DOCSLIB.ORG

Congratulations! 19701970 –– 20102010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congratulations! 19701970 –– 20102010 CONGRATULATIONS! 19701970 –– 20102010 CELEBRATES thANNIVERSARY! 2009 and 2010 RECORD JIM SRYGLEY RECEIVES YEARS FOR FLEETWATCH APTA'S OUTSTANDINGBUSINESS INSTALLATIONS AND UPGRADES40 MEMBER AWARD FOR 2010 Baltimore, MD (MTA) – Installation work has begun on a Jim Srygley, founder and full FLEETWATCH installation at all MTA facilities. The CEO of S & A Systems, has installation includes control and monitoring of fluids worked in Transportation for dispensed at four fueling locations, control and monitoring over 40 years. With of fluid reels at 6 shop areas, FLEETWATCH JX55 units Engineering degrees from for all MTA buses, and FLEETWATCH GP55 units for other Stanford University and the MTA diesel vehicles. University of Texas, Jim Washington, D.C. (WMATA) – WMATA expands from 2 began his transportation facilities with FLEETWATCH to 15 facilities with career developing computer FLEETWATCH installations. Installations include Fuel and Fluids control and monitoring and vehicle mounted simulation models and equipment. providing assistance to Transit Agencies in the PO Box 1928 Columbus, OH (COTA) – COTA upgrades FLEETWATCH Rockwall, TX 75087 system at McKinley and Fields Garages, adds JX55 units implementation of first www.fleetwatch.com for buses, GP55 units for Paratransit, and control and generation Run Cutting and Maintenance Software. monitoring of fluids in service area and shop area for new Paratransit Facility. In 1970 Jim founded S & A Systems and developed the Richmond, VA (GRTC) – Richmond installs concept and design for the FLEETWATCH line of Fluid FLEETWATCH in new facility. Management and Automated Data Collection products and software – products now installed at over 40 Transit Milwaukee, WI (MCTS) – Milwaukee installs Agencies. FLEETWATCH in fueling lanes at 4 garages and JX55 units for all MCTS buses. Jim has been a member and supporter of APTA since the Stamford, CT (CT Transit) – FLEETWATCH installed in founding of APTA. He has served on numerous new CT Transit facility in Stamford. committees and task forces, including over 20 years on the Oakland, CA (AC Transit) – AC Transit upgrades APTA Member Services committee and 12 years on the FLEETWATCH system at all facilities and adds APTA Awards committee. While on the Awards committee, FLEETWATCH JX55 units for all buses. Jim provided leadership in the development of statistical San Francisco, CA (MUNI) – MUNI upgrades evaluation procedures, guided the restructuring of the FLEETWATCH system at all facilities and adds nomination form to better capture quantitative data, and FLEETWATCH JX55 units for all buses. developed spreadsheets and Macros for calculations and CINCINATTI, OH (SORTA) – SORTA upgrades comparisons. Jim then assisted APTA staff in FLEETWATCH system at all facilities and adds incorporating these procedures into an on-going program FLEETWATCH JX55 units for all buses. to provide a consistent tool for future Awards Committees. KANSAS CITY, MO (KCATA) – Kansas City upgrades FLEETWATCH system and adds FLEETWATCH JX55 For the past 5 years Jim has chaired the BMBG Budget units for all buses. Committee, overseeing the allocation of over 1 million SAN BERNARDINO, CA (OMNITRANS) – OMNITRANS dollars contributed by Business Members above and upgrades FLEETWATCH system at all facilities and adds beyond their annual dues payments to support APTA FLEETWATCH GP55 units for all buses. activities. u A CONTINUING COMMITMENT TO OUR CUSTOMERS A SPECIAL THANK YOU – TO CURRENT AND PAST CUSTOMERS Beginning with the first contract in 1970 to develop a computer simulation model, the following customers Quality in products is a result of have played an integral part in the continued success of S & A Systems, Inc.: good design and evolutionary Customer AC Transit – Oakland, CA Mesquite ISD – TX Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority – St. Petersburg, FL change. Our goal and commitment Adtranz – Pittsburg, PA Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority Plano ISD – TX (MARTA) - GA is to continue to evolve our satisfaction Albuquerque, City of - NM Prevost Car, Inc. – Quebec, Canada Alexandria Transit (DASH) – VA Metropolitan Bus Authority – Puerto Rico Rochester-Genesee Regional Transportation Authority FLEETWATCH product line and to Ann Arbor Transportation Authority - MI Metropolitan Evansville Transit System (METS) – IN (RGRTA) - NY will always be Metropolitan Transit Authority – Houston Rohr, Inc. constantly seek improvements in Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) our primary Bombardier Transportation USA – Pittsburgh, PA Milwaukee County Transit System - Wi Ryder/MLS – Pomona, CA reliability, maintainability, and Broward County Transit – Ft. Lauderdale, FL Minneapolis/St. Paul MTC - MN Sacramento Regional Transit District - CA goal at CAF USA – Sacramento, CA Motor Coach Industries – DE Saginaw Transit System - MI functionality. In addition we will Capital