History of the Colorado Courts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History of the Colorado Courts he year 1858 glistens in Colorado’s history. restlessness to secede from Kansas began to grow Immediately upon becoming an official territory, the People gripped by gilded dreams flocked among the citizens. As a response, an election held mass of existing governing entities all ceded power T here to seek their fortunes in the rivers and on Oct. 24, 1859, established the extralegal to the new government. The territory was divided the hills. Despite many of those dreams Territory of Jefferson in what is now Colorado. into three judicial districts. President Abraham getting tarnished along the way, Denver, the “Queen This self-proclaimed government instituted the Lincoln appointed three justices to the first legal City of the Plains” was born on Nov. 17, 1858. But, region’s first Supreme Court with a chief justice and Supreme Court in the territory. Chief Justice as the population grew in what would be the two associate justices. Within two months, Benjamin F. Hall was given jurisdiction of the Centennial State, so did the need for government Jefferson territory’s legislature expanded the judicial Denver District; Justice Charles Lee Armour Central and a system of justice. system to include district, county, and justice of the City District; and Justice S. Newton Pettis, the peace courts, in addition to the already established Southern District, near Pueblo. The first case to be Many and varied judicial systems emerged to satiate Supreme Court. tried before the Supreme Court was Gardner vs. the need for order. In the mountains, this came in Dunn on appeal from Park County. the form of “Miners Districts.” These organizations, Many local citizens refused to acknowledge this which would spring up judicial system’s presumed authority, or that of its Colorado was admitted to the union as a state on whenever a large courts. Inevitably, conflict arose between the Aug. 1, 1876. The state’s original constitution enough group of miners Arapahoe County courts and those of the Jefferson provided for a Supreme Court with a bench of three settled in one area, territory. Neither had a good grip on their claimed justices, as well as four judicial districts, with one established boundaries, jurisdiction, and thus criminals frequently slipped judge serving each. The following timeline defined property rights, through gaping loopholes in the system. As a result, illustrates the early progression of the state’s judicial elected officers, set up People’s Courts emerged. These were not structure. courts, tried lawsuits, permanent, or even official institutions, but they and punished criminals. were summoned by the upper class to deal with 1876 – 4 judicial districts; 1 judge in each Among the first of these serious crimes, such as murders. The court followed 1881 – 7 judicial districts; 1 judge in each districts were Gold Hill general procedures, allowing for both prosecution 1887 – 9 judicial districts; 1 judge each, except near present day and defense, but the sentence was usually death, and Arapahoe County (incl. Denver) with 2 Courtesy of Denver Public Library Western History Collection Boulder, Jackson it was carried out immediately after the ruling. 1891 – 13 judicial districts; first Court of Appeals Diggins District in Clear 1893 – 2nd judge given to Pueblo area Creek County, and Gregory District near 1895 – 2nd judge given to Colorado Springs area Blackhawk, all of which were established in 1859. 1905 – Supreme Court given 7 justices; first Court of Appeals abolished The fledgling judicial system along the Front Range developed in a somewhat more conventional 1913 – second Court of Appeals established for manner. Prior to 1861, most of what is now a four-year life Colorado was part of Arapahoe County in the 1917 – second Court of Appeals abolished Territory of Kansas. In 1855, the legislature of the 1921 – 14 judicial districts Territory of Kansas appointed Allen P. Tibbitts as 1945 – 15 judicial districts the probate judge of Arapahoe County. Tibbitts was 1953 – 16 judicial districts effectively Colorado’s “first judge,” although he Old Supreme Court courtroom in the north wing of the state capitol building 1958 – 18 judicial districts never actually visited Arapahoe County, much less 1963 – 22 judicial districts, the present number held court here. He never claimed his bench After Kansas made the transition from territory to 1970 – third and current Court of Appeals was because, at that time in history, travel through this state in January 1861, people living in the Territory established region could be treacherous, due to poor conditions of Jefferson recognized the necessity, and 1977 – Supreme Court and Court of Appeals and hostile