Download Metaprogramming in NET Free Ebook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Metaprogramming in NET Free Ebook METAPROGRAMMING IN NET DOWNLOAD FREE BOOK Kevin Hazzard | 357 pages | 31 Jan 2013 | Manning Publications | 9781617290268 | English | New York, United States Let's Learn x86-64 Assembly! Part 1 - Metaprogramming in Flat Assembler As a macro of course! Advantages: Comparing this to the standard way of compile time calculation, this method is also useful for runtime calculations. Related Topics. LISP 1. Metaclasses are provided by the following programming languages:. Generic programming invokes a metaprogramming facility within a language, in those languages supporting it. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. Detailed information on how to Remember the 1 rule of development: program requirements always change. The language in which the metaprogram Metaprogramming in NET written is called the metalanguage. How to pronounce metaprogramming? Aspect weaver Comparison of code generation tools Compile- time reflection Genetic programming Homoiconicity Inferential programming Instruction set simulator Intentional Programming Interpreted language Machine learning Metacompiler Metaobject Partial evaluation Reflection computer programming Self-interpreter Self-modifying code Source code generation Transcompiler also known as transpilation Very Large Scale Integration. The 11 revised full papers, 3 short paper and one invited talk presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 27 initial submissions. I was shocked by in order to put technical barriers between us and our competitors and this is tamade correct. Just like templates, Metaprogramming in NET are executed at compiletime. In this one, I want to introduce some important features of Flat Assembler - macros, assembly-time variables and conditional assembly and a couple others. A quine is a special kind of metaprogram that produces its own source code as its output. Demonstrates how to create generic frameworks, libraries, classes, and tools that can be used in the. Word in Definition. In our case, the macro's name is add5it has just a single parameter - the thing to add 5 to. Metaprogramming in NET are harder to write than ordinary Lisp Metaprogramming in NET, and Metaprogramming in NET considered to be bad style to use them when they're not necessary. NET code libraries that fit well with IronRuby code. Note that we also conveniently use instantiationInfo to find out at what location in the program our template was instantiated, something we could not Metaprogramming in NET using a procedure. Constant 4d Metaprogramming in NET, parameter. Wikipedia gives us a nice description of metaprogramming:. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Types of programming languages. In many cases, this allows programmers to get more done in the same amount of time as they would take to write all the code manually, or it gives programs greater flexibility Metaprogramming in NET efficiently handle new situations without recompilation. Metaprogramming is writing a program which outputs another program. In the above code, we evaluate the factorial metafunction by instantiating the template with the parameters we want to pass, and using ::value to get the result of the evaluation. We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe. The ASL fingerspelling provided here is most commonly used for proper names of people and places; it is also used in some languages for concepts for which no sign is available at that moment. C's excellent answer. The result of Object. Learn more. If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly. Strings can be parsed to an enum using parseEnum from strutils :. Hot Network Questions. Metaprogramming is the writing of computer programs that write or manipulate other programs or themselves as their data, or that do part of the work at runtime that would otherwise be done at Metaprogramming in NET time. FirstName Metaprogramming in NET Reflection is a valuable language feature to facilitate metaprogramming. And the second is if constexprwhich allows Metaprogramming in NET to write our original recursive solution in a single function:. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on Metaprogramming in NET talk page. But now we have the advantage that the template is inlined at compiletime, so expensiveDebuggingInfo is only called if the runtime logLevel actually requires it. So when is monkey patching a good idea? NET to create a windows batch file. You might be interested in this answer stackoverflow. Non-English-based Visual. In the previous part we've covered Metaprogramming in NET lot of ground in a short time - from general introduction and description of how registers and memory work, to actually calling Windows API functions. Instead you can use the macros module to create NimNodes of all kinds yourself. Introduction to Metaprogramming in Nim Therefore, something like this:. In