In the Quest for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Etiology
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lumbar Spine Schmorl's Nodes; Prevalence in Adults with Back Pain, and Their Relation to Vertebral Endplate Degeneration Israa Mohammed Sadiq
Sadiq Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (2019) 50:65 Egyptian Journal of Radiology https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-019-0069-9 and Nuclear Medicine RESEARCH Open Access Lumbar spine Schmorl's nodes; prevalence in adults with back pain, and their relation to vertebral endplate degeneration Israa Mohammed Sadiq Abstract Background: In 1927, Schmorl described a focal herniation of disc material into the adjacent vertebral body through a defect in the endplate, named as Schmorl’s node (SN). The aim of the study is to reveal the prevalence and distribution of Schmorl’s nodes (SNs) in the lumbar spine and their relation to disc degeneration disease in Kirkuk city population. Results: A cross-sectional analytic study was done for 324 adults (206 females and 118 males) with lower back pain evaluated as physician requests by lumbosacral MRI at the Azadi Teaching Hospital, Kirkuk city, Iraq. The demographic criteria of the study sample were 20–71 years old, 56–120 kg weight, and 150–181 cm height. SNs were seen in 72 patients (22%). Males were affected significantly more than the females (28.8% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.03). SNs were most significantly affecting older age groups. L1–L2 was the most affected disc level (23.6%) and the least was L5–S1 (8.3%). There was neither a significant relationship between SN and different disc degeneration scores (P = 0.76) nor with disc herniation (P = 0.62, OR = 1.4), but there was a significant relation (P = 0.00001, OR = 7.9) with MC. Conclusion: SN is a frequent finding in adults’ lumbar spine MRI, especially in males; it is related to vertebral endplate bony pathology rather than discal pathology. -
The Characteristics of Osteophyte Around Lumbar Vertebral Foramina Associated with Spinal Stenosis
Original Article https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2019.52.2.143 pISSN 2093-3665 eISSN 2093-3673 The characteristics of osteophyte around lumbar vertebral foramina associated with spinal stenosis Thawanthorn Chaimongkhol1, Atiphoom Thiamkaew1, Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh2,3,4 1Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 2Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 3Forensic Osteology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 4Excellence Center in Osteology Research and Training Center (ORTC), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand Abstract: Spinal stenosis most commonly occurs on lumbar vertebrae because of degenerative changes. This research studied the characteristics of osteophyte development in lumbar vertebrae foramina and association of osteophyte development with lumbar spinal stenosis. The total number of all levels of lumbar spines of subjects was 179 from 31 to 90 years of age. The vertebral foramen was divided into six zones. The prevalence and measurements of the length of osteophytes in the vertebral foramina were obtained. The prevalence and length of osteophytes in the posterior body zone were higher than the laminal zone, and higher than the pedicular zone, respectively. In each zone, the highest prevalence of osteophytes was at L5, except for the inferior posterior body zone that the highest prevalence is at L4. The length of osteophyte was also in same direction as the prevalence. The prevalence of osteophytes among six zones of each level were compared, and found, in L1 to L4, the inferior posterior body zone generally had the highest prevalence, except in L5, the superior posterior body zone had the highest prevalence. -
Artificial Intervertebral Disc: Lumbar Spine Page 1 of 22