Indians. inevitability, of coming under the authority of the United States. An application for status as a moved into current building In March 1859, the first court was established in the territory was filed, and in February 1861 Congress 2010 – 311 judges statewide: 7 Supreme Court “Pikes Peak Country.” S.W. Wagoner was elected passed a bill creating the Territory of Colorado. justices, 22 in the Court of Appeals, 164 as its probate judge. Shortly after, however, a in district courts, and 114 in county courts Supreme Court Court of Appeals The history of Colorado’s highest court began even Colorado’s Court of Appeals has a fragmented, yet before Colorado became the 38th state in the nation. fascinating, history. The first Court of Appeals was The first Supreme Court was established in 1859 by established in 1891 by the Colorado General Welcome to the the Territory of Jefferson, an extra-legal government Assembly for an indeterminate term to help the existing prior to the Territory of Colorado. Supreme Court with its heavy caseload. This court Colorado Supreme Court consisted of three judges and lasted until 1904, When Colorado became an official territory, a new when it was no longer believed to be necessary. Supreme Court was established. Its first three and justices were appointed by President Abraham Lincoln. This court held its initial session in Denver Court of Appeals on July 10, 1861. The court convened in a cozy 7-by-9 foot room in the 12-by-25 foot Commonwealth Building on the corner of Larimer and 13th Street. The present Court of Appeals courtroom at 14th & Broadway In 1913, a second Court of Appeals was created, this time with five judges, but with a pre-established term of only four years. Its mandate expired in 1917. In 1970, the third and present Court of Appeals was established, though it only had six The present Supreme Court courtroom at 14th & Broadway judges at its inception. In 1974, this number was increased to 10, on Jan. 1, 1988, the number was Between 1861 and its eventual move into the north increased to 13 and on July 1, 1988, the number was wing of the state capitol building in the early 1890s, increased to 16. The most recent expansion added An the court convened in many other locations, three judges effective July 1, 2008, for a total of 22. including the Middal Building behind the Lincoln Hotel, the Old Planter’s House on Blake and 16th, The location of this court during its first two terms th Historical the Keller House on 11 , the Jackson Building on is unclear, but due to its close relationship with the 18th and Larimer, George W. McClure’s building on Supreme Court, it may have been held in the same Larimer between 15th and 16th, and one last location location. The third Court of Appeals began hearing on the corner of Lawrence and 15th. cases in 1970 at the Supreme Court courtroom in the Guide capitol building. When the court expanded to 10 In 1905, the court grew to seven justices to help judges in 1974, it moved to a new courtroom on the address the heavy caseload. These justices sit en sixth floor of the Farmer’s Union Building on 16th banc, or in a full panel, for every case. Court of and Sherman. In 1977 it joined the Supreme Court Appeals judges, in contrast, sit in panels of three to in their current location at 14th and Broadway. consider cases. .
Recommended publications
  • Colorado History Chronology
    Colorado History Chronology 13,000 B.C. Big game hunters may have occupied area later known as Colorado. Evidence shows that they were here by at least 9200 B.C. A.D. 1 to 1299 A.D. Advent of great Prehistoric Cliff Dwelling Civilization in the Mesa Verde region. 1276 to 1299 A.D. A great drought and/or pressure from nomadic tribes forced the Cliff Dwellers to abandon their Mesa Verde homes. 1500 A.D. Ute Indians inhabit mountain areas of southern Rocky Mountains making these Native Americans the oldest continuous residents of Colorado. 1541 A.D. Coronado, famed Spanish explorer, may have crossed the southeastern corner of present Colorado on his return march to Mexico after vain hunt for the golden Seven Cities of Cibola. 1682 A.D. Explorer La Salle appropriates for France all of the area now known as Colorado east of the Rocky Mountains. 1765 A.D. Juan Maria Rivera leads Spanish expedition into San Juan and Sangre de Cristo Mountains in search of gold and silver. 1776 A.D. Friars Escalante and Dominguez seeking route from Santa Fe to California missions, traverse what is now western Colorado as far north as the White River in Rio Blanco County. 1803 A.D. Through the Louisiana Purchase, signed by President Thomas Jefferson, the United States acquires a vast area which included what is now most of eastern Colorado. While the United States lays claim to this vast territory, Native Americans have resided here for hundreds of years. 1806 A.D. Lieutenant Zebulon M. Pike and small party of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Unfunded Mandates: a Unifying Principle of All Counties Ecounty Lines | November 2020
