US010544139B2

(12 ) United States Patent (10 ) Patent No.: US 10,544,139 B2 Hood et al. (45 ) Date of Patent : Jan. 28 , 2020

(54 ) TREATMENT OF OSTEOARTHRITIS (56 ) References Cited (71 ) Applicant: Samumed , LLC , San Diego , CA (US ) U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 4,164,559 A 8/1979 Miyata et al. ( 72 ) Inventors : John Hood , San Diego , CA (US ) ; 4,474,752 A 10/1984 Haslam et al . David Mark Wallace, San Diego , CA 4,603,139 A 7/1986 King (US ) ; Sunil Kumar KC , San Diego , 5,037,844 A 8/1991 Hamminga et al. 5,922,733 A 7/1999 Forbes et al. CA (US ) ; Yusuf Yazici, La Jolla , CA 6,120,484 A 9/2000 Silverstein (US ) ; Christopher Swearingen , San 6,358,978 B1 3/2002 Ritzeler et al. Marcos, CA (US ) ; Luis A Dellamary, 6,377,849 B1 4/2002 Lenarz et al. 6,440,102 B1 8/2002 Arenberg et al . San Marcos, CA (US ) 6,555,539 B2 4/2003 Reich et al . 6,648,873 B2 11/2003 Arenberg et al. (73 ) Assignee : Samumed , LLC , San Diego , CA (US ) 6,831,175 B2 12/2004 Li et al . 6,884,890 B2 4/2005 Kania et al . ( * ) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer , the term of this 6,897,208 B2 5/2005 Edwards et al . patent is extended or adjusted under 35 6,911,211 B2 6/2005 Eini et al . 6,919,461 B2 7/2005 Reich et al . U.S.C. 154 ( b ) by 0 days . (Continued ) (21 ) Appl. No.: 15 /773,951 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS ( 22 ) PCT Filed : Nov. 7 , 2016 CN 1394205 1/2003 CN 1671710 9/2005 (86 ) PCT No .: PCT/ US2016 / 060868 (Continued ) $ 371 ( c ) ( 1 ) , ( 2 ) Date : May 4 , 2018 OTHER PUBLICATIONS (87 ) PCT Pub . No .: WO2017 /079765 “ Application of Hamish Christopher Swan Wood , Norman Whit taker, Irene Stirling and Kyuji Ohta ., " 582 F.2d 638 ( Fed . Cir. 1978 ) , PCT Pub . Date : May 11 , 2017 2 pages . (65 ) Prior Publication Data (Continued ) US 2019/0112304 A1 Apr. 18 , 2019 Primary Examiner Niloofar Rahmani ( 74 ) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Fish & Richardson P.C. Related U.S. Application Data (60 ) Provisional application No. 62 / 303,168 , filed on Mar. 3 , 2016 , provisional application No.62 / 252,332 , filed ( 57 ) ABSTRACT on Nov. 6 , 2015 . Provided are compositions and methods for treating osteoar (51 ) Int. Cl. thritis including intra - articular administration of a com CO7D 513/02 ( 2006.01 ) pound of Formula (I ) including amorphous and polymorph CO7D 515/02 ( 2006.01 ) forms thereof . A61K 31/44 (2006.01 ) C070 471/04 ( 2006.01) A61K 31/444 ( 2006.01) F A61P 19/02 (2006.01 ) A61P 29/00 ( 2006.01 ) A61K 31/4545 ( 2006.01 A61K 31/496 ( 2006.01 ) A61K 31/5377 (2006.01 ) A61K 9/00 (2006.01 ) NH (52 ) U.S. CI. N CPC C070 471/04 ( 2013.01 ) ; A61K 9/0019 NH (2013.01 ) ; A61K 31/444 (2013.01 ) ; A61K 31/4545 ( 2013.01) ; A61K 31/496 (2013.01 ) ; A61K 31/5377 (2013.01 ) ; A61P 19/02 ( 2018.01) ; A61P 29/00 (2018.01 ) ; CO7B CZ. 2200/13 ( 2013.01 ) ( 58 ) Field of Classification Search CPC CO7D 513/02 ; CO7D 515/02 ; A61K 31/44 USPC 514/303 See application file for complete search history . 15 Claims, 41 Drawing Sheets US 10,544,139 B2 Page 2

( 56 ) References Cited 2005/0090529 Al 4/2005 McAlpine et al . 2005/0192262 A1 9/2005 Hagstromet et al. U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 2005/0208582 A1 9/2005 Ohi et al . 2005/0261339 A1 11/2005 Ohi et al . 7,008,953 B2 3/2006 Kephart et al. 2006/0004000 Al 1/2006 D'Orchymont et al . 7,064,215 B2 6/2006 Renhowe et al. 2006/0014756 Al 1/2006 Edwards et al. 7,232,912 B2 6/2007 Reich et al . 2006/0079564 A1 4/2006 Jansen et al. 7,285,565 B2 10/2007 Zhu et al. 2006/0094706 Al 5/2006 Paruch et al. 7,390,815 B2 6/2008 Davies et al . 2006/0111322 A1 5/2006 Reich et al . 7,429,609 B2 9/2008 Ohi et al. 2006/0116519 Al 6/2006 Ma et al . 7,452,993 B2 11/2008 Arnold et al . 2006/0135589 Al 6/2006 Berdino et al. 7,468,376 B2 12/2008 Rosales et al . 2006/0142345 Al 6/2006 Kephart et al. 7,482,342 B2 1/2009 D'Orchymont et al. 2006/0167056 A1 7/2006 Rynberg et al. 7,488,737 B2 2/2009 Xie et al. 2006/0264897 Al 11/2006 Lobl 7,491,710 B2 2/2009 Cherrier et al. 2007/0027140 A1 2/2007 Lau et al. 7,541,367 B2 6/2009 Chin et al . 2007/0049598 Al 3/2007 Billedeau et al . 7,626,021 B2 12/2009 Arnold et al. 2007/0060616 Al 3/2007 Bennett et al . 7,642,278 B2 1/2010 Jansen et al. 2007/0078147 Al 4/2007 Schumacher et al . 7,666,867 B2 2/2010 Makriyannis et al. 2007/0185187 Al 8/2007 D’Orchymont et al . 7,812,043 B2 10/2010 Lau et al. 2007/0219257 A1 9/2007 Beachy et al. 7,829,558 B2 11/2010 Arnold et al. 2007/0282101 A1 12/2007 Ericsson et al . 7,842,711 B2 11/2010 D’Orchymont et al. 2008/0004270 A1 1/2008 Gill et al. 7,902,217 B2 3/2011 Xie et al. 2008/0132495 Al 6/2008 Berdini et al. 7,943,616 B2 5/2011 Cox et al . 2008/0255085 Al 10/2008 Arvidsson et al. 8,008,481 B2 8/2011 Ericsson et al. 2008/0262205 A1 10/2008 Haar et al. 8,088,772 B2 1/2012 Garcia et al . 2008/0287452 A1 11/2008 Bursavich et al . 8,129,519 B2 3/2012 Cholody et al. 2009/0005356 A1 1/2009 Blaney et al. 8,158,647 B2 4/2012 Blaney et al . 2009/0005377 Al 1/2009 Almansa Rosales et al. 8,252,812 B2 8/2012 Hood et al. 2009/0048249 A1 2/2009 Chiu et al . 8,288,425 B2 10/2012 Edwards et al . 2009/0054397 A1 2/2009 Ohi et al. 8,304,408 B2 11/2012 Wrasidlo et al . 2009/0099062 A1 4/2009 Lee et al. 8,450,340 B2 5/2013 Hood et al. 2009/0203690 A1 8/2009 Akritopoulou -Zanze et al . 8,604,052 B2 12/2013 Hood et al. 2009/0247504 Al 10/2009 Churcher et al. 8,618,128 B1 12/2013 Hood et al . 2009/0264446 A9 10/2009 Rosales et al . 8,637,508 B2 1/2014 Badiger et al. 2009/0286983 Al 11/2009 Almansa Rosales et al. 8,664,241 B2 * 3/2014 Hood CO7D 471/04 2010/0280063 Al 11/2010 Price et al. 514/303 2010/0298377 Al 11/2010 Aletru et al . 8,673,936 B2 * 3/2014 Hood CO7D 471/04 2011/0009353 A1 1/2011 Chen - Kiang et al . 514/303 2011/0021467 Al 1/2011 D’Orchymont et al . 8,697,887 B2 4/2014 Hood et al. 2011/0034441 Al 2/2011 Hood et al. 8,703,794 B2 4/2014 Hood et al. 2011/0082144 Al 4/2011 Lau et al. 8,815,897 B2 8/2014 Hood et al. 2011/0178075 Al 7/2011 Xie et al. 8,822,478 B2 9/2014 Hood et al. 2011/0190290 A1 8/2011 Hood et al. 8,846,714 B2 9/2014 Hood et al. 2011/0034497 A1 10/2011 Hood et al. 8,883,822 B2 11/2014 Hood et al . 2012/0053345 Al 3/2012 Ericson et al. 8,901,150 B2 12/2014 Hood et al. 2012/0059047 Al 3/2012 Prins et al. 8,987,298 B2 * 3/2015 Hood CO7D 471/04 2012/0129837 A1 5/2012 Cholody et al . 514/303 2012/0277229 A1 11/2012 Bearss et al. 9,012,472 B2 4/2015 Hood et al. 2013/0039906 A1 2/2013 Do et al. 9,056,874 B2 6/2015 Adams et al. 2013/0267548 A1 10/2013 Follmann et al . 9,067,939 B2 6/2015 Hood et al. 2014/0194441 A1 7/2014 Kumar Kc et al . 9,090,613 B2 7/2015 Hood et al. 2014/0364451 A1 12/2014 John et al . 9,174,967 B2 11/2015 Körber et al. 2015/0087687 Al 3/2015 Brown et al . 9,199,991 B2 * 12/2015 Hood CO7D 471/04 2015/0111872 A1 4/2015 Desroy et al. 9,221,793 B2 12/2015 Hood et al . 2016/0068529 Al 3/2016 Kc et al. 9,233,104 B2 1/2016 Hood et al. 2016/0068547 Al 3/2016 Kc et al . 9,381,192 B2 7/2016 Hood et al. 2016/0068548 Al 3/2016 Kc et al. 9,538,272 B2 1/2017 Auclair et al . 2016/0068549 A1 3/2016 Kc et al. 9,540,398 B2 1/2017 Kc et al. 2016/0068550 A1 3/2016 Kc et al. 9,586,977 B2 3/2017 Hood et al. 2016/0068551 A1 3/2016 Kc et al. 9,745,271 B2 8/2017 Hood et al. 2016/0075701 Al 3/2016 Kumar Kc et al. 9,763,927 B2 9/2017 Hood et al . 2016/0090380 A1 3/2016 Kumar Kc et al. 9,763,951 B2 9/2017 Kumar Kc et al. 2016/0101092 Al 4/2016 Hood et al. 9,802,916 B2 10/2017 Hood et al. 2016/0297812 A1 10/2016 Hood et al. 9,815,854 B2 11/2017 Kumar Kc et al. 2017/0224697 A1 8/2017 Kumar Kc et al. 9,828,372 B2 11/2017 Kumar Kc et al. 2017/0333409 A1 11/2017 Hood et al . 9,844,536 B2 12/2017 Kumar Kc et al. 2017/0349584 Al 12/2017 Kumar Kc et al . 9,855,272 B2 1/2018 Hood et al. 2018/0086754 Al 3/2018 Kumar Kc et al. 9,994,563 B2 * 6/2018 Hood CO7D 471/04 2018/0133199 A1 5/2018 Dellamary 2002/0103229 A1 8/2002 Bhagwat et al . 2018/0141963 A1 5/2018 Kumar Kc et al. 2002/0161022 A1 10/2002 Reich et al. 2018/0148444 A1 5/2018 Kumar Kc et al . 2003/0199516 A1 10/2003 Moser et al . 2018/0153873 A1 6/2018 Hood et al. 2004/0048868 A1 3/2004 Edwards et al. 2018/0162840 A1 6/2018 Kumar Kc et al . 2004/0077681 A1 4/2004 Rawlings et al . 2018/0177787 Al 6/2018 Kumar Kc et al . 2004/0176325 A1 9/2004 Munson et al . 2018/0185343 A1 7/2018 Deshmukh et al. 2004/0236101 A1 11/2004 Makriyannis et al. 2018/0201624 A1 7/2018 Kumar Kc et al. 2005/0009894 Al 1/2005 Babin et al . 2018/0207141 A1 7/2018 Kumar Kc et al. 2005/0026960 Al 2/2005 Kephart et al. 2018/02 14427 Al 8/2018 Kc et al. 2005/0070546 A1 3/2005 Arrington et al. 2018/0214428 A1 8/2018 Kc et al . US 10,544,139 B2 Page 3

( 56 ) References Cited WO WO2008150914 12/2008 WO WO2008154241 12/2008 U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS WO WO2008156757 12/2008 WO WO2009011850 1/2009 2018/02 14429 Al 8/2018 Kc et al . WO WO2009016072 2/2009 2018/0215753 A1 8/2018 Kc et al. WO WO2009029609 3/2009 2018/0221341 A1 8/2018 Kc et al. WO WO2009061345 5/2009 2018/0221350 A1 8/2018 Kc et al. WO WO2010064875 6/2010 2018/0221351 A1 8/2018 Kc et al. WO WO2010107765 9/2010 2018/0221352 A1 8/2018 Kc et al. WO WO2010111060 9/2010 2018/0221353 A1 8/2018 Kc et al. WO WO2010132725 11/2010 2018/0221354 A1 8/2018 Kc et al . WO WO2011011722 1/2011 2018/0222891 A1 8/2018 Kc et al . WO WO2011019648 2/2011 2018/0222923 A1 8/2018 Kc et al. WO WO2011019651 2/2011 2018/0228780 A1 8/2018 Kc et al. WO WO2011050245 4/2011 2018/0228781 A1 8/2018 Kc et al. WO WO2011079076 6/2011 2018/0228782 A1 8/2018 Kc et al. WO WO2011084486 7/2011 2018/0228783 A1 8/2018 Kc et al. WO WO2011123890 10/2011 2018/0228784 A1 8/2018 Kc et al. WO WO2012068589 5/2012 2018/0228785 A1 8/2018 Kc et al. WO WO2012104388 8/2012 2018/0230142 A1 8/2018 Kc et al. WO WO2012129562 9/2012 2018/0237416 A1 8/2018 Hood et al. WO WO2013024011 2/2013 2018/0250269 Al 9/2018 Kc et al . WO WO2013030138 3/2013 2018/0256588 Al 9/2018 Hood et al. WO WO2013113722 8/2013 2018/0318292 A1 * 11/2018 Hood A61K 31/444 WO WO2013166396 11/2013 2019/0071440 A1 * 3/2019 Hood CO7D 471/04 WO WO2017079765 5/2017 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS OTHER PUBLICATIONS CN 1829713 9/2006 Adaimy et al. , “Mutation in WNT10A Is Associated with an CN 101440092 5/2009 KZ 20122 1/2010 Autosomal Recessive Ectodermal Dysplasia : The Odonto -onycho RU 2331640 8/2008 dermal Dysplasia ," Am . J. Hum . Genet ., (Oct. 2007 ) , 81( 4 ) , 821 RU 2416610 4/2011 828 . WO WO1987005297 9/1987 WO WO1996002537 2/1996 Adult Brain Tumors Treatment, National Cancer Institute , pp . 1-21 WO WO2001002369 1/2001 ( Jan. 24 , 2013 ), 21 pages . WO WO2001053268 7/2001 Ai et al. , “ Optimal Method to Stimulate Cytokine Producti on and WO WO2003004488 1/2003 Its Use in Immunotoxicity Assessment, ” Int J Environ Res Public WO WO2003035005 5/2003 Health , Sep. 2013 , 10 ( 9 ) :3834-3842 . WO WO2003035065 5/2003 Anastas and Moon , “ WNT signalling pathways as therapeutic WO WO2003035644 5/2003 targets in cancer, ” Nat Rev Cancer , 13 ( 1 ) :11-26 , Jan. 2013 . WO WO2003051366 6/2003 Andres , “ Molecular genetics and animal models in autistic disor WO WO2003070236 8/2003 der ,” Brain Research Bulletin , (2002 ) , 57 ( 1 ) , 109-119 . WO WO2003070706 8/2003 Barker and Clevers , “ Mining the Wnt pathway for cancer therapeu WO WO2003097610 11/2003 tics, ” Nat Rev Drug Discov ., 5 ( 12 ): 997-1014 , Dec. 2006 . WO WO2003101968 12/2003 WO WO2003101993 12/2003 Barroga et al ., “ Discovery of an Intra - Articular Injection Small WO WO2004014864 2/2004 Molecule Inhibitor of the Wnt Pathway (SM04690 ) as a Potential WO WO2004031158 4/2004 Disease Modifying Treatment for Knee Osteoarthritis, ” 2015 ACR WO WO2004076450 9/2004 ARHP AnnualMeeting , Abst . No. 2007 , Sep. 29 , 2015 , retrieved on WO WO2005009997 2/2005 Sep. 27, 2018 , URL , 3 pages . WO WO2005049019 6/2005 Bass, “ Why the difference between tendinitis and tendinosis mat WO WO2005092890 10/2005 ters, ” International Journal of Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork , WO WO2005099703 10/2005 vol. 5 , No. 1 , Mar. 2012 . WO WO2005110410 11/2005 Bendele , “ Animal Models of Arthritis : Relevance to Human Dis WO WO2006001894 1/2006 ease " Toxicol Pathol 1999 27 : 134-142 . WO WO2006015124 2/2006 WO WO2006024945 3/2006 Bernstein , “ Polymorphism in Molecular Crystals, ” Analytical Tech WO WO2006054143 5/2006 niques for Polymporphs, 115-118 , 272. WO WO2006054151 5/2006 Beyer et al ., “ Extended report: B -catenin is a central mediator of WO WO2006063302 6/2006 pro - fibrotic Wnt signaling in systemic sclerosis ,” Ann Rheum Dis , WO WO2006063841 6/2006 71: 761-767 , online Feb. 2012 . WO WO2006130673 12/2006 Biason -Lauber et al ., “ AWNT4 Mutation Associated with Müllerian WO WO2007061360 5/2007 Duct Regression and Virilization in a 46 , XX Woman ,” N. Engl. J. WO WO2007107346 9/2007 Med ., ( Aug. 2004 ) , 351( 8 ), 792-798 . WO WO2007117465 10/2007 Blaydon et al ., “ The gene encoding R - spondin 4 (RSPO4 ), a WO WO2007147874 12/2007 WO WO2008061109 5/2008 secreted protein implicated in Wnt signaling , is mutated in inherited WO WO2008071397 6/2008 anonychia ,” Nat . Genet. , (Nov. 2006 ) , 38 ( 11) , 1245-1247 . WO WO2008071398 6/2008 Blom et al ., “ Involvement of the Wnt signaling signaling pathway WO WO2008071451 6/2008 in experimental and human osteoarthritis : prominent role of Wnt WO WO2008124848 10/2008 induced singaling protein 1, ” Arthritis Rheum ., 60 ( 2 ): 501-512 , Feb. WO WO2008137408 11/2008 2009 . WO WO2008140792 11/2008 Bone fractures — https: //my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/ WO WO2008147713 12/2008 15241 -bone - fractures — Jun . 2018 , 5 pages. US 10,544,139 B2 Page 4

( 56 ) References Cited Davidson et al ., “ Emerging links between CDK cell cycle regulators and Wnt signaling, " Trends Cell Biol. , Aug. 2010, 20 ( 8 ) :453-460 . OTHER PUBLICATIONS De Ferrari and Inestrosa, “ Wnt signaling function in Alzheimer's disease, ” Brain Research Reviews, ( 2000 ), 33 ( 1) : 1-12. Boyden et al. , " High Bone Density Due to a Mutation in LDL De Ferrari and Moon , " The ups and downs of Wnt signaling in Receptor- Related Protein 5 , " N. Engl. J. Med ., (May 2002 ) , prevalent neurological disorders, ” Oncogene, (2006 ) 25 (57 ): 7545 346 ( 20 ) : 1513-1521 . 7553. Brack et al ., “ Increased Wnt signaling during aging alters muscle stem cell fate and increases fibrosis, ” Science. , 317 (5839 ): 807-810 , De Ferrari et al. , “ Common genetic variation within the Low Aug. 2007. Density Lipoprotein Receptor- Related Protein 6 and late - onset Braga et al. , “ Making crystals from crystals : a green route to crystal Alzheimer's disease , ” Proc. Natl . Acad . Sci. USA , (May 2007) , engineering and polymorphism ,” J. Royal Soc . Chem . Commun . , 104 (22 ) :9434-9439 . 2005 , 3635-3645 . Dean “ Analytical Chemistry Handbook. ” 1995, 10.24-10.26 . Brown et al. , “ Toxicity and toxicokinetics of the cyclin - dependent Dermer et al. , “ Another Anniversary for the War on Cancer, " kinase inhibitor AG -024322 in cynomolgus monkeys following Bio / Technology, Mar. 1994 , 12: 320 . intravenous infusion ,” Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. , 62 ( 6 ) : 1091 Deshmkukh et al, “ Abstract: A Small Molecule Inhibitor of the Wnt 1101 , Epub May 2008 . Pathway ( SM04755 ) as a Potential Topical Treatment for Tendinopathy, " Cancer definition in MedicineNet.com - 2005 , 1 page . Abstract from the Orthobiologic Institue ( TOBI) Annual Sympo Cancer Drug Design and Discovery Neidle , Stephen , ed . ( Elsevier / sium , Las Vegas, Nevada, Jun . 7 , 2018, 1 page. Academic Press , 2008 ), 5 pages. Deshmkukh et al, “ Abstract: Discovery of a Small Molecule Inhibi Cecil Textbook of Medicine, edited by Bennet, J.C., and Plum F., tor of the Wnt Pathway ( SM04755 ) as a Potential Topical Treatment 20th edition , vol. 1 , 1004-1010 , 1996 . for Tendinopathy, ” Abstract from the World Congress on Osteopo Chanput et.al., “ Transcription profiles of LPS - stimulated THP - 1 rosis Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Disease , Florence, Italy , monocytes and macrophages: a tool to study inflammation modu Mar. 23 , 2017 , 2 pages . lating effects of food -derived compounds, " Food Funct, Dec. 2010 , Deshmkukh et al , “ Abstract : Discovery of a Small Molecule Inhibi 1 ( 3 ) : 254-261. tor of the Wnt Pathway ( SM04755 ) as a Potential Topical Treatment Chilosi et al ., “ The pathogenesis of COPD and IPF : Distinct horns for Tendinopathy, ” Abstract from Osteoarthritis Research Society of the same devil ?,” Respiratory Research , 13 : 3 , 2012 . International (OARSI ) , Las Vegas, Nevada , Apr. 27 , 2017, 2 pages . Chockalingam et al. , “ Elevated aggrecanase activity in a rat model Deshmkukh et al, “ Abstract : Experimental Tendinopathy Treatment of joint injury is attenuated by an aggrecanase specific inhibitor, " with SM04755, a Topical Small Molecule Wnt Pathway Inhibitor ," Osteoarthritis Cartilage, Mar. 2011, 19 (3 ): 315-323 . Abstract from the Orthobiologic Institue ( TOBI) Annual Sympo Chou and Talalay, “ Quantitative analysis of dose - effect relation sium , Las Vegas, Nevada, Jun . 7 , 2018, 2 pages. ships: the combined effects ofmultiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors ," Deshmkukh et al, “ Abstract : Experimental Tendinopathy Treatment Advances in Enzyme Regulation ( 1984 ), 22, 27-55 . with SM04755 , a Topical Small Molecule Inhibitor of the Wnt Chou , “ Drug combination studies and their synergy quantification Pathway, ” Abstract from Osteoarthritis Research Society Interna using the Chou - Talalay method , " Cancer Res ., 70 ( 2 ) :440-446 , Jan. tional (OARSI ) , Liverpool, England , Apr. 26 , 2018 , 3 pages. 2010 . Deshmkukh et al, “ Poster: A Small Molecule Inhibitor of the Wnt Chou , “ Graphic rule for drug metabolism systems, ” Current Drug Pathway (SM04755 ) as a Potential Topical Treatment for Tendinopathy, " Metabolism , (May 2010 ) 11 ( 4 ): 369-378 . Poster from the Orthobiologic Institue ( TOBI) Annual Symposium , Christodoulides et al. , “WNT10B mutations in human obesity ," Las Vegas, Nevada , Jun . 7 , 2018 , 1 page . Diabetologia, (2006 ) 49 ( 4 ): 678-684 . Deshmkukh et al , “ Poster : Discovery of a Small Molecule Inhibitor Clevers and Nusse, “ Wnt/ ß -catenin signaling and disease, ” Cell , of the Wnt Pathway (SM04755 ) as a Potential Topical Treatment for ( Jun . 2012 ) , 149 ( 6 ) : 1192-1205 . Tendinopathy, ” Poster from the World Congress on Osteoporosis Clevers , “Wnt /beta -catenin signaling in development and disease, ” Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Disease, Florence , Italy , Mar. Cell , (Nov. 2006 ) , 127 ( 3 ) , 469-480 . 23 , 2017 , 1 page . clinicaltrials.gov ' [ online ]. Clinical Trials.gov Identifier :NCT02095548 , Deshmkukh et al, “ Poster: Experimental Tendinopathy Treatment “ Phase 1 , Dose Escalation Study Evaluating the Safety , Tolerability , with SM04755 , a Topical Small Molecule Wnt Pathway Inhibitor, " Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics ofSM04690 in Moderate Poster from the Orthobiologic Institue ( TOBI) Annual Symposium , to Severe Knee Osteoarthritis (OA ), ” Mar. 26 , 2014 , [ retreived on Las Vegas, Nevada , Jun . 7, 2018 , 2 pages. Aug. 1, 2018 ]. Retreived from the Internet : URL < https: // clinicaltrials . Deshmkukh et al, “ Presentation : Experimental Tendinopathy Treat gov/ ct2/ show /NCT02095548 ? term = NCT02095548 & rank = 1 > , 7 pages . ment with SM04755 , a Topical Small Molecule Inhibitor of the Wnt clinicaltrials.gov [online ]. Clinical Trials.gov Identifier : NCT02536833, Pathway, ” Presentation from Osteoarthritis Research Society Inter “ A Study Evaluating the Safety , Tolerability , and Efficacy of SM04690 national (OARSI ) , Liverpool , England , Apr. 26 , 2018 , 17 pages . Injected in the Target Knee Joint of Moderately to Severely Symp Deshmukh et al , Abstract # EULAR -6427 : “ Discovery of a Small tomatic Osteoarthritis Subjects ," Sep. 1, 2015, [ retrieved on Aug. 1 , Molecule Inhibitor of the Wnt Pathway ( SM04755) as a Potential 2018 ]. Retrieved from the Internet : URL < https://clinicaltrials.gov/ Topical Treatment for Tendinopathy, ” Abstract from Annual Euro ct2 / show /NCT02536833 ? term = NCT02536833 & rank = 1 > , X pages . pean Congress of Rheumatology ( EULAR ) , Madrid , Spain , Jun . 14 , Corr, “ Wnt- beta -catenin signaling in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis ," 2017 , 2 pages . Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. , 4 ( 10 ): 550-556 , Oct. 2008 . Deshmukh et al, “ Abstract # THU0522 : Experimental Tendinopathy D'Alessio et al. , “ Benzodipyrazoles: a new class of potent CDK2 Treatment with SM04755 , a Topical Small Molecule Inhibitor of the inhibitors ,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters (2005 ), Wnt Pathway, ” Abstract from Annual European Congress of Rheumatol 15 ( 5 ) , 1315-1319 . ogy ( EULAR ) , Amsterdam , Netherlands , Jun . 13-16 , 2018 , 2 pages . Damia “ Contemporary pre - clinical development of anticancer agents Deshmukh et al, “ Abstract : Discovery of a Small Molecule Inhibitor What are the optimal preclinical models ? ” European Journal of of the Wnt Pathway (SM04755 ) as a Potential Topical Treatment for Cancer 2009 , 45 , pp . 2768-2781 & p . 2778 . Tendinopathy, ” Abstract from Orthopaedic Research Society Annual Dann et al. , “ Insights into Wnt binding and signaling from the Meeting , New Orleans, Louisiana ,Mar. 19 , 2017 , 1 page . structures of two Frizzled cysteine -rich domains, ” Nature , (Jul . Deshmukh et al, “ Abstract : Discovery of a SmallMolecule Inhibitor 2001) , 412 , pp . 86-90 . of the Wnt Pathway ( SM04755 ) as a Potential Topical Treatment for Datta et al ., “ Novel therapeutic approaches for pulmonary fibrosis ," Tendinopathy, ” Abstract from Regenerative Medicine and Biology Br J Pharmacol . , 163 ( 1 ) : 141-172 , May 2011 . From Development to Regeneration , St. Louis , Missouri, May 4 , Davidovich et al, “ Detection of Polymporhism by Powder X -Ray 2017 , 2 pages . Diffraction : Interferences by Preferred Orientation ,” American Phar Deshmukh et al , “ Abstract: Experimental tendinopathy treatment maceutical Review , 2004 , 7 : ( 1 ) : 10 , 12 , 14 , 16 , and 100 . with SM04755, a topical small molecule inhibitor of the Wnt US 10,544,139 B2 Page 5

( 56 ) References Cited Egloff et al. , " Gastrin - releasing peptide receptor expression in non -cancerous bronchial epithelia is associated with lung cancer : a OTHER PUBLICATIONS case -control study, ” Respiratory Research , 13 :9 , Feb. 2012 . Enzo et al. , “ The Wnt/ J- catenin pathway in human fibrotic - like pathway, ” Abstract from Orthopaedic Research Society Annual diseases and its eligibility as a therapeutic target, ” Molecular and Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, Mar. 10 , 2018 , 2 pages . Cellular Therapies, 2015 , 3 ( 1 ) , 13 pages . Deshmukh et al, “ Poster # 1459: Experimental tendinopathy treat Espada et al ., “ Wnt signalling and cancer stem cells, ” Clin . Transl . ment with SM04755 , a topical small molecule inhibitor of the Wnt Oncol ., (2009 ) , 11 ( 7 ) , 411-27. pathway, " Poster from Orthopaedic Research Society Annual Meet Ewan et al. , “ A useful approach to identify novel small- molecule ing , New Orleans, Louisiana ,Mar. 19 , 2018 , 1 page . inhibitors of Wnt- dependent transcription, ” Cancer Res . ( 2010 ) , Deshmukh et al, “ Poster # 443 : Discovery of a Small Molecule 70 ( 14 ), 5963-5973 . Inhibitor of the Wnt Pathway ( SM04755) as a Potential Topical Exhibit A : Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. , Ltd., v. Sandoz, Inc. , Sun Treatment for Tendinopathy, " Poster from Osteoarthritis Research Pharmaceutical Industries , Ltd., Synton BV, Synthon Holding BV, Society International (OARSI ) , Las Vegas, Nevada, Apr. 27 , 2017 , Synthon Laboratories, Inc., and Synton Pharmaceuticals , Inc., and 1 page . Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp., and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA , Inc., Deshmukh et al, “ Poster # SAT067 : Discovery of a Small Molecule Barr Laboratories, Inc. , and Barr Pharmaceuticals , Inc. , Decision Inhibitor of the Wnt Pathway (SM04755 ) as a Potential Topical on Appeal, 2011-1126 , -1127 , May 7 , 2012 , 33 pages. Treatment for Tendinopathy, " Poster from Annual European Con Florez et al. , “ TCF7L2 Polymorphisms and Progression to Diabetes gress of Rheumatology ( EULAR ), Madrid , Spain , Jun . 14 , 2017 , 1 in the Diabetes Prevention Program ,” N. Engl. J. Med. , ( Jul. 2006 ), page . 355 ( 3 ) :241-250 . Deshmukh et al, “ Poster # THU0522: Experimental Tendinopathy Forestier et al. , “ Prevalence of generalized osteoarthritis in a Treatment with SM04755 , a Topical Small Molecule Inhibitor of the population with knee osteoarthritis ,” Joint Bone Spine , May 2011 , Wnt Pathway, ” Poster from Annual European Congress of Rheumatol 78 ( 3 ) :275-278 . ogy ( EULAR ), Amsterdam , Netherlands, Jun . 13-16 , 2018 , 1 page . Freese et al. , “ Wnt signaling in development and disease ," Neurobiol Deshmukh et al, “ Poster : Discovery of a Small Molecule Inhibitor ogy of Disease, ( 2010 ) 38 ( 2 ): 148-153 . of the Wnt Pathway (SM04755 ) as a Potential Topical Treatment for Freshney et al ., Culture of Animal Cells , A Manual of Basic Tendinopathy, ” Poster from Regenerative Medicine and Biology Technique, Alan R. Liss , Inc. , 1983 , New York , p . 1-6 . From Development to Regeneration , St. Louis , Missouri, May 4 , Fujii et al ., “ An antagonist of dishevelled protein -protein interaction 2017 , 2 pages . suppresses beta -catenin -dependent tumor cell growth ,” Cancer Res. , Deshmukh et al, “ Presentation : Discovery of a Small Molecule 67( 2 ) :573-579 , Jan. 2007 . Inhibitor of the Wnt Pathway (SM04755 ) as a Potential Topical Fukuzawa et al. , “ Beckwith - Wiedemann Syndrome- associated Treatment for Tendinopathy, ” Presentation from Orthopaedic Research Hepatoblastoma : Wnt Signal Activation Occurs Later in Tumorigenesis Society Annual Meeting , New Orleans, Louisiana , Mar. 19 , 2017 , in Patients with 11p15.5 Uniparental Disomy, ” Pediatric and Devel 19 pages. opmental Pathology (2003 ) , 6 ( 4 ): 299-306 . Deshmukh et al ., “ A small -molecule inhibitor of the Wnt pathway GastricMALTLynnphonna - LynnphonnaAssociation — 2011, 10 pages . (SM04690 ) as a potential disease modifying agent for the treatment Giles et al. , “ Caught up in a Wnt storm : Wnt signaling in cancer, ” of osteoarthritis of the knee, ” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, Jan. Biochim Biophys Acta . , 1653 ( 1 ) : 1-24 , Jun . 2003 . 2018 , 26 ( 1 ) : 18-27 . Gitter et al. , “ Characteristics of human synovial fibroblast activation Deshmukh et al. , “ Abstract # 1104: Discovery of a Small Molecule by IL - 1 beta and TNF alpha, ” Immunology, Feb. 1989, 66 ( 2 ): 196 Inhibitor of the Wnt Pathway (SM04755 ) as a Potential Topical 200 . Treatment for Chronic Tendinopathy, ” Abstract from 2016 ACR Golub et al ., “ Molecular Classification of Cancer: Class Discovery ARHP Annual Meeting, Nov. 14 , 2016 , 3 pages. and Class Prediction by Gene Expression Monitoring, ” Science , Deshmukh et al. , “ Experimental Tendinopathy Treatment with Oct. 1999 , 286 ( 5439 ) :531-537 . SM04755, a Topical, Small Molecule Inhibitor of the Wnt Path way , ” Slides Present at # 1952 at the American College of Rheumatol Guillory (in Brittain ed .) , “ Polymorphism in Pharmaceutical ogy (ACR ) Conference 2018, Chicago , Illinois , Oct. 19-24 , 2018 , Solids. , " NY : Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1999 , 1-2 , 125-181 , 183-226 . 22 pages . Gunther et al. , “ Prevalence of generalised osteoarthritis in patients Deshmukh et al. , “ Experimental Tendinopathy Treatment with with advanced hip and knee osteoarthritis : the Ulm Osteoarthritis SM04755 , a Topical , Small Molecule Inhibitor of the Wnt Path Study, ” Ann . Rheum . Dis ., Dec. 1998 , 57 ( 12 ) :717-723 . way ,” Abstract of Oral Presentation at # 1952 at the American Handeli and Simon , “ A small -molecule inhibitor of Tcf/ beta - catenin College of Rheumatology (ACR ) Conference 2018 , Chicago , Illi signaling down -regulates PPARgamma and PPARdelta activities, " nois, Oct. 19-24 , 2018 , 2 pages . Mol Cancer Ther . , 7 ( 3 ) : 521-529 , Mar. 2008 . Deshmukh et al. , “ Poster # 1104 : Discovery of a Small Molecule Hayami et al. , " Characterization of articular cartilage and subchondral Inhibitor of the Wnt Pathway (SM04755 ) as a Potential Topical bone changes in the rat anterior cruciate ligament transection and Treatment for Chronic Tendinopathy, ” Poster from 2016 ACR meniscectomized models of osteoarthritis ,” Bone , Feb. 2006 , 38 ( 2 ) :234 ARHP Annual Meeting , Nov. 14 , 2016 , 3 pages. 243 . Dessalew et al ., “ 3D - QSAR COMFA and COMSIA study on Henderson Jr. et al. , “ Inhibition of Wnt/ beta -catenin / CREB binding benzodipyrazoles as cyclin dependent kinase 2 inhibitors, ” Medici protein (CBP ) signaling reverses pulmonary fibrosis ,” Proc Natl nal Chemistry, ( 2008 ) , 4 ( 4 ), 313-321 . Acad Sci US A., 107 (32 ) :14309-14314 , Epub Jul . 2010 . Dong et al. , “ QSAR study of Akt /protein kinase B (PKB ) inhibitors Hu et al . , “ Discovery of indazoles as inhibitors of Tp12 kinase ," using support vector machine, ” European Journal of Medicinal Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters , ( Aug. 2011) 21( 16 ): Chemistry , (Oct. 2009) , pp . 44 (10 ): 4090-4097. 4758-4761. Doumpas et al. , “ TCF /LEF dependent and independent transcrip Huang et al. , “ Tankyrase inhibition stabilizes axin and antagonizes tional regulation of Wnt/ b -catenin target genes” The EMBO Journal Wnt signaling, ” Nature, (Oct. 2009 ), 461 (7264 ): 614-620 . Nov. 13 , 2018 , 1-14 . Huang et al. , “ Synthesis of 3-( 1H -benzimidazol - 2 -yl ) -5 - isoquinolin Du Bois , “ Strategies for treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis ," 4 -ylpyrazolo [ 1,2 -b ]pyridine , a potent cyclin dependent kinase 1 Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 9 ( 2 ) : 129-140 , Feb. 2010 . ( CDK1 ) inhibitor, ” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Edamoto et al. , “ Alterations of RB1 , p53 and Wnt pathways in ( 2007 ) 17 (5 ): 1243-1245 . hepatocellular carcinomas associated with hepatitis C , hepatitis B Hübner et al. , “ Standardized quantification of pulmonary fibrosis in and alcoholic liver cirrhosis, ” Int J Cancer. , 106 ( 3 ) :334-341 , Sep. 1 , histological samples ,” Biotechniques , 44 ( 4 ): 507-511 , 514-517, Apr. 2003 . 2008 . US 10,544,139 B2 Page 6

( 56 ) References Cited Li et al. , “ Artesunate attenuates the growth of human colorectal carcinoma and inhibits hyperactive Wnt/ beta -catenin pathway, ” Int OTHER PUBLICATIONS J Cancer . , 121( 6 ) : 1360-1365, Sep. 2007 . Lin et al. , “ Synthesis and evaluation of pyrazolo [ 3,4 - b ]pyridine Ikejima et al ., “ Interleukin - 1 induces tumor necrosis factor ( TNF) in CDK1 inhibitors as anti - tumor agents ,” Bioorganic & Medicinal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro and a circulating Chemistry Letters , ( Aug. 2007 ) , 17 ( 15 ) : 4297-4302 . TNF - like activity in rabbits ,” J Infect Dis , Jul. 1990 , 162 ( 1 ) :215 Liu , et.al., “ Fibrotic lung fibroblasts show blunted inhibition by 223 . CAMP due to deficient cAMP response element - binding protein Im et al. , “ Wnt inhibitors enhance chondrogenesis of human phosphorylation ,” J Pharmacol Exp Ther ., 315 ( 2 ) :678-687 , Epub mesenchymal stem cells in a long- term pellet culture, ” Biotechnol Aug. 3 , 2005. Lett. , 33 ( 5 ) : 1061-1068 , Epub Jan. 2011 . Lories et al. , “ To Wnt or not to Wnt: the bone and joint health Inestrosa and Toledo , “ The role of Wnt signaling in neuronal dilemma, ” Nat Rev Rheumatol. , 9 (6 ) :328-339 , Epub Mar. 2013 . dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease ,” Mol Neurodegener , 3 : 9 , doi: 10 . Low et al. , “ Phenotypic fingerprinting of small molecule cell cycle 1186 / 1750-1326-3-9 , 13 pages , Jul. 2008 . kinase inhibitors for drug discovery ,” Curr Chem Genomics. , 3 : 13 International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International 21, Mar. 2009 . Application No. PCT/ US2016 /60868 , dated May 17, 2018 , 9 pages. Lu et al ., “ Structure - activity relationship studies of small- molecule International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International inhibitors of Wnt response, ” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Application No. PCT/ US2017 /035411 , dated Dec. 4 , 2018 , 12 Letters , ( Jul . 2009 ), 19( 14 ) :3825-3827 . pages . Lui: “ Histopathological Changes in Tendinopathypotential Roles of International Search Report and Written Opinion for International BMPs ? ” Rheumatology , May 2013 , 52 : 2116-2126 . Application No. PCT/ US2016 /60868 , dated Jan. 19 , 2017, 12 pages. Luo et al ., “ Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein Regulates Pro Jain & Mohammedi, “ Polymorphism in Pharmacy , ” Indian Drugs, liferation and Differentiation of Adult Neural Stem /Progenitor Cells ,” 1986 , 23: ( 6 ): 315-329 . PLoS Genetics , (Apr. 2010 ), 6 ( 4 ): e1000898 , 15 pages. Janssens et al ., “ The Wnt- dependent signaling pathways as target in Luu et al. , “ Wnt/ beta -catenin signaling pathway as a novel cancer oncology drug discovery, ” Invest New Drugs. , 24 ( 4 ): 263-280 , Jul. drug target, ” Curr Cancer Drug Targets ., 4 (8 ): 653-671 , Dec. 2004 . 2006 . Luyten et al. , “Wnt signaling and osteoarthritis, " Bone, 44 (4 ) :522 Jenkins et al ., “ Germline mutations in WTX cause a sclerosing 527 , Epub Dec. 14 , 2008 . skeletal dysplasia but do not predispose to tumorigenesis ,” Nat. Ivanisevic et al. Use of X - ray Powder Diffraction in the Pharma Genet. ( Jan. 2009 ) , 41( 1 ) , 95-100 . ceutical Industry , Pharnn . Sci . Encycl. , 2010 , p . 1-42 . Jessen et al. , “ Peripheral white blood cell toxicity induced by broad MacDonald et al. , “ Wnt/ beta - catenin signaling: components ,mecha spectrum cyclin -dependent kinase inhibitors ,” Journal of Applied nisms, and diseases, ” Dev. Cell (Jul . 2009 ), 17 ( 1 ) , 9-26 . Toxicology (Jan. 2007 ), 27 ( 2 ) , 133-142 . Mandel et al. , “ SERKAL Syndrome: An Autosomal -Recessive Johnson et al. , “ A stem cell- based approach to cartilage repair ,” Disorder Caused by a Loss -of -Function Mutation in WNT4 ,” Am . J. Hum . Genet. , ( Jan. 2008 ), 82 ( 1) , 39-47 . Science ., 336 (6082 ) :717-721 , Epub Apr. 5 , 2012 . Mani, et al. , “ LRP6 Mutation in a Family with Early Coronary Johnson , et . al. “ Relationships between drug activity in NCI preclini Disease and Metabolic Risk Factors ,” Science , (Mar. 2007) , 315 ( 5816 ), cal in vitro and in vivo models and early clinical trials .” British 1278-1282 . Journal of Cancer, 2001, 84 , 1424-1431 . McBride, et al . “ Design and structure -activity relationship of Jordan , “ Tamoxifen : A Most Unlikely Pioneering Medicine, ” Nature 3 -benzimidazol - 2 -yl - 1H - indazoles as inhibitors of receptor tyro Reviews, Mar. 2003 , 2 : 205-213 . sine kinases, ” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters ( 2006 ) , Kanazawa et al. , “ Association of the Gene Encoding Wingless - Type 16 ( 13 ) , 3595-3599 . Mammary Tumor Virus Integration - Site Family Member 5B (WNTSB ) McMahon et al, “ VEGF receptor signaling in tumor angiogenesis, " with Type 2 Diabetes, ” Am . J. Hum . Genet . ( 2004 ) , 75 ( 5 ) , 832-843 . The Oncologist , 2005 , pp . 3-10 . Karlberg et al. , “ Structural basis for the interaction between tankyrase- 2 MedlinePlus, [online ] “ Cancer ,” [ retrieved on Jul. 6 , 2007 ]. Retrieved and a potent Wnt - signaling inhibitor, ” J. Med. Chem . ( 2010 ) , from the internet, URL http ://www.nInn.nih.govinnedlineplus/cancer . 53 ( 14 ) , 5352-5 . html> . Kibar et al. , “ Mutations in VANGL1 Associated with Neural- Tube Misra et al. , “ 1H - Pyrazolo [ 3,4 -b ]pyridine inhibitors of cyclin Defects , ” N. Engl. J. Med ., (Apr. 2007) , 356 ( 14 ): 1432-1437 . dependent kinases: highly potent 2,6 - Difluorophenacyl analogues, " King et al. , “ Build - 3 : a randomized , controlled trial of bosentan in Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, ( 2003) , 13: 2405-2408 . idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, ” Am J Respir Crit Care Med ., 184 ( 1 ) : 92 Monner et al. , “ Induction of lymphokine synthesis in peripheral 99, Epub Apr. 2011. blood mononuclear cells with phorbol ester and calcium ionophore Kishimoto et al: “ Wnt/ Beta - Catenin Signaling Suppresses Expres allows precise measurement of individual variations in capacity to sions of Ses, Mkx and Tnmd in Tendon -Derived Cells , " Plos One , produce IL 2 , ” Lymphokine Res . 1986 ; 5 Suppl 1 : S67-73 . Jul. 27 , 2017, 12 ( 7 ) , E0182051, pp . 1-17 . Mora et al, “ Emerging therapies for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, Kuwajima et al. , “ Necdin Promotes GABAergic Neuron Differen a progressive age- related disease, ” Nat Rev Drug Discov . Oct. 30 , tiation in Cooperation with Dlx Homeodomain Proteins ,” Journal of 2017 , 16 ( 11) : 810 . Neuroscience (May 2006 ) , 26 ( 20 ) , 5383-5392 . Morrisey, “Wnt signaling and pulmonary fibrosis ,” Am J Pathol ., Lacy et al ., “ Generation and characterization of ABT -981 , a dual 162( 5 ) :1393-1397 , May 2003 . variable domain immunoglobulin (DVD -Ig ( TM ) ) molecule that Muddassar et al ., “ Elucidation of binding mode and three dimen specifically and potently neutralizes both IL - laand IL - 1B ,” Mabs, sional quantitative structure- activity relationship studies of a novel May 2015 , 7 ( 3 ) : 605-619 . series of protein kinase B / Akt inhibitors, ” Journal of Molecular Lala and Orucevic , “ Role of nitric oxide in tumor progression : Modeling , (2009 ) , 15 ( 2 ) : 183-192 lessons from experimental tumors ,” Cancer and Metastasi Review , Ngkelo et . al ., “ LPS induced inflammatory responses in human vol. 17 , Mar. 1998 , pp . 91-106 . peripheral blood mononuclear cells ismediated through NOX4 and Lammi et al. , “ Mutations in AXIN2 Cause Familial Tooth Agenesis Gia dependent PI - 3 Kinase signaling, ” Journal of Inflammation , and Predispose to Colorectal Cancer, ” Am . J. Hum . Genet . ( 2004 ) , Dec. 2012 , 9 ( 1 ): 1 , 7 pages. 74 ( 5 ) , 1043-1050 . Niemann et al ., “ Homozygous WNT3 Mutation Causes Tetra Ledford “ US cancer institute overhauls cell lines ” Nature Feb. 25 , Amelia in a Large Consanguineous Family ,” Am . J. Hum . Genet . 2016 , vol. 530 p . 391 . ( 2004 ), 74 ( 3 ), 558-563 . Leyns et al. , “ Frzb - 1 Is a Secreted Antagonist of Wnt Signaling Nishisho et al ., “ Mutations of chromosome 5q21 genes in FAP and Expressed in the Spemann Organizer, ” Cell (Mar. 1997 ) , 88 ( 6 ), colorectal cancer patients, ” Science , ( Aug. 1991) , 253( 5020 ) :665 747-756 . 669 . US 10,544,139 B2 Page 7