Artificial Intervertebral Disc: Lumbar Spine Page 1 of 22 Medical Policy An Independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association Title: Artificial Intervertebral Disc: Lumbar Spine Related Policy: . Artificial Intervertebral Disc: Cervical Spine Professional Institutional Original Effective Date: August 9, 2005 Original Effective Date: August 9, 2005 Revision Date(s): June 14, 2006; Revision Date(s): June 14, 2006; January 1, 2007; July 24, 2007; January 1, 2007; July 24, 2007; September 25 2007; February 22, 2010; September 25 2007; February 22, 2010; March 10, 2011; March 8, 2013; March 10 2011; March 8, 2013; June 23, 2015; August 4, 2016; June 23, 2015; August 4, 2016; May 23, 2018; July 17, 2019; May 23, 2018; July 17, 2019; August 21, 2020; July 1, 2021 August 21, 2020; July 1, 2021 Current Effective Date: September 23, 2008 Current Effective Date: September 23, 2008 State and Federal mandates and health plan member contract language, including specific provisions/exclusions, take precedence over Medical Policy and must be considered first in determining eligibility for coverage. To verify a member's benefits, contact Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas Customer Service. The BCBSKS Medical Policies contained herein are for informational purposes and apply only to members who have health insurance through BCBSKS or who are covered by a self-insured group plan administered by BCBSKS. Medical Policy for FEP members is subject to FEP medical policy which may differ from BCBSKS Medical Policy. The medical policies do not constitute medical advice or medical care. Treating health care providers are independent contractors and are neither employees nor agents of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas and are solely responsible for diagnosis, treatment and medical advice. -
Coblation Versus Traditional Tonsillectomy
Global Journal of Otolaryngology ISSN 2474-7556 Case Report Glob J Otolaryngol Volume 6 Issue 4 - April 2017 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Cristina. Otilia Laza DOI: 10.19080/GJO.2017.06.555695 Dysphagia in Forestier Syndrome Cristina Otilia Laza* and Mostafa Sarv ENT Clinic SCJU, SF APOSTOL ANDREI ‘’, Constanta, Romania Submission: April 06, 2017; Published: April 17, 2017 *Corresponding author: Cristina. Otilia Laza, Professor associate PhD –ENT -head and neck surgery, ENT/OMF Clinic, SCJU SF “APOSTOL ANDREI “ Constanta, B-dul Tomis, 145,8700, Constanta, Romania, Email: Abstract Dysphagia is a frequent complaint in elderly patients. At this age, neurological and tumoral causes predominates. Diffuse idiopathic spine.skeletal Most hyperostosis patients are (DISH), free ofalso symptoms, known as so Forestier that DISH disease is usually , first discovered described fortuitouslyin1950 by J. uponForestier, plain is radiographs a rare cause of of the dysphagia spine obtained ,caused forby large calcification along the anterior and lateral sides of the vertebral bodies, produces the appearance of candle wax dripping down the evaluation for dysphagia in an old patient. The diagnosis requires imaging but also other causes especially tumors must be excluded. another reason. A few patients experience spinal pain, spinal stiffness, or dysphagia. We report a case in which the diagnosis was made upon Keywords: Dysphagia; Retropharyngeal; Prevertebral space; Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH); Forestier syndrome Case Report A 69-year-old man with was referred to our Laboratory Tests dl) with a normal ferritin level. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate otorhinolaryngology clinic for difficulties in swallowing solid His full blood count showed a normocytic anaemia (9.32 g/ he was capable to swallow very soft pureed foods or liquids. -
Osteophyte and Enthesophyte Formation Are Positively Associated
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 1997;56:85–90 85 Ann Rheum Dis: first published as 10.1136/ard.56.2.85 on 1 February 1997. Downloaded from EXTENDED REPORTS Bone formers: osteophyte and enthesophyte formation are positively associated Juliet Rogers, Lee Shepstone, Paul Dieppe Abstract phenomenon, unrelated to any joint disease.4 Objective—To test the hypothesis that New bone can form at individual entheses in enthesophyte formation and osteophyte response to a seronegative spondarthritis.5 growth are positively associated and to More commonly, they are seen in several sites look for associations between bone forma- as part of the condition first described in the tion at diVerent sites on the skeleton so spine by Forrestier and Rotes-Querol6 and now that a simple measure of bone formation known as diVuse idiopathic skeletal hyperost- could be derived. osis (DISH).7 Methods—Visual examination of 337 adult The presence of periarticular osteophytes skeletons. All common sites of either has been noted by Resnick and Niwayama in enthesophyte or osteophyte formation DISH1 but the relation of enthesophyte and were inspected by a single observer who marginal osteophytosis in this condition has graded bone formation at these sites on a not been specifically investigated. This study 0-3 scale. The total score for each feature tests the hypothesis that some individuals have was divided by the number of sites exam- a greater tendency to form bone at both joint ined to derive an enthesophyte and an margins and entheses than others. The osteophyte score. Cronbach’s á and hypothesis has been derived from the observa- principal components analysis were used tion in skeletal studies of striking osteophyte to identify groupings. -