all of these languages metaprogramming is most Metaprogramming in NET seen in the form of programs that modify themselves, typically Metaprogramming in NET macros. Wikipedia gives us a nice description of metaprogramming:. Thank you so much! Learn more. Changing a few definitions in the model can result in distinct programs a Software Product Family. Some comments in the article refer to metaprogramming as the ability to generate code perhaps on the fly. Always remember: With great power comes great responsibility, so use the least powerful construct that does the job. Metaprogramming in NET using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service. Constant 3dparameterExpression. Then it generates the subscripts by writing their code to file and substituting placeholders for the actual start and end times. In strict mode, a false return value from the set handler will throw a TypeError exception. The third declaration the real one simply remove any unnecessary information from T in this case we remove const and volatile qualifiers and then fall backs to one of the Metaprogramming in NET previous declarations. Metaprogramming is the writing of computer programs that write or manipulate other programs as their data, or that do part of the work at compile Metaprogramming in NET that would otherwise be done at runtime. NET web page source code could take weeks if not months. Property deletion delete proxy [foo] delete proxy. If you assemble this file, and open the resulting binary, you will see that it Metaprogramming in NET of a single byte with the value 7! What's the use of metaprogramming? Not exactly. This looks pretty simple, we just acquire the lock, execute the passed statements and finally release the lock, even if exceptions have been thrown. To test if a class has an overload of std::hashone can do this:. But those parentheses are there for a reason. AOP in. Related Topics. This is a great tool for removing duplicate code in classes and I find it helpful in many applications that I work with. If you wish to opt out, please close your SlideShare account. Those are indeed metaprograms but, again, they are a subset of all metaprograms. Generic programming invokes a metaprogramming facility within a language, in those languages supporting it. ArcGIS for Desktop is a powerful Metaprogramming in NET of software tools for creating and using maps, compiling, analyzing and sharing geographic information, using maps and geographic information in applications, and managing geographic databases. The "compiler" can usefully do metaprogramming that's following metaprogramming directives I wrote at a variety of stages, early, middle, late. Get started with a FREE account. I'll have to look up some of his specific essays. We can end the current block and start a new one by invoking commonforward or reverse directive within the macro body. The first way is to expose the Metaprogramming in NET of the run-time engine to the programming Metaprogramming in NET through application programming interfaces. A common example are loggers, which we looked at in another article already. Full Name Comment goes here. A notable exception would be lazy evaluation in Haskell, where this kind of logger would work perfectly fine, only calling expensiveDebuggingInfo when its value is actually needed. Expressions Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. We truly appreciate your support. Programs that manipulate themselves are a subset of all metaprograms. Related Metaprogramming in NET. Active 1 year, 6 Metaprogramming in NET ago. Imagine an MS Access database with forms. Examples of Metaprogramming – A Guide for Beginners The usage is as easy as using a built-in if statement: var lock : Lock initLock lock withLock lock : echo "Do something that requires locking" echo "This might throw an exception" When our template accepts a value of type stmt we can use the colon to pass Metaprogramming in NET entire indented block of code. However, when a meta programmer arms such a tool with the right knowledge, the resulting code can Metaprogramming in NET to be built by an incredibly fast, creative, expert coder. Snippets Learn about the extensive XML core classes in. Demo: Injectors Metaprogramming in. By reusing templates, you can change the template's code, regenerate and get your code changed in Metaprogramming in NET, hundreds of places. Actually, FASM provides Metaprogramming in NET handy library of macros that do exactly that, but I promised to be going as "from scratch" as possible, so no libraries for us :. Written for readers comfortable with C and the. Writing for both Ruby and. With the JSON example, by using introspection of the class you should be able to generate the code to serialise an object, and then add this as a method to the class. Ask a question Ask a question If you Metaprogramming in NET like to share feedback with us about pricing, delivery or other customer service issues, please contact customer service directly.
