The Mathematics Teacher in the Digital

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Mathematics Teacher in the Digital Mathematics Education in the Digital Era Alison Clark-Wilson Ornella Robutti Nathalie Sinclair Editors The Mathematics Teacher in the Digital Era An International Perspective on Technology Focused Professional Development The Mathematics Teacher in the Digital Era MATHEMATICS EDUCATION IN THE DIGITAL ERA Volume 2 Series Editors: Dragana Martinovic, University of Windsor, ON, Canada Viktor Freiman, Université de Moncton, NB, Canada Editorial Board: Marcelo Borba, State University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Rosa Maria Bottino, CNR – Istituto Tecnologie Didattiche, Genoa, Italy Paul Drijvers, Utrecht University, The Netherlands Celia Hoyles, University of London, London, UK Zekeriya Karadag, Bayburt University, Turkey Stephen Lerman, London South Bank University, London, UK Richard Lesh, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA Allen Leung, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong John Mason, Open University, UK John Olive, The University of Georgia, Athens, USA Sergey Pozdnyakov, Saint-Petersburg State Electro Technical University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia Ornella Robutti, Università di Torino, Turin, Italy Anna Sfard, Michigan State University, USA & University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel Bharath Sriraman, The University of Montana, Missoula, USA Anne Watson, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/10170 Alison Clark-Wilson • Ornella Robutti Nathalie Sinclair Editors The Mathematics Teacher in the Digital Era An International Perspective on Technology Focused Professional Development Editors Alison Clark-Wilson Ornella Robutti London Knowledge Lab Dipartimento di Matematica Institute of Education Università di Torino University of London Turin, Italy London , UK Nathalie Sinclair Faculty of Education Simon Fraser University Burnaby, BC, Canada Additional material can be downloaded from http://extras.springer.com ISSN 2211-8136 ISSN 2211-8144 (electronic) ISBN 978-94-007-4637-4 ISBN 978-94-007-4638-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-4638-1 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London Library of Congress Control Number: 2013955236 © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifi cally for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Foreword Integrated Circuits David Pimm It is 1982. I am 28 years old and two-and-a-half years into paid work as a neophyte researcher in mathematics education in the UK. I sit in a secondary mathematics classroom, armed with a coding sheet, watching a lesson based on a piece of software on a Research Machines 380Z, the whole class attending to a small monitor. My aim is to see what difference the computer’s presence makes to the lesson, particularly to the teacher’s practice. I learn many things over the course of a term, including but not limited to: • How restrictive coding sheets can be, how they serve to determine what can actually be documented as occurring; • How the need to write a code every 10 s (an early form of digital sampling) fragments a lesson and, more subtly, how coding is not a real-time activity – for instance, in order to ascertain whether a teacher question has been asked is not simply a matter of the grammatical form of an utterance, it involves waiting to see how it is taken by the students; • How looking for altered patterns of interaction requires a strong grounding in prior norms; and, • How hard it can be to see the really new. Reading across the chapters in this volume brought back these earlier memories, not least because of the intertwined discussions of classroom structures and teacher ‘orchestrations’, as well as both the regularities and distinctions among them that occur in different settings. A staggering amount has changed in the past 30 years, with regard to the richness, range and sophistication of the mathematical devices and their encodings that are available for school use in the teaching and learning of mathematics. How far we have come from ‘Computer-Aided Learning (CAL)’ as it was then known. What is much more complicated to address, and problematic in a D. Pimm Simon Fraser University v vi Foreword variety of senses, is the scope and depth of actual use of this plethora of electronic possibilities in actual school classrooms and other learning contexts. In a chapter of a book for teachers on ICT (information and communication technology) and mathematics, Sinclair and Jackiw (2005) attempt to look to the future: in a prognosticating vein, they identify three waves in technology-for- mathematics- education. The fi rst focuses on the individual student (the site of the ‘L’ in CAL), the second develops the context of classroom learning (including the teacher and the curriculum), and the third looks outward to the world (wide web) . Issues they explore include the relation between curricular specifi city and mathematical expressivity with any particular instance of technology-and-software. I mention their piece here in part as an introduction to my thinking across the various chapters of this