( 56 ) References Cited Seah et al ., “ Neuronal Death Resulting from Targeted Disruption of the Snf2 Protein ATRX is Mediated by p53, ” Journal of Neurosci OTHER PUBLICATIONS ence (Nov. 2008 ) , 28 ( 47 ) , 12570-12580 . Seddon “ Pseudopolymorph : A Polemic ,” Crystal Growth & Design , Nusse , “ Wnt signaling in disease and in development, ” Cell Res . , 2004 , v.4 ( 6 ) p . 1087 . 15 ( 1 ) : 28-32 , Jan. 2005 . Shih et al. , “ Pharmacophore modeling and virtual screening to Oates et al . , “ Increased DNA Methylation at the AXIN1 Gene in a identify potential RET kinase inhibitors , ” Bioorg Med Chem Lett. , Monozygotic Twin from a Pair Discordant for a Caudal Duplication 21 ( 15 ): 4490-4497 , Epub Jun . 2011 . Anomaly , ” Am . J. Hum . Genet. ( 2006 ) , 79 ( 1 ) , 155-162 . Shruster et al. , “ Wnt signaling enhances neurogenesis and improves Ocana , A. “ Preclinical developmentof molecular targeted agents for neurological function after focal ischemic injury , ” PLoS One, ( Jul. cancer" Nat. Rev. Clin . Oncol. 2011 , 8 , pp . 200-209 . 2012 ) , 7 ( 7 ) : 40843, 11 pages. Oduor et al. , “ Trypanosoma brucei glycogen synthase kinase - 3 , a Silva et al, “ Advances in Prodrug Design ,” Mini- Revs . In Med . target for anti- trypanosomal drug development: a public - private Chem . (2005 ) , 5 : 893-914 . partnership to identify novel leads, ” PLoS Negl Trop Dis ., 5 ( 4 ) :e1017 , Solowiej et al. , “ Characterizing the Effects of the Juxtamembrane Apr. 2011 . Domain on Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor- 2 Enzy Okerlund and Cheyette , “ Synaptic Wnt signaling -a contributor to matic Activity , Autophosphorylation , and Inhibition by major psychiatric disorders ? ” J Neurodev Disord ., (2011 ) 3 ( 2 ) : 162 Axitinib ,” Biochemistry , ( 2009) , 48 ( 29) , 7019-7031. 174 . Sperber et al. , “ Cytokine secretion induced by superantigens in Osteoarthritis, https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/ peripheral blood mononuclear cells, lamina propria lymphocytes , osteoarthritis /diagnosis -treatinent / drc - 20351930 — Sep . 2018 , 8 pages . and intraepithelial lymphocytes ,” Clin Diagn Lab Immunol , Jul. Park et. al. , “Optimized THP- 1 differentiation is required for the 1995 , 2 ( 4 ) : 473-477 . detection of responses to weak stimuli, ” Inflamm Res, Jan. 2007 , Staines et al. , “ Cartilage development and degeneration : a Wnt 56 ( 1 ) :45-50 . situation , ” Cell Biochem Funct. , 30 ( 8 ) :633-642 , Epub Jun . 2012 . Parsons et al. , “ Benzo [ d ]imidazole Transient Receptor Potential Stomach cancer— -Mayoclinic.com - Apr . 9 , 2011, 8 pages. Vanilloid 1 Antagonists for the Treatment of Pain : Discovery of Sutherland et al. , “ A robust high - content imaging approach for trans- 2- ( 2- {2- [ 2- ( 4 - Trifluoromethyl- phenyl ) -vinyl ]-1H -benzimidazol probing the mechanism of action and phenotypic outcomes of 5 -yl ) -phenyl) -propan - 2 -ol (Mavatrep ), ” J Med Chem , May 2015, cell -cycle modulators ,” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics , (Feb. 2011) , 58( 9 ) : 3859-3874 . 10 ( 2 ) :242-254 . Patani and Lavoie , “ Bioisosterism : A Rational Approach in Drug Swaney et al. , “ A novel, orally active LPA ( 1 ) receptor antagonist Design ,” Chem . Rev, Jul. 25 , 1996 , vol. 96 , p . 3147-3176 . inhibits lung fibrosis in the mouse bleomycin model ,” Br J Pharmacol ., Piersanti et al. , “ Synthesis of benzo [ 1,2 - d ; 3,4 - d ' ]diimidazole and 1 160 ( 7 ): 1699-1713 , Aug. 2010 . H -pymzolo [ 4,3 - b ]pyridine as putative A2A receptor antagonists ,” Takahashi - Yanaga et al. , “ Celecoxib - induced degradation of T - cell Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry , Aug. 2007, 5 ( 16 ) :2567-2571 . factors - 1 and -4 in human colon cancer cells ,” Biochem Biophys Res Pinedo & Slamon , “ Translational Research : the role of VEGF in Commun . , 377 ( 4 ) : 1185-1190 , print Dec. 2008 , Epub Nov. 2008 . tumor angiogenesis, ” The Oncologist, 2005 , pp . 1-2 . Tamamura et al. , “ Developmental regulation of Wnt/ beta -catenin Polakis , " Wnt signaling and cancer, ” Genes Dev. , 14 : 1837-1851, signals is required for growth plate assembly, cartilage integrity , and 2000 . endochondral ossification ,” J Biol Chem ., 280 ( 19 ): 19185-95 . Epub Pritzker et al ., “ Osteoarthritis cartilage histopathology: grading and Mar. 2005 . staging, ” Osteoarthr. Cartil. , Jan. 2006 , 14 ( 1 ): 13-29 . Thompson et al ., “ WNT/ beta - catenin signaling in liver health and Pubchem . Substance Record for SID 164345938. Deposit Date : disease , ” Hepatology. , 45 ( 5 ) :1298-1305 , May 2007 . Nov. 4 , 2013. [retrieved on Nov. 16 , 2015 ]. Retrieved from the Trujillo et al. , “ 2-( 6 -Phenyl - 1H - indazol- 3 -yl ) -1H -benzo [d ]imidazoles : Internet . , 5 pages . inhibitor ,” Bioorg Med Chem Lett ., 19 ( 3 ): 908-911, Epub Dec. 6 , Qin et al . “ Complexity of the genotype -phenotype correlation in 2008 . familial exudative vitreoretinopathy with mutations in the LRP5 Types of Brain Cancer at http://www.cancercenter.com/brain-cancer/ and /or FZD4 genes , ” Hum . Mutat . ( 2005 ) , 26 ( 2 ) , 104-112 . types- of - brain -cancer.cfrn (Mar. 12 , 2013 ), 3 pages . Reya and Clevers , “ Wnt signalling in stem cells and cancer, ” Nature Types of Breast Cancer, published in breastcancer.org ( Sep. 30 , 434 : 843-850 , Apr. 2005 . 2012 ), 1 page . Richards et al ., “ Peripheral blood proteins predict mortality in Ugur et al. , “ Homozygous WNT10b mutation and complex inheri idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, ” Am J Respir Crit Care Med ., 185 (1 ) :67 tance in Split -Hand / FootMalformation ,” Hum . Mol. Genet. (2008 ), 76 , Jan. 2012 . 17 ( 17 ) , 2644-2653 . Rivera et al. , " An X Chromosome Gene, WTX , Is Commonly Vippagunta et al, “ Crystalline solids, ” Advanced Drug Delivery Inactivated in Wilms Tumor, ” Science , (Feb. 2007 ) , 315 ( 5812 ): 642 Reviews, 2001, 48 :3-26 . 645 , published online Jan. 4 , 2007 . Vulpetti et al. , “ Structure -Based Approaches to Improve Selectivity : Robitaille et al ., “ Mutant frizzled - 4 disrupts retinal angiogenesis in CDK2- GSK3B Binding Site Analysis, ” Journal of Chemical Infor familial exudative vitreoretinopathy, ” Nat. Genet. , ( Sep. 2002 ) , mation and Modeling ( 2005 ) , 45 ( 5 ) , 1282-1290 . 32 (2 ): 326-330 . Wagner et al ., “ The therapeutic potential of the Wnt signaling Rother et al ., “ Efficacy and safety of epicutaneous ketoprofen in pathway in bone disorders , ” Curr Mol Pharmacol. , 4 ( 1 ) : 14-25 , Jan. Transfersome ( IDEA - 033 ) versus oral celecoxib and placebo in 2011 . osteoarthritis of the knee : multicentre randomised controlled trial, " Walters and Kleeberger, “Mouse models of bleomycin - induced Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Sep. 2007 , 66 (9 ): 1178-1183 . pulmonary fibrosis ,” Current Protocols in Pharmacology, ( 2008 ) Ryu et al. , “ Natural derivatives of attenuate the Wnt/ beta Chapter 5 : Unit 5.46 , 1-17 . catenin pathway through down - regulation of the transcriptional Wang, et al ., “Mutations in X - linked PORCN , a putative regulator coactivator p300, ” Biochem Biophys Res Commun . , 377 ( 4 ): 1304 of Wnt signaling , cause focal dermal hypoplasia ,” Nat. Genet . ( Jul. 1308, print Dec. 2008, Epub Nov. 2008 . 2007 ) , 39 ( 7 ) , 836-838 . Salinas, “ Wnt signaling in the vertebrate central nervous system : Wantanabe and Dai, “ Winning WNT: race to Wnt signaling inhibi from axon guidance to synaptic function ," Cold Spring Harb tors, ” Proc Natl Acad Sci US A. 108( 15) : 5929-5930 , Epub Mar. Perspect Biol. , ( 2012 ) 4 ( 2 ) . pii : a008003 , 15 pages . 2011 . Sato , “ Upregulation of the Wnt/ beta -catenin pathway induced by Watts et.al., “ RhoA signaling modulates cyclin D1 expression in transforming growth factor -beta in hypertrophic scars and keloids, " human lung fibroblasts; implications for idiopathic pulmonary fibro Acta Derm Venereol. , 86 ( 4 ) :300-307 , 2006 . sis , ” Respir Res ., 7:88 , Jun . 15 , 2006 . US 10,544,139 B2 Page 8

( 56 ) References Cited U.S. Appl . No. 14 /847,344 , filed Sep. 8 , 2015 , Kumar KC et al . U.S. Appl. No. 14 / 847,379 , filed Sep. 8 , 2015 , Kumar KC et al. OTHER PUBLICATIONS U.S. Appl . No. 14 /847,394 , filed Sep. 8 , 2015 , Kumar KC et al . U.S. Appl . No. 14 /939,434 , filed Nov. 12 , 2015 , Hood et al . Weng et al. , “ Control of Dkk - 1 ameliorates chondrocyte apoptosis , U.S. Appl. No. 14 /940,958 , filed Nov. 13 , 2015 , Hood et al . cartilage destruction , and subchondral bone deterioration in osteoarthritic U.S. Appl . No. 14 / 962,681, filed Dec. 8 , 2015 , Hood et al . knees, ” Arthritis Rheum ., 62 ( 5 ) : 1393-1402 , May 2010 . U.S. Appl . No. 15 / 184,553 , filed Jun . 16 , 2016 , Hood et al . Witherington et al. , “ 5 - Aryl -pyrazolo [ 3,4 - b ]pyridazines : potent inhibi U.S. Appl. No. 15 /244,687 , filed Aug. 23 , 2016 , Hood et al . tors of glycogen synthase kinase - 3 (GSK - 3 ) ,” Bioorganic & Medici U.S. Appl. No. 15 / 257,398 , filed Sep. 6 , 2016 , Kumar KC et al . nal Chemistry Letters , (May 2003) , 13 ( 9) : 1581-1584 . U.S. Appl. No. 15 / 267,939 , filed Sep. 16 , 2016 , Kumar KC et al. Woods, S. et al. , “ Mutations in WNT A Cause a Range of Limb U.S. Appl. No. 15/ 298,346 , filed Oct. 20 , 2016 , Kumar KC et al . Malformations, Including Fuhrmann Syndrome and Al- Awadi/ Raas U.S. Appl. No. 15 / 357,494 , filed Nov. 21, 2016 , Kumar KC et al . Rothschild /Schinzel Phocomelia Syndrome, ” Am . J. Hum .Genet . U.S. Appl . No. 15 / 363,086 , filed Nov. 29 , 2016 , Kumar KC et al. ( Aug. 2006 ) , 79 ( 2 ) , 402-408 . U.S. Appl . No. 15 /420,398 , filed Jan. 31, 2017 , Hood et al . Yamada et al. , “ Emergence of TNIK inhibitors in cancer therapeu U.S. Appl . No. 15 /591,566 , filed May 10 , 2017, Kumar KC et al . tics, ” Cancer Sci, May 2017 , 108( 5 ): 818-823 . U.S. Appl . No. 15 /611,150 , filed Jun . 1, 2017 , Kumar KC . Yan et al ., “ Discovery of small molecule inhibitors of the Wnt/ b U.S. Appl. No. 15 /661,231 , filed Jul. 27, 2017 , Kumar KC et al. catenin signaling pathway by targeting b -catenin / Tcf4 interactions” U.S. Appl. No. 15 /668,992 , filed Aug. 4 , 2017 , Kumar KC et al . Experimental Biology and Medicine, Jun . 2017 , vol. 242, pp . U.S. Appl. No. 15 /673,834 , filed Aug. 10 , 2017, Kumar KC et al . 1185-1197 . U.S. Appl. No. 15 /681,035 , filed Aug. 18 , 2017 , Hood et al. Yardy and Brewster, “ Wnt signalling and prostate cancer, ” Prostate U.S. Appl. No. 15 /709,057 , filed Sep. 19 , 2017 , Hood et al. Cancer Prostatic Dis, 8 ( 2 ): 119-126 , 2005 . U.S. Appl. No. 15/ 716,803 , filed Sep. 27 , 2017, Kumar KC et al. Yazici et al ., “ Abstract # : 312 : Safety , Efficacy and Biomarker U.S. Appl. No. 15 /716,894 , filed Sep. 27 , 2017 , Kumar KC et al. Outcomes of a Novel, Intra - Articular , Injectable , Wnt Inhibitor U.S. Appl . No. 15 /749,586 , filed Feb. 1 , 2018 , Kumar KC et al . ( SM04690 ) in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Interim , U.S. Appl . No. 15 /749,587 , filed Feb. 1 , 2018 , Kumar KC et al . Exploratory Analysis of Results from a Randomized, Double - Blind , U.S. Appl. No. 15 /749,592 , filed Feb. 1, 2018 , Kumar KC et al . Placebo - Controlled Phase 1 Study, " Poster, Presented at 2015 U.S. Appl . No. 15 /749,606 , filed Feb. 1, 2018, Kumar KC et al. ACR / American College of Rheumatology Annual Meeting, San U.S. Appl. No. 15 /749,608 , filed Feb. 1, 2018 , Kumar KC et al . Francisco CA , Nov. 6-11, 2015 ; Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 ; 67 U.S. Appl. No. 15 /749,701 , filed Feb. 1, 2018 , Kumar KC et al . ( suppl 10 ) : 1 page. U.S. Appl . No. 15 /749,706 , filed Feb. 1 , 2018 , Kumar KC et al . Yu et al. , “ Physical characterization of polymorphic drugs : an U.S. Appl . No. 15 /749,713 , filed Feb. 1 , 2018 , Kumar KC et al . integrated characterization strategy, ” PSTT, 1998, 1 ( 3 ) : 118-127 . U.S. Appl. No. 15 /749,718 , filed Feb. 1. 2018 , Kumar KC et al . Zhan et al. , “ Wnt signaling in cancel ” Oncogene , 2017 , 36 , pp . U.S. Appl. No. 15 /749,721 , filed Feb. 1. 2018 , Kumar KC et al . 1461-1473. U.S. Appl . No. 15 /749,727 , filed Feb. 1 , 2018 , Kumar KC et al . Zhang et al. , “ Small- molecule synergist of the Wnt/ beta - catenin U.S. Appl . No. 15 /749,737 , filed Feb. 1, 2018, Kumar KC et al. signaling pathway, ” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. , 104 ( 18 ) :7444-7448 , U.S. Appl . No. 15 /749,739 , filed Feb. 1 , 2018 , Kumar KC et al . Epub Apr. 2007 and correction 104 ( 30 ): 12581, Jul. 2007 . U.S. Appl . No. 15 /749,741 , filed Feb. 1, 2018, Kumar KC et al. Zheng “ Small -molecule inhibitors of Wnt signaling pathway: towards U.S. Appl. No. 15 /749,742 , filed Feb. 1. 2018 , Kumar KC et al . novel anticancer therapeutics ” Future Med . Chem ., 2015 , 7 ( 18 ) , U.S. Appl. No. 15 /749,868 , filed Feb. 2 , 2018 , Kumar KC et al . 2485-2505 . U.S. Appl. No. 15 /749,910 , filed Feb. 2 , 2018 , Kumar KC et al . Zhong et al. , “ Characterization of in vitro and in vivo metabolism U.S. Appl. No. 15 /749,922 , filed Feb. 2. 2018 , Kumar KC et al . of AG -024322 , a novel cyclin -dependent kinase (CDK ) inhibitor, " U.S. Appl. No. 15 /749,923 , filed Feb. 2 , 2018 , Kumar KC et al . Health (2009 ) , 1 ( 4 ) : 249-262 . U.S. Appl. No. 15 /749,929 , filed Feb. 2 , 2018 , Kumar KC et al . Zhu et al. “ Design and synthesis of pyridine -pyrazolopyridine U.S. Appl. No. 15 / 773,737 , filed May 4 , 2018 , Hood et al. based inhibitors of protein kinase B / Akt, ” Bioorganic & Medicinal U.S. Appl. No. 15 /790,544 , filed Oct. 23 , 2017 , Deshmukh et al. Chemistry , Mar. 2007, 15 ( 6 ) :2441-2452 . U.S. Appl. No. 15 / 806,321 , filed Nov. 7 , 2017 , Dellamary et al . U.S. Appl. No. 12 /852,681 , filed Aug. 9 , 2010 , Hood et al . U.S. Appl . No. 15 /808,602 , filed Nov. 9 , 2017, Kumar KC et al . U.S. Appl. No. 12 /852,706 , filed Aug. 9 , 2010 , Hood et al. U.S. Appl . No. 15 /812,629 , filed Nov. 14 , 2017 , Hood et al . U.S. Appl . No. 12 /968,505 , filed Dec. 15 , 2010 , Hood et al. U.S. Appl. No. 15 /843,818 , filed Dec. 15 , 2017 , Kumar KC et al . U.S. Appl . No. 13 /552,188 , filed Jul . 18 , 2012 , Hood et al . U.S. Appl. No. 15 /889,403 , filed Feb. 6 , 2018 , Kumar KC et al . U.S. Appl. No. 13 /614,296 , filed Sep. 13, 2012 , Hood et al. U.S. Appl. No. 15 / 968,555 , filed May 1 , 2018 , Hood et al. U.S. Appl . No. 13 /800,963 , filed Mar. 13 , 2013 , Hood et al. U.S. Appl . No. 16 /015,996 , filed Jun . 22 , 2018 , Kumar KC et al. U.S. Appl . No. 13 /855,874 , filed Apr. 3 , 2013 , Hood et al. U.S. Appl. No. 16 /032,905 , filed Jul. 11, 2018, Hood et al. U.S. Appl. No. 13 / 887,177 , filed May 3 , 2013, Hood et al. U.S. Appl . No. 16 / 115,222 , filed Aug. 28 , 2018 , Kumar KC . U.S. Appl . No. 13 /938,691 , filed Jul. 10 , 2013 , Hood et al. U.S. Appl. No. 16 / 162,155 , filed Oct. 16 , 2018 , Kumar et al . U.S. Appl. No. 13 /938,692 , filed Jul. 10 , 2013 , Hood et al. Caira , “ Crystalline Polymorphism of Organic Compounds, ” Topics U.S. Appl. No. 14 /019,103 , filed Sep. 5 , 2013, Hood et al . in Current Chemistry , Jan. 1998 , 198 : 163-208 . U.S. Appl. No. 14 /019,147 , filed Sep. 5 , 2013, Hood et al . Bharath et al, “ Evaluation of Myofibroblasts by Expression of Alpha U.S. Appl. No. 14 /019,229 , filed Sep. 5 , 2013 , Hood et al . Smooth Muscle Actin : A Marker in Fibrosis , Dysplasia and Carci U.S. Appl. No. 14 /019,940 , filed Sep. 6 , 2013 , Hood et al . noma, ” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research , 2014 , 8 ( 4 ): ZC14 U.S. Appl . No. 14 / 149,948 , filed Jan. 8 , 2014 , Kumar KC et al . ZC17 . U.S. Appl. No. 14 /178,749 , filed Feb. 12 , 2014 , Hood et al. Bollong et al, “ Small molecule -mediated in inhibition of myofibroblast U.S. Appl. No. 14 /331,427 , filed Jul. 15 , 2014 , Hood et al. transdifferentiation for the treatment of fibrosis ,” PNAS, 2017 , U.S. Appl. No. 14 /334,005 , filed Jul. 17, 2014 , Hood et al. 114 : 18 : 4679-4684 . U.S. Appl. No. 14 / 454,279 , filed Aug. 7 , 2014 , Hood et al. Carpino et al , “ Alpha -SMA expression in hepatic stellate cells and U.S. Appl . No. 14 /465,056 , filed Aug. 21, 2014 , Hood et al . quantitative analysis ofhepatic fibrosis in cirrhosis and in recurrent U.S. Appl . No. 14 /621,195 , filed Feb. 12 , 2015 , Hood et al. chronic hepatitis after liver transplantation , ” Digestive and Liver U.S. Appl. No. 14 /621,222 , filed Feb. 12 , 2015 , Hood et al. Disease , 2005 , 37 : 349-356 . U.S. Appl . No. 14 /718,354 , filed May 21, 2015 , Hood et al . Guo et al, “ Wnt/ p - Catenin Signaling: a Promising New Target for U.S. Appl. No. 14 /847,259 , filed Sep. 8 , 2015 , Kumar KC et al . Fibrosis Diseases, ” Physiol. Res ., 2012 , 61: 337-346 . U.S. Appl. No. 14 / 847,287 , filed Sep. 8 , 2015 , Kumar KC et al . Kim et al, “ Blockade of the Wnt/ b -Catenin Pathway Attenuates U.S. Appl. No. 14 /847,299 , filed Sep. 8 , 2015 , Kumar KC et al. Bleomycin - Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis ,” Tohoku J. Exp . Med ., U.S. Appl. No. 14 /847,336 , filed Sep. 8 , 2015 , Kumar KC et al . 2011 , 223: 45-54 . US 10,544,139 B2 Page 9

( 56 ) References Cited OTHER PUBLICATIONS United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit , Eli Lilly and Company , Plaintiff - Appellant, v . Actavis Elizabeth LLC , Defendant Appellee , and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Defendant Appellee , and Sandoz, Inc. , Defendant - Appellee , and Mylan Phar maceuticals Inc., Defendant- Appellee , and Apotex Inc., Defendant Appellee , and Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., Defendant- Appellee , and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA , Inc., Defendant -Appellee , Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Case No. 07- CV -3770 , Judge Dennis M. Cavanaugh , decided on Jul. 29, 2011 , 20 pages . * cited by examiner U.S. Patent Jan. 28 , 2020 Sheet 1 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

400 350 300 Intensity(Counts) 250 200 150 100 Form 1 50 - mun 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2 - Theta (0 ) FIG . 1A

2 280.50 ° C 363.22 ° C 48.09 ° C 132.9J/ g 177.7J/ g . A 0 273.86 ° C 13.78J/ g HeatFlow(W/g) -2 73.37 ° C

-4

365.54 ° C -6 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature ( ° C ) FIG . 1B U.S. Patent Jan. 28 , 2020 Sheet 2 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

102 0.25 0.4410 % 38.78 ° C 0.3342 % (0.0256mg ) 100 + ( 0.01946mg) 0.20 7 100.11 ° C cm mm 299.53° C 98 0.15 Weight(%) Deriv.Weight(%°C)

96 0.10

94 0.05

92 0.00 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 1C

DVS Isotherm Plot Cycle 1 Sorp 20 o Cycle 1 Desorp 18 16 14 Ref-Mass(%)ChangeIn 12 10 oo os 4

N

CH -2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Target % P/ PO FIG . 1D U.S. Patent Jan. 28 , 2020 Sheet 3 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

4500 4000 3500 3000 Intensity(Counts) 2500 2000 1500 1000 Form 2 500

o ??????www ???? than 5 Jurulan10 15 20 25 30 35 2 - Theta (0 ) FIG . 2A 2 234.58 ° C 290.46 ° C 363.35 °C 213.24 ° C 132.2Jg 88.46J/ g 40.55J /g 230.92° C** 39.65J/ g 90.78 ° C 225.48° C HeatFlow(W/g) -2

4

365.75 ° C -6 o 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 2B U.S. Patent Jan. 28 ,2 2020 Sheet 4 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

102 0.25 36.42 ° C 100 K 2.714 % ( 0.1904mg) 0.20 98 1.702 % 116.25 ° C (0.1194mg ) 0.15 96 Deriv.Weight(%/°C) (%)Weight 250.75 °C 94 0.10 92 0.05

88 0.00 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 2C

75004

Intensity(Counts) 5000

2500 Form 2 * why which 5 Juulia10 15 20 25 30 35 2 - Theta (0 ) FIG . 2D U.S. Patent Jan. 28 , 2020 Sheet 5 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

4 236.68° C 2 216.79° C 292.67° C 365.51° C 40.69° C 36.41J / a 136.9J/ g 97.76J/ g tk 232.87° C 285.85 ° C 228.26 °C 44.82J/ g 18.00J/ g HeatFlow(W/g) 83.89° C -2

-6 367.19 ° C -8 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C) FIG . 2E

100 0.3 35.63° C 4.934 % 98 ( 0.5714mg) 0.2 96 Weight(%) 100.47° C Deriv.Weight(%/°C) 94 0.1

92 0.0 90

88 -0.1 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 2F U.S. Patent Jan. 28, 2020 Sheet 6 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

600

500 Intensity(Counts) 400 300 Form 2 ** 200

100 0 with Amamman 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2 - Theta FIG . 2G

236.29 ° C 365.88 ° C 40.40 ° C 216.33 ° C 290.74 ° C 140.9J/ g 126.0J/ g 36.59J/ g 0 232.20 ° C 284.93 ° C 227.86 ° C 45.77J/ g 21.18J/ g 83.89 ° C HeatFlow(W/g) -2

-4

-6

367.00 ° C -8 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 2H U.S. Patent Jan. 28, 2 2020 Sheet 7 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

2000 Intensity(Counts) 1500 1000

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2 - Theta ) FIG . 3A 4

230.61° C 363.23 ° C 2 297.00A ° C 106.1J/ g . 202.26 ° C 292.75 ° C HeatFlow(W/g) 191.37 ° C 225.05 ° C 12.59J/ g 0 18.09J/ g 53.37J/ g

-2 365.17 ° C

-4 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature ( ° C ) FIG . 3B U.S. Patent Jan. 28 , 2020 Sheet 8 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

102 0.3

100 1.832 % 39.98 ° C (0.1194mg ) 0.2 98 + 81.10 ° C 1.731 % (0.1128mg ) 0.6190 % ( 0.04034mg) Weight(%) 188.70° C Deriv.Weight(%/°C) 308.86 ° C 0.1 94

92 -0.0 90

88 -0.1 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C) FIG . 3C 6000

5000

4000

CountsIntensity() 3000

2000 Form 4 1000 Whether when 0 Dun ? 10 15 20 25 30 35 2- Thetao FIG . 4A U.S. Patent Jan. 28 , 2020 Sheet 9 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

234.71 °C 2 213.07 °C 299.98° C 366.76 ° C 57.19 ° C 50.77J/ g 130.6J/ g 31.32J/ g kh HeatFlow(W/g) 231.01° C 292.67 °C 81.30 ° C 222.94 °C 43.18J/ g 23.09J/

-2

4 368.42 °C 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 4B 105 0.3

100 42.36 ° C 0.2 8.255 % 95 (0.5112mg ) Weight(%) Deriv.Weight(%l°C) 200.54 ° C 0.1 90 0.0 85

80 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 4C U.S. Patent Jan. 28 ,2 2020 Sheet 10 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

5000 4500 4000 3500 Intensity(Counts) 3000 2500 2000 1500 Form 4 * 1000 500 ???????????? ??? 0 While when 5 wilalle10 15 20 25 30 35 2 - Theta (0 ) FIG . 4D 2 213.04 ° C 235.87 ° C 179.33° C 21.80J/ g 307.42° C 367.07° C 24.45J/ g 124.5J/ g +1 230.41 °C 300.69° C 0 201.78 °C 45.74J/ g 23.14J/ g 225.97 ° C HeatFlow(W/g) -2

-4 368.93 ° C

-6 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 4E U.S. Patent Jan. 28 ,? 2020 Sheet 11 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

100 -0.25 36.61° C

98 4444 % ( 0.4377mg) - 0.20 04830 % 96 ( 0.04757mg) 101.54° C - 0.15 Weight(%) 1 Deriv.Weight(%/°C) 94 250.030C 0.10 92

- 0.05 90

88 . - 0.00 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 4F

750 -

Intensity(Counts) 500

Form 4 ** 250

(0 ) 5 ??????? 15 20 25 30 35 2 - Thetalº) FIG . 4G U.S. Patent Jan. 28 , 2020 Sheet 12 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

2 235.43° C 300.06 ° C 364.44 °C 215.18 ° C 135.9J/ g 39.14J/ g . K - 4 0 470.64J/ g "231.79 ° C 295.13° C 38.41J/ g 24.47J/ g 85.38 °C 227.25 ° C HeatFlow(W/g) -2

4

367.88 °C -6 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 4H 102 0.25 36.27 ° C 100 2.753 % |( 0.2772mg ) 0.20 98 84.33° C -1.900 % (0.1913mg ) 0.15 96 DerivWeight.(%/°C) Weight(%) 145.66° C 1.284 % ( 0.1293mg) 94 248.96 ° C 0.10 92 0.05 90 s

88 0.00 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 41 U.S. Patent Jan. 28 ,2 2020 Sheet 13 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

7000 6000 5000

Intensity(Counts) 4000 3000 Form 5 2000 1000 Mwhenham 3 0 ?????? 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2 - Theta (0 ) FIG . 5A 2 235.28 ° C 363.71 ° C 209.75 ° C 292.81° C 124.9J/ g 45.49J/ g 11.18J/ g 8100 K 221.71 ° C 280.90 ° C 68.19 ° C 227.64 ° C 18.74J /g HeatFlow(W/g) 30.37J/ g -2

-4 365.64 ° C

-6 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 5B U.S. Patent Jan. 28 , 2020 Sheet 14 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

100 0.25 39.14 ° C 3.054 % 1.657 % 98 (0.2488mg ) ( 0.1350mg) 0.2352 % -0.20 ( 0.01916mg) 96 100.83 ° C + 0.15 DerivWeight.(%/°C) Weight(%) 250.03 ° C 94 299.89 ° C 0.10 92

90 0.05

88 0.00 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature ( ° C ) FIG . 5C

1000 Intensity(Counts) 750 500 Form 5 *

250

0 Murah 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2 - Theta (0 ) FIG . 5D U.S. Patent Jan. 28, 2020 Sheet 15 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

700

600 Intensity(Counts) 500 400 300 Form 6 200 100 Analar hamnation 0 LO 10 ??????15 20????? 25 ?? 30 35 2 - Theta (0 ) FIG . 6A

2

358.33 ° C 249.68 ° C 135.5J/ g 246.42 ° C 5.302J/ g HeatFlow(W/g)

-2

-4 364.22 ° C 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 6B U.S. Patent Jan. 28 ,2 2020 Sheet 16 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

7000

6000

5000

IntensityCounts() 4000

3000 Form 7 2000 1000 w 0 5 Winmal10 15 20 25 30 35 2 - Theta ( ) FIG . 7A

2 232.17 ° C 303.53 ° C 367.28 ° C 40.25 ° C 139.5J/ g 0 15.9J/ g 227.75 ° C 299.04 ° C 28.34J/ g 27.18J/ g HeatFlow(W/g) -2

-4

-6

368.75 ° C -8 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 7B U.S. Patent Jan. 28 ,2 2020 Sheet 17 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2 105 0.3

36.27 ° C 100 +

0.2 12.38 % Weight(%) 95 (1.269mg ) Deriv.Weight(%/°C)

90 200.54 ° C 0.1

85 at

80 0.0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 70

4500 4000 3500 3000 Intensity(Counts) 2500 2000 1500 Form 8 1000 500 ??????????? 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2 - Theta (0 ) FIG . 8A U.S. Patent Jan. 28 , 2020 Sheet 18 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

2 231.00 ° C 362.10 ° C 41.17 ° C 285.16 ° C 132.1J/ g 0 14.20J/ g H 279.08 ° C 46.04 ° C 221.55 ° C 13.68J/ g 38.08J/ g HeatFlow(W/g) -2

-6

364.45 ° C -8 o 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature ( ° C ) FIG . 8B 105 0.20

100 40.57 ° C 4.219 % -0.15 (0.3581mg ) Weight(%) 95 DerivWeight.(%/°C) 3.920 % -0.10 90 ( 0.3327mg) 261.87° C 0.05 85

80 0.00 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 8C U.S. Patent Jan. 28, 9 2020 Sheet 19 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

750

Intensity(Counts) 500

250 Form 9

0 ?.?. hran 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2 - Theta (° ) FIG . 9A 2 364.27 ° C 144.8 / g 0

HeatFlow(W/g) -2

-4

-6 365.79 ° C -8 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature ( ° C ) FIG . 9B U.S. Patent Jan. 28 ,2 2020 Sheet 20 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

100 -0-2823 % 0.7825 % 0.20 30.53 ° C (0.02621mg ) . f (0.07267mg + 100.11 ° C 292.36 ° C 0.15 98 Weight(%) 0.10 Deriv.Weight(%/°C) 96 0.05

94 0.00

92 -0.05 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature ( ° C ) FIG . 9C

DVS Isotherm Plot 0.9 - 0.8 - Cycle 1 Sorp 0.7 --- Cycle 1 Desorp RefMass(%)-ChangeIn 0.6 - 0.54 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 20 40 60 80 100 -0.1 Target % P /PO FIG . 9D U.S. Patent Jan. 28 , 2020 Sheet 21 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

6000

5000 Intensity(Counts) 4000 3000

2000 Form 10 1000 When 0 Luhuhe 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2 - Theta (0 ) FIG . 10A 2 307.99 ° C 234.54 ° C 367.73 ° C 212.86 ° C 33.75J/ g 133.3J/ g 0 34.99J/ g a 301.70 ° C 228.67 ° C 23.75J/ g HeatFlow(W/g) 236.83 ° C -2

-4

-6 369.32 ° C 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature ( ° C ) FIG . 10B U.S. Patent Jan. 28 , 2020 Sheet 22 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

105 0.3 0.5626 % 100 1 (0.1117mg ) 3.783 % (0.7508mg ) 0.2 Weight(%) 95 it Deriv.Weight(%/°C) 7.115 % ( 1.412mg) 90 -0.1

85

80 0.0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 10C

600 500 Intensity(Counts) 400 300 Form 10 * 200 100 0 w 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2 - Theta (0 ) FIG . 10D U.S. Patent Jan. 28 ,2 2020 Sheet 23 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2 2 316.13 ° C 217.79 ° C 237.18 ° C 369.46 ° C 27.79J/ g , 31.34J/ g 124.1J /g th C 313.89 ° C 231.26 ° C 24.32J/ g 240.07 ° C HeatFlow(W/g) -2

-4

371.32 ° C -6 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 10E 700

600

500 Intensity(Counts) 400 300

200 Form 11 100 Wanh wan 0 Wholen 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2 - Theta (0 ) FIG . 11A U.S. Patent Jan. 28, 2020 Sheet 24 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

2 234.94 °C 310.27 °C 219.22 °C 368.02 °C 32.78J /g 134.2J/ g . 232.06 ° C 305.54 ° C 228.43 ° C 27.04J/ g 26.41J/ g -2 HeatFlow(W/g)

-6

369.88 °C -8 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C) FIG . 11B

105 0.3

34.47 ° C 0.7722 % 100 (0.1015mg ) 0.2 101.19° C 14BIOM)(% 7.008 % Deriv.Weight(%/°C) 95 (0.9212mg ) 0.1 248.96 °C -- 90 A

85 -.01 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 11C U.S. Patent Jan. 28, 2 2020 Sheet 25 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2 600

500

400

Intensity(Counts) 300

200 Form 11* 100 Wh mm 0 LO 10 15 20 25 30 35 2 - Theta ( ) FIG . 11D 2 234.99 ° C 310.73 ° C 369.07 ° C 217.05 ° C 132.7J/ g 51.49J/ g . 230.51° C 306.69° C 0 40.94J/ g 28.37J/ g 226.66 ° C HeatFlow(W/g) -2

-4 369.80 ° C -6 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 11E U.S. Patent Jan. 28 , 2020 Sheet 26 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

105 0.20

30.31° C 0.9550 % 0.15 100 (0.1482mg ) † 100.83 ° C -0.10 Weight(%) 7.009 % Deriv.Weight(%/°C) 95 ( 1.088mg) 0.05 250.03 ° C - 90 -0.00

85 -0.05 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C) FIG . 11F

300

250 Intensity(Counts) 200 50 W 100 H 50

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2 -Theta ) FIG . 12A U.S. Patent Jan. 28 , 2020 Sheet 27 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

4

283.84 ° C

2 363.66 ° C 49.50 ° C 138.3J/ g 259.4J/ g HeatFlow(W/g) 282.02 ° C 18.77J/ g

76.22 ° C -2

366.20 ° C -4 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature ( ° C ) FIG . 12B

102 -0.20

100 1.443 % 29.27 ° C 0.1891 % 3 -0.15 (0.1786mg ) ( 0.02342mg) 98 100.83 °C Weight(%) 312.44 °C Deriv.Weight(%/°C) -0.10 96 0.05 94 1

92 -0.00 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 120 U.S. Patent Jan. 28 ,2 2020 Sheet 28 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

5000 4500 4000 3500 IntensityCounts() 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Unhall 5 10 15 Michalkan20 25 30 35 2- Theta ) FIG . 13A 2

362.63 ° C 40.73 ° C 278.23° C 121.3J/ g 252.9J/ g +th O 270.79° C 12.82J/ g HeatFlow(W/g) -2 83.31 ° C

4

365.42° C -6 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 13B U.S. Patent Jan. 28 ,2 2020 Sheet 29 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

100 0.20 33.40 °C 1.874 % (0.1462mg ) -0.15 98 - 100.47° C 0.10 Weight(%) Deriv.Weight(%/°C) 96 0.05 -

1 94 i 0.00

92 -0.05 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (° C ) FIG . 130 DVS Isotherm Plot 18 16 - Cycle 1 Sorp 14 12 Ref-Mass(%)ChangeIn 10 8 6 4 2

0 20 40 60 80 100 Target % P /PO FIG . 13D U.S. Patent Jan. 28 ,2 2020 Sheet 30 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2 1.25

1.00 NormalizedWntActivity 0.75 0.50 EC50 = 2 nM .

0.25

0.00 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 Compound Concentration [UM ] FIG . 14

4

overControl) 3 GeneExpression 2 (FoldChange 1

0 TCF7 C -Myc Axin - 2 Ascl 2 SP5 FIG . 15 U.S. Patent Jan. 28 ,2 2020 Sheet 31 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2 Nile Red 25

20 ** 15 T PositiveObjects 10 5

0 Control 25nM 12.5nM 6.25nM 3.125nM Formula ( I ) Concentration FIG . 16A

Rhodamine B 60 - ** PositiveObjects 40 20

0 Control 25nM 12.5nM 6.25nM 3.125nM Formula ( I ) Concentration FIG . 16B U.S. Patent Jan. 28 ,2 2020 Sheet 32 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

60

Well 40 PositiveObjects/ 20

10 0 30 15 7.5 3.75 1.875 Conc (nM ) n = 6 , Mean + SEM

FIG . 17 U.S. Patent Jan. 28 ,2 2020 Sheet 33 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

Day 21- UP DMSO 10nM 40 30nM FoldChange OverDMSO 20 DI SOX9 Col10A Aggrecan Col2A TGFb1 TIMP1 FIG . 18A

Day 21 -Down DMSO 1.5 z 10nM 30nM 1.0 LI Col1A ALPL BMP4 OsteocaicinFIG . 18B U.S. Patent Jan. 28 ,2 2020 Sheet 34 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

500 MMP1 400 300 FoldChange 200 100 Cytokine 30nM 10nM 3nM 1nM Unstimulated Stimulated FIG . 19A 1000 MMP3 800 600 FoldChange 400 200

o Cytokine 30nM 10nM 3nM 1nM Unstimulated Stimulated FIG . 19B

2000 MMP13 1500 1000 500 0 Cytokine 30nM 10nM 3nM 1nM Unstimulated Stimulated FIG . 19C U.S. Patent Jan. 28 , 2020 Sheet 35 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2 Secreted GAG 8

SecretedGAG(Extracellular /Intracellular)

2

TNFa 4 OM IL1B Formula (1 ) Solo FIG . 20A Nitric Oxide

NORelease(UM) 60

40 - I

0 TNFa + OM IL16 het Formula ( 1) FIG . 20B U.S. Patent Jan. 28 ,2 2020 Sheet 36 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2 IL6 600

500

400 bo ??/6d 300 EC50 24 nM 200

100 o

0 0 und 2 3 4 Log Conc . (nM ) Stimulated with 30ng/ ml IL - 1b FIG . 21A

TNFa 400 350 300 ? 250 ??/6d 200 EC50 35 nM 150 100 ?? 5 50 0 0 1 2 ?? 4 Log Conc . (NM ) Stimulated with 30ng /ml IL - 1b FIG . 21B U.S. Patent Jan. 28 ,2 2020 Sheet 37 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

400 TNFa

300 áo

mlpg/ 200 EC50 ~ 6nM

100 ?? O 100 101 102 103 104 FIG . 22A

IL - 6 600 500

400 w/od 300 O EC50 15 nM 200 100

0 100 101 102 103 104 FIG . 22B U.S. Patent Jan. 28 , 2020 Sheet 38 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

TreatedKnee(0.3ug) 12Weeks IncreasedCartilage FIG.23B

ControlKnee 12Weeks FIG.23A Tibia Femur U.S. Patent Jan. 28 , 2020 Sheet 39 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

0 -5

-10

-15 MeanWOMACTotal BaselinefromChange 104 106 -20

-25 100 102 -30 0 1 2 4 8 12 Time (Weeks ) FIG . 24A

0

-5

-10 114 112 MedianWOMACTotalBaselinefromChange -15 -20 110 -25 108 -30 0 1 2 4 8 12 Time (Weeks ) FIG . 24B U.S. Patent Jan. 28 , 2020 Sheet 40 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

0

- 10 204

-20 1 206 AssessmentPhysicianGlobalMeanBaselineChangefrom -30 202 -40 200

-50 0 1 2 4 8 12 Time (Weeks ) FIG . 25A

0

-10

son -20

1 214 BaselinefromChange -30 MedianPhysicianGlobalAssessment 0 -40 212 210 208 -50 0 1 2 4 12 Time (Weeks ) FIG . 25B U.S. Patent Jan. 28 , 2020 Sheet 41 of 41 US 10,544,139 B2

