Viewpoint April 2010 2010 Promises to Be an Improvement Over the Challenging Year Behind Us, but We Are Not out of the Woods Yet
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
May CARG 2020.Pdf
ISSUE 30 – MAY 2020 ISSUE 30 – MAY ISSUE 29 – FEBRUARY 2020 Promoting positive mental health in teenagers and those who support them through the provision of mental health education, resilience strategies and early intervention What we offer Calm Harm is an Clear Fear is an app to Head Ed is a library stem4 offers mental stem4’s website is app to help young help children & young of mental health health conferences a comprehensive people manage the people manage the educational videos for students, parents, and clinically urge to self-harm symptoms of anxiety for use in schools education & health informed resource professionals www.stem4.org.uk Registered Charity No 1144506 Any individuals depicted in our images are models and used solely for illustrative purposes. We all know of young people, whether employees, family or friends, who are struggling in some way with mental health issues; at ARL, we are so very pleased to support the vital work of stem4: early intervention really can make a difference to young lives. Please help in any way that you can. ADVISER RANKINGS – CORPORATE ADVISERS RANKINGS GUIDE MAY 2020 | Q2 | ISSUE 30 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted The Corporate Advisers Rankings Guide is available to UK subscribers at £180 per in any form or by any means (including photocopying or recording) without the annum for four updated editions, including postage and packaging. A PDF version written permission of the copyright holder except in accordance with the provision is also available at £360 + VAT. of copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Barnard’s Inn, 86 Fetter Lane, London, EC4A To appear in the Rankings Guide or for subscription details, please contact us 1EN. -
Inprs Cafr Fy20 Working Version
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORREPORTT 2020 For the FiscalFiscal YearYear EndedEnded JuneJune 30,30, 20202019 INPRS is a component unit and a pension trust fund of the State of Indiana. The Indiana Public Retirement System is a component Prepared through the joint efforts of INPRS’s team members. unit and a pension trust fund of the State of Indiana. Available online at www.in.gov/inprs COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 2020 For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 INPRS is a component unit and a pension trust fund of the State of Indiana. INPRS is a trust and an independent body corporate and politic. The system is not a department or agency of the state, but is an independent instrumentality exercising essential governmental functions (IC 5-10.5-2-3). FUNDS MANAGED BY INPRS ABBREVIATIONS USED Defined Benefit DB Fund 1. Public Employees’ Defined Benefit Account PERF DB 2. Teachers’ Pre-1996 Defined Benefit Account TRF Pre-’96 DB 3. Teachers’ 1996 Defined Benefit Account TRF ’96 DB 4. 1977 Police Officers’ and Firefighters’ Retirement Fund ’77 Fund 5. Judges’ Retirement System JRS 6. Excise, Gaming and Conservation Officers’ Retirement Fund EG&C 7. Prosecuting Attorneys’ Retirement Fund PARF 8. Legislators’ Defined Benefit Fund LE DB Defined Contribution DC Fund 9. Public Employees’ Defined Contribution Account PERF DC 10. My Choice: Retirement Savings Plan for Public Employees PERF MC DC 11. Teachers’ Defined Contribution Account TRF DC 12. My Choice: Retirement Savings Plan for Teachers TRF MC DC 13. Legislators’ Defined Contribution Fund LE DC Other Postemployement Benefit OPEB Fund 14. -
Annual Report 2019 Annual Report
Annual Report 2019 Annual report 01 Report of the Managing Board 08 Consolidated financial statements 09 Consolidated balance sheet 10 Consolidated income statement 11 Consolidated cash flow statement 12 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 13 1. Accounting policies for the consolidated balance sheet 15 2. Accounting policies for the consolidated income statement 16 3. Financial instruments and risk management 17 4. Notes to the consolidated balance sheet 22 5. Notes to the consolidated income statement 25 6. Employees 26 Company financial statements 27 Company balance sheet 28 Company income statement 29 7. Notes to the company balance sheet 42 8. Supplementary information company financial statements 45 Other information 46 Independent auditor’s report B AlpInvest Annual Report 2019 Report of the Managing Board Market and economic tensions, 10-year yields ended the year at 1.92%, developments 2019 34bps above the yield on 2-year Treasuries. Slower Global Growth Amid Trade Tensions Substantial valuation gains in risk markets Global economic growth continued to lose steam Despite the slowdown in global economic growth, in 2019 as trade tensions undermined business equity markets around the world enjoyed sub- confidence. This slowdown was particularly visible stantial gains in 2019. While the S&P 500 index in the manufacturing sector. By contrast, services, rose 28.9% during the year, the Euro Stoxx 50 which are less exposed to external factors, index gained 24.8% (in euro terms). Although the remained comparatively robust. At the same time, FTSE 100 index increased comparatively more high levels of employment and moderate wage moderately, at the end of 2019 it was still 12.1% gains in major economies supported consump- higher than a year earlier. -