collec- tion, given the latter’s more or less common focus on and concern with the teacher in a mathematics classroom and the use of pertinent digital technology. In Sinclair and Jackiw’s terms, then, this book is primarily second wave. But also in terms of research on technologised mathematics classrooms, this feels to me a second-wave collection. Many early studies in this area focused on what teachers did with the technology (for more on the broader study mentioned above, see, for example, Ridgway et al. 1984) and were largely descriptive and untheorised (cer- tainly the one I was involved in was: in an important sense the coding scheme both summarised and operationalised the extent of theorisation of the act of mathematics teaching – and it was not technology specifi c). “What is it like teaching mathematics with technology present?” such studies asked. We and many others learnt how hard it is (but not much about why). Others also learnt, among other things, about the potential for the ‘worksheetifi cation’ of expressive technology, as well as the ten- sion between programming and small program use [1]. But even given such commonality, this book is still quite plural. There is no one single focus, neither in terms of object of attention, phenomenon of interest, nor method of examination. Actual classrooms are looked at, often; teachers (present in various incarnations, novice and expert, experienced with technology or not, etc.) are considerably more in focus than students (computer-aided teaching?) and are repre- sented by their views via questionnaires and interviews and by their reported class- room actions. We are told about what is and also about what might be. Mathematics is the presumed common concern of all authors, but this book is only cursorily about technology’s effect on or interaction with mathematics. Technological devices are widespread across the chapters, but even they are not in continuous view. In terms of foreground, I fi nd a marked concern with exploring the complexity of being the teacher in a technologised classroom, as well as beginning to address the intricate ‘teacher education’ question about what manner and nature of support to offer teachers in their work (whether beginning or ongoing) in such settings. Some chapters report on more narrowly delineated research studies (some attempt to doc- ument the state of play while others opt for case studies, then, both in terms of the closeness of focus to a very few teachers and necessarily I feel in terms of examining specifi c forms of technology). Others still attempt to propose or harness a far more theorised frame and then look at some teaching settings through it. And some do both and some look across a range of studies. In terms of method and manner of exploration, there is again appreciable diversity. At times, for me, I felt a sense of Foreword vii struggle to fi nd a suitably helpful grip size that is suffi ciently specifi c to offer traction on the particular while rising suffi ciently above it to improve the view before disappearing into the clouds. Returning briefl y to my opening personal vignette, we are far, far along the road from that naïve encounter. Mathematics education has produced much more informed and sophisticated classroom watchers. But despite this enhanced atten- tion, there are still some fundamental and signifi cant questions about operating as a teacher in a technologised classroom that do not seem to have gone away.
Recommended publications
  • IMA International Conference on Barriers and Enablers to Learning Maths: Enhancing Learning and Teaching for All Learners
    IMA International Conference on Barriers and Enablers to Learning Maths: Enhancing Learning and Teaching for All Learners 10 – 12 June 2015 University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland Call for Papers This is the first international conference of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications (IMA) about approaches to teaching and learning mathematics. Mathematics should be understood in the widest possible sense to cover all aspects of mathematics, including number, pure mathematics, applied mathematics, statistics and the full range of applications of mathematics. The conference examines learning and teaching throughout the life span, from the most basic to the most advanced topics and for the full range of learners, including people with dyscalculia and other maths learning difficulties, gifted learners and mathematicians. This should lead to cross-fertilisation between different areas of learning and teaching. The conference is also highly interdisciplinary. In addition to mathematicians, it should be of interest amongst others to psychologists, teachers, pedagogical and educational experts, engineers, scientists and social scientists. The conference is organised into the following four tracks: Motivation and maths anxiety Inclusive practice and learners’ particular requirements Effective practice: what does and does not work The use of technology Submission of papers and proposals for special thematic sessions is invited to the above tracks. Confirmed invited speakers: Dame Celia Hoyles DBE (The Institute of Education, University
