Experiences from 2006 Guimaras Oil Spill in the Philippines Noe John Joseph E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Experiences from 2006 Guimaras Oil Spill in the Philippines Noe John Joseph E Community Livelihood Recovery: Experiences from 2006 Guimaras Oil Spill in the Philippines Noe John Joseph E. Sacramento a * and Dhino B. Geges b a College of Social Sciences, University of the Philippines Cebu b College of Human Ecology, University of the Philippines Los Baños * Corresponding author: Noe John Joseph E. Sacramento ABSTRACT The 2006 oil spill in Guimaras, Philippines, ravaged coastal communities, causing loss of fishing resources, and pollution of the coastal environment. This case study examines the community’s live- lihood recovery efforts after the disaster. The “Build, Back, Better” approach (Clinton, 2006) provided the lens to describe the stakeholder’s participation and empowerment for inclusive and planned community livelihood recovery. The study focuses on Barangay La Paz, Nueva Valencia, Guimaras, a profoundly affected coastal settlement during the oil spill in 2006. Key Informant Interviews (KII), Focus Group Discussions (FGD), and secondary data collected from published research reports and government documents are the major data sources. The study employs thematic analysis. The find- ings reveal that various actors involved in community livelihood recovery provide alternative sources of income and help restore the livelihood sector. Building the community’s sense of ownership in the recovery process is shaped by several push and pull factors and thus also affects the sustainability objectives of the livelihood. Conditions for the release of financial assistance and claims are crucial to alternative and sustainable community livelihood recovery. Participatory planning involving the fishers themselves in deciding the terms and directions of the initiatives is strategic and important for sustainability. In gist, community livelihood recovery effort entails a chain of responsibilities among actors in the process. Recommendations for sustained community livelihood recovery based on the lessons from this case are provided for humanitarian organizations. Keywords: community, fisher, livelihood, oil spill, recovery INTRODUCTION also adversely impacts community livelihood, ecological balance, and the continuity of living Different kinds of disasters regularly strike the traditions and cultures. Philippine archipelago. The National Disas- ter Risk Reduction and Management Council In the past, the country experienced sever- (NDRRMC) reported that among the disasters, al oil spills. In 1994, an oil spill of 1,112.91 to floods and typhoons hit the country yearly, re- 143,088.57L of fuel oil from the bunker barge sulting in loss of human lives, property, crops, Petro Queen took place at the entrance of the natural resources, and other natural assets. Pasig River (ITOPF, 2010). In 2013, an oil spill While natural disasters heavily impinge on vul- that happened in Manila bay damaged the coast- nerable groups and communities, technological al towns of Rosario, Tanza, and Naic in Cavite. disasters such as oil spills adversely distress An estimated 500,000 L of oil were spilled from and “destroy the bio-physical environment an undetermined source. However, the M/T through the breakdown of technological pro- Makisig, a fuel carrier or the submerged pipe- cesses and systems” (Flagg, 2017). The oil spill lines of Petron, a fuel company was alleged to 50 January - December 2019 be the source of the spill (Rappler, 2013; Sabil- post-disaster restoration and improvement in lo, 2013). Cebu in the same year had the same people’s lives. Lindell (2013) mentioned that catastrophe when the RORO passenger vessel disaster recovery measures aim at “re-estab- St. Thomas de Aquinas collided with container lishing normal social, economic, and political ship Sulpicio Express 7 as they approached routines” of the community. The recovery of a Cebu port. The collision resulted in the release community from a disaster links various aspects of 120,000L of intermediate fuel oil (ITOPF, and institutions of the society, and the goal of 2013). Another case was recorded in Estancia, community recovery should go beyond what is Iloilo, after the devastation of Typhoon Haiyan, “normal” in addressing their physical, social, and locally known as “Yolanda”. From the report of economic vulnerabilities. Community livelihood United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) recovery