Redefining Lumbar Spinal Stenosis As a Developmental Syndrome
CLINICAL ARTICLE J Neurosurg Spine 29:654–660, 2018 Redefining lumbar spinal stenosis as a developmental syndrome: an MRI-based multivariate analysis of findings in 709 patients throughout the 16- to 82-year age spectrum Sameer Kitab, MD,1 Bryan S. Lee, MD,2,3 and Edward C. Benzel, MD2,3 1Scientific Council of Orthopedics, Baghdad, Iraq; 2Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic; and 3Center for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio OBJECTIVE Using an imaging-based prospective comparative study of 709 eligible patients that was designed to as- sess lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in the ages between 16 and 82 years, the authors aimed to determine whether they could formulate radiological structural differences between the developmental and degenerative types of LSS. METHODS MRI structural changes were prospectively reviewed from 2 age cohorts of patients: those who presented clinically before the age of 60 years and those who presented at 60 years or older. Categorical degeneration variables at L1–S1 segments were compared. A multivariate comparative analysis of global radiographic degenerative variables and spinal dimensions was conducted in both cohorts. The age at presentation was correlated as a covariable. RESULTS A multivariate analysis demonstrated no significant between-groups differences in spinal canal dimensions and stenosis grades in any segments after age was adjusted for. There were no significant variances between the 2 cohorts in global degenerative variables, except at the L4–5 and L5–S1 segments, but with only small effect sizes. Age- related degeneration was found in the upper lumbar segments (L1–4) more than the lower lumbar segments (L4–S1). -
The Effectiveness of Lumbar Spinal Perineural Analgesia (LSPA) for Various Causes of Low Back Ache
IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861.Volume 19, Issue 6 Ser.19 (June. 2020), PP 08-13 www.iosrjournals.org The Effectiveness of Lumbar Spinal Perineural Analgesia (LSPA) For Various Causes of Low Back Ache Dr. Biju Bhadran MS MCh1, Dr. Arvind K R MS MCh2, Dr. Krishnakumar MS MCh3, Dr. Harrison MS MCh4, Dr. Raghunath MCh5 1Department of Neurosurgery, Govt. TD Medical College, Alappuzha, Kerala, India 2Department of Neurosurgery, Govt. TD Medical College, Alappuzha, Kerala, India 3Department of Neurosurgery, Govt. TD Medical College, Alappuzha, Kerala, India 4Department of Neurosurgery, Govt. TD Medical College, Alappuzha, Kerala, India 5Department of Neurosurgery, Govt. TD Medical College, Alappuzha, Kerala, India Abstract: Background: Back pain is a common medical problem and predominant cause for medical consultations. The concept of lumbar spinal perineural analgesia (LSPA) is to achieve reduction of pain and desensitization of irritated neural structures and not complete analgesia or paralysis of lumbar spinal nerves. This article is intended to study the effectiveness of lumbar spinal perineural analgesia (LSPA) for various causes of low back ache on the basis of degree of pain relief following the procedure. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study comprising of 50 patients who had undergone appropriate investigations before assessment for eligibility, confirming the existence of lumbar disc disease and these selected patients underwent lumbar perineural analgesia for different causes of low back ache not relieved with other conservative modalities of treatment. Pre procedure and post procedure, the severity of pain level was assessed with standard verbal rating scale (VRS), with a score of 1 = no pain, 2 = mild pain, 3 = moderate pain, 4 = severe pain and 5 = intolerable pain. -
Facet Arthropathy Evaluation: CT Or MRI?