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Repertoire
    Mathematics Education Review, No 15, March 2002 The Advisory Committee on Mathematics Education Mission Statement The Advisory Committee on Mathematics Education (ACME) is an independent committee established by the Joint Mathematical Council of the UK and the Royal Society with the explicit support of all major mathematics organisations. ACME is funded by the Gatsby Charitable Foundation and acts as a single voice for the mathematical community, seeking to improve the quality of mathematics education in schools and colleges. Its role is to advise Government on issues such as the curriculum, assessment and the supply and training of mathematics teachers. Committee Membership Professor Sir Christopher Llewellyn Smith FRS (Chairman), Sir Christopher is the current Provost of University College London and was previously the Director of CERN; Chris Belsom is Head of Mathematics at Ampleforth College; Annie Gammon is Key Stage 3 Numeracy Co-ordinator for Tower Hamlets, previously Head of Maths in London comprehensive school; Professor Celia Hoyles is Professor of Mathematics Education at the Institute of Education, University of London, Chair: Joint Mathematical Council of UK; Professor Chris Robson is Professor of Pure Mathematics at University of Leeds; Dr Sue Sanders is Senior Lecturer at University of Wales Swansea, Honorary Secretary: Joint Mathematical Council of UK. ACME email address is: [email protected] 4 Mathematics Education Review, No 15, March 2002 Planning for an Extended Teaching Repertoire Jim D N Smith Sheffield Hallam University This article reports on the design and evaluation of lesson planning guidance. Guidelines were developed specifically to support and encourage student teachers to use a variety of pupil-activities in their lessons.
    [Show full text]
  • Celia Hoyles and Richard Noss
    Celia Hoyles Richard Noss University College London University College London Institute of Education Institute of Education United Kingdom United Kingdom Constructionism at Scale: Some Thoughts on Evaluation Education systems in the developed world might seem close to Papert’s “tipping point’ for meaningful learning with digital technology, in which schools have easy access to hardware, an awareness of the importance of the teacher’s role, well-designed materials and syntactically meaningful programming languages. As Papert would have been first to acknowledge, the mere existence of hardware (or software) tells us little if anything about actual use in homes and schools, let alone any clear idea of what people might be learning as they interact with the computer. Still, we ought to be getting near the point at which we can say what remains to be done to bring out effective change in empowerment of learners and just ordinary folk? But deciding how far we have been successful in implementing the constructionist vision inevitably raises a tricky problem. While it is relatively straightforward to identify performance in clearly pre-defined skills, it is much more difficult to do the same for necessarily open questions: How does programming (in Scratch) engage students in ways that supports them see learning as worthwhile? How do learners express themselves using Scratch? What can a Scratch-aware learner do that he/she couldn’t have done without Scratch?’. Questions like this are hard to answer – we have been trying and will report on the outcomes of our endeavors. It turns out that this is a problem for researchers in the scientific as well as social domains.
    [Show full text]
  • Engaging with Mathematics in the Digital Age1
    i i View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE i i provided by Funes 1 Engaging with Mathematics in the Digital Age Professor Dame Celia Hoyles UCL Institute of Education, University College London United Kingdom [email protected] Abstract There is widespread acceptance that mathematics is important, for an individual and for society. However there are still those who disagree arguing that the subject is boring and irrelevant. It is therefore crucial that mathematics teaching strives to engage all learners at all levels, without of course sacrificing the rigour and ‘essence’ of the subject. In this talk, I will argue that one way to achieve both rigour and broader access to mathematics lies with using appropriately designed digital technology. I will illustrate my argument with examples from research and practice. Key words Mathematics Education, digital technology. 2 Resumen Existe una aceptación generalizada de que las matemáticas son importantes pa- ra un individuo y para la sociedad. Sin embargo, todavía hay quienes están en desacuerdo y argumentan que la disciplina es aburrida e irrelevante. Por tanto, es crucial que la enseñanza de las matemáticas se esfuerce en involucrar a todos los estudiantes en todos los niveles; por supuesto, sin sacrificar el rigor y la “esencia” de la disciplina. En este trabajo voy a argumentar que una manera de lograr tanto el rigor como un acceso más amplio a las matemáticas se encuentra con el uso de la tecnología digital diseñada adecuadamente. Voy a ilustrar mi argumento con ejemplos de la investigación y la práctica.