    Protection from Unfunded Mandates: A Unifying Principle of All Counties eCounty Lines | November 2020 There are various protections in place for local governments from unfunded mandates, both in state statute, as well as the execution of laws by the Governor and his departments. However, there is no absolute protection. Collectively, commissioners—assisted by Colorado Counties Inc.—are the strongest defense against unfunded mandates. A statute enacted in 1991 prohibits unfunded mandates, with some exceptions. “No new state mandate or an increase in the level of service…shall be mandated by the general assembly or any state agency on any local government unless the state provides additional moneys to reimburse such local government for the costs …such mandate or increased level of service for an existing state mandate shall be optional on the part of the local government” (CRS 29-1-304.5). The Colorado Taxpayers Bill of Rights (TABOR) took this statute a step further by allowing local governments to end their participation in a program, if funding was inadequate. “Except for public education through grade 12 or as required of a local district by federal law, a local district may reduce or end its subsidy to any program delegated to it by the general assembly for administration” (Article X, Section 20(9)). Unfortunately, in 1995 these two provisions were defeated twice via State Supreme Court decisions. In the first case, Weld County attempted to withhold their portion of payments towards a public assistance program administered through the county. However, the court did not find this payment to be a subsidy (as referenced in TABOR) and declared that as an arm of the state, counties were essentially part of the state and therefore could not subsidize themselves, so the exemption was not allowed [Romer v.
    [Show full text]
  • Vicarious Aggravators Sam Kamin
    Florida Law Review Volume 65 | Issue 3 Article 3 May 2013 Vicarious Aggravators Sam Kamin Justin Marceau Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Criminal Procedure Commons Recommended Citation Sam Kamin and Justin Marceau, Vicarious Aggravators, 65 Fla. L. Rev. 769 (2013). Available at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol65/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Law Review by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Kamin and Marceau: Vicarious Aggravators VICARIOUS AGGRAVATORS Sam Kamin∗ & Justin Marceau∗∗ Abstract In Gregg v. Georgia, the Supreme Court held that the death penalty was constitutional so long as it provided a non-arbitrary statutory mechanism for determining who are the worst of the worst, and therefore, deserving of the death penalty. As a general matter, this process of narrowing the class of death eligible offenders is done through the codification of aggravating factors. If the jury finds beyond a reasonable doubt that one or more aggravating factors exists, then a defendant convicted of murder is eligible for the ultimate sentence. There is, however, a critical, unanswered, and under-theorized issue raised by the use of aggravating factors to serve this constitutionally mandated filtering function. Can death eligibility be predicated on vicarious aggravating factor liability—is there vicarious death penalty liability? A pair of cases, collectively known as the Supreme Court’s Enmund/Tison doctrine, recognize that there is no per se bar on the imposition of the death penalty for non-killing accomplices.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures
    The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures The Vermont Public Interest Action Project Office of Career Services Vermont Law School Copyright © 2021 Vermont Law School Acknowledgement The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures represents the contributions of several individuals and we would like to take this opportunity to thank them for their ideas and energy. We would like to acknowledge and thank the state court administrators, clerks, and other personnel for continuing to provide the information necessary to compile this volume. Likewise, the assistance of career services offices in several jurisdictions is also very much appreciated. Lastly, thank you to Elijah Gleason in our office for gathering and updating the information in this year’s Guide. Quite simply, the 2021-2022 Guide exists because of their efforts, and we are very appreciative of their work on this project. We have made every effort to verify the information that is contained herein, but judges and courts can, and do, alter application deadlines and materials. As a result, if you have any questions about the information listed, please confirm it directly with the individual court involved. It is likely that additional changes will occur in the coming months, which we will monitor and update in the Guide accordingly. We believe The 2021-2022 Guide represents a necessary tool for both career services professionals and law students considering judicial clerkships. We hope that it will prove useful and encourage other efforts to share information of use to all of us in the law school career services community.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan G. Laitos