100 304 80 PercentStrictResponders(%) 70 302 75 % 56 % 306 44 % 30 20

0 Placebo 0.03mg 0.07mg 0.23mg FIG . 26

CME 404 CAB 406 402 CAB MT Image Provided by Chondrometrics GmbH (Ainring , Germany ) FIG . 27 US 10,544,139 B2 1 2 TREATMENT OF OSTEOARTHRITIS wherein themixture comprises a polymorph Form 1 having an X - ray powder diffraction pattern comprising peaks at 20 CROSS -REFERENCE TO RELATED values of 6.8 + 0.2 , 12.4 + 0.2, and 18.5 + 0.2 ; and a non APPLICATIONS stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and 5 about 20 % by weight water; wherein less than about 20 % by This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Appli weight of the amount of the compound of Formula ( I) in the cation Ser . No. 62 /252,332 , filed on Nov. 6 , 2015 , and composition is polymorph Form 9 having X - ray powder 62 /303,168 , filed on Mar. 3, 2016 , both of which are diffraction pattern comprising peaks at ° 20 values of incorporated by reference in their entireties. 4.9 + 0.2 , 18.6 + 0.2 , and 21.1 + 0.2 . 10 Also provided herein is a pharmaceutical composition TECHNICAL FIELD comprising a compound of Formula (I ) , wherein the com pound of Formula ( 1) is substantially present as a non This description relates to compositions and methods for stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and treating osteoarthritis including administration of a com about 20 % by weight water ; and a pharmaceutically accept pound of Formula (I ) , including polymorph and amorphous 15 able carrier ; wherein less than about 20 % by weight of the forms thereof. For example , provided herein are methods for amount of the compound of Formula (I ) in the composition treating osteoarthritis including administration , such as is polymorph Form 9 having X - ray powder diffraction intra - articular administration , of compositions prepared pattern comprising peaks at ° 20 values of 4.9 + 0.2 , 18.6 + 0.2 , from and /or including compounds of Formula (I ) , including and 21.1 + 0.2 . polymorph and amorphous forms thereof. 20 Also provided herein is a pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of Formula (I ) , wherein the com BACKGROUND pound of Formula (I ) is substantially present as polymorph Form 1 having an X -ray powder diffraction pattern com Osteoarthritis is a chronic degenerative joint disease in prising peaks at O 20 values of 6.8 + 0.2 , 12.4 + 0.2 , and which cartilage and bone are primarily affected and for 25 18.5 + 0.2 ; and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier; which acceptable long -term therapy does not yet exist . wherein less than about 20 % by weight of the amount of the Osteoarthritis is especially common among people over 50 compound of Formula ( I ) in the composition is polymorph years of age , and usually affects a joint on one side of the Form 9 having X - ray powder diffraction pattern comprising body . In osteoarthritis , the cartilage breaks down and wears peaks at 0 20 values of 4.9 + 0.2 , 18.6 + 0.2 , and 21.120.2 . away, causing pain , swelling, and loss of motion of the joint. 30 Also provided herein is a pharmaceutical composition Osteoarthritis of the knee can be unilateral, which affects prepared by a process comprising mixing a pharmaceutically just one knee joint in an individual, or bilateral, which acceptable carrier and one or more polymorphs of a com affects both knees in the same individual. Reported preva pound of Formula ( I ) , wherein the polymorphs are selected lence of unilateral osteoarthritis has ranged from 12.6 % from the group consisting of a polymorph Form 1 having an 34.1 % in individuals with osteoarthritis (Ann . Rheum . Dis . 35 X - ray powder diffraction pattern comprising peaks at ° 20 ( 1998 ) , 57 ( 12 ), 717-723 and Joint Bone Spine ( 2011) , 78 ( 3 ) , values of 6.8 + 0.2 , 12.4 + 0.2 , and 18.5 + 0.2 ; a non - stoichio 275-278 ] . To date, clinical efforts aimed at treating osteoar metric hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % thritis have been primarily directed toward symptomatic by weight water ; wherein less than about 20 % by weight of relief of pain and inflammation . the amount of the compound of Formula (I ) is polymorph 40 Form 9 having X - ray powder diffraction pattern comprising SUMMARY peaks at ° 20 values of 4.9 + 0.2 , 18.6 + 0.2 , and 21.120.2 . Also provided herein is a process for preparing a poly Provided herein are methods for treating osteoarthritis in morph of a compound of Formula (I ) , wherein the poly a subject in need thereof, the methods comprising intra morph is Form 1 and has an X - ray powder diffraction pattern articular administration of a pharmaceutical composition 45 comprising peaks at ° 20 values of 6.8 + 0.2 , 12.4 + 0.2 , and comprising a therapeutically effective amount of a com 18.5 + 0.2 ; wherein the process comprises drying a compound pound of Formula (I ) , including amorphous and polymorph of Formula ( I) to Form 1 . forms thereof. Also provided herein is a process for preparing a poly Also provided herein is a method for treating osteoarthri morph of a compound of Formula (I ) , wherein the poly tis in a subject in need thereof, the method comprising 50 morph is a non - stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 having intra- articular administration of a pharmaceutical composi between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water ; wherein the tion comprising a therapeutically effective amount of a process comprises reslurrying a compound of Formula (I ) in compound of Formula ( I ) , wherein the compound of For an aqueous solution . mula (I ) is substantially present as polymorph Form 13 Also provided herein is a method for treating osteoarthri having an X - ray powder diffraction pattern comprising 55 tis in a subject in need thereof, the method comprising peaks at ° 20 values of 6.4 + 0.2 , 11.0 + 0.2 , and 18.4 + 0.2 . intraarticular administration of a pharmaceutical composi Also provided herein is a composition comprising a tion comprising a therapeutically effective amount of a polymorph of a compound of Formula ( I ) , wherein the compound of Formula (1 ), or a pharmaceutically acceptable polymorph is Form 1 and has an X - ray powder diffraction salt thereof; wherein the compound of Formula (1 ) is sub pattern comprising peaks at ° 20 values of 6.8 : 0.2 , 12.4 + 0.2 , 60 stantially present as a non -stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 and 18.5 + 0.2 ; and wherein less than about 20 % by weight of having between 1 % and 20 % by weight water . the amount of the compound of Formula ( I) in the compo Also provided herein is a composition comprising a sition is polymorph Form 9 having X - ray powder diffraction polymorph of a compound of Formula (1 ), wherein the pattern comprising peaks atº 20 values of 4.9 + 0.2 , 18.6 + 0.2 , polymorph is a non -stoichiometric hydrate and has an X - ray and 21.120.2 . 65 powder diffraction pattern comprising peaks atº 20 values Also provided herein is a composition comprising a of 6.4 + 0.2 , 11.0 : 0.2 , and 18.4 + 0.2 ; and wherein less than mixture of polymorphs of a compound of Formula ( I) : about 20 % by weight of the amount of the compound of US 10,544,139 B2 3 4 Formula ( I) in the composition is polymorph Form 9 having FIG . 2G is an X -ray powder diffraction scan of Form 2 ** . X - ray powder diffraction pattern comprising peaks at ° 20 FIG . 2H is a differential scanning calorimetry scan of Form values of 4.9 + 0.2 , 18.6 + 0.2 , and 21.120.2 . 2 ** . Also provided herein is a pharmaceutical composition FIGS. 3A - 3C are scans of polymorph Form 3 of the comprising a compound of Formula ( I) , wherein the com- 5 compound of Formula ( 1) . FIG . 3A is an X -ray powder pound of Formula (1 ) is substantially present as a non diffraction scan of fully dried Form 3. FIG . 3B is a differ stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and ential scanning calorimetry scan of Form 3. FIG . 3C is a about 20 % by weight water; and a pharmaceutically accept thermal gravimetric analysis scan of Form 3 . able carrier ; wherein less than about 20 % by weight of the FIGS. 4A -41 are scans of polymorph Forms 4 , 4 * , and 4 ** amount of the compound of Formula ( I) in the composition 10 of the compound of Formula (I ) . FIG . 4A is an X - ray powder is polymorph Form 9 having X - ray powder diffraction diffraction scan of fully dried Form 4. FIG . 4B is a differ pattern comprising peaks atº 20 values of 4.9 + 0.2 , 18.6 + 0.2 , ential scanning calorimetry scan of Form 4. FIG . 4C is a and 21.1 + 0.2 . thermal gravimetric analysis scan of Form 4. FIG . 4D is an Also provided herein is a pharmaceutical composition 15 X - ray powder diffraction scan of fully dried Form 4 * . FIG . prepared by a process comprising mixing a pharmaceutically 4E is a differential scanning calorimetry scan of Form 4 * . acceptable carrier and one or more polymorphs of a com FIG . 4F is a thermal gravimetric analysis scan of Form 4 * . pound of Formula ( I ) , wherein the polymorphs are selected FIG . 4G is an X - ray powder diffraction scan of Form 4 ** . from the group consisting of a polymorph Form 1 having an FIG . 4H is a differential scanning calorimetry scan of Form X - ray powder diffraction pattern comprising peaks at ° 20 20 4 ** . FIG . 41 is a thermal gravimetric analysis scan of Form values of 6.8 + 0.2 , 12.4 + 0.2 , and 18.5 + 0.2 ; a non -stoichio 4 ** . metric hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % FIGS. 5A -5D are scans of polymorph Forms 5 and 5 * of by weight ater; and mixtures thereof; the compound of Formula ( I ). FIG . 5A is an X - ray powder wherein less than about 20 % by weight of the amount of the diffraction scan of fully dried Form 5. FIG . 5B is a differ compound of Formula ( I) is polymorph Form 9 having 25 ential scanning calorimetry scan of Form 5. FIG . 5C is a X -ray powder diffraction pattern comprising peaks at ° 20 thermal gravimetric analysis scan of Form 5. FIG . 5D is an values of 4.9 + 0.2 , 18.6 + 0.2 , and 21.120.2 . X - ray powder diffraction scan of Form 5 * . FIGS. 6A and 6B are scans of polymorph Form 6 of the A compound of Formula (I ) has the structure : compound of Formula ( I ) . FIG . 6A is an X -ray powder 30 diffraction scan of Form 6. FIG . 6B is a differential scanning calorimetry scan of Form 6 . F FIGS. 7A -7C are scans of polymorph Form 7 of the compound of Formula ( I ). FIG . 7A is an X - ray powder diffraction scan of fully dried Form 7. FIG . 7B is a differ N 35 ential scanning calorimetry scan of Form 7. FIG . 7C is a thermal gravimetric analysis scan of Form 7 . NH FIGS. 8A -8C are scans of polymorph Form 8 of the compound of Formula ( I) . FIG . 8A is an X -ray powder N diffraction scan of fully dried Form 8. FIG . 8B is a differ NH 40 ential scanning calorimetry scan of Form 8. FIG . 8C is a thermal gravimetric analysis scan of Form 8 . FIGS. 9A - 9D are scans of polymorph Form 9 of the compound of Formula ( I ) . FIG . 9A is an X -ray powder diffraction scan of fully dried Form 9. FIG . 9B is a differ 45 ential scanning calorimetry scan of Form 9. FIG . 9C is a thermal gravimetric analysis scan of Form 9. FIG . 9D is a Other features and advantages of the compositions, meth dynamic vapor sorption scan of Form 9 . ods and uses provided herein will be apparent from the FIGS. 10A - 10E are scans of polymorph Forms 10 and 10 * following detailed description and figures, and from the of the compound of Formula (I ) . FIG . 10A is an X - ray claims . 50 powder diffraction scan of fully dried Form 10. FIG . 10B is a differential scanning calorimetry scan of Form 10. FIG . DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS 10C is a thermal gravimetric analysis scan of Form 10. FIG . 10D is an X - ray powder diffraction scan of Form 10 * . FIG . FIGS . 1A - 1D are scans of polymorph Form 1 of the 10E is a differential scanning calorimetry scan of Form 10 * . compound of Formula ( I) . FIG . 1A is an x -ray powder 55 FIGS. 11A - 11F are scans ofpolymorph Forms 11 and 11 * diffraction scan of fully dried Form 1. FIG . 1B is a differ of the compound of Formula ( I) . FIG . 11A is an X - ray ential scanning calorimetry scan of Form 1. FIG . 1C is a powder diffraction scan of fully dried Form 11. FIG . 11B is thermal gravimetric analysis scan of Form 1. FIG . ID is a a differential scanning calorimetry scan of Form 11. FIG . dynamic vapor sorption scan of Form 1. 11C is a thermal gravimetric analysis scan of Form 11. FIG . FIGS . 2A - 2H are scans of polymorph Forms 2 , 2 * , and 60 11D is an x - ray powder diffraction scan of fully dried Form 2 ** of the compound of Formula (I ) . FIG . 2A is an X -ray 11* . FIG . 11E is a differential scanning calorimetry scan of powder diffraction scan of fully dried Form 2. FIG . 2B is a Form 11 * . differential scanning calorimetry scan of Form 2. FIG . 2C is FIG . 11F is a thermal gravimetric analysis scan of Form a thermal gravimetric analysis scan of Form 2. FIG . 2D is an 11 * . FIGS. 12A - 12C are scans of Form 12 , an example of a X - ray powder diffraction scan of fully dried Form 2 * . FIG . 65 non - stoichiometric hydrate of polymorph Form 1 of the 2E is a differential scanning calorimetry scan of Form 2 * . compound of Formula ( I) . FIG . 12A is an X - ray powder FIG . 2F is a thermal gravimetric analysis scan of Form 2 * . diffraction scan of Form 12. FIG . 12B is a differential US 10,544,139 B2 5 6 scanning calorimetry scan of Form 12. FIG . 12C is a thermal references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in gravimetric analysis scan of Form 12 . their entirety . In case of conflict, the present specification , FIGS . 13A - 13D are scans of Form 13 , an example of a including definitions, will control. non - stoichiometric hydrate of polymorph Form 1 of the The term “ administration” or “ administering” refers to a compound of Formula ( I) . FIG . 13B is a differential scan 5 method of giving a dosage of a compound or pharmaceutical ning calorimetry scan of Form 13. FIG . 13C is a thermal composition to a vertebrate or invertebrate , including a gravimetric analysis scan of Form 13. FIG . 13D is a dynamic mammal, a bird , a fish , or an amphibian . The preferred vapor sorption scan of Form 13 . method of administration can vary depending on various FIG . 14 is a line graph showing Wnt activity vs. concen factors , e.g., the components of the pharmaceutical compo tration of the compound of Formula ( I) . 10 sition , the site of the disease , and the severity of the disease . FIG . 15 is a bar graph showing expression of various Wnt The term “mammal ” is used herein in its usual biological genes as compared to control after treatment with the sense . Thus , it specifically includes, e.g. , humans , cattle , compound of Formula ( I ) . horses , dogs, and cats , but also includes many other species. FIGS . 16A -B are bar graphs showing chondrogenesis . The term “ pharmaceutically acceptable carrier " or " phar FIG . 16A shows chondrogenesis in cells stained with Nile 15 maceutically acceptable excipient” includes any and all Red and treated with the compound of Formula ( I ) . FIG . 16B solvents , co - solvents , complexing agents , dispersion media , shows chondrogenesis in cells stained with Rhodamine B. coatings , antibacterial and antifungal agents , isotonic and FIG . 17 is a line graph showing a dose -dependent increase absorption delaying agents , and the like, which are not in chondrogenesis in cells treated with the compound of biologically or otherwise undesirable . The use of such media Formula (I ) . 20 and agents for pharmaceutically active substances is well FIGS. 18A - B are bar graphs showing chondrogenesis in known in the art . Except insofar as any conventionalmedia cells treated with the compound of Formula (I ) . FIG . 18A or agent is incompatible with the active ingredient , its use in shows upregulated chondrogenic gene expression . FIG . 18B the therapeutic compositions is contemplated . Supplemen shows downregulated osteogenic gene expression . tary active ingredients can also be incorporated into the FIGS . 19A - C are bar graphs showing inhibition of pro- 25 compositions. In addition, various excipients , such as are tease release in cells treated with the compound of Formula commonly used in the art, can be included . These and other ( I ) . FIG . 19A shows MMP1 production . FIG . 19B shows such compounds are described in the literature , e.g., in the MMP3 production . FIG . 19C shows MMP13 production . Merck Index , Merck & Company, Rahway, N.J. Consider FIGS. 20A - B are bar graphs showing the immunosup ations for the inclusion of various components in pharma pressive activity of the compound of Formula ( I) in human 30 ceutical compositions are described , e.g., in Gilman et al. mesenchymal stem cells stimulated with TNF- a and ( Eds. ) ( 2010 ) ; Goodman and Gilman's : The Pharmacologi oncostatin M or IL - 1B . FIG . 20A shows levels of secreted cal Basis of Therapeutics , 12th Ed ., The McGraw -Hill GAG . FIG . 20B shows levels of released nitric oxide . Companies . FIGS. 21A - B are line graphs showing the immunosup “ Patient, ” as used herein , means a human or a non -human pressive activity of the compound of Formula ( I) in synovial 35 mammal , e.g. , a dog , a cat, a mouse , a rat , a cow , a sheep , fibroblasts . FIG . 21A shows inhibition of TNF - a . FIG . 21B a pig, a goat, a non -human primate or a bird , e.g., a chicken , shows inhibition of IL - 6 . as well as any other vertebrate or invertebrate . In some FIG . 22A - B are line graphs showing the immunosuppres embodiments , the patient is a human . sive activity of the compound of Formula (I ) in THP - 1 By “ therapeutically effective amount” or “ pharmaceuti monocytes . FIG . 22A shows inhibition of TNF - a . FIG . 22B 40 cally effective amount” of a compound as provided herein is shows inhibition of IL -6 . an amount which is sufficient to achieve the desired effect FIG . 23A shows a safranin O - stained section of a rat knee and can vary according to the nature and severity of the of a control knee after 12 weeks . FIG . 23B shows a safranin disease condition , and the potency of the compound . A O - stained section of a knee treated with 0.3 ug of Form 1 of therapeutic effect is the relief , to some extent , ofone or more the compound of Formula ( I ) after 12 weeks. 45 of the symptoms of the disease, and can include curing a FIGS . 24A and 24B are line graphs depicting mean disease . “ Curing ” means that the symptomsof active disease WOMAC total score vs. time and median WOMAC total are eliminated . However , certain long - term or permanent score vs. time. effects of the disease can exist even after a cure is obtained FIGS. 25A and 25B are line graphs depicting mean (such as , e.g. , extensive tissue damage ) . physician global assessment vs. time and median physician 50 “ Treat , ” “ treatment, ” or “ treating ," as used herein , refers global assessment vs. time. to administering a compound or pharmaceutical composi FIG . 26 is a bar graph of the percentage of strict respond tion , e.g. , formulation , as provided herein for therapeutic ers for each dosing cohort and a placebo group . purposes . The term “ therapeutic treatment” refers to admin FIG . 27 is an MM of a human knee joint. istering treatment to a patient already suffering from a 55 disease , thus causing a therapeutically beneficial effect , such DETAILED DESCRIPTION as ameliorating existing symptoms, preventing additional symptoms, ameliorating the underlying metabolic causes of 1. Definitions symptoms, postponing or preventing the further develop Unless otherwise defined , all technical and scientific ment of a disorder and /or reducing the severity of symptoms terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly 60 that will or are expected to develop . understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this The term “ polymorph , ” as used herein , refers to crystals disclosure belongs. Methods and materials are described of the samemolecule having different physical properties as herein for use in the present disclosure ; other, suitable a result of the order of the molecules in the crystal lattice . methods and materials known in the art can also be used . Polymorphs of a single compound have one or more differ The materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only 65 ent chemical, physical , mechanical , electrical, thermody and not intended to be limiting . All publications, patent namic , and /or biological properties from each other . Differ applications, patents , sequences , database entries, and other ences in physical properties exhibited by polymorphs can US 10,544,139 B2 7 8 affect pharmaceutical parameters such as storage stability , In some embodiments the % water by weight in a crystal compressibility , density ( important in composition and prod form , such as a non - stoichiometric hydrate , is determined by uct manufacturing ), dissolution rates ( an important factor in the Karl Fischer titration method . In some embodiments , the determining bio - availability ), solubility , melting point, crystal form is dried prior to Karl Fischer titration . chemical stability , physical stability , powder flowability , 5 “ Purity, ” when used in reference to a composition includ water sorption , compaction , and particle morphology. Dif ing a polymorph of a compound of Formula ( I ), refers to the percentage of one specific polymorph form relative to ferences in stability can result from changes in chemical another polymorph form or an amorphous form of a com reactivity ( e.g. differential oxidation , such that a dosage pound of Formula (I ) in the referenced composition . For form discolors more rapidly when comprised of one poly 10 example , a composition comprising polymorph Form 1 morph than when comprised of another polymorph ) or having a purity of 90 % would comprise 90 weight parts mechanical changes ( e.g. , crystal changes on storage as a Form 1 and 10 weight parts of other polymorph and /or kinetically favored polymorph converts to a thermodynami amorphous forms of the compound of Formula ( I ) . cally more stable polymorph ) or both ( e.g., one polymorph As used herein , a compound or composition is “ substan is more hygroscopic than the other ). As a result of solubility / 15 tially free of one or more other components if the com dissolution differences, some transitions affect potency and / pound or composition contains no significant amount of or toxicity . In addition , the physical properties of the crystal such other components . Such components can include start may be important in processing; for example , one poly ing materials , residual solvents , or any other impurities that morph might be more likely to form solvates or might be can result from the preparation of and /or isolation of the difficult to filter and wash free of impurities ( i.e., particle 20 compounds and compositions provided herein . In some shape and size distribution might be different between one embodiments , a polymorph form provided herein is substan polymorph relative to the other ). “ Polymorph ” does not tially free of other polymorph forms. In some embodiments , include amorphous forms of the compound . As used herein , a particular polymorph of the compound of Formula (I ) is “ amorphous ” refers to a non - crystalline form of a compound “ substantially free ” of other polymorphs if the particular which may be a solid state form of the compound or a 25 polymorph constitutes at least about 95 % by weight of the solubilized form of the compound . For example , " amor compound of Formula (1 ) present. In some embodiments , a phous” refers to a compound without a regularly repeating particular polymorph of the compound of Formula ( I) is arrangement of molecules or external face planes . " substantially free" of other polymorphs if the particular The term “ anhydrous, " as used herein , refers to a crystal polymorph constitutes at least about 97 % , about 98 % , about form of the compound of Formula ( I ) that has 1 % or less by 30 99 % , or about 99.5 % by weight of the compound of Formula weight water. For example , 0.5 % or less , 0.25 % or less, or ( I ) present. In certain embodiments , a particular polymorph 0.1 % or less by weight water . of the compound of Formula ( 1) is “ substantially free” of The term “ solvate ” as used herein refers to a crystalline water if the amount of water constitutes no more than about form of a compound of Formula ( I) , such as a polymorph 2 % , about 1 % , or about 0.5 % by weight of the polymorph . form of the compound , where the crystal lattice comprises 35 As used herein , a compound is “ substantially present ” as one or more solvents of crystallization . a given polymorph if at least about 50 % by weight of the The term “ non - stoichiometric hydrate ” refers to a crys compound is in the form of that polymorph . In some talline form of a compound of Formula I that comprises embodiments , at least about 60 % by weight of the com water, but wherein variations in the water content do not pound is in the form of that polymorph . In some embodi cause significant changes to the crystal structure. In some 40 ments , at least about 70 % by weight of the compound is in embodiments , a non -stoichiometric hydrate can refer to a the form of that polymorph . In some embodiments , at least crystalline form of a compound of Formula I that has about 80 % by weight of the compound is in the form of that channels or networks throughout the crystal structure into polymorph . In some embodiments , at least about 90 % by which water molecules can diffuse . During drying of non weight of the compound is in the form of that polymorph . In stoichiometric hydrates, a considerable proportion of water 45 some embodiments , at least about 95 % by weight of the can be removed without significantly disturbing the crystal compound is in the form of that polymorph . In some network , and the crystals can subsequently rehydrate to give embodiments , at least about 96 % by weight of the com the initial non - stoichiometric hydrated crystalline form . pound is in the form of that polymorph . In some embodi Unlike stoichiometric hydrates, the dehydration and rehy ments , at least about 97 % by weight of the compound is in dration of non - stoichiometric hydrates is not accompanied 50 the form of that polymorph . In some embodiments , at least by a phase transition , and thus all hydration states of a about 98 % by weight of the compound is in the form of that non - stoichiometric hydrate represent the same crystal form . polymorph . In some embodiments , at least about 99 % by In some embodiments , a non - stoichiometric hydrate can weight of the compound is in the form of that polymorph . In have up to about 20 % by weight water, such as , about 20 % , some embodiments , at least about 99.5 % by weight of the about 19 % , about 18 % , about 17 % , about 16 % , about 15 % , 55 compound is in the form of that polymorph . about 14 % , about 13 % , about 12 % , about 11 % , about 10 % , “ Room temperature ” or “ RT” refers to the ambient tem about 9 % , about 8 % , about 7 % , about 6 % , about 5 % , about perature of a typical laboratory , which is typically around 4 % , about 3 % , about 2 % , or greater than 1 % water by 25 ° C. weight . In some embodiments , a non - stoichiometric hydrate “ Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis can have between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water , such 60 Index ” or “WOMAC ” refers to a widely used , proprietary as between 1 % and about 5 % , 1 % and about 10 % , 1 % and set of standardized questionnaires used by health profes about 15 % , about 2 % and about 5 % , about 2 % and about sionals to evaluate the condition of patients with osteoar 10 % , about 2 % and about 15 % , about 2 % and about 20 % , thritis of the knee and hip , including pain , stiffness , and about 5 % and about 10 % , about 5 % and about 15 % , about physical functioning of the joints . The WOMAC has also 5 % and about 20 % , about 10 % and about 15 % , about 10 % 65 been used to assess back pain , rheumatoid arthritis , juvenile and about 20 % , or about 15 % and about 20 % by weight rheumatoid arthritis , systemic lupus erythematosus, and water . fibromyalgia . It can be self -administered and was developed US 10,544,139 B2 9 10 at Western Ontario and McMaster Universities in 1982. The substantially free of other forms of the compound of For WOMAC measures five items for pain (score range 0-20 ), mula (1 ) . For example , in some embodiments, the compo two for stiffness ( score range 0-8 ) , and 17 for functional sition is substantially free of other anhydrous forms of the limitation ( score range 0-68) . Physical functioning questions compound of Formula ( I) . In some embodiments , the com cover everyday activities such as stair use , standing up from 5 position contains less than about 15 % by weight of other a sitting or lying position , standing , bending , walking , forms of the compound of Formula ( I ) . For example , the getting in and out of a car , shopping , putting on or taking off composition can contain less than 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , 11 % , socks, lying in bed , getting in or out of a bath , sitting, and 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or less by heavy and lighthousehold duties . weight of other anhydrous forms of the compound of 2. Polymorphs 10 Formula (1 ) . In some embodiments , the composition con tains less than about 15 % by weight of the polymorph Form Provided herein is a compound of Formula (1 ) : 9. For example , the composition can contain less than 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , I 1 % or less by weight of the polymorph of Form 9. In some F 15 embodiments , the composition contains less than about 15 % by weight of one or more other forms of the compound of Formula ( I) , such as less than 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , 11 % , 10 % , N 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or less by weight of one ormore other forms of the compound of Formula (I ). NH 20 For example , the composition can contain less than about 15 % of Form 2 , Form 3 , Form 4 , Form 5 , Form 6 , Form 7, Form 8 , Form 9 , Form 10 , Form 11 , a non - stoichiometric NH hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water, or a combination of two or more thereof. 25 In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph N Form 1 that exhibits an endotherm between about 50-1000 C. as measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC ) related to sorbed water. In some embodiments , polymorph Form 1 exhibits a recrystallization event that is observed including amorphous and polymorph forms thereof. 30 between about 270-290 ° C., e.g., around 280º C. In some The compound of Formula (I ) provided herein can be embodiments , the endotherm and exotherm are observed prepared using methods known and understood by those of when using a scan rate of 10 ° C. per minute . ordinary skill in the art . For example , synthetic methods In some embodim ats , provided herein is polymorph such as those described in US 2013/0267495 can be used , Form 1 that recrystallizes into Form 9 with a melting point and this application is herein incorporated by reference in its 35 of around 363 ° C. In some embodiments , polymorph Form entirety . 1 undergoes a totalmass loss of about 0.33 % before around Also provided herein are polymorph forms of the com 100 ° C., e.g. , from about 39 ° C. to about 100 ° C., as pound of Formula (I ). The forms include , e.g., solvates , measured by thermal gravimetric analysis ( TGA ) . hydrates , non - stoichiometric hydrates , and non - solvated Provided herein are methods of preparing polymorph forms of the compound of Formula (I ) , including , for 40 Form 1. In some embodiments , the method comprises drying example , polymorph Forms 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , a composition comprising the compound of Formula ( I) , 12 , and 13 . including amorphous and polymorph forms thereof, to gen One such polymorph is a polymorph known as Form 1 . erate polymorph Form 1. In some embodiments , the com Form 1 is an anhydrous polymorph of the compound of position comprises a non -stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 Formula ( I ) . In one embodiment, Form 1 has an X -ray 45 having between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water . In some powder diffraction (XRPD or XRD ) pattern , obtained with embodiments , the method comprises reslurrying a compo CuKal- radiation , with at least peaks at o 20 values of sition comprising the compound of Formula ( I) , including 6.8 + 0.2 , 12.4-0.2 , and 18.5 + 0.2 . In some embodiments, amorphous and polymorph forms thereof, in a solvent or Form 1 has an XRPD pattern with at least peaks at ° 20 mixture of solvents to generate polymorph Form 1 as a values of 6.8 + 0.2 , 12.4 + 0.2 , 16.5 + 0.2 , 18.5 + 0.2 , and 50 residual solid . In some embodiments , the reslurrying takes 19.220.2 . In some embodiments , Form 1 has an XRPD place at room temperature (RT ) . In some embodiments , the pattern with at least peaks atº 20 values of 6.8 + 0.2 , 9.3 + 0.2 , reslurrying takes place at around 50 ° C. In some embodi 12.4 + 0.2 , 13.9 + 0.2 , 16.5 + 0.2 , 18.5 + 0.2 , 19.2 + 0.2 , and ments , the method further comprises drying the residual 24.6 + 0.2 . For example , in some embodiments , Form 1 has solid , for example , under vacuum . In some embodiments , an XRPD pattern with at least peaks at ° 20 values of 55 the drying is at a temperature of between about 60 ° C. and 6.830.2 , 9.3 0.2 , 12.4 + 0.2 , 13.9 + 0.2 , 14.5 + 0.2 , 16.5 + 0.2 , 90 ° C., such as, e.g., around 75 ° C. 18.5 + 0.2 , 19.2 + 0.2 , 20.3 + 0.2 , and 24.6 + 0.2 . In some embodiments , the method comprises reslurrying In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition a composition comprising the compound of Formula ( 1 ) , comprising polymorph Form 1. In some embodiments , the including amorphous and polymorph forms thereof in a composition can be substantially pure. For example , the 60 solvent or mixture of solvents to generate polymorph Form composition has a purity of at least about 90 % . In some 1 as a residual solid . In some embodiments , the compound embodiments , the composition has a purity of at least about of Formula (I ) is a non - stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 95 % . In some embodiments , the composition has a purity of having between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water. In some at least about 98 % . For example , the composition can have embodiments , the solvent is methanol. In some embodi a purity of at least 98.5 % , 98.6 % , 98.7 % , 98.8 % , 98.9 % , 65 ments , the solvent is toluene . In some embodiments , the 99 % , 99.1 % , 99.2 % , 99.3 % , 99.4 % , 99.5 % , 99.6 % , 99.7 % , solvent is heptane. In some embodiments , the solvent is 99.8 % , or 99.9 % . In some embodiments , the composition is dichloromethane (DCM ). In some embodiments , the solvent US 10,544,139 B2 11 12 is water . In some embodiments , the solvent is in a mixture Form 5 , Form 6 , Form 7 , Form 8 , Form 9 , Form 10 , Form with water , for example the solvent can be a mixture of 11 , or a combination of two or more thereof. water and acetonitrile , methanol , ethyl acetate (EA ) ,methyl Another example of a non - stoichiometric hydrate of poly tert -butyl ether (MtBE ) , isopropyl alcohol ( IPAC ) , methyl morph Form 1 is referred to as Form 12. Form 12 is a acetate (MA ), methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK ), DCM , n -bu- 5 non - stoichiometric hydrate of polymorph Form 1 that has tyl acetate , heptane, toluene, or n -butanol . In some embodi 1.42 % water by weight. ments , the water is present in an amount of about 5 % by In one embodiment, provided herein is a polymorph Form weight. In some embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at 12 having an XRPD pattern , obtained with CuKal -radiation , room temperature . In some embodiments , the reslurrying with at least peaks at º 20 positions 6.4 + 0.2 , 11.0 + 0.2 , and takes place at around 50 ° C. In some embodiments , the 10 pattern18.4 :0.2 with. In atsome least peaksembodiments atº 20 positions , Form 12 6.4 has: 0.2 an , 9.2 XRPD £ 0.2 , method further comprises drying the residual solid , for 11.0 + 0.2 , 18.4 + 0.2 , and 19.7 + 0.2 . In some embodiments , example , under vacuum . In some embodiments , the drying Form 12 has an XRPD pattern with at least peaks at ° 20 is at a temperature of between about 60 ° C. and 90 ° C., such positions 6.4 + 0.2 , 9.2 + 0.2 , 11.0 : 0.2 , 15.6 + 0.2 , 18.4 + 0.2 , as, e.g., around 75º C. 15 19.7 + 0.2 , 24.4 + 0.2 , and 25.2 + 0.2 . For example , in some Provided herein is a non - stoichiometric hydrate of Form embodiments , Form 12 has an XRPD pattern with at least 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water. In peaks at º 20 positions 6.4 + 0.2 , 9.2 + 0.2 , 11.0 + 0.2 , 15.6 + 0.2 , some embodiments , for example , above 30 % relative 16.120.2 , 18.430.2 , 19.7 + 0.2 , 20.8 + 0.2 , 24.4 + 0.2 , and humidity (RH ) , Form 1 readily sorbs water and shows a 25.2 + 0.2 . distinctive shift in Form 1 peaks from 6.8 + 0.2 to 6.2-0.2 and 20 In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph 12.6 + 0.2 to 11 + 0.2 . In some embodiments, a non - stoichio Form 12 that exhibits an endotherm between about 50-100 ° metric hydrate of Form 1 comprises up to about 20 % by C. as measured by DSC . In some embodiments , polymorph weight water. For example , up to about 20 % , about 19 % , Form 12 exhibits an exotherm at around 283 ° C. In some about 18 % , about 17 % , about 16 % , about 15 % , about 14 % , embodiments , the endotherms and exotherms are observed about 13 % , about 12 % , about 11 % , about 10 % , about 9 % , 25 when using a scan rate of 10 ° C. per minute . about 8 % , about 7 % , about 6 % , about 5 % , about 4 % , about In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph 3 % , about 2 % , or greater than 1 % water by weight. In some Form 12 that has a melting point of around 364 ° C. In some embodiments , a non -stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 has embodiments , polymorph Form 12 undergoes a weight loss between 1 to about 20 % water by weight, e.g. , between 1 % of about 1.4 % before around 100 ° C., e.g. , from about 30 ° and about 10 % , about 5 % and about 15 % , about 10 % and 30 C. to about 100 ° C., as measured by TGA . about 20 % , 1 % and about 5 % , about 5 % and about 10 % , One example of a non - stoichiometric hydrate of poly about 10 % and about 15 % , about 15 % and about 20 % , or morph Form 1 is referred to as Form 13. Form 13 is a about 17 % and about 20 % water by weight. non - stoichiometric hydrate of polymorph Form 1 that has In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition 1.84 % water by weight. comprising a non - stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 having 35 In one embodiment, provided herein is polymorph Form between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water . In some 13 having an XRPD pattern , obtained with CuKal - radia embodiments , the composition is substantially pure . For tion , with at least peaks atº 20 values of 6.8 : 0.2 , 12.4 + 0.2 , example , the composition can have a purity of at least about and 18.5 + 0.2 . In some embodiments, Form 13 has an XRPD 90 % . In some embodiments , the composition has a purity of pattern with at least peaks at º 20 values of 6.8 + 0.2 , at least about 95 % . In some embodiments , the composition 40 12.4 + 0.2 , 16.5 + 0.2 , 18.5 + 0.2 , and 19.2 + 0.2 . In some has a purity of at least about 98 % . For example , the embodiments , Form 13 has an XRPD pattern with at least composition can have a purity of at least 98.5 % , 98.6 % , peaks atº 20 values of 6.8 + 0.2 , 9.30.2 , 12.4-0.2 , 13.9 + 0.2 , 98.7 % , 98.8 % , 98.9 % , 99 % , 99.1 % , 99.2 % , 99.3 % , 99.4 % , 16.5 + 0.2 , 18.5 + 0.2 , 19.2 + 0.2 , and 24.6 + 0.2 . For example , in 99.5 % , 99.6 % , 99.7 % , 99.8 % , or 99.9 % . In some embodi some embodiments , Form 13 has an XRPD pattern with at ments , the composition is substantially free of other forms of 45 least peaks at ° 20 values of 6.8 :0.2 , 9.3 + 0.2 , 12.4 + 0.2 , the compound of Formula (I ). For example , in some embodi 13.9 + 0.2 , 14.5 + 0.2 , 16.5 + 0.2 , 18.5 + 0.2 , 19.220.2 , 20.3 + 0.2 , ments , the composition is substantially free of anhydrous and 24.6 + 0.2 . forms of the compound of Formula ( I) . In some embodi In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph ments , the composition contains less than 15 % by weight of Form 13 that exhibits an endotherm between about 50-100 ° other forms of the compound of Formula ( I ), such as less 50 C. as measured by DSC . In some embodiments , polymorph than 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , Form 13 exhibits an exotherm at between about 265-2850 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or less by weight of other forms of the C., e.g., around 278 ° C. For example , in some embodiments , compound of Formula (I ) ( e.g. , anhydrous forms of the the endotherms and exotherms are observed when using a compound of Formula ( 1 )) . In some embodiments , the scan rate of 10 ° C. per minute . composition contains less than 20 % by weight of polymorph 55 In some embodiments, provided herein is polymorph Form 9 having X - ray powder diffraction pattern comprising Form 13 that has a melting point of around 363 ° C . In some peaks atº 20 values of 4.9 + 0.2 , 18.6 + 0.2 , and 21.1 + 0.2 . For embodiments , polymorph Form 13 undergoes a weight loss example , the composition contains less than 15 % by weight of about 1.9 % before around 100 ° C. as measured by TGA . of Form such as less than 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , Provided herein are methods of preparing a non - stoichio 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or less by weightof other 60 metric hydrate of polymorph Form 1. In some embodiments , forms of the compound of Form 9. In some embodiments , the method comprises reslurrying a composition comprising the composition contains less than 15 % of one or more other the compound of Formula (1 ) , including amorphous and forms of the compound of Formula ( I) , such as less than polymorph forms thereof, in a solvent or mixture of solvents 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , to generate a non - stoichiometric hydrate of polymorph Form 2 % , 1 % or less of one or more other formsof the compound 65 1 as a residual solid . In some embodiments , the composition of Formula ( I) . For example , the composition can contain comprising the compound of Formula ( I ) is a mixture of a less than about 15 % of Form 1 , Form 2 , Form 3 , Form 4 , non -stoichiometric hydrate of polymorph Form 1 and Form US 10,544,139 B2 13 14 1. In some embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at RT . therm between about 233-238 ° C. In some embodiments , In some embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at around polymorph Form 2 exhibits an exotherm between about 50 ° C. In some embodiments , the method further comprises 290-295 ° C. In some embodiments , the endotherms and drying the residual solid , for example , under vacuum . In exotherms are observed when using a scan rate of 10 ° C. per some embodiments , the drying is at a temperature of 5 minute . between about 60 ° C. and 90 ° C., such as , e.g., around 75 ° In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph C. Form 2 that has a melting point of around 363 ° C. In some In some embodiments , the method comprises reslurrying embodiments , polymorph Form 2 undergoes a weight loss of a composition comprising a mixture of a non - stoichiometric about 2.7 % before around 116 ° C., e.g. , from about 36 ° C. hydrate of polymorph Form 1 and Form 1 in a solvent or 10 to about 116 ° C., as measured by TGA . mixture of solvents to generate a non - stoichiometric hydrate Provided herein are methods of preparing polymorph of polymorph Form 1 as a residual solid . In some embodi Form 2. In some embodiments , the method comprises reslur ments , the solvent is in a mixture with water, for example the rying a composition comprising the compound of Formula solvent can be a mixture of water and acetonitrile , methanol, ( I) , including amorphous and polymorph forms thereof, in a MtBE , MA , MIBK , DCM , IPAc , n -butyl acetate , heptane, 15 solvent or mixture of solvents to generate Form 2 as a toluene, or n -butanol . In some embodiments , the water is residual solid . In some embodiments , the composition com present in an amount of about 5 % by weight. In some prising the compound of Formula (1 ) comprises a non embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at RT. In some stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at around 50 ° C. about 20 % by weight water. In some embodiments , the Provided herein is a polymorph known as Form 2. Form 2 20 reslurrying takes place at RT . In some embodiments , the is an anhydrous polymorph of the compound of Formula (1 ) . slurrying takes place at around 50 ° C. In some embodiments , In one embodiment , provided herein is polymorph Form 2 the method further comprises drying the residual solid , for having an XRPD pattern , obtained with CuKal -radiation , example , under vacuum . In some embodiments , the drying with at least peaks at ° 20 values of 7.0 + 0.2 , 21.5 + 0.2 , and is at a temperature of between about 60 ° C. and 90 ° C., such 22.0 + 0.2 . In some embodiments , Form 2 has an XRPD 25 as, e.g. , around 75º C. pattern with at least peaks at O 20 values of 7.0 + 0.2 , In some embodiments , the method comprises reslurrying 18.9 + 0.2 , 21.5 + 0.2 , 22.0 + 0.2 , and 24.2 + 0.2 . In some a composition comprising a non -stoichiometric hydrate of embodiments , Form 2 has an XRPD pattern with at least Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water peaks at O 20 values of 7.0 : 0.2 , 14.1 + 0.2 , 18.9 + 0.2 , in a solvent or mixture of solvents to generate polymorph 19.2 £ 0.2 , 21.5 + 0.2 , 22.0 : 0.2 , 24.2-0.2 , and 26.4 + 0.2 . For 30 Form 2 as a residual solid . In some embodiments , the solvent example , in some embodiments , Form 2 has an XRPD is acetonitrile . In some embodiments , the solvent is ethanol . pattern with at least peaks at o 20 values of 7.0 + 0.2 , In some embodiments , the solvent is in a mixture with water , 10.4+ 14.1 17.6 + 0.2 , 18.9 + 0.2 , 19.2 + 0.2 , 21.5 + 0.2 , for example the solvent can be a mixture of water and 22.0 : 0.2 , 24.2 + 0.2 , and 26.4 + 0.2 . ethanol or water and n -propanol . In some embodiments , the In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition 35 water is present in an amount of about 5 % by weight. In comprising polymorph Form 2. In some embodiments , the some embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at RT. In composition is substantially pure . For example , the compo some embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at around sition can have a purity of at least about 90 % . In some 50 ° C. embodiments , the composition has a purity of at least about Provided herein is a polymorph known as Form 3. Form 95 % . In some embodiments , the composition has a purity of 40 3 is an anhydrous polymorph of the compound of Formula at least about 98 % . For example , the composition can have (1 ) . In one embodiment, provided herein is polymorph Form a purity of at least 98.5 % , 98.6 % , 98.7 % , 98.8 % , 98.9 % , 3 having an XRPD pattern , obtained with CuKal- radiation , 99 % , 99.1 % , 99.2 % , 99.3 % , 99.4 % , 99.5 % , 99.6 % , 99.7 % , with at least peaks at ° 20 values of 7.2 + 0.2 , 22.2 + 0.2 , and 99.8 % , or 99.9 % . In some embodiments , the composition is 24.4 + 0.2 . In some embodiments , Form 3 has an XRPD substantially free of other forms of the compound of For- 45 pattern with at least peaks atº 20 values of 6.3 + 0.2 , 7.2 £ 0.2 , mula (1 ) . For example , in some embodiments , the compo 21.6 + 0.2 , 22.2 + 0.2 , and 24.4 + 0.2 . In some embodiments , sition is substantially free of other anhydrous forms of the Form 3 has an XRPD pattern with at least peaks at ° 20 compound of Formula (I ) . In some embodiments , the com values of 6.3 + 0.2 , 7.2 + 0.2 , 11.0 + 0.2 , 18.4 + 0.2 , 19.0 : 0.2 , position contains less than 15 % by weight of other forms of 21.6 + 0.2 , 22.2 + 0.2 , and 24.4 + 0.2 . For example , in some the compound of Formula ( I) , such as less than 14 % , 13 % , 50 embodiments , Form 3 has an XRPD pattern with at least 12 % , 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or peaks at ° 20 values of 6.3 + 0.2 , 7.2 + 0.2 , 11.0 + 0.2 , 14.2-0.2 , less by weight of other forms of the compound of Formula 17.8 + 0.2 , 18.4 + 0.2 , 19.0 + 0.2 , 21.6 + 0.2 , 22.2 + 0.2 , and ( I ) . In some embodiments , the composition contains less 24.4 + 0.2 . than 15 % by weight of one or more other forms of the In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition compound of Formula ( I) , such as less than 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , 55 comprising polymorph Form 3. In some embodiments , the 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or less composition is substantially pure . For example , the compo by weight of one or more other forms of the compound of sition can have a purity of at least about 90 % . In some Formula ( I ). For example , the composition can contain less embodiments , the composition has a purity of at least about than about 15 % of Form 1 , Form 3 , Form 4 , Form 5 , Form 95 % . In some embodiments , the composition has a purity of 6 , Form 7, Form 8 , Form 9, Form 10 , Form 11 , a non- 60 at least about 98 % . For example , the composition can have stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 , or a combination of two a purity of at least 98.5 % , 98.6 % , 98.7 % , 98.8 % , 98.9 % , or more thereof. 99 % , 99.1 % , 99.2 % , 99.3 % , 99.4 % , 99.5 % , 99.6 % , 99.7 % , In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph 99.8 % , or 99.9 % . In some embodiments , the composition is Form 2 that exhibits an endotherm between about 50-100 ° substantially free of other forms of the compound of For C. as measured by DSC . In some embodiments , polymorph 65 mula (1 ) . For example , in some embodiments, the compo Form 2 exhibits an endotherm between about 220-230 ° C. In sition is substantially free of other anhydrous forms of the some embodiments , polymorph Form 2 exhibits an exo compound of Formula ( I ) . In some embodiments , the com US 10,544,139 B2 15 16 position contains less than 15 % by weight of other forms of pattern with at least peaks at ° 20 values of 7.0 + 0.2 , 9.6 + 0.2 , the compound of Formula ( I ) , such as less than 14 % , 13 % , 17.6 + 0.2 , 18.3 + 0.2 , 19.5 + 0.2 , 21.8 + 0.2, 23.20.2 , 25.1 + 0.2 , 12 % , 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or 25.8 + 0.2 , and 29.320.2 . less by weight of other forms of the compound of Formula In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition ( I) . In some embodiments , the composition contains less 5 comprising polymorph Form 4. In some embodiments, the than 15 % by weight of one or more other forms of the composition is substantially pure . For example , the compo compound of Formula ( I ) , such as less than 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , sition can have a purity of at least about 90 % . In some 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or less embodiments , the composition has a purity of at least about by weight of one or more other forms of the compound of 95 % . In some embodiments , the composition has a purity of Formula (1 ) . For example , the composition can contain less 10 aat purity least aboutof at 98least % . For98.5 example % , 98.6 , % the , 98.7 composition % , 98.8 % ,can 98.9 have % , than about 15 % of Form 1 , Form 2 , Form 4 , Form 5 , Form 99 % , 99.1 % , 99.2 % , 99.3 % , 99.4 % , 99.5 % , 99.6 % , 99.7 % , 6 , Form 7, Form 8 , Form 9 , Form 10 , Form 11, a non 99.8 % , or 99.9 % . In some embodiments , the composition is stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 , or a combination of two substantially free of other forms of the compound of For or more thereof. 15 mula ( I ) . For example , in some embodiments , the compo In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph sition is substantially free of other anhydrous forms of the Form 3 that exhibits an exotherm between about 190-2200 compound of Formula (I ) . In some embodiments , the com C., as measured by DSC . In some embodiments , polymorph position contains less than 15 % by weight of other forms of Form 3 exhibits an exotherm at between about 225-235 ° C., the compound of Formula (I ) , such as less than 14 % , 13 % , e.g., around 230 ° C., as measured by DSC . In some embodi- 20 12 % , 11% , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3% , 2 % , 1 % or ments , polymorph Form 3 exhibits an exotherm at between less by weight of other forms of the compound of Formula about 292-300 ° C., e.g., around 297 ° C., as measured by (1 ) . In some embodiments , the composition contains less DSC . For example, in some embodiments , the endotherms than 15 % by weight of one or more other forms of the and exotherms are observed when using a scan rate of 10 ° compound of Formula (I ) , such as less than 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , C. per minute . 