    [Show full text]
  • Celia Hoyles Bsc Hons, PGCE Med, Phd (
    id27334718 pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com Celia Hoyles BSc Hons, PGCE MEd, PhD (http://www.ioe.ac.uk/people/CeliaHoyles) Summary of qualifications & employment: I studied honours mathematics at the University of Manchester where I was awarded the top first for my year and the Dalton Prize for Science(1967). I was a teacher in London schools, then a lecturer in the Polytechnic of North London, during which time I earned a masters in mathematics education (with distinction, 1973) and doctorate, 1980. I have been a Professor of Mathematics Education at the Institute of Education, University of London since 1984 (Dean of Research 2002-2004). I was a member of the International Study Group BACOMET 1985-94 and was director of the Group 1991-3.I co-presented a series of popular TV programmes (1987-90) aiming to raise the profile of mathematics (with more than 10 million viewers). Since then I have directed over a dozen research projects concerned with mathematics at all levels and in a variety of contexts. I have been an editor for the International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, and book review editor for Educational Studies in Mathematics. In Dec 2004 I took up the position of the UK Government’s Chief Adviser for Mathematics, a post to which I am seconded for 75% of my time. I am co-Chair of a forthcoming ICMI Study on the use of digital technologies in Mathematics Education, with the Study Conference to be held in Vietnam in Dec 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Monday 16 February, 2015 REGISTER NOW! [email protected]
    Connect with Maths ~ Engaging all Students community Join us for our first online professional learning event in 2015 Monday 16 February, 2015 REGISTER NOW! [email protected] Mathematics to Engage All Students with computers Date: Monday February 16, 2015 Daylight Savings Times: 4:30pm to 5:30pm EST - NSW, TAS, VIC 4:00pm to 5:00pm - SA 3:30pm to 4:30pm – QLD 3:00pm to 4:00pm - NT 1:30pm to 2:30pm – WA The Presenters Professor Dame Celia Hoyles OBE Celia Hoyles is Professor of Mathematics Education at the London Knowledge Lab, Institute of Education, University of London, following teaching in London secondary schools. She was awarded a first class honours degree in mathematics from the University of Manchester and holds a masters and doctorate in mathematics education. She was the U.K. Government's Chief Adviser for Mathematics , 2004-7, and the Director of the National Centre for Excellence in the Teaching of Mathematics, 2007 -13. She was the first recipient of International Commission of Mathematics Instruction (ICMI) Hans Freudenthal medal in 2004 and of the UK's Royal Society Kavli Education Medal in 2011. She became an Officer of the British Empire (OBE) in 2004, and was made a Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire in 2014. Her academic interests are secondary students' conceptions of proof, the mathematical skills needed in modern workplaces and the design computer environments for learning mathematics. She has directed more than 30 research and consultancy projects and published widely in articles and books. She also co- presented a popular TV mathematics quiz show, Fun and Games, which topped the prime-time ratings between 1987 and 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach Mathematics In
    Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach Report No. 56/2014 DOI: 10.4171/OWR/2014/56 Mathematics in Undergraduate Study Programs: Challenges for Research and for the Dialogue between Mathematics and Didactics of Mathematics Organised by Rolf Biehler, Paderborn Reinhard Hochmuth, Hannover Dame Celia Hoyles, London Patrick W. Thompson, Tempe 7 December – 13 December 2014 Abstract. The topic of undergraduate mathematics is of considerable con- cern for mathematicians in universities, but also for those teaching mathemat- ics as part of undergraduate studies other than mathematics, for employers seeking to employ a mathematically skilled workforce, and for teacher edu- cation. Different countries have made and continue to make massive efforts to improve the quality of mathematics education across all age ranges, with most of the research undertaken particularly at the school level. A growing number of mathematicians and mathematics educators now see the need for undertaking interdisciplinary research and collaborative reflections around issues at the tertiary level. The conference aimed to share research results and experiences as a background to establishing a scientific community of mathematicians and mathematics educators whose concern is the theoreti- cal reflection, the research-based empirical investigation, and the exchange of best-practice examples of mathematics education at the tertiary level. The focus of the conference was mathematics education for mathematics, engi- neering and economy majors and for future mathematics teachers.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Digital Technologies for Dynamic Mathematics.Indd