    Jan G. Laitos John A Carver, Jr. Professor of Law Constitutional Law Environmental and Natural Resources Law B.A., 1968, Yale University J.D., 1971, University of Colorado S.J.D., 1975, University of Wisconsin Jan Laitos holds the John A. Carver Jr. Chair at the Sturm College of Law. He is a regional board member of the Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute; and since 1981 a Trustee of the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation. He was Vice Chair of the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission. He was also the Director of the nationally ranked Environmental and Natural Resources Law Program at the University of Denver Law School from 1981 until 2004. In 1996, he was given the University of Denver’s distinguished Teaching Award, and in 2005, he was selected a “DU Law Star.” Prior to joining the faculty at the Law school, he was the law clerk to the Chief Justice for the Colorado Supreme Court, and an attorney with the Office of Legal Counsel within the United States Department of Justice. He is the author of several books and treatises, published by Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press, West Academic, Foundation Press, Aspen, Wolters Kluwer, Duke University Press, and Bradford Press. He has worked as a consultant on several cases decided by the 9th Circuit Court of Federal appeals, the Montana Supreme Court, the Nevada Supreme Court, the Idaho Supreme court, and the Colorado Supreme Court, and on several cert. petitions before the United States Supreme Court. He has lectured at Austral University Law School in Buenos Aires, Argentina, at the European Network for Housing Research Institute in Istanbul, Turkey, at the Central European University, Budapest, Hungary, the National University of Ireland at Galway, Ireland, the University of Oslo, Norway, the University of Tarragona, Spain, the University of Edinburgh, Scotland, and the University of Western Sydney, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • A TIMELINE for GOLDEN, COLORADO (Revised October 2003)
    A TIMELINE FOR GOLDEN, COLORADO (Revised October 2003) "When a society or a civilization perishes, one condition can always be found. They forgot where they came from." Carl Sandburg This time-line was originally created by the Golden Historic Preservation Board for the 1995 Golden community meetings concerning growth. It is intended to illustrate some of the events and thoughts that helped shape Golden. Major historical events and common day-to-day happenings that influenced the lives of the people of Golden are included. Corrections, additions, and suggestions are welcome and may be relayed to either the Historic Preservation Board or the Planning Department at 384-8097. The information concerning events in Golden was gathered from a variety of sources. Among those used were: • The Colorado Transcript • The Golden Transcript • The Rocky Mountain News • The Denver Post State of Colorado Web pages, in particular the Colorado State Archives The League of Women Voters annual reports Golden, The 19th Century: A Colorado Chronicle. Lorraine Wagenbach and Jo Ann Thistlewood. Harbinger House, Littleton, 1987 The Shining Mountains. Georgina Brown. B & B Printers, Gunnison. 1976 The 1989 Survey of Historic Buildings in Downtown Golden. R. Laurie Simmons and Christine Whitacre, Front Range Research Associates, Inc. Report on file at the City of Golden Planning and Development Department. Survey of Golden Historic Buildings. by R. Laurie Simmons and Christine Whitacre, Front Range Research Associates, Inc. Report on file at the City of Golden Planning and Development Department. Golden Survey of Historic Buildings, 1991. R. Laurie Simmons and Thomas H. Simmons. Front Range Research Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of Caloratia