25 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or less In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph by weight of one or more other forms of the compound of Form 3 that has a melting point of around 365 ° C. In some Formula ( I ) . For example , the composition can contain less embodiments , polymorph Form 3 undergoes a weight loss of than about 15 % of Form 1 , Form 2 , Form 3 , Form 5 , Form 6 , Form 7 , Form 8 , Form 9, Form 10 , Form 11 , a non about 1.6 % before around 81 ° C. and a weight loss of about 30 stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1, or a combination of two 1.7 % between about 81-169 ° C. as measured by TGA . or more thereof . Provided herein are methods of preparing polymorph In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph Form 3. In some embodiments , themethod comprises reslur Form 4 that exhibits an endotherm between about 50-100 ° rying a composition comprising the compound of Formula C. as measured by DSC . In some embodiments , polymorph (1 ), including amorphous and polymorph forms thereof, in a 35 Form 4 exhibits an endotherm at between about 180-215 ° C. solvent or mixture of solvents to generate Form 3 as a In some embodiments , polymorph Form 4 exhibits an endo residual solid . In some embodiments , the composition com therm between about 220-230 ° C. In some embodiments , prising the compound of Formula ( I) comprises a non polymorph Form 4 exhibits an exotherm at between about stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and 230-240 ° C., e.g. , around 235 ° C. In some embodiments , about 20 % by weight water. In some embodiments , the 40 polymorph Form 4 exhibits an exotherm at between about reslurrying takes place at RT . In some embodiments , the 300-310 ° C. For example , in some embodiments , the endo slurrying takes place at around 50 ° C. In some embodiments , therms and exotherms are observed when using a scan rate the method further comprises drying the residual solid , for of 10 ° C. per minute. example , under vacuum . In some embodiments , the drying In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph is at a temperature of between about 60 ° C. and 90 ° C., such 45 Form 4 that has a melting point of between about 366-369 ° as, e.g., around 75º C. C., e.g., around 367° C. In some embodiments , polymorph In some embodiments , the method comprises reslurrying Form 4 undergoes a weight loss of about 8.3 % before around a composition comprising a non -stoichiometric hydrate of 200 ° C., e.g. , from about 42 ° C. to about 200 ° C., as Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water measured by TGA . in a solvent or mixture of solvents to generate polymorph 50 Provided herein are methods of preparing polymorph Form 3 as a residual solid . In some embodiments, the solvent Form 4. In some embodiments , themethod comprises reslur is IPAc . In some embodiments , the solvent is n - butyl acetate . rying a composition comprising the compound of Formula In some embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at RT. In ( I) , including amorphous and polymorph forms thereof, in a some embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at around solvent or mixture of solvents to generate Form 4 as a 50 ° C. 55 residual solid . In some embodiments , the composition com Provided herein is a polymorph known as Form 4. Form prising the compound of Formula ( 1) comprises a non 4 is an anhydrous polymorph of the compound of Formula stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and ( I ). In one embodiment, provided herein is polymorph Form about 20 % by weight water. In some embodiments , the 4 having an XRPD pattern , obtained with CuKal - radiation , reslurrying takes place at RT . In some embodiments , the with at least peaks at ° 20 values of 7.0 + 0.2 , 21.8 + 0.2 , and 60 slurrying takes place at around 50 ° C. In some embodiments , 25.120.2 . In some embodiments, Form 4 has an XRPD the method further comprises drying the residual solid , for pattern with at least peaks at ° 20 values of 7.0 : 0.2 , example , under vacuum . In some embodiments , the drying 19.5 + 0.2 , 21.8 + 0.2 , 23.2 + 0.2 , and 25.1 + 0.2 . In some is at a temperature of between about 60 ° C. and 90 ° C., such embodiments , Form 4 has an XRPD pattern with at least as , e.g., around 75º C. peaks at ° 20 values of 7.0 + 0.2 , 17.6 + 0.2 , 18.3 + 0.2 , 65 In some embodiments , the method comprises reslurrying 19.5 + 0.2 , 21.8 + 0.2 , 23.2 + 0.2 , 25.120.2 , and 25.8 + 0.2 . For a composition comprising a non - stoichiometric hydrate of example , in some embodiments , Form 4 has an XRPD Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water US 10,544,139 B2 17 18 in a solvent or mixture of solvents to generate polymorph In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph Form 4 as a residual solid . In some embodiments , the solvent Form 5 that has a melting point of around 363 ° C. In some is EA . In some embodiments , the solvent is MA . In some embodiments , polymorph Form 5 undergoes a weight loss of embodiments , the solvent is MtBE . In some embodiments , about 3.1 % before around 100 ° C. and about 1.7 % between the solvent is n - propanol. In some embodiments , the solvent 5 about 100-250 ° C. as measured by TGA . is acetone . In some embodiments , the solvent is in a mixture Provided herein are methods of preparing polymorph with water , for example the solvent can be a mixture of Form 5. In some embodiments , themethod comprises reslur water and MA , EA , or acetone . In some embodiments , the rying a composition comprising the compound of Formula water is present in an amount of about 5 % by weight. In (1 ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms thereof, in a some embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at RT . In 10 solvent or mixture of solvents to generate Form 5 as a some embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at around residual solid . In some embodiments , the composition com 50 ° C. prising the compound of Formula ( 1) comprises a non Provided herein is a polymorph known as Form 5. Form stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and 5 is an anhydrous polymorph of the compound of Formula 15 about 20 % by weight water. In some embodiments , the ( I ) . In one embodiment, provided herein is polymorph Form reslurrying takes place at RT. In some embodiments , the 5 having an XRPD pattern , obtained with CuKal- radiation , slurrying takes place at around 50 ° C. In some embodiments , with at least peaks atº 20 values of 7.3 + 0.2 , 22.3 + 0.2 , and the method further comprises drying the residual solid , for 24.5 + 0.2 . In some embodiments, Form 5 has an XRPD example , under vacuum . In some embodiments , the drying pattern with at least peaks atº 20 values of 6.3 + 0.2 , 7.3 + 0.2 , 20 is at a temperature of between about60 ° C. and 90 ° C., such 21.7 + 0.2 , 22.3 + 0.2 , and 24.5 + 0.2 . In some embodiments , as , e.g., around 75º C. Form 5 has an XRPD pattern with at least peaks at ° 20 In some embodiments , the method comprises reslurrying values of 6.3 + 0.2 , 7.3 + 0.2 , 11.0 + 0.2 , 19.1 + 0.2 , 19.5 + 0.2 , a composition comprising a non -stoichiometric hydrate of 21.7 + 0.2 , 22.3 + 0.2 , and 24.5 + 0.2 . For example , in some Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water embodiments , Form 5 has an XRPD pattern with at least 25 in a solvent or mixture of solvents to generate polymorph peaks atº 20 values of 6.3 + 0.2 , 7.3 + 0.2 , 11.0 : 0.2 , 14.3 + 0.2 , Form 5 as a residual solid . In some embodiments , the solvent 19.120.2 , 19.5 + 0.2 , 21.7 + 0.2 , 22.3 + 0.2 , 24.5 + 0.2 , and is MtBE . In some embodiments , the reslurrying takes place 26.5 + 0.2 . at RT. In some embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition around 50 ° C. comprising polymorph Form 5. In some embodiments , the 30 Provided herein is a polymorph known as Form 6. Form composition is substantially pure. For example , the compo 6 is an anhydrous polymorph of the compound of Formula sition can have a purity of at least about 90 % . In some ( I ) . embodiments , the composition has a purity of at least about In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition 95 % . In some embodiments , the composition has a purity of comprising polymorph Form 6. In some embodiments , the at least about 98 % . For example , the composition can have 35 composition is substantially pure. For example , the compo a purity of at least 98.5 % , 98.6 % , 98.7 % , 98.8 % , 98.9 % , sition can have a purity of at least about 90 % . In some 99 % , 99.1 % , 99.2 % , 99.3 % , 99.4 % , 99.5 % , 99.6 % , 99.7 % , embodiments , the composition has a purity of at least about 99.8 % , or 99.9 % . In some embodiments , the composition is 95 % . In some embodiments , the composition has a purity of substantially free of other forms of the compound of For at least about 98 % . For example , the composition can have mula ( I) . For example , in some embodiments , the compo- 40 a purity of at least 98.5 % , 98.6 % , 98.7 % , 98.8 % , 98.9 % , sition is substantially free of other anhydrous forms of the 99 % , 99.1 % , 99.2 % , 99.3 % , 99.4 % , 99.5 % , 99.6 % , 99.7 % , compound of Formula ( I) . In some embodiments , the com 99.8 % , or 99.9 % . In some embodiments , the composition is position contains less than 15 % by weight of other forms of substantially free of other forms of the compound of For the compound of Formula ( I ), such as less than 14 % , 13 % , mula ( I ) . For example , in some embodiments , the compo 12 % , 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or 45 sition is substantially free of other anhydrous forms of the less by weight of other forms of the compound of Formula compound of Formula (I ). In some embodiments , the com ( I) . In some embodiments , the composition contains less position contains less than 15 % by weight of other forms of than 15 % by weight of one or more other forms of the the compound of Formula (I ) , such as less than 14 % , 13 % , compound of Formula (I ) , such as less than 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , 12 % , 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or less 50 less by weight of other forms of the compound of Formula by weight of one or more other forms of the compound of ( I ). In some embodiments , the composition contains less Formula ( I ) . For example, the composition can contain less than 15 % by weight of one or more other forms of the than about 15 % of Form 1, Form 2 , Form 3 , Form 4 , Form compound of Formula ( I) , such as less than 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , 6 , Form 7 , Form 8 , Form 9 , Form 10 , Form 11, a non 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or less stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 , or a combination of two 55 by weight of one or more other forms of the compound of or more thereof. Formula (I ) . For example , the composition can contain less In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph than about 15 % of Form 1 , Form 2 , Form 3 , Form 4 , Form Form 5 that exhibits an endotherm between about 50-100 ° 5 , Form 7 , Form 8 , Form 9 , Form 10 , Form 11, a non C. as measured by DSC . In some embodiments , polymorph stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 , or a combination of two Form 5 exhibits an endotherm at between about 210-2350 60 or more thereof. C., e.g. , around 222° C. In some embodiments , polymorph In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph Form 5 exhibits an exotherm at between about 227-240 ° C., Form 6 that exhibits an exotherm between about 245-260 ° e.g., around 235 ° C. In some embodiments , polymorph C. as measured by DSC . For example , in some embodi Form 5 exhibits an exotherm at between about 280-300 ° C., ments , the endotherms and exotherms are observed when e.g., around 293 ° C. For example , in some embodiments , the 65 using a scan rate of 10 ° C. per minute . In some embodi endotherms and exotherms are observed when using a scan ments , provided herein is polymorph Form 6 that has a rate of 10 ° C. per minute . melting point of around 364 ° C. US 10,544,139 B2 19 20 Provided herein are methods of preparing polymorph 5 , Form 6 , Form 8, Form 9 , Form 10 , Form 11, a non Form 6. In some embodiments , the method comprises reslur stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 , or a combination of two rying a composition comprising the compound of Formula or more thereof. ( I) , including amorphous and polymorph forms thereof, in a In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph solvent or mixture of solvents to generate Form 6 as a 5 Form 7 that exhibits an exotherm between about 227-235 ° residual solid . In some embodiments , the composition com C., e.g. , around 232° C., as measured by DSC . In some prising the compound of Formula ( I ) is a non -stoichiometric embodiments , polymorph Form 7 exhibits an exotherm between about 299-305 ° C., e.g., around 303 ° C. For hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by example , in some embodiments , the endotherms and exo weight water. In some embodiments , the reslurrying takes 10 therms are observed when using a scan rate of 10 ° C. per place at RT. In some embodiments , the slurrying takes place minute . at around 50 ° C. In some embodiments , the method further In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph comprises drying the residual solid , for example , under Form 7 that has a melting point of around 365 ° C. In some vacuum . In some embodiments , the drying is at a tempera embodiments , polymorph Form 7 undergoes a weight loss of ture of between about 60 ° C. and 90 ° C., such as, e.g., 15 about 12 % before around 200 ° C., e.g. , from about 36 ° C. to around 75 ° C. about 200 ° C., as measured by TGA . In some embodiments, the method comprises reslurrying Provided herein are methods of preparing polymorph a composition comprising a non - stoichiometric hydrate of Form 7. In some embodiments , the method comprises reslur Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water rying a composition comprising the compound of Formula in a solvent or mixture of solvents to generate polymorph 20 (1 ), including amorphous and polymorph forms thereof , in a Form 6 as a residual solid . In some embodiments , the solvent solvent or mixture of solvents to generate Form 7 as a is IPAc . In some embodiments , the solvent is in a mixture residual solid . In some embodiments , the composition com with water , for example the solvent can be a mixture of prising the compound of Formula ( I) is a non - stoichiometric water and IPAc. In some embodiments , the water is present hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by in an amount of about 5 % by weight. In some embodiments , 25 weight water . In some embodiments , the reslurrying takes the reslurrying takes place at RT. In some embodiments , the place at RT. In some embodiments , the slurrying takes place reslurrying takes place at around 50 ° C. at around 50 ° C. In some embodiments , the method further Provided herein is a polymorph known as Form 7. Form comprises drying the residual solid , for example , under 7 is an anhydrous polymorph of the compound of Formula vacuum . In some embodiments , the drying is at a tempera (I ) . In one embodiment, provided herein is polymorph Form 30 ture of between about 60 ° C. and 90 ° C., such as , e.g. , 7 having an XRPD pattern , obtained with CuKal- radiation , around 75º C. with at least peaks at ° 20 values of 7.1 + 0.2 , 21.6 + 0.2 , and In some embodiments , the method comprises reslurrying 23.2 + 0.2 . In some embodiments, Form 7 has an XRPD a composition comprising a non - stoichiometric hydrate of pattern with at least peaks atº 20 values of 4.9 + 0.2 , 7.130.2 , Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water 18.5 + 0.2 , 21.6 + 0.2 , and 23.2 + 0.2 . In some embodiments , 35 in a solvent or mixture of solvents to generate polymorph Form 7 has an XRPD pattern with at least peaks at 0 20 Form 7 as a residual solid . In some embodiments, the solvent values of 4.9 + 0.2 , 7.1 + 0.2 , 10.9 + 0.2 , 18.5 + 0.2, 19.4 + 0.2 , is methyl ethyl ketone (MEK ) . In some embodiments , the 21.6 + 0.2 , 23.2 + 0.2 , and 30.3 + 0.2 . For example , in some solvent is in a mixture with water , for example the solvent embodiments , Form 7 has an XRPD pattern with at least can be a mixture of water and MEK . In some embodiments , peaks at ° 20 values of 4.9 + 0.2 , 7.1 0.2 , 8.8 + 0.2 , 10.9 + 0.2 , 40 the water is present in an amount of about 5 % by weight. In 18.5 + 0.2 , 19.4 + 0.2 , 21.6 + 0.2 , 22.1 + 0.2 , 23.230.2 , and some embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at RT. In 30.3 + 0.2 . some embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at around In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition 50 ° C. comprising polymorph Form 7. In some embodiments , the Provided herein is a polymorph known as Form 8. Form composition is substantially pure . For example , the compo- 45 8 is an anhydrous polymorph of the compound of Formula sition can have a purity of at least about 90 % . In some (1 ) . In one embodiment, provided herein is polymorph Form embodiments , the composition has a purity of at least about 8 having an XRPD pattern , obtained with CuKal -radiation , 95 % . In some embodiments , the composition has a purity of with at least peaks at ° 20 values of 6.9 + 0.2 , 17.7 + 0.2 , and at least about 98 % . For example , the composition can have 21.5 + 0.2 . In some embodiments , Form 8 has an XRPD a purity of at least 98.5 % , 98.6 % , 98.7 % , 98.8 % , 98.9 % , 50 pattern with at least peaks at o 20 values of 6.9 + 0.2 , 99 % , 99.1 % , 99.2 % , 99.3 % , 99.4 % , 99.5 % , 99.6 % , 99.7 % , 11.5 + 0.2, 17.7 + 0.2 , 21.5 + 0.2 , and 27.6 + 0.2 . In some 99.8 % , or 99.9 % . In some embodiments , the composition is embodiments , Form 8 has an XRPD pattern with at least substantially free of other forms of the compound of For peaks at 0 20 values of 6.9 + 0.2 , 11.5 + 0.2 , 15.3 + 0.2 , mula (1 ) . For example , in some embodiments , the compo 16.9 + 0.2 , 17.7 + 0.2 , 21.5 + 0.2 , 27.6 + 0.2 , and 28.9 0.2 . For sition is substantially free of other anhydrous forms of the 55 example , in some embodiments , Form 8 has an XRPD compound of Formula (I ) . In some embodiments , the com pattern with at least peaks at ° 20 values of 6.9 + 0.2 , position contains less than 15 % by weight of other forms of 11.5 + 0.2 , 12.7 + 0.2 , 14.2 + 0.2 , 15.3 + 0.2 , 16.9 + 0.2 , 17.7 + 0.2 , the compound of Formula ( I ) , such as less than 14 % , 13 % , 21.5 + 0.2 , 27.6 + 0.2, and 28.9 + 0.2 . 12 % , 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition less by weight of other forms of the compound of Formula 60 comprising polymorph Form 8. In some embodiments , the (I ). In some embodiments , the composition contains less composition is substantially pure . For example , the compo than 15 % by weight of one or more other forms of the sition can have a purity of at least about 90 % . In some compound of Formula ( I ), such as less than 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , embodiments , the composition has a purity of at least about 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or less 95 % . In some embodiments , the composition has a purity of by weight of one or more other forms of the compound of 65 at least about 98 % . For example , the composition can have Formula ( I ). For example , the composition can contain less a purity of at least 98.5 % , 98.6 % , 98.7 % , 98.8 % , 98.9 % , than about 15 % of Form 1 , Form 2 , Form 3 , Form 4 , Form 99 % , 99.1 % , 99.2 % , 99.3 % , 99.4 % , 99.5 % , 99.6 % , 99.7 % , US 10,544,139 B2 21 22 99.8 % , or 99.9 % . In some embodiments , the composition is example , in some embodiments , Form 9 has an XRPD substantially free of other forms of the compound of For pattern with at least peaks at O 20 values of 4.9 + 0.2 , mula ( I ) . For example , in some embodiments , the compo 10.1 + 0.2 , 15.3 + 0.2 , 16.5 + 0.2 , 18.6 + 0.2 , 21.120.2 , 22.4 + 0.2 , sition is substantially free of other anhydrous forms of the 24.1 + 0.2 , 25.2 + 0.2 , and 28.6 + 0.2 . compound of Formula ( I ) . In some embodiments , the com 5 In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition position contains less than 15 % by weight of other forms of comprising polymorph Form 9. In some embodiments , the the compound of Formula ( I ) , such as less than 14 % , 13 % , composition is substantially pure . For example , the compo 12 % , 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or sition can have a purity of at least about 90 % . In some less by weight of other forms of the compound of Formula embodiments , the composition has a purity of at least about ( I) . In some embodiments , the composition contains less 10 95 % . In some embodiments , the composition has a purity of than 15 % by weight of one or more other forms of the at least about 98 % . For example , the composition can have compound of Formula ( I) , such as less than 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , a purity of at least 98.5 % , 98.6 % , 98.7 % , 98.8 % , 98.9 % , 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or less 99 % , 99.1 % , 99.2 % , 99.3 % , 99.4 % , 99.5 % , 99.6 % , 99.7 % , by weight of one or more other forms of the compound of 99.8 % , or 99.9 % . In some embodiments , the composition is Formula (1 ) . For example , the composition can contain less 15 substantially free of other forms of the compound of For than about 15 % of Form 1 , Form 2 , Form 3 , Form 4 , Form mula (I ) . For example , in some embodiments , the compo 5 , Form 6 , Form 7 , Form 9 , Form 10 , Form 11 , a non sition is substantially free of other anhydrous forms of the stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 , or a combination of two compound of Formula ( I ) . In some embodiments , the com or more thereof. position contains less than 15 % by weight of other forms of In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph 20 the compound of Formula (I ), such as less than 14 % , 13 % , Form 8 that exhibits an endotherm between about 41-60 ° C. 12 % , 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or as measured by DSC . In some embodiments , polymorph less by weight of other forms of the compound of Formula Form 8 exhibits an exotherm at between about 221-235 ° C., ( I ) . In some embodiments , the composition contains less e.g., around 231 ° C. In some embodiments , polymorph than 15 % by weight of one or more other forms of the Form 8 exhibits an endotherm between about 279-290 ° C., 25 compound of Formula ( I) , such as less than 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , e.g., around 285 ° C. For example , in some embodiments , the 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or less endotherms and exotherms are observed when using a scan by weight of one or more other forms of the compound of rate of 10 ° C. per minute . Formula (I ) . For example , the composition can contain less In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph than about 15 % of Form 1 , Form 2 , Form 3 , Form 4 , Form Form 8 that has a melting point of around 364 ° C. In some 30 5 , Form 6 , Form 7 , Form 8 , Form 10 , Form 11, a non embodiments , polymorph Form 8 undergoes a weight loss of stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 , or a combination of two about 4.2 % before around 190 ° C. and about 3.9 % between or more thereof. about 190-261° C. as measured by TGA . In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph Provided herein are methods of preparing polymorph Form 9 that exhibits a single melting endotherm at around Form 8. In some embodiments , the method comprises reslur- 35 364 ° C. as measured by DSC . For example , in some embodi rying a composition comprising the compound of Formula ments , the endotherm is observed when using a scan rate of (1 ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms thereof, in a 10 ° C. per minute . In some embodiments , other polymorph solvent or mixture of solvents to generate Form 8 as a forms provided herein , such as, e.g., Form 1 and Form 2 , can residual solid . In some embodiments , the composition com convert to Form 9 when heated to just before melting ( i.e., prising the compound of Formula (I ) a non -stoichiometric 40 around 364 ° C.) . hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph weight water. In some embodiments , the reslurrying takes Form 9 that has a melting point of around 364 ° C. In some place at RT. In some embodiments , the slurrying takes place embodiments , polymorph Form 9 undergoes a weight loss of at around 50 ° C. In some embodiments , the method further about 0.28 % before around 100 ° C., e.g., from about 30.5 ° comprises drying the residual solid , for example , under 45 C. to about 100 ° C., as measured by TGA . vacuum . In some embodiments , the drying is at a tempera Provided herein are methods of preparing polymorph ture of between about 60 ° C. and 90 ° C., such as, e.g. , Form 9. In some embodiments , the method comprises reslur around 75º C. rying a composition comprising the compound of Formula In some embodiments , the method comprises reslurrying ( I) , including amorphous and polymorph forms thereof, in a a composition comprising a non - stoichiometric hydrate of 50 solvent or mixture of solvents to generate Form 9 as a Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water residual solid . In some embodiments , the composition com in a solvent or mixture of solvents to generate polymorph prising the compound of Formula (I ) is a non - stoichiometric Form 8 as a residual solid . In some embodiments, the solvent hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by is MIBK . In some embodiments , the reslurrying takes place weight water . In some embodiments , the reslurrying takes at RT. In some embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at 55 place at RT. In some embodiments , the slurrying takes place around 50 ° C. at around 50 ° C. In some embodiments , the method further Provided herein is a polymorph known as Form 9. Form comprises drying the residual solid , for example , under 9 is an anhydrous polymorph of the compound of Formula vacuum . In some embodiments , the drying is at a tempera ( I) . In one embodiment, provided herein is polymorph Form ture of between about 60 ° C. and 90 ° C., such as , e.g., 9 having an XRPD pattern , obtained with CuKal- radiation , 60 around 75º C. with at least peaks at ° 20 values of 4.9 + 0.2 , 18.6 + 0.2 , and In some embodiments , the method comprises reslurrying 21.1 + 0.2 . In some embodiments , Form 9 has an XRPD a composition comprising a non - stoichiometric hydrate of pattern with at least peaks at ° 20 values of 4.9 + 0.2 , Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by weightwater 18.6 + 0.2 , 21.1 + 0.2 , 24.110.2, and 25.2 : 0.2 . In some in a solvent or mixture of solvents to generate polymorph embodiments , Form 9 has an XRPD pattern with at least 65 Form 9 as a residual solid . In some embodiments , the solvent peaks at ° 20 values of 4.9 + 0.2 , 15.3 + 0.2 , 16.5 + 0.2 , is n -butanol . In some embodiments , the solvent is IPAc . In 18.6 + 0.2 , 21.1 + 0.2 , 22.4 + 0.2 , 24.1 + 0.2 , and 25.2 + 0.2 . For some embodiments , the solvent is n -butyl acetate . In some US 10,544,139 B2 23 24 embodiments , the solvent is in a mixture with water, for Provided herein are methods of preparing polymorph example the solvent can be a mixture of water and ethanol Form 10. In some embodiments , the method comprises or water and n -propanol . In some embodiments , the water is reslurrying a composition comprising the compound of present in an amount of about 5 % by weight. In some Formula ( I ), including amorphous and polymorph forms embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at RT. In some 5 thereof, in a solvent or mixture of solvents to generate Form embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at around 50 ° C. 10 as a residual solid . In some embodiments , the composi Provided herein is a polymorph known as Form 10 . tion comprising the compound of Formula ( I ) is a non Polymorph Form 10 is a polymorph of the compound of stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and Formula ( I) comprising DMSO . For example , DMSO is on about 20 % by weight water. In some embodiments , the the surface of the polymorph . In one embodiment, provided 10 reslurrying takes place at RT. In some embodiments , the herein is polymorph Form 10 having an XRPD pattern , slurrying takes place at around 50 ° C. In some embodiments , obtained with CuKal- radiation , with at least peaks at ° 20 the method further comprises drying the residual solid , for values of 20.7 + 0.2 , 21.7 + 0.2 , and 24.220.2 . In some example , under vacuum . In some embodiments , the drying embodiments , Form 10 has an XRPD pattern with at least 15 is at a temperature of between about 60 ° C. and 90 ° C., such peaks at O 20 values of 18.2 + 0.2 , 19.0 + 0.2 , 20.7 + 0.2 , as, e.g., around 75º C. 21.7 + 0.2 , and 24.220.2 . In some embodiments, Form 10 has In some embodiments , the method comprises reslurrying an XRPD pattern with at least peaks at ° 20 values of a composition comprising a non - stoichiometric hydrate of 17.8 + 0.2 , 18.2 + 0.2 , 19.0 + 0.2 , 20.7 + 0.2 , 21.7 + 0.2 , 23.4 + 0.2 , Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by weightwater 24.2 £ 0.2 , and 27.9 + 0.2 . For example , in some embodiments , 20 in a solvent or mixture of solvents to generate polymorph Form 10 has an XRPD pattern with at least peaks at ° 20 Form 10 as a residual solid . In some embodiments , the values of 6.7 + 0.2 , 17.8 : 0.2 , 18.2 £ 0.2 , 19.0 : 0.2 , 19.9 + 0.2 , solvent is DMSO . In some embodiments , the solvent is in a 20.7 + 0.2 , 21.7 + 0.2 , 23.4 + 0.2 , 24.2 + 0.2 , and 27.9 + 0.2 . mixture with water, for example the solvent can be a mixture In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition of water and DMSO . In some embodiments , the water is comprising polymorph Form 10. In some embodiments , the 25 present in an amount of about 5 % by weight. In some composition is substantially pure . For example , the compo embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at RT. In some sition can have a purity of at least about 90 % . In some embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at around 50 ° C. embodiments , the composition has a purity of at least about Provided herein is a polymorph known as Form 11. Form 95 % . In some embodiments , the composition has a purity of 11 is an anhydrous polymorph of the compound of Formula at least about 98 % . For example , the composition can have 30 ( 1) . In one embodiment, provided herein is polymorph Form a purity of at least 98.5 % , 98.6 % , 98.7 % , 98.8 % , 98.9 % , 11 having an XRPD pattern , obtained with CuKal- radia 99 % , 99.1 % , 99.2 % , 99.3 % , 99.4 % , 99.5 % , 99.6 % , 99.7 % , tion , with at least peaks atº 20 values of 6.4 + 0.2 , 18.5 + 0.2 , 99.8 % , or 99.9 % . In some embodiments , the composition is and 22.4 + 0.2 . In some embodi nts , Form 11 has an XRPD substantially free of other forms of the compound of For pattern with at least peaks at ° 20 values of 6.4 + 0.2 , mula ( I) . For example , in some embodiments , the compo- 35 17.8 + 0.2 , 18.5 + 0.2 , 19.9 + 0.2 , and 22.4 + 0.2 . In some sition is substantially free of other anhydrous forms of the embodiments , Form 11 has an XRPD pattern with at least compound of Formula ( I ) . In some embodiments , the com peaks at ° 20 values of6.4 + 0.2 , 8.4 + 0.2 , 17.8 + 0.2 , 18.5 + 0.2 , position contains less than 15 % by weight of other forms of 19.9 + 0.2 , 22.4 + 0.2 , 24.5 + 0.2 , and 26.8 + 0.2 . For example , in the compound of Formula (I ), such as less than 14 % , 13 % , some embodiments , Form 11 has an XRPD pattern with at 12 % , 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or 40 least peaks at ° 20 values of 6.4 + 0.2 , 8.4 + 0.2 , 17.8 + 0.2 , less by weight of other forms of the compound of Formula 18.5 + 0.2 , 19.9 +0.2 , 20.3 + 0.2 , 22.4 + 0.2 , 22.9 + 0.2 , 24.5 + 0.2 , (I ) . In some embodiments , the composition contains less and 26.8 + 0.2 . than 15 % by weight of one or more other forms of the In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition compound of Formula (I ), such as less than 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , comprising polymorph Form 11. In some embodiments , the 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or less 45 composition is substantially pure . For example , the compo by weight of one or more other forms of the compound of sition can have a purity of at least about 90 % . In some Formula (I ) . For example , the composition can contain less embodiments , the composition has a purity of at least about than about 15 % of Form 1 , Form 2 , Form 3 , Form 4 , Form 95 % . In some embodiments , the composition has a purity of 5 , Form 6 , Form 7 , Form 8, Form 9, Form 11, a non at least about 98 % . For example , the composition can have stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 , or a combination of two 50 a purity of at least 98.5 % , 98.6 % , 98.7 % , 98.8 % , 98.9 % , or more thereof. 99 % , 99.1 % , 99.2 % , 99.3 % , 99.4 % , 99.5 % , 99.6 % , 99.7 % , In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph 99.8 % , or 99.9 % . In some embodiments , the composition is Form 10 that exhibits an endotherm between about 212-2370 substantially free of other forms of the compound of For C. as measured by DSC . In some embodiments , polymorph mula ( I) . For example , in some embodiments , the compo Form 10 exhibits an endotherm at between about 234-245° 55 sition is substantially free of other anhydrous forms of the C., e.g., around 237° C. In some embodiments , polymorph compound of Formula (I ). In some embodiments , the com Form 10 exhibits an exotherm between about 300-325 ° C., position contains less than 15 % by weight of other forms of e.g., around 308 ° C. For example , in some embodiments , the the compound of Formula ( I ) , such as less than 14 % , 13 % , endotherms and exotherms are observed when using a scan 12 % , 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or rate of 10 ° C. per minute . 60 less by weight of other forms of the compound of Formula In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph ( I ) . In some embodiments , the composition contains less Form 10 that has a melting point of between about 364-372° than 15 % by weight of one or more other forms of the C., such as, e.g., around 369° C. In some embodiments , compound of Formula (I ) , such as less than 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , polymorph Form 10 undergoes a weight loss of about 0.6 % 11 % , 10 % , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % or less before around 100 ° C., a weight loss of about 3.8 % between 65 by weight of one or more other forms of the compound of about 100-170 ° C., and a weight loss of about 7.1 % between Formula (1 ) . For example , the composition can contain less about 170-260 ° C. as measured by TGA . than about 15 % of Form 1 , Form 2 , Form 3 , Form 4 , Form US 10,544,139 B2 25 26 5 , Form 6 , Form 7 , Form 8 , Form 9 , Form 10 , a non by weight water. In some embodiments the % water by stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 , or a combination of two weight in a crystal form , such as a non - stoichiometric or more thereof. hydrate, is determined by the Karl Fischer titration method . In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph In some embodiments , the crystal form is dried prior to Karl Form 11 that exhibits an endotherm between about 215-230 ° 5 Fischer titration . In some embodiments , the crystal form is C. as measured by DSC . In some embodiments , polymorph dried prior to formulation as a composition , for example , Form 11 exhibits an exotherm at between about 230-240 ° C., with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. e.g., around 235 ° C. In some embodiments , polymorph In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical composition Form 11 exhibits an exotherm between about 300-315º C., provided herein contains polymorph Form 1 that has a purity e.g. , around 310 ° C. For example , in some embodiments , the 10 of at least about 90 % . In some embodiments , the purity is at endotherms and exotherms are observed when using a scan least about 95 % . In some embodiments , the purity is at least rate of 10 ° C. per minute . about 98 % . For example, the purity is at least 98.5 % , 98.6 % , In some embodiments , provided herein is polymorph 98.7 % , 98.8 % , 98.9 % , 99 % , 99.1 % , 99.2 % , 99.3 % , 99.4 % , Form 11 that has a melting point of around 368 ° C. In some 99.5 % , 99.6 % , 99.7 % , 99.8 % , or 99.9 % . In some embodi embodiments , polymorph Form 11 undergoes a weight loss 15 ments , the composition comprising Form 1 is substantially of about 0.8 % before around 100 ° C. and a weight loss of free of other forms of the compound of Formula ( I ) , e.g. , about 7.0 % between about 100-249 ° C., as measured by Form 9. In some embodiments , the composition contains TGA . less than 15 % by weight of other forms of the compound of Provided herein are methods of preparing polymorph Formula ( I) , such as less than 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , 11 % , 10 % , Form 11. In some embodiments , the method comprises 20 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % , 0.9 % , 0.8 % , 0.7 % , reslurrying a composition comprising the compound of 0.6 % , 0.5 % , 0.4 % , 0.3 % , 0.2 % , 0.1 % , 0.05 % , 0.01 % , or Formula ( I ), including amorphous and polymorph forms 0.001 % by weight of other forms of the compound of thereof, in a solvent or mixture of solvents to generate Form Formula (I ) . In some embodiments , the other forms of the 11 as a residual solid . In some embodiments , the composi compound of Formula (I ) are other anhydrous forms of the tion comprising the compound of Formula (I ) is a non- 25 compound of Formula ( I) . In some embodiments , the com stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and position contains less than about 15 % by weight of one or about 20 % by weight water. In some embodiments , the more other compounds of Formula ( I) . For example , the reslurrying takes place at RT. In some embodiments , the composition contains less than 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , 11 % , 10 % , slurrying takes place at around 50 ° C. In some embodiments , 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % , 0.9 % , 0.8 % , 0.7 % , the method further comprises drying the residual solid , for 30 0.6 % , 0.5 % , 0.4 % , 0.3 % , 0.2 % , 0.1 % , 0.05 % , 0.01 % , or example , under vacuum . In some embodiments , the drying 0.001 % by weight of one or more other forms of the is at a temperature of between about 60 ° C.and 90 ° C., such compound ofFormula (I ) . For example , the composition can as, e.g., around 75 ° C. contain less than about 15 % by weight of Form 2 , Form In some embodiments , the method comprises reslurrying Form 4 , Form 5 , Form 6 , Form 7 , Form 8 , Form 9 , Form 10 , a composition comprising a non - stoichiometric hydrate of 35 Form 11, a non - stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1, or com Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water binations of two or more thereof . in a solvent or mixture of solvents to generate polymorph In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical composition Form 11 as a residual solid . In some embodiments , the provided herein contains a non - stoichiometric hydrate of solvent is dimethylformamide (DMF ) . In some embodi polymorph Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by ments , the solvent is in a mixture with water, for example the 40 weight water that has a purity of at least about 90 % . In some solvent can be a mixture of water and DMF. In some embodiments , the purity is at least about 95 % . In some embodiments , the water is present in an amount of about 5 % embodiments , the purity is at least about 98 % . For example , by weight. In some embodiments , the reslurrying takes place the purity is at least 98.5 % , 98.6 % , 98.7 % , 98.8 % , 98.9 % , at RT. In some embodiments , the reslurrying takes place at 99 % , 99.1 % , 99.2 % , 99.3 % , 99.4 % , 99.5 % , 99.6 % , 99.7 % , around 50 ° C. 45 99.8 % , or 99.9 % . In some embodiments , the composition 3. Compositions and Administration comprising the non -stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 having Provided herein are pharmaceutical compositions com between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water is substantially prising a therapeutically effective amount of a compound of free of other forms of the compound of Formula ( 1 ) , e.g. , Formula (1 ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms Form 9. In some embodiments , the composition contains thereof, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier . Provided 50 less than 15 % by weight of other forms of the compound of herein are pharmaceutical compositions prepared from a Formula ( I) , such as less than 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , 11 % , 10 % , polymorph form of a compound of Formula ( I ) . In some 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % , 0.9 % , 0.8 % , 0.7 % , embodiments , the polymorph form is Form 1. In some 0.6 % , 0.5 % , 0.4 % , 0.3 % , 0.2 % , 0.1 % , 0.05 % , 0.01 % , or embodiments , the polymorph form is a mixture of Form 1 0.001 % by weight of other forms of the compound of and Form 9. In some embodiments , the polymorph is a 55 Formula ( 1 ). In some embodiments , the other forms of the non -stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % compound of Formula (I ) are other anhydrous forms of the and about 20 % by weight water. compound of Formula ( I) . In some embodiments , the com In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical composition position contains less than about 15 % by weight of one or comprises a polymorph form of a compound of Formula ( I) . more other compounds of Formula ( ) . For example , the In some embodiments , the polymorph form is Form 1. In 60 composition contains less than 14 % , 13 % , 12 % , 11 % , 10 % , some embodiments , the pharmaceutical composition com 9 % , 8 % , 7 % , 6 % , 5 % , 4 % , 3 % , 2 % , 1 % , 0.9 % , 0.8 % , 0.7 % , prises a polymorph form of a compound of Formula ( I ) that 0.6 % , 0.5 % , 0.4 % , 0.3 % , 0.2 % , 0.1 % , 0.05 % , 0.01 % , or is a mixture of forms. In some embodiments, the mixture of 0.001 % by weight of one or more other forms of the forms is a mixture of Forms 1 and 9. In some embodiments, compound of Formula ( I) . For example , the composition can the pharmaceutical composition comprises a polymorph 65 contain less than about 15 % by weight of Form 1, Form 2 , form of a compound of Formula (1 ) that is a non -stoichio Form 3 , Form 4 , Form 5 , Form 6 , Form 7 , Form 8 , Form 9 , metric hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % Form 10 , Form 11 , or combinations of two or more thereof. US 10,544,139 B2 27 28 In some embodiments , the composition can comprise to about 1000 ug ; from about 1 ug to about 500 ug ; from between about 0.1 % and 10 % by weight of a compound of about 1 ug to about 400 ug , about 1 ug to about 300 ug , from Formula ( I ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms about 1 ug to about 250 ug ; about 1 ug to about 200 ug , about thereof . For example , the composition can comprise 01 ug to about 150 ug, from about 1 ug to about 100 ug ; from between about 0.1-10 % , 0.1-5 % , 0.1-4 % , 0.15-3 % , or 0.2- 5 about 1 ug to about 75 ug ; about 10 ug to about 100 ug ; 2 % by weight of a compound of Formula (1 ) , including about 20 ug to about 80 ug ; about 20 ug to about 40 ug; or amorphous and polymorph forms thereof. In some embodi about 60 ug to about 80 ug , from about 5 ug to about 5000 ments , the compound of Formula (1 ) is Form 1. In some ug, about 7.5 ug to about 5000 ug , about 10 ug to about 5000 embodiments , the compound of Formula ( I) is a mixture of ug, about 10 ug to about 4000 ug , about 10 ug to about 3000 Form 1 and Form 9. In some embodiments , the compound 10 ug , about 10 ug to about 2000 ug , about 10 ug to about 1000 of Formula ( I ) is a non -stoichiometric hydrate of polymorph ug, about 10 ug to about 700 ug , about 10 ug to about 500 Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water . ug, about 10 ug to about 300 ug, about 10 ug to about 230 In some embodiments , the composition comprises about ug, about 10 ug to about 100 ug , about 10 ug to about 70 ug , 0.001 mg to about 5.0 mg per injection of a compound of about 10 ug to about 50 ug, about 10 ug to about 30 ug, about Formula (I ), including amorphous and polymorph forms 15 30 ug to about 4000 ug, about 30 ug to about 3000 ug, about thereof. For example , the composition in some embodiments 30 ug to about 2000 ug , about 30 ug to about 1000 ug , about comprises about 0.001 mg to about 4 mg, about 0.001 mg to 30 ug to about 700 ug , about 30 ug to about 500 ug , about about 3 mg, about 0.001 mg to about 2 mg, about 0.001 mg 30 ug to about 300 ug , about 30 ug to about 230 ug , about to about 1 mg, about 0.001 mg to about 0.5 mg, 0.001 mg 30 ug to about 100 ug , about 30 ug to about 70 ug , about 30 to about 0.4 mg, about 0.001 mg to about 0.3 mg, about 20 ug to about 50 ug , about 70 ug to about 4000 ug , about 70 0.001mg to about 0.25 mg, about 0.001 mg to about 0.2 mg, ug to about 3000 ug, about 70 ug to about 2000 ug mg, about about 0.001 mg to about 0.15 mg , about 0.001 mg to about 70 ug to about 1000 ug, about 70 ug to about 700 ug , about 0.1 mg, about 0.001 mg to about 0.075 mg, about 0.001 mg 70 ug to about 500 ug , about 70 ug to about 300 ug , about to about 0.055 mg, about 0.001 mg to about 0.05 mg, about 70 ug to about 230 ug , about 70 ug to about 100 ug , about 0.001 mg to about 0.035 mg , about 0.001 mg to about 0.025 25 25 ug to about 5000 ug, about 45 ug to about 5000 ug , about mg, about 0.001 mg to about 0.01 mg, about 0.001 mg to 50 ug to about 5000 ug, about 75 ug to about 5000 ug, about about 0.005 mg, about 0.005 mg to about 5.0 mg, about 100 ug to about 5000 ug , about 250 ug to about 5000 ug , 0.0075 mg to about 5.0 mg, about 0.01 mg to about 5.0 mg, about 10 ug to about 3000 ug , about 25 ug to about 2000 ug , about 0.01 mg to about 4.0 mg, about 0.01 mg to about 3.0 about 10 ug to about 100 ug , and about 150 ug to about 250 mg, about 0.01 mg to about 2.0 mg, about 0.01 mg to about 30 ug of the compound of Formula ( I ) , including amorphous 1.0 mg, about 0.01 mg to about 0.7 mg, about 0.01 mg to and polymorph forms thereof. In some embodiments , the about 0.5 mg, about 0.01 mg to about 0.3 mg, about 0.01 mg therapeutically effective amount is about 20 ug to about 80 to about 0.23 mg, about 0.01 mg to about 0.1 mg, about 0.01 ug . In some embodiments , the therapeutically effective mg to about 0.07 mg, about 0.01mg to about 0.05 mg, about amount is about 1 ug , 5 ug, 10 ug, 30 ug , 50 ug , 70 ug , 100 0.01 mg to about 0.03 mg, about 0.03 mg to about 4.0 mg, 35 ug , 230 ug, 250 ug , 500 ug , 750 ug, 1000 ug , 1200 ug , 1500 about 0.03 mg to about 3.0 mg, about 0.03 mg to about 2.0 ug , 1700 ug , 2000 ug , 2200 ug, 2500 ug , 2700 ug , 3000 ug , mg, about 0.03 mg to about 1.0 mg, about 0.03 mg to about 3200 ug , 3500 ug, 3700 ug , 4000 ug , 4200ug , 4500 ug, 4700 0.7 mg, about 0.03 mg to about 0.5 mg, about 0.03 mg to ug, or 5000 ug of the compound of Formula (I ) , including about 0.3 mg, about 0.03 mg to about 0.23 mg, about 0.03 amorphous and polymorph forms thereof. In some embodi mg to about 0.1 mg, about 0.03 mg to about 0.07 mg, about 40 ments , the total amount of the compound of Formula (I ), 0.03 mg to about 0.05 mg, about 0.07 mg to about 4.0 mg, including amorphous and polymorph forms thereof , that is about 0.07 mg to about 3.0 mg, about 0.07 mg to about 2.0 administered in a 24 -hour period is from about 1 ug to about mg, about 0.07 mg to about 1.0 mg, about 0.07 mg to about 5000 ug, e.g., from about 1 to about 4000 ug ; from about 1 0.7 mg, about 0.07 mg to about 0.5 mg, about 0.07 mg to ug to about 3000 ug ; from about 1 ug to about 2000 ug ; from about 0.3 mg, about 0.07 mg to about 0.23 mg, about 0.07 45 about 1 ug to about 1000 ug ; from about 1 ug to about 500 mg to about 0.1 mg, about 0.025 mg to about 5.0 mg, about ug ; from about 1 to about 250 ug ; from about 1 ug to about 0.045 mg to about 5.0 mg, about 0.05 mg to about 5.0 mg, 100 ug; from about 1 ug to about 75 ug ; about 10 ug to about about 0.075 mg to about 5.0 mg, about 0.1 mg to about 5.0 100 ug ; about 20 ug to about 80 ug ; about 20 ug to about 40 mg, about 0.25 mg to about 5.0 mg, about 0.01 mg to about ug; or about 60 ug to about 80 ug . 3.0 mg, about 0.025 mg to about 2.0 mg, about 0.01 mg to 50 The compounds of Formula ( 1 ) , including amorphous and about 0.1 mg, and about 0.15 mg to about 0.25 mg of the polymorph forms thereof, can be administered either alone compound of Formula (1 ) , including amorphous and poly or more typically in combination with a conventional phar morph forms thereof. In some embodiments , the composi maceutical carrier , excipient , or the like , e.g. , as a compo tion comprises about 0.001mg , 0.005 mg, 0.01mg , 0.03 mg, sition . In some embodiments , the compounds of Formula ( I) , 0.05 mg, 0.07 mg, 0.1 mg , 0.23 mg , 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, 0.75 55 including amorphous and polymorph forms thereof, are mg, 1.0 mg, 1.2 mg, 1.5 mg, 1.7 mg, 2.0 mg, 2.2 mg, 2.5 mg, formulated as a suspension . For example , the compound of 2.7 mg, 3.0 mg, 3.2 mg, 3.5 mg, 3.7 mg, 4.0 mg, 4.2 mg, 4.5 Formula (I ) is not completely dissolved in the pharmaceu mg, 4.7 mg, or 5.0 mg of the compound of Formula (1 ) , tically acceptable carrier, i.e., the compound of Formula (I ) including amorphous and polymorph forms thereof. is suspended in the pharmaceutically acceptable carrier . In In the methods provided herein , in some embodiments 60 some embodiments , the composition comprises the com relating to intra- articular administration of a compound pound of Formula ( I) suspended in a pharmaceutically provided herein , the therapeutically effective amount of the acceptable carrier. In some embodiments , the composition compound of Formula (1 ) , including amorphous and poly comprises a polymorph form of Formula ( I) suspended in a morph forms thereof, is from about 1 ug to about 5000 ug . pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. In some embodiments , For example , the therapeutically effective amount can be 65 the composition comprises Form 1 suspended in a pharma from about 1 ug to about 4000 ug ; from about 1 ug to about ceutically acceptable carrier. In some embodiments , the 3000 ug; from about 1 ug to about 2000 ug ; from about 1 ug composition comprises a non -stoichiometric hydrate of US 10,544,139 B2 29 30 Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water etc.) , methyl cellulose (Metolose SM : Shin - Etsu Chemical suspended in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier . In some Co., Ltd., etc.) , ethyl cellulose ( Ethocel: Dow Chemical Co., embodiments , the pharmaceutical composition is a solution , etc.) , hydroxypropyl cellulose (Nisso HPC : Nippon Soda i.e., the compound of Formula (I ) is completely dissolved in Co., Ltd. , etc. ), low - substituted hydroxypropyl cellulose the pharmaceutically acceptable carrier . 5 ( L -HPC : Shin -Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd., etc. ), hydroxypropyl In some embodiments , liquid pharmaceutically adminis methyl cellulose 2208 (Metolose 90SH : Shin - Etsu Chemical trable compositions can , for example , be prepared by dis Co., Ltd., etc. ), hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose 2906 (Meto solving, dispersing or suspending a compound of Formula lose 65SH : Shin - Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd., etc.) , hydroxy ( I) , including amorphous and polymorph forms thereof, and propyl methyl cellulose 2910 (Metolose 60SH : Shin -Etsu optional pharmaceutical excipients in a carrier , e.g., water , 10 Chemical Co., Ltd. , etc. ), hydroxypropyl cellulose phthalate saline, aqueous dextrose , mannitol, glycerol, glycols, etha 200731 (HPMCP : Shin - Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd., etc.) , nol or the like , to form a solution , colloid , liposome, hydroxypropyl cellulose phthalate 220824 (HPMCP : Shin emulsion , complex , coacervate , or suspension . If desired , Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd., etc.) , hydroxypropyl methyl cel the pharmaceutical composition can also contain minor lulose acetate succinate (Shin - Etsu AQOAT: Shin - Etsu amounts of nontoxic auxiliary substances such as wetting 15 Chemical Co., Ltd., etc.) , carmellose ( NS -300 : Gotoku agents , emulsifying agents ( e.g., sodium carboxymethyl Chemical Co., Ltd., etc. ) , carmellose calcium ( ECG - 505 : cellulose) , co - solvents , solubilizing agents , pH buffering Gotoku Chemical Co., Ltd., etc.) , carmellose sodium ( Cello agents and the like ( e.g., sodium acetate , sodium citrate , gen : Daiichi Kogyo Seiyaku Co., Ltd., etc. ), croscarmellose cyclodextrin derivatives , sorbitan monolaurate , trietha sodium ( AC - Di- Sol: Asahi Kasei Corp., etc.) , carboxymethyl nolamine acetate , triethanolamine oleate , phosphate , and the 20 ethyl cellulose (CMEC : Freund Corp., etc. ), cellulose like ). acetate phthalate (CAP : Wako Pure Chemical Industries , In some embodiments , a pharmaceutical composition Ltd., etc.) , hydroxyethyl cellulose (NATROSOL : Aqualon provided herein comprises water . For example , the pharma Corp., etc. ) or mixtures thereof. In some embodiments , a ceutical composition can include an aqueous buffer solution . cellulose derivative is a carboxymethylcellulose , or a phar Examples of buffer agents include, but are not limited to , 25 maceutically acceptable salt thereof. For example , a cellu acetic acid , acetic anhydride, adipic acid , alanine , albumin , lose derivative is sodium carboxymethylcellulose. A cellu alcohol, alfadex , ammonia , ammonium acetate, ammonium lose derivative can be present in the composition in an sulfate , anhydrous citric acid , anhydrous dextrose, anhy amount of about 0.1 % to about 5 % by weight of the drous lactose , anhydrous trisodium citrate , arginine , ascor composition . For example , about 0.1 % to about 2.5 % ; about bic acid , aspartic acid , benzenesulfonic acid , benzoic acid , 30 0.1 % to about 1 % ; about 0.1 % to about 0.75 % ; about 0.1 % calcium chloride , calcium gluceptate , calcium hydroxide , to about 0.5 % ; about 0.1 % to about 0.25 % ; about 0.25 % to calcium , caprylic acid , carbon dioxide , citric acid monohy about 5 % ; about 0.5 % to about 5 % ; about 1 % to about 5 % ; drate , dibasic potassium phosphate , diethanolamine , diso about 2.5 % to about 5 % ; about 0.25 % to about 0.75 % ; about dium citrate sesquihydrate , disodium hydrogen citrate , ede 0.5 % to about 1 % ; and about 1 % to about 2 % by weight of tate calcium disodium , edetate disodium , edetate sodium , 35 the composition . In some embodiments , the surfactant can edetic acid , ethanolamine hydrochloride, ferric chloride , be present in the composition at about 0.5 % by weight of the gluceptate sodium , glycine hydrochloride , glycine, guani composition . dine hydrochloride, histidine , hydrochloric acid , isoleucine , In some embodiments , a pharmaceutical composition lactic acid , lactobionic acid , leucine , lysine acetate , lysine , provided herein comprises a surfactant. Non - limiting lysinemonohydrate , magnesium chloride ,magnesium stear- 40 examples of surfactants include polysorbates such as poly ate , maleic acid , metaphosphoric acid , methanesulfonic sorbate 20 , polysorbate 40 , polysorbate 60 , polysorbate 80 , acid , nitric acid , phosphate ion , phosphoric acid , potassium and polysorbate 85 ; polyoxyethylene hydrogenated castor chloride , potassium hydroxide , potassium phosphate oils such as polyoxyethylene hydrogenated castor oil 60 and (monobasic ), sodium acetate , sodium ascorbate , sodium polyoxyl 35 castor oil; sorbitan fatty acid esters ; sucrose benzoate , sodium bicarbonate , sodium bisulfate , sodium 45 fatty acid esters ; polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene gly carbonate , sodium citrate , sodium hydroxide , sodium cols ; polyoxyethylene fatty acid ethers ; polyoxyl stearates; hypochlorite , sodium phosphate dihydrate , sodium phos and other surfactants , including , but not limited to , 1,2 phate , sodium phosphate p - 32, sodium phosphate dibasic dimyristoyl - sn - glycero - 3-( phospho - s- ( 1 - glycerol) ) , 1,2 - dio dihydrate , sodium phosphate dibasic dodecahydrate, sodium leoyl- sn - glycero - 3 - phosphocholine , 1,2 -dipalmitoyl - sn phosphate dibasic, sodium phosphate dibasic ( anhydrous ), 50 glycero - 3-( phospho - rac-( 1 - glycerol) ) , 1,2 -distearoyl - sn sodium phosphate dibasic heptahydrate , sodium phosphate glycero - 3- (phospho -rac- ( 1 - glycerol) ) , 1,2 -distearoyl - sn monobasic (anhydrous ) , sodium phosphate monobasic dihy glycero - 3 -phosphocholine , deoxycholic acid , drate , sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate , sodium dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol ( dl) , distearoylphosphati phosphate monobasic , sodium sulfate (anhydrous ), sodium dylcholine ( dl) , docusate sodium , egg phospholipids, glyc sulfate , sodium thioglycolate , sodium thiomalate , sodium 55 eryl palmitostearate , glyceryl trioleate , hydrogenated soy thiosulfate , succinic acid , sulfuric acid , tartaric acid , tartaric bean lecithin , hydrolyzed soy protein (enzymatic ; 2000 acid (dl ) , trifluoroacetic acid , tromantadine , and trometh mw ) , hydroxyethylpiperazine ethane sulfonic acid , lecithin , amine. In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical composi miripirium chloride, n- (carbonyl - methoxypolyethylene gly tion comprises phosphate buffered saline . col 2000 )-1,2 - distearoyl- sn -glycero - 3 -phiv , oleic acid , In some embodiments , a pharmaceutical composition 60 palmitic acid , peg vegetable oil, peg - 20 sorbitan isostearate , provided herein comprises a cellulose derivative . In some peg -40 castor oil , phospholipid , poloxamer 188, polyethyl embodiments , a pharmaceutical composition provided ene glycol 200 , polyethylene glycol 300 , polyethylene gly herein comprises a water - soluble cellulose or water - soluble col 3350 , polyethylene glycol 400 , polyethylene glycol cellulose derivative . Examples of cellulose and cellulose 4000 , polyethylene glycol 600 , polyoxyethylene fatty acid derivatives include, but are not limited to , microcrystalline 65 esters , sodium cholesteryl sulfate , sodium deoxycholate , cellulose (Avicel : Asahi Kasei Corp., etc.) , microcrystalline sodium n-( carbonyl - methoxypolyethylene glycol 2000 )-1,2 cellulose carmellose sodium (Avicel RC : Asahi Kasei Corp., distearoyl- sn - glyc , sodium oleate , sorbitan monolaurate , US 10,544,139 B2 31 32 sorbitan monopalmitate , stearic acid , tricaprylin , or mixtures electrolytes, such as protamine sulfate , disodium hydrogen thereof. In some embodiments , the surfactant is a polysor phosphate , potassium hydrogen phosphate , sodium -chlo bate . For example , the pharmaceutical composition com ride , zinc salts , colloidal silica, magnesium trisilicate , poly prises polysorbate 80. A surfactant can be present in the vinyl pyrrolidone , cellulose -based substances , polyethylene composition in an amount of about 0.01 % to about 0.5 % by 5 glycol, sodium carboxymethyl cellulose , polyacrylates, weight of the composition . For example , about 0.01 % to waxes , polyethylene- polyoxypropylene -block polymers , about 0.25 % ; about 0.01 % to about 0.1 % ; about 0.01 % to and wool fat , solubilizers, tonicity agents , stabilizers , pre about 0.075 % ; about 0.01 % to about 0.05 % ; about 0.01 % to servatives, salt formation substances, chelators / chelating about 0.025 % ; about 0.025 % to about 0.5 % ; about 0.05 % to agents , viscosity enhancers , contrast agent , anti- foam about 0.5 % ; about 0.1 % to about 0.5 % ; about 0.25 % to 10 agents , control release agents , lubricants , adhesives, anal about 0.5 % ; about 0.025 % to about 0.075 % ; about 0.05 % to gesics, antiheparins, antivirals , colorants , emollients , pro about 0.1 % ; and about 0.1 % to about 0.2 % by weight of the pellants , and other excipients , including, but not limited to composition . In some embodiments , the surfactant can be activated charcoal, barium sulfate , bibapcitide , brocrinat, present in the composition at about 0.05 % by weight of the calcobutrol, glutathione , zinc, zinc acetate , zinc carbonate , composition . 15 zinc chloride, and zinc oxide. Cyclodextrins such as & - , ß , In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition and y - cyclodextrin , or chemically modified derivatives such comprises a compound of Formula ( I) , including amorphous as hydroxyalkylcyclodextrins, including 2- and 3 -hydroxy and polymorph forms thereof, and a pharmaceutically propyl- b -cyclodextrins , or other solubilized derivatives can acceptable carrier. For example , the composition comprises also be advantageously used to enhance delivery of com a compound of Formula (1 ) and saline, e.g., phosphate 20 pounds described herein . Dosage forms or compositions buffered saline. In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical containing a compound as described herein in the range of composition comprises a compound of Formula (1 ) , a phar 0.005 % to 100 % with the balance made up from non - toxic maceutically acceptable carrier, and one or more excipients . carrier may be prepared . The contemplated compositions For example , the composition comprises a compound of can contain 0.001 % -100 % active ingredient, in one embodi Formula (1 ), a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier , e.g. , 25 ment 0.1-95 % , in another embodiment 75-85 % , in a further phosphate buffered saline, and one or more excipients , e.g. , embodiment 20-80 % . Actual methods of preparing such a surfactant and a cellulose derivative . In some embodi dosage forms are known , or will be apparent, to those skilled ments , the surfactant is a polysorbate , e.g. , polysorbate 80 . in the art ; for example , see Remington : The Science and In some embodiments , the cellulose derivative is sodium Practice of Pharmacy , 22nd Edition (Pharmaceutical Press , carboxymethylcellulose . In some embodiments , the pharma- 30 London , U K. 2012) . ceutical composition comprises a compound of Formula (I ) , In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical compositions e.g. , a polymorph form of Formula ( I) , e.g., Form 1 , a provided herein contain a solubilizer. Examples of solubi pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, e.g., phosphate buffered lizers ude, but are not limited to , acetyltryptophan (dl ) , saline, and one or more excipients , e.g., sodium carboxym alanine , albumin (aggregated ), alcohol, alfadex intracavitary ethylcellulose and a polysorbate , e.g., polysorbate 80 . 