is important for affected sectors to re- and United Nations Office for the Coordination cuperate from disasters and fully regain better of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA), the heavily community life. Community livelihood recovery loaded oil tankers that ran ashore during the ty- involves processes and strategies of restoration phoon caused the massive spill of an estimated that impact income levels, access to resources, 800,000L of oil that dented the already severely assets of individuals, and households (Joakim & damaged coast of the town (UNOCHA, 2013). Wismer, 2015). Primarily, community livelihood A recent spill was recorded in Zamboanga City recovery measures are facilitated by govern- in 2017 from the old submerged pipelines of the mental support and humanitarian relief assis- Western Mindanao Power Corporation (WMPC) tance from helping organizations and private that operates for bunker fuels used in the pow- groups (Mannakkara, Wilkinson, and Potanga- er plant which was immediately fixed (Rosal- roa, 2014). However, the participation and own- ado, 2017). Among these cases of the oil spill ership of communities of their recovery is vital in in the country, the worst occurred in 2006, the sustaining these measures. Since most disas- M/T Solar 1 incident in Guimaras that resulted ter studies and community livelihood recovery in the impairment of marine biodiversity and research are people-centered, scholars and life in the island-province. The tanker, carrying practitioners encourage the use of participatory 2,067,000L of bunker fuel bound for Mindanao approaches and frameworks such as “bouncing sank along the southern coast of Guimaras is- back” to allow people perform community liveli- land, initially spilling 200,000L (UNOCHA, 2006) hood recovery interventions in addressing the that destroyed the people’s sources of livelihood vulnerabilities from a pre-disaster state along- across coastal communities, marine life, biodi- side addressing their recovery and building bet- versity, and protected areas. Studying one of the ter conditions. This post-disaster paradigm was stricken coastal barangays in Nueva Valencia, further framed from the perspective of “Bounc- Guimaras is essential to understanding com- ing Forward” (Manyena, O’Brien, O’Keefe, & munity livelihood recovery as central to disas- Rose, 2011: Kelman, Gaillard, Lewis, & Mercer, ter recovery. The roles of stakeholders such as 2016) and “Build Forward Better” (Murphy & community members, local government, help- Ricks, 2013: Kelman, Gaillard, Lewis, & Mercer, ing groups, Non-Government Organizations 2016). (NGOs), and People’s Organizations (POs) are the focus of this study to provide new insights to It is crucial to assess the socio-economic dy- any humanitarian organization in responding to namics and the life of coastal communities in community livelihood recovery, especially that Guimaras province after the disaster. Since technological disasters cause irreversible and the main livelihood of affected communities is hostile impacts on the environment, people, and fishing, small-scale fishers who depend heavily the community. on their catch were affected when the govern- ment regulated fishing activities. The culturally Community livelihood recovery is vital towards embedded traditional panginhas or gathering of Issue No. 8 51 seafood as daily sustenance for the family and The Locale of the Study for survival was also discouraged. Years later, the disaster even caused fewer crustaceans to Nueva Valencia is a 3rd class municipality in the gather. Community livelihood recovery from di- province of Guimaras that has 22 barangays. saster is important for communities to improve Fourteen barangays are coastal, six are inland, their state and bounce back from adverse im- and two are island barangays. The population pacts of the catastrophe. This study sought to of the municipality is 39,810 (PSA, 2015). Most examine the community livelihood recovery ef- areas in the municipality are hilly, and most of forts on livelihood loss after the oil spill. It par- the coastal regions are flat. In 2006, the oil spill ticularly aims to: a) discuss the major livelihood contaminated the coastal area of the municipal- recovery project implemented in the community ity, and among those hugely devastated was after the oil spill, b) explain key issues and prob- Barangay La Paz. Whilst the barangay is one lems that the fishing community encountered in of those