    Dynamic Digital Dynamic Digital Technologies for Dynamic Mathematics for Dynamic Digital Technologies Technologies for This report summarises the outcomes of the Nuffi eld Foundation funded 2014–17 project ‘Developing teachers’ mathematical knowledge for Dynamic Mathematics teaching and classroom use of technology through engagement with key mathematical concepts using dynamic digital technology’. The Nuffi eld Foundation is an endowed charitable trust that aims to improve social Implications for teachers’ well-being in the widest sense. It funds research and innovation in education and social policy and also works to build capacity in education, science and social science research. knowledge and practice The Executive Summary of this report is also available as a separate publication, ISBN 9781782772248. Dr Alison Clark-Wilson is a Principal Research Fellow at the UCL Institute Hoyles Celia and Clark-Wilson Alison of Education and holds a Master’s degree and PhD in mathematics education. A former secondary maths teacher, she is very active in European mathematics education research communities, as a member of the executive of BSRLM and as a leader of the technology working groups at the biennial European Congress on Mathematics Education. She is a Chartered Mathematics Teacher and a Fellow of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications. Professor Dame Celia Hoyles holds a fi rst class honours degree in mathematics and a Masters and Doctorate in mathematics education. She taught mathematics in London schools before moving into higher education, and is now Professor of Mathematics Education at the UCL Institute of Education. She was the UK Government’s Chief Adviser for Mathematics (2004–07) and Director of the National Centre for Excellence in the Teaching of Mathematics (2007–13).
    [Show full text]
  • Where Will the Next Generation of UK Mathematicians Come From?
    Manchester Institute for Mathematical Sciences Where will the next generation of UK mathematicians come from? Preliminary report of a meeting held in Manchester 18/19 March 2005 Participants and contributors acted in a private capacity and did not necessarily express the views of their organisations or institutions: Participants: Stephen Abbott HMI (OfSTED); Dr Paul Andrews (Faculty of Education, Cambridge University; Chair, Association of Teachers of Mathematics ATM); Professor Margaret Brown (Department of Education, King’s College London; Advisory Com- mittee on Mathematics Education ACME); Richard Browne (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority QCA); Doug French (Centre for Educational Studies, Hull University; President Designate, Mathematical Association MA); Gwyneth Gardiner (King Edward’s School, Birmingham); Professor Celia Hoyles (Institute of Education; Government Chief Adviser for Mathematics); Jenny Ingram (Sidney Stringer Community Technology College, Coventry); Dr Andrew Jobbings (United Kingdom Mathematics Trust UKMT; Arbelos); Dr Gerry Leversha (St Paul’s School, London; Editor, The Mathematical Gazette); Dr Hovik Khudaverdyan (School of Mathematics, University of Manchester); Dr Richard Lissaman (Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick; Mathematics in Education and Industry MEI); Dr Mario Micallef (Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick; Admissions Tutor); Dr Karen Page (Department of Computer Science, University College London); Jenny Piggott (Faculty of Education, Cambridge Univer- sity; Millennium Mathematics
    [Show full text]
  • Celia Hoyles on Freudenthal - an Interview
    Celia Hoyles on Freudenthal - an interview Arthur Bakker Institute of Education, University of London Last year, Celia Hoyles received the first Hans Freudenthal Award for a cumulative programme of research in mathe- matics education. Celia Hoyles studied mathematics at the University of Manchester. She began her career as a secondary teacher, and then became a lecturer at the Polytechnic of North London (now London Metropolitan University). She entered the field of mathematics education research in the late 1970s and became professor of Mathematics Education at the Institute of Education, University of London, in 1984. In December 2004, she was appointed Chief Adviser for Math- ematics at the Department for Education and