Recommended publications
  • The Machine That Builds Itself: How the Strengths of Lisp Family
    Khomtchouk et al. OPINION NOTE The Machine that Builds Itself: How the Strengths of Lisp Family Languages Facilitate Building Complex and Flexible Bioinformatic Models Bohdan B. Khomtchouk1*, Edmund Weitz2 and Claes Wahlestedt1 *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract 1Center for Therapeutic Innovation and Department of We address the need for expanding the presence of the Lisp family of Psychiatry and Behavioral programming languages in bioinformatics and computational biology research. Sciences, University of Miami Languages of this family, like Common Lisp, Scheme, or Clojure, facilitate the Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th ST, Miami, FL, USA creation of powerful and flexible software models that are required for complex 33136 and rapidly evolving domains like biology. We will point out several important key Full list of author information is features that distinguish languages of the Lisp family from other programming available at the end of the article languages and we will explain how these features can aid researchers in becoming more productive and creating better code. We will also show how these features make these languages ideal tools for artificial intelligence and machine learning applications. We will specifically stress the advantages of domain-specific languages (DSL): languages which are specialized to a particular area and thus not only facilitate easier research problem formulation, but also aid in the establishment of standards and best programming practices as applied to the specific research field at hand. DSLs are particularly easy to build in Common Lisp, the most comprehensive Lisp dialect, which is commonly referred to as the “programmable programming language.” We are convinced that Lisp grants programmers unprecedented power to build increasingly sophisticated artificial intelligence systems that may ultimately transform machine learning and AI research in bioinformatics and computational biology.
    [Show full text]
  • From JSON to JSEN Through Virtual Languages of the Creative Commons Attribution License (
    © 2021 by the authors; licensee RonPub, Lübeck, Germany. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions A.of Ceravola, the Creative F. Joublin:Commons From Attribution JSON to license JSEN through(http://c reativecommons.org/licenses/by/4Virtual Languages .0/). Open Access Open Journal of Web Technology (OJWT) Volume 8, Issue 1, 2021 www.ronpub.com/ojwt ISSN 2199-188X From JSON to JSEN through Virtual Languages Antonello Ceravola, Frank Joublin Honda Research Institute Europe GmbH, Carl Legien Str. 30, Offenbach/Main, Germany, {Antonello.Ceravola, Frank.Joublin}@honda-ri.de ABSTRACT In this paper we describe a data format suitable for storing and manipulating executable language statements that can be used for exchanging/storing programs, executing them concurrently and extending homoiconicity of the hosting language. We call it JSEN, JavaScript Executable Notation, which represents the counterpart of JSON, JavaScript Object Notation. JSON and JSEN complement each other. The former is a data format for storing and representing objects and data, while the latter has been created for exchanging/storing/executing and manipulating statements of programs. The two formats, JSON and JSEN, share some common properties, reviewed in this paper with a more extensive analysis on what the JSEN data format can provide. JSEN extends homoiconicity of the hosting language (in our case JavaScript), giving the possibility to manipulate programs in a finer grain manner than what is currently possible. This property makes definition of virtual languages (or DSL) simple and straightforward. Moreover, JSEN provides a base for implementing a type of concurrent multitasking for a single-threaded language like JavaScript.
    [Show full text]
  • The Semantics of Syntax Applying Denotational Semantics to Hygienic Macro Systems
    The Semantics of Syntax Applying Denotational Semantics to Hygienic Macro Systems Neelakantan R. Krishnaswami University of Birmingham <[email protected]> 1. Introduction body of a macro definition do not interfere with names oc- Typically, when semanticists hear the words “Scheme” or curring in the macro’s arguments. Consider this definition of and “Lisp”, what comes to mind is “untyped lambda calculus a short-circuiting operator: plus higher-order state and first-class control”. Given our (define-syntax and typical concerns, this seems to be the essence of Scheme: it (syntax-rules () is a dynamically typed applied lambda calculus that sup- ((and e1 e2) (let ((tmp e1)) ports mutable data and exposes first-class continuations to (if tmp the programmer. These features expose a complete com- e2 putational substrate to programmers so elegant that it can tmp))))) even be characterized mathematically; every monadically- representable effect can be implemented with state and first- In this definition, even if the variable tmp occurs freely class control [4]. in e2, it will not be in the scope of the variable definition However, these days even mundane languages like Java in the body of the and macro. As a result, it is important to support higher-order functions and state. So from the point interpret the body of the macro not merely as a piece of raw of view of a working programmer, the most distinctive fea- syntax, but as an alpha-equivalence class. ture of Scheme is something quite different – its support for 2.2 Open Recursion macros. The intuitive explanation is that a macro is a way of defining rewrites on abstract syntax trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Software Development
    WDS'05 Proceedings of Contributed Papers, Part I, 36–40, 2005. ISBN 80-86732-59-2 © MATFYZPRESS Towards Software Development P. Panuška Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic. Abstract. New approaches to software development have evolved recently. Among these belong not only development tools like IDEs, debuggers and Visual modelling tools but also new, modern1 styles of programming including Language Oriented Programming, Aspect Oriented Programming, Generative Programming, Generic Programming, Intentional Programming and others. This paper brings an overview of several methods that may help in software development. Introduction An amazing progress in software algorithms, hardware, GUI and group of problems we can solve has been made within last 40 years. Unfortunately, the same we cannot say about the way the software is actually made. The source code of programs has not changed and editors we use to edit, create and maintain computer programs still work with the source code mainly as with a piece of text. This is not the only relic remaining in current software development procedures. Software development is one of human tasks where most of the job must be done by people. Human resources belong to the most expensive, most limiting and most unreliable ones. People tend to make more mistakes than any kind of automatic machines. They must be trained, may strike, may get ill, need holidays, lunch breaks, baby breaks, etc. Universities can not produce an unlimited number of software engineers. Even if the number of technical colleges were doubled, it would not lead in double amount of high-quality programmers.