severely damaged by the oil spill, the recovering their livelihood, and c) provide possi- case of La Paz will essentially provide insight ble strategies or approaches to improving com- into community livelihood recovery measures munity livelihood recovery in disaster-affected since most humanitarian organizations have ex- communities. tended their assistance and support to the area. Barangay La Paz is a coastal community locat- METHODOLOGY ed beneath a group of islets fronting the coast- al community of Nueva Valencia. La Paz has Theoretical Support of the Study a land area of 7.0459 km2 and a population of 1,921 (PSA, 2015). The barangay’s population This study employs the “Build, Back, Better” ap- represents 4.83% of the total population of the proach (Clinton, 2006) that accentuates
Recommended publications
  • 9Th IGSC Full Programx
    9th EWC International Graduate Student Conference on the AsiaAsia----PacificPacific Region Imin Center, Honolulu HawaiHawai‘i‘i‘i‘i February 1111----13,13, 2010 Program PROGRAM Thursday, February 11, 2010 Registration 1:00 pm – 4:00 pm Opening Ceremony 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm Welcoming Hula & Chant Kumu Mapuana de Silva Kumu Hula, Halau Mohala 'Ilima halau Hula Dancers Halau Mohala 'Ilima halau Conference Report Ms. Vandana Krishnamurthy Conference Co-Chair Welcoming Remarks Dr. Charles E. Morrison President, East-West Center Introduction of Keynote Speaker Ms. Beryl Yang Conference Co-Chair Keynote Address The Honorable C.H. Tung Vice Chairman, Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Founding Chairman, China-United States Exchange Foundation and Former Chief Executive of Hong Kong Reception 6:00 pm – 7:30 pm Wailana Room, Garden Level 2 PROGRAM Friday, February 12, 2010 Parallel Session 1 8:30 am – 10:15 am 1.1 Education in the Asia-Pacific Region 1.2 Navigating Postmodernity I: The Transformation of the Modern 1.3 Asian Democratic Systems 1.4 Responses to Social Traumas in Asia-Pacific Contexts Break 10:15 am – 10:30 am Parallel Session 2 10:30 am - 12:15 pm 2.1 Second Language Acquisition in Asia 2.2 Navigating Postmodernity II: The Transformation of the Traditional 2.3 Taking the Pulse of Global Market Liberalization: Views from Asia 2.4 National Unity in Nations and Regions of Ethnic Diversity Lunch Wailana Room, Garden Level 12:15 pm – 1:30 pm Poster Session 1:00 pm – 1:30 pm Parallel Session 3 1:30 pm - 3:15 pm 3.1 English
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of the COASTS of Guimaras Province
    STATE OF THE COASTS of Guimaras Province The Provincial Government of Guimaras, Philippines GEF UNOPS Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA) State of the Coasts of Guimaras Province The Provincial Government of Guimaras, Philippines GEF UNOPS Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA) State of the Coasts of Guimaras Province April 2012 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes or to provide wider dissemination for public response, provided prior written permission is obtained from the PEMSEA Resource Facility Executive Director, acknowledgment of the source is made and no commercial usage or sale of the material occurs. PEMSEA would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any purpose other than those given above without a written agreement between PEMSEA and the requesting party. Published by the Provincial Government of Guimaras, Philippines, and Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA). 135 p. Printed in Quezon City, Philippines Provincial Government of Guimaras, Philippines and PEMSEA. 2012. State of the Coasts of Guimaras Province. Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA), Quezon City, Philippines. ISBN XXX-XXX-XXX-XXX-X PEMSEA is a GEF Project Implemented by UNDP and Executed by UNOPS. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS), and the other participating organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Disclaimer This Report Was Compiled by an ADRC Visiting Researcher