Metro – Austin, TX Mountain Metropolitan Transit – Colorado Springs, CO San Diego Metro Transit System - CA continue to emphasize customer S&A Systems. Central New York RTA – Syracuse MV Transportation – Herndon, VA San Diego Unified School District - CA Central Ohio Transit Authority – Columbus Neoplan USA Corporation – Lamar, CO San Francisco Municipal Railway - CA service. Champion Bus, Inc. – Imlay City, MI New Flyer Industries – Manitoba, Canada Santa Clarita Transit - CA Left to right: Don Srygley, President of S & A Systems; Chance Coach, Inc. – Valley Center, KS New Jersey Transit - Newark Santa Monica Transit - CA Jeremy Rothermel, Customer Service Manager; and Coach and Transit, Inc. – Phoenix, AZ New Orleans Regional Transit Authority - LA Seattle METRO - WA In 2010 S & A Systems instituted a John Elliott, Vice President Engineering Community Transit – Everett, WA Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority – Buffalo, NY SMART – Detroit, MI CT Transit – Stamford, New Haven North American Bus Industries – Anniston, AL Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority (SORTA) – new on-line reaction system to deal Cincinnati Daimler Chrysler Commercial Buses – Oriskany, NY North County Transit District – Oceanside, CA Don Srygley Sun Metro – El Paso with customer issues quickly and provide unique visibility into the process Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) - TX Norwalk Transit District – CT Pres., S&A Systems, Inc. Sunline Transit – Thousand Palms, CA u Delaware Area Regional Transit (DART) – Wilmington Nova Bus (Volvo) – Canada for both customers and S & A management. Toledo Area Regional Transit Authority (TARTA) - OH Denver Regional Transit District - CO Oahu Transit - HI United Parcel Service (UPS) - TX Des Moines Metropolitan Transit Authority - IA Omnitrans – San Bernardino, CA VARO, Inc. Detroit Department of Transportation - MI Optima Bus Corporation – Valley Center, KS Visalia Transit – CA DFW Airport - TX Overland Custom Coach US, Inc. – Brown City, MI Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority – DC El Dorado National Co. – Salina, KS Pierce Transit – Tacoma, WA POISED FOR THE FUTURE E-Systems, Inc. – Dallas, TX Fairfax County Department of Transportation – VA ® Flint Metropolitan Transit Authority – Flint, MI Current FLEETWATCH Equipment Installations S & A Systems has developed S & A is poised to introduce an Foothill Transit – Pomona, CA One of the main extensive infrastructure for the design, expanding range of new electronic Forster Instruments, Inc. – Ontario, Canada AT TRANSIT AGENCIES development, and manufacture of low- equipment to provide the transit Fort Worth Transportation Authority (The T) - TX These agencies together have over 130 bus garages equipped reasons we have General Railway Signal Bremerton with FLEETWATCH Fluid Management Equipment. cost electronic equipment – and the industry with unparalleled capability Gillig Corporation – Hayward, CA Everett been successful Syracuse software and firmware to provide such at exceptionally low cost. u Goshen Coach – Elkhart, IN Tacoma Rochester for over 40 years is Greater Bridgeport Transit District - CT Buffalo Utica Cleveland Norwalk equipment with sophisticated features Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority - OH Ann Arbor that we have Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority - OH New Haven Sacramento Milwaukee New Jersey and capabilities. Greater Richmond Transit – VA Bridgeport always looked for Oakland Colorado Springs Columbus Stamford Hampton Road Transit – Chesapeake, VA Denver Indianapolis Baltimore Wilmington San Francisco Dayton Dover new ways to make In addition S & A has developed a Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority (HART) – FL Los Angeles Kansas City Cincinnati Washington D.C. IndyGO – Indianapolis Visalia Alexandria our customers’ nationwide network of equipment Granite City Charleston Johnson Controls, Inc. Santa Clarita Fairfax Norfolk San Bernardino Evansville Richmond jobs easier. installers, electrical and mechanical Kanawha Valley Regional Transportation Authority – Long Albuquerque Beach Palm Springs Charleston, WV Oceanside Atlanta Ft. Worth subcontractors, and electronic and Kansas City Area Transportation Authority - MO San Diego Dallas El Paso software maintenance companies Kitsap Transit – Bermerton, WA New Orleans Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority - CA which can be utilized on short notice Houston Jim Srygley Long Beach Transit - CA Honolulu St. Petersburg Tampa LTV, Inc. Ft. Lauderdale CEO, S&A Systems, Inc. to provide installation and support JX55 units undergoing final quality assurance tests prior Madison County Transit – Granite City, IL services. to shipment. Maryland Metropolitan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fuel Buses: a Case Study of the Delaware Authority For