Bricks and Mortar
MORE THAN BRICKS AND MORTAR Infrastructure-as-asset-class: Financing development or developing finance? A Critical Look at Private Equity Infrastructure Funds1 by Nicholas Hildyard The Corner House2 1 Sources for further information, including hyperlinks, have been given throughout this report where possible. Website addresses were correct at the time of writing. Please notify The Corner House of any broken link: enquiries AT thecornerhouse.org.uk 2 The author would like to thank Isabella Besedova, Theodoros Chronopoulos, Peter Frankental, Jutta Kill, Tom Lines, Larry Lohmann, Doug Norlen, Sarah Sexton, Antonio Tricarico and Beck Wallace for their invaluable comments on early drafts of this paper. 1 “When the capital development of a country becomes the by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done.” John Maynard Keynes, General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, 1936 “The last quarter century of ‘deregulation’ involved the introduction of a vast array of new legal mechanisms and regulations by national governments to protect the interests of investors and shareholders. This must be dismantled; and new legal mechanisms and regulations must be introduced nationally to subordinate investment capital to democratic requirements established in international human rights standards.” Peter Rossman and Gerard Greenfield, Financialization: New Routes to Profit, New Challenges for Trade Unions, 20061 Introduction Political discourse is often conducted in code. Where policy proposals or actions are likely to engender strong opposition or cause affront to the public, euphemisms are used (“collateral damage” for “dead civilians”, “land disturbance” for “mining”, “environmental enhancement” for “canalising rivers”)2 or concepts are employed that direct the conversation elsewhere. -
Infrastructure Development Finance Company Limited
PROSPECTUS – TRANCHE 2 Dated January 4, 2011 INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED (Infrastructure Development Finance Company Limited (the “Company”), with CIN L65191TN1997PLC037415, incorporated in the Republic of India with limited liability under the Companies Act, 1956, as amended (the “Companies Act”)) Registered Office: KRM Tower, 8th Floor, No.1 Harrington Road, Chetpet, Chennai 600 031 Tel: (91 44) 4564 4000; Fax: (91 44) 2854 7597 Corporate Office: Naman Chambers, C-32, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex Bandra (East), Mumbai 400 051 Tel: (91 22) 4222 2000; Fax: (91 22) 2654 0354 Compliance Officer and Contact Person: Mahendra N. Shah, Company Secretary E-mail: [email protected]; Website: www.idfc.com PUBLIC ISSUE BY INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED (“COMPANY” OR “ISSUER”) OF LONG TERM INFRASTRUCTURE BONDS OF FACE VALUE OF RS. 5,000 EACH, IN THE NATURE OF SECURED, REDEEMABLE, NON-CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES, HAVING BENEFITS UNDER SECTION 80 CCF OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (THE “BONDS”), NOT EXCEEDING RS. 34,000 MILLION FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2010 - 2011. THE BONDS WILL BE ISSUED IN ONE OR MORE TRANCHES SUBJECT TO THE OVERALL LIMIT OF RS. 34,000 MILLION FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2010- 2011 UNDER THE SHELF PROSPECTUS FILED WITH THE STOCK EXCHANGES AND SEBI ON SEPTEMBER 23, 2010. THE SECOND TRANCHE OF THE BONDS FOR AN AMOUNT NOT EXCEEDING RS. 29,289.64 MILLION (THE “ISSUE”) SHALL BE ISSUED ON THE TERMS SET OUT IN THIS PROSPECTUS TRANCHE – 2. The Issue is being made pursuant to the provisions of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue and Listing of Debt Securities) Regulations, 2008, as amended (the “SEBI Debt Regulations”). -
Private Equity 05.23.12
This document is being provided for the exclusive use of SABRINA WILLMER at BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: NEW YORK 05.23.12 Private Equity www.bloombergbriefs.com BRIEF NEWS, ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY CVC Joins Firms Seeking Boom-Era Size Funds QUOTE OF THE WEEK BY SABRINA WILLMER CVC Capital Partners Ltd. hopes its next European buyout fund will nearly match its predecessor, a 10.75 billion euro ($13.6 billion) fund that closed in 2009, according to two “I think it would be helpful people familiar with the situation. That will make it one of the largest private equity funds if Putin stopped wandering currently seeking capital. One person said that CVC European Equity Partners VI LP will likely aim to raise 10 around bare-chested.” billion euros. The firm hasn’t yet