Skills of the UK Government. learners from the start would appreciate the power of Celia Hoyles (CH) is interviewed by mathematics. This resonated with many educators Arthur Bakker (AB), who worked at the who wished that their subject to be more grounded, so Freudenthal Institute but now works as students would be able to apply their knowledge and a research officer in the ‘Techno-math- at the same time would not be bored. ematical Literacies in the Workplace’ In my view, mathematics education should more gen- project, which is directed by C. Hoyles erally be about investigating structures and symbol- and R. Noss. ising them. And I think that for school students prob- lems need not always be realistic. AB: Do you think him being a mathematician made the 1 The interview approach of Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) successful? AB: How do you remember Freudenthal? CH: I have not quite got to the bottom of why his approach CH: I have this vivid image of Freudenthal with his bow tie of RME turned out to be so appropriate for the culture at a plenary session at the Psychology of Mathematics and tradition in the Netherlands, but I suspect his Education conference in 1983.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Dynamic Digital Technologies for This report summarises the outcomes of the Nuffi eld Foundation funded 2014–17 project ‘Developing teachers’ mathematical knowledge for Dynamic Mathematics teaching and classroom use of technology through engagement with key mathematical concepts using dynamic digital technology’. The Nuffi eld Foundation is an endowed charitable trust that aims to improve social Implications for teachers’ well-being in the widest sense. It funds research and innovation in education and social policy and also works to build capacity in education, science and social science research. knowledge and practice The full Final Report is available as a separate publication, ISBN 9781782772217. Dr Alison Clark-Wilson is a Principal Research Fellow at the UCL Institute of Education and holds a Master’s degree and PhD in mathematics education. A former secondary maths teacher, she is very active in European mathematics education research communities, as a member of the executive of BSRLM and as a leader of the technology working groups at the biennial European Congress on Mathematics Education. She is a Chartered Mathematics Teacher and a Fellow of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications. Professor Dame Celia Hoyles holds a fi rst class honours degree in mathematics and a Masters and Doctorate in mathematics education. She taught mathematics in London schools before moving into higher education, and is now Professor of Mathematics Education at the UCL Institute of Education. She was the UK Government’s Chief Adviser for Mathematics (2004–07) and Director of the National Centre for Excellence in the Teaching of Mathematics (2007–13). She was awarded an OBE in 2004 and made a Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Responding to the Mathematics Problem
    RESPONDING TO THE MATHEMATICS PROBLEM: The Implementation of Institutional Support Mechanisms Edited by C. M. Marr and M. J. Grove Supported by: The Wilkinson Charitable Trust Published by the Maths, Stats & OR Network May 2010 ISBN 978-0-9555914-6-4 Christie dedicates this volume to her darling Poppy, who, at the time of publishing, has mastered counting up to 10. Front cover and separator image: Melancholia I by Albrecht Dürer. © Trustees of the British Museum. CONTENTS piii Preface Acknowledgements piii List of Contributors piv INTRODUCTION C. M. Marr & M. J. Grove p2 The Logistics and Economics of Mathematics Support KEY NOTE ADDRESSES C. Hoyles Mathematics and the Transition from School to University p4 D. A. Lawson & A. C. Croft Enhancing the Quality of Mathematics Support throughout the UK: The Role of sigma p6 CHAPTER 1: Flexible Delivery - Models of Mathematics Support D. A. Lawson p12 The Drop-In Centre Model of Mathematics Support L. Pevy p17 The Portsmouth University Maths Café: Making a Virtue of Necessity C. M. Marr The University of St Andrews Mathematics Support Centre: An Appointment-Based p23 Model L. Meenan p29 Mathematics Support: Looking to the Future C. D. C. Steele p33 The Manchester Mathematics Resource Centre CHAPTER 2: Beyond the STEM Disciplines R. Taylor p39 METAL: Mathematics for Economics: Enhancing Teaching and Learning G. R. Gibbs p44 Mathematics and Statistics Skills in the Social Sciences C. O. Fritz, B. Francis, P. E. Morris & M. Peelo p51 SIMPLE: Helping to Introduce Statistics to Social Science Students CHAPTER 3: Mathematics Support and Institutional Priorities S. J.
    [Show full text]