    LIFE-CYCLE COST AND EMISSIONS ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVE- FUEL BUSES: A CASE STUDY OF THE DELAWARE AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSIT (DART) by Amirhossein Shahpar A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Civil Engineering Summer 2010 Copyright 2010 Amirhossein Shahpar All Rights Reserved LIFE-CYCLE COST AND EMISSIONS ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVE- FUEL BUSES: A CASE STUDY OF THE DELAWARE AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSIT (DART) by Amirhossein Shahpar Approved: __________________________________________________________ Ardeshir Faghri, Ph.D. Professor in charge of thesis on behalf of the Advisory Committee Approved: __________________________________________________________ Harry Shenton III, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Approved: __________________________________________________________ Michael Chajes, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Engineering Approved: __________________________________________________________ Debra Hess Norris, M.S. Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Ardeshir Faghri for his encouragement, patience, and guidance throughout the course of my graduate study. His comments and advice not only helped me to stay on track but also assisted me to get the most out of my time at the University of Delaware. I would like to thank Mr. Mark Glaze, Delaware Department of Transportation’s project manager and Mr. Brett Taylor, Delaware Department of Transportation’s financial and legislative policy advisor, for their comments and suggestions on my research work. I am thankful for Mr. Stephen Kingsberry, Executive Director of DART, for his patience and providing the necessary information for this study. His advice also was invaluable and helped me to make right assumptions whenever needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Mykolo Romerio Universiteto Strateginio Valdymo Ir Politikos Fakulteto Aplinkos Politikos Ir Valdymo Katedra
    MYKOLO ROMERIO UNIVERSITETO STRATEGINIO VALDYMO IR POLITIKOS FAKULTETO APLINKOS POLITIKOS IR VALDYMO KATEDRA VITALIJUS ČEPULIONIS (DARNAUS VYSTYMOSI VADYBA IR ADMINISTRAVIMAS) TRANSPORTO SEKTORIUS DARNAUS VYSTYMOSI KONTEKSTE – EKOLOGIŠKŲ AUTOMOBILIŲ KONCEPCIJA IR JŲ PLĖTROS POLITIKA Magistro baigiamasis darbas Darbo vadovė – lekt. Giedrė Brazdauskaitė Konsultantas – doc. dr. Alfonsas Vaišnoras Vilnius, 2009 TURINYS ĮVADAS..........................................................................................................................................3 1. EKOLOGIŠKŲ AUTOMOBILIŲ KONCEPCIJA DARNAUS VYSTYMOSI KONTEKSTE.....................................................................................5 1.1. Literatūros apžvalga..............................................................................................................5 1.2. Transportas darnaus vystymosi aspektu...............................................................................6 1.2.1. Darnus vystymasis transporto sektoriuje......................................................................6 1.2.2. Transporto politika Europos Sąjungoje......................................................................12 1.2.2.1. Europos Sąjungos politikos analizė transporto sektoriuje..................................12 1.2.2.2. Europos Sąjungos šalių transporto politikos lyginamoji analizė........................16 1.2.2.3. Transporto sektorius Lietuvoje...........................................................................22 1. 3. Ekologiško automobilio koncepcija...................................................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • AACA Clubs & Organizations (Automobile) Coachbuilders
    AACA Coachbuilders 1. AACA Events • Coachbuilders (history, general) 2. Events Elegance 1. Abbott, E.D. 3. History Committee 2. Accossatto 4. Library 3. Ackley, L.M. 5. Library Auction 4. ACG 6. Merchandise 5. Acme Wagon 7. Museum 6. Aerocell 8. National Awards Committee 7. A.H.A. 9. National Board 8. Alcoa Aluminum 10. Presidents 9. Allegheny Ludlum 11. Regions History 10. Alden, Fisk 12. Registration – Antique Auto 11. American Coach & Body 12. American Wagon Clubs & Organizations (Automobile) 13. America’s Body Co. 14. American Custom 1. AAA (American Automobile Assoc.) 15. Ames Body 2. Auburn Cord Duesenberg Club 16. Ansart & Teisseire 3. Automobile Club of America (ACA) 17. Armbruster Stageway 4. Automobile Manufacturers Association (AMA) 18. ASC 5. Automobile Clubs – Australia 19. A.T. DeMarest 6. Bugatti Owner’s Club 20. Auburn 7. Classic Car Club of America (CCCA) 21. Audineau, Paul 8. CCCA Midwest 22. Automotive Body Company 9. Cross Country Motor Club 23. Avon Body Co. 10. FIVA (Federation Internationale des Vehicules Anciens) 24. Babcock, H.H. 25. Baker Raulang 11. Horseless Carriage Club of America (HCCA) 26. Balbo 12. Lincoln Continental Owner’s Club 27. Barclay 13. Mercedes-Benz Club of America 28. Barker 14. Automobile Club – Michigan 29. Bekvallete 15. Automobile Clubs – Misc. 30. Berkeley 16. Model T Ford Club International 31. Bernath 17. MVMA (Motor Vehicle Manuf. Assoc.) 32. Bertone 18. Automobile Clubs – New Zealand 33. Biddle & Smart 19. Automobile Clubs – Philadelphia 34. Bivouac 20. Royal Automobile Club – London 35. Bohman & Schwartz 21. SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) 36. Boneschi 22. SVVCCA (Susquehanna Valley Vintage Sports Car Club) 37.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Bus Rapid Transit for Decision-Making