    [Show full text]
  • Star TEX: the Next Generation Several Ideas on How to Modernize TEX Already Exist
    TUGboat, Volume 33 (2012), No. 2 199 Star TEX: The Next Generation Several ideas on how to modernize TEX already exist. Some of them have actually been implemented. Didier Verna In this paper, we present ours. The possible future Abstract that we would like to see happening for TEX is some- what different from the current direction(s) TEX's While T X is unanimously praised for its typesetting E evolution has been following. In our view, modern- capabilities, it is also regularly blamed for its poor izing TEX can start with grounding it in an old yet programmatic offerings. A macro-expansion system very modern programming language: Common Lisp. is indeed far from the best choice in terms of general- Section 2 clarifies what our notion of a \better", or purpose programming. Several solutions have been \more modern" TEX is. Section 3 on the next page proposed to modernize T X on the programming E presents several approaches sharing a similar goal. side. All of them currently involve a heterogeneous Section 4 on the following page justifies the choice approach in which T X is mixed with a full-blown pro- E of Common Lisp. Finally, section 5 on page 205 gramming language. This paper advocates another, outlines the projected final shape of the project. homogeneous approach in which TEX is first rewrit- ten in a modern language, Common Lisp, which 2 A better TEX serves both at the core of the program and at the The T X community has this particularity of being scripting level. All programmatic macros of T X are E E a mix of two populations: people coming from the hence rendered obsolete, as the underlying language world of typography, who love it for its beautiful itself can be used for user-level programming.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography on Transformation Systems (PDF Format)
    Transformation Technology Bibliography, 1998 Ira Baxter Semantic Designs 12636 Research Blvd, Suite C214 Austin, Texas 78759 [email protected] The fundamental ideas for transformation systems are: domains where/when does one define a notation for a problem area; semantics how the meaning of a notation is defined; implementation what it means for one spec fragment to “implement” another; and control how to choose among possible implementations. The following references describe various ways of implementing one or more of the above ideas. Unfortunately, there aren't any easy, obviously good articles or books on the topic, and there is a lot of exotic technology. I recommend: the Agresti book (a number of short papers) for overview, the Feather survey paper for conciseness and broadness. These are the minimum required reading to get a sense of the field. The Partsch book is excellent for a view of transformational development using wide spectrum languages, but fails to address domains and control. The Turski book is very good for some key theory, but you have to be determined to wade through it. Bibliography [AGRESTI86] What are the New Paradigms?, William W. Agresti, New Paradigms for Software Development, William W. Agresti, IEEE Press, 1986, ISBN 0-8186-0707-6. [ALLEMANG90] Understandings Programs as Devices, Dean T. Allemang, Ph.D. Thesis, Computer Science Department, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1990. [ALLEN90] Readings in Planning, James Allen, James Hendler and Austin Tate, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, California,1990, ISBN 1-55860-130-9. [ASTESIANO87] An Introduction to ASL, Egidio Astesiano and Martin Wirsing, pp. 343-365, Program Specification and Transformation, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Components and Generative Programming
    Components and Generative Programming Krzysztof Czarnecki1 and Ulrich W. Eisenecker2 1DaimlerChrysler AG Research and Technology, Ulm, Germany [email protected] 2University of Applied Sciences Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract. This paper is about a paradigm shift from the current practice of manually searching for and adapting components and their manual assembly to Generative Programming, which is the automatic selection and assembly of components on demand. First, we argue that the current OO technology does not support reuse and configurability in an effective way. Then we show how a system family approach can aid in defining reusable components. Finally, we describe how to automate the assembly of components based on configuration knowledge. We compare this paradigm shift to the introduction of interchangeable parts and automated assembly lines in the automobile industry. We also illustrate the steps necessary to develop a product line using a simple example of a car product line. We present the feature model of the product line, develop a layered architecture for it, and automate the assembly of the components using a generator. We also discuss some design issues, applicability of the approach, and future development. 