    Supreme Court of Caloratia 2 East 14lh Avenue Denver, CO 80203 (720)625-5410 BRIAN D. BOATRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE Order Regarding Safety in Colorado Courthouses With the recent shift in federal and state guidance regarding mask and social distancing requirements, and given the inconsistency in local public health guidance throughout the pandemic, I am hereby entering this order to ensure safe operations in Colorado courthouses. Safety is paramount in state court operations. Not only do our courthouses see a large volume ofin- person traffic, our necessary and critical operations compel attendance from members of the public for extended periods of time, Colorado courts should continue to err on the side of safety for assembly in both public and private areas to promote public safety and public confidence in our operations. Accordingly, I hereby order that all persons continue to wear facial coverings in all public areas of courthouses and probation offices through June 18,2021. Mask and social distancing requirements in non-public areas of our courthouses are to be determined by the chief judges after consultation with local health officials and in consideration of local circumstances regarding COVID risk and staffing needs. Concerning physical distancing requirements in public areas, our chief judges have discretion, in consultation with local public health officials, to decide appropriate standards for each courthouse after consideration of local circumstances, including vaccination rates, COVID positivity rates and other metrics, and courthouse layout. I will continue to monitor our public health situation and will amend this order as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadway East (Running North and South)
    ROTATION OF DENVER STREETS (with Meaning) The following information was obtained and re-organized from the book; Denver Streets: Names, Numbers, Locations, Logic by Phil H. Goodstein This book includes additional information on how the grid came together. Please email [email protected] with any corrections/additions found. Copy: 12-29-2016 Running East & West from Broadway South Early businessman who homesteaded West of Broadway and South of University of Denver Institutes of Higher Learning First Avenue. 2000 ASBURY AVE. 50 ARCHER PL. 2100 EVANS AVE.` 2700 YALE AVE. 100 BAYAUD AVE. 2200 WARREN AVE. 2800 AMHERST AVE. 150 MAPLE AVE. 2300 ILIFF AVE. 2900 BATES AVE. 200 CEDAR AVE. 2400 WESLEY AVE. 3000 CORNELL AVE. 250 BYERS PL. 2500 HARVARD AVE. 3100 DARTMOUTH 300 ALAMEDA AVE. 2600 VASSAR AVE. 3200 EASTMAN AVE. 3300 FLOYD AVE. 3400 GIRARD AVE. Alameda Avenue marked the city 3500 HAMPDEN AVE. limit until the town of South 3600 JEFFERSON AVE. Denver was annexed in 3700 KENYON AVE. 1894. Many of the town’s east- 3800 LEHIGH AVE. west avenues were named after 3900 MANSFIELD AVE. American states and 4000 NASSAU AVE. territories, though without any 4100 OXFORD AVE. clear pattern. 4200 PRINCETON AVE. 350 NEVADA PL. 4300 QUINCY AVE. 400 DAKOTA AVE. 4400 RADCLIFF AVE. 450 ALASKA PL. 4500 STANFORD AVE. 500 VIRGINIA AVE. 4600 TUFTS AVE. 600 CENTER AVE. 4700 UNION AVE. 700 EXPOSITION AVE. 800 OHIO AVE. 900 KENTUCKY AVE As the city expanded southward some 1000 TENNESSEE AVE. of the alphabetical system 1100 MISSISSIPPI AVE. disappeared in favor 1200 ARIZONA AVE.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Southern Frontier Historic Context
    607 COLORADO SOUTHERN FRONTIER HISTORIC CONTEXT PLAINS PLATEAU COUNTRY MOUNTAINS SOUTHERN FRONTIER OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COLORADO HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLORADO SOUTHERN FRONTIER HISTORIC CONTEXT CARROL JOE CARTER STEVEN F. MEHLS © 1984 COLORADO HISTORICAL SOCIETY FACSIMILE EDITION 2006 OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COLORADO HISTORICAL SOCIETY 1300 BROADWAY DENVER, CO 80203 The activity which is the subject of this material has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Historic Preservation Act, administered by the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior and for the Colorado Historical Society. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of the Interior or the Society, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute an endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the Society. This program receives Federal funds from the National Park Service. Regulations of the U.S. Department of the Interior strictly prohibit unlawful discrimination in departmental Federally assisted programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, age or handicap. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility operated by a recipient of Federal assistance should write to: Director, Equal Opportunity Program, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240. This is a facsimile edition of the original 1984 publication. Text and graphics are those of the original edition. CONTENTS SOUTHERN FRONTIER Page no. 1. Spanish Dominance (1664-1822) .• II-1 2. Trading �nd Trapping (1803-1880) .