    Project No: FTA-VA-26-7222-2004.1 Federal United States Transit Department of August 2004 Administration Transportation CharacteristicsCharacteristics ofof BusBus RapidRapid TransitTransit forfor Decision-MakingDecision-Making Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the United States Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES August 2004 COVERED BRT Demonstration Initiative Reference Document 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Characteristics of Bus Rapid Transit for Decision-Making 6. AUTHOR(S) Roderick B. Diaz (editor), Mark Chang, Georges Darido, Mark Chang, Eugene Kim, Donald Schneck, Booz Allen Hamilton Matthew Hardy, James Bunch, Mitretek Systems Michael Baltes, Dennis Hinebaugh, National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Lawrence Wnuk, Fred Silver, Weststart - CALSTART Sam Zimmerman, DMJM + Harris 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Transit Vehicle Industry Study
    Small Transit Vehicle Industry Study Del Peterson Associate Research Fellow Small Urban & Rural Transit Center Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute North Dakota State University April 2007 Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Mike Molloy from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) who contributed to this report by giving his time and sharing related information and insight. Thank you to the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) for its transit vehicle dataset, and the Community Transportation Association of America (CTAA) for hosting our questionnaire on its website. Special thanks to all who attended and provided input during the committee meetings, and to those who completed questionnaires as well. Disclaimer The contents presented in this report are the sole responsibility of the Small Urban & Rural Transit Center and the author. Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 The Research Problem................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Study Objective ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Report Organization..................................................................................................................... 1 2. PAST AND PRESENT SMALL VEHICLE TRENDS.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Useful Life of Transit Buses and Vans Final Report
    Useful Life of Transit Buses and Vans Final Report U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration Federal Transit Administration Useful Life of Transit Buses and Vans Report No. FTA VA-26-7229-07.1 Project VA-26-7229 April 2007 Federal Transit Administration Useful Life of Transit Buses and Vans Final Report Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES April 2007 COVERED Final Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Useful Life of Transit Buses and Vans 6. AUTHOR(S) Richard Laver, Donald Schneck, Douglas Skorupski, Stephen Brady, Laura Cham Booz Allen Hamilton 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 8283 Greensboro Drive McLean, Virginia 22102 FTA 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/ Federal Transit Administration MONITORING U.S. Department of Transportation AGENCY REPORT NUMBER Washington, DC 20590 FTA-VA-26-7229-07.1 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Useful Life of Transit Buses and Vans Final Report
    Useful Life of Transit Buses and Vans Final Report U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration Federal Transit Administration Useful Life of Transit Buses and Vans Report No. FTA VA-26-7229-07.1 Project VA-26-7229 April 2007 Federal Transit Administration Useful Life of Transit Buses and Vans Final Report Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES April 2007 COVERED Final Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Useful Life of Transit Buses and Vans 6. AUTHOR(S) Richard Laver, Donald Schneck, Douglas Skorupski, Stephen Brady, Laura Cham Booz Allen Hamilton 8. PERFORMING 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) ORGANIZATION REPORT Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. NUMBER 8283 Greensboro Drive McLean, Virginia 22102 FTA 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/ Federal Transit Administration MONITORING U.S. Department of Transportation AGENCY REPORT NUMBER Washington, DC 20590 FTA-VA-26-7229-07.1 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus & Motorcoach News