    Disclaimer This report was compiled by an ADRC visiting researcher (VR) from ADRC member countries. The views expressed in the report do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADRC. The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on the maps in the report also do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the ADRC. The Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Syy(stem (PDRRMS) A Countryyp Report Presented by Ms. Ma. Aletha Ahumada Nogra Civil Defense Officer III, OffiOfficece of Civil Defense Department of National Defense (OCD-(OCD-DND)DND) Regional Center VI during the 2013 ADRC Visiting Researcher Program Kobe, Hyogo, Japan Main Contents of Country Report General Information Naturaldhl Hazards Characteristic of fh the Country Disaster Management System Disaster Management Plan Budget Size on National Level Progress and Situations of the Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA) ADRC Counterpart Main Contents of Related Information Link to the Disaster Management Organizations Legal System Organization Plan Earthquake Generators Typhoon Belt El Niňo Phenomenon Guimaras Oil Spill Typhoon Frank (Fengshen) Tropical Storm Sendong (Washi) 6.9 Earthquake in Negros Oriental Compostela Valley Landslide Earthquake Generators Typhoon Belt El Niňo Phenomenon Guimaras Oil Spill Typhoon Frank (Fengshen) Tropical Storm Sendong (Washi) 6.9 Earthquake in Negros Oriental Compostela Valley Landslide Earthquake Generators Typhoon Belt El Niňo Phenomenon Guimaras Oil Spill Typhoon Frank (Fengshen) Tropical Storm Sendong (Washi) 6.9 Earthquake in Negros Oriental Compostela Valley Landslide Distribution of Volcanoes & Seismic Hazards in Region VI Seismicity of Region VI for the last 400 years (Ms 5 and above) 679 TsunamiTsunami--ProneProne Barangays in WV Basis of listing of Tsunami Prone Barangays are indicative maps utilizing maximum wave height and inundation (worst case scenario earthquakes) from major offshore source zones.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    th th Online Model United Nations @ Newton International Academy II 2020 | 11 ​ – 14 ​ of November 2020 ​ ​ ​ ​ Forum: Sustainable Development Goals 14 Issue: The issue of oil spillage in Mauritius Student Officer: Robertus Andika Pradata Position: Deputy Chair Introduction The oil spillage in Mauritius had occurred on July 25th, 2020. This disaster had caused many damages to the marine life around the pristine lagoons, the inhabitants living around the coast of Mauritius, the white-sand beaches Mauritius was known for attracting tourists from around the world, and Fishermen whose livelihoods were ruined by the oil spill. The oil spill happened as MV Wakashio, a large capesize Bulk-carrier, ran aground on a coral reef in the south-eastern tip of Mauritius. On the 4th of July the Japanese-Owned vessel departed from Liyungang, China, the vessel then stopped in Singapore and was expected to arrive in Tubarao, Brazil, on the 13th of August. The vessel also had no cargo onboard as it was departing and was flying under a Panamanian Flag of Convenience but was grounded by a reef on the 25th of July. By 6th of August, Oil had leaked from the stricken vessel and the Mauritian government tried to minimise the spill and control environmentally sensitive areas until Foreign aid was there to help them pump out an estimated 3,890 tonnes of oil still on board the vessel, at this point the Mauritian Government declared a state of environmental emergency. By 10th August 1,000 tonnes of Oil had leaked out the vessel, at this point, the oil spill had heavily affected coastal villages such as Mahebourg, leaving the community with shock and anger at the government’s slow response.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Figures Figure 1 Priority Protected Areas for Ecotourism Within Key Biodiversity Areas and Tourism Development Areas
    List of Figures Figure 1 Priority protected areas for ecotourism within Key Biodiversity Areas and Tourism Development Areas Figure 2 Total number of visitors to protected areas and total income generated from 2014 to 2017 List of Tables Table 1 Priority protected areas for ecotourism development within KBAs List of Footnotes 1 NTDP 2016-2022 Tourism Development Clusters and Areas Source: DENR-Biodiversity Management Bureau, 2018 Figure 1. Priority protected areas for ecotourism within Key Biodiversity Areas and Tourism Development Areas 2,000,000 80,000,000.00 1,800,000 70,000,000.00 1,600,000 60,000,000.00 1,400,000 Income 1,200,000 50,000,000.00 1,000,000 40,000,000.00 800,000 30,000,000.00 600,000 Number of visitors of Number 20,000,000.00 400,000 200,000 10,000,000.00 - 0.00 2014 2015 2016 2017 Local Male Local Female Foreign Male Foreign Female Total Income Source: DENR-Biodiversity Management Bureau, 2018 Figure 2. Total number of visitors to protected areas and total income generated from 2014 to 2017. Table 1. Priority protected areas for ecotourism development within