sent out marketing materials. Two people said they expect it to do so — Janusz Heath, managing director of in the second half. Mary Zimmerman, an outside spokeswoman for CVC Capital, declined Capital Dynamics, speaking at the EMPEA to comment. conference on how Russia might help its reputation and attract more private equity The London-based firm would join only a few other firms that have closed or are try- investment. See page 4 ing to raise new funds of similar size to the mega funds raised during the buyout boom. Leonard Green & Partners’s sixth fund is expected to close shortly on more than $6 billion, more than the $5.3 billion its last fund closed on in 2007. Advent International MEETING TO WATCH Corp. is targeting 7 billion euros for its seventh fund, larger than its last fund, and War- burg Pincus LLC has a $12 billion target on Warburg Pincus Private Equity XI LP, the NEW JERSEY STATE INVESTMENT same goal as its predecessor. -
LAZARD GROUP LLC (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to 333-126751 (Commission File Number) LAZARD GROUP LLC (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 51-0278097 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) or Organization) 30 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10020 (Address of principal executive offices) Registrant’s telephone number: (212) 632-6000 Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. -
Longleaf Partners International Fund Commentary 2Q21
July 2021 Longleaf Partners International Fund Commentary 2Q21 Longleaf Partners International Fund added 1.19% in the quarter and 8.00% year-to- date, trailing the MSCI EAFE Index’s 5.17% and 8.83% for the same periods. US markets continued the monetary liquidity fueled run to ever sillier valuation levels, while non-US lagged relatively. The majority of our holdings were positive in the quarter. The Fund’s exposure to China and Hong Kong (including Netherlands-listed Prosus, whose business is driven by the Chinese consumer) was the biggest geographic headwind. FX was a moderate contributor to the Fund, as well as the MSCI EAFE index. Despite relative underperformance, it was a solid period for value per share growth at our holdings. “Value” had a (we believe temporary) pullback vs. “growth” in the second quarter on the back of lower interest rates and various other factors. Over the last year, we have seen interest rate consensus go from “low rates forever” for most of 2020 to “rates are definitely going up” in February/March of 2021 to what now feels like magical goldilocks thinking for growth stocks in the 1-2% US 10-year range. While we cannot predict precisely what rates will do in the near term, we welcome increased volatility on this all- Average Annual Total Returns for the Longleaf Partners International Fund (6/30/21): Since Inception (10/26/98): 7.45%, Ten Year: 4.50%, Five Year: 10.64%, One Year: 34.82%. Average Annual Total Returns for the MSCI EAFE (6/30/21): Since Inception (10/26/98): 5.62%, Ten Year: 5.89%, Five Year: 10.28%, One Year: 32.35%. -
Evaluating Investments in Unlisted Equity for the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global (Gpfg)1
EVALUATING INVESTMENTS IN UNLISTED EQUITY FOR THE NORWEGIAN GOVERNMENT PENSION FUND GLOBAL (GPFG)1 This version: April 5, 2018 Trond M. Døskeland, NHH Per Strömberg, Stockholm School of Economics 1 We would like to thank Kyrre Stensnes, Hans-Jörgen Tranvåg, Adair Morse, David Robinson, Steve Kaplan, Josh Lerner, and Antti Ilmanen for helpful comments and suggestions. We are also grateful to Ludo Phalippou for sharing his data. Erik Stensrud and Laszlo Sajtos provided excellent research assistance. 1 Executive Summary The purpose of this report is to provide analysis and recommendation to assist the Ministry of Finance in assessing whether the mandate to GPFG should be altered to allow for investments in unlisted equity, or Private Equity (PE) investments. The PE market consists of different segments that differ depending on the types of firms they invest in: venture capital (investing in young companies and startups), growth equity (investing in somewhat more established but fast-growing companies), buyouts (investing in mature companies), and distress (focusing on turnaround situations). Still, the PE model of ownership and governance is quite similar across these segments. The focus of PE investors is on creating real value through active ownership and governance of firms in a way that is difficult to replicate in a public setting. Top PE investors possess unique skills to add real value to the companies they own beyond just financial engineering, and these skills are difficult to acquire and/or imitate. The bulk of PE investment is undertaken by specialized financial intermediaries, PE funds, in which PE fund managers raise capital from institutional investors. -
GP Investments