    [Show full text]
  • Western Civil War Bibliography
    PARTIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE CIVIL WAR ERA AND CIVIL WAR VETERANS’ ACTIVITIES IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES Compiled by David A. Davis, PCC Camp Historian/Civil War Memorials Officer General William Passmore Carlin Camp 25 Department Historian Department of California and Pacific Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War This list was started from a small number of books on the Civil War in the western United States collected by the compiler and then added to from an occasional search of library catalogs and websites. It also includes references on the Grand Army of the Republic (G. A. R.) and its allied orders. Each book has at least a passing reference to the Civil War and/or the G. A. R. This list is only a small part of the likely thousands of such publications out there, and is intended to cover the areas of the present states of Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. This list is a work in progress and will be added to, corrected, and updated as time permits. If anyone sends me a reference, I will add it to the list. Updated as of November 9, 2009. All Quiet on Yamill Hill: the Civil War in Oregon. The Journal of Corporal Royal A. Bensall; edited by Gunter Barth, 1959, University of Oregon Books, 226 p. The Archaeology of Fort Churchill; by Bruce D. Hutchison, 1998, a thesis in partial fulfillment for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno, December, 1998, 162 p.
    [Show full text]
  • THE COLORADO MAGAZINE Published by the State Historical and Natural History Society of Colorado
    THE COLORADO MAGAZINE Published by The State Historical and Natural History Society of Colorado VOL. Ill Denver Colorado, August, 1926 NO. 3 The Colorado Constitution By Henry J. Hersey (Formerly Judge of the District Court of Denver) Colorado's admission to the Union is not alone significant because it occurred 100 years after the Declaration of Independ­ ence, but also because the efforts for governmental independence were accompanied by heroic and almost revolutionary (though peaceful) acts. The early settlers and gold seekers of 1858 found themselves in a country which the various explorers had reported as a barren desert and worthless for human habitation ; though nominally a part of the Territory of Kansas, yet it was so remote, because of the slow means of transportation and communication, that it was outside the pale of governmental consideration or interest, and the pioneers were forced by existing conditions to establish some sort of a government, provide courts and make laws for themselves. So on the plains we find them quickly creating the People's Courts by the methods of pure democracies, assemblies of the peo­ ple hurriedly called together and accused persons brought before them and tried before a judge selected from the people, the people themselves acting as a jury ;1 in the mountains a civil, rather than a criminal, court was the need of the hour and the Miners' Court was created, having, however, both civil and criminal jurisdiction. The Miners' Court was also established by the mass meeting meth­ ods used in the ancient, pure democracies, for representative or republican form of government is always a matter of growth and later development.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard E. Lingenfelter, Steamboats on the Colorado River, 1852-1916, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1978
    @ lglr @ EH gH. e ê3 (-ï @ Õ FE rç-r P @ GÃ e9. t-Ð ô3 eõ- æ @ 5è IA @ @ N9 I A @ @- Steamlboaûs @m the Oonopedo Rflvep 62 flgfl6 Rishand E" Lingenllelûer THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA PRESS TUCSON, ARIZONA About the Author . For permission to use the illustrations contained in this volume we wish to credit the Arizona Department of Library, Archives and Public Richard E. Lingenfelter, a historian by avocation, has been a pro- Records, p. 26; the Arizona Historical Society Library, pp. 25, 28, 39, fessor in residence of geophysics and space physics and astronomy 87, 89, 92-94; The Bancroft Library, pp. 32, 54, 57, 59, 70,79, I78; at the University of Califorrria, Los Angeles, since 1969. He has Barbara Baldwin Ekker, p. 119; the Church Archives Historical Depart- written and edited several books on western American history, in- ment, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, p. 48; Mrs. cluding First Through the Grand Canyon, The Neusþaþers of Ne- Edwin Wilcox, pp. 107, 116; the Engineering Societies Library, p.77; aada, 1858-1958: A History and, Bibliograþlry, Tlu Songs of the Gold H. E. Huntington Library, San Marino, California, pp. 15, 45, 46,75, Rush, Tlw Songs of the Amerban West, and n 1974The Hardrock Min- 83, 90, 170, 186; Historical Collection, Title Insurance & Trust Co., ers, A History of the Mining Labor Moaement in the Amerban West, San Diego, California, pp. 55, 56, 63, 140; the Map Library, University 1863-1893. of California, Los Angeles, p. 61; the Nevada Historical Society, Reno, pp.
    [Show full text]