35 powder, ammonia , anhydrous dextrose , anhydrous lactose , In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical composition anhydrous trisodium citrate , arginine, ascorbic acid , aspartic comprises a compound of Formula (1 ) , e.g., a polymorph acid , benzenesulfonic acid , benzyl alcohol, benzyl benzoate , form of Formula ( I) , about 0.1 % to about 5 % by weight of benzyl chloride , betadex sulfobutyl ether sodium , butanol a cellulose derivative, about 0.01 % to about 0.5 % by weight (mixed isomers ), caprylic acid , carboxymethylcellulose , car of a surfactant ; in an aqueous buffer. For example , a phar- 40 boxymethylcellulose sodium , castor oil, cholesterol, corn maceutical composition provided herein can include a com oil , cottonseed oil , creatine, creatinine , croscarmellose pound of Formula ( I ), e.g. , Form 1 or a non - stoichiometric sodium , crospovidone , cysteine hydrochloride, cysteine, hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by cysteine (dl ) , dextran 40 , dextran , diacetylated monoglyc weight water, about 0.5 % by weight sodium carboxymeth erides , diethanolamine, dimethyl sulfoxide , ethanolamine ylcellulose and about 0.05 % by weight polysorbate 80 in 45 hydrochloride, ethyl acetate , ethylene - vinyl acetate copoly phosphate buffered saline . mer ( 15 % vinyl acetate ), gamma cyclodextrin , gelatin , gen In some embodiments , a pharmaceutical composition tisic acid ethanolamide , gentisic acid , gluconolactone , glu provided herein has a pH of about 6.0 to about 8.0 . For curonic acid , glycerin , hetastarch , human albumin example , a pharmaceutical composition can have a pH of microspheres , hyaluronate sodium , hydroxypropyl betadex about 7.3 or 7.4 . In some embodiments a pharmaceutical 50 intramuscular injection , hypromellose , isopropyl alcohol, composition provided herein has a pH of about 3.0 to about methylcellulose , methylpyrrolidone , microcrystalline cellu 5.0 . For example , a pharmaceutical composition can have a lose , N , N -dimethylacetamide , niacinamide, oleic acid , pH of about 3.8 . palmitic acid , peanut oil, peg vegetable oil, peg - 20 sorbitan The compositions provided herein can contain an excipi isostearate , peg - 40 castor oil, phenylethyl alcohol , polyeth ent . The term “ excipient” is used herein to describe any 55 ylene glycol 200 , polyethylene glycol 300 , polyethylene ingredient other than the compound ( s) provided herein , e.g. , glycol 3350 , polyethylene glycol 400, polyethylene glycol compound of Formula ( 1) , including polymorph and amor 4000 , polyethylene glycol 600 , polypropylene glycol, poly phous forms thereof. Pharmaceutically acceptable excipi vinyl alcohol, poppy seed oil, povidone k12 , povidone k17 , ents include , but are not limited to , ion exchangers , alumina , povidone, proline, propyl gallate , propylene glycol, sesame aluminum stearate , lecithin , self -emulsifying drug delivery 60 oil, soybean oil , starch , stearic acid , trimethylsilyl treated systems (SEDDS ) such as d -a -tocopherol polyethylene gly dimethiconol/ trimethylsiloxysilicate crosspolymer , and yel col 1000 succinate , surfactants used in pharmaceutical dos low wax , and combinations thereof. age forms such as Tweens, poloxamers or other similar In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions polymeric delivery matrices , serum proteins, such as human provided herein contain a tonicity agent. Examples of tonic serum albumin , buffer substances such as phosphates , tris , 65 ity agents include , but are not limited to , dextrose monohy glycine, sorbic acid , potassium sorbate , partial glyceride drate , dextrose solution , dextrose, dimethyl sulfoxide, fruc mixtures of saturated vegetable fatty acids, water, salts or tose, gluconolactone, glucuronic acid , glycerin , glycine US 10,544,139 B2 33 34 hydrochloride , glycine , guanidine hydrochloride, histidine , aldehyde sulfoxylate, sodium iodide, sodium metabisulfite , hydrochloric acid , hypertonic sodium chloride solution , iso sodium sulfite , sodium tartrate , sulfur dioxide , sulfurous leucine , isopropyl alcohol, isotonic sodium chloride solu acid , and thimerosal and combinations thereof. tion , lactic acid (dl ) , lactobionic acid , lactose monohydrate , In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical compositions lactose , leucine , lysine acetate , lysine, lysine monohydrate , 5 provided herein contain a salt formation agent. Examples of magnesium chloride, magnesium stearate , maleic acid , man nitol, meglumine ,methionine , methylboronic acid , polypro salt formation agents include , but are not limited to , acetic pylene glycol, potassium chloride , potassium hydroxide , acid , acetic anhydride, adipic acid , ammonium acetate , potassium phosphate (monobasic ) , proline , propyl gallate , ammonium sulfate, anhydrous citric acid , benzoic acid , propylene glycol, saccharin sodium , serine, sodium acetate , 10 calcium chloride , calcium gluceptate , calcium hydroxide, sodium ascorbate , sodium benzoate, sodium bicarbonate , calcium , carbon dioxide, citric acid monohydrate , dibasic sodium bisulfate , sodium carbonate, sodium chloride , potassium phosphate , diethanolamine , disodium citrate ses sodium citrate , sodium gluconate , sodium hydroxide , quihydrate , disodium hydrogen citrate , hydrochloric acid , sodium hypochlorite , sodium lactate , sodium phosphate isoleucine , lactic acid (dl ) , lactobionic acid , magnesium dihydrate , sodium phosphate , sodium phosphate p - 32 , 15 chloride, magnesium stearate , maleic acid , metaphosphoric sodium phosphate dibasic dihydrate , sodium phosphate acid , methanesulfonic acid , nitric acid , phosphate ion , phos dibasic dodecahydrate , sodium phosphate dibasic , sodium phoric acid , sodium hydroxide , sodium hypochlorite , phosphate dibasic anhydrous) , sodium phosphate dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate , sodium phosphate , sodium heptahydrate , sodium phosphate monobasic (anhydrous ), phosphate p -32 , sodium phosphate dibasic dihydrate , sodium phosphate monobasic dihydrate , sodium phosphate 20 sodium phosphate dibasic dodecahydrate , sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate , sodium phosphate monobasic , dibasic , sodium phosphate dibasic ( anhydrous ) , sodium sodium sulfate (anhydrous ) , sodium sulfate , sodium thio phosphate dibasic heptahydrate , sodium phosphate monoba glycolate , sodium thiomalate , sodium thiosulfate , sorbitol, sic anhydrous ), sodium phosphate monobasic dihydrate , succinic acid , sucrose, sulfuric acid , tartaric acid , tartaric sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate , sodium phos acid (dl ), threonine, trehalose , trifluoroacetic acid , trisodium 25 phate monobasic , and trifluoroacetic acid and combinations citrate dihydrate , tromethamine , tryptophan , tyrosine , urea , thereof. urethane , and valine and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical compositions provided herein contain a chelator or chelating agent. provided herein contain a stabilizer . Examples of stabilizers Examples of chelators or chelating agents include , but are include, but are not limited to , acetyltryptophan (dl ) , alanine , 30 not limited to , caldiamide sodium , caloxetate trisodium , albumin (aggregated ), alcohol, alfadex intracavitary powder , calteridol calcium , edetate calcium disodium , edetate diso ammonia , anhydrous dextrose , anhydrous lactose, anhy dium , edetate sodium , edetic acid , ferric chloride, gluceptate drous trisodium citrate , arginine, ascorbic acid , aspartic acid , sodium , methylboronic acid , nioxime , oxidronate disodium , benzenesulfoniczyl chloride , betadex acid , benzylsulfobutyl alcohol ether, benzyl sodiumbenzoate , boric , acidben, 35 peg- 60 hydrogenated castor oil, pentasodium pentetate , pen butanol (mixed isomers ), caprylic acid , carboxymethylcel tetate calcium trisodium , pentetic acid , sodium phosphite , lulose, carboxymethylcellulose sodium , castor oil , choles sodium pyrophosphate , sodium succinate hexahydrate , terol, creatine , creatinine , croscarmellose sodium , crospovi sodium trimetaphosphate , succimer, and versetamide and done , cysteine hydrochloride, cysteine , cysteine (dl ) , combinations thereof. dextran 40 , dextran , ethylene -vinyl acetate copolymer ( 15 % 40 In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions vinyl acetate ), gelatin , gentisic acid ethanolamide, gentisic provided herein contain a viscosity enhancer. Examples of acid , hetastarch , human albumin microspheres, hyaluronate viscosity enhancers include , but are not limited to , car sodium , hypromellose , meglumine , methionine, methylbo boxymethylcellulose , carboxymethylcellulose sodium , cros ronic acid , methylcellulose, methylpyrrolidone, microcrys carmellose sodium , crospovidone, ethylene -vinyl acetate talline cellulose , miripirium chloride , N-( carbonyl- 45 copolymer ( 15 % vinyl acetate ) , gelatin , hetastarch , human methoxypolyethylene glycol 2000 ) -1,2 -distearoyl -sn albumin microspheres, hyaluronate sodium , hypromellose , glycero - 3 -phiv , N , N - dimethylacetamide, niacinamide , methylcellulose , methylpyrrolidone , microcrystalline cellu phenylalanine , polyvinyl alcohol, povidone K12, povidone lose, polyvinyl alcohol, povidone K12 , povidone K17, povi K17, povidone , serine , sodium citrate , sodium gluconate , sodium lactate , starch , threonine, trehalose , tricaprylin , trim- 50 done , starch , and trimethylsilyl treated dimethiconol/ trim ethylsily1 treated dimethiconol /trimethylsiloxysilicate ethylsiloxysilicate crosspolymer and combinations thereof . crosspolymer, trisodium citrate dihydrate , tryptophan , tyro In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical compositions sine , urea , and valine and combinations thereof. provided herein contain a contrast agent. Examples of con In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical compositions trast agents include , but are not limited to , diatrizoic acid , provided herein contain a preservative . Examples of preser- 55 perflutren , stannous chloride, stannous fluoride, stannous vatives include , but are not limited to , acetone sodium tartrate , tetrakis (2 -methoxyisobutylisocyanide ,copper ( l) tet bisulfite , alpha -tocopherol , benzalkonium chloride , benzyl rafluoroborate , and tetrofosmin and combinations thereof. alcohol, benzyl benzoate , benzyl chloride, boric acid , buty In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions lated hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene, butylpara provided herein contain an anti - foam agent. Examples of ben , chlorobutanol, chlorobutanol hemihydrate , cresol, 60 anti - foam agents include, but are not limited to , dimethi diethyl pyrocarbonate , edetate calcium disodium , edetate cone , polysiloxane, silicone , and simethicone and combina disodium , edetate sodium , edetic acid , hexylresorcinol, tions thereof . metacresol, methylparaben , miripirium chloride, monothio In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical compositions glycerol, nitrogen , phenol, phenylethyl alcohol , phenylmer provided herein contain a control release agent . Examples of curic nitrate , potassium bisulfite , potassium metabisulfite , 65 control release agents include , but are not limited to , poly propylparaben , sodium ascorbate , sodium benzoate , sodium ( dl- lactic -co -glycolic acid ) , (50:50 ; 12000 mw ) , polyglactin , bisulfate , sodium chlorate , sodium dithionite , sodium form and polylactide and combinations thereof. US 10,544,139 B2 35 36 In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical compositions about 4 mL to about 10 mL , about 7 mL to about 10 mL , provided herein contain a lubricant. Examples of lubricants about 1.5 mL to about 2.5 mL , about 2 mL to about 4 mL . include , but are not limited to , silicone and simethicone and In some embodiments , the composition comprises a volume combinations thereof. of about 2 mL per injection . In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical compositions 5 In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of provided herein contain an adhesive. An example of an Formula ( I ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms adhesive includes , but is not limited to , Duro - Tak 87-2287 . thereof, is about 0.1 ug/ kg to about 10 ug/ kg in humans. In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical compositions In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of provided herein contain an analgesic . An example of an Formula (1 ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms analgesic includes, but is not limited to , disodium sulfos- 10 thereof, is about 0.1 ug /kg to about 5 ug /kg in humans . In alicylate . some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of For In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical compositions mula (I ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms provided herein contain an anti -heparin agent. An example thereof, is about 0.2 ug/ kg to about 9 ug/ kg in humans. of an anti -heparin agent includes , but is not limited to , In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of protamine sulfate . 15 Formula ( I) , including amorphous and polymorph forms In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions thereof, is about 0.25 ug/ kg to about 8 ug /kg in humans. provided herein contain an antiviral agent. An example of an In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of antiviral agent includes, but is not limited to , tromantadine . Formula (1 ), including amorphous and polymorph forms In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical compositions thereof, is about 0.3 ug /kg to about 7 ug /kg in humans. provided herein contain a colorant. An example of a colorant 20 In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of includes , but is not limited to , methylene blue . Formula (1 ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical compositions thereof, is about 0.4 ug/ kg to about 6 ug/ kg in humans . provided herein contain an emollient. An example of an In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of emollient includes , but is not limited to , urethane . Formula (1 ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical compositions 25 thereof, is about 0.5 ug/ kg to about 5 ug/ kg in humans. provided herein contain a propellant. An example of a In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of propellant includes , but is not limited to , dichlorodifluo Formula ( I ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms romethane . thereof, is about 0.6 ug/ kg to about 5 ug / kg in humans. In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical compositions In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of provided herein are prepared as single - use injectable com- 30 Formula ( I) , including amorphous and polymorph forms positions . For example , the pharmaceutical composition is thereof, is about 1.0 ug/ kg to about 4 ug /kg in humans. prepared to contain the therapeutically effective amount of In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of the compound of Formula (1 ) , including amorphous and Formula (I ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms polymorph forms thereof, and is intended to be used in a thereof, is about 2.0 ug/ kg to about 4 ug/ kg in humans . single subject for a single injection . In some embodiments , 35 In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of the pharmaceutical compositions provided herein are pre Formula ( I ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms pared as multi- dose compositions . For example, the phar thereof, is about 3.0 ug/ kg to about 5 ug/ kg in humans . maceutical composition is prepared to contain more than the In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of therapeutically effective amount of the compound of For Formula (I ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms mula (I ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms 40 thereof, is about 4.0 ug /kg to about 6 ug/ kg in humans. thereof, and is intended to be used in one or more subjects In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of for more than one injection . In some embodiments , the Formula ( I) , including amorphous and polymorph forms multi- dose composition has a higher concentration of the thereof, is about 5.0 ug/ kg to about 10 ug /kg in humans. compound of Formula (I ) , than is intended for a single In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of dosage and is intended to be diluted on - site to achieve the 45 Formula (I ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms appropriate dosage for the subject . thereof, is 0.01 mg to 1 mg in humans . In some embodiments , the compositions are provided in In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of unit dosage forms suitable for single administration of a Formula (I ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms dose . In some embodiments, the compositions are provided thereof, is 0.01 mg to 0.5 mg in humans . in unit dosage forms suitable for multiple administration of 50 In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of a dose . For example , one injection every threemonths , every Formula (I ), including amorphous and polymorph forms six months, every nine months , etc. thereof, is 0.01 mg to 0.3 mg in humans. Injectables can be prepared in conventional forms, either In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of as liquid solutions, colloids, liposomes , complexes, coacer Formula ( I ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms vates , suspensions, or emulsions , or in solid forms suitable 55 thereof, is 0.03 mg to 0.9 mg in humans. for reconstitution in liquid prior to injection . The percentage In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of of active compound contained in such parenteral composi Formula ( I ), including amorphous and polymorph forms tions is highly dependent on the specific nature thereof, as thereof, is 0.03 mg to 0.23 mg in humans . well as the activity of the compound and the needs of the In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of subject .However , percentages of active ingredient of 0.01 % 60 Formula (I ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms to 10 % in solution are employable , and could be higher if the thereof, is 0.05 mg to 0.8 mg in humans. composition is a solid or suspension , which could be sub In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of sequently diluted to the above percentages . Formula ( 1) , including amorphous and polymorph forms In some embodiments , the composition comprises a vol thereof , is 0.07 mg to 0.7 mg in humans. ume of about 1 mL to about 10 mL per injection . For 65 In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of example , about 1 mL to about 6 mL , about 1 mL to about 4 Formula ( I) , including amorphous and polymorph forms mL , about 1 mL to about 3 mL , about 2 mL to about 10 mL , thereof, is 0.08 mg to 0.7 mg in humans . US 10,544,139 B2 37 38 In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of months. For example , the compositions do not exhibit a Formula (1 ), including amorphous and polymorph forms change in one or more of polymorph form ( e.g., an increase thereof, is 0.1 mg to 0.6 mg in humans . or decrease of a certain form ), appearance , pH , percent In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of impurities , activity ( as measured by in vitro assays ) , or Formula (I ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms 5 osmolarity over time, e.g. , at least 12 months. In the above, thereof, is 0.12 mg to 0.6 mg in humans. the phrase “ do not exhibit a change” refers to a change of In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of less than 5 % ( e.g., less than 4 % , less than 3 % , less than 2 % , Formula (I ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms less than 1 % ) as measured for any of the parameters over the thereof, is 0.14 mg to 0.5 mg in humans . relevant time period . In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of 10 In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical compositions Formula (I ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms provided herein exhibit slow dissolution of the compound of thereof, is 0.16 mg to 0.5 mg in humans . Formula (I ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of thereof. Dissolution time can vary according to the specific Formula (1 ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms solvent, the concentration , the temperature , the polymorph thereof, is 0.18 mg to 0.4 mg in humans . 15 form , etc. In some embodiments , a composition comprising In some embodiments , the unit dosage of compounds of a compound of Formula ( I ) exhibits a mean dissolution time Formula ( I ), including amorphous and polymorph forms of between about 5 days and 1500 days in solution , such as thereof, is 0.2 mg to 0.4 mg in humans . between about 5 days and 10 days , 10 days and 100 days , In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition 100 days and 1000 days , or 1000 days and 1500 days in comprising a compound of Formula (I ), including amor- 20 solution , e.g. , about 5 , 7 , 10, 25, 50 , 75 , 100, 200 , 300 , 400 , phous and polymorph forms thereof, and a pharmaceutically 500 , 600 , 700 , 800 , 900 , 1000 , 1100 , 1200 , 1300 , 1400 , or acceptable carrier. In some embodiments , the composition 1500 days in solution . In some embodiments , a pharmaceu can be prepared from a polymorph form of Formula ( I) , e.g. , tical composition provided herein exhibits a mean dissolu Form 1. The compositions provided herein , e.g., suspensions tion time of greater than 7 days in solution ; greater than 60 and solutions, can maintain the effective drug concentration , 25 days in solution ; greater than 120 days in solution ; or greater i.e., the effective concentration of the compound of Formula than 1 year in solution . In some embodiments , a composition (I ) , over an extended period of time, e.g., over a period of comprising a compound of Formula (1 ) exhibits a mean weeks , months, or years . In some embodiments , the com dissolution time of about 7 days in solution . In some pound of Formula (I ) is present at the site of administration embodiments , a composition comprising a compound of ( e.g., the site of injection ) at about 0.5 % to about 10 % of the 30 Formula (I ) exhibits a mean dissolution time of about 89 initial dose , such as about 0.5 % , 0.55 % , 1 % , 1.5 % , 2 % , days in solution . In some embodiments , a composition 2.5 % , 3 % , 3.5 % , 4 % , 4.5 % , 5 % , 5.5 % , 6 % , 6.5 % , 7 % , 7.5 % , comprising a compound of Formula ( 1 ) exhibits a mean 8 % , 8.5 % , 9 % , 9.5 % , or 10 % of the initial dose after a period dissolution time of about 1116 days in solution . In some such of time. For example, about 0.5 % to about 10 % of the initial embodiments , the pharmaceutical composition comprises dose is at the site of injection after about 45 days , 90 days, 35 about 100 mg/mL of the compound of Formula ( I ) , including or 180 days. In some embodiments , the compound of amorphous and polymorph forms thereof. In some embodi Formula ( I ) is radiolabeled . The compound can be radiola ments , the dissolution time can depend upon , for example , beled at , for example , any carbon , hydrogen , or fluorine pH or concentration or both . As used herein “ mean disso atom with a respective radioactive isotope. Examples of lution time” refers to the rate of drug release from the dosage radioactive isotopes include , but are not limited to , deute- 40 form , wherein the higher the value , the slower the rate of rium , tritium , carbon - 11 , carbon 14 , and fluorine - 18 . The drug release . signal can be measured using any imaging method known to In some such embodiments , the pharmaceutical compo those of skill in the art, including , but not limited to , sition comprises between about 0.005 mg/mL and 2.5 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI ) , ultrasound , endoscopy, mg/ mL of the compound of Formula (I ) , including amor positron emission tomography (PET ) , and single - photon 45 phous and polymorph forms thereof, for example , between emission computed tomography (SPECT ) . about 0.005 mg/mL to about 2 mg/ mL , about 0.01 mg/mL to In some embodiments , the compositions and composi about 1.8 mg/ mL , about 0.025 mg/ mL to about 1.6 mg/mL , tions provided herein are stable for at least 3 months. For about 0.05 mg/ mL to about 1.5 mg/mL , about 0.075 mg/ mL example , the compositions do not exhibit a change in one or to about 1.25 mg/ mL , about 0.1 mg/ mL to about 1 mg/ mL , more of polymorph form ( e.g., an increase or decrease of a 50 or about 0.25 mg/ mL to about 0.75 mg/ mL . In some such certain form ), appearance, pH , percent impurities , activity embodiments , the pharmaceutical composition comprises (as measured by in vitro assays) , or osmolarity over time, about 0.015 mg/ mL to about 0.115 mg/mL of the compound e.g. , at least 3 months. In some embodiments , the compo of Formula (1 ), including amorphous and polymorph forms sitions and compositions provided herein are stable for at thereof. In some embodiments , the injection concentration least 6 months. For example , the compositions do not exhibit 55 comprises between about 0.1 mg/ mL and 4 mg/ mL . In some a change in one ormore of polymorph form ( e.g., an increase embodiments , the injection concentration is 2 mg/ mL . or decrease of a certain form ), appearance , pH , percent The compounds provided herein , e.g., compounds of impurities , activity (as measured by in vitro assays) , or Formula ( I) , including amorphous and polymorph forms osmolarity over time, e.g., at least 6 months. In some thereof, can be formulated as a plurality of particles . For embodiments , the compositions and compositions provided 60 example , particles of a compound provided herein can have herein are stable for at least 9 months. For example , the a median particle size of less than 20 um ( e.g., less than compositions do not exhibit a change in one or more of about 15 um ; less than about 10 um ; less than about 7.5 um ; polymorph form ( e.g. , an increase or decrease of a certain less than about 5 um ; less than about 2.5 um ; less than about form ), appearance , pH , percent impurities , activity (as mea 1 um ; and less than about 0.5 um ) . For example , the median sured by in vitro assays ), or osmolarity over time, e.g., at 65 particle size can be between about 0.1 um and 20 um , such least 9 months. In some embodiments , the compositions and as between about 0.5-20 , 0.5-15 , 0.5-10 , 0.5-7.5 , 0.5-5 , compositions provided herein are stable for at least 12 0.5-2.5 , 0.5-1, 2.5-15 , 5-10 , 7.5-20 , or 1-5 um . In some US 10,544,139 B2 39 40 embodiments , the particles also comprise a polymer. ( e.g., MOBIC® ), celecoxib (e.g. , CELEBREX® ), piroxi Examples of suitable polymers include biocompatible and cam ( e.g. , FELDENE® ) , etodolac (e.g. , LODINE® ), nabu biodegradable polymers like poly ( lactic acid ), a poly (gly metone ( e.g., RELAFEN® ), lumiracoxib , valdecoxib ( e.g. , colic acid ), a poly ( lactic -co -glycolic acid ), a poly ( lactide BEXTRA® ), etoricoxib , parecoxib , fenoprofen (e.g. , NAL co - glycolide ), and mixtures thereof. In some embodiments , 5 FON® ), oxaprozin ( e.g., DAYPRO® ) , mefanamic acid ( e.g. the particles comprise poly ( lactic -co - glycolic acid ) (PLGA ). PONSTEL® ), diflunisal ( e.g., DOLOBID® ) , fenoprofen In some embodiments , the compound of Formula ( I) , ( e.g., NALFON® ) , flurbirofen ( e.g., ANSAID ) , ketopro including amorphous and polymorph forms thereof, e.g., a fen ( e.g., ORUVAIL® ) , ketorolac ( e.g., TORADOL® ) , polymorph form of Formula (I ) , e.g., Form 1 , has a particle sulindac ( e.g., CLINORIL® ) , meclofenamate , choline size distribution ( D value ) , e.g. , a D50 , of between about 1 10 salicylate -magnesium salicylate , salsalate (e.g. , DISAL and about 6 um , such as between about 1.5 and about 5 um , CID® ), and tolmetin ( e.g. , TOLECTIN® ) ; ( b ) physical or about 2.4 to about 2.55 um . For example , the D50 can be therapy ; (C ) injections of corticosteroid medications such as , about 1.5 , 1.6 , 1.7 , 1.8 , 1.9 , 2 , 2.1 , 2.2 , 2.3 , 2.4 , 2.5 , 2.6 , 2.7 , e.g., prednisone , dexamethasone , hydrocortisone , and meth 2.8embodiments , 2.9 , 3 , 3.1 , ,the 3.2 ,D50 3.3 , value3.4 , 3.5is , about4 , 4.5 ,2.55 or 5 umum .. In some 15 ylprenisolone; (d ) injections of hyaluronic acid derivatives embodiments , the D50 value is about 2.45 um . In some ( e.g., HYALGAN® , SYNVISC® , EUIFLEXXA? , GEL embodiments , the D50 value is about 2.1 um . In some ONE® , MONOVISCR , ORTHOVISC® , and SUPARTZ® ); embodiments , the D50 value is about 2 um . In some embodi ( e ) injections or topical application of ( e.g. , ments , the D50 value is about 1.6 um . The D50 can be CAPSAGEL® ; ( f ) narcotics , such as , e.g. , codeine, fentanyl, measured by conventional particle size measuring tech- 20 hydrocodone, hydromorphone, morphine , meperidine, oxy niques well known to those skilled in the art . Such tech codone, and (e.g. , ULTRAM® , CONZIP® , and niques include, for example , sedimentation field flow frac RYZOLT® ); ( g ) antidepressants such as dulozetine ( e.g., tionation , photon correlation spectroscopy, light scattering , CYMBALTA® ); (h ) braces and /or shoe inserts or any laser diffraction and disc centrifugation . device that can immobilize or support the joints to help keep Administration of the compositions and compounds pro- 25 pressure off it ( e.g. , splints , braces , shoe inserts or other vided herein , including amorphous and polymorph forms medical devices ) ; (i ) realigning bones (osteotomy ) ; (j ) joint thereof, can be via any of the accepted modes of adminis tration including , but not limited to , subcutaneous , intrave replacement (arthroplasty ) ; and (k ) chronic pain class . nous , topical , transdermal , intraperitoneal, intramuscular, In some embodiments , a compound of Formula ( I) , intrathecal, intra- articular , intracapsular, intraspinal, intra- 30 usedincluding to treat amorphous osteoarthritis and polymorphin combination forms with thereof one ,or can more be synovial , epidural, intravascular, or via irrigation of infected of the following drugs or methods: prednisone, methylpred bone. In some embodiments , administration is parenteral . In nisolone, SYNVISC® (hylan G -F 20 ), ABT -981 [MAbs some embodiments , administration is intra -articular . (2015 ) 7 ( 3 ): 605-619 ], stem cell injection , JNJ- 42160443 includingIn some amorphous embodiments and , thepolymorph compound forms of thereofFormula, and( I) , 35 (fulranumab ), platelet rich plasma (PRGF ) injection , tan compositions provided herein are administered parenterally , ezumab , venlafaxine , PH -797804 , PG - 530742 ( the dihy including intramuscularly , intra - articularly , periarticularly, drated sodium salt PG - 116800 ), Sprifermin (AS902330 , intraspinally , intrasynovially , and epidurally . For example , rhFGF- 18 ), epicutaneous ketoprofen in transfersome the compounds and compositions can be injected locally at ( IDEA -033 ) [ Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2007 ) the site of the osteoarthritis ( e.g. , knee , hip , shoulder, etc. ). 40 66 ( 9 ) :1178-1183 ], FX005 and FX006 (both by Flexion Injections can occur at one or more locations surrounding Therapeutics, Inc. ), JNJ- 39439335 (Mavatrep ) [ J. Med . the joint. In some embodiments , the injection is guided using Chem . (2015 ) 58 (9 ): 3859-3874 ), polmacoxib (Acelex , an imaging method such as ultrasound . In some embodi CG100649) , balicatib (AAE581 ) , GSK3196165 , cebranop ments , administration ( e.g. , injection ) of a compound of adol (GRT6005 ) , fasinumab (REGN475 ) , TPX - 100 (by Formula (I ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms 45 Ortho Trophix ) , PRX167700 (by Proximagen ), EP 1041AR thereof, is preceded or combined with a local anesthetic . (extended release fluticasone propionate composition ), The compound of Formula ( 1) provided herein intended LY2951742 and LY545694 (both by Eli Lilly & Co ) , Adali for pharmaceutical use can be administered as amorphous or mumab (Humira® ), GW842166 (by GSK ) , YY1201 ( by polymorph compositions. Pharmaceutically acceptable com Yooyoung Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) , CF101 ( IB -MECA ) positions can include suspensions, liquids , solutions, colloi- 50 and CF602 (both by Can - Fite BioPharma) , PLA -695 ( by dals , liposomes , emulsions, complexes , and coacervates. In Pfizer ), VX - 150 (by Vertex ), ADL5859 and ADL5747 (both some embodiments , the composition is formulated as a by Adolor Corporation now Cubist Pharmaceuticals ), suspension . The compounds, including amorphous and funapide ( INN ) (TV -45070 , XEN402 ) , AGG -523 (by Pfizer ) polymorph forms thereof, and compositions can be admin [Osteoarthritis Cartilage ( 2011 ) 19 ( 3 ): 315-323 ], CNTX istered as an injection . 55 4975 ( capsaicin for injection by Centrexion Corporation ) , The compounds and compositions provided herein can CR845 (by Cara Therapeutics ), ASP7962 (by Astellas also be administered in combination (administered together Pharma) , DA -5202 (by Dong - A ST Co., Ltd.) , GZ389988 or sequentially ) with other known agents . (by Sanofi -Genzyme ) , and MEDI 7352 (by AstraZeneca ) , In some embodiments , a compound of Formula (1 ), LNA043 (by Novartis ). including amorphous and polymorph forms thereof, can be 60 4. Kits used to treat osteoarthritis in combination with one or more Also provided herein are kits . Typically , a kit includes one of the following : ( a ) Nonsteroidal anti - inflammatory drugs or more compounds or compositions as described herein . In (NSAIDs ) , including , but not limited to , ibuprofen , certain embodiments , a kit can include one or more delivery naproxen , aspirin , acetaminophen , indomethacin ( e.g., INI systems, e.g., for delivering or administering a compound or DOCIN® and TIVORBEX® ) , diclofenac by mouth or to the 65 composition as provided herein , and directions for use of the affected area ( e.g. , VOLTAREN® , ZIPSOR® , PENN kit ( e.g., instructions for treating a patient) . In some embodi SAID® , FLECTOR® , and CATAFLAM®) , meloxicam ments , the kit can include a compound or composition as US 10,544,139 B2 41 42 described herein and a label that indicates that the contents pound of Formula ( I ) , including amorphous and /or poly are to be administered to a patient with bone or cartilage morph forms thereof, in the joint surrounding the site of diseases or osteoarthritis . administration for at least about 180 days following admin 5. Methods for Treating Osteoarthritis istration . In some embodiments , the compound of Formula Provided are methods for the treatment of osteoarthritis in 5 (I ) is radiolabeled before administration . In some embodi a patient . The methods comprise administering to the patient ments , the compound of Formula (1 ) is radiolabeled with a therapeutically effective amount of a compound of For tritium ( H ). The concentration of the radiolabeled com mula ( I) , including amorphous and /or polymorph forms pound of Formula ( I) can be measured by detection methods thereof, or a pharmaceutical composition comprising a com known to those of skill in the art . For example , the radio pound of Formula (I ) , including amorphous and polymorph 10 labeled compound of Formula (1 ) can be measured by forms thereof, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier . In quantitative radiochemical analysis ( QRA ). In some some embodiments, the methods provided herein include embodiments , the radiolabeled compound of Formula ( I ) is intra - articular administration of a pharmaceutical composi measured by quantitative whole body autoradiography tion comprising a therapeutically effective amount of a ( WBA ). In some embodiments , the radiolabeled com compound of Formula ( I) , including amorphous and poly- 15 pound ofFormula (I ) is detected by radiographic imaging . In morph forms thereof. In some embodiments , the methods some embodiments , the compound of Formula ( I) in the provided herein include intra - articular administration of a composition comprises Form 1. In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical composition prepared by a process compris compound of Formula ( I ) in the composition comprises a ing mixing a polymorph form of a compound of Formula ( I) non - stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. In some embodi- 20 and about 20 % by weight water . In some embodiments , the ments , the polymorph form is dried prior to mixing with the compound of Formula ( I ) in the composition is substantially pharmaceutically acceptable carrier . In some embodiments , present as a non - stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 having the polymorph form is Form 1. In some embodiments , the between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water. In some polymorph form is Form 13. In some embodiments , the embodiments , the pharmaceutical composition is a solution . pharmaceutically acceptable carrier is an aqueous medium 25 In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical composition is a In some embodiments , provided herein are methods for suspension . treating osteoarthritis in a patient comprising intra - articular In some embodiments of the methods provided herein , the administration to the patient a pharmaceutical composition compositions are formulated such that the compound of comprising a therapeutically effective amount of a com Formula (1 ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms pound of Formula (I ), and a pharmaceutically acceptable 30 thereof, e.g., Form 1, is bioavailable over an extended period carrier. In some embodiments , the compound of Formula (1 ) of time following administration . In some embodiments , the in the composition comprises Form 1. In some embodi compound of Formula ( 1) maintains a concentration within ments , the compound of Formula ( I) in the composition a therapeutic window for a desired period of time. comprises a non -stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 having Following intraarticular administration of a pharmaceuti between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water. In some 35 cal composition , e.g. , suspension , of a compound of For embodiments , the compound of Formula ( I ) in the compo mula ( I) , including amorphous and polymorph forms sition is substantially present as a non -stoichiometric thereof, little to no amount of the compound of Formula ( I) hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and 20 % by weight is detected in the plasma of the subject. For example , a water . In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical composi pharmaceutical composition , e.g. , suspension , can provide a tion is a composition . In some embodiments, the pharma- 40 plasma concentration of less than about 0.1 ng/ mL of the ceutical composition is a suspension . compound of Formula (I ) following administration of the In some embodiments of the methods provided herein , a compound of Formula (I ) at 4 hours after administration . In pharmaceutical composition provided herein delivers a some embodiments , the pharmaceutical composition , e.g. , therapeutically effective concentration of the compound of suspension , provides a plasma concentration of less than Formula (I ) , including amorphous and /or polymorph forms 45 about 0.1 ng /mL following administration of the compound thereof, to the jointsurrounding the site of administration for of Formula ( I) at 24 hours after administration . In some at least about two weeks following administration . For embodiments , the pharmaceutical composition , e.g., suspen example , the pharmaceutical composition can provide a sion , provides a plasma concentration of less than about 0.1 therapeutically effective concentration of the compound of ng/ mL of the compound of Formula (1 ) following adminis Formula (I ) , including amorphous and / or polymorph forms 50 tration of the compound of Formula (I ) at 4 weeks following thereof, in the joint surrounding the site of administration for administration . For example , the pharmaceutical composi at least about 30 days following administration . In some tion , e.g., suspension , can provide a plasma concentration of embodiments , the pharmaceutical composition provides a less than about 0.1 ng/ mL of the compound of Formula ( I ) therapeutically effective concentration of the compound of following administration of the compound at 24 weeks Formula (I ) in the joint surrounding the site of administra- 55 following administration . tion for at least about 45 days following administration . In In some embodiments , a pharmaceutical composition , some embodiments , the pharmaceutical composition pro e.g. , suspension , can provide a plasma concentration of less vides a therapeutically effective concentration of the com than about 0.1 ng /mL of the compound of Formula (1 ) pound of Formula (I ) in the joint surrounding the site of following a dose of up to 250 ug of the compound of administration for at least about 60 days following admin- 60 Formula (I ) at 4 hours after administration . In some embodi istration . In some embodiments , the pharmaceutical com ments, the pharmaceutical composition , e.g. , suspension , position provides a therapeutically effective concentration of provides a plasma concentration of less than about 0.1 the compound of Formula ( I) , including amorphous and / or ng/ mL following a dose of up to 250 ug of the compound of polymorph forms thereof, in the joint surrounding the site of Formula ( I) at 24 hours after administration . In some administration for at least about 90 days following admin- 65 embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition , e.g., suspen istration . For example , the pharmaceutical composition can sion , provides a plasma concentration of less than about 0.1 provide a therapeutically effective concentration of the com ng /mL of the compound of Formula ( I) following a dose of US 10,544,139 B2 43 44 up to 250 ug of the compound of Formula (I ) at 7 days about 0.005 mg, about 0.005 mg to about 0.5 mg , about following administration . In some embodiments , the phar 0.0075 mg to about 0.5 mg, about 0.01 mg to about 0.5 mg, maceutical composition , e.g., suspension , provides a plasma about 0.025 mg to about 0.5 mg, about 0.045 mg to about 0.5 concentration of less than about 0.1 ng /mL of the compound mg, about 0.05 mg to about 0.5 mg, about 0.075 mg to about of Formula ( 1) following a dose of up to 250 ug of the 5 0.5 mg, about 0.1 mg to about 0.5 mg, about 0.25 mg to compound of Formula ( I ) at 4 weeks following administra about 0.5 mg, about 0.01 mg to about 0.3 mg, about 0.025 tion . For example , the pharmaceutical composition , e.g., mg to about 0.075 mg, about 0.01 mg to about 0.1 mg, and suspension , can provide a plasma concentration of less than about 0.15 mg to about 0.25 mg of the compound of Formula about 0.1 ng/ mL of the compound of Formula (1 ) following (1 ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms thereof . a dose of up to 250 ug at 24 weeks following administration . 10 In some embodiments , the compositions comprising a In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition , e.g., compound of Formula (1 ) provided herein are administered suspension , can provide a plasma concentration of less than once . In some embodiments , the compositions comprising a about 0.1 ng /mL of the compound of Formula ( 1 ) following compound of Formula ( I ) are administered more than once . a dose of up to 250 ug at 4 hours , 4 weeks , 12 weeks, and /or In some embodiments , the composition is administered in 24 weeks following administration . 15 doses spaced at least 4 weeks apart (e.g. , at least 6 weeks In some embodiments , a pharmaceutical composition , apart , at least 8 weeks apart , at least 12 weeks apart ) . For e.g., suspension , can provide a plasma concentration of less example , the composition is administered in doses spaced at than about 1 ng /mL of the compound of Formula ( I ) fol least 3 months apart up to about 60 months apart . In some lowing administration of a dose of up to 250 ug of the embodiments , the composition is administered once every 3 compound of Formula ( I) at 4 hours after administration . In 20 months. In some embodiments , the composition is admin some embodiments , the pharmaceutical composition , e.g. , istered once every 6 months. In some embodiments , the suspension , provides a plasma concentration of less than composition is administered once every 12 months. In some about 1 ng /mL following a dose of up to 250 ug of the embodiments , the composition is administered once every compound of Formula ( I) at 24 hours after administration . In 24 months. In some embodiments , the composition is some embodiments , the pharmaceutical composition , e.g., 25 administered once every 60 months. suspension , provides a plasma concentration of less than Also provided herein are methods of treating a patient that about 1 ng/ mL of the compound of Formula (1 ) following include first assessing the severity of the disease in the administration at a dose of up to 250 ug of the compound of patient and then administering to the patient a dose of a Formula (I ) at 4 weeks following administration . For compound of Formula (I ) , including amorphous and poly example , the pharmaceutical composition , e.g., suspension , 30 morph forms thereof, based on the assessment. Osteoarthri can provide a plasma concentration of less than about 1 tis can affect any joint in the body. In some embodiments , ng/ mL of the compound of Formula (1 ) following a dose of the osteoarthritis is present in one or more of the hands, feet , up to 250 ug at 24 weeks following administration . In some spine , shoulders, elbows, ankles, wrists , and the large weight embodiments , the pharmaceutical composition , e.g., suspen bearing joints , such as the hips and knees . In some embodi sion , can provide a plasma concentration of less than about 35 ments , the severity of the disorder is determined at one or 1 ng/ mL of the compound of Formula (I ) following a dose more locations within a patient's body . For example , the of up to 250 ug at 4 hours , 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and /or 24 severity of the disorder is determined at or near the target site weeks following administration . of administration of a compound of Formula ( I) , including In some embodiments of the methods herein , the com amorphous and polymorph forms thereof. pound of Formula (1 ) is not substantially systemically 40 The severity of a patient's osteoarthritis can be deter absorbed following administration of a dose of up to 250 ug mined using a variety ofmethods . For example , radiological of the compound of Formula ( I ) at 4 hours after adminis criteria ( e.g., X - rays, CT scans, MM , ultrasonography, and tration . In some embodiments of the methods herein , the bone scanning ), clinical criteria , pain assessments (e.g. , compound of Formula ( I ) is not substantially systemically visual analog scale (VAS ) and Western Ontario and McMas absorbed following administration of a dose of up to 250 ug 45 ter Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC ) scores) , mobility of the compound of Formula ( I ) at 4 weeks after adminis assessments ( e.g., physician global assessments ) , thickness tration . In some embodiments of the methods herein , the of cartilage ( e.g. , at the target site of administration ), total compound of Formula ( I) is not substantially systemically volume of cartilage ( e.g. , at the target site of administration ), absorbed following administration of a dose of up to 250 ug levels of anabolic or catabolic biomarkers indicative of of the compound of Formula ( I) at 12 weeks after admin- 50 cartilage synthesis or degradation ( e.g., cartilage oligomeric istration . In some embodiments of the methods herein , the matrix protein [ COMP ], N - terminal propeptides of procol compound of Formula (I ) is not substantially systemically lagen type I [ PINP ] , and B - C -terminal telopeptide [ B -CTX ]) , absorbed following administration of a dose of up to 250 Mg plasma levels of cytokines related to inflammation ( inter of the compound of Formula (I ) at 24 weeks after admin leukin [ IL ] 1b , IL6 , IL8 , tumor necrosis factor ( TNF ), and istration . 55 interferon - alpha [ IFNa ]) , levels of bone marrow edema In some embodiments of the methods herein , the compo ( e.g., by MRI scans of the target site of administration ) , sition comprises about 0.001 mg to about 0.5 mg per levels of synovial fluid , clarity of synovial fluid ( e.g., levels injection of a compound of Formula ( I) , including amor of crystals present in the fluid when viewed under a polar phous and polymorph forms thereof. For example , the ized microscope ), levels of metalloproteinases ( e.g., colla composition in some embodiments comprises about 0.001 60 genase , stromelysin ) , levels of free radicals ( e.g., nitric mg to about 0.4 mg, about 0.001 mg to about 0.3 mg, about oxide ) , and measurements of the space between bones . In 0.001 mg to about 0.25 mg, about 0.001 mg to about 0.2 mg, some embodiments , one or more methods of assessing the about 0.001 mg to about 0.15 mg, about 0.001 mg to about severity of a patient's osteoarthritis or disease state can be 0.1 mg, about 0.001 mg to about 0.075 mg, about 0.001 mg used . to about 0.055 mg, about 0.001 mg to about 0.05 mg, about 65 Assessments of a joint can be made at one or more 0.001 mg to about 0.035 mg, about 0.001 mg to about 0.025 locations at, around , or near a joint. For example , multiple mg, about 0.001 mg to about 0.01 mg, about 0.001 mg to measurements of the width , thickness , or volume of the US 10,544,139 B2 45 46 cartilage can be made . In some embodiments , the results of TABLE 2 multiple measurements can be combined into a composite score which can be used to assess the severity of the Stage Plain film grading MRI grading disorder . Various methods of assessing the joint can also be 0 Normal Normal Possible joint space Inhomogeneous high considered together to determine the severity of the disorder 5 narrowing and signal intensity in in any particular joint. For example , subjective measure subtle osteophytes cartilage ( T2WI) ments such as pain and mobility determinations can be 2 Definite joint space Inhomogeneity with areas combined with objective measurements in one or more narrowing , defined of high some signal intensity osteophytes and in articular cartilage locations of the joint such as width , thickness, or volume of 10 sclerosis , especially in ( T2WI); indistinct trabeculae the cartilage, measurements of the space between bones , and acetabular region or signal intensity loss in levels of synovial fluid . femoral head & neck ( T1WI) In some embodiments , the severity of the disease is 3 Marked joint space Criteria of Stage 1 & 2 determined based on the stage of the disorder. narrowing, small plus indistinct zone osteophytes , some between femoral head & For example , osteoarthritis (OA ) of the knee can be 15 sclerosis and acetabulum ; subchondral divided into five stages: 0 is assigned to a normal, healthy cyst formation and signal loss due to deformity of femoral bone sclerosis knee . The highest stage , 4 , is assigned to severe OA . head and acetabulum Exemplary diagnosis criteria and typical symptoms of the 4 Gross loss of joint space Above criteria plus various stages are provided below in Table 1 . with above features femoral head 20 plus large osteophytes deformity and increased TABLE 1 deformity of the femoral head Stage Symptoms and acetabulum 0 Stage 0 OA is classified as “ normal ” knee health . The knee joint shows no signs of OA , and the 25 joint functions without any impairment or pain . In some embodiments , a patient is diagnosed or identified A person with stage 1 OA is showing very as having moderate to severe symptomatic osteoarthritis . minor bone spur growth (bone spurs are For example , the patient is diagnosed or identified as having boney growths that often develop where bones meet each other in the joint ). Likely , moderate to severe symptomatic knee osteoarthritis . In some a person with stage 1 OA is not experiencing 30 embodiments , the patient has grade 1 ( or KL - 1 ) osteoarthri any pain or discomfort as a result of the very tis , as determined by the Kellgren - Lawrence system . In minor wear on the components of the joint . some embodiments , the patient has grade 2 (or KL - 2 ) 2 Stage 2 OA of the knee is considered a “ mild " osteoarthritis , as determined by the Kellgren -Lawrence sys stage of the condition . X - rays of knee joints in this stage will likely reveal greater bone tem . In some embodiments , the patienthas grade 3 (or KL - 3 ) spur growth , but the cartilage likely remains at 35 osteoarthritis , as determined by the Kellgren -Lawrence sys a healthy size - the space between the bones is tem . In some embodiments , the patient has grade 4 ( or KL - 4 ) normal, and the bones are not rubbing or osteoarthritis , as determined by the Kellgren -Lawrence sys scraping one another. Synovial fluid is tem . In some embodiments , a patient is administered the also typically still present at sufficient compound of Formula ( I) as a preventative measure , for levels for normal joint motion . However, this is the stage where people may first 40 example , a patient with grade 1 osteoarthritis. begin experiencing symptoms- pain after a Based on the severity of the patient's disease state , a long day of walking or running, greater dosage amount of a compound of Formula ( I ) , including stiffness in the joint when it's not used for amorphous and polymorph forms thereof , can be deter several hours , tenderness when kneeling or mined . bending 45 In some embodiments , the patient has unilateral osteoar 3 Stage 3 OA is classified as " moderate ” OA . The cartilage between bones is showing thritis of the knee . In some embodiments , the patient has obvious damage , and the space between the bilateral osteoarthritis of the knees . bones is narrowing . People with stage 3 OA of In some embodiments , the patient is overweight or obese . the knee are likely experiencing frequent pain In some embodiments , the patient has a body mass index when walking , running , bending, or kneeling . 50 (BMI ) of between 25 and 30 , for example , a BMI of 25 , 26 , They also may experience joint stiffness after sitting for long periods of time or when waking 27 , 28, or 29. In some embodiments , the patient has a BMI up in the morning . Joint swelling may be present of 30 or greater, such as 30 , 31, 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 40 , or greater after extended periods of motion , too . than 40 . 