    June 15, 2003 THE NEWS RESOURCE FOR THE BUS AND MOTORCOACH INDUSTRY Transit competition, safety are industry targets WASHINGTON, D.C. — The sent over-the-road bus operators Blunt, appearing before the Littler, senior vice president of the like in the proposed SAFETEA long-term viability of the U.S. across the United States. panel on behalf of the ABA, testi- United Motorcoach Association, bill, there also are sections that motorcoach industry is being Harry “Woody” Blunt, presi- fied on the Bush Administration’s had briefed the staff directors of “are largely a disaster for the over- threatened by two critical public dent of Concord Coach Lines in public transportation and highway the Senate Commerce, Science & the-road bus industry.” policy issues: transit competition Concord, N.H., and chairman of reauthorization bill, officially Transportation Committee about The first and foremost problem, and safety enforcement. the policy committee of the known as the Safe, Accountable, the coach industry’s position on he said, has to do with competi- That message was forcefully American Bus Association, deliv- Flexible and Efficient Transport- various aspects of the $247 billion tion from public transit systems. emphasized last week before two ered the message to the Senate ation Equity Act of 2003, or transportation and highway bill. “The private bus industry is key committees of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing SAFETEA. Blunt told the banking com- under assault,” Blunt told the sen- by the two associations that repre- and Urban Affairs. A few days earlier, Norman mittee that while there is much to CONTINUED ON PAGE 10 Driver given prison term in N.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transportation Fact Book
    PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACT BOOK 56th Edition April 2005 published by American Public Transportation Association Richard A. White, Chair Ronald L. Barnes, First Vice Chair Paul P. Skoutelas, Secretary-Treasurer George F. Dixon III, Immediate Past Chair Vice Chairs Richard J. Bacigalupo Kim R. Green Joshua W. Shaw Mattie P. Carter John M. Inglish David L. Turney Michael P. DePallo William D. Lochte Kathryn D. Waters Nathaniel P. Ford, Sr. Gary W. McNeil Linda S. Watson Fred M. Gilliam Jeffrey A. Nelson President William W. Millar Chief of Staff Karol J. Popkin Vice Presidents Pamela L. Boswell Daniel Duff C. Samuel Kerns Anthony M. Kouneski Rosemary Sheridan produced by Member Services Department Information Services Group Larry H. Pham, Ph.D. Chief Economist and Director - Information Services prepared by: Damian Danchenko Statistical Analyst/Programmer i American Public Transportation Association 1666 K Street, N.W., Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20006 TELEPHONE: (202) 496-4800 FAX: (202) 496-4326 EMAIL: [email protected] WEB SITE: www.apta.com PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACT BOOK March 2005 International Standard Book Number: 1-931594-14-7 About APTA APTA is a nonprofit international association of over 1,500 public and private member organizations including transit systems and commuter rail operators; planning, design, construction and finance firms; product and service providers; academic institutions, transit associations and state departments of transportation. APTA members serve the public interest by providing safe, efficient and economical transit services and products. Over ninety percent of persons using public transportation in the United States and Canada are served by APTA members. APTA Vision Statement Be the leading force in advancing public transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Information Form
    NEW FLYER INDUSTRIES INC. Annual Information Form March 24, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL...................................................................................................................................................1 CORPORATE STRUCTURE......................................................................................................................3 The Issuer........................................................................................................................................3 Ownership Structure .......................................................................................................................3 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS..................................................................................4 Recent Developments .....................................................................................................................4 DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS .........................................................................................................7 Business of the Company................................................................................................................7 Industry Overview...........................................................................................................................8 Company Overview ........................................................................................................................9 New Flyer History...........................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]