KBAs REGION PROTECTED AREA Ecotourism Products/ Activities 1. CAR Mount Pulag National Park Mountain climbing, camping, cultural visit, photography, cloud formation watching 2. CAR Balbalasang Balbalan National Park Hiking, camping 3. Region 1 Kalbario Patapat Natural Park Hiking, caving, biking, diving, camping 4. Region 1 Manleluag Spring Protected Landscape Trekking, hot spring swimming 5. Region 1 Hundred Island National Park Boating, island hopping, 6. Region 2 Batanes Protected Landscape and Village tour, hiking, photography, biking, Seascape caving 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Status and Prospects of Protected Areas in the Light of the Philippine Biodiversity Conservation Priorities
    Proceedings of IUCN/WCPA-EA-4 Taipei Conference March 18-23, 2002, Taipei, Taiwan CURRENT STATUS AND PROSPECTS OF PROTECTED AREAS IN THE LIGHT OF THE PHILIPPINE BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION PRIORITIES Perry S. Ong, Ph. D. Fellow, Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, CI Science Director, Conservation International Philippines Associate Professor, Institute of Biology, UP Diliman I. INTRODUCTION The Philippines, the world’s second largest archipelago after Indonesia, covers a land area of about 300,000 km2 [1]. It is one of the 17 megadiversity countries, which between themselves contain 70 to 80 percent of global biodiversity [2]. Philippine rainforest is home to more than 1130 terrestrial wildlife species (Table 1) and between 10,000-13,000 species of plants [3] so far recorded, of which more than half are found nowhere else in the world. As such, the Philippines has also been described as Galapagos times ten [4]. It is also one of 25 global biodiversity hotspots [5, 6] with more than 97 percent of its original forest cover lost [7, 8]. In fact more original forests were lost in the last 50 years of the 20th century than what was lost in the previous 450 years combined [9]. Yet more new species are still being discovered on these islands than any other areas on earth in recent times [e.g., see 10, 11] Table 1. Diversity, endemism and conservation status of Philippine wildlife [11, 12, 13 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20] No. of No. of Endemic % No. of No. of Threatened Species Species endemics Endemic Species Threatened Species Amphibians 101+ 79+ 78% 24 24 Reptiles 258+ 170+ 66% 8 4 Birds 5761 195+1 34% 74 59 Mammals 204+1, 2 111+1 54% 51 41 Total 1139+ 555+1 49% 157 128 95 Legend: + includes new species (38 species of amphibians, 35 species of reptiles; 15 species of mammals); 1 includes rediscovered species 2 25 species of dolphins, whales and dugong The country’s marine waters cover 2.21 M km2 with a coastline of 22,450 km and an estimated 27,000 km2 of coral reefs [21].
    [Show full text]
  • Profile on Environmental and Social Considerations in Philippines
    Profile on Environmental and Social Considerations in Philippines ANNEX September 2011 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) CRE CR(5) 11-014 Table of Contents IUCN Red List of the Philippines (2007) Red List of the Philippine Red Data Book,1997 Threatened Species by the National Laws Philippine Fauna and Flora under CITES APPENDIX, 2011 Protected Areas under the NIPAS Act in the Philippines (as of June, 2011) Environmental Standards CDM Projects in the Philippines (as of March 31, 2011) Project Grouping Matrix for Determination of EIA Report Type EIA Coverage & Requirements Screening Checklists Outlines of Required Documents by PEISS IUCN Red List of the Philippines ,2007 IUCN Red List of the Philippines (2007) # Scientific Name Common Name Category Mammals 1 Acerodon jubatus GOLDEN-CAPPED FRUIT BAT EN 2 Acerodon leucotis PALAWAN FRUIT BAT VU 3 Alionycteris paucidentata MINDANAO PYGMY FRUIT BAT VU 4 Anonymomys mindorensis MINDORO CLIMBING RAT VU 5 Apomys sacobianus LONG-NOSED LUZON FOREST MOUSE VU 6 Apomys gracilirostris LARGE MINDORO FOREST MOUSE VU 7 Archboldomys luzonensis MT ISAROG SHREW-MOUSE EN 8 Axis calamianensis CALAMANIAN DEER EN 9 Bubalus mindorensis MINDORO DWARF BUFFALO CR 10 Cervus alfredi PHILLIPINE SPOTTED DEER EN 11 Chrotomys gonzalesi ISAROG STRIPED SHREW-RAT, CR 12 Chrotomys whiteheadi LUZON STRIPED RAT VU 13 Crateromys australis DINAGAT BUSHY-TAILED CLOUD RAT EN 14 Crateromys schadenbergi GIANT BUSHY-TAILED CLOUD RAT VU 15 Crateromys paulus OILIN BUSHY-TAILED CLOUD RAT CR 16 Crateromys heaneyi PANAY BUSHY-TAILED
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court En Banc Decision Velasco, Jr