1 GP Investments Earnings Release Fourth Quarter 2020 Earnings Release 2Q18 2 2020 highlights March 31, 2021 – This release reports the 4Q20 and full-year results of GP Investments, Ltd. (‘GP’) [B3: GPIV33], a leader in private equity and alternative investments. 2020 was a challenging year worldwide; and for GP Investments this was no different. At the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, most of the companies in GP’s portfolio that have physical premises had to close facilities or operate under restrictions. Brick-and-mortar stores had to be closed, restaurants had to depend mostly on delivery and take-out, and many businesses had to be reinvented fast. In March, GP moved 100% of its team members, across all its offices, to remote working, following procedures in its Business Continuity Plan. The transition to a work-at-home model was seamless, with no interruptions in our activities, and we have continued to leverage multiple digital technologies to enable our teamwork. The results reported by GP Investments in 2020 reflected the volatility of the financial markets, and the economic impacts of the pandemic. In the 4th quarter of 2020, GP posted net income of USD 33.8 million, which was driven by increases in the share prices of our listed companies – primarily Centauro – as well as the positive impact of the temporary BRL appreciation. Nevertheless, for the full year, mark-to-market adjustments in the companies in the portfolio have translated into significant net unrealized losses, which together with the rapid devaluation of the Brazilian Real have led to a total net loss of USD (91.8) million in 2020. -
Calculus VCT Plc Top up Offer
Calculus VCT plc Top Up Offer For investors looking for regular, tax-free income A portfolio of entrepreneurial, growing UK companies Tax years 2017-18 and 2018-19 Risk Factors Shareholders and prospective shareholders should materially affect, directly or indirectly, the may be less regulated and are often less has to invest in businesses less than 7 years consider carefully the following risk factors in operation of the Company and/or its ability to liquid, and this may cause difficulties in old (10 years for knowledge intensive), subject addition to the other information presented in this maintain VCT status. valuing and disposing of equity investments to certain exceptions, potentially exposing the document and the Prospectus as a whole. If any in such companies. Company to a higher risk profile. The changes of the risks described below were to occur, it could • The Net Asset Value of the shares (including may limit the Company’s ability to make have a material effect on the Company’s business, the Offer Shares if issued) will reflect the • Although the existing shares issued by the investments or make further investments financial condition or results of operations. values and performance of the underlying Company have been (and it is anticipated into existing portfolio companies, which may assets in the respective portfolios. The value that the Offer Shares will be) admitted to negatively impact the Company’s ability to The risks and uncertainties described below are of the investments and income derived the Official List of the UK Listing Authority support portfolio companies. The penalty for not the only ones the Company, the Board or from them can rise and fall. -
CDC Group Plc Financial Review 2009 Our Mission Is to Foster Growth in Sustainable Businesses, Helping to Raise Living Standards in Developing Countries
CDC Group plc Financial Review 2009 Our mission is to foster growth in sustainable businesses, helping to raise living standards in developing countries. Our investment policy is to make more than 75% of new investments in low income countries* and to invest more than 50% of our funds in sub-Saharan Africa. Contents 2 Statement from the Chairman 4 Our Business 12 Statement from the Chief Executive 14 Board of Directors 16 Business Review – Africa 18 Business Review – Asia 20 Performance Review 28 CDC Universe * Those with an annual gross national income (GNI) per capita of less than US$905. CDC Group plc Financial Review 2009 1 2009 Highlights £359m New investments in developing countries, 61% in Africa £207m Total return after tax £742m1 Other capital mobilised £162m Portfolio cash generated for re-investment in developing countries £1,411m Portfolio of fund investments £207m New commitments to funds in a difficult period for fundraising £1,561m Outstanding commitments to funds 794 Underlying portfolio companies located in 71 countries CDC’s Investment Code Process externally audited for the first time 1 See page 22 for an explanation of how mobilisation is measured. 2 CDC Group plc Financial Review 2009 Statement from the Chairman Richard Gillingwater CBE In the deepest recession that we’ve 2009 also saw the first year of had in many decades in developed CDC’s new investment policy, markets, the emerging markets which the organisation has fully in which CDC invests its capital embraced. The new policy, which showed some positive growth and takes us through to the end of a steady return to financial stability 2013, targets 75% of CDC’s new in 2009.