European Radiology (2019) 29:4990–4998 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06047-5 MUSCULOSKELETAL Facet arthropathy evaluation: CT or MRI? Linda Berg1,2 & Hanne Thoresen1 & Gesche Neckelmann3 & Håvard Furunes4,5,6 & Christian Hellum 7 & Ansgar Espeland3,8 Received: 29 August 2018 /Revised: 31 December 2018 /Accepted: 25 January 2019 /Published online: 22 February 2019 # European Society of Radiology 2019 Abstract Objective To assess the reliability of lumbar facet arthropathy evaluation with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic reso- nance imaging (MRI) in patients with and without lumbar disc prosthesis and to estimate the reliability for individual CT and MRI findings indicating facet arthropathy. Methods Metal-artifact reducing CT and MRI protocols were performed at follow-up of 114 chronic back pain patients treated with (n = 66) or without (n = 48) lumbar disc prosthesis. Three experienced radiologists independently rated facet joint space narrowing, osteophyte/hypertrophy, erosions, subchondral cysts, and total grade facet arthropathy at each of the three lower lumbar levels on both CT and MRI, using Weishaupt et al’s rating system. CT and MRI examinations were randomly mixed and rated independently. Findings were dichotomized before analysis. Overall kappa and (due to low prevalence) prevalence- and bias-adjusted kappa were calculated to assess interobserver agreement. Results Interobserver agreement on total grade facet arthropathy was moderate at all levels with CT (kappa 0.47–0.48) and poor to fair with MRI (kappa 0.20–0.32). Mean prevalence- and bias-adjusted kappa was lower for osteophyte/hypertrophy versus other individual findings (CT 0.58 versus 0.79–0.86, MRI 0.35 versus 0.81–0.90), higher with CT versus MRI when rating osteophyte/hypertrophy (0.58 versus 0.35) and total grade facet arthropathy (0.54 versus 0.31), and generally similar at levels with versus levels without disc prosthesis. -
Characterisation of Size and Direction of Osteophyte in Knee Osteoarthritis: a Radiographic Study Y Nagaosa, P Lanyon, M Doherty
319 EXTENDED REPORT Ann Rheum Dis: first published as 10.1136/ard.61.4.319 on 1 April 2002. Downloaded from Characterisation of size and direction of osteophyte in knee osteoarthritis: a radiographic study Y Nagaosa, P Lanyon, M Doherty ............................................................................................................................. Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61:319–324 Objectives: To examine the size and direction of osteophyte in knee osteoarthritis (OA) and to deter- mine associations between osteophyte size and other radiographic features. Methods: Knee radiographs (standing extended anteroposterior and 30 degrees flexion skyline views) were examined from 204 patients referred to hospital with symptomatic knee OA (155 women, 49 men; mean age 70, range 34–91 years). A single observer assessed films for osteophyte size and direction at eight sites; narrowing in each compartment; varus/valgus angulation; patellofemoral sub- luxation; attrition; and chondrocalcinosis using a standard atlas, direct measurement, or visual assess- ment. For analysis, one OA knee was selected at random from each subject. Results: Osteophyte direction at the eight sites was divisible into five categories. At all sites, except for See end of article for the lateral tibial plateau and the medial patella, osteophyte direction varied according to (a) the size authors’ affiliations of osteophyte and (b) the degree of local narrowing. At the medial femur, medial tibia, and lateral ....................... femur osteophyte direction changed from being predominantly horizontal to predominantly vertical Correspondence to: with increasing size. The size of osteophyte correlated positively with the severity of local narrowing, Professor M Doherty, except for the medial patellofemoral compartment where osteophyte size correlated positively with the Academic Rheumatology, severity of narrowing in the medial tibiofemoral compartment. -
Diagnosis and Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy
Y Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy | NASS Clinical Guidelines 1 G Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines for Multidisciplinary ETHODOLO Spine Care M NE I DEL I U /G ON Diagnosis and Treatment of I NTRODUCT Lumbar Disc I Herniation with Radiculopathy NASS Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines Committee D. Scott Kreiner, MD Paul Dougherty, II, DC Committee Chair, Natural History Chair Robert Fernand, MD Gary Ghiselli, MD Steven Hwang, MD Amgad S. Hanna, MD Diagnosis/Imaging Chair Tim Lamer, MD Anthony J. Lisi, DC John Easa, MD Daniel J. Mazanec, MD Medical/Interventional Treatment Chair Richard J. Meagher, MD Robert C. Nucci, MD Daniel K .Resnick, MD Rakesh D. Patel, MD Surgical Treatment Chair Jonathan N. Sembrano, MD Anil K. Sharma, MD Jamie Baisden, MD Jeffrey T. Summers, MD Shay Bess, MD Christopher K. Taleghani, MD Charles H. Cho, MD, MBA William L. Tontz, Jr., MD Michael J. DePalma, MD John F. Toton, MD This clinical guideline should not be construed as including all proper methods of care or excluding or other acceptable methods of care reason- ably directed to obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding any specific procedure or treatment is to be made by the physi- cian and patient in light of all circumstances presented by the patient and the needs and resources particular to the locality or institution. I NTRODUCT 2 Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy | NASS Clinical Guidelines I ON Financial Statement This clinical guideline was developed and funded in its entirety by the North American Spine Society (NASS). All participating /G authors have disclosed potential conflicts of interest consistent with NASS’ disclosure policy. -
Utilization Management Policy Title: Lumbar Spine Surgeries
Medica Policy No. III-SUR.34 UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT POLICY TITLE: LUMBAR SPINE SURGERIES EFFECTIVE DATE: January 18, 2021 This policy was developed with input from specialists in orthopedic spine surgery and endorsed by the Medical Policy Committee. IMPORTANT INFORMATION – PLEASE READ BEFORE USING THIS POLICY These services may or may not be covered by all Medica plans. Please refer to the member’s plan document for specific coverage information. If there is a difference between this general information and the member’s plan document, the member’s plan document will be used to determine coverage. With respect to Medicare and Minnesota Health Care Programs, this policy will apply unless these programs require different coverage. Members may contact Medica Customer Service at the phone number listed on their member identification card to discuss their benefits more specifically. Providers with questions about this Medica utilization management policy may call the Medica Provider Service Center toll-free at 1-800-458-5512. Medica utilization management policies are not medical advice. Members should consult with appropriate health care providers to obtain needed medical advice, care and treatment. PURPOSE To promote consistency between Utilization Management reviewers by providing the criteria that determine medical necessity. BACKGROUND I. Prevalence / Incidence A. It is reported that the lifetime incidence of low back pain (LBP) in the general population within the United States is between 60% and 90%, with an annual incidence of 5%. According to a National Center for Health Statistics study (Patel, 2007), 14.3% of new patient visits to primary care physicians per year are for LBP. -
Radicular Pain Caused by Schmorl's Node: a Case Report
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2018;68(3):322---324 REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE Publicação Oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia ANESTESIOLOGIA www.sba.com.br CLINICAL INFORMATION Radicular pain caused by Schmorl’s node: a case report ∗ Saeyoung Kim , Seungwon Jang Kyungpook National University, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea Received 29 September 2016; accepted 19 July 2017 Available online 30 August 2017 KEYWORDS Abstract Schmorl’s node a focal herniation of intervertebral disc through the end plate into the vertebral body. Most of the established Schmorl’s nodes are quiescent. However, disc herniation Epidural analgesia; into the vertebral marrow can cause low back pain by irritating a nociceptive system. Schmorl’s Low back pain; Sciatica; node induced radicular pain is a very rare condition. Some cases of Schmorl’s node which Steroids generated low back pain or radicular pain were treated by surgical methods. In this article, authors reported a rare case of a patient with radicular pain cause by Schmorl’s node located at the inferior surface of the 5th lumbar spine. The radicular pain was alleviated by serial 5th lumbar transforaminal epidural blocks. Transforaminal epidural block is suggested as first conservative option to treat radicular pain due to herniation of intervertebral disc. Therefore, non-surgical treatment such as transforaminal epidural block can be considered a first treatment option for radicular pain caused by Schmorl’s node. © 2017 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc-nd/4.0/).