4 Stage 4 OA is considered " severe .” People in One method of monitoring the progression and / or treat stage 4 OA of the knee experience great pain and 55 ment of osteoarthritis involves measuring the joint space . As discomfort when walking or moving the joint. The cartilage deteriorates or wears away , narrowing of the joint joint space between bones is dramatically reduced - the cartilage is almost completely gone , space of the affected joint can be observed (joint space leaving the joint stiff and possibly immobile . narrowing ) . Given the difficulty in measuring cartilage , joint The synovial fluid is decreased dramatically, space width ( JSW ) measurements are often considered a and it no longer helps reduce the friction 60 surrogate for articular cartilage thickness as such measure among the moving parts of a joint. ments involve determining the distance between two bones ( e.g., using X -ray techniques ). Without being bound by any theory, an increase in the JSW is an indicator of cartilage Similarly , the stages of hip osteoarthritis can be divided growth . Methods of measurement of JSW can be completed into five stages according to the severity observed in various 65 following radiographic imaging of the affected joint. Mea images . Exemplary diagnosis criteria and typical symptoms surements can be either manual using calipers or a simple of the various stages are provided below in Table 2 . graduated ruler and a micrometric eyepiece or semiauto US 10,544,139 B2 47 48 mated using computer software . In some embodiments , JSW 1.7 mm ; about 1.75 mm ; about 1.8 mm ; about 1.85 mm ; measurements can involve radiographic images ( e.g., X -ray ) about 1.9 mm ; about 1.95 mm ; or about 2 mm . taken of the knee. For example , one or more of metatar In some embodiments , themethods provided herein result sophalangeal, fixed flexion , semiflexed anteroposterior ( AP ) in an increase in the mean joint space width in the joint and Lyon - Schuss radiographs can be used to obtain the 5 surrounding the point of injection , in a patient population , of measurement. In some embodiments , the subject is imaged a compound of Formula (1 ) , including amorphous or poly while standing . For example , standing , fixed - flexion (Syna flexer ), posterior- anterior (PA ) radiographs. morph forms thereof. In some embodiments , the dose In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result administered by the injection , in a patient population , of the in an increase in the joint space width in the joint surround- 10 compound of Formula (1 ), including amorphous or poly ing the point of injection in a patient of a compound of morph forms thereof, is from about 10 ug to about 250 ug , Formula ( I) , including amorphous or polymorph forms such as from about 20 ug to about 230 ug , such as from thereof. In some embodiments , the dose administered by the about 20 ug to about 200 ug , such as from about 30 ug to injection in a patient of the compound of Formula ( I) , about 150 ug , such as from about 50 ug to about 100ug, such including amorphous or polymorph forms thereof, is from 15 as about 70 ug. In some embodiments , themethods provided about 10 ug to about 250 us , such as from about 20 ug to herein result in an increase in the mean joint space width in about 230 ug, such as from about 20 ug to about 200 us, such the joint surrounding the point of injection , in a patient as from about 30 ug to about 150 us, such as from about 50 population , of about 5 % to about 30 % ( e.g., about 9 % to ug to about 100 ug , such as about 70 In some embodiments , about 23 % ). In some embodiments , the methods provided the methods provided herein result in an increase in the joint 20 herein result in an increase in the mean joint space width in space width in the joint surrounding the point of injection in the joint surrounding the point of injection , in a patient a patient of about 5 % to about 30 % ( e.g. , about 9 % to about population , of about 5 % to about 30 % ( e.g., about 9 % to 23 % ) . In some embodiments , the methods provided herein about 23 % ) at week 24 following administration . In some result in an increase in the joint space width in the joint embodiments , the methods provided herein result in an surrounding the point of injection in a patient of about 5 % 25 increase in the mean joint space width in the joint surround to about 30 % (e.g. , about 9 % to about 23 % ) at week 24 ing the point of injection , in a patient population , of about following administration . In some embodiments , the meth 5 % to about 30 % ( e.g. , about 9 % to about 23 % ) at a dose of ods provided herein result in an increase in the joint space about 70 ug of a compound of Formula ( 1 ) including width in the joint surrounding the point of injection in a amorphous or polymorph forms thereof, at week 24 follow patient of about 5 % to about 30 % ( e.g. , about 9 % to about 30 ing administration . For example , an increase in the mean 23 % ) at a dose of about 70 ug of a compound of Formula (I ) joint space width in the joint surrounding the point of including amorphous or polymorph forms thereof, at week injection of about 10 % to about 20 % at a dose of about 70 24 following administration . For example , an increase in the ug at week 24 following administratio or about 15 % to joint space width in the joint surrounding the point of about 18 % at a dose of about 70 ug at week 24 following injection of about 10 % to about 20 % at a dose of about 70 35 administration . In some embodiments , the methods provided ug at week 24 following administration ; or about 15 % to herein exhibit substantially no change in the mean joint about 18 % at a dose of about 70 ug at week 24 following space width at the joint surrounding the point of injection . administration . In some embodiments , themethods provided Such a result can be indicative of an arrest of symptoms of herein exhibit substantially no change in the joint space the disease as no further loss in the mean joint space width width at the joint surrounding the point of injection . Such a 40 is observed . result can be indicative of an arrest of symptoms of the In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result disease as no further loss in the joint space width is in an increase in the mean joint space width in the joint observed . surrounding the point of injection , in a patient population , of In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result a compound of Formula ( 1 ), including amorphous or poly in an increase in the joint space width in the joint surround- 45 morph forms thereof, of about 0.05 mm to about 2 mm . In ing the point of injection in a patient of a compound of some embodiments , themethods provided herein result in an Formula (I ), including amorphous or polymorph forms increase in the mean joint space width in the joint surround thereof, of about 0.05 mm to about 2 mm . In some embodi ing the point of injection , in a patient population , of a ments , the methods provided herein result in an increase in compound of Formula (I ) , including amorphous or poly the joint space width in the joint surrounding the point of 50 morph forms thereof, of about 0.05 mm to about 2 mm at injection in a patient of a compound of Formula ( I) , includ week 24 following administration . In some embodiments , ing amorphous or polymorph forms thereof, of about 0.05 the methods provided herein result in an increase in the mm to about 2 mm at week 24 following administration . In mean joint space width in the joint surrounding the point of some embodiments , themethods provided herein result in an injection in a patient population at a dose of about 70 ug of increase in the joint space width in the joint surrounding the 55 a compound of Formula (I ) including amorphous or poly point of injection in a patient at a dose of about 70 ug of a morph forms thereof, at week 24 following administration , compound of Formula (I ) including amorphous or poly of about 0.05 mm ; about 0.1 mm ; about 0.15 mm ; about 0.2 morph forms thereof, at week 24 following administration , mm ; about 0.25 mm ; about 0.3 mm ; about 0.35 mm ; about of about 0.05 mm ; about 0.1 mm ; about 0.15 mm ; about 0.2 0.4 mm ; about 0.45 mm ; about 0.5 mm ; about 0.55 mm ; mm ; about 0.25 mm ; about 0.3 mm ; about 0.35 mm ; about 60 about 0.6 mm ; about 0.65 mm ; about 0.7 mm ; about 0.75 0.4 mm ; about 0.45 mm ; about 0.5 mm ; about 0.55 mm ; mm ; about 0.8 mm ; about 0.85 mm ; about 0.9 mm ; about about 0.6 mm ; about 0.65 mm ; about 0.7 mm ; about 0.75 0.95 mm ; about 1 mm ; about 1.05 mm ; about 1.1 mm ; about mm ; about 0.8 mm ; about 0.85 mm ; about 0.9 mm ; about 1.15 mm ; about 1.2 mm ; about 1.25 mm ; about 1.3 mm ; 0.95 mm ; about 1 mm ; about 1.05 mm ; about 1.1 mm ; about about 1.35 mm ; about 1.4 mm ; about 1.45 mm ; about 1.5 1.15 mm ; about 1.2 mm ; about 1.25 mm ; about 1.3 mm ; 65 mm ; about 1.55 mm ; about 1.6 mm ; about 1.65 mm ; about about 1.35 mm ; about 1.4 mm , about 1.45 mm ; about 1.5 1.7 mm ; about 1.75 mm ; about 1.8 mm ; about 1.85 mm ; mm ; about 1.55 mm ; about 1.6 mm ; about 1.65 mm ; about about 1.9 mm ; about 1.95 mm ; or about 2 mm . US 10,544,139 B2 49 50 In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result compound of Formula (1 ), including amorphous or poly in an increase in the cartilage thickness in the joint sur morph forms thereof, is from about 10 ug to about 250 ug , rounding the point of injection in a patient of a compound of such as from about 20 ug to about 230 ug , such as from Formula (I ), including amorphous or polymorph forms about 20 ug to about 200 ug , such as from about 30 ug to thereof. In some embodiments , the dose administered by the 5 about 150 ug , such as from about 50 ug to about 100ug, such injection in a patient of the compound of Formula ( I) , as about 70 ug . In some embodiments , the methods provided including amorphous or polymorph forms thereof, is from herein result in an increase in the mean cartilage thickness about 10 ug to about 250 us, such as from about 20 ug to in the joint surrounding the point of injection , in a patient about 230 us , such as from about 20 ug to about 200 us , such population , of about 5 % to about 30 % ( e.g., about 9 % to as from about 30 ug to about 150 us, such as from about 50 10 about 23 % ) . In some embodiments , the methods provided ug to about 100 ug, such as about 70 In some embodiments , herein result in an increase in the mean cartilage thickness the methods provided herein result in an increase in the in the joint surrounding the point of injection , in a patient cartilage thickness in the joint surrounding the point of population , of about 5 % to about 30 % ( e.g., about 9 % to injection in a patient of about 5 % to about 30 % (e.g. , about about 23 % ) at week 24 following administration . In some 9 % to about 23 % . In some embodiments , the methods 15 embodiments , the methods provided herein result in an provided herein result in an increase in the cartilage thick increase in the mean cartilage thickness in the joint sur ness in the joint surrounding the point of injection in a rounding the point of injection , in a patient population , of patient of about 5 % to about 30 % ( e.g., about 9 % to about about 5 % to about 30 % (e.g. , about 9 % to about 23 % ) at a 23 % ) at week 24 following administration . In some embodi dose of about 70 ug of a compound of Formula (I ) including ments , the methods provided herein result in an increase in 20 amorphous or polymorph forms thereof, at week 24 follow the cartilage thickness in the joint surrounding the point of ing administration . For example , an increase in the mean injection in a patient of about 5 % to about 30 % ( e.g., about cartilage thickness in the joint surrounding the point of 9 % to about 23 % ) at a dose of about 70 ug of a compound injection of about 10 % to about 20 % at a dose of about 70 of Formula ( 1) including amorphous or polymorph forms ug at week 24 following administration ; or about 15 % to thereof, at week 24 following administration . For example , 25 about 18 % at a dose of about 70 ug at week 24 following an increase in the cartilage thickness in the joint surrounding administration . In some embodiments , the methods provided the point of injection of about 10 % to about 20 % at a dose herein exhibit substantially no change in the mean cartilage of about 70 ug at week 24 following administration ; or about thickness at the joint surrounding the point of injection . Such 15 % to about 18 % at a dose of about 70 ug at week 24 a result can be indicative of an arrest of symptoms of the following administration . In some embodiments , the meth- 30 disease as no further loss in the mean cartilage thickness is ods provided herein exhibit substantially no change in the observed . cartilage thickness at the joint surrounding the point of In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result injection . Such a result can be indicative of an arrest of in an increase in the mean cartilage thickness in the joint symptoms of the disease as no further loss in the cartilage surrounding the point of injection , in a patient population , of thickness is observed . 35 a compound of Formula ( I ), including amorphous or poly In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result morph forms thereof, of about 0.05 mm to about 2 mm . In in an increase in the cartilage thickness in the joint sur some embodiments , themethods provided herein result in an rounding the point of injection in a patient of a compound of increase in the mean cartilage thickness in the joint sur Formula (I ), including amorphous or polymorph forms rounding the point of injection , in a patient population , of a thereof , of about 0.05 mm to about 2 mm . In some embodi- 40 compound of Formula (I ) , including amorphous or poly ments , the methods provided herein result in an increase in morph forms thereof, of about 0.05 mm to about 2 mm at the cartilage thickness in the joint surrounding the point of week 24 following administration . In some embodiments , injection in a patient of a compound of Formula ( I) , includ the methods provided herein result in an increase in the ing amorphous or polymorph forms thereof, of about 0.05 mean cartilage thickness in the joint surrounding the point of mm to about 2 mm at week 24 following administration . In 45 injection in a patient population at a dose of about 70 ug of some embodiments , themethods provided herein result in an a compound of Formula (I ) including amorphous or poly increase in the cartilage thickness in the joint surrounding morph forms thereof, at week 24 following administration , the point of injection in a patient at a dose of about 70 ug of of about 0.05 mm ; about 0.1 mm ; about 0.15 mm ; about 0.2 a compound of Formula ( 1 ) including amorphous or poly mm ; about 0.25 mm ; about 0.3 mm ; about 0.35 mm ; about morph forms thereof , at week 24 following administration , 50 0.4 mm ; about 0.45 mm ; about 0.5 mm ; about 0.55 mm ; of about 0.05 mm ; about 0.1 mm ; about 0.15 mm ; about 0.2 about 0.6 mm ; about 0.65 mm ; about 0.7 mm ; about 0.75 mm ; about 0.25 mm ; about 0.3 mm ; about 0.35 mm ; about mm ; about 0.8 mm ; about 0.85 mm ; about 0.9 mm ; about 0.4 mm ; about 0.45 mm ; about 0.5 mm ; about 0.55 mm ; 0.95 mm ; about 1 mm ; about 1.05 mm ; about 1.1 mm ; about about 0.6 mm ; about 0.65 mm ; about 0.7 mm ; about 0.75 1.15 mm ; about 1.2 mm ; about 1.25 mm ; about 1.3 mm ; mm ; about 0.8 mm ; about 0.85 mm ; about 0.9 mm ; about 55 about 1.35 mm ; about 1.4 mm ; about 1.45 mm ; about 1.5 0.95 mm ; about 1 mm ; about 1.05 mm ; about 1.1 mm ; about mm ; about 1.55 mm ; about 1.6 mm ; about 1.65 mm ; about 1.15 mm ; about 1.2 mm ; about 1.25 mm ; about 1.3 mm ; 1.7 mm ; about 1.75 mm ; about 1.8 mm ; about 1.85 mm ; about 1.35 mm ; about 1.4 mm ; about 1.45 mm ; about 1.5 about 1.9 mm ; about 1.95 mm ; or about 2 mm . mm ; about 1.55 mm ; about 1.6 mm ; about 1.65 mm ; about In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result 1.7 mm ; about 1.75 mm ; about 1.8 mm ; about 1.85 mm ; 60 in an increase from baseline in the joint space width in the about 1.9 mm ; about 1.95 mm ; or about 2 mm . joint surrounding the point of injection in a patient of a In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result compound of Formula ( I) , including amorphous or poly in an increase in the mean cartilage thickness in the joint morph forms thereof. In some embodiments , the dose surrounding the point of injection , in a patient population , of administered by the injection in a patient of the compound a compound of Formula ( I) , including amorphous or poly- 65 of Formula (I ) , including amorphous or polymorph forms morph forms thereof. In some embodiments , the dose thereof, is from about 10 ug to about 250 ug, such as from administered by the injection , in a patient population , of the about 20 ug to about 230 ug , such as from about 20 ug to US 10,544,139 B2 51 52 about 200 ug , such as from about 30 ug to about 150 ug , such width in the joint surrounding the point of injection , in a as from about 50 ug to about 100 ug , such as about 70 In patient population , of about 5 % to about 30 % (e.g. , about some embodiments , themethods provided herein result in an 9 % to about 23 % ) from baseline . In some embodiments , the increase in the joint space width in the joint surrounding the methods provided herein result in an increase in the mean point of injection in a patient of about 5 % to about 30 % ( e.g., 5 joint space width in the joint surrounding the point of about 9 % to about 23 % ) from baseline . In some embodi injection , in a patient population , of about 5 % to about 30 % ments , the methods provided herein result in an increase in ( e.g., about 9 % to about 23 % ) from baseline at week 24 the joint space width in the joint surrounding the point of following administration . In some embodiments , the meth injection in a patient of about 5 % to about 30 % ( e.g., about ods provided herein result in an increase in the mean joint 9 % to about 23 % ) from baseline at week 24 following 10 space width in the joint surrounding the point of injection , administration . In some embodiments , themethods provided in a patient population , of about 5 % to about 30 % ( e.g. , herein result in an increase in the joint space width in the about 9 % to about 23 % ) from baseline at a dose of about 70 joint surrounding the point of injection in a patient of about ug of a compound of Formula (1 ) including amorphous or 5 % to about 30 % ( e.g., about 9 % to about 23 % ) from polymorph forms thereof, at week 24 following administra baseline at a dose of about 70 ug of a compound of Formula 15 tion . For example , an increase in themean joint space width ( 1) including amorphous or polymorph forms thereof, at in the joint surrounding the point of injection of about 10 % week 24 following administration . For example , an increase to about 20 % from baseline at a dose of about 70 ug at week in the joint space width in the joint surrounding the point of 24 following administration ; or about 15 % to about 18 % injection of about 10 % to about 20 % from baseline at a dose from baseline at a dose of about 70 ug at week 24 following of about 70 ug at week 24 following administration ; or about 20 administration . In some embodiments, the methods provided 15 % to about 18 % from baseline at a dose of about 70 ug at herein exhibit substantially no change from baseline in the week 24 following administration . In some embodiments , mean joint space width at the joint surrounding the point of the methods provided herein exhibit substantially no change injection . Such a result can be indicative of an arrest of from baseline in the joint space width at the joint surround symptoms of the disease as no further loss in the mean joint ing the point of injection . Such a result can be indicative of 25 space width is observed . an arrest of symptoms of the disease as no further loss in the In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result joint space width is observed . in an increase in the mean joint space width in the joint In some embodiments , themethods provided herein result surrounding the point of injection , in a patient population , of in an increase in the joint space width in the joint surround a compound of Formula ( I ), including amorphous or poly ing the point of injection in a patient of a compound of 30 morph forms thereof, of about 0.05 mm to about 2 mm from Formula (1 ) , including amorphous or polymorph forms baseline. In some embodiments , the methods provided thereof, of about 0.05 mm to about 2 mm from baseline . In herein result in an increase in the mean joint space width in some embodiments , themethods provided herein result in an the joint surrounding the point of injection , in a patient increase in the joint space width in the joint surrounding the population , of a compound of Formula ( I ) , including amor point of injection in a patient of a compound of Formula ( I) , 35 phous or polymorph forms thereof, of about 0.05 mm to including amorphous or polymorph forms thereof, of about about 2 mm from baseline at week 24 following adminis 0.05 mm to about 2 mm from baseline at week 24 following tration . In some embodiments , the methods provided herein administration . In some embodiments , the methods provided result in an increase from baseline in the mean joint space herein result in an increase from baseline in the joint space width in the joint surrounding the point of injection in a width in the joint surrounding the point of injection in a 40 patient population at a dose of about 70 ug of a compound patient at a dose of about 70 ug of a compound of Formula of Formula (I ) including amorphous or polymorph forms ( 1) including amorphous or polymorph forms thereof , at thereof, at week 24 following administration , of about 0.05 week 24 following administration , of about 0.05 mm ; about mm ; about 0.1 mm ; about 0.15 mm ; about 0.2 mm ; about 0.1 mm ; about 0.15 mm ; about 0.2 mm ; about 0.25 mm ; 0.25 mm ; about 0.3 mm ; about 0.35 mm ; about 0.4 mm ; about 0.3 mm ; about 0.35 mm ; about 0.4 mm ; about 0.45 45 about 0.45 mm ; about 0.5 mm ; about 0.55 mm ; about 0.6 mm ; about 0.5 mm ; about 0.55 mm ; about 0.6 mm ; about mm ; about 0.65 mm ; about 0.7 mm ; about 0.75 mm ; about 0.65 mm ; about 0.7 mm ; about 0.75 mm ; about 0.8 mm ; 0.8 mm ; about 0.85 mm ; about 0.9 mm ; about 0.95 mm ; about 0.85 mm ; about 0.9 mm ; about 0.95 mm ; about 1 mm ; about 1 mm ; about 1.05 mm ; about 1.1 mm ; about 1.15 mm ; about 1.05 mm ; about 1.1 mm ; about 1.15 mm ; about 1.2 about 1.2 mm ; about 1.25 mm ; about 1.3 mm ; about 1.35 mm ; about 1.25 mm ; about 1.3 mm ; about 1.35 mm ; about 50 mm ; about 1.4 mm ; about 1.45 mm ; about 1.5 mm ; about 1.4 mm ; about 1.45 mm ; about 1.5 mm ; about 1.55 mm ; 1.55 mm ; about 1.6 mm ; about 1.65 mm ; about 1.7 mm ; about 1.6 mm ; about 1.65 mm ; about 1.7 mm ; about 1.75 about 1.75 mm ; about 1.8 mm ; about 1.85 mm ; about 1.9 mm ; about 1.8 mm ; about 1.85 mm ; about 1.9 mm ; about mm ; about 1.95 mm ; or about 2 mm . 1.95 mm ; or about 2 mm . In some embodiments , themethods provided herein result In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result 55 in an increase from baseline in the cartilage thickness in the in an increase from baseline in the mean joint space width joint surrounding the point of injection in a patient of a in the joint surrounding the point of injection , in a patient compound of Formula (1 ), including amorphous or poly population , of a compound of Formula (1 ) , including amor morph forms thereof. In some embodiments , the dose phous or polymorph forms thereof. In some embodiments , administered by the injection in a patient of the compound the dose administered by the injection , in a patient popula- 60 of Formula (I ) , including amorphous or polymorph forms tion , of the compound of Formula ( I) , including amorphous thereof, is from about 10 ug to about 250 ug , such as from or polymorph forms thereof, is from about 10 ug to about about 20 ug to about 230 ug , such as from about 20 ug to 250 ug , such as from about 20 ug to about 230 ug, such as about 200 ug , such as from about 30 ug to about 150 ug , such from about 20 ug to about 200 us, such as from about 30 ug as from about 50 ug to about 100 ug, such as about 70 ug . to about 150 us , such as from about 50 ug to about 100 ug, 65 In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result in such as about 70 In some embodiments , the methods pro an increase in the cartilage thickness in the joint surrounding vided herein result in an increase in the mean joint space the point of injection in a patient of about 5 % to about 30 % US 10,544,139 B2 53 54 ( e.g. , about 9 % to about 23 % ) from baseline . In some injection , in a patient population , of about 5 % to about 30 % embodiments , the methods provided herein result in an ( e.g., about 9 % to about 23 % ) from baseline at week 24 increase in the cartilage thickness in the joint surrounding following administration . In some embodiments , the meth the point of injection in a patient of about 5 % to about 30 % ods provided herein result in an increase in the mean ( e.g. , about 9 % to about 23 % ) from baseline at week 24 5 cartilage thickness in the joint surrounding the point of following administration . In some embodiments , the meth injection , in a patient population , of about 5 % to about 30 % ods provided herein result in an increase in the cartilage ( e.g. , about 9 % to about 23 % ) from baseline at a dose of thickness in the joint surrounding the point of injection in a about 70 ug of a compound of Formula ( I ) including patient of about 5 % to about 30 % ( e.g., about 9 % to about amorphous or polymorph forms thereof, at week 24 follow 23 % ) from baseline at a dose of about 70 ug of a compound 10 ing administration . For example , an increase in the mean of Formula ( 1) including amorphous or polymorph forms cartilage thickness in the joint surrounding the point of thereof, at week 24 following administration . For example , injection of about 10 % to about 20 % from baseline at a dose an increase in the cartilage thickness in the joint surrounding of about 70 ug at week 24 following administration ; or about the point of injection of about 10 % to about 20 % from 15 % to about 18 % from baseline at a dose of about 70 ug at baseline at a dose of about 70 ug at week 24 following 15 week 24 following administration . In some embodiments , administration ; or about 15 % to about 18 % from baseline at themethods provided herein exhibit substantially no change a dose of about 70 ug at week 24 following administration . in the mean cartilage thickness at the joint surrounding the In some embodiments , the methods provided herein exhibit point of injection . Such a result can be indicative of an arrest substantially no change in the cartilage thickness at the joint of symptoms of the disease as no further loss in the mean surrounding the point of injection . Such a result can be 20 cartilage thickness is observed . indicative of an arrest of symptoms of the disease as no In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result further loss in the cartilage thickness is observed . in an increase in the mean cartilage thickness in the joint In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result surrounding the point of injection , in a patient population , of in an increase in the cartilage thickness in the joint sur a compound of Formula ( I ) , including amorphous or poly rounding the point of injection in a patient of a compound of 25 morph forms thereof , of about 0.05 mm to about 2 mm from Formula (I ) , including amorphous or polymorph forms baseline. In some embodiments , the methods provided thereof, of about 0.05 mm to about 2 mm from baseline . In herein result in an increase in the mean cartilage thickness some embodiments , themethods provided herein result in an in the joint surrounding the point of injection , in a patient increase in the cartilage thickness in the joint surrounding population , of a compound of Formula ( I) , including amor the point of injection in a patient of a compound of Formula 30 phous or polymorph forms thereof, of about 0.05 mm to (I ) , including amorphous or polymorph forms thereof, of about 2 mm from baseline at week 24 following adminis about 0.05 mm to about 2 mm from baseline at week 24 tration . In some embodiments , the methods provided herein following administration . In some embodin nts , the meth result in an increase from baseline in the mean cartilage ods provided herein result in an increase from baseline in the thickness in the joint surrounding the point of injection in a cartilage thickness in the joint surrounding the point of 35 patient population at a dose of about 70 ug of a compound injection in a patient at a dose of about 70 ug of a compound of Formula ( 1) including amorphous or polymorph forms of Formula ( 1) including amorphous or polymorph forms thereof, at week 24 following administration , of about 0.05 thereof, at week 24 following administration , of about 0.05 mm ; about 0.1 mm ; about 0.15 mm ; about 0.2 mm ; about mm ; about 0.1 mm ; about 0.15 mm ; about 0.2 mm ; about 0.25 mm ; about 0.3 mm ; about 0.35 mm ; about 0.4 mm ; 0.25 mm ; about 0.3 mm ; about 0.35 mm ; about 0.4 mm ; 40 about 0.45 mm ; about 0.5 mm ; about 0.55 mm ; about 0.6 about 0.45 mm ; about 0.5 mm ; about 0.55 mm ; about 0.6 mm ; about 0.65 mm ; about 0.7 mm ; about 0.75 mm ; about mm ; about 0.65 mm ; about 0.7 mm ; about 0.75 mm ; about 0.8 mm ; about 0.85 mm ; about 0.9 mm ; about 0.95 mm ; 0.8 mm ; about 0.85 mm ; about 0.9 mm ; about 0.95 mm ; about 1 mm ; about 1.05 mm ; about 1.1 mm ; about 1.15 mm ; about 1 mm ; about 1.05 mm ; about 1.1 mm ; about 1.15 mm ; about 1.2 mm ; about 1.25 mm ; about 1.3 mm ; about 1.35 about 1.2 mm ; about 1.25 mm ; about 1.3 mm ; about 1.35 45 mm ; about 1.4 mm ; about 1.45 mm ; about 1.5 mm ; about mm ; about 1.4 mm ; about 1.45 mm ; about 1.5 mm ; about 1.55 mm ; about 1.6 mm ; about 1.65 mm ; about 1.7 mm ; 1.55 mm ; about 1.6 mm ; about 1.65 mm ; about 1.7 mm ; about 1.75 mm ; about 1.8 mm ; about 1.85 mm ; about 1.9 about 1.75 mm ; about 1.8 mm ; about 1.85 mm ; about 1.9 mm ; about 1.95 mm ; or about 2 mm . mm ; about 1.95 mm ; or about 2 mm . As used herein , " as used herein , the phrase " from base In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result 50 line” refers to the change in the value of a parameter ( such in an increase from baseline in the mean cartilage thickness as JSW , cartilage thickness , WOMAC score, usw ) relative to in the joint surrounding the point of injection , in a patient its value determined s28 days prior to the injection ” population , of a compound of Formula ( I) , including amor In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result phous or polymorph forms thereof. In some embodiments , in a decrease in plasma cartilage oligomeric matrix protein the dose administered by the injection , in a patient popula- 55 (COMP ) concentration at week 12 following administration . tion , of the compound of Formula (1 ), including amorphous In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result or polymorph forms thereof, is from about 10 ug to about in a decrease in WOMAC total score in a subject. In some 250 ug, such as from about 20 ug to about 230 ug , such as embodiments , the methods provided herein result in a from about 20 ug to about 200 us, such as from about 30 ug decrease in WOMAC total score in the subject from base to about 150 us, such as from about 50 ug to about 100 ug , 60 line . For example , a decrease in WOMAC total score in the such as about 70 In some embodiments , the methods pro subject of at least 15 points from baseline; a decrease in vided herein result in an increase in the mean cartilage WOMAC total score of at least 20 points from baseline; or thickness in the joint surrounding the point of injection , in a decrease in WOMAC total score of at least 24 points from a patient population , of about 5 % to about 30 % ( e.g., about baseline . In some embodiments, the methods provided 9 % to about 23 % ) from baseline . In some embodiments , the 65 herein result in a decrease in WOMAC total score in the methods provided herein result in an increase in the mean subject from baseline at week 12 following administration . cartilage thickness in the joint surrounding the point of For example, a decrease in WOMAC total score in the US 10,544,139 B2 55 56 subject of at least 15 points from baseline at week 12 WOMAC pain score of at least 40 % from baseline; or a following administration ; a decrease in WOMAC total score decrease in WOMAC pain score of at least 50 % from of at least 20 points from baseline at week 12 following baseline. In some embodiments , the methods provided administration ; or a decrease in WOMAC total score of at herein result in a decrease in WOMAC pain score from least 24 points from baseline at week 12 following admin- 5 baseline at week 12 following administration , such as, for istration . example , a decrease in WOMAC pain score of at least 10 % In some embodiments , the WOMAC score can be broken from baseline at week 12 following administration ; or a down into individual pain , function , and stiffness scores. decrease in WOMAC pain score of at least 20 % from In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result baseline at week 12 following administration ; or a decrease in a decrease in WOMAC function score in a subject. In 10 in WOMAC pain score of at least 30 % from baseline at week some embodiments , the methods provided herein result in a 12 following administration ; or a decrease in WOMAC pain decrease in WOMAC function score in the subject from score of at least 40 % from baseline at week 12 following baseline . For example , a decrease in WOMAC function administration ; or a decrease in WOMAC pain score of at score in the subject of at least 10 points from baseline ; a least 50 % from baseline at week 12 following administra decrease in WOMAC function score of at least 15 points 15 tion . from baseline; or a decrease in WOMAC function score of In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result at least 19 points from baseline. In some embodiments , the in a decrease in WOMAC stiffness score from baseline , such methods provided herein result in a decrease in WOMAC as, for example, a decrease in WOMAC stiffness score of at function score in the subject from baseline at week 12 least 10 % from baseline ; or a decrease in WOMAC stiffness following administration . For example , a decrease in 20 score of at least 20 % from baseline ; or a decrease in WOMAC function score in the subject of at least 10 points WOMAC stiffness score of at least 30 % from baseline; or a from baseline at week 12 following administration ; a decrease in WOMAC stiffness score of at least 40 % from decrease in WOMAC function score of at least 15 points baseline ; or a decrease in WOMAC stiffness score of at least from baseline at week 12 following administration ; or a 50 % from baseline. In some embodiments , the methods decrease in WOMAC function score of at least 19 points 25 provided herein result in a decrease in WOMAC stiffness from baseline at week 12 following administration . score from baseline at week 12 following administration , In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result such as, for example , a decrease in WOMAC stiffness score in a decrease in WOMAC pain score in a subject. In some of at least 10 % from baseline at week 12 following admin embodiments , the methods provided herein result in a istration ; or a decrease in WOMAC stiffness score of at least decrease in WOMAC pain score in the subject from base- 30 20 % from baseline at week 12 following administration ; or line . For example , a decrease in WOMAC pain score in the a decrease in WOMAC stiffness score of at least 30 % from subject of at least 4 points from baseline ; or a decrease in baseline at week 12 following administration ; or a decrease WOMAC pain score of at least 5 points from baseline. In in WOMAC stiffness score of at least 40 % from baseline some embodiments , the methods provided herein result in a week 12 following administration ; or a decrease in decrease in WOMAC pain score in the subject from baseline 35 WOMAC stiffness score of at least 50 % from baseline at at week 12 following administration . For example , a week 12 following administration . decrease in WOMAC pain score in the subject of at least 4 In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result points from baseline at week 12 following administration ; or in a decrease in mean WOMAC total score in a subject a decrease in WOMAC pain score of at least 5 points from population . In some embodiments , the methods provided baseline at week 12 following administration . 40 herein result in a decrease in mean WOMAC total score in In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result the subject population from baseline . For example , a in a decrease in WOMAC function score from baseline , such decrease in mean WOMAC total score in the subject popu as, for example , a decrease in WOMAC function score of at lation of at least 15 points from baseline; a decrease in mean least 10 % from baseline ; or a decrease in WOMAC function WOMAC total score of at least 20 points from baseline; or score of at least 20 % from baseline ; or a decrease in 45 a decrease in mean WOMAC total score of at least 24 points WOMAC function score of at least 30 % from baseline ; or a from baseline . In some embodiments , themethods provided decrease in WOMAC function score of at least 40 % from herein result in a decrease in mean WOMAC total score in baseline ; or a decrease in WOMAC function score of at least the subject population from baseline at week 12 following 50 % from baseline . In some embodiments , the methods administration . For example , a decrease in mean WOMAC provided herein result in a decrease in WOMAC function 50 total score in the subject population of at least 15 points from score from baseline at week 12 following administration , baseline at week 12 following administration ; a decrease in such as, for example , a decrease in WOMAC function score mean WOMAC total score of at least 20 points from of at least 10 % from baseline at week 12 following admin baseline at week 12 following administration ; or a decrease istration ; or a decrease in WOMAC function score of at least in mean WOMAC total score of at least 24 points from 20 % from baseline at week 12 following administration ; or 55 baseline at week 12 following administration . a decrease in WOMAC function score of at least 30 % from In some embodiments , themethods provided herein result baseline at week 12 following administration ; or a decrease in a decrease in mean WOMAC function score in a subject in WOMAC function score of at least 40 % from baseline at population . In some embodiments , the methods provided week 12 following administration ; or a decrease in herein result in a decrease in mean WOMAC function score WOMAC function score of at least 50 % from baseline at 60 in the subject population from baseline . For example , a week 12 following administration . decrease in mean WOMAC function score in the subject In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result population of at least 10 points from baseline ; a decrease in in a decrease in WOMAC pain score from baseline, such as, mean WOMAC function score of at least 15 points from for example , a decrease in WOMAC pain score of at least baseline ; or a decrease in mean WOMAC function score of 10 % from baseline ; or a decrease in WOMAC pain score of 65 at least 19 points from baseline . In some embodiments , the at least 20 % from baseline ; or a decrease in WOMAC pain methods provided herein result in a decrease in mean score of at least 30 % from baseline ; or a decrease in WOMAC function score in the subject population from US 10,544,139 B2 57 58 baseline at week 12 following administration . For example , WOMAC pain score of at least 40 % from baseline at week a decrease in mean WOMAC function score in the subject 12 following administration ; or a decrease in mean population of at least 10 points from baseline at week 12 WOMAC pain score of at least 50 % from baseline at week following administration ; a decrease in mean WOMAC 12 following administration . function score of at least 15 points from baseline at week 12 5 In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result following administration ; or a decrease in mean WOMAC in a decrease in mean WOMAC stiffness score from base function score of at least 19 points from baseline at week 12 line, such as, for example , a decrease in mean WOMAC following administration . stiffness score of at least 10 % from baseline ; or a decrease In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result in mean WOMAC stiffness score of at least 20 % from in a decrease in mean WOMAC pain score in a subject 10 baseline ; or a decrease in mean WOMAC stiffness score of population . In some embodiments , the methods provided at least 30 % from baseline ; or a decrease in mean WOMAC herein result in a decrease in mean WOMAC pain score in stiffness score of at least 40 % from baseline ; or a decrease the subject population from baseline. For example , a in mean WOMAC stiffness score of at least 50 % from decrease in mean WOMAC pain score in the subject popu baseline . lation of at least 4 points from baseline ; or a decrease in 15 In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result mean WOMAC pain score of at least 5 points from baseline . in a decrease in mean WOMAC stiffness score from baseline In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result at week 12 following administration, such as, for example , in a decrease in mean WOMAC pain score in a subject a decrease in mean WOMAC stiffness score of at least 10 % population . In some embodiments , the methods provided from baseline at week 12 following administration ; or a herein result in a decrease in mean WOMAC pain score in 20 decrease in mean WOMAC stiffness score of at least 20 % the subject population from baseline at week 12 following from baseline at week 12 following administration ; or a administration . For example , a decrease in mean WOMAC decrease in mean WOMAC stiffness score of at least 30 % pain score in the subject population of at least 4 points from from baseline at week 12 following administration ; or a baseline at week 12 following administration ; or a decrease decrease in mean WOMAC stiffness score of at least 40 % in mean WOMAC pain score of at least 5 points from 25 from baseline at week 12 following administration ; or a baseline at week 12 following administration . decrease in mean WOMAC stiffness score of at least 50 % In some embodiments , themethods provided herein result from baseline at week 12 following administration . in a decrease in mean WOMAC function score from base In some embodiments , the values of certain parameters line , such as, for example , a decrease in mean WOMAC are as follows, in each case as a range from lowest median function score of at least 10 % from baseline; or a decrease 30 value (below zero ) to highest median value ( below zero ) : in mean WOMAC function score of at least 20 % from In some embodiments , the change from baseline in baseline ; or a decrease in mean WOMAC function score of WOMAC total score is from about -35 to about -75 . For at least 30 % from baseline ; or a decrease in mean WOMAC example , the change from baseline in WOMAC total score function score of at least 40 % from baseline ; or a decrease is from about -35 to about -60 , about -35 to about -50 , in mean WOMAC function score of at least 50 % from 35 about -38 to about - 73 , about -40 to about -75 , about -40 baseline . to about - 70 , about -40 to about -60 , about -40 to about In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result -50 , about -50 to about -75 , about -55 to about -70 . In in a decrease in mean WOMAC function score from baseline some embodiments , the change from baseline in WOMAC at week 12 following administration , such as, for example , total score is from -38.6 to -73.4 . a decrease in mean WOMAC function score of at least 10 % 40 In some embodiments , the change in WOMAC total score from baseline at week 12 following administration ; or a as compared to placebo is from about 0 to about -20 . For decrease in mean WOMAC function score of at least 20 % example , the change in WOMAC total score as compared to from baseline at week 12 following administration ; or a placebo is about 0 to about -15 , about 0 to about -10 , about decrease in mean WOMAC function score of at least 30 % O to about –5 , about -5 to about -15 , about 5 to about -10 , from baseline at week 12 following administration ; or a 45 about -10 to about –15 . In some embodiments , the change decrease in mean WOMAC function score of at least 40 % in WOMAC total score as compared to placebo is from 0 to from baseline at week 12 following administration ; or a -14.7 . decrease in mean WOMAC function score of at least 50 % In some embodiments , the change from baseline in from baseline at week 12 following administration . WOMAC pain score is from about –5 to about -20 . For In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result 50 example, the change from baseline in WOMAC pain score in a decrease in mean WOMAC pain score from baseline , is from about –5 to about -15 , about 45 to about -10 , about such as , for example , a decrease in mean WOMAC pain -7 to about -20 , about -7 to about -15 , about -10 to about score of at least 10 % from baseline; or a decrease in mean -20 , about -10 to about -15 . In some embodiments , the WOMAC pain score of at least 20 % from baseline ; or a change from baseline in WOMAC pain score is from -6.9 to decrease in mean WOMAC pain score of at least 30 % from 55 -14.6 . baseline ; or a decrease in mean WOMAC pain score of at In some embodiments , the change in WOMAC pain score least 40 % from baseline ; or a decrease in mean WOMAC as compared to placebo is from about 0 to about -5. For pain score of at least 50 % from baseline . example , the change in WOMAC pain score as compared to In some embodiments , themethods provided herein result placebo is about 0 to about -4 , about 0 to about -3 , about in a decrease in mean WOMAC pain score from baseline at 60 0 to about -2 , about 0 to about -1, about -1 to about -5 , week 12 following administration , such as , for example, a about -1 to about -4 , about -1 to about -3 , about -1 to decrease in mean WOMAC pain score of at least 10 % from about -2 . In some embodiments , the change in WOMAC baseline at week 12 following administration ; or a decrease pain score as compared to placebo is from -0.35 to -2.79 . in mean WOMAC pain score of at least 20 % from baseline In some embodiments , the change from baseline in at week 12 following administration ; or a decrease in mean 65 WOMAC function score is from about -25 to about –55 . For WOMAC pain score of at least 30 % from baseline at week example , the change from baseline in WOMAC function 12 following administration ; or a decrease in mean score is from about -25 to about -50 , about -25 to about US 10,544,139 B2 59 60 -40 , about -25 to about -30 , about –28 to about –55 , about patient . In some embodiments , the increase is in an amount -28 to about -52 , about -28 to about -50 , about -28 to or a percentage disclosed herein . In some embodiments , the about -40 , about -28 to about -35 , about -35 to about -55 , increase is at a time point disclosed herein . about -35 to about -45 , about -40 to about –55 . In some In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition embodiments , the change from baseline in WOMAC func- 5 comprising a compound of Formula ( I) , including amor tion score is from -28.0 to -52.0 . phous or polymorph forms thereof, wherein the composition In some embodiments , the change in WOMAC function is suitable for intraarticular injection in a patient population , score as compared to placebo is from about 0 to about -15 . wherein the composition provides an increase in the mean For example , the change in WOMAC function score as joint space width in the joint surrounding the point of compared to placebo is about 0 to about -11, about 0 to 10 injection in the patient population . In some embodiments , about -10 , about 0 to about -5 , about -1 to about -15 , about the increase is in an amount or a percentage disclosed herein . -1 to about -11, about -1 to about -5 , about -5 to about In some embodiments , the increase is at a time point -15 , about -5 to about –10 . In some embodiments, the disclosed herein . change in WOMAC function score as compared to placebo In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition is from -0.59 to -11.06 . 15 comprising a compound of Formula ( I) , including amor In some embodiments , the change from baseline in phous or polymorph forms thereof, wherein the composition WOMAC stiffness score is from about 0 to about -15 . For is suitable for intraarticular injection in a patient population , example , the change from baseline in WOMAC stiffness wherein the composition provides an increase in the mean score is from about 0 to about -10 , about 1 to about -5 , cartilage thickness in the joint surrounding the point of about –3 to about -15, about –3 to about -10 , about –3 to 20 injection in the patient population . In some embodiments , about -7 , about –5 to about -15 , about -5 to about –10 . In the increase is in an amount or a percentage disclosed herein . some embodiments , the change from baseline in WOMAC In some embodiments , the increase is at a time point stiffness score is from -3.2 to -7.0 . disclosed herein . In some embodiments , the change in WOMAC stiffness In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition score as compared to placebo is from about 0 to about –5 . 25 comprising a compound of Formula ( I ) , including amor For example , the change in WOMAC stiffness score as phous or polymorph forms thereof, wherein the composition compared to placebo is about 0 to about -4 , about 0 to about is suitable for intraarticular injection in a patient, wherein -3 , about 0 to about -2 , about -1 to about -5 , about -1 to the composition provides a decrease in the WOMAC total about -4 , about -1 to about –3 . In some embodiments , the score . In some embodiments , the decrease is in an amount or change in WOMAC stiffness score as compared to placebo 30 a percentage disclosed herein . In some embodiments , the is from -0.07 to -1.95 . decrease is at a time point disclosed herein . In some embodiments , the change from baseline in In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition Medial Joint Space Width (mm ) is from about 0 to about comprising a compound of Formula (I ) , including amor +0.5 . For example , the change from baseline in Medial Joint phous or polymorph forms thereof, wherein the composition Space Width (mm ) is from about 0 to about +0.5 , about 0 to 35 is suitable for intraarticular injection in a patient, wherein about +0.4 , about 0 to about +0.3 , about 0 to about +0.2 . In the composition provides a decrease in the WOMAC func some embodiments , the change from baseline in Medial tion score . In some embodiments , the decrease is in an Joint Space Width (mm ) is from 0 to +0.1 . amount or a percentage disclosed herein . In some embodi In some embodiments , the change in Medial Joint Space ments , the decrease is at a time point disclosed herein . Width (mm ) as compared to placebo is from about 0 to about 40 In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition +1. For example , the change in Medial Joint Space Width comprising a compound of Formula (I ), including amor (mm ) as compared to placebo is about 0 to about +0.7 , about phous or polymorph forms thereof, wherein the composition O to about +0.5 , about 0 to about +0.4 , about 0 to about +0.2 , is suitable for intraarticular injection in a patient , wherein about +0.1 to about +1, about +0.1 to about +0.5 , about +0.1 the composition provides a decrease in the WOMAC pain to about +0.4 . In some embodiments , the change in Medial 45 score . In some embodiments , the decrease is in an amount or Joint Space Width (mm ) as compared to placebo is from a percentage disclosed herein . In some embodiments , the +0.06 to +0.42 . decrease is at a time point disclosed herein . In some of the embodiments wherein the methods result In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition in a decrease in WOMAC total score in a subject, in comprising a compound of Formula ( 1) , including amor WOMAC function score in a subject, in WOMAC pain 50 phous or polymorph forms thereof, wherein the composition score in a subject , and /or in WOMAC stiffness score in a is suitable for intraarticular injection in a patient, wherein subject , the subject is a patient. the composition provides a decrease in the WOMAC stiff In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition ness score . In some embodiments , the decrease is in an comprising a compound of Formula ( I) , including amor amount or a percentage disclosed herein . In some embodi phous or polymorph forms thereof, wherein the composition 55 ments , the decrease is at a time point disclosed herein . is suitable for intraarticular injection in a patient, wherein In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition the composition provides an increase in the joint space width comprising a compound of Formula (1 ), including amor in the joint surrounding the point of injection in the patient. phous or polymorph forms thereof, wherein the composition In some embodiments , the increase is in an amount or a is suitable for intraarticular injection in a patient population , percentage disclosed herein . In some embodiments , the 60 wherein the composition provides a decrease in the mean increase is at a time point disclosed herein . WOMAC total score . In some embodiments, the decrease is In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition in an amount or a percentage disclosed herein . In some comprising a compound of Formula (1 ) , including amor embodiments, the decrease is at a time point disclosed phous or polymorph forms thereof, wherein the composition herein . is suitable for intraarticular injection in a patient , wherein 65 In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition the composition provides an increase in the cartilage thick comprising a compound of Formula (I ), including amor ness in the joint surrounding the point of injection in the phous or polymorph forms thereof, wherein the composition US 10,544,139 B2 61 62 is suitable for intraarticular injection in a patient population , vs. hyaline ) for both the meniscus ( two pads of fibrocarti wherein the composition provides a decrease in the mean laginous tissue which serve to disperse friction in the knee WOMAC function score . In some embodiments , the joint between the lower leg (tibia ) and the thigh ( femur) , decrease is in an amount or a percentage disclosed herein . In where the most common injury is the rupturing (tearing ) of some embodiments , the decrease is at a time point disclosed 5 one or more of the fibrocartilage strips ) and articular (hya herein . line) cartilage in the synovial joints, glycosaminoglycans In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition comprising a compound of Formula (I ) , including amor (GAG ; including hyaluronic acid , a major component of phous or polymorph forms thereof, wherein the composition synovial tissues and fluid ), aggrecan (a large proteoglycan is suitable for intraarticular injection in a patient population , 10 which plays a role in fluid pressurization of the cartilage wherein the composition provides a decrease in the mean which supports the articular surface and so may facilitate its WOMAC pain score. In some embodiments , the decrease is function . Aggrecan degradation cause cleavage of all com in an amount or a percentage disclosed herein . In some ponents of the aggregate which are detrimental to cartilage embodiments , the decrease is at a time point disclosed function and are enhanced in osteoarthritic cartilage , result herein . 15 ing in aggrecan depletion and predisposing to cartilage In some embodiments , provided herein is a composition erosion ) , and type 2 and type 10 collagen content ( for joint comprising a compound of Formula (I ), including amor health ) ; and visual grading of cartilage field . phous or polymorph forms thereof, wherein the composition is suitable for intraarticular injection in a patient population , EXAMPLES wherein the composition provides a decrease in the mean 20 WOMAC stiffness score . In some embodiments, the Example 1 decrease is in an amount or a percentage disclosed herein . In some embodiments , the decrease is at a time point disclosed Polymorph Screen herein . A polymorph screen was performed on the compound of In some embodiments , the methods provided herein result 25 Formula ( I) to determine solubility , polymorphism , and in a decrease in mean physician global assessment from thermodynamic stability . baseline at week 12 following administration . For example , A. Analysis of the Starting Solid (a Mixture of Form 1 and a decrease in mean physician global assessment from base a Non -Stoichiometric Hydrate of Form 1 ) line of at least 25 points at week 12 following administra X - ray powder diffraction (XRD ) , differential scanning tion ; or a decrease in mean physician global assessment 30 calorimetry (DSC ) , and thermal gravimetric analysis ( TGA ) from baseline of at least 30 points at week 12 following scans of the starting solid compound of Formula (I ), indi administration . cated that the starting solid was a crystalline material and In some embodiments , a compound of Formula (1 ) , was a mixture of Form I and a non - stoichiometric hydrate of including amorphous and polymorph forms thereof, Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water . increases chondrocyte formation . For example , the com- 35 According to the DSC scan ( FIG . 12B ), the solid showed a pound of Formula ( I) , including amorphous and polymorph wide endotherm between 50 ° C.- 100 ° C .; it also showed a forms thereof, increases chondrocyte formation in human sharp exotherm at 284 ° C .; and the solid eventually melted mesenchymal stem cells . In some embodiments , chondro at 364 ° C. According to the TGA scan (FIG . 12C ) , a 1.4 % changecyte formation over DMSO is increased . In some between embodiments about, a30 compound and 67 - fold of 40 weight loss was observed before 100° C. Formula ( I ), including amorphous and polymorph forms The solubility of the mixture of Form 1 and a non thereof, inhibits expression of MMP1, MMP3 , MMP13 , or stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 was measured by the any combination thereof. For example , the compound of gravimetric method and indicated that the compound had Formula (I ) , including amorphous and polymorph forms low solubility at RT and at 50 ° C. in all solvents tested thereof, inhibits expression of MMP1, MMP3, MMP13 , or 45 except DMF and DMSO . Results from the solubility data any combination thereof in chondrocytes treated with TNFa test at RT and at 50 ° C. are shown in Table 3 . and oncostatin M. Other measurements that can be taken include, but are not TABLE 3 limited to , Daily Pain VAS ( visual analog scale ) for Weekly Solubility data of the starting solid Average Pain Score; NSAID Rescue Medication Use , which 50 (non - stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 ) is a measurement of the amount of pain medication used after administration of the compound of Formula ( I) vs. Solubility Solubility placebo ; Patient Global Assessment , a 5- or 6 -point scoring at RT at 50 ° C. system used to assess disease severity by the patient, taking Solvents (mg /mL ) (mg / mL ) Acetone into consideration overall health ; quantitative computed 55 Acetonitrile 0 tomography ( QCT) for bone density , a fast, non - invasive MeOH 1 1 bone mineral density (BMD ) exam perform on a CT scanner Toluene 1 1 that can be used to detect low bone mass and monitor the EtOH 2 IPAc effects of bone mass therapy in patients undergoing treat EA ment; biomarkers from periphery, including , but not limited 60 MtBE to B -CTX (beta CTX - 1; ( C -terminal telopeptide of collagen IPA 2 type I) , PINP (serum type 1 procollagen (C - terminal/ N MEK 1 round-udone1 MA terminal) ) , COMP ( cartilage oligomeric matrix protein ), and n - Propanol CTX - II ( C -terminal telopeptide of collagen type II) ; bio MIBK 1 markers in joint space fluid , including , but not limited to 65 n - Butyl acetate B -CTX , PINP , COMP, and CTX -II ; histopathology of car water 1 tilage, including , but not limited to cartilage quality ( fibro US 10,544,139 B2 63 64 TABLE 3 - continued TABLE 4 Solubility data of the starting solid Results of slurry experiments at RT ( non - stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 ) Solubility Solubility 5 Crystalline Form Crystalline Form at RT at 50 ° C. Solvent ( wet/ dry ) Solvent (wet / dry ) Solvents (mg /mL ) (mg /mL ) Acetone Solvate 1 Form 2 Acetone/ water Solvate 2 Form 4 ** Heptane Acetonitrile Form 2 Form 1 Acetonitrile / Form 12 Form 1 n - Butanol 1 2 water DMSO n / a n / a 10 MeOH Form 13 Form 1 MeOH /water Form 12 Form 1 DMF 12 16 Toluene Form 1 Form 2 * Toluene / water Form 13 Form 1 DCM 2 2 EtOH Acetic acid 3 Form 2 * Form 3 EtOH /water Solvate 3 Form 2 IPAc Form 3 Form 4 IPAc /water Form 12 Form 1 EA Form 4 * Form 5 EA / water Form 12 Form 1 MtBE Slurry experiments in various solvents were performed . 15 Form 5 * Form 6 MtBE /water Form 12 Form 1 Approximately 30-80 mg of the starting solid ( a non IPA Form 6 Form 7 IPA / water Form 6 Form 6 stoichiometric hydrate of Form 1 having between 1 % and MEK Form 7 Form 4 MEK /water Form 7 Form 7 about 20 % by weight water ) was slurried in 39 different MA Form 4 Form 4 * MA/ water Form 13 Form 1 n Form 4 * Form 8 n - Propanol / Form 2 ** Form 2 ** solvents (pure and binary solvents ; the ratio of organic Propanol water solvent/ water ( V / V ) was 95 % / 5 % ) at RT and 50 ° C. for 5 20 MIBK Form 8 Form 3 MIBK /water Form 12 Form 1 days. Three solvates , one non - stoichiometric hydrate , and n - Butyl Form 3 * Form 1 n - Butyl Form 13 Form 12 eleven non -solvated forms were identified . A “ * ” after a acetate acetate /water particular Form , e.g., Form 2 * , indicates that the forms had Water Form 13 Form 1 Heptane /water Form 13 Form 12 similar XRD scans with minor differences and were con Heptane Form 1 Form 9 n - Butanol/ water Form 13 Form 13 sidered to belong to the same class. Generally , the identified 25 n - Butanol Form 9 Form 10 DMSO /water amorphous Form 10 forms showed multiple endotherms/ exotherms on differen DMSO amorphous Form 11 DMF/ water Form 11 Form 11 tial scanning calorimetry (DSC ) scans; Form 9 showed a DMF Form 11 Form 1 DCM / water Form 13 Form 1 single endotherm . XRD of both wet and dry samples were DCM Form 1 Form 2 scanned (FIG . 12A (dry sample )) . The data is shown in Tables 4 and 5 below . TABLE 5