1 From Handcrafting to an Automated Assembly Line This paper is about a paradigm shift from the current practice of manually searching for and adapting components and their manual assembly to Generative Programming, which is the automatic selection and assembly of components on demand. This paradigm shift takes two steps. First, we need to move our focus from engineering single systems to engineering families of systems—this will allow us to come up with the “right” implementation components.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Programming Patterns in Scala and Clojure Write Lean Programs for the JVM
    Early Praise for Functional Programming Patterns This book is an absolute gem and should be required reading for anybody looking to transition from OO to FP. It is an extremely well-built safety rope for those crossing the bridge between two very different worlds. Consider this mandatory reading. ➤ Colin Yates, technical team leader at QFI Consulting, LLP This book sticks to the meat and potatoes of what functional programming can do for the object-oriented JVM programmer. The functional patterns are sectioned in the back of the book separate from the functional replacements of the object-oriented patterns, making the book handy reference material. As a Scala programmer, I even picked up some new tricks along the read. ➤ Justin James, developer with Full Stack Apps This book is good for those who have dabbled a bit in Clojure or Scala but are not really comfortable with it; the ideal audience is seasoned OO programmers looking to adopt a functional style, as it gives those programmers a guide for transitioning away from the patterns they are comfortable with. ➤ Rod Hilton, Java developer and PhD candidate at the University of Colorado Functional Programming Patterns in Scala and Clojure Write Lean Programs for the JVM Michael Bevilacqua-Linn The Pragmatic Bookshelf Dallas, Texas • Raleigh, North Carolina Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and The Pragmatic Programmers, LLC was aware of a trademark claim, the designations have been printed in initial capital letters or in all capitals.
    [Show full text]
  • Lisp, Jazz, Aikido Three Expressions of a Single Essence
    Lisp, Jazz, Aikido Three Expressions of a Single Essence Didier Vernaa a EPITA Research and Development Laboratory Abstract The relation between Science (what we can explain) and Art (what we can’t) has long been acknowledged and while every science contains an artistic part, every art form also needs a bit of science. Among all scientific disciplines, programming holds a special place for two reasons. First, the artistic part is not only undeniable but also essential. Second, and much like in a purely artistic discipline, the act of programming is driven partly by the notion of aesthetics: the pleasure we have in creating beautiful things. Even though the importance of aesthetics in the act of programming is now unquestioned, more could still be written on the subject. The field called “psychology of programming” focuses on the cognitive aspects ofthe activity, with the goal of improving the productivity of programmers. While many scientists have emphasized their concern for aesthetics and the impact it has on their activity, few computer scientists have actually written about their thought process while programming. What makes us like or dislike such and such language or paradigm? Why do we shape our programs the way we do? By answering these questions from the angle of aesthetics, we may be able to shed some new light on the art of programming. Starting from the assumption that aesthetics is an inherently transversal dimension, it should be possible for every programmer to find the same aesthetic driving force in every creative activity they undertake, not just programming, and in doing so, get deeper insight on why and how they do things the way they do.