    e Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC DEPARTMENT OF G.R. No. 230107 TRANSPORTATION (DOTR), MARITIME INDUSTRY AUTHORITY (MARINA), and Present: PHILIPPINE COAST GUARD (PCG), Petitioners, CARPIO, Senior Associate Justice, VELASCO, JR., LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, PERALTA, - versus - BERSAMIN, DEL CASTILLO, PERLAS-BERNABE, LEONEN, PHILIPPINE PETROLEUM SEA JARDELEZA, TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION, CAGUIOA, HERMA SHIPPING & TRANSPORT MARTIRES, CORPORATION, ISLAS TANKERS TIJAM, SEA TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REYES, JR., and MIS MARITIME CORPORATION, GESMUNDO, JJ. PETROLIFT, INC., GOLDEN ALBATROSS SHIPPING CORPORATION, VIA MARINE CORPORATION, and Promulgated: CARGOMARINE CORPORATION, Respondents. x-------------------------------------------------------------------------- DECISION VELASCO, JR., J.: The Case This case concerns the constitutionality of establishing the "Oil Pollution Management Fund;' under Section 22(a) of Republic Act No. (RA) 9483 and Section 1, Rule X of its Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR), by imposing "ten centavos (1 Oc) per liter for every delivery or transshipment of oil made by tanker barges and tanker haulers." Decision 2 G.R. No. 230107 Antecedents The value of the Philippine marine ecosystem cannot be overemphasized. The country is part of an important marine biosphere known as the "coral triangle" that includes Malaysia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea. Marine scientists working in the area have referred to this ocean corridor as the marine equivalent of the Amazon. 1 At the center of it all is the Philippines
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of the COASTS the Second of Guimaras Province
    The Second STATE OF THE COASTS of Guimaras Province The Provincial Government of Guimaras, Philippines The Second State of the Coasts of Guimaras Province The Provincial Government of Guimaras, Philippines The Second State of the Coasts of Guimaras Province November 2018 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes or to provide wider dissemination for public response, provided prior written permission is obtained from the PEMSEA Resource Facility Executive Director, acknowledgment of the source is made and no commercial usage or sale of the material occurs. PEMSEA would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any purpose other than those given above without a written agreement between PEMSEA and the requesting party. Published by the Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA) and Provincial Government of Guimaras, Philippines with support from the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Printed in Quezon City, Philippines Citation: PEMSEA and Provincial Government of Guimaras, Philippines. 2018. The Second State of the Coasts of Guimaras Province. Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA), Quezon City, Philippines. ISBN 978-971-812-048-4 PEMSEA is an international organization mandated to implement the Sustainable Development Strategy for the Seas of East Asia (SDS-SEA). The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of PEMSEA and other participating organizations. The designation employed and the presentation do not imply expression of opinion, whatsoever on the part of PEMSEA concerning the legal status of any country or territory, or its authority or concerningthe delimitation of its boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 T H P N H R S P R O C E D I N
    8TH PNHRS WEEK CELEBRATION 8 t h P N H R S P R O C E D I N G S Central Visayas Consortium for Health Research and Development Regional Office of Department of Science and Technology VII (DOST VII) Cebu City, Philippines August 2014 i 8TH PNHRS WEEK CELEBRATION Contents Pre-Event Press Conference.................................................................................................................................1 Opening Ceremonies Opening Remarks......................................................................................................................................9 Welcome Remarks and Introduction of Delegates...................................................................................10 Message from the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) ......................................................12 Message from the Department of Health (DOH) .....................................................................................13 Message from the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) ................................................................15 Message from the University of the Philippines Manila (UP Manila) .......................................................16 Report of the PNHRS...............................................................................................................................17 Presentation: Disaster Risk Reduction and the Role of Science.............................................................20 Keynote Speech: SECRETARY PANFILO M. LACSON, Presidential Assistant
    [Show full text]
  • 44 Bab Ii Permasalahan Pencemaran Laut Akibat
    BAB II PERMASALAHAN PENCEMARAN LAUT AKIBAT MINYAK DI INDONESIA-FILIPINA Permasalahan pencemaran akibat limbah minyak bisa dikatakan sangat berbahaya bagi kehidupan laut dan dapat merugikan kesejahteraan masyarakat pesisir pantai yang menggantungkan kehidupannya terhadap laut. Indonesia dan Filipina merupakan negara kepulauan yang memiliki jalur laut yang digunakan sebagai jalur lalu lintas alternatif yaitu Laut Sulawesi dan Laut Sulu. Baik Indonesia maupun Filipina sama- sama berupaya untuk melakukan pencegahan terhadap tumpahan minyak agar tidak membahayakan lingkungan laut dan dapat merugikan masyarakat pesisir. Begitu juga ketika terjadi tumpahan minyak di dalam negaranya, kedua negara ini memiliki kesiapan untuk menghadapi tumpahan tersebut. 2.1 Masalah Pencemaran Minyak di Perairan dan Laut Indonesia – Filipina Indonesia dan Filipina merupakan negara kepulauan. Kedua negara ini memiliki keragaman hayati yang besar, salah satunya keragaman hayati yang ada di laut. Akan tetapi, keragaman hayati dapat rusak dikarenakan pencemaran minyak yang terjadi di laut. Kegiatan atau aktivitas manusia yang berpotensi mencemari lingkungan pesisir dan laut (Sea-based pollution) antara lain adalah pelayaran (shipping), dumpling di laut 44 (ocean dumping), pertambangan (mining), eksplorasi dan eksploitasi minyak (oil exploration and exploitation), budidaya laut (marine culture) dan perikanan (fishing).37 Aktivitas tersebut dapat menyebabkan pencemaran yang dapat merugikan negara. Permasalahan terbesar bagi lingkungan laut yaitu pencemaran minyak. Dikarenakan zat yang terkandung dalam minyak sangat susah larut dan dapat membunuh dan juga merusak ekosistem yang laut serta merugikan aktivitas manusia dibidang perikanan. 2.1.1 Masalah Pencemaran Minyak di Perairan dan Laut Indonesia Indonesia sendiri merupakan negara kepulauan atau sering disebut Archipelagic State. Posisi Indonesia apit oleh beberapa negara seperti Malaysia, Singapura, Filipina, dan memiliki selat yang menjadi penghubung jalur perdagangan antar satu negara ke negara lain.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biophysical Assessment of the Philippine Territory of the Sulu
    A Biophysical Assessment of the Philippine Territory of the Sulu-Sulawesi Marine Ecoregion Sulu-Sulawesi Marine Ecoregion Program WWF-Philippines May 2003 CREDITS AUTHORS: Angel Alcala, Ph.D. Monyeen Alava, M.Sc. Emmanuel Anglo, Ph.D. Naniel Aragones, Ph.D. Emmanuel Bate, M.Sc. Flordeliz Guarin, Ph.D. Rudolf Hermes, Ph.D. Daniel Lagunzad, Ph.D. Augustus Rex Montebon, M.Sc. Ramon Miclat Jose Angelito Palma Johanna Pe-Montebon Hildie Maria Nacorda, M.Sc. Teresita Perez, Ph.D. Gavino Trono, Jr., Ph.D. Arnel Andrew Yaptinchay, D.V.M. EDITORS: Johanna Pe-Montebon, Evangeline F.B. Miclat, M.Sc., and Jose Noel Dumaup TECHNICAL ASSISTANTS: Josephine Sumangil-Evangelista and Dino Leoncarlo Calderon INTEGRATOR: Johanna Pe-Montebon TECHNICAL ADVISERS/REVIEWERS: Alan White, Ph.D., Angel Alcala, Ph.D., and Romeo Trono ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The Biophysical Assessment of the Sulu-Sulawesi Marine Ecoregion is funded by WWF-US. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Credits............................................................................................................................. 1 Table of Contents....................................................................................................... 2 List of Figures ............................................................................................................. 5 List of Tables ............................................................................................................... 7 List of Appendices ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]