Results of slurry experiments at 50 ° C.

Crystalline Form Crystalline Form Solvent (wet / dry ) Solvent (wet / dry )

Acetone Solvate 2 Form 4 ** Acetone/ water Form 4 ** Form 4 ** Acetonitrile Form 2 * Form 2 Acetonitrile /water Form 13 Form 13 MeOH Form 1 Form 1 MeOH /water Form 13 Form 13 Toluene Form 1 Form 1 Toluene /water Form 13 Form 13 EtOH Form 2 * Form 2 * EtOH /water Form 9 Form 9 IPAc Form 9 Form 9 IPAc /water Form 13 Form 13 EA Form 4 * Form 4 EA /water Form 4 * Form 4 * MEBE Form 5 * Form 4 MtBE /water Form 13 Form 13 IPA Form 6 Form 6 IPA / water Form 6 Form 6 MEK Form 7 Form 7 MEK water Form 7 Form 7 MA Form 4 Form 4 MA/ water Form 12 Form 4 n -Propanol Form 4 Form 4 ** n - Propanol/ water Form 9 Form 9 MIBK Form 8 Form 8 MIBK / water Form 13 Form 1 n - Butyl Form 9 Form 9 n - Butyl Form 13 Form 1 acetate acetate / water water Form 13 Form 13 Heptane/ water Form 13 Form 1 Heptane Form 13 Form 13 n - Butanol/ water Form 13 Form 1 n - Butanol Form 9 Form 9 DMSO /water Amorphous Form 10 DMSO Amorphous Form 10 * DMF/ water Form 11 Form 11 DMF Form 11 Form 11 * DCM / water Form 13 Form 1 DCM Form 13 Form 13 US 10,544,139 B2 65 66 The slurry experiments identified 3 solvated forms from TABLE 6 - continued wet samples (Solvates 1 , 2 , and 3 ) ; 2 non - stoichiometric hydrates of Form 1 (Forms 12 and 13 ); and 11 non -solvated Summary of experiments that generated Form 1 forms (Forms 1-11) . In some instances, similar XRD scans with minor differences were obtained . These were consid- 5 Form Solvent Temperature Wet Dry ered to be part of the same class ( e.g., the same form ). For Toluene RT Form 1 Form 1 Toluene 50 ° C. Form 1 Form 1 example , XRD scans of Form 2 and Form 2 * were similar water RT Form 13 Form 1 and were considered to belong to the same class. The Heptane RT Form 1 Form 1 solvated forms were obtained from wet sample analysis ; DCM RT Form 1 Form 1 after drying, the sample indicated a different XRD . 10 Acetonitrile /water RT Form 12 Form 1 MeOH / water RT Form 12 Form 1 Solvate 1 was obtained from acetone at RT, and after Toluene /water RT Form 13 Form 1 drying, a low crystallinity solid was generated . Solvate 2 IPAC /water RT Form 13 Form 1 was obtained from acetone (at RT) and acetone/ water (at EA / water RT Form 12 Form 1 RT) , and after drying , Form 4 ** was generated . Solvate 3 MtBE / water RT Form 12 Form 1 MA /water RT Form 13 Form 1 was obtained from EtOH /water at RT, and after drying , Form 15 MIBK / water RT Form 12 Form 1 2 was generated. MIBK / water 50 ° C. Form 13 Form 1 B. Form 1 DCM /water RT Form 13 Form 1 The experiments that generated Form 1 are shown in DCM / water 50 ° C. Form 13 Form 1 Table 6 , below . Form 1 was generally obtained from drying n -Butyl 50 ° C. Form 13 Form 1 of Form 13 or Form 12. Form 1 may be considered as a 20 acetate / water dehydrated hydrate . Reslurry in many binary solvents (with Heptane /water 50 ° C. Form 13 Form 1 5 % water) generated Form 1. Purity of the residual solid was n - Butanol/ water 50 ° C. Form 13 Form 1 98.9 % . KF of Form 1 (one sample ) solid was 5.8 % ; residual * Amount of water in binary solvents is 5 % MeOH of Form 1 solid was 0.01 % . A TGA scan of fully dried Form 1 solid was performed (FIG . 1C ). A 0.33 % weight loss was observed before 100 ° C. 25 TABLE 7 Form 1 showed sharp crystalline peaks on the XRD scan ( FIG . 1A ) . The XRD peaks of Form 1 are shown in Table 7 , XRD peaks of Form 1 below . According to the DSC scan (FIG . 1B ), the solid 2 - Theta d ( A ) BG Height I % Area I % FWHM showed a wide endotherm between 50-100 ° C .; it showed a 30 5.778 15.2835 57 97 28.3 1765 18.5 0.309 sharp exotherm at 281 ° C .; and the melting point was 363 ° 6.801 12.9871 19 343 100 8306 87.1 0.412 C. 9.26 9.5427 20 178 51.9 3884 40.7 0.371 The Form 1 solid was dried at 75 ° C. under vacuum 12.421 7.1203 30 231 67.3 4862 51 0.358 overnight, and XRD , DSC , and TGA scans were performed . 13.919 6.357 35 147 42.9 3668 38.5 0.424 14.501 6.1033 40 133 38.8 3439 36.1 0.44 Comparison of the first and the second XRD scans (after 35 16.5 5.3681 47 196 57.1 4286 44.9 0.372 drying at 75 ° C. under vacuum overnight) , showed no 17.26 5.1333 53 46 13.4 560 5.9 0.207 change. However , the DSC scans indicated the absence of 18.52 4.7868 68 342 99.7 9539 100 0.474 endotherm . The loss of the early peak on the DSC scan had 19.161 4.6282 54 215 62.7 4130 43.3 0.327 no effect on the XRD trace , showing that the wide endo 20.302 4.3706 49 133 38.8 2823 29.6 0.361 therm between 50-100 ° C. on DSC scan was due to the free 20.619 4.304 43 80 23.3 2047 21.5 0.435 40 23.056 3.8543 41 38 11.1 765 8 0.342 solvent. 24.642 3.6098 33 175 51 7235 75.8 0.703 The Form 1 solid was heated in a DSC chamber to 3050 25.302 3.5171 86 80 23.3 2345 24.6 0.498 26.1 3.4113 83 69 20.1 1545 16.2 0.381 C. (past the endotherm /exotherm around 280 ° C.) , and then 27.46 3.2453 52 46 13.4 872 9.1 0.322 scanned by XRD . Comparison of the first and the third XRD 28.739 3.1038 39 84 24.5 2146 22.5 0.434 and DSC scans shows that after heating to 305 ° C., Form 1 30.444 2.9337 34 32 9.3 1080 11.3 0.54 converted to Form 9. It can be concluded that the endotherm / 45 33.302 2.6882 30 27 7.9 683 7.2 0.405 exotherm around 280 ° C.might be due to melting /crystal lization events . Form 1 tended to convert to a non - stoichiometric hydrate C. Forms 2 , 2 * , and 2 *** of Form 1 having between 1 % and about 20 % by weight The experiments that generated Forms 2, 2 * , and 2 ** are water (e.g. , Form 13 ) at RH above 40–50 % . The hydrate lost 50 shown in Table 8 , below . XRD scans of Forms 2 , 2 * and 2 ** its water below 30 % RH . Form 1 converts to Form 13 when were performed ( FIGS . 2A , 2D , and 2G show the XRD exposed to air. scans of Forms 2 , 2 * , and 2 ** , respectively ) . The XRD The dynamic vapor sorption (DVS ) scan of Form 1 solid peaks of Forms 2 and 2 * are shown in Tables 9 and 10 , showed a 17 % water absorption at 90 % RH (FIG . 1D ). The below , respectively. DSC scans were also performed (FIGS . XRD data indicated that the solid used in the DVS test 55 2B , 2E , and 2H show the DSC scans of Forms 2 , 2 * , and converted to the hydrate form before the start of the DVS 2 ** , respectively ) . According to the DSC scans , Forms 2 , 2 * test . However , at 0 % RH , water was lost, perhaps indicating and 2 ** each showed a wide endotherm between 50 ° that the solid was Form 1 . C.- 100 ° C., and multiple endotherms and exotherms before melting at 363° C. The wide endotherm before 100 ° C.may TABLE 6 60 be due to the containment of water / solvent in the solid . Form 2 was obtained from acetonitrile ; Form 2 * from ethanol; Summary of experiments that generated Form 1 Form 2 ** from n -propanol / 5 % water. Form Solvent Temperature Wet Dry A TGA scan of Form 2 (FIG . 2C ) showed a 2.7 % weight Form 1 MeOH RT Form 13 Form 1 65 loss before 116 ° C. FIG . 2F shows the TGA scan of Form 2 * MeOH 50 ° C. Form 1 Form 1 A PLM photo of Form 2 was taken , indicating that the particle size of this solid was around 50 um . US 10,544,139 B2 67 68 The Form 2 solid was heated in a DSC machine to 90 ° C. TABLE 10 (past the wide endotherm between 50-100 ° C.) ; to 270 ° C. (past the endotherm /exotherm around 240 ° C. ); and finally XRD peaks of Form 2 * to 330 ° C. (past the exotherm around 330 ° C.). The residual 2- Theta BG Height I % I % FWHM solid was analyzed by XRD . According to the first and 5 d ( A ) Area 4.859 18.1701 127 87 1.2 1714 1.9 0.335 second XRD and DSC scans, the form did not change before 7.119 12.4067 148 3587 48.4 44853 50.4 0.213 and after heating to 90 ° C. The wide endotherm between 8.321 10.6166 149 407 5.5 4871 5.5 0.203 50-100 ° C. might be free solvent or hydrate . According to 10.439 8.4669 186 1184 16 13629 15.3 0.196 11.319 7.8109 190 413 5.6 4673 5.3 0.192 the first and third XRD and DSC scans, after heating a Form 10 12.3 7.1899 179 1010 13.6 13220 14.9 0.223 2 sample to 270 ° C., the solid converted to low crystalline 12.803 6.9089 182 140 1.9 1587 1.8 0.193 solids. According to the first and fourth XRD and DSC 14.121 6.2667 179 1966 26.5 27290 30.7 0.236 14.559 6.0791 199 169 2.3 4381 4.9 0.441 scans, after heating the sample to 330 ° C., the solid con 16.236 5.4546 244 436 5.9 5696 6.4 0.222 verted to Form 9. Thus, the exotherm around 290 ° C. was a 16.62 5.3297 271 674 9.1 7919 8.9 0.2 re- crystallization event. According to an XRD and DSC 15 17.059 5.1935 313 629 8.5 6279 7.1 0.17 17.699 5.0071 303 1094 14.7 12619 14.2 0.196 overlay, the behavior of Form 2 * was similar to Form 2 . 18.858 4.7018 359 2334 31.5 31734 35.7 0.231 Residual acetonitrile and EtOH in Form 2 and 2 * was not 19.321 4.5903 325 1650 22.2 28313 31.8 0.292 detected . 19.823 4.4751 412 127 1.7 582 0.7 0.078 20.321 4.3665 327 333 4.5 3361 3.8 0.172 21.479 4.1336 451 3245 43.8 56365 63.3 0.295 TABLE 8 20 22.119 4.0154 612 7417 100 89000 100 0.204 22.782 3.9 536 327 4.4 11890 13.4 0.618 Summary of experiments that generated Forms 2 , 2 * , and 2 ** 23.098 3.8475 466 638 8.6 11127 12.5 0.296 24.3 3.6597 361 4873 65.7 61170 68.7 0.213 25.599 3.4769 487 475 6.4 7278 8.2 0.26 Form Solvent Temperature Wet Dry 25.88 3.4399 541 562 7.6 10968 12.3 0.332 25 26.361 3.3782 372 1289 17.4 20859 23.4 0.275 Form 2 Acetonitrile RT Form 2 Form 2 26.739 3.3312 266 660 8.9 13196 14.8 0.34 27.938 3.1909 284 560 7.6 9888 11.1 50 ° C. Form 2 0.3 Acetonitrile Form 2 * 28.641 3.1142 319 210 2.8 2324 2.6 0.188 EtOH / water RT Solvate 3 Form 2 29.398 3.0357 357 100 1.3 2376 2.7 0.404 Form 2 * EtOH RT Form 2 * Form 2 * 29.779 2.9977 295 708 9.5 13168 14.8 0.316 EtOH 50 ° C. Form 2 * Form 2 * 30 30.3 2.9473 283 451 6.1 6600 7.4 0.249 31.658 2.8239 239 667 9 9228 10.4 0.235 Acetonitrile 50 ° C. Form 2 * Form 2 32.519 2.7511 221 191 2.6 2896 3.3 0.258 Form 2 ** n - Propanol/ RT Form 2 ** Form 2 ** 33.903 2.6419 213 72 876 1 0.207 water 34.82 2.5744 229 110 1.5 3822 4.3 0.591 35.504 2.5264 230 97 1.3 3876 4.4 0.679 Amount ofwater in binary solvents is 5 % 35 D. Form 3 The experiments that generated Form 3 are shown in TABLE 9 Table 11, below . XRD and DSC scans of Form 3 were taken (FIGS . 3A and 3B , respectively ) . Table 12 , below , shows the XRD peaks of Form 2 40 XRD peaks of Form 3. Multiple exotherms and endotherms 2 - Theta d ( A ) BG Height I % Area I % FWHM were observed from the DSC scan of Form 3 . 7.021 12.5802 164 2202 54.1 36151 38.2 0.279 A TGA scan of Form 3 was taken ( FIG . 3C ) and showed 8.298 10.6462 156 194 4.8 2332 2.5 0.204 a 1.6 % weight loss of the solid before 81 ° C., followed by 10.399 8.5 193 397 9.8 6246 6.6 0.267 a 1.7 % weight loss between 81 ° C. and 169° C. 11.258 7.8531 206 151 3.7 1407 1.5 0.158 45 Form 3 was obtained from IPAc at RT, while Form 3 * was 12.239 7.2259 181 287 7 5980 6.3 0.354 14.1 6.2759 186 648 15.9 14147 15 0.371 obtained from reslurry in n -butyl acetate. 14.597 6.0632 195 182 4.5 7983 8.4 0.746 16.18 5.4734 235 201 4.9 4033 4.3 0.341 TABLE 11 16.561 5.3484 251 280 6.9 8382 8.9 0.509 17.033 5.2013 288 160 3.9 1810 1.9 0.192 50 Summary of experiments that generated Form 3 and Form 3 * 17.639 5.0238 295 366 9 3542 3.7 0.165 18.878 4.6968 316 1210 29.7 29303 31 0.412 Form Solvent Temperature Wet Dry 19.22 4.614 333 585 14.4 21169 22.4 0.615 19.863 4.4662 340 95 2.3 437 0.5 0.078 Form 3 IPAC RT Form 3 Form 3 20.411 4.3474 385 86 2.1 671 0.7 0.133 n - Butyl acetate RT Form 3 * Form 3 Form 3 * RT Form 3 * 21.48 4.1335 532 1944 47.8 61345 64.8 0.536 55 n - Butyl acetate Form 3 22.04 4.0297 647 4071 100 94605 100 0.395 23.036 3.8576 634 142 3.5 1478 1.6 0.177 24.24 3.6686 497 1688 41.5 28976 30.6 0.292 25.561 3.482 422 120 2.9 2545 2.7 0.361 TABLE 12 25.918 3.4349 365 271 6.7 11426 12.1 0.717 349 12.2 15133 26.379 3.3759 497 16 0.518 60 XRD peaks of Form 3 26.739 3.3313 387 181 4.4 2845 3 0.267 27.979 3.1863 297 235 5.8 4050 4.3 0.293 2 - Theta d ( A ) BG Height I % Area I % FWHM 29.043 3.072 338 347 8.5 4584 4.8 0.225 29.661 3.0094 321 310 7.6 7879 8.3 0.432 5.024 17.5739 231 87 4.4 845 1.9 0.165 30.204 2.9565 355 135 3.3 1501 1.6 0.189 6.34 13.9294 368 1030 52.5 12361 27.5 0.204 31.58 2.8308 232 206 5.1 3991 4.2 0.329 7.219 12.2357 182 1962 100 36491 81.1 0.316 32.602 2.7443 193 63 1.5 1129 1.2 0.305 65 8.441 10.4665 188 159 8.1 3261 7.2 0.349 9.237 9.5659 207 320 16.3 3365 7.5 0.179 US 10,544,139 B2 69 70 TABLE 12 - continued TABLE 13 - continued XRD peaks of Form 3 Summary of experiments that generated Forms 4 , 4 * , and 4 ** 2 - Theta d ( A ) BG Height I % Area I % FWHM Form Solvent Temperature Wet Dry 5 10.561 8.37 240 278 14.2 6270 13.9 0.383 Form 4 * EA RT Form 4 * Form 4 * 10.998 8.0381 217 849 43.3 17119 38.1 0.343 EA 50 ° C. Form 4 * Form 4 11.46 7.715 256 87 4.4 662 1.5 0.129 EA /water 50 ° C. Form 4 * Form 4 * 12.439 7.11 215 311 15.9 6502 14.5 0.355 n - Propanol RT Form 4 Form 4 * 12.865 6.8756 209 92 4.7 1599 3.6 0.295 Form 4 ** Acetone /water RT Solvate 2 Form 4 ** 14.22 6.2233 231 522 26.6 12265 27.3 0.399 10 Acetone 50 ° C. Solvate 2 Form 4 ** 15.524 273 6.6 5.7034 311 15.9 2957 0.162 n - Propanol 50 ° C. Form 4 Form 4 ** 16.021 5.5276 309 218 11.1 2669 5.9 0.208 Acetone /water Form 4 ** Form 4 ** 16.78 5.2792 368 330 16.8 3780 8.4 0.195 50 ° C. 17.181 5.1567 384 99 5 2614 5.8 0.449 17.782 4.9837 428 496 25.3 6264 13.9 0.215 * Amount of water in binary solvents is 5 % 18.381 4.8227 509 551 28.1 5102 11.3 0.157 15 19.02 4.6622 447 589 30 20513 45.6 0.592 19.758 4.4896 487 423 21.6 14362 31.9 0.577 TABLE 14 20.8 4.267 520 214 10.9 1518 3.4 0.121 21.19 4.1893 408 418 21.3 4581 10.2 0.186 XRD peaks of Form 4 21.6 4.1107 553 1017 51.8 41986 93.3 0.702 22.181 4.0044 662 1736 88.5 44981 100 0.44 2 - Theta d ( A ) BG Height I % Area I % FWHM 23.185 3.8333 508 259 13.2 3327 7.4 0.218 20 24.44 3.6392 467 1441 73.4 29510 65.6 0.348 3.433 25.7129 197 48 1 697 0.7 0.247 25.198 3.5313 551 232 11.8 1362 3 0.1 7.019 12.5829 222 3897 77.3 66968 69.4 0.292 25.618 3.4745 557 79 4 365 0.8 0.079 8.659 10.203 242 448 8.9 8198 8.5 0.311 26.103 3.4109 512 180 9.2 7374 16.4 0.696 8.98 9.8395 223 219 4.3 7649 7.9 0.594 26.479 3.3634 475 306 15.6 11652 25.9 0.647 9.64 9.1672 251 516 10.2 6969 7.2 0.23 27.3 3.264 455 133 6.8 1016 2.3 0.13 25 10.917 8.0978 210 77 1.5 1041 1.1 0.23 28.04 3.1796 378 93 4.7 1485 3.3 0.271 12.339 7.1673 220 465 9.2 9572 9.9 0.35 28.82 3.0953 372 201 10.2 3455 7.7 0.292 13.82 6.4023 268 501 9.9 11493 11.9 0.39 29.258 3.0499 362 76 3.9 2580 5.7 0.577 14.278 6.1981 271 192 3.8 7288 7.6 0.645 29.88 2.9878 334 191 9.7 4011 8.9 0.357 14.923 5.9314 288 172 3.4 . 1636 1.7 0.162 31.802 2.8115 251 205 10.4 4094 9.1 0.34 16.462 5.3804 310 329 6.5 3066 3.2 0.158 32.62 2.7429 231 87 4.4 1109 2.5 0.217 30 17.041 5.199 375 105 2.1 942 1 0.153 32.943 2.7167 215 52 2.7 1107 2.5 0.362 17.638 5.0241 435 1073 21.3 13511 14 0.214 33.961 2.6375 217 101 5.1 1686 3.7 0.284 18.281 4.8488 487 772 15.3 9782 10.1 0.215 19.52 4.5437 504 1590 31.5 31949 33.1 0.342 21.759 4.081 677 5040 100 96504 100 0.32 E. Form 4 23.22 3.8275 693 1457 28.9 28109 29.1 0.328 25.12 3.5421 710 3091 61.3 69330 71.8 0.381 The experiments that generated Forms 4,4 * , and 4 ** are 35 25.76 3.4556 455 827 16.4 22029 22.8 0.453 shown in Table 13 , below . XRD of Forms 4 , 4 * , and 4 ** 27.221 3.2733 419 180 3.6 2915 3 0.275 were taken ( FIGS. 4A , 4D , and 4G , respectively ) . Tables 14 28.638 3.1145 409 210 4.2 4338 4.5 0.351 29.259 3.0498 461 568 11.3 11998 12.4 0.359 and 15 , below , show the XRD peaks of Form 4 and Form 4 * , 30.137 2.9629 409 149 3 1946 2 0.222 respectively . DSC scans of Forms 4 , 4 * , and 4 ** were also 31.817 2.8102 253 110 2.2 4034 4.2 0.623 performed (FIGS . 4B , 4E , and 4H , respectively ). According 40 32.319 2.7677 245 137 2.7 3829 4 0.475 to the DSC scans, Form 4 showed a wide endotherm between 50 ° C.- 100 ° C., followed by multiple endotherms/ exotherms, and then melted at around 367 ° C. Forms 4 * and TABLE 15 4 ** showed similar DSC patterns as Form 4 . TGA scans of Form 4 , Form 4 * , and Form 4 ** were taken 45 XRD peaks of Form 4 * (FIGS . 4C , 4F , and 41, respectively ) . For Form 4 , there was an 8.3 % weight loss before 200 ° C .; for Form 4 * , there was 2 - Theta d ( A ) BG Height I % Area I % FWHM a 4.4 % weight loss before 102 ° C., followed by a 0.5 % 4.981 17.7282 270 684 15.8 12231 12.6 0.304 7.22 12.2329 244 3416 79 65744 67.8 0.327 weight loss between 102 ° C. and 250 ° C .; and for Form 4 ** , 50 8.459 10.4447 202 335 7.7 4814 5 0.244 there were three stages of weight loss, which were 2.8 % , 10.56 8.3707 219 629 14.5 10739 11.1 0.29 1.9 % , and 1.3 % , respectively . 11.42 7.7419 240 203 4.7 2908 3 0.244 These solid forms were obtained from methyl acetate , 12.42 7.1209 221 614 14.2 11445 11.8 0.317 13.019 6.7947 238 59 1.4 423 0.4 0.122 n -propanol , MIBK , MIBE , ethyl acetate , acetone/ water , and 14.26 6.2057 227 1052 24.3 20787 21.4 0.336 ethyl acetate /water . 55 16.318 5.4274 409 85 2 665 0.7 0.133 16.722 5.2973 332 496 11.5 8980 9.3 0.308 TABLE 13 17.199 5.1515 393 226 5.2 3448 3.6 0.259 17.82 4.9733 402 725 16.8 8502 8.8 0.199 Summary of experiments that generated Forms 4 , 4 * , and 4 ** 18.98 4.672 432 1352 31.3 36895 38.1 0.464 19.44 4.5623 439 990 22.9 28546 29.4 0.49 Form Solvent Temperature Wet Dry 20.46 4.3371 444 119 2.8 1163 1.2 0.166 60 21.58 4.1144 458 1982 45.8 71568 73.8 0.614 Form 4 EA RT Form 4 * Form 4 22.22 3.9974 837 4325 100 96937 100 0.381 EA 50 ° C. Form 4 * Form 4 23.16 3.8373 758 114 2.6 1085 1.1 0.162 MA RT Form 4 Form 4 24.42 3.6421 522 2466 57 48977 50.5 0.338 MA 50 ° C. Form 4 Form 4 25.679 3.4663 590 252 5.8 5211 5.4 0.352 MA/ water 50 ° C. Form 12 Form 4 26.5 3.3607 470 671 15.5 23177 23.9 0.587 MEBE 50 ° C. Form 5 * Form 4 65 26.95 3.3056 356 313 7.2 3645 3.8 0.198 n - Propanol RT Form 4 Form 4 * 28.118 3.1709 385 255 5.9 5045 5.2 0.336 US 10,544,139 B2 71 72 TABLE 15 - continued TABLE 17 - continued XRD peaks of Form 4 * XRD peaks of Form 5 2 - Theta d ( A ) BG Height I % Area I % FWHM 2- Theta d ( A ) BG Height I % Area I % FWHM 5 29.9 2.9858 360 383 8.9 13112 13.5 0.582 31.86 2.8065 343 648 10.1 13697 11.7 0.359 30.421 2.9359 346 239 5.5 5602 5.8 0.398 32.642 2.741 314 125 1.9 2403 2 0.327 31.779 2.8134 293 336 7.8 5905 6.1 0.299 34.002 2.6344 298 123 1.9 1956 1.7 0.27 32.618 2.743 267 124 2.9 1934 2 0.265 10 G. Form 6 F. Forms 5 and 5 * The experiments that generated Form 6 are shown in The experiments that generated Forms 5 and 5 * are shown Table 18 , below . XRD and DSC scans of Form 6 were taken in Table 16 , below . XRD scans of Forms 5 and 5 * were taken (FIGS . 6A and 6B , respectively ). According to the DSC (FIGS . 5A and 5D , respectively ). The XRD peaks of Form scan , the solid showed a small exotherm at 250 ° C. and a 5also are performed shown in Tableand showed 17 , below a wide . A DSC endotherm scan of between Form 5 was50 ° 15 sharp melting endotherm at 358° C. C.- 100 ° C., and multiple endotherms and exotherms before Form 6 was obtained by slurrying starting material in IPA melting at 363 ° C. ( FIG . 5B ) . and IPA / 5 % water at RT and 50 ° C. A TGA scan of Form 5 solid showed a 3.1 % weight loss TABLE 18 before 100 ° C., followed by a 1.7 % weight loss between 20 100 ° C. and 250 ° C. ( FIG . 5C ) . Summary of experiments that generated Form 6 Forms 5 and 5 * were obtained from slurrying Form 12 in MtBE at RT and 50 ° C. Wet solid showed Form 5 * , while Form Solvent Temperature Wet Dry dry solid indicated Form 5 . Form 6 IPA RT Form 6 Form 6 25 IPA 50 ° C. Form 6 Form 6 TABLE 16 IPA /water RT Form 6 Form 6 IPA /water 50 ° C. Form 6 Form 6 Summary of experiments that generated Forms 5 and 5 * * Amount of water in binary solvents is 5 % Form Solvent Temperature Wet Dry 30 H. Form 7 Form 5 MEBE RT Form 5 * Form 5 The experiments that generated Form 7 are shown in Form 5 * MtBE RT Form 5 * Form 5 Table 19 , below . XRD and DSC scans of Form 7 were taken MEBE 50 ° C. Form 5 * Form 4 ( FIGS. 7A and 7B , respectively ) . The XRD peaks of Form 7 are shown in Table 20, below . According to the DSC scan , 35 the solid showed two exotherms at 227 ° C. and 299 ° C., TABLE 17 followed by a melting endotherm at 365 ° C. Form 7 showed low degree of crystallinity on XRD . The double exotherm on XRD peaks of Form 5 the DSC scans may be associated with the low crystallinity 2 - Theta d ( A ) BG Height I % Area I % FWHM observed on the XRD scan . 5.098 17.3185 260 155 2.4 2464 2.1 0.27 40 A TGA scan of Form 7 solid showed a 12 % weight loss 6.38 13.8428 256 1778 27.7 34733 29.6 0.332 before 200 ° C. (FIG . 7C ). 7.28 12.1332 214 3964 61.6 78158 66.5 0.335 Form 7 was obtained from MEK and MEK / 5 % water at 8.518 10.3715 234 241 3.7 3170 2.7 0.224 RT and 50 ° C. 9.24 9.5627 227 472 7.3 6614 5.6 0.238 10.639 8.3083 266 765 11.9 20508 17.5 0.456 11.019 8.0226 242 1596 24.8 37620 32 0.401 45 TABLE 19 11.483 7.6998 398 133 2.1 949 0.8 0.121 12.44 7.1091 246 584 9.1 11910 10.1 0.347 Summary of experiments that generated Form 7 12.94 6.8358 249 152 2.4 4189 3.6 0.469 14.301 6.1883 279 1114 17.3 22226 18.9 0.339 Form Solvent Temperature Wet Dry 14.839 5.9648 300 167 2.6 5989 5.1 0.61 15.581 5.6827 404 376 5.8 4045 3.4 0.183 50 Form 7 MEK RT Form 7 Form 7 16.08 5.5073 452 459 7.1 9013 7.7 0.334 MEK 50 ° C. Form 7 Form 7 16.357 5.4146 509 260 4 11967 10.2 0.782 MEK / water RT Form 7 Form 7 16.839 5.2606 521 473 7.4 7195 6.1 0.259 MEK water 50 ° C. Form 7 Form 7 17.254 5.1351 550 258 4 4373 3.7 0.288 17.839 4.968 562 414 6.4 4207 3.6 0.173 * Amount of water in binary solvents is 5 % 18.439 4.8078 667 590 9.2 5946 5.1 0.171 55 19.059 4.6527 616 1603 24.9 35964 30.6 0.381 19.5 4.5486 671 1163 18.1 30384 25.9 0.444 TABLE 20 20.882 4.2506 850 305 4.7 2860 2.4 0.159 21.679 4.0959 935 2272 35.3 66194 56.4 0.495 XRD peaks of Form 7 22.28 3.9867 1083 6430 100 117449 100 0.311 23.221 3.8273 856 564 8.8 9429 8 0.284 2 - Theta d ( A ) BG Height I % Area I % FWHM 24.461 3.6361 697 4250 66.1 74709 63.6 0.299 60 25.276 3.5206 726 170 2.6 1349 1.1 0.135 4.94 17.8745 362 1384 23.3 50829 29.2 0.624 26.081 3.4137 756 442 6.9 17518 14.9 0.674 7.06 12.5111 286 3171 53.3 69159 39.8 0.371 26.52 3.3582 689 1014 15.8 34615 29.5 0.58 8.759 10.0876 370 628 10.6 9606 5.5 0.26 28.139 3.1686 528 306 4.8 4846 4.1 0.269 9.9 8.9272 429 537 9 11110 6.4 0.352 28.821 3.0952 533 463 7.2 7067 6 0.259 10.881 8.1241 546 879 14.8 16425 9.4 0.318 29.94 2.9819 499 755 11.7 15565 13.3 0.35 65 11.84 7.4681 588 413 6.9 7187 4.1 0.296 30.458 2.9324 435 467 7.3 9861 8.4 0.359 12.997 6.8061 463 135 2.3 1351 0.8 0.17 US 10,544,139 B2 73 74 TABLE 20 - continued TABLE 22 - continued XRD peaks of Form 7 XRD peaks of Form 8 2 - Theta d ( A ) BG Height I % Area I % FWHM 2- Theta d ( A ) BG Height I % Area I % FWHM 5 14.404 6.1442 604 126 2.1 3331 1.9 0.449 30.878 2.8935 403 87 2.5 1890 1.4 0.369 15.1 5.8626 791 596 10 8819 5.1 0.252 31.221 2.8624 386 69 2 1898 1.4 0.468 15.92 5.5622 792 593 10 24460 14.1 0.701 16.581 5.3421 739 641 10.8 14919 8.6 0.396 18.5 4.7919 1066 1555 26.1 43174 24.8 0.472 J. Form 9 19.4 4.5717 1087 930 15.6 17521 10.1 0.32 10 20.382 4.3535 1178 154 2.6 867 0.5 0.096 The experiments that generated Form 9 are shown in 21.56 4.1183 1424 5949 100 173972 100 0.497 22.098 4.0192 1830 692 11.6 17678 10.2 0.434 Table 23 , below . XRD and DSC scans of Form 9 were taken 23.22 3.8275 1749 1971 33.1 42151 24.2 0.364 (FIGS . 9A and 9B , respectively) . The XRD peaks of Form 24.203 3.6743 1776 351 5.9 11935 6.9 0.578 9 are shown in Table 24 , below . According to the DSC scan , 24.884 3.5751 1658 271 4.6 2378 1.4 0.149 15 the solid showed a single melting endotherm at 364 ° C. 25.759 3.4556 1416 492 8.3 19894 11.4 0.687 26.3 3.3858 1335 499 8.4 23631 13.6 0.805 A TGA scan of Form 9 showed a 0.28 % weight loss 27.34 3.2594 1192 307 5.2 4494 2.6 0.249 before 100 ° C. ( FIG . 9C ) . 28.641 3.1142 1004 382 6.4 18030 10.4 0.802 29.078 3.0684 979 324 5.4 14234 8.2 0.747 Other forms, when heated to just before melting at 364 ° 30.28 2.9492 759 711 12 16004 9.2 0.383 C., seemed to convert to Form 9. This has been confirmed 31.985 2.7959 551 111 1.9 4816 2.8 0.738 20 for Forms 1 and 2 . 33.402 2.6804 509 102 1.7 2060 1.2 0.343 34.24 2.6167 474 92 1.5 1901 1.1 0.351 A DVS scan of Form 9 showed a 0.8 % water absorption at 90 % RH . Form 9 did not change its form before and after the DVS scan ( FIG . 9D ) . I. Form 8 25 The experiments that generated Form 8 are shown in TABLE 23 Table 21, below . XRD and DSC scans of Form 8 were taken (FIGS . 8A and 8B , respectively ). The XRD peaks of Form Summary of experiments that generated Form 9 8 are shown in Table 22 , below . According to the DSC scan , Form Solvent Temperature Wet Dry the solid showed two endotherms at 205 ° C. and 231 ° C., 30 n - Butanol RT Form 9 Form 9 followed by an exotherm at 279° C., followed by a melting Form 9 IPAc 50 ° C. Form 9 Form 9 endotherm at 362 ° C. Form 8 showed a low degree of n - Butyl acetate 50 ° C. Form 9 Form 9 crystallinity on the XRD scan . The double exotherm on the n - Butanol 50 ° C. Form 9 Form 9 DSC scan may confirm the low crystallinity seen on XRD EtOH /water 50 ° C. Form 9 Form 9 ( low crystalline material convert to higher crystallinity n 50 ° C. Form 9 Form 9 solid ) . 35 Propanol/ water A TGA scan of Form 8 showed a 4.2 % weight loss before * Amount of water in binary solvents is 5 % 190 ° C., followed by a 3.9 % weight loss between 190 ° C. and 261° C. (FIG . 8C ) . TABLE 24 Form 8 was obtained from MIBK at RT and 50 ° C. 40 MIBK / 5 % water reslurry does not produce the same form . XRD peaks of Form 9 TABLE 21 2 - Theta d ( A ) BG Height I % Area I % FWHM Summary of experiments that generated Form 8 4.94 17.8746 21 895 100 23398 100 0.444 45 6.26 14.1076 21 34 3.8 513 2.2 0.257 Form Solvent Temperature Wet Dry 10.099 8.7516 28 66 7.4 1172 5 0.302 11.883 7.4413 30 46 5.1 828 3.5 0.306 Form 8 MIBK RT Form 8 Form 8 13.16 6.7221 27 37 4.1 400 1.7 0.184 MIBK 50 ° C. Form 8 Form 8 15.341 5.771 39 71 7.9 1541 6.6 0.369 16.518 5.3622 40 93 10.4 1728 7.4 0.316 50 18.622 4.7608 46 260 29.1 7069 30.2 0.462 19.74 4.4938 80 138 15.4 1937 8.3 0.239 TABLE 22 21.101 4.2068 64 342 38.2 8314 35.5 0.413 22.42 3.9622 56 77 8.6 1721 7.4 0.38 XRD peaks of Form 8 24.1 3.6897 58 198 22.1 3904 16.7 0.335 25.2 3.5311 63 157 17.5 3615 15.5 0.391 5.6 2 - Theta BG Height I % Area I % 26.897 3.312 46 44 4.9 1307 0.505 d ( A ) FWHM 55 28.577 3.121 35 54 6 1754 7.5 0.552 6.88 12.8368 318 2815 80.8 71578 51.7 0.432 29.884 2.9874 32 30 3.4 477 2 0.254 10.699 8.2619 380 70 2 722 0.5 0.175 30.926 2.8891 35 32 3.6 682 2.9 0.341 11.48 7.7016 344 466 13.4 9513 6.9 0.347 12.66 6.9866 348 136 3.9 1759 1.3 0.22 14.16 6.2496 435 166 4.8 3298 2.4 0.338 K. Forms 10 and 10 * 15.259 5.8017 483 269 7.7 6267 4.5 0.396 60 16.879 5.2484 669 333 9.6 7638 5.5 0.39 The experiments that generated Forms 10 and 10 * are 17.681 5.0121 780 1959 56.2 76035 54.9 0.66 shown in Table 25 , below . XRD scans of Forms 10 and 10 * 19.618 4.5213 833 134 3.8 2110 1.5 0.268 21.5 4.1296 1116 3484 100 138450 100 0.676 were taken (FIGS . 10A and 10D , respectively ). The XRD 24.244 3.6682 899 99 2.8 2643 1.9 0.454 peaks of Form 10 are shown in Table 26 , below . DSC scans 27.559 3.234 753 366 10.5 11182 8.1 0.519 65 of Forms 10 and 10 * were also taken and indicated multiple 28.881 3.0889 636 279 8 8137 5.9 0.496 endotherms/ exotherms , followed by melting at 367 ° C. ( FIGS. 10B and 10E , respectively ). US 10,544,139 B2 75 76 Forms 10 and 10 * were produced by drying of amorphous between 100 ° C. and 249 ° C. Form 11 * solids showed a solids (obtained from DMSO and DMSO /water reslurry at 1.0 % weight loss before 100 ° C., and followed by a 7.0 % RT and 50 ° C.) . Both Form 10 and 10 * are associated with weight loss before 250 ° C. DMSO . Forms 11 and 11 * were obtained from DMF and DMF/ 5 % A TGA scan of Form 10 solid showed a 0.6 % weight loss 5 water at RT and 50 ° C. before 100 ° C., followed by a 3.8 % weight loss between 100 ° C. and 170 ° C., followed by a 7.1 % weight loss TABLE 27 between 170 ° C. and 260 ° C. (FIG . 10C ) . Summary of experiments that generated Forms 11 and 11 * 10 TABLE 25 Form Solvent Temperature Wet Dry Summary of experiments that generated Forms 10 and 10 * Form 11 DMF RT Form 11 Form 11 DMF 50 ° C. Form 11 Form 11 * Form Solvent Temperature Wet Dry DMF / water RT Form 11 Form 11 DMF /water 50 ° C. Form 11 Form 11 Form 10 DMSO RT amorphous Form 10 15 Form 11 * DMF 50 ° C. Form 11 Form 11 * DMSO / water RT amorphous Form 10 DMSO /water 50 ° C. amorphous Form 10 * Amount of water in binary solvents is 5 % Form 10 * DMSO 50 ° C. amorphous Form 10 * * Amount of water in binary solvents is 5 % TABLE 28 20 XRD peaks of Form 11 TABLE 26 2 - Theta d ( A ) BG Height I % Area I % FWHM XRD peaks of Form 10 6.42 13.7554 19 496 81.7 9502 100 0.326 2 - Theta d ( A ) BG Height I % Area I % FWHM 25 8.421 10.4908 20 335 55.2 5775 60.8 0.293 8.86 9.9726 24 166 27.3 4268 44.9 0.437 6.701 13.1792 148 1553 32.1 31364 34.4 0.343 10.859 8.1404 21 91 15 1292 13.6 0.241 8.3 10.6444 207 1026 21.2 17914 19.6 0.297 12.479 7.0871 44 83 13.7 1004 10.6 0.206 9.38 9.4203 212 1352 27.9 21528 23.6 0.271 12.977 6.8165 29 51 8.4 1542 16.2 0.514 10.819 8.1705 223 514 10.6 8714 9.6 0.288 14.519 6.0957 28 91 15 1421 15 0.265 11.919 7.4192 271 635 13.1 9435 10.3 0.253 30 16.801 5.2727 57 104 17.1 2226 23.4 0.364 12.919 6.8469 266 1160 24 22094 24.2 0.324 17.801 4.9787 103 358 59 5109 53.8 0.243 13.718 6.45 242 81 1.7 856 0.9 0.18 18.519 4.7871 101 607 100 8460 89 0.237 14.84 5.9646 271 244 5 4716 5.2 0.329 18.861 4.7011 102 125 20.6 1763 18.6 0.24 15.536 5.6988 312 147 3 1304 1.4 0.151 9.922 4.453 85 38 63.1 7376 77.6 0.327 16.58 5.3424 392 1813 37.5 30451 33.4 0.286 20.258 4.38 79 180 29.7 5778 60.8 0.546 17.821 4.9731 434 2208 45.6 58342 64 0.449 35 20.899 4.247 76 105 17.3 1291 13.6 0.209 18.16 4.881 434 2862 59.2 89029 97.6 0.529 21.738 4.085 86 55 9.1 757 8 0.234 19.001 4.6667 1021 3215 66.5 45840 50.2 0.242 22.441 3.9585 94 471 77.6 7125 75 0.257 19.88 4.4623 1163 1454 30.1 19014 20.8 0.222 22.859 3.8871 78 167 27.5 3724 39.2 0.379 20.701 4.2873 1514 4838 100 78140 85.7 0.275 24.458 3.6365 60 298 49.1 4544 47.8 0.259 21.66 4.0994 596 4067 84.1 91229 100 0.381 26.82 3.3213 45 195 32.1 4777 50.3 0.416 23.38 3.8017 596 2251 46.5 64928 71.2 0.49 29 3.0764 43 99 16.3 3112 32.8 0.534 24.22 3.6717 663 4578 94.6 84228 92.3 0.313 40 29.524 3.023 63 37 6.1 190 2 0.087 26 3.4242 595 430 8.9 11172 12.2 0.442 31.04 2.8788 38 46 7.6 826 8.7 0.305 27.12 3.2853 639 146 3 1986 2.2 0.231 31.825 2.8095 36 56 9.2 737 7.8 0.224 27.88 3.1974 642 2073 42.8 48132 52.8 0.395 32.456 2.7563 857 28.88 3.089 638 477 9.9 14155 15.5 0.504 31 40 6.6 9 0.364 29.867 2.9891 544 205 4.2 4572 5 0.379 30.32 2.9454 528 568 11.7 11936 13.1 0.357 45 31.098 2.8735 517 443 9.2 5841 6.4 0.224 31.661 2.8236 433 118 2.4 953 1 0.137 TABLE 29 33.379 2.6822 433 311 6.4 9235 10.1 0.505 34.22 2.6181 444 281 5.8 6059 6.6 0.367 XRD peaks of Form 11 * 34.822 2.5743 460 84 1.7 2707 3 0.548 2 - Theta d ( A ) BG Height I % Area I % FWHM 35.438 2.5309 465 89 1.8 858 0.9 0.164 50 6.441 13.7116 24 424 93.4 8643 100 0.347 6.944 12.7196 20 84 18.5 2078 24 0.421 L. Forms 11 and 11 * 8.518 10.3718 22 227 50 4871 56.4 0.365 8.86 9.9721 23 147 32.4 3581 41.4 0.414 The experiments that generated Forms 11 and 11 * are 10.859 8.141 26 107 23.6 1695 19.6 0.269 shown in Table 27 , below . XRD scans of Forms 11 and 11 * 55 12.519 7.0648 34 90 19.8 2165 25 0.409 were taken (FIGS . 11A and 11D , respectively ). The XRD 13.021 6.7935 31 54 11.9 1517 17.6 0.478 14.618 6.0547 32 76 16.7 1605 18.6 0.359 peaks of Form 11 and Form 11 * are shown in Tables 28 and 16.638 5.3238 55 115 25.3 2410 27.9 0.356 29 , below , respectively . DSC scans of Forms 11 and 11* 17.838 4.9684 71 368 81.1 6709 77.6 0.31 were also taken (FIGS . 11B and 11E , respectively ) . Accord 18.522 4.7864 130 454 100 7473 86.5 0.28 ing to the DSC scans, the solid showed multiple endotherms/ 19.96 4.4447 109 315 69.4 6433 74.4 0.347 60 20.26 4.3795 109 146 32.2 5359 62 0.624 exotherms and eventually melted at 368 ° C. Amorphous 20.904 4.2461 127 58 12.8 559 6.5 0.164 halo was observed in the XRD of both Forms. The double 21.639 4.1034 142 194 42.7 4690 54.3 0.411 exotherm on the DSC of both formsmay be also associated 22.441 3.9586 161 368 81.1 5409 62.6 0.25 with the amorphous halo observed on XRD scans . 22.94 3.8735 78 150 33 6057 70.1 0.686 23.398 3.7988 78 116 25.6 2330 27 0.341 TGA scans of Form 11 and 11 * were taken (FIGS . 11C 65 24.44 3.6391 75 305 67.2 5097 59 0.284 and 11F, respectively ). Form 11 solids showed a 0.8 % 26.819 3.3215 68 206 45.4 4795 55.5 0.396 weight loss before 100 ° C., followed by a 7.0 % weight loss US 10,544,139 B2 77 78 TABLE 29 - continued TABLE 30 - continued XRD peaks of Form 11 * Summary of experiments that generated Form 13 2 - Theta d ( A ) BG Height I % Area I % FWHM Temperature Wet Dry 5 Form Solvent 29.018 3.0745 56 109 24 4093 47.4 0.638 Acetonitrile /water 50 ° C. Form 13 Form 13 29.566 3.0188 82 43 9.5 341 3.9 0.135 IPAc/ water 50 ° C. Form 13 Form 13 31.022 2.8804 58 55 12.1 509 5.9 0.157 MtBE /water 50 ° C. Form 13 Form 13 31.881 2.8047 49 48 10.6 482 5.6 0.171 MIBK / water 50 ° C. Form 13 Form 1 32.338 2.7661 42 50 11 1360 15.7 0.462 10 * Amount of water in binary solvents is 5 % M. Form 13 and Form 12 The experiments that generated Form 13 and Form 12 are TABLE 31 shown in Tables 30 and 32, below , respectively . Forms 12 XRD peaks of Form 13 and 13 are examples of non -stoichiometric hydrates of Form 15 1 that have between 1 % and about 20 % by weight water . 2 - Theta d ( A ) BG Height I % Area I % FWHM XRD scans of Form 13 and Form 12 were taken (FIGS . 13A 5.06 17.45 278 309 6.5 3685 4.8 0.203 and 12A , respectively ) . The XRD peaks of Form 13 are 6.379 13.8451 223 4743 100 76110 100 0.273 shown in Table 31 , below . DSC scans of Form 13 and Form 9.24 9.5632 164 1370 28.9 20018 26.3 0.248 12 were also taken (FIGS . 13B and 12B , respectively ). 20 11 8.0364 173 3445 72.6 51777 68 0.256 12.899 6.8574 195 173 3.6 3114 4.1 0.306 According to the DSC scan , Form 13 solids showed a wide 13.462 6.572 199 204 4.3 2376 3.1 0.198 endotherm between 50 ° C.- 100 ° C., followed by a small 14.159 6.2498 202 390 8.2 5424 7.1 0.236 exotherm at 278 ° C .; and a melting endotherm at 363 ° C. 15.56 5.6901 262 1335 28.1 19295 25.4 0.246 According to the DSC scan , Form 12 solids showed a wide 16.059 5.5145 302 1002 21.1 17561 23.1 0.298 16.841 5.26 313 774 16.3 7797 10.2 0.171 endotherm between 50 ° C.- 100 ° C., followed by a sharp 25 17.46 5.075 322 314 6.6 3863 5.1 0.209 exotherm at 283 ° C .; and a melting endotherm at 364° C. 18.419 4.8128 339 2354 49.6 29374 38.6 0.212 The purity of the Form 13 sample was 98.8 % ; the KF of 19.3 4.5951 357 210 4.4 8112 10.7 0.657 an undried Form 13 sample was 35.7 % . ADVS scan of Form 19.741 4.4935 329 1566 33 30236 39.7 0.328 20.202 4.3919 342 210 4.4 2880 3.8 0.233 13 solid showed a 17 % water sorption at 90 % RH (FIG . 20.84 4.2589 300 1054 22.2 18033 23.7 0.291 13D ) . Form 13 converted to Form 1 upon drying . 30 21.201 4.1873 284 964 20.3 15700 20.6 0.277 A TGA scan of Form 13 solid showed a 1.9 % weight loss 22.121 4.015 259 197 4.2 2208 2.9 0.191 before 100 ° C. ( FIG . 13C ) . 23.2 3.8307 268 482 10.2 7844 10.3 0.277 Form 13 solid was heated in a DSC chamber to 170 ° C. 24.42 3.642 280 1101 23.2 16244 21.3 0.251 24.839 3.5816 303 468 9.9 9306 12.2 0.338 (past the endotherm between 50-100 ° C.) , and then scanned 25.219 3.5284 385 1093 23 16646 21.9 0.259 by XRD . A comparison of the first and the second XRD and 35 26.164 3.4032 359 357 7.5 5064 6.7 0.241 DSC scans , after heating to 170 ° C., showed that Form 13 26.499 3.3609 402 317 6.7 7316 9.6 0.392 26.798 3.324 346 179 3.8 8025 10.5 0.762 converted to Form 1. It can be concluded that the endotherm 27.339 3.2594 394 720 15.2 13063 17.2 0.308 between 50-100 ° C. is due to bonded water. 27.639 3.2247 341 318 6.7 5673 7.5 0.303 Form 13 solid was heated in a DSC chamber to 330 ° C. 28.799 3.0974 256 805 17 16756 22 0.354 (past the endotherm /exotherm around 300 ° C.) , and then 40 29.902 2.9857 262 234 4.9 3508 4.6 0.255 31.234 2.8613 230 106 2.2 1473 1.9 0.236 scanned by XRD . A comparison of the first and the third 31.96 2.798 226 308 6.5 3908 5.1 0.216 XRD and DSC scans , after heating to 170 ° C., showed that 32.939 2.717 208 117 2.5 1444 1.9 0.21 Form 13 converted to Form 9. It can be concluded that the 33.962 2.6375 266 5.6 4617 5.1 0.295 endotherm /exotherm is due to melting /crystallization 34.917 2.5675 217 73 1.5 736 1 0.171 events. 45

TABLE 30 TABLE 32 Summary of experiments that generated Form 13 Summary of experiments that generated Form 12 50 Form Solvent Temperature Wet Dry Form Solvent Temperature Wet Dry Form 13 MeOH RT Form 13 Form 1 Form 12 Acetonitrile /water RT Form 12 Form 1 MeOH / water 50 ° C. Form 13 Form 13 MeOH / water RT Form 12 Form 1 water RT Form 13 Form 1 IPAc /water RT Form 12 Form 1 water 50 ° C. Form 13 Form 13 EA / water RT Form 12 Form 1 Toluene /water RT Form 13 Form 1 55 MtBE /water RT Form 12 Form 1 Toluene /water 50 ° C. Form 13 Form 13 MIBK water RT Form 12 Form 1 MA / water RT Form 13 Form 1 n - Butyl RT Form 13 Form 12 n - Butyl RT Form 13 Form 12 acetate / water acetate / water Heptane/ water RT Form 13 Form 12 n - Butyl 50 ° C. Form 13 Form 1 MA /water 50 ° C. Form 12 Form 4 acetate / water 60 Heptane 50 ° C. Form 13 Form 13 * Amount of water in binary solvents is 5 % Heptane /water RT Form 13 Form 12 Heptane /water 50 ° C. Form 13 Form 1 N. Solvates 1-3 n - Butanol/ water RT Form 13 Form 13 n - Butanol/ water 50 ° C. Form 13 Form 1 The experiments that generated Solvates 1 , 2 , and 3 are DCM 50 ° C. Form 13 Form 13 shown in Table 33 , below . Solvates 1 and 2 solids were DCM /water RT Form 13 Form 1 65 exposed to air overnight, and then analyzed by XRD . After DCM / water 50 ° C. Form 13 Form 1 the analysis , the solids were dried at 50 ° C. under vacuum , and then analyzed by XRD again . US 10,544,139 B2 79 80 After exposure to air overnight, Solvate 1 converted to TABLE 35 low crystallinity ; after drying at 50 ° C., the sample was still low crystallinity solid . After exposure to air overnight, the XRD scan results competitive slurry experiments XRD pattern of Solvate 2 changed a little ; after drying at 50 ° Temperature Solvent Form after 3 days ; wet/ dry C., the form remained the same as the solid exposed to air 5 RT Toluene Form 13 / Form 1 overnight. IPAc Form 9 + Form 13 / Form 9 + Form 1 n - Butyl acetate Form 9 + Form 13 / Form 9 + Form 1 TABLE 33 50 ° C. Toluene Form 9 + Form 13 / Form 9 + Form 1 IPAc Form 9 / Form 9 Summary of experiments that generated solvates 1-3 10 n - Butyl acetate Form 9 + Form 13 / Form 9 + Form 1 Form Solvent Temperature Wet Dry