    [Show full text]
  • Lisp, Jazz, Aikido – Three Expressions of a Single Essence Didier Verna
    Lisp, Jazz, Aikido – Three Expressions of a Single Essence Didier Verna To cite this version: Didier Verna. Lisp, Jazz, Aikido – Three Expressions of a Single Essence. The Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming, aosa, Inc., 2018, 2 (3), 10.22152/programming-journal.org/2018/2/10. hal-01813470 HAL Id: hal-01813470 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01813470 Submitted on 12 Jun 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Lisp, Jazz, Aikido Three Expressions of a Single Essence Didier Vernaa a EPITA Research and Development Laboratory Abstract The relation between Science (what we can explain) and Art (what we can’t) has long been acknowledged and while every science contains an artistic part, every art form also needs a bit of science. Among all scientific disciplines, programming holds a special place for two reasons. First, the artistic part is not only undeniable but also essential. Second, and much like in a purely artistic discipline, the act of programming is driven partly by the notion of aesthetics: the pleasure we have in creating beautiful things. Even though the importance of aesthetics in the act of programming is now unquestioned, more could still be written on the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • SMC2011 Template
    From Live Coding to Virtual Being Nikolai Suslov Tatiana Soshenina Fund for Supporting Moscow Institute of Architecture Development of Russian Technology State Academy! Vologda, Russia Moscow, Russia [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT "e self#explorative, colla%orative environments and virtual worlds are se&ing up the new standards in so'ware engineering for today( In this, live coding is also re)uired in reviewing as for programmers and as for artists too( "e most popular live coding frameworks, even %eing %uilt %y using highly dynamic, re+ective languages, still suffer on tight %indings to single#node or client#server architecture, language or platform dependence and third#party tools. "at leads to ina%ility nor to develop nor scale to the Internet of things the new created works using live coding. In the paper we introduce the prototype of integration of o%ject#oriented language for pa&ern matching .Meta onto Virtual /orld Framework on 0avaScript( "at integration will allow using the live coding in virtual worlds with user-de1ned languages. Also we explore the possi%ilities of a conformal scaling of live coding in the case of augmented reality systems and Internet of things. In summary, the paper descri%es the efforts %eing done for involving virtual worlds architecture in live coding process. All prototypes that are descri%ed in the paper are availa%le for experimenting with on 2restianstvo SD2 open source project3 h&p344www(*restianstvo(org 1. FROM CO !R TOOLS TO S!LF E"#LORAT$VE% COLLABORAT$VE ENVIRONMENTS Fundamentally, live coding is a%out highly dynamic programming languages, re+ectivity, homoiconicity and Meta properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Programming in Lisp
    Functional Programming in Lisp Dr. Neil T. Dantam CSCI-561, Colorado School of Mines Fall 2020 Dantam (Mines CSCI-561) Functional Programming in Lisp Fall 2020 1 / 50 Alan Perlis on Programming Languages https://doi.org/10.1145%2F947955.1083808 “A language that doesn’t affect the way you think about programming is not worth knowing.” Alan J. Perlis (1922-1990) First Turing Award Recipient, 1966 Dantam (Mines CSCI-561) Functional Programming in Lisp Fall 2020 2 / 50 Eric Raymond and Paul Graham on Lisp Lisp is worth learning for a different reason— By induction, the only programmers in a position to see the profound enlightenment experience you will have all the differences in power between the various languages when you finally get it. That experience will make are those who understand the most powerful one. you a better programmer for the rest of your days, (This is probably what Eric Raymond meant about even if you never actually use Lisp itself a lot. Lisp making you a better programmer.) –Eric Raymond –Paul Graham http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html http://www.paulgraham.com/avg.html Dantam (Mines CSCI-561) Functional Programming in Lisp Fall 2020 3 / 50 Peter Siebel on Lisp, “Blub,” and “Omega” https://youtu.be/4NO83wZVT0A?t=18m26s Dantam (Mines CSCI-561) Functional Programming in Lisp Fall 2020 4 / 50 Introduction Functional Programming Features Outcomes I Persistence: variables and data structures are I Review/understand concepts of immutable (constant) functional programming I Recursion: construct algorithms as recursive I Implement Lisp programs in functions (vs.
    [Show full text]