 2 4.1 Tourism and Recreation ................................................................................................ 2 4.2 Transportation ............................................................................................................... 6 4.2.1 Toll Roads ................................................................................................................. 6 4.2.2 Development of Roads in the Death Valley Region ................................................. 7 4.3 History of the Eichbaum Toll Road ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA DESERT DISTRICT ADVISORY COUNCIL, Reporter's
    1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 2 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 3 CALIFORNIA DESERT DISTRICT ADVISORY COUNCIL 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS 12 SATURDAY, JUNE 29, 2019 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 JOB NO. 3417006 22 REPORTED BY: 23 DIANE CARVER MANN, 24 CLR, CSR NO. 6008 25 PAGES 1-174 Page 1 Personal Court Reporters, A Veritext Company 818-988-1900 1 MEETING OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF 2 LAND MANAGEMENT CALIFORNIA DESERT DISTRICT ADVISORY 3 COUNCIL AT 1511 EAST MAIN STREET, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA, 4 COMMENCING AT 9:14 A.M., ON SATURDAY, JUNE 29, 2019, 5 BEFORE DIANE CARVER MANN, CSR NO. 6008. 6 7 MEMBERS OF THE DAC PRESENT 8 FRAZIER HANEY, CHAIR - ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 9 DANIEL TAYLOR - DEVELOPED OUTDOOR RECREATION 10 PAUL WHITEHEAD - PUBLIC-AT-LARGE 11 MARIANA MAGUIRE - PUBLIC-AT-LARGE 12 JAMES KENNEY - PUBLIC-AT-LARGE 13 MICHELLE LONG - TRANSPORTATION/RIGHTS-OF-WAY 14 EDWARD STOVIN - OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE USERS 15 JAMES BAGLEY - PUBLIC-AT-LARGE 16 BENJAMIN GRUBER - ACTING DISTRICT MANAGER, BLM 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 2 Personal Court Reporters, A Veritext Company 818-988-1900 1 I N D E X 2 AGENDA ITEM: PAGE: 3 WELCOME, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE; APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 15, 2018 MEETING TRANSCRIPT; REVIEW OF 4 MEETING AGENDA AND PROCEDURES FOR PUBLIC COMMENT 5 5 DESERT ADVISORY COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS 17 6 PUBLIC COMMENT ON DESERT ADVISORY COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND NON-AGENDA ITEMS 28 7 PRIOR MEETING CLOSEOUT: WEST MOJAVE (WEMO) ROUTE 8 NETWORK PROJECT 62 9 DESERT ADVISORY COUNCIL DISCUSSION ON WEST MOJAVE (WEMO) ROUTE NETWORK PROJECT 72 10 PUBLIC COMMENT ON WEST MOJAVE (WEMO) ROUTE 11 NETWORK PROJECT 77 12 MORNING BREAK 72 13 STATE DIRECTOR, DISTRICT MANAGER, AND FIELD OFFICE REPORTS 95 14 DESERT ADVISORY COUNCIL DISCUSSION ON STATE 15 DIRECTOR, DISTRICT MANAGER, AND FIELD OFFICE REPORTS 102 16 PUBLIC COMMENT ON DISTRICT MANAGER AND FIELD 17 OFFICE REPORTS 18 LUNCH BREAK 95 19 DESERT ADVISORY COUNCIL DISCUSSION ON EXECUTIVE ORDERS AND SECRETARIAL ORDERS 117 20 PRESENTATION: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE JOHN D.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Amphibians and Reptiles at Death Valley National Park
    Inventory of Amphibians and Reptiles at Death Valley National Park Final Report Permit # DEVA-2003-SCI-0010 (amphibians) and DEVA-2002-SCI-0010 (reptiles) Accession # DEVA- 2493 (amphibians) and DEVA-2453 (reptiles) Trevor B. Persons and Erika M. Nowak Common Chuckwalla in Greenwater Canyon, Death Valley National Park (TBP photo). USGS Southwest Biological Science Center Colorado Plateau Research Station Box 5614, Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona 86011 May 2006 Death Valley Amphibians and Reptiles_____________________________________________________ ABSTRACT As part of the National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program in the Mojave Network, we conducted an inventory of amphibians and reptiles at Death Valley National Park in 2002- 2004. Objectives for this inventory were to: 1) Inventory and document the occurrence of reptile and amphibian species occurring at DEVA, primarily within priority sampling areas, with the goal of documenting at least 90% of the species present; 2) document (through collection or museum specimen and literature review) one voucher specimen for each species identified; 3) provide a GIS-referenced list of sensitive species that are federally or state listed, rare, or worthy of special consideration that occur within priority sampling locations; 4) describe park-wide distribution of federally- or state-listed, rare, or special concern species; 5) enter all species data into the National Park Service NPSpecies database; and 6) provide all deliverables as outlined in the Mojave Network Biological Inventory Study Plan. Methods included daytime and nighttime visual encounter surveys, road driving, and pitfall trapping. Survey effort was concentrated in predetermined priority sampling areas, as well as in areas with a high potential for detecting undocumented species.
    [Show full text]
  • Extraordinary Encounters: an Encyclopedia of Extraterrestrials and Otherworldly Beings
    EXTRAORDINARY ENCOUNTERS EXTRAORDINARY ENCOUNTERS An Encyclopedia of Extraterrestrials and Otherworldly Beings Jerome Clark B Santa Barbara, California Denver, Colorado Oxford, England Copyright © 2000 by Jerome Clark All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Clark, Jerome. Extraordinary encounters : an encyclopedia of extraterrestrials and otherworldly beings / Jerome Clark. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-57607-249-5 (hardcover : alk. paper)—ISBN 1-57607-379-3 (e-book) 1. Human-alien encounters—Encyclopedias. I. Title. BF2050.C57 2000 001.942'03—dc21 00-011350 CIP 0605040302010010987654321 ABC-CLIO, Inc. 130 Cremona Drive, P.O. Box 1911 Santa Barbara, California 93116-1911 This book is printed on acid-free paper I. Manufactured in the United States of America. To Dakota Dave Hull and John Sherman, for the many years of friendship, laughs, and—always—good music Contents Introduction, xi EXTRAORDINARY ENCOUNTERS: AN ENCYCLOPEDIA OF EXTRATERRESTRIALS AND OTHERWORLDLY BEINGS A, 1 Angel of the Dark, 22 Abductions by UFOs, 1 Angelucci, Orfeo (1912–1993), 22 Abraham, 7 Anoah, 23 Abram, 7 Anthon, 24 Adama, 7 Antron, 24 Adamski, George (1891–1965), 8 Anunnaki, 24 Aenstrians, 10 Apol, Mr., 25
    [Show full text]