Solvate 1 Acetone RT Solvate 1 Low Example 3 crystallinity Solvate 2 Acetone /water RT Solvate 2 Form 4 ** 15 Composition Studies Acetone 50 ° C. Solvate 2 Form 4 ** Solvate 3 EtOH / water RT Solvate 3 Form 2 The stability and pharmaceutical acceptability of a 0.22 * Amount of water in binary solvent is 5 % mg/ mL suspension of the compound of Formula ( I) and a 2.1 mg/ mL solution of the compound of Formula ( I ) were 20 evaluated . Example 2 A. Stability Studies 1. Preparation of a 2.1 mg/ mL Solution of the Compound of Formula (1 ) Competitive Slurry Experiments Between 25 250 mg of the compound of Formula (I ) was added to a Polymorph Forms small jar/ vial and dried in an oven at 60 ° C. (55-65 ° C.) for 2 hours (without placing the jar / vial directly in contact with In order to find out the thermodynamic stability between the walls of the oven ) . While still hot, the sample was taken the different forms, several competitive slurry experiments out and the vial was closed and allowed to equilibrate to were carried out. Form 1 , Form 2 , Form 2 * , Form 3 , Form 30 room temperature . 4 , Form 4 * , Form 4 ** , Form 5 , Form 7 , Form 8 , Form 9 , An empty , dry , and sterile 150 mL media bottle containing Form 10 , Form 11 , Form 11 " , and Form 13 ( 10 mg for each ) a cap and a stir bar was weighed and the weight recorded . was mixed and slurried in 2 mL of solvent at both RT and About 120 mL of a 75 % w / w propylene glycol/ water in a 50 ° C. The solids were slurried for 3-5 days and then 250 mL sterile container ( 90 g of propylene glycol + 30 g of analyzed by XRD . According to the analytical data , Form 2 * 35 water for injection (WFI ) ) was prepared and 50 g of the was the most stable form in a MeOH , EtOH , and acetone solution was added to the media bottle , followed by 4004 , of system at both RT and 50 ° C. Form 4 or 4 * was most stable IN HCl, and 134 mg of the compound of Formula ( I) . The in EA at RT and 50 ° C. Form 13 was most stable in water mixture was stirred and sonicated until dissolution occurred . at RT and 50 ° C. Table 34 shows the XRD scan results from If the compound was not completely dissolved, a 40 ul the competitive slurry experiments . 40 aliquot of IN HCl was added , followed by 10 minutes of stirring . Additional 40 uL aliquots of IN HCl were added , TABLE 34 each with subsequent stirring , until a solution was obtained . Once dissolved , the 75 % w / w propylene glycol solution XRD scan results of competitive slurry experiments 45 was added until the solution containing the compound of Form after 3 days ; Form after 5 days; Formula ( I) weighed 60 g . The resulting solution was mixed Temperature Solvent wet /dry wet /dry for no less than 10 minutes. Using aseptic techniques , all the RT MeOH Form 2 * / Form 2 * Form 2 * / Form 2 * solutions were filtered into a 100 mL sterile vial using a 0.22 EtOH Form 2 * /Form 2 * Form 2 * / Form 2 * um PES sterile syringe filter (Millex GP) and 10 mL Acetone Form 2 * /Form 2 * Form 2 * /Form 2 * 50 syringes . The 2.1 mg/ mL solution of the compound of EA Form 4 / Form 4 Form 4 / Form 4 water Form 13 / Form 13 Form 13 /Form 1 & Form 13 Formula ( I ) (75 % PG ) was stored at controlled room tem 50 ° C. MeOH Form 2 * / Form 2 * Form 2 * / Form 2 * perature and was tested initially and again after storage for EtOH Form 2 * /Form 2 * Form 2 * / Form 2 * one month and 26 months. The stability profile , including Acetone Form 2 * /Form 2 * Form 2 * / Form 2 * EA Form 4 / Form 4 Form 4 * /Form 4 * assay ( % ) , purity , pH , and appearance, are shown below in water Form 13 / Form 13 Form 13 / Form 13 55 Table 36 . TABLE 36 In order to find out the thermodynamic stability between Form 13 and Form 9 , several competitive slurry experiments Stability profile of 2.1 mg/ mL solution ( 75 % PG ) of a compound were carried out. 15 mg of Form 1, Form 9 and Form 13 60 of Formula ( I) stored at controlled room temperature solid were mixed in 1 mL of toluene , IPAc , and n -butyl Test Initial 1 month 26 months acetate , and slurried for 3 days at RT and 50 ° C. % Assay 98 % 96 % 98 % Purity 98.7 % 98.7 % 98.3 % The residual solid was analyzed by XRD . After a three pH 3.8 3.8 3.8 day slurry, it was difficult to tell which one was more stable 65 Appearance Clear colorless Clear colorless Clear colorless between Form 13 and Form 9. The XRD scan results of the solution solution solution experiment is shown in Table 35 , below . US 10,544,139 B2 81 82 TABLE 36 - continued 10 % propylene glycol/ 1 % Tween 80 in 0.1 mg/ mL citric acid . Quantitation was performed using HPLC against an Stability profile of 2.1 mg/mL solution (75 % PG ) of a compound external calibration curve . of Formula ( I) stored at controlled room temperature Results were fitted to the Korsmeyer -Peppas equation and Test Initial 1 month 26 months 5 the mean dissolution time (MDT ) was calculated ( Table 38 ) . essentially free essentially free essentially free of visible of visible of visible TABLE 38 particulates particulates particulates Mean Dissolution Times 10 2. Preparation of a 0.22 mg/ mL Suspension of the Com Sample MDT pound of Formula ( I ) 2.1 mg/ mL solution of the compound of Formula ( I) minutes In a laminar flow hood , an empty , dry , and sterile 500 mL 0.22 mg/mL suspension of the compound of Formula (I ) 7 days Kimble -Kontes media bottle with cap and stir bar was 5 mg/ mL suspension of the compound of Formula ( I ) 89 days weighed . 250.0 g +0.5 g of filtered vehicle (propylene glycol 15 100 mg/ mL suspension of the compound of Formula ( I) 1116 days solution ) was added to the media bottle . 56.3 + 0.5 mg of the dried compound of Formula ( I) (Form 1 ) was added to the media bottle . The container was closed , and the mixture Example 4 stirred and sonicated to produce a suspension until no aggregates were observed . 20 Preliminary In Vitro Studies The resulting suspension was stirred for at least 10 A. Wnt Pathway Inhibition minutes. While using aseptic techniques, the vial was filled 1. Sp5 Assay using a sterile 25-50 mL glass pipette while maintaining The compound of Formula (I ) was screened for Wnt mixing during the filling procedure . The vials were crimp 25 activity . The screening assay is described as follows. sealed and labeled according to protocol . The vials were Reporter cell lines were generated by stably transducing autoclaved at 122 ° C. for not less than 20 minutes . The 0.22 cancer cell lines (e.g. , colon cancer ) or primary cells ( e.g. , mg/ mL suspension of the compound of Formula (I ) was IEC - 6 intestinal cells ) with a lentiviral construct that stored at 30 ° C. with 65 % relative humidity and was included a Wnt- responsive promoter driving expression of analyzed initially and again after storage for 3 months, 6 30 the firefly luciferase gene. months , 9 months, and 12 months. The stability profile , SW480 colon carcinoma cells were transduced with a including pH , assay ( % ) , % impurities , and osmolality are lentiviral vector expressing luciferase with a human Sp5 shown below in Table 37 . promoter consisting of a sequence of eight TCF/ LEF bind ing sites. SW480 cells stably expressing the Sp5 -Luc TABLE 37 35 reporter gene and a hygromycin resistant gene were selected by treatment with 150 ug/ mL of hygromycin for 7 days . Stability profile of a 0.22 mg/mL suspension of These stably transduced SW480 cells were expanded in cell Formula (I ) stored at 30 ° C./65% RH culture and used for all further screening activities. Each Test Initial 3 Months 6 Months 9 Months 12 Months compound was dissolved in DMSO as a 10 mM stock and Appearance opaque opaque opaque opaque opaque 40 used to prepare compound source plates. Serial dilution ( 1 : 3 , off - white off - white off -white off -white off -white 10 -point dose -response curves starting from 10 uM ) and suspension suspension suspension suspension suspension compound transfer was performed using the ECHO 550 pH 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.4 7.3 (Labcyte , Sunnyvale , Calif. ) into 384 -well white solid bot Assay ( % ) 104.5 100.0 100.0 100.5 100.0 % impurities 1.17 0.99 1.17 0.97 0.91 tom assay plates (Greiner Bio -One ) with appropriate DMSO Osmolality 308 307 307 N / A N / A 45 backfill for a final DMSO concentration of 0.1 % . For (mOsm /kg ) Sp5 - Luc reporter gene assays, the cells were plated at 4,000 cells /well in 384 -well plates with medium containing 1 % fetalbovine serum and incubated overnight at 37 ° C. and 5 % As the results above indicate , both compositions of the CO2. Following incubation , 20 uL of BrightGlo lumines compound of Formula ( I) ( i.e., the suspension and the 50 cence reagent (Promega ) was added to each well of the solution ) are pharmaceutically acceptable and are stable for 384 -well assay plates. The plates were placed on an orbital extended periods of time. shaker for 2 min and then luminescence was quantified using B. Release Study the Envision (Perkin Elmer ) plate reader . Readings were The release properties of the compound of Formula ( 1 ) normalized to DMSO - only treated cells , and normalized were manipulated by formulating it as a plurality of particles 55 activities were utilized for ECso calculations using the dose in a buffered media to slow the release or dissolution of the response log (inhibitor ) vs. response -variable slope ( four active ingredient from the solution . parameters ) nonlinear regression feature available in Graph An accelerated in vitro release profile was performed in Pad Prism 5.0 (or Dotmatics ). The results showed that there 6.5 mm , 0.4 um polycarbonate costar transwells (Corning was a decrease in Wnt activity with an increase in the catalog # 3413) . The release profile was carried out by 60 concentration of the compound of Formula (I ), with an EC50 placing 1 mL of 10 % propylene glycol/ 1 % Tween 80 in 0.1 of 2 nM (FIG . 14 ). mg/ mL citric acid in the well and 50 uL of either a 2.1 2. In Vitro Wnt Pathway Inhibition mg/mL solution or 0.22 mg/ mL , 5 mg/ mL or 100 mg/ mL Human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs ) were plated in suspension of the compound of Formula ( I) on the insert 6 -well plates in chondrogenic induction medium (Lonza ; membrane . Samples were placed in an incubator set at 37 ° 65 DMEM , dexamethasone , ascorbate , insulin -transferrin - sele C.with a rotation speed of 140 rpm . Samples ( 1.0 mL ) were nium [ITS supplement] , gentamycin - amphotericin [GA taken every day and replaced with a fresh 1.0 mL aliquot of 1000 ], sodium pyruvate , proline and L -glutamine ) and US 10,544,139 B2 83 84 treated with the compound of Formula (I ) (30 nM ) in DMSO induction medium (Lonza ; DMEM , dexamethasone, ascor or TGF -B3 (20 ng /mL ) as a positive control. Cells were bate, insulin - transferrin - selenium [ ITS supplement] , gen incubated at 37 ° C., 5 % CO2 for 48 hours . Cells were tamycin - amphotericin [GA - 1000 ], sodium pyruvate , proline pelleted and washed , and total RNA was isolated and and L -glutamine ) and treated with the compound of Formula purified using RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen ). cDNA was 5 (1 ) in DMSO or TGFB3 (20 ng/ mL ) as a positive control. synthesized from 1 ug of total RNA using QuantiTect Cells were incubated at 37 ° C., 5 % CO , for either 14 or 21 Reverse Transcription kit (Qiagen ). qRT- PCR was per days , with media changes every 5 days . The cells were fixed formed with QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Kit ( Qiagen ) and using 4 % (Electron Microscopy Sciences ). gene - specific primers , using CFX384 thermal cycler ( Bio For Alcian Blue staining, cells were incubated with 10 rad ). Transcripts were quantitated by comparative Ctmethod 10 mg/ mL Alcian Blue (Sigma - Aldrich ) in 3 % acetic acid and normalized to endogenous controls , B - actin and (Sigma - Aldrich ) , pH 2.5 for 30 minutes, washed with PBS , GAPDH . Fold changes were normalized to DMSO treated and imaged using a light microscope (Life Technologies) at cells . The results showed downregulation of Wnt genes 10x magnification . For Safranin O staining , cells were TCF7, C -Myc , Axin - 2 , Ascl 2 , and SP5 at 48 hours (FIG . 15 ) . incubated with 0.1 % Safranin O (Sigma - Aldrich ) in distilled B. Chondrogenesis Induction 15 water for 5 minutes, washed with PBS and imaged using a 1. Rhodamine B and Nile Red staining lightmicroscope (Life Technologies) at 10x magnification . Human MSCs were plated in 96 -well plates in chondro For Type II collagen staining , cells were incubated with genic induction medium (Lonza ; DMEM , dexamethasone , primary antibody in 3 % BSA , 0.3 % Triton X - 100 in PBS ascorbate , insulin -transferrin - selenium [ ITS supplement] , with overnight incubation at 40 ° C. Cells were then washed gentamycin - amphotericin [GA - 1000 ], sodium pyruvate , 20 and incubated with fluorophore -linked secondary antibody proline and L -glutamine ) and treated with the compound of and DAPI (Life Technologies ) for 1 hr at room temperature . Formula (I ) in DMSO or TGFB3 (20 ng /mL ) as a positive Cells were washed and imaged using EVOS FL Microscope control. Cells were incubated at 37 ° C., 5 % CO , for either (Life Technologies ) . The results indicated an increased 7 or 21 days , with media changes every 5 days. The cells amount of chondrogenesis in the cells treated with the were fixed using 4 % formaldehyde (Electron Microscopy 25 compound of Formula ( I) as compared to control. Sciences ), and stained with 2 ug /mL Rhodamine B (Sigma C. Inhibition of Protease Release Aldrich ) and 20 uM Nile Red (Sigma - Aldrich ) ( Johnson et Human MSCs were plated in 10 cm dishes in chondro al. (2012 ) Science 336 (6082 ) :717-721 ) . The nodules were genic induction medium (Lonza ; DMEM , dexamethasone , imaged ( 25 images per well for 96 well plates at 10x ascorbate , insulin -transferrin - selenium [ ITS supplement] , magnification ) by excitation at 531 nm and emission at 625 30 gentamycin -amphotericin [GA - 1000 ], sodium pyruvate , nm and quantified using the CellInsight CX5 ( Thermo proline and L -glutamine ) and treated with TGF -B3 ( 20 Scientific ) . The number of nodules in each well was nor ng /mL ) to induce chondrogenic differentiation . Cells from 4 malized to the average of 6 DMSO treated wells on the same dishes were pooled and re- plated in 24 -well plates in Chon plate using Excel (Microsoft Inc.) . The normalized averages drogenic Induction Medium and treated with various con ( fold change over DMSO ) of 6 replicate wells for each 35 centrations of the compound of Formula (I ) . 4 hours later , compound concentration were calculated . The results MMP production was stimulated by adding TNF - a ( 20 showed a dose dependent increase in chondrogenesis in cells ng /mL ) + Oncostatin M ( 10 ng/ mL ) and cells were incubated stained with Nile Red (FIG . 16A ) and Rhodamine B (FIG . at 37 ° C., 5 % CO , for 72 hours. Cells were then pelleted and 16B ) . washed , and total RNA was isolated and purified using The results of the assay demonstrated dose - dependent 40 RNeasy Plus Mini Kit ( Qiagen ). cDNA was synthesized chondrogenesis, with increased chondrocyte colonies/ well from 1 ug of total RNA using QuantiTect Reverse Tran as the concentration of the compound of Formula ( I) scription kit (Qiagen ). qRT- PCR was performed with Quan increased from 1.88 nM to 30 nM (FIG . 17 ) . ti Tect SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen ) and gene- specific 2. Alcian Blue Staining primers , using CFX384 thermal cycler ( Biorad ) . Transcripts Human MSCs were plated in 10 cm dishes in chondro- 45 were quantitated by comparative Ctmethod , and normalized genic induction medium (Lonza ; DMEM , dexamethasone , to endogenous controls , ß -actin and GAPDH . Fold changes ascorbate , insulin - transferrin -selenium [ITS supplement] , were normalized to unstimulated cells . The results demon gentamycin - amphotericin [GA -1000 ] , sodium pyruvate , strated a dose -dependent inhibition of protease expression . proline and L - glutamine ) and treated with the compound of FIG . 19A depicts MMP1 production . FIG . 19B depicts Formula ( I) in DMSO ( 10 nM and 30 nM ) or TGF -B3 ( 20 50 MMP3 production . FIG . 19C depicts MMP13 production . ng /mL ) as a positive control. Cells were incubated at 37 ° C., D. Immunosuppression 5 % CO2 for 21 days , with media changes every 5 days . Cells 1. Primary Synovial Chondrocytes were pelleted and washed , and total RNA was isolated and Human MSCs were plated in 10 cm dishes in chondro purified using RNeasy Plus Mini Kit ( Qiagen ) . cDNA was genic induction medium (Lonza ; DMEM , dexamethasone, synthesized from 1 ug of total RNA using QuantiTect 55 ascorbate , insulin -transferrin - selenium [ ITS supplement] , Reverse Transcription kit (Qiagen ). qRT- PCR was per gentamycin -amphotericin [GA - 1000 ], sodium pyruvate , formed with QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Kit ( Qiagen ) and proline and L - glutamine ) and treated with TGF -B3 ( 20 gene -specific primers , using CFX384 thermal cycler ( Bio ng/ mL ) to induce chondrogenic differentiation . Cells from 4 rad ). Transcripts were quantitated by comparative Ctmethod dishes were pooled and re -plated in 24 -well plates in Chon and normalized to endogenous controls , B -actin and 60 drogenic Induction Medium and treated with various con GAPDH . Fold changes were normalized to DMSO treated centrations of the compound of Formula (1 ) . 4 hours later , cells . The results showed that the compound of Formula (1 ) cells were stimulated by adding TNF - a ( 20 ng/ mL ) + On upregulated chondrogenic gene expression (FIG . 18A ) and costatin M ( 10 ng /mL ) or IL - 1B (10 ng /mL ) and incubated downregulated osteogenic gene expression (FIG . 18B ) at at 37° C., 5 % CO2 for 72 hours. Chondrocytes were digested both concentrations of the compound of Formula ( I) tested . 65 with papain (Sigma ). GAG content was measured using the 3. Alcian Blue, Safranin 0 , and Type II Collagen Staining dimethylmethylene blue (DMMB ) kit (Chondrex ) . Briefly , Human MSCswere plated in 96 - well plates in chondrogenic the digested chondrocytes were mixed with DMMB in US 10,544,139 B2 85 86 formate buffer and absorbance at 535 nm was measured cells/ well. For the TNF - a assay, 50 ng/ mL ofLPS was added using Cytation 3 (Biotek ). Nitric oxide was measured using to the wells after 2 hours to induce cytokine production , and Greiss reagent (Promega ) according to manufacturer's pro cells were incubated for 20 hours at 37 ° C. For the IL - 6 tocol. The results showed that cells treated with the com assay , 500 ng /mL of LPS was added after 2 hours and cells pound of Formula (1 ) reduced both secreted GAG ( FIG . 5 were incubated for 6 hours at 37 ° C. Plates were spun in a 20A ) and the release of nitric oxide (FIG . 20B ) in cells centrifuge for 1 minute at 10,000 rpm and supernatants were stimulated with TNF - a and oncostatin M and those stimu collected for ELISA . Supernatants were diluted 1 : 1 for the lated with IL - 1ß . TNF - a assay and 1 : 4 for the IL - 6 assay using the assay 2. Synovial Fibroblasts medium . ELISA was performed using Human TNF - a Synovial fibroblasts (SW982 cells ; ATCC ) were cultured 10 ELISA MAXTM Deluxe (Catalog # 430204 , Biolegend , San in Leibovitz's L - 15 Medium (ATCC ) with 10 % FBS at 37 ° Diego , Calif .) and Human IL - 6 ELISA MAXTM Deluxe C. and 0 % CO2. 24 hours before the start of the assay, the (Catalog # 430504 , Biolegend , San Diego, Calif. ) kits . media was changed to Leibovitz's L - 15 Medium with 1 % Briefly , 96 -well plates were coated with the appropriate FBS . The compound of Formula (I ) was dissolved in DMSO capture antibody overnight and washed to remove excess as a 10 mM stock and used to prepare compound source 15 antibody. Blocking buffer was added and incubated for 1 plates . A serial dilution (8 -point dose- response) and com hour to prevent non - specific binding . Diluted supernatants pound transfer was performed using the ECHO 550 (Lab were incubated in the coated plates for 2 hours at room cyte , Sunnyvale , Calif. ) into 96 -well clear bottom assay temperature . Following washes to remove unbound proteins, plates (Greiner Bio -One ) with appropriate DMSO backfill biotinylated detection antibody was added and incubated for for a final DMSO concentration of 0.05 % . Synovial fibro- 20 30 minutes at room temperature , followed by washes to blasts were plated at 2x10 e4 cells /well and stimulated with remove unbound excess antibody. Avidin -HRP was then IL - 1B (20 ng/ ml ) and incubated at 37 ° C. for 48 hrs. Plates added and incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature . were spun in a centrifuge for 1 minute at 10,000 rpm and Following several washes to remove unbound avidin - HRP, supernatants were collected for ELISA . Supernatants were the TMB substrate was added and the plates were read on the diluted 1 : 1 for the TNF- a assay and 1 : 4 for the IL -6 assay 25 Cytation 3 plate reader (Biotek Inc., Winooski, Vt. ) at an using the assay medium . ELISA was performed using absorbance of 450 nm with correction at 570 nm . All Human TNF - a ELISA MAXTM Deluxe (Catalog # 430204 , samples were processed in triplicate. Inhibition profile and Biolegend , San Diego , Calif. ) and Human IL - 6 ELISA EC50 was calculated using Prism 5 (GraphPad Software Inc , MAXTM Deluxe (Catalog # 430504, Biolegend , San Diego , La Jolla , Calif ., USA ) . The results showed a dose -dependent Calif. ) kits . Briefly , 96 -well plates were coated with the 30 inhibition of both TNF- a (FIG . 22A ) and IL -6 ( FIG . 22B ) appropriate capture antibody overnight and washed to production in THP - 1 monocytes , with EC50 values of ~ 6 nM remove excess antibody . Blocking buffer was added and and -15 nM , respectively . incubated for 1 hour to prevent non - specific binding . Diluted supernatants were incubated in the coated plates for 2 hours Example 5 at room temperature . Following washes to remove unbound 35 proteins, biotinylated detection antibody was added and Radiolabeled Studies incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature , followed by washes to remove unbound excess antibody . Avidin - HRP A. Plasma Concentrations and Terminal Elimination Half was then added and incubated for 30 minutes at room Lives in the Blood temperature . Following several washes to remove unbound 40 1. Plasma Concentrations Following a Single Intra -Ar avidin -HRP , the TMB substrate was added and the plates ticular (IA ) Injection of Radiolabeled Compound of Formula were read on the Cytation 3 plate reader (Biotek Inc., (I ) in Rats Winooski, Vt. ) at an absorbance of 450 nm with correction Plasma concentration and distribution of the compound of at 570 nm . All samples were processed in triplicate . Inhibi Formula ( 1) following a single IA injection in Sprague tion profile and EC50 was calculated using Prism 5 (Graph- 45 Dawley (SD ) rats were investigated in radiolabeled and Pad Software Inc , La Jolla , Calif. , USA ) . The results showed mass balance studies with a tritium - labeled ( H ) compound a dose -dependent inhibition of both TNF - a (FIG . 21A ) and of Formula (I ) . [ H ]-Formula ( I) was formulated as a sus IL -6 (FIG . 21B ) production in synovial fibroblasts , with pension in 0.5 % carboxymethylcellulose / 0.05 % polysorbate EC50 values of ~ 35 nM and ~ 24 nM , respectively . 80 for intra -articular (IA ) injection and diluted with unla 3. THP1 monocytes 50 beled Formula ( I ) to the appropriate concentration and THP - 1 cells ( Catalog # TIB - 202 , ATCC , Manassas, Va. ) injected in the rat knee joint at a dose level equivalent to 1 were cultured and grown in Roswell Park Memorial Institute ug/ knee. Following the single IA injection , low circulating (RPMI ) 1640 Medium (Catalog # 21870-100, Buffalo , N.Y. ) plasma levels (0.002 to 0.075 ng -equivalents / g ) which with 1 % L - glutamine, 1 % HEPES , 1 % sodium pyruvate , 2 % declined over time (48 to 168 hours ) were detected in the rat sodium bicarbonate supplemented with 100 units/ mL peni- 55 plasma by quantitative radiochemical analysis ( QRA ) with cillin , 50 ug/ mL streptomycin , 2 -mercaptoethanol (0.05 50 - fold higher sensitivity of 2 pg/ g or pg/ mL over that of the mM ) [basal medium ] and 10 % fetal bovine serum (Catalog LCMS method (LLOQ of 0.1 ng/ mL ). Mean radioactivity # 16140089, Life Technologies , Carlsbad , Calif. ) at 37 ° C. exposures were low , ranging from 0.832 to 1.548 ng and 5 % CO2. THP - 1 cells were cultured in basal medium equiv.h / g (AUCU ( 0-1 ) and AUCO- inf. ) (males ) and 1.040 to with 1 % FBS for 24 hours before the start of the assay. The 60 1.818_ng -equiv.h /g (AUC (0-1 ) and AUC (0 - inf . ) ) ( females ), compound of Formula ( I) was dissolved in DMSO as a 10 with Tmax values of 1 and 4 hours and apparent terminal mM stock and used to prepare compound source plates. A elimination half - lives in the blood of 57 and 124 hours ( in serial dilution ( 8 - point dose -response ) and compound trans males and females, respectively ) . fer was performed using the ECHO 550 (Labcyte , Sunny 2. Plasma Concentration Following Two Single IA Injec vale , Calif. ) into 96 -well clear bottom assay plates (Greiner 65 tions Bio -One ) with appropriate DMSO backfill for a final DMSO Two single IA injections of the 1 ug /knee of the suspen concentration of 0.05 % . THP- 1 cells were plated at 6x10 e4 sion described above containing the compound of Formula US 10,544,139 B2 87 88 ( I ) radiolabeled with tritium were made in both knee joints The stability and radiochemical purity (RCP ) of the of SD rats . Low circulating plasma radioactivity ( 0.010 to radiolabeled [ PH ]-Formula ( I) was established in a concur 0.055 ng -equivalents / g ) was detected with a dose -propor rent experiment where a formulation of radiolabeled [34 ] tional increase following two ( bilateral ) IA injections com Formula (I ) was incubated at 37° C. and radiochemical pared to a single IA injection ( see above) and a clear 5 purity (RCP ) of aliquots were analyzed over time and exponential decline from 48 to 168 hours . determined to be ~ 95.5 % (Days 0 , 7, 14 and 30 ), 94.5 % B. Quantitative Whole Body Autoradiography and Excre (Day 60 ) , 93 % (Day 90 ) , and 83 % ( Day 180 ). Radiographic tion of Radiolabeled Compound of Formula ( I) in Rats 1. Quantitative Whole Body Autoradiography in Rats images were obtained and indicated that the compound of Following two IA injections at 1 ug/ knee in SD rats , 10 Formula (I ) was still detectable in the knee joint space on quantitative whole body autoradiography ( QWBA ) indi Day 180 . cated -75 % total radioactivity was recovered from the D. Half- Life in Rat Knee Joints whole carcass , feces, urine and cage wash , and autoradio The half -life ( T12) of [PH ]-Formula ( I) in the knee joint graphic images indicated that radioactivity was confined in of SD rats was calculated using the radioactivity values the lymph nodes (inguinal and lumbar lymph nodes that is recovered in the rat hind legs (knee joints ) on Days 14 to drain the hind legs ), small and large intestines, and fecal 180 : T1/ 2 = 51.64 days (including all time points , Days matter, and negligible / undetectable in major organs at 1 hour 14-180 ) with elimination rate constant, Ke, of 0.01342 , and and up to 168 hours post - IA injection . T1 /2 = 100.9 days ( time points Days 14-90 only , but excluding 2. Excretion of Radiolabeled Compound Day 180 ) with elimination rate constant, Ke, of 0.00687 . In terms of excretion , 95 % of the excreted radioactivity 20 was recovered in the feces and only 5 % in the urine. QWBA Example 6 radiographic images and quantitation of radioactivity in the feces with much less recovery in the urine, support the Preliminary In Vivo Animal Studies hypothesis that [ H ] -Formula ( I) is being eliminated by In rats and dogs , the pharmacokinetic profile , safety drainage in the lumbar and inguinal lymph ducts and lymph 25 profile , tissue distribution and cartilage regeneration follow nodes, and through the small and large intestines and cecum ing a single intra - articular (IA ) injection of the compound of in a mechanism consistent with slow passive fecal excretion , Formula (I ) in the plasma and the knee joint ( cartilage and a major route of elimination of slowly metabolized xenobi bone ) was determined . The compound of Formula ( I ) (Form wasotics .degraded During this with process only , ~the 1.5 radiolabeled % of parent [ PHdetected ] -Formula in the( I) 301) was formulated as a suspension composition in 0.5 % CMC /0.05 % Polysorbate 80 in PBS . fecal matter . A. Dog Pharmacokinetics C. Persistence of Radiolabeled Compound of Formula ( I ) A 350 uL suspension of the compound of Formula (1 ) in the Knee Joints (Form 1 ) , formulated as described above, and corresponding In1. Rabbitrabbits ,Knee following Joints two single IA injections in two knees 35 to 3 and 30 ug/ knee , was injected intra - articularly (IA ) into the right and left knees of twelve ( 12 ) naïve male beagle at 4 ug /knee ( corresponding to the mid clinical dose of 70 dogs. On Day 1 , blood was collected at 15 minutes imme ug /knee ), 75 % of administered radioactivity was recovered diately after IA injection and on Days 45 , 91 and 179 , dogs in the knee after 1 hour up to 168 hours , consistent with the were sacrificed and blood samples and the knee joints were microautoradiographyrecoveries in the SD indicatedrat knee thatjoints radioactivity . Rabbit knee was jointcon- 40 collected . Plasma and tissue concentrations (bone , cartilage fined in the fluid - filled synovial space and bursa , and sur and synovial fluid ) were determined using the HPLC -MS / rounded the meniscus and femoral and tibial bone heads , MS bioanalytical method with a dynamic range of 2.00 to following IA injection . 1000 ng/ mL in plasma or 5.00 to 5000 ng/ g in tissue . 2. Rat Knee Joints Following two IA injections at 1 ug/ knee in the SD rats , 45 TABLE 39 hind legs were excised and solubilized for quantitation of radiolabeled [ PH ] -Formula ( I ) in the whole knee joint at Pharmacokinetics of the compound of Formula ( I) in dogs different time points post -IA injections : 1 h , 4 h , 12 h , 24 h , Compound of Formula Total 48 h , 96 h and 168 h . These same animals were used for the Dose (I ) Concentration Amount QWBA experiments (above ). Knee joint recoveries indi- 50 (ug Cartilage Bone ng /g Recovered % cated that ~ 60-85 % of the administered radioactivity was knee) Day ng / g [nM ] [nM ] (ng ) Recovered recovered in each knee joint immediately 1 h post -IA 3 45 152 [301 ] 11.2 [22 ] 152 5.1 injection up to 168 h ( 1 week ) . The variable values obtained 91 37.0 [73 ] BQL 16.6 0.55 at 1 h to 168 h were due to the use of the same animals for 179 63.7 [ 126 ] 12.8 [25 ] 79.0 2.6 QWBA and incomplete excision of the knees from the whole 55 30 45 4525 [8960 ] 586 [1160 ] 5057 16.9 animal for solubilization , but it is generally consistent with 91 2328 [4609 ] 118 [ 234 ] 2175 7.4 the values recovered in the rabbit knee joint above ( see 179 115 [228 ] 1156 [2289 ] 2109 7.0 above ). Further time points (Days 14-180 ) were collected from All plasma samples had concentrations of the compound different animals not used for QWBA, resulting in more 60 of Formula (1 ) below the quantitation limit (BQL < 2.00 consistent recoveries between the hind legs A and B. Quan ng/ mL ) at 15 min post -dose in both the 3 or 30 ug /knee dose titation of [PH ] -Formula (I ) in the solubilized knee joint groups. The mean cartilage , bone, and synovial fluid tissue indicated that there was a progressive decrease of [ H ] concentrations, as well as total amount recovered , were Formula ( I ) in the knee joint, with mean values of 64 % , calculated and plotted against the time collected . The total 54 % , 42 % and 38 % of administered dose per knee on Days 65 amount of the compound of Formula (1 ) recovered from 14 , 30 , 60 and 90 , respectively . On Day 180 , only about cartilage and bone tissues from the tibia were 152, 16.6 and ~ 6.6 % of administered dose was detected . 79.0 ng in the 3 ug/ knee (Group 1, low dose) animals for US 10,544,139 B2 89 90 Days 45, 91 and 179 respectively , representing 5.1 , 0.55 and dogs at 0.07, 1.75 and 35 mg of the compound of Formula 2.5 % of administered dose , while in the 30 ug /knee (Group ( I ), no adverse histopathological effects were observed in the 2 , high dose ) animals had a total amount of the compound bone and cartilage except local inflammatory response in the of Formula (I ) of 5057 , 2248 and 2109 ng for Days 45 , 91 synovium and extra - articular tissues at the injection site of and 179 respectively , representing 16.8 , 7.25 and 7.03 % of 5 high -dose animals . The no observed adverse effect level administered dose . (NOAEL ) for the compound of Formula (I ) in this study was Acute intra - articular administration of the compound of the mid - dose of 1.75 mg/ knee . Formula ( I ) at dosages up to 30 ug / knee in dogs resulted in In the repeat- dose toxicology study in dogs, findings no measurable systemic exposure as evidenced by lack of following once -monthly IA injection of the compound of quantifiable plasma concentrations of the compound of 10 Formula (I ) at 12 , 36 or 116 ug/ knee per injection were Formula (1 ) 15 minutes post- dose collection period . At the limited to granulomatous inflammation in the synovium end of 179 days, the compound of Formula (I ) was still and /or periarticular tissue at the injection site ( right stifle detectable in the cartilage and bones, at approximately 2.6 % joint) at the end of the 3- and 9 -month dosing intervals (with to 7.0 % of the administered dose , indicating that the com 3 and 9 repeat injections, respectively ) , with complete and pound of Formula ( 1 ) can persist in the site of action for an 15 partial recoveries in the 3 month- and 9 month -treated extended period of time. There was no mortality in the study, animals after a 4 -week treatment- free period . The NOAEL all animals remained physically healthy, and no adverse for the compound of Formula ( I) in this study was consid effects from intra - articular administration of the compound ered to be 116 ug /knee . In both the single and repeat -dose of Formula (I ) were noted in the dogs. once -monthly IA toxicity studies , there was no measurable B. Rat Pharmacokinetics 20 systemic exposure at all time points ( all were below quan The pharmacokinetics of the compound of Formula ( I) in titation limit (BRL ) with the lower limit of detection rats was studied . Three Sprague Dawley rats were each (LLOQ ) of 0.1 ng/ mL , and no systemic toxicity was injected with a single intra - articular ( IA ) injection (one IA observed , as evidenced by no effects on body weights, ECG injection per knee) of a suspension composition of the and clinical pathology and no target organs. compound of Formula ( I) ( Form 1 ) at 0.3 , 1 , 3 and 9 ug / knee. 25 D. Efficacy of a Suspension Composition of the Com Plasma was collected beginning at 15 minutes post - dose on pound of Formula ( 1 ) Day 1 and the knee joint was collected at Days 30 , 90 , and The efficacy of the compound of Formula ( I) on increas 180 post -IA administration . The bone and cartilage tissues ing cartilage thickness was determined in rats that under from the knee joint were segregated and concentrations went anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT ) com analyzed . The compound was retained in the knee joint 30 bined with medial meniscectomy (MMx ) . above the target concentration level ( ~ 30 nM , the intended Female rats (10-12 weeks old ) were subjected to surgical clinical therapeutic dose ) for greater than 180 days and was severing of the anterior cruciate , medial collateral and undetectable in the plasma at all time points . These results , medial meniscotibial ligaments (ACLT + pMMx ). One - week shown in Table 40 , show that the compound of Formula (I ) post - surgery , after cartilage was allowed to degenerate , the had sustained local exposure and no systemic exposure . rats were injected intra - articular (IA ) with a single dose of TABLE 40 Pharmacokinetics of the compound of Formula ( I ) in rats Day 30 Day 90 Day 180 Formula (1 ) Formula (I ) Formula (I ) Group and concentration concentration concentration Dose Level Tissue (ng / g ) [NM ] (ng / g ) [NM ] ( ng/ g ) [NM ] Group 1-0.3 ug /knee Cartilage 263 [521 nM ] 78 [ 154 nM ] 69.6 [ 138 nM ] Bone 25.8 [51 nM ] 6.56 [ 13 nM ] 19.0 [ 38 nM ] Plasma BQL BOL BOL Group 2–1 ug /knee Cartilage 39 [774 nM ] 243 [ 481 nM ] 201 [ 398 nM ] Bone 196 [388 nM ] 44.4 [88 nM ] 46.4 [92 nM ] Plasma BQL BQL BQL Group 3–3 ug/ knee Cartilage 2574 [5097 nM ] 645 [1277 nM ] 717 [ 1420 nM ] Bone 738 [ 1461 nM ] 166 [329 nM ] 15 [313 nM ] Plasma BQL BQL BOL Group 4–9 ug/ knee Cartilage 3563 [7055 nM ] 224 [4437 nM ] Bone 3293 [6520 nM ] 67 [ 1335 nM ] Plasma BQL BQL BQL BQL = Below Quantitation Limit . QL = Quantitation Limit = 5 ng/ mL in plasma and tissues ( cartilage or bone ) C. Toxicology (Safety ) Studies in Dogs a suspension of the compound of Formula ( I) (0.1 ug or 0.3 The local toxicology of Form 1 of the compound of ug or 1 ug ) . On Days 30 , 60 , and 90 after injection , joint Formula ( I) in dogs was studied . The compound of Formula cartilage, bone and plasma was isolated . Compound from ( I ) (Form 1 ) was administered via single or multiple ( 9 60 these tissues was extracted using acetonitrile -methanol (70 : times) intra -articular (IA ) injections as a suspension com 30 ) and analyzed for concentrations using LC -MS . position in beagle dogs to evaluate local toxicity . 13 weeks after the surgery ( 12 weeks post -IA injection ), After IA injection , the right stifle joint was histologically knees were isolated , fixed in 10 % formalin , decalcified , evaluated for inflammation , cartilage health , bone density , embedded in paraffin , and sectioned . Sections were stained etc. Toxicology was evaluated immediately after a single or 65 with Safranin O - Fast Green and histologically evaluated by multiple ( 3 or 9 once -monthly ) IA injections. Following a two blinded observers based on OARSI scoring system single IA injection in the right femoral tibial ( stifle ) joint of (Pritzker et al. (2006 ) Osteoarthr. Cartil. 14 : 13-29) . The US 10,544,139 B2 91 92 OARSI score measures cartilage matrix loss , fissures, sub phosphate buffered saline solution , pH 7.4 , was prepared . chondral bone remodeling and bone cyst formation . For this study, a dosage of 0.03-0.230 mg of the compound Increased cartilage thickness , decreased fissures , and sub of Formula ( I ) was administered per 2 mL injection . chondral bone remodeling were observed after a single Subjects were evaluated using the following primary and intra - articular injection of the compound of Formula (I ) . 5 secondary assessments : FIG . 23A shows a safranin O - stained section of a ratknee of Primary : a control knee after 12 weeks. FIG . 23B shows a safranin 1. Evaluation of the safety and tolerability of the thera O - stained section of a knee treated with 0.3 ug of the peutic composition administered by intra - articular injection compound of Formula ( 1) after 12 weeks that displays into the target knee joint ofmoderately to severely symp increased cartilage as compared to the control knee . A 10 tomatic osteoarthritis (OA ) subjects . This included : dose -dependent reduction in the total OARSI score ( against a ) monitoring for treatment- emergent adverse events vehicle ) was demonstrated , indicating improved overall ( AES ) ; cartilage health . Results are shown in Table 41 below . b ) assessing bone loss by measuring bone biomarkers 15 ( cartilage oligomeric matrix protein [COMP ], N - terminal TABLE 41 propeptides of procollagen type 1 [PINP ], and B - C - terminal telopeptide [ B - CTX ]) at Weeks 4 and 12 by computed OARSI score of safranin O - stained section from rat knee tomography (CT ) of both knee joints and at Week 12 after study medication injection compared to baseline ; and OARSI score c ) assessing bone marrow edema by magnetic resonance Vehicle 4.43 20 0.1 ug the compound of 3.13 imaging (MRI ) at Week 12 compared to baseline . Formula ( I) 2. Assessment of the pharmacokinetic ( PK ) behavior of 0.3 ug the compound of 2.15 the compound of Formula ( I ) under the conditions of this Formula (1 ) study at Days 1 , 2 , 4 , and 12 . Secondary : 25 Estimation of clinical responses to treatment with the E. Efficacy of Suspension Compositions Compared to a therapeutic composition , including : Solution Composition of the Compound of Formula (1 ) a ) change from baseline in pain visual analog scale ( VAS ) The efficacy of suspension compositions of the compound score assessed at Weeks 1 , 2 , 4 , 8 , and 12 ; of Formula (I ) ( Form 1) as compared to a solution compo b ) change from baseline in the Western Ontario and sition of the compound of Formula (I ) in rat models of 30 McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC ) assessed osteoarthritis (OA ) was determined using a solution ( final IA at Weeks 1 , 2 , 4 , 8 , and 12 ; dose of 3 ug solution ) and 0.1 ug and 0.3 ug suspension c ) change from baseline OA pain as assessed by the compositions of the compound of Formula (I ) (Form 1) . WOMAC pain subscale at Weeks 1 , 2 , 4 , 8 , and 12 ; Osteoarthritis was surgically induced in the right knee d ) change from baseline OA as assessed by the physician joint of 10 week -old male rats via ACLT and pMMx 35 global assessment of disease activity at Weeks 1 , 2 , 4 , 8 , and transection as described in previously published methods 12 ; (Hayami et al. ( 2006 ) Bone 38 : 234-243 ) . The rats were e ) change from baseline in total cartilage volume and treated with final dose levels of either a 0.1 ug or 0.3 ug thickness in the compartments of the target knee joint as suspension or a 3 ug solution of the compound of Formula documented by Mill at Week 12 ; (I ) . Histology score of cartilage integrity in the knee was the 40 f ) changes from baseline in anabolic or catabolic bio readout. The results showed that the 0.3 ug suspension markers indicative of cartilage synthesis or degradation treatment showed significant difference at 3 months ' time (cartilage oligomeric matrix protein [ COMP ], N - terminal points ; treatment with the 0.1 ug suspension showed a propeptides of procollagen type I [PINP ] , and B -C -terminal beneficial effect ( vs. vehicle ) at 3 months ' time points , but telopeptide [B -CTX ] ) at Weeks 4 and 12 ; did not reach the statistical significance ; treatment with the 45 g ) change from baseline in plasma levels of cytokines 3 ug solution showed a beneficial effect (vs vehicle ) at 2 related to inflammation ( interleukin [ IL ] 1b , IL6 , IL8 , tumor months' time points , but did not reach the statistical signifi necrosis factor ( TNF ) , and interferon - alpha [ IFNa ] ) at cance . Weeks 4 and 12 ; and Example 6 50 h ) change from baseline in bone marrow edema as docu mented by Mill scan of the target knee at baseline and at Week 12 . Clinical Studies Data from a representative set of patients is shown below A. Initial Clinical Study in Table 42 . Twenty -one subjects were enrolled in the first cohort of a 55 clinical trial for the treatment of osteoarthritis . All subjects TABLE 42 completed a minimum of 12 weeks of follow - up after Representative results treatment. This study was a first - in -human , multicenter, placebo - controlled , single -dose , dose -escalation safety Base Week study in subjects suffering from moderately to severely 60 line 12 Change carti carti in symptomatic knee OA . Subjects were treated with a single lage lage carti Change ultrasound - guided intra -articular injection of a suspension of thick thick lage Baseline Week 12 in a non -stoichiometric hydrate of Form I having between 1 % ness ness thick WOMAC WOMAC WOMAC and about 20 % by weight water or placebo . Subject (mm ) (mm ) ness score score score A single -use injectable composition containing the com- 65 Placebo 1 14.3 14.7 0.4 43 32 -11 pound of Formula (I ) suspended in a 0.5 % sodium car Placebo 2 13.09 13.68 0.59 44 50 6 boxymethylcellulose and 0.05 % polysorbate 80 in 10 mm US 10,544,139 B2 93 94 TABLE 42 -continued (DXA ) analysis , qCT of the target knee , and evaluation of bone edema via MM . For PK data , samples were collected Representative results 0 , 4 , and 24 hours post dose , and at Weeks 4 and 12 . Base Week Biomarker data included data for procollagen type 1 N - pro line 12 Change 5 peptide (P1NP ) , beta C -terminal telopeptide of type 1 col carti carti in lage lage carti Change lagen (BCTX ), and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein thick thick lage Baseline Week 12 in ( COMP) . Efficacy data included measurements of WOMAC ness ness thick WOMAC WOMAC WOMAC Total score , WOMAC Function and Pain subscores, pain Subject (mm ) (mm ) ness score score score 10 VAS, Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity , Treatment 1 14.01 15.21 1.2 56 0 -56 MM , and radiographs. Efficacy assessments were used to Treatment 2 12.12 13.32 1.2 51 21 -30 determine the percentage of OMERACT -OARSI “ strict ” Treatment 3 13.22 14.52 1.3 59 32 -27 responders . Exploratory analyses of efficacy outcomes were Treatment 4 9.89 11.33 1.44 61 23 -38 conducted using a baseline -adjusted repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA ) in the Intention - to - Treat The data from this study provided an indication of the 15 (ITT ) population . The sponsor was unblinded after Week 12 following correlations: for each cohort; site investigators remained blinded . All AEs 1 ) The correlation of total measured baseline cartilage reported in this study were considered related to study width in the treatment group with change of total cartilage medication . Investigator opinion regarding whether AEs width at Week 12 was -0.20 , a mild negative correlation ( the 20 were related to the compound of Formula (I ) was also higher cartilage width at baseline , the smaller the cartilage collected for informational purposes . change at Week 12 ) . Table 43 depicts subject characteristics for three dosing 2 ) The correlation of total measured baseline cartilage cohorts and a placebo group. width in the treatment group with Week 12 change in WOMAC was -0.31, a mild negative correlation ( the higher 25 TABLE 43 cartilage width at baseline , the smaller the WOMAC change at Week 12 ) . Subject characteristics of clinical trial 3 ) The correlation of the change of total cartilage width at 0.03 mg 0.07 mg 0.23 mg Placebo Week 12 in the treatment group with Week 12 change in N WOMAC was -0.41, a moderate negative correlation ( the 30 more cartilage grew , the smaller the overall WOMAC score 17 16 16 12 at Week 12 ) . Age at Consent 63.2 (6.6 ) 60.6 (5.5 ) 63.1 (4.9 ) 63.7 (5.8 ) B. Phase 1 Clinical Study ( Years ) [Mean ( SD ) ] A Phase 1 study was conducted to evaluate the safety and BMI (kg / m² ) 31.4 (4.8 ) 31.3 (4.1 ) 28.7 (5.0 ) 30.2 (4.6 ) tolerability of the compound of Formula ( I) (Form 1 ) 35 [Mean (SD ) ] administered by intra - articular injection into a target knee Female [ N ( % )] 10 (59 % ) 12 (75 % ) 12 (75 % ) 7 (58 % ) joint of moderate - to -severe symptomatic OA subjects . Race [N ( % ) ] The study was a first - in -human , multicenter, 24 - week , White 14 (82 % ) 13 ( 81 % ) 14 (88 % ) 10 (83 % ) placebo - controlled , single - dose , dose -escalation safety African study of a Wnt pathway inhibitor in subjects suffering from 40 American 2 (12 % ) 3 ( 19 % ) 1 (6 % ) 2 (17 % ) moderate to severe symptomatic knee OA . The sample size Asian 1 (6 % ) 0 1 (6 % ) was 20 subjects (randomized 4 : 1 , 16 active: 4 placebo ) per Kellgren 7 (41 % ) 8 (50 % ) 11 (69 % ) 5 (42 % ) dosing cohort. Inclusion criteria included : Age , 50-75 years ; GradeLawrence 3 [ N % ] Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC ) Total score , 36-72 (out of 96 ) ; Kellgren - Law- 45 rence grade, 2 or 3 ; and a willingness to omit pain medica Table 44 depicts safety data for three dosing cohorts and tion for 24 hours prior to pain assessments . Exclusion a placebo . criteria included : BMI > 40 ; and treatment with IA steroids within 2 months or HA derivatives within 6 months prior to TABLE 44 injection . A full list of the inclusion and exclusion criteria for 50 Safety this study can be found on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02095548 ) . 0.03 mg Placebo The dosing sequence included suspension compositions 0.07 mg 0.23 mg SAE ( s ) Reported 0 1 * 0 of either 0.03 mg, 0.07 mg, or 0.23 mg of the compound of DLT( s) Reported 0 2 * 0 0 Formula ( I) (Form 1 ) per 2 mL injection in a vehicle 55 AE ( S ) Reported — All 15 11 25 19 containing 0.5 % carboxymethylcellulose sodium and 0.05 % AE ( S ) Reported — Target knee polysorbate 80 in pH 7.4 phosphate buffered saline. The Arthralgia 1 1 4 placebo contained only the diluent of 0.5 % carboxymethyl Injection site bruising 0 0 0 cellulose sodium and 0.05 % polysorbate 80 in pH 7.4 Injection site pain 0 2 1 0 phosphate buffered saline . The subjects were given a single , 60 Joint injury 1 0 0 0 intra -articular injection in the target knee on Treatment Day Joint stiffi iess 0 0 1 0 1 and participated in a follow -up period of 24 weeks . Joint swelling 1 1 1 Safety , pharmacokinetics (PK ) , biomarker, and efficacy Meniscus injury 0 0 0 data were collected at baseline and during the 24 -week * Increased target knee pain (DLT ) and paroxysmal tachycardia (DLT and SAE ) follow - up period . Safety data included adverse events 65 (AES ) , concomitant medications, clinical laboratory sam Table 45 depicts adverse effect reporting for three dosing pling , medical history , vital signs, ECGs, hip bone density cohorts and a placebo . US 10,544,139 B2 95 96 TABLE 45 Table 47 depicts WOMAC pain scores for three dosing cohorts and a placebo group . Adverse effect reporting TABLE 47 5 0.03 mg 0.07 mg 0.23 mg Placebo WOMAC pain (0-201 0.03 mg 0.07 mg 0.23 mg Placebo Subjects Who Reported 9 (53 % ) 6 ( 37 % ) 7 (44 % ) 6 (50 % ) N

AE ( s ) [ N ( % ) ] 10 17 16 16 12 Subjects Who Reported 8 (47 % ) 10 (63 % ) 9 ( 56 % ) 6 (50 % ) Baseline [Mean (SD ) ] 10.8 ( 2.0 ) 10.8 ( 3.0 ) 11.4 (2.7 ) 9.9 (2.0 ) No AE( s ) [ N ( % )] Week 12 [Mean (SD ) ] Actual 6.3 (2.7 ) 5.3 (4.5 ) 5.8 (2.7 ) 5.3 (3.9 ) Change from baseline Pharmacokinetics 15 -4.4 (3.0 ) -5.6 ( 4.7 ) -5.7 ( 4.4 ) -4.6 (4.1 ) PK samples were collected at 0 , 4 , and 24 hours post dose , Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 ] and at Weeks 4 and 12. All subjects in cohorts 1 , 2 , and 3 had Mean physician global assessment scores as a function of levels below limits of quantitation (BQL <0.100 ng /mL ) at time in weeks and median physician global assessment all recorded time points . 20 scores as a function of time in weeks is depicted in FIGS . Biomarkers 25A and 25B , respectively . FIG . 25A depicts the mean Biomarker data showed significant reduction in cartilage physician global assessment as a function of time for dosing oligomeric matrix protein (COMP ) in the 0.07 mg cohort at cohorts of 0.03 mg (plot 200 ), 0.07 mg (plot 202 ), 0.23 mg Week 12 ( 130.13 ng/ mL , P = 0.001) . There were no signifi (plot 204 ) , and placebo (plot 206 ). All cohorts notwithstand cant changes in COMP in the 0.03 mg cohort , 0.23 mg 25 ing the placebo group showed a decrease of about 30 or cohort, or the placebo group , or in BCTX or P1NP in any greater in the mean physician global assessment score from treatment or placebo group . baseline . FIG . 25B depicts the median physician global assessment WOMAC Total [ 0-96 ] as a function of time for dosing cohorts of 0.03 mg ( plot Mean WOMAC total score as a function of time in weeks 30 208 ), 0.07 mg (plot 210 ) , 0.23 mg (plot 212 ), and placebo and median WOMAC total score as a function of time in (plot 214 ). The 0.03 mg cohort (plot 208 ) showed a median weeks, are depicted in FIGS. 24A and 24B , respectively. decrease of about 48 from baseline , while the placebo (plot FIG . 24A depicts the mean WOMAC total score as a 214 ) exhibited the lowest median decrease of about 29. function of time for dosing cohorts of 0.03 mg (plot 100 ), 35 Percentage Strict OARSI Responders 0.07 mg (plot 102 ) , 0.23 mg (plot 104 ), and placebo (plot Strict responders were classified by having either a 106 ) . All cohorts and the placebo group showed a decrease WOMAC Function subscore improvement of 250 % with a of about 23 or greater in WOMAC total score from baseline , corresponding Function score improvement of 20 points with the 0.07 mg dosing cohort ( plot 102 ) exhibiting the (scaled to [ 0-100 ] ) , or a WOMAC Pain subscore improve largest decrease at about 27 . 40 ment of 50 % with a corresponding Pain score improvement FIG . 24B depicts the median WOMAC total as a function of 20 points (scaled to [0-100 ] ) . of time for dosing cohorts of 0.03 mg (plot 108 ) , 0.07 mg FIG . 26 depicts a bar graph ofpercentage strict responders ( plot 110 ), 0.23 mg (plot 112 ) , and placebo ( plot 114 ). The for the placebo cohort (300 ) , the 0.03 mg cohort (302 ), the 0.03 mg dosing cohort (plot 108 ) and the 0.07 mg dosing 0.07 mg cohort (304 ), and the 0.23 mg cohort ( 306 ) at week cohort (plot 110 ) each showed a decrease of greater than 25 45 12. The 0.07 mg cohort exhibited the highest percentage of in WOMAC total score from baseline , while the placebo strict responders at 75 % , compared to the placebo group at group (plot 114 ) exhibited a modest decrease of about 15 . 42 % . Table 46 depicts WOMAC function scores for three Discussion dosing cohorts and a placebo group . 50 The interim data from the phase 1 trial suggested that a single intra -articular injection into the knee of OA subjects TABLE 46 of a suspension formulated from Form 1 of the compound of Formula (I ) appears safe , well -tolerated , and potentially WOMAC function (0-68 ] effective in reducing pain and improving function . All 0.03 mg 0.07 mg 0.23 mg Placebo 55 subjects had PK levels below the limit of quantitation at all N recorded time points . 27 of 49 (55 % ) exposed subjects reported no AEs. All AEs reported in this study were deemed 17 16 16 12 related to study medication . Only 16 of 77 ( 22 % ) AEs were Baseline [Mean 39.1 (7.2 ) 37.6 (7.8 ) 40.4 (8.6 ) 34.5 ( 10.6 ) considered related to study medication by the reporting ( SD ) ] 60 investigator. Week 12 [Mean The phase 1 study was not powered to see any statistically ( SD ) ] significant differences between treatment groups and pla Actual 20.3 ( 10.5 ) 18.4 ( 15.9 ) 22.6 ( 10.3 ) 18.8 (11.8 ) cebo . However, the data suggested that subjects treated with Change from -18.4 (13.5 ) -19.2 (16.3 ) -17.8 (15.1 ) -15.8 (13.1 ) the compound of Formula ( I) were more likely to have a baseline 65 strict OARSI response than placebo . At Week 12 , 75 % of 0.07mg cohort achieved strict OARSI response compared to 42 % of placebo (OR = 4.2 , P = 0.081 ) . US 10,544,139 B2 97 98 C. MRI and Radiograph Study Cartilage Thickness To assess the safety and efficacy of the compound of Average cartilage thickness over covered subchondral Formula (I ) (Form 1 ), magnetic resonance imaging (MM ) bone was reported for the following four compartments : was used . Safety evaluations included assessment of bone medial femoral condyles , lateral femoral condyles, medial marrow edema by Mill. MM was used to document changes 5 tibial plateaus, and lateral tibial plateaus. from baseline in total cartilage volume and thickness in the compartments of the target knee joint. Imaging results FIG . 27 depicts the MRI of a knee joint. To determine ( safety and exploratory outcomes ) in the Phase 1 study are average cartilage thickness, the cartilage thickness between described above . the subchondral bone area (400 and 404 ) and the articular Knee MRIs were obtained with a 16 channel knee coil on 10 cartilage surface (402 and 406 ) was measured at numerous a 3.0T MRI machine using a standard diagnostic protocol ( ~ 400-2000 ) locations in both directions in the parts covered ( resolution 0.1-0.4 mm ). MM scans were collected at the by cartilage (CAB ) and averaged . Measurements were per baseline visit ( which could occur 528 days prior to study formed in three dimensions. Additionally , the average of the injection ) and again at Weeks 12 and 24. The sponsor was lowest 1 % of cartilage thickness was also reported for all 4 unblinded after Week 12 for each cohort ; site investigators 15 compartments . The total for both average thickness and remained blinded . lowest thickness were derived by summing each of the 4 An exploratory analysis of change in imaging outcomes compartments’ observations. was conducted using repeated measures analysis of covari Table 50 depicts mean cartilage thickness as measured by ance ( ANCOVA ) adjusting for baseline in the Intention - to MRI for three dosing cohorts and a placebo group . Treat (ITT ) population . 20 Table 48 depicts subject characteristics of the MRI and radiography study for three dosing cohorts and a placebo TABLE 50 group . Mean cartilage thickness by MRI at Week 12 25 TABLE 48 0.03 mg 0.07 mg 0.23 mg Placebo Subject characteristics of MRI and radiography study N 0.03 mg 0.07 mg 0.23 mg Placebo 16 16 15 12 N 30 17 16 16 12 Baseline (mm ) 5.43 ( 1.10 ) 5.38 (0.70 ) 5.36 ( 0.94 ) 5.84 ( 0.65 ) Age at Consent 63.2 (6.6 ) 60.6 (5.5 ) 63.1 (4.9 ) 63.7 (5.8 ) [Mean ( SD ) ] ( Years ) [Mean (SD ) ] Week 12 (mm ) BMI (kg /m² ) 31.4 (4.8 ) 31.3 (4.1 ) 28.7 (5.0 ) 30.2 (4.6 ) 35 [Mean (SD ) ] [Mean (SD ) ] Female [N ( % ) ] 10 (59 % ) 12 ( 75 % ) 12 (75 % ) 7 (58 % ) Race [N ( % )] Actual 5.38 ( 1.19 ) 5.37 (0.71 ) 5.32 ( 1.03 ) 5.84 (0.63 ) Change from -0.06 (0.39 ) -0.02 (0.25 ) -0.04 (0.24 ) 0.01 (0.20 ) White 14 (82 % ) 13 (81 % ) 14 ( 88 % ) 10 (83 % ) African 2 (12 % ) 3 ( 19 % ) 1 (6 % ) 2 ( 17 % ) 40 baseline American Asian 1 (6 % ) 0 (0 % ) 1 (6 % ) 0 (0 % ) Kellgren 7 (41 % ) 8 (50 % ) 11 (69 % ) 5 (42 % ) Lawrence Table 51 depicts mean thinnest cartilage as measured by Grade 3 [N ( % ) ] MM for three dosing cohorts and a placebo group . 45 Bone Marrow Edema TABLE 51 As a safety assessment, MRI scans were used to monitor Mean thinnest cartilage by MRI at Week 12 the presence of focal or diffuse bone marrow edema ( BME ) in all subjects . Table 49 depicts bone marrow edema data for 0.03 mg 0.07 mg 0.23 mg Placebo three dosing cohorts and a placebo group . 50 N 16 16 15 12 TABLE 49 Baseline (mm ) 3.75 ( 1.38 ) 3.78 ( 1.37 ) 3.14 ( 1.17 ) 4.24 (1.45 ) Bone Marrow Edema (BME ) [Mean (SD ) ] 55 Week 12 (mm ) Edema (N ( % ) [Mean ( SD ) ] Baseline Week 12 0.03 mg 0.07 mg 0.23 mg Placebo Actual 3.84 ( 1.57) 3.88 ( 1.39 ) 3.01 ( 1.27) 4.18 ( 1.26 ) Change from 0.11 (0.37 ) 0.10 (0.55 ) -0.13 0.30 ) -0.06 (0.43 ) None None 9 (57 % ) 11 (69 % ) 4 (25 % ) 5 (42 % ) baseline Focal 1 (6 % ) 2 ( 13 % ) 1 (6 % ) 3 (25 % ) 60 Diffuse 0 0 0 0 Focal None 0 1 (6 % ) 1 (6 % ) 0 Joint Space Width Focal 4 ( 25 % ) 1 (6 % ) 8 (50 % ) 3 (25 % ) Diffuse 0 0 0 0 Radiographs of the target knee were taken during the Diffuse None 0 0 0 0 Focal 1 (6 % ) 1 (6 % ) 0 0 screening period and at Week 24 to document change from 65 baseline in joint space width ( JSW ) . Table 52 depicts joint Diffuse 1 (6 % ) 0 2 ( 13 % ) 1 ( 8 % ) space width as measured by radiography for three dosing cohorts and a placebo group . US 10,544,139 B2 99 100 administered by intra - articular injection into a target knee TABLE 52 joint of moderate - to - severe symptomatic OA subjects . Joint space width by radiograph at Week 24 The study was a multicenter, 52 -week , single - dose , pla cebo -controlled study evaluating the safety, tolerability , and 0.03 mg 0.07 mg 0.23 mg Placebo 5 efficacy of a Wnt pathway inhibitor in subjects suffering N from moderate to severe symptomatic knee OA . The sample 15 14 16 12 size was 454 subjects (randomized 3 : 1 , 338 active: 116 placebo ) per dosing cohort. Clinic visits were scheduled at Baseline (mm ) 4.50 (1.70 ) 3.57 (1.63 ) 3.62 ( 1.75) 3.91 (1.62 ) [Mean ( SD ) ] Screening , Treatment Visit Day 1 and Follow -up Weeks 4 , Week 24 (mm ) 10 13, 26 , 39 and 52. Inclusion criteria included : Age : males [Mean (SD ) ] and females between 40 and 80 years ; Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC ) Total Actual 4.50 ( 1.72) 4.16 ( 1.64) 3.47 (1.68 ) 3.53 ( 1.98 ) score: 72-192 (out of 240 ) ; Kellgren - Lawrence grade : 2 or Change from 0.00 ( 0.69) 0.59 (0.66 ) * -0.15 ( 1.07) -0.38 (0.85 ) 3 ; and a willingness to omit pain medication for 24 hours baseline prior to pain assessments . Exclusion criteria included : BMI * p = 0.006 versus placebo 15 > 40 ; and treatment with IA steroids within 2 months or HA derivatives within 6 months prior to injection . A full list of Discussion the inclusion and exclusion criteria for this study can be MM was the primary method utilized to examine bone found on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02536833 ) . marrow edema (BME ) , which the FDA defined as a safety The dosing sequence included suspension compositions outcome in this phase 1 trial . BME stayed the same for most 20 of either 0.03 mg, 0.07 mg, or 0.23 mg of the compound of subjects from baseline to Week 12. For some subjects in both Formula (I ) (Form 1 ) per 2 mL injection in a vehicle treatment ( N = 4 ) and Placebo (N = 3 ) groups, BME worsened containing 0.5 % carboxymethylcellulose sodium and 0.05 % ( none to focal ). 4 subjects in the treatment groups showed polysorbate 80 in pH 7.4 phosphate buffered saline . The improved BME results ( focal to none and diffuse to focal) . placebo contained only 2 mL of phosphate buffered saline . These interim BME imaging data suggest that a single 25 The subjects were given a single , intra - articular injection in intra -articular injection of the compound of Formula (I ) into the target knee on Treatment Day 1 and participated in a the knee of OA subjects appeared to have no appreciable follow - up at weeks 4 , 13 , 26 , 39 , and 52 . effect compared to Placebo . Safety and efficacy data were collected at baseline and Although exploratory imaging results in this phase 1 trial during the 52 -week follow - up period . Safety data included suggested that the 0.23 mg dose was less effective than the 30 incidence, severity and relationship of adverse events (AES ) , 0.03 mg and 0.07 mg doses , it should be noted that the 0.23 medical history , vital signs. Efficacy data included measure mg cohort consisted of the highest percentage of K - L Grade ments of WOMAC Total score , WOMAC Function and Pain 3 subjects . subscores, pain VAS, Physician Global Assessment of Dis Exploratory analyses of MRI outcomes suggested that ease Activity , and radiographs . Efficacy assessments were treated subjects appeared to show no substantial degradation 35 used to determine the percentage of OMERACT-OARSI in mean cartilage thickness at Week 12. The measurement " strict responders . Exploratory analyses of efficacy out changes recorded likely reflectMRI signal noise only , as the comes were conducted using a baseline - adjusted repeated mean values are at the limits of scan resolution . The area of measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA ) in the Inten mean thinnest cartilage showed a possible trend towards tion - to - Treat (ITT ) , Modified Intention - to - Treat (mITT ), increase in the 0.03 mg and 0.07 mg cohorts at Week 12 . 40 and Per -protocol (PP ) population sets . Change in WOMAC Radiographs measuring the change from baseline at Week total , WOMAC pain subscore , WOMAC function subscore , 24 in joint space width showed no change in the 0.03 mg Patient Global Assessment, Physician Global Assessment, cohort, an increase in the 0.07 mg cohort , and a decrease in Joint Space Width ( JSW ) and Health -Related Quality of Life the 0.23 mg cohort, with the Placebo group exhibiting a Research (HRQOL ) from baseline . The sponsor was larger decrease . The MM safety outcomes from this interim 45 unblinded after Week 26 for each cohort; site investigators analysis demonstrated no worsening of bone edema in knee remained blinded . All AEs reported in this study were OA subjects treated with Form 1 of the compound of considered related to study medication . Investigator opinion Formula ( I) . regarding whether AEs were related to the compound of D. Phase II Clinical Study Formula (I ) was also collected for informational purposes. A Phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and 50 Table 53 depicts subject characteristics for three dosing tolerability of the compound of Formula ( I) ( Form 1 ) cohorts and a placebo group . TABLE 53

Subject characteristics of clinical trial

0.03 mg 0.07 mg 0.23 mg Placebo N

112 117 110 116

Age at Consent 59.0 (9.0 ) 60.0 (8.2 ) 61.3 (8.7 ) 60.3 ( 8.7) ( Years ) [Mean (SD ) ]